ML17223A842: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000335/1990013]]
{{Adams
| number = ML17223A842
| issue date = 07/09/1990
| title = Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/90-13 & 50-389/90-13.Corrective Actions:Maint Personnel Counseled & Aware of Importance of Verifying Design Configuration Requirements
| author name = Goldberg J
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| docket = 05000335, 05000389
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = L-90-250, NUDOCS 9007170165
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 6
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
A  ESSION NBR:9007170165              DOC.DATE: 90/07/09  NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power            &  Light  Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power            &  Light  Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME          AUTHOR AFFILIATION NOTES'OCKET GOLDBERG,J.H.
RECIP.NAME
 
==SUBJECT:==
Responds Florida    Power & Light Co.
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document          Control Desk) to violations noted in Insp Repts 50-335/90-13 50-389/90-13.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D          COPIES RECEIVED LTR        ENCL      SIZE:
TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation              R sponse RECIPIENT              ,COPIES          RECIPIENT          COPIES ID  CODE/NAME            LTTR ENCL      ID  CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL PD2-2 PD                    1    1    NORRIS,J                1    1 INTERNAL: ACRS                          2    2    AEOD                    1    1 AEOD/DEIIB                  1    1    AEOD/TPAD              1    1 DEDRO                        1    1    NRR MORISSEAU,D        1    1 NRR SHANKMAN,S              1    1    NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10        1    1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DRIS/DIR 1
1 1
1 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D NRR/DST/DIR 8E2 1,
1 1
1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12              1    1    NUDOCS-ABSTRACT        1    1 OE DIR                      1    1    OGC/HDS2                1    1
        ~REG F            02          1    1    RGN2    FILE 01        1    1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                          1    1    NRC PDR                1    1 NSIC                        1    1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR            24  ENCL    24
 
P.O. Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408.0420 L-90-250 10 CFR 2.201 JUfR 0 9 f990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:    Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.              20555 Gentlemen:
Re:    St. Lucie Units          1  and 2 Docket"Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Inspection Report 90-13 Res onse      to Notice of Violation Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the response is attached.
Very  truly yours,
  ~ Xjnwh~
J. H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division JHG/JWH/lg Attachment cc:    Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region            II,    USNRC Senior Pesident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant 9007170il 5 70070  0 0003=
                              ~
PDR    ADOCK                PDC 0
Sg ol an FPL Group cnrnpdtl~                                                                ~li
 
Re:    St. Lucie Units      1  and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Inspection Report 90-13 Res onse    to Notice of Violation VIOLATION:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions,              Procedures, and Drawings, as implemented by approved FPL Topical guality Assurance Report TAHAR 1-76A, Rev. 15, T(R 5.0, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, and further implemented by TAHAR Appendix C commitment to ANSI N18-7,        1976, paragraph    5.2.7, Maintenance and Modifications, require that maintenance or modifications which may affect functioning of safety-related structures, systems, or components shall be performed in a manner to ensure quality at least equivalent to that specified in original design bases and requirements, materials specifications, and  inspection requirements.
Contrary to the above, in the three examples cited below, the licensee failed to maintain the quality specified in the original design requirements or materials specifications.
Seismic drawing 8770-G-796,          sheet 3, shows the seismic support for the Unit 1 maintenance            hatch drawbridge inside containment to be a pair of 3 x 3 inch          angle supports about 7 feet long and bolted to the drawbridge and          adjacent deck. During a containment tour in preparation for Unit 1 startup, the raised drawbridge at the equipment hatch was not supported by the specified supports.
It was supported by a chainfall.
: 2. The maintenance      organization removed the existing seismic mounting fasteners      for the    hydrogen sampling system containment isolation valves FSE-27-1 through 7 and, when unable to determine the existence of approved drawings, informally designed and installed significantly different mounting fasteners                without design engineering involvement.          The approved    but unissued drawings when located supported the original fastener installation.
: 3. Carbon    steel    nuts were installed on the joint between the 1A ICW    pump    casing to pump stuffing box in lieu of 316 stainless steel nuts required by Ebasco Specification 53-47. In addition, a    single rubber gasket was installed on the safety-related lubricating water flanged joint in lieu of an insulation kit required by drawing 8770-B-124, CW 53, Rev 1, Circ. Water System.
RESPONSE      ITEM 1
: 1. Florida    Power 5    Light concurs with the violation.
: 2. The most      probable cause of the violation was an oversight during the    implementation of General          Maintenance  Procedure  M-0311, "Equipment Access, Hatch - Opening and Closing" and inadequate procedural instructions.
 
RESPONSE    ITEM  I    Continued
: 3. The    maintenance        hatch    drawbridge      braces    were    immediately re-installed      to the originally designed            configuration prior to power operations.
: 4. To    prevent recurrence, General Maintenance Procedure M-0311 will be  revised to explicitly identify the drawbridge brace installation during equipment hatch closing.
: 5. Corrective Action (procedure revision) is expected. to                  be complete by August 10, 1990.
RESPONSE    ITEM 2 Florida    Power    &  Light concurs with the violation.
: 2. The cause    of the violation        was  that the installation detail drawing did not adequately reflect            a  modified valve mounting configuration which came as      a  result of  a  plant  change  modification.
: 3. Plant Design Engineering was requested to review the configuration details further which identified the plant modification. Details
    'of the modi fi ed val ve mounting conf i gurati on were provi ded and the supports were returned to design configuration.
: 4. To  prevent recurrence, a Design Change Request is in preparation to provide the approved mounting configuration for the hydrogen sampling      system      containment      isolation    valves    on  the  system installation detail drawing.
: 5. Corrective action is expected to              be complete by August 10, 1990.
RESPONSE    ITEM 3)
Florida    Power  &  Light concurs with the violation.
: 2. The    cause    of the violation has been determined to be personnel error.      In    the case of the flange installation, maintenance personnel    failed      to verify the design configuration requirements.
In the case of the stuffing box nuts, documentation indicates the correct nuts were requested and issued to the maintenance personnel; however, the wrong>>nuts were installed.
: 3. The    proper    bolting material        was  obtained    and  installed on the joint    between    the  1A  ICW pump    casing to    pump  stuffing box, and the required insulation          kit was installed at      the flanged  joint.
To  prevent recurrence,          maintenance personnel have been counseled and    are    aware      of the      importance of verifying the design configuration        requirements and ensuring the required materials issued from stores are the materials used during installation.
: 5. Corrective action is complete at this time.}}

Latest revision as of 14:08, 4 February 2020

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/90-13 & 50-389/90-13.Corrective Actions:Maint Personnel Counseled & Aware of Importance of Verifying Design Configuration Requirements
ML17223A842
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/09/1990
From: Goldberg J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-90-250, NUDOCS 9007170165
Download: ML17223A842 (6)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

A ESSION NBR:9007170165 DOC.DATE: 90/07/09 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION NOTES'OCKET GOLDBERG,J.H.

RECIP.NAME

SUBJECT:

Responds Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk) to violations noted in Insp Repts 50-335/90-13 50-389/90-13.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation R sponse RECIPIENT ,COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 PD 1 1 NORRIS,J 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD 1 1 AEOD/DEIIB 1 1 AEOD/TPAD 1 1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D 1 1 NRR SHANKMAN,S 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DRIS/DIR 1

1 1

1 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D NRR/DST/DIR 8E2 1,

1 1

1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OE DIR 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 1

~REG F 02 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24

P.O. Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408.0420 L-90-250 10 CFR 2.201 JUfR 0 9 f990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket"Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Inspection Report 90-13 Res onse to Notice of Violation Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the response is attached.

Very truly yours,

~ Xjnwh~

J. H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division JHG/JWH/lg Attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Pesident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant 9007170il 5 70070 0 0003=

~

PDR ADOCK PDC 0

Sg ol an FPL Group cnrnpdtl~ ~li

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Inspection Report 90-13 Res onse to Notice of Violation VIOLATION:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, as implemented by approved FPL Topical guality Assurance Report TAHAR 1-76A, Rev. 15, T(R 5.0, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, and further implemented by TAHAR Appendix C commitment to ANSI N18-7, 1976, paragraph 5.2.7, Maintenance and Modifications, require that maintenance or modifications which may affect functioning of safety-related structures, systems, or components shall be performed in a manner to ensure quality at least equivalent to that specified in original design bases and requirements, materials specifications, and inspection requirements.

Contrary to the above, in the three examples cited below, the licensee failed to maintain the quality specified in the original design requirements or materials specifications.

Seismic drawing 8770-G-796, sheet 3, shows the seismic support for the Unit 1 maintenance hatch drawbridge inside containment to be a pair of 3 x 3 inch angle supports about 7 feet long and bolted to the drawbridge and adjacent deck. During a containment tour in preparation for Unit 1 startup, the raised drawbridge at the equipment hatch was not supported by the specified supports.

It was supported by a chainfall.

2. The maintenance organization removed the existing seismic mounting fasteners for the hydrogen sampling system containment isolation valves FSE-27-1 through 7 and, when unable to determine the existence of approved drawings, informally designed and installed significantly different mounting fasteners without design engineering involvement. The approved but unissued drawings when located supported the original fastener installation.
3. Carbon steel nuts were installed on the joint between the 1A ICW pump casing to pump stuffing box in lieu of 316 stainless steel nuts required by Ebasco Specification 53-47. In addition, a single rubber gasket was installed on the safety-related lubricating water flanged joint in lieu of an insulation kit required by drawing 8770-B-124, CW 53, Rev 1, Circ. Water System.

RESPONSE ITEM 1

1. Florida Power 5 Light concurs with the violation.
2. The most probable cause of the violation was an oversight during the implementation of General Maintenance Procedure M-0311, "Equipment Access, Hatch - Opening and Closing" and inadequate procedural instructions.

RESPONSE ITEM I Continued

3. The maintenance hatch drawbridge braces were immediately re-installed to the originally designed configuration prior to power operations.
4. To prevent recurrence, General Maintenance Procedure M-0311 will be revised to explicitly identify the drawbridge brace installation during equipment hatch closing.
5. Corrective Action (procedure revision) is expected. to be complete by August 10, 1990.

RESPONSE ITEM 2 Florida Power & Light concurs with the violation.

2. The cause of the violation was that the installation detail drawing did not adequately reflect a modified valve mounting configuration which came as a result of a plant change modification.
3. Plant Design Engineering was requested to review the configuration details further which identified the plant modification. Details

'of the modi fi ed val ve mounting conf i gurati on were provi ded and the supports were returned to design configuration.

4. To prevent recurrence, a Design Change Request is in preparation to provide the approved mounting configuration for the hydrogen sampling system containment isolation valves on the system installation detail drawing.
5. Corrective action is expected to be complete by August 10, 1990.

RESPONSE ITEM 3)

Florida Power & Light concurs with the violation.

2. The cause of the violation has been determined to be personnel error. In the case of the flange installation, maintenance personnel failed to verify the design configuration requirements.

In the case of the stuffing box nuts, documentation indicates the correct nuts were requested and issued to the maintenance personnel; however, the wrong>>nuts were installed.

3. The proper bolting material was obtained and installed on the joint between the 1A ICW pump casing to pump stuffing box, and the required insulation kit was installed at the flanged joint.

To prevent recurrence, maintenance personnel have been counseled and are aware of the importance of verifying the design configuration requirements and ensuring the required materials issued from stores are the materials used during installation.

5. Corrective action is complete at this time.