ML062770136: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/24/2007
| issue date = 01/24/2007
| title = Issuance of License Amendment 166 Regarding Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program
| title = Issuance of License Amendment 166 Regarding Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program
| author name = Sands S P
| author name = Sands S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
| addressee name = Crane C M
| addressee name = Crane C
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| docket = 05000374
| docket = 05000374
| license number = NPF-018
| license number = NPF-018
| contact person = Sands S P,NRR/DORL, 415-3154
| contact person = Sands S,NRR/DORL, 415-3154
| case reference number = TAC MD1298
| case reference number = TAC MD1298
| package number = ML062770139
| package number = ML062770139
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:January 24, 2007Mr. Christopher M. Crane President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
{{#Wiki_filter:January 24, 2007 Mr. Christopher M. Crane President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:
PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)


==Dear Mr. Crane:==
==Dear Mr. Crane:==


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosedAmendment No.166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, "Primary Containment LeakageTesting Program," to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of  
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment No.166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.
?no later thanDecember 7, 2008," to  
The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].
?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12]."A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely,/RA/Stephen P. Sands, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-374
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                                    /RA/
Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-374


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
: 1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
: 2. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page Mr. Christopher M. CraneJanuary 24, 2007President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page
 
Mr. Christopher M. Crane                                            January 24, 2007 President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:
PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)


==Dear Mr. Crane:==
==Dear Mr. Crane:==


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosedAmendment No. 166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, "Primary Containment LeakageTesting Program," to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of  
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.
?no later thanDecember 7, 2008," to  
The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].
?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12]."A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely,/RA/Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-374
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                                    /RA/
Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-374


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
: 1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
:PUBLICLPL3-2 R/FRidsNrrPMSSandsRidsOgcRp GHill (2)RidsNrrDirsItsbRidsAcrsAcnwMailCenterRidsRgn3MailCenter RidsNrrLAEWhittRidsNrrDorlDprRidsNrrDorlLpl3-2RidsNrrPMTWengert RidsNrrDssScvbRidsNrrDeEgcbRidsNrrDraAplaPackage: ML062770139Amendment: ML062770136 TS Pages: MLOFFICELPL3-2/PMLPL3-2/LAITSB/BC*SCVB/BC*EGCB/BCNAMESSands:mwEWhittTKobetzRDenningSSamaddarDATE1/22/2007 1/22/2007 11/29/200612/21/2006 1/5/2007OFFICEAPLA/BCOGCLPL3-2/BCNAMEMRubinAHodgdonMMarshallDATE12/19/061/22/2007 1/24/2007OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
PUBLIC                LPL3-2 R/F              RidsNrrPMSSands              RidsOgcRp GHill (2)             RidsNrrDirsItsb        RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter        RidsRgn3MailCenter RidsNrrLAEWhitt      RidsNrrDorlDpr          RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2            RidsNrrPMTWengert RidsNrrDssScvb        RidsNrrDeEgcb          RidsNrrDraApla Package: ML062770139          Amendment: ML062770136 TS Pages: ML OFFICE LPL3-2/PM LPL3-2/LA ITSB/BC*                   SCVB/BC* EGCB/BC NAME        SSands:mw EWhitt          TKobetz        RDenning      SSamaddar DATE        1/22/2007     1/22/2007 11/29/2006 12/21/2006 1/5/2007 OFFICE    APLA/BC        OGC              LPL3-2/BC NAME      MRubin          AHodgdon        MMarshall DATE      12/19/06        1/22/2007         1/24/2007 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Site Vice President - LaSalle County StationExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757Plant Manager - LaSalle County StationExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757Manager Regulatory Assurance - LaSalleExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionLaSalle Resident Inspectors Office 2605 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9756Phillip P. Steptoe, EsquireSidley and Austin One First National Plaza Chicago, IL 60603Assistant Attorney General100 W. Randolph St. Suite 12 Chicago, IL  60601ChairmanLaSalle County Board 707 Etna Road Ottawa, IL  61350Attorney General500 S. Second Street Springfield, IL  62701ChairmanIllinois Commerce Commission 527 E. Capitol Avenue, Leland Building Springfield, IL  62706Robert Cushing, Chief, Public Utilities DivisionIllinois Attorney General's Office 100 W. Randolph Street Chicago, IL  60601Regional AdministratorU.S. NRC, Region III 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL  60532-4351Illinois Emergency Management  Agency Division of Disaster Assistance &
 
Preparedness 110 East Adams Street Springfield, IL  62701-1109Document Control Desk - LicensingExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL  60555Senior Vice President -Operations SupportExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Director - Licensing and Regulatory AffairsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Vice President - Regulatory & Legal AffairsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Assistant General CounselExelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Manager Licensing - LaSalleExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Senior Vice President - Midwest OperationsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLCDOCKET NO. 50-374LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 166License No. NPF-181.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment filed by the Exelon Generation Company, LLC(the licensee), dated April 21, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the enclosure to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of the Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 is hereby amended to read as follows: (2)Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection PlanThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.3.This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall beimplemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Michael L. Marshall, Jr., ChiefPlant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC               Robert Cushing, Chief, Public Utilities Division 2601 North 21st Road                         Illinois Attorney General's Office Marseilles, IL 61341-9757                    100 W. Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60601 Plant Manager - LaSalle County Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC               Regional Administrator 2601 North 21st Road                         U.S. NRC, Region III Marseilles, IL 61341-9757                    801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351 Manager Regulatory Assurance - LaSalle Exelon Generation Company, LLC               Illinois Emergency Management 2601 North 21st Road                           Agency Marseilles, IL 61341-9757                    Division of Disaster Assistance &
Preparedness U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission          110 East Adams Street LaSalle Resident Inspectors Office           Springfield, IL 62701-1109 2605 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9756                    Document Control Desk - Licensing Exelon Generation Company, LLC Phillip P. Steptoe, Esquire                  4300 Winfield Road Sidley and Austin                           Warrenville, IL 60555 One First National Plaza Chicago, IL 60603                            Senior Vice President -Operations Support Exelon Generation Company, LLC Assistant Attorney General                  4300 Winfield Road 100 W. Randolph St. Suite 12                Warrenville, IL 60555 Chicago, IL 60601 Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Chairman                                    Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Board                        4300 Winfield Road 707 Etna Road                                Warrenville, IL 60555 Ottawa, IL 61350 Vice President - Regulatory & Legal Affairs Attorney General                            Exelon Generation Company, LLC 500 S. Second Street                        4300 Winfield Road Springfield, IL 62701                        Warrenville, IL 60555 Chairman                                    Assistant General Counsel Illinois Commerce Commission                Exelon Generation Company, LLC 527 E. Capitol Avenue, Leland Building      200 Exelon Way Springfield, IL 62706                        Kennett Square, PA 19348
 
LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Manager Licensing - LaSalle Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
 
EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-374 LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 166 License No. NPF-18
: 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.       The application for amendment filed by the Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), dated April 21, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.       The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the regulations of the Commission; C.       There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; D.       The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.       The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the enclosure to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of the Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 is hereby amended to read as follows:
 
(2)     Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
: 3.     This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                            /RA/
Michael L. Marshall, Jr., Chief Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Technical   Specifications and Facility Operating LicenseDate of Issuance: January 24, 2007 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 166FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18DOCKET NO. 50-374Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating Licenses and Appendix "A" TechnicalSpecifications with the enclosed pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.Remove InsertUnit 2 License Page 3Unit 2 License Page 35.5-135.5-13 (5)Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70 possess,but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of LaSalle County Station Units
Changes to the Technical Specifications and Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: January 24, 2007
 
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 166 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18 DOCKET NO. 50-374 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating Licenses and Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the enclosed pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove                               Insert Unit 2 License Page 3              Unit 2 License Page 3 5.5-13                              5.5-13
 
(5)       Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70 possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2.
C. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1)    Maximum Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of full power (3489 megawatts thermal). Items in Attachment 1 shall be completed as specified. Attachment 1 is hereby incorporated into this license.
(2)    Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
(3)    Conduct of Work Activities During Fuel Load and Initial Startup The licensee shall review by committee all Unit 2 Preoperational Testing and System Demonstration activities performed concurrently with Unit 2 initial fuel loading or with the Unit 2 Startup Test Program to assure that the activity will not affect the safe performance of the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The review shall address, as a minimum, system interaction, span of control, staffing, security and health physics, with respect to performance of the activity concurrently with the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The committee for the review shall be composed of at least three members, knowledgeable in the above areas, and who meet the qualifications for professional-technical personnel specified by section 4.4 of ANSI N18.7-1971. At least one of these three shall be a senior member of the Assistant Superintendent of Operations staff.
Amendment No. 166


1 and 2.C.This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specifiedin the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:(1)Maximum Power LevelThe licensee is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core powerlevels not in excess of full power (3489 megawatts thermal). Items in  shall be completed as specified. Attachment 1 is hereby incorporated into this license.(2)Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection PlanThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.(3)Conduct of Work Activities During Fuel Load and Initial StartupThe licensee shall review by committee all Unit 2 Preoperational Testingand System Demonstration activities performed concurrently with Unit 2 initial fuel loading or with the Unit 2 Startup Test Program to assure that the activity will not affect the safe performance of the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The review shall address, as a minimum, system interaction, span of control, staffing, security and health physics, with respect to performance of the activity concurrently with the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The committee for the review shall be composed of at least three members, knowledgeable in the above areas, and who meet the qualifications for professional-technical personnel specified by section 4.4 of ANSI N18.7-1971. At least one of these three shall be a senior member of the Assistant Superintendent of Operation's staff.Amendment No. 166 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 166 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLCLASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2DOCKET NO. 50-37
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 166 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18 EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-374
 
==1.0    INTRODUCTION==


==41.0  INTRODUCTION==
By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) dated April 21, 2006 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number ML061740421),
By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) dated April 21, 2006 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number ML061740421),
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The proposed changes wouldrevise TS 5.5.13, "Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program," to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of  
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The proposed changes would revise TS 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].
?no later than December 7, 2008," to  
 
?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12]."
==2.0    REGULATORY EVALUATION==
 
The NRC staff finds that the licensee, in Attachment 1 of its April 21, 2006, submittal, identified the applicable regulatory requirements. The regulatory requirements for which the NRC staff based its acceptance are provided below.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix J, Option B requires that a Type A test be conducted at a periodic interval based on historical performance of the overall containment system. TS 5.5.13 requires that leakage rate testing be performed as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions, and in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163, Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program, dated September 1995, with two exceptions (one of which is pertinent to the current request and is discussed in the next paragraph). This RG endorses, with certain exceptions, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) report NEI 94-01, Revision 0, Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, dated July 26, 1995.
The Type A test is an overall (integrated) leakage rate test of the containment structure.
NEI 94-01 specifies an initial test interval of 48 months, but allows an extended interval of 10 years, based upon two consecutive successful tests. There is also a provision for extending the test interval an additional 15 months in certain circumstances. The two most recent Type A tests at LaSalle have been successful, so the current interval requirement would normally be 10 years. However, by letter dated October 24, 2002 (ADAMS Accession Number ML023040488), as supplemented on June 20, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number
 
ML031740072), the licensee requested a one-time extension of the test interval to 15 years.
On November 19, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number ML03301008), the NRC staff granted this request via License Amendment No. 148.
The licensee is requesting a proposed change to TS 5.5.13 which would alter their exception from the guidelines of RG 1.163 and NEI 94-01, by adding approximately three more months to the 5-year extension already in place, for a total interval of approximately 15 years and 3 months. Specifically, the exception states that the first Type A test performed after the December 8, 1993, Type A test shall be prior to startup following L2R12. L2R12 is scheduled to take place in March 2009.
The local leakage rate tests (URI) (Type B and Type C tests), including their schedules, are not affected by this license amendment request.
 
==3.0      TECHNICAL EVALUATION==


==2.0REGULATORY EVALUATION==
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensees regulatory and technical analyses in support of its proposed license amendment request which are described in Attachments 1 and 4 of the licensees submittal. The detailed evaluation below will support the conclusion that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
The NRC staff finds that the licensee, in Attachment 1 of its April 21, 2006, submittal, identifiedthe applicable regulatory requirements. The regulatory requirements for which the NRC staff based its acceptance are provided below.Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix J, Option B requiresthat a Type A test be conducted at a periodic interval based on historical performance of the overall containment system. TS 5.5.13 requires that leakage rate testing be performed as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions, and in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program," dated September 1995, with two exceptions (one of which is pertinent to the current request and is discussed in the next paragraph). This RG endorses, with certain exceptions, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) report NEI 94-01, Revision 0, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J," dated July 26, 1995.The Type A test is an overall (integrated) leakage rate test of the containment structure. NEI 94-01 specifies an initial test interval of 48 months, but allows an extended interval of 10 years, based upon two consecutive successful tests. There is also a provision for extending the test interval an additional 15 months in certain circumstances. The two most recent Type A tests at LaSalle have been successful, so the current interval requirement would normally be 10 years. However, by letter dated October 24, 2002 (ADAMS Accession Number ML023040488), as supplemented on June 20, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number  ML031740072), the licensee requested a one-time extension of the test interval to 15 years. On November 19, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number ML03301008), the NRC staff granted this request via License Amendment No. 148.The licensee is requesting a proposed change to TS 5.5.13 which would alter their exceptionfrom the guidelines of RG 1.163 and NEI 94-01, by adding approximately three more months to the 5-year extension already in place, for a total interval of approximately 15 years and 3 months. Specifically, the exception states that the first Type A test performed after the December 8, 1993, Type A test shall be prior to startup following L2R12. L2R12 is scheduled to take place in March 2009.The local leakage rate tests (URI) (Type B and Type C tests), including their schedules, are notaffected by this license amendment request.
3.1     Inservice Inspection for Primary Containment Integrity LaSalle, Unit 2 is a General Electric Boiling Water Reactor/5 design, with a Mark II primary containment. The containment vessel consists of a prestressed concrete containment with a continuous and leak-tight steel liner attached to the cylindrical, cone-shaped portion, and floor liner plate on the top of the foundation mat. The design of the containment incorporates a cone-shaped drywell positioned above an 86.5-foot diameter cylindrical suppression chamber.
The containment vessel is penetrated by access openings, process piping, and electrical conduit. The integrity of the penetrations is verified through Type B and Type C local leak rate tests (LLRT) as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the overall integrity of the containment vessel is verified by an integrated leak rate test (ILRT). These tests are performed to verify the leak-tight characteristics of the containment vessel at the design-basis accident pressure.
On November 19, 2003, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT from a 10-year test interval to a 15-year interval for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval increase was justified by the primary containment leakage testing program and the inservice inspection (ISI) program established by the licensee. The NRC staffs review of the application is documented in the safety evaluation (SE) prepared for License Amendment No. 148.
By application dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested changes to TS 5.5.13, to reflect a one-time extension of the primary containment Type A test interval for an additional 3 months beyond the previously amended 15 years to coincide with L2R12. Because the leak rate testing requirements (ILRT and LLRTs) of Option B of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the


==3.0TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
containment ISI requirements mandated by 10 CFR 50.55a, ?Codes and standards, complement each other in ensuring the leak-tightness and structural integrity of the containment, the NRC staffs review of the application for License Amendment No. 148 concentrated on the ISI program. Since the test interval extension requested for this application is relatively small, the same general methodology is used in this evaluation.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's regulatory and technical analyses in support of itsproposed license amendment request which are described in Attachments 1 and 4 of the licensee's submittal. The detailed evaluation below will support the conclusion that:  (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.3.1Inservice Inspection for Primary Containment IntegrityLaSalle, Unit 2 is a General Electric Boiling Water Reactor/5 design, with a Mark II primarycontainment. The containment vessel consists of a prestressed concrete containment with a continuous and leak-tight steel liner attached to the cylindrical, cone-shaped portion, and floor liner plate on the top of the foundation mat. The design of the containment incorporates a cone-shaped drywell positioned above an 86.5-foot diameter cylindrical suppression chamber.
Although Section 9.0 of NEI 94-01 allows an additional 15-month extension to accommodate refueling schedules, the November 19, 2003, license amendment required the licensee to perform the ILRT before December 8, 2008. Based on the previous NRC staff evaluation and approval of License Amendment No. 148, the proposed change in the test interval is not considered significant from the standpoint of ISI. This additional extension will not affect the test program approved on November 19, 2003. Therefore, the information provided in the SE for License Amendment No. 148 and the NRC staff conclusions remain valid.
The containment vessel is penetrated by access openings, process piping, and electrical conduit. The integrity of the penetrations is verified through Type B and Type C local leak rate tests (LLRT) as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the overall integrity of the containment vessel is verified by an integrated leak rate test (ILRT). These tests are performed to verify the leak-tight characteristics of the containment vessel at the design-basis accident
3.2      Probabilistic Risk Assessment Evaluation In License Amendment No. 148, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT interval from 10 to 15 years for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval extension was supported by a licensee risk assessment. The NRC staffs review of the licensees risk assessment was documented in the SE for the license amendment, and concluded that the combined risk impact of the test interval extensions, in terms of total integrated plant risk, large early release frequency (LERF), and conditional containment failure probability, is small and supportive of the change.
By letter dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested that TS 5.5.13 regarding the primary containment leakage rate testing program be amended to effectively allow a one-time extension of the ILRT interval from 15 years to approximately 15 years plus 3 months for LaSalle, Unit 2.
The licensee performed a risk assessment of the impact of extending the ILRT test frequency from the original three tests in 10 years to one test in 15 years plus 15 months, and reported the risk results in the April 21, 2006, application for license amendment (the frequency of one test in 15 years plus 15 months was used to bound the impact of the requested extension to 15 years plus 3 months). The risk assessment is based on the same methodology, input, and assumptions used to support License Amendment No. 148, with the exception of the revised test interval and the use of an updated version of the plant-specific probabilistic risk assessment.
Based on the analyses provided by the licensee, the risk impacts and risk comparisons for the proposed change are essentially unchanged from those reported in the November 19, 2003, SE, and the NRC staffs conclusions remain valid. Specifically, the increase in the total integrated plant risk is small and supportive of the proposed change, the increase in the test interval results in only a small change in LERF consistent with the acceptance guidelines of RG 1.174, and the defense-in-depth philosophy is maintained based on the small magnitude of the change in the conditional containment failure probability.
Based on these conclusions, the NRC staff finds that the increase in predicted risk due to the proposed change is within the acceptance guidelines while maintaining the defense-in-depth philosophy of RG 1.174 and, therefore, is acceptable.


pressure.On November 19, 2003, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT froma 10-year test interval to a 15-year interval for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval increase was justified by the primary containment leakage testing program and the inservice inspection (ISI) program established by the licensee. The NRC staff's review of the application is documented in the safety evaluation (SE) prepared for License Amendment No. 148.By application dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested changes to TS 5.5.13, to reflect aone-time extension of the primary containment Type A test interval for an additional 3 months beyond the previously amended 15 years to coincide with L2R12. Because the leak rate testing requirements (ILRT and LLRTs) of Option B of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the  containment ISI requirements mandated by 10 CFR 50.55a, ?Codes and standards,"complement each other in ensuring the leak-tightness and structural integrity of thecontainment, the NRC staff's review of the application for License Amendment No. 148concentrated on the ISI program.
==4.0     STATE CONSULTATION==
Since the test interval extension requested for this applicationis relatively small, the same general methodology is used in this evaluation.Although Section 9.0 of NEI 94-01 allows an additional 15-month extension to accommodaterefueling schedules, the November 19, 2003, license amendment required the licensee to perform the ILRT before December 8, 2008. Based on the previous NRC staff evaluation and approval of License Amendment No. 148, the proposed change in the test interval is not considered significant from the standpoint of ISI. This additional extension will not affect the test program approved on November 19, 2003. Therefore, the information provided in the SE for License Amendment No. 148 and the NRC staff conclusions remain valid.


3.2Probabilistic Risk Assessment EvaluationIn License Amendment No. 148, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT interval from 10 to 15 years for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval extension was supported by a licensee risk assessment. The NRC staff's review of the licensee's risk assessment was documented in the SE for the license amendment, and concluded that the combined risk impact of the test interval extensions, in terms of total integrated plant risk, large early release frequency (LERF), and conditional containment failure probability, is small and supportive of the change.By letter dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested that TS 5.5.13 regarding the primarycontainment leakage rate testing program be amended to effectively allow a one-time extension of the ILRT interval from 15 years to approximately 15 years plus 3 months for LaSalle, Unit 2.
In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the Illinois State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
The licensee performed a risk assessment of the impact of extending the ILRT test frequency from the original three tests in 10 years to one test in 15 years plus 15 months, and reported the risk results in the April 21, 2006, application for license amendment (the frequency of one test in 15 years plus 15 months was used to bound the impact of the requested extension to 15 years plus 3 months). The risk assessment is based on the same methodology, input, and assumptions used to support License Amendment No. 148, with the exception of the revised test interval and the use of an updated version of the plant-specific probabilistic risk


assessment. Based on the analyses provided by the licensee, the risk impacts and risk comparisons for theproposed change are essentially unchanged from those reported in the November 19, 2003, SE, and the NRC staff's conclusions remain valid. Specifically, the increase in the total integrated plant risk is small and supportive of the proposed change, the increase in the test interval results in only a small change in LERF consistent with the acceptance guidelines of RG 1.174, and the defense-in-depth philosophy is maintained based on the small magnitude of the change in the conditional containment failure probability.Based on these conclusions, the NRC staff finds that the increase in predicted risk due to theproposed change is within the acceptance guidelines while maintaining the defense-in-depth philosophy of RG 1.174 and, therefore, is acceptable. 
==5.0    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==


==4.0STATE CONSULTATION==
The amendment changes requirements with respect to the installation or use of the facilitys components located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (71 FR 32605; June 6, 2006). Accordingly, the amendment meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Illinois State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.


==5.0ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
==6.0    CONCLUSION==
The amendment changes requirements with respect to the installation or use of the facility'scomponents located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. TheCommission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (71 FR 32605; June 6, 2006). Accordingly, the amendment meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.


==6.0CONCLUSION==
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) thereis reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.Based on the foregoing evaluation, the NRC staff finds that the interval until the nextcontainment ILRT at LaSalle Unit 2 may be extended to 15 years plus 3 months, and that the proposed change to TS Section 5.5.13 is acceptable.Principal Contributors: H. Ashar, NRR R. Jackson, NRR B. Lee, NRR R. Palla, NRR Date: January 24, 2007}}
Based on the foregoing evaluation, the NRC staff finds that the interval until the next containment ILRT at LaSalle Unit 2 may be extended to 15 years plus 3 months, and that the proposed change to TS Section 5.5.13 is acceptable.
Principal Contributors: H. Ashar, NRR R. Jackson, NRR B. Lee, NRR R. Palla, NRR Date: January 24, 2007}}

Latest revision as of 14:31, 23 November 2019

Issuance of License Amendment 166 Regarding Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program
ML062770136
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/24/2007
From: Sands S
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
To: Crane C
Exelon Generation Co
Sands S,NRR/DORL, 415-3154
Shared Package
ML062770139 List:
References
TAC MD1298
Download: ML062770136 (12)


Text

January 24, 2007 Mr. Christopher M. Crane President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:

PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)

Dear Mr. Crane:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment No.166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.

The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].

A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-374

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page

Mr. Christopher M. Crane January 24, 2007 President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:

PRIMARY CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NO. MD1298)

Dear Mr. Crane:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 166 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The amendment is in response to your application dated April 21, 2006.

The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].

A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-374

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 166 to NPF-18
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPL3-2 R/F RidsNrrPMSSands RidsOgcRp GHill (2) RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsRgn3MailCenter RidsNrrLAEWhitt RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 RidsNrrPMTWengert RidsNrrDssScvb RidsNrrDeEgcb RidsNrrDraApla Package: ML062770139 Amendment: ML062770136 TS Pages: ML OFFICE LPL3-2/PM LPL3-2/LA ITSB/BC* SCVB/BC* EGCB/BC NAME SSands:mw EWhitt TKobetz RDenning SSamaddar DATE 1/22/2007 1/22/2007 11/29/2006 12/21/2006 1/5/2007 OFFICE APLA/BC OGC LPL3-2/BC NAME MRubin AHodgdon MMarshall DATE 12/19/06 1/22/2007 1/24/2007 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Site Vice President - LaSalle County Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC Robert Cushing, Chief, Public Utilities Division 2601 North 21st Road Illinois Attorney General's Office Marseilles, IL 61341-9757 100 W. Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60601 Plant Manager - LaSalle County Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regional Administrator 2601 North 21st Road U.S. NRC, Region III Marseilles, IL 61341-9757 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351 Manager Regulatory Assurance - LaSalle Exelon Generation Company, LLC Illinois Emergency Management 2601 North 21st Road Agency Marseilles, IL 61341-9757 Division of Disaster Assistance &

Preparedness U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 110 East Adams Street LaSalle Resident Inspectors Office Springfield, IL 62701-1109 2605 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9756 Document Control Desk - Licensing Exelon Generation Company, LLC Phillip P. Steptoe, Esquire 4300 Winfield Road Sidley and Austin Warrenville, IL 60555 One First National Plaza Chicago, IL 60603 Senior Vice President -Operations Support Exelon Generation Company, LLC Assistant Attorney General 4300 Winfield Road 100 W. Randolph St. Suite 12 Warrenville, IL 60555 Chicago, IL 60601 Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Chairman Exelon Generation Company, LLC LaSalle County Board 4300 Winfield Road 707 Etna Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Ottawa, IL 61350 Vice President - Regulatory & Legal Affairs Attorney General Exelon Generation Company, LLC 500 S. Second Street 4300 Winfield Road Springfield, IL 62701 Warrenville, IL 60555 Chairman Assistant General Counsel Illinois Commerce Commission Exelon Generation Company, LLC 527 E. Capitol Avenue, Leland Building 200 Exelon Way Springfield, IL 62706 Kennett Square, PA 19348

LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Manager Licensing - LaSalle Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-374 LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 166 License No. NPF-18

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment filed by the Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), dated April 21, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the enclosure to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of the Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/RA/

Michael L. Marshall, Jr., Chief Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications and Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: January 24, 2007

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 166 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18 DOCKET NO. 50-374 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating Licenses and Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the enclosed pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

Remove Insert Unit 2 License Page 3 Unit 2 License Page 3 5.5-13 5.5-13

(5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70 possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2.

C. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of full power (3489 megawatts thermal). Items in Attachment 1 shall be completed as specified. Attachment 1 is hereby incorporated into this license.

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 166, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

(3) Conduct of Work Activities During Fuel Load and Initial Startup The licensee shall review by committee all Unit 2 Preoperational Testing and System Demonstration activities performed concurrently with Unit 2 initial fuel loading or with the Unit 2 Startup Test Program to assure that the activity will not affect the safe performance of the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The review shall address, as a minimum, system interaction, span of control, staffing, security and health physics, with respect to performance of the activity concurrently with the Unit 2 fuel loading or the portion of the Unit 2 Startup Program being performed. The committee for the review shall be composed of at least three members, knowledgeable in the above areas, and who meet the qualifications for professional-technical personnel specified by section 4.4 of ANSI N18.7-1971. At least one of these three shall be a senior member of the Assistant Superintendent of Operations staff.

Amendment No. 166

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 166 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-18 EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-374

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) dated April 21, 2006 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number ML061740421),

Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Unit 2. The proposed changes would revise TS 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Testing Program, to reflect a one-time extension of the LaSalle, Unit 2 primary containment Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) from the current requirement of ?no later than December 7, 2008, to ?prior to startup following L2R12 [LaSalle, Unit 2 refueling outage 12].

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The NRC staff finds that the licensee, in Attachment 1 of its April 21, 2006, submittal, identified the applicable regulatory requirements. The regulatory requirements for which the NRC staff based its acceptance are provided below.

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix J, Option B requires that a Type A test be conducted at a periodic interval based on historical performance of the overall containment system. TS 5.5.13 requires that leakage rate testing be performed as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions, and in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163, Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program, dated September 1995, with two exceptions (one of which is pertinent to the current request and is discussed in the next paragraph). This RG endorses, with certain exceptions, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) report NEI 94-01, Revision 0, Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, dated July 26, 1995.

The Type A test is an overall (integrated) leakage rate test of the containment structure.

NEI 94-01 specifies an initial test interval of 48 months, but allows an extended interval of 10 years, based upon two consecutive successful tests. There is also a provision for extending the test interval an additional 15 months in certain circumstances. The two most recent Type A tests at LaSalle have been successful, so the current interval requirement would normally be 10 years. However, by letter dated October 24, 2002 (ADAMS Accession Number ML023040488), as supplemented on June 20, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number

ML031740072), the licensee requested a one-time extension of the test interval to 15 years.

On November 19, 2003 (ADAMS Accession Number ML03301008), the NRC staff granted this request via License Amendment No. 148.

The licensee is requesting a proposed change to TS 5.5.13 which would alter their exception from the guidelines of RG 1.163 and NEI 94-01, by adding approximately three more months to the 5-year extension already in place, for a total interval of approximately 15 years and 3 months. Specifically, the exception states that the first Type A test performed after the December 8, 1993, Type A test shall be prior to startup following L2R12. L2R12 is scheduled to take place in March 2009.

The local leakage rate tests (URI) (Type B and Type C tests), including their schedules, are not affected by this license amendment request.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The NRC staff has reviewed the licensees regulatory and technical analyses in support of its proposed license amendment request which are described in Attachments 1 and 4 of the licensees submittal. The detailed evaluation below will support the conclusion that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

3.1 Inservice Inspection for Primary Containment Integrity LaSalle, Unit 2 is a General Electric Boiling Water Reactor/5 design, with a Mark II primary containment. The containment vessel consists of a prestressed concrete containment with a continuous and leak-tight steel liner attached to the cylindrical, cone-shaped portion, and floor liner plate on the top of the foundation mat. The design of the containment incorporates a cone-shaped drywell positioned above an 86.5-foot diameter cylindrical suppression chamber.

The containment vessel is penetrated by access openings, process piping, and electrical conduit. The integrity of the penetrations is verified through Type B and Type C local leak rate tests (LLRT) as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the overall integrity of the containment vessel is verified by an integrated leak rate test (ILRT). These tests are performed to verify the leak-tight characteristics of the containment vessel at the design-basis accident pressure.

On November 19, 2003, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT from a 10-year test interval to a 15-year interval for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval increase was justified by the primary containment leakage testing program and the inservice inspection (ISI) program established by the licensee. The NRC staffs review of the application is documented in the safety evaluation (SE) prepared for License Amendment No. 148.

By application dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested changes to TS 5.5.13, to reflect a one-time extension of the primary containment Type A test interval for an additional 3 months beyond the previously amended 15 years to coincide with L2R12. Because the leak rate testing requirements (ILRT and LLRTs) of Option B of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and the

containment ISI requirements mandated by 10 CFR 50.55a, ?Codes and standards, complement each other in ensuring the leak-tightness and structural integrity of the containment, the NRC staffs review of the application for License Amendment No. 148 concentrated on the ISI program. Since the test interval extension requested for this application is relatively small, the same general methodology is used in this evaluation.

Although Section 9.0 of NEI 94-01 allows an additional 15-month extension to accommodate refueling schedules, the November 19, 2003, license amendment required the licensee to perform the ILRT before December 8, 2008. Based on the previous NRC staff evaluation and approval of License Amendment No. 148, the proposed change in the test interval is not considered significant from the standpoint of ISI. This additional extension will not affect the test program approved on November 19, 2003. Therefore, the information provided in the SE for License Amendment No. 148 and the NRC staff conclusions remain valid.

3.2 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Evaluation In License Amendment No. 148, the NRC approved a one-time extension of the containment ILRT interval from 10 to 15 years for LaSalle, Unit 2. This test interval extension was supported by a licensee risk assessment. The NRC staffs review of the licensees risk assessment was documented in the SE for the license amendment, and concluded that the combined risk impact of the test interval extensions, in terms of total integrated plant risk, large early release frequency (LERF), and conditional containment failure probability, is small and supportive of the change.

By letter dated April 21, 2006, the licensee requested that TS 5.5.13 regarding the primary containment leakage rate testing program be amended to effectively allow a one-time extension of the ILRT interval from 15 years to approximately 15 years plus 3 months for LaSalle, Unit 2.

The licensee performed a risk assessment of the impact of extending the ILRT test frequency from the original three tests in 10 years to one test in 15 years plus 15 months, and reported the risk results in the April 21, 2006, application for license amendment (the frequency of one test in 15 years plus 15 months was used to bound the impact of the requested extension to 15 years plus 3 months). The risk assessment is based on the same methodology, input, and assumptions used to support License Amendment No. 148, with the exception of the revised test interval and the use of an updated version of the plant-specific probabilistic risk assessment.

Based on the analyses provided by the licensee, the risk impacts and risk comparisons for the proposed change are essentially unchanged from those reported in the November 19, 2003, SE, and the NRC staffs conclusions remain valid. Specifically, the increase in the total integrated plant risk is small and supportive of the proposed change, the increase in the test interval results in only a small change in LERF consistent with the acceptance guidelines of RG 1.174, and the defense-in-depth philosophy is maintained based on the small magnitude of the change in the conditional containment failure probability.

Based on these conclusions, the NRC staff finds that the increase in predicted risk due to the proposed change is within the acceptance guidelines while maintaining the defense-in-depth philosophy of RG 1.174 and, therefore, is acceptable.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the Illinois State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes requirements with respect to the installation or use of the facilitys components located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (71 FR 32605; June 6, 2006). Accordingly, the amendment meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Based on the foregoing evaluation, the NRC staff finds that the interval until the next containment ILRT at LaSalle Unit 2 may be extended to 15 years plus 3 months, and that the proposed change to TS Section 5.5.13 is acceptable.

Principal Contributors: H. Ashar, NRR R. Jackson, NRR B. Lee, NRR R. Palla, NRR Date: January 24, 2007