ST-HL-AE-2793, Forwards Addendum 3 to Crdr,Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Rept & Addendum 4 to Crdr,Executive Summary

Forwards Addendum 3 to Crdr,Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Rept & Addendum 4 to Crdr,Executive Summary

ML20205B024
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	10/18/1988
From:	Mcburnett M HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20205B028	List: ML20205B213 ML20205B267 ST-HL-AE-2793, Forwards Addendum 3 to Crdr,Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Rept & Addendum 4 to Crdr,Executive Summary
References
ST-HL-AE-2793, NUDOCS 8810260165
Download: ML20205B024 (8)

Text

. _ -

(_

The Light company P.O. F,ox 1700 liouston. Texas 77001 (713) 228 9211 llouston lj hting3e g Power- - -- - -..~ - . . . - - _ . - - . - - ~ . - .

October 18, 1988 ST-llL AE 2793 File No.. G9.17, J 34, G9.14 10CFR50 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Soutl. Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50 498, STN 50-499 Control Room Design Review Staty

Reference:

A. Control Room Design Review Status; M. R. Wisenburg, llIAP, Letter to the NRC; ST-HL- AE 2421; dited November 23, 1987.

B. Safety Parameter Display System; M. R. Wisenburg, llL&P, Letter to the NRC; ST-HL AE 2589; dated March 18, 1988.

Enclosed are updates to the Control Room Design Review (CRDR) reports for the South Texas Project (STP) as follows:

o Executive Sumtnary - Addendu;n 4 o  !!uman Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addendum 3 These reports reflect the status of the STP CRDR program as of September 30, 1988. Revision bars are usad to denoto changes from the previous submittal. Exceptions not identified with revision bars include the text of the Executive Summary Addendum 4, which it new raaterial, and rninor editorial changes throughout both documents. For Hurnan Engineering Discrepancies (llEDs) which have been resolved, a specific corr:pletion statement has been included for each unit, as appropriate. Where no completion statement is included, corrective action for that lied is still f a ,~ m .,...

A schedule for corrective action for HIDs l'"entified as of Novezber, 1987 was provided in Reference A. That schedule a primarily applicable to Unit 1. Attachrsent 1 provides a schodule which addresses both units, d 0g q0 L4/NRC/ci \b A Subsidiary of Ilouston Industrics incorgmrated 0810260165 631010 PDR (. DOCK 05000498 P PDC j

~ * '

ilouston Lighting & I ower Gimpany ST HL-AE 2793 File No.: G9.17, J34, C9.14 Page 2 HEDs fall into one of three groups relative to schedule, as discussed in Attachment 1:

o OLD - Those HEDs which were discussed in the previous HED Resolution 4

Re ort Addendum (Reference A).

o NEW Those HEDs which were identified subsequent to the previous report (Reference A),

o FUTURE - Those HEDs which may be identified in the future.

Most of the HEDs concerning the Qualified Display Processing System (QDPS) have been included in modifications currently being developed by 1

Westinghouse. As d'.stussed in Reference A, implementation of these changes has been reschedults. to target fuel load for Unit 2 and first refueling outage for Unit 1. QDPS items are discussed further in Attachment 4 (HED Resolution Report Addendum 3, Note CPT-1, Page 2-2 ff).

1 Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) Man in the Loop (MITL) validation testing was completed in December 1987. NRC staff concerns relative to human factors on the SPDS and the MITL Test Results were specifically addressed in the letter of Reference B. HEDs resulting from the MITL are included in

Attachment 4.

}

HL&P remains committed to the Control Room Design Review as an ongoing program. Our next report will be submitted in Docember, 1989. Attachment 2 l contains a current list of CRDR reports for your information, i

If you should have any questions on this matter, pleasa contact Mr.

i A. W. Harrison at (512) 972-7298.

i j i i I

.. )d. HaBur e

Manager, f Operation Support Licensing TilC/hg i

Attachments: (1) STP Schedule for Resolution of !!EDs 1

(2) List of Current Control Roota Design Review Reports (3) Executive Summary Addendum 4 j (4) Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report-c Addendum 3 1

2 S

l a

L4/NRC/ci 1

i l

, 2 S 1lL 2 Ilouston i.ighting & Power Compan) , 17, J34, C9.14 Page 3

<l cc:

Regional Administrator, Region IV Rufus S. Scott Nuclear Regulatory Commission Associate General Counsel ,

t 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suita 1000 liouston Lighting & Power Company ,

Arlington, TX 76011 P. O. Box 1700 Houston, TX 77001

• George Dick, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission INPO Washington, DC 20555 Records Center 1100 Circle 75 Parkway Jack E. Bess Atlanta, CA 30339 3064 Senior Resident Inspector / Operations e/o U.S. Nuclear Re;;ulatory Dr. Joseph M. Hendrie comrnission 50 Be11 pert Lane -

P. O. Box 910 Be11 port, NY 11713 Bay City, TX 77414 J. I. Tapia Senior Resident Inspector / Construction c/c U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Bcx 910 Bay City TX 77414 J. R. Newman, Esquire Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 l

R. L. Range /R. P. Verret Central Power 6 Light Company -

P. O. Box 2121 (

Corpus Christi, TX 78403 L

R. John Miner (2 copies)

Chief Operating Officer City of Austin Electric Utility 721 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704  ;

R. J. Costello/M, T. liardt City Public Service Board P. O. Box 1771 San Antonio, TX 78296 l l

(*) Receives Attachments, f

I Revised 08/24/88 l I

L4/NRC/ci t

r ,,

ATTACILMENT 1 -

STP Schedule for Resolution of HEDs Unit 1 Unit 2 Category A Safety Consequences OLD Resolved, with the exception of Resolved, with the exception of Operator Action Points shown on the HED-1095 for QDP$ and EkFDADS QDPS displays (HED-1095) as discussed setpoints. This HED will be in the HED Resolution Report Addendum 2, resolved prior to fuel load.

which was previously submitted. Interim actions have been implemented; final corrective action is in progress. This HED will be resolved by the end of the first refueling outage.

NEW Resolved To be resolved prior ', fuel loed.

TURTRE The STP CRDR requires mandatory immediate Same as Unit I corrective action. If the HED cannot be resolved immediately, interim action will be taken to mitigate the problem.

L4/NRC/ci

T,~'

l .

ATTACHMENT 1 (Cont'd)

STP Schedule for Resolution of HEDs Unit 1 Unit 2 Category B Plant Availability Enhancement OLD Resolved prior to commercial To be resolved prior to fuel load operation, with the exception of items with the exception of HED-1041, which concerning QDPS displays. (Refer to hED will be resolved prior to the end Resolution Report-Addendum 3, Note CPT-1, of the third refueling outage. (Refer to page 2-2 ff HEDs 1026 & 1041). HED-1026 HED Resolution Report-Addendum 3, Note will be resolved prior to the end of the CPT-1, page 2-2 ff, HEDs 1026 & 1041).

first refueling outagt, and HED-1041 will be resolved prior to the end of the third refueling outage.

NEW To be resolved by the end of the To be resolved prior to commercial first refueling outage. operation.

FUTURE To be resolved at earliest Same as Unit 1 opportunity, generally not later than the next scheduled refueling outage following HED evaluation.

Category C Equipment / Plant Reliability Enhancement OLD/ Resolutlen to be integrated into Same as Unit 1 NEW the plant modification schedule,

.tth implementation targeted for completion prior to the end of the second refueling outage (third refueling outage for QDPS displays) . '

L4/NRt/ci

.. , l ATTACl! MENT 1 (Cont'd)

STP Schedule for Resolution of IIEDs Unit 1 Unit 2 Category C Equipment / Plant Reliability Enhancement FUTURE Resolution to be integrated into Same as Unit 1 the plant modification schedule, with implementation generally targeted for completion prior to or during, the second schedoled refueling outage following IIED evaluation.

Category D Minor OLD/ Resolution to be priorit red and Same as Unit 1 NEW/ integrated into the plant modification IVIURE rocess. Implementation f.4 optional, and will be determined based on the overall priority of each item.

L4/!!RC/ci

• Attachment 2 ST HL AE 2793 File No.: G9.17, J34, G9.14 Page 1 of 2 Control Room Design Review Reports Current  !

Volume Revision Date

1. Program Plan 1 3/31/83 ,

2. Criteria Report 2 3/27/84 Addendum 1 -

6/03/85 Change 1 -

12/22/86

3. Operating Experience Review Report 0 3/25/83 4 System Function & Task Analysis Report 0 3/25/f3

5. Control Room Survey (CRS) Report uolume I (Original) (3/30/84) {

Volume II O 3/30/84 Volume III O 3/30/84 ,

Volume IV (Original) (3/30/84) ,

6. Annunciator Study Report 0 3/29/84

7. Special Studies Report 0 3/30/84

8. Implementation Plan Report 0 3/28/83

9. System Punction & Task Analysis ,

Validation Report 0 3/19/84  ;

i

10. Operating Experience Reviev Validation Report 0 3/07/s4

11. Control Room Survey Validation Report 0 3/07/84 l

() - Indicates submittal, although no revision or date appears on document. [

f i I 1

l L4/NRC/ci l

Attachment 2 ST llL AE 2793 File No.: C9.17, J'4, C9.14 Page 2 of 2 Control Room Design Review Reports Current Volume Revision Date

12. Executive Summary 0 2/27/84 Addendum 1 -

4/15/85 Addendum 2 -

12/22/86 Addendum 3 -

11/23/87 Addendum 4 -

9/30/88

13. Human Engineering Deficiency Resolution Report 0 4/15/86 Revised Pages 1 8/12/85 Addenvam 1 -

12/22/86 Addendum 2 -

11/23/87 Addendum 3 -

9/30/88

14. Emergency Operating Procedures Validation Report 0 12/22/86 r

i L4/NRC/ci

-