ML20134G487: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20134G487
| number = ML20134G487
| issue date = 01/29/1997
| issue date = 01/29/1997
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 960914-1025 & 1213. Violation Noted:Applicable Procedures Recommended in App a of Rg 1.33,Rev 2,dtd Feb 1978,were Not Correctly Implemented in Listed Instances
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 960914-1025 & 1213. Violation Noted:Applicable Procedures Recommended in App a of RG 1.33,Rev 2,dtd Feb 1978,were Not Correctly Implemented in Listed Instances
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)

Latest revision as of 19:02, 28 May 2023

Notice of Violation from Insp on 960914-1025 & 1213. Violation Noted:Applicable Procedures Recommended in App a of RG 1.33,Rev 2,dtd Feb 1978,were Not Correctly Implemented in Listed Instances
ML20134G487
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/29/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134G470 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.033, RTR-REGGD-1.033 50-373-96-13, 50-374-96-13, NUDOCS 9702100426
Download: ML20134G487 (4)


Text

_. . _ _ _ _ .

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Dockets No. 50-373: 50-374 LaSalle County Station Licenses No. NPF-11. NPF-18 Units 1 and 2 During an NRC inspection conducted on September 14 through October 25. and December 13. 1996, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions." NUREG-1600. the violations are listed below:

1. Technical Specification 6.2.A.a requires that applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33. Revision 2.

February 1978, be established implemented, and maintained.

Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33. Revision 2. February 1978. ~

specifies procedures for plant shutdown procedure adherence and temporary change methods. and maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment.

LaSalle General Procedure LGP-2-1. " Normal Unit Shutdown." Revision 48.

Step 7. requires operators to downshift the reactor recirculation (RR)

Jumps to slow speed per LaSalle Operating Procedure LOP-RR-08 " Changing Recirculation Pump Speed from Fast to Slow Speed."

LaSalle Administrative Procedure LAP-100-40 " Procedure Use and Adherence Expectations." Revision 6. requires that a tem]orary procedure change be completed and the procedure revised when the clange is more than an editorial change and the procedure cannot be performed as written.

i LaSalle Maintenance Procedure LMP GM 25. " Emergency Core Cooling System Service Water Strainer Maintenance " Revision 4. Step F.4.25. requires that workers ensure that the ex]osed faces of the shear key collar and the drive shaft which contact t1e inner and outer thrust bearing faces of the strainer backwash valve, are flush with each other. If these faces are not flush, the procedure directs the worker to install a spacer.

Contrary to the above, applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33. Revision 2. February 1978 were not correctly implemented in the following instances:

a. On September 22. 1996, o)erators did not downshift the Unit 2 RR pumps to slow speed per _0P-RR-08 as required by LGP-2-1.

Instead, operators downshifted the RR pumps per LaSalle Instrument Surveillance 3rocedure LIS-RR-205A. " Unit Recirculation Pump Trip System A Breacer Arc Suppression Response Time Test." Revision 2.

without first completing a temporary procedure change to LGP-2-1 as required by LAP-100-40.

9702100426 970129 PDR ADOCK 05000373 0 PDR

Notice of Violation b. On October 2. 1996, during work on the 0 emergency diesel generator (EDG) cooling water strainer, workers did not ensure that the exposed faces of the shear key collar and the drive shaft which contact the inner and outer thrust bearing faces of the strainer backwash valve, were flush with each other and did not install a spacer as required by LMP-GM-25.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50-373/95013-02:

, 50-374/96013-02). _,

4

2. 10 CFR Part 50. Appendix B. Criterion V. " Instructions. Procedures and Drawings." requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions. 3rocedures, or drawings, of a type a)propriate to the circumstances and )e accomplished in accordance with t1ese instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Out-of-service (00S) 960012473 special instructions dated October 11. 1996, specified that the Unit 2. Division 2 battery charger be shut down in accordance with LOP-DC-01. " Energizing. Startup, and Shutdown of a Battery Charger." Revision 8. Step F.3.

Work request (WR) 940061754-01. " Install / Remove 2B Reactor Recirculation Loop Jet Pump Plugs to Support 678 Work." instructions specified that jet pump plugs be installed in jet pumps 11 through 20.

Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with instructions in the following instances:

a. On October 12. 1996, equipment operators shut down the Unit 1.

Division 2 battery charger instead of the Unit 2. Division 2 battery charger as specified in 005 960012473 special instructions. j

b. On October 9. 1996, fuel handlers installed two jet pump plugs in jet pumps 1 and 2 instead of. installing plugs in jet pumps 11 through 20 as specified in WR 940061754-01 instructions.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50-373/96013-03:

50-374/96013-03).

3. 10 CFR Part 50. Appendix B. Criterion V. " Instructions. Procedures and Drawings." requires, in part. that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented . instructions. procedures, or drawings.- of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Contrary to the above, procedures affecting quality were not appropriate to the circumstances in the following instances:

a j .

. Notice of Violation i

a. On October 10,1996. LMP-GM-14. "Use of Freeze Jackets."

i Revision 4. dated July 1. 1992, did not provide workers with information on the lower temperature limit when establishing a

. freeze seal.

I

b. Prior to October 24. 1996. LAP 1300-16. " Engineering Request."

i

' Revision 1. and LAP 1300-18. "Roadmap to Plant Design Changes."

Revision 1. failed to provide sufficient controls to ensure timely

completion of engineering work.

4 This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I) (50-373/96013-05:

50-374/96013-05).

4. Technical Specification 6.2.A.g requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained for the fire protection program.

LaSalle Administrative Procedure LAP-900-10. " Fire Protection Procedure

! for Welding and Cutting." Revision 16. dated June 27. 1996. Step F.1.c.

1 requires, in part, that areas where cutting and welding are in progress 4

be kept clean and that all accumulation of trash, rags, etc.. be i removed. '

Contrary to the above, on September 29, 1996, workers welding on the 0 EDG cooling water strainer did not keep the area clean, and the area i

contained several cloth rags, electrical cords. and plastic bags.

4 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50-373/96013-06; j 50-374/96013-06).

i- j

5. Technical S)ecification 6.2.B. requires that radiation control l procedures Je maintained, available to all station personnel, and

, adhered to.

LaSalle Radiation Procedure LRP-1490-1. " Construction of Radiologically 4

Posted Areas and Step Off Pad Areas." Revision 13. dated January 12 a

1996. Step F.2.d. recuires that hoses. electrical cords, etc., which breach a contaminatec area boundary, be taped or tied securely or

. otherwise be secured where they exit the area. l t LaSalle Radiation Procedure LRP-1410-2. " Minimal Protective Clothing."

Revision 7. dated June 23.-1994. Step F.2. requires that minimal protective clothing requirements include cloth and rubber shoe covers and cloth and rubber gloves.

Contrary to the above, radiation control procedures were not adhered to in the following instances:

4 1

o i

Notice of Violation r

a. On October 7 and 11. 1996, hoses that breached a contaminated area

' boundary in the vicinity of the 20 heater drain (HD) pump room and the 2A HD pum) room, respectively, were not taped or secured as required by L1P-1490-1.

l

b. On October 10. 1996, a maintenance worker did not wear the proper minimal )rotective clothing specified in LRP-1410-2. The worker wore rub)er-gloves and rubber shoe covers but did not have on cloth gloves or cloth shoe covers.

1 2

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50-373/96013-09:

j 50-374/96013-09).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201. Commonwealth Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the 1

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ATTN: Document Control Desk. Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator. Region III. and a copy to t

the NRC Resident Inspector at the LaSalle facility. within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply i

should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation." and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if i

contested, the basis for disputing the violation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (3) the corrective steps that

will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full j

com311ance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous i

docceted correspondence if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time i

' specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why

{ such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is i

shown. consideration will be given to extending the response time, Because your res]onse will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) to the extent possiale, it should not include any personal privacy. 3roprietary.

4 or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR wit 1out i redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you i

should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be

" placed in the PDR. and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

l Dated at Lisle. Illinois-4 this 29th day of January 1997 1

i i

1

_ __ ,,