ML18086A354: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:--
{{#Wiki_filter:--
r I
r I
                *- -
                *
                       -- r
                       -- r
                       ~--
                       ~--
                      -  . **
                              *
                              ...
1
1
                                *-
                                     ~
                                     ~
                                    .__
                                         ; *. !: : :
                                         ; *. !: : :
                                           *I -
                                           *I -
                                                     ~~*
                                                     ~~*
                                                    '
                                                         ;':° :- : .. I" .. *.*.I
                                                         ;':° :- : .. I" .. *.*.I
                                                         ..        .  '"    ;
                                                         ..        .  '"    ;
:      '*    . -.-*        "_, ;*,
:      '*    . -.-*        "_, ;*,
                                                                                                       . =-* ' .. . . .        '
                                                                                                       . =-* ' .. . . .        '
                                                                                                                                    .
r--. \._. L ~
r--. \._. L ~
r*-.. .
r*-.. .
Line 44: Line 35:
                                                                         ***    l.  *.
                                                                         ***    l.  *.
                                                                                                 /
                                                                                                 /
                                                                                                                ..    ,,_, ,
                                                                                                               !".. !'"I\  L... -
                                                                                                               !".. !'"I\  L... -
                                                                                                                                  ,.      ,.-. ...
I IU " ' I t-EMORANDi.JM:    Brian Grime~*"
I IU " ' I
                                                                                                                                          '""""""''
                                                                                                ..
t-EMORANDi.JM:    Brian Grime~*"
US Nuclear feg                                ..
US Nuclear feg                                ..
* ommission
* ommission
Line 67: Line 53:
Neither State has completely satisfied the requirement for a public meeting in accordance with 44 CFR 350.10. New Jersey held a public meeting on March 20, 1981; however notification to the public was not timely. Another public meeting is scheduled for April 29, 1981. Delaware has scheduled a public meeting on June 15, 1981.
Neither State has completely satisfied the requirement for a public meeting in accordance with 44 CFR 350.10. New Jersey held a public meeting on March 20, 1981; however notification to the public was not timely. Another public meeting is scheduled for April 29, 1981. Delaware has scheduled a public meeting on June 15, 1981.
A joint exercise s.ite speci fie to the Salem nuclear plant* was conducted on April 8, 1981, with participation by both States and the local governments.
A joint exercise s.ite speci fie to the Salem nuclear plant* was conducted on April 8, 1981, with participation by both States and the local governments.
within the 10 mile EPZ. ____The stated objectives of the exercise were generally achieved, *even though the scenario had some limitations. __ Wl':lile a number of deficiencies were noted, they cary be readily corrected with additional SOPs, drills and training *
within the 10 mile EPZ. ____The stated objectives of the exercise were generally achieved, *even though the scenario had some limitations. __ Wl':lile a number of deficiencies were noted, they cary be readily corrected with additional SOPs, drills and training
            .
* In summary the overall state of R~diological Emergency Preparedness in the States of New Jersey and Delaware have been significantly improved during the past year. Wnile there is still a need for considerable "impro,*e::irnt, the deficiencies which exist should. not preclude the two States from coping with a., s=cident at the Selem nuclear plant.
In summary the overall state of R~diological Emergency Preparedness in the States of New Jersey and Delaware have been significantly improved during the past year. Wnile there is still a need for considerable "impro,*e::irnt, the deficiencies which exist should. not preclude the two States from coping with a., s=cident at the Selem nuclear plant.
s l 05 0 5 01,'l'?J}}
s l 05 0 5 01,'l'?J}}

Revision as of 09:14, 3 February 2020

Responds to 810205 & 0310 Requests for Info Re Findings & Determination of Status of State & Local Emergency Preparedness for Facility.State of Emergency Preparedness Has Been Significantly Improved
ML18086A354
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/1981
From: Dickey J
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Grimes B
NRC
Shared Package
ML18086A353 List:
References
NUDOCS 8105050273
Download: ML18086A354 (1)


Text

--

r I

-- r

~--

1

~

*. !
: :
  • I -

~~*

'
° :- : .. I" .. *.*.I

.. . '"  ;

'* . -.-* "_, ;*,

. =-* ' .. . . . '

r--. \._. L ~

r*-.. .

-- *- I

      • l. *.

/

!".. !'"I\ L... -

I IU " ' I t-EMORANDi.JM: Brian Grime~*"

US Nuclear feg ..

  • ommission

\. ,,,...'-j:.. ,.!I . I

    • / 1~*' I 1 FROt*1: John E. Dicke~.1"-*(A~t~t'....µ7 Director, RadiclogicJal\ Emerlgency Preparedness Division \ l'

~.

~~BJ::CT: Findings and Determination Relating to the Status of State and Local *Emergency Preparedness for the Salem l::i.i t 2 NL!:: iear Pi ant.

This responds to your February 5 and March 10, 1981, requests for the*

ebovP jnformation.

No for!ilal sub;;-.ission of-.:Hl:]"'_i-'ians by en.ner u1e ~t.aLt:: of i'e"' Jer~1:;y u1* ~ :*,'"'

State of Delaware have been made to FEMA Regions in accordance with flHA proposed Rule 44 CFR 350.7. Both States have, however, submitted draft REP Plans for review and comment by their respective Regional Assistanc17 Committees.(RAC);

New Jersey submitted a draft on January 16, 1981. RAC review comments were furnished to the State on February 25, 1981. Certain tevisions to these plans were made and furnished to the RAC ~n March 27, 1981. The RAC is not finished reviewing the revisions because of an inqedequate cross reference list. Delaware submitted a draft on Dece*mber 29, 1980.

RAC review comments were furnished to the State on February 23, .1981.

Delaware has furnished a revised plan received in the fEMA Region on March 31, 1981, which addressed "short termtt items. A later edition of the plans, dated April 1981 was received by the Region on April 6,1981.

It appears to address more of the RAC concerns first identified in febr.uary, however the RAC members have not completely evaluated the adequacy of the April revision. **

Neither State has completely satisfied the requirement for a public meeting in accordance with 44 CFR 350.10. New Jersey held a public meeting on March 20, 1981; however notification to the public was not timely. Another public meeting is scheduled for April 29, 1981. Delaware has scheduled a public meeting on June 15, 1981.

A joint exercise s.ite speci fie to the Salem nuclear plant* was conducted on April 8, 1981, with participation by both States and the local governments.

within the 10 mile EPZ. ____The stated objectives of the exercise were generally achieved, *even though the scenario had some limitations. __ Wl':lile a number of deficiencies were noted, they cary be readily corrected with additional SOPs, drills and training

  • In summary the overall state of R~diological Emergency Preparedness in the States of New Jersey and Delaware have been significantly improved during the past year. Wnile there is still a need for considerable "impro,*e::irnt, the deficiencies which exist should. not preclude the two States from coping with a., s=cident at the Selem nuclear plant.

s l 05 0 5 01,'l'?J