ML15127A190: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML15127A190 | | number = ML15127A190 | ||
| issue date = 04/30/2015 | | issue date = 04/30/2015 | ||
| title = | | title = Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2014 | ||
| author name = Dostal J | | author name = Dostal J | ||
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC | | author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:1N Exelon Generation Technical Specification 6.9.1 .e RA-1 5-034 April 30, 2015 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219 | ||
==Subject:== | |||
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2014 Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for calendar year 2014 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. This submittal is made in accordance with Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specification 6.9.1 .e, "Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report." | |||
If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact John Renda at 609-971-2572. | |||
Sincerely, Plant Manager - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: Administrator, USNRC Region I USNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster Creek USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek Craig Stewart, American Nuclear Insurers | |||
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT I Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2014 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Aw Exelon Generation., | |||
Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2015 | |||
Table of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions .......................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 A . O bjectives of the REM P .................................................................................. 3 B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 4 C. Discussion ..................................................................................................... 4 III. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7 A. Sam ple Collection ......................................................................................... 7 B. Sam ple Analysis ............................................................................................ 9 C . Data Interpretation ...................................................................................... 10 D. Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11 E. Program Changes ......................................................................................... 12 IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 12 A. Aquatic Environm ent ..................................................................................... 12 B. Atm ospheric Environm ent ........................................................................... 17 C. Am bient G am m a Radiation ......................................................................... 21 D. Land Use Survey .......................................................................................... 22 E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 23 V. References ................................................................................................................... 26 VI. E rra ta ........................................................................................................................... 27 i | |||
Appendices Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection & | |||
Analytical Methods Tables Table B-1 Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Table B-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Table B-3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Figqures Figure B-1 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station. | |||
Figure B-2 Locations of REMP Stations within a I to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station. | |||
Figure B-3 Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station. | |||
Appendix C Data Tables and Figures - Primary Laboratory Tables Table C-1. 1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-1I.2 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-11.3 Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
ii | |||
Table C-I1.4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-111.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-1II.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-IV.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-V. 1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VI.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VI.3 Concentrations of Strontium in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VI.4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VII.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-VIII.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-IX. 1 Quarterly OSLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-IX.2 Mean Quarterly OSLD Results for the Site Boundary, Intermediate, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table C-IX.3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Figures Figure C-1 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Clams Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1983 - 2014. | |||
Figure C-2 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014. | |||
iii | |||
Figure C-3 Mean Cesium-1 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014. | |||
Figure C-4 Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 -.2014. | |||
Figure C-5 Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014. | |||
Figure C-6 Mean Quarterly OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Figure C-7 Mean Quarterly TLD/OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1990 - 2014. | |||
Appendix D Data Tables - QC Laboratory Tables Table D-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-11.2 Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-11.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-Ill.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-Ill.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-V.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table D-VI.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
iv | |||
Appendix E Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table E-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) | |||
Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-4 ERA (a) Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2014 Table E-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) | |||
Environmental, Inc., 2014 Appendix F Errata Data Appendix G Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR) v | |||
: 1. Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. During that time period, 1716 analyses were performed on 1248 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment. | |||
REMP designated surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium, fission or activation products were detected in any of the surface water samples collected as part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program during 2014. | |||
REMP designated drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium, 1-131, and gamma emitting nuclides. The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of drinking water for gross beta. No tritium, 1-131, or fission or activation products were detected in any of the drinking water samples collected. | |||
REMP designated groundwater samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium and no fission or activation products were detected in REMP groundwater samples. | |||
Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams or crabs. Cesium-137 was not detected in any sediment samples. | |||
Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, gamma emitting nuclides, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90. Gross beta and cosmogenic Be-7 were detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. | |||
No fission or activation products were detected. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectable activity. | |||
High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable concentration. | |||
Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected. All Strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity. | |||
Strontium-90 activity was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years at both control and indicator stations, and can be attributed to historical nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. | |||
1 | |||
Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD). Exelon changed the dosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year 2012, Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use of Thermo Luminescent Dosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons for this change. First, OSLDs are not subject to "fade". Fade is where the dose on the dosimeter drifts lower over time. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero after they are read. Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previous years. The maximum dose to any member of the public attributable to radioactive effluents and direct radiation from the OCGS was less than the 25 mrem/year limit established by the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). | |||
2 | |||
II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon, is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from the Barnegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about % mile west of the highway and 1 / miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site property extends about 21/2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side. | |||
A preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was established in 1966, and continued prior to the plant becoming operational in 1969. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Landauer and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. | |||
A. Objectives of the REMP The objectives of the REMP are to: | |||
: 1. Determine whether any significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in major pathways. | |||
: 2. Identify and evaluate the buildup, if any, of radionuclides in the local environment, or any changes in normal background radiation levels. | |||
: 3. Verify the adequacy of the plant's controls for the release of radioactive materials. | |||
: 4. Fulfill the obligations of the radiological surveillance sections of Oyster Creek's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). | |||
3 | |||
B. Implementation of the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by: | |||
: 1. Identifying significant exposure pathways. | |||
: 2. Establishing baseline radiological data for media within those pathways. | |||
: 3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment. | |||
C. Discussion | |||
: 1. General Program The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established in 1966, before the plant became operational. This preoperational surveillance program was established to describe and quantify the radioactivity, and its variability, in the area prior to the operation of OCGS. After OCGS became operational in 1969, the operational surveillance program continued to measure radiation and radioactivity in the surrounding areas. | |||
A variety of environmental samples are collected as part of the REMP at OCGS. The selection of sample types is based on the established pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans. The selection of sampling locations is based on sample availability, local meteorological and hydrological characteristics, local population characteristics, and land usage in the area of interest. The selection of sampling frequencies for the various environmental media is based on the radionuclides of interest, their respective half-lives, and their behavior in both the biological and physical environment. | |||
: 2. Preoperational Surveillance Program The federal government requires nuclear facilities to conduct radiological environmental monitoring prior to constructing the facility. This preoperational surveillance program is aimed at collecting the data needed to identify pathways, including selection of the radioisotope and sample media combinations to be included in the environmental surveillance program conducted after facility operation begins. Radiochemical analyses performed on the 4 | |||
environmental samples should include not only those nuclides expected to be released during facility operation, but should also include typical radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing and natural background radioactivity. All environmental media with a potential to be affected by facility operation as well as those media directly in the major pathways, should be sampled on at least an annual basis during the preoperational phase of the environmental surveillance program. | |||
The preoperational surveillance design, including nuclide/media combinations, sampling frequencies and locations, collection techniques, and radioanalyses performed, should be carefully considered and incorporated in the design of the operational surveillance program. In this manner, data can be compared in a variety of ways (for example, from year to year, location to location, etc.) in order to detect any radiological impact the facility has on the surrounding environment. Data collection during the preoperational phase should be planned to provide a comprehensive database for evaluating any future changes in the environment surrounding the nuclear facility. | |||
OCGS began its preoperational environmental surveillance program three years before the plant began operating in 1969. | |||
Data accumulated during those early years provide an extensive database from which environmental monitoring personnel are able to identify trends in the radiological characteristics of the local environment. The environmental surveillance program at OCGS will continue after the plant has reached the end of its economically useful life and decommissioning has begun. | |||
: 3. Consideration of Plant Effluents Effluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity released to the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and does not exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operation of monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling and analyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent and environmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects of effluent and environmental monitoring. | |||
Both radiological environmental and effluent monitoring indicate that the operation of OCGS does not result in significant radiation exposure of the people or the environment surrounding OCGS and is well below the applicable levels set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the EPA. | |||
5 | |||
There were liquid radioactive effluent releases during 2014 of concentrations of tritium too low to detect at an LLD of 200 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) at the New Jersey Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permitted main condenser outfall. | |||
The releases were part of nearly continuous pumping of groundwater at approximately 70 gpm containing low levels of tritium and no detectable gamma. Exelon and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) agreed to this remediation action instead of natural attenuation to address concentrations of tritium in groundwater. Well 73 and supporting equipment and piping were installed to pump groundwater to the intake structure at the inlet of the main circulating water pumps. | |||
Provisions were established for both batch and continuous releases of groundwater. Continuous releases occurred approximately 230 days in 2014. The nearly continuous releases occurred from March 12, 2014 through December 31, 2014 with a total of 2.31 E+07 gallons of groundwater pumped resulting in 1.74E-01 Ci of tritium released to the discharge canal. The dose to the most limiting member of the public due to the release of groundwater was 8.28E-07 mrem. | |||
Utilizing gaseous effluent data, the maximum hypothetical dose to any individual during 2014 was calculated using a mathematical model, which is based on the methods defined by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. These methods accurately determine the types and quantities of radioactive materials being released to the environment. | |||
The maximum calculated organ dose (Bone) from iodines, tritium, carbon-14 (C-14), and particulates to any individual due to gaseous effluents was 4.78E-01 mrem, which was approximately 3.19E+00 percent of the annual limit of 15 mrem. The maximum calculated gamma air dose in the UNRESTRICTED AREA due to noble gas effluents was 1.62E-02 mrad, which was 1.62E-01 percent of the annual 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, As Low As Reasonably Acheivable (ALARA) limit of 10mrad. The majority of organ dose from gaseous effluents was due to C-14. The maximum hypothetical calculated whole body dose to any individual due to noble gas effluents was 2.18E-03 mrem (0.00218 mrem) which was 4.36E-02 percent of the annual limit of 5 mrem. | |||
The total maximum organ dose (Bone) due to all radiological effluents of 4.94E-01 mrem (0.494 mrem) received by any individual from gaseous effluents from the Oyster CreekGenerating Station for the reporting period is more than 607 times lower than 6 | |||
the dose the average individual in the Oyster Creek area during the same time period. The background radiation dose averages approximately 300 mrem per year in the Central New Jersey area, which includes approximately 200 mrem/year from naturally occurring radon gas. | |||
During 2014, the maximum direct radiation dose to the most likely exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC potentially attributable to the operation of Oyster Creek beyond the site boundary in the west sector, as shown by offsite OSLD readings at station 55 was 5.09 mrem. The nearest member of the public is considered a part-time resident that works 2,000 hours per year at a warehouse located west of the plant. | |||
Environmental sampling of airborne iodine and particulates showed no radioactivity attributable to the operation of OCGS. | |||
Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Incorporated. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS REMP in 2014. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-1, B-2, and B-3, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3. | |||
Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, drinking water, groundwater, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon water samples were collected monthly from two surface locations (33 and 94), semiannually at two surface water locations (23 and 24), monthly from six drinking water wells (1 N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114) and quarterly from 2 groundwater stations (MW-24-3A and W-3C). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in plastic bottles, which were rinsed at least twice with source water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannually at three locations (33, 93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)). Two annual crab samples were collected from two locations (33 and 93). Sediment samples were collected at four locations semiannually (23, 24, 33, and 94 (control)). | |||
7 | |||
Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate and airborne iodine. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed weekly at eight locations (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, and 111). The control location was C. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis. | |||
Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of garden vegetation. No commercial dairy operations and no dairy animals producing milk for human consumption are located within a 5 mile radius of the plant. Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at four locations (35, 36, 66, and 115). Station 36 was the control location. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory. | |||
Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using A120 3 :C Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry (OSLD). Exelon changed the dosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year 2012, Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use of Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons for this change. First, OSLDs are not subject to "fade". Fade is where the dose on the dosimeter drifts lower over time. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero after they are read. The OSLDs were placed on and around the OCGS site and were categorized as follows: | |||
An inner ring consisting of 19 locations (1, T1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 112, and 113) near the site boundary. | |||
An outer rinq consisting of 31 locations (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 22, 46, 47, 48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99,100,101,102,103,104,105, 106, 107, 109, and 110) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population. | |||
8 | |||
Special interest stations consisting of 9 locations (3, 11, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, and 92) representing special interest areas such as population centers, state parks, etc. | |||
Background (Control) stations consisting of two locations (C and 14) greater than 20 miles distant from the site. | |||
Indicator OSLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in each of 16 meteorological compass sectors in the general area of the site boundary. OSLDs were also placed in each meteorological sector in the 1 to 5 mile range, where reasonable highway access would permit, in areas of public interest and population centers. Background locations were located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS. | |||
Two OSLDs were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The OSLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Landauer for analysis. | |||
B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2014. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3. | |||
In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses: | |||
: 1. Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates and drinking water. | |||
: 2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface, drinking water, groundwater, fish, clams, crabs, sediment, air particulates and vegetation. | |||
: 3. Concentrations of tritium in REMP designated surface, drinking water and groundwater. | |||
: 4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges and drinking water. | |||
: 5. Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation. | |||
: 6. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the 9 | |||
OCGS. | |||
C. Data Interpretation For trending purposes, the radiological and direct radiation data collected during 2014 were compared with data from past years. The results of environmental sampling show that radioactivity levels have not increased from the background radioactivity detected prior to the operation of OCGS. The operation of OCGS continues to have no measurable radiological impact upon the environment. | |||
Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data: | |||
: 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis. | |||
The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity. | |||
: 2. Net Activity Calculation and Reportingq of Results Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity, which results in a negative number. | |||
An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected. | |||
Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows: | |||
For surface, drinking water, and groundwater - 12 nuclides: Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported. | |||
10 | |||
For fish - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-1 37 were reported. | |||
For clams - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported. | |||
For crabs - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported. | |||
For sediment - seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported. | |||
For air particulate - six nuclides: Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported. | |||
For air iodine cartridges - one nuclide: 1-131 was reported. | |||
For vegetation - seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, 1-131, Cs-1 34, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported. | |||
Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty. | |||
D. Program Exceptions For 2014 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%. | |||
Exceptions are listed below: | |||
Drinking Water | |||
: 1. Station 39 (Lacey Twp., MUA Pump Station) was not collected January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The station was off line for this time period. | |||
: 2. Station 1S - Offline January through August and the month of December. | |||
: 3. Station 38 - Month of January was a composite for 3 of the 4 weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 1/5. | |||
: 4. Station 1S - Month of September was a composite for 2 of the 4 weeks. Well was out of service for the weeks of 9/7 and 9/14. | |||
11 | |||
: 5. Station 114 - Month of October was a composite for 4 of the 5 weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 10/19. | |||
Dosimetry | |||
: 1. Week 16 (4/20/14 -4/26/14) - One of two dosimeters at Station 57 was found on the ground. Both dosimeters at Station 68 were found on the ground. | |||
: 2. Week 42 (10/19/14 - 10/25/14) - One of the dosimeters at Station 85 was missing. One of the dosimeters at Station 90 was found on the ground. | |||
Air | |||
: 1. Week 10 (3/5/14 - 3/12/14) - The fuse on the main breaker box at Station 20 failed and had to be replaced. Not enough sample volume was collected to be considered a valid sample. | |||
: 2. Week 30 (7/23/14 - 7/30/14) - The AP filter at Station 3 had a few small holes in it. Suspect holes were due to a severe storm. | |||
: 3. Week 32 (8/6/14 - 8/13/14) - The AP filter at Station 73 had a very small hole in it. Suspect hole was due to a severe storm. | |||
Program exceptions are tracked and investigated to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors are reviewed with the personnel involved to prevent recurrence. | |||
The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation. | |||
E. Program Changes There are no program changes for 2014. | |||
IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment | |||
: 1. Surface Water Samples were taken via grab sample methodology at two locations (33 and 94) on a monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples were 12 | |||
collected semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24). Of these locations 23, 24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses were performed: | |||
Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. Data from this year indicates that surface water tritium concentrations remain very low and not significantly different from recent previous years. | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC. | |||
Surface water sampling began in 1966, and the samples were analyzed for tritium as well as other radioactivity. During this preoperational program, tritium was detected at an average concentration of 1.05E+3 pCi/liter. At that time, counting instrumentation was not as sensitive as it now, and the minimum detectable concentration was 1E+3 pCi/liter versus 2E+2 pCi/liter used today. By comparing the 2014 sampling results to the decay corrected average preoperational concentration reported in the 2007 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (1.11 E+2 pCi/liter), it can be seen that the inventory of tritium in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl, and is decreasing with time. | |||
: 2. Drinking water Monthly samples were composited from monthly grab samples from six drinking water wells (1N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114). Station 1, because it is located on the OCGS site, could potentially be affected by radioactive releases from the plant. Station 1 was split into two separate locations, 1N and 1S. Station 38, the Ocean Township Municipal Utility Authority Well, could potentially be affected by effluent releases from the OCGS. Given its distance from the facility (1.6 miles) and depth (approximately 360 feet), | |||
however, the probability of any OCGS related impacts is very small. | |||
Stations 37 and 39, Lacey Township Municipal Utility Authority wells, are not likely to be impacted by effluents from the OCGS. | |||
These wells are located generally up-gradient of the regional 13 | |||
groundwater flow direction (southeast). In addition, because of their depth (> 200 feet) and distance from the site (2.2 and 3.5 miles respectively), they are unlikely to be affected by OCGS operations. | |||
The following analyses were performed: | |||
Tritium Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. | |||
Drinking water was sampled during the preoperational program and throughout the 43 years of the plant's operational program. Tritium sampling results during the preoperational years, yielded results all less than the minimum detectable concentration of 1E+3 pCi/liter. | |||
2014 results are all less than the current MDC of 2E+2 pCi/liter. | |||
Gross Beta Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of total gross beta activity (Tables C-11.2, Appendix C). Gross beta was detected in 41 of 51 samples, and is expected due to natural sources and fallout residual from previous bomb testing. The values ranged from 1.8 to 21.1 pCi/I. | |||
The investigation level for gross beta in water is 15 pCi/I. Drinking water sample 1 N result for gross beta exceeded the investigation level beginning in January 2012. | |||
The initial result for gross beta was 15.1 pCi/I in 2012. This issue was entered into our Corrective Action Program (CAP) and an investigation initiated. The 1N water sample was analyzed for known beta emitters Sr-89, Sr-90, Fe-55 and Ni-63. These analyses results were all <MDC. It was also identified that the 1N well treatment system was upgraded the previous month and a potassium chloride softener system was added as part of the upgrade. Samples were obtained pre and post treatment. The pre-treatment result for gross beta was 3.6 pCi/I, which is a value that has been seen previously in drinking water samples. The post-treatment sample result for gross beta was 22.2 pCi/I. | |||
Based on the fact that there were no typical plant produced beta emitters detected and that natural potassium is a known beta emitter along with the results of the pre and post sampling, the gross beta values obtained for 1N can be attributed to the addition of the water softener system installed during the system upgrade in December of 2011. | |||
14 | |||
Iodine Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for 1-131 by the low level method to detect down to 1 pCi/L (Table C-11.3, Appendix C). All results were less than the MDC. | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.4, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC. | |||
: 3. Groundwater The following analyses were performed: | |||
Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-I11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC. | |||
: 4. Fish Fish samples comprised of bottom feeder (silver perch, white perch, and summer flounder) and predator (American Eel, striped bass, and bluefish) were collected at three locations (33, 93, and | |||
: 94) semiannually. Locations 93 and 33 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed: | |||
Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of fish samples from three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). | |||
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 3,219 to 5,340 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. | |||
15 | |||
No fish were sampled during the preoperational sampling program for OCGS. | |||
: 5. Clams and Crabs Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at two locations (33 and 93) annually. Locations 23, 24, 33, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed: | |||
Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C). | |||
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 1,235 to 1,944 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-1, Appendix C. | |||
Preoperational clam sample results for naturally occurring Potassium-40 ranged from 600 to 9,800 pCi/kg wet, which are consistent with current sample results. | |||
The edible portions of crab samples from two locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C). | |||
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at both stations and ranged from 1,950 to 2,186 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. | |||
Crabs were not sampled during the preoperational years of the OCGS environmental monitoring program. | |||
: 6. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24, 33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed: | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from all four locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring 16 | |||
Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 783 to 14,800 pCi/kg dry. Cesium-137 was not detected in any of the samples. No fission or activation products were found. Figure C-3, Appendix C graphs Cs-1 37 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2014 and figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2014. | |||
The requirement for sampling sediment is a requirement of ODCM 3.12.1, Table 3.12.1-1.d. ODCM Table 3.12.1-2, Reporting Levels for Radioactive Concentrations in Environmental samples Reporting Levels does not include requirements for sediment. | |||
CY-AA-170-1000, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Meteorological Program Implementation, Attachment 1, Analytical Results Investigation Levels, includes sediment investigation level for Cs-1 37 of 1000 pCi/kg, dry. | |||
While aquatic sediment sampling was part of the preoperational program, samples were not analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides until 1981. | |||
In conclusion, the 2014 aquatic monitoring results for surface water, drinking water, fish, clams and crabs showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of OCGS, and with levels measured in past years. No radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any aquatic samples during 2014 and no adverse long-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data. | |||
B. Atmospheric Environment | |||
: 1. Airborne | |||
: a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from eight locations on a weekly basis. The eight locations were separated into three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20, 66 and 111), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group III represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed: | |||
17 | |||
Gross Beta Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-VI.1 and C-VI.2, Appendix C). | |||
Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations. | |||
Comparison of results among the three groups aids in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the Site Boundary locations (Group I) ranged from 6 to 39 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Intermediate Distance locations (Group II) ranged from 6 to 34 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Distant locations (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 27 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 13 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The similarity of the results from the three groups indicates that there is no relationship between gross beta activity and distance from OCGS. These results are consistent with data from previous years and indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figures C-4 and C-5, Appendix C). | |||
Air sample filters have been analyzed for gross beta activity since the inception of the preoperational environmental monitoring program in 1966. The preoperational data values ranged from 1.90E-2 to 2.77E-1 pCi/m3. 2014 gross beta activity values ranged from <6E-3 to 39E-3 pCi/m3. The 2014 results are consistent with historical operational data (Figure C-5, Appendix C) and fall within the range of results observed during the preoperational period. | |||
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VI.3, Appendix C). No strontium was detected in any of the samples. These results are consistent with historical operational data. The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for strontium-89 and strontium-90. | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VI.4, Appendix C). | |||
Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. The values ranged from 35 to 106 18 | |||
E-3 pCi/m 3 . All other nuclides were less than the MDC. | |||
These results are consistent with historical operational data. | |||
The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for gamma emitting nuclides. | |||
: b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from eight (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, 111) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). Consistent with historical operational data, all results were less than the MDC for 1-131. | |||
The preoperational environmental monitoring program for OCGS did not include analysis of air media for iodine-1 31. | |||
In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data are consistent with preoperational and prior operational data and show no long-term trends in the environment attributable to the operation of OCGS. | |||
: 2. Terrestrial | |||
: a. Vegetation Samples were collected from four locations (35, 36, 66, and 115) when available. The following analyses were performed: | |||
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in 24 of 60 samples. | |||
The values ranged from 1.3 to 9.5 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data. | |||
The following information on Strontium 90 is available on the NRC web page under "Backgrounder Radiation Protection and the "Tooth Fairy" Issue" published in December of 2004. | |||
The largest source of Sr-90 in the environment (,-,9 9 %) is from weapons testing fallout. Approximately 16.8 million 19 | |||
curies of strontium-90 were produced and globally dispersed in atmospheric nuclear weapons testing until 1980. As a result of the Chernobyl accident, approximately 216,000 curies of Sr-90 were released into the atmosphere. With a 28 year half-life, Sr-90 still remains in the environment at nominal levels. | |||
The total annual release of strontium-90 into the atmosphere from all 103 commercial nuclear power plants operating in the United States is typically 1/1000th of a curie. (NUREG/CR-2907 Vol.12). At an individual nuclear power plant, the amount of Sr-90 is so low that it is usually at or below the minimum detectable activity of sensitive detection equipment. | |||
Oyster Creek did not report any Sr-90 released in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report as all analyses for Sr-90 performed were less than the minimum detectable activity. | |||
Gamma Spectrometry Vegetation samples from locations 35, 36, 66, and 115 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 2,313 to 10,020 pCi/kg wet. Naturally occurring Be-7 was detected in 18 of 60 samples and ranged from 105 to 1,982 pCi/kg wet. | |||
All other nuclides were less than the MDC. | |||
Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not include strontium analyses or gamma spectroscopy. | |||
Oyster Creek conducted a Cs-1 37 study in 2006/2007. A report was generated titled "Evaluation of Cesium-1 37 in Environmental Samples from the Amergen Property East of the Oyster Creek Generating Station". Below is an excerpt from that report: | |||
The levels of Cs-1 37 observed in the soil and vegetation samples are consistent with environmental concentrations known to be attributable to fallout from historic nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. In addition, the variability of Cs-1 37 concentrations in soil and vegetation on the farm property appears to be driven by a number of environmental factors. Cs-137 concentrations in soil were non-detectable. Vegetation samples exhibited Cs-137 20 | |||
concentrations from non-detectable to 0.130 pCi/g, with a mean concentration of 0.078 pCi/g. For comparison, in the year 2000, as part of the confirmatory release survey for the adjacent Forked River site to the west of OCGS, the NRC reported that the maximum observed soil concentration of 0.53 pCi/g was not distinguishable from the variation in Cs-137 in the environment due to these fallout sources. The NRC also reported background Cs-1 37 concentrations in New Jersey coastal plain soils as high as 1.5 and 2.8 pCi/g. | |||
In addition, decay-corrected historic REMP data from a predominantly upwind location, nearly four miles from the OCGS, yields present-day Cs-1 37 concentrations ranging from 0.862 to 1.68 pCi/g. | |||
There was no Cs-1 37 identified in REMP soil and vegetation samples in 2014, but it is not unusual for Cs-1 37 to be identified given the known environmental levels of this radionuclide attributable to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. | |||
In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for vegetation samples during 2014 showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl. | |||
The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples. | |||
The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment. | |||
C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured using Optically Stimulated Luminenscence Dosimeters (OSLD). Sixty-one OSLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of non-background corrected OSLD measurements are summarized in Tables C-IX.1 to C-IX.3 and Figures C-6 and C-7. | |||
The non-background corrected OSLD measurements ranged from 4.9 to 16.0 mR/standard quarter. In order to correct these results for background radiation, the mean of the dose rates measured at the background OSLD stations (C and 14) was subtracted from the dose measured at each indicator station. The maximum annual background corrected dose was 22.3 mR/year at Station 55, located near the site boundary, 0.3 miles west of the OCGS. This OSLD is located in an area where public access is 21 | |||
restricted but the nearest member of the public for direct radiation is considered an individual that works in the warehouse west of the site. | |||
The individual is assumed to work 2,000 hours per year at this location. | |||
The preoperational environmental monitoring program utilized film badges, the results of which are not comparable with the doses measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters or optically stimulated dosimeters during the operational REMP. In conclusion, the 2014 OSLD results are consistent with past operational measurements of direct radiation, and demonstrate that the OCGS continues to be in compliance with the 40 CFR 190 limit on maximum dose to the public. | |||
D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey, conducted in August 2014 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, Inc. for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey is to identify within a distance of 5 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 500 ft2 producing broad leaf vegetation. The census shall also identify within a distance of 3 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors all milk animal and all gardens greater than 500 square feet producing broadleaf vegetation. For animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS, none were observed. The distance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were determined using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. | |||
There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. The results of this survey are summarized below. | |||
22 | |||
Distance in Feet from the OCGS Reactor Building Sector Residence Garden* | |||
(ft) (ft) 1 N 5,655 8,224 2 NNE 3,240 3,541 3 NE 3,245 5,115 4 ENE 5,704 6,445 5 E 6,549 1,758 6 ESE 3,189 2,081 7 SE 3,073 2,321 8 SSE 4,666 8,341 9 S 7,971 9,011 10 SSW 8,344 20,130 11 SW 9,285 9,776 12 WSW 10,713 14,802 13 W 22,191 None 14 WNW None None 15 NW 27,985 None 16 NNW 7,506 14,487 | |||
*Greater than 500 ft2 in size producing broad leaf vegetation E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix F). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria: | |||
: 1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of TBE's result and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria. | |||
: 2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), state specific performance testing (PT) program requirements or ERA's SOP for 23 | |||
the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. | |||
The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document. | |||
: 3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values. | |||
The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable. | |||
In reviewing our environmental inter-laboratory crosscheck programs, we identified 1) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2) that we are performing crosscheck samples on some matrices and isotopes that we do not perform for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP is designed to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyze for radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, the needed changes were made to the MAPEP program. Therefore, the following isotopes were removed from the MAPEP program: | |||
Soil - gamma - will be provided by Analytics twice per year, starting in 2015. For 2014, one soil gamma is provided by MAPEP, the 2nd soil gamma is provided by Analytics. | |||
AP - gamma - is currently provided by Analytics. | |||
Water - gamma, H-3, Sr-90, uranium, gross alpha and gross beta currently provided by ERA. | |||
MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series. | |||
For the TBE laboratory, 163 out of 169 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-131 in water, and two Sr-90s and one Gross Alpha in AP samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons: | |||
: 1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Ni-63 in water result of 32.7 +/- 1.69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data 24 | |||
but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 - 44.2 Bq/L. | |||
NCR 14-04 | |||
: 2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 K-40 in water result of 1.63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-04 | |||
: 3. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2014 1-131 in water result of 15.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L, falling below the lower acceptance limit of 16.8. The result was evaluated as failed with a found to known ratio of 0.778. No cause could be found for the slightly low result. All previous ERA 1-131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08 | |||
: 4. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.18 Bq/sample, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 0.83 Bq/sample. The reanalysis result was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.836. The reanalysis result was statistically the same number as the original result. No cause could be found for the slightly low results. NCR 14-04 | |||
: 5. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.310 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.703 Bq/sample. The gravimetric yield of 117% was very high (we normally see yields of 60% to 70%) and could account for the low activity. The reanalysis result of 0.508 was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.492. No cause could be found for the slightly low results. NCR 14-09 | |||
: 6. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Gr-Alpha in AP result of 0.153 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.53 Bq/sample. The AP sample was counted on the wrong side. | |||
The AP was flipped over and recounted with acceptable results. | |||
TBE does not perform the gross alpha analysis in support of REMP programs. All effluent AP samples are digested and analyzed as a portion of the total volume (typically 10%). In conclusion, this error could not be duplicated on client effluent APs, because the MAPEP AP is counted as a whole and the client effluent AP sample is digested. TBE routinely performs Analytics AP gross alpha blind sample analysis with no issues. NCR 14-09 For the EIML laboratory, 85 of 90 analyses met the specified acceptance criteria. Five analyses (Water - Pu-238, Pu-239, Fe-55; AP - Co-57; Soil | |||
- Cs1 34) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons: | |||
25 | |||
: 1. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-238 result of 1.28 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.83 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 1.08 Bq/L. The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of the reanalysis with the new tracer was 0.68, which fell within the acceptance criteria. | |||
: 2. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-239/240 result of 0.91 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.68 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 0.88 Bq/L. | |||
The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of reanalysis with the new tracer was 0.66 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria. | |||
: 3. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 AP Co-57 result of 1.60 +/- 0.05 Bq/total sample failed the false positive test. Interference from the Eu-152 resulted in the misidentification of Co-57. | |||
: 4. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 soil Cs-1 34 result of 6.10 +/- 1.80 Bq/kg failed the false positive test. | |||
Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occurring Bi-214 in the sample matrix with a close spectral energy. | |||
: 5. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP August 2014 water Fe-55 result of 55.10 +/- 14.80 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 31.50 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 41.00 Bq/L. The result of the reanalysis of Fe-55 was 32.63 + | |||
16.30 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria. | |||
V. References | |||
: 1. Exelon Nuclear. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for Oyster Creek Generating Station, Procedure CY-OC-170-301. | |||
: 2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979. | |||
3 Pre-Operational Environmental Radiation Survey, Oyster Creek Nuclear Electric Generating Station, Jersey Central Power and Light Company, March 1968. | |||
26 | |||
VI. Errata Corrections to the 2012 AREOR The value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in the report as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to a telephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0 millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standard quarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas of the report: | |||
: 1. Page A-14, TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - the mean for the indicator stations is listed as 19.8 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 19.9 millirem/standard quarter. | |||
: 2. Page C-21, TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The mean for station 113 is listed as 15.7 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.9 millirem/standard quarter. | |||
: 3. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - the mean for the Site Boundary for APR-JUN is listed as 19.5 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.6 millirem/standard quarter. | |||
: 4. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The Site Boundary Period Minimum is listed as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 18.3 millirem/standard quarter. | |||
: 5. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The Site Boundary Period Mean is listed as 20.9 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 21.2 millirem/standard quarter. | |||
27 | |||
APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SURFACE WATER H-3 28 200 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCIIrTER) | |||
GAMMA 28 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 I5 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SURFACE WATER CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER) | |||
CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 DRINKING WATER H-3 51 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER) | |||
GR-B 51 4 6 2 13 IN INDICATOR 0 (36/39) (5/12) (12/12) ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS (1.8/21.1) (2/3) (1.8/21.1) 0.2 MILES N OF SITE 1-131 51 1 <LLD <LLD 0 GAMMA 51 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F.) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION DRINKING WATER FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD (PCI/LITER) | |||
CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION GROUNDWATER H-3 8 200 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER) | |||
GAMMA 8 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 FE-59 30 <LLD NA 0 CO-60 15 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 NB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD NA 0 1-131 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M.) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION 4 REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION GROUNDWATER CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER) | |||
BA-140 60 <LLD NA 0 LA-140 15 <LLD NA 0 BOTTOM FEEDER GAMMA 4 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 4622 3714 4622 33 INDICATOR 0 (3/3) (I/I) (3/3) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (3838/5340) (3838/5340) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <~LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <~LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <~LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <~LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION BOTTOM FEEDER CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) | |||
CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 PREDATOR GAMMA 7 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 3919 4577 4883 33 INDICATOR 0 (4/4) (3/3) (1/1) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (3219/4883) (3457/5287) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION PREDATOR CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) | |||
CLAMS GAMMA 6 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 1600 1756 1859 23 INDICATOR 0 (4/4) (1/2) (2/2) BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK (1235/1944) (1774/1944) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 100 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 1oo <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (Mf) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION CRABS GAMMA 2 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 2068 NA 2186 33 INDICATOR 0 (2/2) (1/1) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (1950/2186) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD NA 0 CO-58 130 <LLD NA 0 00 FE-59 260 <LLD NA 0 CO-60 130 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 100 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 100 <LLD NA 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA (PCI/KG DRY) BE-7 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SEDIMENT K-40 NA 4814 14005 14005 94 CONTROL 0 (PCI/KG DRY) (6/6) (2/2) (2/2) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR (783/9740) (13210/14800) (13210/14800) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 | |||
,>0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 180 <LLD <LLD AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 415 10 14 13 14 11I INDICATOR 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) (301/311) (100/104) (51/52) FINNINGER FARM (6/39) (6/27) (7/37) 0.3 MILES ENE OF SITE (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION AIR PARTICULATE SR-89 32 10 <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) | |||
SR-90 32 10 <LLD <LLD 0 | |||
,> GAMMA 32 BE-7 NA 56 55 65 20 INDICATOR 0 (24/24) (8/8) (4/4) FINNINGER FARM ON SOUTH SIDE ACCESS ROAD (35/106) (36/74) (35/106) 0.7 MILES E OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD CS-134 50 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION AIR PARTICULATE CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) | |||
AIR IODINE GAMMA 415 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 1-131 70 <LLD ZLLD 0 VEGETATION SR-89 60 25 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) | |||
SR-90 60 5 4.6 5.6 5.6 36 CONTROL 0 (15/45) (9/15) (9/15) U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT NJ (1.5/7.8) (1.3/9.5) (1.3/9.5) 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE GAMMA 60 BE-7 NA 471 339 561 66 INDICATOR 0 (17/45) (I/15) (7/15) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHARGE (105/1982) (208/1982) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE K-40 NA 4721 4387 4942 115 INDICATOR 0 (45/45) (15/15) (15/15) EAST OF SITE, ON FINNINGER FARM (2316/10020) (2313/6549) 12316/7555) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION VEGETATION CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) | |||
CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 8.4 9.2 14.8 55 INDICATOR 0 (MLLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (4.9/16.0) (7.9/10.8) (13.1/16.0) 0.3 MILES W (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES | |||
APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS | |||
TABLE B-I: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Sample Medium APT = Air Particulate Clam = Clam AIO = Air Iodine OSLD = Optically Stimulated DW = Drinking Water Dosimetry VEG = Vegetation Fish = Fish SWA = Surface Water Crab = Crab AQS = Aquatic Sediment GW = Ground Water Station Code SStation's Designation Distance - Distance from the OCGS in miles Azimuth SAzimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description - Meteorological sector in which the station is located and a narrative description B-I | |||
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description OSLD 1 0.4 219 SW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ DW is 0.1 209 On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ DW 1N 0.2 349 On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ APT, AIO, OSLD 3 6.0 97 East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park OSLD 4 4.6 213 SSW of site, Route 554 and Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJ OSLD 5 4.2 353 North of site, at Garden State Parkway Rest Area, Forked River, NJ OSLD 6 2.1 13 NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ OSLD 8 2.3 177 South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ OSLD 9 2.0 230 WSW of site, west of where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meet, | |||
,Z Waretown, NJ APT, AIO, OSLD C 24.7 313 NW of site, JCP&L office in rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ OSLD 11 8.2 152 SSE of site, 80te and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ OSLD 14 20.8 2 North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ APT, AIO 20 0.7 95 East of site, on Finninger Farm on south side of access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 22 1.6 145 SE of site, on Long John Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ SWA, CLAM, AQS 23 3.6 64 ENE of site, Bamegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of "Flashing Light 1" SWA, CLAM, AQS 24 2.1 101 East of site, Bamegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of "Flashing Light 3" SWA, AQS, FISH, 33 0.4 123 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge in OCGS Discharge Canal CRAB VEG 35 0.4 111 ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, NJ VEG 36 23.1 319 NW of site, at "U-Pick" Farm, New Egypt, NJ | |||
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description DW 37 2.2 18 NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ DW 38 1.6 197 SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, NJ DW 39 3.5 353 North of Site, Trenton Ave. off Lacey Rd, Lacey Twp. MUA Pump Station, Forked River, NJ OSLD 46 5.6 323 NW of site, on Lacey Road, adjacent to utility pole BT 259 65, Forked River, NJ OSLD 47 4.6 26 NNE of site, Route 9 and Harbor Inn Road, Bayville, NJ OSLD 48 4.5 189 South of site, at intersection of Brook and School Streets, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 51 0.4 358 North of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 52 0.3 333 NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 53 0.3 309 NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 54 0.3 288 WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 55 0.3 263 West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ OSLD 56 0.3 249 WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ OSLD 57 0.2 206 SSW of site, on Southem Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 58 0.2 188 South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 59 0.3 166 SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ OSILD 61 0.3 104 ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ | |||
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (de8rees) Description OSLD 62 0.2 83 East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ OSLD 63 0.2 70 ENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 64 0.3 42 NE of site, on Route 9 North at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ OSLD 65 0.4 19 NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ APT, AIO, 66 0.4 133 SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence, OSLD, VEG Waretown, NJ OSLD' 68 1.3 266 West of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 71.7, Lacey Township, NJ APT, AIO, 71 1.6 164 SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ OSLD APT, AIO, 72 1.9 25 NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ OSLD APT, AIO, 73 1.8 108 ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ OSLD OSLD 74 1.8 88 East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ OSLD 75 2.0 71 ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maui Drive, Forked River, NJ OSLD 78 1.8 2 North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 79 2.9 160 SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive, Waretown, NJ OSLD 81 3.5 201 SSW of site, on Rose Hill Road at intersection with Barnegat Boulevard, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 82 4.4 36 NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJ OSLD 84 4.4 332 NNW of site, on Lacey Road, 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren pole, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 85 3.9 250 WSW of site, on Route 532, just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown, NJ OSLD 86 5.0 224 SW of site, on Route 554, 1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 88 6.6 125 SE of site, eastern end of Street, Bamegat Light, NJ 3 rd OSLD 89 6.1 108 ESE of site, Job Francis residence, Island Beach State Park | |||
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description OSLD 90 6.3 75 ENE of site, parking lot A-5, Island Beach State Park OSLD 92 9.0 46 NE of site, at Guard Shack/Toll Booth, Island Beach State Park 0.1 242 WSW of site, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, FISH, CRAB Forked River, NJ SWA, AQS, CLAM, 94 20.0 198 SSW of site, in Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor FISH OSLD 98 1.6 318 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 73, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 99 1.5 310 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 100 1.4 43 NE of site, Yacht Basin Plaza South off Lakeside Dr., Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 101 1.7 49 NE of site, end of Lacey Rd. East, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 102 1.6 344 NNW of site, end of Sheffield Dr., Bamegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 103 2.4 337 NNW of site, Llewellyn Pkwy., Barnegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 104 1.8 221 SW of site, Rt. 532 West, before Garden State Parkway, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 105 2.8 222 SW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 69.6, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 106 1.2 288 WNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.2, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 107 1.3 301 WNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.5, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 109 1.2 141 SE of site, Lighthouse Dr., Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 110 1.5 127 SE of site, Tiller Dr. and Admiral Way, Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ APT, AIO 111 0.3 64 ENE of site, Finninger Farm property along access road, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 112 0.2 178 S of site, along southern access road | |||
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (derees) Description OSLD 113 0.3 90 E of site, along Rt. 9, North DW 114 0.8 267 Well at Bldg 25 on Forked River site VEG 115 0.3 96 E of Site, on Finninger Farm OSLD T1 0.4 219 SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ GW MW-24-3A 0.8 97 ESE of site, Finninger Farm on South side of access road, Lacey Township, NJ GW W-3C 0.4 112 ESE of site, Finninger Farm adjacent to Station 35, Lacey Township, NJ | |||
TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Drinking Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection gamma spectroscopy procedure - well water Drinking Water Tritium Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct procedure - well water method) | |||
Drinking water Iodine Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2031 Radioiodine in drinking water water samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in water by CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection an ion exchange procedure - well water Drinking Water Gross Beta Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in water samples for radiological analysis various matrices CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., W(DS)-01 Determination of gross alpha and/or procedure - well water gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue) | |||
,= | |||
Env. Inc., W(SS)-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in water (suspended solids) | |||
Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method) | |||
Groundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation Groundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples ER-OCGS-14, Collection of fish samples for 250 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis collected via hook and radiological analysis line technique and traps Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Clams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual ER-OCGS-16, Collection of clam and crab 300 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Crabs samples collected using samples for radiological analysis clam tongs and traps. Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by I 1__1_ 1gamma spectroscopy | |||
TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab ER-OCGS-03, Collection of aquatic sediment 1000 grams (dry) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis samples samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or beta activity in continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters various matrices through glass fiber filter weekly) paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples 13 filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis each station (approximately 4000 Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing air cubic meters) Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by particulate filters for gamma spectroscopic gamma spectroscopy analysis Air Particulates Strontium-89/90 Quarterly composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 13 filters TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion each station particulate samples for radiological analysis (approximately 4000 exchange cubic meters) | |||
Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters through charcoal filter weekly) Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal | |||
,0 canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method) | |||
Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Vegetation Strontium-89/90 Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis OSLD Optically Stimulated Quarterly OSLDs ER OCGS-02, Collection/Exchange of Field 2 dosimeters Landauer Incorporated Luminescence comprised of two Dosimeters for Radiological Analysis Dosimetry A120 3:C Landauer Incorporated elements. | |||
Oyster Creek Generating Station REMP Sample Locations within a I Mile Radius 0.3 01" a 003 Figure B-1 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-9 | |||
Figure B-2 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1 to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-10 | |||
Oyster Creek Generating Station T REMP Sample Locations over a 5 Mile Radius 5.5 2VS 0& W Figure B-3 Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-II | |||
APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY | |||
Table C-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 23 24 33 94 PERIOD 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 193 185 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 170 173 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 200 167 04/16/14 - 04/16/14 < 167 < 168 < 189 186 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 157 158 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 166 165 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 188 188 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 162 161 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 188 < 188 < 179 180 09/30/14 - 10/29/14 160 162 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 185 188 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 160 166 MEAN C-I | |||
Table C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 23 U4/16i14 - U4/16/14 < 4 <4 <lU <b <9 <5 <8 <13 <4 <4 <27 <10 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 5 <6 <9 <4 <11 <6 <8 <15 <5 <6 <30 <8 MEAN 24 04116114 - 04/16(14 < 5 <5 <13 <4 <10 <5 <9 <14 <4 <5 <32 <10 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 5 <6 <12 <4 <11 <5 <10 <15 <5 <5 <35 <13 MEAN 33 01/08114 - 01/28/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 <13 <2 <2 <21 <6 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 6 <6 <13 <6 < 13 <5 < 10 < 15 <5 <6 <34 <10 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 4 <4 <10 <5 <8 <4 <8 <15 <4 <4 <28 < 11 04102/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <8 <2 <2 <17 <4 05/07/14 - 05/28/14 < 4 <5 <10 <5 <10 <5 <9 <8 <6 <6 <21 <8 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 < 5 <5 <13 <6 *13 <5 < 12 < 12 <7 <7 <28 < 11 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 < 4 <5 <10 <5 < 11 <5 <7 <14 <5 <5 < 30 <9 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 7 <6 <13 <6 <11 <6 < 12 < 13 <6 <7 < 37 <8 09/03/14 - 09/24/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <5 <9 <2 <3 <16 <5 09/29/14 - 10/29/14 < 7 <7 <15 <6 < 13 <6 < 10 < 10 <7 <9 <31 <9 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <4 <7 <8 <4 <5 < 23 <8 12/10/14 - 12/30/14 < 6 <6 <12 <6 <12 <6 <10 <11 <5 <6 < 26 <7 MEAN 94 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 <14 <2 <2 <24 <9 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 5 <5 <9 <5 <9 <5 <7 <12 <4 <5 < 28 <9 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 4 <3 <9 <4 <7 <4 <7 <14 <3 <4 < 27 <9 04/04/14 - 04/30114 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <15 <5 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 7 <9 <11 <8 < 16 <8 < 12 < 12 <6 <7 < 35 <9 06/06114 - 06/25/14 < 6 <7 <12 <5 <13 <7 < 11 < 11 <5 <5 <28 <8 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <16 <5 08/08/14 - 08/27114 < 5 <7 <13 <5 < 11 <6 <9 <12 <5 <6 < 28 < 10 09/03/14 - 09/24114 < 4 <3 <11 <4 <9 <4 <8 <13 <4 <4 <25 < 11 09/30/14 - 10/29/14 < 8 <7 <18 <9 <16 <6 <13 <9 <7 <7 < 28 < 11 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 5 <5 <10 <4 <9 <5 <8 <9 <5 <5 < 23 <9 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 6 <6 <13 <5 < 13 <6 < 13 < 12 <6 <5 < 33 <9 MEAN | |||
Table C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN 1s 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - U01/2814 < 18 < 187 (1) < 189 < 166 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 175 < 177 (1) < 173 < 166 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 185 < 164 (1) < 169 < 166 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01/14 < 183 < 188 (1) < 186 < 184 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 153 < 159 (1) < 158 < 157 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/26/14 < 192 < 159 (1) < 184 < 192 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 < 188 < 188 (1) < 186 < 188 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 165 < 166 (1) < 165 < 165 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 181 < 180 < 181 (1) < 180 < 180 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 < 161 (1) < 164 < 161 < 160 < 160 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 186 < 186 < 185 < 187 < 187 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 163 < 185 (1) < 162 < 164 (1) | |||
MEAN Table C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN iS 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - 01/28/14 3.2 + 1.3 9.9 +/- 2.0 (1) < 1.9 2.3 +/- 1.1 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 3.4 +/- 1.8 15.4 +/- 2.5 (1) < 2.6 < 2.4 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 4.5 + 1.4 8.3 +/- 1.6 (1) 2.3 +/- 1.2 1.8 +/- 1.1 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01114 3.1 +/- 1.3 1.8 +/- 1.2 (1) < 1.6 2.1 +/- 1.2 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 3.5 +/- 1.2 21.1 +/- 2.3 (1) 2.8 +/- 1.1 3.2 +/- 1.1 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/26/14 < 1.9 13.6 +/- 2.0 (1) < 1.7 2.3 +/- 1.3 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 3.0 + 1.3 12.6 _ 1.9 (1) 2.4 +/- 1.2 2.2 +/- 1.2 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 4.0 + 1.4 14.9 + 2.2 (1) < 1.9 2.5 +/- 1.3 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 3.7 + 1.4 15.3 + 2.1 < 1.8 (1) < 1.7 2.6 +/- 1.2 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 3.4 + 1.3 (1) 14.4 + 2.0 3.3 +/- 1.3 1.8 +/- 1.1 2.3 +/- 1.1 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 4.4 + 1.4 17.1 +/-2.1 2.7 +/- 1.3 < 1.6 2.1 +/- 1.2 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 5.5 +/- 1.4 13.2 + 1.9 (1) 2.4 +/- 1.1 3.3 +/- 1.2 (1) | |||
MEAN 3.8 +/- 1.5 13.1 +/- 9.7 3.0 +/- 0.9 2.4 +/- 0.7 2.4 +/- 0.9 Table C-11.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN 1s 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - 01/28/14 < 0.8 < 0.7 (1) < 0.8 < 0.9 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 0.7 < 0.9 (1) < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01/14 < 0.8 < 0.8 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 0.7 < 0.6 (1) < 0.8 < 0.8 (1) 06/06/14 - 06126/14 < 0.5 < 0.6 (1) < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31114 < 0.4 < 0.6 (1) < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) < 0.6 < 0.7 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.9 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 < 0.9 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 0.9 < 0.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.7 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 0.6 < 0.4 (1) < 0.5 < 0.5 (1) | |||
MEAN - - - | |||
THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-3 | |||
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 114 01/09i14 - 01/2/14 < 2 <2 <4 <2 < 3 <2 < 3 < 1 <2 <19 <b 02/06/14 02/27/14 < 4 <4 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <7 <4 <5 <29 <8 03/05/14 03/26/14 < 4 <4 <8 <5 <9 <5 <8 <4 <5 <31 <9 04/04/14 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <15 <4 05/09/14 05/28/14 < 3 <4 <7 <4 <7 <4 <6 <4 <4 <16 <5 06/06/14 06/26/14 < 5 <6 < 12 <6 <13 <7 < 10 <6 <8 <31 < 10 07/02/14 07/31/14 < 3 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5 <8 <4 <4 <28 < 10 08/08/14 08/27/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <11 <6 < 10 <6 <6 <28 <7 09/03/14 09/24/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <9 <4 <5 <3 <4 <24 <9 10/01/14 10/29/14 (1) < 4 <4 <9 <6 <8 <4 <8 <4 <5 <21 <5 11/07/14 12/03/14 < 5 <5 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <7 <4 <4 <31 <8 12/12/14 12/30/14 < 4 <4 < 10 <5 <10 <5 <8 <4 <5 <25 <7 MEAN 1IN 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <23 <7 02/04/14 - 02/25114 < 4 <5 <9 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <4 <33 <8 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 3 <4 <8 <3 <8 <4 <5 <3 <4 <32 <11 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 12 <4 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 4 <6 < 11 <5 <11 <6 <8 <6 <6 <27 <6 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 5 <6 < 11 <6 <10 <6 <9 <5 <5 <29 < 10 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <18 <6 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 5 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <9 <5 <4 <26 <7 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <4 <6 <3 <3 <26 <8 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <10 <5 < 11 <6 <6 <24 <8 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <4 <18 <6 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 8 <8 < 12 <5 <15 <7 < 10 <6 <8 < 36 < 12 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION | |||
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1S 01/09/14- 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14- 02/27/14 (1) 03/05114 - 03126114 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09114 - 05/28/14 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/25114 (1) 07102114 - 07/31114 (1) 08/08/14 - 08127/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 (1) <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3 | |||
* 28 <9 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <6 <6 < 12 <6 <11 <6 < 10 <6 <7 | |||
* 29 <9 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 <4 <3 <7 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <3 *18 <6 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1) | |||
MEAN 37 01/09/14- 01/28/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <2 | |||
* 20 <5 02/06/14- 02/27/14 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3 | |||
* 22 <8 03/05/14- 03/26/14 <4 <4 < 10 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <4 | |||
* 29 <10 04/04/14- 04130/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 *15 <4 05/09/14 - 05128/14 <6 <6 < 18 <6 < 11 <7 < 12 <7 <9 < 39 <9 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 <5 <5 <9 <5 <8 <5 <8 <4 <4 | |||
* 28 <9 07/02114 - 07/31/14 <4 <4 <9 <4 <6 <4 <7 <3 <4 | |||
* 25 <8 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 <7 <7 < 16 <7 <17 <8 <15 <7 <8 | |||
* 42 < 11 09/03/14 - 09/24/14 <4 <4 <9 <3 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4 | |||
* 28 <8 10/01/14 - 10129114 <7 <6 <12 <6 < 12 <7 <13 <8 <7 | |||
* 30 <8 11/05/14 - 12/04114 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4 | |||
* 22 <6 12/12/14 - 12/30114 <6 <6 <15 <8 < 16 <6 < 12 <6 <6 < 33 < 14 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION | |||
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 38 01115/14 - 01/28 /14 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 21 <6 02106/14- 02127 114 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <5 <8 <4 <5 < 25 <7 03/05/14- 03/26 '14 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <7 <3 <4 < 33 <7 04104/14- 05/01 /14 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 15 <4 05/07/14- 05128 /14 <7 <8 < 12 <6 < 12 <6 < 13 <6 <6 < 35 <8 06/06114- 06/26 /14 <6 <7 < 13 <7 < 14 <7 < 12 <7 <8 < 36 < 10 07/02/14- 07/31 /14 <4 <5 < 10 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <4 <5 < 27 <9 08/08/14- 08/27/ 14 <5 <5 < 12 <5 <6 <5 < 10 <5 <5 < 29 <9 09/03/14- 09/24 114 <5 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <4 <8 <5 <5 < 30 < 10 | |||
.10/01114 - 10/29 114 <5 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <6 < 11 <8 <6 < 26 <5 11105/14- 12/04 114 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4 < 23 <7 12/10/14 - 12/30 /14 <5 <6 < 11 <5 <9 <5 <8 <4 <6 < 27 <7 MEAN 39 01/07/14- 01/27/14 (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/06/14 (1) | |||
- 05/27/14 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 (1) 07/01/14 - 07129/14 (1) 08/04/14 08/26/14 (1) 09/02/14 09/23/14 (1) 10101/14 10/28/14 (1) 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 (1) 12/03/14 01/06/15 (1) | |||
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION | |||
Table C-III.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION MW-24-3A W-3C PERIOD 01/15i14 - U10114 < Itu < 1v 04/08/14 - 04/08/14 < 148 < 163 07/23/14 - 07/23/14 < 159 < 155 10/16/14 - 10/16/14 < 160 < 158 MEAN C-7 | |||
Table C-111.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 50 5( | |||
MW-24-3A 01115/14 - 01/15 114 < 53 < 2 <53 53 | |||
<11 5 l10 04/08/14 - 04/08 /14 < 4 <6 < 10 <5 <9 <5 <10 <5 <6 | |||
* 27 <8 07/23/14 - 07/23 /14 . < 3 <3 <5 <3 <6 <3 <5 <5 <3 <3 <16 <3 10/16/14 - 10/16 /14 < 3 <4 <6 <4 <7 <4 <6 <10 <3 <4 < 24 <8 MEAN W-3C 01/15/14 - 01/15/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 04/08/14 - 04/08/14 <4 <5 <9 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <8 <5 <5 | |||
* 23 <9 07/23/14 - 07/23/14 <4 <4 <7 <"4 <8 <4 <6 <6 <4 <4 <17 <6 10/16/14 - 10116/14 <4 <5 < 12 <5 <11 <5 <9 <11 <5 <6 | |||
* 28 < 11 MEAN 00 | |||
Table C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH) SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 33 PREDATOR 05/29/14 4883 +/- 876 < 69 <67 < 166 < 64 < 142 < 76 < 68 MEAN 33 BOTTOM FEEDER 09/29/14 3838 +/- 1465 < 100 < 94 < 213 < 75 < 213 < 74 < 81 09/29/14 41687 +/- 1187 < 76 < 72 < 191 < 26 < 179 < 70 < 67 09/29/14 340 +/- 1413 < 57 < 70 < 96 < 83 < 145 < 63 < 72 MEAN 41622 +/- 1506 93 PREDATOR 04/14/14 4044 +/- 931 < 65 < 71 < 167 < 68 < 136 < 64 < 71 09/29/14 3219 +/- 1247 < 89 < 75 < 182 < 88 < 160 < 84 < 86 10/01/14 3530 +/- 1122 < 91 < 102 < 254 < 121 < 220 < 94 < 80 MEAN 3598 +/- 833 94 PREDATOR 04/15/14 5287 +/- 978 < 42 < 63 < 135 < 55 < 136 < 50 < 49 09/30/14 4988 +/- 954 < 65 < 64 < 119 < 44 < 130 < 58 < 58 09/30/14 3457 +/- 826 < 54 < 45 < 111 < 60 < 108 < 55 < 55 MEAN 4577 +/- 1963 94 BOTTOM FEEDER 04/15/14 31714 +/- 846 < 49 < 51 < 151 < 57 < 126 < 58 < 66 MEAN C-9 | |||
Table C-IV.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs- 134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 CLAMS 04/16/14 1944 +/- 634 < 39 < 39 < 92 < 26 < 59 < 36 < 42 CLAMS 09/29/14 1774 +/- 658 <48 <43 < 117 < 57 < 92 < 54 < 56 MEAN 1859 +/- 240 24 CLAMS 04/16/14 1449 +/- 554 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 82 < 41 < 44 CLAMS 09/29/14 1235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98 < 68 < 64 MEAN 1342 +/- 303 33 CRAB 09/29/14 2186 +/- 762 < 53 < 56 < 131 < 48 < 122 < 58 < 60 MEAN 93 CRAB 09/29/14 1950 +/- 595 < 33 < 35 < 73 < 45 < 91 < 29 < 44 MEAN 94 CLAMS 04/15/14 1756 +/- 554 < 41 < 43 < 93 < 41 < 85 < 40 < 44 CLAMS 09/30/14 < 472 < 64 < 72 < 161 < 72 < 111 < 58 < 65 MEAN THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-IO | |||
Table C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 04/16/14 < 494 2096 +/- 634 < 50 < 49 < 41 < 49 < 58 09/29/14 < 747 3842 +/- 906 < 46 < 55 < 42 < 52 < 68 MEAN 2969 +/- 2469 24 04/16/14 < 361 783 +/- 401 < 31 < 33 < 36 < 30 < 30 09/29/14 < 956 9740 +/- 1425 < 86 < 111 < 83 < 76 < 91 MEAN 5261 +/- 12668 33 04/14/14 < 624 7428 +/- 1101 < 61 < 55 < 63 < 63 < 79 09/29/14 < 721 4994 +/- 978 < 64 < 67 < 51 < 37 < 69 MEAN 6211 +/- 3442 94 04/15/14 < 628 14800 +/- 1688 < 79 < 72 < 74 < 73 < 89 09/30/14 < 1160 13210 +/- 2003 < 85 < 113 < 76 < 98 < 106 MEAN 14005 +/- 2249 C-1I | |||
Table C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP II GROUP 11 P III PERIOD 20 66 71 72 73 3 C U 01/02/14 -01/08/14 15 t+/-5 13 +/-5 14 5 12 +/- 5 17 +/-5 18 +/- S 16 +/- 5 18 +/- 5 01/08/14 -01/15/14 15 t+/-5 16 +/-5 14 +/-5 12 +/- 5 16 +/-5 13 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 01/15/14 -01/23/14 12 t+/-4 20 5 19 +/-5 19 +/- 5 15 +/-4 16 +/- 5 11 +/-4 18 +/-5 01/23/14 -01/29/14 10 t+/-6 13 +/-6 18 +/-6 16 +/- 6 12 +/-6 16 +/- 6 14 +/-6 14 +/-6 01/29/14 -02/06/14 13 t+/-4 12 +/-4 13 +/-4 9+/-4 14 +/-4 11 +/-4 11 +/-4 17 +/-4 02/06/14 -02/12/14 39 t+7 24 +/-6 37 +/-7 34 +/-7 31 +/-7 26 +/-7 25 +/-6 21 +/-6 02/12/14 -02/19/14 18 +5 16 +/-5 16 +/-4 12 +/-4 19 +/-5 13 +/-4 17 +/-5 18 +/-5 02/19/14 -02/27/14 11 +/-4 11 +/-4 13 +/-4 11 +/-4 12 +/-4 8+/-4 20 +/-4 13 +/-4 02/27/14 -03/05/14 25 +/-6 21 +/-6 27 +/-7 28 +/-7 24 +/-6 28 +/-6 25 +/-6 27 +/-6 03/05/14 -03/12/14 19 +/-5 21 +/-5 19 +/-5 19 5 21 5 18 +/-5 21 +/-5 51 03/12/14 -03/19/14 22 18 +/-5 19 +/-5 17 +/-5 21 5 19 +/-5 13 +/-4 21 +/-5 | |||
+5 03/19/14 -03/26/14 15 11 +/-5 14 5 18 +/-5 12 +/-5 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 5 | |||
+/-5 03/26/14 -04/02/14 14 15 5 13 +/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 13 i. 4 | |||
+5 04/02/14 -04/09/14 12 11 +/-5 11 5 13 +/-5 11 +/-5 10 +/-5 8+/-3 11 +/-4 | |||
+/-5 04109/14 -04/16/14 14 17 +/-5 17 5 18 +/-5 18 +/-5 17 5 14 +/-4 18 +/-5 | |||
+5 04/16/14 -04/23/14 17 15 +/-5 11 +/-5 14 5 12 +/-5 14 5 11 +/-5 15 5 04/23/14 -05/01/14 7 +/-4 7+/-4 8+/-4 9+/-5 7+/-4 7+/-4 6+/-4 7+/-4 05/01/14 -05/07/14 12 +/-6 10 +/-6 14 +/-6 15 +/-6 9+/-5 12 t 6 14 +/-5 21 +/-9 05/07/14 -05/14/14 15 +/-5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 15 +/- 5 14 +/-5 15 +/-5 05/14/14 -05/21/14 11 +/-5 6+/-3 10 +/- 5 12 +/-5 13 5 12 +/- 5 7+/-5 12 +/-5 05/21/14 -05/28/14 16 +/-5 14 +/-5 15 +/- 5 18 +/-5 20 +/-5 18 +/- 5 16 +/-5 13 +/-5 05/28/14 -06/04/14 9 +/-4 10 5 9+/-5 12 +/-5 8+/-4 8+/-4 6+/-4 14 +/-4 06/04/14 -06/11/14 13 +/-5 12 +/-5 9+/-5 11 +/-5 6+/-4 13 +/-5 7+/-4 10 +/-4 06/11/14 -06/18/14 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 8+/-5 9+/-4 11 +/-5 8+/-4 12 +/- 5 06/18/14 -06/25/14 9 +/-5 8+/-5 8+/-5 7+/-5 10 +/-5 <7 9+/-5 06/25/14 -07/02/14 11 +5 9+/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 15 +/-4 13 +/-5 6+/-4 12 +/-4 07102/14 -07/09/14 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 15 +/-5 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 8+/-5 10 +/-4 14 +/-5 07/09/14 -07/16/14 15 +/-5 18 +/- 5 20 5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 12 +/-5 13 +/-4 14 i 4 07/16/14 -07/23/14 11 +/-5 18 +/- 5 10 +/-5 12 +/-5 10 +/-4 12 +/-5 12 +/-5 9+/-4 07/23/14 -07/30/14 10 +/-5 9+/-5 8+/-5 11 +/-5 12 +/-5 <7 < 7 (1) 14 +/-5 07/30/14 -08/06/14 9 +/-5 11 +/-5 9+/-5 10 +/-5 11 +/-5 15 +/-5 <6 11 +/-5 08/06/14 -08/13/14 14 +/-5 12 +/-5 17 +/-5 14 5 17 +/-5 11 +/-5 (1) 14 +/- 5 16 t 5 08/13/14 -08/20/14 16 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 5 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 12 +/-5 10 +/- 4 15 +/- 5 08/20/14 -08/27/14 8 +/-5 10 +/-5 9+/-5 7+/-4 9+/-4 6+/-3 7+/-4 8+/-t4 08/27/14 -09/03/14 10 +/-5 16 +/- 6 16 +/-6 <7 8+/-5 12 +/-5 7+/-5 13 t 5 09/03/14 -09/10/14 13 t+/-5 10 +/- 5 11 5 13 +/-5 11 +/-5 11 5 11 5 9+/-t5 09/10/14 -09/17/14 9 +/-5 8+/-5 <7 <7 9+/-4 <7 9+/-4 9+/-4 09/17/14 -09/24/14 13 t+/-5 17 +/-5 12 +/-5 17 +/- 5 14 +/-5 13 +/-5 7+/-4 15 +/-5 09/24/14 -10/01/14 14 +/-5 19 +/-5 16 +/-5 16 +/- 5 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 12 +/-4 15 +/-5 10/01/14 -10/08/14 11 +/-5 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/- 5 9+/-4 13 +/-5 10 +/-5 19 +/-5 10/08/14 -10/14/14 13 +/-6 13 +/-6 17 +/-6 15 +/- 6 14 +/-6 17 +/-6 17 +/-6 14 +/-6 10/14/14 -10/22/14 9 +/-4 11 +/-5 7+/-4 <6 11 +/-4 8+/-4 9+/-3 8+/-4 10/22/14 -10/29/14 16 +/-t5 14 +/-5 14 +/-5 17 +/- 5 19 5 15 +/-5 14 5 15 +/-5 10/29/14 -11/05/14 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 22 +/-6 11 +/-5 17 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 9+/-4 11/05/14 -11/12/14 19 +/-5 18 +/-5 14 5 17 +/-5 17 +/-5 14 +/-5 17 +/-5 22 +/-5 11/12/14 -11/19/14 11 +/-5 11 5 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 14 +/-4 13 +/-5 11 +/-4 10 +/-4 11/19/14 -11/25/14 22 +/-6 20 +/- 6 22 +/-6 19 +/-6 21 +/-5 21 +/- 6 21 +/-5 19 +/-5 11/25/14 -12/03/14 16 +/-4 16 +/- 5 17 +/-5 16 +/-5 18 +/-4 18 +/- 5 14 +/-4 14 +/-4 12/03/14 -12/10/14 13 +/-5 9+/-5 12 5 11 +/-5 10 +/-5 11 +/- 5 9+/-5 11 +/-5 12/10/14 -12/17/14 21 +/-5 21 +/-6 25 +/-6 19 +/-5 19 5 19 t 5 20 +/- 5 20 +/-5 12/17/14 -12/23/14 9 +/-6 <8 9+/-6 9+/-6 <7 <8 10 +/- 5 <7 12/23/14 -12/30/14 11 +/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 7+/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/- 5 10 +/- 4 13 +/-5 MEAN 14+/-t10 14 +/-8 14 +/-11 14 +/-10 14 +/-10 14 +/-9 12 +/-9 14+/- 9 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-I12 | |||
Table C-VI.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS INAIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- | |||
PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PPRIOD ,q1n 01/02/14 - 01/29/14 10 20 15 +/- 6 01/02/14 01129114 12 19 15 5 01/02/14 - 01/29/14 11 18 15 +/- 5 01/29/14 - 02/27114 11 39 19 +/- 19 01/29/14 02/27/14 8 34 17 18 01/29/14 - 02/27/14 11 25 18 +/- 9 02/27/14 - 04/02/14 11 27 18 +/- 9 02/27/14 04/02/14 12 28 18 11 02/27/14 - 04/02/14 12 27 17 +/- 11 04/02/14 - 05/01/14 7 17 12 +/- 7 04/02/14 05/01/14 7 18 12 8 04/02/14 - 05101/14 6 18 11 +8 05/01/14 - 06/04/14 6 17 12 +/- 6 05/01/14 06/04/14 8 20 14 7 05/01/14 - 06/04/14 6 21 13 8 06/04/14 - 07/02/14 8 15 11 +/- 5 06/04/14 07/02/14 6 15 10 5 06/04/14 - 07/02/14 6 12 9+/-5 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 8 20 13 +/-8 07/02/14 07/30/14 8 17 12 5 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 9 14 12 +4 07/30/14 - 09/03/14 8 17 12 +/- 6 07/30/14 09/03/14 6 17 11 6 07/30/14 - 09/03/14 7 16 11 +/-7 09/03/14 - 10/01/14 8 19 13 +/- 7 09/03/14 10/01/14 9 17 13 5 09/03/14 - 10/01/14 7 15 11 +6 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 7 17 13 +/- 6 10/01/14 10/29114 8 19 14 7 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 8 19 13+/- 7 10/29/14 - 12/03/14 11 22 16 +/- 8 10/29/14 12/03/14 11 21 16 6 10/29/14 - 12/03/14 9 22 15 +/-9 12/03/14 - 12/30/14 9 25 14 +/- 11 12/03/14 12/30/14 7 19 13 9 12/03/14 - 12/30/14 9 20 13 9 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 39 14 +/- 10 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 34 14 +/- 9 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 27 13 +/-9 | |||
Table C-VI.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER 12 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 PERIOD PERIOD 3 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 72 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <5 <5 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <5 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <9 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 < 10 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <4 <2 MEAN MEAN 20 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 73 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <7 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <5 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <8 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <9 <2 MEAN MEAN 66 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <8 <2 111 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <8 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <6 <7 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <6 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <8 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30114 < 10 <3 MEAN MEAN 71 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <3 C 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 < 10 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <9 <1 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <9 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 MEAN MEAN C-14 | |||
Table C-VI.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 3 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 74 +/- 24 <3 <4 <3 <4 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 61 +/- 32 <3 <4 <4 <4 <4 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 43 + 16 <2 <2 <3 <2 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 43 _+19 <2 <2 <3 <2 <2 MEAN 55 +/- 30 20 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 81 +/- 22 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 04/02114 - 07/02/14 106 +/- 25 <3 <4 <3 <2 <3 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 35 +/- 21 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 37 +/- 20 <2 <2 <2 <3 <2 MEAN 65 +/- 70 66 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 64 +/- 17 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 42 +/- 20 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 54 +/- 31 <4 <4 <6 <4 <5 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 62 +/- 29 <4 <4 <2 <3 <2 MEAN 55 t 19 71 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 74 +/- 22 <2 <3 <3 <3 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 60 +/- 25 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 42 +/- 27 <4 <5 <6 <4 <5 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 65 +/- 23 <3 <4 <3 <3 <3 MEAN 60 +/- 27 72 01/02/14 - 04/02114 67 _+ 26 <3 <4 <2 4 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 55 _+ 22 <2 <2 <3 2 <1 07/02114 - 10/01/14 47 + 32 <4 <4 <4 3 <3 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 45 +/- 17 <2 <2 <1 2 <2 MEAN 53 +/- 20 73 01102/14 - 04/02/14 57 +/- 18 <3 <3 <3 3 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02114 35 +/- 18 <3 <3 <3 3 <3 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 46 +/- 19 <3 <3 <2 3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 52 _ 17 <2 <3 <2 3 <2 MEAN 48 +/- 19 111 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 75 +/- 30 <4 <4 <4 <3 <4 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 52 +/- 28 <4 <4 <5 <5 <4 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 46 +/- 18 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 46 +/- 33 <4 <4 <5 <4 <4 MEAN 55 +/- 28 C 01/02114 - 04/02/14 70 +/- 22 <2 <2 <2 2 <2 04/02114 - 07/02/14 68 +/- 26 <2 <3 <2 2 <1 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 48 +/- 16 <2 <2 <3 3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 36 +/- 22 <2 <3 <2 2 <2 MEAN 55 +/- 32 C-15 | |||
Table C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP 1 GROUP 11 I GROUPHII PERIOD 20 66 i11 71 72 73 3 C U | |||
01/02/14 -01/08/14 | |||
* 23 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 59 *60 *58 01108/14 -01/15/14 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 37 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 37 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 35 01/15/14 -01/23/14 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 32 | |||
* 42 | |||
* 14 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 34 01/23/14 -01/29/14 | |||
* 60 | |||
* 60 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 58 *60 | |||
* 57 | |||
* 54 01/29/14 -02/06/14 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 27 | |||
* 38 | |||
* 27 | |||
* 40 *27 <11 | |||
* 33 02/06/14 -02/12114 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 54 | |||
* 56 *67 | |||
* 57 *65 *68 02/12/14 -02/19/14 | |||
* 65 | |||
* 55 | |||
* 62 | |||
* 55 | |||
* 64 *56 *58 | |||
* 34 02/19/14 -02/27/14 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 35. | |||
* 36 *36 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 34 02/27/14 -03/05/14 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 67 *62 *65 *63 *62 03105/14 -03/12/14 (1) | |||
* 45 | |||
* 45 | |||
* 19 *40 | |||
* 44 *13 | |||
* 37 03/12/14 -03/19/14 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 68 *63 *67 | |||
* 57 *56 03/19/14 -03/26/14 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 41 *38 *40 | |||
* 39 *38 03/26/14 -04/02/14 | |||
* 39 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 16 *42 | |||
* 39 *42 *42 04/02/14 -04/09/14 | |||
* 30 | |||
* 31 | |||
* 30 | |||
* 18 *40 *30 *40 *40 04/09/14 -04/16/14 | |||
* 42 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 43 *40 *16 *40 *40 04/16/14 -04/23/14 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 61 | |||
* 60 | |||
* 61 | |||
* 39 *60 | |||
* 39 | |||
* 37 04/23/14 -05/01/14 | |||
* 44 | |||
* 17 | |||
* 45 | |||
* 44 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 43 *36 | |||
* 37 05/01/14 -05/07/14 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 55 *52 *56 | |||
* 39 05/07/14 -05/14/14 | |||
* 45 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 46 *38 | |||
* 45 *38 *38 05/14/14 -05/21/14 *51 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 20 *62 *51 *62 *62 05/21/14 -05/28/14 *24 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 54 *67 | |||
* 54 *64 05/28/14 -06/04/14 | |||
* 43 | |||
* 39 | |||
* 39 | |||
* 39 *40 *38 *40 *40 06/04/14 -06/11/14 | |||
* 62 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 64 | |||
* 69 *24 *68 *58 *58 06/11/14 -06/18/14 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 49 | |||
* 55 | |||
* 49 *52 06/18/14 -06/25/14 | |||
* 37 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 39 *15 | |||
* 35 06/25/14 -07/02/14 *50 | |||
* 44 | |||
* 52 | |||
* 45 | |||
* 45 | |||
* 44 *64 *63 07/02/14 -07/09/14 *62 | |||
* 68 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 67 *58 *66 *58 *58 07/09/14 -07/16/14 | |||
* 44 *51 *51 *50 *40 | |||
* 49 *41 *41 07/16/14 -07/23/14 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 64 *68 | |||
* 64 *60 *63 | |||
* 55 *50 07/23/14 -07/30/14 *50 | |||
* 69 *70 | |||
* 68 *46 *67 *48 (1) *48 07/30/14 -08/06/14 *42 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 44 | |||
* 16 | |||
* 39 *40 *40 *42 08/06/14 -08/13/14 | |||
* 49 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 45 *39 (1) *46 *46 08/13/14 -08/20/14 | |||
* 63 | |||
* 65 | |||
* 65 | |||
* 64 *65 *25 *66 *65 08/20/14 -08/27/14 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 69 *60 *67 *62 *62 08/27/14 -09/03/14 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 22 | |||
* 57 | |||
* 56 | |||
* 53 | |||
* 55 | |||
* 53 *50 09/03/14 -09/10/14 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 66 *62 *65 *63 *64 09/10/14 -09/17/14 | |||
* 64 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 13 | |||
* 66 *62 *64 *63 *63 09/17/14 -09/24/14 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 65 | |||
* 65 | |||
* 64 *64 *63 *65 *64 09/24/14 -10/01/14 | |||
* 26 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 69 *62 *68 *63 *63 10/01/14 -10/08/14 | |||
* 47 | |||
* 63 | |||
* 49 | |||
* 62 | |||
* 43 *61 *18 | |||
* 47 10/08/14 -10/14/14 | |||
* 60 | |||
* 62 | |||
* 61 | |||
* 24 *25 *60 *60 | |||
* 59 10/14/14 -10/22/14 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 33 *38 | |||
* 33 *16 *38 10/22/14 -10/29/14 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 46 *42 | |||
* 45 *42 *18 10/29/14 -11/05/14 *51 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 47 *58 *48 *48 11/05/14 -11/12/14 *62 | |||
* 48 | |||
* 48 | |||
* 48 | |||
* 57 | |||
* 47 *58 | |||
* 57 | |||
*16 | |||
* 17 *z 17 | |||
* 17 *15 *17 *15 *15 11/19/14 -11/25/14 | |||
* 64 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 66 | |||
* 59 *65 | |||
* 59 | |||
* 59 11/25/14 -12/03/14 | |||
* 32 | |||
* 33 | |||
* 33 | |||
* 13 | |||
* 35 *32 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 35 12/03/14 -12110/14 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 14 | |||
* 33 | |||
* 35 | |||
* 34 | |||
* 33 12/10/14 -12/17/14 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 69 *67 *68 *67 | |||
* 67 12/17/14 -12/23/14 | |||
* 67 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 69 *69 *30 *68 | |||
* 70 12/23/14 -12/30/14 | |||
* 62 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 70 | |||
* 69 | |||
* 57 < 68 *58 | |||
* 58 MEAN---- | |||
(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C- 16 | |||
Table C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 115 0i30i114 Cabbage <9 1.b +/- U.6 < 126 6939 +/- 4U0 <lij <ilb | |||
* 68 < z1 06/30/14 Collards <9 < 1.1 < 130 5467 +/- 367 < 24 < 12 < 14 < 65 < 19 06/30/14 Kale <9 < 1.5 < 173 7319 +/- 386 < 36 < 19 < 18 < 90 < 21 07/30/14 Cabbage < 15 < 2.9 < 173 3279 +/- 413 < 41 < 18 < 20 < 116 < 22 07/30/14 Collards < 10 3.9 +/- 1.5 < 195 7555 +/- 670 < 43 < 19 < 23 < 102 < 26 07/30/14 Kale < 14 1.9 + 1.1 105 +/- 52 5846 +/- 149 < 57 <5 <6 < 77 < 22 08/20/14 Cabbage < 15 < 1.7 < 127 2316 +/- 297 < 58 < 14 | |||
* 15 < 117 < 33 08/20/14 Collards < 15 5.9 + 1.1 < 171 5828 +/- 431 < 57 < 16 *17 < 113 < 30 08/20/14 Kale < 16 4.8 +/- 1.2 < 168 4816 +/- 429 < 53 < 13 <13 < 105 < 31 09/16/14 Cabbage <8 < 2.0 < 161 2921 +/- 348 < 43 < 18 <17 < 96 < 26 09/16/14 Collards <9 7.7 +/- 2.0 < 266 5414 +/- 626 < 52 < 26 | |||
* 25 < 141 < 40 09/16/14 Kale < 10 7.8 +/- 1.8 < 218 4434 +/- 516 < 52 < 18 <19 < 129 < 27 10/22/14 Cabbage < 16 < 1.3 233 +/- 109 3000 +/- 242 < 58 <11 <12 < 107 < 28 10/22/14 Collards < 17 < 2.0 961 +/- 177 4327 +/- 292 < 59 | |||
* 13 <12 < 115 < 32 10/22/14 Kale < 15 < 1.6 476 +/- 127 4671 +/- 309 < 54 | |||
* 10 <12 < 101 < 28 MEAN 4.8 +/- 5.1 444 +/- 755 4942 +/- 3243 - | |||
35 06/30/14 Cabbage < 10 < 1.5 < 177 4767 +/- 572 < 37 | |||
* 24 < 26 | |||
* 105 < 42 06/30/14 Collards <9 1.6 +/- 0.8 < 92 5394 +/- 294 < 21 <10 <11 < 54 < 14 06/30/14 Kale < 11 < 1.6 174 +/- 120 10020 +/- 511 < 29 <13 | |||
* 16 < 84 < 22 07/30/14 Cabbage < 13 < 2.1 < 180 2332 +/- 358 < 39 < 18 < 21 < 102 < 35 07/30/14 Collards < 12 7.3 +/- 2.1 < 254 5077 +/- 521 | |||
* 50 | |||
* 27 | |||
* 25 < 109 < 37 07/30/14 Kale < 12 5.2 +/- 1.9 < 267 4333 +/- 505 < 55 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 28 < 141 < 31 08/20/14 Cabbage < 23 < 2.4 < 141 2467 +/- 321 < 52 <11 | |||
* 16 < 108 < 26 08/20/14 Collards < 20 < 2.1 212 +/- 118 4244 +/- 362 < 54 <14 | |||
* 16 < 111 < 37 08/20/14 Kale < 16 < 1.6 < 165 4559 +/- 327 < 56 <15 <15 < 120 < 30 09/16/14 Cabbage <9 < 2.6 < 252 2784 +/- 480 < 57 | |||
* 28 < 24 < 169 < 56 09/16/14 Collards <9 < 3.3 217 +/- 81 3014 +/- 145 < 59 <3 <3 < 64 < 14 09/16/14 Kale < 13 < 4.7 < 254 3384 +/- 513 < 54 < 21 < 24 < 107 < 34 10/22/14 Cabbage < 22 < 1.9 491 +/- 143 4075 +/- 397 < 46 < 10 < 14 < 121 < 29 10/22/14 Collards < 24 5.3 +/- 1.6 891 +/- 226 3153 +/- 438 < 44 < 13 < 13 < 91 < 16 10/22/14 Kale < 20 < 1.6 322 +/- 113 4921 +/- 304 < 55 <11 < 10 < 97 < 26 MEAN 4.8 +/- 4.8 384 +/- 547 4302 +/- 3726 - | |||
THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-17 | |||
Table C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Control 36 06/30/14 Cabbage <9 1.3 +/- 0.7 | |||
* 134 2972 +/- 294 | |||
* 27 | |||
* 13 *12 < 74 | |||
* 18 06/30/14 Collards <10 | |||
* 2.6 | |||
* 224 6549 +/- 648 | |||
* 51 | |||
* 25 | |||
* 26 | |||
* 134 < 43 06/30/14 Kale <11 <2.1 | |||
* 171 5388 +/- 457 | |||
* 40 | |||
* 16 < 16 | |||
* 100 < 24 07/30/14 Cabbage <7 4.1 +/- 1.4 | |||
* 197 3231 +/- 365 < 49 <16 <19 | |||
* 114 < 37 07/30/14 Collards <15 8.7 +/- 1.8 < 228 5191 +/- 504 < 59 | |||
* 21 | |||
* 22 | |||
* 145 < 37 07/30/14 Kale <9 2.4 +/- 1.5 339 +/- 131 5046 +/- 501 | |||
* 52 | |||
* 20 | |||
* 18 | |||
* 135 | |||
* 26 08/20/14 Cabbage <18 6.0 +/- 1.4 | |||
* 163 2313 +/- 337 | |||
* 60 | |||
* 16 <16 | |||
* 114 | |||
* 38 08/20/14 Collards <15 4.7 +/- 1.2 | |||
* 119 4493 +/- 285 < 59 <11 | |||
* 12 | |||
* 107 | |||
* 25 08/20/14 Kale <19 9.5 +/- 1.7 | |||
* 155 5654 +/- 391 < 59 | |||
* 13 | |||
* 16 | |||
* 136 | |||
* 32 09/16/14 Cabbage <8 | |||
* 2.2 | |||
* 233 2400 +/- 463 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 21 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 151 | |||
* 41 09/16/14 Collards <15 9.0 +/- 3.2 | |||
* 231 4560 +/- 497 | |||
* 52 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 20 | |||
* 108 | |||
* 32 09/16/14 Kale | |||
* 10 5.1 +/- 2.1 | |||
* 280 5017 +/- 667 < 59 < 24 | |||
* 29 | |||
* 141 | |||
* 38 10/31/14 Cabbage <7 | |||
* 1.3 | |||
* 156 3361 +/- 286 | |||
* 52 | |||
* 14 <15 | |||
* 104 | |||
* 36 10/31/14 Collards < 10 | |||
* 1.7 | |||
* 198 4477 +/- 423 | |||
* 58 | |||
* 17 | |||
* 20 | |||
* 145 | |||
* 32 10/31/14 Kale <11 | |||
* 1.8 | |||
* 197 5160 +/- 352 < 57 *19 | |||
* 18 | |||
* 125 | |||
* 23 MEAN 5.6 +/- 5.9 - 4387 +/- 2510 - | |||
66 06/30/14 Cabbage <11 2.7 +/- 0.8 | |||
* 213 6274 +/- 660 | |||
* 41 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 23 < 97 < 38 06/30/14 Collards <11 | |||
* 2.0 | |||
* 209 8322 +/- 500 | |||
* 46 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 125 | |||
* 27 06/30/14 Kale | |||
* 10 2.1 +/- 0.9 | |||
* 291 6084 +/- 709 < 53 < 27 | |||
* 30 < 143 < 39 07/30/14 Cabbage | |||
* 18 6.6 +/-2.1 | |||
* 270 4950 +/- 656 < 59 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 25 | |||
* 132 < 31 07/30/14 Collards <8 | |||
* 2.8 | |||
* 265 6382 +/- 669 < 49 | |||
* 28 | |||
* 23 | |||
* 120 < 24 07/30/14 Kale <12 | |||
* 1.9 | |||
* 191 3859 +/- 414 | |||
* 36 | |||
* 19 <19 | |||
* 98 < 27 08/20/14 Cabbage <13 | |||
* 1.4 | |||
* 135 3191 +/- 340 | |||
* 58 < 13 <15 | |||
* 110 | |||
* 28 08/20/14 Collards | |||
* 14 | |||
* 1.4 480 +/- 155 5349 +/- 429 | |||
* 56 <15 | |||
* 14 | |||
* 105 | |||
* 28 08/20/14 Kale <10 | |||
* 1.4 208 +/- 154 4079 +/- 403 < 57 < 15 | |||
* 14 | |||
* 115 < 33 09/16/14 Cabbage <9 5.2 +/- 1.1 | |||
* 164 3738 +/- 415 | |||
* 41 <17 <15 | |||
* 102 | |||
* 24 09/16/14 Collards < 10 | |||
* 3.2 312 +/- 194 5197 +/- 689 < 59 | |||
* 21 | |||
* 27 | |||
* 126 <41 09/16/14 Kale <9 < 3.3 214 +/- 141 3674 +/- 428 < 49 | |||
* 22 | |||
* 24 | |||
* 130 | |||
* 40 10/22/14 Cabbage | |||
* 16 | |||
* 1.5 271 +/- 114 3503 +/- 310 < 52 | |||
* 14 <13 < 99 | |||
* 26 10/22/14 Collards | |||
* 20 | |||
* 1.8 1982 +/- 218 4875 +/- 374 < 49 <12 <15 | |||
* 103 | |||
* 28 10/22/14 Kale | |||
* 19 | |||
* 1.7 461 +/- 153 4305 +/- 422 < 51 *13 <15 | |||
* 118 < 33 MEAN 4.1 +/- 4.2 561 +/- 1272 4919 +/- 2794 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-18 | |||
Table C-IX.1 Tabl QUARTERLY C-X.1 OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATION STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D. | |||
1 10.4 +/- 1.9 10.4 +/- 2.7 11.3 +/- 0.4 9.1 +/- 0.3 10.8 +/- 0.6 3 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.3 +/- 0.4 6.5 +/- 0.6 .5.7 +/- 1.3 7.9 +/- 0.1 4 9.1 +/- 2.8 10.4 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.0 7.1 +/- 0.8 9.7 +/- 2.8 5 13.8 +/- 1.5 14.3 +/-0.6 13.1 +/- 2.8 14.6 +/- 2.0 13.3 +/- 4.7 6 8.4 +/-0.5 8.2+/-2.5 8.7 +/-0.3 8.3 +/-1.6 8.2 +/-0.6 8 7.6 +/-1.3 8.4+/-0.5 7.9 +/-1.2 6.9+/-t0.9 7.3 +/-1.0 9 6.3 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/-3.1 6.1 t 2.1 5.3 +/- 1.3 6.8 t 1.3 C 8.5 +/-1.0 8.9+/-1.1 7.9 +/-1.3 8.2 +/-1.4 8.9 +/-1.7 11 8.0 +/- 1.0 7.6 +/-0.8 8.1 +/- 2.1 7.6 +/- 1.4 8.6 +/- 1.4 14 9.9 +/- 1.6 8.9 t 1.6 10.8 +/- 2.3 9.9 +/- 1.6 9.8 +/- 0.7 22 7.1 +/- 0.9 6.7 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.7 7.0 +/- 0.1 7.8 +/- 1.3 46 6.3 +/- 2.0 7.2 +/- 0.4 7.0 +/- 0.0 5.7 +/- 0.7 5.2 +/- 0.4 47 7.9 +/- 1.7 8.3 +/- 0.7 7.3 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 4.9 8.8 +/- 0.3 48 8.3 +/- 1.2 9.1 +/- 2.0 8.5 +/- 0.0 7.7 +/- 0.6 8.0 +/- 2.3 51 10.7 +/- 2.2 11.5 t 2.4 9.8 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 2.1 11.8 +/- 2.1 52 11.9 +/- 2.8 11.1 +/- 4.5 11.5 +/- 1.1 11.1 +/- 2.8 14.0 +/- 2.1 53 10.4 +/- 2.7 10.9 +/- 0.6 12.0 +/- 0.6 8.9 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 0.7 54 7.6 +/- 2.5 9.3 +/- 1.1 7.8 +/- 0.4 6.6 +/- 2.8 6.8 +/- 0.4 55 14.8 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.1 14.8 +/- 1.3 15.2 +/- 1.3 16.0 +/- 1.1 56 13.0 +/- 2.1 13.3 +/- 0.3 14.0 +/- 1.0 11.5 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.6 57 9.3 +/- 1.5 10.2 +/- 1.0 9.6 +/- 2.7 (1) 8.4 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.3 58 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.9 +/- 0.7 8.8 +/- 2.4 7.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.3 59 9.1 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 0.6 10.1 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.3 61 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.8 +/- 0.0 7.1 +/- 0.3 6.8 +/- 1.6 62 8.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.8 8.3 +/- 1.7 7.2 +/- 2.3 9.1 +/- 0.1 63 7.8 +/- 0.9 8.1 +/- 0.3 7.2 +/- 1.7 7.7 +/- 0.1 8.1 +/- 1.6 64 8.5 +/- 1.5 9.6 +/- 1.8 7.9 +/- 0.4 8.2 +/- 1.4 8.3 +/- 2.7 65 8.6 +/- 2.2 8.6 +/- 1.7 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.9 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.0 66 7.1 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.2 +/- 0.8 6.9 +/- 1.3 6.8 +/- 1.8 68 6.7 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 2.7 6.9 +/- 3.4 (1) 6.1 +/- 1.0 6.3 +/- 2.5 71 8.5 +/- 3.0 9.9 +/- 1.7 6.4 +/- 6.1 9.0 +/- 0.3 8.5 +/- 1.7 72 8.2 +/- 0.6 8.4 +/- 1.0 7.8 +/- 1.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 8.1 +/- 0.3 73 7.6 +/- 1.9 8.8 +/- 4.0 7.2 +/- 0.1 6.6 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.7 74 7.8 +/- 1.2 8.3 +/- 5.1 8.2 +/- 0.0 7.0 +/- 0.8 7.5 +/- 1.1 75 9.3 +/- 1.8 9.4 +/- 3.5 8.5 +/- 0.7 10.5 +/- 2.7 8.7 +/- 0.4 78 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.8 +/- 0.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 7.3 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 0.7 79 9.2 +/- 0.9 8.8 +/- 0.9 9.0 +/- 2.4 9.0 +/- 0.9 9.8 +/- 1.5 81 7.6 +/- 1.3 8.3 +/- 2.0 7.4 +/- 3.4 6.8 +/- 1.4 7.8 +/- 0.3 82 8.3 +/- 1.1 7.5 +/- 1.0 8.4 +/- 0.0 8.5 +/- 1.3 8.7 +/- 0.4 84 8.1 +/- 1.4 7.7 +/- 2.0 7.6 +/- 0.1 9.1 +/- 0.3 8.1 +/- 0.4 85 7.2 +/- 2.4 8.8 +/- 3.1 6.2 +/- 0.7 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.4 +/- 0.6 (1) 86 8.5 +/- 2.1 10.0 +/- 2.0 7.9 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.0 8.3 +/- 1.6 88 6.4 +/- 1.8 7.4 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 0.4 5.6 +/- 1.8 5.7 +/- 1.0 89 6.1 +/- 1.9 6.7 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 0.8 5.2 +/- 2.0 7.0 +/- 0.7 90 6.8 +/- 2.6 7.8 +/- 0.0 4.9 +/- 1.0 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.4 +/- 0.3(1) 92 8.4 +/- 1.3 8.8 +/- 1.7 8.8 +/- 0.3 7.4 +/- 2.3 8.6 +/- 0.1 98 7.5 +/- 0.7 8.0 +/- 2.5 7.3 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 0.1 7.2 +/- 1.3 99 6.7 +/-1.9 7.9 +/-1.8 6.1 +/-1.1 5.8 +/-1.3 7.0 +/-2.0 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-i19 | |||
Table C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATION STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D. | |||
T1 9.7 +/- 2.1 10.6 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.3 8.2 +/- 0.3 9.9 +/- 1.7 100 7.1 +/- 1.7 7.1 +/- 2.0 8.2 +/- 0.4 6.2 +/- 3.7 6.9 +/- 0.8 101 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.8 +/- 1.8 6.3 +/- 0.1 6.8 +/- 0.1 6.5 +/- 1.1 102 8.9 +/- 2.3 10.0 +/- 3.5 9.4 +/- 1.8 7.3 +/- 1.0 8.9 +/- 0.1 103 7.7 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 1.0 7.0 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 0.6 104 8.5 +/- 1.9 9.3 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 3.1 7.4 +/- 2.3 9.3 +/- 0.6 105 5.9 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/- 2.5 5.4 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 1.1 5.9 +/- 0.3 106 6.9 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 1.8 6.8 +/- 1.4 6.1 +/- 4.0 7.3 +/- 1.1 107 7.1 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 1.1 6.3 +/- 1.3 7.3 +/- 0.1 7.5 +/- 0.4 109 8.5 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 4.1 8.1 +/- 0.1 9.2 +/- 0.1 110 7.4 +/- 1.2 8.1 +/- 0.1 7.6 +/- 4.1 6.8 +/- 0.6 7.0 +/- 0.6 112 11.1 +/- 0.8 11.6 +/- 2.5 10.9 +/- 0.7 11.1 +/- 0.6 10.7 +/- 0.3 113 7.4 +/- 1.1 7.3 +/- 2.8 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.8 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 0.4 C-20 | |||
TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM PER STANDARD QUARTER + | |||
2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/- 2 S.D. | |||
JAN-MAR 9.8 +/- 3.6 8.4 +/- 2.9 8.1 +/- 1.8 8.9 +/- 0.0 APR-JUN 9.7 +/- 4.5 7.7 +/- 2.8 6.9 +/- 2.6 9.4 +/- 4.1 JUL-SEP 8.8+/-4.3 7.4 +/- 3.5 7.0 +/- 2.6 9.1 +/-2.4 OCT-DEC 9.8+/-5.0 8.0 +/- 3.0 7.7 +/- 1.9 9.4 +/- 1.3 TABLE C-IX.3 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D. | |||
SITE BOUNDARY 76 6.6 16.0 9.5 +/- 4.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 5.2 14.6 7.9 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 4.9 9.9 7.4 +/- 2.4 CONTROL 8 7.9 10.8 9.2 +/- 1.9 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112,113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TI INTERMEDIATE STATIONS- 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,109,110, 22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-21 | |||
FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2014 20 ............................................................................................................................................................. | |||
0 INDICATOR STATION 9-BACKGROUND STATION 15 I-> | |||
S10 ........................................................................................................ | |||
0 0 0 0n YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year. | |||
FIGURE C-2 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 350 ........................................................................................................................................................... | |||
- INDICATOR STATION MEAN 300 ...... .. ................................................................................ .. BACKGROUND STATION MEAN 10 0 .............. . .. | |||
I-& | |||
200- Rn (2 250...... ....... ........................................................................................ | |||
oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON | |||
-0 ~ - q e4 YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year. | |||
FIGURE C-3 MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 0c-INDICATOR M 1DA &'?C D ITn11TX~ | |||
600 ------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
E 0._ | |||
200400. | |||
0 tn t- 00 Ch oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON 00 N YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year. | |||
gz-) | |||
picoCuries per cubic meter 1/9/2008 4/9/2008 7/9/2008 10/8/2008 1/6/2009 4/8/2009_ = | |||
7/8/2009 10/7/2009 1/6/2010 4/7/20 10 7/7/2010 10/6/2010 1/5/2011 4/6/2011 7/6/2011OT 10/5/2011 1/4/2012 4/4/2012 7/3/2012 10/3/2012 1/2/2013 4/3/2013 7/2/2013 10/2/2013 1/2/2014 4/2/2014 7/2/2014 10/1/2014 -. | |||
12/30/2014 C) - | |||
C) z a | |||
FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 0.18 ICHERNOBYL ACCIDENT 0.16 ...... !................................................................................I...-. | |||
0.1----- | |||
----- * -------------------------------------- IDIAO.SAIN R SIDI O N AT RISAT | |||
-- BACKGROUND STATION | |||
* c ~0.12 ............................................................................................................................... | |||
* 0.10 .............................................................................................................................. | |||
"C 0.08 ............................................................................................................................... | |||
0 0.04 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
--------------------------------------------------. I . . . ..-------- | |||
0.02 I 0.000 R .YEA 0.04 | |||
- -------- - A | |||
* Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996 | |||
FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 30 1 1~ | |||
25 4 20 ---- -- -- ----- ---- ------ ---- --- ---- -------- ------ ----- -- ------ -- -- --- -- -- -------- ------- ---- --- -- ----- ----- | |||
Ci2 15 4.....................................................................--------------------------------------------- | |||
2 10- ............................................................................................................................................................. | |||
5 .................. .................. | |||
0 I 0OTO 2 MLES 2 TO 5 MILES OVER 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT I 1Q14 12Q14 *3Q14 W4Q14 Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012. | |||
FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD/OSLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1990 - 2014* | |||
70.0 U BACKGROUND MEAN E ------------------------------------------------------------- -- - C T k.FA'--------------------------- | |||
Ia n U. I 6_ | |||
6 CIV ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------------------- | |||
40.0 30.0 L. | |||
2 In n - ---- -- -- ---------------- ---- - --- -------- ------ | |||
,6 10.0 0.0 mImih iollI11MMIII1i11,l MbhM | |||
-n - | |||
e4 -4 t- - - -e \ e'\ eq en4 t ý CP Z I" Year | |||
-Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012. | |||
-In order for Oyster Creek to align with the new ANSI N13.37-2014 Environmental Dosimetry - Criteria for System Design and Implementation, the data was reviewed back to the beginning of 2007 and updated per the guidance in the ANSI Standard. | |||
APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY | |||
The following section presents the results of data analysis performed by the QC laboratory, Environmental Inc. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and the QC laboratory. Comparisons of the results for all media were within expected ranges. | |||
D-1 | |||
TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 24 QCA QCB PERIOD 04/16/14 < 168 < 165 < 144 09/29/14 < 188 < 186 < 149 MEAN - - - | |||
D-2 | |||
TABLE D-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 24 04/16/14 <5 <5 <13 <4 <10 <5 <9 <14 <4 < 5 | |||
* 32 | |||
* 10 09/29/14 <5 <6 <12 <4 <11 <5 <10 <15 <5 <5 < 35 | |||
* 13 MEAN QCA 04/16/14 <4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <4 <8 <12 <3 <5 <28 <10 09/29/14 <4 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5 <8 <12 <4 <5 <23 <7 MEAN QCB 04/16/14 <4 <2 <4 <2 <6 <2 <6 <7 <2 <4 <10 <3 09/29/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <3 <10 <2 MEAN | |||
TABLE D-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION IN 1s QCB IN QCB 1S PERIOD 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 < 187 (1) < 144 (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 < 177 (1) < 139 (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 164 (1) < 145 (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 188 (1) < 143 (1) 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 159 (1) < 140 (1) 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 159 (1) < 142 (1) 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 188 (1) < 131 (1) 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 166 (1) < 173 (1) 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 180 < 181 < 173 149 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 164 < 161 < 169 169 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 186 < 185 < 172 172 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 185 (1) < 198 (1) | |||
MEAN TABLE D-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION IN 1s QCB 1N QCB 1s PERIOD 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 <0.7 (1) < 0.5 < (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 < 0.9 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 0.5 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 0.8 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 0.7 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 < 0.9 < 0.2 < 0.5 10/01114 - 10/28/14 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.4 < 0.3 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 0.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 0.4 (1) < 0.3 (1) | |||
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION D-4 | |||
TABLE D-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 01107114 - 01127114 WN < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <23 < 7 02104114 - 02/25/14 < 4 <5 <9 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <4 <33 < 8 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 3 <4 <8 <3 <8 <4 <5 <3 <4 <32 < 11 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <12 <4 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 4 <6 <11 <5 <11 <6 <8 <6 <6 <27 < 6 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 5 <6 <11 <6 <10 <6 <9 <5 <5 < 29 < 10 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <18 <6 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 5 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <9 <5 <4 <26 < 7 09102/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <4 <6 <3 <3 <26 < 8 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <10 <5 <11 <6 <6 <24 < 8 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <4 <18 <6 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 8 <8 <12 <5 <15 <7 < 10 <6 <8 < 36 < 12 MEAN 1s 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27114 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 (1) 06106/14 - 06/25/14 (1) 07/02/14 - 07131/14 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3 <28 < 9 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 6 <6 <12 <6 <11 <6 <10 <6 <7 <29 < 9 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 < 4 <3 <7 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <3 <18 <6 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1) - | |||
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION | |||
TABLE D-11.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD QOCB 1N 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <2 <1 <9 <3 02/04/14 - 02125114 <2 <1 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <3 <8 <3 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <3 < 12 <2 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <10 <2 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 <2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <13 <2 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 <3 <3 <3 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 12 <3 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 <3 <4 <5 <2 <7 <4 <6 <4 <5 < 20 <4 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <5 <2 <3 <3 <2 < 14 <1 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <3 <7 <2 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <5 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 <8 <3 <4 < 13 <3 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <5 <3 <3 < 13 <1 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 <4 <4 <3 <4 < 10 <2 MEAN QCB 1S 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 <2 <1 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <15 <3 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <3 <2 <4 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <14 <2 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 <2 <3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <6 <4 <2 <15 <2 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1) | |||
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION | |||
TABLE D-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN | |||
.THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION W-3C QCB PERIOD 01/15/14 < 179 < 152 04108/14 < 163 < 142 07/23/14 < 155 < 138 10/16/14 < 158 < 150 MEAN - - | |||
D-7 | |||
TABLE D-Ill.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 *Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD W-3C 01115/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 04/08/14 < 4 < 5 <9 <5 <11 <5 10 <8 <5 <5 | |||
* 23 <9 07/23/14 < 4 < 4 <7 <4 <8 <4 6 <6 <4 <4 <17 <6 10/16/14 < 4 < 5 <12 <5 <11 <5 9 <11 <5 <6 | |||
* 28 <11 MEAN QCB 01/15/14 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <3 5 <7 <2 <3 <13 <1 04/08/14 <2 <1 <2 <2 <6 <2 5 <3 <3 <2 <9 <3 07/23/14 <2 <3 <4 <1 <3 <2 3 <15 <1 <2 | |||
* 22 <3 10/16/14 <3 <3 <4 <1 <5 <3 2 <6 <2 <3 <17 <5 00 MEAN | |||
TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 24 04/16/14 1449 +/- 553.6 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 82 < 41 < 44 09/29/14 1235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98 < 68 < 64 QCA 04/16/14 2010 +/- 446 < 31 < 27 < 58 < 30 < 57 < 26 < 33 QCB 04116114 1785 +/- 97 < 5 <5 < 12 < 5 < 8 < 6 < 4 MEAN 1620 +/- 690 - - - - - - | |||
TABLE D-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 PERIOD I | |||
24 04/16/14 < 361 783 +/- 401 < 31 < 33 < 36 < 30 < 30 988 +/- 587 211 +/- 65 09/29/14 < 956 9740 +/- 1425 < 86 < 111 < 83 < 76 < 91 1674 +/- 1366 642 +/- 117 MEAN* 5261 +/- 12668 1331 +/- 970 426 +/- 611 QCA 04/16/14 < 407 852 +/-464 < 40 < 38 < 35 < 42 < 43 941 +/- 716 99 +/- 83 09/29/14 < 818 13000 +/- 1700 < 85 < 95 < 72 < 62 < 81 < 1300 686 +/- 105 MEAN* - 6926 +/- 8590 392 +/- 831 | |||
,0 QCB 04/16/14 < 109 511 +/- 185 < 12 < 10 < 8 < 10 < 11 < 316 < 951 09/29/14 < 186 6535 +/- 480 < 15 < 10 < 13 < 17 < 15 1069 +/- 402 < 1290 MEAN* - 3523 +/- 8519 | |||
* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES | |||
TABLE D-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 36 Cabbage 07130114 <* 4.1 +/- 1.4 3231 +/- 36b 49 < 16 < 19 < 114 < 31 Collards 07/30/14 < 15 8.7 +/- 1.8 5191 +/- 504 59 < 21 < 22 < 145 < 37 Kale 07/30/14 <9 2.4 +/- 1.5 5046 +/- 501 52 < 20 < 18 < 135 < 26 MEAN* - 5.0 +/- 6.5 4489 +/- 2184 QCA Cabbage 07/30114 < 11 5.0 +/- 1.7 2620 +/- 317 < 39 < 13 < 15 < 92 < 26 Collards 07/30/14 < 13 <3.5 5130 +/- 500 < 59 < 21 < 23 < 126 < 33 Kale 07/30/14 < 16 < 4.0 4830 +/- 512 < 59 < 22 < 22 < 150 | |||
* 36 MEAN* 4193 +/- 2742 QCB Cabbage 07/30/14 <3 2.0 + 1.0 2845 +/- 290 28 <7 <10 <53 <6 Collards 07/30/14 <8 4.0 + 2.0 4711 +/- 342 15 < 5 < 12 < 42 < 15 Kale 07/30/14 <5 7.0 + 2.0 4179 +/- 364 36 < 11 < 10 < 64 < 12 MEAN* 4.3 + 5.0 3912 +/- 1923 | |||
* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES | |||
APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM | |||
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 3) | |||
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c) | |||
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d) | |||
March 2014 E10854 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.1 91.7 1.04 A Sr-90 pCi/L 10.9 15.1 0.72 W E10855 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 96.6 98.5 0.98 A Ce-141 pCi/L 112 119 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 449 491 0.91 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 186 210 0.89 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 250 253 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 248 268 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/L 292 297 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 230 219 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 312 323 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 321 337 0.95 A El 0857 AP Ce-141 pCi 53.0 53.9 0.98 A Cr-51 pCi 232 223 1.04 A Cs-1 34 pCi 100 95.3 1.05 A Cs-137 pCi 122 115 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 122 121 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 135 135 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi 111 99.3 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi 140 147 0.95 A Co-60 pCi 187 153 1.22 W E10856 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 74.1 76.4 0.97 A E10858 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1760 1.19 A June 2014 E10913 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.9 91.3 0.94 Sr-90 pCi/L 13.8 14.5 0.95 E10914 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 86.5 90.9 0.95 Ce-141 pCi/L ill 124 0.90 Cr-51 pCi/L 255 253 1.01 Cs-1 34 pCi/L 147 162 0.91 Cs-I 37 pCi/L 123 120 1.03 Co-58 pCi/L 105 112 0.94 Mn-54 pCi/L 155 156 0.99 Fe-59 pCi/L 106 102 1.04 Zn-65 pCi/L 251 252 1.00 Co-60 pCi/L 218 224 0.97 E10916 AP Ce-141 pCi 95.1 92.6 1.03 Cr-51 pCi 215 190 1.13 Cs-1 34 pCi 122 122 1.00 Cs-1 37 pCi 95.1 89.8 1.06 Co-58 pCi 88.7 84.1 1.05 Mn-54 pCi 115 116 0.99 Fe-59 pCi 72.6 76.7 0.95 Zn-65 pCi 193 189 1.02 Co-60 pCi 179 168 1.07 E10915 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 85.6 85.2 1.00 E10917 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1680 1810 0.93 A E-1 | |||
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 3) | |||
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c) | |||
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d) | |||
September2014 E10946 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90.7 96.9 0.94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.0 16.4 0.85 A E10947 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 92.0 97.6 0.94 A Ce-141 pCi/L 117 126 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 281 288 0.98 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 141 158 0.89 A Cs-137 pCi/L 186 193 0.96 A Co-58 pCi/L 137 143 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 138 142 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi/L 162 158 1.03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 75.2 73.0 1.03 A Co-60 pCi/L 286 297 0.96 A E10949 AP Ce-141 pCi 97.8 82.1 1.19 A Cr-51 pCi 212 188 1.13 A Cs-1 34 pCi 106 103 1.03 A Cs-1 37 pCi 131 126 1.04 A Co-58 pCi 85.7 93.0 0.92 A Mn-54 pCi 92.8 92.3 1.01 A Fe-59 pCi 113 103 1.10 A Zn-65 pCi 53.2 47.5 1.12 A Co-60 pCi 202 193 1.05 A E10948 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 83.9 89.8 0.93 A E10950 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2010 1720 1.17 A E10951 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.208 0.186 1.12 A Cr-51 pCi/g 0.398 0.425 0.94 A Cs-1 34 pCi/g 0.216 0.233 0.93 A Cs-137 pCi/g 0.398 0.365 1.09 A Co-58 pCi/g 0.197 0.211 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/g 0.242 0.209 1.16 A Fe-59 pCi/g 0.238 0.233 1.02 A Zn-65 pCi/g 0.117 0.108 1.08 A Co-60 pCi/g 0.447 0.438 1.02 A December 2014 El 1078 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.7 95.7 0.90 A Sr-90 pCi/L 12.9 15.6 0.83 A El1079 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 85.9 95.1 0.90 A Ce-141 pCi/L 205 219 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 402 406 0.99 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 156 164 0.95 A Cs-137 pCi/L 194 198 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 122 130 0.94 A Mn-54 pCi/L 220 225 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 183 175 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 287 297 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 224 235 0.95 A E-2 | |||
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 3 OF 3) | |||
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c) | |||
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d) | |||
December 2014 El 1081 AP Ce-141 pCi 96.4 102 0.95 A Cr-51 pCi 171 190 0.90 A Cs-1 34 pCi 73.1 76.9 0.95 A Cs-1 37 pCi 99.0 92.6 1.07 A Co-58 pCi 57.5 60.8 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi 107 105 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi 74.2 81.6 0.91 A Zn-65 pCi 144 139 1.04 A Co-60 pCi 114 110 1.04 A El 1080 Charcoal 131 pCi 93.5 98.2 0.95 A El 1082 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1760 1970 0.89 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result. | |||
(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetnc and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation. | |||
(C) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results. | |||
(d) Analytics evaluation basedon TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratiolimits of 0.80-1.20. | |||
W-Acceptable with warning, reportedresult falls within 0. 70-0 80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratiolimits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30. | |||
E-3 | |||
TABLE E-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 1) | |||
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation (c) | |||
May 2014 RAD-97 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 38.25 36.7 27.5 - 43.6 A Sr-90 pCi/L 24.65 26.5 19.2-30.9 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 89.1 87.9 74.0 - 96.7 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 45.55 44.3 35.5 -48.7 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 91.15 89.1 80.2- 101 A Co-60 pCi/L 65.10 64.2 57.8 - 73.1 A Zn-65 pCi/L 244 235 212 -275 A Gr-A pCi/L 45.65 61.0 31.9 - 75.8 A Gr-B pCi/L 27.95 33.0 21.4-40.7 A 1-131 pCi/L 23.75 25.7 21.3- 30.3 A U-Nat pCi/L 9.61 10.2 7.95- 11.8 A H-3 pCi/L 8435 8770 7610-9650 A MRAD-20 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 28.0 46.0 15.4-71.4 A November 2014 RAD-99 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 30.4 31.4 22.8-38.1 A Sr-90 pCi/L 18.6 21.8 15.6-25.7 A Ba-133 pCi/L 46.8 49.1 40.3 - 54.5 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 88.0 89.8 73.7 - 98.8 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 99.0 98.8 88.9-111 A Co-60 pCi/L 92.5 92.1 82.9- 104 A Zn-65 pCi/L 325 310 279 - 362 A Gr-A pCi/L 29.9 37.6 19.4-48.1 A Gr-B pCi/L 27.5 27.4 17.3-35.3 A 1-131 pCi/L 15.8 20.3 16.8-24.4 N(1) | |||
U-Nat pCi/L 5.74 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 A H-3 pCi/L 6255 6880 5940 - 7570 A MRAD-21 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 27.3 36.9 12.4- 57.3 A (1) The Iodine-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of 0. 778. No cause could be found for the slighly low activity. TBE would evaluate this as acceptabile with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-131 decay. All ERA Iodine- 131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreportedresult. | |||
(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetricand/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation. | |||
(c) ERA evaluation:A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the ControlLimits and outside of the Warning Limit. | |||
E-4 | |||
TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) | |||
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 2) | |||
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c) | |||
March 2014 14-MaW30 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.764 0.720 0.504 - 0.936 A Cs-1 34 Bq/L 20.7 23.1 16.2-300 A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 28.0 28.9 20.2 - 37.6 A Co-57 Bq/L 26.5 27.5 19.3 - 35.8 A Co-60 Bq/L 15.6 16.0 11.2-20.8 A H-3** Bq/L NR 321 225-417 N(3) | |||
Mn-54 Bq/L 13.5 13.9 9.7- 18.1 A Ni-63 Bq/L NR 34.0 23.8 - 44.2 N (3) | |||
Pu-238 Bq/L 0.911 0.828 0.580 - 1.076 Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.751 0.676 0.473 - 0.879 K-40 Bq/L NR (1) N (3) | |||
Sr-90** Bq/L NR 8.51 5.96- 11.06 N (3) | |||
U-234/233** Bq/L NR 0.225 0.158 - 0.293 N (3) | |||
U-238"* Bq/L NR 1.45 1.02-1.89 N(3) | |||
Zn-65 Bq/L -0.201 (1) A 14-MaS30 Cs-134 Bq/kg 2.02 (1) A Soil Cs-137 Bq/kg 1300 1238 867 - 1609 A Co-57 Bq/kg 1069 966 676 - 1256 A Co-60 Bq/kg 1.32 1.22 (2) A Mn-54 Bq/kg 1510 1430 1001 -1859 A K-40 Bq/kg 669 622 435 - 809 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 4.14 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/kg 763 695 487 - 904 A 14-RdF30 AP Cs-134** Bq/sample NR 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 N (3) | |||
Cs-1 37"* Bq/sample NR 1.76 1.23-2.29 N (3) | |||
Co-57"* Bq/sample NR (1) N(3) | |||
Co-60** Bq/sample NR 1.39 0.97 - 1.81 N (3) | |||
Mn-54** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3) | |||
Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.8220 1.18 0.83-1.53 N (3) | |||
Zn-65** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3) 14-GrF30 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.606 1.77 0.53-3.01 A Gr-B Bq/sample 0.7507 0.77 0.39-1.16 A 14-RdV30 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 5.96 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 5.06 4.74 3.32-6.16 A Co-57 Bq/sample 11.8 10.1 7.1 - 13.1 A Co-60 Bq/sample 7.34 6.93 4.85 - 9.01 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 8.95 8.62 6.03 - 11.21 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.23 1.46 1.02-1.90 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 8.91 7.86 5.50- 10.22 A E-5 | |||
TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) | |||
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 2) | |||
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c) | |||
September 2014 14-MaW31 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.705 0.88 0.62-1.14 A Cs-1 34*** Bq/L NR (1) N (4) | |||
Cs-1 37*** Bq/L NR 18.4 12.9-23.9 N (4) | |||
Co-57*** Bq/L NR 24.7 17.3-32.1 N (4) | |||
Co-60"** Bq/L NR 12.4 8.7-16.1 N (4) | |||
Mn-54*** Bq/L NR 14.0 9.8-18.2 N (4) | |||
Ni-63 Bq/L 24.07 24.6 17.2-32.0 A Pu-238 Bq/L 0.591 0.618 0.433 - 0.803 A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.0153 0.0048 (2) A K-40* Bq/L NR 161 113-209 N (4) | |||
Zn-65*** Bq/L NR 10.9 7.6- 14.2 N (4) 14-MaS31 Soil Cs-I 34*** Bq/kg NR 622 435-809 N (4) | |||
Cs-i 37~*** Bq/kg NR (1) N (4) | |||
Co-57*** Bq/kg NR 1116 781-1451 N (4) | |||
Co-60*** Bq/kg NR 779 545-1013 N (4) | |||
Mn-54*** Bq/kg NR 1009 706-1312 N (4) | |||
K-40**' Bq/kg NR 824 577-1071 N (4) | |||
Sr-90 Bq/kg 694 858 601-1115 A Zn-65*** Bq/kg NR 541 379-703 N (4) 14-RdF31 AP Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.310 0.703 0.492 - 0.914 N (4) 14-GrF31 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.153 0.53 0.16-0.90 N (4) | |||
Gr-B Bq/sample 0.977 1.06 0.53- 1.59 A September 2014 14-RdV31 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 7.31 7.38 5.17-9.59 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 8.93 8.14 5.70- 10.58 A Co-57 Bq/sample 10.8 9.2 6.4- 12.0 A Co-60 Bq/sample 6.31 6.11 4.28 - 7.94 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 7.76 7.10 4.97 - 9.23 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.738 0.85 0.60-1.11 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 7.16 6.42 4.49 - 8.35 A | |||
* The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. | |||
These nuclides are no longer part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series. | |||
All future gamma cross check samples for these isotopes will be provided by Analytics. | |||
(1) False positive test. | |||
(2) Sensitivity evaluation. | |||
(3) Water, Ni-63 overlooked when reporting,but the result of 32.7 +- 1.69 would have passed the acceptancecriteria. NCR 14-04 Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting,but would have passedthe false positive test. NCR 14-04 AP, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The originaland rerun results were statisticallythe same. No cause could be identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 14-04 Fornon reported(NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reportedin the previous series. NCR 14-04 (4) AP, Sr-90 gravimetric yield was very high at 117%. Couldindicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fuming HNO 3 separationwould be requiredto remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09 AP, Gr-Alpha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed ifthey were reportedin the previous series. NCR 14-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result. | |||
(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetnc and/or volumetnic measurements made during standardpreparation. | |||
(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptablewith warning,N=not acceptable. | |||
E-6 | |||
TABLE E-4 ERA (a) STATISTICAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM' ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 1 of 1) | |||
Concentration (pCi/L) | |||
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result b Result c Limits Acceptance ERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-89 40.29 +/- 5.76 36.70 27.50 - 43.60 Pass ERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-90 24.08 +/- 2.35 26.50 19.20 - 30.90 Pass ERW-1 385 04/07/14 Ba-1 33 78.23 +/- 3.93 87.90 74.00 - 96.70 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Co-60 62.75 +/- 3.53 64.20 57.80 - 73.10 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-134 44.97 +/- 3.99 44.30 35.50 - 48.70 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-137 88.54 +/- 4.93 89.10 80.20 - 101.00 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Zn-65 249.1 +/- 10.44 235.0 212.0 - 275.0 Pass ERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Alpha 56.70 +/- 2.47 61.00 31.90 - 75.80 Pass ERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Beta 32.10 +/- 1.20 33.00 21.40 - 40.70 Pass ERW-1391 04/07/14 1-131 25.52 +/- 1.12 25.70 21.30 - 30.30 Pass ERW-1394 04/07/14 Uranium 10.76 +/- 0.74 10.20 7.95 - 11.80 Pass ERW-1397 04/07/14 H-3 8982 +/- 279 8770 7610 - 9650 Pass ERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-89 29.40 +/- 5.32 31.40 22.80 - 38.10 Pass ERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-90 19.19 +/- 1.85 21.80 15.60 - 25.70 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Ba-133 43.54 +/- 4.54 49.10 40.30 - 54.50 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-134 81.95 +/- 7.49 89.80 73.70 - 98.80 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-137 95.76 +/- 5.50 98.80 88.90 - 111.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Co-60 90.25 +/- 2.77 92.10 82.90 - 104.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Zn-65 327.4 +/- 23.3 310.00 279.0 - 362.0 Pass ERW-5388 10/06/14 Gr. Alpha 30.88 +/- 8.05 37.60 19.40 - 46.10 Pass ERW-5388 10/06/14 G. Beta 20.47 +/- 4.75 27.40 17.30 - 35.30 Pass ERW-5392 10/06/14 1-131 19.58 +/- 2.35 20.30 16.80 - 24.40 Pass ERW-5394 10/06/14 Uranium 5.51 +/- 0.37 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 Pass ERW-5397 10/06/14 H-3 6876 +/- 383 6880 5940 - 7570 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA). | |||
b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations. | |||
c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA. | |||
E-7 | |||
TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) | |||
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 1 of 2) | |||
Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MAW-1140 02/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.77 +/- 0.06 0.85 0.26 - 1.44 Pass MAW-1 140 02/01/14 Gr. Beta 4.31 +/- 0.08 4.19 2.10 - 6.29 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Fe-55 0.40 +/- 3.20 0.00 -0.01 - 2.00 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 H-3 345.10 +/- 10.60 321.00 225.00 - 417.00 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Ni-63 32.40 +/- 3.20 34.00 23.80 - 44.20 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Pu-238 1.28 +/- 0.12 0.83 0.58 - 1.08 Fail (1) | |||
MAW-1184 02/01/14 Pu-239/240 0.91 + 0.10 0.68 0.47 - 0.88 Fail (1) | |||
MAW- 1184 02/01/14 Sr-90 7.00 +/- 0.70 8.51 5.96 - 11.06 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 U-233/234 0.20 +/- 0.07 0.23 0.16 - 0.29 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 U-238 1.25 +/- 0.18 1.45 1.02 - 1.89 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Co-57 27.86 +/- 0.38 27.50 19.30 - 35.80 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Co-60 15.99 +/- 0.27 16.00 11.20 - 20.80 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Cs-134 21.85 +/- 0.54 23.10 16.20 - 30.00 Pass MAW- 1184 02/01/14 Cs-137 28.74 +/- 0.49 28.90 20.20 - 37.60 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 K-40 1.80. +/- 2.00 0.00 0.00 - 10.00 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Mn-54 14.06 +/- 0.40 13.90 9.70 - 18.10 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Zn-65 0.00 +/- 0.19 0.00 -0.01 - 0.00 Pass MAVE-i 148 02/01/14 Co-57 11.63 +/- 0.19 10.10 7.10 - 13.10 Pass MAVE-i 148 02/01/14 Co-60 7.28 +/- 0.18 6.93 4.85 - 9.01 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Cs-134 6.29 +/- 0.29 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Cs-1 37 5.18 +/- 0.20 4.74 3.32 - 6.16 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Mn-54 9.22 +/- 0.26 8.62 6.03 - 11.21 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Zn-65 8.59 +/- 0.40 7.86 5.50 - 10.22 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Co-57 1.60 +/- 0.05 0.00 NA Fail (2) | |||
MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Co-60 1.38 + 0.08 1.39 0.97 - 1.81 Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Cs-134 1.75 + 0.11 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Cs-137 1.81 +/- 0.10 1.76 1.23 - 2.29 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Mn-54 0.01 + 0.03 0.00 NA Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Zn-65 -0.24 | |||
* 0.09 0.00 -0.50 - 1.00 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Sr-90 1.11 + 0.14 1.18 0.83 - 1.53 Pass MAAP-1 154 02/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.56 +/- 0.06 1.77 0.53 - 3.01 Pass MAAP-1 154 02/01/14 Gr. Beta 0.98 +/- 0.06 0.77 0.39 - 1.16 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Ni-63 4.80 +/- 15.30 0.00 NA Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Co-57 1064.50 +/- 3.60 966.00 676.00 - 1256.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Co-60 1.70 +/- 0.50 1.22 (3) Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Cs-134 6.10 +/- 1.80 0.00 NA Fail (4) | |||
MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Cs-137 1364.30 +/- 5.30 1238.00 867.00 - 1609.00 Pass MASO-1146 02/01/14 K-40 728.90 +/- 15.90 622.00 435.00 - 809.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Mn-54 1588.00 +/- 6.00 1430.00 1001.00 - 1859.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Zn-65 763.50 +/- 6.80 695.00 487.00 - 904.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Sr-90 1.23 +/- 1.37 0.00 NA Pass E-8 | |||
TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) | |||
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 2 of 2) | |||
Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MASO-4439 08/01/14 Ni-63 771.62 + 23.29 980.00 686.00 1274.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Sr-90 778.34 + 17.82 858.00 601.00 1115.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Cs-134 520.60 +/- 7.09 622.00 435.00 809.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Co-57 1135.00 +/- 7.40 1116.00 781.00 1451.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Co-60 768.20 +/- 7.70 779.00 545.00 1013.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Mn-54 1050.70 +/- 12.60 1009.00 706.00 1312.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Zn-65 407.89 +/- 15.03 541.00 379.00 703.00 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Am-241 0.79 +/- 0.08 0.88 0.62 - 1.14 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Cs-137 18.62 +/- 0.54 18.40 12.90 - 23.90 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Co-57 24.85 +/- 0.42 24.70 17.30 32.10 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Co-60 12.27 +/- 0.38 12.40 8.70 16.10 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 H-3 207.20 +/- 10.60 208.00 146.00 270.00 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Fe-55 55.10 +/- 14.80 31.50 22.10 41.00 Fail (5) | |||
MAW-4431 08/01/14 Mn-54 14.36 +/- 0.53 14.00 9.80 18.20 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Zn-65 11.46 +/- 0.78 10.90 7.60 14.20 Pass MAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.93 +/- 0.07 1.40 0.42 - 2.38 Pass MAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. Beta 6.31 +/- 1.35 6.50 3.25 - 9.75 Pass MAAP-4433 08/01/14 Sr-90 0.74 +/- 0.10 0.70 0.49 - 0.91 Pass MAAP-4444 08/01/14 Sr-89 7.82 +/- 0.52 9.40 6.60 - 12.20 Pass MAAP-4444 08/01/14 Sr-90 0.76 +/- 0.10 0.76 0.53 - 0.99 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Cs-134 7.49 +/- 0.18 7.38 5.17 9.59 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Co-57 11.20 +/- 0.19 9.20 6.40 12.00 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Co-60 6.84 +/- 0.17 6.11 4.28 7.94 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Mn-54 8.11 +/- 0.26 7.11 4.97 9.23 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Zn-65 7.76 +/- 0.43 6.42 4.49 8.35 Pass a Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation). | |||
b Laboratory codes as follows: MAW (water), MAAP (air filter), MASO (soil), MAVE (vegetation). | |||
MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP. A known value of "zero" indicates an analysis was included in the testing series as a "false positive". MAPEP does not provide control limits. | |||
(1) The high bias on the plutonium crosscheck samples was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. | |||
The results of reanalysis with replacement tracer purchased from NIST: | |||
MAW-1184 Pu-238 0.68 +/- 0.10 Bq / L MAW-1184 Pu-239/240 0.66 + 0.10 Bq / L (2) Interference from Eu-1 52 resulted in misidentification of Co-57. | |||
(3) Provided in the series for "sensitivity evaluation". MAPEP does not provide control limits. | |||
(4) False positive test. Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occuring Bi-214 in sample matrix with a close spectral energy. | |||
(5) Result of reanalysis Fe-55 32.63 +/- 16.30 Bq/L E-9 | |||
APPENDIX F ERRATA DATA | |||
Corrections to the 2012 AREOR The value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in the report as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to a telephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0 millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standard quarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas of the report: | |||
F-I | |||
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2012 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services | |||
~ Exelon Generation, Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2013 F-2 | |||
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M) | |||
LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD), MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION LA- 140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) | |||
CS-134 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 80 64.2 NA 64.2 115 INDICATOR 0 (3/23) (3/12) EAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM (61.5/67.8) (61.5/67.8) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE BA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 LA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 19.8 20.6 26.6 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (0/27.6) (18.3/22.2) (25.5/27.6) 0.3 MILES W | |||
* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) | |||
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M) | |||
LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD (PCI/KG WET) | |||
CS-134 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 80 64,2 NA 64.2 115 INDICATOR 0 (3/23) (3/12) EAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM (61.5/67.8) (61.5/67.8) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE BA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 LA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 19.9 20.6 26.6 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (0/27.6) (I8.3/22.2) (25.5/27.6) 0.3 MILES W | |||
* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) | |||
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D. | |||
107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5 109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3 110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3 112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3 113 15.7 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-21 F-5 | |||
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D. | |||
107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5 109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3 110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3 112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3 113 20.9 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-21 F-6 | |||
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/-2 S.D. | |||
JAN-MAR 21.2 +/- 3.8 19.5 +/- 3.0 19.8 +/- 2.0 20.9 +/- 3.0 APR-JUN 19.5 +/- 10.3 18.6 +/- 3.1 18.0 +/- 2.8 19.7 +/- 3.8 JUL-SEP 21.0 +/- 4.7 18.9 +/- 2.6 18.5 +/- 2.2 20.6 +/- 3.0 OCT-DEC 21.9 +/- 3.9 20.2 +/- 2.6 20.1 +/- 3.3 21.2 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-IX.3 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D. | |||
SITE BOUNDARY 75 0.0 27.6 20.9 +/- 6.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 16.5 24.9 19.3 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 16.2 24.0 19.1 + 3.1 CONTROL 8 18.3 22.2 20.6 +/- 2.7 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112, 113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, Ti INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 100, 101,102,103,104, 105, 106,107, 109, 110, 22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-22 F-7 | |||
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/- 2 S.D. | |||
JAN-MAR 21.2 +/- 3.8 19.5 +/- 3.0 19.8 +/- 2.0 20.9 +/- 3.0 APR-JUN 20.6 +/- 10.3 18.6 +/- 3.1 18.0 +/- 2.8 19.7 +/- 3.8 JUL-SEP 21.0 +/- 4.7 18.9 +/- 2.6 18.5 +/- 2.2 20.6 +/- 3.0 OCT-DEC 21.9 +/- 3.9 20.2 +/- 2.6 20.1 +/- 3.3 21.2 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-IX.3 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D. | |||
SITE BOUNDARY 75 18.3 27.6 21.2 +/- 6.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 16.5 24.9 19.3 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 16.2 24.0 19.1 +/- 3.1 CONTROL 8 18.3 22.2 20.6 +/- 2.7 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112,113, 51,52, 53,54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TI INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106, 107, 109, 110,22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-22 F-8 | |||
APPENDIX G ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR) | |||
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report 1 January Through 31 December 2014 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services | |||
,'" Exelon Generation. | |||
Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2015 | |||
Table of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions .............................................................................................. I I1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 A. O bjectives of the RG PP .................................................................................. 4 B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 6 C . Program Description ...................................................................................... 6 D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3) ...................................................................... 7 I1l. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7 A. Sam ple Analysis .............................................................................................. 7 B. Data Interpretation .......................................................................................... 8 C. Background Analysis ..................................................................................... 9 IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 11 A . Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11 B. G roundwater Results ..................................................................................... 12 C . Surface Water Results .................................................................................. 13 D. Precipitation Water Results ......................................................................... 14 E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 14 F. Leaks, Spills, and Releases ........................................................................ 15 G . Trends .......................................................................................................... 15 H. Investigations ................................................................................................ 15 I. Actions Taken ................................................................................................ 15 V. References ................................................................................................................... 16 | |||
Appendices Appendix A Location Designation Tables Table A-1 Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Figures Figure A-1 Sampling locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Security-Related Information: Detailed maps of the Oyster Creek Generating Station have been withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 and N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1 Appendix B Data Tables Tables Table B-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium, Strontium, Gross Alpha and Gross Beta in Groundwater Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-1.3 Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Groundwater Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-11.3 Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
Table B-Ill.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Precipitation Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014. | |||
ii | |||
Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Generation Company LLC (Exelon) covers the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. | |||
This report covers groundwater and surface water samples collected from the environment, both on and off station property in 2014. In 2014, 1,275 analyses were performed on 498 samples from 63 locations. | |||
There were three inadvertent releases of contaminated water into the groundwater during 2009. There is a plume located west of the turbine building and is monitored via a series of monitoring wells. | |||
Gamma-emitting radionuclide K-40 was detected in nine of the 54 groundwater well samples. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248 pCi/L. Potassium-40 was detected in 264 of 266 surface water samples. The concentrations ranged from 89 to 580 pCi/L. | |||
In the case of tritium, Exelon specified that its laboratories achieve a lower limit of detection 100 times lower than the drinking water limit specified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (200 pCi/I versus 20,000 pCi/I). | |||
As expected, tritium was detected in groundwater samples. The 2014 Tritium concentrations varied from <200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with the highest concentration was MW-561. The flow of groundwater is in the direction of the intake and discharge canals. | |||
No detectable tritium (greater than the MDC) was found in surface water or precipitation samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations during 2014. | |||
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any groundwater samples during 2014. | |||
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions were performed on groundwater samples during the second quarter sampling in 2014. | |||
There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations. Gross Alpha (dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and ranged from 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. Gross Alpha (suspended) was detected in 20 samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1 pCi/L. Gross Beta (dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to 29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samples and ranged from 1.8 to 215 pCi/L. | |||
"Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group of groundwater locations. The analyses for groundwater included Fe-55, Ni-63, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234 and U-238 were detected in three of eight samples. The concentrations of U-234 and U-238 ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L, respectively. All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC. | |||
Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected and are considered background. | |||
II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station consists of a single boiling water reactor (BWR) and turbine generator capable of producing 650 megawatts of electricity. The Station operates under Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) renewed facility operating license number DPR-16. Brackish water from Barnegat Bay is supplied to the circulating water system. The circulating water system is designed to supply a continuous flow of water from Barnegat Bay through the plant to remove the waste heat released by the power cycle in the Main Condenser. The circulating water system is comprised of the intake canal from Barnegat Bay to the plant, the Main Condenser Circulating Water System, the dilution plant, and the discharge canal to Barnegat Bay. The dilution plant portion of the system minimizes the adverse effects of hot discharge water on aquatic life in the discharge canal and Barnegat Bay to meet the conditions of the Oyster Creek New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination system (NJPDES) | |||
Permit No. NJ0005550. Approximately 1 million gallons per minute of water are withdrawn from the intake canal for dilution and station use and returned to the discharge canal. | |||
The Station is located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province. | |||
Topography in the region of the Station is a slightly undulating coastal plain having low relief. The land surface gradually rises from sea level at Barnegat Bay, which is located east of the Station, to approximately 50 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) 2 miles inland. This region of the coastal plain has numerous tidal marshes and is incised by easterly flowing streams and creeks. Elevations at the Station property west of Route 9 range from approximately 0 to 15 feet AMSL immediately adjacent to the intake and discharge canals to slightly more than 30 feet AMSL in the northwest portion of the Station property. The 132-acre developed portion of the Site located within the "horseshoe" formed by the intake and discharge canals west of Route 9 has an approximate average elevation of 20 feet AMSL. In the immediate vicinity of the intake and discharge canals, the Station property slopes steeply down to the canal. The average elevation of the surface water level in the intake and discharge canals is approximately 1-foot AMSL. The remaining 637-acre portion of the Station located east of Route 9 is primarily vegetated and undeveloped. The ground surface is relatively level except for the steep slopes at areas adjacent to the intake and discharge canals. | |||
The three shallowest stratigraphic units in the vicinity of the Oyster Creek area in descending order are the Cape May Formation, the Cohansey Formation, and the Kirkwood Formation. Some of the Station structures are constructed to depths of approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs). Excavations were completed from grade, through the fill, Cape May Formation, Upper Clay, and into the Cohansey Formation during construction. Consequently, the bottoms of some Station structures are completed within the Cohansey Formation and some structures breach the Upper Clay. | |||
The Cape May Formation regionally has an average thickness of 40 feet and at OCGS, the Cape May is described as a light gray to tan, medium- to fine-grained sand, with trace to some silt and occasional coarse sand. It is generally poorly compacted. The Cape May Formation varies from 0 to 21 feet in thickness based on historical boring logs. The variation principally is due to the varying amount of material excavated and replaced by fill during Station construction. | |||
When present, the thickness of the Cape May generally ranges from 15 to 20 feet thick. The base of the Cape May generally is defined by the presence of a dark clay unit referred to as the Upper Clay unit. The Upper Clay is a stiff to hard, gray, plastic organic clay containing inclusions (also described as lenses or partings) of dense fine sand with trace to some organic silt. The deposits of fine sand within the Upper Clay layer have high relative densities and occur as lenses or inclusions. | |||
The Cohansey Formation is primarily composed of a light-colored, fine- to very coarse-grained quartzose sand with lenses of silt and clay. Although most borings at the Station do not penetrate the entire Cohansey Formation, this formation appears to be approximately 60 to 80 feet thick at OCGS. A clay sequence, referred to at the Station as the "Lower Clay", marks the base of the Cohansey, which generally is present to approximately 90 to 100 feet bgs. The lower clay is a dense gray medium- to fine-grained sand containing trace to some organic silt and layers or inclusions of very stiff to hard gray organic clay. | |||
The thickness of the lower clay is estimated to be approximately 10 to 20 feet in the vicinity of OCGS. | |||
The Cohansey Formation is underlain by the Kirkwood Formation which consists of several stratigraphic units. The Kirkwood Formation is described as a medium- to fine-grained sand with trace silt. The thickness of this formation beneath the Station is unknown. The south domestic supply well terminates in the Kirkwood at a depth of 310 feet bgs. The Kirkwood thickness in Ocean County ranges from approximately 300 to 400 feet. | |||
This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected in 2014. | |||
A. Objectives of the RGPP The long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows: | |||
* Ensure that the site characterization of geology and hydrology provides an understanding of predominant ground water gradients based upon current site conditions. | |||
" Identify site risk based on plant design and work practices. | |||
" Evaluate all SSCs that contain or could contain licensed material and for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach groundwater. | |||
" Evaluate work practices that involve licensed material and for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach groundwater. | |||
" Perform on-site monitoring to ensure timely detection of inadvertent radiological releases to ground water. | |||
" Understand background concentrations of radioactive analytes outside of the REMP, as required. | |||
" Evaluate return/re-use of previously discharged radioactive effluents in gaseous or liquid effluents that are returned from the environment to the operating nuclear power facility. | |||
" Ensure controls are established for the selection, installation and retirement of monitoring wells. | |||
" Perform remediation protocols to prevent migration of licensed material off-site and to minimize decommissioning impacts. | |||
" Ensure that records of leaks, spills, remediation efforts are retained and retrievable to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(g). | |||
" Ensure periodic communications are held on the RGPP with the designated State/Local officials. | |||
" Ensure timely verbal and written reporting occurs if there is an inadvertent release of licensed materials to the soil, groundwater or surface water. | |||
" Document and report all applicable RGPP data. | |||
" Identify and resolve deficiencies via the Corrective Action Process as delineated in PI-AA-120 "Issue Identification and Screening Process". | |||
" Perform program oversight to ensure effective implementation of the voluntary RGPP. | |||
B. Implementation of the Objectives The objectives identified have been implemented at the Oyster Creek Generating Station through compliance with approved procedures EN-AA-408-4000, Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Implementation and site specific procedure EN-OC-408-4160, RGPP Reference Material for Oyster Creek Generating Station. | |||
C. Program Description Samples for the OCGS site were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Inc. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS RGPP in 2014. Sample locations can be found in Table A-i, Appendix A. | |||
: 1. Sample Collection Samples of water are collected, managed, transported and analyzed in accordance with approved procedures. Both groundwater and surface water are collected. Sample locations, sample collection frequencies and analytical frequencies are controlled in accordance with approved station procedures. | |||
Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection, preservation management, and shipment of samples, as well as in documentation of sampling events. | |||
: 2. Sample Analysis Samples are analyzed in accordance with approved procedures that are based on industry standards. | |||
: 3. Quality Control Analytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assurance programs, industry cross-check programs, nuclear industry audits, as well as being certified by the State of New Jersey. | |||
: 4. Data Interpretation Station personnel review and evaluate all analytical data deliverables as data is received. Analytical data results are reviewed by both station personnel and independent consultants, including a hydrogeologist, for adverse trends or changes to hydrogeologic conditions. | |||
D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3) | |||
Tritium (chemical symbol H-3) is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. The most common form of tritium is tritium oxide, which is also called "tritiated water." The chemical properties of tritium are essentially those of ordinary hydrogen. | |||
Tritiated water behaves the same as ordinary water in both the environment and the body. Tritium can be taken into the body by drinking water, breathing air, eating food, or absorption through the skin. Once tritium enters the body, it disperses quickly and is uniformly distributed throughout the body. Tritium is excreted primarily through urine with a clearance rate characterized by an effective biological half-life of about 10 days. | |||
Tritium is produced naturally in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays strike air molecules. Tritium is also produced during nuclear weapons explosions, as a by-product in reactors producing electricity, and in special production reactors. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986. Like normal water, tritiated water is colorless and odorless. Tritiated water behaves chemically and physically like non-tritiated water in the subsurface, and therefore tritiated water will travel at the same velocity as the average groundwater velocity. | |||
Tritium has a half-life of approximately 12.3 years. It decays spontaneously to helium-3 (He-3). This radioactive decay releases a beta particle (18.6 keV low-energy electron). The radioactive decay of tritium is the source of the health risk from exposure to tritium. Tritium is one of the least dangerous radionuclides because it emits very weak radiation and leaves the body relatively quickly. Since tritium is almost always found as water, it goes directly into soft tissues and organs. The associated dose to these tissues is generally uniform and is dependent on the water content of the specific tissue. | |||
Ill. Program Description A. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP in 2014. The sampling frequencies are increased if activity is detected. | |||
In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses for groundwater, surface water, and precipitation water: | |||
: 1. Gamma emitters | |||
: 2. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 | |||
: 3. Tritium | |||
: 4. Gross Alpha, Dissolved and Suspended and Gross Beta, Dissolved and Suspended | |||
: 5. Selected transuranics | |||
: 6. Fe-55 | |||
: 7. Ni-63 B. Data Interpretation The radiological data collected prior to Oyster Creek Generating Station becoming operational, as well as background data from publicly available databases, were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of this report, Oyster Creek Generating Station was considered operational at initial criticality. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data: | |||
: 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis. | |||
The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal as an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity. | |||
: 2. Laboratory Measurements Uncertainty The estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium in environmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of the measurement value. | |||
Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as a range with a stated level of confidence. The convention is to report results with a 95% level of confidence. The uncertainty comes from calibration standards, sample volume or weight measurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelon reports the uncertainty of a measurement created by statistical process (counting error) as well as all sources of error (Total Propagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two values calculated. Exelon reports the TPU by following the result with plus or minus (+/-) the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, that is obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty in measurements. | |||
Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level. | |||
C. Background Analysis | |||
: 1. Background Concentrations of Tritium The purpose of the following discussion is to summarize background measurements of tritium in various media performed by others. Additional detail may be found by consulting references. | |||
: a. Tritium Production Tritium is created in the environment from naturally occurring processes both cosmic and subterranean, as well as from anthropogenic (i.e., man-made) sources. In the upper atmosphere, "cosmogenic" tritium is produced from the bombardment of stable nuclides and combines with oxygen to form tritiated water, which will then enter the hydrologic cycle. Below ground, "lithogenic" tritium is produced by the bombardment of natural lithium present in crystalline rocks by neutrons produced by the radioactive decay of naturally abundant uranium and thorium. Lithogenic production of tritium is usually negligible compared to other sources due to the limited abundance of lithium in rock. The lithogenic tritium is introduced directly to groundwater. | |||
A major anthropogenic source of tritium and strontium-90 comes from the former atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Levels of tritium in precipitation increased significantly during the 1950s and peaked in 1963 with the signing of the limited test ban treaty. The Canadian heavy water nuclear power reactors, other commercial power reactors, nuclear research and weapons production continue to influence tritium concentrations in the environment. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986. | |||
: b. Precipitation Data Precipitation samples are routinely collected at stations around the world for the analysis of tritium and other radionuclides. One publicly available database that provides tritium concentrations in precipitation is the USEPA's RadNet database. RadNet provides tritium precipitation concentration data for samples collected at stations throughout the U.S. from 1978 up to and including 1996. | |||
Tritium concentrations in precipitation in New Jersey from 1978 through 1996 have ranged from 600 pCi/I in 1979 to 0 pCi/I in 1996, with an average of 185 pCi/I. Tritium concentrations in wells may still be above the 200 pCi/I detection limit from the external causes described above. | |||
Water from previous years and decades is naturally captured in groundwater, so some well water sources today are affected by the surface water from the 1960s that was elevated in tritium. | |||
: c. Surface Water Data Tritium concentrations are routinely measured in surface water bodies, including Oyster Creek and the Delaware River. New Jersey surface water data between 1978 and 1998 averaged 185 pCi/I. | |||
The USEPA RadNet surface water data typically has a reported 'Combined Standard Uncertainty' of 2 standard deviations. This corresponds to a +/- 36 to +/-100 pCi/I confidence bound on each given reported measurement so that the typical surface water background data provided by RadNet may be subject to measurement uncertainty of up to 100 pCi/I. | |||
The radio-analytical laboratory counts tritium results to an Exelon specified LLD of 200 pCi/I with a typical uncertainty of +/-100 pCi/I. Therefore, sample results reported by TBE near this LLD can not be distinguished from natural background concentrations in surface water. | |||
IV. Results and Discussion A. Program Exceptions | |||
: 1. Sample Anomalies There are no sample anomalies in 2014. | |||
: 2. Missed Samples Exelon maintains a Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) as part of the nuclear industry's voluntary groundwater protection initiative as described in NEI 07-07. As part of this program, samples are obtained routinely from monitoring wells and surface waters at Oyster Creek based on the frequencies outlined in station procedures. The following samples were not obtained as required by procedure: | |||
MW-51 | |||
- Tritium, monthly | |||
- Gamma, semi-annually | |||
- Gross alpha, annually | |||
- Gross beta, annually | |||
- Select transuranics, annually | |||
- Iron-55, annually | |||
- Nickel-63, annually | |||
- Strontium-89, annually | |||
- Strontium-90, annually Immediate actions taken: | |||
MW-51 was dry 12 out of 12 months during sampling events. MW-51 is checked for water each sampling event and no additional actions are required. | |||
: 3. LLDs Not Met Required LLDs for Surface and Groundwater Isotope pCi/liter H-3 200 Mn-54 15 Co-58 15 Fe-59 30 Co-60 15 Zn-65 30 Nb-95 15 Zr-95 30 1-131 15 Cs-134 15 Cs-137 18 Ba-140 60 La-140 15 Pu-241 50 Fe-55 200 Ni-63 5 Sr-89 10 Sr-90 1 Gross Alpha (diss) 3 Gross Alpha (susp) 10 Gross Beta (diss) 4 Gross Beta (susp) 4 Transuranics 0.2 Indicated LLDs for shorter lived radionuclides were not met due to a time lag between taking the samples and analyzing the samples as indicated on table B-1.2 and B-11.2. | |||
B. Groundwater Results Samples were collected from on-site locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. As reported in CRA's 2011 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Torus Water Storage Tank and the Condensate Storage Tank is towards the intake and discharge canals. | |||
Tritium Samples from 54 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1, Appendix B). Tritium was detected in 29 of 209 samples. | |||
The values ranged from < 200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with the highest concentration was MW-561 (Table B-1.1, Appendix B). | |||
Strontium Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any location sampled in 2014. (Table B-1.1, Appendix B) | |||
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended) | |||
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions were performed on groundwater samples during the second sampling in 2014. | |||
There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations. | |||
Gross Alpha (dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and ranged from 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. Gross Alpha (suspended) was detected in 20 samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1 pCi/L. Gross Beta (dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to 29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samples and ranged from 1.8 to 215 pCi/L. | |||
Gamma Emitters Gamma emitting nuclide K-40 was detected in nine of 54 samples analyzed during 2014. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248 pCi/L. (Table B-1.2, Appendix B). | |||
"Hard-To-Detect" "Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group of groundwater locations. The analyses for groundwater included Fe-55, Ni-63, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234 and U-238 were detected in three of eight samples. The concentrations of U-234 and U-238 ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L, respectively. | |||
All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC. | |||
Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected and are considered background (Table B-1.3, Appendix B). | |||
C. Surface Water Results Samples were collected from on-site locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below. | |||
Tritium Samples from 4 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-11.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD) was found in any surface water samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations. | |||
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended) | |||
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions are not required on a routine basis and were not analyzed in 2014. | |||
Gamma Emitters Gamma emitting nuclide, naturally occurring potassium-40, was detected in 264 of 266 samples analyzed. The concentrations ranged from 89 to 580 pCi/L. (Table B-11.2, Appendix B) | |||
"Hard-To-Detect" "Hard-To-Detect" analyses are not required on a routine basis and were not analyzed in 2014. | |||
D. Precipitation Water Results Precipitation samples were collected from onsite and offsite locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below. | |||
Tritium Samples from five locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-Ill.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD) was found in any precipitation water samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations. | |||
E. Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program results for TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) are presented in the 2014 Oyster Creek AREOR. | |||
This report is part of the AREOR. | |||
F. Leaks, Spills, and Releases There were no abnormal liquid releases during 2014. | |||
G. Trends Active remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills that occurred in 2009 was initiated in October 2010. Trending of the data due to active remediation is on-going. Overall, the station has seen a decreasing trend in tritium values. | |||
H. Investigations Conestoga Rovers and Associates performed an independent assessment of the tritium plume. The results of their assessment can be found in References 1, 2 and 3. | |||
I. Actions Taken | |||
: 1. Compensatory Actions Active remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills that occurred in 2009 was initiated in October, 2010. | |||
: 2. Installation of Monitoring Wells The following wells were installed in 2010 to better characterize and monitor the tritium plume and site hydrology. | |||
Well Number Formation Well Installation Date W-581 Cohansey July W-591 Cohansey March W-601 Cohansey July W-61 I Cohansey July W-62 Cape May March W-631 Cohansey July W-64 Cape May March W-65 Cape May March W-661 Cohansey July Well Number Formation Well Installation Date W-67 Cape May March W-681 Cohansey July W-691 Cohansey July 15- | |||
W-701 Cohansey July W-71 Cape May August W-72 Cape May August W-73 Pumping well Cohansey October | |||
: 3. Actions to Recover/Reverse Plumes Oyster Creek Generating Station is currently addressing the tritium in groundwater through pumping of groundwater out of W-73 into the intake structure. | |||
V. References | |||
: 1. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, Fleetwide Assessment, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (6), April 2011 | |||
: 2. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Site Investigation Report, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (4), August 2009 | |||
: 3. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Remedial Investigation Workplan, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (5), | |||
October 2009 APPENDIX A LOCATION DESIGNATION | |||
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample Well GPS RGPP Tritium Aquifer or Identification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Alert Water Number (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Value Body Designation Monitored North 35837333 2000 DWN Domestic 574672.98 300.0 B p2i/L Kirkwood Well South DWS Domestic Wel574616.69 356955.90 145.0 B 2,000 pCi/'L Kirkwood Well E of ISFSI LW-- (microwave 357632.49 575569.96 21.0 2,000 pCi/L Cape May zone) | |||
E of ISFSI LW-2 357645.30 21.0 2,000 Cape May (microwave 575581.92 pCi/L zone) | |||
E of ISFSI 357630.20 21.0 D 2000 Cape May LW-3 (microwave 575575.52 pCi/L zone) | |||
East of LW-4 ISFSI - 357652.78 49.0 D 2,000 Cohansey (microwave 575573.75 pCi/L zone) | |||
SW of 357380.76 2000 MW-1A-2A MFOT 575043.44 24.0 D Cape May Moat MW-1G-1A East of fueling 358551.94 20.0 2,000 Cape May station 575308.91 pCi/L 358550.57 45.0 2,000 East of Chne MW-1G-1B fueling station 575316.19 pCi/L Cohansey Roadway- 357598.17 2,000 MW-1i-1A NW of 574412.70 pi/L Cape May TWST Roadway - 357574.80 2,000 MW-1i -2A SE of 574493.50 17.5 D pCi/L Cape May TWST Intak 57449.50 9.0 D2,000Ma MW-15K-1A Roadway Intake - 357297.90 574469.50 19.0 D pCi/L Cape May Yard-W 357573.30 2,000 MW-16D of MAC 574746.50 25.0 D P&L Cape May Building A-1 | |||
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS RGPP Aquifer or Sample CoodiatS Depth Sample Tritium Location Coordinates (ft) Point Alert Water Identification Number (Northing/Easting) Num rDesignation Desint Value Body V e Monitored Finninger 2000 MW-24-2A Farm - 356838.52 18.0 Cape May near DSB 579470.94 pCi/L Finninger 356828.49 2,000 MW-24-3A Farm - 17.0 1 pCi/L Cape May near DSB 578969.05 Main MCD Condenser N/A N/A Weekly* H-3 2,000 Surface Discharge pCi/L Water Intake SW/Weekly* 2,000 Surface Canal H-3 pCi/L Water RT 9 2,000 Surface SW-2 South N/A N/A SW pCi/L2 Water Bridge SW-3 Fire Pond N/A N/A SW 2,000 Surface pCi/L Water Dilution W-1 Pump 357029.86 50.0 2,000 Cohansey Area - 574140.61 pCi/L West Bank North Yard 358311.70 50.0 2,000 Cohansey W-1A Area 574679.00 pCi/L W-1 B North Yard 358312.80 20.0 2000 Cape May Area 574685.40 p2i/L West end 357149.22 60.0 2,000 W-lC of backsite 572741.00 pCi/L Cohansey W-1 K West end 357151.55 150.0 2,000 Kirkwood of backsite 572728.77 pCi/L W-2 S of EDG 356965.65 57.0 2,000 Cohansey Bldg 574555.73 pCi/L Field-W 358105.00 5.000 W-2A of North 578105.60 50.0 2,000 Cohansey Yard Bldg 574348.60 A-2 | |||
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS Tt Aquifer or Sample Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium Water Identification Number Location (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Designation Alert Value Body Monitored Field - W of 358110.302,000 W-2B North Yard 574348.50 20.0 B pCi/L Cape May Building Forked 357923.67 60.0 2,000 W-2C River CT 57389.92pei/ | |||
573809.92 pCi/L Site Forked 358030.88 150.0 2,000 Kirkwood W-2K River CT 573762.54 pCi/L Site Intake -73.00 24.0 2,000 W-3 Access 574499.10 D pCi/L Cape May Road Plant 358067.92 50.0 2,000 Cohansey W-3A Access 575664.22 pCi/L Road Plant 358070.582,000 W-3B Access 575656.25 20.0 1 pCi/L Road Finninger 356595.30 60.0 2,000 W-3C Farm - N of 576663.33 pCi/L Cohansey Discharge Finninger 356602.17 2,000 W-3K Farm - N of 100.0 Kirkwood Dshre Discharge 576675.04 pCi/L Intake - 357176.40 2,000 W-4 Access 574497.70 55.0 D P611- Cohansey Road SE of 356913.30 W-4A OCAB 575387.10 50.0 B p20i/L ohansey Building SE of2,0 W-4B OCAB 356916.40 2,000 Building 575388.90 20.0 B pCi/L Cape May Finninger 359305.61 60.0 2,000 W-4C Farm - S of 575867.58 pCi/L Cohansey Intake Finninger 359321.83 2,000 W-4K Farm - S of 575874.07 100.00 pCi/L Kirkwood Intake A-3 | |||
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample CoordinatS WelllePWeDepth Det Sample RGPP Wateruor Aquifer Location Coordinates Water Identification (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body Number Designation Value Monitored | |||
*NW Yard area, near 357510.95 2,000 Cape May Fire Water 574374.05 pCi/L Tank Finninger Farm - E 356758.59 60.0 B 2,000 Cohansey of dredge 580642.26 pCi/L spoils Finninger W-5K Farm - E 356743.81 150.0 B 2,000 Kirkwood of dredge 580646.48 p1KLd spoils NW Yard - | |||
W-6 near Fire 357514.02 52.0 D 2,000 Cohansey Water 574373.77 p5i/L2Cohane Tank W-7 NE - 357074.46 20.0 D 2000 Cape May Building 4 574713.08 pCi/L Roadway- 357289.29 2000 W-9 NE of SAS 574892.74 20.0 Dp2i/L, Building W-10 NW of SAS 357286.29 60.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey Building 574890.61 Yard-NW 357669.10 2,000 W-12 of DWPC 574755.60 20.0pCi/L Cape May Building Yard - NW 357666.00 2000 W-13 of DWPC 574755.90 50.0 D pCi/L Cohansey Building Yard - SW 357702.41 Warehouse 575018.75 53.0 0 pCi/L Cohansey Warehouse Yard - Sw 357705.83 2,000DCape May W-15 of 575017.70 pCi/L Warehouse W-16 Yard - E of 357967.26 20.0 D 2000 pCi/L Cape May LLRW 574933.03 W-17 Road/ Exit 358078.05 150.0 1 2,000 Kirkwood Near W-3A 575667.14 pCi/L A-4 | |||
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS RGPP Aquifer Water or Sample Identification Lctoation Coordinates oriae Depth Sample Tritium ae Number (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body Designation Value Monitored Near200ICpMa Near 357005.78 2,000 W-18 EDG 574621.6 20.0 1piL Cape May Building pCi/L Near 357077.91 2,000 W-19 EDG 574633.23 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building SW of 356927.46 2,000 W-20 EDG 574542.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 2,000 W-21 EDG Building 357009.15 574518.22pi/ 20.0 1 2,000 Cape May Building Near2,0 NEDG 357024.50 2,000 Cape May W-22 Building 574590.19 39.0 1 pCi/L Near 357054.89 2,000 W-23 EDG 57454.88 20.0 1 p Cape May Building 574564.88 pCi/L South of W-24 TB Wof old 357128.94 2,000 Machine 574650.77 19.0 D pCi/L Cape May Shop Near 356962.59 2,000 W-25 EDG 574677.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357006.60 2,000 W-26 EDG 574644.03 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357042.43 2,000 W-27 EDG 574636.35 20.0 1 pCiIL Cape May Building Near 356991.292000 W-28 EDG 574573.64 19.5 Cape May Building 574573CapepMay Near 357012.62 2,000 W-29 EDG 574568.69 19.5 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357058.00 2,000 W-30 EDG 574516.71 19.52 Cape May Building A-5 | |||
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS Coodiats Depth RGPP Sample Tritium Aquifer or Sample Identification LocationWater Idnumbera Lo(NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Alert Body Number Designation Value Monitored Near EDG 357051.78 2,000 W-31 Building 574495.62 pCi/L W-32 Near EDG 356978.58 19.5 1 2,00 pCi/L Cape May Building 574528.44 W-33 Near EDG 357026.93 19.5 2000 pCi/L Cape May Building 574499.17 South of TB TB 3719.142,000 W-34 W of old 357196.14 40.0 pi/L Cohansey Machine 574649.43 42, C n Shop Between MW-50 CST and 357368.21 20.0 E2000 pCi/L Cape May Intake 574436.80 Structure MW-Si Near CST 357378.30 20.0 E 2,000 pCi/L Cape May 574480.80 Near Near 35740.902,000 MW-52 Intake 357400.90 20.0 D 2,000 Cape May Structure 574353.00 pCi/L Near end of CW 357272.80 20.0 2000 pCi/L Cape May MW-53 discharge 574447.60 piping Near 357276.20 MW-54 Intake 574311.70 20.0 E 2,000 Cape May Structure pCi/L Between MW-55 CST and 357354.88 30.0 2000 pCi/L Cape May Intake 574440.07 Structure MW-561 Bytanks NaOCI 357305.30 52.0 pCi/L Cohansey 574465.50 Near Near 35733.712,000 MW-571 Intake 357343.71 50.0 pCi/L Cohansey Structure 674373.89 pEla Near Near 35736.702,000 MW-581 Intake 357346.70 72.0 D pCi/L Cohansey Structure 574377.28 7Dhn A-6 | |||
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample WelGS Well GPS Depth Sample RGPP Tritium Aquifer or identification Location Coordinates Deth Sampl Art Water Number (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body rDesignation Value Monitored Intake MW-591 Roadway 357422.14 44.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey | |||
- NW of 574406.38 CST Near 357346.55 MW-601 Intake 574373.88 92.0 D 2,000 Structure pCi/L Cohansey Between MW-611 CST and 357328.64 72.0 E 2,000 Intake 574444.45 pCiIL Cohansey Structure NW MW-62 Corner 357467.93 25.0 D Cape May Turbineof 574524.10 pCi/L Bldg Between MW-631 CST and 357329.40 92.0 D 2000 Cohansey Intake 574447.67 pCi/L Structure MW-64 Near Intake 357343.96 2,000 Structure 574377.88 25.0 E pCi/L Cape May Intake MW-65 Roadway 357421.00 2000 | |||
- NW of 574402.55 25.0 D p2i/L Cape May CST SE of 357320.44 MW-661 Reactor 574889.18 80.0 D 2,000 Bldg pCi/L Cohansey West side 357401.99 MW-67 of Turbine 574540.38 25.0 E 2,000 Cape May Bldg 574540CapepMay SE of 357323.83 MW-681 Reactor 574897.64 100.0 D 2,000 Bldg pCi/L Cohansey Yard - | |||
NW of 357664.03 78.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey MW-691 DWPC 574760.93 Building Yard - | |||
MW-701 NW of 357670.57 98.0 D 2,000 DWPC 574759.18 pCi/L Cohansey Building S of 357365.52 MW-71 Reactor 574841.89 25.0 D 2,000 Cape May Bldg p7I41 Cae/a A-7 | |||
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample Well GPS RGPP Aquifer or Identification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium Water Number (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Designation Alert Body Value Monitored MW-72 N of Reactor 357549.87 25.0 DCape May Bldg 574788.52 pCi/L MW-73 Remediation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A System | |||
* Tritium sampling frequency based upon agreement made with the NJDEP on 4/26/13. | |||
D = Daily W = Weekly M = Monthly S = Semi-annual B = Biennial A-8 | |||
*f u-i,. | |||
~%m~ 3/4 / | |||
W.I9. | |||
~~jW~IK Z I OF BRIDGE | |||
"ýwk Figure A-1 Sampling Locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 A-9 | |||
Figure A-1 Sampling Locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 A-10 | |||
APPENDIX B DATA TABLES | |||
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus) | |||
UWN 04109114 < 191 DWS 04/09/14 | |||
* 189 LW-3 01/15/14 | |||
* 183 LW-3 04/10/14 | |||
* 175 < 6.5 < 0.8 < 0.4 | |||
* 1.0 < 0.8 <2.1 LW-3 07/17/14 | |||
* 191 LW-3 10/17/14 TBE | |||
* 157 LW-3 10/17/14 TBE | |||
* 151 LW-3 10/17/14 EIML | |||
* 150 LW-4 01/15/14 | |||
* 172 LW-4 04/10/14 | |||
* 173 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 0.4 | |||
* 0.9 2.1 +/- 0.6 < 1.9 LW-4 07/17/14 | |||
* 194 LW-4 10/17/14 | |||
* 159 MW-15K-1A 01/13/14 | |||
* 199 MW-15K-lA 04/09/14 | |||
* 195 < 6.1 < 0.7 < 1.5 | |||
* 0.8 11.2 +/- 1.4 2.8 +/- 1.3 MW-15K-1A 07/15/14 | |||
* 153 MW-15K-1A 10/14/14 | |||
* 176 MW-16D 01/15/14 | |||
* 183 MW-16D 04/08/14 | |||
* 177 < 6.1 < 0.7 < 4.7 | |||
* 1.0 17.0 +/- 1.9 < 2.0 MW-16D 07/22/14 | |||
* 156 MW-16D 10/15/14 | |||
* 172 MW-IA-2A 01/15/14 | |||
* 178 MW-iA-2A 04/11/14 | |||
* 176 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.2 | |||
* 1.0 6.8 +/- 1.2 2.1 +/- 1.4 MW-1A-2A 07/22/14 | |||
* 153 MW-IA-2A 10/15/14 | |||
* 191 MW-11-1A 01/15/14 | |||
* 180 MW-11-1A 04/08/14 | |||
* 174 < 6.7 < 0.8 < 0.6 3.4 +/- 1.3 2.0 +/- 0.6 4.0 +/- 1.5 MW-11-1A 07/21/14 | |||
* 151 MW-11-1iA 10/15/14 | |||
* 174 MW-1 I-2A 01/15/14 | |||
* 180 MW-1 I-2A 04/08/14 | |||
* 170 < 5.3 < 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.9 2.1 +/- 0.6 < 2.0 MW-1 I-2A 07/21/14 | |||
* 154 MW-1 I-2A 10/15/14 | |||
* 176 MW-50 01/14/14 TBE 4650 +/- 513 MW-50 01/14/14 TBE 5090 +/- 556 MW-50 01/14/14 EIML 4648 +/- 204 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE 3450 +/- 394 <5.1 < 0.6 | |||
* 1.3 2.8 +/- 1.6 8.3 +/- 1.2 5.4 + 1.6 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE 3320 +/- 382 < 6.3 | |||
* 0.6 | |||
* 0.5 1.7 +/- 1.1 7.7 +/- 1.3 3.4 + 1.3 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML 3456 +/- 181 | |||
* 0.8 | |||
* 0.6 MW-50 07/15/14 TBE 4600 +/- 501 MW-50 07/15/14 TBE 5330 +/- 573 MW-50 07/15/14 EIML 5371 +/- 216 MW-50 10/14/14 2830 +/- 343 MW-52 01/14/14 | |||
* 178 MW-52 04/09/14 | |||
* 190 < 5.3 < 0.6 < 0.8 < 0.6 7.0 +/- 1.0 < 1.6 MW-52 07/16/14 | |||
* 156 MW-52 10/13/14 | |||
* 175 MW-53 01/15/14 TBE | |||
* 193 MW-53 01/15/14 TBE | |||
* 193 MW-53 01/15/14 EIML | |||
* 142 MW-53 04/10/14 | |||
* 196 < 6.8 < 0.7 < 1.7 < 0.6 7.8 +/- 1.4 < 1.6 MW-53 07/17/14 | |||
* 160 MW-53 10/14/14 | |||
* 177 MW-54 01/14/14 | |||
* 191 MW-54 04/09/14 | |||
* 194 < 6.4 < 0.8 < 4.2 10.2 +/- 5.8 29.4 +/- 3.9 43.2 +/- 8.0 MW-54 07/16/14 | |||
* 172 B-I | |||
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus) | |||
MW-54 10/14/14 Ori ginal 320 +/- 129 MW-54 10/14/14 Re count 331 +/- 141 MW-54 10114114 Re*analysis 459 +/- 145 MW-55 01/14/14 TBE 180 MW-55 0 1/14/14 TBE 188 MW-55 01/14/14 EIML 142 MW-55 04/08114 187 < 6.3 < 0.6 0.9 +/- 0.6 < 0.6 7.3 +/- 1.3 < 1.6 MW-55 07/15/14 1020 +/- 154 MW-55 10/14/14 420 +/- 136 MW-561 01/13/14 18800 +/- 1920 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE 8820 +/- 925 < 5.6 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.5 +/- 1.0 3.8 +/- 0.7 3.3 +/- 1.2 MW-561 04109114 TBE 8320 +/- 877 < 8.4 <0.8 < 0.2 1.7 +/- 1.0 3.1 +/- 0.7 2.8 +/- 1.2 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML 8859 +/- 276 < 1.1 <0.8 MW-561 07/15/14 TBE 5130 +/- 553 MW-561 07/15/14 TBE 4360 +/- 476 MW-561 07/15/14 EIML 5496 +/- 218 MW-561 10/14/14 TBE 25600 +/- 2610 MW-561 10/14/14 TBE 26200 +/- 2670 MW-561 10/14/14 EIML 26835 +/- 497 MW-561 12/11/14 7140 +/- 757 MW-571 01114114 TBE 14500 +/- 1490 MW-571 01/14/14 TBE 13500 +/- 1390 MW-571 01/14/14 EIML 15161 +/- 353 MW-571 04/09/14 9930 +/- 1040 < 6.7 < 0.9 0.8 +/- 0.4 2.3 +/- 1.1 15.0 +/- 1.3 3.8 +/- 1.4 MW-571 07/15/14 5750 +/- 614 MW-571 10/13/14 6390 +/- 698 MW-581 01/14/14 < 175 MW-581 04/09/14 < 192 < 4.8 < 0.6 0.5 +/- 0.3 < 1.1 1.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.7 MW-581 07/15/14 < 158 MW-581 10/13/14 < 174 MW-591 01/14/14 < 184 MW-591 04109/14 TBE < 189 < 5.3 < 0.5 < 0.4 < 1.2 2.4 +/- 0.7 < 2.5 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 167 < 5.8 < 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.3 < 0.9 2.7 +/- 0.7 < 3.0 MW-591 04/09/14 EIML < 144 < 0.8 < 0.6 MW-591 07/16/14 TBE < 157 MW-591 07/16/14 TBE < 153 MW-591 07/16/14 EIML < 137 MW-591 10/13/14 < 189 MW-601 01/14/14 < 181 MW-601 04/09/14 < 189 < 4.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 14.4 +/- 3.3 1.8 +/- 0.6 52.0 +/- 3.7 MW-601 07/15/14 < 158 MW-611 01/13/14 < 188 MW-611 04/10/14 < 184 < 5.6 < 0.9 < 0.5 4.6 +/- 1.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 7.8 +/- 1.7 MW-611 07/16/14 < 158 MW-611 10/14/14 < 178 MW-62 01/14/14 < 191 MW-62 04/08/14 < 188 < 6.3 < 0.6 < 0.4 <0.7 8.7 +/- 1.2 < 1.7 MW-62 07/16/14 < 158 MW-62 10/14/14 < 174 MW-631 01/13/14 < 174 MW-631 04/10/14 < 191 < 4.5 < 1.0 < 0.9 8.1 +/- 2.8 6.0 +/- 1.1 31.9 +/- 3.1 MW-631 07/16/14 < 156 MW-631 10/14/14 < 194 MW-64 01/14/14 < 175 B-2 | |||
TABLE B-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-8 (Dis) Gr-B (Sus) | |||
MW-64 04/09/14 | |||
* 185 < 6.7 < 0.6 < 0.9 4.5 +/- 2.5 14.3 +/- 1.7 8.5 +/- 3.0 MW-64 07/15/14 | |||
* 155 < 2.0 < 0.7 MW-64 10/13/14 | |||
* 176 MW-65 01/14/14 | |||
* 182 MW-65 04/09/14 | |||
* 193 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.9 1.4 +/- 0.8 11.1 +/- 1.5 < 1.7 MW-65 07/16/14 | |||
* 157 MW-65 10/13/14 | |||
* 176 MW-661 01/14/14 | |||
* 175 MW-661 04/11/14 | |||
* 182 < 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.4 < 0.9 3.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.5 MW-661 07/16/14 | |||
* 156 MW-661 10/15/14 | |||
* 193 MW-67 01114114 8770 +/- 917 MW-67 04/08/14 8600 +/- 905 < 6.4 < 0.7 3.6 +/- 0.9 2.9 +/- 1.4 9.3 +/- 1.1 3.0 +/- 1.6 MW-67 07/15/14 20900 +/- 2130 MW-67 07/22/14 5200 +/- 558 MW-67 08/27/14 2990 +/- 341 MW-67 10/14/14 1790 +/- 250 MW-681 01/14/14 | |||
* 178 MW-681 04/11/14 < 190 < 7.8 < 0.7 < 0.3 < 0.9 1.8 +/- 0.6 < 1.5 MW-681 07/16/14 < 158 MW-681 10/15/14 < 180 MW-691 01/14/14 < 193 MW-691 04/07/14 < 188 < 5.3 < 0.9 < 0.4 2.6 +/- 1.5 2.0 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.8 MW-691 07/16/14 < 155 MW-691 10/15/14 < 195 MW-701 01/14/14 < 178 MW-701 04/07/14 Original < 188 < 6.4 < 0.5 < 0.4 <1.1 9.3 +/- 0.9 4.5 _ 1.4 MW-701 04/07/14 Recount 4.1 +1.8 MW-701 07116114 < 157 MW-701 10/15/14 TBE < 175 MW-701 10/15/14 TBE < 173 MW-701 10/15/14 EIML < 150 MW-71 01/14/14 < 172 MW-71 04/11/14 Original < 184 < 5.8 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 1.4 9.3 +/- 1.3 3.4 _ 1.4 MW-71 04/11/14 Recount 5.1 +1.8 MW-71 07/16/14 < 156 MW-71 10/15/14 < 194 MW-72 01/14/14 < 192 MW-72 04/08/14 < 188 < 7.5 < 0.7 < 0.6 < 0.9 7.0 +/- 0.9 < 1.5 MW-72 07/16/14 < 153 MW-72 10/16/14 < 153 W-10 01/15/14 < 183 W-10 04/11/14 < 176 < 6.4 < 0.9 0.5 +/- 0.2 < 0.7 1.7 +/- 0.6 < 1.6 W-10 07/21/14 < 198 W-10 10/15/14 < 178 W-12 01/15/14 < 181 W-12 04/07/14 < 176 < 5.2 < 0.8 +/- 1.4 29.1 +/- 13.4 < 4.2 215 +/- 20 W-12 07/22/14 < 177 W-12 10/15/14 < 176 W-13 01/15/14 < 183 W-13 04/07/14 < 177 < 5.4 < 0.7 < < 0.7 2.3 +/- 0.7 < 1.6 W-13 07/22/14 < 153 W-13 10/15/14 < 177 W-14 01/15/14 < 174 W-14 04/07114 < 181 < 5.8 < 0.8 1.4 + 0.4 4.4 + 1.4 3.1 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/- 1.4 B-3 | |||
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus) | |||
W-14 07/21/14 < 191 W-14 10/17/14 < 158 W-15 01/15/14 < 179 W-15 04/07/14 < 177 < 5.0 < 0.7 < 0.8 4.4 +/- 2.0 7.3 +/- 1.4 5.1 +/- 2.6 W-15 07/21/14 < 154 W-15 10/17/14 < 159 W-16 01/15/14 < 181 W-16 04/08/14 < 163 < 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.3 <C ).7 3.1 +/- 1.2 < 1.6 W-16 07/21/14 < 155 W-16 10/16/14 TBE < 157 W-16 10/16/14 TBE < 154 W-16 10/16/14 EIML < 150 W-16 10/16/14 EIML < 150 W-1A 04/11/14 < 177 W-24 01/15/14 < 180 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 189 < 4.8 < 0.7 0.4 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 < 1.6 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 181 < 5.1 < 0.5 <0.5 <1 .0 3.3 +/- 0.8 < 1.7 W-24 04/10/14 EIML < 144 < 0.9 < 0.7 W-24 07/15/14 TBE < 171 W-24 07/16/14 TBE < 157 W-24 07/16/14 EIML < 137 W-24 10/14/14 < 177 W-2B 04/18/14 < 178 W-3 01/13/14 TBE < 177 W-3 01/13/14 TBE < 179 W-3 01/13/14 EIML < 142 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 184 < 4.4 < 0.5 <4.4 <0 .9 14.7 +/- 1.8 1.8 +/- 1.0 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 195 < 7.2 < 0.7 <4.7 <3 1.1 12.0 +/- 4.8 < 8.2 W-3 04/10/14 EIML < 146 < 0.8 < 0.7 W-3 07/16/14 TBE < 169 W-3 07/16/14 TBE < 155 W-3 07/16/14 EIML < 137 W-3 10/14114 TBE < 177 W-3 10/14/14 TBE < 175 W-3 10/14/14 EIML < 151 W-34 01/15/14 < 181 W-34 04/10/14 < 186 < 4.7 < 0.9 0.7 +0.5 < 01.7 13.5 +/- 1.4 < 1.6 W-34 07/21/14 < 184 W-34 10/17/14 < 184 W-4 01/13/14 < 175 W-4 04/10/14 < 188 < 4.9 < 0.4 < 0.8 4.9 +/- 1.7 4.7 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 1.7 W-4 07/16/14 < 156 W-4 10/14/14 < 176 W-4A 04/11/14 < 176 W-4B 04/11/14 < 172 W-5 01/14/14 < 182 W-5 04/08/14 < 193 < 6.3 < 0.7 < 0.5 1.7 +/- 1.0 2.3 +/- 0.7 < 2.1 W-5 07/16/14 < 158 W-5 10/15/14 < 177 W-5C 04/08/14 < 172 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 173 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 178 W-5K 04/08/14 EIML < 144 W-6 01/14/14 < 182 W-6 04/08/14 < 189 < 6.9 < 0.5 2.7 +/- 0.6 5.8 +/- 2.4 5.3 +/- 0.8 5.7 +/- 1.8 B-4 | |||
TABLE B-I. CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus) | |||
W-6 07/16/14 < 154 W-6 10/15/14 < 176 W-7 01/15/14 < 179 W-7 04/10/14 < 174 < 4.8 < 0.8 < 3.4 6.1 +/- 2.1 22.9 +/- 2.4 7.2 +/- 2.3 W-7 07/21/14 < 186 W-7 10/17/14 TBE < 156 W-7 10/17114 TBE < 156 W-7 10/17/14 EIML < 150 W-9 01/15/14 < 182 W-9 04/11/14 < 168 < 4.8 < 0.7 < 1.0 < 0.9 6.1 +/- 1.0 < 2.0 W-9 07/22/14 < 155 W-9 10/15/14 < 177 B-5 | |||
TABLE B-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE DWN 04109/14 < 21 < 44 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <20 <7 DWS 04/09/14 < 16 < 31 <2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 <17 <5 LW-3 04/10/14 < 19 < 19 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <12 <5 LW-4 04/10/14 < 14 < 31 < 1 < 2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <1 <1 <10 <3 MW-15K-1A 04/09/14 < 15 < 25 < 1 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <6 MW-16D 04/08/14 < 21 < 20 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <16 <6 MW-1A-2A 04/11/14 < 16 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <11 <4 MW-1i-lA 04/08/14 < 19 < 16 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 MW-1I-2A 04/08/14 < 14 < 12 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <5 <1 <1 <11 <3 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 18 < 16 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <2 <2 <19 <7 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 24 45 +/- 30 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <16 <2 <2 <26 <9 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML < 24 < 33 < 3 < 3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <12 <3 <2 <17 <4 MW-50 10/14/14 < 59 < 32 < 5 < 5 < 10 <4 <9 <6 <10 <21 <6 <6 <42 <6 MW-52 04/09/14 < 10 < 8 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 <11 <4 MW-53 04/10/14 < 19 < 37 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-54 04/09/14 < 19 < 15 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-54 10/14/14 < 54 < 48 < 5 < 5 <13 <6 < 11 < 6 < 10 <16 <5 <6 < 38 < 10 MW-55 04/08/14 < 17 < 13 < 1 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <2 <17 <6 MW-55 10/14/14 < 43 < 45 < 4 < 5 <9 <5 <9 <5 <8 <13 <4 <5 < 31 < 10 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 20 < 34 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <21 <7 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 40 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <15 <2 <2 <24 < 8 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML < 25 < 63 < 1 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <4 <5 <10 <3 <3 <21 <3 MW-561 10/14/14 < 50 121 t 79 < 5 < 5 < 11 <5 < 10 < 6 < 10 <15 <5 <5 <36 <11 MW-571 04/09/14 < 24 < 22 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <13 <2 <2 <24 < 8 MW-571 10/13/14 < 55 < 113 < 6 < 6 <13 <6 < 13 < 6 < 11 <19 <6 <6 <46 <14 MW-581 04/09/14 < 22 < 42 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <5 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <23 < 7 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 15 < 13 < 1 < 1 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <9 <1 <1 <15 <5 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 17 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <22 <6 MW-591 04/09/14 EIML < 27 < 56 < 3 < 2 <4 <1 <4 <3 <3 <6 <3 <2 <16 <4 MW-601 04/09/14 42 t 17 < 34 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-611 04/10/14 < 17 < 14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <8 <2 <2 <14 <5 MW-611 10/14/14 < 33 < 35 < 4 < 4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <7 <11 <3 <4 <25 < 7 MW-62 04/08/14 < 18 < 13 < 2 < 2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <19 <5 MW-631 04/10/14 < 23 < 41 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <21 <6 MW-64 04/09/14 < 15 < 26 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <5 MW-64 10/13/14 < 54 < 95 < 5 < 6 <11 <5 < 12 < 6 < 10 <19 <5 <6 < 41 < 12 MW-65 04/09/14 < 22 74 t 26 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <14 <2 <2 <22 < 7 MW-661 04/11/14 < 20 < 46 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 <17 <5 MW-67 04/08/14 < 21 42 +/- 25 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <15 <2 <2 <24 < 7 MW-67 10/14/14 < 36 < 86 < 4 < 4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 <12 <4 <4 < 27 <8 MW-681 04/11/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2 <19 <7 MW-691 04/07/14 < 20 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <19 <5 MW-701 04/07/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <14 <2 <2 <23 <7 MW-71 04/11/14 < 21 65 +/- 24 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <20 < 5 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MW-72 04/08/14 < 22 52 +/-22 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 13 <2 <2 <21 <5 W-10 04/11/14 < 16 < 29 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <5 W-12 04/07/14 76+/- 22 248 +/- 31 < 1 < 1 <3 <2 <3 <1 <3 < 10 <1 <1 <15 <3 W-13 04/07/14 < 21 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 13 <2 <2 <22 < 7 W-14 04/07/14 < 17 < 31 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 10 <2 <2 <17 <5 W-15 04/07/14 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 11 <2 <2 <19 <6 W-16 04/08114 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <19 <7 W-1A 04/11/14 < 12 < 22 <1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <8 <3 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 13 <8 < 1 < 1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 <11 <2 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 18 <32 <2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <17 <6 W-24 04/10/14 EIML < 34 < 28 < 3 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <4 <4 <6 <3 <3 <16 <3 W-2B 04/18/14 < 17 < 18 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 10 <2 <2 <18 <5 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 13 < 10 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <3 <8 <1 <1 <14 <4 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 14 35 18 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <1 <13 <4 W-3 04/10/14 EIML < 35 < 48 < 2 < 3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <6 <4 <2 <18 <3 W-34 04/10/14 < 20 < 15 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <9 <2 <2 <17 <5 W-4 04/10/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 11 <2 <2 <23 <7 W-4A 04/11/14 < 17 < 35 <2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-4B 04/11/14 < 19 < 39 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-5 04/08/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 <23 < 7 W-5C 04/08/14 < 19 < 44 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 17 < 16 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 17 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 EIML < 20 < 28 < 2 <2 <3 <3 <4 <3 <5 <9 <2 <3 <20 <3 W-6 04/08/14 < 19 46 26 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 12 <2 <2 <19 <6 W-7 04/10/14 < 14 < 14 < 2 < 2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <5 <1 <2 <10 <3 W-9 04/11/14 < 13 < 11 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 <11 <3 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-1.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243/244 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 U-234 U-235 U-238 Fe-55 Ni-63 DATE MW-bu U4/U0/14 IBE < u.u9 < U.U4 < U.ut < U.12 < U.uZ < u.1u < U.Ub < U.UM < lb2 < 4.b MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 0.14 < 0.06 < 0.10 < 0.09 < 0.07 < 0.16 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 87 < 4.7 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML < 0.08 < 0.29 < 0.18 < 0.25 0.65 +/- 0.18 - 0.19 +/- 0.10 < 756 | |||
* 157 MW-54 04/09/14 0.19 < 0.11 < 0.11 < 0.05 < 0.03 < 0.06 < 0.15 < 0.03 < 150 < 4.3 MW-55 04/08/14 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.09 < 0.04 < 0.09 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.04 < 50 < 4.5 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 0.12 < 0.04 < 0.12 < 0.02 < 0.09 < 0.17 < 0.05 < 0.12 < 104 < 3.5 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 0.17 < 0.11 < 0.11 < 0.04 < 0.07 < 0.13 < 0.17 < 0.16 < 62 < 4.7 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML < 0.08 < 0.13 < 0.18 < 0.18 0.27 +/- 0.15 - 0.13 +/- 0.10 < 760 < 128 MW-571 04/09/14 0.16 < 0.06 < 0.09 < 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.11 < 0.17 < 0.08 < 110 < 4.8 MW-611 04/10/14 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.14 < 0.19 < 0.15 < 0.15 < 58 <5 MW-64 07/15/14 0.09 < 0.09 < 0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.81 +/- 0.39 < 0.08 1.30 +/- 0.50 < 105 < 4.8 MW-67 04/08/14 0.10 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.08 < 0.13 < 0.15 < 0.18 < 0.10 < 93 < 4.9 | |||
,0 | |||
TABLE B-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 01/15/14 < 179 MCD 03/12/14 < 182 MCD 03/13/14 < 184 MCD 03/14/14 < 186 MCD 03/15/14 < 189 MCD 03/16/14 < 192 MCD 03/17/14 < 184 MCD 03/18/14 < 179 MCD 03/19/14 < 187 MCD 03/20/14 < 170 MCD 03/21/14 < 172 MCD 03/22/14 < 170 MCD 03/23/14 < 171 MCD 03/24/14 < 174 MCD 03/25/14 < 170 MCD 03/26/14 < 178 MCD 03/27/14 < 177 MCD 03/28/14 < 173 MCD 03/29/14 < 175 MCD 03130114 < 174 MCD 03/31/14 < 177 MCD 04/01/14 < 172 MCD 04/02/14 < 173 MCD 04/03/14 < 174 MCD 04/04/14 < 175 MCD 04/05/14 < 193 MCD 04/06/14 < 191 MCD 04/07/14 < 193 MCD 04/08/14 < 192 MCD 04/09/14 < 193 MCD 04/10/14 < 196 MCD 04/11/14 < 194 MCD 04/12/14 < 198 MCD 04/13/14 < 195 MCD 04/14/14 < 197 MCD 04/15/14 < 195 MCD 04/16/14 < 188 MCD 04/17/14 < 191 MCD 04/18/14 < 187 MCD 04/19/14 < 193 MCD 04/20/14 < 191 MCD 04/21/14 < 193 MCD 04/22/14 < 195 MCD 04/23/14 < 190 MCD 04/24/14 < 194 MCD 04/25/14 < 193 MCD 04/26/14 < 192 MCD 04/27/14 < 196 MCD 04/28/14 < 196 MCD 04/29/14 < 193 MCD 04/30/14 < 196 MCD 05/01/14 < 192 MCD 05/02/14 < 195 MCD 05/03/14 < 194 MCD 05/04/14 < 193 MCD 05/05/14 < 193 B-9 | |||
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 05/06/14 | |||
* 193 MCD 05/07/14 | |||
* 196 MCD 05/08/14 | |||
* 193 MCD 05/09/14 | |||
* 187 MCD 05/10/14 | |||
* 192 MCD 05/11/14 | |||
* 189 MCD 05/12/14 | |||
* 185 MCD 05/13/14 | |||
* 190 MCD 05/14/14 | |||
* 189 MCD 05/15/14 | |||
* 187 MCD 05/16/14 | |||
* 185 MCD 05/17/14 | |||
* 187 MCD 05118/14 | |||
* 184 MCD 05/19/14 | |||
* 188 MCD 05/20/14 | |||
* 189 MCD 05/21/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 05/22/14 | |||
* 189 MCD 05/23/14 | |||
* 188 MCD 05/24/14 | |||
* 190 MCD 05/25/14 | |||
* 190 MCD 05/26/14 | |||
* 193 MCD 05/27/14 | |||
* 194 MCD 05/28/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 05/29/14 | |||
* 171 MCD 05/30/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 05/31/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 06/01/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 06/02/14 | |||
* 171 MCD 06/03/14 | |||
* 170 MCD 06/04/14 | |||
* 168 MCD 06/05/14 | |||
* 167 MCD 06/06/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 06/07/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 06/08/14 | |||
* 170 MCD 06/09/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 06/10/14 | |||
* 170 MCD 06/11/14 | |||
* 171 MCD 06/12/14 | |||
* 176 MCD 06/13/14 | |||
* 171 MCD 06/14/14 | |||
* 177 MCD 06/15/14 | |||
* 178 MCD 06/16/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/17114 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/18/14 | |||
* 177 MCD 06/19/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/20/14 | |||
* 177 MCD 06/21/14 | |||
* 176 MCD 06/22/14 | |||
* 179 MCD 06/23/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/24/14 | |||
* 178 MCD 06/25/14 | |||
* 173 MCD 06/26/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/27/14 | |||
* 171 MCD 06/28/14 | |||
* 175 MCD 06/29/14 | |||
* 157 MCD 06/30/14 | |||
* 157 B-1O | |||
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITSOF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 07/01/14 < 158 MCD 07102/14 < 156 MCD 07/03/14 < 159 MCD 07/04/14 < 156 MCD 07/05/14 < 159 MCD 07/06/14 < 156 MCD 07/07/14 < 175 MCD 07/08/14 < 174 MCD 07/09/14 < 173 MCD 07/10/14 < 173 MCD 07/11/14 < 174 MCD 07/12/14 < 174 MCD 07/13/14 < 173 MCD 07/14/14 < 174 MCD 07/15/14 < 175 MCD 07116/14 < 175 MCD 07/17/14 < 168 MCD 07/18/14 < 185 MCD 07/19/14 < 181 MCD 07/20/14 < 182 MCD 07/21/14 < 184 MCD 07/22/14 < 182 MCD 07/23/14 < 183 MCD 07/24/14 < 181 MCD 07/25/14 < 183 MCD 07126/14 < 183 MCD 07/27/14 < 184 MCD 07/28/14 <184 MCD 07/29/14 < 182 MCD 07/30/14 < 183 MCD 07/31/14 < 184 MCD 08/01/14 < 157 MCD 08/02/14 < 159 MCD 08/03/14 < 158 MCD 08/04/14 < 160 MCD 08/05114 < 163 MCD 08/06/14 < 164 MCD 08/07/14 < 163 MCD 08/08/14 < 165 MCD 08/09/14 < 163 MCD 08/10/14 < 164 MCD 08/11/14 < 166 MCD 08/12/14 < 168 MCD 08/13/14 < 167 MCD 08/14/14 < 163 MCD 08/15/14 < 165 MCD 08/16/14 < 165 MCD 08/17/14 < 166 MCD 08/18/14 < 169 MCD 08/19/14 < 167 MCD 08/20/14 < 165 MCD 08/21/14 < 162 MCD 08/22/14 < 165 MCD 08/23/14 < 176 MCD 08/24/14 < 168 MCD 08/26/14 < 173 B-il | |||
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 08/27/14 < 157 MCD 08/28/14 < 154 MCD 08/29/14 < 156 MCD 08/30/14 | |||
* 158 MCD 08/31/14 < 157 MCD 09/01/14 | |||
* 159 MCD 09/02/14 | |||
* 159 MCD 09/03/14 < 159 MCD 09/04/14 | |||
* 160 MCD 09/05/14 < 156 MCD 09/06/14 < 155 MCD 09/07/14 | |||
* 160 MCD 09/08/14 < 159 MCD 09/09/14 | |||
* 155 MCD 09/10/14 | |||
* 160 MCD 09/11/14 < 157 MCD 09/12/14 < 159 MCD 09/13/14 < 170 MCD 09/14/14 < 157 MCD 09/15/14 < 156 MCD 09/16/14 < 152 MCD 11/07/14 | |||
* 143 MCD 11/08/14 | |||
* 153 MCD 11/09/14 | |||
* 148 MCD 11/10/14 | |||
* 152 MCD 11/25/14 | |||
* 150 MCD 11/26/14 | |||
* 149 MCD 11/27/14 | |||
* 152 MCD 11/28/14 | |||
* 152 MCD 11/29/14 | |||
* 153 MCD 11/30/14 | |||
* 154 MCD 12/01/14 | |||
* 154 MCD 12/02/14 | |||
* 155 MCD 12/03/14 | |||
* 154 MCD 12/04/14 | |||
* 154 MCD 12/05/14 | |||
* 154 MCD 12/06/14 | |||
* 155 MCD 12/07/14 | |||
* 155 MCD 12/08/14 | |||
* 153 MCD 12/09/14 | |||
* 153 MCD 12/10/14 | |||
* 153 MCD 12/11/14 | |||
* 190 MCD 12/12/14 | |||
* 189 MCD 12/13/14 < 188 MCD 12/14/14 < 184 MCD 12/15/14 < 188 MCD 12/16/14 < 187 MCD 12/17/14 | |||
* 191 MCD 12/18/14 < 190 MCD 12/19/14 < 186 MCD 12/20/14 | |||
* 191 MCD 12/21/14 < 167 MCD 12/22/14 < 179 MCD 12/23/14 < 172 MCD 12/24/14 < 173 MCD 12/25/14 < 173 B-12 | |||
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 12/26/14 | |||
* 173 MCD 12/27/14 | |||
* 167 MCD 12/28/14 | |||
* 179 MCD 12/29/14 | |||
* 172 MCD 12/30/14 | |||
* 169 MCD 12/31/14 | |||
* 167 sw-i 01/15/14 | |||
* 170 sw-l 03/12/14 | |||
* 187 Sw-1 03/19/14 | |||
* 194 sw-i 03/27/14 | |||
* 176 Sw-i 04/02/14 | |||
* 175 Sw-i 04/09/14 | |||
* 176 Sw-i 04/09/14 | |||
* 193 Sw-i 04/16/14 | |||
* 195 Sw-i 04/23/14 | |||
* 192 Sw-i 05/01/14 | |||
* 193 Sw-i 05/07/14 | |||
* 191 sw-i 05/14/14 | |||
* 193 sw-i 05/21/14 | |||
* 193 Sw-i 05/28/14 | |||
* 172 Sw-i 06/04/14 | |||
* 174 Sw-i 06/11/14 | |||
* 174 Sw-i 06/18/14 | |||
* 175 Sw-i 06/25/14 | |||
* 171 sw-i 07/02/14 | |||
* 174 Sw-i 07/09/14 | |||
* 174 Sw-i 07/16/14 | |||
* 172 sw-i 07/23/14 | |||
* 173 Sw-i 07/30/14 | |||
* 172 Sw-i 08/06/14 | |||
* 173 Sw-i 08/13/14 | |||
* 171 Sw-i 08/20/14 | |||
* 166 Sw-i 08/27/14 | |||
* 173 sw-i 09/03/14 | |||
* 170 Sw-i 09/10/14 | |||
* 171 Sw-i 11/26/14 | |||
* 156 Sw-i 12/03/14 | |||
* 150 Sw-i 12/10/14 | |||
* 152 Sw-i 12/17/14 | |||
* 180 Sw-i 12/24/14 | |||
* 179 Sw-i 12/31/14 | |||
* 179 SW-2 01/15/14 | |||
* 179 SW-2 04/07/14 | |||
* 183 SW-2 07/17/14 | |||
* 170 SW-2 10/14/14 < 178 SW-3 01/15/14 < 182 SW-3 04/07/14 < 182 SW-3 07/17/14 < 195 SW-3 10/14/14 < 176 B-13 | |||
TABLE B-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 03/12/14 < 24 229 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 < 4 < 120 <1 <2 < 73 < 21 MCD 03/13/14 < 18 231 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 <86 <1 <1 < 63 < 18 MCD 03/14/14 < 23 336 +/- 45 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 <97 <1 <1 < 70 < 17 MCD 03/15/14 < 29 249 +/- 40 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 169 <2 <2 < 111 < 34 MCD 03/16/14 < 27 153 +/-64 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 5 < 118 <2 <2 < 97 < 25 MCD 03/17/14 < 25 224 +/- 69 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 5 < 108 <2 <2 < 77 < 28 MCD 03/18/14 < 26 246 +/- 72 < 1 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 100 <2 <2 < 74 < 23 MCD 03/19/14 < 20 206 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <77 <1 <1 < 60 <15 MCD 03/20114 < 13 277 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <3 <20 <1 <1 < 24 <6 MCD 03/21/14 < 23 197 +/- 59 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 26 <2 <2 < 34 <11 MCD 03/22/14 < 24 227 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 32 <2 <2 < 39 <9 MCD 03/23/14 < 23 298 +/- 76 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <27 <2 <2 <36 <11 MCD 03/24/14 < 18 237 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <19 <1 <1 | |||
* 24 <7 MCD 03/25/14 < 26 285 +/- 93 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 <25 <2 <2 | |||
* 38 < 10 MCD 03/26/14 < 24 329 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <22 <2 <2 < 33 <11 MCD 03/27/14 < 18 336 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <16 <1 <2 < 23 <6 MCD 03/28/14 < 20 386 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <16 <2 <2 | |||
* 25 <7 MCD 03/29/14 < 15 280 +/- 57 < 2 <1 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <1 | |||
* 16 <6 MCD 03/30/14 < 20 288 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <14 <2 <2 | |||
* 21 <5 MCD 03/31/14 < 13 281 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <9 <1 <1 | |||
* 14 <4 MCD 04/01/14 < 21 245 +/- 62 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 | |||
* 21 <6 MCD 04/02/14 < 18 295 +/- 76 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 | |||
* 18 <3 MCD 04/03/14 < 23 284 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <2 <5 <12 <2 <2 | |||
* 23 <7 MCD 04/04/14 < 21 337 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 | |||
* 23 <7 MCD 04/05/14 < 21 340 +/- 78 < 2 <2 <4 <3 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2 | |||
* 20 <6 MCD 04/06/14 < 21 363 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 | |||
* 18 <6 MCD 04/07/14 < 16 342 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 | |||
* 13 <4 MCD 04/08/14 < 18 298 +/- 57 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2 | |||
* 15 <4 MCD 04/09/14 < 10 234 +/- 41 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <3 MCD 04/10/14 < 17 204 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 | |||
* 14 <3 MCD 04/11/14 < 16 290 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 | |||
* 12 <3 MCD 04/12/14 < 13 243 +/- 49 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <2 MCD 04113114 < 17 245 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 < 12 <4 MCD 04/14/14 < 17 338 +/- 71 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 | |||
* 12 <3 MCD 04/15/14 < 16 226 +/- 55 < 2 <2 <3 <2 <4 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 | |||
* 10 <3 MCD 04116/14 < 15 292 +/- 63 < 1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <3 MCD 04/17/14 < 15 297 +/- 59 < 1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <2 MCD 04/18/14 < 18 221 +/- 44 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <41 <1 <1 < 35 < 11 MCD 04/19/14 < 20 263 +/- 55 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <43 <2 <2 < 43 < 14 MCD 04/20/14 < 20 263 +/- 59 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <36 <2 <2 | |||
* 38 < 13 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 04121114 < 29 306 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 49 <2 <2 < 47 < 17 MCD 04/22114 < 28 345 +/- 71 < 2 <3 <7 <4 <5 <3 <5 < 53 <2 <2 < 56 < 13 MCD 04/23114 < 29 317 +/- 81 < 2 <2 <7 <3 <4 <3 <5 < 42 <2 <2 < 53 < 15 MCD 04/24/14 < 28 295 +/- 75 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 40 <2 <2 <46 < 15 MCD 04/25/14 < 24 320 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 35 <2 <2 < 41 <8 MCD 04/26/14 < 28 290 +/- 91 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 35 <2 <3 < 44 < 16 MCD 04/27/14 < 25 300 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <3 <4 <2 <5 < 29 <2 <2 < 41 < 10 MCD 04/28/14 < 17 243 +/- 51 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 20 <1 <1 < 27 <8 MCD 04/29/14 < 22 313 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 26 <2 <2 < 31 <9 MCD 04/30/14 < 21 225 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 18 <2 <2 < 29 <8 MCD 05/01/14 < 27 266 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <4 <3 <4 < 24 <2 <2 < 32 <6 MCD 05/02/14 < 28 363 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 26 <2 <3 < 38 <7 MCD 05/03/14 < 27 228 +/- 78 < 3 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 23 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 05/04/14 < 24 286 +/- 82 < 2 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 18 <2 <2 <34 < 10 MCD 05/05/14 < 25 263 +/- 76 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 18 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 05/06/14 < 30 337 +/- 77 < 3 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 21 <3 <3 < 34 < 10 MCD 05/07/14 < 25 301 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 14 <2 <2 < 24 <7 MCD 05/08/14 < 21 273 +/- 73 < 3 <2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 11 <2 <2 < 21 <8 MCD 05/09/14 < 24 306 +/- 92 < 2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 12 <2 <2 < 20 <8 MCD 05/10/14 < 26 379 +/- 98 < 3 <3 <6 <4 <5 <3 <5 < 14 <3 <3 < 25 <6 MCD 05/11/14 < 28 385 +/- 97 < 3 <3 <7 <2 <6 <3 <5 < 12 <.3 <3 < 25 <5 MCD 05/12/14 < 29 329 +/- 89 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 12 <3 <3 < 24 <6 MCD 05/13/14 < 39 265 +/- 97 < 4 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 < 13 <3 <4 < 27 <5 MCD 05/14/14 < 37 314 +/- 93 < 4 <4 <7 <4 <7 <4 <6 < 14 <4 <5 < 29 <8 MCD 05/15/14 < 27 232 +/- 89 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <5 <9 <3 <3 < 21 <7 MCD 05/16/14 < 37 292 +/- 114 < 3 <3 <9 <3 <7 <4 <8 <9 <4 <4 < 26 <7 MCD 05/17/14 < 47 282 +/- 82 < 5 <5 <11 <5 <11 <6 <9 < 14 <5 <5 < 33 < 10 MCD 05/18/14 < 49 308 +/- 82 < 5 <6 < 10 <6 <11 <6 <11 < 15 <5 <6 < 32 < 13 MCD 05/19/14 < 56 196 +/- 106 < 7 <8 < 14 <8 < 14 <7 <11 < 15 <7 <8 < 35 < 11 MCD 05/20/14 < 60 249 +/- 112 < 6 <6 < 13 <6 < 13 <7 <11 < 13 <7 <7 < 35 <8 MCD 05/21/14 < 71 323 +/- 122 < 8 <9 < 18 <9 < 20 <9 < 14 < 14 <8 <8 < 38 < 10 MCD 05/22/14 < 77 505 +/- 163 < 9 <9 < 18 <9 < 20 < 10 < 17 < 14 <9 < 10 < 46 < 15 MCD 05/23/14 < 87 299 +/- 133 < 9 <9 < 19 <9 < 21 < 10 < 16 < 14 < 10 < 10 < 44 < 12 MCD 05/24/14 < 75 265 126 < 9 <9 < 17 < 10 < 21 < 10 < 17 < 13 <9 < 10 < 44 < 12 MCD 05/25/14 < 81 334 +/-136 < 9 <11 < 19 < 11 < 20 < 10 < 17 < 13 < 10 < 12 < 42 < 12 MCD 05/26/14 < 111 < 134 < 12 <11 < 23 <9 < 21 < 11 < 21 < 13 < 11 < 11 < 39 < 11 MCD 05/27114 < 85 286 177 < 11 <9 < 25 < 10 < 21 < 11 < 18 < 10 < 10 < 12 < 36 < 13 MCD 05/28/14 < 33 216 65 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 284 <2 <2 < 158 <46 MCD 05/29/14 < 25 222 63 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 206 <1 <2 < 113 < 35 MCD 05/30/14 < 32 297 80 < 2 <3 <9 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 216 <2 <2 < 142 < 52 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 05/31/14 < 21 267 +/- 48 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 146 <1 <1 < 89 < 26 MCD 06/01/14 < 28 287 +/- 69 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 172 <2 <2 < 119 < 25 MCD 06/02/14 < 23 206 t 64 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 153 <2 <2 < 105 < 27 MCD 06/03/14 < 29 348 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 157 <2 <2 < 96 < 29 MCD 06/04/14 < 18 217 +/- 43 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 92 <1 <1 < 61 < 20 MCD 06/05/14 < 20 289 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 85 <2 <2 < 65 < 16 MCD 06/06/14 < 27 255 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 120 <2 <2 < 85 < 23 MCD 06/07/14 < 34 325 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 127 <2 <2 < 95 < 26 MCD 06/08/14 < 28 424+/- 84 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 101 <2 <3 < 77 < 26 MCD 06/09/14 < 24 250 1 79 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 67 <2 <2 < 64 < 21 MCD 06/10/14 < 26 257 +/- 83 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 77 <2 <2 < 65 < 20 MCD 06/11/14 < 27 286+/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <.5 <3 <5 < 69 <2 <2 <64 < 22 MCD 06/12/14 < 41. 378 +/-77 < 3 <4 < 11 <2 <6 <5 <7 < 186 <3 <3 < 135 < 41 MCD 06/13/14 < 31 425 +/-83 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 137 <2 <2 < 101 < 22 ON MCD 06/14/14 < 34 279 86 < 3 <3 < 10 <2 <5 <4 <7 < 124 <2 <2 < 100 < 30 MCD 06/15/14 < 23 281 +/- 58 < 2 <2 <6 <1 <4 <2 <4 < 79 <1 <2 < 68 < 22 MCD 06/16/14 < 25 136 +/- 63 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 82 <2 < 2 < 73 < 24 MCD 06/17/14 < 24 279 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 74 <2 <2 < 68 < 23 MCD 06/18/14 < 30 327 +/- 75 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 75 <2 <2 < 66 < 20 MCD 06/19114 < 31 325 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 80 <2 <2 < 74 < 23 MCD 06/20/14 < 30 362 +/- 77 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 62 <2 <2 < 63 < 19 MCD 06/21/14 < 31 367 75 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 65 <2 <2 <64 < 16 MCD 06/22/14 < 22 356 +/-77 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 44 <2 <2 < 44 < 12 MCD 06/23/14 < 26 208 +/- 84 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 46 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 06/24/14 < 23 371 +/-80 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 41 <2 <2 < 45 < 15 MCD 06/25/14 < 29 358 +/-72 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 41 <2 <2 < 45 < 12 MCD 06/26/14 < 25 284 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 35 <2 <2 < 41 < 13 MCD 06/27/14 < 35 346 +/- 79 < 3 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 42 <3 <3 < 52 < 13 MCD 06/28/14 < 25 321 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 31 <2 <2 < 38 < 11 MCD 06/29/14 < 22 301 +/- 83 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 25 <2 <2 < 33 < 10 MCD 06/30/14 < 19 325 +/- 58 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 20 <2 <2 < 25 <8 MCD 07/01/14 < 20 366 +/- 84 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 19 <2 <2 < 30 <7 MCD 07/02/14 < 21 345 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 20 <2 <2 < 29 < 10 MCD 07/03/14 < 23 329 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 < 18 <2 <2 < 24 <8 MCD 07/04/14 < 13 222 +/- 43 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <1 <1 < 16 <4 MCD 07/05/14 < 17 257 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 12 <1 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 07/06/14 < 23 294 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 < 22 <5 MCD 07/07/14 < 32 321 +/- 84 < 3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 18 <3 <3 < 30 <7 MCD 07/08/14 < 22 398 +/- 79 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 19 <7 MCD 07/09/14 < 21 334+/- 90 < 3 <2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 20 <6 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 07/10/14 < 51 316 +/- 65 < 5 <5 < 11 <5 <11 <6 < 10 < 18 <5 <5 < 38 < 10 MCD 07/11/14 < 18 449 +/- 82 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <3 MCD 07/12/14 < 18 325 +/- 71 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <3 MCD 07/13/14 < 15 334 +/- 67 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <12 <2 MCD 07/14/14 < 12 278 +/- 56 < 1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <3 <1 <2 <9 <3 MCD 07/15/14 < 16 348 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <10 <2 MCD 07/16/14 < 16 304 +/- 62 < 2 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <10 <3 MCD 07/17/14 < 15 275 +/- 56 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <3 <1 <2 <9 <2 MCD 07/18/14 < 18 313 +/- 56 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 92 <1 <1 < 68 < 19 MCD 07/19/14 < 23 280 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 99 <2 <2 <81 <23 MCD 07/20/14 < 21 274 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 84 <1 <2 < 66 < 22 MCD 07/21/14 < 25 242 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 97 <2 <2 < 73 < 21 MCD 07/22/14 < 21 208 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 78 <1 <2 <64 <15 MCD 07/23114 < 21 312 +/- 59 < 2 <2 .< 5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 71 <2 <2 < 65 < 14 | |||
-3 MCD 07/24/14 < 22 254 +/- 52 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 65 <2 <2 < 55 < 13 MCD 07/25/14 < 12 219 +/- 39 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 37 <1 <1 <32 <8 MCD 07/26/14 < 19 317 +/- 58 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 51 <1 <1 < 49 < 11 MCD 07/27/14 < 21 242 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 46 <2 <2 < 45 < 13 MCD 07/28/14 < 17 275 +/- 51 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <2 <3 < 36 <1 <1 <31 <8 MCD 07/29/14 < 21 286 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 40 <2 <2 < 44 < 14 MCD 07/30/14 < 17 264 +/- 53 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 31 <1 <2 < 35 < 12 MCD 07/31/14 < 21 240 +/- 68 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 32 <2 <2 < 38 < 10 MCD 08/01/14 < 19 300 +/- 64 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 32 <1 <2 < 34 < 10 MCD 08/02/14 < 19 217 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 27 <1 <2 <33 < 7 MCD 08/03/14 < 27 368 t 68 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 36 <2 <3 < 45 < 12 MCD 08/04/14 < 26 316 +/- 94 < 3 <4 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 29 <2 <2 <48 < 11 MCD 08/05/14 < 16 322 +/- 57 < 1 <1 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 18 <2 <1 <24 < 8 MCD 08/06/14 < 24 344+/- 69 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 <24 <2 <2 <31 <8 MCD 08107/14 < 20 321 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 18 <2 <2 <25 <8 MCD 08/08/14 < 28 312 +/- 86 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 24 <3 <3 < 38 < 10 MCD 08/09/14 < 18 303 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 <26 <7 MCD 08/10114 < 48 298 +/- 84 < 4 <5 < 12 <4 <9 <6 <9 < 39 <4 <5 < 62 < 16 MCD 08/11/14 < 23 362*+/- 80 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <3 <5 < 16 <2 <2 <28 < 7 MCD 08/12/14 < 24 439 +/-: 95 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <5 <3 <4 < 16 <2 <2 <25 < 9 MCD 08/13114 < 28 321 +/- 73 < 3 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 16 <3 <3 <26 <8 MCD 08/14/14 < 14 225 +/- 52 < 1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <1 <15 <5 MCD 08/15114 < 22 241 1+/-80 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <20 <6 MCD 08/16/14 < 23 285 1 68 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <20 < 5 MCD 08/17/14 < 15 258 t 56 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 <14 <3 MCD 08/18/14 < 22 380:+/-:89 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <5 <3 <4 <9 <2 <3 <20 <6 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 08/19/14 < 13 224 +/- 63 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <3 MCD 08/20/14 < 19 272 +/- 84 <2 <.2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 <7 <2 <2 < 16 <5 MCD 08/21/14 < 22 360 +/- 92 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 < 14 <5 MCD 08/22/14 < 23 273 +/- 90 <3 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <7 <2 <3 < 15 <5 MCD 08/23/14 < 14 214 +/-56 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <5 <1 <1 < 11 <3 MCD 08/24/14 < 14 212 +/- 59 <2 <1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <1 <1 < 10 <3 MCD 08/26/14 < 15 251 +/- 53 <2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 < 10 <3 MCD 08/27/14 < 26 351 +/- 82 <3 <3 <8 <2 <6 <3 <6 < 25 <2 <3 < 39 < 10 MCD 08/28/14 < 22 423 +/- 89 <2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 22 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 08/29/14 < 30 569 +/- 88 <2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 27 <2 <2 < 37 < 10 MCD 08/30/14 < 12 233 +/- 40 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 < 11 <1 <1 < 16 <4 MCD 08/31/14 < 21 210 +/- 70 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 16 <2 <2 < 24 <8 MCD 09/01/14 < 17 172 +/- 71 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 13 <1 <2 < 21 <6 MCD 09/02/14 < 13 226 +/- 48 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <9 <1 <1 < 15 <4 MCD 09/03/14 < 17 216 +/- 65 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 11 <2 <2 < 18 <7 00 MCD 09/04/14 < 10 279 +/- 37 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 < 11 <4 MCD 09/05/14 < 19 492 +/- 64 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 12 <2 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 09/06/14 < 14 222 +/- 59 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <2 < 14 <3 MCD 09/07/14 < 13 209 +/- 50 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 < 12 <3 MCD 09/08/14 < 18 289 +/- 82 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 < 19 <5 MCD 09/09/14 < 12 298 +/- 43 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 < 11 <3 MCD 09/10/14 < 21 580 +/- 77 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 19 <5 MCD 09/11/14 < 34 252 +/- 65 <3 <4 <8 <3 <7 <4 <7 < 15 <3 <4 < 31 <9 MCD 09/12/14 < 15 273 +/- 71 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <1 <2 < 13 <3 MCD 09/13/14 < 14 284 +/- 54 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <5 <1 <1 < 10 <3 MCD 09/14/14 < 59 287 +/- 67 <5 <7 < 16 <4 < 11 <7 < 12 < 193 <4 <4 < 160 < 48 MCD 09/15/14 < 58 263 +/- 72 <4 <6 < 15 <4 < 10 <7 < 11 < 157 <4 <4 < 142 < 41 MCD 09/16/14 < 53 270 +/- 65 <4 <5 < 15 <4 <9 <6 < 10 < 130 <4 <4 < 128 < 42 MCD 11/07/14 < 18 289 +/- 53 <1 <1 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 36 <1 <1 < 36 <11 MCD 11/08/14 < 19 285 +/- 64 <2 <2 <4 <1 <4 <2 <4 < 41 <2 <1 < 43 <11 MCD 11/09/14 < 22 269 +/- 66 <2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 40 <2 <2 < 41 < 13 MCD 11/10/14 < 24 240 +/- 85 <2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 35 <2 <2 < 43 < 13 MCD 11/25/14 < 25 294 +/- 77 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 12 <2 <2 < 23 <6 MCD 11/26/14 < 13 273 +/- 56 <1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <1 < 14 <5 MCD 11/27/14 < 19 245 +/- 75 <2 <2 <4 <3 <4 <2 <5 <9 <2 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 11/28/14 < 17 283 +/- 68 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <8 <2 <2 < 16 <4 MCD 11/29/14 < 26 308 +/- 94 <3 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 10 <3 <3 < 22 <6 MCD 11/30/14 < 53 300 +/- 80 <6 <6 < 14 <6 < 12 <7 < 11 < 22 <6 <6 < 44 < 14 MCD 12/01/14 < 17 204 +/- 66 <2 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 < 13 <4 MCD 12/02/14 < 20 222 +/- 84 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 *15 <5 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 12103114 < 23 364 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <3 <17 <4 MCD 12/04/14 < 17 318 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 MCD 12105114 < 19 274 +/- 81 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <14 <4 MCD 12/06/14 < 21 314 +/- 87 <2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <5 <2 <2 <13 <4 MCD 12/07/14 < 19 323 +/- 87 < 2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <14 <4 MCD 12/08/14 < 21 451 +/- 79 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <3 MCD 12/09/14 < 15 247 +/- 71 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <4 MCD 12/10/14 < 12 273 +/- 48 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <1 <1 <7 <2 MCD 12/11/14 < 19 227 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <53 <1 <1 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/12/14 < 22 210 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 <4 <66 < 1 <2 < 60 < 16 MCD 12/13/14 < 31 186 +/- 92 < 3 <4 < 10 <3 <6 <4 <7 < 103 < 2 <3 < 84 < 33 MCD 12/14/14 < 37 216 +/- 88 <3 <3 <7 <2 <6 <4 <5 <88 <2 <3 < 81 < 19 MCD 12/15/14 < 31 252 +/- 71 <2 <3 <9 <3 <5 <3 <6 <93 <2 <2 < 83 < 21 MCD 12/16/14 < 25 227 +/- 78 <2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 <61 <2 <2 <54 <18 MCD 12/17/14 < 29 255 +/- 74 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <4 <5 <79 <2 <2 < 76 < 18 MCD 12/18/14 < 20 215 +/- 49 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <4 <44 <1 <1 < 42 < 13 MCD 12/19/14 < 29 333 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <8 <3 <5 <3 <6 <66 <2 <2 < 58 < 18 MCD 12/20/14 < 30 268 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 <53 <2 <2 < 58 < 16 MCD 12/21/14 < 23 264 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <42 < 1 <2 <46 < 13 MCD 12/22/14 < 34 367 +/- 92 < 3 <3 <9 <3 <7 <4 <7 <60 <3 <3 < 61 < 21 MCD 12/23114 < 30 222 +/- 98 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <6 <52 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/24/14 < 30 268 +/- 87 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 <44 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/25/14 < 24 153 +/- 63 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 28 <2 <2 < 39 < 12 MCD 12/26/14 < 30 250 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 <42 <2 <2 < 49 < 13 MCD 12/27/14 < 16 278 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <20 <1 <1 <24 < 5 MCD 12/28114 < 22 341 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <3 <4 <3 <4 <26 <2 <2 <40 <8 MCD 12/29/14 < 23 280 +/- 84 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 <29 <2 <2 <34 <11 MCD 12/30114 < 17 296 +/- 60 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <23 <2 <2 <31 <8 MCD 12/31/14 < 27 211 +/-89 <2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <6 <25 <2 <2 <36 < 11 SW-1 03/12/14 < 23 238 +/- 53 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <5 < 124 < 1 <1 < 78 < 20 SW-1 03/19/14 < 29 301 +/- 67 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 110 < 2 <2 < 91 < 24 SW-1 03/27/14 < 22 305 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <21 <2 <2 <30 < 11 SW-1 04/02/14 < 14 228 +/- 58 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <9 <1 <1 <16 <4 SW-1 04/09/14 < 16 218 +/- 60 <2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 SW-1 04/09/14 < 21 239 +/- 39 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <5 SW-1 04/16/14 < 13 236 +/- 54 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <7 <2 SW-1 04/23/14 < 30 345 +/- 82 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <4 <5 <50 <2 <3 < 55 < 15 SW-1 05/01/14 < 29 274 +/- 93 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <22 <2 <3 <41 <8 SW-1 05/07/14 < 18 219 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <2 <17 <4 SW-1 05/14/14 < 26 234 +/- 96 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 <8 <2 <3 <23 <8 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE SW-i 05/21/14 < 71 273 +/- 138 < 9 <8 <19 < 10 < 16 <9 <15 <14 <8 <9 < 39 <7 SW-i 05/28/14 < 31 221 +/- 71 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 333 < 2 <2 < 173 <54 SW-i 06/04114 < 32 234 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <4 <7 < 208 < 2 <2 < 151 < 26 SW-i 06/11114 < 29 293 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 110 <2 <2 < 91 < 22 Sw-i 06/18/14 < 17 241 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <38 < 1 <1 < 37 < 11 SW-i 06/25/14 < 21 288 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 24 <2 <2 < 31 <8 SW-i 07/02/14 < 3 89 +/- 16 < 0 <0 <1 <0 <1 <0 <1 <2 <0 <0 <4 <1 SW-i 07/09/14 < 24 391 +/- 77 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <10 <3 <3 < 19 <5 Sw-i 07/16/14 < 12 313 +/- 51 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <7 <2 SW-i 07/23/14 < 14 240 +/- 36 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <2 <2 <45 < 1 <1 < 39 < 11 SW-i 07/30/14 < 17 329 +/- 49 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 <44 <1 <1 < 42 < 10 SW-i 08/06/14 < 57 279 +/- 70 < 5 <6 <15 <5 < 11 <6 <11 <80 <5 <5 < 96 < 26 SW-i 08/13/14 < 24 212 +/- 82 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <18 <2 <2 < 24 <7 SW-i 08/20/14 < 22 252 +/- 81 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <11 <2 <3 < 22 <8 0u Sw-i 08/27/14 < 24 226 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 <28 <2 <2 < 40 < 14 SW-i 09/03/14 < 15 275 +/- 61 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <2 <2 <3 <12 <1 <2 < 21 <5 Sw-i 09/10/14 < 20 260 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2 < 18 <7 SW-i 11/26/14 < 17 299 +/- 63 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 < 16 <5 SW-i 12/03/14 < 12 247 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <2 sw-i 12/10/14 < 21 280 +/- 88 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <3 <4 <4 <2 <3 < 12 <4 SW-i 12/17/14 < 18 216 +/- 57 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <42 < 1 <1 < 44 < 12 Sw-i 12/24/14 < 24 241 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <2 <5 <35 < 2 <2 < 44 < 11 Sw-i 12/31/14 < 23 313 +/- 86 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 20 <2 <2 < 26 < 11 SW-2 04/07/14 < 17 224 +/- 31 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <5 SW-2 07/17/14 < 7 289 +/- 39 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <4 <1 SW-3 04/07/14 < 17 < 31 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <4 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY | |||
TABLE B-I.3 TABLE B-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243/244 Pu-238 Pu-239/24C U-234 U-235 U-238 Fe-55 Ni-63 DATE DATE NONE FOR 2014 | |||
,=j | |||
TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN PRECIPITATION WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 U | |||
2 01/13/14 < 182 2 04/09/14 < 180 2 07/23/14 < 178 2 10/13/14 < 191 3 01/13/14 < 189 3 04/09/14 < 178 3 07/23/14 | |||
* 181 3 10/13/14 < 189 4 01/13/14 < 177 4 04/09/14 < 176 4 07/23/14 < 182 4 10/13/14 < 190 5 01/13/14 | |||
* 183 5 04/08/14 < 179 5 07/23/14 < 180 5 10/13/14 < 192 6 01/13/14 < 174 6 04/09/14 < 179 6 07/23/14 < 182 6 10/13/14 < 190 B-22}} |
Latest revision as of 13:00, 5 February 2020
ML15127A190 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 04/30/2015 |
From: | Dostal J Exelon Generation Co |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
RA-1 5-034 | |
Download: ML15127A190 (173) | |
Text
1N Exelon Generation Technical Specification 6.9.1 .e RA-1 5-034 April 30, 2015 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2014 Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for calendar year 2014 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. This submittal is made in accordance with Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specification 6.9.1 .e, "Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report."
If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact John Renda at 609-971-2572.
Sincerely, Plant Manager - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Enclosure:
2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: Administrator, USNRC Region I USNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster Creek USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek Craig Stewart, American Nuclear Insurers
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT I Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2014 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Aw Exelon Generation.,
Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2015
Table of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions .......................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 A . O bjectives of the REM P .................................................................................. 3 B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 4 C. Discussion ..................................................................................................... 4 III. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7 A. Sam ple Collection ......................................................................................... 7 B. Sam ple Analysis ............................................................................................ 9 C . Data Interpretation ...................................................................................... 10 D. Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11 E. Program Changes ......................................................................................... 12 IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 12 A. Aquatic Environm ent ..................................................................................... 12 B. Atm ospheric Environm ent ........................................................................... 17 C. Am bient G am m a Radiation ......................................................................... 21 D. Land Use Survey .......................................................................................... 22 E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 23 V. References ................................................................................................................... 26 VI. E rra ta ........................................................................................................................... 27 i
Appendices Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection &
Analytical Methods Tables Table B-1 Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Table B-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Table B-3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Figqures Figure B-1 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station.
Figure B-2 Locations of REMP Stations within a I to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station.
Figure B-3 Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station.
Appendix C Data Tables and Figures - Primary Laboratory Tables Table C-1. 1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-1I.2 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-11.3 Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
ii
Table C-I1.4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-111.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-1II.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-IV.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-V. 1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VI.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VI.3 Concentrations of Strontium in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VI.4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VII.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-VIII.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-IX. 1 Quarterly OSLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-IX.2 Mean Quarterly OSLD Results for the Site Boundary, Intermediate, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table C-IX.3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Figures Figure C-1 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Clams Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1983 - 2014.
Figure C-2 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014.
iii
Figure C-3 Mean Cesium-1 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014.
Figure C-4 Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2008 -.2014.
Figure C-5 Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2014.
Figure C-6 Mean Quarterly OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Figure C-7 Mean Quarterly TLD/OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1990 - 2014.
Appendix D Data Tables - QC Laboratory Tables Table D-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-11.2 Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-11.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-Ill.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-Ill.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-V.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table D-VI.1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
iv
Appendix E Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table E-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)
Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table E-4 ERA (a) Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2014 Table E-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)
Environmental, Inc., 2014 Appendix F Errata Data Appendix G Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR) v
- 1. Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. During that time period, 1716 analyses were performed on 1248 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.
REMP designated surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium, fission or activation products were detected in any of the surface water samples collected as part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program during 2014.
REMP designated drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium, 1-131, and gamma emitting nuclides. The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of drinking water for gross beta. No tritium, 1-131, or fission or activation products were detected in any of the drinking water samples collected.
REMP designated groundwater samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium and no fission or activation products were detected in REMP groundwater samples.
Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams or crabs. Cesium-137 was not detected in any sediment samples.
Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, gamma emitting nuclides, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90. Gross beta and cosmogenic Be-7 were detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years.
No fission or activation products were detected. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectable activity.
High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable concentration.
Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected. All Strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity.
Strontium-90 activity was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years at both control and indicator stations, and can be attributed to historical nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.
1
Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD). Exelon changed the dosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year 2012, Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use of Thermo Luminescent Dosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons for this change. First, OSLDs are not subject to "fade". Fade is where the dose on the dosimeter drifts lower over time. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero after they are read. Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previous years. The maximum dose to any member of the public attributable to radioactive effluents and direct radiation from the OCGS was less than the 25 mrem/year limit established by the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
2
II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon, is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from the Barnegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about % mile west of the highway and 1 / miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site property extends about 21/2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side.
A preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was established in 1966, and continued prior to the plant becoming operational in 1969. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Landauer and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014.
A. Objectives of the REMP The objectives of the REMP are to:
- 1. Determine whether any significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in major pathways.
- 2. Identify and evaluate the buildup, if any, of radionuclides in the local environment, or any changes in normal background radiation levels.
- 3. Verify the adequacy of the plant's controls for the release of radioactive materials.
- 4. Fulfill the obligations of the radiological surveillance sections of Oyster Creek's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
3
B. Implementation of the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:
- 1. Identifying significant exposure pathways.
- 2. Establishing baseline radiological data for media within those pathways.
- 3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.
C. Discussion
- 1. General Program The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established in 1966, before the plant became operational. This preoperational surveillance program was established to describe and quantify the radioactivity, and its variability, in the area prior to the operation of OCGS. After OCGS became operational in 1969, the operational surveillance program continued to measure radiation and radioactivity in the surrounding areas.
A variety of environmental samples are collected as part of the REMP at OCGS. The selection of sample types is based on the established pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans. The selection of sampling locations is based on sample availability, local meteorological and hydrological characteristics, local population characteristics, and land usage in the area of interest. The selection of sampling frequencies for the various environmental media is based on the radionuclides of interest, their respective half-lives, and their behavior in both the biological and physical environment.
- 2. Preoperational Surveillance Program The federal government requires nuclear facilities to conduct radiological environmental monitoring prior to constructing the facility. This preoperational surveillance program is aimed at collecting the data needed to identify pathways, including selection of the radioisotope and sample media combinations to be included in the environmental surveillance program conducted after facility operation begins. Radiochemical analyses performed on the 4
environmental samples should include not only those nuclides expected to be released during facility operation, but should also include typical radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing and natural background radioactivity. All environmental media with a potential to be affected by facility operation as well as those media directly in the major pathways, should be sampled on at least an annual basis during the preoperational phase of the environmental surveillance program.
The preoperational surveillance design, including nuclide/media combinations, sampling frequencies and locations, collection techniques, and radioanalyses performed, should be carefully considered and incorporated in the design of the operational surveillance program. In this manner, data can be compared in a variety of ways (for example, from year to year, location to location, etc.) in order to detect any radiological impact the facility has on the surrounding environment. Data collection during the preoperational phase should be planned to provide a comprehensive database for evaluating any future changes in the environment surrounding the nuclear facility.
OCGS began its preoperational environmental surveillance program three years before the plant began operating in 1969.
Data accumulated during those early years provide an extensive database from which environmental monitoring personnel are able to identify trends in the radiological characteristics of the local environment. The environmental surveillance program at OCGS will continue after the plant has reached the end of its economically useful life and decommissioning has begun.
- 3. Consideration of Plant Effluents Effluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity released to the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and does not exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operation of monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling and analyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent and environmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects of effluent and environmental monitoring.
Both radiological environmental and effluent monitoring indicate that the operation of OCGS does not result in significant radiation exposure of the people or the environment surrounding OCGS and is well below the applicable levels set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the EPA.
5
There were liquid radioactive effluent releases during 2014 of concentrations of tritium too low to detect at an LLD of 200 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) at the New Jersey Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permitted main condenser outfall.
The releases were part of nearly continuous pumping of groundwater at approximately 70 gpm containing low levels of tritium and no detectable gamma. Exelon and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) agreed to this remediation action instead of natural attenuation to address concentrations of tritium in groundwater. Well 73 and supporting equipment and piping were installed to pump groundwater to the intake structure at the inlet of the main circulating water pumps.
Provisions were established for both batch and continuous releases of groundwater. Continuous releases occurred approximately 230 days in 2014. The nearly continuous releases occurred from March 12, 2014 through December 31, 2014 with a total of 2.31 E+07 gallons of groundwater pumped resulting in 1.74E-01 Ci of tritium released to the discharge canal. The dose to the most limiting member of the public due to the release of groundwater was 8.28E-07 mrem.
Utilizing gaseous effluent data, the maximum hypothetical dose to any individual during 2014 was calculated using a mathematical model, which is based on the methods defined by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. These methods accurately determine the types and quantities of radioactive materials being released to the environment.
The maximum calculated organ dose (Bone) from iodines, tritium, carbon-14 (C-14), and particulates to any individual due to gaseous effluents was 4.78E-01 mrem, which was approximately 3.19E+00 percent of the annual limit of 15 mrem. The maximum calculated gamma air dose in the UNRESTRICTED AREA due to noble gas effluents was 1.62E-02 mrad, which was 1.62E-01 percent of the annual 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, As Low As Reasonably Acheivable (ALARA) limit of 10mrad. The majority of organ dose from gaseous effluents was due to C-14. The maximum hypothetical calculated whole body dose to any individual due to noble gas effluents was 2.18E-03 mrem (0.00218 mrem) which was 4.36E-02 percent of the annual limit of 5 mrem.
The total maximum organ dose (Bone) due to all radiological effluents of 4.94E-01 mrem (0.494 mrem) received by any individual from gaseous effluents from the Oyster CreekGenerating Station for the reporting period is more than 607 times lower than 6
the dose the average individual in the Oyster Creek area during the same time period. The background radiation dose averages approximately 300 mrem per year in the Central New Jersey area, which includes approximately 200 mrem/year from naturally occurring radon gas.
During 2014, the maximum direct radiation dose to the most likely exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC potentially attributable to the operation of Oyster Creek beyond the site boundary in the west sector, as shown by offsite OSLD readings at station 55 was 5.09 mrem. The nearest member of the public is considered a part-time resident that works 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> per year at a warehouse located west of the plant.
Environmental sampling of airborne iodine and particulates showed no radioactivity attributable to the operation of OCGS.
Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Incorporated. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS REMP in 2014. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-1, B-2, and B-3, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.
Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, drinking water, groundwater, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon water samples were collected monthly from two surface locations (33 and 94), semiannually at two surface water locations (23 and 24), monthly from six drinking water wells (1 N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114) and quarterly from 2 groundwater stations (MW-24-3A and W-3C). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in plastic bottles, which were rinsed at least twice with source water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannually at three locations (33, 93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)). Two annual crab samples were collected from two locations (33 and 93). Sediment samples were collected at four locations semiannually (23, 24, 33, and 94 (control)).
7
Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate and airborne iodine. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed weekly at eight locations (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, and 111). The control location was C. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.
Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of garden vegetation. No commercial dairy operations and no dairy animals producing milk for human consumption are located within a 5 mile radius of the plant. Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at four locations (35, 36, 66, and 115). Station 36 was the control location. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.
Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using A120 3 :C Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry (OSLD). Exelon changed the dosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year 2012, Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use of Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons for this change. First, OSLDs are not subject to "fade". Fade is where the dose on the dosimeter drifts lower over time. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero after they are read. The OSLDs were placed on and around the OCGS site and were categorized as follows:
An inner ring consisting of 19 locations (1, T1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 112, and 113) near the site boundary.
An outer rinq consisting of 31 locations (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 22, 46, 47, 48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99,100,101,102,103,104,105, 106, 107, 109, and 110) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population.
8
Special interest stations consisting of 9 locations (3, 11, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, and 92) representing special interest areas such as population centers, state parks, etc.
Background (Control) stations consisting of two locations (C and 14) greater than 20 miles distant from the site.
Indicator OSLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in each of 16 meteorological compass sectors in the general area of the site boundary. OSLDs were also placed in each meteorological sector in the 1 to 5 mile range, where reasonable highway access would permit, in areas of public interest and population centers. Background locations were located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.
Two OSLDs were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The OSLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Landauer for analysis.
B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2014. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.
In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:
- 1. Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates and drinking water.
- 2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface, drinking water, groundwater, fish, clams, crabs, sediment, air particulates and vegetation.
- 4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges and drinking water.
- 5. Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.
- 6. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the 9
OCGS.
C. Data Interpretation For trending purposes, the radiological and direct radiation data collected during 2014 were compared with data from past years. The results of environmental sampling show that radioactivity levels have not increased from the background radioactivity detected prior to the operation of OCGS. The operation of OCGS continues to have no measurable radiological impact upon the environment.
Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:
- 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.
The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.
- 2. Net Activity Calculation and Reportingq of Results Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity, which results in a negative number.
An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.
Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:
For surface, drinking water, and groundwater - 12 nuclides: Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.
10
For fish - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-1 37 were reported.
For clams - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.
For crabs - eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.
For sediment - seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.
For air particulate - six nuclides: Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.
For air iodine cartridges - one nuclide: 1-131 was reported.
For vegetation - seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, 1-131, Cs-1 34, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.
Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.
D. Program Exceptions For 2014 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.
Exceptions are listed below:
Drinking Water
- 1. Station 39 (Lacey Twp., MUA Pump Station) was not collected January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The station was off line for this time period.
- 2. Station 1S - Offline January through August and the month of December.
- 3. Station 38 - Month of January was a composite for 3 of the 4 weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 1/5.
- 4. Station 1S - Month of September was a composite for 2 of the 4 weeks. Well was out of service for the weeks of 9/7 and 9/14.
11
- 5. Station 114 - Month of October was a composite for 4 of the 5 weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 10/19.
Dosimetry
- 1. Week 16 (4/20/14 -4/26/14) - One of two dosimeters at Station 57 was found on the ground. Both dosimeters at Station 68 were found on the ground.
- 2. Week 42 (10/19/14 - 10/25/14) - One of the dosimeters at Station 85 was missing. One of the dosimeters at Station 90 was found on the ground.
Air
- 1. Week 10 (3/5/14 - 3/12/14) - The fuse on the main breaker box at Station 20 failed and had to be replaced. Not enough sample volume was collected to be considered a valid sample.
- 2. Week 30 (7/23/14 - 7/30/14) - The AP filter at Station 3 had a few small holes in it. Suspect holes were due to a severe storm.
- 3. Week 32 (8/6/14 - 8/13/14) - The AP filter at Station 73 had a very small hole in it. Suspect hole was due to a severe storm.
Program exceptions are tracked and investigated to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors are reviewed with the personnel involved to prevent recurrence.
The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation.
E. Program Changes There are no program changes for 2014.
IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment
- 1. Surface Water Samples were taken via grab sample methodology at two locations (33 and 94) on a monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples were 12
collected semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24). Of these locations 23, 24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:
Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. Data from this year indicates that surface water tritium concentrations remain very low and not significantly different from recent previous years.
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.
Surface water sampling began in 1966, and the samples were analyzed for tritium as well as other radioactivity. During this preoperational program, tritium was detected at an average concentration of 1.05E+3 pCi/liter. At that time, counting instrumentation was not as sensitive as it now, and the minimum detectable concentration was 1E+3 pCi/liter versus 2E+2 pCi/liter used today. By comparing the 2014 sampling results to the decay corrected average preoperational concentration reported in the 2007 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (1.11 E+2 pCi/liter), it can be seen that the inventory of tritium in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl, and is decreasing with time.
- 2. Drinking water Monthly samples were composited from monthly grab samples from six drinking water wells (1N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114). Station 1, because it is located on the OCGS site, could potentially be affected by radioactive releases from the plant. Station 1 was split into two separate locations, 1N and 1S. Station 38, the Ocean Township Municipal Utility Authority Well, could potentially be affected by effluent releases from the OCGS. Given its distance from the facility (1.6 miles) and depth (approximately 360 feet),
however, the probability of any OCGS related impacts is very small.
Stations 37 and 39, Lacey Township Municipal Utility Authority wells, are not likely to be impacted by effluents from the OCGS.
These wells are located generally up-gradient of the regional 13
groundwater flow direction (southeast). In addition, because of their depth (> 200 feet) and distance from the site (2.2 and 3.5 miles respectively), they are unlikely to be affected by OCGS operations.
The following analyses were performed:
Tritium Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected.
Drinking water was sampled during the preoperational program and throughout the 43 years of the plant's operational program. Tritium sampling results during the preoperational years, yielded results all less than the minimum detectable concentration of 1E+3 pCi/liter.
2014 results are all less than the current MDC of 2E+2 pCi/liter.
Gross Beta Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of total gross beta activity (Tables C-11.2, Appendix C). Gross beta was detected in 41 of 51 samples, and is expected due to natural sources and fallout residual from previous bomb testing. The values ranged from 1.8 to 21.1 pCi/I.
The investigation level for gross beta in water is 15 pCi/I. Drinking water sample 1 N result for gross beta exceeded the investigation level beginning in January 2012.
The initial result for gross beta was 15.1 pCi/I in 2012. This issue was entered into our Corrective Action Program (CAP) and an investigation initiated. The 1N water sample was analyzed for known beta emitters Sr-89, Sr-90, Fe-55 and Ni-63. These analyses results were all <MDC. It was also identified that the 1N well treatment system was upgraded the previous month and a potassium chloride softener system was added as part of the upgrade. Samples were obtained pre and post treatment. The pre-treatment result for gross beta was 3.6 pCi/I, which is a value that has been seen previously in drinking water samples. The post-treatment sample result for gross beta was 22.2 pCi/I.
Based on the fact that there were no typical plant produced beta emitters detected and that natural potassium is a known beta emitter along with the results of the pre and post sampling, the gross beta values obtained for 1N can be attributed to the addition of the water softener system installed during the system upgrade in December of 2011.
14
Iodine Monthly samples from all locations were analyzed for 1-131 by the low level method to detect down to 1 pCi/L (Table C-11.3, Appendix C). All results were less than the MDC.
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.4, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.
- 3. Groundwater The following analyses were performed:
Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-I11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected.
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDC.
- 4. Fish Fish samples comprised of bottom feeder (silver perch, white perch, and summer flounder) and predator (American Eel, striped bass, and bluefish) were collected at three locations (33, 93, and
- 94) semiannually. Locations 93 and 33 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:
Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of fish samples from three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 3,219 to 5,340 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.
15
No fish were sampled during the preoperational sampling program for OCGS.
- 5. Clams and Crabs Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at two locations (33 and 93) annually. Locations 23, 24, 33, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:
Gamma Spectrometry The edible portions of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 1,235 to 1,944 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-1, Appendix C.
Preoperational clam sample results for naturally occurring Potassium-40 ranged from 600 to 9,800 pCi/kg wet, which are consistent with current sample results.
The edible portions of crab samples from two locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at both stations and ranged from 1,950 to 2,186 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.
Crabs were not sampled during the preoperational years of the OCGS environmental monitoring program.
- 6. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24, 33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:
Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from all four locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring 16
Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 783 to 14,800 pCi/kg dry. Cesium-137 was not detected in any of the samples. No fission or activation products were found. Figure C-3, Appendix C graphs Cs-1 37 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2014 and figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2014.
The requirement for sampling sediment is a requirement of ODCM 3.12.1, Table 3.12.1-1.d. ODCM Table 3.12.1-2, Reporting Levels for Radioactive Concentrations in Environmental samples Reporting Levels does not include requirements for sediment.
CY-AA-170-1000, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Meteorological Program Implementation, Attachment 1, Analytical Results Investigation Levels, includes sediment investigation level for Cs-1 37 of 1000 pCi/kg, dry.
While aquatic sediment sampling was part of the preoperational program, samples were not analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides until 1981.
In conclusion, the 2014 aquatic monitoring results for surface water, drinking water, fish, clams and crabs showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of OCGS, and with levels measured in past years. No radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any aquatic samples during 2014 and no adverse long-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data.
B. Atmospheric Environment
- 1. Airborne
- a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from eight locations on a weekly basis. The eight locations were separated into three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20, 66 and 111), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group III represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed:
17
Gross Beta Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-VI.1 and C-VI.2, Appendix C).
Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.
Comparison of results among the three groups aids in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the Site Boundary locations (Group I) ranged from 6 to 39 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Intermediate Distance locations (Group II) ranged from 6 to 34 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Distant locations (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 27 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 13 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The similarity of the results from the three groups indicates that there is no relationship between gross beta activity and distance from OCGS. These results are consistent with data from previous years and indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figures C-4 and C-5, Appendix C).
Air sample filters have been analyzed for gross beta activity since the inception of the preoperational environmental monitoring program in 1966. The preoperational data values ranged from 1.90E-2 to 2.77E-1 pCi/m3. 2014 gross beta activity values ranged from <6E-3 to 39E-3 pCi/m3. The 2014 results are consistent with historical operational data (Figure C-5, Appendix C) and fall within the range of results observed during the preoperational period.
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VI.3, Appendix C). No strontium was detected in any of the samples. These results are consistent with historical operational data. The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for strontium-89 and strontium-90.
Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VI.4, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. The values ranged from 35 to 106 18
E-3 pCi/m 3 . All other nuclides were less than the MDC.
These results are consistent with historical operational data.
The preoperational environmental monitoring program did not include analysis of air samples for gamma emitting nuclides.
- b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from eight (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, 111) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). Consistent with historical operational data, all results were less than the MDC for 1-131.
The preoperational environmental monitoring program for OCGS did not include analysis of air media for iodine-1 31.
In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data are consistent with preoperational and prior operational data and show no long-term trends in the environment attributable to the operation of OCGS.
- 2. Terrestrial
- a. Vegetation Samples were collected from four locations (35, 36, 66, and 115) when available. The following analyses were performed:
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in 24 of 60 samples.
The values ranged from 1.3 to 9.5 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data.
The following information on Strontium 90 is available on the NRC web page under "Backgrounder Radiation Protection and the "Tooth Fairy" Issue" published in December of 2004.
The largest source of Sr-90 in the environment (,-,9 9 %) is from weapons testing fallout. Approximately 16.8 million 19
curies of strontium-90 were produced and globally dispersed in atmospheric nuclear weapons testing until 1980. As a result of the Chernobyl accident, approximately 216,000 curies of Sr-90 were released into the atmosphere. With a 28 year half-life, Sr-90 still remains in the environment at nominal levels.
The total annual release of strontium-90 into the atmosphere from all 103 commercial nuclear power plants operating in the United States is typically 1/1000th of a curie. (NUREG/CR-2907 Vol.12). At an individual nuclear power plant, the amount of Sr-90 is so low that it is usually at or below the minimum detectable activity of sensitive detection equipment.
Oyster Creek did not report any Sr-90 released in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report as all analyses for Sr-90 performed were less than the minimum detectable activity.
Gamma Spectrometry Vegetation samples from locations 35, 36, 66, and 115 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 2,313 to 10,020 pCi/kg wet. Naturally occurring Be-7 was detected in 18 of 60 samples and ranged from 105 to 1,982 pCi/kg wet.
All other nuclides were less than the MDC.
Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not include strontium analyses or gamma spectroscopy.
Oyster Creek conducted a Cs-1 37 study in 2006/2007. A report was generated titled "Evaluation of Cesium-1 37 in Environmental Samples from the Amergen Property East of the Oyster Creek Generating Station". Below is an excerpt from that report:
The levels of Cs-1 37 observed in the soil and vegetation samples are consistent with environmental concentrations known to be attributable to fallout from historic nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. In addition, the variability of Cs-1 37 concentrations in soil and vegetation on the farm property appears to be driven by a number of environmental factors. Cs-137 concentrations in soil were non-detectable. Vegetation samples exhibited Cs-137 20
concentrations from non-detectable to 0.130 pCi/g, with a mean concentration of 0.078 pCi/g. For comparison, in the year 2000, as part of the confirmatory release survey for the adjacent Forked River site to the west of OCGS, the NRC reported that the maximum observed soil concentration of 0.53 pCi/g was not distinguishable from the variation in Cs-137 in the environment due to these fallout sources. The NRC also reported background Cs-1 37 concentrations in New Jersey coastal plain soils as high as 1.5 and 2.8 pCi/g.
In addition, decay-corrected historic REMP data from a predominantly upwind location, nearly four miles from the OCGS, yields present-day Cs-1 37 concentrations ranging from 0.862 to 1.68 pCi/g.
There was no Cs-1 37 identified in REMP soil and vegetation samples in 2014, but it is not unusual for Cs-1 37 to be identified given the known environmental levels of this radionuclide attributable to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.
In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for vegetation samples during 2014 showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl.
The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples.
The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment.
C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured using Optically Stimulated Luminenscence Dosimeters (OSLD). Sixty-one OSLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of non-background corrected OSLD measurements are summarized in Tables C-IX.1 to C-IX.3 and Figures C-6 and C-7.
The non-background corrected OSLD measurements ranged from 4.9 to 16.0 mR/standard quarter. In order to correct these results for background radiation, the mean of the dose rates measured at the background OSLD stations (C and 14) was subtracted from the dose measured at each indicator station. The maximum annual background corrected dose was 22.3 mR/year at Station 55, located near the site boundary, 0.3 miles west of the OCGS. This OSLD is located in an area where public access is 21
restricted but the nearest member of the public for direct radiation is considered an individual that works in the warehouse west of the site.
The individual is assumed to work 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> per year at this location.
The preoperational environmental monitoring program utilized film badges, the results of which are not comparable with the doses measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters or optically stimulated dosimeters during the operational REMP. In conclusion, the 2014 OSLD results are consistent with past operational measurements of direct radiation, and demonstrate that the OCGS continues to be in compliance with the 40 CFR 190 limit on maximum dose to the public.
D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey, conducted in August 2014 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, Inc. for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey is to identify within a distance of 5 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 500 ft2 producing broad leaf vegetation. The census shall also identify within a distance of 3 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors all milk animal and all gardens greater than 500 square feet producing broadleaf vegetation. For animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS, none were observed. The distance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were determined using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology.
There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. The results of this survey are summarized below.
22
Distance in Feet from the OCGS Reactor Building Sector Residence Garden*
(ft) (ft) 1 N 5,655 8,224 2 NNE 3,240 3,541 3 NE 3,245 5,115 4 ENE 5,704 6,445 5 E 6,549 1,758 6 ESE 3,189 2,081 7 SE 3,073 2,321 8 SSE 4,666 8,341 9 S 7,971 9,011 10 SSW 8,344 20,130 11 SW 9,285 9,776 12 WSW 10,713 14,802 13 W 22,191 None 14 WNW None None 15 NW 27,985 None 16 NNW 7,506 14,487
- Greater than 500 ft2 in size producing broad leaf vegetation E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix F). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:
- 1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of TBE's result and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.
- 2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), state specific performance testing (PT) program requirements or ERA's SOP for 23
the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable.
The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.
- 3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.
The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.
In reviewing our environmental inter-laboratory crosscheck programs, we identified 1) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2) that we are performing crosscheck samples on some matrices and isotopes that we do not perform for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP is designed to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyze for radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, the needed changes were made to the MAPEP program. Therefore, the following isotopes were removed from the MAPEP program:
Soil - gamma - will be provided by Analytics twice per year, starting in 2015. For 2014, one soil gamma is provided by MAPEP, the 2nd soil gamma is provided by Analytics.
AP - gamma - is currently provided by Analytics.
Water - gamma, H-3, Sr-90, uranium, gross alpha and gross beta currently provided by ERA.
MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.
For the TBE laboratory, 163 out of 169 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-131 in water, and two Sr-90s and one Gross Alpha in AP samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:
- 1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Ni-63 in water result of 32.7 +/- 1.69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data 24
but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 - 44.2 Bq/L.
NCR 14-04
- 2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 K-40 in water result of 1.63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-04
- 3. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2014 1-131 in water result of 15.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L, falling below the lower acceptance limit of 16.8. The result was evaluated as failed with a found to known ratio of 0.778. No cause could be found for the slightly low result. All previous ERA 1-131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08
- 4. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.18 Bq/sample, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 0.83 Bq/sample. The reanalysis result was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.836. The reanalysis result was statistically the same number as the original result. No cause could be found for the slightly low results. NCR 14-04
- 5. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.310 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.703 Bq/sample. The gravimetric yield of 117% was very high (we normally see yields of 60% to 70%) and could account for the low activity. The reanalysis result of 0.508 was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.492. No cause could be found for the slightly low results. NCR 14-09
- 6. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Gr-Alpha in AP result of 0.153 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.53 Bq/sample. The AP sample was counted on the wrong side.
The AP was flipped over and recounted with acceptable results.
TBE does not perform the gross alpha analysis in support of REMP programs. All effluent AP samples are digested and analyzed as a portion of the total volume (typically 10%). In conclusion, this error could not be duplicated on client effluent APs, because the MAPEP AP is counted as a whole and the client effluent AP sample is digested. TBE routinely performs Analytics AP gross alpha blind sample analysis with no issues. NCR 14-09 For the EIML laboratory, 85 of 90 analyses met the specified acceptance criteria. Five analyses (Water - Pu-238, Pu-239, Fe-55; AP - Co-57; Soil
- Cs1 34) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:
25
- 1. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-238 result of 1.28 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.83 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 1.08 Bq/L. The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of the reanalysis with the new tracer was 0.68, which fell within the acceptance criteria.
- 2. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-239/240 result of 0.91 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.68 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 0.88 Bq/L.
The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of reanalysis with the new tracer was 0.66 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.
- 3. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 AP Co-57 result of 1.60 +/- 0.05 Bq/total sample failed the false positive test. Interference from the Eu-152 resulted in the misidentification of Co-57.
- 4. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014 soil Cs-1 34 result of 6.10 +/- 1.80 Bq/kg failed the false positive test.
Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occurring Bi-214 in the sample matrix with a close spectral energy.
- 5. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP August 2014 water Fe-55 result of 55.10 +/- 14.80 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 31.50 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 41.00 Bq/L. The result of the reanalysis of Fe-55 was 32.63 +
16.30 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.
V. References
- 1. Exelon Nuclear. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for Oyster Creek Generating Station, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.
- 2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.
3 Pre-Operational Environmental Radiation Survey, Oyster Creek Nuclear Electric Generating Station, Jersey Central Power and Light Company, March 1968.
26
VI. Errata Corrections to the 2012 AREOR The value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in the report as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to a telephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0 millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standard quarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas of the report:
- 1. Page A-14, TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - the mean for the indicator stations is listed as 19.8 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 19.9 millirem/standard quarter.
- 2. Page C-21, TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The mean for station 113 is listed as 15.7 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.9 millirem/standard quarter.
- 3. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - the mean for the Site Boundary for APR-JUN is listed as 19.5 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.6 millirem/standard quarter.
- 4. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The Site Boundary Period Minimum is listed as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 18.3 millirem/standard quarter.
- 5. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 - The Site Boundary Period Mean is listed as 20.9 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 21.2 millirem/standard quarter.
27
APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT
SUMMARY
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SURFACE WATER H-3 28 200 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCIIrTER)
GAMMA 28 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 I5 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SURFACE WATER CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)
CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 DRINKING WATER H-3 51 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER)
GR-B 51 4 6 2 13 IN INDICATOR 0 (36/39) (5/12) (12/12) ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS (1.8/21.1) (2/3) (1.8/21.1) 0.2 MILES N OF SITE 1-131 51 1 <LLD <LLD 0 GAMMA 51 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F.) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION DRINKING WATER FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD (PCI/LITER)
CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION GROUNDWATER H-3 8 200 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER)
GAMMA 8 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 FE-59 30 <LLD NA 0 CO-60 15 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 NB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD NA 0 1-131 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M.) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION 4 REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION GROUNDWATER CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER)
BA-140 60 <LLD NA 0 LA-140 15 <LLD NA 0 BOTTOM FEEDER GAMMA 4 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 4622 3714 4622 33 INDICATOR 0 (3/3) (I/I) (3/3) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (3838/5340) (3838/5340) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <~LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <~LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <~LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <~LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION BOTTOM FEEDER CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)
CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 PREDATOR GAMMA 7 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 3919 4577 4883 33 INDICATOR 0 (4/4) (3/3) (1/1) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (3219/4883) (3457/5287) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION PREDATOR CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)
CLAMS GAMMA 6 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 1600 1756 1859 23 INDICATOR 0 (4/4) (1/2) (2/2) BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK (1235/1944) (1774/1944) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 100 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 1oo <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (Mf) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION CRABS GAMMA 2 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 NA 2068 NA 2186 33 INDICATOR 0 (2/2) (1/1) EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE (1950/2186) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE MN-54 130 <LLD NA 0 CO-58 130 <LLD NA 0 00 FE-59 260 <LLD NA 0 CO-60 130 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 100 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 100 <LLD NA 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA (PCI/KG DRY) BE-7 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SEDIMENT K-40 NA 4814 14005 14005 94 CONTROL 0 (PCI/KG DRY) (6/6) (2/2) (2/2) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR (783/9740) (13210/14800) (13210/14800) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0
,>0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 180 <LLD <LLD AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 415 10 14 13 14 11I INDICATOR 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) (301/311) (100/104) (51/52) FINNINGER FARM (6/39) (6/27) (7/37) 0.3 MILES ENE OF SITE (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION AIR PARTICULATE SR-89 32 10 <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)
SR-90 32 10 <LLD <LLD 0
,> GAMMA 32 BE-7 NA 56 55 65 20 INDICATOR 0 (24/24) (8/8) (4/4) FINNINGER FARM ON SOUTH SIDE ACCESS ROAD (35/106) (36/74) (35/106) 0.7 MILES E OF SITE MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD CS-134 50 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION AIR PARTICULATE CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)
AIR IODINE GAMMA 415 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 1-131 70 <LLD ZLLD 0 VEGETATION SR-89 60 25 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)
SR-90 60 5 4.6 5.6 5.6 36 CONTROL 0 (15/45) (9/15) (9/15) U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT NJ (1.5/7.8) (1.3/9.5) (1.3/9.5) 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE GAMMA 60 BE-7 NA 471 339 561 66 INDICATOR 0 (17/45) (I/15) (7/15) EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHARGE (105/1982) (208/1982) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE K-40 NA 4721 4387 4942 115 INDICATOR 0 (45/45) (15/15) (15/15) EAST OF SITE, ON FINNINGER FARM (2316/10020) (2313/6549) 12316/7555) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTS RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION VEGETATION CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)
CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 8.4 9.2 14.8 55 INDICATOR 0 (MLLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (4.9/16.0) (7.9/10.8) (13.1/16.0) 0.3 MILES W (M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES
APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS
TABLE B-I: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Sample Medium APT = Air Particulate Clam = Clam AIO = Air Iodine OSLD = Optically Stimulated DW = Drinking Water Dosimetry VEG = Vegetation Fish = Fish SWA = Surface Water Crab = Crab AQS = Aquatic Sediment GW = Ground Water Station Code SStation's Designation Distance - Distance from the OCGS in miles Azimuth SAzimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description - Meteorological sector in which the station is located and a narrative description B-I
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description OSLD 1 0.4 219 SW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ DW is 0.1 209 On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ DW 1N 0.2 349 On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ APT, AIO, OSLD 3 6.0 97 East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park OSLD 4 4.6 213 SSW of site, Route 554 and Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJ OSLD 5 4.2 353 North of site, at Garden State Parkway Rest Area, Forked River, NJ OSLD 6 2.1 13 NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ OSLD 8 2.3 177 South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ OSLD 9 2.0 230 WSW of site, west of where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meet,
,Z Waretown, NJ APT, AIO, OSLD C 24.7 313 NW of site, JCP&L office in rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ OSLD 11 8.2 152 SSE of site, 80te and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ OSLD 14 20.8 2 North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ APT, AIO 20 0.7 95 East of site, on Finninger Farm on south side of access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 22 1.6 145 SE of site, on Long John Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ SWA, CLAM, AQS 23 3.6 64 ENE of site, Bamegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of "Flashing Light 1" SWA, CLAM, AQS 24 2.1 101 East of site, Bamegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of "Flashing Light 3" SWA, AQS, FISH, 33 0.4 123 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge in OCGS Discharge Canal CRAB VEG 35 0.4 111 ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, NJ VEG 36 23.1 319 NW of site, at "U-Pick" Farm, New Egypt, NJ
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description DW 37 2.2 18 NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ DW 38 1.6 197 SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, NJ DW 39 3.5 353 North of Site, Trenton Ave. off Lacey Rd, Lacey Twp. MUA Pump Station, Forked River, NJ OSLD 46 5.6 323 NW of site, on Lacey Road, adjacent to utility pole BT 259 65, Forked River, NJ OSLD 47 4.6 26 NNE of site, Route 9 and Harbor Inn Road, Bayville, NJ OSLD 48 4.5 189 South of site, at intersection of Brook and School Streets, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 51 0.4 358 North of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 52 0.3 333 NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 53 0.3 309 NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 54 0.3 288 WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ OSLD 55 0.3 263 West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ OSLD 56 0.3 249 WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ OSLD 57 0.2 206 SSW of site, on Southem Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 58 0.2 188 South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 59 0.3 166 SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ OSILD 61 0.3 104 ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (de8rees) Description OSLD 62 0.2 83 East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ OSLD 63 0.2 70 ENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 64 0.3 42 NE of site, on Route 9 North at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ OSLD 65 0.4 19 NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ APT, AIO, 66 0.4 133 SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence, OSLD, VEG Waretown, NJ OSLD' 68 1.3 266 West of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 71.7, Lacey Township, NJ APT, AIO, 71 1.6 164 SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ OSLD APT, AIO, 72 1.9 25 NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ OSLD APT, AIO, 73 1.8 108 ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ OSLD OSLD 74 1.8 88 East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ OSLD 75 2.0 71 ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maui Drive, Forked River, NJ OSLD 78 1.8 2 North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ OSLD 79 2.9 160 SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive, Waretown, NJ OSLD 81 3.5 201 SSW of site, on Rose Hill Road at intersection with Barnegat Boulevard, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 82 4.4 36 NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJ OSLD 84 4.4 332 NNW of site, on Lacey Road, 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren pole, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 85 3.9 250 WSW of site, on Route 532, just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown, NJ OSLD 86 5.0 224 SW of site, on Route 554, 1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway, Bamegat, NJ OSLD 88 6.6 125 SE of site, eastern end of Street, Bamegat Light, NJ 3 rd OSLD 89 6.1 108 ESE of site, Job Francis residence, Island Beach State Park
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (degrees) Description OSLD 90 6.3 75 ENE of site, parking lot A-5, Island Beach State Park OSLD 92 9.0 46 NE of site, at Guard Shack/Toll Booth, Island Beach State Park 0.1 242 WSW of site, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, FISH, CRAB Forked River, NJ SWA, AQS, CLAM, 94 20.0 198 SSW of site, in Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor FISH OSLD 98 1.6 318 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 73, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 99 1.5 310 NW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 100 1.4 43 NE of site, Yacht Basin Plaza South off Lakeside Dr., Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 101 1.7 49 NE of site, end of Lacey Rd. East, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 102 1.6 344 NNW of site, end of Sheffield Dr., Bamegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 103 2.4 337 NNW of site, Llewellyn Pkwy., Barnegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 104 1.8 221 SW of site, Rt. 532 West, before Garden State Parkway, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 105 2.8 222 SW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 69.6, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 106 1.2 288 WNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.2, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 107 1.3 301 WNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.5, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 109 1.2 141 SE of site, Lighthouse Dr., Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ OSLD 110 1.5 127 SE of site, Tiller Dr. and Admiral Way, Waretown, Ocean Township, NJ APT, AIO 111 0.3 64 ENE of site, Finninger Farm property along access road, Lacey Township, NJ OSLD 112 0.2 178 S of site, along southern access road
TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Medium Code (miles) (derees) Description OSLD 113 0.3 90 E of site, along Rt. 9, North DW 114 0.8 267 Well at Bldg 25 on Forked River site VEG 115 0.3 96 E of Site, on Finninger Farm OSLD T1 0.4 219 SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ GW MW-24-3A 0.8 97 ESE of site, Finninger Farm on South side of access road, Lacey Township, NJ GW W-3C 0.4 112 ESE of site, Finninger Farm adjacent to Station 35, Lacey Township, NJ
TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Drinking Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection gamma spectroscopy procedure - well water Drinking Water Tritium Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct procedure - well water method)
Drinking water Iodine Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2031 Radioiodine in drinking water water samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in water by CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection an ion exchange procedure - well water Drinking Water Gross Beta Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in water samples for radiological analysis various matrices CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., W(DS)-01 Determination of gross alpha and/or procedure - well water gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)
,=
Env. Inc., W(SS)-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in water (suspended solids)
Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)
Groundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquid radiological analysis scintillation Groundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis radiological analysis Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples ER-OCGS-14, Collection of fish samples for 250 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis collected via hook and radiological analysis line technique and traps Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Clams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual ER-OCGS-16, Collection of clam and crab 300 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Crabs samples collected using samples for radiological analysis clam tongs and traps. Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by I 1__1_ 1gamma spectroscopy
TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab ER-OCGS-03, Collection of aquatic sediment 1000 grams (dry) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis samples samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or beta activity in continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters various matrices through glass fiber filter weekly) paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples 13 filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis each station (approximately 4000 Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing air cubic meters) Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by particulate filters for gamma spectroscopic gamma spectroscopy analysis Air Particulates Strontium-89/90 Quarterly composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 13 filters TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion each station particulate samples for radiological analysis (approximately 4000 exchange cubic meters)
Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis continuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters through charcoal filter weekly) Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal
,0 canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)
Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Vegetation Strontium-89/90 Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange growing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis OSLD Optically Stimulated Quarterly OSLDs ER OCGS-02, Collection/Exchange of Field 2 dosimeters Landauer Incorporated Luminescence comprised of two Dosimeters for Radiological Analysis Dosimetry A120 3:C Landauer Incorporated elements.
Oyster Creek Generating Station REMP Sample Locations within a I Mile Radius 0.3 01" a 003 Figure B-1 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-9
Figure B-2 Locations of REMP Stations within a 1 to 5-mile radius of the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-10
Oyster Creek Generating Station T REMP Sample Locations over a 5 Mile Radius 5.5 2VS 0& W Figure B-3 Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the Oyster Creek Generating Station B-II
APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY
Table C-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 23 24 33 94 PERIOD 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 193 185 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 170 173 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 200 167 04/16/14 - 04/16/14 < 167 < 168 < 189 186 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 157 158 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 166 165 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 188 188 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 162 161 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 188 < 188 < 179 180 09/30/14 - 10/29/14 160 162 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 185 188 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 160 166 MEAN C-I
Table C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 23 U4/16i14 - U4/16/14 < 4 <4 <lU <b <9 <5 <8 <13 <4 <4 <27 <10 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 5 <6 <9 <4 <11 <6 <8 <15 <5 <6 <30 <8 MEAN 24 04116114 - 04/16(14 < 5 <5 <13 <4 <10 <5 <9 <14 <4 <5 <32 <10 09/29/14 - 09/29/14 < 5 <6 <12 <4 <11 <5 <10 <15 <5 <5 <35 <13 MEAN 33 01/08114 - 01/28/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 <13 <2 <2 <21 <6 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 6 <6 <13 <6 < 13 <5 < 10 < 15 <5 <6 <34 <10 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 4 <4 <10 <5 <8 <4 <8 <15 <4 <4 <28 < 11 04102/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <8 <2 <2 <17 <4 05/07/14 - 05/28/14 < 4 <5 <10 <5 <10 <5 <9 <8 <6 <6 <21 <8 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 < 5 <5 <13 <6 *13 <5 < 12 < 12 <7 <7 <28 < 11 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 < 4 <5 <10 <5 < 11 <5 <7 <14 <5 <5 < 30 <9 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 7 <6 <13 <6 <11 <6 < 12 < 13 <6 <7 < 37 <8 09/03/14 - 09/24/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <5 <9 <2 <3 <16 <5 09/29/14 - 10/29/14 < 7 <7 <15 <6 < 13 <6 < 10 < 10 <7 <9 <31 <9 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <4 <7 <8 <4 <5 < 23 <8 12/10/14 - 12/30/14 < 6 <6 <12 <6 <12 <6 <10 <11 <5 <6 < 26 <7 MEAN 94 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 <14 <2 <2 <24 <9 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 5 <5 <9 <5 <9 <5 <7 <12 <4 <5 < 28 <9 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 4 <3 <9 <4 <7 <4 <7 <14 <3 <4 < 27 <9 04/04/14 - 04/30114 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <15 <5 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 7 <9 <11 <8 < 16 <8 < 12 < 12 <6 <7 < 35 <9 06/06114 - 06/25/14 < 6 <7 <12 <5 <13 <7 < 11 < 11 <5 <5 <28 <8 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <16 <5 08/08/14 - 08/27114 < 5 <7 <13 <5 < 11 <6 <9 <12 <5 <6 < 28 < 10 09/03/14 - 09/24114 < 4 <3 <11 <4 <9 <4 <8 <13 <4 <4 <25 < 11 09/30/14 - 10/29/14 < 8 <7 <18 <9 <16 <6 <13 <9 <7 <7 < 28 < 11 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 5 <5 <10 <4 <9 <5 <8 <9 <5 <5 < 23 <9 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 6 <6 <13 <5 < 13 <6 < 13 < 12 <6 <5 < 33 <9 MEAN
Table C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN 1s 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - U01/2814 < 18 < 187 (1) < 189 < 166 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 175 < 177 (1) < 173 < 166 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 185 < 164 (1) < 169 < 166 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01/14 < 183 < 188 (1) < 186 < 184 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 153 < 159 (1) < 158 < 157 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/26/14 < 192 < 159 (1) < 184 < 192 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 < 188 < 188 (1) < 186 < 188 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 165 < 166 (1) < 165 < 165 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 181 < 180 < 181 (1) < 180 < 180 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 < 161 (1) < 164 < 161 < 160 < 160 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 186 < 186 < 185 < 187 < 187 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 163 < 185 (1) < 162 < 164 (1)
MEAN Table C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN iS 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - 01/28/14 3.2 + 1.3 9.9 +/- 2.0 (1) < 1.9 2.3 +/- 1.1 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 3.4 +/- 1.8 15.4 +/- 2.5 (1) < 2.6 < 2.4 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 4.5 + 1.4 8.3 +/- 1.6 (1) 2.3 +/- 1.2 1.8 +/- 1.1 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01114 3.1 +/- 1.3 1.8 +/- 1.2 (1) < 1.6 2.1 +/- 1.2 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 3.5 +/- 1.2 21.1 +/- 2.3 (1) 2.8 +/- 1.1 3.2 +/- 1.1 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/26/14 < 1.9 13.6 +/- 2.0 (1) < 1.7 2.3 +/- 1.3 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 3.0 + 1.3 12.6 _ 1.9 (1) 2.4 +/- 1.2 2.2 +/- 1.2 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 4.0 + 1.4 14.9 + 2.2 (1) < 1.9 2.5 +/- 1.3 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 3.7 + 1.4 15.3 + 2.1 < 1.8 (1) < 1.7 2.6 +/- 1.2 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 3.4 + 1.3 (1) 14.4 + 2.0 3.3 +/- 1.3 1.8 +/- 1.1 2.3 +/- 1.1 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 4.4 + 1.4 17.1 +/-2.1 2.7 +/- 1.3 < 1.6 2.1 +/- 1.2 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 5.5 +/- 1.4 13.2 + 1.9 (1) 2.4 +/- 1.1 3.3 +/- 1.2 (1)
MEAN 3.8 +/- 1.5 13.1 +/- 9.7 3.0 +/- 0.9 2.4 +/- 0.7 2.4 +/- 0.9 Table C-11.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION 114 IN 1s 37 38 39 PERIOD 01/15/14 - 01/28/14 < 0.8 < 0.7 (1) < 0.8 < 0.9 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 < 0.7 < 0.9 (1) < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) 04/04/14 - 05/01/14 < 0.8 < 0.8 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 < 0.7 < 0.6 (1) < 0.8 < 0.8 (1) 06/06/14 - 06126/14 < 0.5 < 0.6 (1) < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31114 < 0.4 < 0.6 (1) < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 < 0.7 < 0.7 (1) < 0.6 < 0.7 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.9 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 (1) 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 < 0.9 (1) < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.5 (1) 11/07/14 - 12/03/14 < 0.9 < 0.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.7 (1) 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 0.6 < 0.4 (1) < 0.5 < 0.5 (1)
MEAN - - -
THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-3
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 114 01/09i14 - 01/2/14 < 2 <2 <4 <2 < 3 <2 < 3 < 1 <2 <19 <b 02/06/14 02/27/14 < 4 <4 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <7 <4 <5 <29 <8 03/05/14 03/26/14 < 4 <4 <8 <5 <9 <5 <8 <4 <5 <31 <9 04/04/14 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <15 <4 05/09/14 05/28/14 < 3 <4 <7 <4 <7 <4 <6 <4 <4 <16 <5 06/06/14 06/26/14 < 5 <6 < 12 <6 <13 <7 < 10 <6 <8 <31 < 10 07/02/14 07/31/14 < 3 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5 <8 <4 <4 <28 < 10 08/08/14 08/27/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <11 <6 < 10 <6 <6 <28 <7 09/03/14 09/24/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <9 <4 <5 <3 <4 <24 <9 10/01/14 10/29/14 (1) < 4 <4 <9 <6 <8 <4 <8 <4 <5 <21 <5 11/07/14 12/03/14 < 5 <5 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <7 <4 <4 <31 <8 12/12/14 12/30/14 < 4 <4 < 10 <5 <10 <5 <8 <4 <5 <25 <7 MEAN 1IN 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <23 <7 02/04/14 - 02/25114 < 4 <5 <9 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <4 <33 <8 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 3 <4 <8 <3 <8 <4 <5 <3 <4 <32 <11 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 12 <4 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 4 <6 < 11 <5 <11 <6 <8 <6 <6 <27 <6 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 5 <6 < 11 <6 <10 <6 <9 <5 <5 <29 < 10 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <18 <6 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 5 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <9 <5 <4 <26 <7 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <4 <6 <3 <3 <26 <8 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <10 <5 < 11 <6 <6 <24 <8 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <4 <18 <6 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 8 <8 < 12 <5 <15 <7 < 10 <6 <8 < 36 < 12 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1S 01/09/14- 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14- 02/27/14 (1) 03/05114 - 03126114 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09114 - 05/28/14 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/25114 (1) 07102114 - 07/31114 (1) 08/08/14 - 08127/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 (1) <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3
- 28 <9 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <6 <6 < 12 <6 <11 <6 < 10 <6 <7
- 29 <9 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 <4 <3 <7 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <3 *18 <6 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1)
MEAN 37 01/09/14- 01/28/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <2
- 20 <5 02/06/14- 02/27/14 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3
- 22 <8 03/05/14- 03/26/14 <4 <4 < 10 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <4
- 29 <10 04/04/14- 04130/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 *15 <4 05/09/14 - 05128/14 <6 <6 < 18 <6 < 11 <7 < 12 <7 <9 < 39 <9 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 <5 <5 <9 <5 <8 <5 <8 <4 <4
- 28 <9 07/02114 - 07/31/14 <4 <4 <9 <4 <6 <4 <7 <3 <4
- 25 <8 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 <7 <7 < 16 <7 <17 <8 <15 <7 <8
- 42 < 11 09/03/14 - 09/24/14 <4 <4 <9 <3 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4
- 28 <8 10/01/14 - 10129114 <7 <6 <12 <6 < 12 <7 <13 <8 <7
- 30 <8 11/05/14 - 12/04114 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4
- 22 <6 12/12/14 - 12/30114 <6 <6 <15 <8 < 16 <6 < 12 <6 <6 < 33 < 14 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 38 01115/14 - 01/28 /14 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 21 <6 02106/14- 02127 114 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <5 <8 <4 <5 < 25 <7 03/05/14- 03/26 '14 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <7 <3 <4 < 33 <7 04104/14- 05/01 /14 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 15 <4 05/07/14- 05128 /14 <7 <8 < 12 <6 < 12 <6 < 13 <6 <6 < 35 <8 06/06114- 06/26 /14 <6 <7 < 13 <7 < 14 <7 < 12 <7 <8 < 36 < 10 07/02/14- 07/31 /14 <4 <5 < 10 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <4 <5 < 27 <9 08/08/14- 08/27/ 14 <5 <5 < 12 <5 <6 <5 < 10 <5 <5 < 29 <9 09/03/14- 09/24 114 <5 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <4 <8 <5 <5 < 30 < 10
.10/01114 - 10/29 114 <5 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <6 < 11 <8 <6 < 26 <5 11105/14- 12/04 114 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <4 < 23 <7 12/10/14 - 12/30 /14 <5 <6 < 11 <5 <9 <5 <8 <4 <6 < 27 <7 MEAN 39 01/07/14- 01/27/14 (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/06/14 (1)
- 05/27/14 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 (1) 07/01/14 - 07129/14 (1) 08/04/14 08/26/14 (1) 09/02/14 09/23/14 (1) 10101/14 10/28/14 (1) 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 (1) 12/03/14 01/06/15 (1)
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
Table C-III.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION MW-24-3A W-3C PERIOD 01/15i14 - U10114 < Itu < 1v 04/08/14 - 04/08/14 < 148 < 163 07/23/14 - 07/23/14 < 159 < 155 10/16/14 - 10/16/14 < 160 < 158 MEAN C-7
Table C-111.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 50 5(
MW-24-3A 01115/14 - 01/15 114 < 53 < 2 <53 53
<11 5 l10 04/08/14 - 04/08 /14 < 4 <6 < 10 <5 <9 <5 <10 <5 <6
- 27 <8 07/23/14 - 07/23 /14 . < 3 <3 <5 <3 <6 <3 <5 <5 <3 <3 <16 <3 10/16/14 - 10/16 /14 < 3 <4 <6 <4 <7 <4 <6 <10 <3 <4 < 24 <8 MEAN W-3C 01/15/14 - 01/15/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 04/08/14 - 04/08/14 <4 <5 <9 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <8 <5 <5
- 23 <9 07/23/14 - 07/23/14 <4 <4 <7 <"4 <8 <4 <6 <6 <4 <4 <17 <6 10/16/14 - 10116/14 <4 <5 < 12 <5 <11 <5 <9 <11 <5 <6
- 28 < 11 MEAN 00
Table C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH) SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 33 PREDATOR 05/29/14 4883 +/- 876 < 69 <67 < 166 < 64 < 142 < 76 < 68 MEAN 33 BOTTOM FEEDER 09/29/14 3838 +/- 1465 < 100 < 94 < 213 < 75 < 213 < 74 < 81 09/29/14 41687 +/- 1187 < 76 < 72 < 191 < 26 < 179 < 70 < 67 09/29/14 340 +/- 1413 < 57 < 70 < 96 < 83 < 145 < 63 < 72 MEAN 41622 +/- 1506 93 PREDATOR 04/14/14 4044 +/- 931 < 65 < 71 < 167 < 68 < 136 < 64 < 71 09/29/14 3219 +/- 1247 < 89 < 75 < 182 < 88 < 160 < 84 < 86 10/01/14 3530 +/- 1122 < 91 < 102 < 254 < 121 < 220 < 94 < 80 MEAN 3598 +/- 833 94 PREDATOR 04/15/14 5287 +/- 978 < 42 < 63 < 135 < 55 < 136 < 50 < 49 09/30/14 4988 +/- 954 < 65 < 64 < 119 < 44 < 130 < 58 < 58 09/30/14 3457 +/- 826 < 54 < 45 < 111 < 60 < 108 < 55 < 55 MEAN 4577 +/- 1963 94 BOTTOM FEEDER 04/15/14 31714 +/- 846 < 49 < 51 < 151 < 57 < 126 < 58 < 66 MEAN C-9
Table C-IV.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs- 134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 CLAMS 04/16/14 1944 +/- 634 < 39 < 39 < 92 < 26 < 59 < 36 < 42 CLAMS 09/29/14 1774 +/- 658 <48 <43 < 117 < 57 < 92 < 54 < 56 MEAN 1859 +/- 240 24 CLAMS 04/16/14 1449 +/- 554 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 82 < 41 < 44 CLAMS 09/29/14 1235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98 < 68 < 64 MEAN 1342 +/- 303 33 CRAB 09/29/14 2186 +/- 762 < 53 < 56 < 131 < 48 < 122 < 58 < 60 MEAN 93 CRAB 09/29/14 1950 +/- 595 < 33 < 35 < 73 < 45 < 91 < 29 < 44 MEAN 94 CLAMS 04/15/14 1756 +/- 554 < 41 < 43 < 93 < 41 < 85 < 40 < 44 CLAMS 09/30/14 < 472 < 64 < 72 < 161 < 72 < 111 < 58 < 65 MEAN THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-IO
Table C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 04/16/14 < 494 2096 +/- 634 < 50 < 49 < 41 < 49 < 58 09/29/14 < 747 3842 +/- 906 < 46 < 55 < 42 < 52 < 68 MEAN 2969 +/- 2469 24 04/16/14 < 361 783 +/- 401 < 31 < 33 < 36 < 30 < 30 09/29/14 < 956 9740 +/- 1425 < 86 < 111 < 83 < 76 < 91 MEAN 5261 +/- 12668 33 04/14/14 < 624 7428 +/- 1101 < 61 < 55 < 63 < 63 < 79 09/29/14 < 721 4994 +/- 978 < 64 < 67 < 51 < 37 < 69 MEAN 6211 +/- 3442 94 04/15/14 < 628 14800 +/- 1688 < 79 < 72 < 74 < 73 < 89 09/30/14 < 1160 13210 +/- 2003 < 85 < 113 < 76 < 98 < 106 MEAN 14005 +/- 2249 C-1I
Table C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP II GROUP 11 P III PERIOD 20 66 71 72 73 3 C U 01/02/14 -01/08/14 15 t+/-5 13 +/-5 14 5 12 +/- 5 17 +/-5 18 +/- S 16 +/- 5 18 +/- 5 01/08/14 -01/15/14 15 t+/-5 16 +/-5 14 +/-5 12 +/- 5 16 +/-5 13 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 01/15/14 -01/23/14 12 t+/-4 20 5 19 +/-5 19 +/- 5 15 +/-4 16 +/- 5 11 +/-4 18 +/-5 01/23/14 -01/29/14 10 t+/-6 13 +/-6 18 +/-6 16 +/- 6 12 +/-6 16 +/- 6 14 +/-6 14 +/-6 01/29/14 -02/06/14 13 t+/-4 12 +/-4 13 +/-4 9+/-4 14 +/-4 11 +/-4 11 +/-4 17 +/-4 02/06/14 -02/12/14 39 t+7 24 +/-6 37 +/-7 34 +/-7 31 +/-7 26 +/-7 25 +/-6 21 +/-6 02/12/14 -02/19/14 18 +5 16 +/-5 16 +/-4 12 +/-4 19 +/-5 13 +/-4 17 +/-5 18 +/-5 02/19/14 -02/27/14 11 +/-4 11 +/-4 13 +/-4 11 +/-4 12 +/-4 8+/-4 20 +/-4 13 +/-4 02/27/14 -03/05/14 25 +/-6 21 +/-6 27 +/-7 28 +/-7 24 +/-6 28 +/-6 25 +/-6 27 +/-6 03/05/14 -03/12/14 19 +/-5 21 +/-5 19 +/-5 19 5 21 5 18 +/-5 21 +/-5 51 03/12/14 -03/19/14 22 18 +/-5 19 +/-5 17 +/-5 21 5 19 +/-5 13 +/-4 21 +/-5
+5 03/19/14 -03/26/14 15 11 +/-5 14 5 18 +/-5 12 +/-5 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 5
+/-5 03/26/14 -04/02/14 14 15 5 13 +/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 13 i. 4
+5 04/02/14 -04/09/14 12 11 +/-5 11 5 13 +/-5 11 +/-5 10 +/-5 8+/-3 11 +/-4
+/-5 04109/14 -04/16/14 14 17 +/-5 17 5 18 +/-5 18 +/-5 17 5 14 +/-4 18 +/-5
+5 04/16/14 -04/23/14 17 15 +/-5 11 +/-5 14 5 12 +/-5 14 5 11 +/-5 15 5 04/23/14 -05/01/14 7 +/-4 7+/-4 8+/-4 9+/-5 7+/-4 7+/-4 6+/-4 7+/-4 05/01/14 -05/07/14 12 +/-6 10 +/-6 14 +/-6 15 +/-6 9+/-5 12 t 6 14 +/-5 21 +/-9 05/07/14 -05/14/14 15 +/-5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 15 +/- 5 14 +/-5 15 +/-5 05/14/14 -05/21/14 11 +/-5 6+/-3 10 +/- 5 12 +/-5 13 5 12 +/- 5 7+/-5 12 +/-5 05/21/14 -05/28/14 16 +/-5 14 +/-5 15 +/- 5 18 +/-5 20 +/-5 18 +/- 5 16 +/-5 13 +/-5 05/28/14 -06/04/14 9 +/-4 10 5 9+/-5 12 +/-5 8+/-4 8+/-4 6+/-4 14 +/-4 06/04/14 -06/11/14 13 +/-5 12 +/-5 9+/-5 11 +/-5 6+/-4 13 +/-5 7+/-4 10 +/-4 06/11/14 -06/18/14 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 8+/-5 9+/-4 11 +/-5 8+/-4 12 +/- 5 06/18/14 -06/25/14 9 +/-5 8+/-5 8+/-5 7+/-5 10 +/-5 <7 9+/-5 06/25/14 -07/02/14 11 +5 9+/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 15 +/-4 13 +/-5 6+/-4 12 +/-4 07102/14 -07/09/14 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 15 +/-5 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 8+/-5 10 +/-4 14 +/-5 07/09/14 -07/16/14 15 +/-5 18 +/- 5 20 5 16 +/-5 17 +/-5 12 +/-5 13 +/-4 14 i 4 07/16/14 -07/23/14 11 +/-5 18 +/- 5 10 +/-5 12 +/-5 10 +/-4 12 +/-5 12 +/-5 9+/-4 07/23/14 -07/30/14 10 +/-5 9+/-5 8+/-5 11 +/-5 12 +/-5 <7 < 7 (1) 14 +/-5 07/30/14 -08/06/14 9 +/-5 11 +/-5 9+/-5 10 +/-5 11 +/-5 15 +/-5 <6 11 +/-5 08/06/14 -08/13/14 14 +/-5 12 +/-5 17 +/-5 14 5 17 +/-5 11 +/-5 (1) 14 +/- 5 16 t 5 08/13/14 -08/20/14 16 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 5 12 +/-5 12 +/-4 12 +/-5 10 +/- 4 15 +/- 5 08/20/14 -08/27/14 8 +/-5 10 +/-5 9+/-5 7+/-4 9+/-4 6+/-3 7+/-4 8+/-t4 08/27/14 -09/03/14 10 +/-5 16 +/- 6 16 +/-6 <7 8+/-5 12 +/-5 7+/-5 13 t 5 09/03/14 -09/10/14 13 t+/-5 10 +/- 5 11 5 13 +/-5 11 +/-5 11 5 11 5 9+/-t5 09/10/14 -09/17/14 9 +/-5 8+/-5 <7 <7 9+/-4 <7 9+/-4 9+/-4 09/17/14 -09/24/14 13 t+/-5 17 +/-5 12 +/-5 17 +/- 5 14 +/-5 13 +/-5 7+/-4 15 +/-5 09/24/14 -10/01/14 14 +/-5 19 +/-5 16 +/-5 16 +/- 5 15 +/-5 13 +/-5 12 +/-4 15 +/-5 10/01/14 -10/08/14 11 +/-5 15 +/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/- 5 9+/-4 13 +/-5 10 +/-5 19 +/-5 10/08/14 -10/14/14 13 +/-6 13 +/-6 17 +/-6 15 +/- 6 14 +/-6 17 +/-6 17 +/-6 14 +/-6 10/14/14 -10/22/14 9 +/-4 11 +/-5 7+/-4 <6 11 +/-4 8+/-4 9+/-3 8+/-4 10/22/14 -10/29/14 16 +/-t5 14 +/-5 14 +/-5 17 +/- 5 19 5 15 +/-5 14 5 15 +/-5 10/29/14 -11/05/14 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 22 +/-6 11 +/-5 17 +/-5 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 9+/-4 11/05/14 -11/12/14 19 +/-5 18 +/-5 14 5 17 +/-5 17 +/-5 14 +/-5 17 +/-5 22 +/-5 11/12/14 -11/19/14 11 +/-5 11 5 13 +/-5 13 +/-5 14 +/-4 13 +/-5 11 +/-4 10 +/-4 11/19/14 -11/25/14 22 +/-6 20 +/- 6 22 +/-6 19 +/-6 21 +/-5 21 +/- 6 21 +/-5 19 +/-5 11/25/14 -12/03/14 16 +/-4 16 +/- 5 17 +/-5 16 +/-5 18 +/-4 18 +/- 5 14 +/-4 14 +/-4 12/03/14 -12/10/14 13 +/-5 9+/-5 12 5 11 +/-5 10 +/-5 11 +/- 5 9+/-5 11 +/-5 12/10/14 -12/17/14 21 +/-5 21 +/-6 25 +/-6 19 +/-5 19 5 19 t 5 20 +/- 5 20 +/-5 12/17/14 -12/23/14 9 +/-6 <8 9+/-6 9+/-6 <7 <8 10 +/- 5 <7 12/23/14 -12/30/14 11 +/-5 12 +/-5 11 +/-5 7+/-5 12 +/-5 12 +/- 5 10 +/- 4 13 +/-5 MEAN 14+/-t10 14 +/-8 14 +/-11 14 +/-10 14 +/-10 14 +/-9 12 +/-9 14+/- 9 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-I12
Table C-VI.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS INAIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/-
PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PPRIOD ,q1n 01/02/14 - 01/29/14 10 20 15 +/- 6 01/02/14 01129114 12 19 15 5 01/02/14 - 01/29/14 11 18 15 +/- 5 01/29/14 - 02/27114 11 39 19 +/- 19 01/29/14 02/27/14 8 34 17 18 01/29/14 - 02/27/14 11 25 18 +/- 9 02/27/14 - 04/02/14 11 27 18 +/- 9 02/27/14 04/02/14 12 28 18 11 02/27/14 - 04/02/14 12 27 17 +/- 11 04/02/14 - 05/01/14 7 17 12 +/- 7 04/02/14 05/01/14 7 18 12 8 04/02/14 - 05101/14 6 18 11 +8 05/01/14 - 06/04/14 6 17 12 +/- 6 05/01/14 06/04/14 8 20 14 7 05/01/14 - 06/04/14 6 21 13 8 06/04/14 - 07/02/14 8 15 11 +/- 5 06/04/14 07/02/14 6 15 10 5 06/04/14 - 07/02/14 6 12 9+/-5 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 8 20 13 +/-8 07/02/14 07/30/14 8 17 12 5 07/02/14 - 07/30/14 9 14 12 +4 07/30/14 - 09/03/14 8 17 12 +/- 6 07/30/14 09/03/14 6 17 11 6 07/30/14 - 09/03/14 7 16 11 +/-7 09/03/14 - 10/01/14 8 19 13 +/- 7 09/03/14 10/01/14 9 17 13 5 09/03/14 - 10/01/14 7 15 11 +6 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 7 17 13 +/- 6 10/01/14 10/29114 8 19 14 7 10/01/14 - 10/29/14 8 19 13+/- 7 10/29/14 - 12/03/14 11 22 16 +/- 8 10/29/14 12/03/14 11 21 16 6 10/29/14 - 12/03/14 9 22 15 +/-9 12/03/14 - 12/30/14 9 25 14 +/- 11 12/03/14 12/30/14 7 19 13 9 12/03/14 - 12/30/14 9 20 13 9 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 39 14 +/- 10 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 34 14 +/- 9 01/02/14 - 12/30/14 6 27 13 +/-9
Table C-VI.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER 12 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 PERIOD PERIOD 3 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 72 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <5 <5 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <5 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <9 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 < 10 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <4 <2 MEAN MEAN 20 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <2 73 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <7 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <5 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <8 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <9 <2 MEAN MEAN 66 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <8 <2 111 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <8 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <6 <7 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <6 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <8 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30114 < 10 <3 MEAN MEAN 71 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 <9 <3 C 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 < 10 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 <7 <6 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <7 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 <9 <1 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <9 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 <5 <2 MEAN MEAN C-14
Table C-VI.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 3 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 74 +/- 24 <3 <4 <3 <4 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 61 +/- 32 <3 <4 <4 <4 <4 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 43 + 16 <2 <2 <3 <2 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 43 _+19 <2 <2 <3 <2 <2 MEAN 55 +/- 30 20 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 81 +/- 22 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 04/02114 - 07/02/14 106 +/- 25 <3 <4 <3 <2 <3 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 35 +/- 21 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 37 +/- 20 <2 <2 <2 <3 <2 MEAN 65 +/- 70 66 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 64 +/- 17 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 42 +/- 20 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 54 +/- 31 <4 <4 <6 <4 <5 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 62 +/- 29 <4 <4 <2 <3 <2 MEAN 55 t 19 71 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 74 +/- 22 <2 <3 <3 <3 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 60 +/- 25 <3 <3 <3 <3 <2 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 42 +/- 27 <4 <5 <6 <4 <5 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 65 +/- 23 <3 <4 <3 <3 <3 MEAN 60 +/- 27 72 01/02/14 - 04/02114 67 _+ 26 <3 <4 <2 4 <3 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 55 _+ 22 <2 <2 <3 2 <1 07/02114 - 10/01/14 47 + 32 <4 <4 <4 3 <3 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 45 +/- 17 <2 <2 <1 2 <2 MEAN 53 +/- 20 73 01102/14 - 04/02/14 57 +/- 18 <3 <3 <3 3 <2 04/02/14 - 07/02114 35 +/- 18 <3 <3 <3 3 <3 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 46 +/- 19 <3 <3 <2 3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 52 _ 17 <2 <3 <2 3 <2 MEAN 48 +/- 19 111 01/02/14 - 04/02/14 75 +/- 30 <4 <4 <4 <3 <4 04/02/14 - 07/02/14 52 +/- 28 <4 <4 <5 <5 <4 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 46 +/- 18 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 46 +/- 33 <4 <4 <5 <4 <4 MEAN 55 +/- 28 C 01/02114 - 04/02/14 70 +/- 22 <2 <2 <2 2 <2 04/02114 - 07/02/14 68 +/- 26 <2 <3 <2 2 <1 07/02/14 - 10/01/14 48 +/- 16 <2 <2 <3 3 <2 10/01/14 - 12/30/14 36 +/- 22 <2 <3 <2 2 <2 MEAN 55 +/- 32 C-15
Table C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP 1 GROUP 11 I GROUPHII PERIOD 20 66 i11 71 72 73 3 C U
01/02/14 -01/08/14
- 23
- 59
- 56
- 58
- 58
- 59 *60 *58 01108/14 -01/15/14
- 35
- 37
- 35
- 36
- 34
- 37
- 35
- 35 01/15/14 -01/23/14
- 34
- 43
- 32
- 42
- 14
- 43
- 34
- 34 01/23/14 -01/29/14
- 60
- 60
- 58
- 59
- 58 *60
- 57
- 54 01/29/14 -02/06/14
- 40
- 27
- 38
- 27
- 40 *27 <11
- 33 02/06/14 -02/12114
- 68
- 56
- 54
- 56 *67
- 57 *65 *68 02/12/14 -02/19/14
- 65
- 55
- 62
- 55
- 64 *56 *58
- 34 02/19/14 -02/27/14
- 36
- 36
- 34
- 35.
- 36 *36
- 34
- 34 02/27/14 -03/05/14
- 68
- 67
- 67
- 67 *62 *65 *63 *62 03105/14 -03/12/14 (1)
- 45
- 45
- 19 *40
- 44 *13
- 37 03/12/14 -03/19/14
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 68 *63 *67
- 57 *56 03/19/14 -03/26/14
- 41
- 41
- 41
- 41 *38 *40
- 39 *38 03/26/14 -04/02/14
- 39
- 40
- 40
- 16 *42
- 39 *42 *42 04/02/14 -04/09/14
- 30
- 31
- 30
- 18 *40 *30 *40 *40 04/09/14 -04/16/14
- 42
- 43
- 43
- 43 *40 *16 *40 *40 04/16/14 -04/23/14
- 43
- 61
- 60
- 61
- 39 *60
- 39
- 37 04/23/14 -05/01/14
- 44
- 17
- 45
- 44
- 35
- 43 *36
- 37 05/01/14 -05/07/14
- 59
- 53
- 53
- 53
- 55 *52 *56
- 39 05/07/14 -05/14/14
- 45
- 46
- 46
- 46 *38
- 45 *38 *38 05/14/14 -05/21/14 *51
- 53
- 53
- 20 *62 *51 *62 *62 05/21/14 -05/28/14 *24
- 69
- 68
- 68
- 54 *67
- 54 *64 05/28/14 -06/04/14
- 43
- 39
- 39
- 39 *40 *38 *40 *40 06/04/14 -06/11/14
- 62
- 70
- 64
- 69 *24 *68 *58 *58 06/11/14 -06/18/14
- 53
- 56
- 56
- 56
- 49
- 55
- 49 *52 06/18/14 -06/25/14
- 37
- 41
- 41
- 40
- 34
- 39 *15
- 35 06/25/14 -07/02/14 *50
- 44
- 52
- 45
- 45
- 44 *64 *63 07/02/14 -07/09/14 *62
- 68
- 67
- 67 *58 *66 *58 *58 07/09/14 -07/16/14
- 44 *51 *51 *50 *40
- 49 *41 *41 07/16/14 -07/23/14
- 66
- 64 *68
- 64 *60 *63
- 55 *50 07/23/14 -07/30/14 *50
- 69 *70
- 68 *46 *67 *48 (1) *48 07/30/14 -08/06/14 *42
- 41
- 44
- 16
- 39 *40 *40 *42 08/06/14 -08/13/14
- 49
- 40
- 40
- 40
- 45 *39 (1) *46 *46 08/13/14 -08/20/14
- 63
- 65
- 65
- 64 *65 *25 *66 *65 08/20/14 -08/27/14
- 66
- 69
- 67
- 69 *60 *67 *62 *62 08/27/14 -09/03/14
- 56
- 22
- 57
- 56
- 53
- 55
- 53 *50 09/03/14 -09/10/14
- 67
- 67
- 67
- 66 *62 *65 *63 *64 09/10/14 -09/17/14
- 64
- 66
- 13
- 66 *62 *64 *63 *63 09/17/14 -09/24/14
- 69
- 65
- 65
- 64 *64 *63 *65 *64 09/24/14 -10/01/14
- 26
- 70
- 70
- 69 *62 *68 *63 *63 10/01/14 -10/08/14
- 47
- 63
- 49
- 62
- 43 *61 *18
- 47 10/08/14 -10/14/14
- 60
- 62
- 61
- 24 *25 *60 *60
- 59 10/14/14 -10/22/14
- 41
- 34
- 34
- 33 *38
- 33 *16 *38 10/22/14 -10/29/14
- 46
- 46
- 46
- 46 *42
- 45 *42 *18 10/29/14 -11/05/14 *51
- 59
- 59
- 59
- 47 *58 *48 *48 11/05/14 -11/12/14 *62
- 48
- 48
- 48
- 57
- 47 *58
- 57
- 16
- 17 *z 17
- 17 *15 *17 *15 *15 11/19/14 -11/25/14
- 64
- 66
- 66
- 66
- 59 *65
- 59
- 59 11/25/14 -12/03/14
- 32
- 33
- 33
- 13
- 35 *32
- 35
- 35 12/03/14 -12110/14
- 35
- 36
- 36
- 14
- 33
- 35
- 34
- 33 12/10/14 -12/17/14
- 58
- 70
- 69
- 69 *67 *68 *67
- 67 12/17/14 -12/23/14
- 67
- 69
- 69
- 69 *69 *30 *68
- 70 12/23/14 -12/30/14
- 62
- 70
- 70
- 69
- 57 < 68 *58
- 58 MEAN----
(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C- 16
Table C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 115 0i30i114 Cabbage <9 1.b +/- U.6 < 126 6939 +/- 4U0 <lij <ilb
- 68 < z1 06/30/14 Collards <9 < 1.1 < 130 5467 +/- 367 < 24 < 12 < 14 < 65 < 19 06/30/14 Kale <9 < 1.5 < 173 7319 +/- 386 < 36 < 19 < 18 < 90 < 21 07/30/14 Cabbage < 15 < 2.9 < 173 3279 +/- 413 < 41 < 18 < 20 < 116 < 22 07/30/14 Collards < 10 3.9 +/- 1.5 < 195 7555 +/- 670 < 43 < 19 < 23 < 102 < 26 07/30/14 Kale < 14 1.9 + 1.1 105 +/- 52 5846 +/- 149 < 57 <5 <6 < 77 < 22 08/20/14 Cabbage < 15 < 1.7 < 127 2316 +/- 297 < 58 < 14
- 15 < 117 < 33 08/20/14 Collards < 15 5.9 + 1.1 < 171 5828 +/- 431 < 57 < 16 *17 < 113 < 30 08/20/14 Kale < 16 4.8 +/- 1.2 < 168 4816 +/- 429 < 53 < 13 <13 < 105 < 31 09/16/14 Cabbage <8 < 2.0 < 161 2921 +/- 348 < 43 < 18 <17 < 96 < 26 09/16/14 Collards <9 7.7 +/- 2.0 < 266 5414 +/- 626 < 52 < 26
- 25 < 141 < 40 09/16/14 Kale < 10 7.8 +/- 1.8 < 218 4434 +/- 516 < 52 < 18 <19 < 129 < 27 10/22/14 Cabbage < 16 < 1.3 233 +/- 109 3000 +/- 242 < 58 <11 <12 < 107 < 28 10/22/14 Collards < 17 < 2.0 961 +/- 177 4327 +/- 292 < 59
- 13 <12 < 115 < 32 10/22/14 Kale < 15 < 1.6 476 +/- 127 4671 +/- 309 < 54
- 10 <12 < 101 < 28 MEAN 4.8 +/- 5.1 444 +/- 755 4942 +/- 3243 -
35 06/30/14 Cabbage < 10 < 1.5 < 177 4767 +/- 572 < 37
- 24 < 26
- 105 < 42 06/30/14 Collards <9 1.6 +/- 0.8 < 92 5394 +/- 294 < 21 <10 <11 < 54 < 14 06/30/14 Kale < 11 < 1.6 174 +/- 120 10020 +/- 511 < 29 <13
- 16 < 84 < 22 07/30/14 Cabbage < 13 < 2.1 < 180 2332 +/- 358 < 39 < 18 < 21 < 102 < 35 07/30/14 Collards < 12 7.3 +/- 2.1 < 254 5077 +/- 521
- 50
- 27
- 25 < 109 < 37 07/30/14 Kale < 12 5.2 +/- 1.9 < 267 4333 +/- 505 < 55
- 24
- 28 < 141 < 31 08/20/14 Cabbage < 23 < 2.4 < 141 2467 +/- 321 < 52 <11
- 16 < 108 < 26 08/20/14 Collards < 20 < 2.1 212 +/- 118 4244 +/- 362 < 54 <14
- 16 < 111 < 37 08/20/14 Kale < 16 < 1.6 < 165 4559 +/- 327 < 56 <15 <15 < 120 < 30 09/16/14 Cabbage <9 < 2.6 < 252 2784 +/- 480 < 57
- 28 < 24 < 169 < 56 09/16/14 Collards <9 < 3.3 217 +/- 81 3014 +/- 145 < 59 <3 <3 < 64 < 14 09/16/14 Kale < 13 < 4.7 < 254 3384 +/- 513 < 54 < 21 < 24 < 107 < 34 10/22/14 Cabbage < 22 < 1.9 491 +/- 143 4075 +/- 397 < 46 < 10 < 14 < 121 < 29 10/22/14 Collards < 24 5.3 +/- 1.6 891 +/- 226 3153 +/- 438 < 44 < 13 < 13 < 91 < 16 10/22/14 Kale < 20 < 1.6 322 +/- 113 4921 +/- 304 < 55 <11 < 10 < 97 < 26 MEAN 4.8 +/- 4.8 384 +/- 547 4302 +/- 3726 -
THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-17
Table C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Control 36 06/30/14 Cabbage <9 1.3 +/- 0.7
- 134 2972 +/- 294
- 27
- 13 *12 < 74
- 18 06/30/14 Collards <10
- 2.6
- 224 6549 +/- 648
- 51
- 25
- 26
- 134 < 43 06/30/14 Kale <11 <2.1
- 171 5388 +/- 457
- 40
- 16 < 16
- 100 < 24 07/30/14 Cabbage <7 4.1 +/- 1.4
- 197 3231 +/- 365 < 49 <16 <19
- 114 < 37 07/30/14 Collards <15 8.7 +/- 1.8 < 228 5191 +/- 504 < 59
- 21
- 22
- 145 < 37 07/30/14 Kale <9 2.4 +/- 1.5 339 +/- 131 5046 +/- 501
- 52
- 20
- 18
- 135
- 26 08/20/14 Cabbage <18 6.0 +/- 1.4
- 163 2313 +/- 337
- 60
- 16 <16
- 114
- 38 08/20/14 Collards <15 4.7 +/- 1.2
- 119 4493 +/- 285 < 59 <11
- 12
- 107
- 25 08/20/14 Kale <19 9.5 +/- 1.7
- 155 5654 +/- 391 < 59
- 13
- 16
- 136
- 32 09/16/14 Cabbage <8
- 2.2
- 233 2400 +/- 463
- 58
- 21
- 24
- 151
- 41 09/16/14 Collards <15 9.0 +/- 3.2
- 231 4560 +/- 497
- 52
- 24
- 20
- 108
- 32 09/16/14 Kale
- 10 5.1 +/- 2.1
- 280 5017 +/- 667 < 59 < 24
- 29
- 141
- 38 10/31/14 Cabbage <7
- 1.3
- 156 3361 +/- 286
- 52
- 14 <15
- 104
- 36 10/31/14 Collards < 10
- 1.7
- 198 4477 +/- 423
- 58
- 17
- 20
- 145
- 32 10/31/14 Kale <11
- 1.8
- 197 5160 +/- 352 < 57 *19
- 18
- 125
- 23 MEAN 5.6 +/- 5.9 - 4387 +/- 2510 -
66 06/30/14 Cabbage <11 2.7 +/- 0.8
- 213 6274 +/- 660
- 41
- 24
- 23 < 97 < 38 06/30/14 Collards <11
- 2.0
- 209 8322 +/- 500
- 46
- 24
- 24
- 125
- 27 06/30/14 Kale
- 10 2.1 +/- 0.9
- 291 6084 +/- 709 < 53 < 27
- 30 < 143 < 39 07/30/14 Cabbage
- 18 6.6 +/-2.1
- 270 4950 +/- 656 < 59
- 24
- 25
- 132 < 31 07/30/14 Collards <8
- 2.8
- 265 6382 +/- 669 < 49
- 28
- 23
- 120 < 24 07/30/14 Kale <12
- 1.9
- 191 3859 +/- 414
- 36
- 19 <19
- 98 < 27 08/20/14 Cabbage <13
- 1.4
- 135 3191 +/- 340
- 58 < 13 <15
- 110
- 28 08/20/14 Collards
- 14
- 1.4 480 +/- 155 5349 +/- 429
- 56 <15
- 14
- 105
- 28 08/20/14 Kale <10
- 1.4 208 +/- 154 4079 +/- 403 < 57 < 15
- 14
- 115 < 33 09/16/14 Cabbage <9 5.2 +/- 1.1
- 164 3738 +/- 415
- 41 <17 <15
- 102
- 24 09/16/14 Collards < 10
- 3.2 312 +/- 194 5197 +/- 689 < 59
- 21
- 27
- 126 <41 09/16/14 Kale <9 < 3.3 214 +/- 141 3674 +/- 428 < 49
- 22
- 24
- 130
- 40 10/22/14 Cabbage
- 16
- 1.5 271 +/- 114 3503 +/- 310 < 52
- 14 <13 < 99
- 26 10/22/14 Collards
- 20
- 1.8 1982 +/- 218 4875 +/- 374 < 49 <12 <15
- 103
- 28 10/22/14 Kale
- 19
- 1.7 461 +/- 153 4305 +/- 422 < 51 *13 <15
- 118 < 33 MEAN 4.1 +/- 4.2 561 +/- 1272 4919 +/- 2794 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-18
Table C-IX.1 Tabl QUARTERLY C-X.1 OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATION STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D.
1 10.4 +/- 1.9 10.4 +/- 2.7 11.3 +/- 0.4 9.1 +/- 0.3 10.8 +/- 0.6 3 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.3 +/- 0.4 6.5 +/- 0.6 .5.7 +/- 1.3 7.9 +/- 0.1 4 9.1 +/- 2.8 10.4 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.0 7.1 +/- 0.8 9.7 +/- 2.8 5 13.8 +/- 1.5 14.3 +/-0.6 13.1 +/- 2.8 14.6 +/- 2.0 13.3 +/- 4.7 6 8.4 +/-0.5 8.2+/-2.5 8.7 +/-0.3 8.3 +/-1.6 8.2 +/-0.6 8 7.6 +/-1.3 8.4+/-0.5 7.9 +/-1.2 6.9+/-t0.9 7.3 +/-1.0 9 6.3 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/-3.1 6.1 t 2.1 5.3 +/- 1.3 6.8 t 1.3 C 8.5 +/-1.0 8.9+/-1.1 7.9 +/-1.3 8.2 +/-1.4 8.9 +/-1.7 11 8.0 +/- 1.0 7.6 +/-0.8 8.1 +/- 2.1 7.6 +/- 1.4 8.6 +/- 1.4 14 9.9 +/- 1.6 8.9 t 1.6 10.8 +/- 2.3 9.9 +/- 1.6 9.8 +/- 0.7 22 7.1 +/- 0.9 6.7 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.7 7.0 +/- 0.1 7.8 +/- 1.3 46 6.3 +/- 2.0 7.2 +/- 0.4 7.0 +/- 0.0 5.7 +/- 0.7 5.2 +/- 0.4 47 7.9 +/- 1.7 8.3 +/- 0.7 7.3 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 4.9 8.8 +/- 0.3 48 8.3 +/- 1.2 9.1 +/- 2.0 8.5 +/- 0.0 7.7 +/- 0.6 8.0 +/- 2.3 51 10.7 +/- 2.2 11.5 t 2.4 9.8 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 2.1 11.8 +/- 2.1 52 11.9 +/- 2.8 11.1 +/- 4.5 11.5 +/- 1.1 11.1 +/- 2.8 14.0 +/- 2.1 53 10.4 +/- 2.7 10.9 +/- 0.6 12.0 +/- 0.6 8.9 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 0.7 54 7.6 +/- 2.5 9.3 +/- 1.1 7.8 +/- 0.4 6.6 +/- 2.8 6.8 +/- 0.4 55 14.8 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.1 14.8 +/- 1.3 15.2 +/- 1.3 16.0 +/- 1.1 56 13.0 +/- 2.1 13.3 +/- 0.3 14.0 +/- 1.0 11.5 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.6 57 9.3 +/- 1.5 10.2 +/- 1.0 9.6 +/- 2.7 (1) 8.4 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.3 58 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.9 +/- 0.7 8.8 +/- 2.4 7.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.3 59 9.1 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 0.6 10.1 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.3 61 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.8 +/- 0.0 7.1 +/- 0.3 6.8 +/- 1.6 62 8.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.8 8.3 +/- 1.7 7.2 +/- 2.3 9.1 +/- 0.1 63 7.8 +/- 0.9 8.1 +/- 0.3 7.2 +/- 1.7 7.7 +/- 0.1 8.1 +/- 1.6 64 8.5 +/- 1.5 9.6 +/- 1.8 7.9 +/- 0.4 8.2 +/- 1.4 8.3 +/- 2.7 65 8.6 +/- 2.2 8.6 +/- 1.7 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.9 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.0 66 7.1 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.2 +/- 0.8 6.9 +/- 1.3 6.8 +/- 1.8 68 6.7 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 2.7 6.9 +/- 3.4 (1) 6.1 +/- 1.0 6.3 +/- 2.5 71 8.5 +/- 3.0 9.9 +/- 1.7 6.4 +/- 6.1 9.0 +/- 0.3 8.5 +/- 1.7 72 8.2 +/- 0.6 8.4 +/- 1.0 7.8 +/- 1.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 8.1 +/- 0.3 73 7.6 +/- 1.9 8.8 +/- 4.0 7.2 +/- 0.1 6.6 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.7 74 7.8 +/- 1.2 8.3 +/- 5.1 8.2 +/- 0.0 7.0 +/- 0.8 7.5 +/- 1.1 75 9.3 +/- 1.8 9.4 +/- 3.5 8.5 +/- 0.7 10.5 +/- 2.7 8.7 +/- 0.4 78 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.8 +/- 0.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 7.3 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 0.7 79 9.2 +/- 0.9 8.8 +/- 0.9 9.0 +/- 2.4 9.0 +/- 0.9 9.8 +/- 1.5 81 7.6 +/- 1.3 8.3 +/- 2.0 7.4 +/- 3.4 6.8 +/- 1.4 7.8 +/- 0.3 82 8.3 +/- 1.1 7.5 +/- 1.0 8.4 +/- 0.0 8.5 +/- 1.3 8.7 +/- 0.4 84 8.1 +/- 1.4 7.7 +/- 2.0 7.6 +/- 0.1 9.1 +/- 0.3 8.1 +/- 0.4 85 7.2 +/- 2.4 8.8 +/- 3.1 6.2 +/- 0.7 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.4 +/- 0.6 (1) 86 8.5 +/- 2.1 10.0 +/- 2.0 7.9 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.0 8.3 +/- 1.6 88 6.4 +/- 1.8 7.4 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 0.4 5.6 +/- 1.8 5.7 +/- 1.0 89 6.1 +/- 1.9 6.7 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 0.8 5.2 +/- 2.0 7.0 +/- 0.7 90 6.8 +/- 2.6 7.8 +/- 0.0 4.9 +/- 1.0 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.4 +/- 0.3(1) 92 8.4 +/- 1.3 8.8 +/- 1.7 8.8 +/- 0.3 7.4 +/- 2.3 8.6 +/- 0.1 98 7.5 +/- 0.7 8.0 +/- 2.5 7.3 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 0.1 7.2 +/- 1.3 99 6.7 +/-1.9 7.9 +/-1.8 6.1 +/-1.1 5.8 +/-1.3 7.0 +/-2.0 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-i19
Table C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATION STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D.
T1 9.7 +/- 2.1 10.6 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.3 8.2 +/- 0.3 9.9 +/- 1.7 100 7.1 +/- 1.7 7.1 +/- 2.0 8.2 +/- 0.4 6.2 +/- 3.7 6.9 +/- 0.8 101 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.8 +/- 1.8 6.3 +/- 0.1 6.8 +/- 0.1 6.5 +/- 1.1 102 8.9 +/- 2.3 10.0 +/- 3.5 9.4 +/- 1.8 7.3 +/- 1.0 8.9 +/- 0.1 103 7.7 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 1.0 7.0 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 0.6 104 8.5 +/- 1.9 9.3 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 3.1 7.4 +/- 2.3 9.3 +/- 0.6 105 5.9 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/- 2.5 5.4 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 1.1 5.9 +/- 0.3 106 6.9 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 1.8 6.8 +/- 1.4 6.1 +/- 4.0 7.3 +/- 1.1 107 7.1 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 1.1 6.3 +/- 1.3 7.3 +/- 0.1 7.5 +/- 0.4 109 8.5 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 4.1 8.1 +/- 0.1 9.2 +/- 0.1 110 7.4 +/- 1.2 8.1 +/- 0.1 7.6 +/- 4.1 6.8 +/- 0.6 7.0 +/- 0.6 112 11.1 +/- 0.8 11.6 +/- 2.5 10.9 +/- 0.7 11.1 +/- 0.6 10.7 +/- 0.3 113 7.4 +/- 1.1 7.3 +/- 2.8 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.8 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 0.4 C-20
TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM PER STANDARD QUARTER +
2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/- 2 S.D.
JAN-MAR 9.8 +/- 3.6 8.4 +/- 2.9 8.1 +/- 1.8 8.9 +/- 0.0 APR-JUN 9.7 +/- 4.5 7.7 +/- 2.8 6.9 +/- 2.6 9.4 +/- 4.1 JUL-SEP 8.8+/-4.3 7.4 +/- 3.5 7.0 +/- 2.6 9.1 +/-2.4 OCT-DEC 9.8+/-5.0 8.0 +/- 3.0 7.7 +/- 1.9 9.4 +/- 1.3 TABLE C-IX.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D.
SITE BOUNDARY 76 6.6 16.0 9.5 +/- 4.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 5.2 14.6 7.9 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 4.9 9.9 7.4 +/- 2.4 CONTROL 8 7.9 10.8 9.2 +/- 1.9 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112,113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TI INTERMEDIATE STATIONS- 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,109,110, 22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-21
FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2014 20 .............................................................................................................................................................
0 INDICATOR STATION 9-BACKGROUND STATION 15 I->
S10 ........................................................................................................
0 0 0 0n YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.
FIGURE C-2 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 350 ...........................................................................................................................................................
- INDICATOR STATION MEAN 300 ...... .. ................................................................................ .. BACKGROUND STATION MEAN 10 0 .............. . ..
I-&
200- Rn (2 250...... ....... ........................................................................................
oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON
-0 ~ - q e4 YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.
FIGURE C-3 MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 0c-INDICATOR M 1DA &'?C D ITn11TX~
600 -------------------------------------------------------------
E 0._
200400.
0 tn t- 00 Ch oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON 00 N YEAR The year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number of sampling periods per year.
gz-)
picoCuries per cubic meter 1/9/2008 4/9/2008 7/9/2008 10/8/2008 1/6/2009 4/8/2009_ =
7/8/2009 10/7/2009 1/6/2010 4/7/20 10 7/7/2010 10/6/2010 1/5/2011 4/6/2011 7/6/2011OT 10/5/2011 1/4/2012 4/4/2012 7/3/2012 10/3/2012 1/2/2013 4/3/2013 7/2/2013 10/2/2013 1/2/2014 4/2/2014 7/2/2014 10/1/2014 -.
12/30/2014 C) -
C) z a
FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2014 0.18 ICHERNOBYL ACCIDENT 0.16 ...... !................................................................................I...-.
0.1-----
* -------------------------------------- IDIAO.SAIN R SIDI O N AT RISAT
-- BACKGROUND STATION
- c ~0.12 ...............................................................................................................................
- 0.10 ..............................................................................................................................
"C 0.08 ...............................................................................................................................
0 0.04 -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. I . . . ..--------
0.02 I 0.000 R .YEA 0.04
- -------- - A
- Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996
FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 30 1 1~
25 4 20 ---- -- -- ----- ---- ------ ---- --- ---- -------- ------ ----- -- ------ -- -- --- -- -- -------- ------- ---- --- -- ----- -----
Ci2 15 4.....................................................................---------------------------------------------
2 10- .............................................................................................................................................................
5 .................. ..................
0 I 0OTO 2 MLES 2 TO 5 MILES OVER 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT I 1Q14 12Q14 *3Q14 W4Q14 Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012.
FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD/OSLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1990 - 2014*
70.0 U BACKGROUND MEAN E ------------------------------------------------------------- -- - C T k.FA'---------------------------
Ia n U. I 6_
6 CIV ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------- -------------------------------
40.0 30.0 L.
2 In n - ---- -- -- ---------------- ---- - --- -------- ------
,6 10.0 0.0 mImih iollI11MMIII1i11,l MbhM
-n -
e4 -4 t- - - -e \ e'\ eq en4 t ý CP Z I" Year
-Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012.
-In order for Oyster Creek to align with the new ANSI N13.37-2014 Environmental Dosimetry - Criteria for System Design and Implementation, the data was reviewed back to the beginning of 2007 and updated per the guidance in the ANSI Standard.
APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY
The following section presents the results of data analysis performed by the QC laboratory, Environmental Inc. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and the QC laboratory. Comparisons of the results for all media were within expected ranges.
D-1
TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 24 QCA QCB PERIOD 04/16/14 < 168 < 165 < 144 09/29/14 < 188 < 186 < 149 MEAN - - -
D-2
TABLE D-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 24 04/16/14 <5 <5 <13 <4 <10 <5 <9 <14 <4 < 5
- 32
- 10 09/29/14 <5 <6 <12 <4 <11 <5 <10 <15 <5 <5 < 35
- 13 MEAN QCA 04/16/14 <4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <4 <8 <12 <3 <5 <28 <10 09/29/14 <4 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5 <8 <12 <4 <5 <23 <7 MEAN QCB 04/16/14 <4 <2 <4 <2 <6 <2 <6 <7 <2 <4 <10 <3 09/29/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <3 <10 <2 MEAN
TABLE D-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION IN 1s QCB IN QCB 1S PERIOD 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 < 187 (1) < 144 (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 < 177 (1) < 139 (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 164 (1) < 145 (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 188 (1) < 143 (1) 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 159 (1) < 140 (1) 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 159 (1) < 142 (1) 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 188 (1) < 131 (1) 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 166 (1) < 173 (1) 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 180 < 181 < 173 149 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 164 < 161 < 169 169 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 186 < 185 < 172 172 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 185 (1) < 198 (1)
MEAN TABLE D-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION IN 1s QCB 1N QCB 1s PERIOD 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 <0.7 (1) < 0.5 < (1) 02/04/14 - 02/25/14 < 0.9 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 0.5 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 0.8 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.3 < (1) 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 0.6 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 0.7 (1) < 0.4 < (1) 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 < 0.9 < 0.2 < 0.5 10/01114 - 10/28/14 < 0.6 < 0.6 < 0.4 < 0.3 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 0.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 12/12/14 - 12/30/14 < 0.4 (1) < 0.3 (1)
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION D-4
TABLE D-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 01107114 - 01127114 WN < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <23 < 7 02104114 - 02/25/14 < 4 <5 <9 <4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <4 <33 < 8 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 < 3 <4 <8 <3 <8 <4 <5 <3 <4 <32 < 11 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <12 <4 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 < 4 <6 <11 <5 <11 <6 <8 <6 <6 <27 < 6 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 < 5 <6 <11 <6 <10 <6 <9 <5 <5 < 29 < 10 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <18 <6 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 < 5 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <9 <5 <4 <26 < 7 09102/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <4 <6 <3 <3 <26 < 8 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 5 <6 <8 <6 <10 <5 <11 <6 <6 <24 < 8 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 < 3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <4 <18 <6 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 < 8 <8 <12 <5 <15 <7 < 10 <6 <8 < 36 < 12 MEAN 1s 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27114 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 (1) 06106/14 - 06/25/14 (1) 07/02/14 - 07131/14 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 < 3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3 <28 < 9 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 < 6 <6 <12 <6 <11 <6 <10 <6 <7 <29 < 9 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 < 4 <3 <7 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <3 <18 <6 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1) -
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
TABLE D-11.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD QOCB 1N 01/07/14 - 01/27/14 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <2 <1 <9 <3 02/04/14 - 02125114 <2 <1 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <3 <8 <3 03/04/14 - 03/25/14 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <3 < 12 <2 04/01/14 - 04/30/14 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <10 <2 05/06/14 - 05/27/14 <2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 <2 <3 <13 <2 06/03/14 - 06/24/14 <3 <3 <3 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 12 <3 07/01/14 - 07/29/14 <3 <4 <5 <2 <7 <4 <6 <4 <5 < 20 <4 08/04/14 - 08/26/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <5 <2 <3 <3 <2 < 14 <1 09/02/14 - 09/23/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <3 <7 <2 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <5 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 <8 <3 <4 < 13 <3 11/04/14 - 12/03/14 <3 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <5 <3 <3 < 13 <1 12/03/14 - 01/06/15 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 <4 <4 <3 <4 < 10 <2 MEAN QCB 1S 01/09/14 - 01/28/14 (1) 02/06/14 - 02/27/14 (1) 03/05/14 - 03/26/14 (1) 04/04/14 - 04/30/14 (1) 05/09/14 - 05/28/14 (1) 06/06/14 - 06/25/14 (1) 07/02/14 - 07/31/14 (1) 08/08/14 - 08/27/14 (1) 09/17/14 - 09/23/14 <2 <1 <2 <2 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <15 <3 10/01/14 - 10/28/14 <3 <2 <4 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <14 <2 11/04/14 - 12/02/14 <2 <3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <6 <4 <2 <15 <2 12/02/14 - 12/30/14 (1)
MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
TABLE D-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN
.THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION W-3C QCB PERIOD 01/15/14 < 179 < 152 04108/14 < 163 < 142 07/23/14 < 155 < 138 10/16/14 < 158 < 150 MEAN - -
D-7
TABLE D-Ill.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 *Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD W-3C 01115/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 04/08/14 < 4 < 5 <9 <5 <11 <5 10 <8 <5 <5
- 23 <9 07/23/14 < 4 < 4 <7 <4 <8 <4 6 <6 <4 <4 <17 <6 10/16/14 < 4 < 5 <12 <5 <11 <5 9 <11 <5 <6
- 28 <11 MEAN QCB 01/15/14 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <3 5 <7 <2 <3 <13 <1 04/08/14 <2 <1 <2 <2 <6 <2 5 <3 <3 <2 <9 <3 07/23/14 <2 <3 <4 <1 <3 <2 3 <15 <1 <2
- 22 <3 10/16/14 <3 <3 <4 <1 <5 <3 2 <6 <2 <3 <17 <5 00 MEAN
TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 24 04/16/14 1449 +/- 553.6 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 82 < 41 < 44 09/29/14 1235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98 < 68 < 64 QCA 04/16/14 2010 +/- 446 < 31 < 27 < 58 < 30 < 57 < 26 < 33 QCB 04116114 1785 +/- 97 < 5 <5 < 12 < 5 < 8 < 6 < 4 MEAN 1620 +/- 690 - - - - - -
TABLE D-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 PERIOD I
24 04/16/14 < 361 783 +/- 401 < 31 < 33 < 36 < 30 < 30 988 +/- 587 211 +/- 65 09/29/14 < 956 9740 +/- 1425 < 86 < 111 < 83 < 76 < 91 1674 +/- 1366 642 +/- 117 MEAN* 5261 +/- 12668 1331 +/- 970 426 +/- 611 QCA 04/16/14 < 407 852 +/-464 < 40 < 38 < 35 < 42 < 43 941 +/- 716 99 +/- 83 09/29/14 < 818 13000 +/- 1700 < 85 < 95 < 72 < 62 < 81 < 1300 686 +/- 105 MEAN* - 6926 +/- 8590 392 +/- 831
,0 QCB 04/16/14 < 109 511 +/- 185 < 12 < 10 < 8 < 10 < 11 < 316 < 951 09/29/14 < 186 6535 +/- 480 < 15 < 10 < 13 < 17 < 15 1069 +/- 402 < 1290 MEAN* - 3523 +/- 8519
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE D-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 36 Cabbage 07130114 <* 4.1 +/- 1.4 3231 +/- 36b 49 < 16 < 19 < 114 < 31 Collards 07/30/14 < 15 8.7 +/- 1.8 5191 +/- 504 59 < 21 < 22 < 145 < 37 Kale 07/30/14 <9 2.4 +/- 1.5 5046 +/- 501 52 < 20 < 18 < 135 < 26 MEAN* - 5.0 +/- 6.5 4489 +/- 2184 QCA Cabbage 07/30114 < 11 5.0 +/- 1.7 2620 +/- 317 < 39 < 13 < 15 < 92 < 26 Collards 07/30/14 < 13 <3.5 5130 +/- 500 < 59 < 21 < 23 < 126 < 33 Kale 07/30/14 < 16 < 4.0 4830 +/- 512 < 59 < 22 < 22 < 150
- 36 MEAN* 4193 +/- 2742 QCB Cabbage 07/30/14 <3 2.0 + 1.0 2845 +/- 290 28 <7 <10 <53 <6 Collards 07/30/14 <8 4.0 + 2.0 4711 +/- 342 15 < 5 < 12 < 42 < 15 Kale 07/30/14 <5 7.0 + 2.0 4179 +/- 364 36 < 11 < 10 < 64 < 12 MEAN* 4.3 + 5.0 3912 +/- 1923
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES
APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)
March 2014 E10854 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.1 91.7 1.04 A Sr-90 pCi/L 10.9 15.1 0.72 W E10855 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 96.6 98.5 0.98 A Ce-141 pCi/L 112 119 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 449 491 0.91 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 186 210 0.89 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 250 253 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 248 268 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/L 292 297 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 230 219 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 312 323 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 321 337 0.95 A El 0857 AP Ce-141 pCi 53.0 53.9 0.98 A Cr-51 pCi 232 223 1.04 A Cs-1 34 pCi 100 95.3 1.05 A Cs-137 pCi 122 115 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 122 121 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 135 135 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi 111 99.3 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi 140 147 0.95 A Co-60 pCi 187 153 1.22 W E10856 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 74.1 76.4 0.97 A E10858 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1760 1.19 A June 2014 E10913 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.9 91.3 0.94 Sr-90 pCi/L 13.8 14.5 0.95 E10914 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 86.5 90.9 0.95 Ce-141 pCi/L ill 124 0.90 Cr-51 pCi/L 255 253 1.01 Cs-1 34 pCi/L 147 162 0.91 Cs-I 37 pCi/L 123 120 1.03 Co-58 pCi/L 105 112 0.94 Mn-54 pCi/L 155 156 0.99 Fe-59 pCi/L 106 102 1.04 Zn-65 pCi/L 251 252 1.00 Co-60 pCi/L 218 224 0.97 E10916 AP Ce-141 pCi 95.1 92.6 1.03 Cr-51 pCi 215 190 1.13 Cs-1 34 pCi 122 122 1.00 Cs-1 37 pCi 95.1 89.8 1.06 Co-58 pCi 88.7 84.1 1.05 Mn-54 pCi 115 116 0.99 Fe-59 pCi 72.6 76.7 0.95 Zn-65 pCi 193 189 1.02 Co-60 pCi 179 168 1.07 E10915 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 85.6 85.2 1.00 E10917 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1680 1810 0.93 A E-1
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)
September2014 E10946 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90.7 96.9 0.94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.0 16.4 0.85 A E10947 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 92.0 97.6 0.94 A Ce-141 pCi/L 117 126 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 281 288 0.98 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 141 158 0.89 A Cs-137 pCi/L 186 193 0.96 A Co-58 pCi/L 137 143 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 138 142 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi/L 162 158 1.03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 75.2 73.0 1.03 A Co-60 pCi/L 286 297 0.96 A E10949 AP Ce-141 pCi 97.8 82.1 1.19 A Cr-51 pCi 212 188 1.13 A Cs-1 34 pCi 106 103 1.03 A Cs-1 37 pCi 131 126 1.04 A Co-58 pCi 85.7 93.0 0.92 A Mn-54 pCi 92.8 92.3 1.01 A Fe-59 pCi 113 103 1.10 A Zn-65 pCi 53.2 47.5 1.12 A Co-60 pCi 202 193 1.05 A E10948 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 83.9 89.8 0.93 A E10950 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2010 1720 1.17 A E10951 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.208 0.186 1.12 A Cr-51 pCi/g 0.398 0.425 0.94 A Cs-1 34 pCi/g 0.216 0.233 0.93 A Cs-137 pCi/g 0.398 0.365 1.09 A Co-58 pCi/g 0.197 0.211 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/g 0.242 0.209 1.16 A Fe-59 pCi/g 0.238 0.233 1.02 A Zn-65 pCi/g 0.117 0.108 1.08 A Co-60 pCi/g 0.447 0.438 1.02 A December 2014 El 1078 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.7 95.7 0.90 A Sr-90 pCi/L 12.9 15.6 0.83 A El1079 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 85.9 95.1 0.90 A Ce-141 pCi/L 205 219 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 402 406 0.99 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 156 164 0.95 A Cs-137 pCi/L 194 198 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 122 130 0.94 A Mn-54 pCi/L 220 225 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 183 175 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 287 297 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 224 235 0.95 A E-2
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 3 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)
December 2014 El 1081 AP Ce-141 pCi 96.4 102 0.95 A Cr-51 pCi 171 190 0.90 A Cs-1 34 pCi 73.1 76.9 0.95 A Cs-1 37 pCi 99.0 92.6 1.07 A Co-58 pCi 57.5 60.8 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi 107 105 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi 74.2 81.6 0.91 A Zn-65 pCi 144 139 1.04 A Co-60 pCi 114 110 1.04 A El 1080 Charcoal 131 pCi 93.5 98.2 0.95 A El 1082 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1760 1970 0.89 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result.
(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetnc and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.
(C) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.
(d) Analytics evaluation basedon TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratiolimits of 0.80-1.20.
W-Acceptable with warning, reportedresult falls within 0. 70-0 80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratiolimits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30.
E-3
TABLE E-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 1)
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation (c)
May 2014 RAD-97 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 38.25 36.7 27.5 - 43.6 A Sr-90 pCi/L 24.65 26.5 19.2-30.9 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 89.1 87.9 74.0 - 96.7 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 45.55 44.3 35.5 -48.7 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 91.15 89.1 80.2- 101 A Co-60 pCi/L 65.10 64.2 57.8 - 73.1 A Zn-65 pCi/L 244 235 212 -275 A Gr-A pCi/L 45.65 61.0 31.9 - 75.8 A Gr-B pCi/L 27.95 33.0 21.4-40.7 A 1-131 pCi/L 23.75 25.7 21.3- 30.3 A U-Nat pCi/L 9.61 10.2 7.95- 11.8 A H-3 pCi/L 8435 8770 7610-9650 A MRAD-20 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 28.0 46.0 15.4-71.4 A November 2014 RAD-99 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 30.4 31.4 22.8-38.1 A Sr-90 pCi/L 18.6 21.8 15.6-25.7 A Ba-133 pCi/L 46.8 49.1 40.3 - 54.5 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 88.0 89.8 73.7 - 98.8 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 99.0 98.8 88.9-111 A Co-60 pCi/L 92.5 92.1 82.9- 104 A Zn-65 pCi/L 325 310 279 - 362 A Gr-A pCi/L 29.9 37.6 19.4-48.1 A Gr-B pCi/L 27.5 27.4 17.3-35.3 A 1-131 pCi/L 15.8 20.3 16.8-24.4 N(1)
U-Nat pCi/L 5.74 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 A H-3 pCi/L 6255 6880 5940 - 7570 A MRAD-21 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 27.3 36.9 12.4- 57.3 A (1) The Iodine-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of 0. 778. No cause could be found for the slighly low activity. TBE would evaluate this as acceptabile with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-131 decay. All ERA Iodine- 131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreportedresult.
(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetricand/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.
(c) ERA evaluation:A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the ControlLimits and outside of the Warning Limit.
E-4
TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 2)
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)
March 2014 14-MaW30 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.764 0.720 0.504 - 0.936 A Cs-1 34 Bq/L 20.7 23.1 16.2-300 A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 28.0 28.9 20.2 - 37.6 A Co-57 Bq/L 26.5 27.5 19.3 - 35.8 A Co-60 Bq/L 15.6 16.0 11.2-20.8 A H-3** Bq/L NR 321 225-417 N(3)
Mn-54 Bq/L 13.5 13.9 9.7- 18.1 A Ni-63 Bq/L NR 34.0 23.8 - 44.2 N (3)
Pu-238 Bq/L 0.911 0.828 0.580 - 1.076 Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.751 0.676 0.473 - 0.879 K-40 Bq/L NR (1) N (3)
Sr-90** Bq/L NR 8.51 5.96- 11.06 N (3)
U-234/233** Bq/L NR 0.225 0.158 - 0.293 N (3)
U-238"* Bq/L NR 1.45 1.02-1.89 N(3)
Zn-65 Bq/L -0.201 (1) A 14-MaS30 Cs-134 Bq/kg 2.02 (1) A Soil Cs-137 Bq/kg 1300 1238 867 - 1609 A Co-57 Bq/kg 1069 966 676 - 1256 A Co-60 Bq/kg 1.32 1.22 (2) A Mn-54 Bq/kg 1510 1430 1001 -1859 A K-40 Bq/kg 669 622 435 - 809 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 4.14 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/kg 763 695 487 - 904 A 14-RdF30 AP Cs-134** Bq/sample NR 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 N (3)
Cs-1 37"* Bq/sample NR 1.76 1.23-2.29 N (3)
Co-57"* Bq/sample NR (1) N(3)
Co-60** Bq/sample NR 1.39 0.97 - 1.81 N (3)
Mn-54** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3)
Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.8220 1.18 0.83-1.53 N (3)
Zn-65** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3) 14-GrF30 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.606 1.77 0.53-3.01 A Gr-B Bq/sample 0.7507 0.77 0.39-1.16 A 14-RdV30 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 5.96 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 5.06 4.74 3.32-6.16 A Co-57 Bq/sample 11.8 10.1 7.1 - 13.1 A Co-60 Bq/sample 7.34 6.93 4.85 - 9.01 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 8.95 8.62 6.03 - 11.21 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.23 1.46 1.02-1.90 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 8.91 7.86 5.50- 10.22 A E-5
TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 2)
Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)
September 2014 14-MaW31 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.705 0.88 0.62-1.14 A Cs-1 34*** Bq/L NR (1) N (4)
Cs-1 37*** Bq/L NR 18.4 12.9-23.9 N (4)
Co-57*** Bq/L NR 24.7 17.3-32.1 N (4)
Co-60"** Bq/L NR 12.4 8.7-16.1 N (4)
Mn-54*** Bq/L NR 14.0 9.8-18.2 N (4)
Ni-63 Bq/L 24.07 24.6 17.2-32.0 A Pu-238 Bq/L 0.591 0.618 0.433 - 0.803 A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.0153 0.0048 (2) A K-40* Bq/L NR 161 113-209 N (4)
Zn-65*** Bq/L NR 10.9 7.6- 14.2 N (4) 14-MaS31 Soil Cs-I 34*** Bq/kg NR 622 435-809 N (4)
Cs-i 37~*** Bq/kg NR (1) N (4)
Co-57*** Bq/kg NR 1116 781-1451 N (4)
Co-60*** Bq/kg NR 779 545-1013 N (4)
Mn-54*** Bq/kg NR 1009 706-1312 N (4)
K-40**' Bq/kg NR 824 577-1071 N (4)
Sr-90 Bq/kg 694 858 601-1115 A Zn-65*** Bq/kg NR 541 379-703 N (4) 14-RdF31 AP Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.310 0.703 0.492 - 0.914 N (4) 14-GrF31 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.153 0.53 0.16-0.90 N (4)
Gr-B Bq/sample 0.977 1.06 0.53- 1.59 A September 2014 14-RdV31 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 7.31 7.38 5.17-9.59 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 8.93 8.14 5.70- 10.58 A Co-57 Bq/sample 10.8 9.2 6.4- 12.0 A Co-60 Bq/sample 6.31 6.11 4.28 - 7.94 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 7.76 7.10 4.97 - 9.23 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.738 0.85 0.60-1.11 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 7.16 6.42 4.49 - 8.35 A
- The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients.
These nuclides are no longer part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.
All future gamma cross check samples for these isotopes will be provided by Analytics.
(1) False positive test.
(2) Sensitivity evaluation.
(3) Water, Ni-63 overlooked when reporting,but the result of 32.7 +- 1.69 would have passed the acceptancecriteria. NCR 14-04 Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting,but would have passedthe false positive test. NCR 14-04 AP, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The originaland rerun results were statisticallythe same. No cause could be identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 14-04 Fornon reported(NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reportedin the previous series. NCR 14-04 (4) AP, Sr-90 gravimetric yield was very high at 117%. Couldindicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fuming HNO 3 separationwould be requiredto remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09 AP, Gr-Alpha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed ifthey were reportedin the previous series. NCR 14-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result.
(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetnc and/or volumetnic measurements made during standardpreparation.
(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptablewith warning,N=not acceptable.
E-6
TABLE E-4 ERA (a) STATISTICAL
SUMMARY
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM' ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 1 of 1)
Concentration (pCi/L)
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result b Result c Limits Acceptance ERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-89 40.29 +/- 5.76 36.70 27.50 - 43.60 Pass ERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-90 24.08 +/- 2.35 26.50 19.20 - 30.90 Pass ERW-1 385 04/07/14 Ba-1 33 78.23 +/- 3.93 87.90 74.00 - 96.70 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Co-60 62.75 +/- 3.53 64.20 57.80 - 73.10 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-134 44.97 +/- 3.99 44.30 35.50 - 48.70 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-137 88.54 +/- 4.93 89.10 80.20 - 101.00 Pass ERW-1385 04/07/14 Zn-65 249.1 +/- 10.44 235.0 212.0 - 275.0 Pass ERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Alpha 56.70 +/- 2.47 61.00 31.90 - 75.80 Pass ERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Beta 32.10 +/- 1.20 33.00 21.40 - 40.70 Pass ERW-1391 04/07/14 1-131 25.52 +/- 1.12 25.70 21.30 - 30.30 Pass ERW-1394 04/07/14 Uranium 10.76 +/- 0.74 10.20 7.95 - 11.80 Pass ERW-1397 04/07/14 H-3 8982 +/- 279 8770 7610 - 9650 Pass ERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-89 29.40 +/- 5.32 31.40 22.80 - 38.10 Pass ERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-90 19.19 +/- 1.85 21.80 15.60 - 25.70 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Ba-133 43.54 +/- 4.54 49.10 40.30 - 54.50 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-134 81.95 +/- 7.49 89.80 73.70 - 98.80 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-137 95.76 +/- 5.50 98.80 88.90 - 111.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Co-60 90.25 +/- 2.77 92.10 82.90 - 104.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/06/14 Zn-65 327.4 +/- 23.3 310.00 279.0 - 362.0 Pass ERW-5388 10/06/14 Gr. Alpha 30.88 +/- 8.05 37.60 19.40 - 46.10 Pass ERW-5388 10/06/14 G. Beta 20.47 +/- 4.75 27.40 17.30 - 35.30 Pass ERW-5392 10/06/14 1-131 19.58 +/- 2.35 20.30 16.80 - 24.40 Pass ERW-5394 10/06/14 Uranium 5.51 +/- 0.37 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 Pass ERW-5397 10/06/14 H-3 6876 +/- 383 6880 5940 - 7570 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).
b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.
c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.
E-7
TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 1 of 2)
Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MAW-1140 02/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.77 +/- 0.06 0.85 0.26 - 1.44 Pass MAW-1 140 02/01/14 Gr. Beta 4.31 +/- 0.08 4.19 2.10 - 6.29 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Fe-55 0.40 +/- 3.20 0.00 -0.01 - 2.00 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 H-3 345.10 +/- 10.60 321.00 225.00 - 417.00 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Ni-63 32.40 +/- 3.20 34.00 23.80 - 44.20 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Pu-238 1.28 +/- 0.12 0.83 0.58 - 1.08 Fail (1)
MAW-1184 02/01/14 Pu-239/240 0.91 + 0.10 0.68 0.47 - 0.88 Fail (1)
MAW- 1184 02/01/14 Sr-90 7.00 +/- 0.70 8.51 5.96 - 11.06 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 U-233/234 0.20 +/- 0.07 0.23 0.16 - 0.29 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 U-238 1.25 +/- 0.18 1.45 1.02 - 1.89 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Co-57 27.86 +/- 0.38 27.50 19.30 - 35.80 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Co-60 15.99 +/- 0.27 16.00 11.20 - 20.80 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Cs-134 21.85 +/- 0.54 23.10 16.20 - 30.00 Pass MAW- 1184 02/01/14 Cs-137 28.74 +/- 0.49 28.90 20.20 - 37.60 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 K-40 1.80. +/- 2.00 0.00 0.00 - 10.00 Pass MAW-1 184 02/01/14 Mn-54 14.06 +/- 0.40 13.90 9.70 - 18.10 Pass MAW-1184 02/01/14 Zn-65 0.00 +/- 0.19 0.00 -0.01 - 0.00 Pass MAVE-i 148 02/01/14 Co-57 11.63 +/- 0.19 10.10 7.10 - 13.10 Pass MAVE-i 148 02/01/14 Co-60 7.28 +/- 0.18 6.93 4.85 - 9.01 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Cs-134 6.29 +/- 0.29 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Cs-1 37 5.18 +/- 0.20 4.74 3.32 - 6.16 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Mn-54 9.22 +/- 0.26 8.62 6.03 - 11.21 Pass MAVE-1148 02/01/14 Zn-65 8.59 +/- 0.40 7.86 5.50 - 10.22 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Co-57 1.60 +/- 0.05 0.00 NA Fail (2)
MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Co-60 1.38 + 0.08 1.39 0.97 - 1.81 Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Cs-134 1.75 + 0.11 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Cs-137 1.81 +/- 0.10 1.76 1.23 - 2.29 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Mn-54 0.01 + 0.03 0.00 NA Pass MAAP-1 151 02/01/14 Zn-65 -0.24
- 0.09 0.00 -0.50 - 1.00 Pass MAAP-1151 02/01/14 Sr-90 1.11 + 0.14 1.18 0.83 - 1.53 Pass MAAP-1 154 02/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.56 +/- 0.06 1.77 0.53 - 3.01 Pass MAAP-1 154 02/01/14 Gr. Beta 0.98 +/- 0.06 0.77 0.39 - 1.16 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Ni-63 4.80 +/- 15.30 0.00 NA Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Co-57 1064.50 +/- 3.60 966.00 676.00 - 1256.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Co-60 1.70 +/- 0.50 1.22 (3) Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Cs-134 6.10 +/- 1.80 0.00 NA Fail (4)
MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Cs-137 1364.30 +/- 5.30 1238.00 867.00 - 1609.00 Pass MASO-1146 02/01/14 K-40 728.90 +/- 15.90 622.00 435.00 - 809.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Mn-54 1588.00 +/- 6.00 1430.00 1001.00 - 1859.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Zn-65 763.50 +/- 6.80 695.00 487.00 - 904.00 Pass MASO-1 146 02/01/14 Sr-90 1.23 +/- 1.37 0.00 NA Pass E-8
TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 2 of 2)
Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MASO-4439 08/01/14 Ni-63 771.62 + 23.29 980.00 686.00 1274.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Sr-90 778.34 + 17.82 858.00 601.00 1115.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Cs-134 520.60 +/- 7.09 622.00 435.00 809.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Co-57 1135.00 +/- 7.40 1116.00 781.00 1451.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Co-60 768.20 +/- 7.70 779.00 545.00 1013.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Mn-54 1050.70 +/- 12.60 1009.00 706.00 1312.00 Pass MASO-4439 08/01/14 Zn-65 407.89 +/- 15.03 541.00 379.00 703.00 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Am-241 0.79 +/- 0.08 0.88 0.62 - 1.14 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Cs-137 18.62 +/- 0.54 18.40 12.90 - 23.90 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Co-57 24.85 +/- 0.42 24.70 17.30 32.10 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Co-60 12.27 +/- 0.38 12.40 8.70 16.10 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 H-3 207.20 +/- 10.60 208.00 146.00 270.00 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Fe-55 55.10 +/- 14.80 31.50 22.10 41.00 Fail (5)
MAW-4431 08/01/14 Mn-54 14.36 +/- 0.53 14.00 9.80 18.20 Pass MAW-4431 08/01/14 Zn-65 11.46 +/- 0.78 10.90 7.60 14.20 Pass MAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. Alpha 0.93 +/- 0.07 1.40 0.42 - 2.38 Pass MAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. Beta 6.31 +/- 1.35 6.50 3.25 - 9.75 Pass MAAP-4433 08/01/14 Sr-90 0.74 +/- 0.10 0.70 0.49 - 0.91 Pass MAAP-4444 08/01/14 Sr-89 7.82 +/- 0.52 9.40 6.60 - 12.20 Pass MAAP-4444 08/01/14 Sr-90 0.76 +/- 0.10 0.76 0.53 - 0.99 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Cs-134 7.49 +/- 0.18 7.38 5.17 9.59 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Co-57 11.20 +/- 0.19 9.20 6.40 12.00 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Co-60 6.84 +/- 0.17 6.11 4.28 7.94 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Mn-54 8.11 +/- 0.26 7.11 4.97 9.23 Pass MAVE-4436 08/01/14 Zn-65 7.76 +/- 0.43 6.42 4.49 8.35 Pass a Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).
b Laboratory codes as follows: MAW (water), MAAP (air filter), MASO (soil), MAVE (vegetation).
MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP. A known value of "zero" indicates an analysis was included in the testing series as a "false positive". MAPEP does not provide control limits.
(1) The high bias on the plutonium crosscheck samples was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard.
The results of reanalysis with replacement tracer purchased from NIST:
MAW-1184 Pu-238 0.68 +/- 0.10 Bq / L MAW-1184 Pu-239/240 0.66 + 0.10 Bq / L (2) Interference from Eu-1 52 resulted in misidentification of Co-57.
(3) Provided in the series for "sensitivity evaluation". MAPEP does not provide control limits.
(4) False positive test. Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occuring Bi-214 in sample matrix with a close spectral energy.
(5) Result of reanalysis Fe-55 32.63 +/- 16.30 Bq/L E-9
APPENDIX F ERRATA DATA
Corrections to the 2012 AREOR The value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in the report as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to a telephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0 millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standard quarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas of the report:
F-I
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2012 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services
~ Exelon Generation, Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2013 F-2
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)
LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD), MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION LA- 140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)
CS-134 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 80 64.2 NA 64.2 115 INDICATOR 0 (3/23) (3/12) EAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM (61.5/67.8) (61.5/67.8) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE BA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 LA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 19.8 20.6 26.6 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (0/27.6) (18.3/22.2) (25.5/27.6) 0.3 MILES W
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)
LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD (PCI/KG WET)
CS-134 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 80 64,2 NA 64.2 115 INDICATOR 0 (3/23) (3/12) EAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM (61.5/67.8) (61.5/67.8) 0.3 MILES E OF SITE BA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 LA-140 NA <LLD NA 0 DIRECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 244 NA 19.9 20.6 26.6 55 INDICATOR 0 (MILLIREM/STD.MO.) (236/236) (8/8) (4/4) SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE (0/27.6) (I8.3/22.2) (25.5/27.6) 0.3 MILES W
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D.
107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5 109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3 110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3 112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3 113 15.7 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-21 F-5
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D.
107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5 109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3 110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3 112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3 113 20.9 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-21 F-6
Original Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/-2 S.D.
JAN-MAR 21.2 +/- 3.8 19.5 +/- 3.0 19.8 +/- 2.0 20.9 +/- 3.0 APR-JUN 19.5 +/- 10.3 18.6 +/- 3.1 18.0 +/- 2.8 19.7 +/- 3.8 JUL-SEP 21.0 +/- 4.7 18.9 +/- 2.6 18.5 +/- 2.2 20.6 +/- 3.0 OCT-DEC 21.9 +/- 3.9 20.2 +/- 2.6 20.1 +/- 3.3 21.2 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-IX.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D.
SITE BOUNDARY 75 0.0 27.6 20.9 +/- 6.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 16.5 24.9 19.3 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 16.2 24.0 19.1 + 3.1 CONTROL 8 18.3 22.2 20.6 +/- 2.7 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112, 113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, Ti INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 100, 101,102,103,104, 105, 106,107, 109, 110, 22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-22 F-7
Corrected Page - Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION SITE BOUNDARY INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL PERIOD +/- 2 S.D.
JAN-MAR 21.2 +/- 3.8 19.5 +/- 3.0 19.8 +/- 2.0 20.9 +/- 3.0 APR-JUN 20.6 +/- 10.3 18.6 +/- 3.1 18.0 +/- 2.8 19.7 +/- 3.8 JUL-SEP 21.0 +/- 4.7 18.9 +/- 2.6 18.5 +/- 2.2 20.6 +/- 3.0 OCT-DEC 21.9 +/- 3.9 20.2 +/- 2.6 20.1 +/- 3.3 21.2 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-IX.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D.
SITE BOUNDARY 75 18.3 27.6 21.2 +/- 6.4 INTERMEDIATE 124 16.5 24.9 19.3 +/- 3.1 SPECIAL INTEREST 36 16.2 24.0 19.1 +/- 3.1 CONTROL 8 18.3 22.2 20.6 +/- 2.7 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1,112,113, 51,52, 53,54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TI INTERMEDIATE STATIONS - 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106, 107, 109, 110,22, 4, 46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS - 11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92 CONTROL STATIONS - 14, C C-22 F-8
APPENDIX G ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR)
Docket No: 50-219 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report 1 January Through 31 December 2014 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services
,'" Exelon Generation.
Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 April 2015
Table of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions .............................................................................................. I I1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 A. O bjectives of the RG PP .................................................................................. 4 B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 6 C . Program Description ...................................................................................... 6 D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3) ...................................................................... 7 I1l. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7 A. Sam ple Analysis .............................................................................................. 7 B. Data Interpretation .......................................................................................... 8 C. Background Analysis ..................................................................................... 9 IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 11 A . Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11 B. G roundwater Results ..................................................................................... 12 C . Surface Water Results .................................................................................. 13 D. Precipitation Water Results ......................................................................... 14 E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 14 F. Leaks, Spills, and Releases ........................................................................ 15 G . Trends .......................................................................................................... 15 H. Investigations ................................................................................................ 15 I. Actions Taken ................................................................................................ 15 V. References ................................................................................................................... 16
Appendices Appendix A Location Designation Tables Table A-1 Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Figures Figure A-1 Sampling locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Security-Related Information: Detailed maps of the Oyster Creek Generating Station have been withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 and N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1 Appendix B Data Tables Tables Table B-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium, Strontium, Gross Alpha and Gross Beta in Groundwater Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-1.3 Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Groundwater Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-11.3 Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Surface Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
Table B-Ill.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Precipitation Water Samples Collected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.
ii
Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Generation Company LLC (Exelon) covers the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014.
This report covers groundwater and surface water samples collected from the environment, both on and off station property in 2014. In 2014, 1,275 analyses were performed on 498 samples from 63 locations.
There were three inadvertent releases of contaminated water into the groundwater during 2009. There is a plume located west of the turbine building and is monitored via a series of monitoring wells.
Gamma-emitting radionuclide K-40 was detected in nine of the 54 groundwater well samples. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248 pCi/L. Potassium-40 was detected in 264 of 266 surface water samples. The concentrations ranged from 89 to 580 pCi/L.
In the case of tritium, Exelon specified that its laboratories achieve a lower limit of detection 100 times lower than the drinking water limit specified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (200 pCi/I versus 20,000 pCi/I).
As expected, tritium was detected in groundwater samples. The 2014 Tritium concentrations varied from <200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with the highest concentration was MW-561. The flow of groundwater is in the direction of the intake and discharge canals.
No detectable tritium (greater than the MDC) was found in surface water or precipitation samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations during 2014.
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any groundwater samples during 2014.
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions were performed on groundwater samples during the second quarter sampling in 2014.
There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations. Gross Alpha (dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and ranged from 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. Gross Alpha (suspended) was detected in 20 samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1 pCi/L. Gross Beta (dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to 29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samples and ranged from 1.8 to 215 pCi/L.
"Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group of groundwater locations. The analyses for groundwater included Fe-55, Ni-63, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234 and U-238 were detected in three of eight samples. The concentrations of U-234 and U-238 ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L, respectively. All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC.
Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected and are considered background.
II. Introduction The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station consists of a single boiling water reactor (BWR) and turbine generator capable of producing 650 megawatts of electricity. The Station operates under Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) renewed facility operating license number DPR-16. Brackish water from Barnegat Bay is supplied to the circulating water system. The circulating water system is designed to supply a continuous flow of water from Barnegat Bay through the plant to remove the waste heat released by the power cycle in the Main Condenser. The circulating water system is comprised of the intake canal from Barnegat Bay to the plant, the Main Condenser Circulating Water System, the dilution plant, and the discharge canal to Barnegat Bay. The dilution plant portion of the system minimizes the adverse effects of hot discharge water on aquatic life in the discharge canal and Barnegat Bay to meet the conditions of the Oyster Creek New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination system (NJPDES)
Permit No. NJ0005550. Approximately 1 million gallons per minute of water are withdrawn from the intake canal for dilution and station use and returned to the discharge canal.
The Station is located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province.
Topography in the region of the Station is a slightly undulating coastal plain having low relief. The land surface gradually rises from sea level at Barnegat Bay, which is located east of the Station, to approximately 50 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) 2 miles inland. This region of the coastal plain has numerous tidal marshes and is incised by easterly flowing streams and creeks. Elevations at the Station property west of Route 9 range from approximately 0 to 15 feet AMSL immediately adjacent to the intake and discharge canals to slightly more than 30 feet AMSL in the northwest portion of the Station property. The 132-acre developed portion of the Site located within the "horseshoe" formed by the intake and discharge canals west of Route 9 has an approximate average elevation of 20 feet AMSL. In the immediate vicinity of the intake and discharge canals, the Station property slopes steeply down to the canal. The average elevation of the surface water level in the intake and discharge canals is approximately 1-foot AMSL. The remaining 637-acre portion of the Station located east of Route 9 is primarily vegetated and undeveloped. The ground surface is relatively level except for the steep slopes at areas adjacent to the intake and discharge canals.
The three shallowest stratigraphic units in the vicinity of the Oyster Creek area in descending order are the Cape May Formation, the Cohansey Formation, and the Kirkwood Formation. Some of the Station structures are constructed to depths of approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs). Excavations were completed from grade, through the fill, Cape May Formation, Upper Clay, and into the Cohansey Formation during construction. Consequently, the bottoms of some Station structures are completed within the Cohansey Formation and some structures breach the Upper Clay.
The Cape May Formation regionally has an average thickness of 40 feet and at OCGS, the Cape May is described as a light gray to tan, medium- to fine-grained sand, with trace to some silt and occasional coarse sand. It is generally poorly compacted. The Cape May Formation varies from 0 to 21 feet in thickness based on historical boring logs. The variation principally is due to the varying amount of material excavated and replaced by fill during Station construction.
When present, the thickness of the Cape May generally ranges from 15 to 20 feet thick. The base of the Cape May generally is defined by the presence of a dark clay unit referred to as the Upper Clay unit. The Upper Clay is a stiff to hard, gray, plastic organic clay containing inclusions (also described as lenses or partings) of dense fine sand with trace to some organic silt. The deposits of fine sand within the Upper Clay layer have high relative densities and occur as lenses or inclusions.
The Cohansey Formation is primarily composed of a light-colored, fine- to very coarse-grained quartzose sand with lenses of silt and clay. Although most borings at the Station do not penetrate the entire Cohansey Formation, this formation appears to be approximately 60 to 80 feet thick at OCGS. A clay sequence, referred to at the Station as the "Lower Clay", marks the base of the Cohansey, which generally is present to approximately 90 to 100 feet bgs. The lower clay is a dense gray medium- to fine-grained sand containing trace to some organic silt and layers or inclusions of very stiff to hard gray organic clay.
The thickness of the lower clay is estimated to be approximately 10 to 20 feet in the vicinity of OCGS.
The Cohansey Formation is underlain by the Kirkwood Formation which consists of several stratigraphic units. The Kirkwood Formation is described as a medium- to fine-grained sand with trace silt. The thickness of this formation beneath the Station is unknown. The south domestic supply well terminates in the Kirkwood at a depth of 310 feet bgs. The Kirkwood thickness in Ocean County ranges from approximately 300 to 400 feet.
This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected in 2014.
A. Objectives of the RGPP The long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows:
- Ensure that the site characterization of geology and hydrology provides an understanding of predominant ground water gradients based upon current site conditions.
" Identify site risk based on plant design and work practices.
" Evaluate all SSCs that contain or could contain licensed material and for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach groundwater.
" Evaluate work practices that involve licensed material and for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach groundwater.
" Perform on-site monitoring to ensure timely detection of inadvertent radiological releases to ground water.
" Understand background concentrations of radioactive analytes outside of the REMP, as required.
" Evaluate return/re-use of previously discharged radioactive effluents in gaseous or liquid effluents that are returned from the environment to the operating nuclear power facility.
" Ensure controls are established for the selection, installation and retirement of monitoring wells.
" Perform remediation protocols to prevent migration of licensed material off-site and to minimize decommissioning impacts.
" Ensure that records of leaks, spills, remediation efforts are retained and retrievable to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(g).
" Ensure periodic communications are held on the RGPP with the designated State/Local officials.
" Ensure timely verbal and written reporting occurs if there is an inadvertent release of licensed materials to the soil, groundwater or surface water.
" Document and report all applicable RGPP data.
" Identify and resolve deficiencies via the Corrective Action Process as delineated in PI-AA-120 "Issue Identification and Screening Process".
" Perform program oversight to ensure effective implementation of the voluntary RGPP.
B. Implementation of the Objectives The objectives identified have been implemented at the Oyster Creek Generating Station through compliance with approved procedures EN-AA-408-4000, Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Implementation and site specific procedure EN-OC-408-4160, RGPP Reference Material for Oyster Creek Generating Station.
C. Program Description Samples for the OCGS site were collected for Exelon by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, Inc. This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS RGPP in 2014. Sample locations can be found in Table A-i, Appendix A.
- 1. Sample Collection Samples of water are collected, managed, transported and analyzed in accordance with approved procedures. Both groundwater and surface water are collected. Sample locations, sample collection frequencies and analytical frequencies are controlled in accordance with approved station procedures.
Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection, preservation management, and shipment of samples, as well as in documentation of sampling events.
- 2. Sample Analysis Samples are analyzed in accordance with approved procedures that are based on industry standards.
- 3. Quality Control Analytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assurance programs, industry cross-check programs, nuclear industry audits, as well as being certified by the State of New Jersey.
- 4. Data Interpretation Station personnel review and evaluate all analytical data deliverables as data is received. Analytical data results are reviewed by both station personnel and independent consultants, including a hydrogeologist, for adverse trends or changes to hydrogeologic conditions.
D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3)
Tritium (chemical symbol H-3) is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. The most common form of tritium is tritium oxide, which is also called "tritiated water." The chemical properties of tritium are essentially those of ordinary hydrogen.
Tritiated water behaves the same as ordinary water in both the environment and the body. Tritium can be taken into the body by drinking water, breathing air, eating food, or absorption through the skin. Once tritium enters the body, it disperses quickly and is uniformly distributed throughout the body. Tritium is excreted primarily through urine with a clearance rate characterized by an effective biological half-life of about 10 days.
Tritium is produced naturally in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays strike air molecules. Tritium is also produced during nuclear weapons explosions, as a by-product in reactors producing electricity, and in special production reactors. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986. Like normal water, tritiated water is colorless and odorless. Tritiated water behaves chemically and physically like non-tritiated water in the subsurface, and therefore tritiated water will travel at the same velocity as the average groundwater velocity.
Tritium has a half-life of approximately 12.3 years. It decays spontaneously to helium-3 (He-3). This radioactive decay releases a beta particle (18.6 keV low-energy electron). The radioactive decay of tritium is the source of the health risk from exposure to tritium. Tritium is one of the least dangerous radionuclides because it emits very weak radiation and leaves the body relatively quickly. Since tritium is almost always found as water, it goes directly into soft tissues and organs. The associated dose to these tissues is generally uniform and is dependent on the water content of the specific tissue.
Ill. Program Description A. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP in 2014. The sampling frequencies are increased if activity is detected.
In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses for groundwater, surface water, and precipitation water:
- 1. Gamma emitters
- 2. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90
- 3. Tritium
- 4. Gross Alpha, Dissolved and Suspended and Gross Beta, Dissolved and Suspended
- 5. Selected transuranics
- 6. Fe-55
- 7. Ni-63 B. Data Interpretation The radiological data collected prior to Oyster Creek Generating Station becoming operational, as well as background data from publicly available databases, were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of this report, Oyster Creek Generating Station was considered operational at initial criticality. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:
- 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.
The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal as an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.
- 2. Laboratory Measurements Uncertainty The estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium in environmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of the measurement value.
Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as a range with a stated level of confidence. The convention is to report results with a 95% level of confidence. The uncertainty comes from calibration standards, sample volume or weight measurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelon reports the uncertainty of a measurement created by statistical process (counting error) as well as all sources of error (Total Propagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two values calculated. Exelon reports the TPU by following the result with plus or minus (+/-) the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, that is obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty in measurements.
Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level.
C. Background Analysis
- 1. Background Concentrations of Tritium The purpose of the following discussion is to summarize background measurements of tritium in various media performed by others. Additional detail may be found by consulting references.
- a. Tritium Production Tritium is created in the environment from naturally occurring processes both cosmic and subterranean, as well as from anthropogenic (i.e., man-made) sources. In the upper atmosphere, "cosmogenic" tritium is produced from the bombardment of stable nuclides and combines with oxygen to form tritiated water, which will then enter the hydrologic cycle. Below ground, "lithogenic" tritium is produced by the bombardment of natural lithium present in crystalline rocks by neutrons produced by the radioactive decay of naturally abundant uranium and thorium. Lithogenic production of tritium is usually negligible compared to other sources due to the limited abundance of lithium in rock. The lithogenic tritium is introduced directly to groundwater.
A major anthropogenic source of tritium and strontium-90 comes from the former atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Levels of tritium in precipitation increased significantly during the 1950s and peaked in 1963 with the signing of the limited test ban treaty. The Canadian heavy water nuclear power reactors, other commercial power reactors, nuclear research and weapons production continue to influence tritium concentrations in the environment. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in 1986.
- b. Precipitation Data Precipitation samples are routinely collected at stations around the world for the analysis of tritium and other radionuclides. One publicly available database that provides tritium concentrations in precipitation is the USEPA's RadNet database. RadNet provides tritium precipitation concentration data for samples collected at stations throughout the U.S. from 1978 up to and including 1996.
Tritium concentrations in precipitation in New Jersey from 1978 through 1996 have ranged from 600 pCi/I in 1979 to 0 pCi/I in 1996, with an average of 185 pCi/I. Tritium concentrations in wells may still be above the 200 pCi/I detection limit from the external causes described above.
Water from previous years and decades is naturally captured in groundwater, so some well water sources today are affected by the surface water from the 1960s that was elevated in tritium.
- c. Surface Water Data Tritium concentrations are routinely measured in surface water bodies, including Oyster Creek and the Delaware River. New Jersey surface water data between 1978 and 1998 averaged 185 pCi/I.
The USEPA RadNet surface water data typically has a reported 'Combined Standard Uncertainty' of 2 standard deviations. This corresponds to a +/- 36 to +/-100 pCi/I confidence bound on each given reported measurement so that the typical surface water background data provided by RadNet may be subject to measurement uncertainty of up to 100 pCi/I.
The radio-analytical laboratory counts tritium results to an Exelon specified LLD of 200 pCi/I with a typical uncertainty of +/-100 pCi/I. Therefore, sample results reported by TBE near this LLD can not be distinguished from natural background concentrations in surface water.
IV. Results and Discussion A. Program Exceptions
- 1. Sample Anomalies There are no sample anomalies in 2014.
- 2. Missed Samples Exelon maintains a Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) as part of the nuclear industry's voluntary groundwater protection initiative as described in NEI 07-07. As part of this program, samples are obtained routinely from monitoring wells and surface waters at Oyster Creek based on the frequencies outlined in station procedures. The following samples were not obtained as required by procedure:
MW-51
- Tritium, monthly
- Gamma, semi-annually
- Gross alpha, annually
- Gross beta, annually
- Select transuranics, annually
- Iron-55, annually
- Nickel-63, annually
- Strontium-89, annually
- Strontium-90, annually Immediate actions taken:
MW-51 was dry 12 out of 12 months during sampling events. MW-51 is checked for water each sampling event and no additional actions are required.
- 3. LLDs Not Met Required LLDs for Surface and Groundwater Isotope pCi/liter H-3 200 Mn-54 15 Co-58 15 Fe-59 30 Co-60 15 Zn-65 30 Nb-95 15 Zr-95 30 1-131 15 Cs-134 15 Cs-137 18 Ba-140 60 La-140 15 Pu-241 50 Fe-55 200 Ni-63 5 Sr-89 10 Sr-90 1 Gross Alpha (diss) 3 Gross Alpha (susp) 10 Gross Beta (diss) 4 Gross Beta (susp) 4 Transuranics 0.2 Indicated LLDs for shorter lived radionuclides were not met due to a time lag between taking the samples and analyzing the samples as indicated on table B-1.2 and B-11.2.
B. Groundwater Results Samples were collected from on-site locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. As reported in CRA's 2011 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Torus Water Storage Tank and the Condensate Storage Tank is towards the intake and discharge canals.
Tritium Samples from 54 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1, Appendix B). Tritium was detected in 29 of 209 samples.
The values ranged from < 200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with the highest concentration was MW-561 (Table B-1.1, Appendix B).
Strontium Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any location sampled in 2014. (Table B-1.1, Appendix B)
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended)
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions were performed on groundwater samples during the second sampling in 2014.
There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations.
Gross Alpha (dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and ranged from 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. Gross Alpha (suspended) was detected in 20 samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1 pCi/L. Gross Beta (dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to 29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samples and ranged from 1.8 to 215 pCi/L.
Gamma Emitters Gamma emitting nuclide K-40 was detected in nine of 54 samples analyzed during 2014. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248 pCi/L. (Table B-1.2, Appendix B).
"Hard-To-Detect" "Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group of groundwater locations. The analyses for groundwater included Fe-55, Ni-63, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234 and U-238 were detected in three of eight samples. The concentrations of U-234 and U-238 ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L, respectively.
All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC.
Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected and are considered background (Table B-1.3, Appendix B).
C. Surface Water Results Samples were collected from on-site locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.
Tritium Samples from 4 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-11.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD) was found in any surface water samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations.
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended)
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractions are not required on a routine basis and were not analyzed in 2014.
Gamma Emitters Gamma emitting nuclide, naturally occurring potassium-40, was detected in 264 of 266 samples analyzed. The concentrations ranged from 89 to 580 pCi/L. (Table B-11.2, Appendix B)
"Hard-To-Detect" "Hard-To-Detect" analyses are not required on a routine basis and were not analyzed in 2014.
D. Precipitation Water Results Precipitation samples were collected from onsite and offsite locations in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.
Tritium Samples from five locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-Ill.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD) was found in any precipitation water samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locations.
E. Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program results for TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) are presented in the 2014 Oyster Creek AREOR.
This report is part of the AREOR.
F. Leaks, Spills, and Releases There were no abnormal liquid releases during 2014.
G. Trends Active remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills that occurred in 2009 was initiated in October 2010. Trending of the data due to active remediation is on-going. Overall, the station has seen a decreasing trend in tritium values.
H. Investigations Conestoga Rovers and Associates performed an independent assessment of the tritium plume. The results of their assessment can be found in References 1, 2 and 3.
I. Actions Taken
- 1. Compensatory Actions Active remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills that occurred in 2009 was initiated in October, 2010.
- 2. Installation of Monitoring Wells The following wells were installed in 2010 to better characterize and monitor the tritium plume and site hydrology.
Well Number Formation Well Installation Date W-581 Cohansey July W-591 Cohansey March W-601 Cohansey July W-61 I Cohansey July W-62 Cape May March W-631 Cohansey July W-64 Cape May March W-65 Cape May March W-661 Cohansey July Well Number Formation Well Installation Date W-67 Cape May March W-681 Cohansey July W-691 Cohansey July 15-
W-701 Cohansey July W-71 Cape May August W-72 Cape May August W-73 Pumping well Cohansey October
- 3. Actions to Recover/Reverse Plumes Oyster Creek Generating Station is currently addressing the tritium in groundwater through pumping of groundwater out of W-73 into the intake structure.
V. References
- 1. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, Fleetwide Assessment, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (6), April 2011
- 2. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Site Investigation Report, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (4), August 2009
- 3. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Remedial Investigation Workplan, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (5),
October 2009 APPENDIX A LOCATION DESIGNATION
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample Well GPS RGPP Tritium Aquifer or Identification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Alert Water Number (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Value Body Designation Monitored North 35837333 2000 DWN Domestic 574672.98 300.0 B p2i/L Kirkwood Well South DWS Domestic Wel574616.69 356955.90 145.0 B 2,000 pCi/'L Kirkwood Well E of ISFSI LW-- (microwave 357632.49 575569.96 21.0 2,000 pCi/L Cape May zone)
E of ISFSI LW-2 357645.30 21.0 2,000 Cape May (microwave 575581.92 pCi/L zone)
E of ISFSI 357630.20 21.0 D 2000 Cape May LW-3 (microwave 575575.52 pCi/L zone)
East of LW-4 ISFSI - 357652.78 49.0 D 2,000 Cohansey (microwave 575573.75 pCi/L zone)
SW of 357380.76 2000 MW-1A-2A MFOT 575043.44 24.0 D Cape May Moat MW-1G-1A East of fueling 358551.94 20.0 2,000 Cape May station 575308.91 pCi/L 358550.57 45.0 2,000 East of Chne MW-1G-1B fueling station 575316.19 pCi/L Cohansey Roadway- 357598.17 2,000 MW-1i-1A NW of 574412.70 pi/L Cape May TWST Roadway - 357574.80 2,000 MW-1i -2A SE of 574493.50 17.5 D pCi/L Cape May TWST Intak 57449.50 9.0 D2,000Ma MW-15K-1A Roadway Intake - 357297.90 574469.50 19.0 D pCi/L Cape May Yard-W 357573.30 2,000 MW-16D of MAC 574746.50 25.0 D P&L Cape May Building A-1
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS RGPP Aquifer or Sample CoodiatS Depth Sample Tritium Location Coordinates (ft) Point Alert Water Identification Number (Northing/Easting) Num rDesignation Desint Value Body V e Monitored Finninger 2000 MW-24-2A Farm - 356838.52 18.0 Cape May near DSB 579470.94 pCi/L Finninger 356828.49 2,000 MW-24-3A Farm - 17.0 1 pCi/L Cape May near DSB 578969.05 Main MCD Condenser N/A N/A Weekly* H-3 2,000 Surface Discharge pCi/L Water Intake SW/Weekly* 2,000 Surface Canal H-3 pCi/L Water RT 9 2,000 Surface SW-2 South N/A N/A SW pCi/L2 Water Bridge SW-3 Fire Pond N/A N/A SW 2,000 Surface pCi/L Water Dilution W-1 Pump 357029.86 50.0 2,000 Cohansey Area - 574140.61 pCi/L West Bank North Yard 358311.70 50.0 2,000 Cohansey W-1A Area 574679.00 pCi/L W-1 B North Yard 358312.80 20.0 2000 Cape May Area 574685.40 p2i/L West end 357149.22 60.0 2,000 W-lC of backsite 572741.00 pCi/L Cohansey W-1 K West end 357151.55 150.0 2,000 Kirkwood of backsite 572728.77 pCi/L W-2 S of EDG 356965.65 57.0 2,000 Cohansey Bldg 574555.73 pCi/L Field-W 358105.00 5.000 W-2A of North 578105.60 50.0 2,000 Cohansey Yard Bldg 574348.60 A-2
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS Tt Aquifer or Sample Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium Water Identification Number Location (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Designation Alert Value Body Monitored Field - W of 358110.302,000 W-2B North Yard 574348.50 20.0 B pCi/L Cape May Building Forked 357923.67 60.0 2,000 W-2C River CT 57389.92pei/
573809.92 pCi/L Site Forked 358030.88 150.0 2,000 Kirkwood W-2K River CT 573762.54 pCi/L Site Intake -73.00 24.0 2,000 W-3 Access 574499.10 D pCi/L Cape May Road Plant 358067.92 50.0 2,000 Cohansey W-3A Access 575664.22 pCi/L Road Plant 358070.582,000 W-3B Access 575656.25 20.0 1 pCi/L Road Finninger 356595.30 60.0 2,000 W-3C Farm - N of 576663.33 pCi/L Cohansey Discharge Finninger 356602.17 2,000 W-3K Farm - N of 100.0 Kirkwood Dshre Discharge 576675.04 pCi/L Intake - 357176.40 2,000 W-4 Access 574497.70 55.0 D P611- Cohansey Road SE of 356913.30 W-4A OCAB 575387.10 50.0 B p20i/L ohansey Building SE of2,0 W-4B OCAB 356916.40 2,000 Building 575388.90 20.0 B pCi/L Cape May Finninger 359305.61 60.0 2,000 W-4C Farm - S of 575867.58 pCi/L Cohansey Intake Finninger 359321.83 2,000 W-4K Farm - S of 575874.07 100.00 pCi/L Kirkwood Intake A-3
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample CoordinatS WelllePWeDepth Det Sample RGPP Wateruor Aquifer Location Coordinates Water Identification (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body Number Designation Value Monitored
- NW Yard area, near 357510.95 2,000 Cape May Fire Water 574374.05 pCi/L Tank Finninger Farm - E 356758.59 60.0 B 2,000 Cohansey of dredge 580642.26 pCi/L spoils Finninger W-5K Farm - E 356743.81 150.0 B 2,000 Kirkwood of dredge 580646.48 p1KLd spoils NW Yard -
W-6 near Fire 357514.02 52.0 D 2,000 Cohansey Water 574373.77 p5i/L2Cohane Tank W-7 NE - 357074.46 20.0 D 2000 Cape May Building 4 574713.08 pCi/L Roadway- 357289.29 2000 W-9 NE of SAS 574892.74 20.0 Dp2i/L, Building W-10 NW of SAS 357286.29 60.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey Building 574890.61 Yard-NW 357669.10 2,000 W-12 of DWPC 574755.60 20.0pCi/L Cape May Building Yard - NW 357666.00 2000 W-13 of DWPC 574755.90 50.0 D pCi/L Cohansey Building Yard - SW 357702.41 Warehouse 575018.75 53.0 0 pCi/L Cohansey Warehouse Yard - Sw 357705.83 2,000DCape May W-15 of 575017.70 pCi/L Warehouse W-16 Yard - E of 357967.26 20.0 D 2000 pCi/L Cape May LLRW 574933.03 W-17 Road/ Exit 358078.05 150.0 1 2,000 Kirkwood Near W-3A 575667.14 pCi/L A-4
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS RGPP Aquifer Water or Sample Identification Lctoation Coordinates oriae Depth Sample Tritium ae Number (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body Designation Value Monitored Near200ICpMa Near 357005.78 2,000 W-18 EDG 574621.6 20.0 1piL Cape May Building pCi/L Near 357077.91 2,000 W-19 EDG 574633.23 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building SW of 356927.46 2,000 W-20 EDG 574542.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 2,000 W-21 EDG Building 357009.15 574518.22pi/ 20.0 1 2,000 Cape May Building Near2,0 NEDG 357024.50 2,000 Cape May W-22 Building 574590.19 39.0 1 pCi/L Near 357054.89 2,000 W-23 EDG 57454.88 20.0 1 p Cape May Building 574564.88 pCi/L South of W-24 TB Wof old 357128.94 2,000 Machine 574650.77 19.0 D pCi/L Cape May Shop Near 356962.59 2,000 W-25 EDG 574677.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357006.60 2,000 W-26 EDG 574644.03 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357042.43 2,000 W-27 EDG 574636.35 20.0 1 pCiIL Cape May Building Near 356991.292000 W-28 EDG 574573.64 19.5 Cape May Building 574573CapepMay Near 357012.62 2,000 W-29 EDG 574568.69 19.5 1 pCi/L Cape May Building Near 357058.00 2,000 W-30 EDG 574516.71 19.52 Cape May Building A-5
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Well GPS Coodiats Depth RGPP Sample Tritium Aquifer or Sample Identification LocationWater Idnumbera Lo(NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Alert Body Number Designation Value Monitored Near EDG 357051.78 2,000 W-31 Building 574495.62 pCi/L W-32 Near EDG 356978.58 19.5 1 2,00 pCi/L Cape May Building 574528.44 W-33 Near EDG 357026.93 19.5 2000 pCi/L Cape May Building 574499.17 South of TB TB 3719.142,000 W-34 W of old 357196.14 40.0 pi/L Cohansey Machine 574649.43 42, C n Shop Between MW-50 CST and 357368.21 20.0 E2000 pCi/L Cape May Intake 574436.80 Structure MW-Si Near CST 357378.30 20.0 E 2,000 pCi/L Cape May 574480.80 Near Near 35740.902,000 MW-52 Intake 357400.90 20.0 D 2,000 Cape May Structure 574353.00 pCi/L Near end of CW 357272.80 20.0 2000 pCi/L Cape May MW-53 discharge 574447.60 piping Near 357276.20 MW-54 Intake 574311.70 20.0 E 2,000 Cape May Structure pCi/L Between MW-55 CST and 357354.88 30.0 2000 pCi/L Cape May Intake 574440.07 Structure MW-561 Bytanks NaOCI 357305.30 52.0 pCi/L Cohansey 574465.50 Near Near 35733.712,000 MW-571 Intake 357343.71 50.0 pCi/L Cohansey Structure 674373.89 pEla Near Near 35736.702,000 MW-581 Intake 357346.70 72.0 D pCi/L Cohansey Structure 574377.28 7Dhn A-6
TABLE A-1 : Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample WelGS Well GPS Depth Sample RGPP Tritium Aquifer or identification Location Coordinates Deth Sampl Art Water Number (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert Body rDesignation Value Monitored Intake MW-591 Roadway 357422.14 44.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey
- NW of 574406.38 CST Near 357346.55 MW-601 Intake 574373.88 92.0 D 2,000 Structure pCi/L Cohansey Between MW-611 CST and 357328.64 72.0 E 2,000 Intake 574444.45 pCiIL Cohansey Structure NW MW-62 Corner 357467.93 25.0 D Cape May Turbineof 574524.10 pCi/L Bldg Between MW-631 CST and 357329.40 92.0 D 2000 Cohansey Intake 574447.67 pCi/L Structure MW-64 Near Intake 357343.96 2,000 Structure 574377.88 25.0 E pCi/L Cape May Intake MW-65 Roadway 357421.00 2000
- NW of 574402.55 25.0 D p2i/L Cape May CST SE of 357320.44 MW-661 Reactor 574889.18 80.0 D 2,000 Bldg pCi/L Cohansey West side 357401.99 MW-67 of Turbine 574540.38 25.0 E 2,000 Cape May Bldg 574540CapepMay SE of 357323.83 MW-681 Reactor 574897.64 100.0 D 2,000 Bldg pCi/L Cohansey Yard -
NW of 357664.03 78.0 D 2,000 pCi/L Cohansey MW-691 DWPC 574760.93 Building Yard -
MW-701 NW of 357670.57 98.0 D 2,000 DWPC 574759.18 pCi/L Cohansey Building S of 357365.52 MW-71 Reactor 574841.89 25.0 D 2,000 Cape May Bldg p7I41 Cae/a A-7
TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point List Sample Well GPS RGPP Aquifer or Identification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium Water Number (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Designation Alert Body Value Monitored MW-72 N of Reactor 357549.87 25.0 DCape May Bldg 574788.52 pCi/L MW-73 Remediation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A System
D = Daily W = Weekly M = Monthly S = Semi-annual B = Biennial A-8
- f u-i,.
~%m~ 3/4 /
W.I9.
~~jW~IK Z I OF BRIDGE
"ýwk Figure A-1 Sampling Locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 A-9
Figure A-1 Sampling Locations - Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014 A-10
APPENDIX B DATA TABLES
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)
UWN 04109114 < 191 DWS 04/09/14
- 189 LW-3 01/15/14
- 183 LW-3 04/10/14
- 175 < 6.5 < 0.8 < 0.4
- 1.0 < 0.8 <2.1 LW-3 07/17/14
- 191 LW-3 10/17/14 TBE
- 157 LW-3 10/17/14 TBE
- 151 LW-3 10/17/14 EIML
- 150 LW-4 01/15/14
- 172 LW-4 04/10/14
- 173 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 0.4
- 0.9 2.1 +/- 0.6 < 1.9 LW-4 07/17/14
- 194 LW-4 10/17/14
- 159 MW-15K-1A 01/13/14
- 199 MW-15K-lA 04/09/14
- 195 < 6.1 < 0.7 < 1.5
- 0.8 11.2 +/- 1.4 2.8 +/- 1.3 MW-15K-1A 07/15/14
- 153 MW-15K-1A 10/14/14
- 176 MW-16D 01/15/14
- 183 MW-16D 04/08/14
- 177 < 6.1 < 0.7 < 4.7
- 1.0 17.0 +/- 1.9 < 2.0 MW-16D 07/22/14
- 156 MW-16D 10/15/14
- 172 MW-IA-2A 01/15/14
- 178 MW-iA-2A 04/11/14
- 176 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.2
- 1.0 6.8 +/- 1.2 2.1 +/- 1.4 MW-1A-2A 07/22/14
- 153 MW-IA-2A 10/15/14
- 191 MW-11-1A 01/15/14
- 180 MW-11-1A 04/08/14
- 174 < 6.7 < 0.8 < 0.6 3.4 +/- 1.3 2.0 +/- 0.6 4.0 +/- 1.5 MW-11-1A 07/21/14
- 151 MW-11-1iA 10/15/14
- 174 MW-1 I-2A 01/15/14
- 180 MW-1 I-2A 04/08/14
- 170 < 5.3 < 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.9 2.1 +/- 0.6 < 2.0 MW-1 I-2A 07/21/14
- 154 MW-1 I-2A 10/15/14
- 176 MW-50 01/14/14 TBE 4650 +/- 513 MW-50 01/14/14 TBE 5090 +/- 556 MW-50 01/14/14 EIML 4648 +/- 204 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE 3450 +/- 394 <5.1 < 0.6
- 1.3 2.8 +/- 1.6 8.3 +/- 1.2 5.4 + 1.6 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE 3320 +/- 382 < 6.3
- 0.6
- 0.5 1.7 +/- 1.1 7.7 +/- 1.3 3.4 + 1.3 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML 3456 +/- 181
- 0.8
- 0.6 MW-50 07/15/14 TBE 4600 +/- 501 MW-50 07/15/14 TBE 5330 +/- 573 MW-50 07/15/14 EIML 5371 +/- 216 MW-50 10/14/14 2830 +/- 343 MW-52 01/14/14
- 178 MW-52 04/09/14
- 190 < 5.3 < 0.6 < 0.8 < 0.6 7.0 +/- 1.0 < 1.6 MW-52 07/16/14
- 156 MW-52 10/13/14
- 175 MW-53 01/15/14 TBE
- 193 MW-53 01/15/14 TBE
- 193 MW-53 01/15/14 EIML
- 142 MW-53 04/10/14
- 196 < 6.8 < 0.7 < 1.7 < 0.6 7.8 +/- 1.4 < 1.6 MW-53 07/17/14
- 160 MW-53 10/14/14
- 177 MW-54 01/14/14
- 191 MW-54 04/09/14
- 194 < 6.4 < 0.8 < 4.2 10.2 +/- 5.8 29.4 +/- 3.9 43.2 +/- 8.0 MW-54 07/16/14
- 172 B-I
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)
MW-54 10/14/14 Ori ginal 320 +/- 129 MW-54 10/14/14 Re count 331 +/- 141 MW-54 10114114 Re*analysis 459 +/- 145 MW-55 01/14/14 TBE 180 MW-55 0 1/14/14 TBE 188 MW-55 01/14/14 EIML 142 MW-55 04/08114 187 < 6.3 < 0.6 0.9 +/- 0.6 < 0.6 7.3 +/- 1.3 < 1.6 MW-55 07/15/14 1020 +/- 154 MW-55 10/14/14 420 +/- 136 MW-561 01/13/14 18800 +/- 1920 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE 8820 +/- 925 < 5.6 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.5 +/- 1.0 3.8 +/- 0.7 3.3 +/- 1.2 MW-561 04109114 TBE 8320 +/- 877 < 8.4 <0.8 < 0.2 1.7 +/- 1.0 3.1 +/- 0.7 2.8 +/- 1.2 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML 8859 +/- 276 < 1.1 <0.8 MW-561 07/15/14 TBE 5130 +/- 553 MW-561 07/15/14 TBE 4360 +/- 476 MW-561 07/15/14 EIML 5496 +/- 218 MW-561 10/14/14 TBE 25600 +/- 2610 MW-561 10/14/14 TBE 26200 +/- 2670 MW-561 10/14/14 EIML 26835 +/- 497 MW-561 12/11/14 7140 +/- 757 MW-571 01114114 TBE 14500 +/- 1490 MW-571 01/14/14 TBE 13500 +/- 1390 MW-571 01/14/14 EIML 15161 +/- 353 MW-571 04/09/14 9930 +/- 1040 < 6.7 < 0.9 0.8 +/- 0.4 2.3 +/- 1.1 15.0 +/- 1.3 3.8 +/- 1.4 MW-571 07/15/14 5750 +/- 614 MW-571 10/13/14 6390 +/- 698 MW-581 01/14/14 < 175 MW-581 04/09/14 < 192 < 4.8 < 0.6 0.5 +/- 0.3 < 1.1 1.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.7 MW-581 07/15/14 < 158 MW-581 10/13/14 < 174 MW-591 01/14/14 < 184 MW-591 04109/14 TBE < 189 < 5.3 < 0.5 < 0.4 < 1.2 2.4 +/- 0.7 < 2.5 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 167 < 5.8 < 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.3 < 0.9 2.7 +/- 0.7 < 3.0 MW-591 04/09/14 EIML < 144 < 0.8 < 0.6 MW-591 07/16/14 TBE < 157 MW-591 07/16/14 TBE < 153 MW-591 07/16/14 EIML < 137 MW-591 10/13/14 < 189 MW-601 01/14/14 < 181 MW-601 04/09/14 < 189 < 4.6 < 0.7 < 0.4 14.4 +/- 3.3 1.8 +/- 0.6 52.0 +/- 3.7 MW-601 07/15/14 < 158 MW-611 01/13/14 < 188 MW-611 04/10/14 < 184 < 5.6 < 0.9 < 0.5 4.6 +/- 1.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 7.8 +/- 1.7 MW-611 07/16/14 < 158 MW-611 10/14/14 < 178 MW-62 01/14/14 < 191 MW-62 04/08/14 < 188 < 6.3 < 0.6 < 0.4 <0.7 8.7 +/- 1.2 < 1.7 MW-62 07/16/14 < 158 MW-62 10/14/14 < 174 MW-631 01/13/14 < 174 MW-631 04/10/14 < 191 < 4.5 < 1.0 < 0.9 8.1 +/- 2.8 6.0 +/- 1.1 31.9 +/- 3.1 MW-631 07/16/14 < 156 MW-631 10/14/14 < 194 MW-64 01/14/14 < 175 B-2
TABLE B-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-8 (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)
MW-64 04/09/14
- 185 < 6.7 < 0.6 < 0.9 4.5 +/- 2.5 14.3 +/- 1.7 8.5 +/- 3.0 MW-64 07/15/14
- 155 < 2.0 < 0.7 MW-64 10/13/14
- 176 MW-65 01/14/14
- 182 MW-65 04/09/14
- 193 < 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.9 1.4 +/- 0.8 11.1 +/- 1.5 < 1.7 MW-65 07/16/14
- 157 MW-65 10/13/14
- 176 MW-661 01/14/14
- 175 MW-661 04/11/14
- 182 < 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.4 < 0.9 3.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.5 MW-661 07/16/14
- 156 MW-661 10/15/14
- 193 MW-67 01114114 8770 +/- 917 MW-67 04/08/14 8600 +/- 905 < 6.4 < 0.7 3.6 +/- 0.9 2.9 +/- 1.4 9.3 +/- 1.1 3.0 +/- 1.6 MW-67 07/15/14 20900 +/- 2130 MW-67 07/22/14 5200 +/- 558 MW-67 08/27/14 2990 +/- 341 MW-67 10/14/14 1790 +/- 250 MW-681 01/14/14
- 178 MW-681 04/11/14 < 190 < 7.8 < 0.7 < 0.3 < 0.9 1.8 +/- 0.6 < 1.5 MW-681 07/16/14 < 158 MW-681 10/15/14 < 180 MW-691 01/14/14 < 193 MW-691 04/07/14 < 188 < 5.3 < 0.9 < 0.4 2.6 +/- 1.5 2.0 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.8 MW-691 07/16/14 < 155 MW-691 10/15/14 < 195 MW-701 01/14/14 < 178 MW-701 04/07/14 Original < 188 < 6.4 < 0.5 < 0.4 <1.1 9.3 +/- 0.9 4.5 _ 1.4 MW-701 04/07/14 Recount 4.1 +1.8 MW-701 07116114 < 157 MW-701 10/15/14 TBE < 175 MW-701 10/15/14 TBE < 173 MW-701 10/15/14 EIML < 150 MW-71 01/14/14 < 172 MW-71 04/11/14 Original < 184 < 5.8 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 1.4 9.3 +/- 1.3 3.4 _ 1.4 MW-71 04/11/14 Recount 5.1 +1.8 MW-71 07/16/14 < 156 MW-71 10/15/14 < 194 MW-72 01/14/14 < 192 MW-72 04/08/14 < 188 < 7.5 < 0.7 < 0.6 < 0.9 7.0 +/- 0.9 < 1.5 MW-72 07/16/14 < 153 MW-72 10/16/14 < 153 W-10 01/15/14 < 183 W-10 04/11/14 < 176 < 6.4 < 0.9 0.5 +/- 0.2 < 0.7 1.7 +/- 0.6 < 1.6 W-10 07/21/14 < 198 W-10 10/15/14 < 178 W-12 01/15/14 < 181 W-12 04/07/14 < 176 < 5.2 < 0.8 +/- 1.4 29.1 +/- 13.4 < 4.2 215 +/- 20 W-12 07/22/14 < 177 W-12 10/15/14 < 176 W-13 01/15/14 < 183 W-13 04/07/14 < 177 < 5.4 < 0.7 < < 0.7 2.3 +/- 0.7 < 1.6 W-13 07/22/14 < 153 W-13 10/15/14 < 177 W-14 01/15/14 < 174 W-14 04/07114 < 181 < 5.8 < 0.8 1.4 + 0.4 4.4 + 1.4 3.1 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/- 1.4 B-3
TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)
W-14 07/21/14 < 191 W-14 10/17/14 < 158 W-15 01/15/14 < 179 W-15 04/07/14 < 177 < 5.0 < 0.7 < 0.8 4.4 +/- 2.0 7.3 +/- 1.4 5.1 +/- 2.6 W-15 07/21/14 < 154 W-15 10/17/14 < 159 W-16 01/15/14 < 181 W-16 04/08/14 < 163 < 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.3 <C ).7 3.1 +/- 1.2 < 1.6 W-16 07/21/14 < 155 W-16 10/16/14 TBE < 157 W-16 10/16/14 TBE < 154 W-16 10/16/14 EIML < 150 W-16 10/16/14 EIML < 150 W-1A 04/11/14 < 177 W-24 01/15/14 < 180 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 189 < 4.8 < 0.7 0.4 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 < 1.6 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 181 < 5.1 < 0.5 <0.5 <1 .0 3.3 +/- 0.8 < 1.7 W-24 04/10/14 EIML < 144 < 0.9 < 0.7 W-24 07/15/14 TBE < 171 W-24 07/16/14 TBE < 157 W-24 07/16/14 EIML < 137 W-24 10/14/14 < 177 W-2B 04/18/14 < 178 W-3 01/13/14 TBE < 177 W-3 01/13/14 TBE < 179 W-3 01/13/14 EIML < 142 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 184 < 4.4 < 0.5 <4.4 <0 .9 14.7 +/- 1.8 1.8 +/- 1.0 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 195 < 7.2 < 0.7 <4.7 <3 1.1 12.0 +/- 4.8 < 8.2 W-3 04/10/14 EIML < 146 < 0.8 < 0.7 W-3 07/16/14 TBE < 169 W-3 07/16/14 TBE < 155 W-3 07/16/14 EIML < 137 W-3 10/14114 TBE < 177 W-3 10/14/14 TBE < 175 W-3 10/14/14 EIML < 151 W-34 01/15/14 < 181 W-34 04/10/14 < 186 < 4.7 < 0.9 0.7 +0.5 < 01.7 13.5 +/- 1.4 < 1.6 W-34 07/21/14 < 184 W-34 10/17/14 < 184 W-4 01/13/14 < 175 W-4 04/10/14 < 188 < 4.9 < 0.4 < 0.8 4.9 +/- 1.7 4.7 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 1.7 W-4 07/16/14 < 156 W-4 10/14/14 < 176 W-4A 04/11/14 < 176 W-4B 04/11/14 < 172 W-5 01/14/14 < 182 W-5 04/08/14 < 193 < 6.3 < 0.7 < 0.5 1.7 +/- 1.0 2.3 +/- 0.7 < 2.1 W-5 07/16/14 < 158 W-5 10/15/14 < 177 W-5C 04/08/14 < 172 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 173 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 178 W-5K 04/08/14 EIML < 144 W-6 01/14/14 < 182 W-6 04/08/14 < 189 < 6.9 < 0.5 2.7 +/- 0.6 5.8 +/- 2.4 5.3 +/- 0.8 5.7 +/- 1.8 B-4
TABLE B-I. CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)
W-6 07/16/14 < 154 W-6 10/15/14 < 176 W-7 01/15/14 < 179 W-7 04/10/14 < 174 < 4.8 < 0.8 < 3.4 6.1 +/- 2.1 22.9 +/- 2.4 7.2 +/- 2.3 W-7 07/21/14 < 186 W-7 10/17/14 TBE < 156 W-7 10/17114 TBE < 156 W-7 10/17/14 EIML < 150 W-9 01/15/14 < 182 W-9 04/11/14 < 168 < 4.8 < 0.7 < 1.0 < 0.9 6.1 +/- 1.0 < 2.0 W-9 07/22/14 < 155 W-9 10/15/14 < 177 B-5
TABLE B-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE DWN 04109/14 < 21 < 44 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <20 <7 DWS 04/09/14 < 16 < 31 <2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 <17 <5 LW-3 04/10/14 < 19 < 19 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <12 <5 LW-4 04/10/14 < 14 < 31 < 1 < 2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <1 <1 <10 <3 MW-15K-1A 04/09/14 < 15 < 25 < 1 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <6 MW-16D 04/08/14 < 21 < 20 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <16 <6 MW-1A-2A 04/11/14 < 16 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <11 <4 MW-1i-lA 04/08/14 < 19 < 16 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 <14 <4 MW-1I-2A 04/08/14 < 14 < 12 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <5 <1 <1 <11 <3 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 18 < 16 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <2 <2 <19 <7 MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 24 45 +/- 30 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <16 <2 <2 <26 <9 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML < 24 < 33 < 3 < 3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <12 <3 <2 <17 <4 MW-50 10/14/14 < 59 < 32 < 5 < 5 < 10 <4 <9 <6 <10 <21 <6 <6 <42 <6 MW-52 04/09/14 < 10 < 8 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 <11 <4 MW-53 04/10/14 < 19 < 37 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-54 04/09/14 < 19 < 15 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-54 10/14/14 < 54 < 48 < 5 < 5 <13 <6 < 11 < 6 < 10 <16 <5 <6 < 38 < 10 MW-55 04/08/14 < 17 < 13 < 1 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <2 <17 <6 MW-55 10/14/14 < 43 < 45 < 4 < 5 <9 <5 <9 <5 <8 <13 <4 <5 < 31 < 10 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 20 < 34 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <21 <7 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 40 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <15 <2 <2 <24 < 8 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML < 25 < 63 < 1 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <4 <5 <10 <3 <3 <21 <3 MW-561 10/14/14 < 50 121 t 79 < 5 < 5 < 11 <5 < 10 < 6 < 10 <15 <5 <5 <36 <11 MW-571 04/09/14 < 24 < 22 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <13 <2 <2 <24 < 8 MW-571 10/13/14 < 55 < 113 < 6 < 6 <13 <6 < 13 < 6 < 11 <19 <6 <6 <46 <14 MW-581 04/09/14 < 22 < 42 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <5 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <23 < 7 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 15 < 13 < 1 < 1 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <9 <1 <1 <15 <5 MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 17 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <22 <6 MW-591 04/09/14 EIML < 27 < 56 < 3 < 2 <4 <1 <4 <3 <3 <6 <3 <2 <16 <4 MW-601 04/09/14 42 t 17 < 34 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <20 <6 MW-611 04/10/14 < 17 < 14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <8 <2 <2 <14 <5 MW-611 10/14/14 < 33 < 35 < 4 < 4 <8 <4 <8 <4 <7 <11 <3 <4 <25 < 7 MW-62 04/08/14 < 18 < 13 < 2 < 2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <19 <5 MW-631 04/10/14 < 23 < 41 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <21 <6 MW-64 04/09/14 < 15 < 26 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <5 MW-64 10/13/14 < 54 < 95 < 5 < 6 <11 <5 < 12 < 6 < 10 <19 <5 <6 < 41 < 12 MW-65 04/09/14 < 22 74 t 26 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <14 <2 <2 <22 < 7 MW-661 04/11/14 < 20 < 46 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 <17 <5 MW-67 04/08/14 < 21 42 +/- 25 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <15 <2 <2 <24 < 7 MW-67 10/14/14 < 36 < 86 < 4 < 4 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 <12 <4 <4 < 27 <8 MW-681 04/11/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2 <19 <7 MW-691 04/07/14 < 20 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <19 <5 MW-701 04/07/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <14 <2 <2 <23 <7 MW-71 04/11/14 < 21 65 +/- 24 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <20 < 5 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MW-72 04/08/14 < 22 52 +/-22 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 13 <2 <2 <21 <5 W-10 04/11/14 < 16 < 29 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2 <14 <5 W-12 04/07/14 76+/- 22 248 +/- 31 < 1 < 1 <3 <2 <3 <1 <3 < 10 <1 <1 <15 <3 W-13 04/07/14 < 21 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 13 <2 <2 <22 < 7 W-14 04/07/14 < 17 < 31 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 10 <2 <2 <17 <5 W-15 04/07/14 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 11 <2 <2 <19 <6 W-16 04/08114 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <19 <7 W-1A 04/11/14 < 12 < 22 <1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <8 <3 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 13 <8 < 1 < 1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 <11 <2 W-24 04/10/14 TBE < 18 <32 <2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <17 <6 W-24 04/10/14 EIML < 34 < 28 < 3 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <4 <4 <6 <3 <3 <16 <3 W-2B 04/18/14 < 17 < 18 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 10 <2 <2 <18 <5 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 13 < 10 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <3 <8 <1 <1 <14 <4 W-3 04/10/14 TBE < 14 35 18 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <1 <13 <4 W-3 04/10/14 EIML < 35 < 48 < 2 < 3 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <6 <4 <2 <18 <3 W-34 04/10/14 < 20 < 15 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <9 <2 <2 <17 <5 W-4 04/10/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 11 <2 <2 <23 <7 W-4A 04/11/14 < 17 < 35 <2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-4B 04/11/14 < 19 < 39 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-5 04/08/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 <23 < 7 W-5C 04/08/14 < 19 < 44 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 17 < 16 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <12 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 TBE < 17 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 W-5K 04/08/14 EIML < 20 < 28 < 2 <2 <3 <3 <4 <3 <5 <9 <2 <3 <20 <3 W-6 04/08/14 < 19 46 26 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 12 <2 <2 <19 <6 W-7 04/10/14 < 14 < 14 < 2 < 2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <5 <1 <2 <10 <3 W-9 04/11/14 < 13 < 11 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 <11 <3 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-1.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243/244 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 U-234 U-235 U-238 Fe-55 Ni-63 DATE MW-bu U4/U0/14 IBE < u.u9 < U.U4 < U.ut < U.12 < U.uZ < u.1u < U.Ub < U.UM < lb2 < 4.b MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 0.14 < 0.06 < 0.10 < 0.09 < 0.07 < 0.16 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 87 < 4.7 MW-50 04/08/14 EIML < 0.08 < 0.29 < 0.18 < 0.25 0.65 +/- 0.18 - 0.19 +/- 0.10 < 756
- 157 MW-54 04/09/14 0.19 < 0.11 < 0.11 < 0.05 < 0.03 < 0.06 < 0.15 < 0.03 < 150 < 4.3 MW-55 04/08/14 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.09 < 0.04 < 0.09 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.04 < 50 < 4.5 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 0.12 < 0.04 < 0.12 < 0.02 < 0.09 < 0.17 < 0.05 < 0.12 < 104 < 3.5 MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 0.17 < 0.11 < 0.11 < 0.04 < 0.07 < 0.13 < 0.17 < 0.16 < 62 < 4.7 MW-561 04/09/14 EIML < 0.08 < 0.13 < 0.18 < 0.18 0.27 +/- 0.15 - 0.13 +/- 0.10 < 760 < 128 MW-571 04/09/14 0.16 < 0.06 < 0.09 < 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.11 < 0.17 < 0.08 < 110 < 4.8 MW-611 04/10/14 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.14 < 0.19 < 0.15 < 0.15 < 58 <5 MW-64 07/15/14 0.09 < 0.09 < 0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.81 +/- 0.39 < 0.08 1.30 +/- 0.50 < 105 < 4.8 MW-67 04/08/14 0.10 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.08 < 0.13 < 0.15 < 0.18 < 0.10 < 93 < 4.9
,0
TABLE B-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 01/15/14 < 179 MCD 03/12/14 < 182 MCD 03/13/14 < 184 MCD 03/14/14 < 186 MCD 03/15/14 < 189 MCD 03/16/14 < 192 MCD 03/17/14 < 184 MCD 03/18/14 < 179 MCD 03/19/14 < 187 MCD 03/20/14 < 170 MCD 03/21/14 < 172 MCD 03/22/14 < 170 MCD 03/23/14 < 171 MCD 03/24/14 < 174 MCD 03/25/14 < 170 MCD 03/26/14 < 178 MCD 03/27/14 < 177 MCD 03/28/14 < 173 MCD 03/29/14 < 175 MCD 03130114 < 174 MCD 03/31/14 < 177 MCD 04/01/14 < 172 MCD 04/02/14 < 173 MCD 04/03/14 < 174 MCD 04/04/14 < 175 MCD 04/05/14 < 193 MCD 04/06/14 < 191 MCD 04/07/14 < 193 MCD 04/08/14 < 192 MCD 04/09/14 < 193 MCD 04/10/14 < 196 MCD 04/11/14 < 194 MCD 04/12/14 < 198 MCD 04/13/14 < 195 MCD 04/14/14 < 197 MCD 04/15/14 < 195 MCD 04/16/14 < 188 MCD 04/17/14 < 191 MCD 04/18/14 < 187 MCD 04/19/14 < 193 MCD 04/20/14 < 191 MCD 04/21/14 < 193 MCD 04/22/14 < 195 MCD 04/23/14 < 190 MCD 04/24/14 < 194 MCD 04/25/14 < 193 MCD 04/26/14 < 192 MCD 04/27/14 < 196 MCD 04/28/14 < 196 MCD 04/29/14 < 193 MCD 04/30/14 < 196 MCD 05/01/14 < 192 MCD 05/02/14 < 195 MCD 05/03/14 < 194 MCD 05/04/14 < 193 MCD 05/05/14 < 193 B-9
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 05/06/14
- 193 MCD 05/07/14
- 196 MCD 05/08/14
- 193 MCD 05/09/14
- 187 MCD 05/10/14
- 192 MCD 05/11/14
- 189 MCD 05/12/14
- 185 MCD 05/13/14
- 190 MCD 05/14/14
- 189 MCD 05/15/14
- 187 MCD 05/16/14
- 185 MCD 05/17/14
- 187 MCD 05118/14
- 184 MCD 05/19/14
- 188 MCD 05/20/14
- 189 MCD 05/21/14
- 175 MCD 05/22/14
- 189 MCD 05/23/14
- 188 MCD 05/24/14
- 190 MCD 05/25/14
- 190 MCD 05/26/14
- 193 MCD 05/27/14
- 194 MCD 05/28/14
- 172 MCD 05/29/14
- 171 MCD 05/30/14
- 172 MCD 05/31/14
- 172 MCD 06/01/14
- 172 MCD 06/02/14
- 171 MCD 06/03/14
- 170 MCD 06/04/14
- 168 MCD 06/05/14
- 167 MCD 06/06/14
- 172 MCD 06/07/14
- 172 MCD 06/08/14
- 170 MCD 06/09/14
- 172 MCD 06/10/14
- 170 MCD 06/11/14
- 171 MCD 06/12/14
- 176 MCD 06/13/14
- 171 MCD 06/14/14
- 177 MCD 06/15/14
- 178 MCD 06/16/14
- 175 MCD 06/17114
- 175 MCD 06/18/14
- 177 MCD 06/19/14
- 175 MCD 06/20/14
- 177 MCD 06/21/14
- 176 MCD 06/22/14
- 179 MCD 06/23/14
- 175 MCD 06/24/14
- 178 MCD 06/25/14
- 173 MCD 06/26/14
- 175 MCD 06/27/14
- 171 MCD 06/28/14
- 175 MCD 06/29/14
- 157 MCD 06/30/14
- 157 B-1O
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITSOF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 07/01/14 < 158 MCD 07102/14 < 156 MCD 07/03/14 < 159 MCD 07/04/14 < 156 MCD 07/05/14 < 159 MCD 07/06/14 < 156 MCD 07/07/14 < 175 MCD 07/08/14 < 174 MCD 07/09/14 < 173 MCD 07/10/14 < 173 MCD 07/11/14 < 174 MCD 07/12/14 < 174 MCD 07/13/14 < 173 MCD 07/14/14 < 174 MCD 07/15/14 < 175 MCD 07116/14 < 175 MCD 07/17/14 < 168 MCD 07/18/14 < 185 MCD 07/19/14 < 181 MCD 07/20/14 < 182 MCD 07/21/14 < 184 MCD 07/22/14 < 182 MCD 07/23/14 < 183 MCD 07/24/14 < 181 MCD 07/25/14 < 183 MCD 07126/14 < 183 MCD 07/27/14 < 184 MCD 07/28/14 <184 MCD 07/29/14 < 182 MCD 07/30/14 < 183 MCD 07/31/14 < 184 MCD 08/01/14 < 157 MCD 08/02/14 < 159 MCD 08/03/14 < 158 MCD 08/04/14 < 160 MCD 08/05114 < 163 MCD 08/06/14 < 164 MCD 08/07/14 < 163 MCD 08/08/14 < 165 MCD 08/09/14 < 163 MCD 08/10/14 < 164 MCD 08/11/14 < 166 MCD 08/12/14 < 168 MCD 08/13/14 < 167 MCD 08/14/14 < 163 MCD 08/15/14 < 165 MCD 08/16/14 < 165 MCD 08/17/14 < 166 MCD 08/18/14 < 169 MCD 08/19/14 < 167 MCD 08/20/14 < 165 MCD 08/21/14 < 162 MCD 08/22/14 < 165 MCD 08/23/14 < 176 MCD 08/24/14 < 168 MCD 08/26/14 < 173 B-il
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 08/27/14 < 157 MCD 08/28/14 < 154 MCD 08/29/14 < 156 MCD 08/30/14
- 158 MCD 08/31/14 < 157 MCD 09/01/14
- 159 MCD 09/02/14
- 159 MCD 09/03/14 < 159 MCD 09/04/14
- 160 MCD 09/05/14 < 156 MCD 09/06/14 < 155 MCD 09/07/14
- 160 MCD 09/08/14 < 159 MCD 09/09/14
- 155 MCD 09/10/14
- 160 MCD 09/11/14 < 157 MCD 09/12/14 < 159 MCD 09/13/14 < 170 MCD 09/14/14 < 157 MCD 09/15/14 < 156 MCD 09/16/14 < 152 MCD 11/07/14
- 143 MCD 11/08/14
- 153 MCD 11/09/14
- 148 MCD 11/10/14
- 152 MCD 11/25/14
- 150 MCD 11/26/14
- 149 MCD 11/27/14
- 152 MCD 11/28/14
- 152 MCD 11/29/14
- 153 MCD 11/30/14
- 154 MCD 12/01/14
- 154 MCD 12/02/14
- 155 MCD 12/03/14
- 154 MCD 12/04/14
- 154 MCD 12/05/14
- 154 MCD 12/06/14
- 155 MCD 12/07/14
- 155 MCD 12/08/14
- 153 MCD 12/09/14
- 153 MCD 12/10/14
- 153 MCD 12/11/14
- 190 MCD 12/12/14
- 189 MCD 12/13/14 < 188 MCD 12/14/14 < 184 MCD 12/15/14 < 188 MCD 12/16/14 < 187 MCD 12/17/14
- 191 MCD 12/18/14 < 190 MCD 12/19/14 < 186 MCD 12/20/14
- 191 MCD 12/21/14 < 167 MCD 12/22/14 < 179 MCD 12/23/14 < 172 MCD 12/24/14 < 173 MCD 12/25/14 < 173 B-12
TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 MCD 12/26/14
- 173 MCD 12/27/14
- 167 MCD 12/28/14
- 179 MCD 12/29/14
- 172 MCD 12/30/14
- 169 MCD 12/31/14
- 167 sw-i 01/15/14
- 170 sw-l 03/12/14
- 187 Sw-1 03/19/14
- 194 sw-i 03/27/14
- 176 Sw-i 04/02/14
- 175 Sw-i 04/09/14
- 176 Sw-i 04/09/14
- 193 Sw-i 04/16/14
- 195 Sw-i 04/23/14
- 192 Sw-i 05/01/14
- 193 Sw-i 05/07/14
- 191 sw-i 05/14/14
- 193 sw-i 05/21/14
- 193 Sw-i 05/28/14
- 172 Sw-i 06/04/14
- 174 Sw-i 06/11/14
- 174 Sw-i 06/18/14
- 175 Sw-i 06/25/14
- 171 sw-i 07/02/14
- 174 Sw-i 07/09/14
- 174 Sw-i 07/16/14
- 172 sw-i 07/23/14
- 173 Sw-i 07/30/14
- 172 Sw-i 08/06/14
- 173 Sw-i 08/13/14
- 171 Sw-i 08/20/14
- 166 Sw-i 08/27/14
- 173 sw-i 09/03/14
- 170 Sw-i 09/10/14
- 171 Sw-i 11/26/14
- 156 Sw-i 12/03/14
- 150 Sw-i 12/10/14
- 152 Sw-i 12/17/14
- 180 Sw-i 12/24/14
- 179 Sw-i 12/31/14
- 179 SW-2 01/15/14
- 179 SW-2 04/07/14
- 183 SW-2 07/17/14
- 170 SW-2 10/14/14 < 178 SW-3 01/15/14 < 182 SW-3 04/07/14 < 182 SW-3 07/17/14 < 195 SW-3 10/14/14 < 176 B-13
TABLE B-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 03/12/14 < 24 229 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 < 4 < 120 <1 <2 < 73 < 21 MCD 03/13/14 < 18 231 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 <86 <1 <1 < 63 < 18 MCD 03/14/14 < 23 336 +/- 45 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 <97 <1 <1 < 70 < 17 MCD 03/15/14 < 29 249 +/- 40 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 169 <2 <2 < 111 < 34 MCD 03/16/14 < 27 153 +/-64 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 5 < 118 <2 <2 < 97 < 25 MCD 03/17/14 < 25 224 +/- 69 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <3 < 5 < 108 <2 <2 < 77 < 28 MCD 03/18/14 < 26 246 +/- 72 < 1 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 100 <2 <2 < 74 < 23 MCD 03/19/14 < 20 206 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <77 <1 <1 < 60 <15 MCD 03/20114 < 13 277 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <3 <20 <1 <1 < 24 <6 MCD 03/21/14 < 23 197 +/- 59 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 26 <2 <2 < 34 <11 MCD 03/22/14 < 24 227 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 32 <2 <2 < 39 <9 MCD 03/23/14 < 23 298 +/- 76 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <27 <2 <2 <36 <11 MCD 03/24/14 < 18 237 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <19 <1 <1
- 24 <7 MCD 03/25/14 < 26 285 +/- 93 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 <25 <2 <2
- 38 < 10 MCD 03/26/14 < 24 329 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <22 <2 <2 < 33 <11 MCD 03/27/14 < 18 336 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <16 <1 <2 < 23 <6 MCD 03/28/14 < 20 386 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <16 <2 <2
- 25 <7 MCD 03/29/14 < 15 280 +/- 57 < 2 <1 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <1
- 16 <6 MCD 03/30/14 < 20 288 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <14 <2 <2
- 21 <5 MCD 03/31/14 < 13 281 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <9 <1 <1
- 14 <4 MCD 04/01/14 < 21 245 +/- 62 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2
- 21 <6 MCD 04/02/14 < 18 295 +/- 76 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2
- 18 <3 MCD 04/03/14 < 23 284 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <2 <5 <12 <2 <2
- 23 <7 MCD 04/04/14 < 21 337 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2
- 23 <7 MCD 04/05/14 < 21 340 +/- 78 < 2 <2 <4 <3 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2
- 20 <6 MCD 04/06/14 < 21 363 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2
- 18 <6 MCD 04/07/14 < 16 342 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2
- 13 <4 MCD 04/08/14 < 18 298 +/- 57 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <7 <2 <2
- 15 <4 MCD 04/09/14 < 10 234 +/- 41 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <3 MCD 04/10/14 < 17 204 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2
- 14 <3 MCD 04/11/14 < 16 290 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2
- 12 <3 MCD 04/12/14 < 13 243 +/- 49 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <2 MCD 04113114 < 17 245 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 < 12 <4 MCD 04/14/14 < 17 338 +/- 71 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2
- 12 <3 MCD 04/15/14 < 16 226 +/- 55 < 2 <2 <3 <2 <4 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2
- 10 <3 MCD 04116/14 < 15 292 +/- 63 < 1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <3 MCD 04/17/14 < 15 297 +/- 59 < 1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <2 MCD 04/18/14 < 18 221 +/- 44 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <41 <1 <1 < 35 < 11 MCD 04/19/14 < 20 263 +/- 55 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <43 <2 <2 < 43 < 14 MCD 04/20/14 < 20 263 +/- 59 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <36 <2 <2
- 38 < 13 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 04121114 < 29 306 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 49 <2 <2 < 47 < 17 MCD 04/22114 < 28 345 +/- 71 < 2 <3 <7 <4 <5 <3 <5 < 53 <2 <2 < 56 < 13 MCD 04/23114 < 29 317 +/- 81 < 2 <2 <7 <3 <4 <3 <5 < 42 <2 <2 < 53 < 15 MCD 04/24/14 < 28 295 +/- 75 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 40 <2 <2 <46 < 15 MCD 04/25/14 < 24 320 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 35 <2 <2 < 41 <8 MCD 04/26/14 < 28 290 +/- 91 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 35 <2 <3 < 44 < 16 MCD 04/27/14 < 25 300 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <3 <4 <2 <5 < 29 <2 <2 < 41 < 10 MCD 04/28/14 < 17 243 +/- 51 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 20 <1 <1 < 27 <8 MCD 04/29/14 < 22 313 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 26 <2 <2 < 31 <9 MCD 04/30/14 < 21 225 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 18 <2 <2 < 29 <8 MCD 05/01/14 < 27 266 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <4 <3 <4 < 24 <2 <2 < 32 <6 MCD 05/02/14 < 28 363 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 26 <2 <3 < 38 <7 MCD 05/03/14 < 27 228 +/- 78 < 3 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 23 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 05/04/14 < 24 286 +/- 82 < 2 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 18 <2 <2 <34 < 10 MCD 05/05/14 < 25 263 +/- 76 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 18 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 05/06/14 < 30 337 +/- 77 < 3 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 21 <3 <3 < 34 < 10 MCD 05/07/14 < 25 301 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 14 <2 <2 < 24 <7 MCD 05/08/14 < 21 273 +/- 73 < 3 <2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 11 <2 <2 < 21 <8 MCD 05/09/14 < 24 306 +/- 92 < 2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 12 <2 <2 < 20 <8 MCD 05/10/14 < 26 379 +/- 98 < 3 <3 <6 <4 <5 <3 <5 < 14 <3 <3 < 25 <6 MCD 05/11/14 < 28 385 +/- 97 < 3 <3 <7 <2 <6 <3 <5 < 12 <.3 <3 < 25 <5 MCD 05/12/14 < 29 329 +/- 89 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 12 <3 <3 < 24 <6 MCD 05/13/14 < 39 265 +/- 97 < 4 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <6 < 13 <3 <4 < 27 <5 MCD 05/14/14 < 37 314 +/- 93 < 4 <4 <7 <4 <7 <4 <6 < 14 <4 <5 < 29 <8 MCD 05/15/14 < 27 232 +/- 89 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <5 <9 <3 <3 < 21 <7 MCD 05/16/14 < 37 292 +/- 114 < 3 <3 <9 <3 <7 <4 <8 <9 <4 <4 < 26 <7 MCD 05/17/14 < 47 282 +/- 82 < 5 <5 <11 <5 <11 <6 <9 < 14 <5 <5 < 33 < 10 MCD 05/18/14 < 49 308 +/- 82 < 5 <6 < 10 <6 <11 <6 <11 < 15 <5 <6 < 32 < 13 MCD 05/19/14 < 56 196 +/- 106 < 7 <8 < 14 <8 < 14 <7 <11 < 15 <7 <8 < 35 < 11 MCD 05/20/14 < 60 249 +/- 112 < 6 <6 < 13 <6 < 13 <7 <11 < 13 <7 <7 < 35 <8 MCD 05/21/14 < 71 323 +/- 122 < 8 <9 < 18 <9 < 20 <9 < 14 < 14 <8 <8 < 38 < 10 MCD 05/22/14 < 77 505 +/- 163 < 9 <9 < 18 <9 < 20 < 10 < 17 < 14 <9 < 10 < 46 < 15 MCD 05/23/14 < 87 299 +/- 133 < 9 <9 < 19 <9 < 21 < 10 < 16 < 14 < 10 < 10 < 44 < 12 MCD 05/24/14 < 75 265 126 < 9 <9 < 17 < 10 < 21 < 10 < 17 < 13 <9 < 10 < 44 < 12 MCD 05/25/14 < 81 334 +/-136 < 9 <11 < 19 < 11 < 20 < 10 < 17 < 13 < 10 < 12 < 42 < 12 MCD 05/26/14 < 111 < 134 < 12 <11 < 23 <9 < 21 < 11 < 21 < 13 < 11 < 11 < 39 < 11 MCD 05/27114 < 85 286 177 < 11 <9 < 25 < 10 < 21 < 11 < 18 < 10 < 10 < 12 < 36 < 13 MCD 05/28/14 < 33 216 65 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 284 <2 <2 < 158 <46 MCD 05/29/14 < 25 222 63 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 206 <1 <2 < 113 < 35 MCD 05/30/14 < 32 297 80 < 2 <3 <9 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 216 <2 <2 < 142 < 52 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 05/31/14 < 21 267 +/- 48 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 146 <1 <1 < 89 < 26 MCD 06/01/14 < 28 287 +/- 69 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 172 <2 <2 < 119 < 25 MCD 06/02/14 < 23 206 t 64 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 153 <2 <2 < 105 < 27 MCD 06/03/14 < 29 348 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 157 <2 <2 < 96 < 29 MCD 06/04/14 < 18 217 +/- 43 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 92 <1 <1 < 61 < 20 MCD 06/05/14 < 20 289 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <5 < 85 <2 <2 < 65 < 16 MCD 06/06/14 < 27 255 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 120 <2 <2 < 85 < 23 MCD 06/07/14 < 34 325 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 127 <2 <2 < 95 < 26 MCD 06/08/14 < 28 424+/- 84 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 101 <2 <3 < 77 < 26 MCD 06/09/14 < 24 250 1 79 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 67 <2 <2 < 64 < 21 MCD 06/10/14 < 26 257 +/- 83 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 77 <2 <2 < 65 < 20 MCD 06/11/14 < 27 286+/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <.5 <3 <5 < 69 <2 <2 <64 < 22 MCD 06/12/14 < 41. 378 +/-77 < 3 <4 < 11 <2 <6 <5 <7 < 186 <3 <3 < 135 < 41 MCD 06/13/14 < 31 425 +/-83 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 137 <2 <2 < 101 < 22 ON MCD 06/14/14 < 34 279 86 < 3 <3 < 10 <2 <5 <4 <7 < 124 <2 <2 < 100 < 30 MCD 06/15/14 < 23 281 +/- 58 < 2 <2 <6 <1 <4 <2 <4 < 79 <1 <2 < 68 < 22 MCD 06/16/14 < 25 136 +/- 63 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 82 <2 < 2 < 73 < 24 MCD 06/17/14 < 24 279 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 74 <2 <2 < 68 < 23 MCD 06/18/14 < 30 327 +/- 75 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <6 < 75 <2 <2 < 66 < 20 MCD 06/19114 < 31 325 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <6 < 80 <2 <2 < 74 < 23 MCD 06/20/14 < 30 362 +/- 77 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 62 <2 <2 < 63 < 19 MCD 06/21/14 < 31 367 75 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 65 <2 <2 <64 < 16 MCD 06/22/14 < 22 356 +/-77 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 44 <2 <2 < 44 < 12 MCD 06/23/14 < 26 208 +/- 84 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 46 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 06/24/14 < 23 371 +/-80 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 41 <2 <2 < 45 < 15 MCD 06/25/14 < 29 358 +/-72 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 41 <2 <2 < 45 < 12 MCD 06/26/14 < 25 284 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 35 <2 <2 < 41 < 13 MCD 06/27/14 < 35 346 +/- 79 < 3 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 42 <3 <3 < 52 < 13 MCD 06/28/14 < 25 321 +/- 78 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 31 <2 <2 < 38 < 11 MCD 06/29/14 < 22 301 +/- 83 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 25 <2 <2 < 33 < 10 MCD 06/30/14 < 19 325 +/- 58 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 20 <2 <2 < 25 <8 MCD 07/01/14 < 20 366 +/- 84 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 19 <2 <2 < 30 <7 MCD 07/02/14 < 21 345 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 20 <2 <2 < 29 < 10 MCD 07/03/14 < 23 329 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 < 18 <2 <2 < 24 <8 MCD 07/04/14 < 13 222 +/- 43 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 < 10 <1 <1 < 16 <4 MCD 07/05/14 < 17 257 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 12 <1 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 07/06/14 < 23 294 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 < 22 <5 MCD 07/07/14 < 32 321 +/- 84 < 3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 18 <3 <3 < 30 <7 MCD 07/08/14 < 22 398 +/- 79 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 19 <7 MCD 07/09/14 < 21 334+/- 90 < 3 <2 <5 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 20 <6 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 07/10/14 < 51 316 +/- 65 < 5 <5 < 11 <5 <11 <6 < 10 < 18 <5 <5 < 38 < 10 MCD 07/11/14 < 18 449 +/- 82 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <3 MCD 07/12/14 < 18 325 +/- 71 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <3 MCD 07/13/14 < 15 334 +/- 67 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <12 <2 MCD 07/14/14 < 12 278 +/- 56 < 1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <3 <1 <2 <9 <3 MCD 07/15/14 < 16 348 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <10 <2 MCD 07/16/14 < 16 304 +/- 62 < 2 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 <10 <3 MCD 07/17/14 < 15 275 +/- 56 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <3 <1 <2 <9 <2 MCD 07/18/14 < 18 313 +/- 56 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 92 <1 <1 < 68 < 19 MCD 07/19/14 < 23 280 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 99 <2 <2 <81 <23 MCD 07/20/14 < 21 274 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 84 <1 <2 < 66 < 22 MCD 07/21/14 < 25 242 +/- 69 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 97 <2 <2 < 73 < 21 MCD 07/22/14 < 21 208 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 78 <1 <2 <64 <15 MCD 07/23114 < 21 312 +/- 59 < 2 <2 .< 5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 71 <2 <2 < 65 < 14
-3 MCD 07/24/14 < 22 254 +/- 52 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 65 <2 <2 < 55 < 13 MCD 07/25/14 < 12 219 +/- 39 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 37 <1 <1 <32 <8 MCD 07/26/14 < 19 317 +/- 58 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 51 <1 <1 < 49 < 11 MCD 07/27/14 < 21 242 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 46 <2 <2 < 45 < 13 MCD 07/28/14 < 17 275 +/- 51 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <2 <3 < 36 <1 <1 <31 <8 MCD 07/29/14 < 21 286 +/- 65 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 40 <2 <2 < 44 < 14 MCD 07/30/14 < 17 264 +/- 53 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 31 <1 <2 < 35 < 12 MCD 07/31/14 < 21 240 +/- 68 < 1 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 32 <2 <2 < 38 < 10 MCD 08/01/14 < 19 300 +/- 64 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 32 <1 <2 < 34 < 10 MCD 08/02/14 < 19 217 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 27 <1 <2 <33 < 7 MCD 08/03/14 < 27 368 t 68 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 36 <2 <3 < 45 < 12 MCD 08/04/14 < 26 316 +/- 94 < 3 <4 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 29 <2 <2 <48 < 11 MCD 08/05/14 < 16 322 +/- 57 < 1 <1 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 18 <2 <1 <24 < 8 MCD 08/06/14 < 24 344+/- 69 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 <24 <2 <2 <31 <8 MCD 08107/14 < 20 321 +/- 67 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <4 < 18 <2 <2 <25 <8 MCD 08/08/14 < 28 312 +/- 86 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 < 24 <3 <3 < 38 < 10 MCD 08/09/14 < 18 303 +/- 66 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 14 <2 <2 <26 <7 MCD 08/10114 < 48 298 +/- 84 < 4 <5 < 12 <4 <9 <6 <9 < 39 <4 <5 < 62 < 16 MCD 08/11/14 < 23 362*+/- 80 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <3 <5 < 16 <2 <2 <28 < 7 MCD 08/12/14 < 24 439 +/-: 95 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <5 <3 <4 < 16 <2 <2 <25 < 9 MCD 08/13114 < 28 321 +/- 73 < 3 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 16 <3 <3 <26 <8 MCD 08/14/14 < 14 225 +/- 52 < 1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <1 <15 <5 MCD 08/15114 < 22 241 1+/-80 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <20 <6 MCD 08/16/14 < 23 285 1 68 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 <20 < 5 MCD 08/17/14 < 15 258 t 56 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 <14 <3 MCD 08/18/14 < 22 380:+/-:89 < 2 <3 <5 <2 <5 <3 <4 <9 <2 <3 <20 <6 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 08/19/14 < 13 224 +/- 63 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <3 MCD 08/20/14 < 19 272 +/- 84 <2 <.2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <5 <7 <2 <2 < 16 <5 MCD 08/21/14 < 22 360 +/- 92 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <6 <2 <2 < 14 <5 MCD 08/22/14 < 23 273 +/- 90 <3 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <4 <7 <2 <3 < 15 <5 MCD 08/23/14 < 14 214 +/-56 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <5 <1 <1 < 11 <3 MCD 08/24/14 < 14 212 +/- 59 <2 <1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <1 <1 < 10 <3 MCD 08/26/14 < 15 251 +/- 53 <2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <4 <2 <2 < 10 <3 MCD 08/27/14 < 26 351 +/- 82 <3 <3 <8 <2 <6 <3 <6 < 25 <2 <3 < 39 < 10 MCD 08/28/14 < 22 423 +/- 89 <2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 < 22 <2 <2 < 32 <8 MCD 08/29/14 < 30 569 +/- 88 <2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 27 <2 <2 < 37 < 10 MCD 08/30/14 < 12 233 +/- 40 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 < 11 <1 <1 < 16 <4 MCD 08/31/14 < 21 210 +/- 70 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 16 <2 <2 < 24 <8 MCD 09/01/14 < 17 172 +/- 71 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 13 <1 <2 < 21 <6 MCD 09/02/14 < 13 226 +/- 48 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <9 <1 <1 < 15 <4 MCD 09/03/14 < 17 216 +/- 65 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 11 <2 <2 < 18 <7 00 MCD 09/04/14 < 10 279 +/- 37 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 < 11 <4 MCD 09/05/14 < 19 492 +/- 64 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 12 <2 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 09/06/14 < 14 222 +/- 59 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <2 < 14 <3 MCD 09/07/14 < 13 209 +/- 50 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 < 12 <3 MCD 09/08/14 < 18 289 +/- 82 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <9 <2 <2 < 19 <5 MCD 09/09/14 < 12 298 +/- 43 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <6 <1 <1 < 11 <3 MCD 09/10/14 < 21 580 +/- 77 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 10 <2 <2 < 19 <5 MCD 09/11/14 < 34 252 +/- 65 <3 <4 <8 <3 <7 <4 <7 < 15 <3 <4 < 31 <9 MCD 09/12/14 < 15 273 +/- 71 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <1 <2 < 13 <3 MCD 09/13/14 < 14 284 +/- 54 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <5 <1 <1 < 10 <3 MCD 09/14/14 < 59 287 +/- 67 <5 <7 < 16 <4 < 11 <7 < 12 < 193 <4 <4 < 160 < 48 MCD 09/15/14 < 58 263 +/- 72 <4 <6 < 15 <4 < 10 <7 < 11 < 157 <4 <4 < 142 < 41 MCD 09/16/14 < 53 270 +/- 65 <4 <5 < 15 <4 <9 <6 < 10 < 130 <4 <4 < 128 < 42 MCD 11/07/14 < 18 289 +/- 53 <1 <1 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 < 36 <1 <1 < 36 <11 MCD 11/08/14 < 19 285 +/- 64 <2 <2 <4 <1 <4 <2 <4 < 41 <2 <1 < 43 <11 MCD 11/09/14 < 22 269 +/- 66 <2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 < 40 <2 <2 < 41 < 13 MCD 11/10/14 < 24 240 +/- 85 <2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 35 <2 <2 < 43 < 13 MCD 11/25/14 < 25 294 +/- 77 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 12 <2 <2 < 23 <6 MCD 11/26/14 < 13 273 +/- 56 <1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <1 < 14 <5 MCD 11/27/14 < 19 245 +/- 75 <2 <2 <4 <3 <4 <2 <5 <9 <2 <2 < 20 <5 MCD 11/28/14 < 17 283 +/- 68 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <8 <2 <2 < 16 <4 MCD 11/29/14 < 26 308 +/- 94 <3 <3 <7 <3 <5 <3 <5 < 10 <3 <3 < 22 <6 MCD 11/30/14 < 53 300 +/- 80 <6 <6 < 14 <6 < 12 <7 < 11 < 22 <6 <6 < 44 < 14 MCD 12/01/14 < 17 204 +/- 66 <2 <2 <3 <2 <3 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 < 13 <4 MCD 12/02/14 < 20 222 +/- 84 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <2 *15 <5 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE MCD 12103114 < 23 364 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <7 <2 <3 <17 <4 MCD 12/04/14 < 17 318 +/- 74 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 MCD 12105114 < 19 274 +/- 81 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <5 <2 <2 <14 <4 MCD 12/06/14 < 21 314 +/- 87 <2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <3 <4 <5 <2 <2 <13 <4 MCD 12/07/14 < 19 323 +/- 87 < 2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <14 <4 MCD 12/08/14 < 21 451 +/- 79 < 2 <2 <3 <1 <4 <2 <4 <5 <2 <2 <12 <3 MCD 12/09/14 < 15 247 +/- 71 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <9 <4 MCD 12/10/14 < 12 273 +/- 48 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <1 <1 <7 <2 MCD 12/11/14 < 19 227 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <53 <1 <1 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/12/14 < 22 210 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <6 <2 <3 <2 <4 <66 < 1 <2 < 60 < 16 MCD 12/13/14 < 31 186 +/- 92 < 3 <4 < 10 <3 <6 <4 <7 < 103 < 2 <3 < 84 < 33 MCD 12/14/14 < 37 216 +/- 88 <3 <3 <7 <2 <6 <4 <5 <88 <2 <3 < 81 < 19 MCD 12/15/14 < 31 252 +/- 71 <2 <3 <9 <3 <5 <3 <6 <93 <2 <2 < 83 < 21 MCD 12/16/14 < 25 227 +/- 78 <2 <2 <6 <2 <3 <3 <5 <61 <2 <2 <54 <18 MCD 12/17/14 < 29 255 +/- 74 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <4 <5 <79 <2 <2 < 76 < 18 MCD 12/18/14 < 20 215 +/- 49 < 2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <4 <44 <1 <1 < 42 < 13 MCD 12/19/14 < 29 333 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <8 <3 <5 <3 <6 <66 <2 <2 < 58 < 18 MCD 12/20/14 < 30 268 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 <53 <2 <2 < 58 < 16 MCD 12/21/14 < 23 264 +/- 64 < 2 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <4 <42 < 1 <2 <46 < 13 MCD 12/22/14 < 34 367 +/- 92 < 3 <3 <9 <3 <7 <4 <7 <60 <3 <3 < 61 < 21 MCD 12/23114 < 30 222 +/- 98 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <6 <52 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/24/14 < 30 268 +/- 87 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 <44 <2 <2 < 48 < 14 MCD 12/25/14 < 24 153 +/- 63 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 28 <2 <2 < 39 < 12 MCD 12/26/14 < 30 250 +/- 72 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 <42 <2 <2 < 49 < 13 MCD 12/27/14 < 16 278 +/- 55 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <20 <1 <1 <24 < 5 MCD 12/28114 < 22 341 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <6 <3 <4 <3 <4 <26 <2 <2 <40 <8 MCD 12/29/14 < 23 280 +/- 84 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <4 <29 <2 <2 <34 <11 MCD 12/30114 < 17 296 +/- 60 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <23 <2 <2 <31 <8 MCD 12/31/14 < 27 211 +/-89 <2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <6 <25 <2 <2 <36 < 11 SW-1 03/12/14 < 23 238 +/- 53 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <5 < 124 < 1 <1 < 78 < 20 SW-1 03/19/14 < 29 301 +/- 67 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <4 <3 <4 < 110 < 2 <2 < 91 < 24 SW-1 03/27/14 < 22 305 +/- 80 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <21 <2 <2 <30 < 11 SW-1 04/02/14 < 14 228 +/- 58 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <9 <1 <1 <16 <4 SW-1 04/09/14 < 16 218 +/- 60 <2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 <13 <4 SW-1 04/09/14 < 21 239 +/- 39 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <3 <4 <6 <2 <2 <14 <5 SW-1 04/16/14 < 13 236 +/- 54 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <7 <2 SW-1 04/23/14 < 30 345 +/- 82 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <4 <5 <50 <2 <3 < 55 < 15 SW-1 05/01/14 < 29 274 +/- 93 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <22 <2 <3 <41 <8 SW-1 05/07/14 < 18 219 +/- 51 < 1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <2 <17 <4 SW-1 05/14/14 < 26 234 +/- 96 < 3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <3 <6 <8 <2 <3 <23 <8 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 DATE SW-i 05/21/14 < 71 273 +/- 138 < 9 <8 <19 < 10 < 16 <9 <15 <14 <8 <9 < 39 <7 SW-i 05/28/14 < 31 221 +/- 71 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <6 < 333 < 2 <2 < 173 <54 SW-i 06/04114 < 32 234 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <4 <7 < 208 < 2 <2 < 151 < 26 SW-i 06/11114 < 29 293 +/- 72 < 2 <2 <7 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 110 <2 <2 < 91 < 22 Sw-i 06/18/14 < 17 241 +/- 50 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <38 < 1 <1 < 37 < 11 SW-i 06/25/14 < 21 288 +/- 54 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <4 < 24 <2 <2 < 31 <8 SW-i 07/02/14 < 3 89 +/- 16 < 0 <0 <1 <0 <1 <0 <1 <2 <0 <0 <4 <1 SW-i 07/09/14 < 24 391 +/- 77 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <5 <10 <3 <3 < 19 <5 Sw-i 07/16/14 < 12 313 +/- 51 < 1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <2 <3 <1 <1 <7 <2 SW-i 07/23/14 < 14 240 +/- 36 < 1 <1 <4 <1 <2 <2 <2 <45 < 1 <1 < 39 < 11 SW-i 07/30/14 < 17 329 +/- 49 < 1 <2 <5 <1 <3 <2 <3 <44 <1 <1 < 42 < 10 SW-i 08/06/14 < 57 279 +/- 70 < 5 <6 <15 <5 < 11 <6 <11 <80 <5 <5 < 96 < 26 SW-i 08/13/14 < 24 212 +/- 82 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <18 <2 <2 < 24 <7 SW-i 08/20/14 < 22 252 +/- 81 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <5 <3 <4 <11 <2 <3 < 22 <8 0u Sw-i 08/27/14 < 24 226 +/- 79 < 2 <3 <7 <2 <5 <3 <5 <28 <2 <2 < 40 < 14 SW-i 09/03/14 < 15 275 +/- 61 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <2 <2 <3 <12 <1 <2 < 21 <5 Sw-i 09/10/14 < 20 260 +/- 75 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <10 <2 <2 < 18 <7 SW-i 11/26/14 < 17 299 +/- 63 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <2 <2 < 16 <5 SW-i 12/03/14 < 12 247 +/- 42 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <4 <1 <1 <9 <2 sw-i 12/10/14 < 21 280 +/- 88 < 2 <3 <5 <3 <4 <3 <4 <4 <2 <3 < 12 <4 SW-i 12/17/14 < 18 216 +/- 57 < 1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <42 < 1 <1 < 44 < 12 Sw-i 12/24/14 < 24 241 +/- 73 < 2 <3 <6 <2 <3 <2 <5 <35 < 2 <2 < 44 < 11 Sw-i 12/31/14 < 23 313 +/- 86 < 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <3 <5 < 20 <2 <2 < 26 < 11 SW-2 04/07/14 < 17 224 +/- 31 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <5 SW-2 07/17/14 < 7 289 +/- 39 < 1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <4 <1 SW-3 04/07/14 < 17 < 31 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <6 <2 <2 < 13 <4 BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY
TABLE B-I.3 TABLE B-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243/244 Pu-238 Pu-239/24C U-234 U-235 U-238 Fe-55 Ni-63 DATE DATE NONE FOR 2014
,=j
TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN PRECIPITATION WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 U
2 01/13/14 < 182 2 04/09/14 < 180 2 07/23/14 < 178 2 10/13/14 < 191 3 01/13/14 < 189 3 04/09/14 < 178 3 07/23/14
- 181 3 10/13/14 < 189 4 01/13/14 < 177 4 04/09/14 < 176 4 07/23/14 < 182 4 10/13/14 < 190 5 01/13/14
- 183 5 04/08/14 < 179 5 07/23/14 < 180 5 10/13/14 < 192 6 01/13/14 < 174 6 04/09/14 < 179 6 07/23/14 < 182 6 10/13/14 < 190 B-22