ML15225A117: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1As of: 8/7/15 2:28 PMReceived: August 02, 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:e l-'enlgFOtosComments Due: August 31, 201Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantLicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact StatementDocument: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FRDoc #2015-15921 ..~-.._, ... /.15Submitter Information .....Name: Nathan Macher =, , -}rs.-)rnGeneral CommentI am writing to support the continued operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2. The DiabloCanyon Power Plant provides many benefits to the local community, including revenue, jobs, and cleanenergy. The plant not only protects children (and adults) from breathing in harmful sulfur dioxide and otherparticulates that come from the combustion of fossil fuels, but the plant can also help with the drought bydesalinating water.Removing the plant from operation would be a loss for the environment and public health. After the San Ofreplant shut down in 2012, California's carbon emissions rose by 35%, according to NuclearMatters. In thecontext of climate change closing clean energy plants is going in the wrong direction. Disregarding climatechange, closing clean energy plants is a public health disaster as it forces those in the surrounding communityto breathe in more air pollution.Keep Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 open.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C :/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020.html 0/72108/07/2015}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 As of: 8/7/15 2:28 PM Received:
August 02, 2015 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:e l-'enlgFOtos Comments Due: August 31, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FRDoc #2015-15921  
..~-.._, ... /.15 Submitter Information  
.....Name: Nathan Macher =, , -}rs.-)rn General Comment I am writing to support the continued operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2. The Diablo Canyon Power Plant provides many benefits to the local community, including revenue, jobs, and clean energy. The plant not only protects children (and adults) from breathing in harmful sulfur dioxide and other particulates that come from the combustion of fossil fuels, but the plant can also help with the drought by desalinating water.Removing the plant from operation would be a loss for the environment and public health. After the San Ofre plant shut down in 2012, California's carbon emissions rose by 35%, according to NuclearMatters.
In the context of climate change closing clean energy plants is going in the wrong direction.
Disregarding climate change, closing clean energy plants is a public health disaster as it forces those in the surrounding community to breathe in more air pollution.
Keep Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 open.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 file :///C :/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020.html 0/721 08/07/2015}}

Latest revision as of 00:43, 9 July 2018

Comment (3) of Nathan Macher Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML15225A117
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2015
From: Macher N
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of Administrative Services
SECY RAS
References
80FR37664 00003, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15225A117 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Page 1 of 1 As of: 8/7/15 2:28 PM Received:

August 02, 2015 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:e l-'enlgFOtos Comments Due: August 31, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FRDoc #2015-15921

..~-.._, ... /.15 Submitter Information

.....Name: Nathan Macher =, , -}rs.-)rn General Comment I am writing to support the continued operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2. The Diablo Canyon Power Plant provides many benefits to the local community, including revenue, jobs, and clean energy. The plant not only protects children (and adults) from breathing in harmful sulfur dioxide and other particulates that come from the combustion of fossil fuels, but the plant can also help with the drought by desalinating water.Removing the plant from operation would be a loss for the environment and public health. After the San Ofre plant shut down in 2012, California's carbon emissions rose by 35%, according to NuclearMatters.

In the context of climate change closing clean energy plants is going in the wrong direction.

Disregarding climate change, closing clean energy plants is a public health disaster as it forces those in the surrounding community to breathe in more air pollution.

Keep Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 open.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 file :///C :/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0020.html 0/721 08/07/2015

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15225A117&oldid=858051"