ML15121A651: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
1717 Wakonade Drive East | 1717 Wakonade Drive East | ||
Welch, MN 55089 | Welch, MN 55089 | ||
SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, | SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 | ||
, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION | , REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION | ||
REPORT | REPORT 0500 0 282/20 1 5007; 05000 306/20 1 5007 Dear M r. Davison: On August 3, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a | ||
triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at | triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at | ||
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. | Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. | ||
A team of six inspectors will perform this | A team of six inspectors will perform this | ||
3-week inspection. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21. | 3-week inspection. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21. The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk | ||
-significant components | -significant components | ||
associated with one or more accident | associated with one or more accident scenari o or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first on | ||
-site inspection | -site inspection | ||
week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from you | week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from you | ||
Line 45: | Line 42: | ||
The inspection will include | The inspection will include | ||
3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance | 3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance | ||
, and one on operations | , and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows: | ||
. The current inspection schedule is as follows: | |||
On-site weeks: | On-site weeks: | ||
August 3-7, 2015; August | August 3-7, 2015; August 1 7-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015. | ||
-September 4, 2015. | |||
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of | The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of | ||
July 27-31, 2015, as discussed in the attached enclosure. | July 27-31, 2015, as discussed in the attached enclosure. | ||
K. Davison | K. Davison | ||
-2- Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that | -2- Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that th is type of inspection is | ||
extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on | extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on | ||
-site portions of | -site portions of | ||
Line 76: | Line 71: | ||
We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is | We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is | ||
Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829 | Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829 | ||
-9828 or via e-mail | -9828 or via e-mail a t James.Neurauter@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). | ||
Existing information collection | Existing information collection | ||
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget | requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget | ||
Line 88: | Line 83: | ||
-rm/adams.html | -rm/adams.html | ||
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). | (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/ | ||
Christine A. Lipa, | Christine A. Lipa , Chie f Engineering Branch 2 | ||
Division of Reactor Safety | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Docket | Docket No s. 50-282; 50-306 License No | ||
s. | s. D PR-42; D P R-60 Enclosure: | ||
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) | Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) | ||
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV | cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV | ||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) | INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) | ||
Enclosure | Enclosure Inspection Report: | ||
05000 282/20 1 5007; 05000 306/20 1 5007 Inspection Dates: | |||
August 3-7, 2015; August 17-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015 | |||
August 3-7, 2015; August 17 | |||
-21, 2015; and August 31 | |||
-September 4, 2015 | |||
. Inspection Procedure: | . Inspection Procedure: | ||
IP 71111.21 "Component Design Bases Inspection" | IP 71111.21 "Component Design Bases Inspection" | ||
Line 109: | Line 100: | ||
James Neurauter | James Neurauter | ||
, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS | , Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS | ||
(630) 829 | (630) 829-9828 James.Neurauter@nrc.gov | ||
-9828 James.Neurauter@nrc.gov | |||
I. Information Requested Prior to the On | I. Information Requested Prior to the On | ||
-site Information Gathering/Inspection Week | -site Information Gathering/Inspection Week | ||
The following | The following information is requested by June 23, 2015 , or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. Please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media | ||
should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology. | |||
should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge | |||
1. Risk-ranking of t | 1. Risk-ranking of t | ||
op | op 2 50 components from your site specific probabilistic safety | ||
analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk | analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk | ||
-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk | -Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk | ||
Line 129: | Line 117: | ||
-sets from your PSA. | -sets from your PSA. | ||
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the P | 4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the P | ||
S A that contributes more than 5 | |||
percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency (CDF). | percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency (CDF). | ||
5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document. | 5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document. | ||
Line 149: | Line 137: | ||
or expert panel judgment | or expert panel judgment | ||
(i.e., those systems/components not identified in the | (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the | ||
P S A). 13. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last | |||
3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable) | 3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable) | ||
. 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last | . 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last | ||
Line 158: | Line 146: | ||
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming. | 19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming. | ||
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart | 20. Current management and engineering organizational chart | ||
. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major | . 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major o ne line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies). | ||
23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawing | 23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawing | ||
s (P&IDs) (if available). | s (P&IDs) (if available). | ||
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be | II. Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be | ||
Available by | Available by | ||
July 22, 2015 | July 22, 2015 , (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of | ||
, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of | |||
July 27-31, 2015). This information | July 27-31, 2015). This information | ||
should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc | should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc | ||
Line 174: | Line 161: | ||
associated with each of the selected components for the last | associated with each of the selected components for the last | ||
10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities. | 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities. | ||
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters) | 3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations | ||
. Pipe stress calculations | |||
are excluded from this request | are excluded from this request | ||
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. | 4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. | ||
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, | 5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components | ||
. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. | . This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. | ||
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable | 6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable | ||
Line 204: | Line 189: | ||
, On-Site (for final selected components) | , On-Site (for final selected components) | ||
1. During the in | 1. During the in | ||
-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 27-31, 2015. | -office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 27-31, 2015. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three onsite inspection weeks. | ||
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection | IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection | ||
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection | 1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection | ||
. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | . 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | ||
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies) | status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies) | ||
. 4. Reference materials | . 4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on | ||
. (make available if needed during all on | |||
-site weeks): | -site weeks): | ||
Individual Plant Examination | Individual Plant Examination | ||
Line 227: | Line 210: | ||
-rm/adams.html | -rm/adams.html | ||
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). | (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for | ||
/ | / | ||
Christine A. Lipa, | Christine A. Lipa, Chie f Engineering Branch 2 | ||
Division of Reactor Safety | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Docket | Docket No s. 50-282; 50-306 License No | ||
s. DPR-42; DPR-60 Enclosure: | s. DPR-42; DPR-60 Enclosure: | ||
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) | Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) | ||
Line 250: | Line 232: | ||
Publicly Available | Publicly Available | ||
Non-Publicly Available | Non-Publicly Available | ||
Sensitive | Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy | ||
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME JNeurauter:cl | OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME JNeurauter:cl | ||
ADunlop for CLipa DATE 04/29/15 04/29/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COP | ADunlop for CLipa DATE 04/29/15 04/29/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COP | ||
Y | Y | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 03:46, 9 July 2018
ML15121A651 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Prairie Island |
Issue date: | 04/29/2015 |
From: | Lipa C A NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
To: | Davison K Northern States Power Co |
References | |
IR 2015007 | |
Download: ML15121A651 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000282/2015007
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUIT
E 210 LISLE, IL 60532
-4352 April 29, 2015 Mr. Kevin Davison
Site Vice President
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
1717 Wakonade Drive East
Welch, MN 55089
SUBJECT: PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI) INSPECTION
REPORT 0500 0 282/20 1 5007; 05000 306/20 1 5007 Dear M r. Davison: On August 3, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a
triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2.
A team of six inspectors will perform this
3-week inspection. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21. The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk
-significant components
associated with one or more accident scenari o or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first on
-site inspection
week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from you
r simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second on
-site week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact.
The inspection will include
3 weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance
, and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
On-site weeks:
August 3-7, 2015; August 1 7-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of
July 27-31, 2015, as discussed in the attached enclosure.
K. Davison
-2- Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that th is type of inspection is
extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on
-site portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than
June 23, 2015.
By July 10, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately
15 components.
The second group of documents requested is
those items needed to support our in
-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector
at the Regional Office no later than
July 22, 2015.
During the in
-office preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on August 3, 2015.
It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the
inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is
We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is
Benjamin Hammargren of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829
-9828 or via e-mail a t James.Neurauter@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
Control Number.
K. Davison
-3- In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for/
Christine A. Lipa , Chie f Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No s. 50-282; 50-306 License No
s. D PR-42; D P R-60 Enclosure:
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
Enclosure Inspection Report:
05000 282/20 1 5007; 05000 306/20 1 5007 Inspection Dates:
August 3-7, 2015; August 17-21, 2015; and August 31-September 4, 2015
. Inspection Procedure:
IP 71111.21 "Component Design Bases Inspection"
Lead Inspector:
, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
(630) 829-9828 James.Neurauter@nrc.gov
I. Information Requested Prior to the On
-site Information Gathering/Inspection Week
The following information is requested by June 23, 2015 , or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. Please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media
should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.
1. Risk-ranking of t
op 2 50 components from your site specific probabilistic safety
analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk
-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk
-Reduction Worth (RRW), and Fussell
-Veseley (FV)
(as applicable).
2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release Frequency
[LERF]) from your site specific PSA sorted by
RAW. 3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut
-sets from your PSA.
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the P
S A that contributes more than 5
percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency (CDF).
5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document.
6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
performance measures (JPMs). 7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures
(EOPs). 8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description)
.
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
2 9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE), if available.
10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to
design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). 11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the
open and closed direction (identify safety
-related direction) for valves
in the Motor-Operated Valve
(MOV) and Air-Operated Valve
(AOV) Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.
12. List of high
-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
or expert panel judgment
(i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
P S A). 13. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last
3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable)
. 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last
3 years. 16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years at your facility
. 17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
issues initiated/completed in the last
5 years. 18. List of open operability evaluations.
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart
. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major o ne line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawing
s (P&IDs) (if available).
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be
Available by
July 22, 2015 , (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of
July 27-31, 2015). This information
should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc
.).
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
3 1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last
6 years. 2. The maintenance history
(corrective, preventive, and elective)
associated with each of the selected components for the last
10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities.
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations
are excluded from this request
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components
. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable
. 7. Copies of selected operator work
-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable.
9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components' performance for last 3 years (For example, pumps' performance including in
-service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves:
stroke time and leak rate results, etc.
). 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components
and selected scenarios
. 11. A copy of any internal/external self
-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection
. 12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component
, for example: Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. Heat Exchangers/room coolers
- thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc.
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (CDBI)
4 13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
III. Additional Information to be
Provided on August 3, 2015
, On-Site (for final selected components)
1. During the in
-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 27-31, 2015. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection
. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies)
. 4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on
-site weeks):
Individual Plant Examination
/Probabilistic Risk Assessment
(IPE/PRA) Report; Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
K. Davison
-3- In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, /RA Andrew Dunlop Acting for
/
Christine A. Lipa, Chie f Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No s. 50-282; 50-306 License No
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI)
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV DISTRIBUTION
w/encl: Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland Resource
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
DRPIII DRSIII Jim Clay Carmen Olteanu
ADAMS Accession Number ML15121A651
Publicly Available
Non-Publicly Available
Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME JNeurauter:cl
ADunlop for CLipa DATE 04/29/15 04/29/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COP
Y