ML19141A107: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard To: Walpole, Robert Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource
{{#Wiki_filter:From:           Guzman, Richard To:             Walpole, Robert Cc:             RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Danna, James
; Danna, James


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review Determination: Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program (EPID: L-2019-LLL-0015)
Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review Determination: Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program (EPID: L-2019-LLL-0015)
Date: Monday, May 20, 2019 12:41:00 PM Bob, By letter dated April 15, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19105A632), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee)requested NRC approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program for Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for this action. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Date:           Monday, May 20, 2019 12:41:00 PM
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
: Bob, By letter dated April 15, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19105A632), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) requested NRC approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program for Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months from the date of this e-mail communication.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for this action. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::80 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months from the date of this e-mail communication. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}}

Latest revision as of 20:49, 3 March 2020

Acceptance Review Determination: Certified Fuel Handler Training Program(05/20/2019 E-mail) EPID: L-2019-LLL-0015
ML19141A107
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/2019
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Robert Walpole
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Guzman R, NRR/DORL/LPL1
References
EPID L-2019-LLL-0015
Download: ML19141A107 (2)


Text

From: Guzman, Richard To: Walpole, Robert Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Danna, James

Subject:

Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review Determination: Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program (EPID: L-2019-LLL-0015)

Date: Monday, May 20, 2019 12:41:00 PM

Bob, By letter dated April 15, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19105A632), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) requested NRC approval of the Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program for Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for this action. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours3.333 days <br />0.476 weeks <br />0.11 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months from the date of this e-mail communication. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov