ML16257A088
| ML16257A088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/2016 |
| From: | Entergy Operations |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16256A115 | List:
|
| References | |
| W3F1-2016-0053 | |
| Download: ML16257A088 (13) | |
Text
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-312.4-1Revision 12 (10/02)12.4DOSE ASSESSMENT 12.4.1 ANTICIPATED DOSE RATES Peak external dose rates expected are those given as the maximum dose rates present in a designated access zone area shown in Figures 12.3-1 through 12.3-8. The access area zones have been designated by
either anticipated radiation level of the equipment in the area or the desired radiation levels to be achieved through shielding. The peak external doses are not expected to occur during normal operation but could
occur due to infrequent anticipated operational occurrences during which times the plant might be operating with maximum coolant activities corresponding to one percent defective fuel cladding. The annual average isotopic concentrations of fission products are expected to be much less than the design maximum, and therefore the actual dose rates in a given zone are expected to be significantly less (approximately one eighth of the design maximum) than the maximum calculated dose rate in that zone. Another source of radiation exposure within the plant comes from airborne radionuclides. Occupational exposure to the sourceis usually insignificant in comparison to direct radiation exposure. However under certain circumstances of
coolant leakage in containment coupled with high coolant activity, doses from airborne activity could become a major fraction of the allowed limits. Proper purging however should maintain airborne exposures
so low that their contribution to the total man-rem is insignificant in comparison with exposure to direct
radiation.
Radiation exposures from direct radiation at locations outside the plant structures are insignificant sincethere are no potential sources of radiation outside the plant structures. Therefore the total exposure from the plant is given essentially by the occupational exposure to direct radiation within plant structures. Inside
equipment compartments or adjacent to equipment carrying radioactive material, the anticipated dose rates will result from the function of the equipment. The highest doses in the plant occur in Zone V areas, such as in rooms containing equipment and piping handling highly radioactive fluids, or in the containment. Again
it is emphasized that experience in the design of power plants shows that the measured radiation levels are usually less than those used as shielding design objectives for controlling the radiation doses. The annual
doses received by the plant personnel will therefore be well below the limits of 10CFR20 since the plant
shielding and access control are designed based on radiation levels from maximum coolant activities.(DRN 99-2362)
The main control room and office areas in the Reactor Auxiliary Building will be Zone I areas and hence will have a maximum allowable dose rate of 0.25 mrem/hr as in Table 12.3.1. Therefore, annual doses in these areas, considering occupancy factor, will be well within the limits of IOCFR20, particularly since the expected dose rates in those areas will be well below 0.25 mrem/hr. PWR operating experience confirms
the above assertions.(DRN 99-2362) 12.4.2 ESTIMATES OF PLANT PERSONNEL EXPOSURES (Direct) 12.4.2.1 General The annual direct exposure that could be received by plant personnel during reactor operations and surveillance, routine and special maintenance, in-service inspection, radwaste handling and refueling has been estimated to verify that personnel exposures would be less than 10CFR20 limits.(DRN 02-110)The expected doses to individuals at or beyond the site boundary are shown in Table 11.3-7.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-312.4-2Revision 12 (10/02)For the purposes of the estimate, reactor operations and surveillance, routine and special maintenance, in-service inspection, radwaste handling and refueling have been defined as follows:a)Reactor Operations and Surveillance: Include main control room work, local operations such as valve alignment, starting and stopping pumps, operation of radwaste system (but not the actual handling of the solid wastes), periodic jobs such as sampling, radiation and contamination surveys, occasional lubrication, etc.b)Routine and Special Maintenance: Routine maintenance includes peri odic preventive maintenance operations such as oil changes, controls calibration, performance tests, and overhauls with possible preventive repairs. Special maintenance include unplanned repairs, or infrequent major jobs such as
steam generator tube plugging, etc.c)In-service Inspection: Primarily inspection for pressure boundary integrity. As such the testing includes removal of insulation, testing of the component installation of the insulation, and possibly
the removal of the reactor vessel fuel and internals.
Exposures from routine operational inspections are not included in in-service inspection, nor arethose associated with work on steam generation parts. The former are included in a) and the latter
in b).(DRN 99-2362)d)Radwaste Handling: Includes actual handling operations of the plant wastes such as resin and concentrates handling, filter handling, and handling of low activity wastes such as rags, plastics, etc.(DRN 99-2362)e)Refueling: Include exposures associated with all phases of refueling operations, but does not include exposures from surveillance or maintenance which for convenience may take place concurrently with refueling operations, but which are not part of refueling.
The assumptions in the estimate are as follows:
a)The power plant is staffed by the personnel shown in the organization al chart of Chapter 13.b)The plant is operated in continuous shifts. Each shift should have as a minimum four members who hold an NRC license.In addition two more auxiliary operators will be part of the shift. At all times at least two and oftenthree of the above will be in the main control room. Two or three will be able to perform routine
surveillance and inspection functions in other areas of the plant.c)Maintenance personnel are normally available during the day shift only. On Shift Maintenancepersonnel cover all shifts normally performing preventive maintenance activities.d)Shift Technical Advisors are on continuous shifts.(DRN 02-110)
From an operational basis, the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report provides an assessment of radiation doses to the public due to liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents.(DRN 02-110)
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-312.4-3 Revision 13 (04/04)(DRN 03-1135, R13)
The technical staff will spend most or all of their time in uncontrolled areas where the radiation levels are expected to be less than 0.03 mr/hr. For instance the Engineering Personnel will be involved
essentially in office work except during refueling. Likewise the Radiation P rotectionManager, the Chemistry Superintendent and their Associates and Technicians will spend a considerable part of their shift in office work. The Radiation Protection Technicians however, will be engaged in periodic
plant surveys and Health Physics Technicians will be present during many maintenance operations.
The technicians may spend approximately one third of their shifts in laboratory work and collecting certain samples.(DRN 03-1135, R13)(DRN02-110, R12)Actual annual exposure received during the plant operation years has been less than the estimated exposure listed in Table 12.4-1a. ALARA concepts and gained operation experiences with strong
management support contributed to the exposure drop during the past years.(DRN02-110, R12)12.4.2.2 Reactor Operations and Surveillance Exposures for reactor operations and surveillance are primarily incurred by operation personnel which patrol the plant during all shifts and operates it. The technical staff performs the majority of their work in offices and
laboratories except for the surveys of the plant performed by Health Physics personnel and the collection of
local samples by chemistry personnel.
The operations people, primarily the auxilary operators, patrol the plant every shift, check for leaks, inspect equipment, and during the day shift operate the blowdown, boric acid, and waste management systems.
They also perform minor lubrication Jobs.The exposures listed in Table 12.4-la are predicated on surveillance of the plant with inspection for checkup of every active equipment, and daily operation of the blowdown, boric acid, and waste management system
panels.The total exposures predicted agree reasonably well with the average exposures for reactor operation and surveillance deduced from Reference 1.(DRN02-110, R12)Actual annual exposure received during the plant operation years has been less than the estimated exposure listed in Table 12.4-1a. ALARA concepts and gained operation experiences with strong
management support contributed to the exposure drop during the past years.(DRN02-110, R12)12.4.2.3 Maintenance Two kinds of maintenance are performed in a power plant: routine maintenance and special maintenance.Exposures resulting from the former can be estimated by examining each individual maintenance item, identifying the personnel required, the time involved, and computing the resulting exposures. This
maintenance includes the testing and check out of equipme nt, lubrica tion, etc, which are normally performed by the operators; tasting and cali bration of controls, valve maintenance, overhaul, sump cleaning and so on, which are performed by maintenance personnel.Special maintenance includes jobs of unanticipated occurrence and frequency. Estimates of the exposures from this type of maintenance are therefore, based entirely on past experience (References 1 and 2).Table 12.4-lb lists a breakdown of the activities estimated for maintenance at the Waterford 3 P lant.The exposures associated with each activity have been derived considering the time and number of personnel required to perform routine maintenance of pumps, compressors, and selected instrumentation.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-312.4-4Revision 12 (10/02)
The maintenance involves oil changing, greasing, disassembly, including "cutting and rewelding, removal to hot machine or instrumentation shop, reassembly, etc. For general valve maintenance and instrumentation and control work, exposures have been derived from Reference 2. The distribution of these exposures is
allocated to the individual disciplines in the table on the basis of the efforts normally required by the
disciplines to perform an individual valve maintenance.
Exposures resulting from special maintenance have also been derived from Reference 2. Guidance from that document and operating utilities reports have been used to distribute the exposures for special maintenance
among the worker's categories.It has been assumed that major repair work would be handled by outside contractors. From Reference 2,the average amount of exposure in manrem for major equipment failure type work has been derived to be
approximately 30 man-rems.(DRN 02-110)
Actual annual exposure received during the plant operation years has been less than the estimatedexposure listed in Table 12.4-1a. ALARA concepts and gained operation experiences with strong
management support contributed to the exposure drop during the past years.(DRN 02-110) 12.4.2.4 In-service Inspection(DRN 99-0823)
It is expected that exposures from in-service inspection activities will be borne primarily by outside contractors, site non-desctructive examination, and operation personnel with some exposure received by Waterford 3 supervisory personnel.
Exposures due to inservice inspection activities have averaged approximately 8.2 man-rem per outage. This average is based on the exposure received during outages contained in the first inservice inspection interval.
Therefore, in Table 12.4-1, the total exposure for inservice inspection is estimated also as 5.5 man-rem per
year.(DRN 99-0823)12.4.2.5Waste Processing Exposures resulting from waste handling evolutions are primarily confined to operating personnel and Radwaste personnel who operate the solid waste handling and solidification area, perform the spent resin transfers, perform the periodic filter replacements, and package the low activity radioactive wastes. Some
additional exposure will also be received by Health Physics and Chemistry personnel who support the sampling and radiological monitoring activities affiliated with waste processing activities.(DRN 99-2362)A large fraction of the exposure will result from filter handling. The exposures for this operation have beenestimated by assuming a frequency of filter change based on plant experience for that type of filter and a sequence of operation. The sequence of operation involves the installation of the filter transfer shield
container, unbolting and swinging the filter head, withdrawal of the filter, removal of the shield container and
transport to the filter packaging area. insertion of new filter and repetition of the opening phases in reverse.(DRN 99-2362)(DRN 02-110)
Actual annual exposure received during the plant operation years has been less than the estimatedexposure listed in Table 12.4-1a. ALARA concepts and gained operation experiences with strong
management support contributed to the exposure drop during the past years.(DRN 02-110)
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-312.4-5Revision 12 (10/02) 12.4.2.6 Refueling Operations Exposures during refueling have been estimated on the basis of known tasks and estimated time requiredfor the performance of these tasks. The forecasted exposures are tabulated by personnel categories in
Table 12.4 - 1 a&b. These exposures do not include exposures resulting from maintenance (either specialor routine) or in-service inspection activities which are likely to be conducted during the refueling outage. Of
the total exposure, approximately nine man-rem are associated with the actual fuel handling operations. 18 man-rem are associated with health physics surveys and building decontamination with the remaining 35 man-rem being due to head removal and reinstallation.
It must be emphasized that exposures during refueling are difficult to evaluate on the basis of predicted) dose rates, since the number of persons involved will vary.
Experience (3) indicates that approximately 29 man rem occur at PWR plants per removal and reinstallationof the head. These exposures appear to be primarily due to activation products accumulation in the control rod drive mechanism. The predicted exposures are then in good agreement with those experienced in the past. The exposures accrued during the actual fuel handling may vary between six and 33 man-rem/yr.
This range appears to be caused by random difficulties encountered in the removal and replacement of fuel assemblies. The nine man-rem of this estimate considers such difficulties only to the extent of employingtwo full weeks for the fuel shuffling operation. Since these difficulties are encountered commonly, the
personnel dose could be higher.(DRN 02-110)
Actual annual exposure received during the plant operation years has been less than the estimatedexposure listed in Table 12.4-1a. ALARA concepts and gained operation experiences with strong
management support contributed to the exposure drop during the past years.(DRN 02-110) 12.4.2.7 Comparison With Exposure Experience at Other PWR Plants Table 12.4-2 presents data on total number of personnel and total annual dose in operating PWRs. These data are taken from References 1 and 3 and is further supported by data given in Reference 2. Data from this
table is reduced to a weighted average expressing the average man-rem for operating power plants in Table
12.4-3, which also shows the good agreement between this average and the exposure estimated for
Waterford 3.
Table 12.4-4 derived from Reference 1, lists the distribution of man-rem doses for various functions ofoperating light water reactors (including BWRs) and compares it with that estimated for Waterford 3.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 12.4-6SECTION 12.4: REFERENCES1.NUREG-0322. Ninth Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report. 1976 . USNRC Office ofManagement. Information and Program Control. Oct. 19772.National Enviromental Studies Project. Compilation and Analyses ofData on Occupational Radiation Exposure Experienced at Operating Nuclear Power Plants SAIServices. Sept. 19743.Murphy, T D et al. NUREG-75/032. Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water CooledPower Reactors 1969-1974 . USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch. June, 1975 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-1aRevision 11 (05/01)ESTIMATE OF PERSONNEL EXPOSURE (MAN-REM) Maintenance Tech Staff Others ActivityTotalMan-Rem/Yr.Operation &Maintenance Supv./
Control & Maint Op/Maintenance Op.Mech.ElectI & CNucl.Eng./Asso.Nuc. Eng.Health Phys/Engr. Tech/ TechChem Eng/Asso. Eng/
Engr. Tech/ TechQANSSSContr.ReactorOperations& Surveillance 17.5 13.00.115 2.25 2.25Maintenance 291 35.01203.07.0 - 25.0 -1 20 80(DRN 99-0823)In-service Insp. 5.5 2.0 1.5 2.0(DRN 99-0823)Waste Processing 5.5 2.3 1.15 1.1 1.0Refueling 51 7.0 17.80.21.91.8 1.67 1.0 2.5 1.2(DRN 99-0823)Total370.5 59.31383.092.0 46 41 2484.2(DRN 99-0823)
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 TABLE 12.4-1b (Sheet 1 of 2)Revision 11-A (02/02)ESTIMATE OF PERSONNEL EXPOSURE DURING MAINTENANCE (MAN-REM) Maintenance Tech Staff Others Activity Operation &
Maintenance Supv./Control &
Maint Op/Maintenance Op.Mech. Eng.ElectI & C Nucl.Eng./Asso.Nuc. Eng.Health Phys/
Engr. Tech/
TechChemEng/Asso.Eng/
Engr. Tech/
TechQA NSSS Outside Contractor ROUTINE MAINT.a) Waste Gas Compressors .0850.560.26 - - 0.16 - - - -b) All Valve Work 2.48.20.4 0.4 - 1.7 - - - -
c) Inst. & Controls - - - 5.8 - 3.6 - - - -
d) Charging Pumps .092.160.22 0.27 - 0.48 -.04 - -e) BA Condensate Tanks & Pumps .020.370.04 - - 0.16 - - - -
f) Hold-Up Pumps .030.550.06 - - 0.24 - - - -g) BA Make-up Tanks & Pumps .021.270.55 - - 0.175 - - - -h) Sump Pumps & Sumps 0.126.440.48 - - 3.92 - - - -
i) Waste Condensate Tanks, Laundry Tanks & Pumps 0.041.480.16 - - 0.64 - - - -j) Waste Tanks & Pumps 0.061.440.080.12 - 0.32 - - - -k) Shutdown HX Room 0.06 - -0.03 - 0.015 - - - -
l) Safety Inj. Pumps 0.278.00.480.81 - 1.92 -0.32 - -m) BA & Waste Concentratr. 0.100.200.050.10 - 0.10 - - - -n) Process Monitors 0.181.8 - - - 0.18 - - - -(DRN 00-1046)o) Hot Tool Room 0.100.200.050.10 - 0.10 - - - -(DRN 00-1046)p) Concentrate Tank -0.450.07 - - 0.07 - - - -q) Containment Work 1.0 -1.0 - - 1.0 - - - -
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-1b (Sheet 2 of 2)ESTIMATE OF PERSONNEL EXPOSURE DURING MAINTENANCE (MAN-REM) Maintenance Tech Staff Others ActivityOperation &Maintenance Supv./
Control & Maint Op/
Maintenance Op.Mech. Eng.ElectI & C Nucl.Eng./Asso.
Nuc. Eng.Health Phys/Engr. Tech/
TechChem Eng/Asso. Eng/
Engr. Tech/
TechQANSSS OutsideContractorSPECIAL MAINT.a) Major Equipment Failure - - - - - - - - - 30b) S.G. Repair 11 45 - - - 3 -0.2 10 45 c) Main Coolant Loops 5 11 - - - 2 -0.2 1 -d) R.C. Pump 5 7 - - - 2.5 -0.2 2 -e) Fuel Pool Decon. Weld 2 4 - - - 1 - - - -
f) Maint. of Loose Parts Mon. Syst. 1 - - - - - - - - 1g) Chem & Vol. Control Syst. 1 2 - - - .5 - - 1 -h) Pressurizer 3.5 9 - - - 1.0 - - - -i) Clean Up Containment 2 9 - - - 1.0 - - - -j) Constr. Work on Plant - - - - - - - - - 5 k) Work Inside Reactor Vessel - - - - - - - - 5 -GRAND TOTALTOTALS ROUNDOFF 35.6 35 1.20 1.20 2.3 3.0 7.6 7.0 - - 25.3 25.0 - - .96 1.0 20 20 81 80 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-2 (Sheet 1 of 2)DATA FROM OPERATING PWR PLANTS (a)Year Plant Designed Power Level (MWe) Total No. of Personnel Total Annual Dose (Man-Rem)1970Connecticut YankeeSan Onofre - Unit 1 575 450 734 251 689 1551971Connecticut YankeeGinnaSan Onofre - Unit 575 490 450 289 340 121 342 430 501972Connecticut YankeeGinna Point Beach - Unit 1 RobinsonSan Onofre - Unit 1 575 490 497 707 450 355 677
NA 245
326 325 1,032 580 215
2561973Connecticut YankeeGinna Palisades Point Beach - Units 1
& 2 (2nd Unit 4/73)
Robinson San Onofre - Unit 1 575 490 821 497, 497 707 450 841 421 901
729 831 878 673 244
1,109
570 695 3291974Connecticut YankeeFort CalhounGinnaHaddam Neck Maine Yankee Oconee - Unit 1 PalisadesPoint Beach - Units 1 & 2Robinson San Onofre Surry - Units 1 & 2 (Unit 2 5/73)Turkey Point - Units 3 & 4 (Units 4 9/73) 575 457 490 575 790 886 821 497, 497
707 450 823, 823 745, 745 550 327
884 550 610
844
774
400
853
219
1,715 794 201 71
1,225
201
420
517
627
295
672
71
884 454a.These are taken from data for operating PWR plants given in Reference 1 and 3. In compiling this table,generally data from the first year of plant operation has not been considered. Only data from those PWRplants that are designed to operate at power levels greater than or equal to 450 MWe were chose.NA:Not available WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-2 (Sheet 2 of 2)Year Plant Designed Power Level (MWe) Total No. of Personnel Total Annual Dose (Man-Rem)1975Arkansas One Unit 1Calvert Cliffs 1 Fort CalhounHaddam NeckKewaunee Maine Yankee Oconee Unit 1 PalisadesPoint Beach 1 & 2 RobinsonSan Onofre Surry 1 & 2 Turkey Point 3 & 4 850 1,065 457 575 560 790 886 821 497, 497 707 450 823, 823
745, 745 147 783
469
685
104
440
829
495
339
849
424
1,948
1,176 21 77 294
538
28 319 497
306
459
1,142 292 1,649
8761976Arkansas One Unit 1Calvert Cliffs
D C CookFort Calhoun Haddam Neck KewauneeMaine YankeeOconee 12 Palisades Point Beach 1 & 2 Prairie Island 1 & 2RobinsonSan Onofre Surry 1 & 2 Three Mile IslandTurkey Point 3 & 4Zion 1 & 2 850 1,065 1,090 457 575 560 790 886 821 447 NA 707 450 823, 823
819 745, 745 1,015, 1,015 476 507
395
516
758
381
244
1,215
742
313
818
597
1,330
2,753
819
1,647
774 289 74
116
313
636
270
85
1,026
696
459
447
715
880 3,165 286
1,184
571 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-3YEARLY AVERAGES AND GRAND AVERAGE FOR NUMBER OF PERSONNELAND MAN-REM DOSES FOR OPERATING PWR PLANTS (a)Year No. of Units Total No.of Personnel TotalMan-Rem Dose Average No. of PersonnelAverageMan-Rem Dose1970 2 985 844 493 4221971 3 750 822 250 274 1972 5 1,603(b) 2,408 401 4821973 7 4,601 3,620 657 517 1974 15 8,529 5,538 568 369 1975 16 9,483 7,794 593 4871976 2315,41612,031 670 523 1970 -1976 7141,367 (c)33,057 583 466(a)This table is based on the data given in Table 12.4-2.(b)The entry corresponds to four plants only, since no information on personnel is available for Point Beach,Units 1.(c)The entry corresponds to a total of 70 plants only.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 12.4-4DISTRIBUTION MAN-REM DOSESFOR VARIOUS FUNCTIONSOperating Light Water Reactors*(Includes BWRs) Waterford 3 Percentage ofPercentage of Total Man-Rem Total Man-Rem Reactor Operation
& Surveillance10.4 4.2Maintenance (Routine & Special)71.2 70.5In-Service Inspection 5.7 11.8Waste Processing 4.8 1.3 Refueling 7.9 12.2* Reference 1 Table 5 1976 data