ML14027A033

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Eplan and EAL Scheme Change Request for Additional Information (LAR #315)
ML14027A033
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/2013
From: Gratton C
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Westcott D
Duke Energy Corp
References
Download: ML14027A033 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Gratton, Christopher Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 4:16 PM To: Westcott, Daniel (Daniel.Westcott@duke-energy.com)

Subject:

Eplan and EAL Scheme Change Request for Additional Information (LAR #315)

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE EMERGENCY PLAN AND THE EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL SCHEME DOCKET NO. 50-302 By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated September 26, 2013, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13274A584, the application), Duke Energy Florida, Inc. (DEF, the licensee), submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to Facility Operating License No. DPR-72, for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3). The LAR seeks NRC approval of changes to the CR-3 Emergency Plan and revised Emergency Action Level scheme. The NRC staff finds that additional information is needed to complete its review.

In your application, you requested approval of the Fuel Handling Accident and the Radioactive Waste Handling Accident for inclusion in the CR-3 Final Safety Analysis Report [FSAR]. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.91, Notice for public comment; state consultation, requires licensees to provide an analysis about the issue of no significant hazards consideration determination (NSHCD) using the standards in Section 50.92, Issuance of amendments. Section 4.1 of your application, No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, evaluates whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92. The evaluation provided in Section 4.1 does not provide an analysis of the proposed changes to the FSAR discussed in to the application for which you are requesting approval.

Please provide a NSHCD analysis addressing the proposed changes to the FSAR discussed in Enclosure 6 to your application, or a justification why such an analysis is not required.

1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1041 Mail Envelope Properties (Christopher.Gratton@nrc.gov20131216161500)

Subject:

Eplan and EAL Scheme Change Request for Additional Information (LAR #315)

Sent Date: 12/16/2013 4:15:36 PM Received Date: 12/16/2013 4:15:00 PM From: Gratton, Christopher Created By: Christopher.Gratton@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Westcott, Daniel (Daniel.Westcott@duke-energy.com)" <Daniel.Westcott@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1942 12/16/2013 4:15:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: