ML20205B213
| ML20205B213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1988 |
| From: | HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205B028 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8810260205 | |
| Download: ML20205B213 (203) | |
Text
- - - - - - -
[ Addendum 3
[
E-Gontroll Room _:D_e:sigwRevieuz L
[
c Human Engineering c Discrepancy c Resolution c
Report E
E
[
[
L
[
The SouthTexas Project se1onoros ee101e,e pos noocxosoog. -
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY E
L
[
l houston CONTROL ROOM HED RESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . . POWER CO.
REVISION LOG Revision Pages No. Date Description Affected
[
[ 0 4/15/85 Initial Issue 1 8/12/85 General Revision i, vii, 2-4, 25, A 2, A 5,
{ A 6 A 8, A 9, A 10, A 11, A 12, B 3, B 4, B 3, B 8, B 9, B 18, f~
B-19,B 25, B 29, r
D 5, D 6 Adde ndu:n 12/22/86 Initial Issue N/A
[ No. 1 F Addendurn 11/23/87 Complete Revision of N/A No. 2 Addendu:n No. 1 Addendu:n 09/30/88 Complete Revision of N/A No.3 Addendum No. 2 E
E M
B.TXT 09/30/ES u
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM HED RESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REV/EW POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mc:, gn Title Page REVISION LOG i TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 LIST OF TABLES iii l LIST OF FIGURES 111
( ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iv
SUMMARY
vi PREFACE viii
{
1.0 INTRODUCTION
11 1.1
GENERAL COMMENT
S 11 1.2 OBJECTIVE 11 1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS 11
[ 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS 21
[ CATECORY A A1 CATECORY B B1 CATEGORY C C1 CATEGORY D D1 11 S.TXT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM IGHTING DES /GM #EV/EW HED RESOLUTION REPORT
. . . . . POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES I
Table Title Page 21 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED 27 l RESOLUTION REPORT 2-2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED 2 19 RESOLUTION REPORT I
LIST OF FIGURES Firure Title I
F1 STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS I
I E
I III I
I
!s TXT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM HE? RESOLUTION REPORT
. ). POWER CO.
3 l
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ATV Auailiary Feedvater ATJS Anticipated T ansient Without Scram BAT horic Acid Tank CCV Component Cooling Water CR Control Room CRDR Control Room Design Review CAS Control Room Survey CRT Cathode Ray Tube CSF Critical Safety Function CVI Containment Ventilation Isolation I dB(A) Decibels (A Scale) l DC Direct Current EAB Electrical Auxiliary Building ECV Essential Cooling Vater EOP Emergency Operating Procedure (s)
ERFDADS Emergency Response Facilities Data Acquisition and Display System (SPDS is a portion of ERFDADS)
I ESF ESFAS Engineered Safety Features Engineered Safety Faatures Actuation Syctem FJ Teedvater CPM Callons pe' Minute Human Engi seerin; Discrepancy I HED HF Human Factsrs l HL&P Houston LighG; g & Power Company HVAC Heating, Ventilstion, and Air Condftionlig IR Intermediate Range j kV Kilovolt LCO Limiting Condition for Operation l LOOP Loss of Offsito Power iv n
I
I HGUSTON CONTROL ROOM k HED RESOTUTION REPORT DES /GN REV/EW
.. . . POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 3 l ACRONYM 9 AND ABBREVIATIONS I
MCC Motor Control Center MCO Main Construction Office MC Motor Cenerator HVAR Megavar MSR Moisture Separator Reheater NI Nuclear Instrumentation .
NIS Nuclear Instrumentation System NE Nuclear Regulatory Com:nission NSF Normal Safety Function OER Operatf.ng Experience Review P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagram PORV Power Operated Relief Valve PR Power Range Proteus l Plant computer QDPS Qualified Display Processing System RCB Reactor Containment Building RCS Reactor Coolant System RMR g Residual Heat Removai E R'*ST Refueling Water Storage Tank STTA System Function and Task Analysis SG Steaa Generator SGTP Steam Generator Feed Pump SI safety Injection SIS Safety Injection System SPDS Safety Parameter Display System SR Source Range l
STP South Texas Project V Volt V6V Verification and Validation VCT Volume Control Tank -
v I
B.TXT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING HED RESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW
. . . POWER CO. ADDENDUM 3
SUMMARY
This addendu:n to the HED Resolution Report su=merizes the results of the resolution of Category A, B, C, and D human engineering discrepancies (HEDs),
as approved by the Project Review Team and Management Tuam, in response to l human engineering observations generated as a result of the following activities:
- a. The Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) validatior i b. The disposition of HEDs that were not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report I
- c. The evaluation of Category E HEDs
- d. Miscellaneous CRDR human factors work
- e. Dispositions where it was determined that revision, clarification, or additional information was necessary
- f. The SPDS Man in the leep Validation The E0P validation was performed at the South Texas Project simulator, located in the training facility, during May 1986. This effort and the results are described in the EOP Validation Report.
Disposition of HEDs not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report (dated April 15, 1985, as revised August 12. 1985) and evaluation of nearly all of the Category E HEDs have been perforued. Various other remaining CRDR tasks, as shown in the '.xecutive Summary and its addenda, have also been Disposition of the HEDs resulting from these evaluations and tasks I corpleted.
is included in this addendum.
vi
,I S.TXT 09/30/88
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DES /GN REVIEW k
HED RESOLUTION REPORT
. _ . POWER CO. Appggggg 3 HEDs are also identified by project operations, engineering, and startup personnel. Disposition of HEDs iden % 1ed through this avenue is included in this addendum.
The SPDS Han in the Loop Validation was perforned at the South Texas Project simulator during November 1987. Disposition of HEDs developed during this effort is included in this addendum.
This addendum su=marizes the disposition of HEDs open at the time of the I
I initial HED Resolution Report and those HEDs developed af ter that report.
Addendum 3 supersedes Addendum 2 in its entirety.
I I
I k
I I
vii I
B B
I B.TXT 09/3C/88
F HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
" HED P.ESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REV/EW
. _. E3 POWER CO. ADDENDUM 3 PREFACE The control room design review (CRDR) of the South Texas Project (STP)
Electric Generating Station was started in September 1982. This review was perfermed by Torrey Pines Technolon for Houston Light ng & Power Company i
i (HIAP) with Bechtel Energy Corporatioa (Bechtel) acting as agent.
1 The program plan was presented to the NRC at the STP main control panel cock- l up in October 1982. The basic review work for operator experience review, system function and task analysis, and control room survey was completed in October 1982. In November 1982 the Management Team put a hold on CRDR activ-ities and authorized a desiga study to sddress mounting evolutionary engin-eering changes and correct discrepancies with the NCREC 0700 guidelines.
In November 1982, a decision was mide by HLAP to completely relayout six main control panels and upgrade the remaining four based on the design study. This redesign effort was required to accommodate design changes resultirg from plant design evolution and Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements and to correct discre-pancies with NUREG 0700. In December 1932 the Management Team selected one of I five alternatives studied for dasign implementation.
The mock up vas revised considering the 441 identified HEDs and evolutionary engineering changes. As the Bechtel layout engineers advanced the layouts of the ten panels, Torrey ?ines Technology engineers reviewed the rework for correction of known discrepancies and compliance with good human factors principles. The redesign effort on the main control panels was completed in I April 1983. The NRC performed an in progress audit in May 1983, after which the panel vendor was provided with firm layout drawings, viii i
I I a= o>o'
H6USTON CONTROL ROOM l.lGHTING {
& HED RES01UTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW
. . - . _ . POWER CD.
ADDENDUM 3 The NRC audit com:ne nts required the addition of reveral special studies to those already in progress, e.g., demarcation and hierarchical labeling. The cost significant addition, the evaluation of specified parameters, resulted in a not reduction of 51 panel meters. The extensive relayout required a repeat of the system function and task analysis with verification and walk through/-
talk through validation. 1.ikewise, a specially structured control room review cnd human factors review of the corrective measures for all Category A and representative category B discrepancies vert performed. The demarcation and l
hierarchical labeling studies resulted in continued upgrading of the mock up. }
The completion of the panel relayout allowed the design of the annunciator system consistent with the relocations of mar.y systems and subsystems, and a '
reduction of active windows from 1055 to 642.
Following the completion of these majer efforts, H1AP has continued the CRDR prog ram, including resolution of human engineering deficiencies identified, using Bechtel and Torrey 'ines Technology as required.
l The documentation for this program was necessarily extensive in view of its design developreent nature. Documentation describing the work perforced during the CRDR is su=marized below and in Figure P 1:
- 1. Program Plan Defines the plan for performing the CADR.
- 2. Criteria Report Provides the detailed guicalines and basis g
for the CRDR and describes the interface betweec the control u room and plant systems. This reoort also includes review procedures, plant conventions, and human factors data deve-loped during the CRDR ths.t will facilitate future control room modifications.
h I
B.TXT 09/30/86
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING HED RESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW u
.. POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 3
- 3. Operating Experience Review (OER) Report Describes the operations personnel review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of this task defined in the Progran Plan. .
- 4. System Function and Task Analysis (SITA) Report - Describes the .
methodology, results, conclusions, and recom:nendations for this SITA effort defined in the Program Plan.
- 5. Control Room Survey (CRS) Report Describes the review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of this task defined in the Program Plan. This report also includes the final results and dispositions for the human factors observations obtained from t I OER and the SFTA.
- 6. Annunciator Report Describes the review process, results, con-clusions, and recommendations of the annunciator review task defined in the Program Plan and the annunciator study guide.
I >
- 7. Special Studies Report Describes details of miscellaneous studies performed as part of the CRDR. This includes the anthropometric study, the hierarchical labeling study, the demarcation study, evaluation of specified parameters, and many minor studies to resolve NRC audit comments.
- 8. Implementation Plan Report - Summarizes the control panel design changes resulting from the implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements, engineering design requirements, and preliminary cbnervations of the CRDR design review team. It describes the reasons for major changes to the control panel layouts.
I x I .
B.TXT 09/30/88
,I h - , . .
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING HED RESO'UTION REPORT DES /GN REVIEW
_ _ _ POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 3
- 9. SFTA Validation Report . Sum arizes the second review required because of the extensive revisions made to the control panel layouts and also includes walk through/ talk through exercises performed in the mock up area.
- 10. OER Validation Report . Sum:narizes the review made by op *ators to determine if the redesigned panels corrected reported operator concerns and evaluate if any new problems were created as a result of the corrective messures taken.
- 11. CRS Validation Report - Summarizes the review made to determine if the Category A and representative 6saples of the Category B HEDs were satisfactorily corrected and if any new problems were created.
l 12. Executive Summary Summarizes the CRDR results, conclusions.
l recommendations, and schedules for remaining work. Technical details are in the Operating Experience Review Report, the System Function and Tas'< Analysis keport, the Annunciator Repert, the Control Room Survey Report, the 3pecial Studies Report, the Implementation Plan Report, and various validation reports.
- 13. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report -
Summarizes all Category A, B, C, and D HED resolutions (as of January 1,1986) .
{
- 14. Executive Suasary Addenda Summarize the results and remaining work schedules of the CRDR progran following the submittal of the Exe.
cutive Suasary Report. Addendum i showed progress as of April 15, 1985; Addendus 2 as of December 22, 1986; and Addendus 3 as of November 23, 1987. Addendu:n 4 sho.'s progress as of September 30, 1988.
xi l'
B.TXT 09/30/8!-
HOUSTON CONYROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW g HED RESOLUTION REPORT
. . . POWER CO.
ADDEbDUM 3
- 15. Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Validation Report Summaris e n the validatic.n procens used for the Emergency Operating Procedures and che results as thsy involve the control panels. This validation was canducted at the STP simulator during May 1986 using the draft EOPs.
- 16. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addenda Stemarize rerolutions for Category A, B, C, and D HEDs identified after I January 1, 1986. Addendum i summarized the HED resolutions as of December ^2, 1986, and Addendum 2 as of November 23, 1987.
Addendtm 3 summarizes the HED resolutions as of September 30, 1988.
For clarity, each addendum shows resolutions for HEDs identified after January 1, 1986, thus superseding the previous addendum in its entirety.
1 I
I I .
I I
I E m I
I l 3.TXT 09/30/88 t
_ _ _ _ _ __ \
,\
p Hous10N CONTROL ROOM g
DESIGN REVIEW
}lGHTING <
IEiIi POWER CO.
I PLANNING g i
/
f "1'; ?" '"+' 'l f
l ,
~
filt h
REVIEW & =
DESIGN SUPPORT ! E5 e { ,, sa E EU I 88 l Sg 5
Ip !{ ER I
[
l-' 5 '
. / _ / _
a:kAy^p.; yy .. , , . n.
4 N. ,., . e sf
[ ;y -
- j. ?- fliy ',
a a, -
r .,- ?9 -
/h h,,,p f j j j[
[
I 16 b ASSESSMENT w ,, h h h ! I IMPLEMENTATION 2 5 ll R ja (9 f*j lstf gj. ,a $l l
EF FECTIVENESS $
- gE .)
s "I
g>
g>e< - w$ d 0
h4 E! ,N E T l :! w*
"I IE D
- 5g @ f 5'
- 1// Et / --
[ STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS Figure P 1 o
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING HED RESOLLTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . . . POWER CO. ADDENDLH 3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 CENERAL COMENTS The Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report was prepared to provide in one document a sum. mary of the HEDs and their resolutions, as approved by I the Proj ec t Review Team and Management Team involved in the CRDR of ths l South Texas Project. This addendum addresses the HEDs not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report and those developed as a result of CKDR activities since that time. This addendum is prepared in a manner to I be consistent with the initial HED Resolution Report.
1.2 OBJ ECTIVE The purpose of this addeNum is t3 provide a structured reporting method for l su=ari:ing the resolutions of HEDs not completely resolved in the initial HED Resolution Report atid HEDs developed subsequent to that report in the l continuing program to apply human factors principles to the design of the l control room.
1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS The Category A, B, C, and D HEDs and resolutions addressed by this addendum are shown in Section 2.
The achedules for completion of ongoing or remaining CRDR activities are provided in the Executive Summary Report Addenda, Section 5.0, Schedule.
11 5
I I = a '> o'"
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING HED RESOLUTION REPORT DESIGN REV/EW
.8 POWER CO. ADDENDUM 3 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS The HED resolution sheets are organized by category (A, B, C, and D) and each category is subdivided according to the NUREG 0700 Section 6 topics as follows:
Workspace Communications Annunciator Controls l Visual Displays Labels and Location Aids Coeputers Panel Layout Control / Display Integration Renu bering of so=e HEDs occurred in HED Resolution Report Addendum 2, i diffeting from Addendum 1 and the E0P Validation Report. This renumbering was done to facilitate use of a single nu=ber (i.e., the HED nu ber) instead of cultiple sheet numbers to reference a single finding.
For ease in locating a particular HED. Tables 2 1 and 2 2 have been pro-v i .t e d , listing respectively the HEDs identified since the initial HED Resolution Report and the HEDs identified in the initial HED Resolution Report for which additional information is provided herein. Revision bars are not shown in these tables where only the page number has changed.
Disposition notes are provided when several HEDs can be more effectively addressed in one location, and are shown on pages 2 2 through 2 6 for the I Quallhed Display Processing System.
l 21 l
1 1
B.!XT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW EeodE OWER CO. DISPOSITION NOTES
, HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY- N/A NOTE NO. DISPOSITION CPT.1 The Qualified Display Processing System (QDPS) is a microprocessor-g based system designed to perform several safety related functions, l as follows:
- 1. Data acquisition, processing, and qualified display for post auident monitoring
- 2. Data acquisition, display, and analog control for safe shutdown to address separation / isolation concerns for a postulated control room / relay room fire 1
- 3. Data acquisition and digital processing of steam generator narrow range water level signals and primary g
coolant system hot leg temperature signals for I transmission to the protection system and for display
- 4. Safety grade control (and position indication, as I I required) of several safety related valves Design changes and resolutions to human engineering observations have been identified that involve modifications to the QDPS. g Because the QDPS is microprocessor based, these modifications involve software changes; these software changes will require completion of a comprehensive verification and validation (V&V) effort.
The extent of changes required and the consequent extent of V&V effort have lengthened the schedule for implementation of these changes beyond that originally anticipated. Resolutions for l
22
'[. Tn 09/30/88 I
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- 'e3J8 POWt R C0. DISPOSITION NOTES HF AREA Computera HED CATEGORY N/A NOTE NO. DISPOSITION most of the following HEDs have beOn included in the scope of a modification packagn being developed by Vestinghouse. The schedule is discussed in the Executive Summary Addenda, Section 5.0, Itec 22. Discussions of each HED resolution are l provided below.
HED 1022 The QDPS displays will be revised to consistently refer to steam (Cat. C) line pressure as "STh PRESS", to use the correct abbreviation for "estimated", and to delete "ec* from the cubicle cooler representation on the display.
I HED 1024 The Q0PS displays re being revised to provide a more accurate (Cat. C) indication at low flow rates. When the flov signal falls below a preset icv limit, the display will read "***". The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the flow indication problem and measures that should I be taken when QDPS flow indication is toward ti.= low end of the range. This information has been included in the i.perator requalification program.
HED 1025 The QDPS software controlling valve position indicating lights I (Cat. C) on the Operator Interface Modules is being revised to make the setpoints adjustable. Initial setpoints of 54 and 954 vill be used. The QDPS display modifications required are being per.
formed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS 23 5.TxT 09/30/88 I
l - -
c HOU$ TON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW Pe31G POWtRCo. DISPOSITION NOTES HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY N/A NOTE NO. DISPOSITION 4
modifications. Information has been issued to the Operations and I-Training Departments identifying the valve position indicatin5 light problers and interio instructions for accurately deternining valve position. This information has been included in the operator requalification progr.us.
HED 1026 The QDPS displays are being revised to clearly indicate which NIS g
(Cat. B) channel (I,II,III,IV) is being shown. Additionally, the bar graph I display of power range neutron flux is being revised to show the corresponding RCS loop. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the NIS display problems, so that 1 operators are aware of what the displays are actually showing, g
This information has been included in the operator requalification 3 program.
HED 1027 The QDPS displays are being revised to correct the inconsistencies (Cat. C) in nomenclature and labeling noted (missing errowhead, missing units). The QDPS software is being revised as required to permit adjustment within the needed range for operator action points. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Two other in.
l consistencies (incorrect PORV label, incorrect abbreviation) will be corrected at a later date.
HED.1041 QDPS displays of tank levels which are Tech Spec parameters will be (Cat. B) revised to display the levels in gallons, rather than percent, wher I 24 B.TXT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
, "\ a fe&Id PowtR CO. DISPOSITION NOTES Computers HED CATEGORY N/A HT AREA NOTE NO. Di$ POSITION the Tech Spec requirement is in gallons. This change vill allow direct comparison of the Tech Spec requirement and the actual tank
( level. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments giving the conversion from percent to gallons for ' ach tank, allowing use of QDPS to verify complianca. vich the Tech Spec.
- [ This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
[
HED 1094 The QDPS displays are being revised to use appropriate flow ranges (Cat. C) for ECV flows. The QDPS display nodifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifi-cation. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training
,[ Departments identifying the range problem and that flows may indicate off scale high during normal flow operations. This information has been included in the operator requalification
{ program.
HED 1095 The Qb?S displays have been revised on Unit 1 to rsflect the current (Cat. A) E0P setpoints. Correction of the QDPS displays to reflect the cur-rent EOP se points is being implemented on Unit 2.
{ However, several of the QDPS displays are designed in such a manner tha* the current E0P setpoints cannot be entered. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. For the setpoints that cannot be properly
[ adjusted in QDPS, information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the setpoint adjustment problem and identifying interim instructions / solutions. This information has been included in the operator requalification program. The 25
- 5. Ixi '~ 09/30/88 l
L.
HOU$ TON CONTROL ROOM uunTING DESIGN REVIEW Ei3 p&o.%E R CO. OlSPOSITION NOTES Computers N/A HF AREA _ HED CATEGORY i
NOTE NO. DISPOSITION 10Ps have also been ravised to include cautions about the in- !
correct setpoints on the QDPS displays.
HED 1126 Operator action points on the QDPS CSF display will be revised to (Cat. C) be consistent with the modifications made on the SPDS CSF displays .
These changes will result in all operator action points in che QDPS displays having arrows and dashed lines, with numerical l
values corresponding to the status trees.
HED 1134 The QDPS "SI termination /reinitiation" display has been revised in (Cat. C) Unit 1 and Unit 2 to correct setpoints shown incorrectly. The display is being revised to add the actua) RCS pr*ssu'te value for "Currect Status" and the required value for "Reg'd Status",
based on the E0Ps. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications.
I I
I J
]
2.. ]
7 .IXI 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
) . . _ .
TABl.E 2 1 f HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT
{
Numbar M Title HED 1001 D 8, Switch Accion After "Quick Release"
( HED 1002 B 17 Control Switch Action on Transfer Switch Panel HED 1003 B 18 Standby Diesel Generator Emergency Stop Capability HED 1004 A2 Tendback for CCW Tiov to Reactor Coolant Pwtps HED 1005 A 17 Safety Injection System Layout Train / subsystem
( Differentiation HED 1006 A9 CCV/ECV Pump Labeling $1milarity HED 1007 A 10 Labels and Mimic for CCV System HED 1008 A 11 Load Center Switches Used for AT'.'S Response HED 1009 A6 Misleading Indication of Power Available to EST Buses HED 1010 A3 First Out Vindows Unreadable
( HED 1011 A4 Inadvertent Actuation of Annunciator Test Pushw;'tton HED 1012 5 53 Demarcation Color Pads for Panel CP010 Power Feeds to EST Buses on Panel CP003
- 27 l
5.TXT 09/30/88 L
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIG HTll4G DESIGN REVIEW
. . _ POWE R CO.
TABLE 2 1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT
? umber h Title I
HED 1013 B 22 Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Flov Recorder Scales HED 1014 B 54 Recorder Pen Sequence Reversed From Indicator Sequence HED 1015 C 15 Feedback for Status of Reactor Makeup System HED 1016 B 36 Parallel Himic Lines on Panel CP010 HED 1017 C 21 Incorrect Reflectiot of Charging Pump Valves on Panel CP004 HED 1018 C 16 Feedback for EST Actuation Signal Re:,at l HED 1019 C 22 EST Signal Block Switch Labeling HED 1020 C 23 SI Power Lockout Switch Labeling H'iD 1021 C 24 SI Reset Switch Labeltag HED 1022 C 33 QDPS/ERTDADS Display Abbreviatior- tnsplay Revisions HED 1023 C 34 QDPS Display Abbreviations Crhe ;e ?, visions HED 1024 C 35 Zero/Lov Flow Indications on QDPS 28 -
B.Tx; 09/30/40 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM V LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_ . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1
, HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Nurtbe r Pare Title HED 1025 C 17 Inconsistent Position Indication for QDPS Controlled Valves HED 1026 B 43 NIS Displays on QDPS and U . DADS
( HED 1027 C 36 QDPS/ERFDADS Display Inconsistencies HED 1028 D9 Third Pen Visibility on Three-Pen Recorders HED 1029 D-2 Controls Above 70 Inches HED 1030 B2 Glare from Meters
{
HED 1031 C 13 LeSend Pushtutton Label Inconsistencies HED 10',2 C 18 Ste n and Teodwater Headers - Differential Pressure De ce rnitiation
{
HED-1033 D 44 Proteus and ERFDADS Use of Colors HED 1034 0 15 ERFDADS Normal and Critical Safety Function Designators
[ on Displays HED 1035 D 16 ERFDADS Keys Differentiation of "Shifted" and "linshif ted" Functions 29 B.TXT 09/30/88 r l l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ _ . . . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Pare Title HED-1036 C-37 Abbreviations on Computer Displays HED 1037 B-45 Clare on Computer CRTs HED 1038 C 38 Plant Computer Color Quality and Menu Listing Order HED 1039 D 17 Use of Periods on Computer Displays HED 1040 C 39 ERFDADS/ Plant Computer Labeling and Colors HED 1041 B 46 Tech Spec Level Presentation Inconsistencies HED 1042 D 47 Proteus Dispisy Er*:or HED 104'S C 62 Cross-Loop Comparison of RCS Tempera ures (T,y , T , T , Leita T) h n HED 1044 B 5) VCT Pressure and Level Meters Differentiatisn HED-1045 A 12 D6marcation Inadequate for SC Level Meters and PCRV l Controls HED 1046 B 37 Labels Inconsistent with Meters Identified 1
2 10 -
B.TXT 09/30/88
. . _ . . _ - - =
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
, . _ . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2 1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED 1047 B 48 ERFDADS Unit Overwritten by Data Quality Character HED-1048 B 49 ERFDADS Display Errors on Valve Status HED 1049 B 50 ERFDADS Display Error on RHR Flow Range HED 1050 B 51 Radiacion Honitoring Information Not Datalinked to ERFDADS HED 1051 B6 Bypass / Inoperable Indi,:ation Phase A Isolation HED 1052 B7 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Main Steam Isolation HED 1053 B8 bypass / Inoperable indication - Safety Injection HED 1054 P-9 Bypcss/Inoporable Indication PJiR Heat Exe. hang,er Valves r
HED 1055 C6 Abbreviations on ESF Status Monitoring System HED 1056 C7 Inconsistent / Incorrect labels on ESF Status Honitoring System HED 1057 C 25 Labeling of AW Pump lutbine Trip Pushbutton HED 1058 C 26 Inconsistent Recorder Labels and Pen Labels for RCS Temperature
- 2 11 B.TXT 09/30/88 d
m mem .. - . ..- mi- i
I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
__ POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 EEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED 1059 B 52 ERFDADS Display Error on Valve Numbers HED-1060 C2 Air Velocities Above Limits i
HED 1061 B-3 Lighting Levels Outside Requiremenes
( HED 1062 B4 Inadequate Illum! nation Levels (Emergency Lighting)
HED 1063 B5 Control Room Noise Levels HED 1064 C 40 ERFDADS Transfer Switch Position Descriptions HED 1065 C-41 ERFDADS and QPPS Displayed Values Differences HED 1066 B 10 Status Monitoring Not Provided Afte.r a LOOP HED 1067 B 11 Status Moni':oring Alarms Af ter LOOP for Components Not Actuated HE0 1068 C-8 Seisaic Monitoring Annunciation HEDe1069 T,18 Color Meanings in Trend Craphs on ERFDADS l HED 1070 C 42 SPDS Status Box Color Differentiation 2 12 -
c B.TXT 09/30/88 -
h
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
___.. POWE R C O.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED 1071 D 19 SPDS Keys - Differentiation on ERFDADS Keyboards HED 1072 C 43 SPDS CSF Displays - No Color Changes for Alarm Conditions HED 1073 D 20 Cooling coil and Heating Coil Symbols on Computer Displays HED-1074 D 21 Data Presentation Order Difference Between QDPS and ERFDADS HED 1075 C 44 AFV Flow Offseale High Indication HED 1076 D 1D Toch Spec Flow Value Readability on Heter Scale HED 107" C 27 Jemaication/LcDelit.g on HVAC Panel CP022
{
HED 1072 C 28 Labels for Power Source Identification 5.(ED 1079 B 19 Color Coding of Pushbattons and Switches llED 1080 C 29 Open/Close Indication For RCS Purification Flow Controller l
HED 1081 B 12 Annunciator and ESF Status Monitoring Lampbox Labels
{
HED-1082 C 45 ERFDADS Inputs for ESF Actuation Signal Alarus Incomplete HED 1083 C 14 Inadvertent Actuation of Cem=unications Console Switches 2-13 B.TXT 09/30/88
{ _ - - _ - - _ - - - - - - -- -- ------- ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _
e HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .__ __ POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1084 C5 Backup Power for Telephone Equipment HED-1085 D4 Maintenance Communication System Jack Patch Panel Labeling HED-1086 C3 Procedures for Emergency Equipment Use HED 1087 C4 Labeling of Storage Areas for Emergency Equipnent HED 1088 D3 Control Room Noise Level HED-1089 C-9 Bypass / Inoperable Status Alarm for Normal Purge Containment Isolation Valves HED-1090 D7 taproper Cole r Coding of Switches on Panel CP010 HED 1091 D 13 Process Mimic Color-Coded by Train HED 1092 D5 Temporary Identification on Ar.nunciator Windous Actuated by ERFDADS HED 1093 D8 Bypass / Inoperable Status Manual Pushbuttons -
Differentiaticn frem Indicating Lights HED 1094 C 46 Ranges for ECW Flow on QDPS and ERFDADS Displays 2 14 3 TXT 09/30/88
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. ... POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED 1095 A 13 Displayed Operator Action Points Inconsistent with E0Ps HED 1096 B 13 ESF Status Honitoring for Phase B Isolation f HED 1097 C 47 ERFDADS Keyboard CRT Select Key Engraving HED 1098 B 34 Condenser Vacuum Indication HED 1099 B 15 Common Alarms Not Provided in Unit 2 HED 1100 D-14 ESF Status Monitoring Syste:s Test Pushbutton
( Demarcation Pad / Labeling HED 1101 B 40 Labelt for SI Actuation Switches HED 1102 B 41 "AFV Actuate" Usage HED 1103 C 19 Engineering Units Designations for Recorders HED 1104 D 11 P.CS Pressure Recorder Reading Comparison HED 1105 C 30 Train Related Color Coded Himics HED 1106 D 22 ERFDADS Display CV 02 2 15
{
B.TXT 09/30/88 r-
___a
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGk REVIEW
. . . . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT NUMBER PAGE TITLE HED 1107 D 29 Power Range Low Setpoint Trip Block Pushbuttons HED 1108 A 14 SPDS Plant Status Monitoring during Adverse Contairment Conditions HED 1109 C 48 SPDS Monitoring of ATVS Conditions HED ll10 D 23 SPDS Cursor Visibility on Trend Plots HED llll C 49 SPDS Top Level Display Bar Height HED lll2 C 50 E0P Parameter Label vs. SPDS Label i
HED lll3 D 24 SPDS Scale Le6 ends on NSF Z Df. splay HED lll4 D-25 SPDS NSF SDi ital Values r.ot Provided HEC 1115 C 51 SPDS Microcurie Abbreviation i
!! lied lll6 C $2 SPDS NSF to CSF Changes on Reactor Trip t l
HED lll7 C 53 SPDS CSF P Display Spacing HED 1118 C-54 SPDS Subcooling "+/ " Conventions HED lll9 C 55 SPDS Alarm Acknowledgment Difficult 2 16 -
~
B.TXT 09/30/88 h
(
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHilNG DESIGN REVIEW
__... POWE R CO.
TABLE 2 1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT NUMBER PACE TITLE HED 1120 C-56 SPDS Complexity HED 1121 C 57 SPDS Alarm Colors Inconsistent HED 1122 D 26 SPDS "Breaker" Acronym i HED 1123 D 27 SPDS Colors for Alarms and Trcads HED 1124 C 58 SPDS NSF-Z INOP Flags With Insufficient Labeling HED 1125 C 59 SPDS NSF Z Background Label Confusion /
/
HED 1126 C 60 CSF Operator Action Poirts Designations Itconsistent HFD 1127 C 61 SPDS NSF S Layout / Labeling of NIS Rzadings HED 1128 B 42 Labeling for Sterm Du.tp Rototellite Lights HED 1129 C 10 Lampbox Vindows for AW PufJp Start Blocked HED 1130 C 31 Reset Pushbutton Escutcheon Engravings HED 1131 B 43 Turbine Bearing Water Spray Valve Labels i~~
HED 1132 B 35 Delta I Recorder Scale an$ Paper 2 17 B.TXT 09/30/88
~ -a- _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT NUMBER PACE TITLE HED 1133 C 32 Labels and Locations of Switches for SI Check Valve Test Valves HED-1134 A 15 SI Termination /Reinitiation Criteria vs QDPS/ERFDADS Displays l
HED 1135 B 16 QDPS Alarm Window Priorities HED-1136 D 28 ERFDADS Radiation Monitor Units on Displays HED 1137 D 12 Main Generator MVAR Meter Scale HED 1138 B 56 SG Level Indicator and Control Switch Inconsistency l
HED 1139 C 20 Contain:nent Moisture Indicator HED 1140 C 11 Nulsance A14 ras on AFV Tu:r rischstge Pressure e
1 HED 1141 C 12 Inappropriate Pypass/Inop indication for Class 15 Battery Chargers HED 1142 C 63 Valve Position Light Arrangement for MSR Main Steam Purge Valves l
2 18 B.TXT -
09/30/88 h
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG gggggy ggyjgy
. . . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2 2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE NUMBER PACE Annunciator Horns S-510 6. 5 Rototellite Lights S 367, 484 A7 679, 723, 748 Legend Pushbutton S 703 B 20 Distinguishability from Legend Lights Knurled or J Handle S 711. 734, B 21 Switches 695, 705, 699, 459 Meter Zone Ms.rl.ings S 006, 268, B 24 67', 297 9 210, 764, 757, 480, r
366, 460..
F 912, 961, k 998 r
2 19 i
B.TXT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . _ . . . . POWER CO.
TABLE 2-2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE NUMBER PAGE Intermediate Graduation S 671, 743, B 25 Marks for Scales 650, 782, 360, 392 Parameters Not Inunediately S 716, 666, B-26 l Usable from Meters 739, 776, 470 Abbreviations on Meter Faces S 718, 668, B 27 741, 757, 778, 471, l 404, 406 l
' lumber of Graduations S-719, 670, B 28 Between Scale Markings 742, 649, 759, 781, 475, 359, 334, 329 l
1 1
2 20 B.TXT 09/30/88 -
HOU3 TON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
___ -.. POW E R C O.
TABLE 2 2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE N' UMBER PACE Distinguishability of S 720, 672, B 29 Intermediate and Minor 744, 651, Graduations on Scales 760, 783, 476, 361 Meter Pointers Black vs. Red S 724, 675, B 30 747, 655, 763, 786, 479, 408, 911, 960, 997 Inco=patible Scales for S 871, 885 B 31 Parameters '.'hich Must be Co= pared Inappropriate Ranges on 3 877, 880, B 32 Meters 882, 872, 873, 884, 800, 804, b t08 2 21 B.TXT 09/30/88
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
. . . , POWER CD.
TABLE 2 2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE NUMBER PAGE Scales Inconsistent with S 878, 879, B 33 Degree of Readability 881, 870, Required 874, 883, 799, 803, 807, 892 Lettering Size on Labels S-584, 216, B 38 692, 637, 615, 626, 449, 437, 345, 342 Stroke Width to Charactar S 591, 693, B 39 Height Rs.tio and Engraving 602, 639, Incons.istencies on 'abels 618, 620, 4'47, 440 343, 346 r I,
l l l
l 2 22 B.TXT 09/30/88
b HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
-.. POWER CO.
CATEGORY A HED DISPOSITIONS i
l I
I I
]
A1 u med N
c.TxT 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESICN REVIEW E
- . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Annunr4APnr HED CATEGORY A I
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1004 There is no direct feedback The high flow switch has been Pg 6.3.1.2 for component cooling water replaced with a high/ low flow P2 8.1 flow to the reactor coolant switch. The annunciator and pump thernal barriers. High computer provide the CCV low flow is determined by means flow alarms to the operator.
of a high flow switch.
Normal flow can only be Based on the above actions, determined indirectly by a this HED is considered resolved time consuming process of for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
checking status of numerous valves and operation of a CCV pu=p.
l 1
I I
REF:
E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A ,
l l
i 1
I l
Note: Reference P gis hTREG-0700 Section 5 number P2 is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT 09/30/88 A- 2
HOUSTON OONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . L.9 POWE R CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY ^
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1010 The "first out" windows are The coloring of the "first-out" P y -6.3.3.5 unreadable when lit because annunciator windows has been changed P2 8.6.11 the letters are white on a to white with black letters. (The red window and tend to wash red bordor around the "first out" out. group of windows was retained.)
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
J E
Note: Reference P is NUREC S700 Section 6 number P is SPT Ctiteria Report number C.TXT A.3 M/30/88
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW u N.) OWER CO.
HF AREA An " Ci8t Y HED CATEGORY ^
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1011 The annunciator "TEST" push A guard has been installed over each #
P g 6.3.4.2 pushbutton was inadvert- annunciator system "TEST" pushbutton P
2 8.4.3.D ently depressed several to differentiate it from the times while actually trying "SILENCE", "ACKNOWLEDGE", and "RESET" to "SILENCE" or "RESET" the pushbuttons and to prevent annunciator, inadvertent activation of the system test.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
E0P VALIDATION REIORT APPENDIX A i
I 1
i Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P2 is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT A4 09/30/88 j
I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESI N REVIEW
._.. tel POWE R CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 510 Original annunciator design To correct this discrepancy, six P
y G.3.2.1 provides for only one DC horns have been installed in the P
2 8.4.1 buzzer. control room.
I A human factors evaluation during December 1986 has determinated that the installation of audible devices meets the criteria.
l Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for 'Jnit 1 and )
Unit 2.
j REF:
s HED RESOLUTION REPORT PACE A 2
(
[
1 Note: Reference P 3is hTREC-0700 Section 6 number -
P in SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT 09/30/88 A- 5
HOUSTON CGNTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. J. POWER CC.
i 1 8 Plays ^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARt.G R APH HED 1009 The blue "Power Available" Power available should be determined Pg 6.5.3.2 lights on CP003 indicate by using the voltmeter between the P2 -App. H motor operated disconnect 13.8 kV/4160V transformer mimic and H.1 switch position and not the the 4160V supply breaker switch.
Engineered Safety Features The purpose of the lights has been (EST) 4160V bus voltage, clarified to indicate to the operator This gives false indication whether and which feed from the 13.8 that offsite power is kV buses is lined up. The indicating available and energizing the light color has been revised to red.
ESF buses. The light input has been revised to indicate that the supply breaker from that 13.8 kV bus is in the closed position. Since the supply breaker cannot be closed unless the corresponding disconnect switch is closed, this light indicato.4 that the supply breaker and disconnect switch from that 13.8 kV bus are both in the closed position.
I
- Information has bean issued to the f Operations and Training Departments identifying the above resciution; REF
- this information has been included E0P VA1.IDATION REPORT in the operator requalification l APPENDIX A program.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P2 is SPT Criteria Report number
/ C.TXT A- 6 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. ?.'Lf! OWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY ^
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR O!SPOSIT10t8 REFERENCE CRITERI A llTLE PARAGRAPH S 367 Rototellite green light This HED was reviewed by a task S 484 color is not distinguish- team and the following is noted:
S 679 able.
S-725 Where panel space limitation was not S 748 a factor, the rototellites were Pg 6.5.3.1 replaced with conventional P2 App. H indicating lights. This occurred H.1 on panels CP001, CP002, CP003, H.2.2 CP004, CP005, and CP006.
H.3.1 The rototellites were retained on panels CP007 and CP008 due to panel space limitations.
A space limitation problem was encountered on panel CP022 where rototellites are installed, but the rototellites were not considered to be a problem since these are posi-tioned on a vertical surface. _
The vendor advises thst these g rototellites are a standard design 5 used in numerous nuclest power plant control room applications. The STP circuit design is such that the bulbs l will operate at approximately 5 percent above the rated voltage, thereby increasing the intensity but p somewhat reducing the life L (Cont.) -
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number "
P3' is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT 09/30/88 A-7
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. .. EA POWE R CO.
HF ARE/, visual Displays HED CATEGORY A SHEET i
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lil0N REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITLE PARAGRAPH A human factors evaluation performed during December 1986 has determined that these lights meet the criteria; the visibility under actual operating conditions is acceptable.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 ar.d Unit 2.
j REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGES A 4. A 5 t
J !
I I !
I I
I Note: Reference P is h"JREG-0700 Section 6 number g
P2 is SPT Criteria Report number C.TxT 3,3 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. ._.. EN POWE R CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION 0 OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERis itTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1006 Labeling of the CCV and ECW The nameplates have been revised P .6.6.3.6 pump switches is too similar , to spell out the full names of 1
P 2
6.4.1.2 The CCW and ECW switches are the pumps. Additionally the CCW 6.4.5.E close to each other and and ECW systems have been 6.4.5.H some operators have used demarcated with different the wrong switch. shades of paint.
Based on the above actions, this HED
(
is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF: 1 E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A ,
[
[
[
[
[
Note: Refsrence P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Pf is SPT Criteria Report numbeir {
C.TXT g,, 9 09/30/88 L_
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . t,c1 POWE R CO.
A Labels and Location Aids A HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1007 Labels and mimic for the The labels and mimic have beer Pg 6.6.1.? component cooling water revised to improve descriptions, 6.6.3.2 (CCW) system are eliminate possible confusion, better 6.6.6.4 inadequate, reflect system arrangement, and P2 6 413 Provide differentiation between 6.4.5 trains.
App. N N.1.2 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
t REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT nPPENDIX A r
[
[
Note: Reference P is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
[ P2 is SPT Criteria Report number 7 c.TXT 09/30/88 3 10
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll0HTlNG DESIGN REVIEW
_ _ E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA bels and beation Aids HED CATEGORY ^
NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1008 The load center switches on The handles of those particular Pg 6.6.1.1 CP010 that must be actuated switches have been color coded to 6.6.6.] to de energize the control provide a contrast to other P2 -App. S r d drive motor generator switches.
S.4.E (MG) sets after an "Anticipa.
ted Transient k'ithout Scram" Based on the above actions, this HED (AT'.'S) are not easily is considered resolved for Unit 1 and identifiable. Unit 2.
REF:
(Refer also to HED 1079) 20P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
l li I
i i
l I
No'4: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number PfisSPTCriteriaReportnumber C.TXT 09/30/88
- g. 3 3
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW f5t.c. POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids A NU BER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1045 Existing demarcation on Demarcation lines have been added P
1 6.6.6.2 CP006 does not prevene to separate the SG groups.
P -6.8.1.3 association of SG 1B level 2
6.5.1.3 meters with SC 1A PORV Based on the above actions, this HED App. N control and SG 1D level is considered resolved for Unit 1 N.1.1 meters with SC 1C PORV and Unit 2.
control.
REF:
RANDCM SAMPLE REVIEV 0F DEMARCATION PAINTING (EXECUTIVE SUMVARY ADDENDA, SECTION 3.0, ITEM 8) l l
l l
l
~
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number n P 2 is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT A.12 09/30/88
I l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM L1GHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. . POWER CD.
HF AREA . HED CATEGORY
~
NUMBER 08 SERVAT 10N OR DISP 0$lil0N REFERENCE CRIT 2RI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1095 Operator action points shovr For the discussion of QDPS revisions, Pg 6.7.2.7 on QDPS and ERFDADS displays see Disposition Note CPT 1.
P2 11.1.1 are n t e nsistent with the E0Ps in all cases. The ERFDADS displays have been l modified to reflect the current EOP setpoints.
RSF:
ENCINEFRIN'] 03SERVATIO11 AND SPDS MAN IN THE !DOP VALIDATION l
1 l l i
l I
i J
Notet Reference P is hTREC-0700 Section 6 number '
P2 is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT 09/30/88 A.g3
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIDN REVIEW
. . . E.(1 POW E R C O.
Computers HED CATEGORY ^
HF AREA -
3 HEE NUggE OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1108 n e SPDS does not accurately The SPDS software has been revised to Py 6.7.2.7 monitor Critical Safety incorporate adverse containment P2 11.1.1 Function (CSF) status under setpoints so that the algorithm 11.1.4 adverse containment condi- automatically changes to the correct App. Q tions. This can result in setpoints. Thus the CSF status
- Q.7 a less conservative CSF box colors are determined using indication for core cooling correct setpoints for the conditions and heat sink. existing in the containment.
In addition, SPDS displays have been revised to show "ADVERSE CNTMT" in ,
reverse video in the vicinity of pararneters whose setpoints are affected during adverse containment condir. ions, i.e., RCS subcooling and core exit temperatures on the CSF core cooling display, and in the vicinity of the staam generator levels on the CSF heat sink display.
These display changes are essential for the monitoring of C3F part. meters and status during adverso contmirment conditions.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1.
These same changes are being I implemented on Unit 2.
REF:
SPDS MAN TN THE LOOP L'A1.I DAT 10N
~
Note: Reference P isg N1"AEG-0700 Section 6 number n F 2
is SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT A. p, 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIDN REVIEW
. . . t. POWER CO.
Puters ^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER 055ER ^ '
OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1134 The QDPS and ERFDADS 1he ERFDADS display has been revised Pg 6.7.2.6 "SI TERM /REINIT" displays to show the correct values for SI P2* APP- Q Provide infor=ation on the termination /reinitiation, based on Q.6 parameters, requirements, the E0Ps, and to identify adverse and current status of containment conditions, values for terminating or reinitiating Safety Inject- For the discussion of the QDPS ion (SI). However,the revisions. .ee Disposition Nnte values provided for "REQ'D CPT 1.
STATUS" are incorrect in some cases as compared with the E0Ps, and in some cases the displays are incomplete. Additionally, adverse containment condit.
ions also affect certain vagues, but this is not Ldentified on the displays.
)iscrepancies of displays
-aroviding incorrect set-aoints and not identifying i
letpoints affected by
.idverse containment condit-
'ons are considered HED Category A.
' Cont'd)
Note: Reference "
is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P fr., SPT Criteria Report number C.TXT 09/30/88 A- D m
( M
- a L l ) .) O
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .O POWER CO.
Computers ^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSill0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH Discrepancies of displays providing incomplete setpoint data are considered HED Category C.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION l
l I
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is SPT Criteria Report nu=ber C.TXT A-16 09/30/88
HOUSTON CGNTRCL RO3M LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Panel layout HED CATEGORY A
" OBSERVATION NUMBER OR Ol8P081Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH dED 1005 The Safety Injection System Mimics have been revised to clearly P
g 6.8.1.3 layout is confusing. 'Ihe differentiate between the SIS trains P
2 6.5.1.3 three trains and various and subsystans.
subsystems are not clearly differentiated. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT )
APPD? DIX A J
s Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number PfisSPTCriteriaReportnumber C.TXT 09/30/88 A-17
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g gggg y gg ypy y
. . . . . . POWER CO.
I l
i CATEGORY B HED DISPOSITIONS i
I l ;
[
I F
L F j S
B1 a.txt 09/30/8d i t
c' i L, ,
P-0-
B l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. .. . ECT POWER CO.
Space HF AREA HED CATEGORY
' OBSERVATION NU SER OlSPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1030 Glare exists from meters on Lighting modifications have been S 0177 panels CF001 through CP010. performed in the control room to l P-y address lighting concerns.
6.1.5.3.f Another evaluation is being P App. D perf rmed t establish proper 2
D.1.2.C lighting levels (see HED 1061) and then identify any remaining glare concerns. Should glare problems be found, corrective actions vill be determined and implemented.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS I
I I
I I
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Pk is STP Criteria Report number B-2 09/30/88 A.TXT
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGH11No DESIGN REVIEW 7 '.' t. 0WER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1061 With control room lighting Additional light fixtures have S 0170 at maximum setting, criteria been added near panels CP004 P-g levels not satisfied are: and CP005. The light survey is 6.1.5.3.a being repeated to establish a P2 App. D o Maximum of 50 footcandles control band for light dimmers D.1.2 on CP001, CP002, PP007, and to confirm that the design CPOOS, CP009 change resulted in illumination o Minimum of 20 focteandles levels meeting the criteria.
on CP004, CP005 Lighting levels will be maintained in the control band throu6h With lighting at reduced administrative controls.
level (rheostats at 8 o' clock), levels not satisfied are:
o Minimum of 20 footcandles on CP004, CP003 REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS I
~
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section ~ number ~
Pf is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT 3-3 09/30/88 m
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._..t.. POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY _
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1062 The emergency lighting Additional lighting has been S 0182 illumination levels on provided for the main control P-y panels CP001, CP004, panel horseshoe area. Lights 6.1.5.4.c CP006, and CP010 do not have been balanced between the P2 APP. D meet the 10 footeandle two banks of lighting. Another D.1.3.B requirement. lighting evaluation is being perforced to confirm that the design change resulted in illumination levels meeting the criteria. The study will include panels CP001 through CP010 and panels CP018 and CP022 as well.
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIO"5 l l 1
" Note: Reference P isg N1*kEC-0700 Section 6 nu=ber P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.T.\T B-4 09/30/88
l HOUSTON UGHTING CONTROL ROOM h, &
DESIGN REVIEW M t.G. POWER CO.
r Pace HF AREA HED CATEGORY I
NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITI.E PARAGRAPH HED 1063 Noise levels in the control The control room HVAC system has been S.0184 room with two and three revised and balanced to reduce noise P-g trains of HVAC operating levels per the design criteria. A 6.1.5.5.a exceed the 65 dB(A) follow up survey was performed in P2 Ap. D limit, resultin8 in Unit 1, which showed that noise D.1.4.B cecuunication difficulty. levels are within the criteria except for one operating configuration at 5 0185 one representative location. This P-g exception has been documented as 6.1.5.5.a HED 1088 (Category D).
P2 app. D D.l.4.C Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1.
l S 0186 These same changes are being l
.Ty - implemented for Unit 2.
j u 6.1.5.5.b P2 App. D D.1.4.D S 0187
'1' 6.1.5.5.c P2 App. D D.1.4 E REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS
~
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 52ction 6 number "
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B 09/30/88
HOUST0n OONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESICN REVIEW
- s. &
._.19 POWE R CO.
^" "
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSIT!0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE P AR AG'A AP H HED 1051 The Containment Isolation The ESP Status Monitoring System has Py 6.3.1.2 Phase A signal to several been revised to provide Bypass /Inop P
2 10.2.B valves is defeated by moving windows for these valves on the the transfer switch away Containment Isolation Phase A from the "Control Room" lampbox and delete the vindows on the po s i tie r. . However, Bypass / incorrect lampbox.
Inop indication for these valves is not shown on the Based on the above actions, this HED Containment Isola-ion Phase is considered resolved for Unit 1 A lacpbox, and Unit 2.
Valves in question are:
Train A: W 2454 Train B: W 2455, W 4823 Train C: W 4454, W 4455,
$ W 2458 REP:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
I
, Note: Reference P gis NUREG-0700 Section 6 nu=ber P is STP Criteria Report number 2
~
A.TXT B- 6 09/30/88
HOUSTON C@NTROL ROOM Ll0HTlNG DESIGN REVIEW
. E. . POWER CO.
^
- 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1052 The Main Steam Isolation The ESF Status Monitoring System has Pg 6.3.1.2 signal for the drain valves been revised to provide Bypass /Inop P2 10.2.8 is defeated by moving the windows for the main stea, drain transfer switch away from valves on the Steam Line Isolation the "Control Room" position. lampbox and delete the vindows on the However, Bypass /Inop in. incorrect lampbox.
dication for these valves is not shown on the Steam Based on the above actions, this HED Line Isolation lampbox, is considered resolved for Unit 1 Valves are W-7900A, and Unit 2.
W 7901A, W 7902A, and W 7903A.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
?
7 U
Y
~
Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 number Pf is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-7 09/30/88
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM L1GHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- CFt9 POWE R CO.
^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1053 The Safety Injection signal The ESF Status Monitoring System has Pg 6.3.1.2 is defeated for the been revised to provide P
2 10.2.B Radiation Monitoring and Bypass /Inop windows for these 10.2.C Hydrogen Analyzer room fans components on the Control Room and by moving the transfer Combustible Cas Control laupboxes l switch away from the (2M60, 2M61, 22M10, 22M04 and 22M06).
"Control Room" position. The vindows have been deleted on the However, Bypass /Inop in- incorrect lampbox.
dication for these fans is not shown on the Control Based on the above actions, this HED Room or Combustible Gas is considered resolved for Unit 1 Control lampboxes, and Unit 2.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
I Note: Reference P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number Pf is STP Criteria Report number B-8 09/30/88 A.TXT
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll0HTING DESIGN REVIEW 7).I. 0WER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1054 RHR heat exchanger bypass The ESF Status Monitoring System has P.
g and flow control valves are beon revised by noving the windows 6.3.3.3.b shown for Bypass /Inop status from the RRR system block to the IRSI Pp10.2.C in the PER section of the system block in the SI lanpboxes Safety Injection lampboxes. (typical all three trains).
However, the Bypass /Inop status is applicable to the Based on the above actions, this HED 125I portion instead, based is considered resolved for Unit 1 l upon the alarm condition. and Unit 2.
During full power operation, the operator would believe the PER system to be inop-l erable rather than the SI system. During RHR condi-tions, when flow is being throttled and the heat exchanger bypassed, the windows would always be lit.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
M Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B.9 09/30/88
HOUSTON C@NTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a &
. . . . tcl POWER CO.
1 Annunciator B HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH BED 1066 During a loss of offsite The input to the ESF Status P
t 6.3.1.2 power (LOOP), the E:;F Monitoring System fail to actuate P2 10.2.D Status Monitoring System subsystem has been revised, using the does not provide indication ESF load sequencer output indicating of components that failed a 140P ccndition. Thus, after a LOOP, to actuate properly in components failing to operate pro-response to the th0P. The perly are alarmed through the fail-input provided is inappro- to actuate subsystem of ESF Status priate, shosing only bus Monitoring.
undervoltage condition, which is removed when the Based on the above actions, this HED standly diesel generator is considered resolved for Unit 1 provides power to the bus, and Unit 2.
Thus operators do not re-ceive indication of which components failed to act-unte, which is the function of the fail to actuate subsystem.
REF:
STARTUP OBSERVATION t
[
[
B e
Sote: Reference P isI hTREC-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number
~ 2
[ g,5pg ________ ___
g.30 09/30/88
HOUSTON CSNTCCL RSSM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIUW
._. POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMSER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1067 The ESF Status Monitoring ERFDADS provides equipment status Pg .6.3.1.2 System logic provides information for use in the ESF Status P2 .10.2.D fail to actuate alarms Monitoring System logic. The ERFDADS during a loss of offsite software has been modified such that power (140P) to HVAC information provided to ESF Status components. However, these Monitoring, when acted upon by that components are not actuated logic, results in alarms for on LOOP. components only when the component should have operated and did not operate properly following a LOOP.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
STARTVP OBSERVATION
)
1 J
n e
w
~
Note: Referene. P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber A.TXT B- 11 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN KEVIEW o ,. . &
- 9E9 POWE R CO.
^ "' ' 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
- iED 1081 Annunciator and ESF Status Temporary labels for the annunciator P
y 6.3.3.1 Monitoring lampboxes do not and ESF Status Monitoring lanpboxes 6.6.5.1 have labels corresponding to have been replaced with permanent 1
P 2
6.4.1.2 annunciator response pro- labels conforming to the CRDR l cedures. Temporary labels criteria.
are currently in use.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
OPEPATOR OBSERVATION I
I d
Note: Reference P is STREG-0700 Section 6 nusber P is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT b-12 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . t. . POWER CO.
^ " "
- 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBEp OBSERVATION OR OISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
] HED 1096 Curre,tly, Containment Phase A windowbox has been Pg 6.3.3.1 Isolat.an Phase B bypass / revised as follows:
6.3.3.3 inoperable and fail to.
P 2
8.5.1.2 actuate indications are shown using the Containment A) Relabeled as Phase A/ Phase B.
Isolation Phase A ESF Status B) Differentiation between and Monitoring vindoubox. The labeling of Phase A and Phase B bypass / inoperable windows fail to actuate system indications for Phase B are not component vindows.
dif ferentiated froin the Phase A windows; the Phase B C) Phase B signal presence vindov l fail to actuate vindows are provided in manner consistent with not clearly differentiated other ESFAS signals.
from the Phase A component vindows. (Use of the Phase Based on the above actions, this HED A vindowbox for Phase B is considered resolved for Unit 1 and indications was implemented Unit 2.
as an interim fix until a long tern design could be be implemented.)
This situation leads to operator confusion as to where the Phase B isolation ESF Status Monitoring is displayed in the control (Cont.)
~
Note: Re.erence P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number Pf is STP Criteria Report number .
A.TXT _ _ _ _ _
B- 13 09/30/88
.40usTON CCNTREL RSSM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. . . . POWE R C O.
^ "
HF AREA HED C ATEGORY NUMBER 0BSERVAll0N OR DISP 081Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH _
room. Also, the light location used to indicate Phase B actuation is a fail to actuate window, and thus tends to indicate an abnormal coidition i when one does not in fact exist, EEF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
(
[
Note: Reference P is NVREG-0700 Section 6 number Pf is STP Criteria Report number A,7n 3. g 09/30/88 F-.
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING CESIGN REVIEW
. . . E. POWER CO.
^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER O BSE R'/ATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HEO 1099 Annunciator windows for Annunciator vindows for critical P. g shared systems and equipment shared systems and equipment (e.g.,
i G.3.1.2.d are provided in the Unit 1 circulating water system) are being P2 8.3 E control room, but are provided in the Unit 2 control room.
l 6.1.2 not provided in Unit 2.
l REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
I L.
Not : Reference P gis bTREG-0700 Section 6 nu=ber -
Py is STP Criteria Report nu:ber A.?XT B-15 09/30/88
I HOUSTON C2NTC3lM33M LIGH1lNG DESIGN MEVIEW
. .. -. POWE R CO.
^
MF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMSER OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lil0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
I HED 1135 QDPS alarm vindows are The QDPS alarn vindows have been
'P y 6.3.1.4 identified as Priority 3 changed to Priority 2 (yellow) l P
2 8.4.4 white) windows. However, lenses.
QDPS alarms identify Tech l
Spec limiting conditions Based on the above actions, this HED l
for operation (LCO) is considered resolved for Unit 1 and violations, and therefore Unit 2.
should be Priority 2 l (yellow) windows, i
REF:
[
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
L r l L
l
[
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number B- 16 09/30/88 I A.TXT
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . L. . POWER CO HF AREA HED C ATEGORY-NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1002 Control switches installed The control switches on Transfer P-g on Transfer Switch Panel Panel ZLP 701 have been changed so 6.4.1.1.c ZLP 701 for control of the that their action is identical to P
2 4.3.1 RHR system sample select those on Main Control Panel CP002 and 5.4 valves do not have the same meet the CRDR criteria, action as the switches located on Main Control Based on the above actions, this HED Panel CP002 which control is considered resolved for Unit 1 and the same valves. Unit 2.
Both Main Control Panel and Transfer Switch Panel Control Switches are re-quired to meet the same criteria established in the Control Room Design Review Criteria Report.
i REF:
ENGINEERING 0*SERVATION T
L Note: Reference P is STREG-0700 Section 6 nu=ber -
P is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-17 OW30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._. . (. POW E R C O.
HF AREA - HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1003 Emergency stop capability An "Emergency Stop" switch in the Pg 6.4.1.1 for shutting down the control room has been provided 6.1.1.1 Standby Diesel Generators for each Standby Diesel Generator P
2 6.2.1 from the control rvom is to override the start signal and 6.1.1.1 not provided. Thus, if stop the diesel, the diesel generator's cooling water fails, the Lased on the above actions, this HED generator might overheat is considered resolved for Unit 1 and before it can be stopped Unit 2.
locally.
REF:
EOP VA1.IDATION REPORT APPENDIX A I
l Note: Reference P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number l Pk is STP Criteria Report number f A.TXT ____ _ ___ __ _ _ _ B - 1 8 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.s. &
. L.4 POWE R CO.
- 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATl10 N OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1079 Trip / actuate and reset The trip / actuate switches have Pg 6.4.1.2 pushbuttons are inconsist. been color coded red; additionally, 6.4.2.2 ent in color coding (red vs. pushbuttons have been provided with P-2 white) and use of guards, guards.
6.2.1.10 There is also no color coding of the Electro- Reset switches are color coded switches used for ESPAS vhite; guards are not provided for actuation. reset pushbuttons since no signifi-cant adverse effects will result from reset.
Based on the above action, thic HED is censidered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
I REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION u Sote: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number 2 -
A.TXT B -19 09/30/88
HOUSTON CG'NTRSL REGM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. . POWER CD.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SH T NWSER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH S 703 Le'gend pushbuttons on the A special study recommended the P
g 6.4.3.3 main turbine insert panels "Closed Corner Octagon" marking for P2 app. E are not readily distinguish- the controls. Refer to the CRDA E.1.5.1 able from legend lights. special Studies Report, "Dir.tinguishing Legend Pushbutton from Legend Lights."
The study recommendation has been implemented. A human factors evaluation has been performed during December 1986 and the implementation has been found satisfactory.
REF: Based on the above actions, this HED HED RESOLUTION REPORT is considered resolved for Unit 1 and PACE B S Unit 2.
Note: Reference P is NVREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-20 09/30/88
[
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
- LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW htf! POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
- S 711 "Select" function switches These switches were initially changed S 734 and pu=p or fan control to knurled handles for "select" S 695 switches are not provided functions and J handles for pump or S 705 with knurled or J handles fan control.
S 699 respectively on panels S 459 CP001, CP003, CP004, A special study recommended lever Pg 6.4.1.1 CP005, CP006, and CP007. handles for "select" functions. Refer P
2 6.2.1 t the CRDR Special Studies Report, "Knurled Knob Position Indicator."
The study reco==endation has been icplemented. A human factors evaluation has been perforced during December 1986 and the implementation has been found satisfactory.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT Based on the above actions, this HED PACE B 9 is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
I
~
I Note: Reference P is STRIC-0700 Section 6 number 3
P; is STP Criteria Report nu=ber A TXT B-21 09/30/88
HOUSTON CCNTCCL RCOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
& 1
... .Cl FCWE R CO. l 8 8 8 plays 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1013 The scales on the reactor The signal conditioning for the Py 6.5.1.5 coolant pump seal flow logaritbaic flows has been revised l P App. F recorders are a mixture of so that all three inputs are 2
F.5 linear and logarithmic linear.
(square root) scales.
Based on the above actions, this PED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
EOP val.IDATION REPORT APPD; DIX A r
I I
I I
Note: Reference P isI STitEC-0700 Section 6 nunber P is STP Criteria Report nunber
, 2 09/30/68 A.TXT B- 22
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHYING DESIGN REVIEW
. . t' . OWE R C0.
HF AR3 HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1128 The steam dump valve The position indicating lights Pg 6.5.1.1 position indicating lights for the steam dump valves are being 6.5.3.3 are not provided with any provided with labeling indicating 6.6.3.1 labeling indicating which condenser and stie, e.g.:
P 2
6.3.1.2 side of which condenser the CNDSR 11 VEST App. H valves are cennected to.
H.3 Should one valve leak, the 6.4.5 operator is thus unable to quickly direct auxiliary operators to the proper valve location.
REF:
OPERAlva CSSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN ?HE LOOP VALIDATION I
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Sectien 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B- 23 09/30/88
HOUSTON CCNTRCL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .19 POWER CO.
- 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY -
SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER D!WSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 006 Meter zone markings are not A tone coding rehene has been S 288 used to denote operational developed, 5 676 implications, ,
S 299 A husan factors evaluation l S 310 of the materials and nethods to be.
S 764 used'nas been parforced during S 767 December 1986. The zone coding s 480 implementation eethod has been S 364 determined to ceet the criteria S 060 via actual demonstration, s o'2
,, 161 Icplementation of the eeter zone S-998 coding throughet*. the control room P
g 6.5.2.3 has been coepleted. The :ene coding P App. T 2
has been reviewed: the review has F.6 determined that the installed coding meets the criteria, Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1.
REF: nese same changes are being HED RESCLUTION REPORT imple ented for Unit 2.
I PACE B 13 I
I I
I 9 Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 9 PfisSTPCriteriaReportnuber u Je O'/30/88 B - R_-- ___ _ _- -_
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESICN REVIEW
.1 POWER CO.
8 8 8 Plays I HF AREA HED CATEGORY 8
NU RER OBSERVATION OR 015P051Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 671 Intercediate graduation Engineering documents such as the S 743 marks nre not used on meter scale drawings have been S 650 scales with five or more corrected.
S 782 graduations between S 360 numerals. New noter scales have been installed.
S 392 A human fa-tors evaluation perforned P
y 6.5.1.5 during December 1986 has determined P2 App. F that the installed scales neet the F.4.C criteria.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for L' nit I and unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 17 l
l 5:
1, Note: Reference P g is N1' REG-0700 Sectien 6 number -
P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-25 09/30/89
HOUSTON CONTROL t.')OM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. ' . t, ' . . OWER CO.
"'suti
. Displays B HF AREA . HED CATEGORY NU bel OB$ERVATION OR OISPOSITION REFEREP t i CRIT ERI A TITLE PARAGR, '<
S-716 rs contain parameters Engineering documents such as the S-666 which are in a form that is meter scale drawings have been S-739 not immediately usable by corrected.
S-776 the operator.
S 470 New meter scales have been in-P y -6.5.1.2 stalled. A human factors evalu-i P2 -APP F ation performed during December 1986 F.1 has determined that the installed scales meet the criteria.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 15 L
c 1
J Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
09/30/88
(_ QoVXT B-26
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\ LIG.HTIN G DESIGN REVIEW NC! POWER CO.
B HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 718 Standard abbreviations are Engineering documents such as the S-668 not used on meter faces. meter scale drawings have been S-741 corrected.
S-757 S-778 New meter scales have been installed.
S 471 A human factors evaluation performed S-404 during December 1986 has determined S.406 that the installed scales meet the P
y 6.5.1.4 criteria.
P -app. F 2
! F.3 Based on the above actions, this HED 1
is considered resolved for Unit 1 atid Unit 2. 1 REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 16 I
I Note: Refcrence P is g NUREC-0700 Section 6 nuber i P
2 is STP Criteria Report numb ~.e _
A.TXT B- 27 09/30/88
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW ht3 OWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Di8P lays HED CATEGORY B l
I SHEET NUM!!ER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 719 There are more than nine Engineering documents such as the S-670 graduations between scale meter scale drawings have been S-742 numerals. corrected.
S 649 S-759 New meter scales have been installed.
S-781 A human factors evaluation performed S 475 during December 1986 has determined S 359 that the installed scales meet the S 334 criteria.
S 329 P
y 5.5.1.5 Based on the above actions, this HED P2 App. F is considered resolved for Unit 1 and F.4.A Unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 17 l
s Note: Reference P is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
^' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .J3 POWER CO.
sua sP l ays 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-720 It is difficult to distin- The meter task team has applied the S-672 guish between intermediate follow & g criteria to the meter scale S-744 and minor graduation marks redesign effort (graduation mark S 651 on meter scales. thickness): Major graduations S-760 3-point or 3/64-inch; Intermediate S 783 graduations 2-point or 1/32-inch; S 476 Minor graduations 1 point or 1/64-inch S-361 Engineering documents such a- the l Py -6.5.1.5 meter scale drawings have been P2 App. F corrected.
F.4 New meter scales have been installed.
A human factors evaluation performed during December 1986 has determined that the installed scales meet the criteria.
Based on the above actions, this HED REF: is considered resolved for Unit 1 and HED RESOLUTION Rl E T Unit 2.
PAGE B-18 1
[
c w
Note: Reference P itg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number
[
L_
2 ATH 9- 2 9 __ ____ _ 09/30/88
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIG H1'IN G DESIGN REVIEW
_. 9 POWER CO. l HF ARE A HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-724 Meter pointers are black The possibility of painting the black S-675 instead of red. pointers red was investigated but S-747 deemed not feasible. Painting S-655 pointers leads to instrument S-763 inaccuracies. Meters with black S-786 pointers are being replaced with ones S 479 with red pointers.
S-408 S 911 S 960 S-997 P
y 6.5.2.2 P2 -APP G G.2.3 REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-19
?
L r
I 5 Note: Reference P is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B-30 09/30/88 e _-
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW b5 OWER CO.
u sP l ays B HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 871 Parameters which must be New meter scales have been installed S 885 compared have meter scales and a human factors evaluation F
1 6.5.1.5 with incompatible numerical performed during December 1986 P2 APP. F progression and scale determined that the installed scales F.5 organization, meet the criteria.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 19 l
l l
[
h Nc-t e : Reference P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number r A.TXT P
2 is STP Criteria Report number B- 31 ')9/30/88
[
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
, . , a
..)t.C1 POWE R CO.
' 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-877 Meters have inappropriate Engineering documents such as the S-880 ranges, meter scale drawings have been S 882 corrected to reflect the correct S 872 ranges.
S 873 S 884 New metet scales have been installed.
S-800 A human factors evaluation perforned S 804 during December 1986 has determined S 808 that the installed scales meet the P y -6.5.1.2 criteria.
P -App. F 2
F.1.3 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B 16 l
l j
t
[ Sote: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number g
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
I A.TXT B- 32 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTIhG DESIGN REVIEW 7'..M OWE R CO.
8u 18Pl ays HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH S 878 Scales are not consistent The meter task team has matched the S 879 with the degree oC ,.ecision meter scales to the operating S 881 and accuracy required, procedures requirements. Engineering S 870 documents such as the meter scale S 874 drawings have been corrected.
S 883 S 799 New meter scales have been installed.
S 803 A human factors evaluation performed S 807 during December 1986 has determined i S 892 l that the installed scales meet the Py 6.5.1.2 criteria.
l P2 -A?P. F F.1.1 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and j Unit 2.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-15 l
l
[
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number F A.TXT P
2 is STP Criteria Report number B-33 09/30/88
[
HOUSTON OONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW v &
. ._. L.9 POWE R CO.
E HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1098 Condenser vacuum The indicator scales have been P 6.5.1.1 indicators in the control replaced to read in inches of mercury 1
6.5.1.2 room read in absolute vccuum rather than absolute pressure, 6.5.1.4 pressure; procedures and reading "30" at the bottom of the P -6.3.1.2 trip setpoints are expressed 2
scale and "0" at the top.
App. F in inches of mercury vacuum.
F.1 Mental calculations are To resolve the resulting discrepancy F.3.4 required to determine system of having an upside down scale status, and the failed indicator reading 30 inches of mercury vacuum (considered to be a Category D HED),
the instrument loop will be revised to reverse the transmitter output, and change the scale to read "0" at the bo'. tom and "30" at the top.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
l l
l a
, Note:
Reference P)P is is h*UREG-0700 Section STP Criteria 6 number Report number 2
~
A.TXT B- 34 09/30/88
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.._. E.C1 POWE R CO.
I Visual Displays B HF AREA HED CATEGORY _.__
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1132 Delta I on each of four The four Delta I inputs are being P1 -6.5.1.1 nuclear instrumentation removed from NR-0045 and moved to 6.5.1.2 (NI) channels is available individual recorders NR 0041 through P2 -6.3.1.2 for recording only on NR 0044 for continuous recording, by App. F NR 0045, a 2 pen strip combining Delta I, upper flux, and F.1 chart recorder. NI lower flux for each of the power range channels of source range channels on a 3 pen recorder.
(SR), intermediate range (IR), power range (PR), or Delta-I may be recorded by each pen via selector switches. Scales are provided on the recorder for SR, IR, and PR inputs, but are not provided for Delta I inputs. Operator needs for trending Delta I and for trending SR, IR, and PR flux cannot be met by the existing 2 pen recorder.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION Note: Reference P isg NUREC-0700 Section 6 number ~
P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-35 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIDN REVIEW
. .ECI POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1016 The mimic for the 13.8 kV The parallel orange mimic lines Pg 6.6.6.4 bus on panel CP010 is that represent the 13.8 kV buses P2 -APP. N confusing because of have been differentiated amongst N.1.2 the number of the parallel themselves by adding black dashes herizontal paths shown and boxes onto the existing mimic lines. Mimic lines without added marking, with dashes added, and with boxes added are easily distinguishable from each other.
These subject mimic lines have been reviewed; this review has determined that the installed markings are effective in lifferentiating the mimic lines, l
Based on the above actions. this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
(
I h
Note: Reference P isI NUREC-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B-3 6 09/30/88
{
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING
, . . & DESIGN REVIEW
. . 9 POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION I
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1046 Labels "SG W INLET" and The latels have been reversed, so F1 -G.6.3.1 "SGFP SUCT HDR" do not that the label is provided for P 6.4.5.I correspond to the meters 2 the appropriate meter, they identify.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
b Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 num er ~
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B-37 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. . E9 POWER CD.
Labels and Location Aids B 8"
MUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 584 Ore hundred and seventy An extensive study corrected this S 216 three labels on CP003 HED. The study is described in S 692 use 0.125-inch letters Note L 1 of the HED Resolution S 637 which allows a viewing Report and included reviews of S 615 distance of only 21 inches. subtended visual angles, reviews S 626 by plant operations personnel, and S 449 other tasks.
S-437 S-345 A human factors evaluation performed S-342 during December 1986 has determined P
y 6.6.4.1 that component labels are now P2 App. M suitable for a viewing distance of 42 M.I.A inches as identified in Criteria Report, Appendix V, Table 4 1.
REF: Based on the above actions, this HED HED RESOLUTION REPORT is considered resolved for Unit 1 and PAGE B 25 Unit 2.
i
[
[ ,
J Note' Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 3
P 7
is STP Criteria Report number
~
A.TXT B-38 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
((.'E3 POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 591 Stroke width to-character An extensive study corrected this S 693 height ratio is not be-HED. The study is described in S-602 tween 1:6 and 1:8 on the Note L 1 of the HED Resolution S-639 service engravings and Report and included reviews of S 618 engraving is inconsistent.
stroke width to-character height S 630 ratios, reviews by plant operations S-447 personnel, and other tasks.
S-440 S-343 A human factors evaluation performed S 346 during December 1986 has determined Py -6.6.4.1 that stroke width-to character P2 -APP. M height ratio was between 1:6 and 1:8 M.1.G as identified in Criteria Report, Appendix V, Section 4.3.
l REF:
Based on the above actions, this HED HED RESOLUTION REPORT is considered resolved for Unit 1 and PAGE B 25 Unit 2.
l
)
1 Note: Reference P is3 NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.Tn B- 39 09/30/88
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM IGHTING DESIGN REVIEW M9E9 POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B l
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1101 The labels for the manual The labels have been revised P
1 6.6.3.2 actuation switches for on both panels CP001 and CP005 '
P 2
6.4.5.A Safety Injection (SI) to read "SI ACT".
currently say "ESF ACT".
The label "SI" is quite Based on the above actions, this HED small and mounted on the is considered resolved for Unit 2.
switch plate. Confusion These same changes are being results as to which switch implemented for Unit 1.
is to be used for manual SI actuation.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE-LOOP VALIDATION l
l
{
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number l P 2
is STP Criteria Report nut:ber l A.TXT B- 40 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . [.M POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH M02 "AW ACTUATE" is used on All usages ot "AW ACTUATE" are Pg -6.6.3.2 various labels to indicate being revised to indicate P
2 6.4.5.F AW actuation as a result "SG LO-14 LVL" to designate that of steam generator (SG) AW actuation in response to SG low low water level. low low level has occurred.
However, the operators have misinterpreted the label as meaning AW auto a tuation from any signal, and have attempted to reset the signal even though SG low low level was not reached.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION Note: Reference P gis NU.EG-0700 iection 6 number -
P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-41 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . ).E OWE R CO.
Labels and Location Aids B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1131 Turbine bearing water spray The label for each valve pushbutton P y -6.6.3.2 valve pushbutton labels is being replaced with n label P -6.4.5 2
identify the valve number, indicating both the valve number but do not indicate which and the bearing being sprayed.
bearings are being sprayed The hierarchical label will identify by that valve. In case of these pushbuttons as turbine bearing a need to spray a particular water spray valves, bearing, identified to the operator by location, the operator would be unable to quickly identify which pushbutton to actuate.
REF:
I OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAS IN THE-LOOP LLIDATION F
L L
Note: Reference P is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
^" ""2 "**
f - - - - - - --
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DGSIGN REVIEW
. . . K! POW E R C O.
HF AREA -
HED CATEGORY =
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION 0R 01 tPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARt.G R APH HED-1026 NIS displays on QDPS and For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P g 6.7.2.4 ERFDADS identify readings see Disposition Note CPT-1.
P2 APP. Q for power range neutron Q.4.A flux by letters A, B, C, The displays on ERFDADS and D. It is not clear have been revised to clearly l vhether RCS loops or channel indicate which channel (I, II, separacion groups are being III, IV) is being shown.
identified. Additionally, the bar graph display of power range neutron flux has been l revised to show the corresponding RCS loop.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION bem
~
Note: Reference P is NUREt-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B- 43 09/30/88 mm
HOUSTON CENTROL R SOM LIGHTING DESICN REVIEW
.. . . POWE R CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY I
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1033 The Proteus computer use The color convention problems S 0812 of color deviates from identified were corrected during P
1 6.7.2.7 Appendix S of the Criteria the plant startup phase. Use of P2 App. S Report. The most signi. color is being addressed during a S.3 ficant problem is the use of human factors review of all Proteus magente for parameter bars and ERFDADS displays. Any additional and text. Magenta is the discrepancies will be documented color designated for separately and corrected following Priority 1 Alarm Messages. that review. Color usage criteria for computer displays will also be updated in conjunction with that Both the Proteus and review. The use of magenta for ERFDADS computers use text, other than alarm messages, colors in a manner which has been eliminated.
deviates from the criteria.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1.
These same changes are being implemented for Unit 2.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Pf is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B-44 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG
, . , & DESIGN REVIEW
. . E. . POWER CO.
"
- B HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1037 1. The CRTs on the consoles CRTs have been provided with a non-Py 6.7.2.1 have a glare problem due reflective covering. Subsequently, P2 App. Q to the direct streaming the CRTs have been reviewed; this Q.1.B of light from the over-review has determined that the in-head light fixtures, stalled non reflective coverings correct the glare and reflectance problems.
- 2. The ERFDADS panel mounted CRTs have a reflectance Based on the above actions, this HED problem. They act as a is considered resolved for Unit 1.
mirror, displaying the These same changes are being control room prominently, implemented for Unit 2.
and present a distraction to the operator.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS 1
I I
Notes Reference P in NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number A. TAT B- 45 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
( POWER CO.
. . C1 Puters 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1041 There is inconsistency in A study has been performed to identify l
S-0812 information presentation all inconsistencies in Tech Spec tank Py 6.7.2.4 among the Tech Specs, CR level presentatio'.s in the cor. trol 6.5.1.2 displays, and computer room. (The inconsistency noted P2 APP- Q di8Plays. For example, applies only to tank levels. Other Q.4.A 1) Rk'ST level indicator Tech Spec parameters are consistently App. F scale is in gals; QDPS displayed to the operator.) In order F.1.1 is displayed in percent, to allow direct comparison of the
- 2) BAT level ind'.cator Tech Spec requirement and the actual scale is in gals; QDPS tank level, the criterion has beea is displayed in percent. established that all tank levels be shown in the Tech Spec level unit.
For the discussion of QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note CPT 1.
Recorder and meter scales and ERFDADS tank level displays have been revised l as necessary to reflect gallons.
[ REF:
CATEGOR'i E EVALUATIONS E
Note: Reference P is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
2 is STP Criteria Report nunber A,TXT B-46 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . .. C1[ POWER CO.
I HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1042 On Proteus display CV-10P The graphics error has been S 0825 (Circulating Vater Pumps corrected.
Pg -6.7.2.4 Status), the motor upper P2 APP. Q guide bearing temperature Based on the above actions, this HED Q.4 is displayed as the motor is considered resolved for Unit 1 and thrust bearing temperature Unit 2.
and vice versa for one of the circulating water pumps.
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS 1
l l
b beam Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number ~
Pf is STP Criteria Report number _
A.TXT B.47 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._..tcI POWE R CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1047 On the ERFDADS Critical The display has been modified to 7
1 6.7.2.4 Safety Function display avoid the overwrite condition P2 -App. Q for Containment (CSF Z), such that the data quality Q.4 for containment wide range character and the units are both water level on each train, displayed, the letter "I" of "IN" (for inches) is over- Based on the above acticns, this HED written by the data is considered resolved for Unit 1.
quality character. These same changes are being implemented for Unit 2.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
r L
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B- 48 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. [.'t. , OWER C0.
'E *" 8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY 8"
NUMIER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITL E PARAGRAPH HED-1048 On the ERFDADS Normal The ERFDADS displays have been l Pg 6.7.2.4 Safety Function displays modified to display the correct P2 App. Q for RCS Integrity and Con- information.
Q.4 tainment (NSF P and NSF Z respectively), incorrect Based on the above actions, this HED information is displayed. is considered resolved for Unit 1.
These same changes are being On NSF P, the flags for implemented for Unit 2.
pressurizer PORV, safety, and head vent valves read OPN ("open"). These should read N/CLSD ("not closed").
l On NSF Z the flag for containment ventilation isolation velve inopera-bility reads F/CLS
("fail to close"), but should read INOP
("inoperable status").
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION i
m Note R ference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
2 is STP Criteria Report number ~
A.TXT B-49 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG Df! SIGN REVIEW
, . . & 1
.._.t.. POWER CO. I HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1049 On the ERFDADS Normal The display has been corrected for l P
t 6.7.2.4 Safety Function display the bar graph to read from 0 to P2 -APP. Q for Core Cooling (NSF C), 12,000 CPM.
Q.4 the scale for total RHR flow is shown as 0 1200 Based on the above actions, this HED GPM. The total RHR flov is considered resolved for Unit i ranges from 0 to 12,000 and Unit 2.
GPM.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
r L
r L
4 H Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Pj is STP Criteria Report number
~
A.TxT B-50 09/30/88
HOUSTON L'GHTING CONTROL ROOM
,. & DESIGN REVIEW
. . M POWE R CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPO$lTION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1050 Values for RC3 atmosphere The identified parameters have been Pg 6.7.2.4 radioactivity level, used added to the datalink from the P2 App. Q on ERFDADS Normal Safety Radiation Monitoring System to Q.4 Function displays, are not ERFDADS, and the ERFDADS database available on the datalink has been updated. These steps from the Radiation Monitor- l provide the necessary values for the ing System to ERFDADS. displays.
These values are the RCB atmosphere noble gas and Based on the above actions, this HED particulate radioactivity is considered resolved for Unit 1.
levels, and are used on These same changes are being the RCS Integrity and implemented for Unit 2.
Containment NSF displays.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
h N te: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.TXT B- 51 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . Ef! POWE R CO.
Puters HED CATEGORY 8
HF AREA SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1059 On ERFDADS display CV 02, The display has been revised to P
1 6.7.2.4 the centrifugal charging show the correct valve numbers.
P . App. Q 2
pump normal discharge The input variables have been Q.4 valves are shown with verified as correct.
incorrect (reversed) valve numbers. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 Inputs to display may be and Unit 2.
incorrect as well.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number is STP Criterie Report number P
A.TXT B-52 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. . EQ POWE R CO.
8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER DESERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAuRAPH HED 1012 The panel demarcation color The panel demarcation color pads Pg -6.8.1.3 pads for the power feeds on have been revised to include the P-2 main control room panel circuit breaker and the motor-6.5.1.3.C CP010 to the Engineered operated disconnect switch.
Safety Features (EST) buses on CP003 do not adequately Sased on the above actions, this HED identify that both a circuit is considered resolved for Unit 1 breaker and a motor operated and Unit 2.
disconnect switch nust be closed to feed the Class 1E bus.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
l 6
i 1 -
Note: Reference P is hTREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report t.. sber A,TXT B-5 3 09/30/88 -
HOU3 TON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFCRENCE CRITED! A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1014 Recorder pens for steam The recorder pen inputs have been Py 6.8.2.3 generator water level and revised so that the recorder pen and P
2 6.5.2.3 feedvater and steam flow indicator sequence are in agreement, are reversed relative to the sequence left to right Based on the above actions, this HED of tha indicators located is considered resolved for Unit 1 above the recorder and and Unit 2.
showine the same parameters.
REF:
E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
l 1
[
r Note: Refer 3nce P is3 NUREG-0700 Section 6 number L P 2
is STP Criteria Report number A.Tn B-54 09/30/88 I __ _ - _ - - - -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESICN REVIEW Fj5Ft. POWER CO.
Control / Display Integration B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPM HED 1044 VCT prwssure and level The pressure scale has been revised Py 6.9.1.1 meters on CP004 have similar to use increments of 5 (psig), so as P- ranges (0 90 psig and 2 to differentiate this meter from the 6.6.1.1.c 0 1004) with same minor level metcr.
scale increments (i.e.
2 units). The level meter has been reviewed; the review has determi'ted that the installed scale is effective in differentiation between the two metere.
l Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
Note: Reference P isg NCREG-0700 Section 6 number $
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
A.TXT B-55 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESION REVIEW
. 1. - POWER CO.
Control / Display Integration B HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISP 0$lil0N OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1138 The signals from two The wiring for the SG 1evel Pl. s::eam generator (SC) selector switches is being
\
6.9.1.2.c narrow range water level reversed so that the left ,
6.9.2.2.d transmittwrs are displayed switch position and the left side of 6.8.2.1.a on a dual indicator, the indicator correspond to the 6.8.2.2 One of the signals is same transmitter. The escut:heon P- selected for use in plates are being re-engraved to 2
6.6.1.2.C control/ recording via a correspond with tne rewiring.
6.6.2.2.D selector switch im=ediately 6.5.2.1.A below the indicator. How- Once the design change is effected, 6.5.2.2 ever, tha left side of the the arrangement will be consistent indicator and the right with the steam flow and feedwater switch posi'.: ion correspond flow indicator / switch pairs in the to the ..:me transmitter, same area of the panel, dnd vice Versa, increasing the likelihood of improper operator selection.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION ,
L l
Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number
, 2 B- 56 09/30/88 A.TXT ._ _ _ _ _
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ;
LIGHTING g yggg y gg ygg y
& l
. .... POWE R C O.
l w
i i
CATEGORY C HED DISPOSITIONS i
f b
[ :
[
[ !
I.Tn c-1 09/30/ss b _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ - . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___-_______
HQUSTON CGNTROL RSGM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . . POWER CO.
orkspace HED CATEGORY c HF AREA ,
SHEET NUMt!R OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFIRENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1060 Ai velocities in the The HVAC design has been evaluated S 0169 control room exceed the 45 and the system rebalanced.
P.g ft/ min limit and cause Measurements of the air velocities 6.1.5.2.b drafts. are being taken to verify conformance P2* APP. D to the criterion of 45 f t/ min D.1.1.C maximum. Exceptions will be addressed as required.
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS Note Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number F is STP Criteria R6 port number E.TXT C-2 09/30/88
\
houston CONTROL ROOM LISHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._. LA POWE R CO.
HF AREA k' rkspace HED CATEGORY c I"
NUMBER OBSERVATl0N OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1086 Procedures for putting on, Vendor supplied instructions for the S 0162 taking off, and controlling self contair,ed breathing apparatus P-3 protective /energency equip- are provided in the container for 6.1.4.1.J nent were not available. each one.
P2 App. C C l.P l
l REF:
CATECORY E EVAU)ATIONS I
Noce: Reference t is 3rDREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number E.7n C- 3
{
09/30/88 L
HOUSTON CONTROL ROSM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
... POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1087 The storage area and storage The storage area and the outside of S 0164 cabinet for emergency equip. the storage cabinet are being clearly P-g ment are not clearly and and distinctively marked.
6.1.4.3.b distinctively marked.
P2 App. C C.1.1 REF:
CATEGORY E EVAL.UATIONS i
t Note: Reference 2 is WUREG-0700 Section 6 ramber
? is STP Criteria Report number I
E.TXT C4 09/30/88
{ _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING l
\
b DESIGN REVIEW
. . Ki POWER CO.
I HF AREA comunicatiers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE
, PARAGRAPH HED 1084 There is no back up power An uninterruptible power supply has P-1 for the H1AP four node been installed for the MCO telephone 6.2.1.8.a telephone exchange center switch. Additionally, a new poeer P
2 7.1.2 located in the MCO. This feed has been installed from the facility is housed in what double ended 480V HCC in the switch-appears to be temporary yard. The building has been construction, wooden framed repaired, building that is reported to leak. The site has Based on the above actions, this HED experienced a major "crash" is considered resolved for Unit 1 of this vital comunication and Unit 2.
system and consequint loss of telephone cor.=unications.
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS I
h Note: Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number '
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C-5 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
,. .b
. . _. . @ POWER CO.
Annunciator C HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE Cn!TERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1055 On the EST Status Monitoring The abbreviations used on the ESF Py 6.3.3.4 vindows, abbreviations / Status Monitoring vindows and in CRDR P2 -8.6.10 acronyms that are not in Criteria Report Appendix L vere Appendix L of the CRDR reviewed. The vindov engravings Criteria Report are used, as having the specific examples follows: identified in the observation have SUPP, BU, RET, CSIV, been corrected.
EMERG, POS (when used for position), EXC (used for Based on the above actions, this HED excess), CVS (when used is considered resolved for Unit 1.
for Chilled Water System). These same changes are being SL, SMP, CHRGR, WIB. implemerted for Unit 2.
REF: (Additionally, a review is ongoing of ENGINEERING OBSERVATION abbreviations used in the control room to verify their consisoney with l Appendix L.)
l 1.
I 1
h Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 09/30/88
[ E. TIT C-6
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l.lG HTIN G
& DESIGN REVIEW
._. . t9 P OW E R C O.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lil0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1056 Various incorrect or incon- The labels used on the ESF Status Pg 6.3.3.4 sistent labels are used on Monitoring windows specifically P2 8.6.10 the ESF Status Monitoring identified in the observation have vindows, been revised to correct the incorrect and inconsistent labels.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1.
These same changes are being implemented for Unit 2.
REF:
(Additionally, a review is ongoing to ENGINEERING OBSERVATION identify other incorrect labels and correct them.)
1 Note Reference P gis NUREG-0700 Section 6 nenber -
P2 is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-7 09/30/88
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g gggg y gg yjg y o-, .&
- G1.0 POW E R C O.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION ;
REFERENCE CRITERI A Tif LE PARAGRAPH HED 1068 The seismic monitoring systen A test has been performed to assess Pg .6.3.1.2 annunciator window is not audibility of the seismic monitoring l P2 .8.1 functional. Alarn n the panel alarm across the control room, seismic monitoring panel may with result being that the alara is not be audible across the audible. The seismic monitoring control room, panel is being modified to actuate the annunciato't vindows in Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
D;GINEERING OGSERVAT105
- Note: Reference t is gNUR.EG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
E. TIT C-8 09/30/88
HOUSTON L1GHTING CCNTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW
. .19 POWER CO.
HF AREA Annunciator C HED CATEGORY 8HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1089 Tech Specs require that the Modifications to properly identify P
3 6.3.1.2 normal purge containment that the valves are not sealed closed P .8.1 isolation valves (48" lines) 2 are being developed for evaluation be sealed closed during and implementation.
Modes 1 4 The valves are being sealed closed by re-moving power from the valve operators, thus removing control power as well.
"Control power not avail-able" is used for indicating bypass / inoperable status through ERFDADS and the EST Status Monitoring System.
Thus the ERFDADS displays and the status monitoring vindows vill show that these 4 valves are ' abnormal" during the normal antici.
pated code of operation.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
Note: Referenco P is NURIG-0J00 Section 6 number '
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C9 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CCNTRGL R2SM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW ;
. .. . t. POWE R CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl8P081T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED ll29 Lampbox SM23 has three These windows are illuminated when P g 6.3.3.c. vindows with engravings of any steam generator hav.a 2 out of 4 P2 8.6.10 ' AUX FPKP START BlXD TRAIN A low low level signal present and the (B C)". It is not clear what reset button has been pushed for that is meant when these vindows actuation train (A.B,C).
are illuminated.
The engravings for these windows are being revised to read:
SG 1414 LVL ESTAS Blys TRAIN A (B,C)
REF:
OPERATOR COMMENT DURING SPDS MAN IN THE lDOP VALIDATIOS f
(
r L
F L
Note Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 oumber PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber E .TXT C-10 09/30/88 F
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG m &
DESIGN REVIEW
. . . E. POWER CO.
^"""*i"*
- C HF AREA HED CATEGORY
' SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1140 The annunciator vindows for The ERTDADS software is being revised P-g AW pump low discharge to suppress the alaru when the pump 6.3.3.2.e pressure are continuously is not running, thus removing the P2 .8.6.1 in alarm when the pumps are nuisance alarms for the annunciator 8.6.9 turned off. This condition vindows and the ERTDADS display, also exists on ERIDADS display AT 01.
(In addition, the current Annunciator Study Task Force scope includes the identification of other such "nuisance" alarus. Those discovered vill be addressed as required.)
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
N Note: Reference f is NUKEG-0700 Section 6 number F is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TE C- 11 09/30/88 _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG gggggy ggyjgg
....t.. POWER CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSIT10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1141 On channels II and III, the The ESF Status Monitoring Lampboxes P-g Tech Specs require that one for channels II and III are being 6.3.3.2.e battery charger be available, revised to show a single window for 6.3.3.4.a Mechanical interlocks are both chargers. The ERTDADS software P
2 8.6.9 pr vided on the switchboard is being revised such that the 8.6.10 breakers such that only one Bypass /Inop window is lit when both charger can be connected to chargers for that channel are not the switchboard at a time, connected to the switchboard.
However, when a charger is Sicilarly, the ERFDADS displays are not connected to the switch- being revised to show "INOP" when board. its Bypass /Inop both chargers are not connected to window is lit. incorrectly the switchboard, indicating that conditions do not meet the operability requirements of the Tech Specs.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION i
l L
F 1 5 ,
-- t
- Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 secdon 6 member PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumbe!
E.TXT C 12 09/3w/85
- ma
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
. . . t. . POWER CO.
HF AREA Controls C HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE ,
PARAGRAPH HED 1031 1Agend pushbuttons on the The "REM /1DC' label has been revised P- turbine control panels for g to "nTRB/CR", to provide positive 6.4.3.3.t SGFP 11, 12, and 13 on panel indication of the active control P2 App. E CP006 do not conform to the station. The "RESET" label has been App. H convention of labels. The revised to alATCH", to be consistent H.3.2 labels provided read with the main turbine labeling in a "REM / LOC", where: similar application.
REM - Control at turbine LOC - Control in control Based on the above actions, this HED roo=. is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
Another pushbutton is ,
labeled "RESET", meaning "
latch and reset.
REF:
OPEPATOR OBSERVATION s
c Note Reference r is g NUREG-0700 Section 6 sunber _
) P2 is STP Criteria Report nusher I. TIT C.13
~
09/30/88 L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . ---
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. __).IO POWER CO.
HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY C NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1083 The integrated communica- Modifications for the communications Pg 6.4.1.2 tions consoles have three consoles such that two distinct P
2 6.2.1.6 toggle switches that are actions are required for actuation of subj ec t to inadvertent these alarms are being developed for actuation. This will result evaluation and implementation.
in the actuation of false main plant alarms as follows:
- 1. Evacuation
- 2. Fire
- 3. Reactor Containment Building Evacuation REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS J
~
Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 ouaber
? is ST? Criteria Report number E.TXT C- 14 09/30/88
l houston CONTROL ROGM LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
(
. . . . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA vi'"*1 Ui'PI*Y' HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1015 The Emergency Operating The circuit has been revised to I P-g Procedures require a check provide a "system teart sealed in" 6.5.1.1.a to determine if the reactor output. A red light has been added l P
2 6.3.1.2 coolant makeup system is on, above the reactor coolant makeup to provide automatic makeup system control switch to indicate to the volume control tank, that the "system start" signal has Currently there is no means been sealed in, of indication in the control room that confirms the status Based on the above actions, this HED of the reactor coolant makeup is considered resolved for Unit 1 system. and Unit 2.
REF:
E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A I
t'"
Note Reference P is NURIG-0700 Section 6 assaber -
PhisSTPCriteriaReportnumber E.TU C-15 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROGM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . E. POWE R CO.
HF AREA visual Disclavn HED CATEGORY c NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1018 There is inadequate feedback Revisions have been made to use the Pg 6.5.1.1 to show that depression of EST Status Monitoring systen actuate P
2 6.3.1.2 an ESTAS signal reset push- red lights to provide the feedback.
6.3.1.3 button has reset the signal. Roset of an ESTAS signal results in The reset pushbuttons and the red light being extinguished.
the status lights are on well separated panels. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
E0P VA1.IDATION REPORT APPENDIX A
- Note: Reference P isgWITREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
E .TXT C-16 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . L. POWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY c NU BER OBSERVATION OR Dl8P081Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1025 The SC PORVs and the ECW For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P
g 6.5.3.1 valves controlling flow to see Disposition Note CPT 1.
P2* APP. H the essential chillers are H.1 controlled by the QDPS.
Panel indications (valve open/ closed lights) are l derived from the analog signal indicating valve position, which is not repeatable; the software setpoints of 0.54 and 99.5% for fully closed and fully open, respectively, are too restrictive, such that the valve position lights cay never indicate a fully open or closed position.
REP:
STARTUP OBSERVATION h
Note: Reference P is NURIG-C7Cd . .
- Ar P is STP Crite s'.<J ~
E.TXT C-17 09/30/88 _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . _ . . . ' POWE R CO.
HF AREA Visual Disclavs HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMIER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1032 During plant startup, the A direct readout of the differential P .6.5.1.)
3 FW header p essure must be pressure has been provided on a 6.8.1.2 compared to the steam header Proteus computer display.
P2 .6.3.1.2 pressure. The indicators are App. T not in close proximity to T.1 each other, being on two 6.5.1.2 adjacent panels and in two sections of the panels (Section D of CP006 and Section B of CP007). The pressure differential for a given procedure step must be determined to be 45 psid or greater. The minimum scale increments are 50 psi, rendering "x + 45 psig" readable for only a few values of x.
REF:
OPEFATOR OBSERVATION l
. Note Reference 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number E.T33 C-IS 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
( POWE R CO.
. .. CI HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY c NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DIS *0EIT10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1103 Certain recorders have Designation of engineering Pg .6.5.1.1 no indications of engin. units for each pen is being added to P2 .6.3.1.2 eering units on the scales, recorders on which this information is not nrovihd.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
1 emum
~
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number ~
E.TXT C 19 09/30/88 .
HOUST06 CCNTRSL ROOM 1lGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW
.._.t., POWE R CO.
HF AREA _. visual Displays HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPCSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH MED 1139 The containment moisture The devpoint temperature indicator P-y indicator is a davpoint nameplate is being revised to read 6.5.1.1.b temperature indicator, 'DEVPOINT" rather than "MOISTVRE".
6.5.1.2.b reading in 'F. To determine As a temporary measure, a 6.6.3.2 whether the moisture level psychrometric chart vill be provided P '0'3'1'2 i"
- UI*i"**"*
2 i' 'h*"E "E' i i" *h' * "** 1 # ** **i1i"**
App. F the enerator must take conversien.
F.1.1 readings from this 6.4.5 instrument and from the dry Further evaluation is being performed bulb temperature indicator to determine the feasibility of adj acent to it , and use a providing an indicator reading
,psychrometric chart to directly in relative humidity.
convert this information into coisture levels.
The discrepancy of the in-accurate meter nameplate and the discrepancy of requiring cental conversiens are con-sidered HED Category C.
The discrepancy of not providing an indicator for reading directly in relative I
humidity is coasidered HED Cate5ory D.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
Note: Reference 2 is R*JREG-0700 Section 6 nus.oer i is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-20 09/30/88
HOUSTON CGNTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. . - . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and 14eati$:W 3c HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER 08SE RVt.T10N OR Dl8P081T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1017 The mimic of panel CP004 The discharge and bypass valve Pg .6.6.6.4 shows the normal discharge switches for charging pump 1A have P
2 6.4.1.1 valves of the centrifugal been interchanged for fidelity to the App. N charging pumps as the notual system arrangement and to remain N.1.2 discharge valve for one punp consistent with the switch and as the bypass valve for arrangement for pump 18. Also, the the other pump. Conversely, check valves in the discharge header the bypass valves are shown have been added to the mimic, as a bypass valve for one pump and as the normal dis- Based on the above actions, this HED charge valve for the other is considered resolved for Unit 1 l pump. and Unit 2.
i REF:
l EOP VALIDATION RETORT l APPENDIX A l
1 1
h Note: Reference T isg NU.tIG-0700 Section 6 aumber -
P2 is ST? Criteria Report number _
E.TXT C-21 09/.10/88
HOUSTON CCNTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . Ki POWER CO.
HF AREA labels and location Aids HED CATEGORY c NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1019 On panel CP005 the pressur- The switch escutcheons have been P g .6.6.3.2 irer pressure Safety changed to read "UNB1DCK blank.51DCK" P .6.4.5 2
Injection (SI) block / reset to provide better definition of the switch labeling is switch function, i.e., that the left confusing. The escutcheon position removes the signal block.
reads ' RESET blank BLOCK" The pressurizec pressure SI block and (three position switch). lov steanline pressure SI block switches have been changed in this fashion.
Based on the above actions. this HED is considered reselved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REP:
EOP VA1.IDATION REPORT APPENDIX A Note: Reference P is IrURIG-0700 Section 6 number
~
P .ts STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-22 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . ' . POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1020 Labeling of power lockout Labeling of the power lockout ,vitches Pg 6.6.3.1 control switches for the has been revised to identify the P
2 6.4.5 Safety Injection (SI) specific service.
system requires additional information on the name. Based on the above actions, this HED plates in order to is considered resolved for Unit i differentiate between the and Unit 2.
accumulator discharge isolation valves and the hot les isolation valves.
FEP:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A I
J Note: Reference t is NUR.EG-0700 Section 6 number .
? ic STP Criteria Report nisbar
~
E. TIT C 23 09/30/88 u
houston CCNTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C NU 3ER OBSERVATION OR DISPollTION REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1021 The train A, B, and C Safety The escutcheons have been revised to P
g 6.6.3.2 Injection block / reset push- read "RESET".
P 2
6.4.5 buttons have confusing labeling. The escutcheon Based on the above actions, this HED reads "BLOCK / RESET". is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
(See also HED 1130.)
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A L
(
l
[ l _
Note Reference P is NUREC4700 Section 6 mamber P is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-21 09/30/88
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . t.Ci POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and location Aids HED CATEGORY C I"EEi NUgBgR OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lfl0N K28ERENCE CRITERI A TITLE Pi.' 4GR APH HED.1057 The function of the AW pump An escutcheon has been added to indi.
Py 6.6.1.1 turbine trip pushbutton is cate the ft.netion of the pushbutton 6.6.3.2 not indicated. (i.e., ' TRIP").
P 2
6.4.1.1 6.4.5 Based on the above ac'. ions, this HED is considered resos. id for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
I REF:
EOP VALIDATION RIPORT APPENDIX A l
~
~
Note: Reference P is NUR.EG-0700 sec' ion 6 number P is STP Criteria Raport number I.TXT C-25
{L 09/30/88
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. . S
. . E9 POWEP CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUM8ER OBSERVATION OR D!SPOSITION REFERENCE CRif ERI A YlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1058 The RCS ten:perature re- The recorder inputs have been P .6.6.3.3 1
corders have inconsistent verified and the labels.have been P -6.4.5 panel labels and pen labels. changed accordingly.
2 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REP:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A I
i Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 7
( E.TX1 F is STP Criteria Report number 2
C-26 09/30/88 u
HOUSTON LIGHTING CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
[.'t9 OWER CO.
HF AREA labels and location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE l PARAGRAPH HED 1077 Pemarcation zone coding and Demarcation and simic options to Pg -6.6.1.1 labeling are not adequate to provide visual distinction between 6.6.6.2 properly identify system and trains of the same systen and between 6.8.1.3 train configuration on panel systems are being developed for P2 -6.4.1.2 CP022 in the area for CR/EAB evaluation and implementation.
App. N HVAC.
N.1.1 6.5.1.3 l
1 l
1 REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
u Wote Reference 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 m mber -
? is STP Crit aria Report number _
E.TXT C-27 09/30/88 _
l l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY c .
SHEET NUMBER 03SERVATl0N OR blSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH 4ED lJ78 Temporary labels nave been Labels have been re engraved to P
g 6. 6. 5.1 addad for power source permanently add the power source 6.6.3.1 identification on the lower for the items identified in a survey 6.6.3.3 left hand corner of main of the control panels. An ongoing P
2 6.4.5 control panel labels, to program is under way to ensure that correct inaccurate informa- power sources are identified on tion or to provide missing nameplates, in accordance with the ir.f o rma tion . criteria.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION F
L
[
[
Note Reference t isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
( P2 is STP Criteria Report niisber i E.TXT C-28 09/30/88 I _ ~
HOUSTON LIGHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW
. f.! POWER CO.
HF AREA fabeln nni fecatinn Aide HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVAT!ON OR DISPCSITIDN REFEREN E CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRA7il HED 1080 The controller for Reactor Labels are being provided to clearly P j 6.6.3.2 Coolam. Purification flow indicate what the controller action 6.6.3.8 control does not indicate is, i.e., "OfEN" or "CIDSE" the P
2 6.4.5 valve open/close direction. controlled valve.
I I
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
l l
J l -
Notes Kaferenr.e 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number _
P. is STP Criteria Report number i E.TXT C.29 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.O POWER CO.
l HF AREA 1.abels and Loedtion Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1105 Color coded simics (red, The criteria are being developed P-y blue, yellow) 1.ase been for appropriate and consistent use 6.6.6.4.a implemented on I,anel CP001 of train related color coding of 6.5.1.6 for the SI/RHR System. The mimics throughout the control room.
6.8.),3 CCV, EC, ESF bus , and HVAC After the criteria have been P2 APP. N systems are not volor developed, the mimics in the N l.2 coded in the same fashion, control room will be modified to be App. S consistent wit','he criteria.
5.4. G 6.5.1.3 REF: (See also HED 1091.)
OIERATOR OBSERVATION i
Note: Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber E.TXT C-30 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. t,cf POWER CD, Label and Location Aids C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lTION REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITLE P
_ARAGRAPH HED 1130 Several signals causing All reset pushbuttons on the main P1 -6.6.3.2 ESFAS actuations can be control board have been reviewed P2 -6.4.5 reset, with that action also for function. Each has been blocking the actuation identified as to whether depressing signal, such as the SI the pushbutton will block the signal. These reset push- actuating signal, or whether the buttons say "RESET" and are actuating signal must be removed not differentiated from the prior to reset of the signal.
reset pushbuttons for 6 signals that cannot be reset The latter group of reset push-until the actuating signal buttons will continue to be labeled is removed. "RESET". The former group is being revised such that the escutcheon reads:
RESET (BLOCK)
(See also HED-1021.)
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE lh0P VALIDATION l
i i
1 Notes Reference 2, is NUREG-0700 section 6 number ~
P j is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-31
{
09/30/88 L
l l H O U S'e'O N CONTROL ROOM l LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l .'..' 0WER CO, HF AREA 1.abels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSP051T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1133 On CP001, tha switches for The switch labels are being revised Py 6.6.3.1 the SI check valve test to provide accurate descriptions of 6.6.3.2 valves have labels that are the valve service.
6.4.2.2 inaccurate for the valve 6.8.2.1 service. Additionally, the The switch and lamp locations will P -6.4.1.1 switches are not arranged in be revised to achieve a consistent 2
6.4.5 a consistent manner, a rrangement.
6.2.1.9 6.5.2.1 The discrrpancy of inaccurate labels is considered HED Category C.
The discrepancy of inconsis-tent switch locations is considered HED Category D.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION E
Notes Reference 2 isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P 2 is STP Criteria Report number E.TU C 32 09/30/88 F
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . E. . POWER CO.
HF AREA Computers c HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1022 QDPS display labeling errors For the discussion of QDPS revisions, Py -6.7.2.4 have been identified during see Disposition Note CPT 1.
P2 -APP. Q tha QDPS V6V process. These Q.4 errors also occur in ERFDADS The ERFDADS displays have been displays thet were developed reviewed, and the displays based upon the QDPS displays, modified consistently with changes being incorporated into QDPS.
l REF:
i QDPS V6V I
Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
~
PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber E.TXT C- 33 {
09/30/88 L
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . K1 POWER CO.
HF AREA cornutern HED CATEGORY c NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1023 QDPS display labeling The CRDR Criteria Report, Appendix L, P y -6.7.2.4 inconsistencies with has been revised.
P2 APP- Q Appendix L of the Criteria Q.4 Report have been identified Based on the above actions, this HED during the QDPS V6V process, is considered resolved for Unit 1 and 'Jnit 2.
REF:
QDPS V6V a
p
[
Note: Reference 2 is NURECA 700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-34 09/30/88
____ _ _ __ _ _ _ - . . _ _ . . _ _ . . _. _._ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ ~
HOUSTON L1GHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW
,_.. W POWE R CO.
Computers HF AREA HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISICSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH I
HED 1024 The display on QDPS does For the discussion of QDPS revisions, 1 6.7.2.4 not accurately reflect the P
see Disposition Note CPT-1.
P2APp. Q actual flow rates for AW, Q.4 RHR, ECW, and CCV flows when Because the flow indications are the actual flow is at or datalinked to ERFDADS, appropriate near zero. changes will also be incorporated in l l ERFDADS to elim.'nate the misleading flow indication, following acceptance of the QDPS implementation.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION
! )
I
~
i Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 uumber -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C-35 09/30/88
i i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT 1NG DESIGN REVIEW
. 41 POWE R CO.
H AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE
?ARAGRAPH HED 1027 The QDPS and/or ERFDADS For discussion of QDPS revisions, see Py -6.7.2.4 displays contain inconsis. Disposition Note CPT 1.
P2 -App. Q tencies in nomenclature and Q.4 labeling. The ERFDADS diplays have been rev.ised to correct the problems noted.
Additionally, the operator the operator action point ranges were action points for six revised, the displays were reviewed variables must be available to assure that backt;round information over a different range than on the display was not being currently specified. overwritten.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
{
Note: Reference f is NUREG-0700 Section 6 aussber
( F is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C 36 09/30/88
HOUSTON LIGHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW
. 19 POWER CO.
HF AREA *P" *#' C HED CATEGORY 1
NU BER OBSERVATION OR OlSP05fil0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1036 The various computer The abbreviations used on the computer Pg -6.7.2.4 displays use abbreviations displays and the abbreviations listed P2 app. Q that do not comply with the in CRDR Criteria Report Appendix L are Q.4 Criteria Report Appendix L. being reviewed. As appropriate, the displays are being revised and the abbreviations list is being updated.
REF:
l CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS t
I Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C-37 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM '
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
( POWER CO.
.. . Ci HF AREA c.sputers HED CATEGORY C NUMBER O BSERVATION OR Dl8P0$iTl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1038 The plant computer displays CRTs have been adjusted and tubes have S-0825 are generally good but been replaced as required. (Display Pg -6.7.2.1 problems with color color quality was degraded due to poor 6.7.2.4 quality and various CRT adjustment and "burned in' tubes.)
6.7.2.7 display and menu discrep- The identified display discrepancies P2 app. Q ancies were noted. are being resolved by ongoing programs Q.1 for display review and revision.
Q.4 Q.7 h
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
l i
{ .
I Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number E.TU C-38 09/30/88 w._ __
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgw
._.. .. POWER CO.
HF AREA Computers C HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1040 The ERFDADS and Proteus An engineering review is being per-S-0854 computers use inconsistent formed to evaluate the current Pg -6.7.2.4 labeling. The use in Proteus displays in the computer systems, 6.7.2.7 of a full background color and determine how they can be improved 2-APP. Q with black letters is good, and made more consistent. The display Q.4 but violates criteria in the criteria and the displays themselves Q.7 choice of background color, will then be revised. The displays will be made as consistent as possible The ERFDADS use of cyan is based upon the differing machine not quickly distinguished capabilities.
from the remainder of the display.
REF:
CATECCRY E EVALUATIONS l
l 1
Note: Reference 2 1., NURIG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criterie Report number -
E.TXT C-39 09/30/88
.~ _ .- .
HOUSTON CONTetOL c'CO/>f LIGHTING CESIGN Db?9W
. .. t,c1 POW E R C O.
HF AREA CermursI.F ._ HED CAThCOF ', _ C THEET ',
l MBER *-
-- 0\tPfl?'il&i4 REFERENCE .
PARAGRAPH ,_ m . . ., . . . - . .
HED ,. r 11 , f @$trr 'a r .vitur. pa.'. tion P g-r .' . E un .- .r .- - t viptic,w at' ta'ng ravised to use Ag , P Ar, . .', i . I w CR for ;ontrol room, MT for auxiliary 2
,5 Q.- Tr . . ' , . .ir 4 :. shi Jovn panel, ::12 fc; another local use f,R - oot, ASP panel, and A Pt;L for t,.so transfer for auxi.. e- .. .own panel. avitch panel. These revisions make g ZLP
- xx ' . -ther local the .*"IP JS descriptions as close as ,
pane w. : ..L fo. contro) possible to the transfer switch
, occurritig u that same escutcheons, given the computer transfer witch panv '. . descriptor limitations.
ERTDADS ises only IDCAL ar.3 REMOTE.
REF:
E!;GINEERING OBSERVATIO!;
1
[
[
[
Notes Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
( P is STP Criteria Report number E.TxT c 40 09/30/88 c-l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . M POWE R CO.
HF ARFp HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl8P081Tl0N AEFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED.1065 The identical displays in ERFDADS algorithms are being revised P- QDPS and ERJDADS may show g to be consistent with QDPS. In the 6.7.2.4.e a different value and/or interim, use of substitute values is P2
- app. Q quality for a calculated being administratively controlled; Q.4.E parameter because the the cluster limits and referee values algorithms performing the were chosen to minimize the calculations are not the differences in the information same in the two systems. displayed.
l l
l REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
l l
l l
l 1
m.
Note Reference P is NULEG-0700 Section 6 number "
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C-41 09/30/88 ,
\ HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. . L. POWER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1070 It is difficult to Colors are generally distinguishable Py 6.7.2.1 distinguish between green from the intended viewing distance.
6.7.2.7 and yellow status bo:::s CRTs have been readjusted to alleviate P2* APP. Q on the EPJDADS displays. distinguishability problems. A Q.1 problem regarding residual magnetism Q.7 in certain panels has been identified.
This residual magnetism is a significant contributor to the color problem noted. Panol degaussing is being performed. The symbols are being evaluated, with the aim of differentiating the status conditions both by color and by shape.
REF:
SPDS AUDIT
[
[
I s .
i r
r- Note Reference 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number
( E.TXT 3
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
C 42 09/30/88 c
HOUSTON LIGr4 TING CONTROL ROOM oggggy ggyjgw
. t. . POWE R CO.
HF AREA con:pute rs c HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1072 The SPDS Critical Safety The SPDS Man in-the-kop Validation Py -6.7.2. 7 Function displays do not has been performed; evaluation of P2 APP. Q change color based on color changes based upon alaru Q.7 parameter being in alarm condition was performed as part of condition, this validation. Refer to the discussion provided for HED ll21 for the final disposition.
I I
REF:
SPDS AUDIT Y
Notes Reference t is IrUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C-43 09/30/88 -
- m ---m.- -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
...19 POWE R CO.
HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY t' NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1075 AW flow indication on The controls design for the AW flow P -6.7.2.4 1
QDPS may go offseale high regulating valves is being revised, so 6.5.1.2 during AW actuation. If that flow limiting to below 700 gpm P2* APP. Q actuated by SG low low level, (the upper limit of the QDPS AW flov Q.4 automatic flow control may scale) is effective continuously.
App. F terminate while flow indica- Thus the flow will be on scale at all F.1,3 tion is still offscale high, times.
if low lov level signal clears.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Notes Reference t is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number
" FfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber E.TXT C-44 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .19 POWER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1082 On the ERTDADS Normal Safety Hodifications to ERFDADS displays are P
1 6.7.2.4 Function Containment display being developed for evaluation and 6.7.2.6 (NSF Z), the "INOP" flags for implementation.
P2 App. Q containment isolation status Q.4 are not driven by the proper Q.6 valves (i.e., all valves l receiving Phase A or Phase B or CVI signals).
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
i ,o ., ..,.r..t. i. - ,. S.tuon . _ ,.r [
,f is STP Crit.ria Report misber P
E.TxT c 45 09/30/88
H O U'STO N CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG gggggy ggypf g
....L.. POWER CO.
HF AREA comeuters HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 081Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1094 ECV flow displays on QDPS For the discussion of QDPS revisions, Py -6.7.2.4 and ERFDADS use inappropri- see Disposition Note CPT 1.
6.5.1.2 ate ranges: too wide on flow P2 APP. Q to CCV heat exchanger, too The ERFDADS displays are being revised Q.4 narrow on flows to essential to use appropriate flow ranges for ECW App. F chillers, flows.
F.1.3 REF-STARTUP OBSERVATION
[
[
[
Note Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report nusiber E.TXT C 46 09/30/88 F
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . ).'EA 0WER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1097 There is confusion as to The ERFDADS keybosrds/CRT nameplates Pg -6.7.1.5 which CRT is being selected are being revised to correct the P2* APP. P through the ERFDADS keyboard. problems noted. The CRT nameplates P.2 Select key keycaps are a e being revised to include the engraved with the last part identifying number engraved on the of the equipment numbers for keycaps. The lef t to right sequence the controlled CRTs. of the keys is also being revised to However, those numbers are correspond to the CRT spacial not included on the CRT arrangement, nameplates.
Additionally, the left to-right sequence of the select keys on the keyboard is reverse.1 when compared with the CRT spacial arrangement.
REF:
l OPEPATOR OBSERVATION 1
]
Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is ST? Criterie. Report cumber -
E . TX'.' C-47 09/30/88 _
nousTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . POWER CO. i HF AREA coreuters HED CATEGORY c SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 081710N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1109 The SPDS displays incorrect / Additional trip-related logic is Py 6.7.2.4 misleading safety function being added so SPDS cr.n, detect that P2 -11.1.1 status information during the plant should have tripped and 11.1.9 ATk'S conditions . Since the automatically provide Critical App. Q reactor trip breakers remain Safety Function status indication.
Q.4.A closed during an ATk'S, the Normal Safety Function status boxes remain on the SPDS displays instead of the Critical Safety Function status boxes required post trip.
t
[ REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE lh0F c VALIDATION L
r L
I r l Note: Reference t ie NURIG-0700 Seation 6 number L P is STP Criteria Report number E.T XT C-48 09/30/88 m
i HOUSTUN LIGHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW i'
_. .. POWE R CO.
HF AREA computers c HED CATEGORY _ _
SNEET NUMBER 0BSERVAT10N OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE SRITER; A TIT LE PARAGRAPH HED 1111 SPDS top level display bar This discrepancy remains under P
1 6.7.2.5 heights mislead the Unit evaluation to determine final P2 -11.1.1 Supervis r/ Shift Technical disposition.
11.1.3.3 Advisor, resulting App. Q occasionally in use of the Q.5 bar heights rather than status box color and incor-rect determination of plant safety status.
I REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE lh0P VALIDATION h
Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
E.TXT C 49 09/30/88 _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. ._. . L.O POW E H C O.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C
' OBSERVATION Nu RER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1112 The Critical Safety The CSF.C status tree E0P is being Pg -6.7.2.4 Function Core Cooling revised to replace the wording 6.7.2.5 (CSF-C) status tree E0P "Upper Plenu:n" with "Plenum" .
P2 -11.1.1 w rding "Upper Plenum" does App. Q not catch ef.tha- CSF C Q.4 display wordirg "Plenum" or Q.5 "Upper Head".
e REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE 140P VA1.1DATION
{
[
t
[
Notes Reference 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number F is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C 50 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESl2N REVIEW
. . .. . . POWE R C O.
P"
- C HF AREA HED CATEGORY 8HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A T;TLE PARAGRAPH HED-lll5 The abbreviation used for The engineering units for radio-g 6.7.2.4 "Microcuries" is not P
activity concentration values on 6.6.3.3 consistent throughout the ERFDADS displays are being revised P2 APP. Q SPDS displays. to "uci/ce".
Q.4 6,4.6 App. L l
REF:
i SPDS MAN IN THE 140P VALIDATION l
J Note: Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 aumber -
P, is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-51 00/30/88
HOUSTON CGNTROL ROOM LIGHTHG DESIGN REVIEW
. . L. . 70WER CO.
HF AREA Coeputers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMSER OBSERVATION UR DISPOSITION 3EFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRA*H __
HED 1115 The failure of the SPDS to The SPDS is being revised such that P1 .6.7.2.5 change automatically from the system ;ill auton.atically display P2 -11.1.1 Normal Safety Function information needed to determine the 11.1.4 displays to critf. cal Safety safety status of the plant. After 11.1.9 Function displays following, reactor trip, the disp 11.ys vill show 11.2.1.1 reactor trip e3uses data to the CSF related data. ,
be displayed that ic not consistent with plant conditions.
REF:
SPDS MAN.IN THE 1/)OP VA1,IDATION F
s '
I Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 section 6 number
? is STP Criteria Report cumber E.TXT C-52 09/,10/88
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
._.. W POWE R C O.
HF AREA computers c HED C ATEGOTlY SHEET NUM8ER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1117 Inappropriate spacing exists The CSF Integrity dispit) is being P
3 6.7.2.5 on the SPDS Critical Safety revi,aed to provide senm priate P2 App. Q Function (CSF) Integrity spacing.
Q.5 display: the "AUCT 14 T c
k'/R" label and value are too close to the "cold overpressure limits" plot.
This causes confasion as to che units un the plant cperational limits trend pin.
and the title of the cold overpressure limito trend plot.
l l
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE.140P VALIDATION I
Note: Reference t is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is ST? Criteria Report number E.TU p c-53 09/30/88 (
c__________ _______________ _ ______ - _ - . .
\.
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .. . t. POWER CO.
Hr AREA % ,ne.ve HED CATEGORY e NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 081T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH _,
HED ll18 The SPDS displays RCS The SPDS display is being revised to Pg 6.7.2.4 subcooling with a negative suppress the minus sign'and display P2* APP. Q value, while the E0Ps the absolute value of subcooling, Q.4 consider RCS subcooling since the labels "SUBCOOL" and as having a positive "SUPERREAT" are provided.
value.
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE IDOP VALIDATION 1
L Note: Reference P is NUKEG-0700 Section 6 number
? is STP criteria Report number E.TXT C-54 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING S
DESIG4 R"t'WP'
._. . lC1 POWER CD.
HF AREA C eputeys __ HED CATEGORY c .
NUMIER OBSERVATION OR O!SP0390N REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1119 The SPDS alarus are The SPDS is being revised to group g 6.7.2.5 difficult to acknowledge, P
l the SPDS s.larus separately from the l
6.7.2.6 Failure of the operator non SPDS. alarms to simplify l
P2 11.1.1 to acknowledge the alarus acknowledgement.
11.2.2 voids the "reflash" App. Q feature of the annunciator.
Q.5 l
Q.6 l
1 REF:
SPDS MM IN THE IDOP VALIDATION I
N
~
Note: Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-55 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . t. F0WER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATiGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISM$iTION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1120 The SPDS is complex in The features of the SPDS are being Pg None reistion to the training simplified via resolution of the P*2 fr*9u*ncy. OP erators have various HEDs egeinst the SPDS (refer 11.1.J.3 difficulty renamberin;; to HED 1108, 1109, -1111, 1116, 11.2.5 quality tag definitions, 1118, -1121, and 11t3). The usage during ATk'S and quateerly training frequency is adverse containment seen as appropriate for licensed events, safety function reactor operators, bar height meaning, etc.
l REF:
f SPDS HAN IN THE 1DOP VALIDATION
(
[ .
Note Referenet 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number 2 is STP Criteria Report number I .TXT c-56 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
, . _ . . . POWE R CO.
HF AR E A . ._E**Put'Y8 HED C ATEGORY_ c NUMBER DISER ATION REFERENCE ChlTERI A '!)TLE QRAGRAPH ~
HED 1121 The usage of color is The SPDS is being revised such that P- inconsistant within the 7 SPDS paranetors that exceed their 6.7.2.7.k SPDS: on Normal Safety status tree setpoints become magenta.
P2APp. Q Function display:, parameters.
l Q.7.K in alarm are yellow and magenta; on Critical 1
Safety Tunction displays, parameters in alare re2ain salmon.
(This evaluation also resolves HED 1072.)
l REP:
SPDS MAN IN THE IDOP '
VALIDATION ~
]
Noter Reference P is NUREG-0700 5ection 6 mamber Pf is STP Criteria Report awaber E.TXT C-57 09/30/88
{L
r HOUSTON CCNTRSL RSCM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. '.' t. POWER C" HF AREA "4"t*** HED CATEGORY C NUMBER 08 SERVAT 10N OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1124 The label "INOP" is displayed The SPDS is being revised to add P
g twice below "CNTMT ISOL 'CNTYT ISOL" AND "CVI" labels. Thus 6.7.2.4.s STATUS" on the Normal Safety when a valve actuated by Containment 6.7.2.6 Function containment display, Isolation Phase A signal becomes P2 -APP. Q without further labeling, inoperable, the message 'CN'lHT ISOL Q.4.A Lack of appropriate labeling INOP" is displayed. Similarly, when Q.6.B causes confusion and an a valve actuated by the Containment opportunity for Ventilation Isolation signal becomes misinterpretation. inoperable, the message "CVI INOP" is displayed.
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE 1DOP VALIDATION
(
[
Note Reference t is WUREG-0700 Section 6 rumber P is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C 5S 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
[.'Ed OWER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1125 The area under "CNTMT ISOL The SPDS is being revised to clarify P
g 6.7.2.5 STATUS
- on the flormal Safety the Containment Isolation and the 5.7.2.6 Function Containment display Containment Ventilation Isolation l P2 App. Q is blank when Containment labels. The method for resolution Q.5 Isolation Phase A and of this discrepancy remains under Q.6.B Containment Ventilation evaluation.
Isolation signals are not present and no containment l isolation valves receiving l these signals are in Bypass /
Inop condition. This lack of information does not meet
- he requirement to provide l clear and concise data to the operators.
REF:
SPDS MAN IN-THE 1DOP I VA1.IDATION Note: Reference t is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number -
? is STP Criteria Report *. umber E.TXT C-59 09/30/88
HOUSTON CGNTRDL ROCM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . L. . POWER CO.
C HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DitP081T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1126 Setpoints highlighted in The criteria has been established that Pg 6.7.2.5 the Critical Safety Function only operator action points are shown 6.7.2.7 displays by arrows and on the CSF displays, and that these P2* APP Q dashed lines versus solid points are shown using arrows and Q.5 lines do not have consist- dashed lines, with numerical values Q.7.B ent meaning to the operator, corresponding to the status trees.
The SPDS displays have been modified to use arrows and dashed lines for operator action points on Unit 1 and are being so modified on Unit 2.
The revision to use numerical values at arrows is being implemented.
For the discussion of QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note CPT 1.
( ,
REF:
SPDS MAN IN.THE.1h0P
( VALIDATION f
Note: Reference t is NUR.EG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number E.TXT C-60 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l . . Ed POWE R CO.
l HF AREA *P"t*#' HED CATEGORY C q
NUMBER OBSERVATION l
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED.1127 NIS channel values shown on The SPDS display is being revised to P g 6.7.2.5 the Normal Safety Function include channel numbers and loop P2 APP. Q Suberiticality display are designations.
Q.5 not located according to north / south /ea:t/ west plant location around the core.
The quadrant labels are not equivalent to RCS loop designations, which leads to confusion.
l l
REF:
- SPDS MAN IN THE 1DOP VALIDATION I
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 m ober '
?g is STP Criteria Isport number E.TXT C-61 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTHOL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
....@&POWER CO.
""' I" C HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1043 The arrangement of the T,yg, An ERFDADS display has been developed Pg 6.8.1.1 Th ' T,, and Delta T noters to show loop comparisons of T,yg, P
2 6.5.1.1 for the reactor coolant Th. T,, and Delta T on bar graphs.
loops on panel CP005, while This display facilitates quick appropriate for other needs, comparison of the same parameter is not adequate for cross. across the four RCS loops.
loop comparisons of these parameters. Presentation Based on the above actions, this HED of these parameters on a is considered resolved for Unit 1 cross loop basis is no*. and Unit 2.
provided on a computer display either.
REF:
OPEPATOR OBSERVATION l
L Note: Reference 2 is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number
, P is STP Criteria Report nuber I.TXT C 62 09/30/88
)
l HOUSTON L1GHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESl@N REVIEW
... . . _ POWE R CO.
HF AREA Panel layout c HED CATEGORY N BER OBSERVATION OR DISP 0$lil0N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH 1
HED 1142 Valve position light The viring to the valve position P. displays for the MSR main g li hts 5 is being revised auch that the 6.8.2.2.a steam purge valves currently numerical progression criteria are 2 6.5.2.2 show the MSR 11 valves P
met, i.e., valve position lights for below the MSR 12 valves. MSR 11 are above the valve position lights for MSR 12.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
f Note Reference 2 isNUREG-0700Section6aus5er PhisSTPCriteriaReportnumber -
E.TXT C-63 09/30/88 m _
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHilNo DESIGN REVIEW
_ . . . POWER CO.
CATEGORY D HED DISPOSITIONS l
)
W e
W
,,7g o.1 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. _ . F3WER CO.
rkspace HED CATEGORY D HF AREA NUMBER 08 SERVAT 10N OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH x
HED 1029 Controls are above 70 inches These flow controllers are S-138 on panel CP022 for the Fuel infrequently used and operated.
Pg 6.1.2.5 Handling Building HVAC location of controls above or below P2-APP.A exhaust air flow controllers, the reconnended zone is a secondary A.5 concern to locating the controls on the appropriate panel. A small ladder has been provided to improve accessibility.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS l
(
l i
Note Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
( PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber o.txt o- 2 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
...t... POWER CO.
- 'P'
- D HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1088 During three train emergency Additional noise level measurements P-3 mode control room HVAC oper- are planned during the first 6.1.5.5.b ation, noise levels reach operating cycle. Based on those P2
- app. D 66 dB(A) at the entrance to measurements, the background noise D.1.4 the horseshoe area of the level will be determined and the control room. Noise levels need for corrective action at other representative assessed.
locations were below the 65 dB(A) criterion.
l REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 nuisber B
PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber D.TKT D-3 09/30/88
p houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW M.@t9 POWER CO.
Comunications HED CATEGORY D HF AREA NUMIER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1085 The patch panels for the Labels will be provided at each patch S 0255 maintenance communication panel to provide interconnection Pg 6.2.1.3 system do not have readily information.
6.6.1.1 available information for P
2 7.3 tieing in several people at 6.4.1.2 vartets locations.
l k REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS f
L Note: Reference t is IEURIG-0700 section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number D. TIT D- 4 09/30/88 J
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
[.'t. . 0WER CO.
HF AREA Annunciator ._ HED CATEGORY D NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1092 Temporary identification Means of providing permanent P-3 (colored dots) has been identification for annunciator 6.3.3.3.e added to the annunciator windows actuated upon ERFDADS failure 6.6.5.1 vindows actuated via ERFDADS or malfunction are being developed P2 N ne t distinguish these alarms for evaluation and implementation.
in the event of ERFDADS failure or calfunction.
REF:
OPERATOR 03SERVATION 4
l l
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number '
P is STP Criteria Report number _
D. TIT D-5 09/30/88 s
HOUSTON CCNTRSL ROSM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW ;
._.. . POWER CO.
18 D HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMSER OBSERv '
0R Ol8P081T10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1001 After "quick release" of Training has been implemented to Pg 6.4.1.2 certain Microswitch switches, ensure that operators do not "quick P
2 6,2.1.6 the switch may go past the release" the switches. Vithout the center position and make up "quick release," the switch does not contacts for the opposite go past the center position and cause position of the switch. The the reverse actuation. No further switches involved are three- corrective action is required.
position switches, maintained in the right or left position Based on the above actions, this HED and spring return to center is considered resolved for Unit 1 from the other position, and Unit 2.
This accidental actuation may occur when the switch is turned to the spring return position and then released quickly.
REF:
ESCINEERING OBSERVATION Note Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number D.TXT D-6 09/30/88 F
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
, . . . L. POWER CO.
C "t' l' D HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1090 color coding of J handles on Switch handles on panel CP010 have P
y 6.4.2.2 panel CP010 switches provid- been replaced with black handles, P.2 ing feeds to ESF bus trans- conforming to the color coding 6.2.1.10 formers does not conforn to criteria for switches.
App. S the color coding criteria.
S.4.E Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 l and Unit 2.
1 I
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number '
? is STP Criteria Report number -
D.T K1 D-7 09/30/86
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW W.Cl POWER CO.
Controls D HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBEn OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1093 Pushbuttons for manual Pushbuttons will be re engraved to P
1 6.4.3.3 initiation of the bypass / add closed corners, distinguishing Pg App. E inoperable status monitoring them from indicating lights.
E.1.5.1 system do not meet the "closed corner octagon" criterion for distinguishing legend pushbuttons from indicating lights.
REF:
ENGI!?EERI?;G OBSERVATION l
Bote: Refersace t is EUtsG-07'X) Section 6 member s
PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber D.Tn D-8 09/30/s3
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LicHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._. . . POWE R CO.
18ua 18 Plays HF AREA HED CATEGORY D SH T NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlMSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1028 The third pen on three pen Three pen recorders have been P
1 6.5.4.1 recorders is obscured by the replaced with recorders made by P2 APP. I scales, another manufacturer. These new I.4.T recorders clearly show all three pens.
Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 i REF:
and Unit 2.
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A 1
1 s
, Note Reference P is NURIG-0700 Section 6 number ~
P is STP Criteria Report number D.T*T D-9 09/30/88 -
HOUSTo rt CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
,,L
. . _ . . . POWER CO.
' D HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1076 The alternate boric acid Instrument loop scaling requirements P
y 6.5.1.2 flow indicator has the first will be investigated to determine an 6.5.1.3 division at 30 CPM (log acceptable range having readability P2 APP. F scale). This is the minimum for the minimum Tech Spec flow.
F.1 required flow per Tech Specs F.2 and very hard to determine.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATIOS I
I Notet Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number L PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber D.TXT D-10 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_ _ . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISP 051Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1104 RCS pressure recorder FR 0406 The technical and licensing reasons P
g 6.5.1,5 has a range of 0 3000 psig, for the differeat scales override P2
- APP. T on a scale of 0 to 30 (psig the desirability to meet the human F.5 x 100) with major division factors criteria. No corrective increments of 10. RCS pres- action is required, sure recorder PR 0407 has a range of 0 3500 psig, on a Based on the above, this HED is scale of 0 to 35 (psig x 100) considered resolved for Unit 1 with major division incre- and Unit 2.
ments of 5. Since the re-corde are adjacent to each other, the readings will be compared; the scales should be compatible in numerical progression and scale organization.
' REP:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
~
1 Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
D. TIT D-11 09/30/88
HOUSTON CCNINSENS6M LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. .. POWER CO.
Ubels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY N SER OBSERv T' 0R DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1091 Color coding of $1 process Use of mimic colors to differentiate P g .6.6.6.4 mimic on panel CP001 does ESF cubsystems by train has been 6.5.1.6 not conform to simic color evaluated as effective as an aid to P2* APP. N coding criteria, operators in differentiating train N.1.2 associated equipment on panel CP001.
App. S Criteria are being develeped for the S.4.C use of train related color coding of mimics. The mimics in the control room vill be modified in accordance with the revised criteria.
(See also HED 1105.)
b REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION
(
{
{
[ Notat Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 4 mumber Pf is STP Criteria Report number f _
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ilGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . POWER CO, HF AREA bels and Weation Aids HED CATEGORY D I NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1100 The ESF Status Monitoring A demarcation pad will be provided Pg 6.6.6.1 test pushbutton on CP004 for this test pushbutton. Labels 6.6.6.2 lacks a demarcation pad will be provided for all ESF Status 6.6.1.1 (darker color paint). The Monitoring test pushbuttons.
P2
- App. N test pushbuttons on CP022 N.1.1 have labels indicating 6.4.1.2 which is used for Bypass /Inop window test and which is used for Tail to.
Actuate vindow test. Such labels are not provided on other main control panels.
REF:
ENOINEERING OBSERVATION I
Note: Refereace t is NUREG-0700 section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
D.TKT D-13 09/30/88
HOUSTON CCNTR$lCSSM LIGHTING g ggjg y gg yjg y b
. _ . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA visual Displays HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1137 The main generator MVAR The main generator MVAR meter label P
g 6.5.1.1 meter uses "IN/0UT" labeling, will be revised to use "LEAD /1AG" 6.5.1.2b while system dispatcher uses terminology.
6.6.3.2 terminology of "1. LAD /1AG" .
P '0'3'I'2 2
App. F T.1 F.3.4 6.4.1.2 6.4.5 REF:
OPEPATOR OBSERVATION Note Reference F is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
{ g P2is STP Criteria Report number D.TXT D-14 09/30/88 F
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll0 H Tl*:tl DESIGN REVIEW
. . . . . POWE R 60.
P **
HF AREA HED CATEGORY D NU OBSERVATION
[R RE?ERLACE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRH;H HED 1034 The titles for the Normal g The F.RFDADS displays will be revised S.0825 "ond Critical Safety Function to put the NSF/CSF letter designator l Pg 6.7.2.4 displays on ERFDADS would in brackets after the safety P2 App. Q be enhanced if the NSF/CSF function.
Q.4.P letter designator were plactd in brackets, e.g.:
I l
Preseat HEAT $1NK H Better - HEAT SINK [H]
1 REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS l
l
)
l
[
Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number D.TXT D- 15 09/30/88 -
H0usTON C3NTM3L MS3M LIGHTING DESIGN MEVIEW \
& l
_ _ . . . POWER CO.
HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER O'45E RV AT10 N OR Di$ POSITION REFERENCE Cf ITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1035 The ERFD/DS keyboard is The possibility of differentiating Py 6.7.1.4 lettered in 3 lines. It is the "shift" function line from the P2
- APP P difficult to find the correct "unshifted" function line will be P.1 key since the same letter may itive s tigat e d. (The top line is the appear on two of the lines. "shift" function.) The keys may not (The "shift" function should be large enough to implement thir be differentiated from the recoc=endation.
"unshifted" function.)
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS l
[
[
Wote Reference t is IrDREG-0700 Section 6 mumber b PfisSTPCriteria.Reportnumber i D.TXT D- 16 09/30/88 r -
HOUSTON CCNTRCL RCOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. POWE R C0.
H F AR E A .f.om u r a r e HED CATEGORY n SHEET NUM8fR OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1034 Proteus displays were The criteria for use of periods on S.0853 inconsistent in the use of toaputer displays vill be reeval-P.
g periods at the end of a usted. Af ter criteria changes are 6.7.2.4.k sentence or listing, made as needed, the computer displays P2
- APP. Q (Procedure writer's guides will be reviewed for confermance to Q.4.K sometimes encourage not the criteria and revised as required, using complete santenees and avoiding the use of periods.)
REF:
CATECORY E EVALUATIONS J
1 a
Note Refarence t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 aumber F is STP Criteria Report number ]
D.TXT D-17 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON C3NTCOL COSM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. . . t. . POWER CO.
computers HED C ATEGORY D HF AREA NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1069 Color codi.7gs on SPDS Criteria vill be revised to address Pg .6.7.2.7 displays have different trend graphs. Displays will be P2 *AEE' S ***"i"E" i" di ***"t #**id t 'I'*i 7
- 1 #8 ""d *#
Q.?.K places (trend 3,raph s ) , trend displays.
(See also HED 1123.)
' REF:
SFDS AUDIT
[
[
F L
~
Note Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number PfisSTPCriteriaReportnumber
. D.Tn D-Is 09/30/s8
I l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll0HTING DESIGN REVIEW I~ I'.I OWEC CO.
HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY n Nt1 8ER 08SERVATl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TIT LE PARAGRAPH HED 1071 The ERFDADS function keys Labeling provided on the SPDS keys is Pg 6.7.1.4 used for SPDS should oe seen as adequate. Ev luations will Pg -App. P differentiated from the be performed to determine possible P.1 remaining keys. means to highlight these keys as SPDS keys.
4 I
REF:
SPDS AUDIT I
l -
Note Referenca P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number -
D.TXT D-19 us,'M.It R
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
-h &
j hE9 POWER CO.
Computers HED CATEGORY D HF AREA l
SH T OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1073 Displays for QDPS and ERFDADS The displays will be revised to show P
1 6.7.2.7 have been developed using the the symbol for a cooler or heater, P2
- APP. Q P&lD symbol for a cooler or without letters identifying the Q.7.H heater, but without con- service or water source, in App. L sistency in use of letters conformance to the criteria identifying the service or developed.
water source.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l.
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number
- D.TKT D-20 09/30/88
H0JSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . .. EfI POWE R CO.
Computers D HF AREA HED CATEGORY 11 SHEET NUMs*R OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1074 The displayed value sequence The ERFDADS display will be revised Pg -6.7.2.4 for RCS pressure in ERFDADS to conform with the QDPS display, P2* APP. Q is different from QDPS. which is designed to group the tvo Q.4.E sensors with the same range together, REP:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note Reference P isg NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P2 is STP Criteria Report number
~
l D.TXT D-21 09/30/88 -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. . . E. - POWER CO.
computers HED CATEGORY D HF AREA NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DitMSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1106 Various changes are required The ERFDADS display CV-02 has been P
y
-6.7.2., on the ERFDADS display CV 02 revised to more. closely reflect the P2 APP. Q to match the actual plant, actual plant.
O 5.A Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit '.
These same changes are bei.sg implemented for Unit 2.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATIO!!
l L
[
[ :
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 aumber P is STP Criteria Report numhr D.TXT D-22 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. ).' .Cj E
OWER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRiTERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1110 The cursors on the SPDS This discrepancy remains under P- Critical Safety Function g evaluation to determine final 6.7.2.5.n Integrity "0PERATING" and disposition.
P2APP. Q "COLD OVERPRESSURE" trend Q.5.N displays are diffi<. alt to locate on the CRT. The size of each cursor is one pixel and is meant to show the current value in a trend plot.
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION Notes Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number -
P is STP Criteria Report number D.TKI D-23 09/30/88
l l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHilNG DESIGN REVIEW
. ).' .
E OWER CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY n NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1113 On the SPDb NSF-Containment The SPDS Normal Safety Function P1 ,6.7.2.5 display the scale legend Cortainment display will be revised P2 -APP. Q associated with containment to move the "pressure" bar to the Q.5.C temperature and pressure left hand side of the trend chart.
values can result in operator conf"sion and potential mis.eading of the values.
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE-LOOP VALIDATION l
l t
i 1
l Moto: Reference t is NUREG-0700 section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number D.TXT D-24 09/30/88
{
/
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
\
. . E. . POWER CO.
HF AREA C mputers D HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFEel:NCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGHAPH HED lll4 The lack of digital This discrepancy remains under Pg -6.7.2.4 information makes accurate evaluation te determine final P2 11.1 determir.ation of the SPDS disposition.
App. Q Normal Safety Function bar Q.4. A chart values difficult and time consuming.
REF:
SPDS K W-IN-THE LOOP VALIDATION 4
i 1
Notes Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number DoTXT D-25 09/30/88
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
[).'Ed OWER CO.
Computers HED CATEGORY D HF AREA NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITE RI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1122 The acronym for breaker The SFDS top level displays have been P g -6.7.2.4 (BRK) appearing on the top revised to change "BRK" to BKR".
6.6.3.3 level SEDS displays is P2 -App. Q inc nsistent with the Based on the above actions, this HED Q.4 acronym for breaker (BKR) is considered resolved for Unit 1 6.4.6 contained in the "STP and Unit 2.
App. L Standard Acronyms List."
REF:
SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION l
Notes Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number
~
D.TXT D-26 09/30/88
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING
& DESIGN REVIEW
. E. . POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMB (R OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1123 The SPDS uses some of the This discrepancy remains under Pg -6.7.2.7 same colors for trends and evaluation to determine final P2 ' app. Q bar chart alarms on the disposition as to colors to be Q.7.K. Normal Safety Functici used on trend plots.
displays. Specifically, green and yellow are used for both purposes. (See also HED 1069.)
REF:
SPDS MAN-IN-THE-LOOP VALIDATION l
l 1
hm
~
l Note: Reference t is NUREG-0700 Section 6 nunker PhisSTPCriteriaReportnumbr -
D.TXT D- 2 7 09/30/88
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g ggjg y gg yjg g
.... O POWE R CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY n SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPO$lTION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1136 ERFDADS display MS 06 gives Class 1E radiation monitor values are Py 6.7.2.4 the main steam line datalinked to ERFDADS from both QDPS 6.6.3.3 radiation value units as and directly from the radiation moni-P2 APP. Q "R/HR" and uses the values toring system. Criteria are being Q.4 catalinked from QDPS, which developed to govern what input values 6.4.6 are actually in uCi/cc will be used on each display.
App. L instead. Following development of the criteria, the displays will be ERFDADS display RA 10 uses revised to conform to the criteria, the RMS datalinked values band the proper units will be shown, for SG blowdown, which have units of mR/HR, but the display shows units of uCi/cc .
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
L
[
[
[
I Note Reference P is NUKEG 6700 Section 6 number
{ g P 2 is STP Criteria Report number D.TXT D-28 09/30/88 f
HOUSTON LIGHTING CONTROL ROOM
& DESIGN REVIEW
_ .. POWER CO.
HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Ol8P081Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1107 Pushbuttons for blocking the The power range neutron flux low Py -6.8.2.2 power range neutron flux low setpoint trip block pushbuttons, and 6.8.2.3 setpoint trip above P-10 are their associated labels, will be 2 6.5.2.2 laid out vertically on P
reversed so that the "R' switch is 6.5.2.3 panel CP005. The "S" train above the "S" switch.
pushbutton is above the "R" train pushbutton. This arrangement is inconsistent with the source range block switches and the inter-mediate range block push-buttons (also on CP005) and the normal top-to-bottom alphabetic layout arrangement REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
~
e Notes Reference 2 is NUREG-0700 section 6 number ~
PfisSTPCriteriaRepo: number -
D.TXT D-29 09/30/88 _
- _