ML16256A184: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16256A184 | | number = ML16256A184 | ||
| issue date = 08/25/2016 | | issue date = 08/25/2016 | ||
| title = | | title = Revision 309 to Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 3, Design of Structures, Components Equipment and Systems, Section 3.7, Figures 3.7-1 Through 3.7-36 | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | | author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 36 | | page count = 36 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:8 6 Y 2 0.04 I I 0.01 6 ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 i VI \\\I \ \I\ CD PERIOD (SEC. HISTORY SPECTRA NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA WATERFORD 3 DESIGN SPECTRA WONG-TRI FUNAC SPECTRA 6 KM WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 15 KM LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric StationHORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-l 100 80 60 10 8 6 0.8 0.6 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME 0.08 0.06 HISTORY SPECTRANRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA | |||
------ WATERFORD 3 DESIGN SPECTRA WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 8 KM WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 15 KM IOB NUMBER S LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPP PERIOD (SEC. | |||
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station NTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS UAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-2 100 80 60 40.20 10 8 8 4 2 0.8 0.6 4 0.4 0.2 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME HISTORY SPECTRA 0.1NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY 0.01 8 PERIOD (SEC. | |||
LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS Waterford Steam EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-3 Electric Station 100 80 60 40 20 10 8 6 4 2 0.8 06 .4 0.4 0.2 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME HISTORY SPECTRA 0.1NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 0.01 a 8 0 0 PERIOD (SEC. | |||
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Figure HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS Waterford Steam EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-4 Electric Station 20 10 8 6 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-5 6 0.6 4 0.4LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 I I \\I \ PERIOD (SEC. | |||
Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-6 10 8 6 0.8 06 . 0.4 0.1 0.08 0.06 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP PLEISTOCENE 3.7-7 10 a 6 1 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.08 0.06 iLAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY ATLANTA, GEORGIA B NUMBER SA-239 | |||
\I N PERIOD (SEC. | |||
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-8 Electric Station I | |||
SHIELD BLDG. | |||
CONTAINMENT VESSEL EL.197.5 EL.172.4 2 EL.150.7 3 EL.131.0 4 a EL.lll.O 5 12 EL.176.0 13 EL.154.0 N EL.132.0 EL.86.0 6 INTERNAL STRUCTURE EL.1 10.0 HANDLING 16 BUILDING EL.61.0 7 a EL.41.0 8 EL.19.0 9 EL.35.0 N EL.23.0 E 4.22.0 E 10 EL85. . N I EL.l.O E L.-4.0 32 REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EL.lOO.O 33 E L.84.5 I 35 EL.4 E L.-35 E L.-47 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS (HORIZONTAL EXCITATIONS) | |||
Figure 3.7-9 REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING HANDLING BUILDINGMATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS (VERTICAL EXCITATION) | |||
6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 6 DESIGN ENVELOPE SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI = 5800 = 8000 = 16050 0.700.800.80 (SECOND) | |||
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station FLOOR SPECTRA E-W SSE 1% | |||
FOUNDATION MAT ELEV. -35 FT. MSL Figure 3.7-l 5 6.50 6.00 5.56 5.00 4.50 r DESIGN ENVELOPE t SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI 1.50 = 5800 = 8000 = 16050 I .oo1.101.201.30 1.40 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.80 1 PERIOD | |||
, , , , , I , , , , LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
FLOOR SPECTRA VERTICAL SSE 1% | |||
Figure Waterford Steam Electric Station INTERNAL STRUCTURE ELEV. | |||
FT. MSL 3.7-l 7 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.56 4.06 II II I DESIGN ENVELOPE 250-SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI 5600 = 8000 0.100.300.400.500.600.70 0.80 1.00 1.10 1.361.401.50 PERIOD (SECOND) 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I DESIGN ENVELOPE I I I I0.100.200.300.40 SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI | |||
=5800=8000=160500.500.600.700.800.80 1.001.101.201.301.40 1.50 PERIOD (SECOND) | |||
I LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station FLOOR SPECTRA VERTICAL SSE 1% | |||
FOUNDATION MAT ELEV. -35 FT. MSL Figure 3.7-20 ZERO DISTANCE CONTAINMENT SHIELD VESSEL BUILDING EL.197.5 12 EL.176.0 13 EL.154.0 14 EL.1320 15 FUEL HANDLING EL.110.0 16 BUILDING 16 EL. 66.0 19 EL. 44.0 EL. EL.8.0 21 EL.-4.0 28 EL. 0.0 MAT EL. 198.3 2 EL. 172.4 3 EL. 150.7 4 EL. 131.0 5 EL. 111.0 6 EL. 86.0 COMBINED 8 STRUCTURE REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EL. 69.0 36 EL. 46.0 EL. 21.0 EL. 41.0 -24.0 UP X NORTH TRANSLATIONAL ROTATIONAL SOIL SPRINGS LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station REACTOR BUILDING MATHEMATICAL TORSION MODEL Figure 3.7-21 N 1. MAXIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE INCLUDING BUOYANCY EFFECT 7.22, 7.04, 7.02 AND 6.64 KSF2. FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST A BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE = | |||
1517.22 2.06 L I I I I! I PLAN OF MAT 0 4 267'0'1'0 3 ----1 I DATA:A. MOMENTS DUE TO SSE IN E-W AND N-s DIRECTIONS ARE APPLIED SIMULTAN-EOUSLY.M = B. BUOYANCY EFFECTS ARE CALCULATEDBASED ON MINIMUM GROUND WATER LEVEL AT EL + 5.0 FT. MSL C. TOTAL LOADS 1.10 + + 1.0 + WHERE: D=DEAD LOAD EQUIPMENT LOAD SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE BUOYANCY D. ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 15.0 KSF 3. FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNINGOVERTURNING MOMENT = | |||
+ RESISTING MOMENT MR (BASED MAXIM UM WATER LEVEL AT EL + 13.0 FT F.S. = 2.77 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station STABILITY AGAINST OVERTURNING FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES Figure 3.7-22 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 Revision 307 (07/13) | |||
(EC-8458, R307) | |||
FIGURE 3.7-23 HAS BEEN DELETED (EC-8458, R307) | |||
MASS POINT SUPPORT POINT Y X POINT FREEDOM X. PRESSURIZER SEISMIC ANALYSIS MODEL 3.7-24 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 Revision 307 (07/13) | |||
(EC-8458, R307) | |||
FIGURE 3.7-25 HAS BEEN DELETED (EC-8458, R307) | |||
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO. 1 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO..SHEET1 Figure 3.7-27 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO. 2SHEET2 Figure 3.7-28 N TEMP.1 F. EC= 27.9 x PSI EH 27.84 x PSI 1 TO 30)X Y-22.15' 1 TO 25)X-22.15'Z -50.29'LOUISIANA LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO.. 3 Figure 3.7-29 IN-COREINSTRUMENTATION SUPPORTPLATE IN-CORE INSTRUMENT LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
REPRESENTATIVE NODE LOCATIONS Waterford Steam SEISMIC MATHEMATICAL MODEL Electric Station MASS NODE MODEL 0 NODE MEMBER NUMBERS ARE CIRCLED I 32 32 31 0 31 30 CEA SHROUDS 30 29 0 29 0 25 24 t 0 24 16 CORE SUPPORT 23 I 15 CORE FUEL 0 21 20 18 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 11 COLUMNS 0 10 10 14 13 0 3 3 0 2 2---0 9 CSB F LANG E 0 1LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Figure Waterford Steam I REACTOR INTERNALS LINEAR LATERAL SEISMIC MODEL Electric Station 3.7-31 52 CEA SHROUDS 46 33 32 31 30 43 29 42 26 FUEL- 41 26 25 23 36 22 35 14 CORE 0 N NODE 16 2 N MEMBER 17 1 SPRING 11 RIGID CONNECTING LINK LOUISIANA Figure POWER & LIGHT CO. | |||
REACTOR INTERNALS LINEAR Waterford Steam VERTICAL SEISMIC MODEL 3.7-32 Electric Station 21 UPPER GUIDE CYLINDER CEASHROUDS NOTE: 29 28 LOWERSUPPORT STRUCTURE 18 16 15 14 13 12 11 REACTOR VESSEL SNUBBERS LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam REACTOR INTERNALS NONLINEAR LATERAL SEISMIC MODEL Figure Electric Station I I CORE SHROUD (MOTION-PRESCRIBED) | |||
CORE SHROUD 12 11 10 98 7 6 54 3 00000 00 00 0 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 54 3 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 CORE SHROUDCORE SHROUD (MOTION-PRESCRIBED) | |||
NOTE: DETAILED CORE SEISMIC MODEL (ONE ROW OF 17 FUEL ASSEMBLIES) | |||
FUEL ASSEMBLY LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station REACTOR CORE HORIZONTAL NONLINEAR SEISMIC MODEL 3.7-34. | |||
LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO.CORE-SUPPORT BARREL UPPER FLANGE Waterford Steam FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL 3.7-35 Electric Station 18 27 205 204 52 12 403 231 303 19 El 17 1610 15 9 14 8 43 RHS cl 21 El SYMBOLS STRUCTURAL JOINT LUMPED MASS JOINT IDEALIZED SEAM MEMBER MEMBER RELEASE SUPPORTJOINT NUMBER MEMBER NUMBER LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO. | |||
Waterford Steam Electric Station SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE THEORETICALLY MODELED INCH CEDM Figure}} |
Latest revision as of 02:02, 27 April 2019
ML16256A184 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/25/2016 |
From: | Entergy Operations |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML16256A115 | List:
|
References | |
W3F1-2016-0053 | |
Download: ML16256A184 (36) | |
Text
8 6 Y 2 0.04 I I 0.01 6 ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 i VI \\\I \ \I\ CD PERIOD (SEC. HISTORY SPECTRA NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA WATERFORD 3 DESIGN SPECTRA WONG-TRI FUNAC SPECTRA 6 KM WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 15 KM LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric StationHORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-l 100 80 60 10 8 6 0.8 0.6 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME 0.08 0.06 HISTORY SPECTRANRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA
WATERFORD 3 DESIGN SPECTRA WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 8 KM WONG-TRIFUNAC SPECTRA 15 KM IOB NUMBER S LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPP PERIOD (SEC.
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station NTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS UAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-2 100 80 60 40.20 10 8 8 4 2 0.8 0.6 4 0.4 0.2 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME HISTORY SPECTRA 0.1NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY 0.01 8 PERIOD (SEC.
LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO.
HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS Waterford Steam EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-3 Electric Station 100 80 60 40 20 10 8 6 4 2 0.8 06 .4 0.4 0.2 WATERFORD 3 SYNTHETIC TIME HISTORY SPECTRA 0.1NRC REG. 1.60 DESIGN SPECTRA 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 0.01 a 8 0 0 PERIOD (SEC.
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Figure HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS Waterford Steam EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-4 Electric Station 20 10 8 6 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-5 6 0.6 4 0.4LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY ATLANTA, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 1972 JOB NUMBER SA-239 I I \\I \ PERIOD (SEC.
Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE 3.7-6 10 8 6 0.8 06 . 0.4 0.1 0.08 0.06 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE 2% DAMPING-TOP PLEISTOCENE 3.7-7 10 a 6 1 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.08 0.06 iLAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY ATLANTA, GEORGIA B NUMBER SA-239
\I N PERIOD (SEC.
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING-TOP OF PLEISTOCENE Figure 3.7-8 Electric Station I
SHIELD BLDG.
CONTAINMENT VESSEL EL.197.5 EL.172.4 2 EL.150.7 3 EL.131.0 4 a EL.lll.O 5 12 EL.176.0 13 EL.154.0 N EL.132.0 EL.86.0 6 INTERNAL STRUCTURE EL.1 10.0 HANDLING 16 BUILDING EL.61.0 7 a EL.41.0 8 EL.19.0 9 EL.35.0 N EL.23.0 E 4.22.0 E 10 EL85. . N I EL.l.O E L.-4.0 32 REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EL.lOO.O 33 E L.84.5 I 35 EL.4 E L.-35 E L.-47 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS (HORIZONTAL EXCITATIONS)
Figure 3.7-9 REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING HANDLING BUILDINGMATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS (VERTICAL EXCITATION)
6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 6 DESIGN ENVELOPE SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI = 5800 = 8000 = 16050 0.700.800.80 (SECOND)
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station FLOOR SPECTRA E-W SSE 1%
FOUNDATION MAT ELEV. -35 FT. MSL Figure 3.7-l 5 6.50 6.00 5.56 5.00 4.50 r DESIGN ENVELOPE t SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI 1.50 = 5800 = 8000 = 16050 I .oo1.101.201.30 1.40 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.80 1 PERIOD
, , , , , I , , , , LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
FLOOR SPECTRA VERTICAL SSE 1%
Figure Waterford Steam Electric Station INTERNAL STRUCTURE ELEV.
FT. MSL 3.7-l 7 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.56 4.06 II II I DESIGN ENVELOPE 250-SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI 5600 = 8000 0.100.300.400.500.600.70 0.80 1.00 1.10 1.361.401.50 PERIOD (SECOND) 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I DESIGN ENVELOPE I I I I0.100.200.300.40 SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL IN PSI
=5800=8000=160500.500.600.700.800.80 1.001.101.201.301.40 1.50 PERIOD (SECOND)
I LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station FLOOR SPECTRA VERTICAL SSE 1%
FOUNDATION MAT ELEV. -35 FT. MSL Figure 3.7-20 ZERO DISTANCE CONTAINMENT SHIELD VESSEL BUILDING EL.197.5 12 EL.176.0 13 EL.154.0 14 EL.1320 15 FUEL HANDLING EL.110.0 16 BUILDING 16 EL. 66.0 19 EL. 44.0 EL. EL.8.0 21 EL.-4.0 28 EL. 0.0 MAT EL. 198.3 2 EL. 172.4 3 EL. 150.7 4 EL. 131.0 5 EL. 111.0 6 EL. 86.0 COMBINED 8 STRUCTURE REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EL. 69.0 36 EL. 46.0 EL. 21.0 EL. 41.0 -24.0 UP X NORTH TRANSLATIONAL ROTATIONAL SOIL SPRINGS LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station REACTOR BUILDING MATHEMATICAL TORSION MODEL Figure 3.7-21 N 1. MAXIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE INCLUDING BUOYANCY EFFECT 7.22, 7.04, 7.02 AND 6.64 KSF2. FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST A BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE =
1517.22 2.06 L I I I I! I PLAN OF MAT 0 4 267'0'1'0 3 ----1 I DATA:A. MOMENTS DUE TO SSE IN E-W AND N-s DIRECTIONS ARE APPLIED SIMULTAN-EOUSLY.M = B. BUOYANCY EFFECTS ARE CALCULATEDBASED ON MINIMUM GROUND WATER LEVEL AT EL + 5.0 FT. MSL C. TOTAL LOADS 1.10 + + 1.0 + WHERE: D=DEAD LOAD EQUIPMENT LOAD SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE BUOYANCY D. ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 15.0 KSF 3. FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST OVERTURNINGOVERTURNING MOMENT =
+ RESISTING MOMENT MR (BASED MAXIM UM WATER LEVEL AT EL + 13.0 FT F.S. = 2.77 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station STABILITY AGAINST OVERTURNING FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES Figure 3.7-22 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 Revision 307 (07/13)
(EC-8458, R307)
FIGURE 3.7-23 HAS BEEN DELETED (EC-8458, R307)
MASS POINT SUPPORT POINT Y X POINT FREEDOM X. PRESSURIZER SEISMIC ANALYSIS MODEL 3.7-24 LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 Revision 307 (07/13)
(EC-8458, R307)
FIGURE 3.7-25 HAS BEEN DELETED (EC-8458, R307)
LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station Figure ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO. 1 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO..SHEET1 Figure 3.7-27 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO. 2SHEET2 Figure 3.7-28 N TEMP.1 F. EC= 27.9 x PSI EH 27.84 x PSI 1 TO 30)X Y-22.15' 1 TO 25)X-22.15'Z -50.29'LOUISIANA LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station SEISMIC PROTECTION ANALYSIS SAMPLE PROBLEM NO.. 3 Figure 3.7-29 IN-COREINSTRUMENTATION SUPPORTPLATE IN-CORE INSTRUMENT LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO.
REPRESENTATIVE NODE LOCATIONS Waterford Steam SEISMIC MATHEMATICAL MODEL Electric Station MASS NODE MODEL 0 NODE MEMBER NUMBERS ARE CIRCLED I 32 32 31 0 31 30 CEA SHROUDS 30 29 0 29 0 25 24 t 0 24 16 CORE SUPPORT 23 I 15 CORE FUEL 0 21 20 18 CORE SUPPORT PLATE 11 COLUMNS 0 10 10 14 13 0 3 3 0 2 2---0 9 CSB F LANG E 0 1LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Figure Waterford Steam I REACTOR INTERNALS LINEAR LATERAL SEISMIC MODEL Electric Station 3.7-31 52 CEA SHROUDS 46 33 32 31 30 43 29 42 26 FUEL- 41 26 25 23 36 22 35 14 CORE 0 N NODE 16 2 N MEMBER 17 1 SPRING 11 RIGID CONNECTING LINK LOUISIANA Figure POWER & LIGHT CO.
REACTOR INTERNALS LINEAR Waterford Steam VERTICAL SEISMIC MODEL 3.7-32 Electric Station 21 UPPER GUIDE CYLINDER CEASHROUDS NOTE: 29 28 LOWERSUPPORT STRUCTURE 18 16 15 14 13 12 11 REACTOR VESSEL SNUBBERS LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam REACTOR INTERNALS NONLINEAR LATERAL SEISMIC MODEL Figure Electric Station I I CORE SHROUD (MOTION-PRESCRIBED)
CORE SHROUD 12 11 10 98 7 6 54 3 00000 00 00 0 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 54 3 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 CORE SHROUDCORE SHROUD (MOTION-PRESCRIBED)
NOTE: DETAILED CORE SEISMIC MODEL (ONE ROW OF 17 FUEL ASSEMBLIES)
FUEL ASSEMBLY LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station REACTOR CORE HORIZONTAL NONLINEAR SEISMIC MODEL 3.7-34.
LOUISIANA Figure POWER LIGHT CO.CORE-SUPPORT BARREL UPPER FLANGE Waterford Steam FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL 3.7-35 Electric Station 18 27 205 204 52 12 403 231 303 19 El 17 1610 15 9 14 8 43 RHS cl 21 El SYMBOLS STRUCTURAL JOINT LUMPED MASS JOINT IDEALIZED SEAM MEMBER MEMBER RELEASE SUPPORTJOINT NUMBER MEMBER NUMBER LOUISIANA POWER LIGHT CO.
Waterford Steam Electric Station SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE THEORETICALLY MODELED INCH CEDM Figure