ML17221A561: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000335/1987027]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM       (RIDS)
INFORMATION
Cq ACCESSION NBR: 8712280308       DOC. DATE: 87/12/23     NOTARIZED: NO         DOCKET FACIL: 50-335 St. Lucie Planti Unit ii Florida Power 8c 'Light Co.         05000335 50-38'P St. Lucie Planti Unit 2i Florida Poeer 5 Light Co.           05000389 AUTH. NAME         AUTHOR AFFILIATION WOODY'. O.         Florida Poeer   5 Light Co.
DISTRIBUTION
RECIP. NAME         RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch   (Document   Control Desk)
SYSTEM (RIDS)Cq ACCESSION NBR: 8712280308
 
DOC.DATE: 87/12/23 NOTARIZED:
==SUBJECT:==
NO DOCKET FACIL: 50-335 St.Lucie Planti Unit ii Florida Power 8c'Light Co.05000335 50-38'P St.Lucie Planti Unit 2i Florida Poeer 5 Light Co.05000389 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
Forwards response to Insp Repts 50-335/87-27 8c 50-389/87-2hi 50-389/87-26. Util concurres to violation Sc reason for inadequate frisk due to personnel inattentive in frisking.
WOODY'.O.Florida Poeer 5 Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
DISTRIBUTION CODE:     IE06D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR       ENCL     SIZE:
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Forwards response to Insp Repts 50-335/87-27
TITLE: Environ 0 Radiological (50 DKT)-Insp Rept/Notice of         Violation 'Respons NOTES:
8c 50-389/87-2hi
RECIPIENT         COPIES          REC IP I ENT        COPIES ID CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL PD2-2 L*               1     0     PD2-2 PD               1     1 TOURIGNYe E                  1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA               1    1    AEOD/DSP                1    1 NMSS/LLOB                   1    NMSS/SGOB              1    1 NRR/DLPG/PEB           1    1    NRR/DOEA/EAB            1    1 NRR/DREP/EPB           1    1    NRR/DREP/RPB            2    2 NRR/ AS/ILRB           1     1     OGC/HDS2                1     1 IL      02    1     1     RES                    1     1 RES DE    GI          1     1     RGN2     FILE 01 RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB        1    1    RGN4 MURRAY'           1     1 ERNAL: LPDR                    1     1     NRC PDR NSIC                        1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR       23   ENCL     22
50-389/87-26.
 
Util concurres to violation Sc reason for inadequate
P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, F L 33408 0420 DECEMBER   2 ~ $ 987 L-87-526 10 CFR 2.201 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:   Document Control Desk Washington, D. 'C. 20555 Gentlemen:
frisk due to personnel inattentive
Re:   St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 335 87-27 and 389 87-26 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR 2.201, the response 'is attached.
in frisking.DISTRIBUTION
There is no proprietary information in this report.
CODE: IE06D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Environ 0 Radiological
Very truly yours, C. O. W~eSy Executive Vice President COW/EJW/gp Attachment cc:   Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant EJW/005.IR 8712280308 871223 05000335 PDR   ADOCK     PDR 8
(50 DKT)-Insp Rept/Notice
an FPL Group company
of Violation'Respons NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 L*TOURIGNYe E COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 REC IP I ENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA NMSS/LLOB NRR/DLPG/PEB
 
NRR/DREP/EPB
ATTACEBfENT VIOLATION Technical Specification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and 'hall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.
NRR/AS/ILRB IL 02 RES DE GI RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB
Health Physics Procedure,     HP-70, Revision 6, Personnel Contamination Monitoring and Decontamination, dated September 25, 1987, requires in Section 8.1.3, that personnel exiting the radiation control area (RCA) who have been in a contaminated area perform a whole body frisk.
ERNAL: LPDR NSIC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AEOD/DSP NMSS/SGOB NRR/DOEA/EAB
Health Physics Procedure, HP-50, Revision 7, Protective Clothing Requirements, dated June 18, 1987, requires in Section 4.2 that protective clothing is to be worn in such a way as to cover the maximum part of the body for which designed.
NRR/DREP/RPB
it was Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to adhere to radiation control procedures in that:
OGC/HDS2 RES RGN2 FILE 01 RGN4 MURRAY'NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 23 ENCL 22  
On   October 28, 1987, five out of sixteen individuals observed exiting the Unit 2 Reactor Containment Building (RCB) contaminated area at the craft RCB access point located near the equipment hatch did not perform a complete   whole body frisk, and
: 2. On October 28, 1987 numerous people working inside the contaminated area in Unit 2 RCB were noted wearing their protective clothing hoods or caps with the flaps fastened behind their heads.
P.O.BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, F L 33408 0420 DECEMBER 2~$987 L-87-526 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
 
Commission
===RESPONSE===
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.'C.20555 Gentlemen:
Florida   Power   & Light Company   concurs with the violation.
Re: St.Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 335 87-27 and 389 87-26 Florida Power&Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection
2.a ~ In the instance in which the inspector identified personnel exiting the Reactor Containment Building (RCB) without performing the required whole body frisk, the'eason for the inadequate frisk was due, to personnel being inattentive in their frisking.
report, and pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR 2.201, the response'is attached.There is no proprietary
: b. In the instance of personnel improperly wearing their hoods while in the RCB, the principal reason that workers wore the hood flaps fastened behind their heads was to obtain relief from the RCB temperature.
information
3.a. Personnel       were stationed   to observe personnel frisking and ensure that personnel leaving the RCB performed a whole body frisk.
in this report.Very truly yours, C.O.W~eSy Executive Vice President COW/EJW/gp
: b. Supervisors were     notified to instruct personnel to correctly wear       protective clothing and the consequences     that could result from incorrectly wearing protective clothing. This was addressed by Outage Management         in meetings attended by supervisory personnel.
Attachment
4 ~   All   personnel   have been instructed in the strict adherence   to radiation protection procedures.     In addition, signs are being placed where appropriate, clearly stating plant policy regarding the consequences       of not following the applicable radiation procedure for that area.
cc: Dr.J.Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant EJW/005.IR
Example: Frisking Station "Failure to Frisk Adequately Will Result in Disciplinary Action.
8712280308
Plant Manager" A   letter regarding this poli:cy will be issued by the Plant Manager.
871223 PDR ADOCK 05000335 8 PDR an FPL Group company  
: 5. Compliance with the identified areas has been achieved.
ATTACEBfENT
Full compliance will be achieved by January     15, 1988.
VIOLATION Technical personnel with the approved, involving Specification
EJW/005.IR}}
6.11 requires that procedures
for radiation protection
shall be prepared consistent
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 20 and'hall be maintained
and adhered to for all operations
personnel radiation exposure.Health Physics Procedure, HP-70, Revision 6, Personnel Contamination
Monitoring
and Decontamination, dated September 25, 1987, requires in Section 8.1.3, that personnel exiting the radiation control area (RCA)who have been in a contaminated
area perform a whole body frisk.Health Physics Procedure, HP-50, Revision 7, Protective
Clothing Requirements, dated June 18, 1987, requires in Section 4.2 that protective
clothing is to be worn in such a way as to cover the maximum part of the body for which it was designed.Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to adhere to radiation control procedures
in that: On October 28, 1987, five out of sixteen individuals
observed exiting the Unit 2 Reactor Containment
Building (RCB)contaminated
area at the craft RCB access point located near the equipment hatch did not perform a complete whole body frisk, and 2.On October 28, 1987 numerous people working inside the contaminated
area in Unit 2 RCB were noted wearing their protective
clothing hoods or caps with the flaps fastened behind their heads.  
RESPONSE Florida Power&Light Company concurs with the violation.
2.a~In the instance in which the inspector identified
personnel exiting the Reactor Containment
Building (RCB)without performing
the required whole body frisk, the'eason for the inadequate
frisk was due, to personnel being inattentive
in their frisking.b.In the instance of personnel improperly
wearing their hoods while in the RCB, the principal reason that workers wore the hood flaps fastened behind their heads was to obtain relief from the RCB temperature.
3.a.Personnel were stationed to observe personnel frisking and ensure that personnel leaving the RCB performed a whole body frisk.b.Supervisors
were notified to instruct personnel to correctly wear protective
clothing and the consequences
that could result from incorrectly
wearing protective
clothing.This was addressed by Outage Management
in meetings attended by supervisory
personnel.
4~All personnel have been instructed
in the strict adherence to radiation protection
procedures.
In addition, signs are being placed where appropriate, clearly stating plant policy regarding the consequences
of not following the applicable
radiation procedure for that area.Example: Frisking Station"Failure to Frisk Adequately
Will Result in Disciplinary
Action.Plant Manager" A letter regarding this poli:cy will be issued by the Plant Manager.5.Compliance
with the identified
areas has been achieved.Full compliance
will be achieved by January 15, 1988.EJW/005.IR
}}

Latest revision as of 23:16, 29 October 2019

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/87-27 & 50-389/87-26.Corrective Actions:All Personnel Instructed in Strict Adherence to Radiation Protection Procedures & Signs Posted Re Consequences of Not Following Procedures
ML17221A561
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/23/1987
From: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
L-87-526, NUDOCS 8712280308
Download: ML17221A561 (5)
v • d • e


Text

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

Cq ACCESSION NBR: 8712280308 DOC. DATE: 87/12/23 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL: 50-335 St. Lucie Planti Unit ii Florida Power 8c 'Light Co. 05000335 50-38'P St. Lucie Planti Unit 2i Florida Poeer 5 Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION WOODY'. O. Florida Poeer 5 Light Co.

RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards response to Insp Repts 50-335/87-27 8c 50-389/87-2hi 50-389/87-26. Util concurres to violation Sc reason for inadequate frisk due to personnel inattentive in frisking.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE06D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Environ 0 Radiological (50 DKT)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation 'Respons NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES REC IP I ENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 L* 1 0 PD2-2 PD 1 1 TOURIGNYe E 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP 1 1 NMSS/LLOB 1 NMSS/SGOB 1 1 NRR/DLPG/PEB 1 1 NRR/DOEA/EAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/EPB 1 1 NRR/DREP/RPB 2 2 NRR/ AS/ILRB 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 1 IL 02 1 1 RES 1 1 RES DE GI 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB 1 1 RGN4 MURRAY' 1 1 ERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR NSIC 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 23 ENCL 22

P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, F L 33408 0420 DECEMBER 2 ~ $ 987 L-87-526 10 CFR 2.201 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. 'C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 335 87-27 and 389 87-26 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report, and pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR 2.201, the response 'is attached.

There is no proprietary information in this report.

Very truly yours, C. O. W~eSy Executive Vice President COW/EJW/gp Attachment cc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant EJW/005.IR 8712280308 871223 05000335 PDR ADOCK PDR 8

an FPL Group company

ATTACEBfENT VIOLATION Technical Specification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and 'hall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

Health Physics Procedure, HP-70, Revision 6, Personnel Contamination Monitoring and Decontamination, dated September 25, 1987, requires in Section 8.1.3, that personnel exiting the radiation control area (RCA) who have been in a contaminated area perform a whole body frisk.

Health Physics Procedure, HP-50, Revision 7, Protective Clothing Requirements, dated June 18, 1987, requires in Section 4.2 that protective clothing is to be worn in such a way as to cover the maximum part of the body for which designed.

it was Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to adhere to radiation control procedures in that:

On October 28, 1987, five out of sixteen individuals observed exiting the Unit 2 Reactor Containment Building (RCB) contaminated area at the craft RCB access point located near the equipment hatch did not perform a complete whole body frisk, and

2. On October 28, 1987 numerous people working inside the contaminated area in Unit 2 RCB were noted wearing their protective clothing hoods or caps with the flaps fastened behind their heads.

RESPONSE

Florida Power & Light Company concurs with the violation.

2.a ~ In the instance in which the inspector identified personnel exiting the Reactor Containment Building (RCB) without performing the required whole body frisk, the'eason for the inadequate frisk was due, to personnel being inattentive in their frisking.

b. In the instance of personnel improperly wearing their hoods while in the RCB, the principal reason that workers wore the hood flaps fastened behind their heads was to obtain relief from the RCB temperature.

3.a. Personnel were stationed to observe personnel frisking and ensure that personnel leaving the RCB performed a whole body frisk.

b. Supervisors were notified to instruct personnel to correctly wear protective clothing and the consequences that could result from incorrectly wearing protective clothing. This was addressed by Outage Management in meetings attended by supervisory personnel.

4 ~ All personnel have been instructed in the strict adherence to radiation protection procedures. In addition, signs are being placed where appropriate, clearly stating plant policy regarding the consequences of not following the applicable radiation procedure for that area.

Example: Frisking Station "Failure to Frisk Adequately Will Result in Disciplinary Action.

Plant Manager" A letter regarding this poli:cy will be issued by the Plant Manager.

5. Compliance with the identified areas has been achieved.

Full compliance will be achieved by January 15, 1988.

EJW/005.IR

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17221A561&oldid=2003447"