|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams | | {{Adams |
| | number = ML20199L020 | | | number = ML20215C363 |
| | issue date = 04/04/1986 | | | issue date = 11/26/1986 |
| | title = Response Team Activities Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13 on 851101-30.Violation Noted: Failure to Verify Performance to Procedure Requirements for Hilti Bolt Installation | | | title = Route Sheet for Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13 on 851101-30.Time Summary for Hours Applied to Assigned Topics from IE Manual Encl |
| | author name = Barnes I, Ellershaw L, Hale C, Johnson A, Smith W, Wagner P, Westerman T | | | author name = Westerman |
| | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | | | author affiliation = NRC |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
| | addressee affiliation = | | | addressee affiliation = |
Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | license number = | | | license number = |
| | contact person = | | | contact person = |
| | document report number = 50-445-85-16-01, 50-445-85-16-1, 50-446-85-13, NUDOCS 8604100278 | | | case reference number = FOIA-86-380, FOIA-86-A-177 |
| | package number = ML20199K948 | | | document report number = 50-445-85-16, 50-446-85-13, NUDOCS 8612150113 |
| | | package number = ML20215C281 |
| | document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | | | document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS |
| | page count = 34 | | | page count = 2 |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
Line 19: |
Line 20: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:* | | {{#Wiki_filter:____ _ - . - . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ |
| .
| | '. '' |
| APPENDIX D COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM ACTIVITIES INSPECTION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
| | o |
| | | ~ -- |
| ==REGION IV==
| | ~ 7 ECYt0R REPORT ROUTE SHEET abzQ Control No |
| ,
| | .~ h, 0 G 0 2//3'/ |
| NRC Inspection Report: 50-445/85-16 Permits: CPPR-126 50-446/85-13 CPPR-127 Dockets: 50-445 e Category: A2 50-446 Applicant: Texas Utilities Electric Company (TUEC)
| | N/M |
| Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street Lock Box 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES). Units 1 & 2 Inspection At: Glen Rose, Texas Inspection Conducted: November 1-30, 1985 Inspectors: e d Y / 76 L' E. Ellershaw, Reactor Inspector, Region IV Dalfe /
| |
| CPSES Group (paragraphs 1, 5, 6.g - 6.h, 6.k. 7.f - 7.t)
| |
| 3htf86 W. F. Smith, Resident Reactor Inspector (RRI) Date Region IV CPSES Group (paragraphs 1, 6.c - 6.f)
| |
| ck$t s +/Wh6 Date
| |
| [ C. J. Hale, Reactor Inspector, Region IV CPSES Group (paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.b, 6.1 - 6.j) | |
| _ | |
| &Oh$ ?
| |
| G
| |
| | |
| .
| |
| *
| |
| . | |
| | |
| 9 C.uk e P. C. Wagner, ReactTr Inspector, Region IV ahus6 Date CPSES Group d ,
| |
| (paragraphs 1, 6.a. 7.a - 7.e)
| |
| Sm B/&/P&
| |
| p A. R. Johnson, Reactor Inspector, Region IV Date CPSES Group Consultants: EG&G - R. Bonnenberg, J. Dale, L. Jones, A. Maughan, W. Richins, R. VanderBeek Parameter - J. Birmingham, D. Brown, J. Gibson, K. Graham, D. Jew Reviewed By: % w4//J%
| |
| I. Barnes, Group Leader, Region IV CPSES Date Group Approved: ' //hj/C T. F. Westerman, Chief, Region IV CPSES Group Date Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted: November 1-30, 1985 (Report 50-445/85-16; 50-446/85-13)
| |
| Areas Inspected: Nonroutine, unannounced inspection of applicant actions on previous inspection findings, Hilti bolt inspections, and Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) issue - specific action plans (ISAPs). The inspection involved 2008 inspector-hours onsite by 6 NRC inspectors and 11 consultants. A summary of NRR and IE audit / inspection activities is provided in paragraph 4 of this !
| |
| appendi i Results: Within the three areas inspected, four violations (unacceptable design basis for grouting Richmond inserts, paragraph 5; failure of QC inspectors to detect undersize welds, paragraph 6.k; failure to verify confomance to procedure requirements for Hilti bolt installation, paragraph 6.k; QC inspector acceptance of an HVAC duct system exhibiting damage and an unacceptable gasket gap, para-graph 7.k) and three deviations (failure to comply with approved instructions in '
| |
| performance of reinspections, paragraphs 7.a. 7.b 7.e. 7.1, 7.1, 7.n, and 7.q; inadequate quality instruction (QI) for liner measurements, paragraph 7.1; inadequate review of reinspection documentation, paragraph 7.n) were identifie .
| |
| ' | | ' |
| .
| |
|
| |
| DETAILS Persons Contacted
| |
| *S. R. Ali, TUGCo Staff Engineer, TUGCo Nuclear Engineering (TNE)
| |
| W. Bailey, ERC Supervisor, QA/QC Reinspection Engineering
| |
| *C. T. Brandt, TUGCo Quality Engineering Supervisor
| |
| *D. W. Braswell, TUGCo Engineering Superintendent, Plant Operations C. I. Browne, Project Manager, R. L. Cloud & Associates, In (RLCA)
| |
| R. Brown, ERC Lead Civil / Structural Engineer
| |
| *R. E. Camp, Assistant Project General Manager, Ur.it 1 (Impell Corp.)
| |
|
| |
| J. Cardoza, TUGCo System Engineer J. D. Christensen, ERC Deputy QA/QC Review Team Leader
| |
| *D. E. Deviney, TUGCo Operations QA Supervisor J. Finneran, TUGCo Lead Pipe Support Engineer
| |
| *S. M. Franks, Special Projects and Technical Support Lead (Impell Corp.)
| |
|
| |
| E. L. Gastenel, TUGCo System Test Engineer
| |
| *P. Halstead, TUGCo Site QC Manager
| |
| *J. L. Hansel, ERC QA/QC Review Team Leader J. Honekamp, TERA TRT Issues Manager
| |
| *C. R. Hooten, TUGCo Project Supervisor, THE Civil
| |
| *R. A Jones, TUGCo Manager, Plant Operations D. M. McAfee, TUGCo QA Manager G. M. McGrath, TUGCo Licensing / Compliance Supervisor
| |
| *J. T. Merritt, TUGCo Assistant Project General Manager, Unit 2
| |
| *C. K. Moehlman, TUGCo Project Mechanical Engineer
| |
| *A. A. Patterson, ERC Reinspection Engineering Supervisor
| |
| *F. L. Powers, TUGCo Unit 1 Building Manager C. M. Puffer, TUGCo System Test Engineer
| |
| *G. R. Purdy, Brown & Root (B&R) QA Manager J. G. Red, TUGCo Technical Support Supervisor
| |
| *R. B. Seidel, TUGCo Operations Superintendent
| |
| *J. C. Smith, TUGCo Operations QA C. Spinks, ERC Inspection Supervisor
| |
| *J. Streeter, TUGCo Executive Assistant to Executive Vice President P. Streeter, TERA Senior Mechanical Engineer P. Turi, TEPA Issue Coordinator
| |
| * I. Vogelsang, TUGCo Coordinator, Electrical and Instrumentation and Controls
| |
| *C. H. Welch, TUGCo QC Services Supervisor
| |
| *D. W. Westbrook, TUGCo Project Control Supervisor, Pipe Support Engineering M. J. Wise, CPRT Testing Review Team Leader
| |
| * Denotes those persons who attended the exit intervie The NRC inspectors also contacted other CPRT and applicant employees during this inspection perio .
| |
| *
| |
| .
| |
|
| |
| 2. Applicant Actions on Previous Inspections Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (445/8514-U-19): Certification to QI-QP-11.8-7 could not be located for a TUGCo inspector who performed original inspec-tion with respect to instrumentation installation Verification Package No. R-E-ININ-060. Additional documentation was located by the applicant i
| |
| ' | | ' |
| during this report period which resolved the question concerning the TUGCo inspector's certification to QI-QP-11.8- . CPRT Program The applicant's responses to the detailed NRC staff coments on the CPRT Program Plan, Revision 2, were forwarded to NRR by TUGCo letter of November 22, 1985. This submittal included a preliminary copy of the umbrella QA program; i.e., CPRT Third-Party Quality Assurance Progra . NRR and IE Audit / Inspection Activities NRR: A site inspection was performed on November 5 and 20, 1985, of the Stone and Webster (SWEC) walkdown. An audit was performed at Ebasco, New York, on November 8, 1985, to review specifications and design documents related to cable tray / conduit supports. A site audit was performed on November 11, 1985, of the construction adequacy program as it relates to the SWEC piping and pipe support effort. A CCL test of conduit supports and components was observed at Charlotte, North Carolina, on November 13, 1985. A site inspection was performed with Region IV participation during November 18-22, 1985, of as-built drawings for Unit 1 cable tray supports. An audit of homogeneity of design activities was performed at TERA, Bethesda, Maryland, on November 4-6 and 12-13, 1985. An audit was performed on November 25, 1985, at SWEC, New York, with respect to nonseismic piping effects on seismic design pipin IE: Inspection activity which was performed, in part, in November 1985 Es previously documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-445/85-14; 50-446/85-1 Copies of reports for these activities will be placed in the Public Document Room upon completion. The results of the Unit 1 cable tray support inspection performed by NRR and Region IV will be documented in a Region IV inspection repor . Hilti Bolt Inspection An independent measurement inspection was performed by NRC Region I personnel during September 9-19, 1985, which was documented by Appendix F of NRC Inspection Report 50-445/85-13; 50-446/85-09. This inspection included examination of 124 installed Hilti anchor bolts with respect to
| | < |
| | LICENSEE / VEND 0R: |
| | , |
| | ' ODCEET 50. : Y[MI~ REPORTNd.:[6/4//f_. |
|
| |
|
| '
| | INSPECT 0k: >> M g ) |
| .
| |
| | |
| embedment depth, bolt spacing and length, and diameter of individual bolt One bolt was identified by ultrasonic examination (UT) during this inspec-tion as appearing to be underlength. Separate subsequent reexaminations by applicant and Region IV personnel confirmed that the questioned bolt was, in fact, of the correct length. Applicant personnel noted, however, during their verification activity that six other Hilti bolts used in the support installation were identified by their marking (i.e., star stamp) as being a Super-Hilti type, although the drawing required use of only a regular Hilti type. UT by applicant personnel of these bolts identified that the bolts were misidentified, in that they were established to actually be regular Hilti bolt As a result, nonconformance report (NCR) M-18708 was initiated on September 26, 1985, in order to properly document and correct this
| |
| , condition. Concurrently, corrective action report (CAR) 058 was initiated
| |
| ' | | ' |
| in order to: (a) identify Super-Hilti design required installation loca-tions which were installed prior to March 1982, and (b) to perform UT on a randomly selected sample of 60 supports. March 1982 was the date on which application of the star stamp, designating Super-Hilti type bolts, became a QC controlled operation. The CAR further stated that any identi-fied deviations from design would be cause for expansion of the sample to 100% of all Super-Hilti installations made prior to March 198 Because of the potential for installation of misidentified regular Hilti bolts rather than the design required Super-Hilti bolts, NRC Region IV initiated an independent inspection. A total of 64 ASME component supports, which were located inside containment and containing 247 anchor-bolts, were selected for UT. Of the 247 anchor bolts examined, 246 were identified with the star-stamp marking. All of these were verified to be of the Super-Hilti typ UT of the one unmarked anchor bolt revealed that this bolt was not a Hilt The original construction / installation documentation package was reviewed in order to assess the condition. The package did not reflect usage of anything other than the required Hilti bolt. Discussions with applicant personnel resulted in their review and subsequent identification of Component Modification Cards (CMCs) which had been misfiled. The CMCs revealed that a Richmond insert had been substituted for a Super-Hilti bolt. Further investigation revealed that Design Change Authorization (DCA) 10633 dated July 20, 1981, had been issued which allowed the use of a shorter Super-Hilti than what was originally called for; i.e.,11 inche This apparently was the result of an interferenc The 11-inch Super-Hilti was installed between July 20, 1981, and August 24, 1981. Subsequently, DCA 13349 dated May 17, 1982, was issued allowing the replacement of i.he Super-Hilti with a Richmond insert. An associated Concrete Chipping Request (CCR) dated May 24, 1982, indicated that the Super-Hilti had pulled out. Required calculations to support the modifica-tion were performed on June 19, 1982. The CCR provides the following instruction: " Chip out concrete 5 inches dia. x 8 inches deep for 1 inch Richmond insert." A handwritten note on the CCR states, " Complete 5-26-82."
| | O22/1-1NSPECTION DATE(5) ,,, g PRIORITY |
| | | // |
| An inspection report (IR) No. IRC-7542 dated February 10, 1983, attests that all grouting pre-placemeat, placement, and inspection attributes were satisfactor *
| | Branch Chief I REPORT DE DATE I |
| | | INITIAL /DATE- |
| 6 During the NRC inspector's review of the above documentation, it was noted that DCA 13349 failed to provide instructions or procedures for the accomp-lishment of the modification activit It was further noted that the
| | ~ HANDWRITTEN ORAFT COMPLETED 4 M g 2/g' - DATE REPORT MAILED: , |
| *
| | * ' |
| calculations failed to consider the shear capacity of the grout-concrete interfac These conditions constitute a violation of Criterion III of Appendix B to
| | delete / archives REVIEW SY SECTION CHIEF . |
| , 10 CFR Part 50 (445/8516-V-08). s 6. CPRT ISAPs (Excluding ISAP No. VII.c) Inspection Reports on Butt Splices (ISAP No. I.a.2) and Butt Splice Qualification (ISAP No. I.a.3) | | DUE DATE AFTER 10 DAYS: |
| Status of CPRT Activity Phase II actions for ISAP No. I.a.2 have been completed and Phase III reinspections are in progress. The splices involved in the reinspec-tions are environmental butt splices, and uninsulated splices covered with heat shrink tubing. The applicant has completed the reinspection of 38 of the 76 cables listed in NCR E-85-1006305, Revision Status of NRC Inspection Activity The review of CPRT ISAP Nos. I.a.2 and I.a.3 has been completed and the review of the Phase III program is in progres A review of the results of 10 cable reinspections, Work Orders C850003404 and 3441, showed that the following NCRs were generated:
| | ; RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector) RESPONSE DUE - 30 DAYS: |
| NCR N Item (s) Identified E85-101532 One conductor was twisted and the cable bend radius was violate E85-101533 Butt splice " shims" were not installed as had been indicated on a previous I E85-101534 The flexible conduit had a cut in the outer jacke E85-101535, Revision 1 Two torminal blocks were broke E85-101536, Revision 1 Butt splice " shims" were not installed as had been previously indicated in an IR and the heat shrink tubing was not installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction E85-1016575 The heat shrink tubing was not installed per the manufacturer's instruction E85-101762 Seven terminal blocks were cracked or broke ..
| | REWORK C0tPLETE . |
| | | CLOSE0UT DATE: |
| ( _ - -
| | DRAFT REC'D - DMU TYPING TIME WORKING DA) |
| *
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| NRC inspectors witnessed reinspections of cables E0119863A, E0119865A, E0100821Z, E0100822Z, and EG100861 During inspections of cables E0119863A and E0119865A, it was noted that the length of the conduits between the end device and the associated junction box was longer than allowed by Drawing 2323-EI-1701, Revision 11. This is an unresolved item pending completion of review of the applicability of the drawing detail to the installation (445/8516-U-09).
| |
| | |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie b. QC Inspector Qualifications (ISAP No. I.d.1)
| |
| Status of CPRT Activity The Special Evaluation Team (SET) is evaluating information received in TUGCo memorandum TUQ 3426. This memorandum was a response to the SET evaluation of historical electrical and all current non-ASME inspectors' qualification If this additional information is determined to not establish the qualifications for the inspectors, a letter detailing the specific area of inadequacy is sent to the QC manager requesting additional response. Discrepancies not resolved advance the inspector to Phase III of ISAP No I.d.1 for reinspectio Reinspection activity for the seventh inspector placed into Phase III of ISAP No. I.d.1 has been completed and the results report is in preparation. Reinspection activity for an A5ME-related inspector identified for Phase III has not begun and is awaiting inspection packages from B& Status of NRC Inspection Activity The NRC inspector reinspected 33 conductor terminations as part of a continuing check on the adequacy of ERC reinspection effort conducted for Phase III of ISAP No. I.d.1. The NRC reinspection results were in agreement with those obtained by ERC. The SET transmittal and TUGCo response pertaining to qualification status of non-ASME inspectors has been reviewed. Further SET evaluations will be monitored as they are mad No NRC violations or deviations were identifie c. Hot Functional Testing Data Packages (ISAP No. III.a.1)
| |
| In order to maintain a correlation between areas inspected and the applicable sections of the ISAP, this inspection report will address each area using the ISAP paragraph number assigned by the applican During the inspection period of August 1-31, 1985 (see Appendix E of InspectionReport'50-445/85-11), paragraphs 4 1.1 thru 4.1.6 were followup inspected, and paragraph 4.1.7 was started but not complete During the inspection period of September 1-30, 1985 (see Appendix E of NRC Inspection Report 50-445/85-13), paragraphs 4.1.7 and 4. '
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| were comple ing this inspection period, the remaining paragraphs i No. III.a.1 were followup inspected as indicated below:
| |
| 4. In accordance with the sampling plan guidelines established by the applicant for the remaining 139 completed preopera-tional test data packages, the applicant committed to sample 60 items comprising test deficiency reports (TDRs), test procedure deviations (TPDs), and FSAR commitments to demonstrate the capability of systems to function as designed. These items were reevaluated utilizing the attributes in Attachment 1 of ISAP No. III.a.1. A followup inspection was conducted by the NRC inspector to ensure both that the results of reevaluations were consistent with the guidelines delineated in Attachment 1, and that the dispositions were consistent with regulatory requirement The NRC inspector sampled 20% of the list of items identi-fied by the applicant. This sampling consisted of seven TPDs, three Tuus, and two FSAR commitment No NRC violations or deviations were identifie .1.10 The applicant committed to incorporate the guidelines of ISAP No. III.a.1, Attachment 1, into the applicable startup administrative procedures to assure that the concerns expressed by the NRC Technical Review Team (TRT) would be addressed in a consistent manner during future test results review The NRC inspector reviewed the Startup Administra-tion Procedures Manual and verified that the above guidelines were incorporated into Revision 6 of CP-SAP-11, " Review, Approval and Retention of Test Results," dated July 8, 198 In addition, the applicant incorporated an improved method of Joint Test Group (JTG) reviews. The procedure now requires all JTG members to document their review comments and submit them to TUGC0 Startup for resolution. The resolutions are then to be documented and redistributed to all of the JTG members, so that each has an opportunity to evaluate the resolution to all comments before approving the data package. The NRC inspector questioned whether or not the comments and resolutions would become a permanent part of the JTG-approved data packages. The response was that the intent of Section 4.2.1.5 of CP-SAP-11, which describes supporting documentation requirements for data packages, is to include the JTG comments and resolution .1.11 The applicant committed to determine the root cause(s) and evaluate the potential for generic implications related to the issues and findings in ISAP No. III. When asked by the NRC inspector to produce evidence that this had been done, the applicant indicated that the final results report would contain the information, but it had not been completed yet. As such, this shall be tracked as an open item (50-445/8516-0-10).
| |
| | |
| ,-
| |
| .
| |
| ' | |
| | |
| Followup inspection of ISAP No. III.a.1 is completed pending closure of the above open item and those items identified in Appendix E of NRC Inspection Reports 50-445/85-11;50-446/85-06 and 50-445/85-13; 50-446/85-09; i.e., unresolved item 445/8511-U-02 and open items 445/8511-0-02, 445/8511-0-03, 445/8513-0-07, and 445/8513-0-0 No NRC violations or deviations were identifie JTG Approval of Test Data (ISAP No. III.a.2)
| |
| During the 1984 TRT inspection of testing programs, the NRC inspector noted that if a preoperational test is deferred into the Initial Startup (ISU) program, which commences after_ initial fueling, the completed results data would be reviewed by the Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) in lieu of the JTG. The version of the FSAR in effect at the time of the inspection did not provide for this shift in review responsibility; i.e., the FSAR stated that the JTG is responsible for reviewing preoperational test data. Deferring,this testing to another time frame, or incorporating the deferred preoperational tests in ISU procedures, did not in itself relieve the JTG of this responsibilit The action required by Supplement to Safety Evaluation Report (SSER)
| |
| No. 7 and accordingly the commitment in.ISAP No. III.a.2 was to revise the FSAR. During the followup inspection, the NRC inspector verified that the FSAR had been revised (see Amendment 54,'Section 14.2) t clarify the division of responsibility between the JTG and the SOR The FSAR now supports station procedures which prescribe the method of deferral of preoperational tests from the preoperational test program, which is the responsibility of the JTG, to the ISU program, which is the responsibility of the SORC, a similarly qualified group. _ This issue is close ~
| |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identified, Technical Specifications for Deferred Tests (ISAP No. III.a.3)
| |
| During the TRT inspection of test programs in the preoperational test area, the NRC Operations resident inspectors expressed concern that the orderly progress of ISU testing may be hampered by Technical Specification (TS) limiting conditions for operation, due to the nature and extent of the preoperational tests which had been deferred.-
| |
| In order to achieve the plant conditions (i.e., hot plant at normal pressure and temperature) to conduct the deferred preoperational
| |
| ' tests, the TS requires some of the systems being tested to be operable.:
| |
| However, operability cannot be verified until preoperational' testing is completed. Since then, the applicant conducted another hot' testing
| |
| | |
| ' | |
| .
| |
| | |
| , | | , |
| sequence in November and December 1984, at which time most of the deferred tests were completed. In a letter dated January 24, 1985, the NRC closed this issue and thus the concern did not appear in SSER No. ~
| | ORAFT TYPING COMPLETE - |
| There is no followup inspection required. This item is close f. Preoperational Testing (ISAP No. III.d)
| | ORAFT RE8EW SY SEC'Y/ INSPECTOR gy p . |
| ' | | C y, |
| During the TRT inspection of the preoperational testing program, conclusions were reached indicating that none of the related allega-tions and findings had either safety significance or generic implica-tions, except that past document control system problems may have affected the testing program. Details of these conclusions and findings are in SSER No. 7. The primary concern was that past preoperational testing may not have been conducted using fully updated procedures because of the difficulties system test engineers (STEs)
| | ' |
| had in obtaining design document update In response to the TRT's concerns over possible past document control impacts on testing, the applicant committed to actions that establish measures to provide greater assurance that current design data was utilized in testing, and to determine whether or not past document control system problems did not adversely affect the testing progra In the ISAP, this is broken down into three action categories:
| | ORAFT REVIEW BY SECTION CHIEF W p rFwl g 9,g DRAFT REVIEW BY BRANCH CHIEF 7, m .:2/.:2/ . |
| 4. Assessments, administrative procedural changes, and training to ensure an adequate program is in place to maintain test procedures curren . Detailed record reviews to determine the effect of Document Control Center (DCC) problems on the testing progra . Determinationofrootcause(s)andevaluationofthe potential for generic implication The NRC followup inspection of actions taken in accordance with this ISAP commenced with 4.1.1 during this inspection period and will continue during subsequent periods. For the sake of clarity and tracking, the ISAP No. II paragraph numbers are indicated belo .1. The applicant comitted to revise CP-SAP-21, " Conduct of Testing," to include instructions for STEs to review test procedures approximately two weeks prior to the scheduled test date to help facilitate timely updates and thus eliminate last-minute complex reviews. The NRC inspector verified Section 4.9.3 of CP-SAP-21 (Revision 3) as having this requirement as of January 11, 198 .
| | M" " |
| | RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector) |
| | REWORK C0W LETE M M[c . it . |
| | W .r.4 , g c, l |
| | FINAL REC'D - DNU - |
| | 7/y' /// n w Jl2,c - n z u Ag FINALTYPINGCblPLETE h'A 7/19/& |
| | - |
| | FINAL REVIEW BR. SEC'Y/DIV. SEC'Y ,, |
| | FINAL REVIEW 8Y INSPECTOR [g g FINAL REVIEW SY SECTION OtIEF ) , /2.p/pf RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS - DMU 3/2,gjg M CORRECTIONS COMPLETE - OltJ CORRECTION REVIEW - INSP/ SECT. CH. |
|
| |
|
| 4.1. The applicant committed to instruct STEs on the new requirements of CP-SAP-21. This was verified to be complete by the NRC followup inspector by review of documented evidence that the training had been completed by January 14, 198 Sections 4.1.1.3 and 4.1.1.4 of ISAP No. III.d involve a review of the CPSES document control program and interviews of STEs to help assess the adequacy of existing procedures and method When the NRC followup inspector attempted to review related documentation, there were only a few rough, hand written notes showing evidence of STE interviews, but no results or actions
| | - |
| , from the review and interviews were available. The applicant
| | FINAL REVIEW SY BRANCH CHIEF DIVISION DIRECTOR REVIEW ENFORCE!1ENT REVIEW |
| '
| | . |
| explained that the final results report would address this, therefore this part of the followup will be conducted late For tracking purposes, this is an open item (445/8516-0-11).
| | * |
| | * . . |
| | 0612150113 861210 , , , |
| | * * |
| | A.ty7 PDR . |
| | DE |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie g. Plug Welds (ISAP No. V.d)
| | ' |
| Status of CPRT Activity Reinspection of the new random sample of 57 ASME Code, Section III supports by ERC has been completed. No unauthorized plug welds were
| | . _ . . _ |
| .
| |
| identified. This new random sample was required as a result of the f
| |
| NRC identifying that the original sample of supports included unauthorized non-ASME Code, Section III support Status of NRC Inspection Activity
| |
| '
| |
| (1) The NRC inspector has witnessed a total of 13 ERC reinspections from the new random sample, of which the following 5 were performed during this report period:
| |
| Component Support N Unit N SF-X-002-021-F43S Common SI-2-105-404-052K 2
| |
| ;
| |
| CC-2-204-421-C53R 2 CC-1-065-007-533R 1 MS-2-RB-004-2 2
| |
|
| |
|
| During the above reinspections, ERC did not identify any conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations. The NRC inspector also witnessed the macroetching of four component support base plates which exhibited indications that suggested the possible existence of plug welds. Two of these base plates were identified during the October inspection period. The macroetching confirmed that plug welds did not exis No NRC violations or deviations were identifie i
| | . ! <;;,* : |
| '
| | _ |
| | -. |
| | .; |
| . | | . |
| | . . |
| | -FILE.HAME8 REPORT.7 HOUEMBER 26,'1985 TIME SUMMARY. 11/11/65 THRQUCH 11/36/85 Hours ' applied to : assigned topics f rom |
| | : Manuel Inspection'and Enforcement Procedure 37055: paragraph 024b 10CFR50.55e 4' hours Procedure 92703 I.E. Bulletin, Ceneric Letter Followup Confirmatory Action ' Letter, - and |
| | * |
| | 92 hours Procedure 92701 Unresolved I t erns - |
| | 2 hours |
| | _ |
|
| |
|
| (2) A total of four independent inspections has been conducted by the NRC inspector, of which the following three occurred during this report period:
| | I e |
| Component Support N Unit N CS-2-AB-067-013-3 2 CC-2-050-700-A43K 2 CS-2-564-701-A33R 2 No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (3) Documentation packages for the 13 reinspected and 4 independently inspected supports were reviewed. No discrepancies or missing documents were identifie No NRC violations or deviations were identified, b. Installation of Main Steam Pipes (ISAP No. V.e)
| | O J |
| Status of CPRT Activity The status of CPRT activity has not changed from the last reporting period. The results report is being reviewed by CPR Status of NRC Inspection Activity The preservice inspection documentation; i.e., UT and magnetic particle examination reports are currently being reviewed. In addition, the results of the four UTs performed on the highest stressed areas of loops 1 and 4 will be reviewe No NRC violations or deviations were identifie i. Nonconformance and Corrective Action Systems (ISAP No. VII.a.2)
| | + |
| Status of CPRT Activity A review of current and historical procedures that controlled the processing and documenting of deficiencies has been completed. This review was made to determine if programmatic deficiencies existed in these procedures. Sub populations of nonconformances have been selected from the various systems used to document deficiencie These sub populations were based on-type of documentation, method of processing, and time of occurrence in plant constructio Addition-ally, ASME and non-ASME related deficiencies were divide Random samples have been generated for each sub populatio Review of the documentation is complete for approximately 360 NCR Review of the remaining sub populations is ongoing. If programmatic deficiencies are found, root cause and generic implication will be determine s
| |
| .
| |
|
| |
|
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity Checklists used by ERC to evaluate nonconformances were reviewed by the NRC inspector. It was noted that no evaluation of the dispositions for adequacy was made on the checklists. This omission may be resolved by an ERC proposed review of dispositions for technical adequac This is an open item (445/8516-0-12, 446/8513-0-08).
| | Q''f(, |
| | , |
| | . -- - ._ __ _ _ _ - _ __- - _ _ |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie j. Audit Program and Auditor Qualifications (ISAP No. VII.a.4)
| | ... |
| Status of CPRT Activity The draft of the results report for this ISAP has been written and is undergoing review and revisio Status of NRC Inspection Activity The NRC inspector reviewed background data for verification during a future NRC audit of the corporate audit file No NRC violations or deviations were identifie '
| | * |
| k. Pipe Support Inspections (ISAP No. VII,b.3)
| | , % a |
| Status of CPRT Activity The reinspections being performed under ISAP No. VII.b.3 deal with pipe supports located in Room 77N and the 42 pipe supports previously inspected by the TRT. All other pipe support populations and their samples are being reinspected under ISAP No. VII.c, " Construction Reinspection / Documentation Review Plan."
| | .. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAinUTY PROJECT 1555 Connecocut Avenue, N.W., Suite 202 6k j//$ y /(, |
| | t |
| | ' |
| | Washington, D.C. 20036 (202)232-8550 May 16, 1986 N OF WFW MA7Dt Director Mq Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f ~[ b ~ d [O Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: |
| | b /o/ffggg FOIA Request To whom it may concern: |
| | Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. |
|
| |
|
| (1) Room 77N Pipe Supports Reinspection of the 178 pipe supports in Room 77N, identified as being nonconforming by TRT, has been completed. Of the 238 devi-ations identified, 234 have been evaluated with 229 determined to be vali (2) TRT Issues - 42 Pipe Supports Of the 42 pipe supports identified by TRT as being nonconforming, 17 have been reinspected by ERC. Physical reinspections _ are being accomplished using QI-058, Revision 0. Twenty-six deviations have been issued with 22 processed as being vali _ | | 552, as amended, the Government Accountability Project (GAP) |
| '
| | requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, computer runoffs, any other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated in connection with Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plan. |
| .
| |
|
| |
|
| .
| | This request includes all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211, Parts 1.A.2 and A.3 (approved October 8, 1980), whether they currently exist in the NRC official, " working", investigative, or other files, or at any other location, including private residences. |
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) Room 77N Pipe Supports (a) The NRC inspector has reviewed QI-037, Revision 0. To date, seven reinspections have been witnessed. The following seven independent inspections were performed by the NRC inspector during this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Support N Unit N I-S-PS7N-190 SI-1-039-044-S42R 1 I-S-PS7N-031 CC-1-131-010-S43R 1 I-S-PS7N-038 CC-1-155-011-S43R 1 I-S-PS7N-039 CC-1-155-012-543R 1 I-S-PS7N-095 CS-1-158-033-542R 1-I-S-PS7N-129 PS-1-SB-006-004-2 1 I-S-PS7N-143 SI-1-SB-043-008-2 1 (b) During the above independent inspections, the NRC inspector identified the following conditions:
| |
| I-S-PS7N-031: The welds joining a wide flange (item 8) to a plate (item 9) consisted of a fillet weld on both sides of the wide flange of approximately 22 inches in lengt Approximately 20 inches of the welds were undersize by a minimum of 1/16 inch with respect to the 1/4-inch _ fillet required by Drawing CC-1-131-010-543R, Revision 4, and a consecutive 2-inch segment was 1/8-inch undersize. The vertical welds on the outside of the wide flange joining two plates (items 9 and 10) were also undersize by a minimum of 1/16 inch for more than 25% of the weld lengt Paragraphs 5.1.2 and 5.3 of B&R Procedure CP-NDEP-200 require-plate and piping welds to be inspected'for siz Review of the applicable operation traveler, CC-1-131.010-S43R, and associated weld data cards showed that the welds had been previously inspected and accepted. As a result of this condition being identified, B&R-initiated NCR XI-70 The failure to identify undersize welds is'a violation (445/8516-V-13).
| |
|
| |
|
| I-S-PS7N-190: The NRC inspector measured a center-to-center spacing of 10 1/2 inches.between a 1 1/4-inch Hilti bolt and a 1-inch Hilti bolt on adjacent fixtures of support SI-1-039-044-542R. It was ascertained that this installation had been inspected and accepted on December 21, 198 'However, review of Attachment l'in Revision 7 of B&R-Procedure CEI-20 revealed that a minimum center-to-center-spacing of 11 1/4 inches is required between 1 1/4-inch and i 1-inch Hilti bolts. This procedure further stated that this
| | l |
| '
| |
| ~m inimum spacing applies to Hilti bolts detailed on separate
| |
| ! | | ! |
| -_ _ - - - _ - . . - . --. . .,. . - - . . . . . _ _-
| | If any records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, supra, and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed, or are destroyed and/or removed after receipt of this reque.;t, please provide all surrounding records, including but not Alaited to a list of all records which have been or are I destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implen.ent the action (s). |
| | |
| ._
| |
| '
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| .
| |
| adjacent fixtures and that violation of_ minimum spacing must be approved by issuance of design change documents by the applicable Comanche Peak Project Engineering design group There was no evidence of any design change documents approving this minimum spacing violation.
| |
| | |
| , | |
| This failure to verify conformance to procedure requirements is a violation (445/8516-V-14).
| |
| | |
| <
| |
| '
| |
| (2) TRT Issues - 42 Pipe Supports (a) The NRC inspector reviewed QI-058, Revision 0, and QI-061, Revision 0. To date, three reinspections have been witnessed with the following two performed during this inspection period:
| |
| Verification Package N Support N Unit N I-S-PS42-25 CT-1-013-011-S22R 1 I-S-PS42-41 RH-1-020-003-522K 1 (b) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| |
| I-S-PS42-25: (i) No lock nuts were present on clamp balts, and (ii) location of bolt hole in relation to base plate edge was incorrec I-S-PS42-41: (i) Paint was observed on a spherical hearing, and (ii) material was incorrectly identified.
| |
| | |
| , Dispositions of the above findings are open items (445/8516-0-15 and 445/8516-0-16).
| |
| | |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (c) The following five independent inspections were performed by the NRC inspector during this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Equipment N Unit N I-S-PS42-06 AF-1-035-029-S33A 1 I-S-PS42-024 CT-1-013-010-522K l'
| |
| I-S-PS42-034 RC-1-052-016-C41K 1 I-S-PS42-033 RC-1-035-700-C41R 1 I-S-PS42-08 AF-1-059-003-S33R 1 (d) During the above independent inspections, the NRC inspecto identified the following conditions:
| |
| _
| |
|
| |
|
| _ _
| | GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the irformation can be considered as primarily benefitting the gene-ral public." 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (4) (A). GAP is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through its citizens Clinic, GAP offers assistance to local public interest and citizens groups seeking to ensurn the health and safety of their communities. |
| .
| |
|
| |
|
| 16
| | 04'l;T 'b.- f |
| ; I-S-PS42-06: The NRC inspector observed that three 1 1/4-inch Hilti kwik bolts (from a total of eight), that were used to attach two base plates of support AF-1-035-029-S33A to the wall, had been installed through an embed plate. It was noted that this ir.stallation was inspected and accepted on IR No. 15042 dated March 30, 198 B&R construction Procedure CEI-20, applicable to this installation, was reviewed. Attachment 3 of CEI-20 allows Hilti bolts to be placed as close as practical to the edge of an embedded plate, without damaging the plate, as long as there are no attachments to the plate within a minimum of 12 inches on both sides of the proposed Hilti bolt locatio Subsequent to this report period, applicant personnel showed the NRC inspector that insertion of Hilti kwik bolts through the embed plate had been authorized by DC The adequacy of the engineering basis for the DCA is considered an unresolved item pending NRC review (445/8516-U-55).
| | - . . .. . -_ - |
| | - --. -- |
|
| |
|
| 7. ISAP No. VI Electrical Cable
| | , . . - - . - |
| > Status of_ CPRT Activity ERC has completed 87 reinspections and 88 documentation reviews of sampled electrical cable as of November 25, 198 Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) NRC inspectors have, as of November 25, 1985, witnessed 21 ERC reinspections and performed independent reviews of 10 documenta- ;
| |
| tion packages. The following three independent reinspections of sampled electrical cable were performed in this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Cable N Unit N I-E-CABL-014 ER140509Z 1 I-E-CABL-063 E9123380 1 I-E-CABL-102 EG139517 1 (2) During the above independent reinspections, the following condition was identified: -
| |
| I-E-CABL-102: Reinspection revealed that ERC inspectors did not identify the disagreement of the physical routing with the cable and raceway schedule, as required by Section 5.6 of QI-014, Revision 0, dated July 18, 1985. The cable physically routes into tray T13GCCP80 and then tray T13GCCP81. The cable schedule routes this cable into T13GCCP81 and then T13GCCP80. This is an NRCdeviation(445/8516-D-17).
| |
| | |
| . _ | |
| | |
| -
| |
| * | | * |
| . | | ..- . i |
| | | . i |
| ..
| | .. g.gw , |
| i b. Cable Trays j Status of CPRT Activity ERC has completed 89 reinspections and 83 documentation reviews of sampled cable trays as of November 25, 198 Status of NRC Inspection Activity i (1) NRC inspectors have,'as of November 25,19C, witnessed 11 ERC reinspections, performed independent reviews of 7 documentation packages, and performed 6 independent ieinspections of sampled cable trays. The following independent reinspection was
| | .. |
| ,
| | . |
| performed in this report period:
| | -FOIA Request |
| Verification Package N Cable Tray N Unit N I-E-CATY-077 T14BREC28 1 (2) During the above independent reinspection, the NRC inspector identified that F.RC inspectors did not identify a missing bolt and locking device on the splice plate joining tray section ,
| | - |
| T14BREC28 to T14BREC27 as required by Section 5.3.6 of QI-016,
| | -.May 16,' 1986 |
| '
| | - |
| Revision 1. This is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-18).
| | Page Two-GAP is-requesting the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protecta public safety and health at nuclear power plants. |
| | |
| c. Electrical Conduit Status of CPRT Activity ERC has completed 80 reinspections and 80 documentation reviews of sampled electrical conduit as of November 25, 198 Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) NRC inspectors have, as of November 25, 1985, witnessed 14 ERC
| |
| :
| |
| '
| |
| reinspections, performed independent reviews of 15 documentation packages and performed 5 independent reinspections of sampled electrical condui (2) The following two independent reinspections of sampled electrical conduit were performed in this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Conduit N Unit N I-E-CDUT-036 C12909546 1 I-E-CDUT-048 C16WO9519 1
| |
| ' | |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie ,
| |
| | |
| - . . ,
| |
| . .. -. . -
| |
| '
| |
| *
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| 4 (3) The following documentation review was performed for an electrical separation inspection in this report perfod: ,
| |
| Conduit N Room N Un_it N C12G03270 100 1 During the above review, it was identified that the electrical inspector who signed the " Electrical Separation Punchlist" and
| |
| " Electrical Separation Deficiency Report," which were attached to IR E-1-0013528, had been certified for "All QI-QP11.3" as a *
| |
| level II inspector, despite having failed the written examination for QI-QP-11.3-29. This condition was ascertained to have been previously identified by the TUGC0 Audit Group (TAG) cnd is being evaluated by SET. Thi's is an open item pending review of the SET 9 evaluationandaction(445/8516-0-19).
| |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie ,
| | 'For any documents or portions of documents that you deny due-to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide'an index itemizing |
| d. Electrical Equipmegt Installation l Status of CPRT Activity ;
| |
| ERC has completed 59 reinspections and 20 documentation review packages of sampled electrical equipment installations as of November 25, 198 ,
| |
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) NRC inspectors have, as of November 25, 1985, witnessed 11 ERC reinspections, perforned independent reviews of 10 documentation packages and performed 3 independent reinspections of sampled electrical equipment ir.stallation ,
| |
| .
| |
| I (2) The following ERC reinspection of sampled electrical equipment installation was witnessed during this report period:
| |
| ,
| |
| Verification Package N Equipment N '
| |
| Unit _N I-E-EEIN-062 1E35 1 During the above reinspection, ERC identified the following i condition as subject to evaluation as a potential deviation:
| |
| Nuts on the studs for the penetration were not engaged flush with !
| |
| top of stud thread ,
| |
| Disposition of the above finding is an open item (445/8516-0-20). ;
| |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie .
| |
| I
| |
| , | | , |
| . .
| | and. describing the documents or portions of documents withheld. |
|
| |
|
| . . . . - . . .
| | The index should provide a detailed justification _of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is - |
| '
| | relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld. |
| .< l
| |
| | |
| 1
| |
| | |
| ;
| |
| (3) The following independent 'teinspections of electrical equipment installations were parformed during this rep 6rt period:
| |
| Verification, Package N Equipment N Unit N I-E-EEIN+050 CPX-ELDPEC-06 1 I-E-EEIN-055 CPI-ELOPEC-10 1
| |
| -
| |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identified.
| |
|
| |
|
| '. (4) Independent documentati4n reviews were performed of nine verification packages during this . report perio The results of these reviews are open items per. ding comparison with ERC findings ;
| | This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen E 484 F. 2d 820' |
| when they become available (445/8516-0-11 through 445/8516-0-29),
| |
| e. Instrumentation Equipment _ Installation Status of CPRT Activity ERC has completed 80 reinspections and 97 documentation reviews of !
| |
| sampled instrumentation equipment installations as of November :25,198 Status of NRC Insnection Activity
| |
| . | | . |
| (1) NRC fr.spectors nave, as of November 25, 1985, witnessed eight ERC reinspections, performed independent reviews of five documentation packages and performed six ir, dependent reinspections of sampled instrumentation equipment installations.
| | (D.C. Cir. 1973) , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974). |
| :
| |
| (2) Of the six Independent NRC inspections performed, to date, the
| |
| '
| |
| ,
| |
| "
| |
| following four occurred during this report period:
| |
| Verification _ Package N Eguipment N Unit N I-E-ININ-051 1- LT-932 .1 I-E-ININ-041 1-LT-930 1 I-E-ININ-049 1-FT-425 1 1-E-ININ-059 1-PT-124 1 During the above reirspections, the following conditions were
| |
| ;
| |
| identified by the NRC inspector:
| |
| I-E-ININ 051: The ERC inspector failed to identify and inspect the required mininum bend radius for Bend No. 5. This berd was accessible for inspectio I-E-ININ-041: Bend No. 5 which was identified by the ERC inspector as being inaccessible for measurement was found to be accessible and inspectable.
| |
|
| |
|
| !
| | We look forward to your response to this request within ten |
| l
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| - , .. . '
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| '
| |
| .
| |
| .
| |
| 1-E-lNIN 059: '(a) A swagelck fitting rear support C-24-04-51 was observed to be touching the wall, thus violating the air gap requirement; and (b) an air gap violation was identified between '
| |
| tee tubing arid the wall penetration at the inside face of the excess letdesn heat exchanger orifice roo I-E-ININ 049: (a) Installation identification tag for the low pressure root valve was incorrectly marked with respect to appitchble instrument identity, i.e., the tag on val e 1-RC-80618 which was assctiated with 01strument 1-FTe425, showed instrument 1-FT-424; (b) less than the required 1/84f nch air gap existed between the high pressure sensing line and a steel member adjacent
| |
| '
| |
| to the isolation valve location; and (c) a loose bolt was observed at the lov pressur6 sensing line flange attachment to the differential pressure type instrumen The above failures to inspect required attributes and identify non-onfor' ming conditions constitute a deviation (445/8516-D-20h 00 ring the abote inspection, the ERC inspector additionally noted that tags on immediat'ely adjacent lay pressure root valves were also incorrectly marltd with retpect to applicable instrument identit Tlie tag on valve 1-8C-80598, which was associated with -
| |
| instrument 1-FT-424, showad instrument 1-FT-426. The tag on '
| |
| '
| |
| valve 1-RC-8060B, which was associated with instrumsnt 1-FT*426, ~
| |
| showed instrumeht 1-FT-42 ,
| |
| (3) irdependept documentation reviers were performed on three '
| |
| verification packages during this report period, The l'esults of these rev$ews are open itehis pending comparison with ERC firdings when they becone available (445/85M-0*31 through 445/8516'0-33).
| |
| | |
| f- pipi.ig Syr*.em Bolted Joir.ts/.Materialp ;
| |
| Statys of CFET Activity ERC has completed 72 reinspectlons of piping system bolted joints / materials as of November 23,19Q5, from a total random aird engineered sample size of 73. Seyeo valid deviation repoFts (DRs)
| |
| were g'anerated as a result cf the above reinspection ERC has also cQmpleted 65 docm.ent revien on these packages. Eight valid ors have been generated as a result of the above documentation review Status of NRC Inspection Acti_vity i
| |
| (1) The NRC inspector has performed five independent inspections, to l date, of which the following occurred during this report period: j Verification Package N Drawing No, Flange N UMt-1 I-M-PBOM-035 BRP-D0-2-0G-056 5 ?
| |
| i No NRC violations or deviaticns were ident.ifie :
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| | |
| .
| |
| . . . .-..
| |
| '
| |
| .
| |
| | |
| (2) The NRC inspector performed independent document reviews of the following packages during this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Drawing N Flange N Unit R-M-PBOM-018 BRP-SW-1-SB-003 1 1 R-M-PB0M-031 BRP-CS-1-AB-001 1 1 R-M-PB0M-042 BRP-SI-1-SB-012 1 1 No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (3) The following independent NRC inspections were performed during September 1985, but were not specifically identified in NRC Inspection Report 50-445/85-13; 50-446/85-09:
| |
| Verification Package N Drawing N Flange N Unit I-M-PBOM-003 BRP-CC-1-RB-038 4 1 I-H-PB0M-054 BRP-CC-1-RB-056 1 1 No NRC violations or deviations were identified, Small_ Bore Piping and Instrumentation Tube Welds / Material Status of CPRT Activity Reinspection of a random sample of 60 small bore pipe and instrumentation tube welds and material from Units 1, 2, and common is in progress. To date, 45 small bore piping welds have been rein wected by ERC. No deviations havo been identifie Status of NRC Inspection Activity To date, the NRC inspector has witnessed seven reinspections performe by ERC, none of which occurred during this report period. The following two independent inspections were conducted in this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Pipe and Weld No_ Unit N I-M-SBWM-004 WP-X-073-151R3, 3 Common I-M-SBWM-005 MS-1-221-1303-2, 16 1 No NRC violations or deviations were identifie Large Bore Piping Welds / Material Status of CPRT Activity Visual reinspection of a random sample of 60 ASME Code, Section III large bore piping welds hnd material from Units 1 and 2 is in progress.
| |
| | |
| - -
| |
| - -
| |
| | |
| . . . . _ - . ._
| |
| '
| |
| ,
| |
| | |
| To date, 45 large bore piping welds have been reinspected with one deviation being identified. The deviattor,was evaluatcd as being valid; however, it was determined to r.ot have safety significanc Status of NRC Inspection Activity To date, the NRC it.spectcr has w'itnessed eight reinspections by ERC, none of which occurred during this report period. Tne following independent inspection was conducted in this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Pipe & Weld N Unit N ,
| |
| I-M-LBWM-073 CS-X-010-151R3, ISA Comon
| |
| ;
| |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identift.e . Large Bore _ pipe Supports - Rigid Status of CP_RT Activity j
| |
| Reinspection / verification of pipe support installations by ERC is in
| |
| , | | , |
| ' rocess p with approximately 96% of the population sar.ple completed. A
| | ' Respectful'ly, |
| '
| | ' |
| total of 164 deviations have been identified of which 136, to date, have been determined to be valid. ERC has determined that 70 of the -
| | iLO A GJ Billie Pirner. Garde |
| valid DRs are not safety significant, while the reminder are currently being reviewed for safety significanc Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) To date, five ERC reinspections have been witnessed to assure
| | ,, Citizens Clinic Director 42115 |
| '
| |
| compliance with QI-027, with the following being witnessed during this report period:
| |
| '
| |
| Verification Package N Pipa Support N Unit _N .
| |
| !
| |
| '
| |
| j I-S-LBSR-217 CC-1-197-008-C52R 1 During the reinspection, ERC identified the following to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| |
| '
| |
| (a) clearances between the pipe -and the support were out-of-tolerance, (b) undersize welds were present, and (c) component n: ember lengths were not shown or) the design drawin Dispositionsoftheabovefindingsareanopenitem(445/2516-0-24). | |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie i
| | e |
| .
| | ' |
| *
| | ;. |
| E-
| |
| | |
| - . -
| |
| '
| |
| . | | . |
| | | I |
| (2) Five independent inspections of pipe support installations have been performed, with the following three inspections performed :
| | ? |
| during this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Pipe Support N Unit N I-S-LBSR-006 CC-1-146-008-S43R 1 I-S-LBSR-013 DD-1-016-016-S33R 1 I-S-LBSR-041 CC-1-126-702-F43R 1 ,
| |
| During independent review of ERC Verification Package No. I-S-LBSR-041 and the original installation documentation package for pipe support Mark No. CC-1-126-702-F43R, a deviation ,
| |
| from commitment (445/8516-D-35) was identified. Section 5.6. '
| |
| of QI-027, Revision 0, states, " Verify welds are located as shown on design drawings. Record any welds that are in addition to those specified on the drawings (attachment 6.6)." ERC did not identify or document the existence of two additional field welds which were not specified on the drawings, but were identified by the issuance of " Vendor Supplied Component Modification Records" that documented the performance of field weldin ,
| |
| J. Large Bore Pipe Supports - Non-Rigid Status of CPRT Activity Reinspection / verification of pipe support installations by ERC is in process with approximately 83% of the population sample completed. A total of 234 ceviations have been identified of which 187, to date, have been determined to be vali ERC has detennined that 72 of the ,
| |
| valid DRs are not safety significant, while the remainder are currently .
| |
| being reviewed for safety significanc ,
| |
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) To date, six ERC reinspections of pipe support installations have been witnessed to assure compliance with QI-029, with the
| |
| '
| |
| following being witnessed during this report period:
| |
| Verification Package N Pipe Support N Unit N I-S-LBSN-043 MS-1-150-033-C52K 1 1-S-LBSN-240 CC-1-040-019-E33S 1 (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| |
| I-S-LBSN-043: (a) Component member length and location were out-of-tolerance, (b) locking devices were missing, (c) spherical ,
| |
| .
| |
| - m
| |
| | |
| . _ .. .-. - .- - ..
| |
| i .
| |
| ,
| |
| | |
| I bearing gap was out-of-tolerance, (d) safety lockwire on snubber capscrew was broken, (e) paint.was present on spherical bearings, r (f) welder identification was not visible on pressure boundary welds,and(g)snubberinterferencewithinsulationwasobserve I-S-LBSN-240: (a) Component member identification was incorrect, (b) bill of material items were not within fabrication tolerances, (c) component member location was out-of-tolerance, (d) shear lug
| |
| : to pipe clamp clearances were out-of-tolerance, (e) pipe clamp bolts did not have full thread engagement, (f) locking devices were missing, and (g) one Hilti bolt violated requirements for perpendicularity, l
| |
| *
| |
| Dispositions of the above findings are open items (445/8516-0-36 and 445/8516-0-37).
| |
| | |
| ! | | ! |
| : No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (3) To date, five independent inspections of pipe support
| |
| ;
| |
| installations have been perfomed. During this report period, the following inspection was performed to assess the adequacy of i ERC reinspections:
| |
| i Verification Package N Pipe Support N Unit No.
| |
|
| |
|
| j I-S-LBSN-003 SI-1-008-003-S42S 1 This effort revealed that ERC had perfomed the reinspection in accordance with the requirements of QI-02 No NRC violations or deviations were identified.
| | r |
| | ,. |
|
| |
|
| i k. HVAC Duct Supports
| | % g n.g |
| | | / No UNITED STATES |
| Status of CFRT Activity
| | [gg |
| ~
| | '' ' |
| A total of 89 HVAC duct supports were randomly selected from a population of 2580 supports representing Units 1, 2, and common. To i date, ERC has reinspected 55 supports and initiated 142 DRs, primarily in the areas of undersize welds and configuration discrepancies. Of l the 142 DRs,106 have, to date, been established as being valid.
| | - |
| | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| | ']5, E t WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 |
| | . |
| | _x...../ |
| | .Ms; Billie' Pirner Garde-Citizens. Clinic Director gg 315' |
| | Government Accountability Project ' |
| | 1555 Connecticut' Avenue, NW, Suite 202- IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC- 20036 TO F0!A-86-380 |
|
| |
|
| '
| | ==Dear Ms.-Garde:== |
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) To date, the No.C inspector has witnessed seven ERC reinspections, I with the following four being performed during this report period:
| | This is -in further response to your-letter dated May 16, 1986,~in which you requested,; pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F01A), copies of all records pertaining to Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant. |
| ( Verification Package N Duct Support N Unit No.-
| |
| !
| |
| l I-S-HVDS-029 SG-785-1H-RIF 1
| |
| [
| |
| I-S-HVDS-089 CB-810-IN-2BB 1 r I-S-HVDS-103 CB-810-1N-2BD 1 l I-S-HVDS-109 CB-854-2N-C30/C30-1 2 i
| |
| . . _ . - -_ _, _ - , ,
| |
|
| |
|
| .
| | The enclosed Appendix C identifies documents which are being placed in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),1717 H Street, hW, Washington, DC 20555, |
| . | | . where they will be available for public inspection at no charge or repro-duction at a' nominal charge of five cents ($0.05) per page, as specified in 10 CFR 9.14. The documents will be filed in PDR folder F01A-86-380 under your name. |
|
| |
|
| (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| | The enclosed Appendix D identifies documents containing information which constitutes advice, opinions, and recommendations of the staff. This information is being withheld from public disclosure of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(5) pursuant to Exemption (5) |
| I-S-HVDS-029: (a) Weld symbols and weld locations were incorrect, (b) welds were undersized, and (c) a Hilti Kwik Bolt violated required embedment length.
| | of the Comission's regulations. |
|
| |
|
| l I-S-HVDS-089: (a) Member dimensions were incorrect, (b) welding configuration was incorrect, (c) weld sizes were incorrect,
| | Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV. |
| | |
| (d) incomplete fusion was noted in welds, and (e) weld undercut was observed.
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| I-S-HVDS-103: (a) Dimension violations, (b) duct dimension was
| |
| '
| |
| incorrect, (c) incorrect orientation was observed, (d) welds were undersized, and (e) an unsatisfactory weld profile was note I-S-HVDS-109: (a) Weld location was_ incorrect, (b) welds were undersize, (c) welding was not performed per weld symbol, and (d) minimum thread engagement was unsatisfactor Subsequent to the inspection, DRs were initiated for the above condition Dispositions of the abc/e findings are open items (445/8516-0-38 through 445/8516-0-40 and 446/8513-0-09).
| |
|
| |
|
| (3) During the witnessing of ERC's reinspection of support CB-854-2N-C30/C30-1, the NRC inspector observed what appeared to be significant damage to Flange Nos.-17 and 18 of Battery Room Ventilation Exhaust Duct System EMD-3. This observed condition was not an attribute being reinspected by ERC at this time, and was therefore not identified. Further examination revealed that this condition most likely was caused during installation, in that the bolted flanges were force bent upwards approximately 30 degrees in order to preclude interference with an adjacent concrete wall. The force bending created a gasket gap of 1/4 inch
| | This denial may be appealed to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an |
| '
| | " Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision." |
| in the trough of the bend which is in excess of the maximum allowable gap of 5/32 inch. A sealant type material was used to fill in the excessive gap. Review of the original installation and inspection documentation revealed that this field modification was neither reported nor documented on a Bahnson Installation Interference Report or a Bahnson Deficiency & Disposition Repor Further, the Bahnson QC IR dated April 1, 1983, which required ductwork inspection for visual damage, reported that joints 1 through 18 of Duct System BRVE-EMD-3 had been inspected and l accepted. This failure to document field modifications and l identify nonconforming conditions is a violation (446/8513-V-10). '
| |
|
| |
|
| .-
| | -$Nd4D@Ch[ ~ |
|
| |
|
| . _ _ _
| | ._ |
| d
| | .. |
| '' ' | | .. |
| | .. |
| | < ,_ |
| | + . . |
| | ; ,_ . -.. . |
| | f; , - |
| | - . . .. .. |
| . | | . |
| '
| | Ms. Garde ' -2-' |
| | |
| . | | . |
| ~
| | The' review of additional records. subject to -your F0IA request has not yet been. |
| (4) The NRC inspector conducted the-following five independent ~.
| |
| inspections during this inspection period:
| |
| VerificationiPackage N Duct Suppor.t N Unit N I-S-HVDS-010 AB-886-1L-WP2 1 I-S-HVDS-066 SG-773-2H-WP5 2 I-S-HVDS-057 SG-852-1J-1E 1 I-S-HVDS-065 CB-830-2N-1CV -2 I-S-HVDS-122 DG-810-2K-PS1 2 i
| |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie . Reinspection of Containment Liner and Tank Stainless Steel Liner
| |
| ~
| |
| Status of CPRT Activity A tank stainless steel liner was 100% reinspected representing 29 weld seam package Sixty-two weld seams were randomly selected from Units 1 and 2 containment liners incloding both dome and cylindrical liners. ERC reinspections and document revie'ws are 100% complet However, changes to QI-031, Revision 0,.are contemplated and may require additional reinspectio Eighty-two valid deviations have been identified by ERC which are currently being reviewed for safety significanc Status of NRC Inspection Activity .
| |
| (1) The NRC inspector had previously witnessed 9 reinspections representing approximately 10% of the random sample of 9 The NRC inspector independently reinspected the following three containment liner and tank stainless steel liner weld seams during this report period
| |
| !
| |
| Verification Package N Joint N Unit N !
| |
| - !
| |
|
| |
|
| I-S-LINR-08 8D 1 l I-S-LINR-12 P88
| | completed. - We will notify you upon completion ~ of review. |
| -
| |
|
| |
|
| I-S-LINR-61 PS2 2
| | J |
| /
| | ' |
| (2) During the independent reinspections, the NRC inspector noted the following conditions:
| |
| I-S-LINR-61: Excessive reinforcement up to 7/32 inch was identified for approximately 80% of the weld length. This weld seam is between the 3/8-inch cylindrical liner plate and a pipe penetration with a 3 to 1 tape QI-031, Revision 0, does not provide specific instructions for the measuring of reinforcement ,
| |
| of welds connecting a tapered item to a uniform thickness ite l However, Section 5.1. A3c states, .in p' art, " Verify that the height .
| |
|
| |
|
| *
| | Sincerely, |
| ,
| | . . |
| | | M_ = = _ wa Donnie H. Grimsley, Director |
| of the reinforcement on each face of the seam does not exceed 3/32-inch." All NRC measurements were taken from the liner plate to the center of the weld seam. The ERC inspector accepted this attribute without comment or obtaining special instruction This is an NRC deviation (446/8513-D-11). | | . |
| | Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration Enclosures: As-stated' |
| | . |
|
| |
|
| I-S-LINR-08: The NRC inspector rejected attribute A.1.d of the checklist regarding contour measured from a 10-foot straight edg Section 5.1.Al of QI-031, Revision 0, states, in part, with respect to attribute A.1.d, "The following local contour devia-tions are to be verified: . . . A maximum of 3/4 inch deviation from a 10 foot straight edge placed in the vertical direction between the horizontal weld seams." The NRC inspector measured a 1 1/4-inch deviation from the straight edge. The liner plate-in this location is apparently somewhat convex near the center of a vertical cross section. The NRC inspector measured the 1 1/4-inch deviation by placing the 10-foot straight edge in contact with the liner plate for approximately the top 30% of the vertical cross section and measuring at the bottom of the cross section just above the lower horizontal weld seam. The ERC inspector stated that he measured the deviation from the 10-foot straight edge by placing the straight edge in contact with the greatest inward vertical deviation and adjusting the position of the straight edge until equal maximum deviations exist for the upper and lower portion of the vertical cross sectio The ERC inspector measured a maximum deviation of 3/4 inch using this
| | .- , --- |
| ' | | ,- 7 ,p |
| method and accepted the attribute. Values of measurements obtained by these methods are not precise and in this case varied by as much as a factor of two. QI-031, Revision 0, fails to provide concise instructions for the measuring of this attribute,
| | ' # |
| , | | .<[*' 5+ t |
| This is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-41).
| | - s |
| | | }pi- :: : |
| I-S-LINR-08, -12, and -61: It was noted with respect to the base material local contour attributes for cylindrical liner verifica-tion packages that the ERC inspector had entered "N/A" (not applicable) and " dome only" on the checklists. Section 5.1. in Revision 0 of QI-031 states, in part, "The following local contour deviations are to be verified: A maximum of 1-inch gap between the cylindrical liner or dome shell plate and a 6 feet long template curved to the required radius . . . ." Thus, the local contour attribute is applicable and does apply to the cylindrical liner. The failure to inspect the required attribute is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-42).
| | W[i.f.- 4 - ::j .' |
| | | , _ |
| The NRC inspector noted that attribute A.1.b was not applicabl Paragraph 5.1.A.1 of QI-031, Revision 0, states, in part, with respect to attribute A.1.b, "The following local contour deviations are to be verified: . . . A maximum 1 1/2-inch gap when the 6 feet long template is placed across 'the dome weld l
| | n.' |
| seams when measuring horizontally or vertically." Therefore, l attribute A.1.b applies only to the dome weld seams. Review of the completed checklists revealed that the ERC inspector had
| | - - |
| !
| | 4 * ^> |
| _- | |
| | |
| _ - __ . . ._ _ . . _ _ __ _ _ _ . . _ . __ _
| |
| *
| |
| .
| |
| I
| |
| :
| |
| ;
| |
| 28 l
| |
| : | | : |
| | M".. f ,. s , c- |
| | ) '.. |
| | , - . . . , .g. |
|
| |
|
| accepted this attribute for these three verification packages
| | y: , <;< r M-$ m *: _ ' |
| '
| | gy b |
| which are weld seams on the cylindrical _ liner. The.NRC inspector then reviewed the ERC Description Memorandum QA/QC-RT-293 which lists Gibbs and Hill (G&H) Containment Liner Specification 2323-SS-14, Revision 4, dated January 10, 1979, as a reference for developing QI-031 Revision 0. Paragraph 8.2.2.1.2.b in G&H Specification 2323-SS-14, Revision 4, states, in part, "The -
| | * |
| i following deviations are acceptable: . . . A 1 1/2 inch gap when
| | , |
| : the template above is placed across one or more welded seams,"
| | + ~ + y; ,. |
| and applies to both the cylindrical liner and the dome line ; This conflict between the G&H specification and attribute A. i
| | f. ' |
| .of QI-031, Revision 0, is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-41).
| | - |
| | | ._ |
| ; Structural Steel
| | - |
| ! Status of CPRT Activity
| | + |
| $ Reinspection of the first random sample of 60 structural steel members is approximately 25% complete. Twenty-five valid deviations have been identified. The second sample, which is related to safe shutdown l systems, has not yet been selected.- Documentation review procedures
| |
| ! have not been issue Status of NRC Inspection Activity
| |
| -
| |
| (1) Seven reinspections have been partially witnessed (welding inspection is not complete), representing approximately 12% of the first random sample. The following four ERC reinspections were witnessed by the NRC inspector during this report period:
| |
| .
| |
| Verification Package N Equipment N Unit'No.
| |
|
| |
|
| ; I-S-STEL-059 AFCO-MK-F180-1-RB 1-
| | y - r s |
| , I-S-STEL-007 liK-12 1 I-S-STEL-066 DCA 16019 MK-10 Common
| | , , s;p |
| ; I-S-STEL-010 AFC0-C70-3-SA 1-I (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:- | | - |
| [' I-S-STEL-059: Numerous attributes _were rejected including bolt hole coverage and edge distance, bolt size, and weld locatio Paint removal was requested to allow for adequate surface inspection of the weld 4 - !
| | '_'.n..._ |
| -'
| | .n - + .c maq.. - s p:.- . n , |
| I-S-STEL-007: An extra bolt hole, not identified in the field performed alterations, was~noted. Bolt contact was also. rejecte ~
| | .,c |
| ,
| | ', , |
| i . Verification Package No. I-S-STEL-007 involves the reinspection i of a sump screen in the Unit 1 reactor building. The screen is a
| | ,, |
| ~ | | , , |
| vendor assembled frame bolted to a -structural steel framewor ! The screen is-included in_the ERC Population Description under
| | -~ |
| | , |
| | r . |
| | ..:..- ' ' ' |
| | 7'g- v , |
| | si n irb :F0fA2860380.: |
| | '" |
| | - ' n 3 ;% ,7 ;% . ~_ - |
| | , |
| | ' |
| | # ''' - v. . |
| . | | . |
| | ,g. _ |
| | , |
| | > |
| | - , |
| | & , _ :- ;_ ;7 _ |
| | , |
| | ., |
| | .; A |
| | - |
| | ' |
| - | | - |
| . . - _ . - _ -.
| | .c |
| | | '! ppendix.C.' |
| *
| | , |
| | , |
| | : r' : |
| . | | . |
| | t |
| | - |
| | r |
| | . :X 4 |
| | ,- |
| | , , y : , |
| | - |
| | - |
| | -. |
| | . . |
| | . _ , |
| | x ; |
|
| |
|
| " Vendor assembled frames and bents," but is not actually a
| | . . . . ., |
| - structural member. The validity of the structural steel population is being evaluate I-S-STEL-066: Hilti bolt size and field installed associated details (size of components) were rejecte I-S-STEL-010: Numerous attributes were rejected including bolt spacing, configuration and edge distance, connection orientation and location, limit of alterations, and location of membe This package is a monorail support member that is installed at an angle of approximately 60 degrees between the monorail and the support member. The drawings indicate an installation angle of 90 degree Dispositions of the above findings are open items (445/8516-0-43 through 445/8516-0-46). | | :,n, |
| | : |
| | WQT |
| | , . |
| | y * |
| | .. - |
| | . |
| | - |
| | d |
| | 'g.;' * . .. |
| | - |
| | . . |
| | ' |
| | M ;p |
| | ' . |
| | l), ylo/24'/85 : .-. le:no rani! ann,+1*lSCo, Itoy Tre.nt.to-: Kin 'soper. : |
| | M t, ;2.10/l/85: |
| | ., |
| | s6bjce: "TSC-12568'.(1. pas;e) , |
| | - |
| | } - .CPSES: TUCCo-. Nuclear Enginsdrin;; iMsi:n Deficioney: |
| | M" Ni - a .: .. . , |
| | l Report,Xy FP-35-063.._(1 paget c |
| | + |
| | ( |
| | - |
| | I, " 33)L9/16/85i ~ ' |
| | . Letter.' BISCO ~to Texas Utilitied Generating Co;.- |
| | ~ |
| | f. J |
| | ' |
| | 4W8/20/85; C.?C? Crc.iner,Jsubject: Penetrationlieals (2 pages)- ' |
| | LLetter. American ' Nuclear 11nsurers (ASI), John ~ J, , |
| | ~ |
| | ' ' . |
| | .. , |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie n. Concrete Placement Status of CPRT Activity Reinspection of the first random sample of 60 concrete placement packages is approximately 98% complete. Reinspection of the second sample related to safe shutdown systems is approximately 40% complet Thirty-one deviations have been identified related primarily to unfilled holes, voids, and debris in the concrete surface. Of the 28 deviations which have been evaluated, 25 were identified as valid.
| | ; CarneyL ..to: Clayton W.' |
| | 5.Lt1/22/83) Brown.. SISCo (1: page) |
| | 41utual? Atomic Energy Reinsurance P6oh Acceptance: |
| | ' |
| | y _ |
| | l Lof Test-ing;(2,pages)~ |
| | ; 6.'8/20/85 |
| | . |
| | _ |
| | ~^ |
| | . . . |
| | Letter, A:nerican Nuclear Insurces (ANI). John J. o |
| | * 'L 7.11/13/84 ' Carne'ynto-R,-0;sBabb',.TUCCo Engineering'(2 pages). |
|
| |
|
| ,
| |
| These are currently being reviewed for safety significanc Documentation review procedures have not yet been issue Status of NRC Inspection Activity
| |
| ' | | ' |
| (1) The NRC inspector has witnessed a total of 12 reinspections' to date. The following three ERC reinspections were witnessed by the NRC inspector during this report period:
| | - |
| Verification Package N Concrete Placement N Unit N I-S-CONC-079 IRCN-CPC-201-4822-007 2 I-S-CONC-076 IRCN-CPC-201-6885-010 2 I-S-CONC-069 IRCN-CPC-101-8805-001 1 (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation _a ,
| | Letter, BISCc William J. Ackerman to Texas. . |
| potential deviations:
| | , |
| | ' |
| | Utilit 1 Sequence No. |
|
| |
|
| I-S-CONC-079: The locations and sizes of installed concrete !
| | fes, J. C. fYoungblood 'Ref,0 bisco letter.. |
| cast-in place Richmond inserts were out-of-tolerance. Embedded plates were installed too close to cast-in place insert I l
| | , |
| :
| | - |
| | | - |
| '
| | ' |
| | 8. 9/12/83' . 3346-271 ^ (1 page) |
| | ; CPSES/ESAR.: |
| | / Final' Safety: Analysis: Comanche Report. ~ Peak-Steam Electric. Station e |
| | (6 pa3es)- 3-r 2 ) |
| | , |
| | $'H 1 |
| | . |
| . | | . |
| | . . { % |
| | V P A UP k Q s |
|
| |
|
| I-S-CONC-076: The locations of installed concrete cast-in place Richmond inserts were out-of-toleranc Dispositions of the above findings are open items (446/8513-0-12 and 446/8513-0-13).
| | t |
| | - .,, |
| | ? 'k |
| | ' ' J |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (3) The NRC inspector independently reinspected the following five concrrte placements during this report period, representing approximately 5% of the first and second samples:
| | " J. |
| Verification Package N Concrete Placement Unit N I-S-CONC-017 IRCN-CPC-003-4860-023 Common I-S-CONC-003 IRCN-CPC-002-5852-025 Common I-S-CONC-016 IRCN-CPC-205-6810-010 2 I-S-CONC-015 IRCN-CPC-002-4790-040 Common I-S-CONC-057 IRCN-CPC-002-E852-370 Common (4) During the above independent reinspections, the NRC inspector identified the following conditions:
| |
| I-S-CONC-015: During review of the ERC inspection checklist subsequent to the NRC inspection, the NRC inspector observed that attribute 3.A of the checklist (surface inspection of walls, etc.)
| |
|
| |
|
| was not signed off. Therefore, it could not be established whether or not ERC had performed the required reinspection of this attribut Section 5.2.4 of ERC Procedure CPP-009, Revision 1, requires the lead inspector (Level III) and the lead discipline engineer to ". . . ensure that reinspection /
| | ' |
| documentation review results are clear, accurate, and complete."
| | 9 ~ |
| | % |
| | * |
| | _ % 'l |
| | ' |
| | vic |
| | .il t |
| | =$c p- ; GM; 7, ;;3 ' '., - + % |
| | . ' |
| | - #.- |
| | g m.9 J. |
|
| |
|
| The incomplete checklist for Verification Package No. I-S-CONC-015 had been approved by both the lead inspector and the lead discipline engineer. This is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-47).
| | , w. . - |
| | ,- - |
| | , |
| | . my 3 3: - . |
| | .e Y. |
|
| |
|
| I-S-CONC-057: The NRC inspector identified dirt in the construction joint and a void with a depth of at least 11/2 inches. The void and dirt were not identified by the ERC inspector. Further review of the inspection checklist revealed that the ERC inspector had entered "N/A" (not accessible) and
| | , , , |
| " coated" with respect to attribute 3.A. Section 5.3.A of QI-043, Revision 1, states with respect to concrete surface inspection, | | ; |
| " Inspect all accessible surfaces for honeycombing and void (Inaccessible surfaces are those cast against earth, backfilled, or coated)." The NRC inspector observed the concrete placement associated with this verification package and found that it was not coated on any surface and was accessible. This is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-48). | | ' ' |
| | '' |
| | c. : ~ '. |
| | , |
| | ' |
| | p RE: |
| | . 'FOIA-86-380 p 99 |
| | > , . |
| | < |
| | , , _ _ |
| | _ _ , |
| | - |
| | , , x- ' |
| | m-p w-ym. ; < '3 |
| | '. |
| | r |
| | , |
| | s |
| | + |
| | _ , Vf , , |
| | - |
| | jg , : 4 'y,'* |
| | , |
| | a |
| | , , - - - " |
| | r. . |
| | , |
| | n ? % i 'r , ;a t t k, |
| | - ' |
| | ' x . |
| | ...g Q_. |
|
| |
|
| * | | ,7 |
| . | | - |
| | % :Ap'pendix ;"D : , g f ;~ - i- |
| | < |
| | m |
| | _ |
| | , _ |
| | , > ' , |
| | , |
| | T ',N' . |
| | ' |
| | * S g ,, - |
| | , - |
| | w * |
| | ;i1/b/Mi |
| | , , |
| | ;] .; r Mi :.pr J.dum ! rom 11; 'S. Ph i s l ijm . tW T. Wds t e rm.m . |
| | .. - :. |
| | ' 1 BISCu"fi re Seal s' Certif fi:ationi Andj]A Recordh ?[ |
| | Wiiirh: % rned . ;(3 pagesfS -is |
| | >(r |
| | _ |
| | * , , , |
| | . |
| | J.N;., . |
| | - |
| | m , . |
|
| |
|
| o. Small Bore Pipe Supports Status of CPRT Activity Reinspection of the first and second samples of small bore pipe supports is approximately 97% complete. A total of 67 valid deviations have been identified related primarily to Hilti bolt embedment, hole spacing and edge distance in base plates, and pipe clearance Documentation review is approximately 99% complete with 31 valid deviations identifie Status of NRC Inspection Activity Six reinspections were previously witnessed by the NRC inspecto There was no NRC inspection activity during this report perio p. Pipe Whip Restraints Status of CPRT Activity ERC has completed 28 reinspections of pipe whip restraints out of the planned sample size of 11 Nine valid ors have been identifie Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) The NRC inspector has witnessed four ERC reinspections, to date, of which the following occurred during this report period:
| | X |
| :
| |
| Verification Package N Support Identification Unit N I-S-PWRE-057 -M40-S1-0588 1 I-S-PWRE-053 FW-1-018-906-C67W 1 (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| |
| I-S-PWRE-053: (a) Gaps existed between the plate and the top of the washer (0.164 inches) and between the bottom of the washer and the nut (0.140 inches) on the upper right anchor bolt of the reactor side plate, (b) a gap of 0.122 inches existed between the washer and the top of the nut on the middle left anchor bolt on the reactor side plate, and (c) the capture plate on the reactor side was 1/16 inch out of location from drawing requirement Dispositions of the above findings are an open item (445/8516-0-49).
| |
| | |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identified.
| |
| | |
| .
| |
| . -
| |
| sr
| |
|
| |
|
| _ _ _ _ _ _ -
| |
| * | | * |
| . | | :3/6/864 |
| | . |
| | 2.' |
| | .. |
| | . |
| | . |
|
| |
|
| q. Instrument Pipe / Tube Supports Status of CPRT Activity ERC has completed 46 out of the planned 102 reinspections of instrument pipe / tube supports. Twenty-eight DRs have been validated from a current total of 29 that have been reviewed by the population engineer. Two hundred and sixty-three deviations have not yet been reviewed for validit Status of NRC Inspection Activity The NRC inspector has performed, to date, four independent inspections of which the following occurred during this report period:
| | > |
| Verification Package N Instrument Tag N Unit N I-S-INSP-010 1-PI-4770 1 I-S-INSP-033 1-LT-462 1 While performing the above independent reinspections, it was observed and noted with respect to support 33A, that the serrated grooves on the spring nuts did not align with the channel clamping ridge as required by attribute 4.5 of QI-05 However, the ERC inspector signed off the attribute as being acceptable. This is an NRC deviation (445/8516-D-50).
| | "' |
| | ' rtemorandum f rom.. H'. ' S. Ph illips - to . E . 11. 'Jo(n' sn'n . |
| | - |
| | . . |
| | BISCO' Fire Penetration-Seals Test Neports PCA-76. |
|
| |
|
| r. Category I Conduit Supports Status of CPRT Activity A total of 110 Category I conduit supports were randomly selected from a population of 5500. The number of supports inspected, to date, is 7 Physical reinspections are being accomplished using QI-053, Revision 0, and are approximately 64% complete. Nineteen deviations have been identified and are being reviewed t,y ERC for validity and safety i significance. Two have been processed and were found to be not vali '
| | and?748-1831 .(3.pages) o' |
| Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) The NRC inspector reviewed QI-053, Revision 0, and QI-054, Revision 0, and witnessed the following three reinspections during this report period:
| | , |
| Verification Package N Equipment N Unit N I-S-COSP-046 C03609956-04 1 I-S-COSP-073 C-140-06419-01 1 I-S-COSP-071 C-14W-13102-05 1 (2) During the reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| | h ~ |
| _
| | ,( ;* ' |
| | | ~ |
| ,, s
| | ' " |
| , | | w |
| | ' , |
| | ' '..:3. |
|
| |
|
| I-S-COSP-046: A 3/8-inch Hilti, on south end, had a 1/8-inch gap
| |
| ' | | ' |
| between unistrut and wal I-S-COSP-071: (a) Plate size was incorrect, and (b) a nut was
| | _ (3. .?4 /'./86 ~ . Memorandum f ro:n. II. - S! ^ Phillips to. T.' r"} uesterman, |
| . bottomed out on Hilti bolt thread Dispositions of the above findings are open items (445/8516-0-51 and 445/8516-0-52). | | ' |
| | , 2C : Inspect 10a .Reportf SS-16/13 and Rstentli>n of |
| | _ iDraft' Reports. (2 ' pat;es)p O g |
| | * , |
| | . |
| | < |
| | 0 -g |
| | ;, |
| | - |
| | ^... |
| | %, |
| | 4.-Undated -Draft Report, 50-445/16',446/13 Docunient 1.a . 1.b- |
| | % |
| | ' |
| | ..(31 pages) . 4 |
| | . |
| | , N s, |
| | ' |
| | " |
| | 5; Draf t Report, same> number as above, Doc $ ment 2.a (5 pages). # |
| | . |
| | . |
| | " ., |
| | ~6. |
|
| |
|
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie s. Documentation Review of Fill and Backfill Placement Status of CPRT Activity Documentation review of the sample of 120 fill and backfill placements is approximately 92% complete. A total of 254 deviations have been identified and are being evaluated for validit No physical reinspections are planne Status of NRC Inspection Activity The NRC inspector reviewed Revision 3 of QI-05 No independent document reviews have yet been performe No NRC violations or deviations were identifie t. Field Fabricated Tanks Status of CPRT Activity The population consists of eight tanks which were fabricated on site, four of which are inaccessible. Reinspection by ERC is in process and is approximately 60% complete. A total of 54 deviations have been identified which are being reviewed by ERC for validity and safety significance.
| | ~~ |
| | | - |
| a Status of NRC Inspection Activity (1) The NRC inspector reviewed QI-041 for accuracy and adequacy, and witnessed 10% of the ERC reinspection effort on the following four tanks: l Verification Package N Unit N l I-M-FFTA-01 Common (1)
| | Draft Report, same number as above, JDocurien t 2.b |
| ! I-M-FFTA-02 Common (1)
| | , |
| I-M-FFTA-03 Common (1)
| | i (19 pages) s |
| I-M-FFTA-04 Common (1) ,
| | ' |
| I
| | ' ' |
| | | . |
| l
| | " '\ |
| . . . | | 7. Draft Report, same namber as above, Docurent 2.c (3 pages) |
| | | " |
| .
| | 8. . Draft Report, same number as above, Document 3 (21 pa;;es) ' |
| , . . -
| | ' |
| | | '9. ." |
| (2) During the above reinspections, ERC identified the following conditions to the NRC inspector as subject to evaluation as potential deviations:
| | Draft Report, same numbe r as above, ' Document 4 |
| I-M-FFTA-01: (a) A stitch weld was used where a full length
| | , |
| : weld is required, (b) weld size was indeterminate on lap joints, (c) a 3/8-inch fillet weld was specified on 1/4-inch thick material, (d) Bill of Material item 6 to 11 fillet weld had an
| | (25 pages) |
| '
| | " |
| insufficient weld throat size,.(e) seismic restralit gussets had
| | - 10. Draft Report, same number as'above, Ducument 5.a w |
| ! insufficient weld throat size, and (f) anchor bolt ring chairs had undersize weld '
| | (19 paces) |
| , I-M-FFTA-02: (a) A stitch weld was used where a full length weld is required, (b) weld size was indeterminate on lap joints, (c) undersize fillet weld was present at nozzle locations No. 1 and 15, (d) Bill of Material item 11 to tank shell had an undersize fillet weld, (d) Bill of Material item 11 to item 6 fillet weld had an undersize throat, (f)-fillet welding on the davit bracket was undersize, and (g) anchor bolt ring chairs had undersize weld Dispositions of the above findings are open items (445/8516-0-53 and 445/8516-0-54). | | 11. " |
| | | Draft Report, same number as above. Document 5.h (19 paaes) |
| ,
| | 12. -" |
| No NRC violations or deviations were identifie (3) Due to the small population, the NRC inspector performed
| | Dratt seport, same number as above, Document 6.a (58 pages)- |
| ; independent inspections of approximately 15% of the defined
| | " |
| { attributes on the four accessible tanks. This effort revealed that reinspections were performed in accordance with the 1 requirements of QI-04 No NRC violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview
| | 13. outline of above report number. exit with~ Tucco (6 pages) |
| : An exit interview was conducted on Dec0nber 4,1985, with the applicant representatives denoted in paragraph 1 of this appendix. During this interview, the NRC inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The applicant acknowledged the findings.
| | " |
| | | 14. , |
| 1
| | Report input by McCleskey, NRC consultant (20 pgs) s :a |
| | | - |
| ( | |
| f i
| |
| i l
| |
| , -
| |
| }} | | }} |
Route Sheet for Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13 on 851101-30.Time Summary for Hours Applied to Assigned Topics from IE Manual EnclML20215C363 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Comanche Peak ![Luminant icon.png](/w/images/d/d7/Luminant_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
11/26/1986 |
---|
From: |
Westerman NRC |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20215C281 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
FOIA-86-380, FOIA-86-A-177 50-445-85-16, 50-446-85-13, NUDOCS 8612150113 |
Download: ML20215C363 (2) |
|
|
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000445/19990151999-10-20020 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822-1002. Non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990141999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990131999-08-18018 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-13 & 50-446/99-13 on 990720-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures IR 05000445/19990101999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-10 & 50-446/99-10 on 990510-0628. Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990121999-07-29029 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-12 & 50-446/99-12 on 990530-0710.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990111999-06-22022 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-11 & 50-446/99-11 on 990418-0529.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990081999-06-0909 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-08 & 50-446/99-08 on 990503-11.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990091999-05-12012 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-09 & 50-446/99-09 on 990419-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviewed Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program IR 05000445/19990071999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-07 & 50-446/99-07 on 990307-0417.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990061999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-06 & 50-446/99-06 on 990329-0402.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Planning & Preparation,External Exposure Controls & Quality Assurance of Radiation Protection Activities IR 05000445/19990031999-04-0707 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-03 & 50-446/99-03 on 990124-0306.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990051999-03-19019 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-05 & 50-446/99-05 on 990222-26.One Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19990011999-03-0909 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-01 & 50-446/99-01 on 990208-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program IR 05000445/19990021999-01-10010 January 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-02 & 50-446/99-02 on 990119-22.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000445/19980081998-12-30030 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-08 & 50-446/98-08 on 981025-1205.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Licensee Emergency Response Organization IR 05000445/19980071998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-07 & 50-446/98-07 on 980913-1024.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980151998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-15 & 50-446/98-15 on 981102-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Program Activities,Including External & Internal Exposure Controls & Controls of Radioactive Matl & Contamination IR 05000445/19980161998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-16 & 50-446/98-16 on 981019-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Testing & Maint, Protected Area Barrier & Detection Aids,Vital Area Barriers & Detection Aids & Security Sys Power Supply IR 05000445/19980141998-10-21021 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-14 & 50-446/98-14 Has Been Canceled.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued IR 05000445/19980061998-09-30030 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-06 & 50-446/98-06 on 980802-0912.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980121998-09-16016 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-12 & 50-446/98-12 Cancelled IR 05000445/19980051998-08-20020 August 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-05 & 50-446/98-05 on 980621-0801.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980041998-07-16016 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-04 & 50-446/98-04 on 980510-0620.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000445/19983011998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-301 & 50-446/98-301 on 980619-26.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations.All 9 License Applicants Passed Exam IR 05000445/19980031998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-03 & 50-446/98-03 on 980329-0509. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operation,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980131998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-13 & 50-446/98-13 on 980615-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980021998-04-24024 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-02 & 50-446/98-02 on 980215-0328. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20216H3501998-04-16016 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-11 & 50-446/98-11 on 980323-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980011998-03-19019 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-01 & 50-446/98-02 on 980104-0214. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970211998-02-11011 February 1998 Errata to Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21,correcting Errors in Insp follow-up Sys Number Associated W/Items Described in Rept IR 05000445/19970231998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-23 & 50-446/97-23 on 971123-980103.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support ML20198S1891998-01-16016 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-20 & 50-446/97-20 on 971012-1122. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H0241997-11-21021 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-18 & 50-446/97-18 on 970831-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970221997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-22 & 50-446/97-22 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint ML20199E6481997-11-13013 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21 on 971027-31.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Records & Repts,Test & Maint and Access control-vehicle IR 05000445/19970191997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-19 & 50-446/97-19 on 970922-25. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rev 25 to Comanche Peak Steam Electric Emergency Plan ML20211A1051997-09-19019 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-17 & 50-446/97-17 on 970720-0830. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970161997-08-13013 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-16 & 50-446/97-16 on 970722-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp of Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures ML20151L9231997-08-0505 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-15 & 50-446/97-15 on 970608-0719. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20149L3361997-07-25025 July 1997 Corected Pages 13,17,19,22,28 & Page 2 of Supplemental Info for Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 Issued on 970611 IR 05000445/19970141997-06-30030 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-14 & 50-446/97-14 on 970427-0607. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support ML20148K2851997-06-11011 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 on 970421-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970061997-06-0606 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-06 & 50-446/97-06 on 970428-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Plant Support & Assessment of Licensed Operator Requalification Program ML20148F8791997-06-0303 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-09 & 50-446/97-09 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970131997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-13 & 50-446/97-13 on 970428-0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19970081997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-08 & 50-446/97-08 on 970316-0426.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970011997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-01 & 50-446/97-01 on 970127-31,0428 & 0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee self-assessment Effort IR 05000445/19970101997-05-20020 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-10 & 50-446/97-10 on 970421-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20148B5891997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-11 & 50-446/97-11 on 970407-10.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support,Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19970071997-04-16016 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-07 & 50-446/97-07 on 970324-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support 1999-09-14
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000445/19990151999-10-20020 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822-1002. Non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990141999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990131999-08-18018 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-13 & 50-446/99-13 on 990720-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures IR 05000445/19990101999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-10 & 50-446/99-10 on 990510-0628. Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990121999-07-29029 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-12 & 50-446/99-12 on 990530-0710.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990111999-06-22022 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-11 & 50-446/99-11 on 990418-0529.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990081999-06-0909 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-08 & 50-446/99-08 on 990503-11.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990091999-05-12012 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-09 & 50-446/99-09 on 990419-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviewed Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program IR 05000445/19990071999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-07 & 50-446/99-07 on 990307-0417.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990061999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-06 & 50-446/99-06 on 990329-0402.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Planning & Preparation,External Exposure Controls & Quality Assurance of Radiation Protection Activities IR 05000445/19990031999-04-0707 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-03 & 50-446/99-03 on 990124-0306.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990051999-03-19019 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-05 & 50-446/99-05 on 990222-26.One Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19990011999-03-0909 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-01 & 50-446/99-01 on 990208-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program IR 05000445/19990021999-01-10010 January 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-02 & 50-446/99-02 on 990119-22.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000445/19980081998-12-30030 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-08 & 50-446/98-08 on 981025-1205.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Licensee Emergency Response Organization IR 05000445/19980071998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-07 & 50-446/98-07 on 980913-1024.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980151998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-15 & 50-446/98-15 on 981102-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Program Activities,Including External & Internal Exposure Controls & Controls of Radioactive Matl & Contamination IR 05000445/19980161998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-16 & 50-446/98-16 on 981019-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Testing & Maint, Protected Area Barrier & Detection Aids,Vital Area Barriers & Detection Aids & Security Sys Power Supply IR 05000445/19980141998-10-21021 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-14 & 50-446/98-14 Has Been Canceled.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued IR 05000445/19980061998-09-30030 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-06 & 50-446/98-06 on 980802-0912.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980121998-09-16016 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-12 & 50-446/98-12 Cancelled IR 05000445/19980051998-08-20020 August 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-05 & 50-446/98-05 on 980621-0801.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980041998-07-16016 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-04 & 50-446/98-04 on 980510-0620.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000445/19983011998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-301 & 50-446/98-301 on 980619-26.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations.All 9 License Applicants Passed Exam IR 05000445/19980031998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-03 & 50-446/98-03 on 980329-0509. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operation,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980131998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-13 & 50-446/98-13 on 980615-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980021998-04-24024 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-02 & 50-446/98-02 on 980215-0328. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20216H3501998-04-16016 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-11 & 50-446/98-11 on 980323-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980011998-03-19019 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-01 & 50-446/98-02 on 980104-0214. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970211998-02-11011 February 1998 Errata to Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21,correcting Errors in Insp follow-up Sys Number Associated W/Items Described in Rept IR 05000445/19970231998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-23 & 50-446/97-23 on 971123-980103.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support ML20198S1891998-01-16016 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-20 & 50-446/97-20 on 971012-1122. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H0241997-11-21021 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-18 & 50-446/97-18 on 970831-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970221997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-22 & 50-446/97-22 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint ML20199E6481997-11-13013 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21 on 971027-31.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Records & Repts,Test & Maint and Access control-vehicle IR 05000445/19970191997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-19 & 50-446/97-19 on 970922-25. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rev 25 to Comanche Peak Steam Electric Emergency Plan ML20211A1051997-09-19019 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-17 & 50-446/97-17 on 970720-0830. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970161997-08-13013 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-16 & 50-446/97-16 on 970722-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp of Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures ML20151L9231997-08-0505 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-15 & 50-446/97-15 on 970608-0719. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20149L3361997-07-25025 July 1997 Corected Pages 13,17,19,22,28 & Page 2 of Supplemental Info for Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 Issued on 970611 IR 05000445/19970141997-06-30030 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-14 & 50-446/97-14 on 970427-0607. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support ML20148K2851997-06-11011 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 on 970421-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970061997-06-0606 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-06 & 50-446/97-06 on 970428-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Plant Support & Assessment of Licensed Operator Requalification Program ML20148F8791997-06-0303 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-09 & 50-446/97-09 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970131997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-13 & 50-446/97-13 on 970428-0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19970081997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-08 & 50-446/97-08 on 970316-0426.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970011997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-01 & 50-446/97-01 on 970127-31,0428 & 0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee self-assessment Effort IR 05000445/19970101997-05-20020 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-10 & 50-446/97-10 on 970421-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20148B5891997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-11 & 50-446/97-11 on 970407-10.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support,Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19970071997-04-16016 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-07 & 50-446/97-07 on 970324-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support 1999-09-14
[Table view] Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000445/19990151999-10-20020 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822-1002. Non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990141999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990131999-08-18018 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-13 & 50-446/99-13 on 990720-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures IR 05000445/19990101999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-10 & 50-446/99-10 on 990510-0628. Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990121999-07-29029 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-12 & 50-446/99-12 on 990530-0710.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990111999-06-22022 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-11 & 50-446/99-11 on 990418-0529.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990081999-06-0909 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-08 & 50-446/99-08 on 990503-11.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990091999-05-12012 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-09 & 50-446/99-09 on 990419-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviewed Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program IR 05000445/19990071999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-07 & 50-446/99-07 on 990307-0417.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990061999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-06 & 50-446/99-06 on 990329-0402.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Planning & Preparation,External Exposure Controls & Quality Assurance of Radiation Protection Activities IR 05000445/19990031999-04-0707 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-03 & 50-446/99-03 on 990124-0306.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990051999-03-19019 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-05 & 50-446/99-05 on 990222-26.One Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19990011999-03-0909 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-01 & 50-446/99-01 on 990208-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program IR 05000445/19990021999-01-10010 January 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-02 & 50-446/99-02 on 990119-22.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000445/19980081998-12-30030 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-08 & 50-446/98-08 on 981025-1205.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Licensee Emergency Response Organization IR 05000445/19980071998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-07 & 50-446/98-07 on 980913-1024.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980151998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-15 & 50-446/98-15 on 981102-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Program Activities,Including External & Internal Exposure Controls & Controls of Radioactive Matl & Contamination IR 05000445/19980161998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-16 & 50-446/98-16 on 981019-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Testing & Maint, Protected Area Barrier & Detection Aids,Vital Area Barriers & Detection Aids & Security Sys Power Supply IR 05000445/19980141998-10-21021 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-14 & 50-446/98-14 Has Been Canceled.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued IR 05000445/19980061998-09-30030 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-06 & 50-446/98-06 on 980802-0912.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980121998-09-16016 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-12 & 50-446/98-12 Cancelled IR 05000445/19980051998-08-20020 August 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-05 & 50-446/98-05 on 980621-0801.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980041998-07-16016 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-04 & 50-446/98-04 on 980510-0620.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000445/19983011998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-301 & 50-446/98-301 on 980619-26.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations.All 9 License Applicants Passed Exam IR 05000445/19980031998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-03 & 50-446/98-03 on 980329-0509. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operation,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980131998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-13 & 50-446/98-13 on 980615-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980021998-04-24024 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-02 & 50-446/98-02 on 980215-0328. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20216H3501998-04-16016 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-11 & 50-446/98-11 on 980323-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980011998-03-19019 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-01 & 50-446/98-02 on 980104-0214. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970211998-02-11011 February 1998 Errata to Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21,correcting Errors in Insp follow-up Sys Number Associated W/Items Described in Rept IR 05000445/19970231998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-23 & 50-446/97-23 on 971123-980103.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support ML20198S1891998-01-16016 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-20 & 50-446/97-20 on 971012-1122. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H0241997-11-21021 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-18 & 50-446/97-18 on 970831-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970221997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-22 & 50-446/97-22 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint ML20199E6481997-11-13013 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21 on 971027-31.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Records & Repts,Test & Maint and Access control-vehicle IR 05000445/19970191997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-19 & 50-446/97-19 on 970922-25. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rev 25 to Comanche Peak Steam Electric Emergency Plan ML20211A1051997-09-19019 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-17 & 50-446/97-17 on 970720-0830. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970161997-08-13013 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-16 & 50-446/97-16 on 970722-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp of Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures ML20151L9231997-08-0505 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-15 & 50-446/97-15 on 970608-0719. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20149L3361997-07-25025 July 1997 Corected Pages 13,17,19,22,28 & Page 2 of Supplemental Info for Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 Issued on 970611 IR 05000445/19970141997-06-30030 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-14 & 50-446/97-14 on 970427-0607. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support ML20148K2851997-06-11011 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-12 & 50-446/97-12 on 970421-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970061997-06-0606 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-06 & 50-446/97-06 on 970428-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Plant Support & Assessment of Licensed Operator Requalification Program ML20148F8791997-06-0303 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-09 & 50-446/97-09 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000445/19970131997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-13 & 50-446/97-13 on 970428-0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19970081997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-08 & 50-446/97-08 on 970316-0426.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19970011997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-01 & 50-446/97-01 on 970127-31,0428 & 0502.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee self-assessment Effort IR 05000445/19970101997-05-20020 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-10 & 50-446/97-10 on 970421-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20148B5891997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-11 & 50-446/97-11 on 970407-10.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support,Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19970071997-04-16016 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-07 & 50-446/97-07 on 970324-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support 1999-09-14
[Table view] Category:UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000445/19900401990-11-13013 November 1990 Safety Insp Repts 50-445/90-40 & 50-446/90-40.Violations Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status, Operational Safety Verification,Onsite Followup of Events, Followup on Fastener Testing for Bulletin 87-02 IR 05000445/19900311990-10-10010 October 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-31 & 50-446/90-31 on 900808-0918. Violation Noted IR 05000445/19900301990-09-11011 September 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-30 & 50-446/90-30 on 900723-0802.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Security Program Audits,Protected & Vital Area Physical Barriers,Detection & Assessment Aids & Access Control IR 05000445/19900291990-08-30030 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-29 & 50-446/90-29 on 900723-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Water Chemistry & Radiochemistry Programs IR 05000445/19900281990-08-29029 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-28 & 50-446/90-28 on 900716-20.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radioactive Matl Transportation & Solid Radwaste Programs IR 05000445/19900341990-08-27027 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-34 & 50-446/90-34 on 900731-0807. Violation Noted.Major Areas inspected:900730 Main Steam Line Low Pressure Safety Injection Event,Including Actions Taken Prior To,During & Subsequent to Event IR 05000445/19900321990-08-0707 August 1990 Advises That NRC Insp 50-445/90-32 & 50-446/90-32 Canceled.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued for Rept Number ML20058M2501990-08-0303 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-22 & 50-446/90-22 on 900606-0703. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status, Operational Safety Verification,Startup Test Results Review, QA for Startup Test & Onsite Followup of Events IR 05000445/19900161990-08-0202 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-16 & 50-446/90-16 on 900423-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program Including Implementing Procedures,Changes to Emergency Facilities & Equipment IR 05000445/19900211990-07-25025 July 1990 Notifies That NRC Insps 50-445/90-21 & 50-446/90-21 Have Been Cancelled IR 05000445/19900251990-07-24024 July 1990 Cancels Insp Repts 50-445/90-25 & 50-446/90-25 IR 05000445/19900231990-07-13013 July 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-23 & 50-446/90-23 on 900618-22.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Including Organization & Mgt Controls,Training & Qualifications IR 05000445/19900241990-07-11011 July 1990 Insp Repts 50-445/90-24 & 50-446/90-24 on 900618-22 & 25-28. No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Self Assessment Capability IR 05000445/19890641989-09-26026 September 1989 Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-64 & 50-446/89-64 on 890802- 0905.Violation & Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/ Deviations & Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies IR 05000445/19890661989-09-26026 September 1989 Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-66 & 50-446/89-66 on 890802- 0905.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Violations/Deviations,Applicant Action on 10CFR50.55 (E) Const Deficiencies & General Plant Area Tours IR 05000445/19890631989-09-26026 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-63 & 50-446/89-63 on 890802-0905.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies & Assessement of Allegations IR 05000445/19890591989-09-25025 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-59 & 50-446/89-59 on 890814-25. Weaknesses,Strengths & Unresolved Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Response Guidelines (Erg),Including Review of ERG Training Program & Engineering Activities IR 05000445/19890651989-09-22022 September 1989 Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-65 & 50-446/89-65 on 890802- 0905.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies IR 05000445/19890611989-09-14014 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-61 & 50-446/89-61 on 890724-0804.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Final Reconciliation Process to Assure That Pending Open Items Addressed within Corrective Action Repts IR 05000445/19890681989-09-13013 September 1989 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/89-68 & 50-446/89-68 on 890814-18 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program,Including Assessment Aids,Detection Aids,Physical Barriers & Personnel Training IR 05000445/19890571989-08-25025 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-57 & 50-446/89-57 on 890717-28. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Controls & Implementation of Operations & Maint Procedure for Unit 1 IR 05000445/19890581989-08-25025 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-58 & 50-446/89-58 on 890724-28.No Violations & Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Performance & Capabilities During Annual Exercise of Emergency Plan & Procedures IR 05000445/19890501989-08-25025 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-50 & 50-446/89-50 on 890717-21.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program,Organization & Mgt Controls,External & Internal Exposure Controls & Training & Qualification Controls IR 05000445/19890541989-08-24024 August 1989 Resident Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-54 & 50-446/89-54 on 890706-0801.No Violations,Deviations,Open Items,Unresolved Items,Strengths or Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Util Action on Previous Insp Findings & Plant Tours IR 05000445/19890621989-08-24024 August 1989 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/89-62 & 50-446/89-62 on 890731-0804 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program, Including Security Program Audits & Testing & Maint IR 05000445/19890381989-08-17017 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-38 & 50-446/89-38 on 890717-27. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preservice Insp Activities,Licensee Disposition of Reported Deficiencies & Licensee Erosion/Corrosion Program IR 05000445/19890521989-08-17017 August 1989 Resident Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-52 & 50-446/89-52 on 890706-0801.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Util Action on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/ Deviations & safety-related Mechanical Components IR 05000445/19890551989-08-17017 August 1989 Resident Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-55 & 50-446/89-55 on 890706-0801.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Retest Procedure Review, Preoperational Test Witnessing,Plant Tours & Plant Maint IR 05000445/19890561989-08-15015 August 1989 Partially Withheld Preoperational Insp Repts 50-445/89-56 & 50-446/89-26 on 890710-14 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Applicant Physical Security Program,Including Protected Area Physical Barriers IR 05000445/19890431989-08-15015 August 1989 Emergency Preparedness Program Appraisal Insp Repts 50-445/89-43 & 50-446/89-43. Outstanding Items Noted.Major Areas Appraised:Emergency Organization,Training & Equipment & Procedures Which Implement Emergency Plan IR 05000445/19890531989-08-14014 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-53 & 50-446/89-53 on 890706-0801.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Action on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & post-const Hardware Validation Program IR 05000445/19890511989-08-0404 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-51 & 50-446/89-51 on 890706-0801.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & Assessment of Allegations IR 05000445/19890491989-07-21021 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-49 & 50-446/89-49 on 890607-0705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & Corrective Action Program IR 05000445/19890451989-07-21021 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-45 & 50-446/89-45 on 890607-0705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Preoperational Retest Procedure Review,Preoperational Test Witnessing,Plant Tours & Operational Staffing IR 05000445/19890471989-07-20020 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-47 & 50-446/89-47 on 890607-0705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & General Plant Areas IR 05000445/19890481989-07-19019 July 1989 Resident Safety Insp Repts 50-445/89-48 & 50-446/89-48 on 890607-0705.No Strengths or Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Util Action on Previous Insp Findings & Action on self-identified 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies IR 05000445/19890461989-07-19019 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-46 & 50-446/89-46 on 890607-0705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Plant Procedures for Operations & Applicant Meetings IR 05000445/19890391989-07-17017 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-39 & 50-446/89-39 on 890626-0706.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test IR 05000445/19890421989-07-17017 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-42 & 50-446/89-42 on 890605-09.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Radiation Protection Programs Organization & Mgt Controls, Training & Qualifications & External Exposure Controls IR 05000445/19890441989-07-12012 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-44 & 50-446/89-44 on 890607-0705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Action on Previous Findings,Followup on Violations,Applicant Action 50.55 & Deficiencies IR 05000445/19890301989-07-0707 July 1989 Augmented Insp Team Insp Repts 50-445/89-30 & 50-446/89-30 on 890515-0616.Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Check Valve Failures Which Allowed Backflow Through Auxiliary Feedwater Sys During Hot Functional Testing of Unit 1 IR 05000445/19890371989-06-30030 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-37 & 50-446/89-37 on 890503-0606. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies, Followup on NRC Bulletins & SER Verification IR 05000445/19890361989-06-27027 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-36 & 50-446/89-36 on 890503-0606.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Review of 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies & NRC Bulletins IR 05000445/19890411989-06-22022 June 1989 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/89-41 & 50-446/89-41 on 890605-09 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program, Including Protected Area Barriers & Testing & Maint IR 05000445/19890331989-06-19019 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-33 & 50-446/89-33 on 890503-0606.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies by Applicant & General Plant Tours ML20245D9941989-06-19019 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-35 & 50-446/89-35 on 890503-0606. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Applicant Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations,Applicant Action on NRC Bulletins & Fuel Storage Racks ML20245E0761989-06-19019 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-32 & 50-446/89-32 on 890503-0606. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Actions on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations,Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies & Preoperational Testing Audits IR 05000445/19890291989-05-30030 May 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-29 & 50-446/89-29 on 890502-04.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Unit 1 Solid,Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Sys,Radioactive Matl Transportation Program & Radwaste Mgt Program IR 05000445/19890221989-05-22022 May 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-22 & 50-446/89-22 on 890405-0502.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Applicants Action on Previous Insp Findings,Followup on Violations/Deviations & Followup on Bulletins IR 05000445/19890241989-05-18018 May 1989 Insp Repts 50-445/89-24 & 50-446/89-24 on 890405-0502. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Violation/Deviation,Action on 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiencies,Nrc Bulletins,Preoperational Test Program & TMI Action Items 1990-09-11
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000445/19990151999-10-20020 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822-1002. Non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990141999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990131999-08-18018 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-13 & 50-446/99-13 on 990720-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures IR 05000445/19990101999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-10 & 50-446/99-10 on 990510-0628. Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990121999-07-29029 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-12 & 50-446/99-12 on 990530-0710.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19993011999-07-16016 July 1999 Exam Repts 50-445/99-301 & 50-446/99-301 on 990618-24.Exam Results:Six Applicants for Senior Operator Licenses Passed Exams IR 05000445/19990111999-06-22022 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-11 & 50-446/99-11 on 990418-0529.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990081999-06-0909 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-08 & 50-446/99-08 on 990503-11.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990091999-05-12012 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-09 & 50-446/99-09 on 990419-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviewed Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program IR 05000445/19990071999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-07 & 50-446/99-07 on 990307-0417.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990061999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-06 & 50-446/99-06 on 990329-0402.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Planning & Preparation,External Exposure Controls & Quality Assurance of Radiation Protection Activities IR 05000445/19990031999-04-0707 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-03 & 50-446/99-03 on 990124-0306.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19990051999-03-19019 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-05 & 50-446/99-05 on 990222-26.One Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radioactive Matls Transportation Programs IR 05000445/19990011999-03-0909 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-01 & 50-446/99-01 on 990208-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program IR 05000445/19990021999-01-10010 January 1999 Insp Repts 50-445/99-02 & 50-446/99-02 on 990119-22.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000445/19980081998-12-30030 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-08 & 50-446/98-08 on 981025-1205.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Licensee Emergency Response Organization IR 05000445/19980151998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-15 & 50-446/98-15 on 981102-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Program Activities,Including External & Internal Exposure Controls & Controls of Radioactive Matl & Contamination IR 05000445/19980071998-11-19019 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-07 & 50-446/98-07 on 980913-1024.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980161998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-16 & 50-446/98-16 on 981019-23.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Testing & Maint, Protected Area Barrier & Detection Aids,Vital Area Barriers & Detection Aids & Security Sys Power Supply IR 05000445/19980141998-10-21021 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-14 & 50-446/98-14 Has Been Canceled.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued IR 05000445/19980061998-09-30030 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-06 & 50-446/98-06 on 980802-0912.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980121998-09-16016 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-12 & 50-446/98-12 Cancelled IR 05000445/19980051998-08-20020 August 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-05 & 50-446/98-05 on 980621-0801.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980041998-07-16016 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-04 & 50-446/98-04 on 980510-0620.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000445/19983011998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-301 & 50-446/98-301 on 980619-26.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations.All 9 License Applicants Passed Exam ML20236G9321998-07-0202 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980329-0509.Violation Noted:Four Examples Were Identified,Where Licensee Failed to Meet Requirement for Design of ECCS Switchover from Refueling Water Storage Tank to Containment Recirculation IR 05000445/19980031998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-03 & 50-446/98-03 on 980329-0509. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operation,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000445/19980131998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-13 & 50-446/98-13 on 980615-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980021998-04-24024 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-02 & 50-446/98-02 on 980215-0328. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20217F6051998-04-24024 April 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980215-0328.Violations Noted:Corrective Actions Were Not Sufficient to Identify That Excessive Leakage in ECC Sys Check Valves During Unit 1 Cycle 6 Required Unit 1 Safety Injection Pumps Be Started ML20216H3501998-04-16016 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-11 & 50-446/98-11 on 980323-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000445/19980011998-03-19019 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/98-01 & 50-446/98-02 on 980104-0214. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20248L8831998-03-19019 March 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980104-0214.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Document Heat Related Degredation of Unit 2,Train B Solid State Safeguards Sequencer IR 05000445/19970211998-02-11011 February 1998 Errata to Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21,correcting Errors in Insp follow-up Sys Number Associated W/Items Described in Rept IR 05000445/19970231998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-23 & 50-446/97-23 on 971123-980103.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 07100012/20110221998-01-16016 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971012-1122.Violation Noted:Procedure IPO-005B,rev 2,not Appropriate to Circumstances in That Procedure Did Not Require Pressure Be Maintained Below Rc System Pressure & Temp Limits ML20198S1891998-01-16016 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-445/97-20 & 50-446/97-20 on 971012-1122. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198R6571998-01-16016 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970922-25.Violation Noted: on 961029,licensee Made Changes to Emergency Plan,W/O Commission Approval,That Decreased Effectiveness of Plan & Did Not Continue to Meet Planning Standard 50.47(b)(2) ML20198N2071998-01-14014 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970608-0719 & Subsequent Inoffice Reviews Concluded on 971114.Violation Noted: Procedures OPT-102A & 102B Did Not Include Appropriate Quantitative Acceptance Criteria ML20199H0131997-11-21021 November 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970831-1011.Violation Noted:Thermometer IC1473,was Used During Performance of Procedure PPT-SX-7505A on 970807 ML20199H0241997-11-21021 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-18 & 50-446/97-18 on 970831-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering PNO-IV-97-067, on 971117,medical Emergency Declared in Unit 1 Electrical Switchgear Room.Licensee Issued Stop Work Order for Electrical Maint While Investigation Conducted.Nrc Resident Insp Staff Will Be Following Licensee1997-11-17017 November 1997 PNO-IV-97-067:on 971117,medical Emergency Declared in Unit 1 Electrical Switchgear Room.Licensee Issued Stop Work Order for Electrical Maint While Investigation Conducted.Nrc Resident Insp Staff Will Be Following Licensee PNO-IV-97-066, on 971115,new Fuel Damage Occurred.Licensee Suspended Fuel on-load & Conducting Investigation Into Why Damage Occurred.Licensee Expects Delivery of Replacement Fuel Assembly on 971123.State of Tx Informed1997-11-17017 November 1997 PNO-IV-97-066:on 971115,new Fuel Damage Occurred.Licensee Suspended Fuel on-load & Conducting Investigation Into Why Damage Occurred.Licensee Expects Delivery of Replacement Fuel Assembly on 971123.State of Tx Informed IR 05000445/19970221997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-22 & 50-446/97-22 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint ML20199E6481997-11-13013 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-21 & 50-446/97-21 on 971027-31.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Records & Repts,Test & Maint and Access control-vehicle PNO-IV-97-061, on 971027,Unit 1 Experienced Main Generator Lockout,Turbine Trip & Reactor Trip from 100% Power.Afw Manually Started Shortly Following Trip,In Anticipation of Automatic Initiation of AFW Sys.State of Tx Informed1997-10-30030 October 1997 PNO-IV-97-061:on 971027,Unit 1 Experienced Main Generator Lockout,Turbine Trip & Reactor Trip from 100% Power.Afw Manually Started Shortly Following Trip,In Anticipation of Automatic Initiation of AFW Sys.State of Tx Informed IR 05000445/19970191997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-19 & 50-446/97-19 on 970922-25. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rev 25 to Comanche Peak Steam Electric Emergency Plan ML20211A1051997-09-19019 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-445/97-17 & 50-446/97-17 on 970720-0830. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support ML20211A0691997-09-19019 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970720-0830.Violation Noted:On 970507,while Performing Procedure OPT-457B,licensed Operator Failed to Close Valve 2-8812A Per Step 8.8 ML20198G1821997-09-12012 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 970606.Violation Noted:Mn Shook Submitted Falsified Info to NRC Re Being Denied Access to Nuclear Power Plant as Result of fitness-for-duty Policy 1999-09-14
[Table view] |
Text
____ _ - . - . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
'.
o
~ --
~ 7 ECYt0R REPORT ROUTE SHEET abzQ Control No
.~ h, 0 G 0 2//3'/
N/M
'
'
<
LICENSEE / VEND 0R:
,
' ODCEET 50. : Y[MI~ REPORTNd.:[6/4//f_.
INSPECT 0k: >> M g )
'
O22/1-1NSPECTION DATE(5) ,,, g PRIORITY
//
Branch Chief I REPORT DE DATE I
INITIAL /DATE-
~ HANDWRITTEN ORAFT COMPLETED 4 M g 2/g' - DATE REPORT MAILED: ,
delete / archives REVIEW SY SECTION CHIEF .
DUE DATE AFTER 10 DAYS:
- RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector) RESPONSE DUE - 30 DAYS
REWORK C0tPLETE .
CLOSE0UT DATE:
DRAFT REC'D - DMU TYPING TIME WORKING DA)
,
ORAFT TYPING COMPLETE -
ORAFT RE8EW SY SEC'Y/ INSPECTOR gy p .
C y,
'
ORAFT REVIEW BY SECTION CHIEF W p rFwl g 9,g DRAFT REVIEW BY BRANCH CHIEF 7, m .:2/.:2/ .
M" "
RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector)
REWORK C0W LETE M M[c . it .
W .r.4 , g c, l
FINAL REC'D - DNU -
7/y' /// n w Jl2,c - n z u Ag FINALTYPINGCblPLETE h'A 7/19/&
-
FINAL REVIEW BR. SEC'Y/DIV. SEC'Y ,,
FINAL REVIEW 8Y INSPECTOR [g g FINAL REVIEW SY SECTION OtIEF ) , /2.p/pf RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS - DMU 3/2,gjg M CORRECTIONS COMPLETE - OltJ CORRECTION REVIEW - INSP/ SECT. CH.
-
FINAL REVIEW SY BRANCH CHIEF DIVISION DIRECTOR REVIEW ENFORCE!1ENT REVIEW
.
0612150113 861210 , , ,
A.ty7 PDR .
DE
'
. _ . . _
. ! <;;,* :
_
-.
.;
.
. .
-FILE.HAME8 REPORT.7 HOUEMBER 26,'1985 TIME SUMMARY. 11/11/65 THRQUCH 11/36/85 Hours ' applied to : assigned topics f rom
- Manuel Inspection'and Enforcement Procedure 37055: paragraph 024b 10CFR50.55e 4' hours Procedure 92703 I.E. Bulletin, Ceneric Letter Followup Confirmatory Action ' Letter, - and
92 hours0.00106 days <br />0.0256 hours <br />1.521164e-4 weeks <br />3.5006e-5 months <br /> Procedure 92701 Unresolved I t erns -
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />
_
I e
O J
+
Qf(,
,
. -- - ._ __ _ _ _ - _ __- - _ _
...
, % a
.. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAinUTY PROJECT 1555 Connecocut Avenue, N.W., Suite 202 6k j//$ y /(,
t
'
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202)232-8550 May 16, 1986 N OF WFW MA7Dt Director Mq Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f ~[ b ~ d [O Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:
b /o/ffggg FOIA Request To whom it may concern:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.
552, as amended, the Government Accountability Project (GAP)
requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, computer runoffs, any other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated in connection with Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plan.
This request includes all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211, Parts 1.A.2 and A.3 (approved October 8, 1980), whether they currently exist in the NRC official, " working", investigative, or other files, or at any other location, including private residences.
l
!
If any records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, supra, and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed, or are destroyed and/or removed after receipt of this reque.;t, please provide all surrounding records, including but not Alaited to a list of all records which have been or are I destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implen.ent the action (s).
GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the irformation can be considered as primarily benefitting the gene-ral public." 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (4) (A). GAP is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through its citizens Clinic, GAP offers assistance to local public interest and citizens groups seeking to ensurn the health and safety of their communities.
04'l;T 'b.- f
- . . .. . -_ -
- --. --
, . . - - . -
..- . i
. i
.. g.gw ,
..
.
-FOIA Request
-
-.May 16,' 1986
-
Page Two-GAP is-requesting the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protecta public safety and health at nuclear power plants.
'For any documents or portions of documents that you deny due-to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide'an index itemizing
,
and. describing the documents or portions of documents withheld.
The index should provide a detailed justification _of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is -
relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.
This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen E 484 F. 2d 820'
.
(D.C. Cir. 1973) , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).
We look forward to your response to this request within ten
,
' Respectful'ly,
'
iLO A GJ Billie Pirner. Garde
,, Citizens Clinic Director 42115
e
'
- .
.
I
?
!
r
,.
% g n.g
/ No UNITED STATES
[gg
'
-
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
']5, E t WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655
.
_x...../
.Ms; Billie' Pirner Garde-Citizens. Clinic Director gg 315'
Government Accountability Project '
1555 Connecticut' Avenue, NW, Suite 202- IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC- 20036 TO F0!A-86-380
Dear Ms.-Garde:
This is -in further response to your-letter dated May 16, 1986,~in which you requested,; pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F01A), copies of all records pertaining to Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant.
The enclosed Appendix C identifies documents which are being placed in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),1717 H Street, hW, Washington, DC 20555,
. where they will be available for public inspection at no charge or repro-duction at a' nominal charge of five cents ($0.05) per page, as specified in 10 CFR 9.14. The documents will be filed in PDR folder F01A-86-380 under your name.
The enclosed Appendix D identifies documents containing information which constitutes advice, opinions, and recommendations of the staff. This information is being withheld from public disclosure of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(5) pursuant to Exemption (5)
of the Comission's regulations.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV.
This denial may be appealed to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an
" Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."
-$Nd4D@Ch[ ~
._
..
..
..
< ,_
+ . .
- ,_ . -.. .
f; , -
- . . .. ..
.
Ms. Garde ' -2-'
.
The' review of additional records. subject to -your F0IA request has not yet been.
completed. - We will notify you upon completion ~ of review.
J
'
Sincerely,
. .
M_ = = _ wa Donnie H. Grimsley, Director
.
Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration Enclosures: As-stated'
.
.- , ---
,- 7 ,p
' #
.<[*' 5+ t
- s
}pi- :: :
W[i.f.- 4 - ::j .'
, _
n.'
- -
4 * ^>
M".. f ,. s , c-
) '..
, - . . . , .g.
y: , <;< r M-$ m *: _ '
gy b
,
+ ~ + y; ,.
f. '
-
._
-
+
y - r s
, , s;p
-
'_'.n..._
.n - + .c maq.. - s p:.- . n ,
.,c
', ,
,,
, ,
-~
,
r .
..:..- ' ' '
7'g- v ,
si n irb :F0fA2860380.:
'"
- ' n 3 ;% ,7 ;% . ~_ -
,
'
- - v. .
.
,g. _
,
>
- ,
& , _ :- ;_ ;7 _
,
.,
.; A
-
'
-
.c
'! ppendix.C.'
,
,
- r' :
.
t
-
r
. :X 4
,-
, , y : ,
-
-
-.
. .
. _ ,
x ;
. . . . .,
- ,n,
WQT
, .
y *
.. -
.
-
d
'g.;' * . ..
-
. .
'
M ;p
' .
l), ylo/24'/85 : .-. le:no rani! ann,+1*lSCo, Itoy Tre.nt.to-: Kin 'soper. :
M t, ;2.10/l/85:
.,
s6bjce: "TSC-12568'.(1. pas;e) ,
-
} - .CPSES: TUCCo-. Nuclear Enginsdrin;; iMsi:n Deficioney:
M" Ni - a .: .. . ,
l Report,Xy FP-35-063.._(1 paget c
+
(
-
I, " 33)L9/16/85i ~ '
. Letter.' BISCO ~to Texas Utilitied Generating Co;.-
~
f. J
'
4W8/20/85; C.?C? Crc.iner,Jsubject: Penetrationlieals (2 pages)- '
LLetter. American ' Nuclear 11nsurers (ASI), John ~ J, ,
~
' ' .
.. ,
- CarneyL ..to
- Clayton W.'
5.Lt1/22/83) Brown.. SISCo (1: page)
41utual? Atomic Energy Reinsurance P6oh Acceptance:
'
y _
l Lof Test-ing;(2,pages)~
- 6.'8/20/85
.
_
~^
. . .
Letter, A:nerican Nuclear Insurces (ANI). John J. o
- 'L 7.11/13/84 ' Carne'ynto-R,-0;sBabb',.TUCCo Engineering'(2 pages).
'
-
Letter, BISCc William J. Ackerman to Texas. .
,
'
Utilit 1 Sequence No.
fes, J. C. fYoungblood 'Ref,0 bisco letter..
,
-
-
'
8. 9/12/83' . 3346-271 ^ (1 page)
- CPSES/ESAR.
/ Final' Safety: Analysis: Comanche Report. ~ Peak-Steam Electric. Station e
(6 pa3es)- 3-r 2 )
,
$'H 1
.
.
. . { %
V P A UP k Q s
t
- .,,
? 'k
' ' J
" J.
'
9 ~
%
_ % 'l
'
vic
.il t
=$c p- ; GM; 7, ;;3 ' '., - + %
. '
- #.-
g m.9 J.
, w. . -
,- -
,
. my 3 3: - .
.e Y.
, , ,
' '
c. : ~ '.
,
'
p RE:
. 'FOIA-86-380 p 99
> , .
<
, , _ _
_ _ ,
-
, , x- '
m-p w-ym. ; < '3
'.
r
,
s
+
_ , Vf , ,
-
jg , : 4 'y,'*
,
a
, , - - - "
r. .
,
n ? % i 'r , ;a t t k,
- '
' x .
...g Q_.
,7
-
% :Ap'pendix ;"D : , g f ;~ - i-
<
m
_
, _
, > ' ,
,
T ',N' .
'
, -
w *
- i1/b/Mi
, ,
- ] .; r Mi
- .pr J.dum ! rom 11; 'S. Ph i s l ijm . tW T. Wds t e rm.m .
.. - :.
' 1 BISCu"fi re Seal s' Certif fi:ationi Andj]A Recordh ?[
Wiiirh: % rned . ;(3 pagesfS -is
>(r
_
.
J.N;., .
-
m , .
X
- 3/6/864
.
2.'
..
.
.
>
"'
' rtemorandum f rom.. H'. ' S. Ph illips - to . E . 11. 'Jo(n' sn'n .
-
. .
BISCO' Fire Penetration-Seals Test Neports PCA-76.
and?748-1831 .(3.pages) o'
,
h ~
,( ;* '
~
' "
w
' ,
' '..:3.
'
_ (3. .?4 /'./86 ~ . Memorandum f ro:n. II. - S! ^ Phillips to. T.' r"} uesterman,
'
, 2C : Inspect 10a .Reportf SS-16/13 and Rstentli>n of
_ iDraft' Reports. (2 ' pat;es)p O g
.
<
0 -g
- ,
-
^...
%,
4.-Undated -Draft Report, 50-445/16',446/13 Docunient 1.a . 1.b-
%
'
..(31 pages) . 4
.
, N s,
'
"
5; Draf t Report, same> number as above, Doc $ ment 2.a (5 pages). #
.
.
" .,
~6.
~~
-
Draft Report, same number as above, JDocurien t 2.b
,
i (19 pages) s
'
' '
.
" '\
7. Draft Report, same namber as above, Docurent 2.c (3 pages)
"
8. . Draft Report, same number as above, Document 3 (21 pa;;es) '
'
'9. ."
Draft Report, same numbe r as above, ' Document 4
,
(25 pages)
"
- 10. Draft Report, same number as'above, Ducument 5.a w
(19 paces)
11. "
Draft Report, same number as above. Document 5.h (19 paaes)
12. -"
Dratt seport, same number as above, Document 6.a (58 pages)-
"
13. outline of above report number. exit with~ Tucco (6 pages)
"
14. ,
Report input by McCleskey, NRC consultant (20 pgs) s :a
-