ML22199A247

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ile ES-201-2 NRC-Developed Outline Quality Checklist-Signed
ML22199A247
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2022
From: Randy Baker
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Baker R
Shared Package
ML20140A264 List:
References
Download: ML22199A247 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC-developed Examination Outlines Facility: Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: February 28 - March 4, 2022 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. JR/LR N/A RDB W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with JR/LR R N/A RDB Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

I T

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. JR/LR N/A RDB T

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. JR/LR N/A RDB

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of JR/LR N/A RDB normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and JR/LR N/A RDB U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

O

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and JR/LR N/A RDB R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: JR/LR N/A RDB (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R O b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: JR/LR N/A RDB U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of JR/LR N/A RDB applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual JR/LR N/A RDB plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. JR/LR N/A RDB N

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. JR/LR N/A RDB E

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. JR/LR N/A RDB A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. JR/LR N/A RDB

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). JR/LR N/A RDB Printed Name/Signature Date John Robbins / 2/22/2022
a. Authors Lionel Rodriguez / 2/22/2022
b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A N/A
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Randal D. Baker / Digitally signed by Randal D. Baker Date: 2022.02.22 07:58:03 -06'00'
d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke / Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2022.02.22 16:04:53 -06'00'
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.