ML15222A547: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15222A547
| number = ML15222A547
| issue date = 08/31/2015
| issue date = 08/31/2015
| title = Calvert Cliffs, GSI 191 Program Chemical Effects Testing Update Option 2b Closure Approach
| title = GSI 191 Program Chemical Effects Testing Update Option 2b Closure Approach
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| addressee name = Chereskin A N
| addressee name = Chereskin A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| docket = 05000317, 05000318
| docket = 05000317, 05000318
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 14
| page count = 14
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Calvert Cliffs GSI-191 Program Chemical Effects Testing Update Option 2b Closure Approach August 2015
Agenda
* Introductions
* Objectives for Meeting
* Discussion of Chemical Effects Test Plans
* Discussion of Option 2b Simplified Risk-Informed Closure Plan
* Refined Debris Generation Topics
* Strainer Head Loss Testing
* Strainer Head Loss Correlation
* Staff Questions & Concerns
* Schedule for Future Periodic Meetings 1  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
CCNPP Attendees
* Andre Drake - Lead Responsible Engineer GSI-191
* Anne Elliott - Mechanical Design Engineer
* Ken Greene - Licensing Engineer
* Craig Sellers - Project Manager GSI-191
* Steve Kinsey - Chemical Effects Testing
* Eric Federline - Project Support & Testing 2  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Objectives of this Meeting
* Status of CHLE Testing
* Status of Risk-Informed Approach
* Refined Debris Generation Topics
* Strainer Head Loss Testing
* Strainer Head Loss Correlation
* Capture Staff Issues and Concerns
* Discuss Next Steps 3  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Status of CHLE Testing
* First Integrated Test Initiated April 17, 2015
* Detector Bed Head Loss Immediately Started Increasing
* Head loss increased until the test was terminated
  - Started at 1.44 ft
  - Test terminated at 10.25 ft, and rising
* Test lasted approximately 4.6 hrs 11 Vertical Loop Online (t = 0.9 hrs)
High Range DP Cell    Higher Range DP Cell Start of test (t = 0 hrs) 10 Pegged (t = 3.7 hrs) 9 Installed (t = 4.3 hrs) 8 7
Head Loss [ft]
6 5
4 3
2 1
0 4  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Status of CHLE Testing (continued)
* Performed Multiple Investigatory Tests
  - Investigatory Head Loss Testing of Materials
* Baked Nukon Binder Water - Notable Head Loss Impact
* Unbaked Nukon Water - No Notable Head Loss Impact
* Marinite Board - Notable Head Loss Impact
* Dimetcote 9 IOZ Powder - Notable Head Loss Impact
* Mineral Wool - No Notable Head Loss Impact
  - Chemical Analysis of Filtered Material
* Mineral wool particles - Observed
* Lead particles - Analyzing
* Aluminosilicate Clay - Analyzing
* Organic Material - Analyzing, Believed to be Binder from Fiberglass
* Head Loss Increase Due to Particulate Migration to Debris Bed
* Detector Debris Bed Significantly Smaller than Equivalent Installed Strainer
  - 2% of full strainer surface area
  - 12% of circumscribed strainer surface area
  - Much more susceptible to particulate head loss increase 5  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Simplified Risk-Informed Approach
* Identify Applicable Strainer Chemical Effects Head Loss Test
  - WCAP-16530 Chemical Surrogates
* Identify Smallest Double-Ended Guillotine Break(s) that Generate Equivalent Quantity of Fine Fibrous Debris as used in Applicable and Acceptable Head Loss Test
* Smaller Breaks Acceptable Through Deterministic Analysis
* Larger Breaks Addressed Probabilistically (Risk-Informed)
* Two Independent Parallel Analysis Produced Same Positive Results
  - ETRANCO Influence Matrix Approach
  - ENERCON NARWHAL Analysis 6  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Refined Debris Generation Topics
* Debris Size Distribution for Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass
* CCNPP Has Assumed Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Debris was 100% Fines
* CCNPP Desires to Use a 4-Size Debris Distribution for these insulation types
    - Fines, Small Pieces, Large Pieces, and Intact Pieces
* NRC Accepted 4-Size Debris Distribution for these insulation types at Indian Point [ML082050433, ML093290316, and ML101170237]
    - Mineral wool and generic fiberglass have higher density than NUKON and Thermal Wrap
    - Less Mineral wool and generic fiberglass debris than NUKON and Thermal Wrap
* CCNPP Insulation Densities
    - NUKON & Thermal Wrap: 2.4 lbm/ft3
    - Mineral Wool:                                        8 lbm/ft3
    - Generic Fiberglass:                                  3.5 lbm/ft3 to 5.5 lbm/ft3
    - Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Higher Densities than NUKON and Thermal Wrap
* CCNPP Debris Quantities
    - NUKON & Thermal Wrap: 1,902 ft3 - 4,565 lbm
    - Generic Fiberglass:                                  248 ft3 - 1,363 lbm (based on 5.5 lbm/ft3 maximum density)
    - Mineral Wool:                                        61.5 ft3 - 492 lbm
    - Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Smaller Quantities than NUKON and Thermal Wrap 7  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Strainer Head Loss Testing
* CCNPP Conducted 7 Strainer Head Loss Tests in 2010
  - Tests included WCAP-16530 Chemical Precipitate Surrogate
* Test #1 Included Fine and Small Fibrous Debris
  - Maximum Head Loss 1.75 inches of water
  - Non-Uniform Debris Deposition
== Conclusion:==
Testing with Small Pieces is Non-Conservative 8  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Strainer Head Loss Testing (continued)
* Remaining Tests Used Only Fine Fibrous Debris
  - Full load of particulates and precipitates
  - Test for Success Campaign
  - Break-throughs experienced during each test 9  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Strainer Head Loss Testing (continued)
* Tests included same insulation types as installed in plant
  - EXCEPT no mineral wool was included in tests
* Test for success campaign based on multiple insulation replacement schemes all of which included 100% replacement of mineral wool
* Significantly larger particulate load used in test.
  - CCNPP particulate source term reduced since 2010
* Mineral wool <10% of fiber debris source term
* CHLE investigatory tests showed no notable head loss impact from mineral wool 10  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Strainer Head Loss Correlation
* Plot of Head Loss -vs- Fiber Mass produces well correlated curve fit
* Plot includes clean strainer head loss Head Loss Data - Test Data + Clean Screen 4
3.5 3
Head Loss (ft-water) 2.5 y = 0.0803e2.1877x R&#xb2; = 0.9939 2
1.5 1
0.5 0
0          0.5                1                        1.5  2 Debris Mass (kg) 11  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Questions/Concerns
* Jointly Review Issues, Questions, and Concerns for Future Communication 12  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan
Next Steps
* Update Debris Generation Calculations
* Present Risk-Informed GSI-191 Analysis Results
* Desire Next Meeting - October 2015 13  Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 5 February 2020

GSI 191 Program Chemical Effects Testing Update Option 2b Closure Approach
ML15222A547
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/2015
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To: Alexander Chereskin
Plant Licensing Branch 1
Alexander Chereskin, 415-2549
References
Download: ML15222A547 (14)


Text

Calvert Cliffs GSI-191 Program Chemical Effects Testing Update Option 2b Closure Approach August 2015

Agenda

  • Introductions
  • Objectives for Meeting
  • Discussion of Chemical Effects Test Plans
  • Discussion of Option 2b Simplified Risk-Informed Closure Plan
  • Refined Debris Generation Topics
  • Strainer Head Loss Testing
  • Strainer Head Loss Correlation
  • Staff Questions & Concerns
  • Schedule for Future Periodic Meetings 1 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

CCNPP Attendees

  • Andre Drake - Lead Responsible Engineer GSI-191
  • Anne Elliott - Mechanical Design Engineer
  • Ken Greene - Licensing Engineer
  • Craig Sellers - Project Manager GSI-191
  • Steve Kinsey - Chemical Effects Testing
  • Eric Federline - Project Support & Testing 2 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Objectives of this Meeting

  • Status of CHLE Testing
  • Status of Risk-Informed Approach
  • Refined Debris Generation Topics
  • Strainer Head Loss Testing
  • Strainer Head Loss Correlation
  • Capture Staff Issues and Concerns
  • Discuss Next Steps 3 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Status of CHLE Testing

  • First Integrated Test Initiated April 17, 2015
  • Detector Bed Head Loss Immediately Started Increasing
  • Head loss increased until the test was terminated

- Started at 1.44 ft

- Test terminated at 10.25 ft, and rising

  • Test lasted approximately 4.6 hrs 11 Vertical Loop Online (t = 0.9 hrs)

High Range DP Cell Higher Range DP Cell Start of test (t = 0 hrs) 10 Pegged (t = 3.7 hrs) 9 Installed (t = 4.3 hrs) 8 7

Head Loss [ft]

6 5

4 3

2 1

0 4 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Status of CHLE Testing (continued)

  • Performed Multiple Investigatory Tests

- Investigatory Head Loss Testing of Materials

  • Baked Nukon Binder Water - Notable Head Loss Impact
  • Unbaked Nukon Water - No Notable Head Loss Impact
  • Marinite Board - Notable Head Loss Impact
  • Dimetcote 9 IOZ Powder - Notable Head Loss Impact
  • Mineral Wool - No Notable Head Loss Impact

- Chemical Analysis of Filtered Material

  • Mineral wool particles - Observed
  • Lead particles - Analyzing
  • Aluminosilicate Clay - Analyzing
  • Organic Material - Analyzing, Believed to be Binder from Fiberglass
  • Head Loss Increase Due to Particulate Migration to Debris Bed
  • Detector Debris Bed Significantly Smaller than Equivalent Installed Strainer

- 2% of full strainer surface area

- 12% of circumscribed strainer surface area

- Much more susceptible to particulate head loss increase 5 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Simplified Risk-Informed Approach

  • Identify Applicable Strainer Chemical Effects Head Loss Test

- WCAP-16530 Chemical Surrogates

  • Identify Smallest Double-Ended Guillotine Break(s) that Generate Equivalent Quantity of Fine Fibrous Debris as used in Applicable and Acceptable Head Loss Test
  • Smaller Breaks Acceptable Through Deterministic Analysis
  • Larger Breaks Addressed Probabilistically (Risk-Informed)
  • Two Independent Parallel Analysis Produced Same Positive Results

- ETRANCO Influence Matrix Approach

- ENERCON NARWHAL Analysis 6 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Refined Debris Generation Topics

  • Debris Size Distribution for Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass
  • CCNPP Has Assumed Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Debris was 100% Fines
  • CCNPP Desires to Use a 4-Size Debris Distribution for these insulation types

- Fines, Small Pieces, Large Pieces, and Intact Pieces

  • NRC Accepted 4-Size Debris Distribution for these insulation types at Indian Point [ML082050433, ML093290316, and ML101170237]

- Mineral wool and generic fiberglass have higher density than NUKON and Thermal Wrap

- Less Mineral wool and generic fiberglass debris than NUKON and Thermal Wrap

  • CCNPP Insulation Densities

- NUKON & Thermal Wrap: 2.4 lbm/ft3

- Mineral Wool: 8 lbm/ft3

- Generic Fiberglass: 3.5 lbm/ft3 to 5.5 lbm/ft3

- Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Higher Densities than NUKON and Thermal Wrap

  • CCNPP Debris Quantities

- NUKON & Thermal Wrap: 1,902 ft3 - 4,565 lbm

- Generic Fiberglass: 248 ft3 - 1,363 lbm (based on 5.5 lbm/ft3 maximum density)

- Mineral Wool: 61.5 ft3 - 492 lbm

- Mineral Wool and Generic Fiberglass Smaller Quantities than NUKON and Thermal Wrap 7 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Strainer Head Loss Testing

  • CCNPP Conducted 7 Strainer Head Loss Tests in 2010

- Tests included WCAP-16530 Chemical Precipitate Surrogate

  • Test #1 Included Fine and Small Fibrous Debris

- Maximum Head Loss 1.75 inches of water

- Non-Uniform Debris Deposition

Conclusion:

Testing with Small Pieces is Non-Conservative 8 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Strainer Head Loss Testing (continued)

  • Remaining Tests Used Only Fine Fibrous Debris

- Full load of particulates and precipitates

- Test for Success Campaign

- Break-throughs experienced during each test 9 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Strainer Head Loss Testing (continued)

  • Tests included same insulation types as installed in plant

- EXCEPT no mineral wool was included in tests

  • Test for success campaign based on multiple insulation replacement schemes all of which included 100% replacement of mineral wool
  • Significantly larger particulate load used in test.

- CCNPP particulate source term reduced since 2010

  • Mineral wool <10% of fiber debris source term
  • CHLE investigatory tests showed no notable head loss impact from mineral wool 10 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Strainer Head Loss Correlation

  • Plot of Head Loss -vs- Fiber Mass produces well correlated curve fit
  • Plot includes clean strainer head loss Head Loss Data - Test Data + Clean Screen 4

3.5 3

Head Loss (ft-water) 2.5 y = 0.0803e2.1877x R² = 0.9939 2

1.5 1

0.5 0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Debris Mass (kg) 11 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Questions/Concerns

  • Jointly Review Issues, Questions, and Concerns for Future Communication 12 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan

Next Steps

  • Update Debris Generation Calculations
  • Present Risk-Informed GSI-191 Analysis Results
  • Desire Next Meeting - October 2015 13 Calvert Cliffs Chemical Effects Testing & Option 2b Refined Closure Plan