ML18152A859: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/29/1988
| issue date = 02/29/1988
| title = Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1988.W/880315 Ltr
| title = Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1988.W/880315 Ltr
| author name = BENSON D L, STEWART W L, WARREN L A
| author name = Benson D, Stewart W, Warren L
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. ,,
{{#Wiki_filter:POW 34-04
* 4' a -. . 8803180050 880229 PDR ADOCI< 05000280 R DCD POW 34-04 e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT 88-02 APPROVED:
.a    - ,,
Jrvvia. LJr/l14D11. . 0 MANAGER
* 4' e
*./ SECTION --*-Operating Data Report -Unit No. 1 Operating Data Report -Unit No. 2 i Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions  
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT     88-02 APPROVED: Jrvvia. LJr/l14D11. .
-Unit No. 1 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions  
0   MANAGER 8803180050 880229 PDR ADOCI< 05000280 R              DCD
-Unit No. 2 Average Daily Unit Power Level-Unit No. 1 Average Daily Unit Power Level-Unit No. 2 Summary of Operating Experience  
 
-Unit No. 1 Summary of Operating Experience  
*./
-Unit No. 2 Facility Changes Requiring NRG Apprqval Facility Changes That Did Not Require NRG Approval Procedure or Method of Operation Changes that Did Not Require NRG Approval Procedure or Method of Operation that Did Require NRG Approval Tests and Experiments Requiring NRG Approval Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval Chemistry Report Fuel Handling -Unit No. 1 Fuel Handling -Unit No. 2 Procedure Revisions That Changed the Operating Mode Described in the FSAR Description of Periodic Test Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications PAGE ' t ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 
i SECTION                                                         PAGE '
' .. -OPERAl'ING DAU REPOR% 1. Unit Name: Surry Unit # 1 Notes 2. Reportin&
    - -*-                                                               t Operating Data Report - Unit No. 1                                1 Operating Data Report - Unit No. 2                                 2 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 1                   3 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 2                   4 Average Daily Unit Power Level- Unit No. 1                         5 Average Daily Unit Power Level- Unit No. 2                         6 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 1                       7 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 2                       8 Facility Changes Requiring NRG Apprqval                           9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require NRG Approval             10-12 Procedure or Method of Operation Changes that Did Not Require NRG Approval                                             13 Procedure or Method of Operation that Did Require NRG Approval   14 Tests and Experiments Requiring NRG Approval                     15 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval           16 Chemistry Report                                                 17 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 1                                       18 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 2                                       19 Procedure Revisions That Changed the Operating Mode Described in the FSAR                                             20 Description of Periodic Test Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications             21
Period: February 01-29, 1988 3. Licensed thermal Power CHWt): 2441 It. Nameplate Rating (Groaa MWe): 847,5 5. Design Eleei:i'ied bting (Nei: MWe) i --:.7..;:8:..:.:B;._..;,_..
 
__ 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gro111 MWe): 820 7. Maximwa Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): 781 PAGE 1 OF 21 DOClCE'r No. __,.s ... 0-.... 2 .... 8 ..... 0 __ _ DAD 3/3/88 _...,...,..........,.,, __ _ COHPLnED BY L. A. Warren ttL!PHONE 804-357-3184
PAGE 1 OF 21
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings Cltema Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe): 10. Reasons lor Restrictions, If Any: ?his Month Yr. -to-Date Cumulative ll. Hours In Reporting Period 696.Q 1440 1 0 133152.0 12. Number of Bour* Reactor Vas Critical 679~5 1423~5 86146.9 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Roura o.o o.o 3774.5 1,.. Hours Generator On-Line 672.0 1416.0 . 84387. 2 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours o.o 0. 0 . 3736.2 . 16. Gross thermal Energy Generated (MW) 1606034.0 3417744.2 196137965.6
                                      -                  OPERAl'ING DAU REPOR%
: 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (HWH) 542760.0 1157695.0
DOClCE'r No.
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MW) 516-58ft~
DAD COHPLnED BY 3/3/88 L. A. Warren
Q: . 11Q2405 1 0 19. Unit Service Factor .95:~6% 98~3 *% 20. Unit Available Factor 96.6% ;_98.3 % 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usina MDC Net) 95% 98% 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 94.2 97.2% 23. Unit Forced Rate 3.4% 1. 7% v.. Shutdowa Scheduled over llext 6 Months (type, Date, and Duration of !acbh Refuelin2 Outage, 4/2/88 -62 days
__,.s...0-....2....8.....0_ __
* 2S. If Shut Down At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startups 26. Units_ In Teat Status (Prior to CC11111ercial Operationh Forecast 63532868.0 60257781.0 63.4% 66.2 %. .26f~~
ttL!PHONE        804-357-3184
* 57*.4% 17.4% Achiev,ed (9/77) 
: 1. Unit Name:      Surry Unit # 1                                              Notes
* .. , e OPERilING DAU REPORT 1. Unit Name: Surry Unit # 2 Notes 2. Reportina Period: February 01-29. 1988 3. Licensed 'l'hermal Power CMWt):. 2441 It. Nameplate Rating (Cross MWe): 847.5 5. Dedsn Electrical l~t!ng (Net !file): 788 __ ...;.::; ___ _ 6. Kaxillum Dependable Capacity (Groaa MWe): 820 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): 781 .e PAGE 2 OF 21 OOClCE? NO. 50-281 DilE 3/3/88 COHPLErED BY L. A. Warren tELEPHONB 804-357-3184
: 2. Reportin& Period:     February 01-29, 1988
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasona: 9. Power Level 'to Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe): 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any: Thia Month Yr.-to-Date Cumulative
: 3. Licensed thermal Power CHWt):             2441 It. Nameplate Rating (Groaa MWe):             847,5
: u. Hours In Reporting Period 696.0 1440.0 130032.0 12. Humber of Roura Reactor Was Critical 696.0 1440.0 86106.0 u. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Bour* 0.0 0.0 328.1 14. Hours Generator On-Line 696.0 1440.0 -84738.3 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Boun o.o o.o 0.0 . 16. Gross tberaal Energy Generated (MWB) 1673842.0 3484907.7 198655270.4
: 5. Design Eleei:i'ied bting (Nei: MWe) i --:.7..;:8:..:.:B;._..;,_.._ _
: 17. Gross !lectrical Energy Generated (MWB) 557300.0 1163840.0 64536664.0
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gro111 MWe):                 820
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWB) 530236 ,.o 1107816.0 61184293.0
: 7. Maximwa Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):                   781
: 19. Unit Service Factor 100% 100% 65.2% 20. Unit Available Pactor 100% 100% 65.2% 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usin& MDC Net) ~z.sz 98.5 6Q. ft,% :-22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 96. 7% 97.6 59:7% 23. Unit Forced Rate 0.0% 0.0% 14.2% v.. Shutdown*
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings Cltema Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
Scheduled over lext 6 Hontha (type, Date, and Duration of !acb): Refu~l1Dg Ql1tag1;:
: 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
2&#xa3;2&#xa3;66 -~a da~s 25. If Shut Dow At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startup: 26. Units In 'teat Status (Prior to Commercial Operationh Forecast Acbie~ed (q/77\
: 10. Reasons lor Restrictions, If Any:
II NO. DATE a. :,,, I-88-02 02-06-88 s 88-03 02-16-88 F I l
                                                                            ?his Month            Yr. -to-Date              Cumulative ll. Hours In Reporting Period                                              696.Q                1440 1 0                  133152.0
* F: Forced 2 S: Scheduled (9/77) UNIT SHUIDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORI K:>NTH FEBRUARY 1988 .. .., .. C .. a, a .. a -N a C .. LICENSEE E :r C ... .. C ... u II on .. .. a 'ti .. II II II C II CD :I II a ., II EVENT .. 'ti a 'ti .. a II .s: :I a: II 0 a. a :I ::c II .. .s: REPOR:r # CJ E CJ 0 -a: II CD C a ::E )I 0 a 0 o.o B 1 24.0 G 3 LER-280/ 88-003 Reason: 3 Method: A -Equipment Failure (Explain)
: 12. Number of Bour* Reactor Vas Critical                                  679~5                1423~5                      86146.9
B -Maintenance or Test l -Manual 2
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Roura                                            o.o                  o.o                          3774.5 1,.. Hours Generator On-Line                                                672.0                1416.0                  . 84387. 2
* Manual Sc.ram. PAGE 3 OF 21 DOCXET No. __ s_o-_2_0...,0
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours                                              o.o                  0. 0 .                     3736.2
_____ _ UNIT NAME -~S!""u""'!'rry...;.~O-n_l_t_l
    . 16. Gross thermal Energy Generated (MW)                              1606034.0          3417744.2              196137965.6
___ _ DATE -~3 ... /3 .... /_88 _______ _ COMPLETED BY -~L.~A~ * ..,.W,,...arr~,..,en
: 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (HWH)                            542760.0            1157695.0                63532868.0
_____ _ TELEPHONE
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MW)                               516-58ft~ Q: .     11Q2405 1 0              60257781.0
__ 8_04_-_35_7_-_3_18_4
: 19. Unit Service Factor                                                    .95:~6%              98~3 *%                                63.4%
__ _ .. CAUSE & CORRECTIVE ACTION to PREVEN'I RECURRENCE Unit was reduced to 7 f'Plo power, 580 -MW*s to allow monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1 ). During. performance of .PT-8.1, the Train 11 B 11 P-10 button was pushed when T?'.ain 'A'. was
: 20. Unit Available Factor                                                    96.6%              ;_98.3 %                                66.2 %.
* being .*tested causing a NIS Power Range Lo SP Hi fl~x reactor trip. Corrective action is to ensure proper pre-job briefing and to change some wording in the procedure to give command type steps when referring to which Train to be in*or to go to. e 4 C -Refueling D Regulatory Restriction 3 -Automatic Scram. 4 -Other (Explain)
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usina MDC Net)                                    95%                  98%                                    .26f~~ *
Exhibit *c -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG 0161) E -Operator Training & License Examination F -Administrative G -Operational Error (Explain)
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)                                    94.2                  97.2%                                  57*.4%
H -Other (Explain) 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source .i I :1
: 23. Unit Forced Rate                                                          3.4%                  1. 7%                                17.4%
*---**--***-*"*-----*---'-**----
v.. Shutdowa Scheduled over llext 6 Months (type, Date, and Duration of !acbh Refuelin2 Outage, 4/2/88 - 62 days
.........
* 2S. If Shut Down At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startups
______ ,. _________ , ___ ~----**-*-----~* ~-******--***-**
: 26. Units_ In Teat Status (Prior to CC11111ercial Operationh                              Forecast                Achiev,ed (9/77)
... -*---*** UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH FEBRUARY 1988 .., L. C m a .. a -N a C ., LICENSEE E :zo C -... II C ... u 11*.., II .. L. D 'ti ., II II II C II NO. DATE a. II :, II a ., II EVEN'I .. "Cl a "Cl >-L. a Ill s: :, Ill: II D 0.. D ... :, :I: Ill .. s: REPORT# g; u E u C -Ill: II C D ::E en :, u a ,Q 88-02 02-20-88 s o.o *B 1 Unit was PAGE 4 OF 21 DOCKET NO. 50-281 ~~----------
 
UNIT NAME Surry Unit 2 DATE 3/3/88 COHPLE'J:ED BY L. A. Warren TELEPH0~:~8:o:4-:3~5~7-:3:1:s:4::::::: . CAUSE 6.CORREC'IIVE AcrION '.00 PREVEN't RECUltREMCE e reduced to 70% power, 580 MW to allow monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1)
e                                          .e            PAGE 2 OF 21 OPERilING DAU REPORT OOClCE? NO. 50-281 DilE    3/3/88 COHPLErED BY    L. A. Warren tELEPHONB    804-357-3184
! 1 F: Forced 2 S: Scheduled (9/77) Reasons* A -Equipment Failure (Explain)
: 1. Unit Name:      Surry Unit # 2                                  Notes
B -Maintenance OT Test C -Refueling D -Regulatory Restriction E -Operator Training & License Examination F -Administrative G -Operational Error (Explain)
: 2. Reportina Period:      February 01-29. 1988
H -Other (Explain) 3 Method: 1 -Manual 2 -Manual Scram. 3 -Automatic Scram. 4 -Other (Explain) 4 s Exhibit G -InstTUCtion*
: 3. Licensed 'l'hermal Power CMWt):.
for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LEll) File (NUREG 0161) Exhibit 1 -Same Source ... e
It. Nameplate Rating (Cross MWe):
: 5. Dedsn Electrical l~t!ng (Net !file):
: 6. Kaxillum Dependable Capacity (Groaa MWe):
2441 847.5 788      ____
820
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):              781
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasona:
: 9. Power Level 'to Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
: 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:
Thia Month          Yr.-to-Date          Cumulative
: u.     Hours In Reporting Period                                  696.0              1440.0              130032.0
: 12. Humber of Roura Reactor Was Critical                      696.0              1440.0              86106.0
: u.     Reactor Reserve Shutdown Bour*                              0.0                    0.0                328.1
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line                                    696.0              1440.0              -84738.3
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Boun                                  o.o                    o.o                  0.0
. 16. Gross tberaal Energy Generated (MWB)                   1673842.0          3484907.7          198655270.4
: 17. Gross !lectrical Energy Generated (MWB)                    557300.0          1163840.0            64536664.0
: 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWB)                   530236 ,.o        1107816.0            61184293.0
: 19. Unit Service Factor                                            100%                  100%                  65.2%
: 20. Unit Available Pactor                                      100%                  100%                  65.2%
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usin& MDC Net)                        ~z.sz                98.5                  6Q. ft,% :-
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)                        96. 7%                97.6                  59:7%
: 23. Unit Forced Rate                                            0.0%                  0.0%                14.2%
v.. Shutdown* Scheduled over lext 6 Hontha (type, Date, and Duration of !acb):
Refu~l1Dg Ql1tag1;:  2&#xa3;2&#xa3;66 -  ~a da~s
: 25. If Shut Dow At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startup:
: 26. Units In 'teat Status (Prior to Commercial Operationh                  Forecast              Acbie~ed (q/77\
 
PAGE 3 OF 21 UNIT SHUIDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS                          DOCXET No. _ _  s_o-_2_0...,0_ _ _ _ __
UNIT NAME -~S!""u""'!'rry...;.~O-n_l_t_l____
DATE  -~3... /3..../_88________
COMPLETED BY  -~L.~A~        * ..,.W,,...arr~,..,en______
REPORI K:>NTH  FEBRUARY 1988                                  TELEPHONE  __  8_04_-_35_7_-_3_18_4_ __
C
                                ....a -.. N C
                                                    .a  a, C
a u      LICENSEE        E :r C
II on
:1 II                      a
                                                    'ti .. II                      II  II    C    II NO.       DATE       a.         CD
:I    II      a  .,   II        EVENT          ..  'ti    a  'ti                  CAUSE & CORRECTIVE ACTION to
:,,,              a    II    .s:      a:                                  a. a
                                      -                 :I                            II  0 I-         :I   ::c    II
                                                        .s:                           ~ CJ        E  CJ 0          a:      II CD    C       REPOR:r #                  a                              PREVEN'I RECURRENCE
::E      )I                                  0 a
0 88-02    02-06-88      s            o.o      B        1                                                  Unit was reduced to 7 f'Plo power, 580 MW*s to allow monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1 ).
88-03    02-16-88      F            24.0      G        3        LER-280/                                  During. performance of .PT-8.1, the Train 88-003                                  11 B11 P-10 button was pushed when T?'.ain 'A'.
was
* being .*tested causing a NIS Power Range I                                                                                Lo SP Hi fl~x reactor trip. Corrective action is to ensure proper pre-job briefing and to change some wording in the procedure to give command type steps when referring to which Train to be in*or to go to.
e l                           2                                                       3                                  4
* F: Forced              Reason:                                                    Method:                          Exhibit *c - Instructions S:  Scheduled          A - Equipment Failure (Explain)                            l - Manual                      for Preparation of Data B - Maintenance or Test                                    2
* Manual Sc.ram.               Entry Sheets for Licensee C - Refueling                                              3 - Automatic Scram.            Event Report (LER) File D ~ Regulatory Restriction                                4 - Other (Explain)              (NUREG 0161)
E - Operator Training & License Examination 5
F - Administrative                                                                          Exhibit 1 - Same Source G - Operational Error (Explain)
(9/77)                        H - Other (Explain)
 
PAGE 4 OF 21 UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS                        DOCKET NO.
UNIT NAME  ~~----------
50-281 Surry Unit 2 DATE  3/3/88 COHPLE'J:ED BY  L. A. Warren REPORT MONTH FEBRUARY 1988                                  TELEPH0~:~8:o:4-:3~5~7-:3:1:s:4:::::::
                  -II C
-II L.
N C
                                              ~
a m a C
L.
u        LICENSEE        E :zo C
11*..,
D
                                              'ti .,      II                        II  II NO. DATE      a.           :,    II      a                                               C    II
                  >-       II  a      Ill    s:
II Ill:
EVEN'I        ..  "Cl    a    "Cl                CAUSE 6.CORREC'IIVE AcrION '.00 L.                                                       II  D     0.. D C
:,  :I:    Ill Ill:    II s:      C        REPORT#        g;  u      E   u                          PREVEN't RECUltREMCE
::E en      :,                                  D u
a
                                                      ,Q 88-02  02-20-88  s        o.o      *B          1                                                     Unit was reduced to 70% power, 580 MW to allow e
monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1) e 1                      2                                                        3                                4 F: Forced            Reasons*                                                     Method:                        Exhibit G - InstTUCtion*
S: Scheduled        A - Equipment Failure (Explain)                              1 - Manual                    for Preparation of Data B - Maintenance OT Test                                      2 - Manual Scram.              Entry Sheets for Licensee C - Refueling                                                3 - Automatic Scram.          Event Report (LEll) File D - Regulatory Restriction                                    4 - Other (Explain)            (NUREG 0161)
E - Operator Training & License Examination F - Administrative                                                                      s  Exhibit 1 - Same Source G - Operational Error (Explain)
(9/77)                  H - Other (Explain)
 
PAGE 5 OF 21 e                                                e
.1,
.1,
* MONTH PAGE 5 OF 21 e e AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET NO. _s--'o __ -__ 2 __ 80""-----UNIT Surrv Unit I DATE 3l3l88 COMPLE'IED BY L~ A~ Warren TELEPHONE 804-357-3184 F~bruarv f988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) (MWe-Net) 1 789 17 16.7 2 788 18 561 '3 788 19 787 4 788 20 785 5 789 21 787 6 724 22 788 7 788 23 788 8 785 24 787 9 788 25 788 10 789 26 787 11 790 27 785 12 789 28 787 l'3 788 29 782 14 789 30 15 789 31 16 385 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
* AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET NO. _s--'o__-__2__80""-----
UNIT   Surrv Unit I DATE   3l3l88 COMPLE'IED BY   L~ A~ Warren TELEPHONE   804-357-3184 MONTH F~bruarv f988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL                   DAY         AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net)                                                 (MWe-Net) 1           789                               17                         16.7 2           788                               18                         561
        '3           788                               19                         787 4           788                               20                         785 5           789                               21                         787 6           724                               22                         788 7           788                               23                         788 8           785                               24                         787 9           788                               25                         788 10             789                               26                         787 11             790                               27                         785 12             789                               28                         787 l'3           788                               29                         782 14             789                               30 15             789                               31 16             385 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
(9/77)
(9/77)
PAGE b Ut ZI e. e AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL MON'IH Februazy 1988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) 1 776 2 778 '3 777 4 777 5 776 6 775 7 776 8 777 9 777 10 776 11 774 12 776 l'3 775 14 776 15 776 16 773 INSTRUCTIONS DOCKE'I NO. __ 5.,.0-......._28
 
__ 1 _____ _ UNIT Surry Unit 2 DATE 3/3/88 COMPLETED BY L; A; warren ?ELEPHONE 804-357-3184 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) 17 767 18 764 19 774 20 606 21 712 22 775 23 776 24 775 25 774* 26 770 27 671 28 744 29 771 '30 31 On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
PAGE b Ut ZI e.
_(9/77)
AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e
----~~--~-e. e  
DOCKE'I NO. __5.,.0-......._28__1______
UNIT Surry Unit 2 DATE   3/3/88 COMPLETED BY   L; A; warren
                                            ?ELEPHONE   804-357-3184 MON'IH Februazy 1988 DAY    AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL                  DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net)                                                     (MWe-Net) 1            776                                17                             767 2            778                                  18                           764
          '3          777                                19                             774 4            777                                20                             606 5            776                                21                             712 6            775                                22                             775 7            776                                23                             776 8            777                                24                             775 9            777                                25                             774*
10            776                                26                             770 11            774                                27                             671 12            776                                28                             744 l'3            775                                29                             771 14            776                                '30 15            776                                31 16            773 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
_(9/77)
 
PAGE 7 OF 21
: e.                                   e


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 PAGE 7 OF 21 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
UNIT ONE 02-01-88 0000 02-06-88 1047 1258 1430 2101 02-16-88 1143 02-17-88 0410 1144 1225 1440 1616 02-18-88 1113 2100
UNIT ONE 02-01-88   0000     This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s.
* 02-29-88 2400 This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s. Commenced rampdown at 150 MW/hr. for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test). Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s. Commenced power increase at 40 MW s/hr. Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s. . Rx trip caused by NIS Power Range Lo SP Hi 0, while PT-8.1 was being performed.
02-06-88    1047      Commenced rampdown at 150 MW/hr. for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test).
* Rx critical.
1258      Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s.
Generator on line. Holding power at 30%, 180 MW s. Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr. Holding power at 57%, 403 Mw* s due to IJ. flux problems.
1430      Commenced power increase at 40 MW s/hr.
Commenced slow power increase.
2101      Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s.   .
Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s. This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s.
02-16-88    1143      Rx trip caused by NIS Power Range Lo SP Hi 0, while PT-8.1 was being performed.
. e.  
* 02-17-88    0410      Rx critical.
1144      Generator on line.
1225      Holding power at 30%, 180 MW s.
1440      Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr.
1616      Holding power at 57%, 403 Mw* s due to IJ. flux problems.
02-18-88    1113      Commenced slow power increase.
2100
* Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s.
02-29-88    2400      This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s.
 
PAGE 8 OF 21
                      . e.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 PAGE 8 OF 21 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR         FEBRUARY 1988 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
UNIT TWO 02-01-88 0000 02-20-88 0455 0515 0712 0841 02-21-88 0528 0730 02-26-88 2230 2315 02-28-88 0604 0737 02-29-88-2400 This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power; 815 MW s~ Commenced slow power decrease due to losing condenser vacuum. Holding power at 99%, 800 MW*s~ Commenced power decrease at 150 MW /hr for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test)~ Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s~ Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~ Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s. Commenced power decrease at 15 0 MW /hr to allow removal of 11 1 A 11 FW heater. Holding power at 89%, 720 MW s~ Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~ Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s~ This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power; 810 MW s~
UNIT TWO 02-01-88   0000     This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power; 815 MW s~
: e. F AGILITY CHANGES REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD PAGE 9 OF 21 T-MOP-2007 TM-Sl-88-3 TM-Sl-88-06 TM-S2-88-8
02-20-88    0455      Commenced slow power decrease due to losing condenser vacuum.
* PAGE 10 OF 21 e . . F ACIUTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 ----------
0515      Holding power at 99%, 800 MW*s~
REPLACEMENT OF RV-BR-109 This temporary operating procedure involved the temporary hookup of fill and vent hoses from the gas stripper feed heat exchangers (HX) to the overhead gas compressors suction to evacuate the stripper feed HX while RV-BR-109 was replaced.
0712      Commenced power decrease at 150 MW /hr for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test)~
0841      Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s~
02-21-88    0528      Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~
0730      Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s.
02-26-88    2230      Commenced power decrease at 15 0 MW /hr to allow removal of 11 1A 11 FW heater.
2315      Holding power at 89%, 720 MW s~
02-28-88    0604      Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~
0737    Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s~
02-29  2400    This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power; 810 MW s~
 
PAGE 9 OF 21 e.
F AGILITY CHANGES REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR   FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD
 
PAGE 10 OF 21 e.
            .F ACIUTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR           FEBRUARY 1988 T-MOP-2007      REPLACEMENT OF RV-BR-109                                       02-12-88 This temporary operating procedure involved           the temporary hookup of fill and vent hoses from the     gas stripper feed heat exchangers (HX) to the overhead   gas compressors suction to evacuate the stripper feed     HX while RV-BR-109 was replaced.
This change will not have an effect on the volume control tank (VCT) or waste gas decay tank (WGDT) rupture analyses as the gas concentration and release rates are unaffected and no condition exists wherein the relief capacities of the tanks relief devices are exceeded.
This change will not have an effect on the volume control tank (VCT) or waste gas decay tank (WGDT) rupture analyses as the gas concentration and release rates are unaffected and no condition exists wherein the relief capacities of the tanks relief devices are exceeded.
TEMPORARY CCW MAKEUP SUPPLY FROM PG A temporary modification connected a hose from a primary grade water service connection to a connection at the component cooling water (CCW) pump suction header in order to work l-CD-372.
TM-Sl-88-3      TEMPORARY CCW MAKEUP SUPPLY FROM PG                           02-01-88 A temporary modification connected a hose from a primary grade water service connection to a connection at the component cooling water (CCW) pump suction header in order to work l-CD-372.
Since a source of makeup is provided to CCW system and CCW remains operable and reliable, accidents are not affected or created. TRANSFER OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN A temporary modification installed a fitting and flexible hose for transfer of ion exchange resin. This modification does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because its probability of failure was not increased (due to appropriate pressure rating of components and pre-use testing of installation) and consequences of failure are previously evaluated.
Since a source of makeup is provided to CCW system and CCW remains operable and reliable, accidents are not affected or created.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF TV-SS-202A  
TM-Sl-88-06      TRANSFER OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN                                 02-23-88 A temporary modification installed a fitting and flexible hose for transfer of ion exchange resin.
& TV-SS-202B This temporary modification  
This modification does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because its probability of failure was not increased (due to appropriate pressure rating of components and pre-use testing of installation) and consequences of failure are previously evaluated.
''failed 11 closed (by lifting solenoid valve leads and isolating instrument air) and placed under administrative control the sample trip valves TV-SS-202 A/B. No unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification because alternate PASS flowpaths via RHR sample lines, RCS -Loop Hot Leg Sample lines and eves demineralized sample lines will remain available.
TM-S2-88-8      ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF TV-SS-202A & TV-SS-202B             02-02-88 11 This temporary modification ''failed closed (by lifting solenoid valve leads and isolating instrument air) and placed under administrative control the sample trip valves TV-SS-202 A/B.
02-12-88 02-01-88 02-23-88 02-02-88 PAGE 11 OF 21 e. -FACILJTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 ----------
No unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification because alternate PASS flowpaths via RHR sample lines, RCS - Loop Hot Leg Sample lines and eves demineralized sample lines will remain available.
TM-S .2-88-10
 
* CORROSION PRODUCT STUDY . SP-88-08 A temporary modification installed sampling lines for the following Unit 2 components/systems:
PAGE 11 OF 21 e.
A and C blowdown, feedwater, and 2A feedwater heater. No
FACILJTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR         FEBRUARY 1988 TM-S .2-88-10
* unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification since additional sampling lines do not increase probability of tube rupture and consequences of main steam line rupture are previously analyzed
* CORROSION PRODUCT STUDY                                       02-25-88 A temporary modification installed sampling lines for the following Unit 2 components/systems: A and C blowdown, feedwater, and 2A feedwater heater.
* PLANT COASTDOWN Setpoints of various plant instruments*
No
were changed to allow an end of cycle plant coastdown.
* unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification since additional sampling lines do not increase probability of tube rupture and consequences of main steam line rupture are previously analyzed*
Accidents and equipment were reviewed for the proposed average temperature.
. SP-88-08        PLANT COASTDOWN                                               02-25-88 Setpoints of various plant instruments* were changed to allow an end of cycle plant coastdown.
Proposed reduction was within previously reviewed range resulting
Accidents and equipment were reviewed for the proposed average temperature. Proposed reduction was within previously reviewed range resulting
* in no unreviewed safety question.
* in no unreviewed safety question.
SCAFFOLD REQUEST A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Unit 2 Main Stearn valve house at 27 1 elevation to work on 2-MS-176 (steam supply check valve to 2-FW-P-2).
SCAFFOLD REQUEST                                               02-10-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Unit 2 Main Stearn valve house at 27 1 elevation to work on 2-MS-176 (steam supply check valve to 2-FW-P-2).
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function.
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
I I
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF CH HEAT TRACING Heat tracing circuit 2Al-25 (CH) was placed under administrative control to provide increased surveillance of the heat tracing circuit and, if required, manual operation of the circuit to maintain temperature within the required band. Manual control of CH heat tracing does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because it will be under administrative control ensuring that fluid temperatures are maintained between l 20&deg;F and l B0&deg;F. 02-25-88 02-25-88 02-10-88 02-22-88 I I ! 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF CH HEAT TRACING                       02-22-88 !
--* e . FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR . SCAFFOLD REQUEST FEBRUARY 1988 A temporary scaffold.
Heat tracing circuit 2Al-25 (CH) was placed under administrative control to provide increased surveillance of the heat tracing circuit and, if required, manual operation of the circuit to maintain temperature within the required band.
platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at ten feet elevation to work a vertical ladder. Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function.
Manual control of CH heat tracing does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because it will be under administrative control ensuring that fluid temperatures are maintained between l 20&deg;F and l B0&deg;F.
Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
 
SCAFFOLD REQUEST A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at five feet elevation to work on a vertical ladder. Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function.
PAGE 12 OF 21 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL e          .
Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
MONTH/YEAR         FEBRUARY 1988
* SCAFFOLD REQUEST A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Turbine Building Basement . at nine feet elevation to work on 1-CW-MOV-lOOA.
  . SCAFFOLD REQUEST                                                 02-23-88 A temporary scaffold. platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at ten feet elevation to work a vertical ladder.
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function.
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
SCAFFOLD REQUEST                                                 02-23-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at five feet elevation to work on a vertical ladder.
PAGE 12 OF 21 02-23-88 02-23-88 02-26-88
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
: e. PROCEDUREORMETHOI>
* SCAFFOLD REQUEST                                                 02-26-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Turbine Building Basement .at nine feet elevation to work on 1-CW-MOV-lOOA.
OF-QPERATION-GHANGES THAT-DID NOT-REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 EMP-P-RT-13 PROTECTIVE RELAY MAINTENANCE FOR CB I5Hl A procedure deviation was approved to place the H and J bus cross connect breaker in test to perform the preventive maintenance procedure while at power; Placing the H and J cross_ connect breaker in test while at power will have no effect on the H & -J buses because the breaker will not be placed in the connect position; PAGE 13 OF 21 02-25-88 IMP-C-RPI-32 ROD POSITION INDICATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE UNIT 2 02-10-88 MOP-12.4 Procedure deviation to allow use of the Prodac 250 computer to monitor control bank 'B' rod positions during repair of benchboard  
Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.
!RPI.
: e.                                                PAGE 13 OF 21 PROCEDUREORMETHOI> OF-QPERATION-GHANGES THAT-DID NOT-REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR         FEBRUARY 1988 EMP-P-RT-13 PROTECTIVE RELAY MAINTENANCE FOR CB I5Hl                       02-25-88 A procedure deviation was approved to place the H and J bus cross connect breaker in test to perform the preventive maintenance procedure while at power; Placing the H and J cross_ connect breaker in test while at power will have no effect on the H & -J buses because the breaker will not be placed in the connect position; IMP-C-RPI-32 ROD POSITION INDICATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE UNIT 2               02-10-88 Procedure deviation to allow use of the Prodac 250 computer to monitor control bank 'B' rod positions during repair of benchboard !RPI.
* Control rod position indication from the P-250 computer is an acceptable substitute for benchboard  
* Control rod position indication from the P-250 computer is an acceptable substitute for benchboard !RPI provided that T.S. 3~12.E is complied with and duration of substitute is minimized.
!RPI provided that T.S. 3~12.E is complied with and duration of substitute is minimized.
MOP-12.4    RETURN OF RM-SS-113 TO SERVICE                     UNIT-I     02-16-88 Procedure deviation to align blowdown of two steam generators (B & C) through RM-SS-113 which contradicted UFSAR 11;3;3~8; UFSAR 11~3;3~8 states that all three steam generator blowdown flows are through one radiation monitor~
RETURN OF RM-SS-113 TO SERVICE UNIT-I Procedure deviation to align blowdown of two steam generators (B & C) through RM-SS-113 which contradicted UFSAR 11;3;3~8; UFSAR 11~3;3~8 states that all three steam generator blowdown flows are through one radiation monitor~ Changing the UFSAR assumed alignment of steam generator blowdown flow through the radiation monitors enhances the ability to detect primary-to-secondary leakage. Therefore; SGTR accident analyses and consequences are not adversely affected; 02-16-88 r--, t l
Changing the UFSAR assumed alignment of steam generator blowdown flow through the radiation monitors enhances the ability to detect primary-to-secondary leakage. Therefore; SGTR accident analyses and consequences are not adversely affected;
* I . l : f ' ' ( '' '' e. -*PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL -NONE-PAGE 14 OF 21 PAGE I 5 OF 21 e. TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 ----------
 
NONE DURING TIITS PERIOD PAGE 16 OF 21 e. -TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 ---=-===:.:.:.=:......;a..;:a...:;..::e---
r--
NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD PRIMARY COOLANT ANALYSIS VIRGINIA .POWER SURRY POWER STATION CHEMISTRY REPORT February 19 88 UNIT NO. 1 **-e PAGE 17 OF 21 UNIT NO. 2 MAX. MIN. AVG. MAX. MIN. AVG. Gross Radioact., &#xb5;Ci/ml 1.63 E+( 4. 60 E-1 1.16 E+O 2.43 :8:-1 1.54 E-1 1.83 E-1 Suspended Solids, DDm o.o o.o o.o o.o p.o o.o Gross Tritium, &#xb5;Ci/ml 6.90 E-2 3.40 E-2 4.60 E-2 1.59 E-1 1.20 E-1 1.40 E-1 Iodine 131 , lJCi/ml 9.30 E-l 5.53 E-3 7.08 E-2 f!i..13 E-~ 12.91 E-5 1. 50 E-4 11'31 / 11'31 0.24 0.12 0.18 0.23 k).06 0.10 Hydrogen, cc/kfl. 33.9 25.6 28.3 33.6 ~6.2 29.8 Lithium, ppm 0.63 0.26 0.40 0.90 P.63 0.79 Boron-10, ppm* 43.9 1.18 10.3 69.0 ~2.9 61.5 -Oxygen, (DO), ppm 0.005 o.oos 0.005 0.005 p.005 0.005 Chloride, ppm o. 010 0.001 0.006 0.010 0.001 0.007 pH@ 25 de2ree Celsius 7.98 6.65 7.31 6.81 p.56 6.70
,                                               PAGE 14 OF 21 I.
t l
f l *
: e.                           -
        *PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL
                          - NONE-(
~
 
PAGE I 5 OF 21 e.
TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR     FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING TIITS PERIOD
 
PAGE 16 OF 21 e.
TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR ---=-===:.:.:.=:......;a..;:a...:;..::e---
FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD
 
e          PAGE 17 OF 21 VIRGINIA .POWER SURRY POWER STATION CHEMISTRY REPORT February       19 88 PRIMARY COOLANT ANALYSIS                      UNIT NO. 1                     UNIT NO. 2 MAX.       MIN. AVG.         MAX.     MIN.       AVG.
Gross Radioact., &#xb5;Ci/ml       1.63 E+( 4. 60 E-1   1.16 E+O 2.43 :8:- 1 1.54 E-1 1.83 E-1 Suspended Solids,   DDm     o.o       o.o       o.o       o.o       p.o         o.o Gross Tritium, &#xb5;Ci/ml         6.90 E-2 3.40 E-2   4.60 E-2 1.59 E-1 1.20 E-1 1.40 E-1 131 Iodine     , lJCi/ml         9.30 E-l 5.53 E-3   7.08 E-2 f!i..13 E-~ 12.91 E-5 1. 50 E-4 11'31 / 11'31                 0.24       0.12     0.18     0.23       k).06       0.10 Hydrogen, cc/kfl.             33.9       25.6     28.3     33.6       ~6.2       29.8 Lithium, ppm                   0.63       0.26     0.40     0.90       P.63       0.79 Boron-10, ppm*                 43.9       1.18     10.3     69.0       ~2.9       61.5 Oxygen, (DO),   ppm           0.005     o.oos     0.005     0.005     p.005       0.005 Chloride, ppm                 o. 010     0.001     0.006     0.010     0.001       0.007 pH@ 25 de2ree Celsius         7.98     6.65       7.31     6.81       p.56       6.70
* Boron-10
* Boron-10
* Total Boron X 0.196 REMARKS: Unit One: Lithium additions on 2-8@ 1430 290g. 2-17@ 0210 290z. 2-18@ 0905 380 g, and 2-19@ 0555 400g for a total LiOH addition of 1360g. Unit One A Deborating Bed was in service on 2-24 at 2040 until 2-25 0327 for Boron removal; Operations also put A DEB in service as needed for Boron control. Unit Two: No Lithium additions; Cation Bed in service for Lithium removal on 2-3 from 0600 to 0838 and 2-16 from 2000 -2237.
* Total Boron X 0.196 REMARKS:     Unit One:   Lithium additions on 2-8@ 1430 290g. 2-17@ 0210 290z.
PAGE 18 OF 21 e. UNIT I FUEL HANDLING DATE FEB 1988 --NEW OR DATE NUMBER OF NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPPED OR ASSEMBLIES ASSEMBLY ANSI INITIAL FUEL SHIPPING SHIPMENT#
2-18@ 0905 380 g, and 2-19@ 0555 400g for a total LiOH addition of 1360g.
RECEIVED PER SHIPMENT (I (I ENRICHMENT CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ~G TIIlS Pl RIOD -
Unit One A Deborating Bed was in service on 2-24 at 2040 until 2-25 0327 for Boron removal; Operations also put A DEB in service as needed for Boron control.
e PAGE 19 OF 21 UNIT 2
Unit Two: No Lithium additions; Cation Bed in service for Lithium removal on 2-3 from 0600 to 0838 and 2-16 from 2000 - 2237.
* FUEL HANDLING DATE FEB 1988 NEW OR
 
* DATE NUMBER OF NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPPED OR . ASSEMBLIES ASSEMBLY ANSI INITIAL FUEL SHIPPING SHIPMENT I RECEIVED PER SHIPMENT I , ENRICHMENT CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ING THIS Pl RIOD -
PAGE 18 OF 21 e.
e PROCEDURE REVISIONS THAT CHANGED THE OPERATING MODE DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD PAGE 20 OF 21 I. I L r e -PAGE 21 OF 21 . DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 ----------
DATE FEB 1988 UNIT
NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD * * * * **r**. **** * *
    --I                          FUEL HANDLING NEW OR     DATE     NUMBER OF                                   NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPPED OR ASSEMBLIES     ASSEMBLY   ANSI INITIAL     FUEL SHIPPING SHIPMENT#   RECEIVED PER SHIPMENT       (I       (I ENRICHMENT   CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ~G TIIlS Pl RIOD
* __..1.-..  
 
*-**,,111*  
PAGE 19 OF 21 e
.. *c.*,1 <1_*,*1 *:.l'*.,...,-
UNIT   2*                           FUEL HANDLING           DATE FEB 1988 NEW OR
.. -*L",1***-'f/',;;.""'*a."1.*
* DATE       NUMBER OF                                   NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPMENT I SHIPPED OR RECEIVED
l~*'"'lo'<I . .J..***""-ai-)1., ...... --\(,...,..>.'\..*I~
                      . ASSEMBLIES PER SHIPMENT ASSEMBLY I        ,
J~--\ -. ' . .... *~ . .._ . . ' . *. *~~*. . VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 W. L. STEWART VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS March 15, 1988 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
ANSI INITIAL ENRICHMENT FUEL SHIPPING CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ING THIS Pl RIOD
Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
 
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Serial No. NO/DAS:vlh Docket Nos. License Nos. 88-132 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of February 1988. Very truly yours, lJL~ W. L. Stewart Enclosure cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. W. E. Holland NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station \}}
PAGE 20 OF 21 e
PROCEDURE REVISIONS THAT CHANGED THE OPERATING MODE DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR MONTH/YEAR   FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD
 
e
. DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
                                                                                      -                        PAGE 21 OF 21 MONTH/YEAR
                                  - -FEBRUARY - - - -1988              ----
NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD
              * * * * **r**. **** * *
* __..1.-.. *-**,,111* .. *c.*,1 <1_*,*1 *:.l'*.,...,-..-*L",1***-'f/',;;.""'*a."1.* l~*'"'lo'<I. .J..***""- ~ ai-)1., ......--\(,...,..>.'\..*I~
 
J. ~
    \
                    *. *~~*.
                                  *~
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 W. L.
VICE PRESIDENT STEWART March 15, 1988 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                       Serial No. 88-132 Attention: Document Control Desk                           NO/DAS:vlh Washington, D. C. 20555                                   Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281  \
License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Gentlemen:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of February 1988.
Very truly yours, lJL~W. L. Stewart Enclosure cc:     U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. W. E. Holland NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station}}

Latest revision as of 03:53, 23 February 2020

Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1988.W/880315 Ltr
ML18152A859
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/29/1988
From: Benson D, Stewart W, Warren L
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
88-132, NUDOCS 8803180050
Download: ML18152A859 (24)


Text

POW 34-04

.a - ,,

  • 4' e

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT 88-02 APPROVED: Jrvvia. LJr/l14D11. .

0 MANAGER 8803180050 880229 PDR ADOCI< 05000280 R DCD

  • ./

i SECTION PAGE '

- -*- t Operating Data Report - Unit No. 1 1 Operating Data Report - Unit No. 2 2 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 1 3 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 2 4 Average Daily Unit Power Level- Unit No. 1 5 Average Daily Unit Power Level- Unit No. 2 6 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 1 7 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 2 8 Facility Changes Requiring NRG Apprqval 9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require NRG Approval 10-12 Procedure or Method of Operation Changes that Did Not Require NRG Approval 13 Procedure or Method of Operation that Did Require NRG Approval 14 Tests and Experiments Requiring NRG Approval 15 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRG Approval 16 Chemistry Report 17 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 1 18 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 2 19 Procedure Revisions That Changed the Operating Mode Described in the FSAR 20 Description of Periodic Test Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications 21

PAGE 1 OF 21

- OPERAl'ING DAU REPOR%

DOClCE'r No.

DAD COHPLnED BY 3/3/88 L. A. Warren

__,.s...0-....2....8.....0_ __

ttL!PHONE 804-357-3184

1. Unit Name: Surry Unit # 1 Notes
2. Reportin& Period: February 01-29, 1988
3. Licensed thermal Power CHWt): 2441 It. Nameplate Rating (Groaa MWe): 847,5
5. Design Eleei:i'ied bting (Nei: MWe) i --:.7..;:8:..:.:B;._..;,_.._ _
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gro111 MWe): 820
7. Maximwa Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): 781
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings Cltema Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reasons lor Restrictions, If Any:

?his Month Yr. -to-Date Cumulative ll. Hours In Reporting Period 696.Q 1440 1 0 133152.0

12. Number of Bour* Reactor Vas Critical 679~5 1423~5 86146.9
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Roura o.o o.o 3774.5 1,.. Hours Generator On-Line 672.0 1416.0 . 84387. 2
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours o.o 0. 0 . 3736.2

. 16. Gross thermal Energy Generated (MW) 1606034.0 3417744.2 196137965.6

17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (HWH) 542760.0 1157695.0 63532868.0
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MW) 516-58ft~ Q: . 11Q2405 1 0 60257781.0
19. Unit Service Factor .95:~6% 98~3 *% 63.4%
20. Unit Available Factor 96.6% ;_98.3 % 66.2 %.
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usina MDC Net) 95% 98% .26f~~ *
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 94.2 97.2% 57*.4%
23. Unit Forced Rate 3.4% 1. 7% 17.4%

v.. Shutdowa Scheduled over llext 6 Months (type, Date, and Duration of !acbh Refuelin2 Outage, 4/2/88 - 62 days

  • 2S. If Shut Down At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startups
26. Units_ In Teat Status (Prior to CC11111ercial Operationh Forecast Achiev,ed (9/77)

e .e PAGE 2 OF 21 OPERilING DAU REPORT OOClCE? NO. 50-281 DilE 3/3/88 COHPLErED BY L. A. Warren tELEPHONB 804-357-3184

1. Unit Name: Surry Unit # 2 Notes
2. Reportina Period: February 01-29. 1988
3. Licensed 'l'hermal Power CMWt):.

It. Nameplate Rating (Cross MWe):

5. Dedsn Electrical l~t!ng (Net !file):
6. Kaxillum Dependable Capacity (Groaa MWe):

2441 847.5 788 ____

820

7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): 781
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Humber 3 through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasona:
9. Power Level 'to Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:

Thia Month Yr.-to-Date Cumulative

u. Hours In Reporting Period 696.0 1440.0 130032.0
12. Humber of Roura Reactor Was Critical 696.0 1440.0 86106.0
u. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Bour* 0.0 0.0 328.1
14. Hours Generator On-Line 696.0 1440.0 -84738.3
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Boun o.o o.o 0.0

. 16. Gross tberaal Energy Generated (MWB) 1673842.0 3484907.7 198655270.4

17. Gross !lectrical Energy Generated (MWB) 557300.0 1163840.0 64536664.0
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWB) 530236 ,.o 1107816.0 61184293.0
19. Unit Service Factor 100% 100% 65.2%
20. Unit Available Pactor 100% 100% 65.2%
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Usin& MDC Net) ~z.sz 98.5 6Q. ft,% :-
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 96. 7% 97.6 59:7%
23. Unit Forced Rate 0.0% 0.0% 14.2%

v.. Shutdown* Scheduled over lext 6 Hontha (type, Date, and Duration of !acb):

Refu~l1Dg Ql1tag1;: 2£2£66 - ~a da~s

25. If Shut Dow At !nd Of Report Period Estimated Date of Startup:
26. Units In 'teat Status (Prior to Commercial Operationh Forecast Acbie~ed (q/77\

PAGE 3 OF 21 UNIT SHUIDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS DOCXET No. _ _ s_o-_2_0...,0_ _ _ _ __

UNIT NAME -~S!""u""'!'rry...;.~O-n_l_t_l____

DATE -~3... /3..../_88________

COMPLETED BY -~L.~A~ * ..,.W,,...arr~,..,en______

REPORI K:>NTH FEBRUARY 1988 TELEPHONE __ 8_04_-_35_7_-_3_18_4_ __

C

....a -.. N C

.a a, C

a u LICENSEE E :r C

II on

1 II a

'ti .. II II II C II NO. DATE a. CD

I II a ., II EVENT .. 'ti a 'ti CAUSE & CORRECTIVE ACTION to
,,, a II .s: a: a. a

- :I II 0 I- :I  ::c II

.s: ~ CJ E CJ 0 a: II CD C REPOR:r # a PREVEN'I RECURRENCE

E )I 0 a

0 88-02 02-06-88 s o.o B 1 Unit was reduced to 7 f'Plo power, 580 MW*s to allow monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1 ).

88-03 02-16-88 F 24.0 G 3 LER-280/ During. performance of .PT-8.1, the Train 88-003 11 B11 P-10 button was pushed when T?'.ain 'A'.

was

  • being .*tested causing a NIS Power Range I Lo SP Hi fl~x reactor trip. Corrective action is to ensure proper pre-job briefing and to change some wording in the procedure to give command type steps when referring to which Train to be in*or to go to.

e l 2 3 4

  • F: Forced Reason: Method: Exhibit *c - Instructions S: Scheduled A - Equipment Failure (Explain) l - Manual for Preparation of Data B - Maintenance or Test 2
  • Manual Sc.ram. Entry Sheets for Licensee C - Refueling 3 - Automatic Scram. Event Report (LER) File D ~ Regulatory Restriction 4 - Other (Explain) (NUREG 0161)

E - Operator Training & License Examination 5

F - Administrative Exhibit 1 - Same Source G - Operational Error (Explain)

(9/77) H - Other (Explain)

PAGE 4 OF 21 UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS DOCKET NO.

UNIT NAME ~~----------

50-281 Surry Unit 2 DATE 3/3/88 COHPLE'J:ED BY L. A. Warren REPORT MONTH FEBRUARY 1988 TELEPH0~:~8:o:4-:3~5~7-:3:1:s:4:::::::

-II C

a -II L.

N C

~

a m a C

L.

u LICENSEE E :zo C

11*..,

D

'ti ., II II II NO. DATE a.  :, II a C II

>- II a Ill s:

II Ill:

EVEN'I .. "Cl a "Cl CAUSE 6.CORREC'IIVE AcrION '.00 L. II D 0.. D C

, :I: Ill Ill: II s: C REPORT# g; u E u PREVEN't RECUltREMCE
E en  :, D u

a

,Q 88-02 02-20-88 s o.o *B 1 Unit was reduced to 70% power, 580 MW to allow e

monthly testing of turbine valves (PT-29.1) e 1 2 3 4 F: Forced Reasons* Method: Exhibit G - InstTUCtion*

S: Scheduled A - Equipment Failure (Explain) 1 - Manual for Preparation of Data B - Maintenance OT Test 2 - Manual Scram. Entry Sheets for Licensee C - Refueling 3 - Automatic Scram. Event Report (LEll) File D - Regulatory Restriction 4 - Other (Explain) (NUREG 0161)

E - Operator Training & License Examination F - Administrative s Exhibit 1 - Same Source G - Operational Error (Explain)

(9/77) H - Other (Explain)

PAGE 5 OF 21 e e

.1,

  • AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET NO. _s--'o__-__2__80""-----

UNIT Surrv Unit I DATE 3l3l88 COMPLE'IED BY L~ A~ Warren TELEPHONE 804-357-3184 MONTH F~bruarv f988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) (MWe-Net) 1 789 17 16.7 2 788 18 561

'3 788 19 787 4 788 20 785 5 789 21 787 6 724 22 788 7 788 23 788 8 785 24 787 9 788 25 788 10 789 26 787 11 790 27 785 12 789 28 787 l'3 788 29 782 14 789 30 15 789 31 16 385 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

(9/77)

PAGE b Ut ZI e.

AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e

DOCKE'I NO. __5.,.0-......._28__1______

UNIT Surry Unit 2 DATE 3/3/88 COMPLETED BY L; A; warren

?ELEPHONE 804-357-3184 MON'IH Februazy 1988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) (MWe-Net) 1 776 17 767 2 778 18 764

'3 777 19 774 4 777 20 606 5 776 21 712 6 775 22 775 7 776 23 776 8 777 24 775 9 777 25 774*

10 776 26 770 11 774 27 671 12 776 28 744 l'3 775 29 771 14 776 '30 15 776 31 16 773 INSTRUCTIONS On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

_(9/77)

PAGE 7 OF 21

e. e

SUMMARY

OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.

UNIT ONE 02-01-88 0000 This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s.

02-06-88 1047 Commenced rampdown at 150 MW/hr. for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test).

1258 Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s.

1430 Commenced power increase at 40 MW s/hr.

2101 Unit at 100% power, 830 MW s. .

02-16-88 1143 Rx trip caused by NIS Power Range Lo SP Hi 0, while PT-8.1 was being performed.

  • 02-17-88 0410 Rx critical.

1144 Generator on line.

1225 Holding power at 30%, 180 MW s.

1440 Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr.

1616 Holding power at 57%, 403 Mw* s due to IJ. flux problems.

02-18-88 1113 Commenced slow power increase.

2100

  • Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s.

02-29-88 2400 This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power, 825 MW s.

PAGE 8 OF 21

. e.

SUMMARY

OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 Listed below in chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.

UNIT TWO 02-01-88 0000 This reporting period begins with the Unit at 100% power; 815 MW s~

02-20-88 0455 Commenced slow power decrease due to losing condenser vacuum.

0515 Holding power at 99%, 800 MW*s~

0712 Commenced power decrease at 150 MW /hr for performance of PT-29.1 (turbine valve stroking test)~

0841 Holding power at 70%, 580 MW s~

02-21-88 0528 Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~

0730 Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s.

02-26-88 2230 Commenced power decrease at 15 0 MW /hr to allow removal of 11 1A 11 FW heater.

2315 Holding power at 89%, 720 MW s~

02-28-88 0604 Commenced power increase at 150 MW /hr~

0737 Unit at 100% power, 810 MW s~

02-29 2400 This reporting period ends with the Unit at 100% power; 810 MW s~

PAGE 9 OF 21 e.

F AGILITY CHANGES REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD

PAGE 10 OF 21 e.

.F ACIUTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 T-MOP-2007 REPLACEMENT OF RV-BR-109 02-12-88 This temporary operating procedure involved the temporary hookup of fill and vent hoses from the gas stripper feed heat exchangers (HX) to the overhead gas compressors suction to evacuate the stripper feed HX while RV-BR-109 was replaced.

This change will not have an effect on the volume control tank (VCT) or waste gas decay tank (WGDT) rupture analyses as the gas concentration and release rates are unaffected and no condition exists wherein the relief capacities of the tanks relief devices are exceeded.

TM-Sl-88-3 TEMPORARY CCW MAKEUP SUPPLY FROM PG 02-01-88 A temporary modification connected a hose from a primary grade water service connection to a connection at the component cooling water (CCW) pump suction header in order to work l-CD-372.

Since a source of makeup is provided to CCW system and CCW remains operable and reliable, accidents are not affected or created.

TM-Sl-88-06 TRANSFER OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN 02-23-88 A temporary modification installed a fitting and flexible hose for transfer of ion exchange resin.

This modification does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because its probability of failure was not increased (due to appropriate pressure rating of components and pre-use testing of installation) and consequences of failure are previously evaluated.

TM-S2-88-8 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF TV-SS-202A & TV-SS-202B 02-02-88 11 This temporary modification failed closed (by lifting solenoid valve leads and isolating instrument air) and placed under administrative control the sample trip valves TV-SS-202 A/B.

No unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification because alternate PASS flowpaths via RHR sample lines, RCS - Loop Hot Leg Sample lines and eves demineralized sample lines will remain available.

PAGE 11 OF 21 e.

FACILJTY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 TM-S .2-88-10

No

  • unreviewed safety question exists due to this modification since additional sampling lines do not increase probability of tube rupture and consequences of main steam line rupture are previously analyzed*

. SP-88-08 PLANT COASTDOWN 02-25-88 Setpoints of various plant instruments* were changed to allow an end of cycle plant coastdown.

Accidents and equipment were reviewed for the proposed average temperature. Proposed reduction was within previously reviewed range resulting

  • in no unreviewed safety question.

SCAFFOLD REQUEST 02-10-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Unit 2 Main Stearn valve house at 27 1 elevation to work on 2-MS-176 (steam supply check valve to 2-FW-P-2).

Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.

I I

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF CH HEAT TRACING 02-22-88 !

Heat tracing circuit 2Al-25 (CH) was placed under administrative control to provide increased surveillance of the heat tracing circuit and, if required, manual operation of the circuit to maintain temperature within the required band.

Manual control of CH heat tracing does not constitute an unreviewed safety question because it will be under administrative control ensuring that fluid temperatures are maintained between l 20°F and l B0°F.

PAGE 12 OF 21 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL e .

MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988

. SCAFFOLD REQUEST 02-23-88 A temporary scaffold. platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at ten feet elevation to work a vertical ladder.

Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.

SCAFFOLD REQUEST 02-23-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Auxiliary Building at five feet elevation to work on a vertical ladder.

Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.

  • SCAFFOLD REQUEST 02-26-88 A temporary scaffold platform was constructed in the Turbine Building Basement .at nine feet elevation to work on 1-CW-MOV-lOOA.

Installation of this temporary scaffolding was reviewed for effect on accident analyses and equipment operability/function. Conclusion is that assumptions, bases and probabilities of accident analyses and equipment malfunctions are not affected.

e. PAGE 13 OF 21 PROCEDUREORMETHOI> OF-QPERATION-GHANGES THAT-DID NOT-REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 EMP-P-RT-13 PROTECTIVE RELAY MAINTENANCE FOR CB I5Hl 02-25-88 A procedure deviation was approved to place the H and J bus cross connect breaker in test to perform the preventive maintenance procedure while at power; Placing the H and J cross_ connect breaker in test while at power will have no effect on the H & -J buses because the breaker will not be placed in the connect position; IMP-C-RPI-32 ROD POSITION INDICATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE UNIT 2 02-10-88 Procedure deviation to allow use of the Prodac 250 computer to monitor control bank 'B' rod positions during repair of benchboard !RPI.
  • Control rod position indication from the P-250 computer is an acceptable substitute for benchboard !RPI provided that T.S. 3~12.E is complied with and duration of substitute is minimized.

MOP-12.4 RETURN OF RM-SS-113 TO SERVICE UNIT-I 02-16-88 Procedure deviation to align blowdown of two steam generators (B & C) through RM-SS-113 which contradicted UFSAR 11;3;3~8; UFSAR 11~3;3~8 states that all three steam generator blowdown flows are through one radiation monitor~

Changing the UFSAR assumed alignment of steam generator blowdown flow through the radiation monitors enhances the ability to detect primary-to-secondary leakage. Therefore; SGTR accident analyses and consequences are not adversely affected;

r--

, PAGE 14 OF 21 I.

t l

f l *

e. -
  • PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL

- NONE-(

~

PAGE I 5 OF 21 e.

TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS REQUIRING NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING TIITS PERIOD

PAGE 16 OF 21 e.

TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRG APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR ---=-===:.:.:.=:......;a..;:a...:;..::e---

FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD

e PAGE 17 OF 21 VIRGINIA .POWER SURRY POWER STATION CHEMISTRY REPORT February 19 88 PRIMARY COOLANT ANALYSIS UNIT NO. 1 UNIT NO. 2 MAX. MIN. AVG. MAX. MIN. AVG.

Gross Radioact., µCi/ml 1.63 E+( 4. 60 E-1 1.16 E+O 2.43 :8:- 1 1.54 E-1 1.83 E-1 Suspended Solids, DDm o.o o.o o.o o.o p.o o.o Gross Tritium, µCi/ml 6.90 E-2 3.40 E-2 4.60 E-2 1.59 E-1 1.20 E-1 1.40 E-1 131 Iodine , lJCi/ml 9.30 E-l 5.53 E-3 7.08 E-2 f!i..13 E-~ 12.91 E-5 1. 50 E-4 11'31 / 11'31 0.24 0.12 0.18 0.23 k).06 0.10 Hydrogen, cc/kfl. 33.9 25.6 28.3 33.6 ~6.2 29.8 Lithium, ppm 0.63 0.26 0.40 0.90 P.63 0.79 Boron-10, ppm* 43.9 1.18 10.3 69.0 ~2.9 61.5 Oxygen, (DO), ppm 0.005 o.oos 0.005 0.005 p.005 0.005 Chloride, ppm o. 010 0.001 0.006 0.010 0.001 0.007 pH@ 25 de2ree Celsius 7.98 6.65 7.31 6.81 p.56 6.70

  • Boron-10
  • Total Boron X 0.196 REMARKS: Unit One: Lithium additions on 2-8@ 1430 290g. 2-17@ 0210 290z.

2-18@ 0905 380 g, and 2-19@ 0555 400g for a total LiOH addition of 1360g.

Unit One A Deborating Bed was in service on 2-24 at 2040 until 2-25 0327 for Boron removal; Operations also put A DEB in service as needed for Boron control.

Unit Two: No Lithium additions; Cation Bed in service for Lithium removal on 2-3 from 0600 to 0838 and 2-16 from 2000 - 2237.

PAGE 18 OF 21 e.

DATE FEB 1988 UNIT

--I FUEL HANDLING NEW OR DATE NUMBER OF NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPPED OR ASSEMBLIES ASSEMBLY ANSI INITIAL FUEL SHIPPING SHIPMENT# RECEIVED PER SHIPMENT (I (I ENRICHMENT CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ~G TIIlS Pl RIOD

PAGE 19 OF 21 e

UNIT 2* FUEL HANDLING DATE FEB 1988 NEW OR

  • DATE NUMBER OF NEW OR SPENT SPENT FUEL SHIPMENT I SHIPPED OR RECEIVED

. ASSEMBLIES PER SHIPMENT ASSEMBLY I ,

ANSI INITIAL ENRICHMENT FUEL SHIPPING CASK ACTIVITI LEVEL NONE DUF ING THIS Pl RIOD

PAGE 20 OF 21 e

PROCEDURE REVISIONS THAT CHANGED THE OPERATING MODE DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR MONTH/YEAR FEBRUARY 1988 NONE DURING THIS PERIOD

e

. DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

- PAGE 21 OF 21 MONTH/YEAR

- -FEBRUARY - - - -1988 ----

NONE DURING TlllS PERIOD

  • * * * **r**. **** * *
  • __..1.-.. *-**,,111* .. *c.*,1 <1_*,*1 *:.l'*.,...,-..-*L",1***-'f/',;;.""'*a."1.* l~*'"'lo'<I. .J..***""- ~ ai-)1., ......--\(,...,..>.'\..*I~

J. ~

\

  • . *~~*.
  • ~

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 W. L.

VICE PRESIDENT STEWART March 15, 1988 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.88-132 Attention: Document Control Desk NO/DAS:vlh Washington, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 \

License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of February 1988.

Very truly yours, lJL~W. L. Stewart Enclosure cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. W. E. Holland NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station