ML19337A860: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:-
   ,)V" . .                                                                                                        !
   ,)V" . .                                                                                                        !
* r    .                                          LAW 099sm                          .
r    .                                          LAW 099sm                          .
l MILLER, BALIS & 0'NEIL, P.C.
l MILLER, BALIS & 0'NEIL, P.C.
778 EXECUTIYK BUILDING 1030 FIFTEENTH STRECT. N. W.
778 EXECUTIYK BUILDING 1030 FIFTEENTH STRECT. N. W.
(102) 755 1480 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20005 WILLf AM 7, uggggg CTANLEY W. S ALIS COBERT A. O'NElk kh      ]
(102) 755 1480 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20005 WILLf AM 7, uggggg CTANLEY W. S ALIS COBERT A. O'NElk kh      ]
p                  s
p                  s coccRE)
                                                                                                                -
coccRE)
A          t!SMEC            3
A          t!SMEC            3
:n
:n
                                                                        .
* September 24, 1980                ::    sep 26 E80 s Of BM
* September 24, 1980                ::    sep 26 E80 s Of BM
                                                                                                 %h&
                                                                                                 %h&
Line 37: Line 34:
Re:  Houston Lighting & Power Company (South Texas                                  l Project, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498A and 50-499A; Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al.
Re:  Houston Lighting & Power Company (South Texas                                  l Project, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498A and 50-499A; Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445A, and 50-446A.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445A, and 50-446A.
                              .


==Dear Chairman Miller:==
==Dear Chairman Miller:==
Line 43: Line 39:
At the September 15, 1980 status hearing in the above-referenced proceedings, Mr. James R. Choukas-Bradley, of this law firm, addressed the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board concerning the Petition of the Border Cooperatives for Leave to Intervene Out of Time. Prior to responding to the Board's questions, Mr.
At the September 15, 1980 status hearing in the above-referenced proceedings, Mr. James R. Choukas-Bradley, of this law firm, addressed the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board concerning the Petition of the Border Cooperatives for Leave to Intervene Out of Time. Prior to responding to the Board's questions, Mr.
Choukas-Bradley advised that he had not yet received the results of the District of Columbia Bar Exam and had not yet                  been admitted to the practice of law as an attorney. In the course of the ensuing discussion, it was requested that the record be supplemented with a confirming statement that Mr. Choukas-Bradley did have Authorization to act as a representative for the Border Cooperatives. As attorney of record for the Border Cooperatives I would like to confirm that Mr. Choukas-Bradley was authcrized to express the position of this    I  law reviewed have    firm on behalf the    of the Border transcript        of.the Cooperatives. Furthermore, September 15, 1980  status      conference,      and the representations          made by Mr. Choukas-Bradley at that time do accurately reflect the Border Cooperatives' position.                                                        .
Choukas-Bradley advised that he had not yet received the results of the District of Columbia Bar Exam and had not yet                  been admitted to the practice of law as an attorney. In the course of the ensuing discussion, it was requested that the record be supplemented with a confirming statement that Mr. Choukas-Bradley did have Authorization to act as a representative for the Border Cooperatives. As attorney of record for the Border Cooperatives I would like to confirm that Mr. Choukas-Bradley was authcrized to express the position of this    I  law reviewed have    firm on behalf the    of the Border transcript        of.the Cooperatives. Furthermore, September 15, 1980  status      conference,      and the representations          made by Mr. Choukas-Bradley at that time do accurately reflect the Border Cooperatives' position.                                                        .
                                                                                                .
e so f
e so f
8009300 %              -
8009300 %              -
                                                                                              .
o  !
o  !
1 P' l
1 P' l


                                                      . __ ._ _ ._                      _ _ _ _ _
e {.              .
e {.              .
$*
                                                                        .
                                                                     ~
                                                                     ~
                                                                      .
Marshall Miller September 24,~1980 Page two I would like the record to be clear, however, that neither I nor Mr. Choukas-Bradley anticipated that the matter of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be taken up at the September 15, 1980 status hearing. To the contrary, I personally telephoned your office on Friday, September 12, 1980, to ascertain whether the subject of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be a topic of the discussion, and was advised that it would not.              It was only after being so advised by a secretary that Mr.
Marshall Miller September 24,~1980 Page two I would like the record to be clear, however, that neither I nor Mr. Choukas-Bradley anticipated that the matter of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be taken up at the September 15, 1980 status hearing. To the contrary, I personally telephoned your office on Friday, September 12, 1980, to ascertain whether the subject of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be a topic of the discussion, and was advised that it would not.              It was only after being so advised by a secretary that Mr.
Choukas-Bradley was designated to monitor the proceedings.
Choukas-Bradley was designated to monitor the proceedings.
Very truly yours,                e'
Very truly yours,                e'
_[{ b!fE' $*ll. .I Robert A. O'Neil RAO/stp                                                    '
_[{ b!fE' $*ll. .I Robert A. O'Neil RAO/stp                                                    '
cc: All parties of record
cc: All parties of record 4
                                                                                  .
e 9
                                                                      .
4
* e 9
e N
e N
e e
e e
                                                                                     , ,}}
                                                                                     , ,}}

Latest revision as of 14:28, 31 January 2020

Confirms That Jr Choukas-Bradley Was Authorized to Express Position of Miller,Balis & O'Neil,P.C. on Behalf of Tx Border Cooperatives at 800915 Status Hearing Re Leave to Intervene Out of Time
ML19337A860
Person / Time
Site: South Texas, Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1980
From: Oneil R
MILLER, BALIS & O'NEIL
To: Mark Miller
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19337A861 List:
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8009300488
Download: ML19337A860 (2)
v • d • e


Text

-

,)V" . .  !

r . LAW 099sm .

l MILLER, BALIS & 0'NEIL, P.C.

778 EXECUTIYK BUILDING 1030 FIFTEENTH STRECT. N. W.

(102) 755 1480 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20005 WILLf AM 7, uggggg CTANLEY W. S ALIS COBERT A. O'NElk kh ]

p s coccRE)

A t!SMEC 3

n
  • September 24, 1980  :: sep 26 E80 s Of BM

%h&

9

,, 4 l Honorable Marshall E. Miller  ;

Chairman l Atomic Safety and Licensing Board  !

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 i

Re: Houston Lighting & Power Company (South Texas l Project, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498A and 50-499A; Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al.

(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445A, and 50-446A.

Dear Chairman Miller:

At the September 15, 1980 status hearing in the above-referenced proceedings, Mr. James R. Choukas-Bradley, of this law firm, addressed the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board concerning the Petition of the Border Cooperatives for Leave to Intervene Out of Time. Prior to responding to the Board's questions, Mr.

Choukas-Bradley advised that he had not yet received the results of the District of Columbia Bar Exam and had not yet been admitted to the practice of law as an attorney. In the course of the ensuing discussion, it was requested that the record be supplemented with a confirming statement that Mr. Choukas-Bradley did have Authorization to act as a representative for the Border Cooperatives. As attorney of record for the Border Cooperatives I would like to confirm that Mr. Choukas-Bradley was authcrized to express the position of this I law reviewed have firm on behalf the of the Border transcript of.the Cooperatives. Furthermore, September 15, 1980 status conference, and the representations made by Mr. Choukas-Bradley at that time do accurately reflect the Border Cooperatives' position. .

e so f

8009300 % -

o  !

1 P' l

e {. .

~

Marshall Miller September 24,~1980 Page two I would like the record to be clear, however, that neither I nor Mr. Choukas-Bradley anticipated that the matter of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be taken up at the September 15, 1980 status hearing. To the contrary, I personally telephoned your office on Friday, September 12, 1980, to ascertain whether the subject of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be a topic of the discussion, and was advised that it would not. It was only after being so advised by a secretary that Mr.

Choukas-Bradley was designated to monitor the proceedings.

Very truly yours, e'

_[{ b!fE' $*ll. .I Robert A. O'Neil RAO/stp '

cc: All parties of record 4

e 9

e N

e e

, ,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19337A860&oldid=2354833"