ML20204G563: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:..
f 4 ... ~
h5        SOUllflRN Calif 0RNIA                                                                A. Edward Scherer s ' EDISON                                                                                    t!""=6.m,                          '
an uns<>s mumlow c%
March 12,1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
 
==Subject:==
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Simulation Facility Certification Four Year Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
 
==Reference:==
: 1. Letter R. M. Rosenblum (SCE) to Document Control Desk (NRC),
                                          " Simulation Facility Certification, San Onofre Nuclear Generating                                  l Station, Units 2 and 3," dated March 22,1991                                                          )
i
: 2. Letter, W.C. Marsh (SCE) to Document Control Desk (NRC),                                              !
                                          " Simulation Facility Certification Four Year Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 " dated February 24,1995                                    l By letter dated March 22,1991, Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted                                                  i the Simulation Facility Certification letter as required by 10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (i). In                                      j accordance with 10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (ii), SCE is required to " Submit, every four years on the anniversary of the certification, a report to the Commission which identifies any uncorrected performance test failures, and submit a schedule for correction of such performance test failures, if any." This letter provides the report due on March 22,1999 (Attachment).
                  ' All performance testing scheduled between March 22,1995 and March 22,1999 has been completed, and there is no uncorrected performance test failure for the simulator.
Thus, a correction schedule is not needed.
10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (vi) requires that a certification report * ..must include a description of performance ter, ting completed for the simulation facility, and must include a                                    !
description of the performance tests, if different, to be conducted on the simulation facility during the subsequent four-year period, and a schedule for the conduct of                                      f approximately 25 percent of the performance tests per year for the subsequent four years."
9903260180 990312 P PDR        ADOCK 05000361                                                                                  -
R                          PDR j P. O. Box 128 San Clemente. CA 926744)128 949-368-7501
                      ~ Fax 949-368-7575
 
Documsnt Cohtrol Desk                                          March 12,1999 San Onofre procedure, SO23-XXI-3.1.2, " Simulator Performance Test Scheduling,"                l included in the Attachment, describes the performance testing completed since                  )
March 22,1995. SCE will use the schedule in this procedure for required simulator            !
performance testing for the upcoming four-year period.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please let me know.                        .
Sincerely,                                    ,
Attachment cc:    E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, Region IV J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch, NRC Region IV J. W. Clifford, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre, Units 2 & 3 (w/ enclosures)
J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident inspector, San Onofre, Units 2 & 3 (w/o enclosures) i 1
l l
l i
I l
. - .}}

Revision as of 16:41, 30 December 2020

Provides Simulation Facility Certification Four Yr Rept, Identifying Uncorrected Performance Test Failures & Providing Schedule for Correction of Failures.Plant Procedure SO23-XXI-3.1.2 Simulator...Scheduling Encl
ML20204G563
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/1999
From: Scherer A
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20204G565 List:
References
NUDOCS 9903260180
Download: ML20204G563 (3)


Text

..

f 4 ... ~

h5 SOUllflRN Calif 0RNIA A. Edward Scherer s ' EDISON t!""=6.m, '

an uns<>s mumlow c%

March 12,1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Simulation Facility Certification Four Year Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

Reference:

1. Letter R. M. Rosenblum (SCE) to Document Control Desk (NRC),

" Simulation Facility Certification, San Onofre Nuclear Generating l Station, Units 2 and 3," dated March 22,1991 )

i

2. Letter, W.C. Marsh (SCE) to Document Control Desk (NRC),  !

" Simulation Facility Certification Four Year Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 " dated February 24,1995 l By letter dated March 22,1991, Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted i the Simulation Facility Certification letter as required by 10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (i). In j accordance with 10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (ii), SCE is required to " Submit, every four years on the anniversary of the certification, a report to the Commission which identifies any uncorrected performance test failures, and submit a schedule for correction of such performance test failures, if any." This letter provides the report due on March 22,1999 (Attachment).

' All performance testing scheduled between March 22,1995 and March 22,1999 has been completed, and there is no uncorrected performance test failure for the simulator.

Thus, a correction schedule is not needed.

10 CFR 55.45(b) (5) (vi) requires that a certification report * ..must include a description of performance ter, ting completed for the simulation facility, and must include a  !

description of the performance tests, if different, to be conducted on the simulation facility during the subsequent four-year period, and a schedule for the conduct of f approximately 25 percent of the performance tests per year for the subsequent four years."

9903260180 990312 P PDR ADOCK 05000361 -

R PDR j P. O. Box 128 San Clemente. CA 926744)128 949-368-7501

~ Fax 949-368-7575

Documsnt Cohtrol Desk March 12,1999 San Onofre procedure, SO23-XXI-3.1.2, " Simulator Performance Test Scheduling," l included in the Attachment, describes the performance testing completed since )

March 22,1995. SCE will use the schedule in this procedure for required simulator  !

performance testing for the upcoming four-year period.

If you have any questions regarding this subject, please let me know. .

Sincerely, ,

Attachment cc: E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, Region IV J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch, NRC Region IV J. W. Clifford, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre, Units 2 & 3 (w/ enclosures)

J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident inspector, San Onofre, Units 2 & 3 (w/o enclosures) i 1

l l

l i

I l

. - .