ML12152A415: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:May 31, 2012  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITE D S TATE S
 
                                NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON
Randall K. Edington, Executive Vice President, Nuclear/CNO Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034  
                                                    RE G IO N I V
                                              1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
                                        AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511
                                                May 31, 2012
Randall K. Edington, Executive
Vice President, Nuclear/CNO
Arizona Public Service Company
P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
SUBJECT:        PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -
                NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION
                REPORT 05000528/2012005, 05000529/2012005 AND 05000530/2012005 AND
                REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Edington:
From August 27 through August 31, 2012, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commissions (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification
inspection at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, using NRC Inspection
Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator Requalification Program. Experience has shown
that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff.
In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection,
we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection. These documents have
been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies
information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately
prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies the information the
inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of this enclosure)
identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few
weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these documents are up to date
and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the
preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. Fara Oreshack of your licensing
organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of
examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material
requested, please contact the lead inspector Nicholas Hernandez at (817) 200-1430
(nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov) or Kelly Clayton at (817) 200-1216 (kelly.clayton@nrc.gov).


SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000528/2012005, 05000529/2012005 AND 05000530/2012005 AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
R. Edington                                 -2-
Dear Mr. Edington:
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
From August 27 through August 31, 2012, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program."  Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff.  In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection.  These documents have been divided into three groups.  The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
prepared.  The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site.  The third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site.  It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-
preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.
0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. Fara Oreshack of your licensing organization.  Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of
request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document
examination activities.  If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Nicholas Hernandez at (817) 200-1430
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
(nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov) or Kelly Clayton at (817) 200-1216 (kelly.clayton@nrc.gov).  UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
R. Edington - 2 -  
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a  
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document
request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
  Sincerely,   /RA/
                                                        Sincerely,
Mark S. Haire, Chief Operations Branch   Division of Reactor Safety  
                                                        /RA/
                                                        Mark S. Haire, Chief
Docket:   50-328, 50-329, 50-330 License: NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74  
                                                        Operations Branch
Enclosure: Inservice Inspection Document Request  
                                                        Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-328, 50-329, 50-330
License: NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74
Enclosure:
Inservice Inspection Document Request
Electronic Distribution for PVNGS, Units 1, 2, & 3


Electronic Distribution for PVNGS, Units 1, 2, & 3
R. Edington                                 -3-
 
Electronic distribution by RIV:
R. Edington - 3 -  
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
  Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)  
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Tony.Brown@nrc.gov)  
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Mica.Baquera@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Dustin.Reinert@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) Project Manager (Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov) Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)  
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) OEMail Resource RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov) DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)  
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Tony.Brown@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Mica.Baquera@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Dustin.Reinert@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov)
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
R:\_REACTORS\_PV\2012\PV2012005 RFI LTR-nah.docx                  ADAMS ML12152A415
ADAMS:        No    7 Yes        7 SUNSI Review Complete      Reviewer Initials:NAH
                                  7Publicly Available          7Non-Sensitive
                                    Non-publicly Available        Sensitive
OE/DRS OPS              BC/DRS OPS
NAHernandez            MSHaire
/RA/                    /RA/
05/29/2012              05/31/2012
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                  T=Telephone    E=E-mail        F=Fax


    R:\_REACTORS\_PV\2012\PV2012005 RFI LTR-nah.docx ADAMS ML12152A415 ADAMS:    No      Yes  SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials:NAH
              BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
Publicly Available Non-Sensitive
From: Nicholas Hernandez
  Non-publicly Available  Sensitive OE/DRS OPS BC/DRS OPS
        Operations Engineer, NRC RIV
  NAHernandez MSHaire  /RA/ /RA/  05/29/2012 05/31/2012  OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                        T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax 
        817-200-1430
  - 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
To:    Scott Whitson
From: Nicholas Hernandez Operations Engineer, NRC RIV 817-200-1430  
        Requal Supervisor, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
        623-393-6379
Subj: Information Request to Support July and August, 2012, Licensed Operator
        Requalification Program Inspection (IP 71111.11B)
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation
    activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module
    (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or
    hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than July 27, 2012.
    *  Electronically: To: Nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov Cc: Kelly.clayton@nrc.gov and
        brian.larson@nrc.gov
    *  Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV
                        1600 E. Lamar Blvd
                        Arlington, TX 76011
                        ATTN: Lead Inspector name
    General Requests:
        * List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
        * Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR
            evaluators identified)
        * Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training
            program up to date
        * List of outstanding LOR program changes
        * List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR
            program since last BRQ
        * Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator
            requalification training program
        * Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
        * Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
    02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
        * The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
        * The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that
            have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival
            onsite.
        * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and
            including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have
                                            -1-                                      Enclosure


To: Scott Whitson Requal Supervisor, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 623-393-6379
      adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via
      regular mail per NUREG-1021.
Subj: Information Request to Support July and August, 2012, Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection (IP 71111.11B)  
  *  The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)
02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities.  These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than July 27, 2012.
  * The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of
* Electronically:  To:  Nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov  Cc: Kelly.clayton@nrc.gov and brian.larson@nrc.gov
      August 27 (week team is onsite).
   * Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011 ATTN:  Lead Inspector name
  * The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately
General Requests:
      via telephone at later date) to be given the week of August 27 (week team is onsite)
* List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
   * Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week
* Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified)
      prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
* Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training program up to date
  * All of the previous years NRC required annual operating tests.
* List of outstanding LOR program changes
  * Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
* List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR program since last BRQ
  * All portions of the UFSAR that identify operator response times for time critical
* Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program
      operator actions
* Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams
* Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  *   All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
  *   All procedures used to assess operator performance
* The current and approved biennial written examination schedule 
  *   All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
* The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite. * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have 
  *  All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
   - 2 - Enclosure adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via regular mail per NUREG-1021. 
02.06: Requalification Examination Security
* The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)
   * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
02.04:  Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
      the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a
* The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of August 27 (week team is onsite).  
      periodic basis.
* The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of August 27 (week team is onsite)
  * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
* Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
      the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions
* All of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests.  
      (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc) on a
* Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
      periodic basis.
* All portions of the UFSAR that identify operator response times for time critical operator actions
  * All Procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to
02.05:  Licensee Admin of Requal Exams
      develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations
* All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
      in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
* All procedures used to assess operator performance
  * List of all Condition Reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to
* All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
      examination security and overlap
* All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program
02.06: Requalification Examination Security
  * List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes
* Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a periodic basis. 
      training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided
* Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc) on a periodic basis.  
      to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam
* All Procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
      cycle)
* List of all Condition Reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap
  * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance
02.07:  Licensee Remedial Training Program
      documentation)
* List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance documentation)
                                        -2-                                      Enclosure
 
    
  02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions
  - 3 - Enclosure
      * All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,
02.08:  Conformance with Operator License Conditions
          tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
* All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
      * All Procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any
* All Procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
          SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
02.09:  Simulator Performance
  02.09: Simulator Performance
* For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test,
      * For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be
the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI 3.5 standard requirements:  
          electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test
o Transient test 8, Max RCS rupture with LOSP 
          procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test,
o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)
          the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review
o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV
          versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI 3.5
o Steady State tests for 50% and 100% power 
          standard requirements:
* All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above.  
          o  Transient test 8, Max RCS rupture with LOSP
* Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DR's. For closed DR's, summary list for those items closed between August 2010 and August 2012.
          o  Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)
* Malfunction Tests for Main Steam and Main Feed Line breaks. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package would be acceptable.  
          o   Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV
* Test packages for Moderator Temperature Coefficient and Integral Rod Worth (tested in order to verify core physics parameters). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.  02.10:  Problem Identification and Resolution
          o  Steady State tests for 50% and 100% power
* A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
      *       All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided
* Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
          for section 02.05 above.
issues  B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on August 27, 2012.  
      *  Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,
02.02:  Exam Results  /  02.03 and 02.04:  Written Exam and Op Test Quality
          summary list for those items closed between August 2010 and August 2012.
* All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after onsite week
      *  Malfunction Tests for Main Steam and Main Feed Line breaks. If these are included
* All results up to the day the team leaves the site. 
          in an SBT package then the review of that package would be acceptable.
 
      *   Test packages for Moderator Temperature Coefficient and Integral Rod Worth
  - 4 - Enclosure
          (tested in order to verify core physics parameters). The applicable reference graphs
02.08:  Conformance with Operator License Conditions
          from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also
* Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews)  
          be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance criteria with
* Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
          results.
* Access to licensed operators' medical records
  02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution
02.09:  Simulator Performance
      * A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the
* Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from August 2010 to August 2012. This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure. 
          control room
* Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available).
      * Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
* Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.
          issues
* All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this)
B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection
* Summary list of modifications from August 2010 to August 2012.  
  activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either
* Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from August 2010 to August 2012.  
  electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on August 27, 2012.
* Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to August 27, 2012).  
  02.02: Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Quality
* The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI standard requirements.  
      * All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after
* All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.
          onsite week
* All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
      * All results up to the day the team leaves the site.
* Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.
                                            -3-                                      Enclosure
02.10:  Problem Identification and Resolution
 
* All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
  02.08:  Conformance with Operator License Conditions
C. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the inspection.
      *  Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
      *   Access to licensed operators training attendance records
      *   Access to licensed operators medical records
  02.09: Simulator Performance
      * Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from August 2010 to August 2012. This should
          include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the
          documentation/justification for closure.
      * Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at
          the time of acceptance (as available).
      * Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and
          neutronics models, to the actual plant.
      * All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator
          (any documentation on this)
      * Summary list of modifications from August 2010 to August 2012.
      * Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due
          date from August 2010 to August 2012.
      * Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to August 27, 2012).
      * The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a
          single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all
          transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include the
          test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient
          test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert
          review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
          ANSI standard requirements.
      * All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The
          applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other
          means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and
          the acceptance criteria with results.
      * All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the
          room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,
          simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
      * Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.
  02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution
      * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
C. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is required to send the final results summary
  and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the
  regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison
  against the Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results
  for the inspection.
                                            -4-                                        Enclosure
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:03, 12 November 2019

IR 05000528-12-005, IR 05000529-12-005 and IR 05000530-12-005 on 08/27 - 08/31/2012, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Notification of Inspection
ML12152A415
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2012
From: Mark Haire
Operations Branch IV
To: Edington R
Arizona Public Service Co
References
IR-12-005
Download: ML12152A415 (7)


See also: IR 05000528/2012005

Text

UNITE D S TATE S

NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON

RE G IO N I V

1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD

AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511

May 31, 2012

Randall K. Edington, Executive

Vice President, Nuclear/CNO

Arizona Public Service Company

P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602

Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034

SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -

NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION

REPORT 05000528/2012005, 05000529/2012005 AND 05000530/2012005 AND

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Edington:

From August 27 through August 31, 2012, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory

Commissions (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification

inspection at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, using NRC Inspection

Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator Requalification Program. Experience has shown

that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff.

In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection,

we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection. These documents have

been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies

information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately

prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies the information the

inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of this enclosure)

identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few

weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these documents are up to date

and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the

preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. Fara Oreshack of your licensing

organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of

examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material

requested, please contact the lead inspector Nicholas Hernandez at (817) 200-1430

(nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov) or Kelly Clayton at (817) 200-1216 (kelly.clayton@nrc.gov).

R. Edington -2-

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection

requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-

0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document

displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document

system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mark S. Haire, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-328, 50-329, 50-330

License: NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74

Enclosure:

Inservice Inspection Document Request

Electronic Distribution for PVNGS, Units 1, 2, & 3

R. Edington -3-

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector (Tony.Brown@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Mica.Baquera@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Dustin.Reinert@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)

Project Manager (Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov)

Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)

Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)

Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

OEMail Resource

RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)

DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

R:\_REACTORS\_PV\2012\PV2012005 RFI LTR-nah.docx ADAMS ML12152A415

ADAMS: No 7 Yes 7 SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials:NAH

7Publicly Available 7Non-Sensitive

Non-publicly Available Sensitive

OE/DRS OPS BC/DRS OPS

NAHernandez MSHaire

/RA/ /RA/

05/29/2012 05/31/2012

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

From: Nicholas Hernandez

Operations Engineer, NRC RIV

817-200-1430

To: Scott Whitson

Requal Supervisor, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

623-393-6379

Subj: Information Request to Support July and August, 2012, Licensed Operator

Requalification Program Inspection (IP 71111.11B)

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation

activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or

hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than July 27, 2012.

  • Electronically: To: Nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov Cc: Kelly.clayton@nrc.gov and

brian.larson@nrc.gov

  • Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV

1600 E. Lamar Blvd

Arlington, TX 76011

ATTN: Lead Inspector name

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR

evaluators identified)

  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up to date

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator

requalification training program

  • Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that

have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival

onsite.

  • All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and

including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have

-1- Enclosure

adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via

regular mail per NUREG-1021.

  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of

August 27 (week team is onsite).

  • The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately

via telephone at later date) to be given the week of August 27 (week team is onsite)

  • Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week

prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.

  • All of the previous years NRC required annual operating tests.
  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
  • All portions of the UFSAR that identify operator response times for time critical

operator actions

02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a

periodic basis.

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions

(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc) on a

periodic basis.

  • All Procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to

develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all Condition Reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to

examination security and overlap

02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes

training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided

to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam

cycle)

  • Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

-2- Enclosure

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,

tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators

  • All Procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any

SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be

electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test

procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient test,

the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review

versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the ANSI 3.5

standard requirements:

o Transient test 8, Max RCS rupture with LOSP

o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)

o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV

o Steady State tests for 50% and 100% power

  • All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided

for section 02.05 above.

  • Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,

summary list for those items closed between August 2010 and August 2012.

  • Malfunction Tests for Main Steam and Main Feed Line breaks. If these are included

in an SBT package then the review of that package would be acceptable.

  • Test packages for Moderator Temperature Coefficient and Integral Rod Worth

(tested in order to verify core physics parameters). The applicable reference graphs

from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also

be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance criteria with

results.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection

activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on August 27, 2012.

02.02: Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Quality

  • All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after

onsite week

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

-3- Enclosure

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
  • Access to licensed operators training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators medical records

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from August 2010 to August 2012. This should

include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the

documentation/justification for closure.

  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at

the time of acceptance (as available).

  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and

neutronics models, to the actual plant.

  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator

(any documentation on this)

  • Summary list of modifications from August 2010 to August 2012.
  • Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due

date from August 2010 to August 2012.

  • Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to August 27, 2012).
  • The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a

single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all

transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include the

test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert

review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI standard requirements.

  • All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The

applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other

means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and

the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the

room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is required to send the final results summary

and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the

regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison

against the Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results

for the inspection.

-4- Enclosure