ML102920354: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/24/2009 | | issue date = 11/24/2009 | ||
| title = Email - from: Williams, Charles R. to: Lake, Louis; Thomas, George; Nausdj@Ornl.Gov Cc: Herrin, Dennis W. (Charles.Williams@Pgnmail.Com) Dated Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:10 Am Subject: Refute 2.8 for Review Attachments: Fm 2.8.ppt; Pictur | | title = Email - from: Williams, Charles R. to: Lake, Louis; Thomas, George; Nausdj@Ornl.Gov Cc: Herrin, Dennis W. (Charles.Williams@Pgnmail.Com) Dated Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:10 Am Subject: Refute 2.8 for Review Attachments: Fm 2.8.ppt; Pictur | ||
| author name = Williams C | | author name = Williams C | ||
| author affiliation = Progress Energy Co | | author affiliation = Progress Energy Co | ||
| addressee name = Lake L | | addressee name = Lake L, Naus D, Thomas G | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-II, Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) | | addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-II, Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) | ||
| docket = 05000302 | | docket = 05000302 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:t'Franke, Mark From: Sent: To: Cc: | {{#Wiki_filter:t' Franke, Mark From: Williams, Charles R. [Charles.Williams@pgnmail.com] | ||
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:10 AM To: Lake, Louis; Thomas, George; nausdj@ornl.gov Cc: Herrin, Dennis W. | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Refute 2.8 for Review , | |||
Attachments: FM 2.8.ppt; Picture 01 3.jpg; 4 jan 73 emailsize.jpg; 5 april 73.bmp.jpg; DSC04768.JPG; DSC04776.JPG; Picture 006.jpg Mr Lake, I am resending due to difficulty with opening/reading the previous attachments. Again, this is prelim. Call me with questions. It looks like I will need to send each one as separate emails to keep from mixing documents. | |||
Thank you, Charles Williams 919-516-7417 1 | |||
Again, this is prelim. Call me with questions. | ?/ý ?5--ý | ||
It looks like I will need to send each one as separate emails to keep from mixing documents. | |||
Thank you, Charles Williams 919-516-7417 1?/ý ?5--ý 2.8 Inadequate Support of Tendons D eýmýnaý | 2.8 Inadequate Support of Tendons during Pouring May identify additional perspective on this D eýmýnaý issue as RCA related efforts proceeds | ||
== Description:== | == Description:== | ||
If the tendons are not supported well, they may move during concrete pouring resulting in either or both, (1) localized friction between the tendon and its sleeve and (2) non-uniform stress in the concrete over the length of the tendon. | |||
If the tendons are not supported well, they may move during concrete pouring resulting in either or both, (1) localized friction between the tendon and its sleeve and (2) non-uniform stress in the concrete over the length of the tendon.Data to be Collected and Analyzed: Examine supports of hoop sleeves during construction. | Data to be Collected and Analyzed: | ||
Examine supports of hoop sleeves during construction. | |||
(1) Examine supports of vertical sleeves during construction. | (1) Examine supports of vertical sleeves during construction. | ||
(2) Examine sleeve location and condition during demolition. | (2) Examine sleeve location and condition during demolition. | ||
See Exhibit 1 as an example of a few pictures that show spacing during construction and SGR hole cutting.Verified Refuting Evidence: | See Exhibit 1 as an example of a few pictures that show spacing during construction and SGR hole cutting. | ||
Verified Supporting Evidence: 1. Photos from original construction demonstrate the support system.2. Photos taken during demolition show that the sleeves were evenly distributed in the zone and not deformed.Reviewed by: Dr. Avi Mor, 352-795-6486, ext 1030 -PII CR3 Team Office 11/23/2009 1*ot relca~c to ~ th.rd party vvithuut P~B~D2~ | Verified Refuting Evidence: Verified Supporting Evidence: | ||
I I I JAN 73 REACTOR BLDG EQUIP ACCESS OPENING I 5 APRIL 73 REACTOR BLDG EXT WALL 300° 1360 0 | : 1. Photos from original construction demonstrate the support system. | ||
: 2. Photos taken during demolition show that the sleeves were evenly distributed in the zone and not deformed. | |||
Reviewed by: Dr. Avi Mor, 352-795-6486, ext 1030 - | |||
PII CR3 Team Office 11/23/2009 1*ot relca~c to ~th.rd party vvithuut 1 P~B~D2~ | |||
L J t | |||
I I | |||
I JAN 73 REACTOR BLDG EQUIP ACCESS OPENING | |||
I 5 APRIL 73 REACTOR BLDG EXT WALL 300° 1360 0 | |||
* '.11 J | |||
; :} ~4 4 I 4',. ~* | |||
4, | |||
lit IL}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:58, 11 March 2020
| ML102920354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/2009 |
| From: | Williams C Progress Energy Co |
| To: | Lake L, Naus D, George Thomas NRC/RGN-II, Oak Ridge |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0116 | |
| Download: ML102920354 (8) | |
Text
t' Franke, Mark From: Williams, Charles R. [Charles.Williams@pgnmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:10 AM To: Lake, Louis; Thomas, George; nausdj@ornl.gov Cc: Herrin, Dennis W.
Subject:
Refute 2.8 for Review ,
Attachments: FM 2.8.ppt; Picture 01 3.jpg; 4 jan 73 emailsize.jpg; 5 april 73.bmp.jpg; DSC04768.JPG; DSC04776.JPG; Picture 006.jpg Mr Lake, I am resending due to difficulty with opening/reading the previous attachments. Again, this is prelim. Call me with questions. It looks like I will need to send each one as separate emails to keep from mixing documents.
Thank you, Charles Williams 919-516-7417 1
?/ý ?5--ý
2.8 Inadequate Support of Tendons during Pouring May identify additional perspective on this D eýmýnaý issue as RCA related efforts proceeds
Description:
If the tendons are not supported well, they may move during concrete pouring resulting in either or both, (1) localized friction between the tendon and its sleeve and (2) non-uniform stress in the concrete over the length of the tendon.
Data to be Collected and Analyzed:
Examine supports of hoop sleeves during construction.
(1) Examine supports of vertical sleeves during construction.
(2) Examine sleeve location and condition during demolition.
See Exhibit 1 as an example of a few pictures that show spacing during construction and SGR hole cutting.
Verified Refuting Evidence: Verified Supporting Evidence:
- 1. Photos from original construction demonstrate the support system.
- 2. Photos taken during demolition show that the sleeves were evenly distributed in the zone and not deformed.
Reviewed by: Dr. Avi Mor, 352-795-6486, ext 1030 -
PII CR3 Team Office 11/23/2009 1*ot relca~c to ~th.rd party vvithuut 1 P~B~D2~
L J t
I I
I JAN 73 REACTOR BLDG EQUIP ACCESS OPENING
I 5 APRIL 73 REACTOR BLDG EXT WALL 300° 1360 0
- '.11 J
- } ~4 4 I 4',. ~*
4,
lit IL