ML17222A469: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/12/1988
| issue date = 09/12/1988
| title = Responds to NRC 880816 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-335/88-16.Corrective Actions:Monthly Diesel Periodic Test Changed to Require That Design Start Time Be Verified within Specs
| title = Responds to NRC 880816 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-335/88-16.Corrective Actions:Monthly Diesel Periodic Test Changed to Require That Design Start Time Be Verified within Specs
| author name = CONWAY W F
| author name = Conway W
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000335/1988016]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:IACCELERATED
{{#Wiki_filter:I ACCELERATED            IHSTRIBUTION                   DEMONSTRATION               SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
IHSTRIBUTION
CCESSION NBR:8809140329                   DOC.DATE: 88/09/12      NOTARIZED: NO          DOCKET CIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida                    Power  & Light  Co. 05000335 UTH.NAME            AUTHOR AFFILIATION ONWAY,W.F.         Florida Power & Light Co.
DEMONSTRATION
RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document                 Control Desk)
SYSTEMREGULATORY
 
INFORMATION
==SUBJECT:==
DISTRIBUTION
Responds    to 50-335/88-16.
SYSTEM(RIDS)DOCKET05000335CCESSIONNBR:8809140329
NRC          880816 ltr  re violations noted in Insp Rept DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID TITLE: General   (50 COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation esponse, 2  ENCL    SIZE:
DOC.DATE:
NOTES:
88/09/12NOTARIZED:
ID RECIPIENT CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1    1 RECIPIENT ID .'CODE/NAME; TOURIGNY,E COPIES 2
NOCIL:50-335
LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ACRS                              2    2    AEOD                      1      1 DEDRO                            1    1    NRR MORISSEAU,D           1      1 NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11                  1    1    NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10          1      1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11                  1    1    NRR/DREP/EPB 10          1      1 NRR/DREP/RPB 10                  2    2    NRR/DRIS DIR 9A          .1    '1 LRB                              NUDOCS-ABSTRACT           1      1 O
St.LuciePlant,Unit1,FloridaPower&LightCo.UTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION
G I-E.B, FWE 12 J
ONWAY,W.F.
02
FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAME
                              'RR/PMAS/I 1
RECIPIENT
1 1
AFFILIATION
1 1
DocumentControlBranch(Document
1 OGC/HDS2 RES/DSIR DEPY 1
ControlDesk)NOTES:SUBJECT:RespondstoNRC880816ltrreviolations
1 1
notedinInspRept50-335/88-16.
1 GN2~ P        01              1    1 0 RNAL: LPDR NSIC 1    1    NRC PDR                  1      1 1    1 A
DISTRIBUTION
D ig 8
CODE:IEOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                  25    ENCL    25
2ENCLSIZE:TITLE:General(50Dkt)-Insp
 
Rept/Notice
P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408.0420 SEt'TEh18ER 1 2 1989 L-88-393 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.       20555 Gentlemen:
ofViolation
Re:   St. Lucie Unit    1 Docket No. 50-335 Ins ection  Re  ort  335 88-16 Florida  Power & Light  Company has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to  NRC  letter  (A. R. Herdt to W. F. Conway) dated August 16, 1988, the response  is attached.
esponse,RECIPIENT
Very  truly yours,
IDCODE/NAME
~Sr~~~
PD2-2PDINTERNAL:
W. F. Conwag Senior Vice President - Nuclear WFC/GR 1/cm Attachment cc:   Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region        II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant GRMIR335 3309'1 00 ~29'v0922 PDR    ADOCK  05000"'35 PDC                                        an Fpl Group company
ACRSDEDRONRR/DLPQ/PEB
 
11NRR/DOEADIR11NRR/DREP/RPB
NRC REPORT  50-335/88-16 DEVIATION The Uni:t 1 FSAR,   Section 8.3.1.1.7, requires the diesel generators to be capable of    reaching full speed and voltage within 10 seconds after receiving a    signal to start.
10'RR/PMAS/I
Contrary to the above,       during Unit 1 emergency diesel generator surveillance testing on March 29, 1987, emergency diesel generators 1A and 1B attained rated speed and voltage in 10.1 seconds and 12.7 seconds, respectively.       As such, Unit 1 surveillance testing on two occasions failed to demonstrate the diesel generators are capable of satisfying FSAR design requirements.
LRB12OI-E.B,JGFWE02GN2~P010RNAL:LPDRNSICCOPIESLTTRENCL112211111122111111111111RECIPIENT
 
,ID.'CODE/NAME;
===RESPONSE===
TOURIGNY,E
: 1. Reason  for deviation:
AEODNRRMORISSEAU,D
FPL  has investigated this deviation with the operators involved.
NRR/DLPQ/QAB
Because of the time lapse (greater than 15 months), no specific reasons could be given as to why they would have entered start times for the diesels in excess of the design values and not have notified the responsible supervision.         Subsequent entries in the same data sheet are within the design values and records of maintenance activities show no conclusive evidence that start times were affected.     In addition, the diesels were tested as part of the integrated    response    time tests    for  safeguards equipment   in July and found  to  be satisfactory.
10NRR/DREP/EPB
: 2. Corrective steps:
10NRR/DRISDIR9ANUDOCS-ABSTRACT
Since the    diesels  had met the design start times      subsequent  to the dates  identified,   no immediate action was taken.
OGC/HDS2RES/DSIRDEPYNRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL2'''11111111.1'111111111ADig8TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
: 3. Corrective steps to preclude further deviation:
LTTR25ENCL25
FPL  has changed the monthly diesel periodic test to require the design start time be verified within specifications.           In addition, the responsible personnel have been instructed to notify the operations      supervisor     in instances where surveillances are satisfactory but the equipment is known not to meet its design requirements.
: 4. Corrective action is considered complete.
P.O.BOX14000,JUNOBEACH,FL33408.0420
 
SEt'TEh18ER
i'}}
121989L-88-393U.S.NuclearRegulatory
Commission
Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,
D.C.20555Gentlemen:
Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335InsectionReort33588-16FloridaPower&LightCompanyhasreviewedthesubjectinspection
report,andpursuanttoNRCletter(A.R.HerdttoW.F.Conway)datedAugust16,1988,theresponseisattached.
Verytrulyyours,~Sr~~~W.F.ConwagSeniorVicePresident
-NuclearWFC/GR1/cmAttachment
cc:Dr.J.NelsonGrace,RegionalAdministrator,
RegionII,USNRCSeniorResidentInspector,
USNRC,St.LuciePlantGRMIR3353309'100~29'v0922
PDRADOCK05000"'35
PDCanFplGroupcompany
NRCREPORT50-335/88-16
DEVIATION
TheUni:t1FSAR,Section8.3.1.1.7,
requiresthedieselgenerators
tobecapableofreachingfullspeedandvoltagewithin10secondsafterreceiving
asignaltostart.Contrarytotheabove,duringUnit1emergency
dieselgenerator
surveillance
testingonMarch29,1987,emergency
dieselgenerators
1Aand1Battainedratedspeedandvoltagein10.1secondsand12.7seconds,respectively.
Assuch,Unit1surveillance
testingontwooccasions
failedtodemonstrate
thedieselgenerators
arecapableofsatisfying
FSARdesignrequirements.
RESPONSE1.Reasonfordeviation:
FPLhasinvestigated
thisdeviation
withtheoperators
involved.
Becauseofthetimelapse(greaterthan15months),nospecificreasonscouldbegivenastowhytheywouldhaveenteredstarttimesforthedieselsinexcessofthedesignvaluesandnothavenotifiedtheresponsible
supervision.
Subsequent
entriesinthesamedatasheetarewithinthedesignvaluesandrecordsofmaintenance
activities
shownoconclusive
evidencethatstarttimeswereaffected.
Inaddition,
thedieselsweretestedaspartoftheintegrated
responsetimetestsforsafeguards
equipment
inJulyandfoundtobesatisfactory.
2.Corrective
steps:Sincethedieselshadmetthedesignstarttimessubsequent
tothedatesidentified,
noimmediate
actionwastaken.3.Corrective
stepstoprecludefurtherdeviation:
FPLhaschangedthemonthlydieselperiodictesttorequirethedesignstarttimebeverifiedwithinspecifications.
Inaddition,
theresponsible
personnel
havebeeninstructed
tonotifytheoperations
supervisor
ininstances
wheresurveillances
aresatisfactory
buttheequipment
isknownnottomeetitsdesignrequirements.
4.Corrective
actionisconsidered
complete.  
i'
}}

Latest revision as of 14:21, 4 February 2020

Responds to NRC 880816 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-335/88-16.Corrective Actions:Monthly Diesel Periodic Test Changed to Require That Design Start Time Be Verified within Specs
ML17222A469
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1988
From: Conway W
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
L-88-393, NUDOCS 8809140329
Download: ML17222A469 (6)


Text

I ACCELERATED IHSTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

CCESSION NBR:8809140329 DOC.DATE: 88/09/12 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET CIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 UTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ONWAY,W.F. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to 50-335/88-16.

NRC 880816 ltr re violations noted in Insp Rept DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID TITLE: General (50 COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation esponse, 2 ENCL SIZE:

NOTES:

ID RECIPIENT CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 RECIPIENT ID .'CODE/NAME; TOURIGNY,E COPIES 2

LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD 1 1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 1 1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 1 1 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 1 1 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 2 2 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A .1 '1 LRB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 O

G I-E.B, FWE 12 J

02

'RR/PMAS/I 1

1 1

1 1

1 OGC/HDS2 RES/DSIR DEPY 1

1 1

1 GN2~ P 01 1 1 0 RNAL: LPDR NSIC 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 A

D ig 8

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 25

P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408.0420 SEt'TEh18ER 1 2 1989 L-88-393 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Ins ection Re ort 335 88-16 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to NRC letter (A. R. Herdt to W. F. Conway) dated August 16, 1988, the response is attached.

Very truly yours,

~Sr~~~

W. F. Conwag Senior Vice President - Nuclear WFC/GR 1/cm Attachment cc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant GRMIR335 3309'1 00 ~29'v0922 PDR ADOCK 05000"'35 PDC an Fpl Group company

NRC REPORT 50-335/88-16 DEVIATION The Uni:t 1 FSAR, Section 8.3.1.1.7, requires the diesel generators to be capable of reaching full speed and voltage within 10 seconds after receiving a signal to start.

Contrary to the above, during Unit 1 emergency diesel generator surveillance testing on March 29, 1987, emergency diesel generators 1A and 1B attained rated speed and voltage in 10.1 seconds and 12.7 seconds, respectively. As such, Unit 1 surveillance testing on two occasions failed to demonstrate the diesel generators are capable of satisfying FSAR design requirements.

RESPONSE

1. Reason for deviation:

FPL has investigated this deviation with the operators involved.

Because of the time lapse (greater than 15 months), no specific reasons could be given as to why they would have entered start times for the diesels in excess of the design values and not have notified the responsible supervision. Subsequent entries in the same data sheet are within the design values and records of maintenance activities show no conclusive evidence that start times were affected. In addition, the diesels were tested as part of the integrated response time tests for safeguards equipment in July and found to be satisfactory.

2. Corrective steps:

Since the diesels had met the design start times subsequent to the dates identified, no immediate action was taken.

3. Corrective steps to preclude further deviation:

FPL has changed the monthly diesel periodic test to require the design start time be verified within specifications. In addition, the responsible personnel have been instructed to notify the operations supervisor in instances where surveillances are satisfactory but the equipment is known not to meet its design requirements.

4. Corrective action is considered complete.

i'