ML22256A318
| ML22256A318 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2022 |
| From: | Jorge Corujo-Sandin NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
| To: | Strope M Point Beach |
| References | |
| IR 2022010 | |
| Download: ML22256A318 (12) | |
See also: IR 05000266/2023010
Text
September 13, 2022
Mr. Michael Strope
Site Vice President
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC
6610 Nuclear Road
Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516
SUBJECT: POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN
NRC QUADRENNIAL COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2023010; 05000301/2023010
Dear Mr. Strope:
On January 9, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a quadrennial
baseline Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI) at Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.21M
which is being revised and should be publicly available in the near future.
The Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and
operation of risk significant components with low margin, or associated with an accident
scenario, or a specific system. The inspection also monitors the implementation of changes to
structures, systems, and components as modifications to one system may also affect the
design bases and functioning of interfacing systems as well as introduce the potential for
common cause failures. The components, modifications, 50.59 Evaluations, 50.59 Screenings
and Operating Experiences to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified as
part of the preparation for the inspection and finalized during the first onsite inspection week.
Additionally, the inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This
request would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time,
and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite
week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to
ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact.
The inspection will include 2 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of seven NRC
inspectors who will focus on engineering/maintenance/operations of the selected components
modifications, 50.59 Evaluations, 50.59 Screenings and Operating Experiences. The current
inspection schedule is as follows:
Preparation week: January 3 - 6, 2023
Onsite weeks: January 9 - 13, 2023 and January 23 - 27, 2023
Experience with previous baseline design/modification inspections of similar depth and length
has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC
inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to
ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information
needed for the inspection.
M. Strope -2-
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into five groups, with their respective due
dates:
October 14, 2022 - The First Group lists information necessary for our initial
risk-informed scoping activities.
October 28, 2022 - The Second Group lists information necessary for our initial
inspection scoping activities (preliminary sample selections).
- November 18, 2022 - The lead inspector will communicate the preliminary
samples selected. This will include Components, Modifications,
50.59 Evaluations and 50.59 Screenings.
December 27, 2022 - The Third Group of documents requested are those items
needed to support our in-office preparation activities. During the in-office preparation
activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the
inspection.
January 9, 2023 - The Fourth Group includes the additional information identified
during the in-office preparation as well as plant-specific reference material. This
information should be available to the team onsite.
After January 9, 2023 - The Fifth Group includes supporting information to be
provided throughout the inspection. Specifically, corrective action documents and
questions developed during the inspection are requested to be provided as the
documents are generated.
In addition, the enclosure includes information and requests addressing inspection logistics.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. J. Corujo-Sandin. We understand that our licensing
contact for this inspection is Ms. K. Locke of your organization. If there are any questions about
the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at
630-829-9741 or via e-mail at Jorge.Corujo-Sandin@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.
M. Strope -3-
This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
Signed by Corujo-Sandin, Jorge
on 09/13/22
Senior Reactor Engineer
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301
License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27
Enclosure:
Design Bases Assurance Inspection
Document Request
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
M. Strope -4-
Letter to Michael Strope from Jorge Corujo-Sandin dated September 13, 2022.
SUBJECT: POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN
NRC QUADRENNIAL COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2023010; 05000301/2023010
DISTRIBUTION:
Lou McKown
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
RidsNrrPMPointBeach
RidsNrrDroIrib Resource
DRPIII
DRSIII
ADAMS Accession Number: ML22256A318
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive
OFFICE RIII
NAME JCorujo-Sandin:mb
DATE 09/13/2022
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
(TEAMS) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INSPECTION INFORMATION
Inspection Report Number: 05000266/2023010; 05000301/2023010
Onsite Inspection Dates: January 9 - 13, 2023 and January 23 - 27, 2023
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21M, Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection
Jorge Corujo-Sandin, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS
Lead Inspector: 630-829-9741
Jorge.Corujo-Sandin@nrc.gov
Joon Park, Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
Kevin Barclay, Senior Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
Teammates: Daneira Melendez-Colon, Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
Lionel Rodriguez, Senior Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
Kevin Fay, Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
Benny Jose, Senior Reactor Inspector, RIII/DRS
II. LOGISTICS
Email the following inspection logistics to the lead inspector by December 9, 2022, or
sooner:
1. Entrance meeting time and location.
2. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
3. Response team contact information (names and phone numbers) and team roles
(e.g., management sponsor, lead, inspector counterpart).
4. Any potential resource conflicts during the inspection (e.g., emergency drills and
all-staff meetings).
5. Available times, during the Monday and Tuesday of the second on-site week, to use
the simulator to run scenarios. An operations crew to support this effort will also be
required.
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 situation, additional logistics related with inspector presence
on-site will be coordinated closer to the actual start of the inspection. Reach out to the
Team Lead for questions or comments.
Enclosure
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
III. INFORMATION REQUEST
Contact the lead inspector as soon as possible if you have any questions regarding this
information request. Provide the information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other
searchable formats, preferably via an electronic sharing service (CERTREC, ShareFile, Box,
etc.). Specific Excel formats for various Enclosure items may be requested to assist in
Inspection Sample Selection. If you do not have access to any of these services or similar,
we can provide you access to Box, which can be used to upload/download and share
documents. The files should contain descriptive names and be indexed and hyperlinked to
facilitate ease of use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily
understood by someone who has knowledge of light-water reactor technology.
1. Information Requested to Support Risk Informed Selections
The following information is requested by October 14, 2022, or sooner, to facilitate
the initial risk scoping required to support the sample selections.
Note: If you are unable to provide items 1.1. through 1.6.2. as requested, please
reach out to the Team Lead as soon as possible.
1.1. Risk-Ranking of the top 500 components from your site-specific probabilistic
safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Birnbaum Worth. Include values for Risk
Achievement Worth, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley. Please
provide the ranking in an excel spreadsheet that contains the importance
measures and the description of the basic event (e.g., not just the basic event
designator).
1.2. Risk-ranking of the top 500 components (i.e., Large Early Release Frequency
(LERF)) from your site-specific PSA similar to the request in Item 1.1. (Provide
in Excel format.)
1.3. Provide a list of the top 500 cut-sets from your PSA. Provide the descriptions
of the basic events in the list of cut-sets. (Provide in Excel format.)
1.4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
(Provide in Excel format.)
1.5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, Human Error Reliability Analysis Notebook,
Internal Flood scenario notebook and latest internal event PSA summary
document.
1.6. For Fire PSA Model:
1.6.1 Provide the fire PRA quantification notebook.
1.6.2 Provide importance measures ranked preferably by Birnbaum but if not
available by RAW for the top 500 basic events for the fire PRA.
(Provide in Excel format.).
2
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
1.7. List of systems, system numbers/designators, and corresponding system
names.
1.8. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified high
risk in the PSA).
1.9. Electronic copies of simplified plant drawings (if available). Note: these may
be uncontrolled documents such as big notes, training diagrams, etc.
2. Information Requested for Selection of Samples
The following information is requested by October 28, 2022, or sooner, to facilitate
the initial sample selection.
2.1. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
Manual.
2.2. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures and abnormal operating
procedures.
2.3. Provide the in-service testing (IST) program document.
2.4. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule
(a)(1) category for the last 4 years.
2.5. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 4 years.
2.6. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the
last 4 years at your facility.
2.7. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
issues initiated/completed in the last 4 years.
2.8. List of open operability evaluations.
2.9. List of all time critical and/or risk significant operator actions. Identify those
actions that do not have job performance measures.
2.10. List of permanent plant modifications to SSCs that are field work complete.
Do not include canceled or still in process modifications. For the purpose of
this inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent:
2.10.1 Plant changes, design changes, set point changes, completed in the last
4 years;
2.10.2 Equivalency evaluations, suitability analyses, and commercial grade
dedications completed in the last 4 years;
3
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
2.10.3 Procedure changes for Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs),
Abnormal Operating Procedures (AOPs), surveillances, and test
procedures in the last 4 years; and
2.10.4 Calculation changes that have been issued for use in the last 4 years.
2.11. A list of corrective action documents (open and closed) in the last 4 years that
address permanent plant modifications issues, concerns, or processes. These
documents should also include the corrective action documents associated
with the modification implementation.
2.12. List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving (a) calculations,
(b) procedure revisions, (c) changes to the facility (modifications),
(d) non-routine operating configurations, or (e) departures in methods of
analyses. The list should NOT include any evaluations which concluded a
license amendment was required. Include evaluations performed over the last
4 years. This list should include 50.59 evaluations for the following:
2.12.1 Changes that have been made under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59
that have been updated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4);
2.12.2 Modifications that are field work complete; and
2.12.3 Changes to calculations (or initiation of new calculations) that have
been issued. The list should contain the number and title of each
document, a brief description of the change, and the corresponding
number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or
procedure to which the evaluation applies).
2.13. A list of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not
requiring a full evaluation involving (i.e., just a 50.59 Screenings):
(a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility
(modifications); (d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in
methods of analyses.
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief
description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the
affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation
applies).
2.14. A list of any modifications, procedure revisions, or the Updated Final Safety
Analysis Report (UFSAR) changes where it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59
did not apply.
2.15. A list of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address
10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes. These documents should also
include the associated corrective action documents and the 50.59 change
implementation.
4
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each
document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if
applicable).
2.16. UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4). Provide
copies of the complete submittal.
2.17. Copy of the UFSAR change log or a synopsis of the changes. This should
include all of the changes made to the UFSAR that were incorporated in the
last 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) submittal.
3. Information Requested for the Preliminary Selected Samples to be Available by
December 27, 2022.
This information should be separated for each selected sample, especially if
provided electronically (e.g., folder with component or modification name that
includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
3.1. Corrective Action Program procedures, including the operability/functionality
determination procedure.
3.2. Quality Assurance Program document/procedure.
3.3. Procedures addressing time critical and/or risk significant operator actions.
3.4. Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes,
set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial
grade dedications, post-modification testing, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and
screenings, and UFSAR updates.
3.5. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
3.6. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
For the selected Components:
3.7. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
3.8. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of
the selected components for the last 4 years. (Excel format preferred.)
3.9. For each selected component list of the maintenance history (corrective,
preventive, and elective) over the last 10 years. Identify frequency of
preventive maintenance activities.
3.10. Aging Management Program documents applicable to each selected
component.
5
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
3.11. Provide an all-inclusive list of calculation revisions in effect associated with
each of the selected components. Include document number, title, and
revision number.
3.12. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components,
excluding data files. If number of applicable responses under this request, for
a specific component, is excessive (e.g., more than 10 calculations), you may
reach out to the Team Lead to for an alternative. [Pipe stress calculations
excluded from this request.]
3.13. Electronic copies of electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams.
3.14. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).
3.15. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 4 years) associated with
each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if
applicable.
3.16. Copies of operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
3.17. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the
selected components, if applicable.
3.18. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
last 4 years. (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing,
other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and
leak rate results, diagnostic trend data, etc.)
3.19. Provide copies of the normal and alarm response procedures associated with
the selected components and selected scenarios (if any).
3.20. Completed tests and surveillances for each selected component performed
during the last 3 years. For those tests and surveillances performed at a
periodicity of greater than 3 years, provide the latest two performed. Include
the associated acceptance criteria basis calculations. For those specific tests
or surveillances performed at a periodicity resulting in excessive responses to
this request, you may reach out to the Team Lead for an alternative.
For the selected Modifications, 50.59 Evaluations and 50.59 Screenings:
3.21. For each of the selected modifications, provide the engineering change
package.
3.22. Provide a copy of each selected 50.59 Evaluation.
3.23. Provide copies of the selected 50.59 Screening.
3.24. The selected Modification, 50.59 Evaluations and 50.59 Screenings will be
further filtered by the inspectors until the final samples are selected. Once
these are selected (during the preparation week and the first on-site week) the
6
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
site should be prepared to provide other supporting documents for the selected
item. Examples of supporting documents include:
- Design drawings supporting the change
- Procedure, calculations, etc. affected by the change
- Post-modification test packages
- UFSAR change papers generated (e.g., marked off pages)
4. Additional Information to be Provided on January 9, 2023, When the Team is
Onsite
4.1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final
selections and may identify additional information needed to support the
inspection.
4.2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the
selected components during the two onsite inspection weeks.
5. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
5.1. Any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams questions
during this inspection as the documents are generated.
5.2. List of questions and/or document requests submitted by the team and their
status (e.g., open, closed) sorted by inspector. Provide daily by 2:00 p.m.,
plant local time, to each inspector. It is recommended to provide the team
leader with a master list sorted by inspector and each inspector with a list
containing only the items originated by that inspector.
5.3. If available in hardcopy form, one complete set of P&IDs and simplified
drawings (e.g., training schematics). If any of these documents is not available
in hardcopy form, contact the lead inspector.
5.4. Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have been
located and are readily retrievable as the inspection team will likely be requesting
these documents during the inspection. Examples of supporting documents are:
5.4.1 Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment report;
5.4.2 Procurement documents for components and modifications selected
(verify retrievable);
5.4.3 Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.);
5.4.4 Vendor manuals;
5.4.5 Historical revisions of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR),
including the Original FSAR and Original Safety Evaluation Report; and
5.4.6 Copy of electrical drawings, key diagrams, and isometrics (paper
copies).
7
DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
8