ML19296A994: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:'
{{#Wiki_filter:'
t
t
.
   )  '
   )  '
l SUPPLEMEi4TARY INFORMATION
l SUPPLEMEi4TARY INFORMATION
Line 31: Line 30:
: 6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:
: 6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:
N/A
N/A
_
: 7. Description of Occurrence:
: 7. Description of Occurrence:
Seawater samples were collected at the six (6) sample stations as required but due to equipment malfunctions, the analyses were not performed correctly.
Seawater samples were collected at the six (6) sample stations as required but due to equipment malfunctions, the analyses were not performed correctly.

Latest revision as of 15:10, 1 February 2020

Supplemental Info to LER 80-004/04L-0:during Jan 1980, Analyses of Seawater Samples Collected at Six Sample Stations Not Performed Correctly Due to Equipment Malfunctions.Samples Recollected & Analyzed
ML19296A994
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/1980
From:
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19296A993 List:
References
LER-80-004-04L, LER-80-4-4L, NUDOCS 8002190653
Download: ML19296A994 (1)


Text

'

t

) '

l SUPPLEMEi4TARY INFORMATION

1. Report No.. 50-302/80-004/04L-0
2. Facility: Crystal River Unit tio. 3
3. Rep rt Date: February 1, 1980
4. Occurrence Date: Janua ry ,1980 (discovered 24 January 1980)

(determined at plant 29 January 1980)

5. Identification of Occurrence:

Failure to analyze samples according to the routine listed in Ap-pendix B, Table 3.2-2, as required by Appendix B, Specifica-tion 3.2.2.

6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:

N/A

7. Description of Occurrence:

Seawater samples were collected at the six (6) sample stations as required but due to equipment malfunctions, the analyses were not performed correctly.

8. Designation of Apparent Cause:

The apparent cause of the occurrence is the malfunctioning of the analysis equipment.

9. Analysis of Occurrence:

This occurrence was not a result of the operation of Crystal River Unit 3. Random equipment malfunction, while undesirable, is an inherent equipment characteristic and cannot be predicted.

10. Corrective Action:

Seawater samples were re-collected at the six (6) sample stations and analyzed as required. All Lower Limits of Detection were less than those required and there was not reportable activity in any of the samples.

11. Failure Data:

This is the first report for this type occurrence.

RonBright*(LER)DN62 8002 190653