ML20203B552: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:- -        .        .-.~          - . .    . . -    . . -          _ _ _ _ . . - - - - - .      - - - - . - . - . -
          =
pann p          1          %                                  UNITED STATES
    '                                        NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS810N p
                                }.                              WASHINGTON, D.C. 30eeH001 o
              %                                                        _ february 17, 1998 l
1 DOCKET:          70 1113 LICENSEE:        General Electric Compcfiy                                                              3 4                                    Wilmington, North Carolina                                                              ;
 
==SUBJECT:==
SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT: SUBMITTAL DATED NOVEMBER 13,1997, REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL PLAN                                                                  F i
BACKGROUND 1              By cover letter dated November 13,1997, General Electric (GE) submitted changes to its Fundamental Nuclear Mate ial Control (FNMC) Plan, none of which represented a decrease in effectiveness relative to the commitments in the existing approved Plan. Thus, the submitted FNMC Plan revisions qualify as changes permitted by 10 CFR 70.32(c).
E                  plSCUSSION The licenses submitted various changes to the FNMC Plan within Chapters 3.0 (Management Structure),4.0 (MC&A Measuremer.ts), and 7,0 (Identification and Resolution of Significant i
S5ipper-Receiver Differences). In all, the subject chapters of the FNMC Plan were submitted
;                    ih a new designated date. These Plan changes involved:
o        Correction of typographic errors throughout the subject chapters,                                ,
;                e        A revision to address the handling of certain materials of very low uranium concentration, and l
;                -e        Clarification of transforred material from other licensees and addition of enrichment
!                          confirmation measurement.
I All the ' proposed changes had been previously discussed with the NRC MC&A liceming reviewer and upon review were found to be acceptable.
CONCLUSION
,              - The staff concludes that the licensee's FNMC Plan revision does not decrease the effectiveness of the MC&A safeguards program and is, therefore, acceptable. The staff also determined that -
                . the revised Plan coritains appropriate and necessary' commitments to satisfy applicable MC&A
                . regulations specified in 10 CFR 74.31, The Operations Branch (FCOB) inspection staff has no objection to this proposed action.
g PRINCIPAL CONTRIBUTOR                                                                  N
_    _ Thomas N. Pham                                                              % .2uJJ a
gid T$M Mk 13 p
C.                          PDR o-e,}}

Revision as of 04:42, 1 January 2021

SER Accepting Rev to GE Fundamental Nuclear Matl Control Plan
ML20203B552
Person / Time
Site: 07001113
Issue date: 02/17/1998
From: Weber M
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20203B538 List:
References
NUDOCS 9802240317
Download: ML20203B552 (1)
v • d • e


Text

- - . .-.~ - . . . . - . . - _ _ _ _ . . - - - - - . - - - - . - . - . -

=

pann p 1  % UNITED STATES

' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS810N p

}. WASHINGTON, D.C. 30eeH001 o

% _ february 17, 1998 l

1 DOCKET: 70 1113 LICENSEE: General Electric Compcfiy 3 4 Wilmington, North Carolina  ;

SUBJECT:

SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT: SUBMITTAL DATED NOVEMBER 13,1997, REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL PLAN F i

BACKGROUND 1 By cover letter dated November 13,1997, General Electric (GE) submitted changes to its Fundamental Nuclear Mate ial Control (FNMC) Plan, none of which represented a decrease in effectiveness relative to the commitments in the existing approved Plan. Thus, the submitted FNMC Plan revisions qualify as changes permitted by 10 CFR 70.32(c).

E plSCUSSION The licenses submitted various changes to the FNMC Plan within Chapters 3.0 (Management Structure),4.0 (MC&A Measuremer.ts), and 7,0 (Identification and Resolution of Significant i

S5ipper-Receiver Differences). In all, the subject chapters of the FNMC Plan were submitted

ih a new designated date. These Plan changes involved

o Correction of typographic errors throughout the subject chapters, ,

e A revision to address the handling of certain materials of very low uranium concentration, and l
-e Clarification of transforred material from other licensees and addition of enrichment

! confirmation measurement.

I All the ' proposed changes had been previously discussed with the NRC MC&A liceming reviewer and upon review were found to be acceptable.

CONCLUSION

, - The staff concludes that the licensee's FNMC Plan revision does not decrease the effectiveness of the MC&A safeguards program and is, therefore, acceptable. The staff also determined that -

. the revised Plan coritains appropriate and necessary' commitments to satisfy applicable MC&A

. regulations specified in 10 CFR 74.31, The Operations Branch (FCOB) inspection staff has no objection to this proposed action.

g PRINCIPAL CONTRIBUTOR N

_ _ Thomas N. Pham  % .2uJJ a

gid T$M Mk 13 p

C. PDR o-e,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203B552&oldid=3069891"