ML17241A046

Submittal of Cycle 28 Startup Physics Tests Report

ML17241A046
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	08/24/2017
From:	Stanley B Dominion Energy Services, Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Region 2 Administrator
References
Download: ML17241A046 (49)

Text

i.

Dominion Energy Services, Inc.

5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060 ~Dominion Dominion Energy.com  ;;iiliii" Energy.

August 24, 2017 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.: 17-330 Regional Administrator- Region II NRA/GDM Marquis One Tower Docket No.: 50-281 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 License No.: DPR-37 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS REPORT As required by Surry Power Station (Surry) Technical Specification 6.6.A.1, enclosed is the Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics Tests Report. This report summarizes the results of the physics testing program performed prior to and following initial criticality of Cycle 28 on June 3, 2017. The results of the physics tests were within the applicable Technical Specifications limits.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Gary Miller at (804) 273-2771.

Sincerely, B. L. Stanley, Director Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Dominion Energy Services, Inc. for Virginia Electric and Power Company Enclosure Commitments made in this letter: None

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Ms. K. R. Cotton Gross NRG Project Manager - Surry U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 J. R. Hall NRG Project Manager- North Anna U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08 B-1A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 NRG Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Enclosure SURRY UNIT 2 CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS REPORT August 2017 Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Energy Virginia)

Surry Power Station Unit 2

CLASSIFICATION/DISCLAIMER The data, techniques, information, and conclusions in this report have been prepared solely for use by Dominion Energy (the Company), and they may not be appropriate for use in situations other than: those for which they have been specifically prepared. The Company therefore makes no ylaim or warranty whatsoever, express or implied, as to their accuracy, usefulness, or applicability. In particular, THE COMPANY MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILI'LY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NOR SHALL ANY WARRANTY BE DEEMED TO ARISE FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE, with respect to this report or any of the data, techniques, information, or conclusions in it. By making this report available, the Company does not authorize its use by others, and any such use is expressly, forbidden except with the prior written approval of the Company. Any such written approval shall itself be deemed to incorporate the disclaimers of liability and disclaimers of warranties provided herein. In no event shall the Company be liable, under any legal theory whatsoever (whether contract, tort, warranty, or strict or absolute liability), for any property damage, mental or physical injury or death, loss of use of property, or other damage resulting from or aris~ng out of the use, authorized or unauthorized, of this report or the data, techniques, information, or conclusions in it.

Page 1of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Classification/Disclaimer ............................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................2 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 Preface ...................................... ***************************************************e11***************************************************5 Section 1 - Introduction and Summary ........................*.........*.......................*.......................... 6 Section 2 - Control Rod Drop Time Measurements ..........................................**..*.*...*.......... 14 Section 3 - Control Rod Bank Worth Measurements .................*.........*................................ 19 Section 4 - Boron Endpoint and Worth Measurements ...............................*..*.....................24 Section 5 - Temperature Coefficient Measurement ...............................................................27 Section 6 - Power Distribution Measurements .........*............................................................. 29 Section 7 -- Conclusions ....................................... ~ ..................................................................... 36 Section 8 -- References ...............................................................................................................38 Appendix - Startup Physics Test Summary Sheets ...................................................*............ 40 Page 2 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 - Chronolog)'" of Tests .................................................................................................. 9 Table 2.1 - Hot Rod Drop Time Summary .............................................................................. 15 Table 3.1 - Control Rod Bank Worth Summary .....................................*.*.............................21 Table 4.1 - Boron Endpoints Summary ...................................................................................25 Table 4.2 - Boron Worth Coefficient ........................................................................................26 Table 5.1 - Isothermal Temperature Coefficient Summary...................................................28 Table 6.1 - Incore Flux Map Summary ....................................................................................31 Table 6.2 - Comparison of Measured Power Distribution Parameters with their Core Operating Limits .....................................................................................................32 Table 7.1 - Startup Physics Testing Results Summary ...........................................................37 Page 3 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 - Core Loading Map **************************************************************************o**********************lO Figure 1.2 - Beginning of Cycle Fuel Assembly Burnups (GWD/MTU) ..*.....*...*.*..*.*..........*. 11 Figure 1.3 - Available Incore Moveable Detector Locations .....*............................................. 12 Figure 1.4 - Control Rod Locations ........................................................................................... 13 Figure 2.1 - Typical Rod Drop Trace ........................................................................................ 16 Figure 2.2 - Rod Drop Time - Hot Full Flow Conditions ................*........................*.............. 17 Figure 2.3 - Rod Drop Times Trending .................................................................................... 18 Figure 3.1 - Control Bank B Integral Rod Worth - HZP ..............*.........................................22 Figure 3.2 - Control Bank B Differential Rod Worth - HZP ..................................................23 Figure 6.1 - Assemblywise Power Distribution 28.81 % Power ..............................................33 Figure 6.2 - Assemblywise Power Distribution 71.02% Power ........................................*.....34 Figure 6.3 - Assemblywise Power Distribution 99.80% Power .......*......................................35 Page4 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report PREFACE This report presents the analysis and evaluation of the physics tests that were performed to verify that the Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 (S2C28) core could be operated safely, and makes an initial evaluation of the performance of the core.

• This report was performed in accordance with DNES-AA-NAF-NCD-5007, Rev. 3 [Ref. 12]. It is not the intent of this report to discuss the particular methods of testing or to present the detailed data taken. Standard testing techniques and methods of data analysis were used. The test data, results and evaluations, together with the detailed startup procedures, are on file at Surry Power Station. Therefore, only a cursory discussion of these items is included in this report. The analyses presented include a brief summary of each test, a comparison of the test results with design predictions, and an evaluation of the results.

The S2C28 startup physics tests results and evaluation sheets are included as an appendix to provide additional information on the startup test results. Each data sheet provides the following information: 1) test identification, 2) test results, 3) acceptance criteria and whether it was met (if applicable), 4) date and time of the test, and 5) preparer/reviewer initials. These sheets provide a compact summary of the startup test results in a consistent format. The entries for the design values were based on calculations performed by Dominion Energy's Nuclear Engineering and Fuel Group. The acceptance criteria are based on design tolerances or applicable Technical Specification and COLR Limits.

Page 5 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION AND

SUMMARY

On May 6, 2017, Unit No. 2 of Surry Power Station completed Cycle 27 and began refueling

[Ref. l]. During this refueling, 89 of the 157 fuel assemblies in the core were replaced with 65 fresh Batch S1/30 and Batch S2/30 assemblies, 8 twice-burned S2/26 assemblies last irradiated in Surry 2 Cycle 25, and 16 twice-burned Sl/28 assemblies last irradiated in Surry 1 Cycle 27 [Ref. 1]. The Cycle 28 core consists of 7 sub-batches of fuel: two fresh batches (Sl/30A and S2/30A), two once-burned batches (S2/29A and S2/29B), and three twice-burned batches (S2/26B, Sl/28B, and S2/28B). Like the previous cycle, S2C28 will have a full core of the 15xl5 Upgrade Fuel Design

[Ref. l].

The Westinghouse Upgrade fuel includes three ZIRLO Intermediate Flow Mixing (IFM) grids for improved thermal-hydraulic performance, ZIRLO (I-spring) structural mid grids with balanced mixing vane pattern, "tube-in-tube" guide thimbles, and the use of optimized ZIRLO fuel clad that improves corrosion resistance and oxidation of the bottom portion of the fuel clad to improve debris resistance. The Upgrade fuel used for all batches except S2/26 includes the Westinghouse Robust Protective Grid (RPG) and modified Debris Filter Bottom Nozzle (mDFBN).

Only batches Sl/30, S2/29, and S2/30 include the Westinghouse Integrated Top Nozzle (WIN)

[Ref. 13].

This cycle uses Westinghouse's Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) fuel product. The IFBA design involves the application of a thin coating of ZrB2 on the fuel pellet surface during fabrication. Pellets with the IFBA coating are placed in specific symmetric patterns in each fresh assembly, typically affecting from 16 to 148 rods per assembly. The top and bottom 6 inches of the fuel pellet stack in the IFBA rods will contain pellets that have no IFBA coating, and have a hole in the center (annular). This additional void space helps accommodate the helium gas that accumulates from neutron absorption in ZrB 2

• IFBA rods generate more internal gas during operation because neutron absorption in the ZrB 2 coating creates helium gas in addition to the fission gas created during irradiation of the fuel. Therefore, the initial pressure is set lower so the internal pressure early in lifetime may be lower [Ref. 5].

Cycle 28 loads two Secondary Source Assemblies (SSAs) in core locations H-04 and H-12.

Each assembly consists of six source rods containing antimony and beryllium pellets encapsulated in Page 6 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report a double layer of stainless steel cladding. There are no thimble plugging, devices in S2C28. The cycle design report [Ref. 1] provides a more detailed description of the Cycle 28 core.

The S2C28 full core loading plan [Ref. 2] is given in Figure 1.1 and the beginning of cycle fuel assembly bumups [Ref. 18] are given in Figure 1.2. The incore moveable* detector locations used for the flux map analyses [Ref. 11] are identified in Figure 1.3. Figure 1.4 identifies the location and number of control rods in the Cycle 28 core [Ref. 1].

According to the Startup Physics logs, the Cycle 28 core achieved initial criticality on June 3, 2017 at 03:59 [Ref. 3]. Prior to and following criticality, startup physics tests were performed as outlined in Table 1.1. This cycle used the Reactivity Measurement and Analysis System (RMAS) to perform startup physics testing. Note that RMAS v.7 [Ref. 9] was used for S2C28 Startup Physics Testing. The tests performed are the same as in previous cycles. A summary of the test results follows.

The measured drop time of each control rod was within the 2.40 second* Technical Specification [Ref. 6] limit, as well as the Surry Unit 2 1.68 second administrative limit [Ref. 8].

Individual control rod bank worths were measured using the rod swap technique [Ref. 4].

For the purpose of this test, a bank was defined as 'fully inserted' when it was 2 steps off the bottom of the core [Ref. 10]. The sum of the individual measured control rod bank worths was within-2.3%

of the design prediction. The reference bank (Control Bank B) worth was within -1.9% of its design prediction. Control rod banks with design predictions greater than 600 pcm were within -5.l % of the design predictions. Control rod banks with design predictions less than 600 pcm (Control Bank A) were within 6 pcm of the design prediction. These results are within the design tolerances of +/-15%

for individual banks worth more than 600 pcm (+/-10% for the reference bank worth), +/-100 pcm for individual banks worth 600 pcm or less, and +/- 10% for the sum of the individual control rod bank worths.

Measured critical boron concentrations for two control bank configurations, all rods out (ARO) and Reference Bank (B-bank) in, were within the design tolerances and the Technical Specification criterion [Ref. 6] that the overall core reactivity balance shall be within +/- 1% Lik/k of Page 7 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report the design prediction. The boron worth coefficient measurement was within + 1.3% of the design prediction, which is within the design tolerance of+/- 10%.

The measured isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) for the ARO configuration was within +0.248 pcm/°F of the design prediction. This result is within the design tolerance of

+/-2.0 pcm/°F.

All criteria [Ref. 20] to perform the first flux map at up to 50% power were met. However, the first flux map was performed at approximately 30% power in anticipation of a required chemistry hold [Ref. 14].

The investigation summarized in Reference 19 concluded that the start order of the reactor coolant pumps (RCPs) could be a contributor to the larger than expected core tilts experienced at the beginning of Surry Unit 2 Cycle 27. The S2C28 initial start order sequence of the RCPs was C-B-A, and is consistent with the startup sequence recommended in Reference 19.

Core power distributions were all within established design tolerances. The measured assembly power distributions were within +/-5.5% of the design predictions, where a 5.5% maximum difference occurred in the 28.81 % power map. The heat flux hot channel factors, FQ(z), and enthalpy rise hot channel factors, F:r, were within the limits of the COLR [Ref. 13]. The maximum positive incore quadrant power tilts ranged from 0.72% to 1.05% during the power ascension. All flux maps were within the maximum incore power tilt design tolerance of 2% (QPTR :'.S 1.02).

The total RCS Flow was successfully verified as being greater than 273,000 gpm and greater than the limit in the COLR (274000 gpm), as required by Surry Technical Specifications [Ref. 6].

The total RCS Flow at nominal conditions was measured as 290,226 gpm.

In summary, all startup physics test results were acceptable. Detailed results, specific design tolerances and acceptance criteria for each measurement are presented in the following sections of this report.

Page 8 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Table 1.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 CHRONOLOGY OF TESTS Reference Test Date Time Power Procedure Hot Rod Drop-Hot Full Flow 06/02/17 13:26 HSD 2-NPT-RX-O 14-0T0-1 Reactivity Computer Checkout 06/03/17 05:00 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Boron Endpoint - ARO 06/03/17 05:00 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Zero Power Testing Range 06/03/17 05:00 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Boron Worth Coefficient 06/03/17 10:00 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Temperature Coefficient -ARO 06/03/17 05:41 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 BankB Worth 06/03/17 06:53 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Boron Endpoint - B in 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 BankA Worth-Rod Swap 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank C Worth - Rod Swap 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank D Worth - Rod Swap 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank SA Worth - Rod Swap 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank SB Worth- Rod Swap 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Total Rod Worth 06/03/17 09:35 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Flux Map - less than 50% Power* 06/04/17 09:27 28.81% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-008

& Power Range Calibration 2-NPT-RX-005 2-GEP-RX-001 Flux Map - 65% - 75% Power 06/05/17 02:14 71.02% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-008

& Power Range Calibration 2-NPT-RX-005 2-GEP-RX-001 Flux Map - 95% - 100% Power 06/08/17 09:00 99.80% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-008

& Power Range Calibration 2-NPT-RX-005 2-GEP-RX-001 RCS Flow Measurement 06/08/17 10:30 HFP 2-NPT-RX-009

• Results of zero power physics testing permitted the first flux map to be performed up to 50%

power (versus 30% power if specified criteria were not met). The first flux map was performed below 30% power in anticipation of a required chemistry hold.

Page 9 of 46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 1.1 SURRY UNIT 2-CYCLE 28 CORE LOADING MAP SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28

~ULL CORE LOADING PLAN REVISION NO. 0 K'l'IMIAP-201,,-0144, Rov. 0 1.ttaeh!Mne 1 PME l of 1 R M K J ll F D c B A 234 655 Z38 llOR'l'll l 52X RCC 228 819 RO::

?GJ 8l2 RCC Q03 RCC

,19 RCC 820 749 SS9 Q()Q RO::

415 llO::

1G1 BlO RO::

227 822 -'6X RCC 2

37X 811 8'8 741 714 752 709 146 850 817 40X RCC RCC 5 231 821 842 729 "MO 854 724 956 735 732 8'14 813 230 RCC RCC RCC llCC RCC RCC RCC G 757 9::19 748 ?3'1 'Ill 834 '113 $39 726 7'G "14) 827 7~!1 ace RO:: !I.CC RCC 23~ 801 419 706 as2 9lS 720 ?1S 7?.l 8J3 847 ?Ol 4l4 80? 236 '

RO:: RCC RCC RCC B 660 916 ?51 ?53 719 709 703 857 112 ?ll 719 750 ?55 924 658 ace RCC RCC RCC z;;s 806 416 704 845 836 ?21 705 717 837 841 707 41? 804 240 RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RO::  !ICC 10

?GO 925 '42 7l9 no 840 702 8lS 728 733 7-'S 831 764 RCC RCC 11 22, 81-1 855 727 73~ 843 722 8~9 73!> 725 846 815 232 RCC RCC ssa RCC RC:C 12 SLX 818 8~L 747 7U 756 710 744 853 809 56X l~'COR!o: OEVICB DBSS<:l<.ll'T.ICllS: RCC RCC 1J W::C- YUL!. LDICn'K C'JC~.1110:. ROD 42X B~2 829 413 754 421) 826 8~.3 47X sst- sccond<ley s~ure~ 1"'CC11bl.y RCC RCC  !\CC 14 229 762 802 810 BOS  ?SB 225 15 237 656 233 Proparoo By: _.... --;;:::=._  !>ate: fl t.;=116 ( _1.,~/~i(,,.""---

!>cite' ......l_J.....

aav!cwcd Hy:LJ.. D~~ IMC"°' 1'2..(/$ //(,

T~ S .. ?ouik Approved By: ~L D.sto: 17./'l.O(lfo A. ff. >>icnoJson Page 10 of 46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 1.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 BEGINNING OF CYCLE FUEL ASSEMBLY BURNUPS (GWD/MTU)

R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A 1 I 42.571 32.051 42.611 I MEASURED I 1 I 42.511 31.821 42.so1 I PREDICTED I 2 I 41.631 23.181 0.001 0.001 0.001 22.661 42.101 2 I 41.511 22.671 0.001 0.001 0.001 22.681 41.521 3 I 39.491 0.001 0.001 0.001 21.661 0.001 0.001 0.001 39.491 3 I 39.441 0.001 0.001 0.001 2i.41I 0.001 0.001 0.001 39.4BI 4 I 39.611 0.001 0.001 19.361 23.661 20.021 23.841 19.591 0.001 0.001 39.551 4 I 39.591 0.001 0.001 19.261 23.591 19.941 23.621 19.381 0.001 0.001 39.601 I 42.171 0.001 0.001 23.70119.281 0.001 23.301 O.OOl 19.221 23.BOI 0.001 0.001 41.721 I 41.521 0.001 0.001 23.931 19.191 0.001 23.381 0.001 19.191 23.971 0.001 0.001 41.511 I 22.821 0.001 19.321 19.281 23.141 0.001 23.781 0.001 23.241 19.321 19.231 0.001 22.821 I 22.761 0.001 19.311 19.151 23.341 0.001 23.831 0.001 23.361 19.lBI 19.231 0.001 22.681 7 I 42.801 0.001 0.001 23.711 0.001 0.001 23.341 23.941 23.231 0.001 0.001 23.611 0.001 0.001 42.531 I 42.521 0.001 0.001 23.661 0.001 0.001 23.491 23.911 23.311 0.001 0.001 23.631 0.001 0.001 42.541 I 32.291 0.001 21.891 20.561 23.331 23.751 23.741 0.001 23.771 24.051 23.421 19.981 21.561 0.001 32.00I I 31.891 0.001 21.481 19.981 23.491 23.731 23.711 0.001 23.701 23.731 23.481 19.981 21.481 0.001 31.871 I 42.561 0.001 0.001 24.021 0.001 0.001 23.301 24.231 23_301 0.001 0.001 23.611 0.001 0.001 42.621 I 42.541 0.001 0.001 23.651 0.001 0.001 23.301 23.911 23.491 0.001 0.001 23.611 0.001 0.001 42.521 10 I 22.801 0.001 19.561 19.221 23.301 0.001 23.881 0.001 23.271 19.351 19.501 0.001 22.811 10 I 22.701 0.001 19.231 19.191 23.351 0.001 23.831 0.001 23.341 19.221 19.311 0.001 22.761 11 I 41.301 0.001 0.001 23.78119.621 0.001 23.541 O.OOl 19.171 23.791 0.001 0.001 41.601 11 I 41.511 0.001 ..0.001 23.971 19.211 0.001 23.381 0.001 19.111 23.931 0.001 0.001 41.521 12 I 39.551 0.001 0.001 19.571 23.521 20.161 23.901 19.541 0.001 0.001 39.311 12 I 39.601 0.001 0.001 19.381 23.631 20.001 23.641 19.261 0.001 0.001 39.591 13 I 39.SSI 0.001 0.001 0.001 21.391 0.001 0.001 0.001 39.411 13 I 39.481 0.001 0.001 0.001 2i.411 0.001 0.001 0.001 39.441 14 I 41. 60 I 22. 73 I o. oo I o. oo I o. oo I 22. 63 I 41. 68 I 14 I 41. 52 I 22. 70 I o. oo I 0.001 o. oo I 22. 66 I 41.51 I 15 I 42.911 31.901 42.561 15 I 42.501 31.831 42.511 R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A Page 11 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 1.3 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 AVAILABLE INCORE MOVEABLE DETECTOR LOCATIONS R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A MD 2

MD 3

MD MD MD MD 4

MD MD MD 5

MD MD MD MD MD MD 6

MD MD MD 7

MD MD MD MD MD 8

MD* MD MD MD MD MD 9

MD MD MD MD 10 MD MD MD MD 11 MD MD MD MD 12 MD MD MD MD 13 MD MD 14 MD MD 15 MD MD - Moveable Detector

• Detector in R8 was not available for power ascension maps.

Page 12 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 1.4 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 CONTROL ROD LOCATIONS R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A 180° 1

A D A 2 SA SA 3 c B B c 4 SB SB 5 A B D c D B A 6 SA SB SB SA 7 D c c D 270° 8 SA SB SB SA 9 A B D c D B A 10 SB SB 11 c B B c 12 SA SA 13 A D A 14 15 D = Control Battle D SB = Shutdown Bank SB C = Control Battle C SA = Shutdown Battle SA B = Control Battle B A = Control Battle A Page 13 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report SECTION 2 - CONTROL ROD DROP TIME MEASUREMENTS The drop time of each control rod was measured at hot shutdown (HSD) with three reactor coolant pumps in operation (full flow) and with Tave greater than or equal to 530°F per 2-NPT-RX-O 14-0TO-l. This verified that the time to entry of a rod into the dashpot region was less than or equal to the maximum allowed by Technical Specification 3 .12. C. l [Ref. 6] .

.Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 used the Rod Drop Measurement Instrument (RDMI) to gather and analyze the rod drop data [Ref. 7]. The rod drop times were measured by withdrawing all banks to their fully withdrawn position and dropping al~ of the 48 control rods by opening the reactor trip breakers. This allowed the rods to drop into the core as they would during a plant trip.

The current methodology acquires data using the secondary RPI coil terminals (/3 & /4) on the CERPI racks for each rod. Data is immediately saved to a comma-separated value file.

Further details about the RDMI can be found in Reference 7.

Additional verification was performed for the rod drop in core location G-13 due to the bending and subsequent replacement of the control rod drive shaft for that location during the onload. Although the shape was not consistent with the shape in G-13 from S2C27, the shape was consistent with the shape in location F-06, which has shown acceptable performance. The drop time in G-13 was slightly slower (~O.l seconds) than S2C27. All remaining criteria for G-13 were satisfactory [Ref. 14].

A typical rod drop trace for S2C28 is shown in Figure 2.1. The measured drop time for each control rod is recorded on Figure 2.2. The slowest, fastest and average drop times are summarized in Table 2.1. Figure 2.3 shows slowest, fastest, and average drop times for Surry 2 Cycles 20-28. Technical Specification 3.12.C.l [Ref. 6] specifies a maximum rod drop time to dashpot entry of 2.4 seconds for all rods. These test results satisfied this technical specification limit as well as the administrative limit [Ref. 8] of 1.68 seconds. In addition, rod bounce was observed at the end of each trace demonstrating that no control rod stuck in the dashpot region.

The average rod drop time for S2C28 was the same as S2C27.

Page 14 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Table 2.1 SURRY UNIT 2- CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS HOT ROD DROP TIME

SUMMARY

ROD DROP TIME TO DASHPOT ENTRY SLOWEST ROD FASTEST ROD AVERAGE TIME G-13 1.45 sec. L-05 1.30 sec. 1.35 sec.

Page 15 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 2.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS TYPICAL ROD DROP TRACE S2C28 DROP DATA: G7 (SBB}

Beginning of 5 it::-=*--==¥e~~ii!i~~~~~~-ii!l--5"-ii-~~- Dashpot Entry (Extreme Drop in . ~--.. 1 4.5

• 4 3.5 ~* +----

--~~~----,..- _____

---

+---

Voltage)

.' _ t**- ' *---I..

---

w

!' i I 3- -** **---**-t***~***~-""""l>l 2 5

• , Initiation of Bottom of Dashpot 2 *' RodDrop - - - - - - - - - - - ----1-1 Event Mark Bounce Indicating Rod is NOT Stuck

---

*~--------'1-1 0 1 2 3 4 nme (sec)

Page 16 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 2.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ROD DROP TIME - HOT FULL FLOW CONDITIONS R p N M L K J H G F E D C B A 1

2 1.338 1.322 1.332 3

1.338 1.344 4

1.336 1.314 1.352 1.358 5

1.304 1.342 6

1.324 1.324 1.336 1.342 1.430 1.330 1.420 7

1.342 1.360 1.358 1.344 8

1.310 1.338 1.332 1.360 9

1.346 1.356 1.340 1.324 10 1.344 1.338 1.360 1.348 1.382 1.330 1.362 11 1.328 1.344 12 1.324 1.322 1.346 1.340 13 1.324 1.446 14 1.392 1.316 1.360 15 I 1-->

x.xxx Rod drop time to dashpot entry (sec.)

Page 17 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 2.3 SURRY UNIT 2- CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ROD DROP TIMES TRENDING 2.50 2.40 Tlchnkal: pecificat on Limit, l2.4secor ds 2-30 2.20 2.10 2.00

- Slowest Rod Time

-Fastest RodTime

_1.90 -+-Average Time u

CD CD E

i=1.80 Adm in Istrative

___l mit,1.68 seconds 1.70

.-ca-.a

--- ---* --- i---* ---

1.60 1.50

~~

• ~ /

1.40 ~

./"

1.30

/)k I.____ /

1.20 1.10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cycle Page 18 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report SECTION 3 - CONTROL ROD BANK WORTH MEASUREMENTS Control rod bank worths were measured for the control and shutdown banks using the rod swap technique [Ref. 4]. The initial step of the rod swap method diluted the predicted most reactive control rod bank (hereafter referred to as the reference bank) into the core and measured its reactivity worth using conventional test techniques. The reactivity changes resulting from the reference bank movements were recorded continuously by the reactivity computer and were used to determine the differential and integral worth of the reference bank. For Cycle 28, Control Bank B was used as the reference bank. Surry 2 targeted a dilution rate around 1100 pcm/hr for the reference bank measurement.

During a previous startup physics testing campaign, a control rod became stuck on the bottom eventually forcing a reactor trip to fix the problem. The solution to this issue for startup physics testing was to avoid requiring control rods to be manually inserted to 0 steps. To accomplish this, an evaluation of the startup physics testing process was performed [Ref. 10],

concluding that the definition of fully inserted for control rod positions used in startup physics testing could be changed from 0 steps withdrawn to a range of 0 to 2 steps withdrawn. The S2C28 startup physics testing campaign used 2 steps withdrawn for all conditions requiring control rods to be manually fully inserted.

After completion of the reference bank reactivity worth measurement, the reactor coolant system temperature and boron concentration were stabilized with the reactor critical and the reference bank near its full insertion. Initial statepoint data (core reactivity and moderator temperature) for the rod swap maneuver were next obtained with the reference bank at its fully inserted position and all other banks fully withdrawn.

Test bank swaps proceed in sequential order from the bank with the smallest worth to the bank with the largest worth. The second test bank should have a predicted worth higher than the first bank in order to ensure the first bank will be moved fully out before the second bank is fully inserted. The rod swap maneuver was performed by withdrawing the previous test bank (or reference bank for the first maneuver) several steps and then inserting the next test bank to balance the reactivity of the reference bank withdrawal. This sequence was repeated until the previous test bank was fully withdrawn and the current test bank was nearly inserted. The next step was to swap the rest of the test bank in by balancing the reactivity with the withdrawal of the reference bank, until the test bank was fully inserted and the reference bank was positioned Page 19 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report such that the core was near the initial statepoint condition. This measured critical position (MCP) of the reference bank with the test bank fully inserted was used to determine the integral reactivity worth of the test bank.

The core reactivity, moderator temperature, and differential worth of the reference bank were recorded with the reference bank at the MCP. The rod swap maneuver was repeated for all test banks. Note that after the fmal test bank was fully inserted, the test bank was swapped with the reference bank until the reference bank was fully inserted and the last test bank was fully withdrawn. Here the final statepoint data for the rod swap maneuver was obtained (core reactivity and moderator temperature) in order to verify the reactivity drift was within procedural limitations for the rod swap test.

A summary of the test results is given in Table 3.1. As shown in this table and the Startup Physics Test Summary Sheets given in the Appendix, the individual measured bank worths for the control and shutdown banks were within the design tolerance of +/- 10% for the reference bank, +/- 15% for test banks of worth greater than 600 pcm, and +/- 100 pcm for test banks of worth less than or equal to 600 pcm. The sum of the individual measured rod bank worths was within -2.3% of the design prediction. This is well within the design tolerance of +/-10% for the sum of the individual control rod bank worths.

The integral and differential reactivity worths of the reference bank (Control Bank B) are shown in Figures 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. The design predictions [Ref. 1] and the measured data are plotted together in order to illustrate their agreement. In summary, the measured rod worth values were found to be satisfactory.

Page20 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Table 3.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS CONTROL ROD BANK WORTH

SUMMARY

MEASURED PREDICTED PERCENT WORTH WORTH DIFFERENCE(%)

BANK (PCM) (PCM) (M-P)/P X 100 B - Reference 1396 1424 -1.9%

A 357 363 -6 pcm*

c 770 807 -4.6%

SA 950 943 +0.7%

SB 921 971 -5.1%

D 1176 1196 -1.6%

Total Bank Worth 5572 5705 -2.3%

• Note: For bank worth < 600 pcm, worth difference= (M - P).

Page 21of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 3.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS CONTROL BANK B INTEGRAL ROD WORTH - HZP ALL OTHER RODS WITHDRAWN 1600 l

I I I

1400

,....... -- l 1--

--~ 'II i

~

• I\\

-* \\

-).

I

-- *- *-,__ I 1200

\ I *- ,_.

J. I C--*

.\\ ~

\I

\\

i 1000 . *-

\l,. ,_,_.

~ -

S

~

• - ----* *- I ,.._

~

~

0 'i 11- -

~ I 800

~

Ill

~

I-** - -M-o - --- ,....._ t--*

"1'

~

~

OI '~

Cll r\\

~ 600 H p\ ,_

~

i. I *-

400 .

- e--

\ I

~

~

I r :I..

1--

~

200 I

",""\,

r I

'\.,,

i I * ~

I -,; ~

0 i .... ~

0 50 100 150 200 250 Bank Posit~on (steps)

Page 22 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 3.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS CONTROL BANK B DIFFERENTIAL ROD WORTH - HZP ALL OTHER RODS WITHDRAWN 12.0 l l

I°'I' "

14< I r

I/

10.0 1\ I - ,_ t - -

I ' '.. .,__

~

\

..... ~\

~ 8.0

__ * ~

~- -

-1.l

......Ill

' *~~

-..~-

'"~-~

B S! ,__.. ,__ _,_ I I iif..I l"t

& r- - ,_ l ~  !'.,,.

6.0

'O

~

0 l ~-

~ ~ la --Pmdlctod l*

I 1'""- ,...

rl I Ill

\

rJ

~

~

J.-4

• 1.0000).

Page 31 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Table 6.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS COMPARISION OF MEASURED POWER DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS WITH THEIR CORE OPERATING LIMITS Peak FQ(Z) Hot Channel Factor F~ Hot Channel Factor Map Meas. Limit Node Margin* Meas. Limit Margin*

No. (%) (%)

1 2.308 5.000 26 53.8 1.552 1.984 21.8 3.520 26 2 1.996 43.3 1.493 - 1.777 16.0 3 1.880 2.505 26 25.0 1.463 1.636 10.6 The measured FQ(Z) hot channel factors include 8% total uncertainty. Measured F~ data includes no uncertainty.

• Margin(%)= lOO*(Limit - Meas.) I Limit Page 32 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 6.1 - ASSEMBL YWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 28.81 % POWER ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER FRACTIONS Top value = Measured, middle value = Analytical, bottom value = % Delta

% Delta = (M - A)xlOO/A R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A

/ 0.261/ o.397/ 0.265/

1 I 0.261/ o.392/ 0.265/

I -0.13/ i.20/ 0.06/

/ 0.209/ o.658/ i.019/ i.102/ i.011/ 0.660/ 0.209/

/ 0.291/ o.664/ 1.090/ 1.114/ 1.005/ 0.660/ 0.290/

I -o.54/ -0.05/ -o.99/ -i.o3/ -0.13/ -0.05/ -o.5o/

I o.359/ i.002/ i.265/ i.1011 i.200/ i.115/ i.250/ o.996/ o.363/

I o.363/ 1.011/ 1.210/ 1.195/ 1.206/ 1.106/ 1.269/ 1.005/ o.361/

I -1.05/ -o.9o/ -1.00/ -1.19/ -o.5o/ -o.9o/ -0.00/ -0.01\ o.44\

/ o.365/ i.002\ i.212/ i.313/ 1.158/ i.203\ i.141/ i.290/ 1.199/ o.99o/ o.36o/

I o.363/ i.006\ i.221/ i.325/ i.113\ i.225\ i.150/ i.313\ i.215\ i.oo4/ o.363\.

J o.45\ -o.36\ -0.12\ -o.92\ -1.25/ -1.03\ -1.44/ -1.13/ -1.35\ -1.35/ -0.11\

/ 0.295/ 1.022/ 1.220/ 1.151\ 1.292/ 1.200/ 1.111/ 1.211/ 1.212/ 1.134/ 1.201\ 1.010\ 0.290\

I 0.292\ 1.011/ 1.221/ 1.151\ 1.306/ 1.301\ 1.139\ 1.299\ 1.300\ 1.156\ 1.225\ 1.011\ 0.294/

J o.97\ i.06/ -0.04/ 0.01\ -i.o9\ -1.42/ -1.95/ -2.10/ -2.12\ -1.93\ -1.96/ -0.12/ 1.39\

I o.669/ i.205/ 1.319\ i.211\ i.066\ i.230/ i.o49\ i.210/ i.051\ i.290/ i.320/ i.290\ o.677\

/ o.665\ i.200\ 1.325/ i.301\ i.090\ i.256/ i.019/ i.256\ i.091/ i.312/ 1.336\ i.290/ 0.610/

J o.64/ o.43/ -o.46\ -2.30\ -2.21/ -2.06/ -2.02/ -3.03\ -3.68\ -1.69/ -o.57/ 0.01/ o.98/

I o.269/ i.101/ i.211/ 1.173\ 1.295/ 1.240\ 1.019/ 0.963/ i.oo5/ i.225\ 1.303\ i.205\ i:221\ 1.119\ 0.215/

1 / 0.260/ i.o96\ i.201\ i.114/ i.311/ i.261\ i.o39\ o.900\ i.o43\ i.263/ i.320/ i.190\ i.211\ i.102/ 0.210/

/ o.49/ o.44/ 0.05/ -0.00/ -i.24/ -1.65\ -1.93/ -2.51/ -3.68/ -2.99\ -i.29/ i.23/ 0.05\ 1.55/ i.04/

J o.395\ i.124/ i.220\ i.211\ 1.145\ i.015/ o.910/ i.010/ o.964/ i.041\ i.130/ i.214/ i.231\ i.159\ o.405/

0 J o.394\ 1.126/ 1.224/ 1.210\ 1.152/ 1.006/ o.992/ 1.041/ o.993/ 1.001\ 1.154\ 1.212\ 1.226\ 1.120\ o.395/

J 0.23/ -0.14/ 0.29/ 0.00/ -o.63\. -o.90\ -1.45/ -2.10/ -2.94/ -3.12\ -i.42\ 0.10/ o.9o\ 2.14\ 2.62\

J 0.211\ 1.100/ 1.221/ 1.196/ 1.315/ 1.252\ 1.030\ 0.912\ 1.014\ 1.229/ 1.294\ 1.114/ 1.209/ 1.114/ 0.214/

9 J 0.269/ 1.100\ 1.209\ 1.100\ 1.310/ 1.261\ 1.042/ 0.901/ 1.039\ 1.261\ 1.312\ 1.116\ 1.203\ 1.091\ 0.260\

/ 0.11\ 0.11/ o.90\ o.66/ -0.26/ -0.60/ -i.16/ -i.52/ -2.42/ -2.56/ -i.31/ -0.16/ o.53\ 1.53\ 2.01/

/ 0.601/ 1.316/ 1.353\ 1.319\ 1.003\ 1.240\ 1.060\ 1.239\ 1.069\ 1.292/ 1.320\ 1.204/ 0.611\

10 I o.669/ i.201\ 1.333/ i.309\ i.000/ i.254/ i.011/ i.256\ i.o9o\ i.306/ i.326\ i.201\ o.666\

/ 1.75/ 2.21/ 1.47/ 0.14/ -o.47/ -i.12\ -0.02/ -1.33\ -i.89/ -i.10/ -o.45\ 0.23/ 0.10/

/ o.3oo/ i.o39/ i.246/ i.116/ i.311/ i.303/ i.131/ i.3o4/ i.296\ i.144\ i.223/ i.016\ 0.294\

11 J 0.293\ 1.015/ 1.222/ 1.153/ 1.291\ 1.296/ 1.131\ 1.306\ 1.301/ 1.151/ 1.221/ 1.012\ 0.292\

/ 2.31/ 2.35/ 1.94\ 1.96/ i.o5/ o.51/ -0.03/ -0.10/ -0.00/ -i.11/ 0.19/ o.35/ o.65\

J o.379\ i.025\ i.231\ 1.336\ i.101/ i.246/ i.193/ 1.348/ i.230\ i.031/ o.368/

12 I o.363/ i.002\ i.212/ i.310\ i.155\ i.222/ i.110\ t.324/ i.220/ i.oo5/ o.363/

I 4.32/ 2.26/ 2.01/ 2.01/ 2.24/ 1.98/ 1.98/ 1.84/ 1.51/ 2.50/ i.32/

I o.369/ 1.025/ 1.296/ 1.211/ 1.241/ 1.239/ 1.335/ 1.042/ o.373/

13 I o.36o/ i.003/ 1.266/ i.103/ i.203/ i.193/ i.216/ i.010/ o.362/

/ 2.42/ 2.16/ 2.35/ 2.05/ 3.65/ 3.84/ 4.6o/ 3.12/ 3.10/

/ 0.294/ o.676/ 1.111/ 1.151/ 1.140/ o.697/ o.3o3/

14 I 0.209/ o.658/ 1.002\ 1.112/ 1.0001 o.663/ 0.291/

/ i.02/ 2.19\ 3.24\ 3.46\ 5.55\ 5.01\ 4.00\

I 0.210/ o.400\ 0.201\

15 / 0.265\ o.391\ 0.261/

/ 4.85\ 4.23\ 5.20\

AVERAGE ABSOLUTE PERCENT DIFFERENCE = 1.6 STANDARD DEVIATION 1.188 Summary:

Map No: 82-28-01 Date: 06/04/2017 Power: 28.81%

Control Rod Position: Fo(Z) = 2.308 QPTR: 0.9926 0.9897 D Banlc at 170 Steps pN = 1.552 1.0105 1.0073 Ml Fz = 1.379 Axial Offset(%)= +2.178 Burnup = 1.25 MWD/MTU Page 33 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 6.2 - ASSEMBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 71.02% POWER ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER FRACTIONS Top value ;:: Measured, middle value = Analytical, bottom value = % Delta

% Delta = (M - A)xlOO/A R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A I 0.2061 o.4241 0.2031 1 I 0.2051 0.4201 0.2031 I o.341 o.961 0.101 I 0.2991 o.6721 i.1001 i.1561 i.o93I o.6631 0.2961 I o.3011 o.6731 i.1021 i.1591 i.0901 0.6101 0.2991 I -o.521 -0.111 -0.191 -0.251 -o.481 -o.981 -o.941 I o.3611 o.9931 1.2401 1.1051 1.2111 1.1151 1.2361 o.9841 o.3611 I o.3111 1.0001 1.2531 1.1011 1.2011 1.1001 1.2461 o.9951 o.3101 I -2. 63 I -o. 73 I -o.42 I -0.20 I o.34 I -o. 45 I -o. 79 I -1.15 I -2.40 I I o.3111 o.99ol 1.1921 1.2091 1.1531 1.2011 1.1391 1.2101 1.1111 o.9761 o.3671 I o.3711 o.9961 i.1911 i.2961 i.1611 i.2131 i.1401 i.2061 i.1921 o.9941 o.3721 I -0.111 -0.581 -0.391 -0.511 -0.681 -0.961 -0.801 -0.601 -1.271 -1.791 -1.441 I o.3011 o.9991 i.1951 i.1401 i.2011 i.2011 i.1241 i.2121 i.2111 i.1261 i.1121 o.9921 o.3021 I o.3001 o.9991 i.1961 1.1431 1.2951 i.2911 i.1311 i.2901 i.2901 1.1421 1.1991 i.0041 o.3021 I 0.491 0.021 -0.131 0.461 -0.631 -1.271 -1.141 -1.391 -1.511 -1.441 -2.231 -1.151 -0.021 I 0.6111 1.2581 1.2911 1.2111 1.1211 1.2521 1.0001 1.2421 1.1031 1.2001 1.2921 1.2511 0.6021 I o.6731 i.2541 i.2941 i.2951 i.1341 i.2611 i.0911 i.2611 1.1341 i.2991 i.3031 i.2611 o.6771 I o.651 o.311 -0.201 -1.371 -i.131 -i.111 -i.021 -1.951 -2.121 -1.491 -0.001 -0.201 0.011 I 0.2871 1.1131 1.2051 1.1631 1.2911 1.2601 1.0501 0.9991 1.0381 1.2441 1.2921 1.1791 1.2061 1.1301 0.2921 1 I 0.2051 i.1051 i.1911 i.1601 i.3001 i.2111 i.0611 i.0121 i.o64I i.2131 i.3011 i.1141 i.1991 i.1091 0.2061 I o.831 0.121 i.151 0.211 -o.661 -0.031 -i.001 -1.331 -2.421 -2.291 -1.171 o.461 o.591 1.931 2.201 I o.4231 1.1101 1.2241 1.2571 1.1451 1.0951 1.0101 1.0551 o.9991 1.0101 1.1371 1.2551 1.2301 1.1961 o.4301 0 I o.4201 i.1661 i.2201 i.2521 i.1411 i.0901 1.0151 i.0611 i.0111 i.0901 i.1401 1.2541 i.2211 i.1601 o.4211 I o.671 o.371 o.311 o.381 -0.161 -0.261 -0.581 -i.121 -1.731 -2.521 -0.971 0.051 o.761 2.381 2.121 I 0.2001 1.1161 1.2011 1.1031 1.3211 1.2141 1.0611 1.0051 1.0521 1.2591 1.2901 1.1611 1.1951 1.1111 0.2011 9 I 0.2061 i.1001 i.1911 i.1121 i.3051 i.2121 i.o64I i.0121 i.0611 i.2111 i.3001 i.1621 i.1921 i.1061 0.2051 I 0.031 0.151 0.031 o.971 i.251 0.111 -0.291 -o.631 -0.001 -o.941 -0.151 -0.111 0.201 o.961 0.101 I 0.6051 i.2n1 i.3151 i.3001 i.1351 i.2611 i.0051 i.2591 i.1251 i.2051 i.2901 i.2521 0.6121 10 I o.6761 i.2591 i.3011 i.2911 i.1331 i.2661 i.0911 i.2611 1.1351 i.2941 i.2951 i.2541 o.6741 I i.321 1.451 i.091 0.051 0.111 -o.361 -o.521 -o.661 -o.n1 -0.121 -o.371 -0.161 -0.261 I o.3061 1.0161 1.2091 1.1491 1.2951 1.2901 1.1211 1.2931 1.2901 1.1301 1.1931 o.9961 o.3001 11 I o.3021 1.0031 1.1901 1.1411 1.2001 1.2091 1.1361 1.2961 1.2961 1.1431 1.1961 1.0001 o.3011 I 1.331 i.261 o.941 o.681 o.511 0.001 -0.111 -0.211 -o.411 -i.131 -0.231 -o.421 -o.3ol J o.3101 i.0031 i.2011 i.291J i.1601 i.225J i.1131 i.310J i.2051 i.0091 o.3651 12 I o.3111 o.9931 i.1911 i.2041 i.1461 i.2101 i.1591 i.2951 i.1911 o.9961 0.3111 I 1.901 1.021 0.011 o.991 1.201 1.221 1.231 1.111 0.101 1.331 -1.531 I o.3731 i.0031 i.2601 i.1991 i.2401 i.2101 i.29ol i.0191 o.3781 13 I o.3691 o.9941 1.2441 1.1191 1.2051 1.1061 1.2531 o.9991 o.3111 I 1.141 o.9ol 1.261 1.741 2.091 2.661 2.991 1.981 1.011 I 0.2971 o.6791 i.1101 i.1011 1.1411 o.6961 o.3001 14 I 0.2991 o.6691 i.o96I i.1501 i.1011 o.6731 o.3001 I -o.591 1.471 2.041 2.541 3.651 3.371 2.791 I 0.2091 o.4311 o.2951 15 I 0.2031 o.4191 0.2051 I 2.011 2.051 3.561 AVERAGE ABSOLUTE PERCENT DIFFERENCE = 1.0 STANDARD DEVIATION 0. 7 8 6 Summary:

Map No: S2-28-02 Date: 06/05/2017 Power: 71.02%

Control Rod Position: F0 (z) = 1.996 QPTR: 0.9967 0.9916 D Bank at 197 Steps pNAH = 1.493 1.0072 1.0045 Fz = 1.229 Axial Offset(%)= +4.387 Burnup = 12.8 MWD/MTU Page 34 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Figure 6.3 - ASSEMBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 99.80% POWER ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER FRACTIONS Top value = Measured, middle value = Analytical, bottom value = % Delta

% Delta = (M - A)xlOO/A R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A I 0.2941 o.4311 o.2n1 I 0.2951 o.4331 0.2931 I -o.471 -o.351 -o.651 I 0.3021 0.6691 1.0931 1.1761 1.0851 0.6631 0.2991 2 I 0.3041 0.6721 1.0961 1.1801 1.0921 0.6691 0.3031 I -o.541 -o.301 -0.201 -o.311 -0.611 -o.961 -i.111 I o.3661 o.9761 i.2231 i.1161 i.2031 i.1631 i.2091 o.9661 o.3661 I o.3761 o.9841 i.2291 i.1101 i.2021 i.1121 i.2231 o.9001 o.3741 I -2.641 -0.061 -o.511 -0.101 0.061 -0.191 -i.131 -i.301 -2.001 I o.3731 o.9741 1.1101 1.2691 1.1481 1.1921 1.1311 1.2511 1.1511 o.9651 o.3111 4 I o.3761 o.9831 1.1191 1.2761 1.1551 1.2061 1.1431 1.2611 1.1741 o.9011 o.3761 I -0.791 -0.951 -0.741 -0.581 -0.611 -1.121 -1.051 -1.221 -1.481 -1.631 -1.291 I o.3o31 o.9781 i.1101 i.1321 i.2061 i.2001 i.1311 i.2151 i.2111 i.1191 i.1611 o.9761 o.3011 I o.3o41 o.9841 i.1101 1.1381 i.2941 1.2981 i.1421 i.2921 i.2901 i.1311 i.1011 o.9881 o.3061 I -0.211 -o.651 -0.601 -o.561 -0.611 -0.141 -o.921 -i.291 -1.471 -1.561 -1.691 -i.221 -1.761 I o.6721 i.2211 i.2101 i.2061 i.11s1 i.2151 i.o99I i.2661 i.1621 i.2021 i.2121 i.2291 o.6761 I 0.6121 i.2301 i.2151 i.2951 i.1021 i.2041 i.1001 i.2041 i.1021 i.2901 i.2031 i.2361 o.6761 I -0.071 -0.251 -0.411 -0.731 -0.601 -0.731 -0.861 -1.411 -1.711 -1.231 -0.851 -0.551 -0.051 I 0.2951 1.1011 i.1051 i.1541 1.2951 i.2011 i.0101 i.0261 i.o69I i.2111 i.2961 i.1691 i.1091 i.1131 0.2991 1 I 0.2941 i.o99I i.1021 i.1551 i.3011 i.2001 i.0041 i.o36I i.0011 i.2091 i.3011 i.1611 i.1091 i.1031 0.2961 I 0.331 0.141 0.211 -0.081 -0.451 -0.511 -0.581 -0.941 -1.621 -1.391 -0.841 0.181 0.011 0.931 1.071 I 0.4351 1.1891 1.2111 1.2451 1.1501 1.1141 1.0371 1.0831 1.0291 1.1011 1.1461 1.2431 1.2151 1.2121 0.4411 0 I o.4341 i.1011 i.2151 1.2451 i.1521 i.1141 i.0401 i.0911 i.o4ol i.1151 1.1531 1.2461 i.2161 i.1001 o.4341 I 0.261 0.171 -0.341 0.041 -0.151 -0.041 -0.311 -0.701 -1.061 -1.281 -0.621 -0.221 -0.121 1.981 1.641 I 0.2911 1.1091 1.1971 1.1161 1.3191 1.2941 1.0001 1.0321 1.0151 1.2051 1.2961 1.1531 1.1001 1.1041 0.2951 9 I 0.2951. 1.1021 1.1881 1.1661 1.3061 1.2891 1.0871 1.0361 1.0841 1.2881 1.3011 1.1571 1.1831 1.1001 0.2951 I 0.121 0.671 0.751 0.851 1.021 0.391 0.101 -0.371 -0.831 -0.201 -0.401 -0.321 -0.221 0.401 -0.031 I 0.6851 1.2601 1.2991 1.3111 1.1901 1.2881 1.1081 1.2801 1.1801 1.2891 1.2691 1.2241 0.6651 10 I o.6751 i.23s1 i.2011 i.2961 i.1011 i.2041 i.1001 i.2041 i.1021 1.2941 i.2151 i.2311 o.6721 I i.471 2.061 1.381 i.161 o.761 0.201 -0.041 -0.201 -0.201 -o.351 -o.491 -o.551 -i.031 I o.3111 i.0031 i.1951 i.1511 i.3011 i.2991 i.1411 i.2901 i.2921 i.1361 i.1111 o.9011 o.3021 11 I o.3osl o.9011 i.1001 i.1361 i.2001 i.2911 i.1411 i.2n1 i.29sl i.1301 i.1101 o.9841 o.3041 I i.021 1.581 i.211 1.331 i.011 o.641 -0.011 0.111 -0.211 -0.111 -0.091 -o.341 -o.s11 I o.3001 o.9921 i.1011 i.2021 i.1601 i.2161 1.1671 i.2921 i.1901 o.9931 o.3741 12 I o.3761 o.9801 i.1131 1.2661 1.1411 i.2031 1.1531 1.2751 i.1191 o.9831 o.3761 I 0.991 1.231 1.201 1.271 1.651 1.121 1.191 1.311 0.921 1.051 -0.541 I o.3101 o.99ol i.2311 i.1011 i.2201 i.2021 i.2601 i.0041 o.3021 13 I o.3741 o.9791 i.2221 i.1101 i.2011 i.1111 i.2291 o.9841 o.3761 I 1.191 1.111 1.201 1.451 1.551 2.141 3.131 2.041 1.551 I o.3031 o.6761 i.1011 i.2021 i.1211 o.6921 o.3121 14 I o.3031 o.6681 i.0911 i.1191 i.o9sl 0.6121 o.3041 I -0.101 1.261 1.511 1.951 2.091 2.981 2.5sl I 0.2941 o.4411 o.3021 15 I 0.2921 o.4331 o.2941 I o.841 1.061 2.111 AVERAGE ABSOLUTE PERCENT DIFFERENCE = 0.9 STANDARD DEVIATION 0.666 Summary:

Map No: S2-28-03 Date: 06/08/2017 Power: 99.80%

Control Rod Position: Fo(Z) = 1.880 QPTR: __o_.9_9_5_5-+----0_.9_9_13_

D Bank at 229 Steps F!:i = 1.463 1.0086 1.0046 Fz = 1.181 Axial Offset(%)= +2.334 Burnup = 124.5 MWD/MTU Page 35of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report SECTION 7 - CONCLUSIONS Table 7 .1 summarizes the results associated with Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 startup physics testing program. As noted herein, all test results were acceptable and within associated design tolerances, technical specification limits, or COLR limits. Based on the results associated with the S2C28 startup physics testing program, it is anticipated that the Surry 2 core will continue to operate safely throughout Cycle 28.

Page 36 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Table 7.1 SURRY UNIT 2- CYCLE 28 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS STARTUP PHYSICS TESTING RESULTS

SUMMARY

Measured Predicted Diff (M-P) or Design (M) (P) (M-P)/P,% Tolerance Parameter Critical Boron Concentration 1632 1648 -16 +/-50 (HZP ARO), oom Critical Boron Concentration 1448 1442 6 +/-29 (HZP Ref Bank in), oom Isothermal Temp Coefficient -1.394 -1.642 0.248 +/-2 (HZP ARO}, ocm/F Differential Boron Worth -7.59 -7.49 1.3% +/-10%

(HZP ARO), ocm/oom Reference Bank Worth 1396 1424 -1.9% +/-10%

(B-bank, dilution), pcm A-bank Worth (Rod Swap), pcm 357 363 -6 +/-100 C-bank Worth (Rod Swap}, pcm 770 807 -4.6% +/-15%

SA-bank Worth (Rod Swap), pcm 950 943 0.7% +/-15%

SB-bank Worth (Rod Swap), pcm 921 971 -5.1% +/-15%

D-bank Worth (Rod Swap}, pcm 1176 1196 -1.6% +/-15%

Total Bank Worth, pcm 5572 5705 -2.3% +/-10%

S2C28 Testing Time: 7.0 Hrs

[criticality 06/03/2017 @03:59 to end of testing 06/03/2017@ 10:56]

Recent Startups:

S1 C28 testing time: 5.8 hrs S2C27 testing time: 7.6 hrs S1C27 testing time: 5.6 hrs S2C26 testing time: 7.2 hrs S1C26 testing time: 7.8 hrs S2C25 testing time: 6.1 hrs S1C25 testing time: 5.7 hrs S2C24 testing time: 7.1 hrs S1 C24 testing time: 7.0 hrs S2C23 testing time: 9.4 hrs S1 C23 testing time: 6.2 hrs Page 37 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report SECTION 8 - REFERENCES

1. W. A. Peterson, "Surry Unit 2, Cycle 28 Design Report," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0, May 2017.

2. B. R. Kinney, "Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Full Core Loading Plan," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2016-0144, Rev. 0, January 2017.

3. B. R. Kinney, "Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics Testing Logs and Results," Memorandum MEMO-NCD-20170017, Rev. 0, June 2017.

4. T. S. Psuik, "Control Rod Reactivity Worth Determination By The Rod Swap Technique,"

Topical Report VEP-FRD-36-Rev. 0.3-A, February 2015 [Included in Technical Report NE-1378, Rev. 2 as Attachment B].

5. R. W. Twitchell, "Operational Impact of the Implementation of Westinghouse Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) and the Removal of Flux Suppression Inserts (FSis) for Surry Unit 1 Cycle 21," Technical Report NE-1466, Rev. 0, January 2006.

6. Surry Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications.

7. D. J. Agnew, "Rod Drop Text Computer Users Guide and SQA Paperwork," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2014-0118, Rev. 0, April 2015.

8. B. J. Vitiello and G. L. Darden, "Implementation of the Westinghouse 15x15 Upgrade Fuel Design at Surry Units 1 and 2," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2010-0080, Rev. 0, January 2011.

9. M. P. Shanahan, "Implementation of RMAS version 7 at Surry Units 1 and 2," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2014-0021, Rev. 0, May 2014.

10. A. H. Nicholson, "Justification For Defining 0 To 2 Steps Withdrawn As Fully Inserted When Measuring Control And Shutdown Banks During The Surry Startup Physics Testing Program,"

Engineering Transmittal ET-NAF-2006-0046, Rev. 0, May 2006.

11. D. T. Smith et al, "Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Flux Map Analysis," Calculation PM-1890, Rev.O, and Addenda A-B, June 2017.

12. Nuclear Engineering Standard DNES-AA-NAF-NCD-5007, Rev. 3, "Startup Physics Tests Results Reporting," July 2016.

13. B. T. Miller, "Reload Safety Evaluation Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Pattern PRI," EVAL-ENG-RSE-S2C28, Rev. 0, April 2017.

14. S. B. Rosenfelder, "Surry Unit 2 Cycle 28 Hot Rod Drops, Startup Physics Testing and Flux Map Post-Job Critique," MEMO-NCD-20170019, Rev. 0, June 2017.

15. C. J. Wells and J. G. Miller, "The CEBRZ Flux Map Data Processing Code for a Movable In-core Detector system," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2011-0004, Rev. 0, March2011.

Page 38 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report

16. A. M. Scharf, "The CECOR Flux Map Analysis Code Version 3.3 Additional Software Requirements and Design," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2013-0088, Rev. 0, November 2013.

17. A. M. Scharf, "Qualification and Verification of the CECOR-GUI," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2013-0081, Rev. 0, November 2013.

18. J. A. Cantrell, "Surry Unit 2, Cycle 28 TOTE, Core Follow, and Accounting Calculations,"

Calculation PM-1889, Rev. 0, May 2017.

19. A. K. Lafrance, "Evaluation of Surry Unit 2 Cycle 27 Incore Tilt," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2016-0019, Rev. 0, April 2016.

20. T. S. Psuik, "Implementation of Changes to the Allowable Power Level for the Initial Startup Flux Map for Surry Units 1 and 2," Engineering Technical Evaluation ETE-NAF-2015-0007, Rev. 0, April 2015.

Page 39 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report APPENDIX- STARTUP PHYSICS TEST

SUMMARY

SHEETS Page 4.0 of 46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report s¥rry Power S!aUon Unit 2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics T.:ist Summary Sheet* Fonnal Tests (Page 1 of 6)

.Date!

Measured Value Design Criteria Acceptance Criteria Oesig11. Acceptance Time of Preparer/

Criteria Met Criteria Met Reviewer Test background < ZPTR < POAH

~---to backbround = l./. l/ 6: e.. '." I Jamps N/I\

No

..._,_-"-_amps POAM"' ~Q~amps i

P~"'T 7f. >'U-lfB',1Jicm Vves

{measured reactivity) lfCPo 4pJ!pJI x 100% :> 4.0% 1 6/.Jln IJAfi/

The ~Howallle range ls set to the larger of the P1"" 11.tl.Z!il -'!:{t. 601 pcm meailured resu!~ orthe pre-cr1tlcal bench test No S~oo /(L[<

(predicted reactMty) I

! N/A NIA Prejritlcal Bench Test Results

%0 = {(pc* pt)lpt} x '100%

.J 11.o/-/Oopcm .

%0 == -o, l/i 9£ 1-1. n~ Altowabl<i range -t I z.o I -l co pcm i

• ftJlt£:~ll@[mQ'~~_a,{1gi~aum~ri~<<~*!~J'.t:I~lll:~illi:!~~i;~s;;rr~i4~,dll!f~lll~§i~'ll!#J;i "4'~~,

1'1Ce XA{Cs)i;.'\ol :S: 1000 pcm

___..L Yes

[f.S. 4.10.A]

a/SO S: a.wJlm ~ <<Tm'11! + a; (a/"' 0 1

) Nl.O"'

i~O\ 1 * £ LJ-11. +/- 2 pcm/"F a.,180 :,,; 3.680 pcmf'F V Yes V Yes

-r,3~1 pcm/'F

(

N.

....TjJAP.Q- -~

where: (a~iijm}; 6.0 pcmf"F .[COLR 3.4] No _ _ No /(Lr/(

I

' (r,i.;'"!:<!)1; 0.5 pcmrF (11.r*s7idA.qp-(a.~50)AAo =0.t.'{~pcm/"F I (a.r° 0P)2; -1.82 pcm/"F i 16REF,,,Z 1424 +/- 10% Yes i NlA NiA pcm i100x(Meas.

• Des.)JDes."' ... 1.9  % No References 1.} DNES-AA-NAF-NCD4015, Rev. 3 2.} ~TE-NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0 3.) gTE-NAF-2017-0058, Rev. 0 Page 41of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Surry Power Station Unit 2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics Test Summary Sheet- Formal Tests (Page 2 of 6) l Date/

Measured Value Design Criteria Acceptanca Criteria Design Acceptance Time of Preparer/

Criteria Met Criteria Met Reviewer

, (l1oi.i)a" * $'?C +/- 10%

I 100x(Meas. - Des.)JOes. = -:(?. ~ %

References 1.)jDNES-AA-NAF-NCP-4015, Rev. 3 2.)fETE-NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0 3.)jETE-NAF-2017--0058, Rev. 0 Page 42 of 46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Surry Power Station Unit 2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics Test Summary Sheet- Formal Tests (Page 3 of 6)

Date/

Design Acceptance Preparer[

Measured Value Design Criteria Acceptance Criteria Time of Criteria Met Criteria Met Reviewer Test

~i~l~?;:}~f'.?f\:c;Jf.\~'i'if\':lil'~t:~'~'.}i! q:;::' "" '""'*.,;;

":~;,;~ .,,~::,:~it:;~~;t~E h,~*

• .:: ... *1'>":<.=* ~* ..*

• • -*~,ir~~~ ...,~l:nfu*. ~,~;;i~!Y];\J:::1~\~~0~

"f;yt,;~t1:&0H~1;;;;,~:i;;~z~>r~K' "'" .' -"'" "'" "'Xi:i1;;t;}::;>;::;V;f;

...,;p. ;r/

Map Power level (% Full Power)

Max Relative Assembly Power, %DfFF (M*P)/P 6/1/17 /(11(

+/-10% for P1 <!:0.9 .L_ves o9! "-1 NM&

%DIFF= .5';~ %forPi;;;;0.9 +/-15% for P;<0.9 NIA

--* No NIA 5:3 %forP1<0.9 {P1= a$$Y po<<ver) 12 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor, FAH(N)

/ Yes Fti.H(N)= /,sS2- NIA Fi1H(N):;1.635(1+0.3(1-P)) {COLR 3.7] NIA

- - No Total Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor, FQ(Z)

Peak F0 (Z) Hot Channel ___L_ Yes NIA Fo_{Z}so*K(Z) {COLR 3. 7] NIA Factor= .:2,13 0 8'

-- No ~

Maximum Positive lncore Quadrant Power Tilt L_ves Tilt= L,o/o.$'"  :;; 1.021 N/A NIA

- - No References 1.) DNES-AA-NAF*NCD-4015, Rev. 3 2.) ETE-NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0 3.) ETE-NAF-2017-0058, Rev. 0 Page 43 of 46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report Surry Power Station Unit2 Cycle 28 Startup Physics Test Summary Sheet- Formal Te$h~ {Page 4 of G)

Date/

Measured Value Design Criteria Acceptance Criteria Design Acceptance Time of Preparer/

Criteria Met Criteria Met Reviewer Te$t Map Power Level (% Full Power)= I l

• O"Z.

__e_m_b_ly__P_o~w_e_r,_%_00_1_F_F_(M_*_P_)l_P_______________,_--------------------------.--------~---------t~{'S'{ll rM_a_x_R_e_1_at_iv_e_A_ss

+/-10%forP;~0.9 _J.L_ Yes 0'1...l'-\

%01FF= 13.. ~ % for Pi 2':0.9 +/-15% for P1<0.9 NIA No NIA S. 6  % for P1oc:0.9 (Pi= assy power)1.Z Nuclear ~nthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor, FAH(N}

F11H(N)'" \ .11, 93.

7 Yes NIA FLIH(Nr--1.635(1+0.3(1-P)) (COLR 3.7} NIA No Total HeatFll.t~ HotChannel Factor, FQ(Z)

Peak F0 (Z) Hot C ~annel _.L._ Yes N/A F0 (Z):>{2.5/P}*K(Z) [COLR 3.7J NIA factor= I. t:tq a No Maximum Posl ive. lncore Quadrant Power Tilt

_:L__Yes NIA NIA No References 1.) DNES-AA-NAF-NCD-4015, Rev. 3 2.) ETE-NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0 3.) ETE-NAF-2017*0058, Rev. 0 Page 44 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report

, .. ' .** .... .......Surey:.Pov~er .Station Unit 2 *cycle 28 Startup Physics Test. Summary Sheet - formal Tests (Page 5 of6)_. *l * --:7.~*-,,*-*---*-

. ~

... .- Oesig~-~~~~H~,~-* ;*'..,;;~:.;:/:*! ,:;::~: i .*,:,_,~crk~~~gi_~.~t.eria D

• _criti~':~et c~~:~

A

, .., .,. ...,_,,. **:-; **;;;;;i '"'"

tan M: n~:~~f- Rr;~:~:, ;Data/ p f

• "'*. ~~l*~~~~W,;E~~f,.J~~

R:'J*"..i*::*i:->.*1*flli~~/iiti'",)~;fJi:'.~1".;< ' .. ~ /' " ~" ,,........... " *.*

~.~i~f~.~'f.s:.i~i'!~!!il~~~tf~~,_ v.- .~ ~4;{~~:?.-;:;.~~;*.~*;~~r~~{f'..~~i~i:J~.~~~~~~~~~u~~~*r~~!.~~~\~~wu~~flV~?.~1~~~~~~1~~  :*

Map Pow-:irlavet (%.Full Power)=~- .... **.* '

Max Relative Assembly f>cwer, %DIFF iM*P)/P ***  :.;~.. ~:'\.~* .. ~-.;;:'~*<<**~ * . i._:;** ... *" **

1.. ~ I VYas

'l l%DlfF=

. .E., 0 I

/. .

% tor Pi

~o.9

.% for P1.:0.9 I

• 1 +/-1.5% to: Pj<0.9... * ;

(Pr *'assy povtar;1 ~ '  !-

WA __ >>No*

~ *. "'.* .. i: ..

NIA Nuclear Enthalpy Ri$eHotChannei Fact.er. Ft\H(N)

.,., . ~ ..

! VYe~.

iFAH<Nt"' ./,f/~;J.f ' . . * :wA ~tiH (N)~1.635( 1+0.$(1-P.l} (COU~ 3.7} NIA

• u . i$J _ _ No Total Heat Flu>< Hot Cham.i~l.Factor, f.Q(Zj , *' ~* .. ' .~.-.. **:* : .* ,.. ..,

i--~--.............~.........._......_...,.....__________ *~~~---*~~~~-r--~~--------~-----~-_,.--------.-~----1 Peak F0 (Z) Hot Cha,nnel ~- .* .

• V'Yes Factor=~ * * ;* * )!fA '.-" Fa(Z)s{2,5!P},K(Z) [COl.R3.7j NIA i.,,.~*_No:

Maximum P.ositivelncore QmldrantPower Tilt '< *~ **:.. ~* A_:. .~ *...*, .;*'

V Yes Ti!t,. o .ct:oZ ('.CCtt~) s1.02 1

NIA NIA L-u ~\> No References t) DNES~AA*NAF-NCD-4015, Rev. 3 * .. *-** ii

1 2.} ETE-NAF..:2017-0059; Rev. 0 "~- ...

3.) ETE-'MAF-2017-u058_,:Rev.O ,.

}

Page 45 of46

Serial No.17-330 Docket No. 50-281 S2C28 Startup Physics Tests Report l

Surry Power Station Unit2 Cyc1e*2a Startup Physics Test Summary Sheet-Formal Tests (Page.6 of6k fI

.* ....... **.' Design; Acceptance Dater Preparer/

Measured Value * .* _,.. *-,* ... 0es1 9 i:a.c~ieria,.

. .~*I . * *-** ***  :'"1 ' -

Acceptanee Criteria

~ --.,. * '1 * **': -* : *

• Criteria Met Criteria Met .:r;i~:s~f Reviewer Froiai"'.

• NIA F~ ;:: 274000 gpm (COLR 3.8]

i

... *~!A. - -*Yes '-fsM

• Jcto~c;, gpm * ~*~:~ - !'[Q :. io *Q References 1.) DNES*AA*NAF-NCD-4015, Rev. 3 . :\

2.) ETE~NAF-2017-0059, Rev. 0 ~ .

3.) ETE-NAF-2017*0058, Rev. 0 Page 46 of46