ML20024B306

Determining Portion of Regulatory Burden on Indian Point 3 Capital & O&M Expenditures 1976 - 1986:10-Yr Cost Projection Also Included.

ML20024B306
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point, 05000000
Issue date:	04/30/1983
From:	POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20024B287	List: ML20024B301 ML20024B303 ML20024B304 ML20024B306 ML20024B308 ML20024B310 ML20024B312
References
NUDOCS 8307080341
Download: ML20024B306 (36)

Text

-- .

a . _ _ _ .

" ~;..*

~ ,) .w.. . # :. . ._,, ,. y- ' i' 9 7_ . ,.G. . 9... . q ..

. a t

~ ' m. .. ,.  :- , ,

7.. . r. . . - - .

i. . .

g.;y ._.,:t;.. - . .. ... .

~.c.,7.,. .

.),. . z.y . 8 . . , . .

k .

.:,- n _,As

s. . ;, s. ,

• *-. ~,-6* ~

'* * - a .

. PRODUCT ,,

-?.-

+4, + <5 4

-....t.";- x ar.J

. .n ,. CONFIDENTIAL:

... s ,wt .pi .

. . ATTORNEY,.WO ~ DISTRIBUTION ONLY s.L * . * . . .

g, h G.'.a. - - 9 : r .g.n. + . .,, . .,,,-(.,_

"FOR INTE ,

u.: . ~;, . . ,4; T.*

+

• if;.,%,,y. n . p ...

.:t ~

.(-w.8:.,.-

m a .- s~ .u.s..-~ -- u .

.-e. : - . -:.c.:. w. . . - .. .w.,;yn.:,.z, r ;. g. , g

, 7w . . ..m,.,...---.,

.q.,...

3, 2...m. .e ,3._ . - . . - .

. _ , .. _. ..i ..

. .. ~

+ - :. w.v . ,.....___,...,u...

... .. _.,. . . -. ,--s.- .

,.......s . . . . , ._ ..

. .. c . - . - . .

"' DETERMINING THE PORTION OF REGULATORY BURDEN ON INDIAN POINT UNIT 3 CAPITAL AND O&M EXPENDITUPIS

. -: n..

1976 - 1986 w- ~;. . . . . . . . .:2 ."'

ALSO INCLUDED--

I'[,, .-N- ..

.. --TEN-YEAR COST.n~s,

.x _ .

PROJECTION 1

- 3 .' . 3.

- BUDGET DIVISION APRIL, 1983

/

(

i l

l 8307000341 830622 PDR REVGP IWIGREC

' PDR

CONTENTS _

.1 INTRODUCTION . ..................

.2

.y BRIEF HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .

.-4

SUMMARY

OF TABLES I - XIII (BACKGROUND & FINDINGS)

.  : . . . . . .8 TABLE I PERS0XNEL STAFFING - INDIAN POINT 3

.9 I-A MANAGEMENT STAFFING BY SECTION 10 I-B UNION STAFFING BY SECTION

. . . . . . 11 I-C PASNY PAYROLL COSTS - INDIAN POINT 3 .

12 II HISTORICAL O&M COSTS - IP-3 13 III HISTORICAL CAPITAL COSTS - IP-3 IV EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY (OTHER . THAN

. . . .TMI) . 14 OEM EXPENDITURES - IP-3 1977 - 1982

. . . . . . . 15 1977 - 1982

' IV-A ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS -

EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY 1977 (OTHER THAN. . THI) 16 V - 1982 . .

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - IP-3

7. .:. -

1979 - 1982 17

\- VI TMI LESSONS LEARNED BACKFITTING - IP-3 VII EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY O&M PROJECTIONS 18 IP-3 1983 - 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY CAPITAL PROJECTIONS 19 VIII IP-3 1983 - 1986 ................

IX CURRENT & FUTURE IP-31983 CAPITAL

- 1990 IMPROVEMENT

. . . . . . 20 PROJ PRUDENT PLANT OPERATIONS

. . . . . . 21 1977 - 1986 X REGULATORY BURDEN - OEM 22 XI O&M FORECAST 1983 - 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . .

23 1977 - 1986 . . . . .

XII. REGULATORY BURDEN - CAPITAL 24 1983 1993 . . . . . . . . .. .

CAPITAL FORCAST

. XIII 25 APPENDIX A - NOTES ................

s

. . . . . . . . . 26.

APPENDIX B - NRC LICENSING ACTION

. . 30 APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION CAPACITY FACTORS IP-3 31 APPENDIX D - MAJOR OUTAGES l

O INTRODUCTION:

' This report documents a first attempt to trace and estimate the principal monetary costs of regulatory burden(O&M) as a percentage expenditures of total Capital and Operating and Maintenance (IP-3) nuclear for the Power Authority's Indian Point Unit 3 generating plant. Regulatory burden takes the form of NuclearI&E Bulletins Regulatory Commission Generic Letters,(see Appendix NRC Orders It B) is , but can also inclu other federal- and state-level regulatory agencies.

important to note that the ten-year costs developed in this report are the result of the Power Authority's compliance with existing regulation since acquiring IP-3 from Co,nsolidated Edison in No monetary December, 1975 and then projected to December, 1986.

determinations have been made for anticipated regulatory burden

~daat has yet to take the form of an official federal or state mandate.

Therefore, estimates are subject to revision as current orders are modified'and as new information becomes available.

The purpose of this study is to develop a realistic ten-year of total IP-3 Capital (with and without forecast (1983 - 1993) and site-related O&M expenditures.

replacement of steam generators)

Specifically, the analytic problem is to quantify all non-recurring regulatory expenses and unusual costs with respec parts at IP-3 (some of which are documented in the Settlement Agreement between PASNY and Westinghouse Electric Corporation) .

s Through the use of cross section analysis, these fixed-value residuals can be disaggregated leaving costsThese that can bevariables plus extrapo-lated at an appropriate rate of inflation.for expected nonrecurrin mathematical model for analyzing the economics associated withIndian Poin IP-3. One word of caution is in order. After subtracting in operation for little over seven years. costs, because of abnormalities associa intial years' we are left with very few values to starting-up a nuclear plant, base a ten-year cost projection (hetercskedastic correction could alter statistical weighting to costs which have a higher the early data is excluded from analysis).. .

All material used in constructing cost actuals and forecasts were obtained through interviews with and information providedsby in-house personnel and the Power Authority's independent engineer.

As with most historical analysis, data gathered from the early years of operation have a much lower degree of certainty than does the information from later years when the Authority assu record keeping procedures.

r This report was prepared by Alan Jaffe, Financial Analyst-from Nancy Capital Budgets; SunderwithRaj technical assistance

, Director-Project Engineering-PWR, and numerous s_ IP-3, K.S.

individuals from the Authority's New York, White Plains , and Indian  ;

i Point offices.

~

^ BRIEF HISTORY Con Edison contracts with Westinghouse FEBRUARY 1969 to begin construction of Indian Point 3 (PWR) in the Village of Buchanan, New York (subsequent rewriting of contract in December 1971).

NRC grants Con Ed license to load PASNY fuel acquires DECEMBER 1975 (subcritical' testing) .

IP-3 from Con Ed. Total project cost

$435 million.

Con Ed receives NRC Operating License.

APRIL 1976 Indian Point 3 begins Commercial Operation.

AUGUST 1976 NRC approves transfer of complete operating MARCH 1978 and other associated responsibility to the Authority. License (No. DPR-64) expires August 13, 2009.

(.

s

• NRC approves an increase in IP-3 net AUGUST 1978 rated output from 873 to 965 MW.

(UCS)

Union of Concerned Scientists SEPTEMBER 1979 file a petition with the NRC to suspend operation of IP-3 (as well as IP-2) until the potentials for a severe accident can be determined.

NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FEBRUARY 1980 allows IP-J (and IP-2) to continue.

operations.

NRC orders (Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286)

'MAY 1980 adjudication of issues raised by UCS and others. +

]

9 4

s

Brief History Cont.

~.

NRC unanimously decides to permit the JULY 1980 Indian Point units to remain open during the adjudicatory proceedings.

NRC appoints a three-member board SEPTEMBER 1981 (Atomic Safety and Licensing Board - ASLB) to conduct public safety hearings on the Indian Point units.

ASLB temporarily suspends filing schedule JULY 1982 & hearings subsequent to NRC orders.

Filing of testimony to NRC Ouestion #6 APRIL 1983 re: economic costs of Indian Point nuclear generating station shutdown.

f .

(. a e

~^ - - - ~ - ~ _ . _ _ __ _ _

4 TABLES I, I-R, I-B, I-C (INDIAN POINT 3 PERSONNEL STAFFING & COSTS)

BACKGROUND:

There are currently over 400 on-site personnel at Indian This Point 3, of which 30% are management (exempt) employees.

figure includes the many Consolidated Edison workers who continued their responsibilit'ies when the Authority Their labor assumed ownership and benefit expenses of the plant in December, 1975.

' were paid through an operating agreement with Con Edison until  ;

1 May 2,19 82 when retained employees became PASNY union (non-exempt) personnel.

Prior to September, 1980, outside contractors provided After this date, PASNY instituted security services for IP-3.its Currently own in-house , staff there are to meet over 70 NRC non- requirements security system upgrading.

exempt security personnel, a number that has remained f airly constant from 1980 to present.

FINDINGS:

In large part due to additional requirements mandated by l NRC orders on plant staffing and upgrading since the Three Mile Island incident, there was a need to substantially increase As Table on-site I indicates, personnel in the years following March,1979.the more than e=ployees, plus the addition of 69 non-exempt security people, l'~ brought > total on-site staff at Indian Point 3 for 1980 up to 327, an increase of over 90% from 1979 levels.

Correspondingly, payroll costs in 1980, as shown in Table I-C, rose approximately 50% in 1980 to $8.8 million beforeThe full cos adjusting for inflation.

and more than half of additional new management personne September, 1980) 1981, 53% above 1980 and in the $13.5 million payroll expense in 229% Coove 1979 before adjusting for inflation.

. TABLES II, III (INDIAN POINT 3 HISTORICAL O&M AND CAPITAL COS BACKGROUND:

PASNY historical Operating and Maintenance (O&M) costs for IP-3 represent production expenses as reported in the Annual These figures Report of Public Electric Utilities DOE form EIA-412.

represent tne sum total of nuclear power generation accounts as recorded in the Uniform Systems of' Accounts Prescribed Given this for Public

, Utilities definition of O&M, and Licensees minus fuel allocations.non-capitalizable expenses per l operating agreement with Con Edison are not fully reflected in the l

/

figures shown in Table II. ,

I i

l

. - - . . ~ - - - -_. ._, - - ----, . . _ . . . -- , - - . , ,

. - .= . . _ _ - _ - -- _. _ - . ._ . _ _ .

l l

3 TABLES I, I-A, I-B, I-C (INDI AN POINT 3 PERSONNEL STAFFING & COSTS)

f l

I t- BACKGROUND _:

4 There are currently over 400 on-site personnel at Indian (exempt) employees. This

! Point 3, of which 30% are management J

figure includes the many Consolidated Edison workers who continued their responsibilities when the Authority Their labor assumed and benefit ownership expenses of the plant in December, 1975.

were paid through an operating agreement with Con Edison until May 2,1982 when retained employees became PASNY union (non-exempt) personnel.

• y 1

Prior to September, 1980, outside contractors provided

After this date, PASNY instituted security services for IP-3.its own in-house staf f to meet NRC requirements re l security system upgrading. Currently, there are over 70 non-l exempt security personnel, a number that has remained fairly

? constant from 1980 to present. ,

?

! ~ FINDINGS:

In large part due to additional requirements mandated by NRC orders on plant staffing and upgrading since the Three Mile Island incident, there was a need to substantially increase As Table on-site personnel in the years following March, 1979. .

c I indi~ cates, the more than 50% jump in both union and management '

1

\~ employees, plus the addition of 69 non-exempt security people $27, I

brought total on-site staff at Indian Point 3 for 1980 up to an increase of over 90% from 1979 levels.

Correspondingly, payroll costs in 1980, as shown in Table  ;

I-C, rose approximately 50% in 1980 to $8.8 million before(in-house security The full cost of these adjusting for inflation.and more than half of additional new management perso September, 1980) and other additional employees is fully reflected 1981, 53% above 1980 and 1

in the $13.5 million payroll expense in 229% above 1979 before adjusting for inflation.

TABLES II, III (INDIAN POINT 3 HISTORICAL O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS I BACKGROUND:

PASNY historical Operating and Ma'intenance (O&M) costs i

for IP-3 represent production expenses as reported in the Annual These figures l

Report of Public Electric Utilities DOE form EIA-412.

represent the sum total of nuclear power generation accounts as recorded in the Uniform Systems of Accounts Prescribed for Public-Given this 4

Utilities definition of OEM, and Licensees minus fuel allocations.non-capitalizable expenses

(

operating agreement with Ccn Edison are not fully reflected in the figures shown in Table II.

l

. . = _ , _ ._ ._ - . - . - . . . -.

o .

i Historical Capital costs represent net yearly increases in

(~ of combined electric plant in service and construction work progress. Capital projects performed for the Authority by con Edison are fully included in the figures shown on Table III.

FINDINGS:

In the early years of IP-3 plant operation, payments to con Edison were a sizable portion of total plant expenses;be therefore, OEM defined as prcduction costs may appear Operating to severely understated in the years 1976 through 1978. l agreement payments are expected to be a smaller portion f of tota

' OEM expenses in 1983 than in previous years due to the trans er of Con Edison retained employees to PASNY non-exempt personnel in May, 1982.

1 i

OEM expenses since Three Mile Island rise far above the rate of inflation in the years 1979 to 1982 following theReasons for this increa experience of other nuclear units. IV-A, and include additional regulation, as shown in Tables IV,as well VI, In addition, there were various unusual outage related expenses due to steam generator repairs and sleeving, replacement of(see Appendix D reactor coolant pump stators, and turbine repairs

.', r do O&M expenses.

Net historical Capital costs fluctuate more narrowly th

(' V, VI, and VIII indicate, beginning in 1981 and is expected toExaminati continue rising through 1985.

historical capital costs indicates that some major projects which were regulatory related were extraordinary and would In addition to regulatory not be

• expectedthere to occur in the future.

burden, were a few significant capital acquisitions such as the purchase of two spare spindles.

VII, VIII, IX (PASNY EXTRAORDINARY REGULA-TABLES IV, IV-A, V,.VI, TORY O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS-HISTORICALS AND. PROJECT BACKGROUND:

Three primary sources--former and present IP-3 personnel, accounting records , and the Gilbert / Commonwealth- Independent Improvements Engineers Report on Capital Projects and Nuclear Plant TDraf t-1983 Edition)-- were consulted for the compilation of regulatory costs and projections listed in Tables IV - IX.

Regulatory burden incurred in the early years of plant operation bles that was handled by Con Edison is not fully reflected .in here.

operation have a much lower degree of certainty than does more recent information when the Authority assumed ev In addition, projected regulatory and prudent plant costs may

(. change as current requirements are modified and when the final Gilbert / Commonwealth report is completed.

i

FINDINGS: -

( The total cost of O&M regulatory burden at IP-3 for the t

years 1977 - 1982 is $40.9 million (not including additions to16% of total figures include personnel) , about to S256.0 million. Some of the more significant-07, -14) , various -

safety-related piping (I.E. Bulletins 79-02, environmental studies and biological monitoring per the Hudsonso-called shor River Settlement agreement, (see Table VI) , probabilistic risk assessment and USC hearingOp support expenses.

from 1983 - 1986 total $18.8 million, about 7% of the $269.1 Significant million total O&M for those years in unadjusted dollars.

expenses include seismic and dynamic qualifications andofvarious plant equipment, qualification of mechanical equipment,It is important to note that no on-going environmental expenses.

monetary determinations have been made for anticipated regulatory burden that has yet to take the form of an of ficial federal or state mandate.

1977 - 1982 was Regulatory Capital burden for the years

$39.0 million, about 26% of the $150.6 million total Significant netinclude costs Capital costs since IP-3 became operational.

security system upgrading and building, facility upgrading, liquid radwater storagefire prote Capital regulatory long-term TMI modifications (see Table VI). 1983 - 1986, about projections total S75.7 million for the years 33% of total Capital costs without Majorreplacement capitalof steam generators additions include t

and about 25% with replacement. costs, long-term TMI modifications, EPA-cooling tower settlementinterim radwaste storage building, and post accident mo systems (Reg Guide 1.97).

Current and future Indian Point 3 Capital improvement The prudent plant projects have been identified in Table IX.

most costly item is the possible replacement of 1-4 steam generators. The steam generators at IP-3 have experiencedresulted in tube de some corrosion which has Currently a $33.6 million program is underway to extend the life of the generators and assess the full ef fect of the existingthe possibil corrosion, however, and may occur in the late 1980's.

TABLES X, XI, XII, XIII (PERCENTAGE OF REGULATION TO TOTAL O&M AND C]APITAL COSTS, TEN-YEAR O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS PROJECT BACKGROUND:

Few would argue that there is considerable uncertainty i with respect to the future behavior of the variables that compr In this analysis majorse O&M and Capital costs at Indian Point 3.have been disaggregated, namely, transfers, components of O&M expenseregulatory burden, Consolidated Edison operating ag

[ PASNY outages.

personnel costs, and unusual costs resulting in forced g a suitable starting point from which future escalation can be extrapolated. It is important to note that while total O&M costs have historically risen far above inflation, the " co quite flat after 1980.*

Capital projections, on the other hand, are the aggregate (with and of individual projects outlined in Tables VIII and IXThe bulk of this analysis ified without replacement of steam generators) .was performed by th based on interviews with in-house personnel.

FINDINGS: l O&M costs are, expected to fall about 17% in 1983 to S68.7 l million as the bulk of the sleeving and girth weld repairs are completed. In 1984, O&M should fall another 10% from 1983 levels to $61.6 million as the cost related to the prer ant outageFor the following ye is over.

(scheduled to end June 1, 1983)is projected to remain flat as Con Edison ope (1985 - 1986) costs liquid further diminish with the completion of an Authorityrad  ;

In 1987, O&M may increase due to various steam generator decreases.

repairs, and after that a simple inflationary increase of 7% is forecast.

(

Capital costs follow no specific trend and are heavily influenced by the possibility of a $210.0 million steam generatorIn 1984, howev replacement over the next 5 - 7 years.

costs are expected to rise due to additions regarding the EPA-moder cooling tower settlement, moisture separater reheaters, main condenser, feedwater heaters ,Th and condensate polisher.

keep projections high through 1985.

• It should be noted that " core" O&M expenses rise significantlyReasons may in from 1978-79 (Pre-TMI) to 1980 (Post-TMI). (see Appendix the significant number of additional outages in 1980 D), the addition of materials and spare parts, and the step-up s

' of routine maintenance activities brought about by the increased number of forced outages.

. . -g-TABLE I_

PERSONNEL STAFFING _

[

e INDIAN POINT 3_

.A+B C A+B+C A B MGMT. TOTAL _

WION( SECURITY'(UNION)

YEAR (1) 0 0 0

1975 0 23 0 23 1976 0 120 64 56 1977 64 165 105 60 1978 105 171 108 63 1979 108 327 229 98 160 69 19,80 104 360 75 256 1981 181 398 283 115 76 1982 207 404 l 282 122 209 73 1983(') l

, i s

(1) As of December 31.

(2) Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO.

t (Separate Contract).

I (3) Utility Workers Union of AmericaContract with Pinkerton Services and G prior to September 1980.

(4) As of March 9, 1983.

Site employees only. Figures do not include support staff at the Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

S 0

m

TABLI I-A s

MANAGEMENT STAFFING BY SECTION INDIAN POINT 3 YEAR SECTION 1979 1980 1981_ 1982 1983_(2) 1976 1977 1978 6 6 6 3 3 5 3 3 ADMINISTRATION 4 4 4 3 3 2 14 15 OFFICE SERVICES ( I 1 1 1 0 0 I O O O WAREHOUSE 4 5 4 0 0 II O O O PURCHASING 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 0

ACCOUNTING ( 2 2 3 3

' O O O 2 PERSONNEL O O 12 14 O O O O

FINANCE 13 13 12 12 9 10 9 2

MAINTENANCE 11 9 10 12 10 10 8 9

,- '( OPERATIONS 10 13 14 15 5 5 5 1

RAD./ENV. SERVICES 5 5 6 6 7 3 5 INSTRUMENTATION & CNTRL. 0 21 25 25 25 6 10 9 13 TECHNICAL SERVICES 4 12 13 17 17 0 1 2 SECURITY & SAFETY 5 4 7 8 1 1 3 0 _

TRAINING 98 104 115 122 23 56 60 63 TOTAL - -

(1) As of December 31.

(2) As of March 9, 1983.

(3) Prior to 1979 Warehouse, Purchasing, Accounting, and PersonnelFrom were included under Office Services. - .

sections were recorded separately.

(4)

Mid-1982 Finance Department created and included Warehouse, Purchasing, and Accounting.

- Site employees only. Figures do not include support staff at the Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

TABLE I-B

(

UNION STAFFING BY SECTION INDIAN POINT 3 YEAR (

SECTION 1980 1981 1982 1983(2) 1977 _

1978_ 1979 1

OFFICE SERVICES / 15 16 18 6 7 8 15 FINANCE 9 10 4 7 9 3 4 WAREHOUSE 44 51 53 8 24 26 42 MAINTENANCE 45 46 44 23 25 44 18 OPERATIONS 28 42 42 7 17 17 17 RAD./ENV. SERVICES 25 31 31 11 18 19 f' INSTRUMENTATION & CNTRL. 8 9 7 7 7 6 8 3

\~ . TECHNICAL SERVICES 76 78 75 l 1 1 70 SECURITY & SAFETY 2 1 0 2 2 2 1

TRAINING 3 2 2 I4} 9 1 5 9

OTHER 229 256 283 282 64 105 108 TOTAL (1) As of December 31.

(2) As of March 9, 19 83.

(3) Including Security (Union) after September, 1980.

(4) Unidentified employees or those contracted through Con Edison that are unidentified.

Site employees only. Figures do not include support staff'at the Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

(

w + -. -er y + a v

I ~

TABLE I-C l (. PASNY PAYROLL COSTS _

f4. l, INDIAN POINT 3 * --

I

($ in millions) --

C+D A+B MGMT' - A+B+C+D C D B UNION TOTAL A

I MGMT BENEFITS (3) TOTAL YEAR (1) UNION BENEFITS ( ) TOTAL '

- 0.1 ,0,1

- 0.1 1976 * -

~ 1. 5 1.6

- 0.1 1.3 0.2 1977

• 0.1 1.8 4.6 0.7 2.8 1.6 0.2 1978 2.1 5.9 2.0 0.4 2.4 2.6 0.9 3.5 1979 0.7 4.0 8.8 1.2 4.8 3.3 ,

1980 3.6 6.5 13.5 1.7 7.0 5.3 1.2 1981 5.3 "

7.1 16.4 1.9 9.3 5.8 - 1.3 1982 7.4 '

1.3 3.4 2.1 l'.1 0.2 1983(') 1.7 0.4 ,

. I

• Payroll costs paid to Con Edison may not be fullf~refl'ected in 1976 and 1977 figures.

(1) As of December 31.

Edison until May 2, 1982; PASNY HOURLY I (2) Operating agreement with Con PERSONNEL thereaf ter.

(3) Estimated benefits include FICA, Pension, Insurance, e t e'. . . . ,

(4) As of March 9, 1983. ,

Site employees only. Figures do not inclu'de support staff at the Authority's New York or White Plains Offices.

h 9

~

r e

, N

~ .

. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _______m__m.___ _ _ _ - _ . _

j v

, . s

t. TABL2 II, ,

s p.

PASNdiHISTORICAL O&M COSTS (1)

'~~

INDIAN POINT 3 s.

s.i

'a, l

YEAR COST

$ in millions

\

' 1976' . $ 2.5 1977 12.7 1978 '

23.3 1 1 , -1979 28.9 1980 .

50.4 1981 58.2 1982 82.5 s

e-(1) Based' on ' DOE Form IIA-412_ .

OEM costs do not include. indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-yapitalizable e'xpenses per the Authority's operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are not fully reflected

_ Ps in the'yfigurds above.

v.. ,

s .

~

1 ,

\-

\ =

s f

e aum N

h - - -' -

= 13 -~

(

I TABLE III PASNY HISTORICAL CAPITAL COSTS (1)

INDIAN POINT-3 9

COST YEAR S in millions

$434.8 1976 26.3 1977 14.7 1978 29.7

. 1979 1980 30.0 34.4 1981

'( 1982 15.5 III Total Capital Ex- $585.4 penditures as of December 31, 1982 Consisting of:

Electric Plant in $535.7 Service Construction Work 49.7 in Progress -

$585.4 (1) Does not include cost of IP-3 nuclear fuel which as December 31, 1982 amounted to $94.4 million:

of

$38.6 Unamortized cost of fuel in reactor Reload 3 - ready to go into reactor 55.8 during next refueling

$94.4 4

TA*LE EV PASNY EXTRAC22] NARY REGULATORY (OTHER THAN TMI)III OFERATING AND MAINTENANCE EIPENDITURES INDIAN POINT 3 1977-1982 (4 in millions) 1981 1982 1979 1980 1977 1978 TOTAL COST .

TASE 5/27/75 0.2 0.2 MAIN STEAM 180l4ATION VALVES (NRC 18tFO. PEQUEST 1.3 14-02s 1.3 2.8 3.1 0.2 0.4 LETTTR) 6.0 BCS OVERPRESSURATION SYSTEM (NBC DEQUEST)(I.E. BUL. 79-02,-07 0.4-14) 0.2 SAFETY RELATTD PIPING - MANGER NOD. 0.2 0.7 79-18) 02 UPCRADE MASONRY NALLS (I.E. SUL. 80-11)AUDISILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0.5 1.0 FOR EVACUA DEGRADED 79-018: WUREG-0508)

GRID VOLTAGE 11,1980 (INTERIM ACTIONS)

STUDY 1.5 (NBC 6/3/77 LETTER)EWIRONMENTAL 0.1 QUA

) 0.1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 CONFIRMATORY ORDERS OF PEBRUARYNESTINGHOUSE VENOOR ASSICNMENT 0.1 0.1 (NUCLEAR0.5 0.6 STEAM SUP METEROthGICAL TOWER BACRUP PONER 0.6 ESP SLS9P EVALUATION, COIMPREGNATION OF FILTERS 10 CFR 0.6 50. 71-EI) 0.6 0.6 0.6-0.8 0.8 3.0 2.3 2.9 3.0 FSAR UPDATE (FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI 2. 4 0.1 0.9 I3I 12.2 0.1 SEISMOLOGICAL STUDIgg(2) 0.1 1.0 EWIRONMENTAL STUDIES & SIOIDGICAL MONITORINC 0.2 0.2 0.2 i

SYSTEMS INTERACTION STUDY (LICENSING CONDITION) 0.4 0.2

] CONTROL OF REAVY 1AADS (NUREG 06121 7/31/800.3LETTED) 5.5 APPENOIE R STUDY (10 CFR 50) 5.5 ANGLE SCREENS STUDY (EPA-COOLING TONES SETTLEMENT) 2.5 0.9 UCS NEARING SUPPORT 2/11/803 SUPPORT FOR UCS 3.4 0.1 PDOBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (CC,tur. ORDER 0.1 0.8 0.8 CASE) LETTER) 1.6 CONTAIDSIENT DRANING UPDATE PROGRAM PURCE EVALUAT1006 (NBC 11/28/78(AS PER NBC IRSPECTION OF IP-2)l4) .

s.a 11.3 7.1 7 .7 a.2 1.1 s is .e 27.5 sit.e TOTAL - 06n sAcar1TTING 7.3 14.4 22.1 CIsUtAttvE torAL NOTESs As Or Dec 31 (1) SEE TAetE vt 1981); NUDSON RIVER SETTLEMENT ACREEMtWT (THEREAFTER)

(UNTIL MAY, .

(2) Wrc EWIRONNENTAL TECHNICAI. SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS t (3) SEE taste IV-A (4) StCOMES CAPITAL ITEM AFTER 1981

(# ..__..

l TABLE IV-A Environmental Programs Estimated S in Hillion 1980 1981 1982 1977 1978 1979 b 0.2 0.2 Meteorological 0.07 0.16 Monitoring 0.06" 0.06 Backup Tower --

-- -- 0.1 Backup Power c 0.05 0.05 6

MIDAS Systems --

-- -- 0.2 Software Biological 2.6 0.5 0.5 2.3 .2. 2 2.8 Monitoring i

-- -- .17 Angled Screens Prior to 1978, Con Ed was handling the contract for Meteorological flonitoring a.

at the entire site, so we have no records of actual expenditures.

b.

The' increased expenditure is the result of compliance with NRC confirmatory order of February, 1980, and NRC NUREG - 0654.

c.

The funds for this item might have come from other than environmental studies.

e

/

% y

~

TADLE V

~16-pasty EXTRActDIliARY REGULATORY (DTHER TilAN TNI)III CAPITAL EXPINDITUR13 JNCIAN ECINT 3 1977-1982 is in millional 1980 1981 1982 1973 1979 TOTAL Coilf 1977 TASE 2.9 0.1 3.0 l2) 0.1 0.5 0.2 SPENT PUEL RACES - NIGN DENSITY (NBC UNRESOLVED SAFETY 2.0 1.2 0.5 1.5 0.5 FIPR RFSTR 4ttrTS FOR ASYMETRIC VESSEL 1 DADS 4.0 1.5 ISSUE A-21 0.2 SECURITY SYSTEM UPGAADING & BUILDING 110 CPR 50)11, 1980 0.2 (INTERIN ACTIONS) 0.1 CONPIBMA10Ry ORDERS OF PER 0.1 0.1 0.2 A1WS - ANf1CIPATED TRANSIENTS W/O SCRAN 0.3 0.2 HUMAN PACTORS STUDY 0.3 2.3 2.3 0.5 A2WS IMPROVEMENT - NISSILE SNIELD 4.6 0.2 0'.3 IDW PIEW BYPASS SYSTEM 0.5 0.1 0.1

,* I3) 0.1 LIQUID RADNATER 61CRAGE PACILITY UPGRADE0.1(AS PER NBC INSPECTION OF o.3 0.1 IP-21 DRAWING UPDATE PROGRAN CNARGING PUNP SECTION STABILIIERS & DISCNARGE DANPTNEAg 1.5 C 1.5 1.5 2.5 3.0

' SEISNIC POS. 9.5.1)

QUAL - AUE PEETWATER SYSTEN (NRC GENERIC LETTEM 81 10.0

I 2.2 3 .7 4.0 25 a .5 3.4 2

_25.6 10TAL - CAPITAL-BAC5 PITTING 22.7 m25.8 12.0 14.2 17.9 i

CUNUtAT1vE TorAL NOTESs AS OF DBC 31 .

(1) SPE TABLE fl AL OH-SITE STORAGE SPACE.

(2) INCLUDES 1976 - GOVERWlENT POLICY REQUIRED THE NEED FOR ADDITION (3) 06N ITEN BEFORE 1981 e

=

l i

, kw y \

T*,ILE VI 1].

TMI LESSONS LEADMED SACEFITT!!C INnIAN POINT 3 1979-1962

($ in millions) 1981 1982 1979 1980 1977 1978 UPTAL mST TASE 1.1 0.2 III 1.1 0.2 06N - 0.4 0.2 TMI NODIFICATIOMI SESEARCN 880RT TERN (NUBEG-0578)

(NUSEC-0578) 0.4 a.6 ELECTIC POWEB & DESEARCN INST. STUDY-TMI EMIGENCY PREPAREDNESS STUDY INUREG-0654) 0.6 0,i I.1

$7.I .

TorAL 06N 3.5 7.8 CAPITAL -

11.3 0.5 0.1 TMI NODIFICATIONS - IANG TERN (NUREG-0578 8.6

-0737)(2) 0.1 1.4 ENERGENCY PDEPA8EDNESS WODIFICATION1.5lNUREC-0654I-CUIDE 1.23)

PUBLIC NorIFICATION SYSTEPl (NUREG 0654I GUIDE 1.23) 4.1 9.3 SI) 4 TOTAL CAPITAL NOTES:

AS OF DEC 31 (1) SHORT TEIW4 TML DEACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM SATURATION ALARN ACOUSTIC NOMITORING CONTAINNENT ISOI.ATION FACILITIES FOR STA PEADCTOR COOLANT SYSTEN POST ACCIDENT SAMPLING

• TECHNCIAL SUPPORT CEWrtS .

APW FIAN INDICAITON (2) IDNG 1ERN TMI CORTAlletENT ISOLATION DEPENDASILITY Cf*TAINNENT PARANETERS PLANT SHIELDING PEACTOR VESSEL NEAD VEWF SYSTENINSTRUNENTATIOtt FOR DETICTION OF INADEQUAT MICH DANGE RADIATION NONITORING INST 90NENTATOf CONTROL DOOM MARITABILITY ON-SITE TECHNCIAL SUPPORT CENTER TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER COMPUTER CONTROL DOON = DESIGN INPROVptENTS O

S

• l

TABLE VII PASNY EITPA09DINA9Y DEGULATORY III OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE PICIECTIONS INDIAN POIKT 3 1983-1986 (3 in m1111onE8 TOTAL COST gges 1985 1986 g,g3 ESTIMATI TA5B 0.3 0.3 79-18) 0.1 0.1 AUDIBILITY IMPPOVINENTS FOR EVACULATION ALARM 1.0 (I.E. BUL 0.5 0.5 DEGRADED GRID VOLTAGE STUDY (1.E. BUL 79-018) 0.1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (INTEplM ACTIONS) 0.1 0.1 0.1 11, 1980 0.4 0.1 CONFIRMA10EY ORDERS OF FEBRUARY 0.1 1.5 1.5 NEETINGNOUSE VENDOR ASSIGNMENT 0.1 1.0 ARCH /I3tG REPRESENTATIVE UEAC ($10,000 m 7 YEAps) 4.1 AL 0.2 SEISMIC 6 DYNAMIC QUALIFICATIONS PROGRAM (NUREG-0696) 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.5 OF0.2 PLANT 0.2 0.2 EQUIPMENT (2) EMERG FSAR UPDATE (FINAL SAF'ETY ANALYSIS 9tEPORT) 1.3 1.3 0.1 ANGLE SCREENS STUDY 0.3 UCS HEARING SUFPORT 0.4 0.4 CX)MTAISENT PURGE EVALUATION I2) 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.1 1.0 E.5 DFAWING UPDATF PROGRAM 4.1 SYSTutS INTERACTION STUDY l23 0.2 0.2 QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 0.2 0.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 ELECTRIC POWER 6 RESEARCH INST. STUDY - THI 4.0 1.0 INERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STUDr 4.1 4.4 ENVIRO

• ENTAL STUDIES & BIOLOGICAL MONITORING 6.7 3.9 S_18.8 TOTAL = 06M PRGIECTIONS 14.4 SIS t 10.1 CUMULATIVE TOTAL NOTES 8 AS OF DIC 31 (1) SEE APPENDIX A (2) AWAITING NBC FINAL CUIOEbIHE8 6

t I

k*

l b #

'O

TAOLE VI!! 19 PASNY EITpAORDINARY REGULATORY III CAPITAL PROJECTIONS JMDIAN POINT 3 1983-1986

($ in millional TOTAL COff 1985 1906 .

1983 1984 ESTIMATE TASE 5.9 1.5 76 10.0 *

[ 25.0 INTARE STRUCTUht (ENCIASED) (2) I- 1.0 CIRCUIATING MATER PIMPS ANDl MOTORS 0.2 09 2.1 3.1 1.1 ANCLE SC9EEN5 5.3 1.1 6.2 3.2 3.3 AWS - ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS W/O SCRAM 12.7 1.2 0.8 REG GUIDE 1.97 - POST(NUBEG-0578 ACCIDENT 1.2

-0737)MONITORING SYSTEM 3.2 1.7 8.6 3MI MODIFICATIONS - LONG TERM 10.5 0.2 FINES FOR APPENDIE 3 to 10 CFR 50 1.0 1.0 INTERIM RADNASTE S10BAGE BUILDING SUPPORT POR 25 0.5

! PpOBASILISTIC WISE ASSCSSME3rf (CONF. ORDER 2/11/80I '

SAFETY 2.1 0.1 2.0 UCS CASE) 2.0 PIPE REST 9AINFS FOR ASYMETSICR 81-14) VESSEL IAADS 2.1 (NBC0.1

• 2.0 UNBESOLVED ISSUE A-2l 2.0 SEISMIC OuAL. - Aur FEEDWATER SYSTEM (NBC GENESIC 0.5LETTE 1.6 2.1 2.0 2.0 EMERCENCY PREPAREDNESS 4.0 SYST3 INTERACTION MODIFICATICM 0 .1 0.1 SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADE 1.0 0.5 05 PRESSUSIRED TNESMAL SNOCR 1.'O 1.0 MAIN TURSINE MISSILE ANALYSIS PUBLIC N0tIFICATIOtt SYSTEM 26.a 27.s L9 15.2

_37_5.7 10TAL - CAPITAL FRCUECTS &O_ 69.8 E l,

CUMULATIVE TOTAL i

W ESS AS OF Dec 31 (1) REE APPENDIX A

• 12) EPA-COOLING TONER SETTLEMENT i

i

,I .

i

\.m.

~20-TABil3 IE CURRDff 6 FUTURE INDIAN III POINT 3 CAPITAL IMPROVIMENT PB(UECTS 1983-1990 PRUDENT flANT OPERATIONS

($ in sillions) 1988 1989 1990 TOTAL COST 1984 1987 1984 1985 ESTIMATE 1945 R.1 3.2 3.2 TASE 6.5 3.8 3.6 0.2 l33 0.5 FUTURE SECURITY SUILDIW3 0.5 MAJOR SPARE PARTS INCLUDINO SPAkt MAIN TRANSFORMER 0.1 0.4 0.5 5.0 2.1 LEALING REMOTE AFJi SYSTEM EDGE FthW METE 8 833(AREA RADIATION 7.1 MONITORING 0 .1 0.1 SYSTEM)

BICH PRESSURE TURBINE MODIFICATION 0.5 0.5 CENERATOR STATOR MONITORING SYSTEM 1.8 1.8 1.1 2.1 3.1 FEEDWATER PLMP CowrROL SYSTEM I4I 6.3 1.8 REACTOR COOtANT PLMP AND MOTOR ILDING 0.2 4.9 6.9 0.1 MAJOR SPARES STORAGE SUIIDING AND/OR ADMINISTRATION 0.6 0.5 BU 4.1 5.3 LIQUID RADWASTE PROCESSING FACILITY 10.5 0.5 2.0 STEAM CENERA10R MANWAY REMOVAL DEVICES 2.0 8.4 9.4 ELIX:TRICAL AUX 1LARY POWER DISTRIRUTION UPCRADE 1.1 68.2 68.3 18.9 9.4 31.5 31.5 2.5 6.0 STEAM CENERATOR 814WDOWN RECOVERY 210.0 1.1 13.1 11.3 15 0 12.0 19.7 16.0 3.0 15.8 WIM TRAINING /SIMUIATOR BUILDING 80.6 1.0 1.0 STEAM CENERATOR REPLACMENT 35.0 2.6 5.3 5.3 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS (5) 0.5 2.1 15.8 0.2 0.1 NEW FUtt. STORACE BUILDING 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 12.0 15.0 17.0 VOLUME REDUCTION 0.3 3.0 5.0 8.0 _

ISOIATION VALVE 60.0 STEAM PURITY MON. SYSTEN III 15.8 91.8 8A.8 18.0 FUTURE NUCLEAR IMPROVEMENTS 78.0 62.0 24.3 64.2

$468.1 415.1 453.1 8468.1 TOTAL-PRUDENT FIANT 228.5 326.3 88.5 166.5 ,

CtMU!ATIVE TOTAL

>0TESs AS OF DOC 31 15.4/1981, 3.0/1982 .

TUR8INE REPAIRS - FURCNASS SWO SPARE SPINDLES 6/1942 (1) SEE APPENDIE0.5/1981, Al2) MAJOR 0.3/1982 SPARE PARTS INCLUDING SPARE MA14 TRANSPORMER 0.

(3) LEADING EDCE FI4W METER 0,7/1982 EATERS (4)

(5) REACTOR COOIAlfr PLMP AND MOFORINCLUDE8s MODERNIZATION 6 IMPTALLA?IOM OF S MAIN CONDENSER FEEDNATER HEATERS CONDENSATE POLISHER 2.2/3901, 6.2/1982(MAY INCt.UDE PUTUht NFC REGUIATIONS) g i (6) MOF IDENTIFIED SY INDEPENDENT ENGINEER'S REPORT 0

~!

p W v-

./

b TABLE X REGULATORY BURDEN - O&M INDIAN POINT 3 1977 - 1986 (S in millions)

TOTAL O&M  % REGULATION REGULATORY OF TOTAL COST O&M EXPENDITURES ( COSTS YEAR S12.7 33.1%

1977 $ 4.2 23.3 13.3 1978 3.1 I 28.9 28.4 1979 8.2 50.4 15.3 1980 7.7 58.2 10.3 1981 6.0 11.7 82.5 14.1 1982 68.7 9.0 1983 6.2

• ( 1984 3.9 61.6 6.3 69.5 6.2 1985 4.3 4.4 69.3 6.3 1986 (1) 1977 - 1982 Actuals; 1983 - 1986 Projections in nominal dollars (2) Including TMI Lessons Learned Backfitting O&M costs do not include indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-capitalizable expenses per the Authority's operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are.not fully reflected in the figures above.

/

TABLE XI

( 1-O&M FORECAST 1983 -1993 INDIAN POINT 3 f

YEAR FORECAST

$ in millions (nominal dollars) 1983 $ 68.7 1984 61.6 i 1985 69.5 1986 69.3 .

l

-[

N 77.7 l 1987 1988 - 83.1 1989 89.0 1990 95.2 1991 10 1.8 1992 109.0 1993 116.6 O&M costs do not include-indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-capitalizable expenses per the Authority's,. operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are not fully reflected in the figures above.

4 0

.-e++** **

w

TABLE XII REGULATORY BURDEN - CAPITAL INDIAN POINT-3 1977-1986

($ in millions)

TOTAL CAPITAL  % REGULATION REGULATORY OF TOTAL COST COSTS YEAR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 32.7%

$ 8.6 $ 26.3 1977 23.1 3.4 14.7 1978 7.4 2.2 29.7 1979 12.3 3.7 30.0 1980 25.9 34,4 8.9 1981 15.5 78.7 12.2

(. 1982 w/o Gen ( } w/ Gen w/o Gen w/ Gen 39.5- 39.6 38.5 15.2 38.4 1983 91.0 32.8 29.5 26.8 81.6 1984 105.8 37.4 26.3 27.8 74.3 1985 67.9 16.2 8.7 5.9 36.4 1986 l

l f

(1) 1977-1982 Actuals; 1983-1986 Proj ections in nominal dollars r (2) Including TMI Lessons Learned Backfitting lf ections not including $210.0 Steam Generator Replacement  ;

\s (3) Proj/1983, 1.1 9.4/1984, 31.5/1985, 31.5/1986, 68.2/1987, 68.3/1988  !

J l l 1

l m - , . ,

(.

F .

j TABLE XIII -

CAPITAL FORECAST 1983-1993 .

INDIAN POINT 3 FORECAST.

YEAR

$ in millions (nominal dollars) w/o Gen.(1) w/ Gen.

S 38.4 S 39.5 1983 81.6 91.0 1984 74.3 105.8 1985

' 36.4 67.9 19,86 29.6 97.8 1987 20.5 88.8 1988 38.0 1989 15.0 1990 16.1 1991 17.2 1992 18.4 1993 (1) Projections not including $210.0 Steam Generator Replacement -

, f 1

1.1/1983, 9.4/1984, 31.5/1985, 31.5/1986, 68.2/1987, 68.3/1988 l

APPENDIX A I - and installation i

Estimated costs include engineering, material procurement, costs e and a 54 allowance for PASNY administrat,ive expenses.

Excluded are interest during construction and other financing costs.

Projections are subject to revision.

e f

c --

APPENDIX B (j GENERIC LETTERS 1980 1981 2 1982 1 1978 1979 1977 40 27 56 58 4 28

1. From 12/77.

. 2. Includes one supplement, one draft, and one letter never issued.

I I&E DOCUMENTS 78 79 80 81 82 73 2 74 2 75 76 77 51 32 5 7 19 11 7 9 15 Bulletins 6 (8) (14) (28) (25) (3) (4)

(16) (8)'

19 25 25 15 0 7 17 I Circulars s s

- 38 45 40 52 Info. Notices (39) (48)

1. Includes supplements and revisions, number in () incicates originals.

2. Issued as regulatory operations bulletins.

i REGULATORY GUIDES (Division 1)1 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 71 72 73 74 75 70 12 6 2 2 4 1 17 14 34 20 11 17 4

,l

1. Original guide issued during calendar year. ,

f f December 14, 1982 4

\

Generic Letters, I & E Documents, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

. . . ~ .

l

. 1

- ~ ~

.. i APPENDIX B (COMT.)_

1 l

NUREGs 2

79 80 81 82 75 76 77 78 Periodicals 107 77 111 105 107 20 6 69 169 1.

Totals include original issues and revisions (supplements not included);

taken from LIS HUREG' Listing.

2. Received by LIS through December 14, 1982.

~

'( .

I TOTAL NURECs ISSUED (NUREG, CR, CP, BR) 1981 19822 1979 1980 1222 1107 532 949

'1 . Includes originals, revisions, and supplements.

2.

Includes originals, revisions, and supplements of NUREGs, NUREG/C NUREG/ cps.

Generic Letters, NUREGs, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

( December 14, 1982

. . . ... . .-.-= .-

APPENDIX B (CONT.)

NRC ORDERS h

k:

1 1978 28 Issued o 18 re: ECCS Evaluation o 2 re: Steam Generator Inspection o 3 re: CP Extensions o l're: Power Supply to RPS, Limits on Operation, D/G Load Sequencing,

• Resumption of Hearing's, Control Building Repair

1. 3/28/78 - 12/31/78 1979 41 Issued o 5 re: Show Cause - Seismii. Analysis

'h o 5 re: B&W Modifications CP Extensions o 13 re:

o 12 re: Hearings (' Resumption of, Evidentiary, etc.)

o 2 re: Relief from ISI o 1 each re: Indefinite Shutdown, Suspension of OL, EPICOR II, S/G Tube Hydrostatic Testing 1980, 88 Issued o 31 re: Show Cause on 0578 Category "A" Requirement.

o 5 re: Extends CP Date o T re: Installation of Recirculation Pump Trip o 17 re: Hearings ,

o 3 re: Monetary Penalty 2 re: Modify Category "A" Order o

o 1 each re: Various

( December 14, 1982 Generic Letters, NRC Orders, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

APPENDIX B (CONT.)

NRC ORDERS (Cont'd) 1981 132 Issued o 47 re: TMI Commitments and Requirements o 13 re: Extends CP Date o 2 re: Revokes CP .

o 5 re: Mark I Containment Modification o 32 re: Hearing o 8 rc: Monetary Penalty o 13 re: Modification of License re: Surveillance of LC0 and PCS Isolation Valves o 2 re: BWR Scram Modifications (1 was to all BWRs) o 1 each re: Various

/

s 1982 .

56 Issued o 12 re: Extends CP Date o 22 re:

Modification of Order Regarding Completion of Mark I Modifications o 3 re: Hearings .

o 9 re: Monetary Penalty o 1 re: Extends time for NRC to review ALAB-653 (Diablo Canyon) .

o 5 re: 1.icensing Commitments l

i o 1 re: Suspension of All Construction o I re: Seismic Upgrade o 1 each re: Various .

Generic Letters, NRC Orders, etc. do not all necessarily apply

' to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

December 14, 1982

(~ APPENDIX C g

FACTORS.

PRODUCTION CAP ACITY INDIAN POINT 3_

% f Time in Operation YEAR CUM.

YTD NA l 65 1977 65 65 1978 63 57 1979 61 39 1980 57 39 1981 51 18 1982

(-

(Using Maximum Dependable (1) Unit Capacity Factor Capacity Net) e

f APPENDIX D_

b MAJOR OUTAGES _

INDIAN POINT 3_ _

OUTAGES _

TOTAL DAYS YEAR ( )

3 9d 1977 3 93 1978 4 119 1979 8* 165 1980 5 144 1981 1 280 1982 1* 152 1983

.(-

s 108 days in 1979 and (1) September 1979 - February 1980 outage:280 March 1982 outage days in 1982 and 42 152days daysinin1980.

1983 (expected start-up June 1983) .

e indicates outages occurring between years (counted as one in each year).

e l

f'  !

\ l l

i i

APPENDIX D (CONT.)

' Major Outages b

Indian Point - 3 e

i Reason Dsys Date Began commercial. operation 8/30/76 Scheduled Turbine Outage 23 9/10/76-10/3/76 Scheduled Maintenance on Secondary

!, 5 12/17/76-12/21/76 Side of ! Plant Repair of 53 Loop Spray Valve il 1/15/77-01/26/77 Scheduled Repair of 31 Safety 7 4/05/77-04/12/77 Injection Pump and 31B Main Steam Reheater j

Scheduled Turbine Outage, Warranty i

72 10/06/77-12/17/77 Inspection Repair of #33 Loop RTD Bypass L~- 7 2/03/78-02/10/78 Manifold Hot Leg Stop Valve .

I Scheduled Refueling Outage f 79 6/07/78-08/25/78 .

Repair of 33 Steam Generator Tube l 7 12/07/78-12/14/78 Leak Repair :of 34 Steam Generator Tube 7 3/20/79-03/27/79 Lenk Transformer fault on B&C phase 1 8/08/79-08/09/79 bushing on 131 Main Transformer High Cloride amounts in Steam 3 9/01/79-09/04/79 Generator due to Condensor Tube .

Leaks Scheduled Refueling 150 9/14/79-02/11/80

' ~ ~ QI)' .;

~

. ~

APPENDIX D (CONT.)

Reason 8 DLys Date Turbine Balance 5 2/11/80-02/16/80 Main Boiler Feed Pump Lube Oil 8 3/05/80-03/'.3/80 System Clean up and Return to Service circulating Water Pump Inspection,

13 4/06/80-04/19/80 Repair and Return to Service i Replacement of 31 Reactor Coolant

'i 15 7/15/80-07/30/80 Pump 6.9 KV Electrical Penetration Electrically Isolated Failed Unit 3 9/09/80-09/12/80 ~

Auxiliary Transformer

'i Scheduled Turbine and Steam 1

! 64 10/01/80-12/04/80 Generator Inspection Outage Replacement of 33 Reactor Coolant 15 12/04/80-12/19/80 Pump Stator Repair Blade Damage in 31 Lov 60 1/31/81-04/01/81 Pressure Turbine li '

1 a

Electrically Isolated" Failed 32 l 1 4/01/81-04/02/81

• Main Transformer Scheduled Outage to Complete 21 9/03/81-09/24/81 Replacement of 32 Main Transformer Repair of Tube Leak in 31 Steam 53 9/24/81-11/16/81 Generator 1 Replacement of 31 Reactor Coolant 9 11/23/81-12/02/81 Pump Stator Refueling Outage 432 3/25/82-present (proj. 6/1/83) .

e g w i ~

.