ML19257C563: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 28: Line 28:
The attached report is submitted in accordance with the Order which accompanied your letter of December 5,1979 to Mr. S. G. Schaffer relating to the exceeding of a Limiting Condition for Operation which occurred on November 27, 1979.
The attached report is submitted in accordance with the Order which accompanied your letter of December 5,1979 to Mr. S. G. Schaffer relating to the exceeding of a Limiting Condition for Operation which occurred on November 27, 1979.
Pursuant to Section III, paragraph (3) of the Order Modifying License forwarded as Appendix C to the aforementioned NRC letter, a report describing 1) the new administrative procedures whicF have been adopted to require redundant, independent verification of tne operability of the remaining engineered safety features whenever any safety system, or subpart thereof, required by the Limiting Conditions for Operation is intentionally removed from service, and 2) the review of existing procedures which has been performed to assure that Limiting Conditions for Operation are not defeated by maintenance or other activities, is forwarded herewith. This report also describes other actions taken by Duquesne Light Company to prevent recurrence of this or any similar incident.
Pursuant to Section III, paragraph (3) of the Order Modifying License forwarded as Appendix C to the aforementioned NRC letter, a report describing 1) the new administrative procedures whicF have been adopted to require redundant, independent verification of tne operability of the remaining engineered safety features whenever any safety system, or subpart thereof, required by the Limiting Conditions for Operation is intentionally removed from service, and 2) the review of existing procedures which has been performed to assure that Limiting Conditions for Operation are not defeated by maintenance or other activities, is forwarded herewith. This report also describes other actions taken by Duquesne Light Company to prevent recurrence of this or any similar incident.
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours, C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations At tachment
                                                                        ,
C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations At tachment
                                                                                                 \
                                                                                                 \
                                                                                              '
182f.287 3 001290            MO
182f.287 3 001290            MO
   .}}
   .}}

Latest revision as of 23:38, 1 February 2020

Forwards Rept on Review & Establishment of Administrative Procedures to Provide Redundant,Independent Verification of Operability of Engineered Safety Features, in Response to NRC 791205 Order
ML19257C563
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/10/1980
From: Dunn C
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML19257C564 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001290404
Download: ML19257C563 (1)


Text

.

A

'Af (412) 456-6000 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 January 10, 1980 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20555

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334 Response to December 5, 1979 Order Mcdifying License

Dear Mr. Stello:

The attached report is submitted in accordance with the Order which accompanied your letter of December 5,1979 to Mr. S. G. Schaffer relating to the exceeding of a Limiting Condition for Operation which occurred on November 27, 1979.

Pursuant to Section III, paragraph (3) of the Order Modifying License forwarded as Appendix C to the aforementioned NRC letter, a report describing 1) the new administrative procedures whicF have been adopted to require redundant, independent verification of tne operability of the remaining engineered safety features whenever any safety system, or subpart thereof, required by the Limiting Conditions for Operation is intentionally removed from service, and 2) the review of existing procedures which has been performed to assure that Limiting Conditions for Operation are not defeated by maintenance or other activities, is forwarded herewith. This report also describes other actions taken by Duquesne Light Company to prevent recurrence of this or any similar incident.

Very truly yours, C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations At tachment

\

182f.287 3 001290 MO

.