IR 05000373/1998017
| ML20239A293 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 09/02/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20239A290 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-373-98-17, 50-374-98-17, NUDOCS 9809080375 | |
| Download: ML20239A293 (2) | |
Text
.
y
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
l REGION lll Docket Nos:
50-373; 50-374 License Nos:
50-373/98017(DRS); 50-374/98017(DRS)
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)
Facility:
LaSalle Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Location:
2601 No. 21st Road Marseilles,IL 61341 Dates:
July 13-17,1998 Inspector:
James L. Belanger Senior Physical Security inspector
)
Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
)
9009080375 990902 ADOCK0500g3 DR l
,.
l
.. '
.
l
\\
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LaSalle Generating Station -
NRC Inspection Reports 50-373/98017; 50-374/98017 This inspection reviewed the security program aspect of Plant Support and included an l
evaluation of the conduct of security and safeguards activities, the status of security facilities and equipment, security and safeguards procedures and documentation, a review of two one-hour safeguards event reports, and a follow-up on three previous inspection findings relating to
' the vehicle barrier system. This was an announced inspection.
- A review of a licensee's investigation of an incident identified two unresolved items l
pertaining to the licensee's Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) program. The incident involved the
,
I failure of a contract supervisor to conduct a for-cause test upon the confirmation of the odor of alcohol on an employee who was subject to the licensee's FFD program; and the failures to report instances of violations of the FFD policy and procedures. These are unresolved issues pending further review. (Section S1.1)
Security managers conducted an aggressive investigation and initiated prompt e
corrective actions to address several human performance errors in the security program.
(Section S4.1)
l The licensee implemented a major personnel reduction in the contract security support I
staff. The eliminated positions were not required by the security plan. The effect of this reorganization on performance will be evaluated in future inspections. (Section S6.1)
Security management effectively analyzed adverse trends in their security program.
e Self-assessments in three self-identified problem areas were comprehensive and professional. (Section S7.1)
N