ML061770049
| ML061770049 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/2006 |
| From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ml061510490 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML061770049 (8) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE BRAIDWOOD INITIAL EXAMINATION - MAY 2006
ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Chief Examiner's Initials
-180
-120
-120 1 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
I drm
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) drm
- 2.
drm NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
-120 1-90]
- 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) drm
- 15. Reference material due (12.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)l nla I
drm
{-70] I (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee IC.2.h: C.3.e))
~
{-75)
~
~
ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2. ES-401-3. and ES-401-4. as applicable (C.1.e and f: C.3.d) drm I
drm
-30 I 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)
{-45)
I.
- 8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs. and scenarios, as applicable). supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3. ES-301-4, ES-301-5. ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e. f, g and h; C.3.d) drm
-14
-14
-14
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions
-7 I distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) drm
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supelvisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.9
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facilitv licensee (C.1.i; C.2.f and h; C.3.a) drm drm I
drm
~
~
~
~~
~
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >lo) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7
- 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed
-7 with facility licensee (C.3.k)
' Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date dentified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-
- ase basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
Applies only] {Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.
drm n/a drm
r
N N
m X
W E
W m
A N
W P
P o
-El 3
0 P
0 P
N o
0 01 ES201, paOe 26 of 27
(
b & P / b ( J d a J
@A)( 3 d b,G%#/?7 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement F
o
~
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week@) of 5 (1S1bL as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to Facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week($ of add-.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME RE(2)
DATE NOTE
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5. Cn\\ A n a +
5 os
- 6. I&
A.,
G r - c iwc\\,,
- 7. -
&r&
pcoctBc R
ES-201, Page 26 of 27
ES-401 RECORD OF REJECTED KAs Form ES-401-4 Tier I Group 1 I1 1 I1 1 I1 211 211 212 211 1 I1 211 Randomly Selected KIA 000008G2.1.I4 000056G2.1.30 000058AA1.01 063000A1.01 007000K5.02 071000A4.27 061 0002.4.49 0000652.1.I4 078000A2.01 Reason for Rejection KIA 000008G2.1.14 randomly selected for RO Tier 1 Group 1.
Cannot develop exam item at license level for selected KIA.
WA G2.1.I4 is sampled four separate times on exam.
Replaced KIA 000008G2.1.I4 with randomly selected KIA 000008G2.1.23 for broader samle of generic WAS.
WA 000056G2.1.30 randomly selected for RO Tier 1 Group 1.
Cannot develop exam item at license level for selected KIA.
KIA G2.1.14 is sampled three separate times on exam.
Redaced WA 000056G2.1.30 with randomlv selected KIA 000056G2.1.33 for broader samle of generic WAS.
KIA 000058AA1.01 randomlv selected for RO Tier 1 GrouD 1 KIA also sampled on audit exam. Can not develop two separate exam items without overlapping. Replaced KIA 000058AA1.01 with randomly selected KIA 000058AA1.03.
WA 063000A1.01 randomly selected for RO Tier 2 Group 1 and KIA 000055A2.05 randomly selected for SRO Tier 1Group 1. Can not develop two separate exam items without exDosina candidates to double ieoDardv. Redaced WA 063000~1.01 with randomly seiecied h A 063000K2 01 WA 007000K5.02 randomlv selected for RO Tier 2 Grouo 2 KIA addresses operationalimplications on PRT of drawl Ag a bubble in PZR. Currently, Braidwood method of forming PZR bubble has no imact on PRT. No reference to PRT is made in procedures for forming PZR bubble. No other WAS in cateaorv K5 available for selection. Redaced KIA 007000K5.02 with randomly selected WA 007000A1.02.
KIA 071000A4.27 randomly selected for RO Tier 2 Group 2 WA addresses ability to monitor opening and closing of the gas decay tank (GDT) discharge control valve. GDT discharge valve opening and closing is monitored at local panel OGWOIJ (vs. MCR) Replaced KIA 071000A4.27 with randomly selected WA071 000A4.29.
WA 0610002.4.49 randomly selected for SRO Tier 2 Group 1.
Can not develop exam item without exposing candidates to double jeopardy with other exam items. Replaced WA 0610002.4.49 with randomly selected KIA 0590002.4.49 WA 0000652.1.I4 randomly selected for SRO Tier 1 Group 1.
Cannot develop exam item at license level for selected KIA.
WA G2.1.14 is sampled four separate times on exam.
Replaced WA 000065G2.1.14 with randomly selected WAOOOOI 1G2.1.14.
WA 078000A2.01 randomly selected for SRO Tier 2 Group 1.
Cannot develop exam item at license level for selected KIA.
Loss of IIA is tested on the RO portion of the exam.
Replaced KIA 000008G2.1.14 with randomly selected KIA
ES-401 RECORD OF REJECTED KAs Form ES-401-4 3
212
~
212 2.1.27 072000K3.01 034000K1.05 2.1.31 OOOOllG 2.1.14 026000A2.08.
WA 2.1 27 ramdomly selected for RO Tier 3. WA addresses system purpose andlor function. Cannot develop generic question that is not specific to a particular system. Replaced KIA 2.1 2 7 with randomly selected WA 2.1.3.
KIA 072000K3.01 randomly selected for RO Tier 2 Group 2.
During site validation, question content was potentially compromised. From discussions with NRC, directions was received to replace WA with ramdomly selected KIA from RO Tier 2 Group 2 KIA categoty K.3. Randomly selected WA 016000K3.03 to replace WA 072000K3.01.
KIA 034000K1.05 randomly selected for SRO Tier 2 Group 2.
WA addresses shutdown monitor. Shutdown monitor does not exist at Braidwood Station. Braidwood Station shutdown reactivity monitored by SR NI. With concurrence of NRC lead examiner, replaced WA with SR NI WA 034000K1.04.
WA 2.1.31 randomly selected for RO Tier 3. Developed question for WA which was rejected by NRC due to level of difficulty. Cannot develop exam item of at least level of difficulty 2 for the selected WA. Redaced with randomlv selected WA 2.1.3.
WA 00001 1G2.1.14 randomlv selected for SRO Tier 1 Grow
- 1. Developed question for K/A wich was rejected by NRC due to level of difficulty. Cannot develop exam item of at least level of difficulty 2 for this combination of event and KIA.
Replaced WA with randomly selected WA 00001 1G2.4.4.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility Braidwood U1/U2 Dale of Exam: 05/19/2006 ExamLevel. RO SRO I I Initials Item Description a
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading 4%
- 2.
+
Gh Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
Grading for all borderline cases (80 Q% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, *4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
rda rda
- a. Grader Carl Moore /
- b. NRC Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
T b -.
rda rda nla Tb.
Date 05/22/2006 05/22/2006 05/22/2006
~
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5