IR 05000445/1985016: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20206S889
| number = ML20215C363
| issue date = 09/17/1986
| issue date = 11/26/1986
| title = Ack Receipt of 860616 & 0905 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13.Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Insp
| title = Route Sheet for Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13 on 851101-30.Time Summary for Hours Applied to Assigned Topics from IE Manual Encl
| author name = Johnson E
| author name = Westerman
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| author affiliation = NRC
| addressee name = Counsil W
| addressee name =  
| addressee affiliation = TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
| addressee affiliation =  
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8609230019
| case reference number = FOIA-86-380, FOIA-86-A-177
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document report number = 50-445-85-16, 50-446-85-13, NUDOCS 8612150113
| package number = ML20215C281
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
Line 18: Line 20:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- -
{{#Wiki_filter:____  _ - . - .  . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
-.
  '. ''
  ...,
o
SEP ll N In Reply Refer To:
  ~ --
Dockets: 50-445/85-16 50-446/85-13 Texas Utilities Generating Company ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil Executive Vice President 400 North Olive, L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Gentlemen:
    ~ 7 ECYt0R REPORT ROUTE SHEET  abzQ Control No
Thank you for your letters dated June 16, 1986, and September 5, 1986, in response to our letters dated April 4,1986, and August 12, 1986. We have no further questions at this time and will review your corrective action during a future inspection.
      .~ h, 0 G 0 2//3'/
N/M
  '
      '
          <
LICENSEE / VEND 0R:
,
' ODCEET 50. : Y[MI~  REPORTNd.:[6/4//f_.
 
INSPECT 0k: >> M g )
'
O22/1-1NSPECTION DATE(5)  ,,, g  PRIORITY
  //
Branch Chief  I REPORT DE DATE I
INITIAL /DATE-
  ~ HANDWRITTEN ORAFT COMPLETED  4 M g 2/g' -  DATE REPORT MAILED:  ,
*    '
delete / archives REVIEW SY SECTION CHIEF  .
DUE DATE AFTER 10 DAYS:
;  RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector)    RESPONSE DUE - 30 DAYS:
REWORK C0tPLETE    .
CLOSE0UT DATE:
DRAFT REC'D - DMU TYPING TIME  WORKING DA)
,
ORAFT TYPING COMPLETE  -
ORAFT RE8EW SY SEC'Y/ INSPECTOR gy p .
C y,
          '
ORAFT REVIEW BY SECTION CHIEF  W p rFwl  g 9,g DRAFT REVIEW BY BRANCH CHIEF    7, m .:2/.:2/  .
M" "
RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector)
REWORK C0W LETE M M[c . it .
W .r.4 , g c, l
FINAL REC'D - DNU -
7/y'  /// n w Jl2,c - n z u Ag FINALTYPINGCblPLETE h'A 7/19/&
          -
FINAL REVIEW BR. SEC'Y/DIV. SEC'Y  ,,
FINAL REVIEW 8Y INSPECTOR  [g g FINAL REVIEW SY SECTION OtIEF  ) , /2.p/pf RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS - DMU 3/2,gjg M CORRECTIONS COMPLETE - OltJ CORRECTION REVIEW - INSP/ SECT. CH.
 
-
FINAL REVIEW SY BRANCH CHIEF DIVISION DIRECTOR REVIEW ENFORCE!1ENT REVIEW
          .
      *
    *  .  .
0612150113 861210    , , ,
        * *
A.ty7 PDR    .
DE
 
        '
. _ . . _
 
. ! <;;,* :
_
  -.
  .;
.
. .
  -FILE.HAME8 REPORT.7 HOUEMBER 26,'1985 TIME SUMMARY. 11/11/65 THRQUCH 11/36/85 Hours ' applied to : assigned topics f rom
  : Manuel  Inspection'and Enforcement Procedure 37055: paragraph 024b 10CFR50.55e 4' hours Procedure 92703 I.E. Bulletin, Ceneric Letter Followup  Confirmatory Action ' Letter, - and
*
92 hours Procedure 92701 Unresolved I t erns -
2 hours
_
 
I e
O J
+
 
Q''f(,
      ,
  . -- - ._ __ _ _ _ - _ __- - _ _
 
...
*
, %  a
.. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAinUTY PROJECT 1555 Connecocut Avenue, N.W., Suite 202 6k j//$ y /(,
t
    '
Washington, D.C. 20036    (202)232-8550 May 16, 1986 N OF WFW MA7Dt Director    Mq Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  f ~[ b ~ d [O Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:
b /o/ffggg FOIA Request To whom it may concern:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.
 
552, as amended, the Government Accountability Project (GAP)
requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, computer runoffs, any other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated in connection with Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plan.
 
This request includes all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211, Parts 1.A.2 and A.3 (approved October 8, 1980), whether they currently exist in the NRC official, " working", investigative, or other files, or at any other location, including private residences.
 
l
!
If any records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, supra, and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed, or are destroyed and/or removed after receipt of this reque.;t, please provide all surrounding records, including but not Alaited to a list of all records which have been or are I  destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implen.ent the action (s).
 
GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the irformation can be considered as primarily benefitting the gene-ral public." 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (4) (A). GAP is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through its citizens Clinic, GAP offers assistance to local public interest and citizens groups seeking to ensurn the health and safety of their communities.
 
04'l;T 'b.- f
- . . ..  . -_ -
    - --.  --
 
  ,  .  . - - . -
*
..- .      i
.      i
.. g.gw    ,
..
.
  -FOIA Request
  -
  -.May 16,' 1986
  -
Page Two-GAP is-requesting the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protecta public safety and health at nuclear power plants.
 
'For any documents or portions of documents that you deny due-to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide'an index itemizing
,
and. describing the documents or portions of documents withheld.


Sincerely, c .inni signed BY.
The index should provide a detailed justification _of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is -
relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.


E. H. Johnson.,
This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen E 484 F. 2d 820'
E. H. Johnson, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects cc:
.
, Texas Utilities Electric. Company l ATTN: G. S. Keeley, Manager l
  (D.C. Cir. 1973) , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).
Licensing
'
Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street Lock Box 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Juanita Ellis President - CASE 1426 South Polk Street Dallas, Texas 75224 RIV: CPG  RSB  DRSPTQi IBar s:gb TFWesterman Johnson c/// /86  y /ff/86 Epl/p/86
      /EO/
8609230019 860917    1\
PDR ADOCK 05000445
_ . . ,
G  PDR
      .. . - . . . - - . . - -


We look forward to your response to this request within ten
,
    ' Respectful'ly,
   '
   '
V
iLO A GJ Billie Pirner. Garde
.; . .
  ,, Citizens Clinic Director 42115
Texas Utilities Generating Company    2 Renea Hicks Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division P. O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711 - 2548 Administrative Judge Peter Elech U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Elizabeth Administrative Judge Oak Ridge National Laboratory P. 0. Box X, Building 3500 Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37830 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom 1107 West Knapp Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 Dr. Walter H. Jordan 881 Outer Drive Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Anthony Roisman, Esq.


Executive Director Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 2000 P. Street, N.W., Suite 611 Washington, D. C. 20036 Texas Radiation Control Program Director bec to DMB (IE01)
e
bec distrib by RIV:
  '
  *RFB      * MIS System
;.
  *RRI-OPS      *RSTS Operator
  *RRi-CONST    *R&SPB
  *T. F. Westerman, RSB    DRSP V. Noonan, NRR    R. Martin, RA S. Treby, ELD    *RSB
.
.
'
I
  *RIV File      J. Taylor, IE
?
  *D. Weiss,LFMB(AR-2015)    J. Konklin, IE i
!
  *I. Barr.es, CPTG
 
   *w/766
r
.
,.
_ , _ . - . . . . _ , - _ _ , _ . _ _ , _ _ , - - . , , . _ _ _ , . . . _ - . , _ , , - _ , . . - . . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ . _ - _ . _ - - . , _ - . _ - - - - _ _ - - -
 
% g n.g
/ No UNITED STATES
   [gg
'' '
      -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
']5, E t  WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655
      .
_x...../
.Ms; Billie' Pirner Garde-Citizens. Clinic Director gg 315'
Government Accountability Project  '
1555 Connecticut' Avenue, NW, Suite 202- IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC- 20036  TO F0!A-86-380


SEP 5 '86 16:18  LICENSE TUGCO    PAGE.02
==Dear Ms.-Garde:==
. <.      ,
This is -in further response to your-letter dated May 16, 1986,~in which you requested,; pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F01A), copies of all records pertaining to Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant.
i      i 0      Log # TXX-4992 File # 10130 o        IR 85-16 85 13 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY    '7 EKYW AY TOWER . 400 MoaTN 01JVB STREET. L.B. 91. DAIJ,,AS. TRE.As 7s3o1 September 5, 1986  _:- -
T m@  W :W W W a===
      '  ' * '
Mr. Eric H. Johnson, Director    -
Division of Reactor Safety and Projects    1  i.


U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000
The enclosed Appendix C identifies documents which are being placed in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),1717 H Street, hW, Washington, DC 20555,
'
. where they will be available for public inspection at no charge or repro-duction at a' nominal charge of five cents ($0.05) per page, as specified in 10 CFR 9.14. The documents will be filed in PDR folder F01A-86-380 under your name.
Arlington, TX 76012 i SUBJECT: COMANCHE PEAK S' TEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)   ,
        '
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 RESPONSE TO NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION      e
!          f l  INSPECTION REPORT NOS.: 50-445/85-16 AND 50-446/85-13    ,


==Dear Mr. Johnson:==
The enclosed Appendix D identifies documents containing information which constitutes advice, opinions, and recommendations of the staff. This information is being withheld from public disclosure of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(5) pursuant to Exemption (5)
We have reviewed your letter of August 12, 1986 and have provided the additional information you requested regarding Notice of Violation 445/8516-V-03(ItemA)intheattachmenttothisletter. We requested and received a two week extension in providing this information in a phone discussion with Mr. I. Barnes on September 2, 1986.
of the Comission's regulations.


You also requested that we confirm that all references .to training sessions, meetings, and discussions are appropriately documented and available for audit. Our responses have indicated when these items are formally documented.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV.


In those cases where we have not indicated formal documentation, such as l meetings and discussions, key personnel are available to confirm that these meetings and discussions took place as stated. We consider that training
This denial may be appealed to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an
'
" Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."
sessions should be documented and the confirming documents are available for your review.


We believe that our approach is consistent with 20CFR50 Appendix B and meets l
-$Nd4D@Ch[ ~
all applicable regulations.


l      Very truly yours,  -
      ._
        .
    ..
W. G. Counsil
    ..
      '
  ..
JWA/amb      ,
< ,_
Attachments    @]j .
+ . .
        '
; ,_ . -.. .
c-NRCRegionIV(0+1 copy)  " N '' 'H# E3 7 h ~
f; ,  -
Director, Inspection & Enforcement (15 copies)    '
- . . .. ..
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. V.S. Noonan Mr. D.L. Kolley
  .
        '
Ms. Garde  ' -2-'
a asvraron or ruxaa t/vitriiss mLECTRIC COMPANT
  .
[C / _____ _. .. ._ -. .. .____.  - _ _ -  . _
The' review of additional records. subject to -your F0IA request has not yet been.


,
completed. - We will notify you upon completion ~ of review.
SEP 5 '86 16:19 LICENSE TUGCO  PAGE.03
,
)  Additional Information to g  NOV 445/8516-V-08 1. RC Concern    -
"
... [Y]our response failed to provide any action taken with respect to the failure of tie design review process to identify the technical inadequacy of Design Change Authorization 13,349."


Response A. corrective Action IAkta add Results Achieved As stated in our original response, the DCA was re-reviewed and additional calculations were done to show that the design change was acceptable. This re-review of the DCA was performed in accordance with project procedures which insure that the design change receives the same design control measures as those applicable to the original design.
J
    '


B. Action la Prevent Recurrence As stated in the response to Concern No. 2, we believe the instance noted in this Violation is an isolated occurance. However, the engineering personnel involved in the review and processing of DCA 13349 will be counseled regarding the applicable design control measures.
Sincerely,
. .
M_ = = _ wa Donnie H. Grimsley, Director
      .
Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration Enclosures: As-stated'
  .


In the event that the engineering review delineated in Part B of the response to Concern No. 2 determines this violation is widespread, additional corrective action will be formulated.
  .-  ,         ---
                ,- 7    ,p
        '      #
  .<[*'    5+  t
            -  s
              }pi-  :: :
W[i.f.- 4 - ::j .'
        ,      _
n.'
              -  -
4 *  ^>
:
M".. f ,. s    , c-
          ) '..
          , - . . . ,    .g.


SEP S '86 16:19 LICENSE TUGC0  ,
y: , <;< r M-$ m *: _ '
      , PAG . b4   i .
gy b
.s      ~ -
    *
      ,
      +  ~   + y; ,.
f. '
              -
                ._
                -
                  +


   ,    .
y   - r s
    ,
          , ,      s;p
                -
                  '_'.n..._
.n - +  .c  maq..  -  s p:.- . n  ,
          .,c
            ', ,
                ,,
                ,  ,
                  -~
                  ,
r .
    ..:..-  ' ' '
7'g-    v      ,
si  n  irb :F0fA2860380.:
                  '"
          - '  n 3 ;% ,7   ;% . ~_          -
                  ,
  '
          #    '''    - v.  .
.
      ,g. _
           ,
           ,
           ' ' '
            >
l
            - ,
  '
&  ,    _  :- ;_ ;7  _
Additional Infofwaticn   -l  1
          ,
          -
            .,
            .; A
        -
              '
      -
                  .c
            '! ppendix.C.'
                ,
                ,
           : r' :
.
t
  -
r
  . :X    4
          ,-
    , ,  y :  ,
              -
              -
                -.
  . .
    . _      ,
x            ;
 
  . . . . .,
  :,n,
              :
WQT
      , .
y  *
      .. -
            .
                -
d
    'g.;'     * .  ..
      -
            . .
  '
M ;p
  ' .
l), ylo/24'/85 :   .-. le:no rani! ann,+1*lSCo, Itoy Tre.nt.to-: Kin 'soper. :
M t,  ;2.10/l/85:
      .,
s6bjce: "TSC-12568'.(1. pas;e)  ,
                  -
    }      - .CPSES: TUCCo-. Nuclear Enginsdrin;; iMsi:n Deficioney:
M" Ni -    a .: .. . ,
l Report,Xy FP-35-063.._(1 paget        c
    +
                  (
    -
I,  "  33)L9/16/85i            ~ '
        . Letter.' BISCO ~to Texas Utilitied Generating Co;.-
      ~
f. J
  '
4W8/20/85;  C.?C? Crc.iner,Jsubject: Penetrationlieals (2 pages)-     '
LLetter. American ' Nuclear 11nsurers (ASI), John ~ J, ,
        ~
'  '    .
        .. ,


s
        ; CarneyL ..to: Clayton  W.'
  'J
5.Lt1/22/83)      Brown.. SISCo (1: page)
  ! 'a .' -
41utual? Atomic Energy Reinsurance P6oh Acceptance:
to N3V 445/8515-V OS  . i  .,
      '
          -
y  _
e  ,
l    Lof Test-ing;(2,pages)~
    ,
      ; 6.'8/20/85
        -   ,
  .
i  4
_
    '
      ~^
2. MG Concarn    y    s
      . . .
          *
Letter, A:nerican Nuclear Insurces (ANI). John J. o
3 ;r
*    'L 7.11/13/84 '   Carne'ynto-R,-0;sBabb',.TUCCo Engineering'(2 pages).
            '
"...,[W]edonotconsiderthatreliancesolelyonpersonnIi1 discussion's providas and adequate basis for determining that the irientified use cf a
            '
            '
grouted Richmond Insert was a single case. Accordingly, please describe      '
those actions, planced or t made from discussions withperstennel aken, which
    . "- will substantiate the ccnclusions
            ,
    '        '
    , .
        ,
Reseense i
A. Corrective Action Ighgfl And Besults &c.bfered In our previous response, the cbnclusio.n this issue "is not generic" was based upon extensive discussions with txperienced engineering personnel who have been involved in the structural design of CPSES fc-several years. The calculat8ons noted previously have confirmed the i
installation is acceptable. '
    ,
            '
            '
8. Action in Frevent Racurranra  /l '
        '
1 ,
H  s>
'-
To provide additional assurance tte int.tance,roted in the Violation was an isolated case, an engineering review will t,e conducted involving all
    .
i
!
design changes originated within the civil engineering disciplinet ')     f This review will provide an assessment of 'the review process, verify *
the technical adequacy of information provided by the originator of the      ,
design change, and support our position the instance cited was ,1 isolated. This review is scheduled for comoletion by Novamber 7,1986.


'
'
l      .
    -
s  ,
Letter, BISCc William J. Ackerman to Texas.    .
I    '
                  ,
i          -
                  '
          '
Utilit 1 Sequence No.
        ,   ;
 
        '
fes, J. C. fYoungblood 'Ref,0 bisco letter..
          ;
,
            $q s 'g e
    -
        #
    -
f
      '
            '
8. 9/12/83'     . 3346-271 ^ (1 page)
       .
  ;       CPSES/ESAR.:
         !
         / Final' Safety: Analysis:  Comanche Report. ~ Peak-Steam Electric. Station e
          +
              (6 pa3es)-    3-r 2 )
           ,
           ,
        \
    $'H 1
        +
      .
a b
.
        '4 ,
. . { %
          }
V P A UP k              Q s
      ,
 
t
t
- .,,
  ?  'k
' '                  J
" J.
'
9 ~
        %
        *
_ % 'l
        '
vic
            .il t
              =$c p-  ; GM; 7, ;;3 ' '., - +  %
        .          '
    -    #.-
g m.9 J.
, w.  . -
    ,-    -
        ,
        . my      3 3: -  .
                .e Y.


       ?
,  ,    ,
              ;
  '  '
       ''
c. : ~ '.
          ,
  '
p RE:
            . 'FOIA-86-380 p 99
  >  ,            .
      <
    , , _ _
_ _  ,
-
  , ,    x- '
m-p w-ym.  ; <    '3
           '.
           '.
I i      ~
r
       ._ E .5ba5fAlt Mh     ----
  ,
s
              +
_ , Vf , ,
                -
jg , : 4 'y,'*
                  ,
a
      ,  , - -  -  "
r. .
        ,
n ?    %  i 'r  ,  ;a t t k,
      -  '
  '       x  .
              ...g  Q_.
 
,7
    -
        % :Ap'pendix ;"D : ,    g  f ;~ -  i-
          <
m
_
        , _
,  >    '    ,
  ,
T ',N'        .
              '
          *       S g    ,,        -
              , -
w            *
    ;i1/b/Mi
  ,              ,
    ;] .;  r Mi :.pr J.dum ! rom 11; 'S. Ph i s l ijm . tW T. Wds t e rm.m .
                .. - :.
      ' 1 BISCu"fi re Seal s' Certif fi:ationi Andj]A Recordh ?[
Wiiirh: % rned . ;(3 pagesfS        -is
              >(r
_
  *            ,  ,  ,
  .
J.N;., .
            -
m  ,  .
 
X
 
*
    :3/6/864
          .
2.'
            ..
            .
            .
 
  >
"'
      ' rtemorandum f rom.. H'. ' S. Ph illips - to . E . 11. 'Jo(n' sn'n .
          -
          .  .
BISCO' Fire Penetration-Seals Test Neports PCA-76.
 
and?748-1831 .(3.pages)    o'
  ,
h ~
          ,(  ;* '
  ~
        '        "
w
            '  ,
'          '..:3.
 
'
_ (3. .?4 /'./86 ~  . Memorandum f ro:n. II. - S! ^ Phillips to. T.' r"} uesterman,
                  '
      , 2C : Inspect 10a .Reportf SS-16/13 and Rstentli>n of
_    iDraft' Reports.  (2 ' pat;es)p  O  g
     *    ,
            .
<
0  -g
;,
-
                ^...
              %,
4.-Undated  -Draft Report, 50-445/16',446/13 Docunient 1.a . 1.b-
            %
                '
      ..(31 pages)    . 4
.
              , N s,
  '
      "
5;  Draf t Report, same> number as above, Doc $ ment 2.a (5 pages).    #
            .
      .
      "        .,
    ~6.
 
~~
      -
Draft Report, same number as above, JDocurien t 2.b
                ,
i (19 pages)      s
                '
                '  '
              .
      "          '\
7. Draft Report, same namber as above, Docurent 2.c (3 pages)
      "
8. . Draft Report, same number as above, Document 3 (21 pa;;es)      '
                '
    '9. ."
Draft Report, same numbe r as above, ' Document 4
,
      (25 pages)
      "
    - 10. Draft Report, same number as'above, Ducument 5.a w
      (19 paces)
11. "
Draft Report, same number as above. Document 5.h (19 paaes)
12. -"
Dratt seport, same number as above, Document 6.a (58 pages)-
      "
13. outline of above report number. exit with~ Tucco (6 pages)
      "
14. ,
Report input by McCleskey, NRC consultant (20 pgs)      s :a
-
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:38, 18 December 2021

Route Sheet for Insp Repts 50-445/85-16 & 50-446/85-13 on 851101-30.Time Summary for Hours Applied to Assigned Topics from IE Manual Encl
ML20215C363
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/1986
From: Westerman
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20215C281 List:
References
FOIA-86-380, FOIA-86-A-177 50-445-85-16, 50-446-85-13, NUDOCS 8612150113
Download: ML20215C363 (2)
v • d • e


Text

____ _ - . - . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _

'.

o

~ --

~ 7 ECYt0R REPORT ROUTE SHEET abzQ Control No

.~ h, 0 G 0 2//3'/

N/M

'

'

<

LICENSEE / VEND 0R:

,

' ODCEET 50. : Y[MI~ REPORTNd.:[6/4//f_.

INSPECT 0k: >> M g )

'

O22/1-1NSPECTION DATE(5) ,,, g PRIORITY

//

Branch Chief I REPORT DE DATE I

INITIAL /DATE-

~ HANDWRITTEN ORAFT COMPLETED 4 M g 2/g' - DATE REPORT MAILED: ,

  • '

delete / archives REVIEW SY SECTION CHIEF .

DUE DATE AFTER 10 DAYS:

RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector) RESPONSE DUE - 30 DAYS

REWORK C0tPLETE .

CLOSE0UT DATE:

DRAFT REC'D - DMU TYPING TIME WORKING DA)

,

ORAFT TYPING COMPLETE -

ORAFT RE8EW SY SEC'Y/ INSPECTOR gy p .

C y,

'

ORAFT REVIEW BY SECTION CHIEF W p rFwl g 9,g DRAFT REVIEW BY BRANCH CHIEF 7, m .:2/.:2/ .

M" "

RETURN FOR REWORK (inspector)

REWORK C0W LETE M M[c . it .

W .r.4 , g c, l

FINAL REC'D - DNU -

7/y' /// n w Jl2,c - n z u Ag FINALTYPINGCblPLETE h'A 7/19/&

-

FINAL REVIEW BR. SEC'Y/DIV. SEC'Y ,,

FINAL REVIEW 8Y INSPECTOR [g g FINAL REVIEW SY SECTION OtIEF ) , /2.p/pf RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS - DMU 3/2,gjg M CORRECTIONS COMPLETE - OltJ CORRECTION REVIEW - INSP/ SECT. CH.

-

FINAL REVIEW SY BRANCH CHIEF DIVISION DIRECTOR REVIEW ENFORCE!1ENT REVIEW

.

  • . .

0612150113 861210 , , ,

  • *

A.ty7 PDR .

DE

'

. _ . . _

. ! <;;,* :

_

-.

.;

.

. .

-FILE.HAME8 REPORT.7 HOUEMBER 26,'1985 TIME SUMMARY. 11/11/65 THRQUCH 11/36/85 Hours ' applied to : assigned topics f rom

Manuel Inspection'and Enforcement Procedure 37055: paragraph 024b 10CFR50.55e 4' hours Procedure 92703 I.E. Bulletin, Ceneric Letter Followup Confirmatory Action ' Letter, - and

92 hours0.00106 days <br />0.0256 hours <br />1.521164e-4 weeks <br />3.5006e-5 months <br /> Procedure 92701 Unresolved I t erns -

2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />

_

I e

O J

+

Qf(,

,

. -- - ._ __ _ _ _ - _ __- - _ _

...

, % a

.. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAinUTY PROJECT 1555 Connecocut Avenue, N.W., Suite 202 6k j//$ y /(,

t

'

Washington, D.C. 20036 (202)232-8550 May 16, 1986 N OF WFW MA7Dt Director Mq Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f ~[ b ~ d [O Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:

b /o/ffggg FOIA Request To whom it may concern:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.

552, as amended, the Government Accountability Project (GAP)

requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, computer runoffs, any other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated in connection with Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plan.

This request includes all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211, Parts 1.A.2 and A.3 (approved October 8, 1980), whether they currently exist in the NRC official, " working", investigative, or other files, or at any other location, including private residences.

l

!

If any records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, supra, and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed, or are destroyed and/or removed after receipt of this reque.;t, please provide all surrounding records, including but not Alaited to a list of all records which have been or are I destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implen.ent the action (s).

GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the irformation can be considered as primarily benefitting the gene-ral public." 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (4) (A). GAP is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through its citizens Clinic, GAP offers assistance to local public interest and citizens groups seeking to ensurn the health and safety of their communities.

04'l;T 'b.- f

- . . .. . -_ -

- --. --

, . . - - . -

..- . i

. i

.. g.gw ,

..

.

-FOIA Request

-

-.May 16,' 1986

-

Page Two-GAP is-requesting the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protecta public safety and health at nuclear power plants.

'For any documents or portions of documents that you deny due-to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide'an index itemizing

,

and. describing the documents or portions of documents withheld.

The index should provide a detailed justification _of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is -

relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.

This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen E 484 F. 2d 820'

.

(D.C. Cir. 1973) , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).

We look forward to your response to this request within ten

,

' Respectful'ly,

'

iLO A GJ Billie Pirner. Garde

,, Citizens Clinic Director 42115

e

'

.

.

I

?

!

r

,.

% g n.g

/ No UNITED STATES

[gg

'

-

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

']5, E t WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655

.

_x...../

.Ms; Billie' Pirner Garde-Citizens. Clinic Director gg 315'

Government Accountability Project '

1555 Connecticut' Avenue, NW, Suite 202- IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC- 20036 TO F0!A-86-380

Dear Ms.-Garde:

This is -in further response to your-letter dated May 16, 1986,~in which you requested,; pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F01A), copies of all records pertaining to Inspection Report 85-16/85-13 regarding the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant.

The enclosed Appendix C identifies documents which are being placed in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),1717 H Street, hW, Washington, DC 20555,

. where they will be available for public inspection at no charge or repro-duction at a' nominal charge of five cents ($0.05) per page, as specified in 10 CFR 9.14. The documents will be filed in PDR folder F01A-86-380 under your name.

The enclosed Appendix D identifies documents containing information which constitutes advice, opinions, and recommendations of the staff. This information is being withheld from public disclosure of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(5) pursuant to Exemption (5)

of the Comission's regulations.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV.

This denial may be appealed to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an

" Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."

-$Nd4D@Ch[ ~

._

..

..

..

< ,_

+ . .

,_ . -.. .

f; , -

- . . .. ..

.

Ms. Garde ' -2-'

.

The' review of additional records. subject to -your F0IA request has not yet been.

completed. - We will notify you upon completion ~ of review.

J

'

Sincerely,

. .

M_ = = _ wa Donnie H. Grimsley, Director

.

Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration Enclosures: As-stated'

.

.- , ---

,- 7 ,p

' #

.<[*' 5+ t

- s

}pi-  :: :

W[i.f.- 4 - ::j .'

, _

n.'

- -

4 * ^>

M".. f ,. s , c-

) '..

, - . . . , .g.

y: , <;< r M-$ m *: _ '

gy b

,

+ ~ + y; ,.

f. '

-

._

-

+

y - r s

, , s;p

-

'_'.n..._

.n - + .c maq.. - s p:.- . n ,

.,c

', ,

,,

, ,

-~

,

r .

..:..- ' ' '

7'g- v ,

si n irb :F0fA2860380.:

'"

- ' n 3 ;% ,7  ;% . ~_ -

,

'

  1. - v. .

.

,g. _

,

>

- ,

& , _  :- ;_ ;7 _

,

.,

.; A

-

'

-

.c

'! ppendix.C.'

,

,

r' :

.

t

-

r

. :X 4

,-

, , y : ,

-

-

-.

. .

. _ ,

x  ;

. . . . .,

,n,

WQT

, .

y *

.. -

.

-

d

'g.;' * . ..

-

. .

'

M ;p

' .

l), ylo/24'/85 : .-. le:no rani! ann,+1*lSCo, Itoy Tre.nt.to-: Kin 'soper. :

M t, ;2.10/l/85:

.,

s6bjce: "TSC-12568'.(1. pas;e) ,

-

} - .CPSES: TUCCo-. Nuclear Enginsdrin;; iMsi:n Deficioney:

M" Ni - a .: .. . ,

l Report,Xy FP-35-063.._(1 paget c

+

(

-

I, " 33)L9/16/85i ~ '

. Letter.' BISCO ~to Texas Utilitied Generating Co;.-

~

f. J

'

4W8/20/85; C.?C? Crc.iner,Jsubject: Penetrationlieals (2 pages)- '

LLetter. American ' Nuclear 11nsurers (ASI), John ~ J, ,

~

' ' .

.. ,

CarneyL ..to
Clayton W.'

5.Lt1/22/83) Brown.. SISCo (1: page)

41utual? Atomic Energy Reinsurance P6oh Acceptance:

'

y _

l Lof Test-ing;(2,pages)~

6.'8/20/85

.

_

~^

. . .

Letter, A:nerican Nuclear Insurces (ANI). John J. o

  • 'L 7.11/13/84 ' Carne'ynto-R,-0;sBabb',.TUCCo Engineering'(2 pages).

'

-

Letter, BISCc William J. Ackerman to Texas. .

,

'

Utilit 1 Sequence No.

fes, J. C. fYoungblood 'Ref,0 bisco letter..

,

-

-

'

8. 9/12/83' . 3346-271 ^ (1 page)

CPSES/ESAR.

/ Final' Safety: Analysis: Comanche Report. ~ Peak-Steam Electric. Station e

(6 pa3es)- 3-r 2 )

,

$'H 1

.

.

. . { %

V P A UP k Q s

t

- .,,

? 'k

' ' J

" J.

'

9 ~

%

_ % 'l

'

vic

.il t

=$c p-  ; GM; 7, ;;3 ' '., - +  %

. '

- #.-

g m.9 J.

, w. . -

,- -

,

. my 3 3: - .

.e Y.

, , ,

' '

c. : ~ '.

,

'

p RE:

. 'FOIA-86-380 p 99

> , .

<

, , _ _

_ _ ,

-

, , x- '

m-p w-ym.  ; < '3

'.

r

,

s

+

_ , Vf , ,

-

jg , : 4 'y,'*

,

a

, , - - - "

r. .

,

n ?  % i 'r , ;a t t k,

- '

' x .

...g Q_.

,7

-

% :Ap'pendix ;"D : , g f ;~ - i-

<

m

_

, _

, > ' ,

,

T ',N' .

'

  • S g ,, -

, -

w *

i1/b/Mi

, ,

] .; r Mi
.pr J.dum ! rom 11; 'S. Ph i s l ijm . tW T. Wds t e rm.m .

.. - :.

' 1 BISCu"fi re Seal s' Certif fi:ationi Andj]A Recordh ?[

Wiiirh: % rned . ;(3 pagesfS -is

>(r

_

  • , , ,

.

J.N;., .

-

m , .

X

3/6/864

.

2.'

..

.

.

>

"'

' rtemorandum f rom.. H'. ' S. Ph illips - to . E . 11. 'Jo(n' sn'n .

-

. .

BISCO' Fire Penetration-Seals Test Neports PCA-76.

and?748-1831 .(3.pages) o'

,

h ~

,(  ;* '

~

' "

w

' ,

' '..:3.

'

_ (3. .?4 /'./86 ~ . Memorandum f ro:n. II. - S! ^ Phillips to. T.' r"} uesterman,

'

, 2C : Inspect 10a .Reportf SS-16/13 and Rstentli>n of

_ iDraft' Reports. (2 ' pat;es)p O g

  • ,

.

<

0 -g

,

-

^...

%,

4.-Undated -Draft Report, 50-445/16',446/13 Docunient 1.a . 1.b-

%

'

..(31 pages) . 4

.

, N s,

'

"

5; Draf t Report, same> number as above, Doc $ ment 2.a (5 pages). #

.

.

" .,

~6.

~~

-

Draft Report, same number as above, JDocurien t 2.b

,

i (19 pages) s

'

' '

.

" '\

7. Draft Report, same namber as above, Docurent 2.c (3 pages)

"

8. . Draft Report, same number as above, Document 3 (21 pa;;es) '

'

'9. ."

Draft Report, same numbe r as above, ' Document 4

,

(25 pages)

"

- 10. Draft Report, same number as'above, Ducument 5.a w

(19 paces)

11. "

Draft Report, same number as above. Document 5.h (19 paaes)

12. -"

Dratt seport, same number as above, Document 6.a (58 pages)-

"

13. outline of above report number. exit with~ Tucco (6 pages)

"

14. ,

Report input by McCleskey, NRC consultant (20 pgs) s :a

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000445/1985016&oldid=3382982"