IR 05000373/1998007
| ML20217E424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1998 |
| From: | Creed J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217E405 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-373-98-07, 50-373-98-7, 50-374-98-07, 50-374-98-7, NUDOCS 9803310036 | |
| Download: ML20217E424 (2) | |
Text
-. -
..
.
~
.
i
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION lll Docket Nos:
50-373;30-374 License Nos:
NPF 11; NPF-18 Report Nos:
50-373/98007(DRS); 50-374/98007(DRS)
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)
l
)
J Facility:
LaSalle Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Location:
2601 No. 21st Road Marseilles,IL 61341 Dates:
February 23-27,1998 Inspector:
James L. Belanger, Senior Physical Security inspector Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety 9803310036 980325 PDR ADOCK 05000373 G
,
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LaSalle Generating Station NRC Inspection Reports 50-373/98007; 50-374/98007 This inspection reviewed the security program aspect of Plant Support. This report evaluated security staff knowledge and performance, reviewed the security training and qualification program, reviewed the security organization and administration, evaluated the quality of the security program related audits and reviews, and included a follow-up of previous inspection findings. This was an announced inspection.
The security program was well implemented, meeting security plan commitments and regulatory requirements.
The new security computer system was effectively installed and has demonstrated
.
improved reliability and capability of generating reports. (Section S2)
Security force members' were experienced and knowledgeable about their duties.
.
Security management was actively pursuing resolution of an open item regarding a weakness in the defensive strategy. (Section S4.1)
The response by security force members to the discovery of an undeclared firearm and
.
ammunition was professional and prevented an unauthorized firearm from entering the protected area. (Section S4.2)
The dedication, experience and program ownership of the training staff and the
.
demonstrated effectiveness of the contingency training were considered a program strength. (Section SS)
Security management responded aggressively to identified security force performance
.
issues and effectively evaluated generic causes through the Problem Identification Form (PlF) process. (Section S6)
Self-assessment activities were effective. The detail and quality of the audits and
.
assessment reports were very good. Findings represented valid issues and were good findings. The peer goup assessment was a useful tool in identifying and obtaining corrective action on security issues at this site and others. (Section S7)
Revised post orders and instructions were clearly written and user friendly. This action
-
completes corrective actions in response to a root cause investigation of security force performance events from January 1,1995 through March 9,1996. (Section S8.4)
_