ML18086A761: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000272/1980031]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'',,."' ' ) I.., -;ok W. Sohne;d., Vice President  
{{#Wiki_filter:'',,."' ' ) I.., -;ok W. Sohne;d., Vice President Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373 Production  
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373  
.. *
Production  
* March 9, 1981 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 Attention:
.. * * March 9, 1981 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection  
Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:
and Enforcement  
NRC INSPECTION 50-272/80-31 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 1 We have reviewed the report of your conducted by Dr. Jin W. Chung during the period November 17-21, 1980. Our response to the item of noncompliance identified in Appendix A is as follows: Item of Violation Technical Specification 6.8 addresses the requirements of plant procedures in that paragraph 6.8.l states in part, "Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities referenced below: a. The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix 'A' of Regulatory Guide 1.33, 'Revision 2, February 1978 ... "; paragraph 6.8.2 states in part: "Each procedure  
Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
... of 6.8.l above ... shall be reviewed by the SORC .** prior to implementation and reviewed periodically as set forth in administrative procedures." and, paragraph 6.8.3 states in part: " .*. The change is documented, reviewed by SORC ..* within fourteen days of implementation." Administrative Control cedure AP-3, 'Station Documents', Revision 9, requires that the station procedures be reviewed at least every two years. Contrary to the above, station procedures and changes thereto, were either improperly implemented or not reviewed in the following instances:   
Commission  
* * .* Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3/9/81 Item Of Violation Part (a) Procedures in the Control Room Master Files listed below, had not been reviewed during the last two year review cycle: OI II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977 QI II-3.3.3, Revision 8, May 12, 1978 OI II-11.3.3, Revision 3, June 2, 1977 OI II-15.3.2, Revision 2, March 8, 1978 lPD-2.9.001, Revision 0, October 27, 1976 ReplX to Item Of Violation Part (a) 1. Operating Instruction II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977, has been revised twice since this revision.
631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 Attention:  
The current revision is Revision 5, December 17, 1979, which is within the two year review cycle. 2. Operating Instructions II-3.3.3, Revision 8, II-11.3.3, Revision 3, and II-15.3.2, Revision 2 have not been reviewed in the required two year cycle. All Operating Instructions are being revised to incorporate all of the on-the-spot changes and outlined*
Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations  
in a new format. .The Lead Engineer has been designated responsible for ensuring that procedure reviews and revisions are completed in the required two year cycle. The addition of personnel to the staff has been done in order to expedite the revision process. All revisions should be completed by June 1, 1981. 3. lPD-2.9.001, Revision O, was not reviewed within the two year cycle due to personnel error. The Performance Department is currently revising their program to include provisions f9r a systematic review process, scheduling and computer program. The procedure noted has been reviewed.
and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:  
We are in compliance now. Item of Violation Part (b) The Index/List of Effective Revisions, Station Manual Books 2 and 4, in the Control Room Master Copies was not up to date and did not reflect the corresponding revision numbers and dates of the procedures in the Control Room Files as required by Administrative Procedure AP-1, Paragraph 5.6, Index and List of Effective Pages .   
NRC INSPECTION  
. . * *fl. Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3/9/81 Reply To Item Of Violation Part (b) The personnel responsible for placing the Operating Instruction revision in the Control Room Master Copies were not aware of the requirements of the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, General Information.
50-272/80-31  
The Lead Engineer will publish a new Index/List of Effective Revisions each time a revision is made to the Operating Instructions.
SALEM GENERATING  
The Index should be completed by June 1, 1981. NOTE AP-1 is only for the Administrative Procedure Program. Item Of Violation Part (c) The following procedure revision numbers and dates in the Control Room Master Files were pencil-changed without any objective evidence of review or corresponding references to SORC review as required by Administrative Procedure AP-3, Section 6.0, Control of Station Materials:
STATION UNIT NO. 1 We have reviewed the report of your  
OI II-1,3.1:
conducted  
Revision 3, May 3, 1977 in the procedure was deleted and Revision 4 was entered by pencil. OI II-3.3.2:
by Dr. Jin W. Chung during the period November 17-21, 1980. Our response to the item of noncompliance  
Revision 7, February 18, 1977 was deleted and Revision 8 was entered by pencil. Reply To Item Of Violation Part (c) The Index/List of Effective Revisions was pencil changed to reflect the current revision number. The Index/List of Effective Revisions is not required to have the SORC review meeting number. This is on the last page of each Operating Instruction.
identified  
: 1. OI II-1.3.1, Revision 5, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on December 17, 1979. 2. OI II-3.3.2, Revision 8, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on June 19, 1978. A new Index/List of Effective Revisions will be issued with each new revision to the Operating Instructions.
in Appendix A is as follows: Item of Violation  
Item Of Violation Part (d) The following "on-the-spot" permanent changes to procedures were not reviewed by SORC within fourteen days of their implementation.   
Technical  
*
Specification  
* Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
6.8 addresses  
.-4-3/9/81 OI II-3.3.1, Permanent Change (P-3), May 3, 1979; P-4, May 10, 1979; P-5, May 11, 1979 OI IV-16.3.1, P-6, September 6, 1980 OI V-1.3.1, P-7, April 29, 1979, was reviewed on November 13, 1979 by SORC Reply To Item Of Violation Part (d) In accordance with the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, "General Information", the green copies of permanent "on-the-spot" changes are maintained in the Control Room. Each permanent "on-the-spot" change listed above has had the proper review by SORC within fourteen days as required.
the requirements  
The SORC Secretary retains the original white copies for the record file and for inclusion in the next revision of each Operating Instruction and are available at the site for review. Item Of Violation Part (e) Emergency Communication System Operating Instruction IV-12.3.1, Revision 2, July 9, 1980, had not been reviewed by SORC prior to implementation.
of plant procedures  
This is a procedure type listed in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Item lm. Reply To Item Of Violation Part (e) The Emergency Communication System Operating Instruction was not reviewed by SORC. This was an apparent administrative oversight.
in that paragraph  
The procedure has been reviewed by SORC. We are in compliance now. Sincerely, CC Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555   
6.8.l states in part, "Written procedures  
' . ... ,i.,
shall be established, implemented  
* STATE OF NEW JERSEY SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection Report 50-272/80-31 are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. ' FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER Subscribed and sworn to before me r./-, '-. 1
and maintained  
* this i day of ) J /O-l C/) , 1981  
covering the activities  
referenced  
below: a. The applicable  
procedures  
recommended  
in Appendix 'A' of Regulatory  
Guide 1.33, 'Revision  
2, February 1978 ... "; paragraph  
6.8.2 states in part: "Each procedure  
... of 6.8.l above ... shall be reviewed by the SORC .** prior to implementation  
and reviewed periodically  
as set forth in administrative  
procedures." and, paragraph  
6.8.3 states in part: " .*. The change is documented, reviewed by SORC ..* within fourteen days of implementation." Administrative  
Control cedure AP-3, 'Station Documents', Revision 9, requires that the station procedures  
be reviewed at least every two years. Contrary to the above, station procedures  
and changes thereto, were either improperly  
implemented  
or not reviewed in the following  
instances:   
* * .* Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
-2-3/9/81 Item Of Violation  
Part (a) Procedures  
in the Control Room Master Files listed below, had not been reviewed during the last two year review cycle: OI II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977 QI II-3.3.3, Revision 8, May 12, 1978 OI II-11.3.3, Revision 3, June 2, 1977 OI II-15.3.2, Revision 2, March 8, 1978 lPD-2.9.001, Revision 0, October 27, 1976 ReplX to Item Of Violation  
Part (a) 1. Operating  
Instruction  
II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977, has been revised twice since this revision.  
The current revision is Revision 5, December 17, 1979, which is within the two year review cycle. 2. Operating  
Instructions  
II-3.3.3, Revision 8, II-11.3.3, Revision 3, and II-15.3.2, Revision 2 have not been reviewed in the required two year cycle. All Operating  
Instructions  
are being revised to incorporate  
all of the on-the-spot  
changes and outlined*  
in a new format. .The Lead Engineer has been designated  
responsible  
for ensuring that procedure  
reviews and revisions  
are completed  
in the required two year cycle. The addition of personnel  
to the staff has been done in order to expedite the revision process. All revisions  
should be completed  
by June 1, 1981. 3. lPD-2.9.001, Revision O, was not reviewed within the two year cycle due to personnel  
error. The Performance  
Department  
is currently  
revising their program to include provisions  
f9r a systematic  
review process, scheduling  
and computer program. The procedure  
noted has been reviewed.  
We are in compliance  
now. Item of Violation  
Part (b) The Index/List  
of Effective  
Revisions, Station Manual Books 2 and 4, in the Control Room Master Copies was not up to date and did not reflect the corresponding  
revision numbers and dates of the procedures  
in the Control Room Files as required by Administrative  
Procedure  
AP-1, Paragraph  
5.6, Index and List of Effective  
Pages .   
. . * *fl. Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
-3-3/9/81 Reply To Item Of Violation  
Part (b) The personnel  
responsible  
for placing the Operating  
Instruction  
revision in the Control Room Master Copies were not aware of the requirements  
of the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, General Information.  
The Lead Engineer will publish a new Index/List  
of Effective  
Revisions  
each time a revision is made to the Operating  
Instructions.  
The Index should be completed  
by June 1, 1981. NOTE AP-1 is only for the Administrative  
Procedure  
Program. Item Of Violation  
Part (c) The following  
procedure  
revision numbers and dates in the Control Room Master Files were pencil-changed  
without any objective  
evidence of review or corresponding  
references  
to SORC review as required by Administrative  
Procedure  
AP-3, Section 6.0, Control of Station Materials:  
OI II-1,3.1:  
Revision 3, May 3, 1977 in the procedure  
was deleted and Revision 4 was entered by pencil. OI II-3.3.2:  
Revision 7, February 18, 1977 was deleted and Revision 8 was entered by pencil. Reply To Item Of Violation  
Part (c) The Index/List  
of Effective  
Revisions  
was pencil changed to reflect the current revision number. The Index/List  
of Effective  
Revisions  
is not required to have the SORC review meeting number. This is on the last page of each Operating  
Instruction.  
1. OI II-1.3.1, Revision 5, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on December 17, 1979. 2. OI II-3.3.2, Revision 8, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on June 19, 1978. A new Index/List  
of Effective  
Revisions  
will be issued with each new revision to the Operating  
Instructions.  
Item Of Violation  
Part (d) The following "on-the-spot" permanent  
changes to procedures  
were not reviewed by SORC within fourteen days of their implementation.   
* * Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
.-4-3/9/81 OI II-3.3.1, Permanent  
Change (P-3), May 3, 1979; P-4, May 10, 1979; P-5, May 11, 1979 OI IV-16.3.1, P-6, September  
6, 1980 OI V-1.3.1, P-7, April 29, 1979, was reviewed on November 13, 1979 by SORC Reply To Item Of Violation  
Part (d) In accordance  
with the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, "General Information", the green copies of permanent "on-the-spot" changes are maintained  
in the Control Room. Each permanent "on-the-spot" change listed above has had the proper review by SORC within fourteen days as required.  
The SORC Secretary  
retains the original white copies for the record file and for inclusion  
in the next revision of each Operating  
Instruction  
and are available  
at the site for review. Item Of Violation  
Part (e) Emergency  
Communication  
System Operating  
Instruction  
IV-12.3.1, Revision 2, July 9, 1980, had not been reviewed by SORC prior to implementation.  
This is a procedure  
type listed in Regulatory  
Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Item lm. Reply To Item Of Violation  
Part (e) The Emergency  
Communication  
System Operating  
Instruction  
was not reviewed by SORC. This was an apparent administrative  
oversight.  
The procedure  
has been reviewed by SORC. We are in compliance  
now. Sincerely, CC Director, Office of Inspection  
and Enforcement  
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
Washington, DC 20555   
' . ... ,i., * STATE OF NEW JERSEY SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX FREDERICK  
W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according  
to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President  
of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection  
Report 50-272/80-31  
are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. ' FREDERICK  
W. SCHNEIDER  
Subscribed  
and sworn to before me r./-, '-. 1 * this i day of ) J /O-l C/) , 1981  
' *\-,_; /i ., . .. ;:;* )/7(: /, /7 /i ' " /f. ,, ( ) *-.......t_  
' *\-,_; /i ., . .. ;:;* )/7(: /, /7 /i ' " /f. ,, ( ) *-.......t_  
-.*  
-.*  
.. ?Cl. 1_,*. . l/''-'* , ..t_J: , ( .. /.__..* Notary Public of New Jersey /!:; _;_ I ,r;. -, My Commission  
.. ?Cl. 1_,*. . l/''-'* , ..t_J: , ( .. /.__..* Notary Public of New Jersey /!:; _;_ I ,r;. -, My Commission expires on (L' C(-. I,,  
expires on (L' C(-. I,,  
"--:! *   
"--:! *   
. *: ... STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) ) SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX ) FREDERICK  
. *: ... STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) ) SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX ) FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and* as such,. I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection Report are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. IP.J. SCHNEIDER and sworn to before me this 9 day of }J cA , 1981 / Notary Public of New M;{ Commission expires on dJd. I If <f:-...3}}
W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according  
to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President  
of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and* as such,. I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection  
Report  
are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. IP.J. SCHNEIDER  
and sworn to before me this 9 day of }J  
cA , 1981 / Notary Public of New  
M;{ Commission  
expires on dJd. I If <f:-...3
}}

Revision as of 21:58, 31 July 2019

Responds to NRC 810212 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-272/80-31.Corrective Actions:Operating Instructions Revised.Lead Engineer Will Publish New Index/List of Effective Revisions After Each Addition
ML18086A761
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/09/1981
From: Schneider F
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Brunner E, Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18086A760 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107080041
Download: ML18086A761 (6)
v • d • e


Text

,,."' ' ) I.., -;ok W. Sohne;d., Vice President Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 201/430-7373 Production

.. *

  • March 9, 1981 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 Attention:

Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Gentlemen:

NRC INSPECTION 50-272/80-31 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 1 We have reviewed the report of your conducted by Dr. Jin W. Chung during the period November 17-21, 1980. Our response to the item of noncompliance identified in Appendix A is as follows: Item of Violation Technical Specification 6.8 addresses the requirements of plant procedures in that paragraph 6.8.l states in part, "Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities referenced below: a. The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix 'A' of Regulatory Guide 1.33, 'Revision 2, February 1978 ... "; paragraph 6.8.2 states in part: "Each procedure

... of 6.8.l above ... shall be reviewed by the SORC .** prior to implementation and reviewed periodically as set forth in administrative procedures." and, paragraph 6.8.3 states in part: " .*. The change is documented, reviewed by SORC ..* within fourteen days of implementation." Administrative Control cedure AP-3, 'Station Documents', Revision 9, requires that the station procedures be reviewed at least every two years. Contrary to the above, station procedures and changes thereto, were either improperly implemented or not reviewed in the following instances:

  • * .* Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3/9/81 Item Of Violation Part (a) Procedures in the Control Room Master Files listed below, had not been reviewed during the last two year review cycle: OI II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977 QI II-3.3.3, Revision 8, May 12, 1978 OI II-11.3.3, Revision 3, June 2, 1977 OI II-15.3.2, Revision 2, March 8, 1978 lPD-2.9.001, Revision 0, October 27, 1976 ReplX to Item Of Violation Part (a) 1. Operating Instruction II-1.3.1, Revision 3, May 3, 1977, has been revised twice since this revision.

The current revision is Revision 5, December 17, 1979, which is within the two year review cycle. 2. Operating Instructions II-3.3.3, Revision 8, II-11.3.3, Revision 3, and II-15.3.2, Revision 2 have not been reviewed in the required two year cycle. All Operating Instructions are being revised to incorporate all of the on-the-spot changes and outlined*

in a new format. .The Lead Engineer has been designated responsible for ensuring that procedure reviews and revisions are completed in the required two year cycle. The addition of personnel to the staff has been done in order to expedite the revision process. All revisions should be completed by June 1, 1981. 3. lPD-2.9.001, Revision O, was not reviewed within the two year cycle due to personnel error. The Performance Department is currently revising their program to include provisions f9r a systematic review process, scheduling and computer program. The procedure noted has been reviewed.

We are in compliance now. Item of Violation Part (b) The Index/List of Effective Revisions, Station Manual Books 2 and 4, in the Control Room Master Copies was not up to date and did not reflect the corresponding revision numbers and dates of the procedures in the Control Room Files as required by Administrative Procedure AP-1, Paragraph 5.6, Index and List of Effective Pages .

. . * *fl. Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3/9/81 Reply To Item Of Violation Part (b) The personnel responsible for placing the Operating Instruction revision in the Control Room Master Copies were not aware of the requirements of the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, General Information.

The Lead Engineer will publish a new Index/List of Effective Revisions each time a revision is made to the Operating Instructions.

The Index should be completed by June 1, 1981. NOTE AP-1 is only for the Administrative Procedure Program. Item Of Violation Part (c) The following procedure revision numbers and dates in the Control Room Master Files were pencil-changed without any objective evidence of review or corresponding references to SORC review as required by Administrative Procedure AP-3, Section 6.0, Control of Station Materials:

OI II-1,3.1:

Revision 3, May 3, 1977 in the procedure was deleted and Revision 4 was entered by pencil. OI II-3.3.2:

Revision 7, February 18, 1977 was deleted and Revision 8 was entered by pencil. Reply To Item Of Violation Part (c) The Index/List of Effective Revisions was pencil changed to reflect the current revision number. The Index/List of Effective Revisions is not required to have the SORC review meeting number. This is on the last page of each Operating Instruction.

1. OI II-1.3.1, Revision 5, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on December 17, 1979. 2. OI II-3.3.2, Revision 8, is the current revision, which was reviewed by SORC on June 19, 1978. A new Index/List of Effective Revisions will be issued with each new revision to the Operating Instructions.

Item Of Violation Part (d) The following "on-the-spot" permanent changes to procedures were not reviewed by SORC within fourteen days of their implementation.

  • Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.-4-3/9/81 OI II-3.3.1, Permanent Change (P-3), May 3, 1979; P-4, May 10, 1979; P-5, May 11, 1979 OI IV-16.3.1, P-6, September 6, 1980 OI V-1.3.1, P-7, April 29, 1979, was reviewed on November 13, 1979 by SORC Reply To Item Of Violation Part (d) In accordance with the Station Plant Manual, Volume I, Section 1, "General Information", the green copies of permanent "on-the-spot" changes are maintained in the Control Room. Each permanent "on-the-spot" change listed above has had the proper review by SORC within fourteen days as required.

The SORC Secretary retains the original white copies for the record file and for inclusion in the next revision of each Operating Instruction and are available at the site for review. Item Of Violation Part (e) Emergency Communication System Operating Instruction IV-12.3.1, Revision 2, July 9, 1980, had not been reviewed by SORC prior to implementation.

This is a procedure type listed in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Item lm. Reply To Item Of Violation Part (e) The Emergency Communication System Operating Instruction was not reviewed by SORC. This was an apparent administrative oversight.

The procedure has been reviewed by SORC. We are in compliance now. Sincerely, CC Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

' . ... ,i.,

  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection Report 50-272/80-31 are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. ' FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER Subscribed and sworn to before me r./-, '-. 1
  • this i day of ) J /O-l C/) , 1981

' *\-,_; /i ., . .. ;:;* )/7(: /, /7 /i ' " /f. ,, ( ) *-.......t_

-.*

.. ?Cl. 1_,*. . l/-'* , ..t_J: , ( .. /.__..* Notary Public of New Jersey /!:; _;_ I ,r;. -, My Commission expires on (L' C(-. I,,

"--:! *

. *: ... STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) ) SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX ) FREDERICK W. SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and* as such,. I find the matters set forth in our response dated March 9, 1981, to Inspection Report are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. IP.J. SCHNEIDER and sworn to before me this 9 day of }J cA , 1981 / Notary Public of New M;{ Commission expires on dJd. I If <f:-...3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18086A761&oldid=1871058"