ML061770023: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PROPOSED EXAMINATION COVER LETTER AND CHECKLISTS FOR THE BRAIDWOOD INITIAL EXAMINATION - MAY 2006 Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Braidwood Station Nuclear March 10,2006 BW060019 James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 111 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532- 4352 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457 Submittal of Integrated Initial License Training Examination Materials
{{#Wiki_filter:PROPOSED EXAMINATION COVER LETTER AND CHECKLISTS FOR THE BRAIDWOOD INITIAL EXAMINATION MAY 2006
 
Exelon Generation Company, LLC Braidwood Station www.exeloncorp.com Nuclear March 10,2006 BW060019 James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 111 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532- 4352 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Enclosed are the examination materials, which Braidwood Station is submitting in support of the Initial License Examination scheduled for the week of May 15, 2006 at Braidwood Station. This submittal includes the Senior Reactor Operator and Reactor Operator Written Examinations, Job Performance Measures, and integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides. These examination materials have been developed in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards,"
Submittal of Integrated Initial License Training Examination Materials Enclosed are the examination materials, which Braidwood Station is submitting in support of the Initial License Examination scheduled for the week of May 15, 2006 at Braidwood Station.
Revision 9. Please note that reference materials are attached to each individual examination question or item. Some minor modifications have been made to the Integrated Examination Outline with regards to the operational scenarios in order to improve balance and content. These changes improve examination quality and are in compliance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards."
This submittal includes the Senior Reactor Operator and Reactor Operator Written Examinations, Job Performance Measures, and integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides.
Some modifications or adjustments to the examination material may be required due to procedural changes. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, Revision 9, Section ES-201, please ensure that these materials are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.
These examination materials have been developed in accordance with NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards, Revision 9. Please note that reference materials are attached to each individual examination question or item.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Dale Ambler, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (81 5) 41 7-2800. For questions concerning examination materials, please contact Mr. Darren Stiles at (815) 458-7829.
Some minor modifications have been made to the Integrated Examination Outline with regards to the operational scenarios in order to improve balance and content. These changes improve examination quality and are in compliance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Operator Licensing Examination Standards.
Respectfully, Keith JrPolson Site Vice President Braidwood Station  
Some modifications or adjustments to the examination material may be required due to procedural changes.
In accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Section ES-201, please ensure that these materials are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.
 
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Dale Ambler, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 417-2800. For questions concerning examination materials, please contact Mr. Darren Stiles at (815) 458-7829.
Respectfully, Keith JrPolson Site Vice President Braidwood Station


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
(Hand delivered to Dell McNeil, Chief Examiner, NRC Region Ill) RO/SRO Composite Examination with references attached Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Job Performance Measures with references attached Administrative Topic Job Performance Measures with references attached Integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides Completed Checklists: Operating Test Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-3) Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-4) Transient and Event Checklist (Form ES-301-5) Competencies Checklist (Form ES-301-6)
(Hand delivered to Dell McNeil, Chief Examiner, NRC Region Ill)
Written Exam Quality Checklist (Form ES-401-6) Examination Security Agreements (Form ES-201-3) Record of Rejected WAS (Form ES-401-4) cc: (without attachments)
RO/SRO Composite Examination with references attached Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Job Performance Measures with references attached Administrative Topic Job Performance Measures with references attached Integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides Completed Checklists:
Chief, NRC Operator Licensing Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Braidwood Station bcc: (w/o enclosures) Braidwood Station Project Manager, NRR Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Regulatory Assurance Manager - Braidwood Station Manager, Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle County Stations Braidwood Nuclear Licensing Administrator Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing (Hard Copy) D. Stiles, Braidwood Training Department ES-301 Operating Test Quality Ch ecklist Form tS-301-3 1. GENERAL CRITERIA S a b The operahng test conforms wth he previouslyapproved OUb ne changes are consistent Wth sampling ieqmements (e g 10 CFR 55 45, operabonal mponance safety funcbon dish Dut on) There IS no day-to-day repebtion berween this and Other operabng tests to be adm nstered dLring ths examination The operating test sna I not dbplicate items from the applicants allall tesgs)(see Secton 0 1 a) Overfap wtn the M nen examination and berween different pans of the operating lest IS wthm acceptable lhm#ts C d e. It appears @at the operating test will differentiate between competent and lessthan-competent applicants at the designated license level. 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA A Facility:
Operating Test Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-3)
Braidwood Date of Examination:
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-4)
05/15/2006 Operating Test Number: 2006301 nitials b* dl $ a. Each JPM includes the following.
Transient and Event Checklist (Form ES-301-5)
as applicable:
Competencies Checklist (Form ES-301-6)
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific petiormance criteria that include: - detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature L . - . system response and olner examrner cues statements oescnb ng mporbnt ObSeNabOnS 10 be made by the app cant cr term for <trced._l mrnnletton of the task . . . .~ ~ identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
Written Exam Quality Checklist (Form ES-401-6)
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previouslyapproved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteoa (e.g.. item disbibution. bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.  
Examination Security Agreements (Form ES-201-3)
@7 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA .. - The associated Simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Record of Rejected WAS (Form ES-401-4) cc:     (without attachments)
y l9b Date a Author Darren Stiles I 0311 0106 b Facility Reviewer r) Dan Ackerman I 03110/06 c NRC Chief Examiner (#) blu R . Mcd tA / / h//% t?@Zfh d NRC Supervisor  
Chief, NRC Operator Licensing Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Braidwood Station
/*e, mr/ <//./a4 c NOTE:
 
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column IC":
bcc: (w/o enclosures)
chief examiner concurrence is required.
Braidwood Station Project Manager, NRR Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Regulatory Assurance Manager - Braidwood Station Manager, Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle County Stations Braidwood Nuclear Licensing Administrator Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing (Hard Copy)
c ES-301, Page 24 of 27 tS-301 Transient and tvent Checklisthrm tS-301-5 Date of Exam: 05/15/2006 Operating Test Number. 2006301 icility: Braidwood - A 0 b L I C A N T ~ P Y-" ? P-' Y iYL Y ?-I i7RO-l RO-I 3 ~ ;RO-U 1 ~ iRO-I 3 ~ - lnstru 1. 2 Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled apnorma, condSions (refer to Section 8 5 d) bLt must be sign ficant per Section C 2 a of Appendix D ) Reacttvity and normal evolutions may be replaced with adaitional instrument or component mat I bnctions on a 1-for-1 Das 5 3 Whenever practical.
D. Stiles, Braidwood Training Department
botn nstrLrnent and component malfLnctions shoLld be inc uded, only those that reqLire verifable actions that provide .nsight to the applicant's competence CoJnt toward tne mimmdm requirements specified for the appl.can1 s icense level in the right-nana COlLmnS ES-301, Page 26 of 27 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 ~ Facility: Braidwood Date of Examination: 05/15/2006 Operating Test No.: 2006301 Competencies Notes: (1) (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. Instructions:
 
Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301                                         Operating Test Quality Checklist                                  Form tS-301-3 A
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:
Facility: Braidwood                                            Date of Examination: 05/15/2006  Operating Test Number: 2006301 S      nitials
Braidwood Date of Exam: 05/15/2006 Exam Level RO SRO Item Description 1 Ouestions and answers are technicallv accurate and aDolicable to me facilitv 2. a. NRC WAS axencedfor all questions
: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA b*    dl a          The operahng test conforms wth h e previouslyapproved O U b ne changes are consistent Wth sampling ieqmements (e g 10 CFR 55 45, operabonal mponance safety funcbon dish Dut on) b          There IS no day-to-day repebtion berween this and Other operabng tests to be adm nstered dLring ths examination C          The operating test sna I not dbplicate items from the applicants allall tesgs)(see Secton 0 1 a) d          Overfap wtn the M nen examinationand berween different pans of the operating lest IS wthm acceptable lhm#ts
: b. Facilitv leamina obiectives are referenced as available.
: e.         It appears @atthe operating test will differentiate between competent and lessthan-competent applicants at the designated license level.
: 3. 4. 5. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance wim Sdon D.2.d of ES-401 The sampling process was random and systematic (If more man 4 RO or'2 SRO questions were repeated from me last 2 NRC iicensing exam, consunme NRR OL program oftice). Question duplication from me license saeeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check me item mat applies) and appears appropriate: - the audit exam ws systematically and randomly developed: or - X me audit exam was completed before me license exam was started; 01 - me examinations were developed independently:
: 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA L
or - me licensee certifies hat mere is no duplication; or - omer (explain)
: a.          Each JPM includes the following. as applicable:
I *3;; 1 MOcieC 1 New 59/19 6. Bank use meets limits (no more man 75 percent from me bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified);
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation ifdeemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific petiormance criteria that include:
enter me acbal RO / SRO-only question disbibution(s) at right.
                  -     detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
42/17 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of Me questions on me RO exam are wilten at me comprehension /analysis level; me SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if me randomly selected KAs support me higher cognitive levels; enter the acluai RO I SRO question disbibution(s) at right 8. 9. Referenceshandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in me elimination of disbactors. Question content conforms wim specific WA statements in me previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for me Tier to which mey are assigned; deviations are iustified IO, 11. Question psychometric quality and format meet me guidelines in ES Appendix 6. me exam contains the required number of one-point multiple choice items; me total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet z= - Printed Name I Signalure Initial a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (7 Dan Ackermanl cd - + 91 *- Date 03/10/06 z c. NRC Chief Examiner
                  . system response and olner examrner cues
(#) # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column '12 chief examiner concurrence required.
                  -    statements oescnb ng mporbnt ObSeNabOnS 10 be made by the app cant
                  . cr term for < t r c e d . _mrnnletton  of
                                                              . the
                                                                ..task y
l                .~~
identificationof critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
: b.         Ensure that any changes from the previouslyapproved systems and administrativewalk-through outlines (Forms ES301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance       @7 criteoa (e.g.. item disbibution. bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations)specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
: 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated Simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.                                                                                   l9b Date a   Author                         Darren Stiles I                                                               03110106 b   Facility Reviewer     r)       Dan Ackerman I                                                                 03110/06 c   NRC Chief Examiner (#)           blu R . Mcd tA / / h//%                                                     t?@Zfh d   NRC Supervisor                       /*e, mr/                     c
                                                                                                                  <//./a4 NOTE:
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests
            # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column IC":chief examiner concurrence is required.
c ES-301, Page 24 of 27
 
tS-301 Transient and tvent Checklisthrm tS-301-5 icility: Braidwood A
Date of Exam: 05/15/2006             Operating Test Number. 2006301 0
b L
I C
A N
T
    ~
P RO-I 3
Y-"
  ~
  ?
P-'
  ;RO-U 1
  ~
Y iRO-I 3
iYL
~
Y
?-I i7RO-l
-lnstru 1.
2               Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled apnorma, condSions (refer to 8                                                                  I Section 5 d) bLt must be sign ficant per Section C 2 a of Appendix D ) Reacttvity and normal evolutions may be replaced with adaitional instrument or component mat bnctions on a 1-for-1Das 5 3               Whenever practical. botn nstrLrnent and component malfLnctions shoLld be inc uded, only those that reqLire verifable actions that provide .nsight to the applicant's competence CoJnt toward tne mimmdm requirements specified for the appl.can1 s icense level in the right-nana COlLmnS ES-301, Page 26 of 27
 
ES-301                               Competencies Checklist                         Form ES-301-6
                                                                                            ~
Facility: Braidwood             Date of Examination: 05/15/2006     Operating Test No.: 2006301 Competencies Notes:
(1)       Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)       Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)       Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301, Page 27 of 27
 
ES-401                               Written Examination Quality Checklist                                 Form ES-401-6 Facility: Braidwood                             Date of Exam: 05/15/2006                   Exam Level RO       SRO Initial Item Description 1       Ouestions and answers are technicallv accurate and aDolicableto me facilitv
: 2.       a. NRC WAS a x e n c e d f o r all questions
: b. Facilitv leamina obiectives are referencedas available.
: 3.       SRO questions are appropriate in accordancewim S d o n D.2.d of ES-401
: 4.      The sampling process was random and systematic (If more man 4 RO or'2 SRO questions were repeated from me last 2 NRC iicensingexam, consunme NRR OL program oftice).
: 5.      Question duplicationfrom me licensesaeeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check me item mat applies) and appears appropriate:
            - the audit exam w s systematicallyand randomlydeveloped: or X me audit exam was completed before me licenseexam was started; 01
            - me examinations were developed independently:or 6.
            -   me licensee certifies hat mere is no duplication; or
            - omer (explain)
Bank use meets limits (no more man 75 percent from me bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter me acbal RO / SRO-only I 1 1
                                                                        ; ; 3      MOcieC        New 59/19
                                                                                                                +
question disbibution(s)at right.
: 7.       Between 50 and 60 percent of Me questions on me RO exam are wilten at me comprehension/analysis level; me SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if me randomly 42/17 selected KAs support me higher cognitive levels; enter the acluai RO I SRO question disbibution(s)at right
: 8.       Referenceshandoutsprovided do not give away answers or aid in me elimination of disbactors.
: 9.      Question content conforms wim specific WA statements in me previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for me Tier to which mey are assigned; deviations are iustified 91*-
IO,     Question psychometric quality and format meet me guidelines in ES Appendix 6.
z=
11.
m e exam contains the required number of one-point multiple choice items; me total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name I Signalure                            Date
: a. Author
: b. FacilityReviewer (7
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
Dan Ackermanl   cd                             -                     03/10/06 z
            # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column '12   chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-401, Page 29 of 33}}
ES-401, Page 29 of 33}}

Latest revision as of 04:24, 14 March 2020

Proposed Examination Cover Letter and Checklists for the Braidwood Initial Examination - May 2006
ML061770023
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/2006
From: Polson K, Stiles D
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
To: Caldwell J
NRC/RGN-III
Shared Package
ml061510490 List:
References
BW060019
Download: ML061770023 (8)


Text

PROPOSED EXAMINATION COVER LETTER AND CHECKLISTS FOR THE BRAIDWOOD INITIAL EXAMINATION MAY 2006

Exelon Generation Company, LLC Braidwood Station www.exeloncorp.com Nuclear March 10,2006 BW060019 James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 111 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532- 4352 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457

Subject:

Submittal of Integrated Initial License Training Examination Materials Enclosed are the examination materials, which Braidwood Station is submitting in support of the Initial License Examination scheduled for the week of May 15, 2006 at Braidwood Station.

This submittal includes the Senior Reactor Operator and Reactor Operator Written Examinations, Job Performance Measures, and integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides.

These examination materials have been developed in accordance with NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards, Revision 9. Please note that reference materials are attached to each individual examination question or item.

Some minor modifications have been made to the Integrated Examination Outline with regards to the operational scenarios in order to improve balance and content. These changes improve examination quality and are in compliance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Operator Licensing Examination Standards.

Some modifications or adjustments to the examination material may be required due to procedural changes.

In accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Section ES-201, please ensure that these materials are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Dale Ambler, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 417-2800. For questions concerning examination materials, please contact Mr. Darren Stiles at (815) 458-7829.

Respectfully, Keith JrPolson Site Vice President Braidwood Station

Enclosures:

(Hand delivered to Dell McNeil, Chief Examiner, NRC Region Ill)

RO/SRO Composite Examination with references attached Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Job Performance Measures with references attached Administrative Topic Job Performance Measures with references attached Integrated Plant Operation Scenario Guides Completed Checklists:

Operating Test Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-3)

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist (Form ES-301-4)

Transient and Event Checklist (Form ES-301-5)

Competencies Checklist (Form ES-301-6)

Written Exam Quality Checklist (Form ES-401-6)

Examination Security Agreements (Form ES-201-3)

Record of Rejected WAS (Form ES-401-4) cc: (without attachments)

Chief, NRC Operator Licensing Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Braidwood Station

bcc: (w/o enclosures)

Braidwood Station Project Manager, NRR Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Regulatory Assurance Manager - Braidwood Station Manager, Licensing - Braidwood, Byron and LaSalle County Stations Braidwood Nuclear Licensing Administrator Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing (Hard Copy)

D. Stiles, Braidwood Training Department

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form tS-301-3 A

Facility: Braidwood Date of Examination: 05/15/2006 Operating Test Number: 2006301 S nitials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA b* dl a The operahng test conforms wth h e previouslyapproved O U b ne changes are consistent Wth sampling ieqmements (e g 10 CFR 55 45, operabonal mponance safety funcbon dish Dut on) b There IS no day-to-day repebtion berween this and Other operabng tests to be adm nstered dLring ths examination C The operating test sna I not dbplicate items from the applicants allall tesgs)(see Secton 0 1 a) d Overfap wtn the M nen examinationand berween different pans of the operating lest IS wthm acceptable lhm#ts
e. It appears @atthe operating test will differentiate between competent and lessthan-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA L
a. Each JPM includes the following. as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation ifdeemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific petiormance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

. system response and olner examrner cues

- statements oescnb ng mporbnt ObSeNabOnS 10 be made by the app cant

. cr term for < t r c e d . _mrnnletton of

. the

..task y

l .~~

identificationof critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previouslyapproved systems and administrativewalk-through outlines (Forms ES301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance @7 criteoa (e.g.. item disbibution. bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations)specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated Simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. l9b Date a Author Darren Stiles I 03110106 b Facility Reviewer r) Dan Ackerman I 03110/06 c NRC Chief Examiner (#) blu R . Mcd tA / / h//% t?@Zfh d NRC Supervisor /*e, mr/ c

<//./a4 NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column IC":chief examiner concurrence is required.

c ES-301, Page 24 of 27

tS-301 Transient and tvent Checklisthrm tS-301-5 icility: Braidwood A

Date of Exam: 05/15/2006 Operating Test Number. 2006301 0

b L

I C

A N

T

~

P RO-I 3

Y-"

~

?

P-'

RO-U 1

~

Y iRO-I 3

iYL

~

Y

?-I i7RO-l

-lnstru 1.

2 Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled apnorma, condSions (refer to 8 I Section 5 d) bLt must be sign ficant per Section C 2 a of Appendix D ) Reacttvity and normal evolutions may be replaced with adaitional instrument or component mat bnctions on a 1-for-1Das 5 3 Whenever practical. botn nstrLrnent and component malfLnctions shoLld be inc uded, only those that reqLire verifable actions that provide .nsight to the applicant's competence CoJnt toward tne mimmdm requirements specified for the appl.can1 s icense level in the right-nana COlLmnS ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

~

Facility: Braidwood Date of Examination: 05/15/2006 Operating Test No.: 2006301 Competencies Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Braidwood Date of Exam: 05/15/2006 Exam Level RO SRO Initial Item Description 1 Ouestions and answers are technicallv accurate and aDolicableto me facilitv

2. a. NRC WAS a x e n c e d f o r all questions
b. Facilitv leamina obiectives are referencedas available.
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordancewim S d o n D.2.d of ES-401
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more man 4 RO or'2 SRO questions were repeated from me last 2 NRC iicensingexam, consunme NRR OL program oftice).
5. Question duplicationfrom me licensesaeeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check me item mat applies) and appears appropriate:

- the audit exam w s systematicallyand randomlydeveloped: or X me audit exam was completed before me licenseexam was started; 01

- me examinations were developed independently:or 6.

- me licensee certifies hat mere is no duplication; or

- omer (explain)

Bank use meets limits (no more man 75 percent from me bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter me acbal RO / SRO-only I 1 1

; 3 MOcieC New 59/19

+

question disbibution(s)at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of Me questions on me RO exam are wilten at me comprehension/analysis level; me SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if me randomly 42/17 selected KAs support me higher cognitive levels; enter the acluai RO I SRO question disbibution(s)at right
8. Referenceshandoutsprovided do not give away answers or aid in me elimination of disbactors.
9. Question content conforms wim specific WA statements in me previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for me Tier to which mey are assigned; deviations are iustified 91*-

IO, Question psychometric quality and format meet me guidelines in ES Appendix 6.

z=

11.

m e exam contains the required number of one-point multiple choice items; me total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name I Signalure Date

a. Author
b. FacilityReviewer (7
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

Dan Ackermanl cd - 03/10/06 z

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column '12 chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33