|
|
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | document type = SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES, TEXT-SAFETY REPORT | | | document type = SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES, TEXT-SAFETY REPORT |
| | page count = 2 | | | page count = 2 |
| | | project = TAC:64713 |
| | | stage = Approval |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
Line 23: |
Line 25: |
| ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== |
|
| |
|
| By letter dated February 13, 1987, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) requested a revision to Section 2.1.4 of the staff's September 9, 1983 Safety Evaluation (SE) supporting Amendment No. 75 to Operating License DPR-40. This section of that SE prescribes that the Fort Calhoun refueling machine be interlocked to prevent movement directly into Region 2 of the spent fuel pool during refueling operations. This revision would allow the temporary transfer of fuel assemblies in and out of Region 2 of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool during refueling outages for the purpose of inspection of spent fuel assemblies. The request is due to the Fort Calhoun fuel integrity program which necessitates fuel inspections to be conducted in the cask loading area (Region 2) of the spent fuel pool due to test equipment requirements. | | By {{letter dated|date=February 13, 1987|text=letter dated February 13, 1987}}, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) requested a revision to Section 2.1.4 of the staff's September 9, 1983 Safety Evaluation (SE) supporting Amendment No. 75 to Operating License DPR-40. This section of that SE prescribes that the Fort Calhoun refueling machine be interlocked to prevent movement directly into Region 2 of the spent fuel pool during refueling operations. This revision would allow the temporary transfer of fuel assemblies in and out of Region 2 of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool during refueling outages for the purpose of inspection of spent fuel assemblies. The request is due to the Fort Calhoun fuel integrity program which necessitates fuel inspections to be conducted in the cask loading area (Region 2) of the spent fuel pool due to test equipment requirements. |
| 2.0 EVALUATION In order to support the movement of fuel directly into Region 2 during refueling operations, Pickard, Lowe and Garrick (PLG) performed a supplementary criticality analysis of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool with the proposed ultrasonic test rig located in the cask laydown area. An analysis of the spent ; | | 2.0 EVALUATION In order to support the movement of fuel directly into Region 2 during refueling operations, Pickard, Lowe and Garrick (PLG) performed a supplementary criticality analysis of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool with the proposed ultrasonic test rig located in the cask laydown area. An analysis of the spent ; |
| fuel pool in the absence of the test rig had been performed previously by PLG and approved by the staff. | | fuel pool in the absence of the test rig had been performed previously by PLG and approved by the staff. |
Latest revision as of 14:52, 5 December 2021
Letter Sequence Approval |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20211G4081987-02-13013 February 1987 Application to Amend License DPR-40,revising Tech Specs to Allow Temporary Transfer of Fuel Assemblies in & Out of Region 2 of Facility Spent Fuel Pool During Refueling Outages for Insp of Assemblies.Related Info Encl.Fee Paid Project stage: Request ML20207S4931987-03-12012 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 870213 Request to Allow Temporary Transfer of Fuel Assemblies During Ultrasonic Fuel Insp in Spent Fuel Pool Project stage: Approval ML20207S4881987-03-12012 March 1987 Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 870213 Request to Modify NRC 830909 SER to Allow Temporary Transfer of Fuel Assemblies for Ultrasonic Fuel Insp in Spent Fuel Pool Project stage: Approval 1987-02-13
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217B5401999-10-0606 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 193 to License DPR-40 ML20211J9321999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternatives Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety. Proposed Alternatives Authorized for Remainder of Third ten- Yr ISI Interval for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20210G2181999-07-27027 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-40 ML20210D9951999-07-22022 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-40 ML20206L4241999-05-10010 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Corrective Actions to Ensure That Valves Are Capable of Performing Intended Safety Functions & OPPD Adequately Addressed Requested Actions Discussed in GL 95-07 ML20206M2601999-05-0606 May 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee IPEEE Complete Re Info Requested by Suppl 4 to GL 88-20 & IPEEE Results Reasonable Given FCS Design,Operation & History ML20205Q5831999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 190 to License DPR-40 ML20198S3771998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 189 to License DPR-40 ML20198S4831998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License DPR-40 ML20154M4881998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 186 to License DPR-40 ML20154N2411998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 187 to License DPR-40 ML20236V4891998-07-30030 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Relating to Response to GL 87-02,suppl 1 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20248C0671998-05-21021 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee Request for Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 ML20217L7201998-03-23023 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 185 to License DPR-40 ML20203M4161998-02-0303 February 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 184 to License DPR-40 ML20203A4291998-01-26026 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 183 to License DPR-40 ML20199L0711997-11-24024 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 182 to License DPR-40 ML20198Q4031997-10-28028 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Control Room Habitability Requirements ML20137L6241997-03-27027 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 181 to License DPR-40 ML20134N7751997-02-13013 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 180 to License DPR-40 ML20134M6171997-02-13013 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Request for Approval to Use ASME Section XI Code Case N-416-1 W/Proposed Exception & Code Case N-498-2 as Alternative to Required Hydrostatic Pressure Test ML20133P9161997-01-23023 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Revised Temperature Limits for DG-1 & DG-2 ML20133C2771996-12-30030 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 179 to License DPR-40 ML20132F4911996-12-0909 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Related to Individual Plant Evaluation Omaha Power District,Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20134M0871996-11-19019 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Relief from Modifying Supports SIH-3,SIS-63,SIS-65 & RCH-13 at Fort Calhoun Station ML20129H3371996-10-25025 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 178 to License DPR-40 ML20128F6441996-10-0202 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 177 to License DPR-40 ML20129G3131996-09-27027 September 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 176 to License DPR-40 ML20059J1831994-01-14014 January 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-40 ML20059J2491994-01-14014 January 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-40 ML20058G9371993-12-0303 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-40 ML20058F5951993-11-22022 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-40 ML20058C7491993-11-18018 November 1993 Safety Evaluation,Authorizing Alternative,On One Time Basis Only,W/Conditions That Licensee Perform Volumetric Exam of nozzle-to-vessel Welds During First Refueling Outage of Third 10-yr Insp Interval ML20059L7081993-11-10010 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Changes to Low Power Physics Testing Program ML20059G6601993-10-29029 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 156 to License DPR-40 ML20057E3471993-10-0101 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Advising That Based on Determination That Alternative Testing Consistent w/OM-10,paragraph 4.3.2.2. Requirements,No Relief Required ML20056E5411993-08-12012 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 155 to License DPR-40 ML20056E5371993-08-10010 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 154 to License DPR-40 ML20056D6801993-07-26026 July 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 153 to License DPR-40 ML20128B8241993-01-26026 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 149 to License DPR-40 ML20128D4511992-11-30030 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Evaluation of 120-day Response to Suppl 1 to GL 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical & Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue A-46 ML20062G6621990-11-19019 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 134 to License DPR-40 ML20216K0661990-11-14014 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Denying Util 900221 & 0622 Requests for Exemption from App R of 10CFR50 for Fire Area 34B,upper Electrical Penetration Room.Current Level of Fire Protection Does Not Meet Section III.G.2 Requirements ML20062B6161990-10-12012 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 133 to License DPR-40 ML20055G0221990-07-0606 July 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 132 to License DPR-40 ML20246A0741989-08-17017 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves ML20245H9031989-08-15015 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1), Equipment Classification (Reactor Trip Sys Components). Licensee Program Meets Requirements of Item 2.1 (Part 1) of Generic Ltr 83-28 & Acceptable ML20245K3481989-08-11011 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Electrical Isolation Devices for Interfacing Safety & Nonsafety Sys Re Implementation of ATWS Rule ML20247H6421989-07-24024 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Granting 890118 Request for Relief from Hydrostatic Testing Requirements of Section XI of ASME Code ML20248C0851989-06-0202 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 122 to License DPR-40 1999-09-02
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217B5401999-10-0606 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 193 to License DPR-40 ML20217A9931999-09-30030 September 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data LIC-99-0096, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With ML20211J9321999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternatives Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety. Proposed Alternatives Authorized for Remainder of Third ten- Yr ISI Interval for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 LIC-99-0084, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station.With ML20216E6431999-08-26026 August 1999 Rev 19 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1 ML20210R1961999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1 ML20210G2181999-07-27027 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-40 ML20210D9951999-07-22022 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-40 ML20216E6361999-07-21021 July 1999 Rev 18 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1 ML20210R2081999-06-30030 June 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1 LIC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20196H8621999-06-30030 June 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data, June 1999 Rept ML20210P5461999-06-0808 June 1999 Rev 0,Vols 1-5 of Fort Calhoun Station 1999 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Manual, to Be Conducted on 990810. Pages 2-20 & 2-40 in Vol 2 & Page 4-1 in Vol 4 of Incoming Submittal Not Included ML20195B4581999-05-31031 May 1999 Rev 3 to CE NPSD-683, Development of RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept for Removal of P-T Limits & LTOP Requirements from Ts ML20207H7401999-05-31031 May 1999 Performance Indicators Rept for May 1999 LIC-99-0053, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 11999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20195B4521999-05-17017 May 1999 Technical Data Book TDB-IX, RCS Pressure - Temp Limits Rept (Ptlr) ML20206L4241999-05-10010 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Corrective Actions to Ensure That Valves Are Capable of Performing Intended Safety Functions & OPPD Adequately Addressed Requested Actions Discussed in GL 95-07 ML20206M2601999-05-0606 May 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee IPEEE Complete Re Info Requested by Suppl 4 to GL 88-20 & IPEEE Results Reasonable Given FCS Design,Operation & History LIC-99-0047, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With ML20195E8621999-04-30030 April 1999 Performance Indicators, for Apr 1999 ML20205Q5831999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 190 to License DPR-40 ML20210J4331999-03-31031 March 1999 Changes,Tests, & Experiments Carried Out Without Prior Commission Approval for Period 981101-990331.With USAR Changes Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59 ML20206G2641999-03-31031 March 1999 Performance Indicators Rept for Mar 1999 LIC-99-0034, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With ML20205J8181999-02-28028 February 1999 Performance Indicators, for Feb 1999 LIC-99-0025, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20207F3291999-01-31031 January 1999 FCS Performance Indicators for Jan 1999 ML20203B0991998-12-31031 December 1998 Performance Indicators for Dec 1998 LIC-99-0026, 1998 Omaha Public Power District Annual Rept. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Omaha Public Power District Annual Rept. with LIC-99-0003, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station.With ML20198S3771998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 189 to License DPR-40 ML20198S4831998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License DPR-40 ML20196G2251998-12-18018 December 1998 Rev 2 to EA-FC-90-082, Potential Over-Pressurization of Containment Penetration Piping Following Main Steam Line Break in Containment ML20198M3141998-11-30030 November 1998 Performance Indicators Rept for Nov 1998 LIC-98-0172, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With LIC-98-0160, Special Rept:On 981113,MSL RM RM-064 Was Declared Inoperable Due to Leakage Past Isolation Valve HCV-922.Troubleshooting Has Indicated That Leakage Has Stopped & Cause of Leak Continues to Be Investigated1998-11-25025 November 1998 Special Rept:On 981113,MSL RM RM-064 Was Declared Inoperable Due to Leakage Past Isolation Valve HCV-922.Troubleshooting Has Indicated That Leakage Has Stopped & Cause of Leak Continues to Be Investigated ML20203B0721998-11-16016 November 1998 Rev 6 to HI-92828, Licensing Rept for Spent Fuel Storage Capacity Expansion ML20196E4981998-10-31031 October 1998 Performance Indicators Rept for Oct 1998 ML20196G2441998-10-31031 October 1998 Changes,Tests & Experiments Carried Out Without Prior Commission Approval. with USAR Changes Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59 LIC-98-0154, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20154M4881998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 186 to License DPR-40 ML20154N2411998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 187 to License DPR-40 LIC-98-0136, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20155G4261998-09-30030 September 1998 Performance Indicators for Sept 1998 ML20154A1251998-08-31031 August 1998 Performance Indicators, Rept for Aug 1998 LIC-98-0122, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With ML20238F7231998-08-17017 August 1998 Owner'S Rept for Isis ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
-. . . _ . - . . __ _ . - . - --
- $ %, UNITED STATES
. 8 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g a wasHmaTom o.c.zooss SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATON OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285 ULTRASONIC FUEL INSPECTION IN SPENT FUEL POOL
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated February 13, 1987, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) requested a revision to Section 2.1.4 of the staff's September 9, 1983 Safety Evaluation (SE) supporting Amendment No. 75 to Operating License DPR-40. This section of that SE prescribes that the Fort Calhoun refueling machine be interlocked to prevent movement directly into Region 2 of the spent fuel pool during refueling operations. This revision would allow the temporary transfer of fuel assemblies in and out of Region 2 of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool during refueling outages for the purpose of inspection of spent fuel assemblies. The request is due to the Fort Calhoun fuel integrity program which necessitates fuel inspections to be conducted in the cask loading area (Region 2) of the spent fuel pool due to test equipment requirements.
2.0 EVALUATION In order to support the movement of fuel directly into Region 2 during refueling operations, Pickard, Lowe and Garrick (PLG) performed a supplementary criticality analysis of the Fort Calhoun spent fuel pool with the proposed ultrasonic test rig located in the cask laydown area. An analysis of the spent ;
fuel pool in the absence of the test rig had been performed previously by PLG and approved by the staff.
Both Combustion Engineering (CE) and Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corp. (ANF) fuel are stored in the pool. However, since criticality analyses have indicated that the ANF fuel is more reactive than the CE fuel at the limiting enrichment of 4.0 weight percent U-235, the ANF fuel design was used in these analyses.
The test rig is rectangular in shape with dimensions of approximately 3 ft by 4 ft. No more than two fuel assemblies may be in the test rig at any time and a minimum center-to-center separation distance of 17 inches between assemblies
- is mechanically assured. During refueling, the charging system is locked out.
l Therefore, a boron dilution event is not feasible. However, water may escape from the test facility and, therefore, PLG has investigated the criticality effects of both a water density decrease and a water temperature increase (due t
to the increased heating arising from a water height decrease).
The results of these analyses, which were performed with the approved LEOPARD computer program and which used appropriately conservative input assumptions,
= 0.8020) for the showcase worst that configuration.
the test rig willThe be staff, at least 20% subcritical therefore, finds the(K'Niticality effects l of any normal or abnormal test rig configuration to be acceptable. In l addition, the staff agrees that any permanently discharged fuel assemblies may l be placed in the Region 2 racks directly from the test rig provided that the l required burnup verification has been performed.
i I
8703190547 PDR 870312 ADOCK 05000285 G PDR
.%L
~
- - . = - . ~ - - ~ . u,: , . - . , . . - - ,
6
- 3. 0 CONCLUSION Based on the above evaluation, the staff finds that the OPPD request to allow the refueling machine interlock to be bypassed for the temporary transfer of discharged fuel assemblies to the test equipment in the cask loading area in Region 2 for inspection during refueling outages is acceptable. In addition, fuel assemblies being permanently discharged may remain in the Region 2 spent fuel racks provided that the required burnup verification has been performed.
Date: March 12,1987 Principal Contributor:
L. Kopp 4
)
l
. -