ML20235B566
| ML20235B566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1987 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235B348 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8709240145 | |
| Download: ML20235B566 (217) | |
Text
-_ - _ _ _ . - ..
(-
f I
Dated:- September 10, 1987 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA l
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION {
before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of )
l
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL OF-NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-444-OL
)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 ) (Offsite Emergency and 2) ) Planning Issues)
)
APPLICANTS' DIRECT TESTIMONY NO. 6 (Sheltering)
Panel Members: John W. Baer, Emergency Planning Specialist, Aidikoff Associates Donald W. Bell, Senior Nuclear Technology Engineer, Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
John D. Bonds, Assistant Director for Planning, Division of Public Health Services, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Anthony M. Callendrello, Manager, Emergency Planning, New Hampshire Yankee Paul R. Frechette, Jr., Senior Emergency Planner, New Hampshire Yankee James A. MacDonald, Radiological Assessment Manager, New Hampshire Yankee Dennis Mileti, Professor of Sociology and Director of the Hazards Assessment Laboratory, Colorado State University Richard H. Strome, Director New Hampshire Office of .
l hoh D$ f -
l_ G L__-_____-_
p' i .
Emergency Management William T. Wallace, Jr., M.D., M.P.H.,
Director, Division of Public Health Services, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services INTRODUCTION The NHRERP does not contemplate mutually exclusive protective measures for any segment of the population, but provides for a continuum of protective responses that may be implemented to protect the health and safety of the public, including summer, seasonal populations. Further, this continuum of protective responses has the flexibility to ensure an adequate response to a wide spectrum of accident conditions.
The concept of protective action recommendation decisionmaking employed by the NHRERP is patterned on emergency planning guidance of NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1 and emergency planning regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Protective Action Guides (PAGs) of the U.S. EPA have been incorporated in the NHRERP and provisions have been made for calculation of projected dose which permits reliance on the PAGs for protective action decisionmaking. Decision criteria have been developed and committed to procedures to aid accident assessment personnel and decision makers in making choices among available protective action options including that of sheltering.
-2 -
_m__._________._-___._________ - . _ _ _ _
~
v .
The NHRERP provides for precautionary actions intended to avoid exposure of the beach population to potential radiological risk. Plans and procedures, including decision criteria, have been put into place specifical?y for implementation of these measures. Accident assessment personnel of the State of New Hampshire are prepared by procedures and training to evaluate the status and prognosis of plant conditions and safety systems for the purpose of recommending precautionary actions prior to the manifestation of radiological consequences.
While the preferred protective action for the seasonal beach population is evacuation, the State of New Hampshire is prepared to recommend the protective action of " shelter-in-place" considering specific conditions at the time of an accident (e,q , time of release, duration of exposure, magnitude of release). The statement of Section 2.6.5 of the NHRERP that " sheltering may not be considered a feasible _
protective action on the Seacoast beach during the summer" is not a command that proscribes sheltering as a protective action recommendation. The NHRERP will be amended to clarify this particular statement. Based on a study of potential shelters on beach areas, State of New Hampshire decision makers are aware of the availability of potential public shelters should sheltering be the appropriate recommendation.
(See infra page 27.) In this regard, a comprehensive I shelter study has been conducted for the seven coastal l l
1 l
i
l 4
communities within the Seabrook Station emergency planning i 1
zone (EPZ) to identify the existence of sufficient shelter j capacity if needed for the beach population.
The NHRERP provides the method and means to ensure l prompt notification of the summer, seasonal population of 1
precautionary and protective actions to be taken. This is primarily accomplished by a system of fixed sirens providing coverage of the Seabrook Station EPZ. In addition, sirens specifically designated for beach areas of concern have public address capability for which taped, voice messages containing specific instructions for the beach population have been developed. Each campground in the EPZ will be equipped with tone-alert radios to supplement notification provided by the siren system. Both beach areas and campgrounds will be supplied with public information materials in the form of durable signs in the beach area, posters, and brochures that provide instructions to the public on actions to take in an emergency.
The NHRERP includes a special facility plan for each campground in the EPZ. These plans call for campground operators to ensure that campground users are notified of an emergency and are advised to depart the EPZ immediately in the event any precautionary or protective action is recommended for any segment of the population. Campground users constitute neither a significantly large segment of the i
I population nor an inordinate concentration of persons in any
-4 -
- . o one area of the EPZ so as to impede their rapid departure from the EPZ in the event of an emergency.
The NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.5, contains an analysis of the relative, representative values of external sheltering factors for typical structures to be found in the Seabrook Station EPZ. This analysis concludes that
, essentially any residential structure in the Seabrook Station EPZ affords a cloud shielding factor of 0.9 which is assumed by the NHRERP for the purpose of choosing between the protective action options of evacuation and sheltering.
Furthermore, schools and day care centers are presumed to share the characteristics of structures that prevail in the Seabrook Station EPZ and to have at least the same dose reduction factors. Because protective action recommendations for the general public apply also to schools and day care centers, evaluation of the protection afforded by the individual structures is not considered as part of the decision-making process.
PLANNING BASIS FOR PROTECTIVE ACTIONS The NHRERP Volume 1 and the local plans, Volumes 16 through 32, and specifically plans for the Towns of Seabrook and Hampton, V:?umes.16 and 18 respectively, provide for a continuum of protective responses that may be implemented to protect the health and safety of the public, including the summer, seasonal populations, in the event of a radiological emergency. This continuum of protective responses has the
. . - - _ - - . - - _ _ - _ _ m___--__._m____ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ , , , __ , _ _
p flexibility to ensure an adequate response to a wide spectrum of conditions.
The plans are premised on the basic concept of NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1 (NUREG 0654) that any one or a combination of. protective responses will be taken to achieve the best dose savings to the public. The continuum of responses prescribed by the NHRERP ranges from precautionary actions fur the beach' population at the early stages of an accident to the protective actions for the general public of shelter, evacuation, and control of access to affected areas.
The NHRERP recognizes that under certain circumstances a o recommendation to shelter the general'public may be combined with closure of beaches and parks, evacuation of the public from beach areas and parks, and restriction of access to those areas. In other circumstances, shelter may also be recommended for beach areas.
- 1. Concept of Protective Action Decisionmaking
- a. Purpose of Protective Actions The NHRERP is based on the planning guidance of NUREG 0654, which states at page 6:
The overall objective of emergency response plans is to provide dose savings (and in some cases immediate life saving) for a spectrum of accidents that could produce offsite doses in excess of Protective Action Guides (PAGs).
The NHRERP is predicated on the understanding that emergency planning for a nuclear plant is not required to be designed to cope with any particular accident sequence or a
" worst case accident".
NUREG 0654 states further at page 6:
No specific accident sequence should be isolated as the one for which to plan because each accident could have different consequences, both in degree and nature.
The protective action decision criteria of the NHRERP take into consideration plant conditions, evacuation clear times, shelter factors, and other conditions that may exist at the time of an accident,
- b. Protective Action Guides and Projected Doses Protective Action Guides (PAGs) are criteria provided for use by public health officials and decision makers to determine the need for protective actions and for choosing appropriate protective actions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated Protective Action Guides on the basis of projected doses which act as trigger points to initiate protective actions. The U.S. EPA Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents, EPA - 520/1-75-001, cautions:
A Protective Action Guide under no circumstance implies an acceptable dose.
Since the PAG is based on projected dose, it is used only in an ex post facto effort to minimize the risk from an event which is occurring or has already occurred.
(Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Action for l Nuclear Incidents, U.S. EPA, September 1975 (Revised June 1980), pg. 1.1.) In sum, PAGs are guidance tools for use by
decision makers and are not levels of acceptable or j unacceptable risks.
l The NHRERP Volume'1, Section 2.6.3 incorporates the US l
l EPA PAGs.for direct exposure to radioactive materials within the Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ. The range of PAG doses delineated by the US EPA for the general public are indicated in Table 2.6-1 of the NHRERP. The guidelines incorporated in Table 2.6-1 provide protection for the most sensitive members of the general population: women who are pregnant and infants. As expressed in Section 2.6.3, New Hampshire has chosen to base its protective action decisions on the lowest values cited by the U.S. EPA, that is, a 1 rem whole-body projected dose, and a 5 rem thyroid projected dose.
In order to utilize the PAGs, projected doses to the general public murt be determined. Projected doses must be determined following the incident based on data from (1) plant conditions, (2) release and meteorological conditions, (3) offsite radiological measurements, or (4) combinations of these three factors. (Manual of Protective Action Guides, U.S. EPA, p. 5.1.) The NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.5.2 provides for estimating the projected doses for the Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ and for reporting projected doses as quickly as possible in terms of whole body and thyroid doses.
NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.5.3 describes the means by which State of New Hampshire officials will determine projected doses. Calculation techniques for this purpose are e
explicated in procedures contained in NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendices N, 0, P, and Q. . Each of these procedures incorporates the factors identified in the U.S. EPA Manual for determining projected dose.
- c. Protective Action Recommendation Decisionmaking for the General Public.
NUREG 0654, criterion J. 9 provides that:
Each State and local organization shall establish a capability for implementing protective measures based upon protective action guides and other criteria. This shall be consistent with the recommendations of EPA regarding exposure resulting from passage of radioactive airborne plumes . . . .
The NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.7 describes the decision criteria to be applied for selecting protective actions for direct exposure within the Seabrook Station Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ. (Precautionary action decisionmaking is discussed under item (d) within.) These criteria are used by decision makers for choosing between sheltering and evacuation, and are sufficiently flexible to be applied to any type of projected or actual release from a nuclear power plant. The decision criteria depicted in Figure 2.6-7 of the NHRERP consider the time to release, time of plume arrival at a specified location, time of exposure at the reference location, projected dose, EPA PAGs, time available to make protective action decision, time available to implement i I
protective actions, constraints to implementation of protective action decision, and dose reduction factors
~
l
.c } l' 4
pertinent.to either sheltering or evacuation. At the final decision step in the process, the decision criteria call for detailed analysis and calculations to determine the comparative effectiveness of shelter and evacuation. If evacuation is indicated, it will be recommended. If shelter is indicated, then shelter will be recommended.
NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U contains procedures which delineate the sequence of steps to be'followed by accident assessment personnel of the New Hampshire Division.of Public i Health Services (DPHS) in applying the NHRERP decision criteria. As a practical matter, DPHS accident assessment personnel at both the State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in Concord, New Hampshire and at the State Incident Field Office (IFO) , co-located with the Utility Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) in Newington, New Hampshire, will ,i obtain the indicated data in conjunction with utility.
accident assessment personnel.
Both facilities.are to be activated at the early stages of an emergency, specifically at the Alert emergency classification level. Procedures contained in NHRERP, Volume 4A call for DPHS personnel to make contact with utility emergency personnel immediately after notification of an emergency to obtain availabic data on plant conditions.
Accident assessment will be initiated at the State EOC and Continued through the duration of an emergency at both the State EOC and at the IFO/ EOF. DPHS accident ar.sessment
____-______-________-____-__a
l
'e ll I )
personnel at the IFO/ EOF will receive firsthand projected dose data and field measurement data, assess the data with r,3 O' utility accident assessment perconnel in conjunction with emergency management personnel, perform independent calculations of projected doses and formulate protective action recommendations to be conveyed to the State EOC where the public: protective action recommendation decision will be made.
- d. Decisionmaking Criteria for Seasonal Beach Populations The protective action decision criteria discussed in NHRERP, Volumef.f, Section 2.6.7, contain decision criteria designed for summ r; seasonal populations, including seasonal beach populations. These decision criteria incorporate considerations for'precau'tionary actions for the summer, seasonal population based on the status and prognosis of plant conditions. These provisions of the NHRERP go beyond the emergency planning requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 (b) and guidance of NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, in that they are not predicated on known potential radiological consequences expressed as, projected dose. They are instead based on a prognosis by State of New Hampshire accident assessment jV' personnel of,the potential for plant conditions to lead to
/
F offsite consequences. On the other hand, protective actions are intended to mitigate the effects of a known risk to the f
l offsite population, 11g2, a protective action is an action l
taken to avoid or minimize projected dose.
e
. _____-m-.
L NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.5.2 advises accident assessment personnel that complete radiological assessment data may not be available or no release may yet be projected when they are considering early, precautionary actions for the summer, seasonal population. Therefore, the current plant status and a prognosis of anticipated plant conditions may be the best indicator of the need for precautionary actions. Procedures contained in NHRERP, Volume 4A, facilitate consideration of plant status and prognosis of plant conditions by providing for early reporting of plant
~
status data by the utility emergency organization to State of New Hampshire emergency management and public health officials. In particular, the Manager of the State of New Hampshire Radiological Health Program (or designated alternate) is instructed to contact the plant control room ,
for plant status information immediately after being notified of an emergency classification level. The data to be obtained are identified on the notification form utilized by both utility and Division of Public Health Services' procedures. These data will be evaluated by State of New Hampshire accident assessment personnel and decision makers to determine the advisability of precautionary actions.
State of New Hampshire accident assessment personnel and decision makers will consider implementation of precautionary measures as early as the Alert emergency classification level. The description of Alert of NUREG 0654, Appendix I,
E j. (- , m- .
ye a "T>,
l )jQ '? . 'T f, u ,
3 ..
l 6;; , j' ;? _, _eh i
,'d ,
~'* c yf_ ,
,' l ~ ,
?-
< t 'y 'l ,y. ,
4 '
1
.gN M+. ssays in part: '
.< ll -
h
~
c . > N. $
't l' f 6 f Any releases [r.t this classifica.tlon level are] expected to be limited tol '
i .
" ,U small fractilo:1 of the EPA Protective- t '
-) "
l ; Action Guidance exposure levels. ,
f i e g e-
^
.3 !
2
, At this classification leval, no offsite act. ion Fould 1g' 4,
1 ) .i- l \\ . , .; ,
'ottlinitrily warranted to protect the public, ;but' its '
.g'
.i ,-l r , ,
consideration here afferin additiordli time to clear thef
"[
i , l .m '\
4 M ches or'prqvant additio)nal publig' access totthe beaches.
/ .
5
- , a > - ,
ss ;
4 , ,
"At thisystage the State's dacisions w:k11 be bas,.ed on the
). , ' t, 9 ,i J 7
, g 5 status of plant safety s titems, with particular attenpign 1 f,
i - ,.
7 ~'
4 given to s,tatus of, safety syst: Isms identified in Div $3dn 5f
,f-
'l l r 4
i 4
Public Hec 1k;h Sbrvices procedures, NHRERP, Volotne 4A, .;
., !, e 4 }
Apdandix U. These procedures contain sets of gaestions khich , t
'l y ?
elicit respensesipertaining to the status of principal plant
\j
'f. safety systems. While no apecific response, or any, i N , , , ,
y
'* combination'thereof, will determine any action to be ta' ken,
.j the answers.to these questions will p ovide accidend 1 assessment personnel with essential information on whsch.to
- a ,
formulate a judgment on the implications of plant status fdj#
- I.
offsite precautionary actions. The procedures direct'the..:
, r i
attentioniof adcident assessment personnel to tne systems ofi' 1 3 t
.a t y concern. ,
J.\a ., /
) These ' decision criteria of the N'1W P are.'re intended
../ j
.i lC t# dictate ' automatic implementation of precautionary actions 1 (
at tnis classification level. They are intended to i.. y facilitate the exercise of judgm. int ordthe part 5f. New
/
\
Hampshire acciddnt' assessment personnei.and decision'makhrs a w ;
i.
k 1
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .._ F
y . .
as to the most prudent course of action given'the particular circumstances of an accident situation.
NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.7 states further at page 2.6-24:
If the degrading plant condition leads to a release or potential for release thereby initiating declaration of a site Area Emergency or more severe ECL, immediate protective actions will be recommended (by State decisionmakers] for seasonal populations and for the general public within a two mile radius and five miles downwind.
Figure 2.6-6 of the NHRERP indicates that for these conditions during periods of summer, seasonal population, the recommended protective action would be evacuation of Hampton and Seabrook beaches. The intent of this provision is the implementation of protective measures for the beach population at the first indication of a potential for offsite populations to be affected. Under these conditions, any projected doses to the public would be expected to be below the lowest values of the EPA PAGs. At the Site Area Emergency classification level, offsite protective actions would not be expected to be necessary to protect the public.
At this classification level, however, the State may consider precautionary or protective actions for the beach population.
The description of Site Area Emergency of NUREG 0654, Appendix 1 provides foundation for this decisionmaking concept where it says: J Any releases [are) not expected to exceed EPA Protective Action Guideline exposure e
_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ __ __ D
c .
i l
levels except near site boundary.
The emergency classification levels incorporated into the NHRERP are inherently conservative, and are anticipatory in nature. They are initiated by conditions that allow anticipation of later consequences if conditions are not mitigated. Decision makers are thereby led to prudent courses of action before offsite consequences are realized.
In summary, where projected dose data that would allow application of the EPA PAGs for formulating protective action recommendation are D21 available, as much technical data as can be made available to, and evaluated by, accident assessment personnel and decision makers will be used in deciding appropriate actions to be taken. Where projected doses can be calculated on the basis of available source term data for accident assessment personnel and decision makers to evaluate against the PAGs, then the decision criteria of NHRERP, Volume 1, Figure 2.6-7 for selecting between the protective actions of sheltering and evacuation will be applied. Figure 2.6-7 and Figure 1A, Protective Action )
1 Recommendations Worksheet for the General Population, of i NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U, both of which delineate the criteria to be applied for selecting between sheltering and evacuation are provided as Attachment 1.
- 2. Implementation of Precautionary and Protectiva Actions for the Summer, Seasonal Population Actions psascribed for implementation of precautionary and protective actions for the public, and specifically for
l the seasonal beach population, are contained in appendices to both NHCDA (now Governor's Office of Emergency Management) and Division of Public Health Services procedures (Volume 4, Appendix F and Volume:4A, Appendix U respectively). These procedures establish explicit actions for implementation of j carly, precautionary measures for the Hampton and Seabrook
- beaches.
- a. Public Alert and Notification A key provision for initiation of protective actions is prompt notification of the public. This is achieved by activation of a system of fixed sirens situated throughout the 17 New Hampshire communities. These sirens provide audible alert coverage of the EPZ communities. For beach areas where precautionary actions may be recommended (i.e.,
Hampton and Seabrook beaches), three sirens have been designated for potential activation in early stages of an emergency for the purpose of initiating precautionary actions. Procedures are in place for these sirens to sound an alert signal and to broadcast a voice message in both English and French to advise beach populations of actions they should take. Procedures provide for immediate (within ;
15 minutes of the Governor's decision) activation of the l I
audible alert system by either Rockingham County Dispatch l Center or as a backup, by the Towns of Hampton and Seabrook after precautionary or protective action decisions are made for beach areas.
1
Activation of the audible alert signal would be followed by a voice message over the siren public address system containing emergency instructions for.the public. The script of the voice message is: " Attention . . . Attention . . .
Because of_a problem at Seabrook Station, the bes;.tes are now closed. Please leave the beach immediately. Listen to a local radio station for more information."
In addition to the audible alert system, a series of permanent signs which display emergency instructions will be posted in recreation areas, including on the beaches, throughout the EPZ. Currently 18 locations for placement of these signs have been identified in cooperation with the NH Department of Resources and Economic Development. The instructions explain what to do when sirens are heard and identify the emergency broadcast stations from which further information and instructions can be obtained. This information is also displayed in both English and French.
Additional public information materials containing the same
'information, again in both languages, will be available to transients at motels, hotels, and business establishments throughout the EPZ.
Emergency broadcast messages would be broadcast at 15-minute intervals over radio stations identified on the public information signs and in other informational materials for transients. The content of the EBS message would depend on
'the actions recommended by State of New Hampshire
~
(. -- _ - _ - _ _ _
(
- decisionmakers. Sample EBS messages containing instructions for the transient population are provided as Attachment 2.
- b. Precautionary Actions Precautionary actions planned for implementation for Hampton and Seabrook beaches are delineated in NHRERP, Volume 4, Appendix F and Volume 4A, Appendix U. Those actions pertain.particularly to the beach areas in an approximate 2-mile radius of Seabrook Station, in other words, those areas that could potentially be most immediately affected. This area is bounded by Great Boar's Head at Hampton Beach to the north and the New Hampshire-Massachusetts border at Route 286 and Ocean Boulevard at Seabrook Beach to the south. (The procedures contained in NHRERP, Rev. 2, define the northern boundary of this area as Little Boar's Head which is in North Hampton. The plan and procedures will be amended to identify this boundary as Great Boar's Head which is consistent with traffic control and public notification provisions for precautionary actions for the beach.)
4 Precautionary actions prescribed for this area are: j 1
(1) Closing beaches that attract seasonal populations l and which are in close proximity to the plant; (2) Implementation of traffic control to discourage transient traffic from flowing into the affected areas, j including beach areas; l
(3) Issuance of public announcements of actions taken through emergency broadcast and normal media channels; and
- I i
1
_ _ _ _ - - _ - - - J
(4) ' Monitoring of traffic' flow and local conditions in affected areas.
To facilitate implementation of these actions, the following. arrangements have been made:
(1) .The Department of Resources and Economic Development, which has jurisdiction over State beaches and parks, has been designated to assist with closing beaches and parks and adjacent parking areas under its control.
Procedures are in place for DRED to utilize lifeguards, park managers, and other available personnel for this purpose.
(2) Specific traffic control points have been designated for State and local police to discourage access of transient traffic into beach. areas and to facilitate egress of outgeing traffic. These points are specified for implementation of early precautionary actions and are explained in the ETE Testimony.
(3) Procedures are in place at the Rockingham County Dispatch Center and in the RERPs for the Towns of Hampton and Seabrook for activation of public alert sirens and public announcements for the beaches. Additionally, public information personnel at both the Media Center and the State l
EOC are activated at the Alert-classification to issue public l announcements to the media.
(4) Utility, State and local emergency response organizations will be activated at the early stages of an emergency, as early as the Alert classification level, to
monitor conditions in the plant and in potentially affected areas.
The option of early, precautionary actions for beachgoers is not intended to imply that precautionary evacuation is the only option available to decisionmakers responsible for formulating recommendations for the public.
Because the precautionary actions of. closing the beach and that of evacuating the beach population at early stages of an emergency, before dose consequences would even be projected, would avoid incurrence of dose consequences to the beach population, it is a preferred option. Therefore, specific plans have been put in place to implement it.
- c. Evacuation As A Protective Action In the event that accident conditions preclude timely implementation of precautionary measures for beach populations, evacuation of beach areas.as a protective action L continues to be an option available to State of New Hampshire decisionmakers. Where projected dose data are available for assessment, the decision criteria contained in NHRERP, Volume 1,-Section 2.6.7 and Figure 2.6-7 for selecting between Ebeltering and evacuation come into play. NHRERP, Volume 1, Sec' ion 2.6, at page 2.6-11 says:
If all potential radiological exposure can be avoided by implementing a timely evacuation, evacuation may be the preferred protective action. Where implementation of protective action is deemed appropriate, and where time and plant conditions permit, evacuation will generally be the selected course of l
i l i I
L ________
actic.i.
Numerous factors can influence the effectiveness of evacuation. They include the delay time between accident warning and initiation of evacuation, the radius within which the public is evacuated, evacuation speed, and changing 1 1
meteorological conditions during the evacuation.
Specific and detailed procedures are provided in the NHRERP to ensure early notification and evacuation of the j beach population. Administrative provision for and coordination of emergency instructions to be broadcast have been provided in NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.1, anu Volume 4, NHCDA procedures, and Volume 4B, State Police Communications Center procedures to ensure the flexibility to get the most appropriate message aired in a timely manner for the spectrum of accident conditions. The conditions covered by these provisions range from when the emergency organizations are fully staffed and are following a slowly developing situation I to the case when a severe situation is developing rapidly prior to emergency organizations being able to fully staff or assess the situation.
- d. Shelter In Place ,
NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.5 explains the shelter in l place concept on which New Hampshire relies as a protective action option. This concept provides for sheltering at the location in which the sheltering instruction is received.
The NHRERP, Volume 1, at page 2.6-6 explains this to mean:
I.
Those at home are to shelter at home, those at work or school are to shelter in the work place or school building.
Transients located indoors or in private homes will be asked to shelter at the locations they are visiting if this is feasible. Transients without access to an indoor location will be advised to evacuate as quickly as possible in their own vehicles (i.e., the vehicles in which they arrived).
Although precautionary actions for and evacuation of the beach areas are the preferred courses of action for the beach population because in most cases they would provide the greatest dose savings by avoiding potential radiological exposure risks altogether, sheltering as a protective action option for this segment of the population is not precluded.
Sheltering for example may be the appropriate protective action for a puff release - a gaseous or gaseous and particulate release - of less than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> duration. (Manual of Protective Action Guides, U.S. EPA, p. 1.29.) Sheltering would provide a constant cloud shielding factor of at least 0.9. Inhalation dose reduction from sheltering, which is variable with time, would also be effective for this period of time. Sheltering, which can be implemented quickly, in this case may afford a greater dose savings than evacuation if evacuation cannot be completed prior to a release. These factors are considered in the protective action decision criteria of NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U.
The decision to recommend shelter must, of course, be based on its effectiveness in achieving the greatest savings
-a____.-____-.__
with the goal of' maintaining projected doses below the lowest value of.the EPA PAGs. For implementation of this protective L;
' action option, New. Hampshire decisionmakers will rely on the mechanisms now in place, or to be put in place, in the NHRERP for recommending shelter to the public whether on the beach or.any place else. These mechanisms include rapid assessment of accident conditions; activation of the public alert system, which' include the beach public. address system; and Emergency Broadcast System announcements. Specific emergency messages have been developed, and will be added to the plan, for advising the beach population to take shelter in the nearest indoor public location. A pre-recorded message to-this effect will be in place at the beach siren activation points for broadcast over the beach public address system.
The EBS sheltering message for the beach population will advise' people to go to the nearest indoor public location.
The EBS message for this contingency will also request owners / operators of public access facilities to assist people with taking shelter. A sample of these messages is provided as Attachment 3. It is expected that people will comply with emergency broadcast system announcements to take shelter and that owners / operators of public access facilities will make their facilities available for this purpose, as discussed in the testimony of the ETE and Human Bnhavior Panel.
The NHRERP, Volume 1, Section 2.6.5 contains provisions i
to assist accident assessment personnel and decisionmakers in )
- 23 - -
1 J
evaluating the effectiveness of shelter as a protective I action option. Table 2.6-4 of NHRERP, Volume 1 provides representative values of external sheltering factors for typical structures that can be found in the Seabrook Station Plume Exposure Fathway EPZ. These representative values are generally applicable and are taken from Structure Shieldina from Cloud and Fallout Gamma Ray Sources for Assessina the Consequences of Reactor Accidents, EG&G, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada, EGG-1183-1670 (1975). On the basis of these values New Hampshire decisionmakers can approximate the level of whole body dose reduction that would be afforded to the population by a protective action recommendation to shelter.
The values range from 0.2 or less (80% protection) for large office or industrial-type buildings to 0.9 (10% protection) for wood-frame houses with no basements. The NHRERP assumes a cloud shielding factor of 0.9 for all structures within the Seabrook Station Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ. As an assumed protection factor, New Hampshire accident assessment personnel would apply this factor to calculations of ;
l projected doses to determine the level of protection that would be provided by implementation of sheltering. (See NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U, Figure 1A, Item 21.) l l
Exceptions to this rule are certain institutions., including j l
hospitals, nursing homes, and correctional facilities, where the risks from evacuation are higher than that for the general population and the structures offer better protection l
- 24 -
l 1
i m________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l
than that assumed by the NHRERP.
- e. Beach Shelter capacity "A Study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach l
Areas Near Seabrook Station" was performed for New Hampshire Yankee by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation in March 1986 and updated ~in August, 1987. This study was performed to identify the approximate sheltering capacities that.would be suitable for use by the beach population along the Massachusetts and New Hampshire coastlines within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone of the Seabrook Station. The study is provided as Applicants' Exhibit 2.
(1) Methodology The study examined available' listings of all commercial properties and tax-exempt properties (municipal and church buildings) in the beach area. These listings were taken from municipal tax records of the Tax Assessor Offices of the seven coastal municipalities.
Information was taken from tax assessment cards on each property particularly noting the building address, construction characteristics, available floor space, number of stories and whether or not there is a basement. Each property was then visually inspected externally to confirm its location and construction characteristics before developing a list of potential shelters.
Each potential shelter was visually inspected externally by a health physicist who estimated the structures' specific
cloud shielding factors. Public Protection Stratecies for Potential Nuclear Reactor Accidents: Shelterina Concepts with Existina Public and Private Structures, SAND-77-1725, by Aldrich et al., February 1978, was utilized as reference for estimating shielding factors. Using this reference, masonry buildings and buildings with masonry basements were assigned shielding factors of 0.4 to 0.6 for cloud shielding. Wood frame builldings were assigned a cloud shielding factor of 0.9. Wood frame buildings were added as potential shelter area to the August 1987 update of the study because they meet the criteria used in calculations for deciding between the protective actions of sheltering and evacuation for the Seabrook EPZ. Wood frame structures that were judged not to conform to the reference criteria were eliminated from consideration.
The study also included a sample survey of private residences to estimate the numbers of beach area residences with basements or masonry construction and which would, therefore, provide a level of protection greater than that assumed by the NHRERP. For the August, 1987 update, the residence sampling was increased to 100 percent for Hampton and Seabrook beach areas.
(2) Results (a) Public Shelters The results of the March, 1986 study, utilizing more effective cloud shielding factors than the 0.9 assumed by the 4
l j L
i NHRERP, showed a total potential sheltering area for the Hampton and Seabrook Beach areas of 311,000 square feet in a )
total of 115 public shelters. (Public shelters are defined as those facilities, commercial, municipal, church, etc.,
which are normally accessible to the public.) The results of the August, 1987 update of the study, which considered structures conforming to the NHRERP decision criteria, showed a total potential public shelter area of 1,380,000 square feet in Hampton Beach and 70,900 square feet in Seabrook Beach because of the inclusion of wood frame buildings.
It is recognized that not all of the potential public sheltering area can be considered as being available for sheltering because of stored materials and internal structural features. A separate visual Inspection of 78 of 205 potential public shelters in Hampton Beach determined a range of building availability factors based on the type of commercial use to which the building _is put. In so doing, potential shelter areas were classified into three groups:
(1) hotels, motels, restaurants, and lounges; (2) entertainment centers; (3) clothing, gift and convenience stores. A potential shelter availability of two-thirds was allowed for group 1, one-half for group 2, and one-third for group 3. The Reception and Care Facility Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency uses a factor of 10 square feet per person for short term public sheltering.
When compared to this guideline, the availability factors
~
4
______.-m_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
correspond approximately to permissible occupation load values of the National Fire Codes for groups 1 and 3. These values are 15 ft 2/ person and 30 ft 2/ person respectively. The results indicate a total public shelter availability of 861,000 square feet in Hampton Beach and 35,800 square feet in Seabrook Beach. This combined total of 896,800 square feet could provide short term shelter for approximately 89,600 persons.
The potential public shelters have been identified on maps of Hampton and Seabrook beach areas and denoted by their relative available shelter capacity. Their locations were compared to the relative density of the beach population on a crowded, good weather, summer weekend. An examination of aerial photographs taken on Saturday, July 18, 1987 (a hot, clear day with a peak temperature of 89 0 as measured at the Seabrook Station site), between 12 noon and 1 p.m., shows that beachgoers congregate in those areas of the beach in closest proximity to the potential shelters with greatest capacities. The largest concentration of beachgoers, for example, is in the immediate vicinity of the N.H. Department of Resources and Economic Development Headquarters on Hampton Beach. Immediately across Ocean Boulevard are located the potential public shelters with the largest capacity, i.e.,
the Hampton Beach Casino and the Ashworth Hotel with 73,606 square feet and 33,969 square feet of available shelter area (utilizing availability factors) respectively. All potential f
1
~
l
public shelters in the Hampton and'Seabrook Beach areas are located within one-half mile of the populated beach areas.
(b) Residential Shelters The results of the' residential survey showed that 34 percent of 3,036 residences in Hampton Beach and 51 percent of 758 residences in Seabrook Beach provide basement and masonry sheltering capability. The remaining percentage of residences provide sheltering characteristics at least as effective as that assumed by the NHRERP. The field survey revealed very few wood-frame residences that would not meet these sheltering characteristics.
A prior demographic study of the Seabrook Station area performed.by the NRC determined the average number of people per residential building during peak, beach season periods to be 7.6. (Demographic and Vehicular Demand Estimate for'an Evacuation Analysis of the Seabrook Station, M. Kaltman, Feb.
1981.)
Residential structures having basement and masonry sheltering capability would, therefore, provide that level of cheltering for 10,784 persons in the Hampton and Seabrook Beach area.
Including residences in the Hampton and Seabrook Beach areas having shelter characteristics at least as effective as {
those assumed by the NHRERP, shelter would be provided for 28,834 persons.
(c) Total Shelter Capacity / Peak Beach Population The total potential sheltering area for Hampton and Seabrook beaches would therefore accomodate 118,434 persons -
89,600 in public, and 28,834 in residential structures.
Recent estimates of the peak beach population for Hampton and Seabrook were computed using the results of vehicle occupancy rate surveys and counts of potential vehicle parking spaces for Hampton and Seabrook Beaches. The summer weekend peak population estimate is approximately 39,000 for Hampton and Seabrook Beaches combined. (The basis for these estimates is set forth in the testimony of the ETE and Human Behavior Panel.) Thus the available shelter space exceeds by a considerable margin the peak beach population.
A map and chart depicting available public and residential sheltering capacities in relation to their accessibility to beach locations in the beach areas between Great Boar's Head and the Massachusetts / Town of Seabrook border is provided as Attachment 4. The chart shows these capacities in terms of numbers of shelterees for whom potential short-term shelter is available in public and residential buildings. This capacity is shown in increments of two-tenths of a mile. In addition, the chart shows the l observed beach population on July 18, 1987 derived from aerial photographs taken en that date. This population includes numbers of people on the beach, in the water, and on the ocean side of Route 1A. The numbers of people observed ,
l U_ _ -_ _ _ __- .
t.
[,:. . .
l L.
L are displayed in two-tenths of a mile increments as a means of showing the distribution of the beach population in relation to available shelter capacities.
(3) Consequences for Decisionmaking The cloud shielding factor (0.9) that is used by the NHRERP protective action decision criteria and by the State of New Hampshire dose assessment model allows reliance on essentially any indoor location, including wood-frame structures'with no basement, for sheltering. A decision to recommend shelter-in-place would not be invalidated by the-characteristics of the Seabrook area houses and public structures.
- 3. Implementation of Protective Actions for Campgrounds Specific plans for special facilities within the Seabrook Station EPZ are contained in appendices to the local plans-of the NHRERP, Volumes 16-32. These appendices are labeled Appendix'F of Volumes-16-32. ' Appendix F includes plans for campgrounds located in the respective {
municipalities. The plans identify the campgrounds to which they pertain and contain descriptive information about the l campgrounds. They also explain the method of notification and the actions to be taken.
- a. Notification Campgrounds will be equipped with tone-alert radios l which will enable proprietors or managers to be advised immediately of any protective measures recommended for the
s
(.
l l-l L public. The tone-alert radios are activated by the EBS radio l
signal-over which emergency instructions will be transmitted.
In addition,Lall campgrounds in the EPZ are covered by the system of, fixed sirens.
l A supply of public information materials, including posters'and brochures, will be provided to all campgrounds; and the plans call for campground operators to ensure that
- public information materials containing emergency
-instructions are available for users of their facilities.
Therefore, there are two methods of notification. One.
.is the siren signal. Second, the operators will be alerted by tone-alert radios which provide notification and emergency instructions,
- b. Actions The campground plans provide that at a Site Area Emergency, campgrounds may be directed to undertake a protective response or to close on a precautionary basis. If the facility is advised to close as a precaution or if there is a sheltering recommendation announced for any part of the EPZ, campground operators would instruct campers to pack all i 1
belongings and to leave the area. Public information brochures containing emergency instructions would be available for all campers.
l If an evacuation is recommended in any part of the EPZ, i
campground operators would make an accounting of all current users of the campground and instruct campers to evacuate the 1
i
=
area by evacuation routes specified in the campground plan.
The. total maximum capacity of campgrounds in the Seabrook' Station EPZ is approximately 8500 campers. This maximum-capacity.of campground users is distributed over a total' of 1889 camp sites in 18' campgrounds situated within 11 of the 17 municipalities of the Seabrook Station EPZ. Thus, campground. users constitute.neither a significantly large number nor an inordinate concentration of persons in any one area of the EPZ.. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that campground users would be able to depart the area rapidly whether this was to occur prior to an evacuation of the general population or during such an evacuation. Maximum-total vehicle-capacity of campgrounds is approximately 2950, or 1 vehicle for every 2.9 campers. Five of these campgrounds are day and youth camps for which nineteen buses have been allocated. Consequently, there is ample vehicle capacity'for campground users to depart from the area.
- 4. Sheltering for the General Public
- a. Concept of Shelter in Place As explained previously, New Hampshire employs the shelter in place concept as a protective action option for the general public. This concept provides for short-term sheltering at the location in which the sheltering instruction is received. Those at home are to shelter at home, those at work or school are to be sheltered in the work place or school building.
i, Except for institutionalized populations, sheltering and evacuation will be implemented on a municipality by
[ municipality basis in New Hampshire. One town may be advised to take shelter, while an abutting town is advised to l
evacuate or take no protective action. Therefore, shelter areas in New Hampshire are defined as municipalities. .The decision to implement sheltering or evacuation of a particular municipality in the EPZ would be based on a i prediction that projected doses to the general population would equal or exceed EPA Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for these areas.
- b. Assessment of Existing Shelter Adequacy
.The NIIRERP, Volume 1, Table 2.6-4 provides representative values of external (whole body) sheltering factors for typical structures that can be found in the Seabrook Station EPZ. On the basis of these values, New Hampshire decision makers can approximate the level of protection that would be afforded to the population by a protective action recommendation to shelter. The values range from 0.2 or less (80% protection) for large office or industrial type buildings to 0.9 (10% protection) for wood-frame houses with no basements. Based on the previously l cited studies by Aldrich, et al., and their analysis of typical structures to be found in the Northeast region of the United States, Seabrook Station EPZ structures have a cloud shielding factor of at least 0.9; and this is, therefore, a
~
- 34 -
l J
l
. \
l reasonable sheltering protection factor to be assumed by the I NHRERP. As an assumed protection factor, New Hampshire decision makers would apply this factor to calculations of projected doses to determine the level of protection that f
would be provided by implementation of sheltering. The only exceptions to this rule are-certain institutions, including hospitals, nursing homes, and correctional facilities, where risks from evacuation are higher than that'for the general population. For these institutions, shielding factors of the individual structures have been determined and would be I
applied to calculation of projected doses to the resident populations according to instructions contained in NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U.
(1) Shelter Effectiveness of Residences in the Seabrook Station EPZ Because of their location in the Northeast region of the United States, Seabrook Station EPZ residences can be expected to consist of substantial construction materials and to be of airtight construction. Essentially any indoor location, even a wood-frame house with no basement, provides at least a 10% reduction for a cloud source. This assessment of the relative shelter effectiveness of structures in the Seabrook Station EPZ indicates that typical residential structures afford a cloud shielding factor of at least 0.9.
(2) Shelter Effectiveness of Schools and Day Care Centers It is reasonable to assume that schools and day care
l'
?-
I centers share the prevailing characteristics of typical structures of the Seabrook Station EPZ, and are airtight, winterized structures.
Further, because protective action recommendations for the general population are applied to schools and day care centers, evaluation of protection afforded by these structures would neither make them more suitable for sheltering, nor affect the choice of the sheltering option.
Specific protective action recommendations would not be made for schools (which, for the purpose of the plan, include day care centers) based on the relative sheltering factors of their structures. The NHRERP explicitly says in NHRERP, Volume 4A, Appendix U that sheltering factors other than 0.9 are not to be considered for school facilities. Schools (and day care centers) will follow the same protective actions prescribed for the general population.
I 1
l l
i l
)
l l
1 i
y ;_
Paul R. Frechette, Jr., Senior Emergency Planner, New Hampshire Yankee James A. MacDonald, Radiological Assessment Manager, New Hampshire Yankee William N. Colburn, Coordinator of Emergency Services, 1 Division of Human Services, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Spec.ici Needs and Transportation:
Richard H. Strome, Director, New Hampshire Office of Emergency Management Anthony M. Callendrello, Manager, Emergency Planning, New Hampshire Yankee Paul R. Frechette, Jr., Senior Emergency Planner, New Hampshire Yankee ,
Michael C. Sinclair, Emergency Planning Specialist, Aidikoff Associates Personnel Resources:
l Richard H. Strome, Director, New Hampshire Office of Emergency Management William T. Wallace, Jr., M.D., M.P..H. Director, Division of Public Health. Services of New Hampshire, Department of Health and Human Services John D. Bonds, Assistant Director for Planning, Division
! of Public Health Services, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Anthony M. Callendrello, Manager, Emergency Planning, New Hampshire Yankee Paul R. Frechette, Jr., Senior Emergency Planner, New Hampshire Yankee William F. Renz, Emergency Planning Specialist, Aidikoff Associates Letters of Aareement:
Richard H. Strome, Director, New Hampshire Office of Emergency Management u- ._____.--____.m._ . .
- .. r
- O..
ij, .
, m
. ,q.
. :/
._ ll
[ 9 f /.
Thomas,G. Dignan, Jr. T I) ',l' ,
-r George H. Lewald
' 1 Kathryn A. Selleck:
i-
- " g:',. Deborah S. Steenland
- Ropes & Gray-i225 Franklin Street]
Boston, MA .02110
, , ; (617) 423-6100 s
.c
,y !!\
~)
1 u
e ff' j ,
I V, _ ,'
( ' f 9[,
j i \
! , b. .
- i!, I
', .. g -
V
- f g s
.:- i i.
I 1
., -/
)
Il e
I .
\
2 -_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ .______._m____Q
gy .. ,,-
w.
!J1
, 3'
,; , ~
. '. e- :
+if - l3 .yl .l ;:'h.
i_
'l jf D '
v, ?
e
, yV ;, ,
/;
E As t6tanswers: r' -
l
'< :- l'l . i'
%. s
/ ;. 1 b.rp _ * ? .
(i.- George S. Thomas
%,y !. 'a4. Vice President, Nuclear Production li ff . . g f,;< : New Hampshire Yankee Division of Public Service Company of New Hampshire 4p N [Ih ,.
- g. ,
d ',
j, ' <
September 11, 1987 State of New) Hampshire
, ,Q[f' ,
Rockingham.. County) ss.
4:. .
fl ;]l Then apjeaicd.before me the above subscribed George S. Thomas and made oath that he;in the Vice President, Nuclear Production of New Hampshire Yanked Ilivision, authorized to execute the foregoing supplemental responses to. interrogatories on behalf of the-Applicants,
, '.that he madejinquiry and believes that the foregoing answers accuratel i , set forth such information as is.available to the Applicants.
Before me, J ;)
~-
My Commission Expires sAs to objections:
Thomas G. Dignan, Jr.
'; George H. Lewald
-l - (" 4 Kathryn A. Selleck b Deborah S. Steenland Ropes & Gray 225 Franklin Street
/' Boston, MA 02110 (617) 423-6100 l Counsel for ADD 11 cants
,. .y s
1 4
.N r _____ ____-- ___. __.
c , , ATTACHMENT 1 (1 of 3)
A m 1 g
- Projected Dose *** * ***** SOTH NO
- Escese er tow Pao ter Thv
. PA0 TH L M Ac h A m W PAQwg or wenie soey Espeewet YES FOR OM OR BOTH C 2 D can avecussion Time to Release ygg
- to compietoe Mer to
- Pfume ArrivalTime a Recommend Evocustion a Mume Expoevro Time % 4,,,,,,,
- Deley Time Action Time Offette Contrainto NO Y'#
E F FOR SHELTER Ce ens ONLY Action Boom Detore W t Mmm Recommend Sheltef ~
me Panne Mme Pesear?
2 gg g .
YII DRF * = FOR BOTH EVACUATION DR9 we a gyo Sygzgyn 4
WHOLE BODY whecs Patnwer THYROIO se more erni,ortentf M
Recommend Shefter 4 ' $HELTER H
\
coes 5 6 Does 5 shone, or NOT DECISIVE NOT DECis!VE snener e Evacuation Provise the most .
Evacussion Provice the most
,,ie. o.teiwa x see.a u x..-
. v. _._
EVA CUA TDN EVACUA TCN
- R.comm d evoeveen =
FIGURE 2.6-7 Decision Criteria for Selecting between Evacuation and Sheltering Recommendations for the Governor Vol. 1 2.6-26 Rev. 2 8/86
r s; e:
~
. e, T - h ,ypX.
q~ jil 1 9 i
< ' ATTACHMENT 1. (2 of: 3)
- 3. U A {
'[ m : ;.
t p
\l FIGURE 1A
/
i Protective Action Recommendation Worksheet "For General Population i
- 1. TLws cf calculation (use 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> clock) hours
, r ,- i
. Tire of release start 4 $nurs 2.
- 3. Release duration hJurs (
mph 4
- 4. a.- Wfpd Speed degreet f'i
, .Wind direction from
- 5. miles Distance to reference location' '
4 6. Affectedt,ubareep[' ,
(use Itede 48 ar@5 a Egur 2)
. a 7,
~
- 7. Plumej travel time (Itan 5/ Item ee). ' ,r ~ y
- 8. Time until exposure (choose efor b)
I ..
a.,\ y release has oegun y ^ ,
hours (1./ Difference (Item 1 - It n 2)
(2) Tinn [Itsn 7 - Itsn Ba(1)] hours
- b. If r21easMwill begin later '
,< v (1) Difference (Itan 2 - Item 1) i hours;)
hour 1, I
!,2) Time [Itan 7 + Itsn 8b(1)] :p j !
- q. Evacuatitn Conditions '
., a. Season (circle one)
(1) Stmner: May 15 - Sept 15 (see Protective Actions for Seasonal Populations)
,s -
(2) Winter: Sapt 15.- May 15
) kl. Weather (circle ans,) I ,,
(1) Normal seasonal weather ;
f
)
(mild, light rain, light snow) ;
i (2) Adverse (Stmners heavy rain / fog - Winter: heavy snow / ice) hours
- 10. Evaucati$nTime.
(Use items 6 and 9 and Figure 3, Evacuation Time Estimates to detennine evacuation time.)
- 11. Exposure Time hours (Itern 10 - Item Sa(2) or 8b(2)]
I l
y' I .
Rev. 2 8/85 Vol. 4A U-15 .
i 1
I t .
.' . . ATTACHMENT 1 (3 of 3)
FIGURE 1A (cont'd)
- 12. F re - . tion Exposure Feriod hours (smaller of Itsn 3 or Itsn 11) 13.. Projected Whole Body Dose Rate R/hr
- 14. Monitoring Team Whole Body Dose Rate R/hr
- 15. Most Reliable Whole Body Dose Rate R/hr.
(Itan 13 or Itsn 14)
- 16. Projected Thyroid Dose Rate R/hr
- 17. Monitcring Team Thyroid Dose Rate R/hr (frun calculations)
- 18. Most Reliable Thyroid Dose Rate -
R/hr 3
(Item 16 or Iten 17)
- 19. male Body Evacuation Dose R (Item 12 x Itan 15)
- 20. Thyroid Evacuation Dose R (Itsn 12 x Itsn 18)
- 21. Whole Body Shelter Dose R (Itsn 15 x Item 3 x 0.9) 2
- 22. Thyroid Shelter Dose (choose a or b)
- a. For release duration of less than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> (Item 18 x Item 3 x 0.5) R
- o. For release duration of greater than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> (Itan 18 x Item 3 < [1- 0.5) R Iten 3 2
- 23. Whole Body Indicated Action -
refer to Figure 4 (indicate no action, shelter, or evacuation)
- 24. Thyroid indicated action -
refer to Figure 4 (indicete no action, shelter or evacuation)
- 25. Reconnended Protective Action (Recced more severe action from Itan 23 cr Itan 24 on Figure 2.)
l i
l Vol. 4A U-16 Rev. 2 8/85 .
. . . ATTACHMENT 2 (1 of 5)
BEACH PRECAUTIONARY ACTION (French and English)
DATE RELEASED:
TIME RELEASED:
RELEASED BY:
"We interrupt our program at this time to bring you the following message. This is not a test.
(CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:)
(An ALERT condition has been declared at Seabrook Station; an )
(Alert oresents no threat to public health and safety. )
(A SITE AREA EMERGENCY has been declared at Seatrook Station; )
(no release of radiation has occurred; no release of radiation )
(is likely to occur. )
As a precaution, the State of New Hampshire has closed beach and state park areas in Seabrook and Hampton. Persons on the beaches and in state park areas in Seabrook and Hampton should leave the beaches and park areas immediately. The Governor is making this recommendation after consulting with State of New Hampshire Emergency Management and public health officials.
The closing of beaches is a precautionary measure based on policy adopted long before Seabrook was operational. It does not mean that a release of radiation has occurred or will occur.
All persons should stay tuned to this station for further information.
I repeat, because of a problem at Seabrook Station, the beach and state park areas in Seabrook and Hampton have been closed.
Persons on the beaches and in state park areas in Seabrook and Hampton should leave the beaches and park areas immediately.
The following portion of this message is directed to persons in Brentwood, East Kingston, Exeter, Greenland, Hampton, Hampton Falls, Kensington, Kingston, New Castle, Newfields, Newton, North Hampton, Portsmouth, Rye, Seabrook, South Hampton, and Stratham:
l State of New Hampshire Emergency Management and public health
! officials are currently reviewing the situation at Seabrook l Station with the Governor of New Hampshire. At this time, there l
is no need to take any action if you are not on the beaches or in
. , , ATTACHMENT 2 (2 of 5) i e
state park areas in Seabrook and Hampton. If these conditions change, state officials may make additional recommendations and q we will inform you immediately. Please stay tuned to this J station for further information and instructions. 1 People in the towns of Brentwood, East Kingston, Exeter, Greenland, Hampton, Hampton Falls, Kensington, Kingston, New .
Castle, Newfields, Newton, North Hampton, Portsmouth, Rye, Seabrook, South Hampton and Stratham should look up the annual emergency information mailed to them. If you are not in any of these towns, there is no reason to take any action. Posters, signs, and brochures with emergency information have been provided in beach areas, parks, motels, hotels, and business establishments. If-these are unavailable, information is also contained in area telephone books.
Once again, the Seabrook Station has declared an (Alert / Site Area Emergency). This does not mean that a release of radioactive materials has occurred or will occur. This message will be repeated frequently on this station until new information is available. Stay tuned to this station for the latest official information.
l I
C_______________
', , e ATTACHMENT 2 (3 of 5)
MESSAGE D -- SITE AREA EMERGENCY (SHELTERING / BEACHES CLOSED / BEACH AREAS EVACUATED)
(RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL)
DATE RELEASED:
TIME RELEASED:
RELEASED BY; "A Site Area Emergency was declared at (time) today at Seabrook Station.
There has been a release into the air of radioactive materials from the Seabrook Station. The radioactive release does not exceed levels established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and does not present a hazard to public health and safety. The release occurred at (time).
As a precaution, however, certain actions for the public are being recommended by the Governor of New Hampshire. The Governor is making these recommendations after consulting with State of New Hampshire Emergency Management and public health officials. !
State and local Emergency Operations Centers are functioning and j state and local emergency response personnel are ready to take !
any necessary actions. l l
(Seasonal only) The State of New Hampshire has closed state l beaches and parks in the Hampton and Seabrook areas. Access to these areas by non-residents is being restricted. As an additional precaution, all persons residing in, working in or visiting Hampton Beach or Seabrook Beach, between Great Boar's Head to the north and Route 286 and Ocean Boulevard to the south, are advised to evacuate those areas immediately.
People in the towns of Seabrook, Hampton Falls, Hampton (and) l (circle other towns affected) Brentwood, East Kinaston, Exeter, l Greenland, Kensington, Kinaston, New Castle, Newfields. Newton, North Hampton, Portsmouth, Rye, South Hampton, Stratham will be i safer if they SHELTER IN PLACE. This means you should remain indoors at your current location. Staying indoors will provide-
. . o ATTACHMENT 2-(4 of S) l I
H you with protection from radiation caused by radioactive material which leaves the Seabrook Station site area due to weather conditions or other factors. In order to get the greatest l protection from possible exposure to radiation, you should take the following actions:
- 1. Shelter indoors at your current location.
- 2. Make sure all windows and doors are closed tightly.
- 3. If you are in your car, close all windows and vents while you continue to travel to your destination.
- 4. Turn off all fans, heating or air conditioning systems if they bring in outside air.
- 5. Take a radio with you and move to the room with fewest windows and doors.
- 6. Keep all members of your household indoors and stay tuned to your local Emergency Broadcast System radio station.
- 7. Remain indoors until told by local or state officials that it is safe to go outside, or until further protective actions are recommended.
Schools, hospitals and other institutions in the towns advised to shelter are taking similar sheltering actions. Public officials have instructions for protecting the children or other persons in their care until sheltering is no longer necessary. Parents and relatives are advised not to call the schools or other institutions, nor to drive to the schools to attempt to pick up their children. Community safety will be better protected if the phone lines are kept open for official communications and the schools are permitted to conduct their sheltering plans over the next several hours.
Please refrain from all unnecessary use of communications systems. Do not call Police, Fire, or public officials, relatives, neighbors or friends unless absolutely necessary.
Your use of telephones for unnecessary calls may tie up circuits needed by others for emergency calls.
If you are at home, look up the emergency information mailed to you about Seabrook Station for further information. If you are sheltering at your workplace or other public building, ask to review the emergency information brochures delivered to all hotels, motels and most other businesses. Consult the telephone l book for additional information. Stay tuned to this EBS station.
1
~
l
ATTACHMENT 2'(5 of 5)
- f O If you are not (seasonal only -- at the Hampton or Seabrook beaches or park areas, and D21) located in the' towns of Seabrook, Hampton Falls, Hampton (or) (circle other towns affected)
Brentwood. East Kinaston. Kensinaton. Exeter. Greenland.
Kinaston, New Castle. Newfields. Newton, North Hampton, Portsmouth. Rye. South Hamoton. Stratham, there is no reason for you to take shelter or other actions. Actual or potential consequences of the. incident do not affect areas beyond the towns already given instructions. If these conditions change, public health officials may change these recommendations and we will inform you immediately.
If you know of any neighbors or co-workers with hearing or language problems, please be sure they are aware of this announcement and understand what they.should do.
(Seasonal only) To repeat: the State of New Hampshire has closed state beaches and parks in Hampton and Seabrook. Access to these areas by non-residents is being restricted. As an additional precaution, all persons residing in, working in or visiting Hampton Beach or Seabrook Beach, between Great Boar's Head to the north and Route 286 and Ocean Boulevard to the south, are advised to evacuate those areas. (Seasonal only)
Seabrook Station has declared a Site Area Emergency. It has been advised that people in the towns of Seabrook, Hampton Falls, Hampton (and) (circle other towns affected) Brentwood. East Kinaston. Exeter. Greenland. Kensinaton. Kinaston. New Castle.
Newton. North HamDton. Portsmouth. Rve. South HamDton. Stratham, should SHELTER IN PLACE. That is, remain indoors with outside ventilation sources closed off.
This message will be repeated every fifteen minutes or until new information becomes available. Stay tuned to this Emergency Broadcast System Station for the latest official information."
6
, ATTACHMENT 3 (1 of 4)
Beach Public Address Shelter Message Attention ... Attention ...
Because of a problem at Seabrook Station, beaches are now closed. Please leave the beach.and go indoors immediately.
Listen to the radio for more information."
i 1
ATTACHMENT 3 (2 of 4)
MESSAGE F -- GENERAL EMERGENCY (SHELTERING / TOWNS AND BEACHES)
(RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL) l DATE RELEASED:
TIME RELEASED:
RELEASED BY:
"A General Emergency was declared at (time) today at Seabrook Station."
A release of radioactive material into the air occurred at (time).
Certain actions for the public are being recommended by the Governor of New Hampshire. The Governor is making these recommendations after consulting with State of New Hampshire Emergency Management and public health officials. State and local Emergency Operations Centers are functioning and state and local emergency response personnel are ready to take any necessary actions.
(Seasonal only) The State of New Hampshire has closed state beaches and parks in the Hampton and Seabrook areas. Access to these areas by non-residents is being restricted. As an additional precaution, all persons residing in, working in or visiting Hampton Beach or Seabrook Beach, between Great Boar's Head to the north and Route 286 and Ocean Boulevard to the south, are advised to seek shelter indoors immediately. Go to a nearby building where you can take shelter until advised by this EBS station that instructions have changed.
Owners and operators of business establishments and other public access buildings are asked to assist people seeking shelter.
People in the towns of Seabrook, Hampton Falls, Hampton (and)
(circle other towns affected) Brentwood, East Kinaston, Exeter, Greenland, Kensincton, Kinaston, New Castle, Newfields, Newton, North Hampton, Portsmouth, Rye, South Hampton, Strathan are advised to SHELTER IN PLACE. This means you should remain indoors at your current location. Staying indoors will provide you with protection from radiation caused by radioactive material
, ,, , ATTACHMENT 3 (3 of 4) released from the Seabrook Station. In order to get the greatest protection from possible exposure to radiation, you should take the following actions:
- 1. Shelter indoors at your current location.
- 2. Make sure all windows and doors are closed tightly.
- 3. If you are in your car, close all windows and vents while you continue to travel to your destination.
- 4. Turn off all fans, heating or air conditioning systems if they bring in outside air.
- 5. Take a radio with you and move to the room with fewest windows and doors.
- 6. Keep all members of your household indoors and stay tuned to your local Emergency Broadcast System radio station.
- 7. Remain indoors until told by local or state officials that it is safe to go outside, or until further protective actions are recommended.
Schoo]s, hospitals and other institutions in the towns advised to shelter are taking similar sheltering actions. Public officials have instructions for protecting the children or other persons in their care until sheltering is no longer necessary. Parents and relatives are advised not to call the schools or other institutions, nor to drive to the schools to attempt to pick up their children. Community safety will be better protected if the phone lines are kept open for official communications and the schools are permitted to conduct their sheltering plans over the next several hours.
Please refrain from all unnecessary use of communications systems. Do not call Police, Fire, or public officials, relatives, neighbors or friends unless absolutely necessary.
Your use of telephones for unnecessary calls may tie up circuits needed by others for emergency calls.
If you are at home, look up the emergency information mailed to you about Seabrook Station for further information. If you are l sheltering at your workplace or other public building, ask to i
review the emergency information brochures delivered to all hotels, motels and most other businesses. Consult the telephone book for additional information. Stay tuned to this EBS station.
If you are not (seasonal only --
at the Hampton or Seabrook beaches or park areas, and Dat) located in the towns of Seabrook,
- p
, , , ATTACHMENT 3 (4 of 4)
Haupton Falls, Hampton (or) (circle other towns affected)
Brentwood, East Kinaston, Kensinaton, Exeter, Greenland, Kinaston, New Castle, Newfields. Newton, North Hamoton, Portsmouth. Rye, South Hamoton, Stratham, there is no reason for you to take shelter or other actions. Actual or potential consequences of the incident do not affect areas beyond the towns already given instructions. If these conditions change, public health officials may change these recommendations and we will inform you immediately.
If you know of any neighbors or . co-workers with hearing or language problems, please be sure they are aware of this announcement and understand what they should do.
(Seasonal only) To repeat: the State of New Hampshire has closed state beaches and parks in Hampton and Seabrook. Access to these areas by non-residents is being restricted. As an additional precaution, all persons residing in, working in or visiting Hampton Beach or Seabrook Beach, between Great Boar's Head to the north and Route 286 and. Ocean Boulevard to the south, are advised to seek shelter indoors immediately. Go to a nearby building where you can take shelter until advised by this EBS station that instructions have changed. (Seasonal only)
Seabrook Station has declared a General Emergency. It has been advised that people in the towns of Seabrook, Hampton Falls, Hampton (and)
Kinaston, (circle other towns affected)
Exeter, Greenland, Kensinaton, Brentwood, Kinaston, New Castle, East Newton, North Hamoton, Portsmouth, Rye, South Hamoton, Stratham, should SHELTER IN PLACE. That is, remain indoors with outside ventilation sources closed off.
This message will be repeated every fifteen minutes or until new information becomes available. Stay tuned to this Emergency Broadcast System Station for the latest official information."
1
(
4 l
- . . , ATTACHMENT 4 SEABROOK SHELTER STUDY POTENTIAL SHELTER CAPACITY (PERSONS) sHELTEREES:
08S VE p
N Public and JULY 18,1987 TOTAud)
AQ'* T c U2 MILE FROM C0 ASTM N
\RESIDENCES (b) HAMPTON j PUBLIC (a) \'# 8.060 640 6.90 7,980 2M9 23,930 1843 2 Ms.E RAOIUS- 22,g00 4192 15.310 N -
a gg,030 14,820 7,950 656 5.790 1,110
\
TOTAL
^
g ~ f g.060 .
g 84.950 t 1 90 L
1 357
/ 3* - / 1020 l 1850
\ * - gg50 M ROOK
- C 2980 STATION - i g g
) '
(s 0 SO$
's ,
1395 SEASAOoK h 823 4 506
\-
gg6 185 i 474
( gt 1995
'h *$ TOTAL b m 1
2,07
, j 10.920
. $10 [ *
,.a ."g / $560 SEABROOK ROUTE 206
/
(c) The total shelter capacity (persons) in public buildings (i.e. churches, restaurants, motels,etc.).
(b) The total shelter capacity (persons) in private residences.
(c) (c) + (b).
(d) The total number of people on the beach,in the water,and on the ocean side of Route 1 A on July 18,1987 4 ct approximately 12:20 P.M., in .2 mile increments. .
1
O ')
l
SUMMARY
{
I OF j PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE ;
NEW HAMPSHIRE RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN August 1987
- I l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-~ '
l
'\_ /
Section Title Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED FOR 2-1 LOCAL RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS 2.1
SUMMARY
OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY USED FOR 2-1 ALL LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES 2.2 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR TOWNS 2-4 ANTICIPATED TO REQUIRE FULL STATE ASSISTANCE 2.2.1 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-4 Town of Kensington 2.2.2 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-9 Town of Hampton 2.2.3 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-14 Town of Hampton Falls 2.2.4 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-19 IS Town of South Hampton V
2.2.5 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-24 Town of Rye 2.2.6 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-29 Town of North Hampton 2.3 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LOCAL 2-34 MUNICIPALITIES HAVING DESIGNATED PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS 2.3.1 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-34 Town of Brentwood 2.3.2 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-38 Town of East Kingston 2.3.3 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-42 Town of Exeter 2.3.4 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-46 Town of Greenland
-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS jr's (continued)
V)
+
Section Title Page 2.3.5 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-50 Town of Kingston 2.3.6 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-54 Town of New Castle 2.3.7 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-58 Town of Newfleids 2.3.8 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-62 Town of Newton 2.3.9 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-66 City of Portsmouth 2.3.10 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-70 Town of Seabrook 2.3.11 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the 2-74 Town of Stratham t
-b 3 PERSONNEL RESGURCE ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED FOR 3-1 STATE AGENCIES AND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS 3.1
SUMMARY
OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 3-1 4 CONCLUDING REMARKS 4-1 l0
.g .
,- SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of personnel resource needs , . their . avail-abilities, and their assignments for the 17 local municipalities located within .
the New Hampshire portion of the Seabrook Station plume exposure Emergency Planning Zone. In addition, it includes a summary of the personnel resources of-the State of New Hampshire inclusive of those resources anticipated to be needed
'to provide assistance to affected municipalities.
This ~ document summarizes information obtained .through the implementation of a personnel resource assessment program designed to support the maintenance of an emergency response capability and satisfy the concerns raised in. past reviews conducted internally and by the Regional Assistance Committee.
O The personnel . resource assessment program has been applied to any organization I
assigned Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) responsibilities and is intended to be used as a tool for implementing the plans. This ongoing program is complimented by an active dialogue with local officials so that the State. I the Utility, and the local communities may assist each other in achieving the most efficient utilization of personnel resources needed to implement the New Hampshire RERP.
1-1
l J
At this time, 6 of the 17 EPZ communities have not designated assignments of available personnel resources to the respective local emergency response organ-12ation. Therefore, for demonstration purposes only, this summary provides I i
personnel availability and proposed assignments for these 6 communites. It also considers personnel availability for the 11 municipalities that have made such assignments, the State, and the additional resources required of the State as a 1
result of the assistance anticipated to be provided to local communities. I O
1 0 1-2
_____-____-___-_-________-____a
SECTION 2 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED FOR LOCAL
' RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS 2.1
SUMMARY
OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY USED FOR ALL LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES An ongoing personnel resources assessment program has been established to ensure availability of personnel resources in sufficient numbers to fulfill all response actions contemplated in each Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) developed to support a response to an emergency situation at Seabrook Station.
Specifically, with regard to the assessment of personnel needs and availabili-ties associated with the local municipality RERPs, a systematic approach to define the types and numbers of personnel required and available to perform O. these functions was undertaken.
J The first step in this process was to ensure that each plan reflected all of the required planning responsibilities. This was done by a review of each plan and its associated procedures against present federal guidance and against other RERPs that make up the entire offsite response effort for Seabrook Station.
Building upon the review and revision of each plan, a walk-through of each implementing procedure was then conducted to identify, by position and func-tional responsibility, all of the tasks required to be performed in fulfilling the contemplated emergency response functions. This process led to the deter-mination of specific numbers of personnel required to implement each plan and the identification of those positions requiring staffing for 24-hour operations.
O 2-1
-The resulting ident,1fied personnel-needs are displayed in the form.of emergency response organization charts for each of the 17 local municipalities within the New Hampshire portion of the Seabrook Station plume exposure Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ). An organization chart is included in each municipality's respective section of this summary.
The next step in this process was to identify personnel resources available to fill the emergency response positions identified in the procedural walk-throughs. This was done through the analysis of available background documen-tation which included specific data sources including Town Plan Appendices; Town Annual Reports: New Hampshire public records, such as the New Hampshire Police Standards and Training Commission, the New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission, and the Bureau of Emergency Medica'l Service, and other available sources, such as the New Hampshire Firemen's Association. In addition, surveys were conducted with persons knowledgeable about the specific municipality to verify and adjust the numbers of required and available personnel resources.
Various individuals such as Selectmen, Town Managers, Civil Defense Directors, Police Chiefs, Fire Chiefs, and Health officials within the towns were contacted by representatives of New Hampshire Emergency Management Agency (NHEMA). A flow chart depicting this overall process is provided on Figure 2.1-1.
The physical assignment of personnel to a local emergency response organization has been made by, or with the concurrence of, municipal officials. For the six municipalities f'or which state assistance is anticipated, however, no complete assignment of personnel has yet been adopted. Therefore, for demonstration pur-
- l. poses, Section 2.2 of this report contains an organization chart depicting per-i sonnel needs, a breakdown of personnel availabilities, and a matrix of how the lo 2-2 L_____________
l I
available personnel might be assigned to the corresponding emergency response
( . organization for each of the six towns. Section 2.3 provides a current status i of personnel needs, availabilities, and assignments for the remaining eleven municipalities.
One of the results of the overall program was the definition of two methods to be used for the identification of additional personnel resources to fill any I
shortfalls uncovered by the program. The first is simply the reallocation of
- j. personnel surpluses found to exist elsewhere within the overall, if not the spe-l
! cific, offsite emergency response organization. The second is to implement a recruiting program focused at the specific area of concern.
As this program is ongoing, any pertinent information will be ir,corporated into l
the program as it is made available. Additionally, the program will include a full.. annual update of information regarding personnel resource needs versus O
availability.
l l
O 2-3
FIGURE 2.1 1 LOCAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FLOWCHART O
~
NEEDS AVAILABILITY -
Review Each Local Review Avadable Town o = u = = t=
- a 4 ae a rt.
pi.n,P,cedureA& sin.i n- -
Fa auggy,$ '* 280'.*n!7'*""
" . u is Town 10 By Position / Functional Willing To NO Responsitulity All Tasks Scheoule _ ID Alternste Source Required 4 Determine No. -
For Required Data of Personnel Required Resource , g ,,,,,n p,jg, intef- , py,
'I'*8 e Kensington 9
- YES 4 1 f' 1f I l
Conduct Surveys O Develoo X Ref of Need vt Avadable Personnet & 10
' Shortfalls To Venfy Avadable Personnel / Confirm With Alternate Data Sources I
1 f Can g[q'$f8,(e , ,q NO Impht Recruiting By Reeslocation of Personnel MT[*d* $A' en i 1
YES r
1 I f Reallocate j END l Personnel O
l 4l END l
L _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _i
2.2 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR TOWNS ANTICIPATED TO REQUIRE FULL STATE y~x ASSISTANCE U
There are six towns that are anticipated to require full state assistance at this time. For purposes of demonstration, however, this section contains a depiction of personnel needs, availabilities, and assignments for each town.
None of these towne have made or formally concurred with any assignments of per-sonnel, therefore, the matrix included for each town depicts how available per-sonnel resources might be assigned to positions within the respective emergency response organization.
2.2.1 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Kensington The assecsment of personnel resources for the Town of Kensington revealed a need for 28 people to fully staff the Town of Kensington's emergency response organi-
- zation. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-1.
The approximate number of 56 personnel depended upon as being available to the Town of Kensington results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This determination was made through the analysis of available background documentation including the Town of Kensington RERP, Rev. 2.
Appendix A. and the Town of Kensington Annual Report. (Additional data sources are included in Table 2.2-1.)
r l u 1
2-4
The Town of Kensington has either full-time or part, time' personnel available to j
- .- it as follows:
' Position Number Available -l Selectman' 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel 39 Police Department 7 Health Officer 1 Road' Agent' 1 Town Clerk 1 Municipal Volunteers _3 Total 56 A matrix providing a breaxdown of personnel readily available to the Town of Kensington and how they might be . assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.2-2.
The determination that the Town of Kensington RERP needs 28 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization, and that the Town'has approximately 56 Individuals available to support the plan's implementation 1:
I indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
l l
O 2-5 l
l' t . - - - - - - - _ - - _
TABLE 2.2-1
( SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF KENSINGTON o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Town of
~
Kensington, Volume 29 o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Letters of Agreement, Volume 5 o Documentation provided by the New Hampshire Police Standards and Training Commission o Documentation provided by the New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission o Documentation provided by New Hampshire Emergency Management Agency Representatives o Listing of Municipal Volunteers o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment Program (including supporting material)
O 2-6
-'_ T A B !.
KENSINGTON E-PLAN RERP/PE
/
r.
3 SPL SPEC EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP - STG FAC PUB RESPONSIBLE COMM NDS STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA SAF POSITION 4 5 6 7 VERS VER9 to N 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SELECTMEN 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 civil DEFENSE DIRECTOR 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0* 0* 2 FIRE DEPT. 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 * *'
POLICE DEPT.
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 t MISC. EOC STAFF 0"
2 1 3** t 2 1 0* 2 TOTALS 15 1
1 i
l COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Secunty
- 3. Municroal Secunty 4 Traffic Control
- 5. ;moediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area {
j
- 7. Communications
- 8. Spec:at Needs Verificatioris j
- 9. Soecial Facilities Venfications l
- 10. Public Safety $
- 11. EOC Clerk t 2. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required i
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Vanance f
i
2.2-2 <
SONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR REMARKS CLER LIAISON REO AVL E 11 12 13 14 +/ 15 p.__
2 0 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN. 2 OUT OF THE 3 SERVE 7.- S FPNCTION 0 0 2 1 SELECTMAN COULD ACT AS ALTERNATE CIVilDEFENSE DIRECT 0H I
l 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 1 CD DIRECTOR,3RD S$tiCi',1AN COULD ACT AS l0 0 2 2 0 ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR l
l 41 TOTAL FIRE DEPT / AMBULANCE PERSONNEL (1 MEMBER ACTS AS CIVIL DEFENSE
'2 0 15 39 +24 DIRECTOR.1 MEV-3ER ACTS AS ROA0 AGENT) WITHIH THE REMAINING 39.
2 SERVE AS TFN43 C00R05.2 SERVE AS FIRE ChlEF. AND 2 SERVE AS RADEF OFFICER
- TRANS C00PD CONTACTS SPL NOS RESIDENTS AND SPL FAC 0 0 6 7 +1 7 TOTAL POLICE DEPT. PERSONNEL (1 F/T. 6 P/T)
" STATE POLICE WILL PROVIDE 1 PERSON TO STAFF TCP S 6 TOTAL PERSCNNEL 1 ROAD AGENT,1 HEALTH OFFICER,1 TOWN CLERK.AND 3 MUNIC: PAL VOLUNTEERS 0 0 3 6 +3 t PRIVATE CONTRACTORS AND/OR STATE WILL PRDVIDE ADDITIONAt, PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED FIRE DEPT ANC MUN:Cl PAL VOLUNTEERS i3) CDULD PROVDE ADDITIONAL STAFflNG 2 0*" 28 56 N/A "* SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU 16 CC'JLD APPOINT A SCHOOL OFFiC:AL TO ACT AS SCHOOL L!AISCN AS NEECEO
/
g ":'?:V APERTURM CARD
'gbo Avallable UE Aperture N 8709240145-01 m
~!=!
y -
( i l
o> FIGURE 2.2*1 ,
l 1
,7 %
e i k~~) KENSINGTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION l
1 I Selectmen (2)*
\
Civil Defense Director (2)*
RADEF Officer (2)*
Town Fira Transpor- Health Police Clerk (1) . Road Chief (2)* tation Officer (1) Chief (2)* i Agent (1)
Coordinator (2)' I (3j f
v
.. EOC Clerk (1)
(
Traffic Control Municipal EOC Points Sec(1) Security (2)*
(3)**
Staging Public Area Safety j Personnel (2) Personnel (2)
Comrnonica-EOC Clerk EOC Dispatcher N l-
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 Hr Staffing
- State Police Will Provide 1 Personnel For Traffic Control Points ,
Total Personnel Required: 28 w_____.---. _ _ . . _ . . _ _ __.
(
2.?. 2 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Hampton O The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Hampton revealed a need for 40 people to fully staff the Town of Hampton's emergency response organiza-tion. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed .to staff each. position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-2.
The approximate number of 127 personnel depended upon as being available to the Town of Hampton results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program.
This determination was-made through the analysis of available background docu-mentation including the Town of Hampton RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and the Town of Hampton Ancual Report. (Additional data sources are included in Table 2.2-3.)
The Town of Hampton has either full-time or part-time personnel available to it as follows:
Position [ Number Available)
Selectmen 5 Town Manager
- 1 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel 55 Police Department 31 Public Works Department 34 School Superintendent 1 Total 127
- Town Manager acts as the Civil Defense Director O
2-9
A matrix providing a ' breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
/~~~g ) ,\
) Hampton and how they might be assigned to the Town's emergency response organi- '
i
/
zation positions is provided in "able 2.2-4.
( i 1
, 4 The determination that the Town of Hampton RERP needs 40 local individualstJ I fully staff the Town's emergency response organization, and that the Town has approximately 127 individuals available to support the plan's implementation indicates that the Town has suffi:;ient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level, e
t I
b
,k l
2-10
i TABLE 2.2-3
. ./~N Q SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF'HAMPTON o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Town of Hampton, Volume 18 o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2. Letters of Agreement, Volume 5 (New Hampshire Towing Association) o Documentation provided by New Hampshire Emergency Management Agency Representatives o Documentation provided by the New Hampshire Fire Standards Commission o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment Program es (including supporting material)
LJ O
2-11 t;
., ~.
TABL HAMPTON E-PLAN RERP/PERl is EOC I RESPON5iBLE EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG SPL SPEC STF COMM FAC PUB POSITION SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS VERg SAF N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERS ic SELECTMEN /
TOWN MANAGER / 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD DIRECTOR FIRE DEPT. 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 4 I PUBUC WORKS DEPT. 2 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 1
POUCE DEPT. 4 2 6 2" 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 18 2 6 2* t 3 1 1 1 4 COLUMN HEADINGS KEY 1 EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 3. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facihties Verifications
/. 0. Pubhc Safety i'"' F t1. EOC Clerk
- 2. Sehool Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Recurred
- 14. Total Personnel Available 15 Variance
v.2-4
'NNEL RESOURCES SURVEY f0C SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR LIAISON REO AVL REMARKS (ER11 12 13 14
+/-
15 I
0 0 6 6 0 6 TOTAL PERSONNEL 5 SELECTMEN AND 1 TOWN MANAGER (2 ACT AS CIVilDEFENSE DIRECTORS 2 AC' AS TOWN MANACERS AND 2 ACT AS SELECTMEN) 55 TOTAL FIAE DEPT PERSONNEll34 F/T. 21 CALL) 1 COULD ACT AS HEALTH 2 0 17 55 +38 0FFiCER.1 EOC OLERK ACTS AS EOC OPERATIONS OFFICER 2 ACT AS RACEF OFFICER 2 ACT AS FIRE CHIEF 0 0 2 34 +32 34 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT PERSONNEL t PRIVATE CONTRACTORS AND/0R STAT; WILL PROViOE A00lfl0NAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED 109 TOTAL POUCE DEPT PERSONNEL (31 F/T. 60 SEASONAU,PLUS CIVIUAN 0 0 14 31 +17 PERSONNEll7 FJ.11 P/T)
' STATE P0tlCE '.V!LL PROVIDE UP TO 28 PERSONNEL FOR MUNICIPAL TCPS
"$CH00L SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU 21 CONTACTS ALL SCHOOLS AND WILL NAME O O.. 1 1 0 SCHOOL LIAIS% AS NEEEED 2 0** 40 127 N/A TI
' APERTURE CARD
'\lso Available duE
\perture M '
8709240145-04 4/87 ,
l FIGURE 2.2 2 O HAMPTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION l -
l I
I Selectmen (2)*
Senoot l
Supt Town Manager l gj, (2)*
Public Civil Defense Police Health Fire orks Director (2)* Chief (2)* Officer (1) Chief (2).
~
I i I i 1 l
"" '
RADEF (1) Officer (1)
Officer (2)*
O Mun Tra k pg,;c, EOC C '
Sec (2)* Sec(6) p, r2)'.. Dispatcher (2)*
ubik SplFac Spl Nds #9 "9
- I' Area Verif(1) Verif (1) (3)
Personnel (4)
J l
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 Hr Staffing
" State Police Will Provide Up to 28 Personnel For Traffic Control Points Dunng the Season and 19 During the Off Season
.l Total Personnel Required: 40 o 1 4/87 j
l Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Hampton Falls 2.2.3
~
The assessment of personnel resources for.the Town of Hampton Falls revealed the need for 24 local people to fully staff the Town of Hampton Falls' emergency i
response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-3.
The approximate number of 30 personnel depended upon as beind available-to the Town of Hampton Falls results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This determination was made through the analysis of available background documentation including the Town of Hampton Falls RERP, Rev. 2.
Appendix A, and the Town of Hampton Falls Annual Reports for 1985 and 1980.
(Additional data sources are included in Table 2.2-5.)
The Town of Hampton Falls has either full-time or part-time personnel or volun-teers available to it as follows:
Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel 19 Police Department 4 Road Agent 1 Town Clerk 1 Municipal Volunteer J Total 30 0
2-14 i
-_---___.___m..__
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of n Hampton Falls and how they might be assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.2-6.
The determination that the Town of Ha- ' c a lls RERP calls for the need of 24 local individuals to fully staff the . wn's emergency response organization, and that the Town has approximately 30 individuals available to support the plan's implementation indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available per-sonnel to field a response capability on the local level.
l O
2-15
I L
-s TABLE 2.2-5 .j SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF HAMPTON FALLS l
o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Town of Hampton Falls, Volume 17 f
o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Letters of Agreement. Volume 5 o Documentation provided by the New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission o Documentation provided by New Hampshire Emergency Management AgenJ o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment Program O
I O
2-16
%/ d TABL@
/^ HAMPTON FALLS E-PLAN RERP/PE x.
PE RESPONSIBLE POSITION f g EOC SEC MUN SEC TRAF CNTR IMP RMVL STG AREA 6
COMM 7
N VERa FC VER9 PUB SAFg J
SELECTMEN /CD DIRECTOR 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 6 0 0 0- 0 2 1 0*** 0"* 2 l FIRE DEPT. i POUCE DEPT.
2 2 0* 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 MISC. 3 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0* 0" t 2 1 0*** 0*** 2 TOTALS.
COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff fJeed
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security 4 Traffic Control Impediment Removat
! 5.
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications y 10. Pubhc Saf ety
- 11. EOC Clerk L' 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Aequired
( 14. Total Personnel Availaole 15 Variance
b6
)NNEL RESOURCES SURVEY SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR REO AVL , REMARKS D LIAISON 11 12 13 14 +/ 15 I
4 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 3 SELECTMEN AND 1 CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR; 0 4 4 0 3RD SELECTMAN COULO ACT AS ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR 20 TOTAL FIRE DEPT PERSONNEL 1 ALSOIN POUCE DEPT. 2 RADEF 0FFICERS.2 FIRE l 0 13 19 '+6 CHIEFS. 2 TRANSPORTATION C00R0'NATORS. AND 7 SUPPORT POSITIONS COULO BE STAFFE0 BY THE F!RE DEPT. 1
'"TRANS COORD CONTACTS SPL NOS RESIDENTS AND SPL FAC 4 TOTAL POUCE DEPT PERSONNEL I
- STATE POLICE WILL PROVIDE MUNICIPAL SECURITY DURihG AND O 4 4 0 AFTER AN EVACUATION
" STATE POUCE WILL PROVICE STAFFING FOR MUNIC! PAL TCP S 3 IOI AL PEhSCNNEL - 1 T0/.'. CLER A. I MEALTH OFFICER 1 AGA0 AGENT t PRIVATE CCNTRACTC30 ANO,0R THE STATE A;LL PROV:0E AOCITIONAL '
0 PERSONNEL AS RE0tJ'R50 l 0" *
- 3 3 "" SUPER;NTENDENT OF dC900LS COULD AFP0 NT A SCHOOL OFFIClAL TO ACT 1 AS SCHOOL UAISCN AS NEEDED l 0"" 24 30 N/A McN C: PAL VOLUNTEERS COULO F A0VICE A00lTIONAL STAFFING N
' APERTURE CARD
, Avallaw. Ik
. erture Card '
l 8709240145-03
/ \.
FIGURE 2.2 3 HAMPTON FALLS EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION -
Selectmen (2)*
Civil Defense Director (2)*
Health Transportation Town Road Agent Fire Chief Clerk Pohce Cnief Officer Coordinator (f) (2)* (2)*
(1) (2)* (1)
EOC ClerN1)
RADEF Communica- EOC Offcer tions ClerN1)
(2)* (1)
{
\
Staging Public Area Safety (2) Personnel (2)
E
- Cn S
Po ,, e 2)*
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 Hr Staffing
- State Police Will Prov@ 1 Personnel For Traffic Control Points
- " State Police Will Provide 1 Personnel for Security Total Personnel Required: 24 4/87 u)
L I
' Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of South Hampton 2.2.4
' The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of South Hampton revealed a
' need for 23 people to fully staff the Town of South Hamptdn's emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-sonnel' needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-4.
The approximate number of 26 personnel depended upon as being available to the Town of South Hampton results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This determination was made through the analysis of available background documentation including the Town of South Hampton RERP, Rev. 2.
Appendix A, and the Town of South Hampton Annual Report. (Additional data sour-ces are included in Table 2.2-7.)
1he Town of South Hampton has either full-time or part-time personnel or volun-teers available to it as follows:
Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel
- 16 Police Department 4 Highway Department 1 Town Clerks _2 Total 26
- 1 person acts as the Civil Defense Director
/')
U 2-19
A matrix providing -a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
' South Hampton and how they might-be assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.2-8.
The determination that the Town of South Hampton RERP needs 23 local indivi-duals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization, and that the Town has approximately 26 individuals available.to support the plan's implemen-tation indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a. response capability on the local level.
O o
V 2-20
TABLE 2.2-7
$UPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF SOUTH HAMPTON o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2, Town of South Hampton, Volume 31 o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2 Letters of Agreement, Volume 5 o New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment Program (including supporting material)
O V
I o 2-21 N_-_____ _ _ _
=~
TAB 0 SOUTH HAMPTON E-PLAN RERP/0 u.u.
EOC IMP SPL SPEC RESPONSIBLE EOC MUN TRAF STG PUB STF COMM NDS FAC POSITION SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA SAF N1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERa VERg to SELECTMEN /CD DIRECTOR 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIRE DEPT. 6 2 0 0 0 1 1 0" 0" 2 POLICE DEPT. 2 0 1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGHWAY DEPT. 1 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 MISC. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
TOTALS 14 2 1 0' I 1 1 0" 0" 2 l I
COLUTAN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. M unicipal Security
- 4. Traf fic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications 9 Special Facilities Verifications l
- 10. Pubhc Saf ety,
) 11. EOC Cterk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Reausted
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Variance
.s
% g
$.2-8 (RSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY IOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR LER LIAISON REO AVL14 +/-
REMARKS i 11 12 13 15 4 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 3 SELECTMEN AND 1 CIVilDEFENSE DIRECTOR
! 4 4 0 3RD SELECTMAN NORMALLY SERVES AS CD DIRECTOR
'0 0 ASSISTANT CIVilDEFENSE DIRECTOR IS ALSO A MEMBER OF THE F RE DEPT 16 TOTAL FIRE DEFT PERSONNEL (1 MEMBER ACT AS ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR)
WITHIN THE REMAINING 15. 2 ACT AS FIRE CHIEF. 2 MEMSERS ACT AS TRANS
- 1 0 13 15 +2 COORD; AND 2 MEMBERS ACT AS RADEF 0FFICER "TRANS COORD CONTACTS THE SPL NEEDS RESIDENTS AND SPL FAC 5 TCTAL POLICE DEPT PERSONNEL (10FFICER ACT3 AS HIGHWAY AGENT)
- 0 0 3 4 +1 STATE POLICE WILL PROV10E 2 0FFICERS TO STAFF MUNICIPALS TCP S 1 HICHWAY DEPT PERSON t PR:VATE CONTRACTORS AND/OR THE STATE WILL 0 0 1 1 0 PR0viOE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED 2 TOWN CLERKS 1 0*" 2 2_ 0 "* SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OF SAU 21 COULD APPOINT A SCHCOL OFFICIAL TO ACT AS SCHCCL LIAISON AS NEECED 2 0"- 23 26 N/A MUNIC PAL VCLUNTEERS COULL PROVICE ADDITIONAL STAFFING TI APERTURE CARD Also Available On .
Aperture Card '
8709240145-04 s
~4/87
FIGURE 2.2 4 O- SOUTH HAMPTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION Selectmen (2)*
Civil Defense Director (2)*
Transportation Coordinator (2)*
St' aging Public Area Safety (1) Personnel (2)
Deputy Fire H ghw *"
Police Chief Fire Chief Chief gn C erk (2)* gg)
(2)* RADEF/
(3)
Health (2)*
EOC Clerk (1)
Mun
'*"I#
EOC Sec(1) Sec(2)' Po$nt )**
Communica- EOC tions Clerk (1)
(1) l
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 Hr Staffing
" State Police Will Provide 2 Personnel For Traffic Control Points ,
I Total Personnel Required: 23 4/87
2.2.5 ' Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Rye O The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Rye revealed a need for 31 people to fully staff the Town of Rye's emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required - number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-5.
The approximate number of 64 personnel depended upon as being available to the Town of Rye results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program.
This determination was made through the analysis of available background docu-mentation including the Town of Rye RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A and the Town of Rye Annual Report. (Additional data sources are included in Table 2.2-9.)
The Town of Rye has either full-tlue or part-time personnel available to it as follows:
Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel 27 Police Department 23 Road Agents 6 Town Clerk 1 Health Officer 1 School Superintendent 1 Transportation Coordinator J Total 64 A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of Rye and how they might be assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.2-10.
(-
f O
2-24
l The determination that the Town of Rye RERP needs 31 local individuals to fully (M
( ,) staff the Town's emergency response organization, and that the Town has approx-imately 64 individuals available to support the plan's implementation indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
l 1
o i
v 2-25
TABLE 2.2-9
'r .
4
' SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF RYE o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2 Town of Rye, Volume 20 o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 2. Letters of Agreement, Volume 5 o New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission o New' Hampshire Police Standards and Training Commission o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment Program (including supporting material) d O
2-26
T.
l-TAB (
hm RYE E-PLAN RERP/PERSG I
EOC SPL SPEC RESPONSIBLE EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG PUI STF COMM NDS FAC gg l POSITION SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VER8 VER 9 <
SELECTMEN 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
6 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4 FIRE DEPT POUCE DEPT 2 2 2 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0l ROAD AGENT I O 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 t
M:SC E0C STAFF 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* O' Oi
\
lotALS 18 2 2 0" t 2 1 0' 0' 4 l
COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security 3 Municipal Security
- 4. Traf fic Control 5 Impediment Removat 6 Stag ng Area
- 7. Communications I 8 Special Needs Verifications 9 Special Facihties Verifications
- 10. Pubhc Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk l I 12. School Liaison I
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- i* 15 Variance
22.2-10 l
{
SNEL RESOURCES SURVEY i IEOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR lCLER LIAISON REO AVL REMARKS 11 12
+/-
13 14 15 ,
i 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL. 3 SELECTMEN.1 SELECTMAN COULD ACT AS ALTERNATE O O 2 2 0 Civil OEFENSE DIRECTOR ,
i 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL.1 CD DIRECTOR 1 SELECTMAN COULO ACT AS ALTERNATE l -
0 0 2 2 0 C0 OiRECTOR f I'
l 27 TOTAL FIRE CEPT PERSONNEL (1 MEMBER COULD ACT AS ALTERNATE !i TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR WITHIN THE REMAINING 26.2 ACT AS FIRE CHIEF.2 l 2 0 15 26 + 11 ACT AS RADEF OFFICER 2 ACT AS FIRE OlSPATCHER lI
- b l
0 23 23101 AL FOLCL DEPT PE ES0t.'.E L ff 0 6 + 17 "3 STATE P0uCE N t STMF UUN.CJAL TCPS j f' RCAD AGET 'ER5M.NEL t PR;VATE CONTRACTORS AND,0R THE STATE W LL 0 0 1 6 +5 PRD',iC E ADD'T.C*. A. PERSON *.E L AS RE CD;RE D l
l 2 ThANS C00RJ 1 mE ALIM OFFICER.1 SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT. . TOAN CLERN t VEMBER OF 5;FE CtPT C0ut0 ACT AS ALTERNAff TRANS C0ORD 0 0,,, 5 5 0 'TRANS C0CRD CONTACTS THE SPL NEEDS RESIDENTS AND SPt FAC
' SUPER NIENDE.*w.7 t e r 3_ q c aw - . 0F SCHOOLS OF SAU-5C COULO AFFOINT A SCHOCL sac,,ccern
]
I 2 0'" 31 64 N, A 'c'. CP AL v0t'ATEERS cou.0 PROV.LE ADO iiC?. AL STAFONG 71
' APERTURE CARD Also Available UsE Aperture CarF 8709240145-05
-1 4/87 o
,/~T -
FIGURE 2.2 5 RYE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION S.i.ctmem2)-
School Civil Defense Sy' Director (2)"
RADEF Offcer (2)* .
( Health Transportation Town Fire Police Chief Road A0ent Fire Dispatcner Officer Coordinator Clerk (2)C.hief (2)* (1) (1) (2),
(1) (2)*
Traffe Pubic Staging Communca- EOC EOC Mun Safety Area tions cierm Sed 2) Contro#
Sed 2r Personne44) (2) (1) (t)
Pointa(0)**
EOC Curt II)
- Desenated Positions When Recure 24-Hr Staffing
" State Pohce Will Provide 3 Personnel For Traffc Control Points Total Personnel Required 31 4/87 O
2.2.6 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of North hampton
/
lk l The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of North Hampton revealed a l
need for 28 people to fully staff the Town of North Hampton's emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-sonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a l
protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.2-6.
The approximate number of 47 personnel depended upon as being available to the Town of North Hampton results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This determination was made through the analysis of available background documentation including the Town of North Hampton RERP, Rev. 2.
Appendix A, and the Town of North Hampton Annual Report. (Additional data sources are included in Table 2.2-11.)
The Town of North Hampton has either full-time or part-time personnel or volun-V teers available to it as follows:
Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Fire Department / Ambulance Personnel 26 Police Department 12 Highway Department 4 Town Clerk 1 Health officer _1_
Total 47 A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of North Hampton and how they might be assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.2-12.
2-29
The determination that the Town of North Hampton RERP needs 28 local indivi-(g duals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization, and that the Town has approximately 47 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
/~'T Nj l
l lO 2-30 I
L______________.__
7 i
((f '
1+,
- g. t 1
]
\
TABLE 2.2-11 l SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TOWN OF. NORTH HAMPTON s
o New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan,'Rev. 2 Town of. North
,, ;1- i.
Hampton,-Volume 19 :
2 L
o New ' Hampshire Radiological Emergeacy Response P1 n, Rev. ~ 2l _ Letters of Agreement, Volume S
)
o Town RERP Appendices as updated by ongoing Resource Assessment ~ Program (including supporting material) v, I
l e
Ih I
(
O ~
1 2-31
.,: / - --
TABLu
./
NORTH HAMPTON E-PLAN RERP/0 l g' EOC TRAF IMP SPL SPEC
( RESPONSIBLE EOC MUN STG PUB STF RMVL COMM NDS FAC POSITION SEC SEC CNTR AREA SAF !
4 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERa VER9 1c
, t' SELECTMEN!CD DIRECT 0fi 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I
?/ '
F RE DEPT. 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0* O' 2
., J
~
1.. ) .
POUCE DEPT. 2 2 2 0** 0 0 0 0 0 0
~
HIGHWAY 0EPT. 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0
, / MISC ECC STAFF 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t
TOTALS 17 2 2 0"* t 2 1 0* 0* 2 4 .
)
1 COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. ECC Statt Need
- 2. ECC Secunty
- 3. M unicical Security
- 4. Traf fic Control
- 5. Imcediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Scec:al Neecs Vent cations
- 9. Spec:al Facilities Venfications
- 10. Puetic Safety
- 11. ECC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Tctal Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
. 15. Vanance
- m. ,
[
y, , .
k, , % w
1 2.2-12
)ERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY-EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR CLER LIAISON REO +/- REMARKS 11 12 13 AVL,4 is 4 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN.1 SELECTMEN ACTS AS 0 0 4 4 0 Civit DEFENSE OfRECTOR I FIRE DEPT MEMBER COULD ACT AS ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR 30 TOTAL FIRE DEPT PERSONNEL (1 PERSON ALSO ON POLICE DEPT;3 PEOPLE ALSO IN HICHWAY DEPT;l MEMBER ACTS AS ALTERNATE CD DIR.)2 T.MBERS 2 0 15 25 +10 ACT AS TRANS CWE.2 ACT M WET OTTICER. 2 ACT AS FIRE CHt!F. &
2 ACT AS FIRE DISP. *TRANS COORD CONTACTS SPL NDS RES. 6 $PL FAC.
l 14 TOTAL POUCE DEPT PERSONNELit PERSON IS ALSO THE IflGHWAY AGENT, 0 0 6 12 +6 1 PERSON IS ALSO ON THE HAMPTON POLICE DEPT)
" STATE POUCE WILL PROVIDE 5 CFFICERS TO STAFF MUNICIPAL TCP S 5 TOTAL HIGHWAY DEPT PERSONNEL (3 F/T. 2 P/T.1 IS TRANS C00RD >
0 0 1 4 +3 tPRIVATE CCNTRACTOR AND/OR STATE WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED 0 0 2 TOTAL PERSON'.EL 1 HEALTH OFFICER AND 1 TOWN CLERK 2 2 0 McNiC: PAL VOLUNTEERS COULD PROVIDE AOCITIONAL STAFFING 2 0*** 28 47 N/A '" SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS COULD APPOINT A SCHOOL OFOC:AL TO ACT AS SCHOOL LIAISCN AS NEECED IN RPERTURE CARD
. l I'
Also Ara 11able Ou Aperture Car 2 '
8709240145-O(o i
/ I 4/sr
l r 1 l
r%
l
%.J
)'
FIGURE 2.2 6 NORTH HAMPTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION Selectmen (2)*
Civil Defense Director (2)*
Highway Health Town Polke Chef Fire Chief Agent Clerk Officer (2)*
(2). (1) (1)
(1)
EOC Clarm
/ til Traffic . Mun EOC
" Sed 2) Sec(2)*
po g g)..
Fire communica- %OC Deputy Fire Deputy Fire ciera Disostcher tions Chief /Trans (2)* . CP. ef/RADEF (1)
(2P (2)* (1)
.I I I
Staging Pum F*a Sefety (il Personnell2)
- Designate;d Positions Which Require 24 Hr Staffing a State Police Will Provide 5 Personnel For Traffic Control Points Total Personnel Required: 28 4/87
,G b
-- - - _ - - - -D
l 2.3 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES HAVING DESIGNATED l
'r PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS 1 -t l
Eleven of the seventeen local municipalities that are located within the New l
l l
Hampshire portion of the Seabrook Station plume exposure Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) have designated personnel assignments for implementation of local RERPs.
l l Each of these municipalities have provided information and input on personnel resources to the planning effort. The current . status of personnel resource needs, availabilities, and assignments are presented in this section.
2.3.1 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Brentwood The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Brentwood revealed the need for 27 local people to fully staff the Town of Brentwood emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-sonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a O
protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-1.
The approximate number of 58 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Brentwood RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A. and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town. j i
2-34 i
The Town of Brentwood has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director. 1 Fire Department 39 Police Department 10 Public Works Department 2 Health Officer 1 Town Clerk 1 Municipal Volunteer _1 Total 58 A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of Brentwood and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-1.
The Town of Brentwood RERP calls for the need of 27 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 58 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
, 2-35
~
i t
l I' BRENTWOOD E-PLAN RERP/
I EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC PUB EO(
RESPONSIEL: -
SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS SAF CLE!
" STF Ij POSITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VE 10 9 1 SELECTMEN / 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' CD DIRECTOR FIRE 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 DEPT.
POUCE 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT.
PUBUC WORKS 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 CEPT.
MISC EOC 4 0 0 0 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 0 STAiF TOTALS 15 2 1 3 t 1 1 0* 0* 2 2 CCLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. ECC Staff Need
- 2. ECC Secunty
- 3. Municipal Security 4 Tratfic Contrel
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Spec lal Needs Venfications
- 9. Spec:al Fac:lities Venfications
. 10. Public Saf ety
- 11. EO C C erk
- 12. Schoci Liaisen
- 13. Total Personnel Recuired 14 Total Oersonnel Availacle
' ~
- ii Var ance
h2.3-1 (SONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY l
l
?HOOL TOT TOT VAR AISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS 12 13 14 15 0 4 4 0 4 TOTAL PERSCNNEL - 3 SELECTMEN.1 civil DEFENSE D RECTOR 1 SELECTMAN NORMALLY SERVES AS CD DIRECTOR 46 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS SELECTMEN.1 SERVES AS CD DiFECTOR 0 10 38 +28 1 SERVES AS ALTERNATE TRANS COORD.1 SERVES AS ROAD AGENT. 2 FIREMEN ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF THE POL!CE DEPARTMENT.1 FIREMAN IS ALSO A MEMBER OF THE HAMPTCN FIRE DEFT OF THE REMAIN:NG 38. 2 SE AVE AS FIRE CHIEF AND 2 AS RADEF OFFICER 0 8 10 +2 10 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT DERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS POUCE CHIEF. POUCE OFHCER CN DUTY ALSO PROV;CES MUNIC:FAL SECURITY 0 1 2 +1 2 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 SERVES AS RCAD AGENT t PRIVATE CONTRACTOR AND/0R THE STATE WILL PROVICE ADCITiCNAL PERSONNEL AS FECUlRED 0 4 4 ' TOTAL PERSCNNEL 1 SEAVES AS HEALTH 9FFICER.1 SERVES AS TOWN CLERK.2 SER\E AS 0 TRANS COCRD.
^' "SCHOCL SufEA.NTENCENT CF SAU f 6 CONTACTS SCHOOLS AND WILL NAME A SCHCOL 0** c3
- N/A LIAiSCN AS NEEED TI
' APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture C8 S709240145-07 4
7/87 e
FIGURE 2.3 1 C
A BRENTWOOD EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
RADEF 0FFICER (2)*
FIRE ROAD AGENT (1) HEALTH TOWN POLICE CHIEF (2)* OFFICER (1) _ CLERK (1) CHIEF (2)*
E00 COMMUNICATIONS (1) E00 TRANSPORTATION CLERK (1) COORDINATOR (2)*
TRAFFIC MUN E00 l l CONTROL SEC (1) SEC (2)*
STAGING PUBUC POINTS (3)
AREA (1) . SAFETY (2)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24-hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 27 7/87 P
2.3.2 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of East Kingston O The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of East Kingston revealed the need for 20 local people to fully staf f the Town of East Kingston emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-2.
The approximate number of 33 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of East Kingston RERP, Rev. 2. Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of East Kingston has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position. M ber Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Directors 2 Fire Department 17 Police Department 3 Highway Department 3 Town Clerk 1 Municipal Volunteers J Total 33 1
O 2-38 j i
i i
]
f- A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of East Kingston'and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in. Table 2.3-2.
The Town of East Kingston RERP calls for the need of 20 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 33 individuals available to support the plan's imple-mentation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response-organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to fleid a response capability on the local level.
O O
2-39
e- -
c' TABLE EAST KINGSTON E-PLAN RERP/
EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC PUB E' RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS FAC SAF Cl VE ER POSITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 2 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 R SELECTMEN CIVIL DEFENSE 2 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 N DIRECTOR FIRE 2 0 0 3 0 N'A N!A 0 0 0 N DEPT.
POLICE 2 0* 1 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 N DEPT.
HIGHWAY 1 0 0 0 t N/A N/A 0 0 0 N DEPT.
MISC. EOC 7 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0" 0"' 0"" N STAFF TOTALS 16 0' 1 3 t N/A N/A 0" 0"' 0'"' N I
COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Secunty
- 3. M unicipal Secunty
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Pubhc Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required 14 Total Personnel Available
% 15. Variance
- 2 l
SONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY
$H00L TOT -TOT VAR AISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS 12 -13 14 15 10 2 3 +1 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN 0 2 2 0 2 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR AND 1 ALTERNATE CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR 19 TOTAL FIFIE DEFARTMENT PEREONNEL 1 SERVES AS CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR.1 SERVES 0 5 16 +11 AS EMERGENCY fiRST AfD SOUA0 DIRf.CTOR 1 SERVES AS SELECIMAN OF THE REMANNG 16, 2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF 5 TOTAL POLICE CEPARTMENT PERSONNEL- 1 IS A MEMBER OF THE SOUTH HAMPTON POUCE
,0 3 3 0 DEPARTMENT.1 IS A MEYBER OF THE CNGSTON POUCE DEFLOF THE REMA;NiNG 3,2 SERVE AS POUCE CH,EF. EOC SEC NOT RECuthEO 3 TOTAL HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 1 SERVES AS ilGHW AY AGENT t PRIVATE 0 1 3 +2 CCNTRACiDR AND/0R THE STATE WILL PRC'viCE ADDmCNAL FERSCNNEL AS REQUIRED 6 ICTAL PE950NNEL 2 SE AVE AS TRAN5FCRIAf:CN CC0CNA10A 2 AS EVE ACENCY F:RST AfD 0 7 6 -1 SCL C ONCiOR.1 AS ACES OmCER AV 1 As thN CMM ALTE ANATE RADEF CIFiCE A NEEDS TC PE ASSiCN!D "EVEI'G IST A10 SCLAC DA CCNIACTS SPL NDS RES. CENTS "TRANS C00 A0 CCNTACi$ SPL F AC * '.'NO PLBUC SAFETY PE ASONNEi AEQUtPED 20 33 "*'$CH00L SUPER NIENDENT OF SAU 16 CONTACTS SCHOOLS AND WILL NAME SCHOOL D""
- N/A' UA: SON AS NEEDED TI
' APERTURE CARD Also Avallable &
Aperture I f 8.709240145-OS l 7/87 1.- -- __ _ - _ __ .__ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FIGURE 2.3 2 EAST KINGSTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
EMERGENCY FIRE l TRANSPORTATION TOWN POUCE RADEF HIGHWAY FIRST AlD (2)* CHIEF (2)* IC00RDINATOR (2)* CLERK (1) CHIEF (2)* OFFICER (2)* ; AGENT (1)
O TRAFFIC MUN CONTROL , SEC (1)
POINTS (3)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24-HR Staffing Total Personnel Required: 20 l
7/87
2.3.3 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Exeter T
(~J L The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Exeter revealed the need for 50 local people to fully staff the Town of Exeter emergency response organi-zation. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-3.
The approximate number of 126 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Exeter RERP. Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of Exeter has personnel available to it as follows:
Position Number Available Selectmen 5 Town Manager 1 Fire Department 45 Police Department 23 Public Safety Dispatchers 8 Public Works 38 School Superintendents 2 Health Officer 1 Municipal Volunteers 3 Total 126 O
2-42
i i
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of Exeter and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organi-zation positions is provided in Table 2.3-3.
The Town of Exeter RERP calls for the need of 50 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 126 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
O O
2-43
_t'_
Y,, , '
EXETER E-PLAN RERP/
EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC ' PUB EC RESPONS BLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NS SAF CL{
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ER 10 8 9 TOWN 2' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g, ,ggg NA CIVIL DEFENSE 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NJ DIRECTOR FIRE 4 2 0 0 0 8 1 1 1 4 N/l DEPT.
POU^E 2 0 3 6* 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA DE PT.- ,
PUBUC $AFETY 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA DISPATCHER PUBUC WORKS 0 t 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 NA DEPT.
MISC. EOC- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Nd 6
STAFF TOTALS 20 2 3 6' t 12 1 1 1 4 N!l COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control S. Impediment Removal i
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications ;
- 8. Special Needs Venfications l
/ 9. Special Facilities Verifications j Public Safety (f 10.
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
~ 15. Variance I
_-_- - - _ - - - _ - _ _- - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - __ -- _ _ _ _ 3
LE 2.3-3 3SONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY hH00L TOT TOT VAR AIS0N REO AVL +/- REMARKS l 12 13 14 15 i
i0 2 5 +3 6 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 TOWN MANAGER AND 5 SELECTMEN (TOWN MANAGER SERVES AS CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR) 0 2 1 -1 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR NEEDS TO BE ASSIGNED 0 21 45 +24 4s TOTAL FIRE DEPARTVENT PERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF,2 AS EMS COORDINATOR EMS C00RDAATCR OtRECTS CONTACT OF SPL FAC 0 11 23 +12 23 TOTAL P0llCE DEFARTMENT PERSONNEL- 2 SERVE AS POUCE CH EF *THE STATE POUCE WILL PROVIDE UP TO 5 PERSONNEL TO STAf F MUN:C;FAL TCPS 0 2 8 +6 s TOTAL PHUC SAFETY DISPATCH PERSCuEL 0 6 38 +32 as TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS PERSCNNEL 2 SER'.E AS PUBUC WORKS 0:FECTOR t PRIVATE CONTRACTORS ANDiCR THE STATE W'LL PROVtCE ADDIT!CNAL PERSCNNEL AS REQUIRED 6 70'A Pt R50h%f t - 1 SER*tS Ai ?94LPO4' A"Os C0050 NATCA 0 AS AA;f f CFf CE R 1 AS SCHOOL SLP( A %T140(hf A401 AS 0" 6 6 0 "t * * ""c t a 'm"a= 5 "c' o' 5'": 5 " S * ' 5 5""5 "c'
- 5 "c '*" 5'* 8'5"" ^
CCWW,%'0AriC%S CCUMA%0 PCSf "SCHOCL SVF(R %'IN0(%T Of sag 16 (041 ACTS SCHOOLS A43 *'LL 44W[ A SCHOOL LA:504 AS h(ECED ALTERNAfl 1945 CC0A0 NitCS f) BE ASSiChf D 0" 50 126 N/A TI APERTURE CARD Also Available Aperture M '
18709240145-07 7/87
FIGURE 2.3 3 EXETER EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION O
TOWN MANAGER (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
\
TRANSPORTATION E0C RADEF POUCE SCHOOL FIRE PUBUC WORKS' COORDINATOR (2)* CONTROLLER (2) 0FFICER(2)* CHIEF (2)* SUPERINTENDENT (1)
CHIEF (2)* DIRECTOR (2) i _
EMS HEALTH COORD (2)* OFFICER (1)
SPL NDS STAGING SPL FAC VERIF (1) AREA (6) VERIF (1)
O COMMUNICATIONS (1)
PICK-UP STAGING AREA (4)
MUN TRAFFIC PUBLIC SAFETY PUBUC SAFETY EOC CONTROL PERSONNEL (4). DISPATCHER (2)*
SEC (2)* SEC (3)
POINTS (6)"
- Designated Positions Which Require 24-hr Staffing
" State Police Will Provide Up To 5 Personnel for Traffic Control Points Total Personnel Required: 50 7/87
2.3.4 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Greenland l
/N
'b The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Greenland revealed the l
need for 24 local people to fully staff the Town of Greenland emergency response organization.~ The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-sonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-4.
The approximate number of 52 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available background documentation including the Town of Greenland RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town, The Town of Greenland has personnel available to it as follows:
A Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Directors 2 Fire Department 40 Police Department 4 Highway Agent 1 Town Clerk 1 Health Officer _1 Total 52 0
2-46
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
.f Greenland and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-4.
The determination that the Town of Greenland RERP calls for the need of 24 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 52 individuals available to sup-port the plan's implementation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has suf-ficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
O l
l O
2-47
TABLE GREENLAND E-PLAN RERP/F EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC PUB EOC RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS SAF CLE.
POSITION 2 3 4 5 6 7 VE 10 1 1 9 SELECTMEN 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD DIRECTOR 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 RRE 6 0 0 3 0 2 2 0" 0" 0"- 1 DEPT. ,
POUCE 2 0* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT. ,
MISC. EOC 3 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 STAFF TOTALS 15 0- 1 3 t 2 2 0" 0" 0" 1 COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
, 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Variance o
k 03-4 j
. i
!RSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY <
SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR UAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS ;
12 13 14 15 i 0 2 3 +1 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN l
0 2 2 0 2 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR AND 1 ALTERNATE civil DEFENSE DIRECTOR 42 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSOP.NEL 2 SERVE AS CD DIRECTOR OF THE REMAINING 40.2 SERVE 0 14 40 +26 AS DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF / COMMUNICATIONS AND EOC.2 SERVE AS RADEF 0FFICER.AND 2 SERVE AS ;
TRANS AND EMS. " TRANS/ EMS CONTACTS SPL NDS RESIDENTS AND SPL FAC. FIRE OEPT WILL l PROVIDE UP T0 3 PERSONNEL TO STAFF TCPS '" NO PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL REQUIRED {
0 3 4 +1 4 TOTAL PULICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS POUCE CHIEF.
- EOC SECURITY PROVIDED
. BY STAFF PERSONNEL ;
O 3 3 0 3 TOTAL FC.RSONNEL 1 SERVES AS HIGHWAY AGENT.1 AS HEALTH OFFICER 1 AS TOWN CLERK t PRIVATE CONTRACTOR AND/0R THE STATE %'LL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED
" SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU 50 CONTACTS SCHOOLS AND WILL NAME SCHOOL LIAISON 0"" 24 52 N/A AS NEEDED Tl
'APEllTUltE CAllD Also Available Da Aperture CarF I
e8709240145-1O l
7/87 !
FIGURE 2.3 4 1
[ l GREINLAND EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION l
SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
TOWN CLERK (1) l l
E00 CLERK (1)
POUCE HEALTH OFFICER (1) RADEF HIGHWAY DEPUTY DEPUTY CHIEF (2)* OFFICER (2)* AGENT (1) FIRE CHIEF FIRE CHIEF COMMUN/E0C(2)* TRANS/ EMS (2)*
n O
I TRAFFIC MUN SEC (1) COMMUNICATIONS STAGING CONTROL (2) AREA (2)
POINTS (3)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 24 I
7/87 l O-J
2.3,5 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Kingston The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Kingston revealed the need for 28 local people to fully staff the Town of Kingston emergency ~ response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-l sonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-5.
The approximate number of 57 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Kingston RERP, Rev. 2. Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of Kingston has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department 37 Police Department 10 Highway Department 1 Town Clerks 3 School Superintendent 1 Health Officer _1 Total 57 e
l 2-50
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of Kingston and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-5.
The Town of Kingston RERP calls for the need of 28 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 57 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
O.
l l
I
.I j
.O 2-51
._. e.
TABLEf
>-(.- .
KINGSTON E-PLAN RERP/@
COMM SPL SPEC EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG FAC PUB EOC R."SPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS SAF CLE(
POSITION VER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEg g 10 V SELECTMEN / 4 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0" 0 0 CD DEFENSE FIRE 4 2 0 3 0 2 1 0' O. 0"' 1 DEPT.
POLICE 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT.
HIGHWAY 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT. ,
MISC E00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0 1 pp TOTALS 14 2 0 6 t 2 1 0' 0" 0*" 2' COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security ;
- 3. Municipal Security '
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area l
- 7. Communications j
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications ;
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
/l , 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Variance I
i
~% - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
y,-- , . , - -
@ONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY
$00L TOT TOT VAR ..
- lSON REO AVL +/- REMARKS l 12 13 14 15 4 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN AND 1 CIVi
- DEFENSE DIRECTOR
,0
! 0 4 0 1 SELECTMAN ACTS AS ALTERNATE Dvh DEFENSE DIRECTOR "C0 OIRECTOR CONTACTS SPEClFIED SPL FAC CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR PERFORMS RADEF FUNCTION 42 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 4 ARE WEWBERS OF THE NEw10N FIRE DEPARTMENT 1IS 0 13 37 +24 At50 A R040 AcENT OF isE REuA 41~c 37 2 StRvE AS FIRE Cn>EF AND 2 SEavE AS AusutANcE OtRECTOR ' AMBULANCE DiR CONTACTS SPt NOS RES;0ENTS *"N0 PUBUC SAFETY PERSONNEL RfCU: RED UP TO 3 F!REMEN WILL STAFF M(NiC PAL TCPS AS REcu: RED 0 6 10 +4 10 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS POLICE CHIEF POLICE OFFICER ON DUTY ALSO PERFORMS MUNICIPAL SECURITY DUTIES 0 i r0TAL HIGHWAY CEPARTMENT PERSONNEL t PRIVATE CONTRACTOR AND/0R THE 1 1 0 STATE WILL FRCV10E ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED o .. 5 TOTAL PERSONNEL - 1 SERVES AS SCHOOL / SUPERINTENDENT 1 AS TOWN 4 5 +1 CLERK AND 1 AS NEALTH OFFICER "'""SCHt'OL SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU ' 7 CONTACTS SPL FACISCHOOLS) AND WILL NAVE A SCHOOL LIAISON AS NEEDEC 28 57 N/A T1 APERTUllE CARD Also Available Da Aperture CarF 8709240145-l) 7/87
/*
FIGURE 2.3-5 KINGSTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION ,.
SELECTMEN (2)*
- CML DEFENSE DIRECT I05)*
STAGING AREAgi I I I I I I
~
FIRE HE LTH ROAD TOWN SCN00L POUCE
, OFFICER (1) AGENT (1) CLERK (1) SUPT (1) CHIEF (2)*
ChlEF (2)*
?
.E00
_ CLERK (1)
~
COMMUNICATIONS (1) E0C TRAFFIC MUN E00 AMBULANCE CLERK (1) CONTROL SEC (1) SEC (2)*
DIRECTOR (2)*
POINTS (6)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24-hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 28 .
7/87 i
_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ A
{}\
\
>s.
2.3.6 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of New Castle O The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of New Castle revealed the need for 22 local people to fully staff the Town of New Castle emergency l
l The breakdown of positions, including the required l- response organization.
number of peNonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-6.
1
)
?
The approximate number of 33 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-l mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of New Castle RERP. Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open r'
dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of New Castle has personnel available to it as follows:
l O Position Ntimler Available Selectmen ,
3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department 18 Police Department 7 Road Agent 1 Town Clerks 2 Health Officer J Total 33 l
0 2-54
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
.ON New Castle and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response
()
organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-6.
The Town of New Castle RERP calls for the need of 22 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 33 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
I i
2-55
. . _ - . __ __-____________b
o.- - ,>
l:
i
- 0 TABN
~
NEW CASTLE E-PLAN RERPi EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC PUB EC RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS FAC SAF C1 VER VE
. POSITION 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 SELECTMEN 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (
CML DEFENSE 2 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (
DIRECTOR f" 4 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 '
D .
POUCE 2 0 2 0 0 0 0* O' 0" 1
{
DEPT. .
' PUBL C MRKS 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0
, 0
- S E00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STdFp @
TOTALS 13 2 1 2 t 1 2 0* O' 0" 0 COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available '
._ 15. Variance t
i
@-6 t
%SONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY lCH00L TOT TOT VAR t LIAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS l 12 13 14 15 l.0 2 2 0 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 3 SELECTMEN 1 ACTS AS ALTERNATE CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR 0 2 2 0 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR. ONE SELECTMAN ACTS AS ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR 2610 fat FIRE DEFARTMENT PERSONNEL 1 is A MEMBER OF THE EXETER flRE DEPT 0 10 18 +8 AND A SPECIAL PATROL OFFICER IN NEWCASTLE 7 ARE MEMBERS OF THE PORTSMOUTH FIRE DEPl 05 TH' REMAINfNG 18. 2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF, ANDI AS ASS!STANT FIRE CH!EF AS$rSTANT FIRE CHIEF POSifl0N PER'ORMS RADEF FUNCTON O 5 7 +2 I NSI' I '
- P W"i 0 ' ' " I " 5' '7""' 5W" '"
n' A' 5iI 5'5CNaWe'lu ei?Wf s"K iin!n'a'",!!!=#!#i"e'25"""*'5 E
"" C"'"
0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL PERSCNNEL t PRfyATE CONTRACTOR AND/0R THE STATE WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED 0 2 3 +1 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 1 SERVES AS HEALTH OFFICER AND 1 SERVES AS TOWN CLERK O'" 22 33 N/A *" SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU 50 CONTACTS SCHOOLS AND WILL hAME A SCHOOL UAISON AS NEEDED MUNICIPAL VOLUNTEERS AND/0R FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL ARE AVAILABLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STAFFlNG Tl
' APERTURE CARD Also Available On Aperture Card '
6 7 0 9 24 014 5- Q 7/87
FIGURE 2.3 6 NEW CASTLE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
POUCE HEALTH OFFICER (1) ROAD TOWN Ci.ERK(1) FIRE CHIEF (2)* AGENT (1) CHIEF (2)*
f~
STAGING EOC SEC (2)* MUN SEC (1) TRAFFIC AREA (1) CONTROL POINTS (2)
COMMUNICATIONS (2) ASST E00 FIRE CHIEF (2)* CLERK (1)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 22 O 7/87
2.3.7 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Newfields O The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Newfields revealed the need for 19 local people to fully staff the Town of Newfields emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of per-sonnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-7.
The approximate number of 32 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Newfields RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of Newfields has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Directors 2 Fire Department 22 Police Department 5 Total 32 0
2-58
f A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
'O Newfields and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response Q
organization positions is provided in Table 2,3-7.
The Town of Newfields RERP calls for the need of 19 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization, the determination that the Town has approximately 32 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation. coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
O U-2-59 l
O O
O
l l
I I .
1 l,
i p.,
. l
\.
NEWFIELDS E-PLAN R[
EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC g RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS FAC POSITION 2 3 4 5 6 7 VER VER 1
8 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (
SELECTMEN CIVIL DEFENSE 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0" g i
DIRECTOR 1 FIRE 5 2 0 1 t 1 1 0 0 d DEPT.
POUCE 2 0 1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 d i DEPT.
TOTALS 11 2 1 1* t 1 1 0" 0" 0 COLUMN HEADINGS KE/
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison ;
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
(. -
- 15. Variance 4
i
)
I
DLE 2.3-7 RP/ PERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY
@ EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR
@ CLER LIAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS
)O 11 12 13 14 15 0 0 2 3 +1 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SERVE AS SELECTMEN o'
0 0 2 2 2 TOTAL PERSONNEL "C0 OIRECTOR CONTACTS SPL NOS RESIDENTS AND SPL FAC. *"N0 PUBUC 0
SAFETY PERSONNEL REQUIRED 24 TOTAL FIRE DEPT. PERSONNEL 1 AS THE Civil DEFENSE DIRECTOR ,1 AS ALTERNATE CML 2 0 12 22 +10 DEFENSE DIRECTOR.0F THE REMAINING 22.2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF.2 SERVE AS RADEF OFFICER.
AND 1 SERVES AS HIGHWAY AGENT t PRIVATE CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE STATE WILL PROVICE A00til0NAL PERSONNEL AS RE00lPED 0 0 3 5 +2 5 TOTAL POUCE DEPT. PERSONNEL 2 SER'd AS POUCE CHIEF. STATE POUCE WILL PROVIDE 2 A00lil0NAL PERSONNEL TO STAFF MUNICIPAL TCPS 2 0"" 19 32 N/A " SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT OF SAU 16 CO TACTS SCHOOLS AND W'LL NAME SPH00L UAISON AS NEEDED Tl
'APERTUlm CARD Also Available On Aperture CmNI l
7/87 t
i i
9 709240145-l3 I
l
/
[
l l
FIGURE 2.3-7
)O l
NEWFIELDS EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION t
1 SELECTMEN (2)*
i CLE K(1) civil DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
STAGING AREA PERSONNEL (1)
FIRE HIGHWAY RADEF/ HEALTH POUCE CHIEF (2)* AGENT (1) 0FFICER(2)* CHIEF (2)*
I I E00 COMMUNICATIONS (1) TRAFFIC E00 MUN CLERK (1) CONTROL SEC (2)* SEC (1)
POINTS (1)"
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing
- State Police Will Provide 2 Personnel for Traffic Control Points Total Personnel Required: 19 7/87 O
2.3.8 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Newton '
V The assessment of personnel resources for the Town-of Newton revealed the need for 27 local people to fully staff the Town of Newton emergency response organi-zation. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-8.
The approximate number of 60 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the . Town of Newton RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue wJth representatives of the Town.
The Town of Newton has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position Number Available 1 Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department 41 Police Department 7 Highway Department 2 Town Clerk 1 Municipal Volunteers _5 Total 60 J l
I l
2-62
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
(~~T Newton and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response U
organization positions I's provided in Table 2.3-8.
The Town of Newton RERP calls for the need of 27 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 60 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
(-
\ /
ss O
9, w
2-63
w -
O',
NEWTON E-PLAGS EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC RESPONSIBLE SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS FAC STF SEC POSITION 3 4 5 6 7 VER VER.
1 2 8 -9' 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SELECTMEN civil DEFENSE 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIRECTOR FIRE 2 2 0 0 'O 2 1 0 0 ,
D E PT. -
g POLICE 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0l '
OEPT.
HIGHWAY 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 DEPT.
MISC. E0C 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0' STAFF l
=
TOTALS 14 2 2 2 t 2 1 0* O' COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
+j 15. Variance
/
W* '4
D
.@LE 2.3 8
- P/ PERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR CLER LIAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS 11 12 13 14 15 3 TOTAL PEMONNEL 1 SELECTMAN ACTS AS ALTERNATE CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR.THE 2 0 0 2 2 0 REMAINING FILL THE SELECTMAN POSITION 0 0 2 2 0 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 SELECTMAN SERVES AS ALTERNATE CD DIRECTOR 2 0 11 41 +30 42 TOTAL FIRE DEPT PERSONNEL 1 IS ALSO A MEY3ER OF THE KiNGSTON FIRt DEPT.OF THE REMAINING 41,2 SEnvE AS FIRE CHEF
+1 to 10IAL POUCE CEFT PEREONNEL -(4 F/T.6 PM( 2 ARE NON SAORN 1 F/T,1 P/T),1 SERVES 0 0 6 7 AS CML DEFENSE 0l RECTOR OF THE REMAINING 7. 2 SERVE AS POLICE CHIEF 0 +1 2 TOTAL PERS0wtt t Pas ATE C'NTvCica ANo:cR THE STATE MLL PRCVICE ACDITICNAL 0 1 2 PERSC%EL AS RECU1 REC 6 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 SERVES AS TCAN CLE% 2 SERVE AS FACEFmEALTH OFFICER AND 2 0 0 5 6 +1 SERVE AS TUNSP0; TAT 40N C00RDtNAfCR *TRANS CCCRD CONTACTS SPt. NDS RESACENTS AND SPL FAC
" SCHOOL SUPER!NTENCENT OF SAU 17 CCNTACTS SCHOOLS AND MLL NAME A SCHOOL 2 0" 27 60 N/A UAISON AS NEEDED Ti hPERTUllE CARD Also AvallaMe Out Aperture Car 5' 7/87 c8 7 0 9 24 014 5. jtf
FIGURE 2.3*8 NEWTON EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
I RADEF/ HEALTH OFFICER (2*)
STAGING AREA (2)
[ I I l 1 POLICE TRANSPORTATION TOWN ROAD FIRE CHIEF (2)* COORDINATOR (2)* CLERK (1) AGENT (1) CHIEF (2)*
.O -
PUBLIC SAFETY CLERK (1)
PERSONNEL (2)
MUN E00 TRAFFIC COMMUNICATIONS (1) -
SEC (2) SEC (2*) CONTROL POINTS (2)
E0C _
CLERK (1)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing Total Personnei Required: 27 7/87
2.3.9 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the City of Portsmouth l
l D
l 0 The assessment of personnel resources for the City of Portsmouth revealed the need for 84 local people to fully staff the City of Portsmouth emergency response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-9.
The approximate number of 275 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the City of Portsmouth RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the City.
The City of Portsmouth has personnel available to it as follows:
O Position Number Avallable City Manager 1 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department 62 Public Works Department 100 Police Department 104 City Clerks 2 School Superintendents 2 Human Services Department 2 Health Officer 1 Total 275 O
2-66 l l
I
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the City of ,
Portsmouth and how they have been assigned to the City's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-9.
The City of Portsmouth RERP calls for the need of 84 local individuals to fully staff the City's emergency response organization. The determination that the City has approximately 275 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, indicates that the City has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
O O
2-67
-.m
,~, >
\
'~
PORTSMOUTH E-PLAN EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC l RESPONSIBLE SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NOS FAC STF VER POSITION 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 VEj CllY MANAGERI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 CD DIRECTOR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 FIRE DEPT.
2 0 2 0 0 0 t 0 0 0- 0+
PUBUC WORKS DEPT 4 2 15 25 0 3 1 3 .1 1
~l POUCE DEPT.
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" MISC. EOC STAFF 19 2 15 25 t 3 2 3- 1 TOTALS COLUMN HEAOlNGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety 1 11. EOC Clerk I 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required f 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Variance l
49 "N Mg
ABLE 2.3 9 RP/ PERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR CLER LIAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS 11 12 13 14 15 l
2 TOTAL PERSONNEL ~ 1 CITY MANAGER AND 1 CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR ALTERNATE CITY l 0 0 4 2 -2 MANAGE R AND AL TERNATE CD DIRECTOR NEED TO BE ASSIGNED. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY BE USED AS AD0iT10NAL STAFFING 67 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL (46 F/T.21 P/T) 1 SERVES AS ALTERNATE PUBLIC 1 0 4 62 + 58 w0RKS DIRECTOR 3 ARE VEMBERS OF THE NEW CASTLE FIRE DEPARTMENT.1 IS A MEMBER OF THE EXE1ER FIRE DEPARTMENT. OF THE REMAINING 62. 2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF 100 TOTAL PUBUC WLan5 PE%ChsEL 2 SLRVE AS PUBUC AGRKS 0 RECTOR 25 AColTIONAt. PERSONNEL ARE
' ' ' * "E SLVuiR SEASCN t THE ST ATE WILL PACviCE A00lfiChAL PERSONNEL AS REQUIRED f 0 0 2 *00
' + 98 ***u"C
.Pte W oR.'S ce'Ec ta CecRoiN AIE S CesiACi or sPt Nc5 RESictsTS A%0 SELECTEo SPt rAC AND
^
E2l?/A@sEO57'l@$MYN{g gga a NS ARE ASmte rRCu inE mE 105 TOTAL POUCE DEFARTVENT PERSCNNEL 153 f di 52 P/T- ALL PERSONNEL ARE QUALIFIED TO 66 + 38 BE DISPATCHE AS )1 POUCE 0F FICER IS ALSO CML DEFENSE 01 RECTOR,0F THE RE MAIN NG 104,2 SERVE 0 0 104 AS POLICE CHIEF.2 SERVE AS POUCE DISPATCHER 1 TGTAL PtR$CNNil- 2 M%t AS NVAN SE WerCE5 C MECICR 1 AS NEALIM CFriCER. I As CITY CLERK A%D 1 AS SCHOOL SUPER,%f E 40Esi *LuAN SERVICES CAtCic. COORD %ATES CCNTACT OF SELECTED SPL F AC 1 POUCE 1 0*" 8 7 -1 PEsS:s%Et. *:tt eE Ass cNEo TC Assist atuA% Stav:C:S c rec!Ca .= Ccs:AC: sc SPt r AC 2 nAcEr 0rr.CEas HEED 70 SE A55 GNE:
- SCaCCL SJER>NTEN;ENT CF tu 52 CCN' ACTS SCMCOLS ANO Altt %AuE A SCHC0t i A e nN n su rs-2 0"* 84 275 N/A rg APERTp6S CARB
@o AvdilANC JAperture CEO '
7/87
/S70:9240145-15
FIGURE 2.3 9 PORTSMOUTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION r'
MAYOR / CITY COUNCIL i
CITY
~~~~~~~7
[
ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
' POLICE HUMAN HEALTH PUBLIC CITY FIRE CHIEF (2)* SERVICES OFFICER (1) WORKS CLERK CHIEF (2)*
DIRECTOR (2)* _ DIRECTOR (2)* (1)
O I SPL NDS RADEF E00 VERIF(3) 0FFICER (2)* CLERK (1) i i i POLICE E00 MUN TRAFFIC SCHOOL DISPATCHER (2)* SEC (2)* SEC (15) CONTROL SUPERINTENDENT (1)
P0lNTS(25j 1
STAGING PUBUC SPL FAC AREA (3) SAFETY (12) VERIF(1)
COMMUNICATIONS E00 (2) CLERK (1)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 84 O 7/87
2.3.10 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Seabrook O The' assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Seabrook revealed the need for 47 local people to fully staff the Town of Seabrook emergency response organization. 'The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-10.
The. approximate number of 91 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Seabrook RERP, Rev. 2, Appendix A, and an open dialogue with. representatives of the Town.
The Town of Seabrook has personnel available to it as follows:
D O Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Directors 2 Fire Department 32 Police Department 25 Highway Department 18 Health Officer / Building Inspector 1 Town Clerks 2 Administrative Assistant 1 Water Superintendents 4 Municipal Volunteers 3 Total 91 e
I 2-70
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of
,m Seabrook and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-10.
The Town of Seabrook RERP calls for the need of 47 local individuals to fully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 91 individuals available to support the plan's implemen-tation, coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, Indicates that the ' Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
l V
2-71
_r SEABROOK E-PLAR EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL S P EC,-
RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTR RMVL AREA NDS 1 POSITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEj g; SELECTMEN 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0' CIVIL DEFENSE 2 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 .0 DIRECTOR FIRE 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0-DEPT.
POLICE 4 0 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 ,
4 DEPT. !
HIGHWAY 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 DEPT.
MISC. EOC 8 0 0- 0-0 0 0 0 0 STAFF TOTALS 19 2 4 13 t 2 1 0- 0*
COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Security
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Control
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Verifications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available
- 15. Variance s
W N
l hlE 2.3 10 P/ PERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR CLER UAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS 11 12 13 14 15 0 0 2 3 +1 3 TOTAL PERSONNEL 3 SELECTMEN 0 0 2 2 0 2 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 1 CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR AND 1 AS$1STANT CD DIRECT 0fL 3S TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 2 SERVE AS CIVilDEFENSE DIRECTOR,1IS ALSO A
! 1 0 12 31 +19 Pti PCUCE OFFICER.AND 1 SERVES AS TRANS COORD OF THE REMAIN!NG 31; 2 SERVE AS FIRE CHIEF 26 TOTAL POUCE DEFACVE NT PER5C%EL 1 SERVES AS Civil DL'FE NSE 0; RECTOR 1 IS
+4 AVAILABLE CNLY FOR ClEi,; CAL CUT;ES CF THE REMAIN.NG 25 2 SERVE AS POUCC CHIEF 0 0 21 25 AND 2 SERVE AS POUCE 7SPATCHER 8 FRCM THE HIGH6AY DEPARTMENT COULD ASSIST AT ICPS ( AS CONDlIIC';S PEhMIT) 0 0 1 18 +17 18 TcTAt +GH AAY cEPmvtNT PEaSmEt. i StmS AS ROAD A.'ENT t THE STATE WILL PRONCE ADDIT:CNAL FEFSC%EL AS RECuiRED 1270iALPERSONNEL-2 sea, AS 9;EF Cf 0CE R 2 SE ave AS TMNS COCR015ERVES AS AATER SLP. i SERVES AS E' i" "'CER AND 1 SE*'.ES AS ACM NISTMilVE ASSIST A%T (ACM N:St ui;VE 1 i1 9 12 +3 ';^'(tf *" ' SE"S ^S "!;, % WETA CEN'EE rh IC AN 08F'CE; 'f MN5 C0080 CCN! ACTS SPL 405 AESCENTS ASS'STANT REPORTS TC THE AND SPL F AC
" SCHOOL SUPERNTEN:ENT Oi SAU 21 CCNTACTS SCH00tS AND WILL NAVE A SCHOOL UA!SCN 2 0" 47 91 N/A AS NEE 0ED F:hE DEPARTYENT POUCE CEPARTMENT, AND VUNiCtFAL VOLUNTEERS COULD FPCVCE ADDITIONAL STATONG
' T1
!APERTUliR CARD Also Available Dst Aperture CsetM 7/87 (8709240145-16
fl FIGURE 2.3 10 SEABROOK EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)* ADMINISTRATIVE ASST (1) civil DEFENSE
' DIRECTOR (2)*
RADEF 0FFICER (2)*
I I I I I 3 O POUCE CHIEF (2)*
ROAD AGENT (1)
TOWN CLERK (1) WATER SUPT (1)
HEALTH 0FFICER/
BUILDING FIRE CHIEF (2)*
~
INSPECTOR (1)
EOC CLERK (1)
TRAFFIC E0C . TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS (1)
CONTROL . ,MUN SEC (4)- CLERK (1) . COORDINATOR (2)*
'E00 SEC (2).
POINTS (13) ,
POLICE I DISPATCHER (2)* PUB'UC STAdlNG SAFETY AREA (2)
PERSONNEL (4)
- Designated Positions Which Require 24-hr Staffing Total Personnel Required: 47 7/87
2.3.11 Assessment of Personnel Resources for the Town of Strathan I \
L> The assessment of personnel resources for the Town of Stratham revealed the
{
need for 30 local people to fully staff the Town of Stratham emergency i l
response organization. The breakdown of positions, including the required number of personnel needed to staff each position within the organization to provide for a protracted response capability, is depicted on Figure 2.3-11.
The approximate number of 133 personnel available to staff this organization results from the ongoing personnel resources assessment program. This deter-mination was made through the analysis of available generic background documen-tation including the Town of Stratham RERP, Rev. 2. Appendix A, and an open dialogue with representatives of the Town.
The Town of Strathan has personnel available to it as follows:
(~~
Position Number Available Selectmen 3 Civil Defense Director 1 Fire Department 101 Pollee Department 7 Newmarket Dispatchers 12 Public Works 8 Town Clerk 1 Total 133 2-74 N --_-_-_-_a_.
k l
A matrix providing a breakdown of personnel readily available to the Town of r~~T Stratham and how they have been assigned to the Town's emergency response tj organization positions is provided in Table 2.3-11.
The Town of Stratham RERP calls for the need of 30 local individuals'to l lully staff the Town's emergency response organization. The determination that the Town has approximately 133 individuals available to support the plan's inplemen- -
tation. coupled with the assignment of local personnel to emergency response organization positions, Indicates position that the Town has sufficient numbers of available personnel to field a response capability on the local level.
h a
U
~...
s e
O 2-75 l
l l
l .
7 i
1
. j
[V' STRATHAM E-PLAN @
4 u
EOC EOC MUN TRAF IMP STG COMM SPL SPEC ]
RESPONSIBLE STF SEC SEC CNTA RMVL AREA NDS FAC- 4, POSITION VER 1 2 3 ~4 5 6 '7 VER8 9
.j SELECTMEN / 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/0OlRECTOR
" 6 2 0 0 0 2 1 0" 0" t, 0 .
POLICE 2 0 1 3- 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT.
NEWMARKET 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3'
1 OlSPATCHER
/ PUBUC W RKS 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 MISC. EOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3:- .s! SMFF TOTALS 17 2 1 3* t 2 1 0" 0" COLUMN HEADINGS KEY
- 1. EOC Staff Need
- 2. EOC Secunty
- 3. Municipal Security
- 4. Traffic Controf
- 5. Impediment Removal
- 6. Staging Area
- 7. Communications
- 8. Special Needs Venfications
- 9. Special Facilities Verifications
- 10. Public Safety
- 11. EOC Clerk
- 12. School Liaison
- 13. Total Personnel Required
- 14. Total Personnel Available s
- 1. 5. Varianco
.n
'Wg
TABLE 2.3 11 RP/ PERSONNEL RESOURCES SURVEY
) EOC SCHOOL TOT TOT VAR CLER llAISON REO AVL +/- REMARKS
) 11 .12 13 -14 15
,Q ' 4 4- 4 TOTAL PERSONNEL- 3 SELECTMAN 1 CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR,13ELECTMAN SERVES AS Q 0 ALTERNATIVE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR I
110 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTME NT PERSONNEL- 1 IS ALSO SELECTMAN 1 IS ALSO Civil DEFENSE 2- 0 101 + 86 DIRECTOR.1 tS ALSO HIGHWAY AGENT.6 ARE ME MBERS OF OTHE R FlRE CR PULICE DEPARTMENTS. 0F 15 THE REMAlNING 101:2 SERVE AS RADEF OFFICEFL 2 AS FIRE CHIEF AND 2 AS EMS CAPTAIN " FIRE CHIEF CONTACTS SPL NDS F.ES! DENTS AND SPL FAC 6 TOTAL POUCE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL tS FIT.3 P/T) 1 P/T OFFtCER l$ ALSO A POUCE OFFICER 'I 0 0 6 .7 +1 iN NCRrs HAvFTom. OF THE REVA@NG 7. 2 SERVE AS POUCE CH:EF
- STATE POUCE WILL PROVIDE PERSONNEL FOR dm TRAfflC CONTROL PC$m0N 0 0 2 12 +10 12 TOTAL DISPATCHERS DISPATCHER $ 04 RATE f RCM NE AYARKET DISPATCH CENTER .l 8 TOTAL PERSONNEL 1 SIRVES AS HISH A AY AGENT t PR:VATE CCNTRACTOR AND/OR THE STATE WILL 0 0 1 8 +7 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERTCNNEL AS RE0WRED 0 0 2 1 1 1 TOTAL PERSONNEL WHO SEWES AS TCAN CLERK HEALTH OFFICER NEEDS TO BE ASSIGNED
'" SCHOOL SUPER;NIENDENT OF SAU 16 CONTACTS SCHOOLS AND WILL ?.AME A SCHOOL UAISON 2: 0*" 30 133 N/A AS NEE 0ED uuNiCiFAL votLNTEERS ANO CR FIRE DEPARTVENT PERSONNEL ARE AVAILABLE TO FROVIDE A00lil0NAL STAf FWG l
Tl SPERTU1G iCARD l
(Also Avillalile'Om Aperture Oset '
1 7/87 f
B 7 0 9 24 014 5 -17 __
t FIGURE 2.311 ..
j STRATHAM EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION SELECTMEN (2)*
CML DEFENSE DIRECTOR (2)*
FIRE CHIEF (2)* HEALTH OFFICER (1) TOWN CLERK (1) .
HIGHWAYAGENT(1] POLICE CHIEF (2)* RADEF OFFICER (2)*
i E00 1 COMMUNICATIONS (1) CLERK (1)
I I EMS CAPTAIN (2)* ^ NEWMARKET ' ' STAGING ' EOC j DISPATCH (2)- AREA (2) CLERK (1) l PUBUC SAFE 1Y(2) l TRAFFIC CONTROL POINTS (3)"l lMUN SEC(1)l lE00 SEC (2)*l
- Designated Positions Which Require 24 hr Staffing
" State Police Will Provide 1 Personnel for Traffic Control Points Total Personnel Required: 30 )
j O- 7'*'
4 i
SECTION 3 PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED FOR STATE AGENCIES AND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS 3.1
SUMMARY
OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY An ongoing personnel resources assessment! Program has been initiated to ensure the availability of personnel resources within the various State of New Hampshire agencies and support organizations. All State of New Hampshire agencies and support organizations assigned a responsibility under the NHRERP,
)
Rev. 2 have been included in this assessment.
A systematic approach was undertaken to define the types and numbers of person-nel required to perform the assigned functions. This process, which is described below, is depicted on Figuro 3.1-1.
The first step in the process was to review the NHRERP, Rev. 2, and the proce-dures contained in NHRERP, Rev. 2, Volumes 4, 4A. and 4B to ensure that all assigned responsibilities were considered. This analysis included both primary and support responsibilities. For example, the analysis of New Hampshire State Police procedures included primary responsibilities of communications, notifica-tion, and access control as well as support responsibilities of traffic control, law enforcement, and the dispatching of towing vehicles. On the basis of this review, a walk-through of each implementing procedure was conducted to identify by agency, position, and functional responsibility all the tasks required to be performed and the number of personnel required to complete those tasks.
O 3-1
The ' next step of the process was to identify personnel resources available to fill the emergency response positions . identified in the procedural- walk-throughs. To accomplish this, a set of survey forms designed spec!fically for each State agency was developed. The purpose of these survey forms was to elicit agency-specific data pertinent to each of the agency's assigned respon-sibilities.
Under the auspices of the New Hampshire Emergency Management Agency (NHEMA), a series of interviews was then arranged with principal emergency response person-nel of each New Hampshire State agency and organizatico assigned a respon-sibility under the NHRERP, Rev. 2. The survey forms were completed during the interviews, and the number, location, and types of personnel available to per-form emergency response functions were documented.
This primary data source for State personnel resources has been supplemented by a review of resource appendices to the procedures contained in NHRERP, Rev. 2, Volumes 4, 4A, and 4B and by review of currently available State directories and other public records.
The information was complied into a matrix (Table 3.1-1) that shows the results of the personnel resource assessment for State agencies and supporting organiza-tions. This matrix identifies the number of required personnel, available per-sonnel, and the resultant variance for each agency or organization.
These numbers reflect implementation of all aspects of the NHRERP with the exception of State assistance to municipalities unable to respond to an emergency.
O 3-2
Tables 3.1-2 and 3.1-3 were developed to detail the additional personnel requirements for those agencies or supporting organizations designated in NHRERP, Rev. 2, Volume 2, Appendix G as having responsibilities for providing assistance to municipalities unable to respond. The assumptions and additional detailed information used to determine these personnel requirements are included as an appendix to this section.
}
Table 3.1-4 summarizes the State personnel required to assist local municipali-ties to respond to a radiological emergency and the total resources available to provide this assistance. l Data sources used to develop the resource requirements and availabilities are provided in Table 3.1-5.
O l
l l
9 3-3
hA-7 TA@
m
'(x -
SUMMARY
OF STATE AGENCIES AND SUPPORTING ORG<
~
r ,
S ATE S E EA E EAG AGENCY / LOCATION ,"yE RE P g ELD AC GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY 26 26 0 2 o 0 5't da
= =5 MANAGEMENT NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH 8 24 o o 24 o o
-o SERVICES STATE POLICE 4 2 o o o o o o i
CIVIL AIR PATROL 2 o o o o o o o (
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2 2 o o o o 42- Jgst <
DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES & ECONOMIC 2 2 o o o o $
o 41 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME 2 2 o o o o 24 o a
=
PUPIL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY 2 o o o o o o o q AMERICAN RED CROSS 2 0 o o -
8- o o h DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2 0 o o o o 12 o a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES o 2 0 o 136 o o o EMERGENCY SERVICES UNIT NATIONAL GUARD 2 2 o o o o 50- 4"u;3 a WATER SUPPLY & POLLUTION CONTROL 2 0 o o o o 6 o (
U.S. COAST GUARD o 2 o o o o 9 o (
=
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2 o o o o o o o c EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 2 0 2 o o o o 72 c PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 2 2 o o o o o o c ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPT. o o 23 o o o o o AND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS VEHICLE PROVIDERS o o o o o o o 515- c l TOTALS 64 64 25 2 160 8 184 537 2<
s..-
3.1 1 ,.
'I'I .
EATIONS/ PERSONNEL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 'APERTUF CARD C "*'" '
oIrl$t 'fsAI atcuYSow'AU^jti {^ "., REMARKS e 3.%h\ COD 0 0 0 54 75 + 21 SEE VEHICLE PROVIDERS FOR REQUIRED ORIVERS Aperture C8fd TOTALS INCLUDE 12 VOLUNTEERS 0 0 6 66 +4 4 LOCATED AT THE DPHS LAB IN CONCORD 62 2 RADIATION HEALTH MANAGERS IN CONCORD 48 0 6 86 185 +99 TOTALS INCLUDE 6 COMM.,2 FROM ADMIN. AND 74 FOR TCP S/ACPS 0 25 WILL PROVIDE GROUND AND AIR TRANSPORTATION l 0 25 27 80 +53 ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL WILL BE USED IN A SUPPORT R0LE ONLY _
- FIELD PERSONNEL 10 f.,ET UP TCP S> ALP $ AND iMPtDIMLNI REMOVAL l0 0 0 46 90 +44 1E8 00T PEPSCNNEL ARE AVAILABLE TO DRIVE BUSES NUMBER AVA!LABLE SHO AN UNDER VEHCLE FLOVIDERS
- NUMBER AVAILABLE REFLECTS TOTAL DRED EMPLOYMENT, WH;CH 0 0 0 45 182 +137 FLUCTUATES SEASONALLY 0 0 0 28 48* +20
- TOTALS INCLUDE 20 FIELD BIOLOGISTS AVAILABLE AS BACK-UP ASSISTANCE
'O O O 2 2 0 L 0 0 10 10
- ^I" ' ^ ^ ** ' ^ ! ' ' " "*"" "
0 ERS. EASTE RN OP3, OF ARC 41LL $L PPLEMT NT ki c' D 1 PF 6 OTHff PER$0NNEL MOM TPROl:iiaCT N A!'J N 0 0 2 EXTENSION SERVICE REPS. FROM ROCKINGHAM COUNTY COMPLEX 4 18 183 +165 2 EXTENSION SERVICE REPS. FROM UNH SnD STAFF INCLL'DE THE STATE EDC FOSir;CNS AND STAFF FROM HOST 0 0 0 138 560 +422 LOYMJNiiY FR1YARf AND SLPPORT UNiiS PLUS SUPPLEMENTARY STAFF A'v AILARI E fCR ASSiGNVE NT 2510 NATIONAL GUA lD MEV6ERS 196 MEYBERS ARE AVAILABLE TO DRIVE SUSES 0 0 0 54 2314 +2260 AS SHC AN UNDER VEHICLE NOV:DERS NUMBER INCLUDES 38 DECCN PFRSCWL 0 TOTALS INCLUDE 3 SUMMER INSPECTORS 0 0 8 16 +8 THE OTHER 6 WILL BE USED AS BACK4JP SilPPORT 0 0
- COAST GUARD WILL NOT PROVIDE A ROSTER OF PERSONNEL 0 11 NA*
' 0 THEY HAVE ENOUGH PERSONNEL TO PERFORM REQUIRED FUNCil0N O O O 2 2 0 ANY ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL WOULD BE CLERICAL 0 0
- TOTALINCLUDES 8 PERSONNEL AVAllABLE FROM 4 OTHER EMS REGIONS AND 0 76 134' +58 126 PERSONNEL UNDER LETTER OF AGREEMENT 0 0 0 4 6 +2 TOTALS INCLUDE G SHER:f F S CEPAhiMENT PERSONNEL 10 DISPATCHERS AT RCCW.CHAV CO 0 0 6 '9 51 +22 DiSFATCH CENTER AND N OTHER COUNTY SHER!FF S DEPARTMENT FERSCNNEL
0 0 0 515 1228 + 713 net, s Art cre. 5 o!un votarra e*:s. ec a un em 48 0 47 1215 5232 NA r8709240145-l$ .-
& e ens e mniA r end i h
s p
i Ll t t eaa ii nvs oia .
h e s l
t u
l orl u m l n cn pcl t p ps oaq a anii eeas e proie Il cof d l ri e D ueocR osi r e cu SPC e w L rt o T r eq s p e e o o ope '
S N 5 pnc 3f s r f f
i r
l e a l h t ye S nt n ein m mr o a eus 1 1 1 1 1 1 G h l cr g p ee n PSP i u k E S c C o N R A
T s S l
- a I a
- S t
- t S n l n A e e e .i S mP n ms u NE eC n 0 2 0 3 0 0 5 t t OT lp T o r ne I A N s ae pmyn TT O p r CS I u e et N T S P D r p UL C ap FL N spul U U
- es YF F g
f d f
2 C
- NE n o i st r'
1 ER i t GI f ef e
- l. 3 RU f dP hf vl
. %E L B
EQ ME ER ta nieSl S gN i
1 8 2
5 1 ^ 2 0 4
Si ai y e t hd) rh A YO P s nsl u
T ET C s K TA o*
- at O YP
.al 1 2 3 3 3 _
2 4 R o S or o 1 2 u N N T r _ egoi W t n _ hif O t t T o n C h ow R gco(
O u F om
- r oh l b r c e t f a n _
A n d e S o 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 el n T s 1 dbi r i a e vl s P _
oiP r aC
. p vT a
1 e e nd n ar o m s n n s I
o o rl m n l t t - e n
w a p n p nn o F m o m i n T i a eol Q n o
n o
l l
e t g
n l
f S
s s ert t t h i h L h e p p 1 s t A T pTt m m r n e u T a a o e y o O
- l l
l l N K R S T
s n oe ed t c on n l l eo l i t s h aa o i oip p l y o S s' uv d c rw s a f eh c e ee d t ee c i l t yf a es e nhl r t b t f v5 n i occ '
e oar ni e . r f ciit n nno ur es yo i hhf o uf oe d r u l f c swei h n Ch eab n e s vh p i ss s e od p en s ee m ner e s coe e t i c re et ct nd v st r ha 's l ep ma y apon i i i u ge ah uv d m o e sl o ni it d si a d ad c c . s as it c e st e nH ne n ee ape k n es r A c r a aS o rc ir cu pni a l n s n oc oo s oq wu a cis a oa t i n R c .e i n .
e t t no rt e l b s f t ol R s ) ui ms o r o r n e f ps o aer r
) i t mt ou f d i t s f a r o ee t a t r cet f s i nt f u sir ac u t x p a i a hi r g l f a p d e p h s o s i ai d e 2 s r sp A t uce nr m t n n o res S n d el wa o uwew rf ein T o i pp ou r b or o e pt a c vs o t G f i t at T Y pn i r l i e / . r S C i 5l t a m d xp Cl dl t r e 'C LI EN 3 ( i c o ni O a easerO e ASRE ( g ce o r i so E n euip eE c TSAG n s at l f w o nnd h i NA R si nf e yeT di a wTdl E HE rl o l r d t h rt l M oe r o MOCN el sl p o n et aa a t r aP ETI E k a i am f a f .
wN . t t c . w L H l c aio ar s r y nnl s r e PDWN a i cc g t soe ot r eeeI wot 3 PE A t s L e n n F s F aa mmn eF a
- URS n po i e c u h s eener g omcl S t
.b l t s e
l a
UI T ns a f t l a pa su pnr s ocr 3 EQT or cdd a r b sd cd c HEI D h e onn t a p
uu e one uaes woo E TRLN P p L aa S Pbb L an SMPAt Lf L AO Z B FLPP y y P A
OEI S E T NCE t t YNI R n n RON f u u n ASUO ol o o P i C
_ i RNT e C C
- W I E nn s A s s UPEE on O O m m n / e n S SL i o F F a a w P g w EOB t s I I h h o C a o ATHA en r g x gx T T r T ATN c e n e ne a T U oP i l i l l l G l S L k p k p a a a c m cm c c T c o o o o o o O o R C RC L L D L l
a
_ n o
il t ed i ne
_ d nr d oi G G A su 6 0 2 0 5 4 r q 1 1 1 1
_ f ee
_ oPR
_ o
_ N
_ t
_ n c e , d
_ ei c5 e y ml n i
_ t t b a . f nr u sl l i
_ u aP eu odl n d y op ibV r a f o r
_ c C el cm a u e oi a n D anAf uq c t u
_ e m t e oG ) i t a G g a s n g3 yl l nt
_ A h' eA sl l e o er l gf m n eal nP mop a nf e yocn an t n A t iio c o e rs o iil M k r pegviist an i E c e pf e rt d r a pa t
_ 1 1 oh u aR eae et e r a N RS SS( SNMP S DT N
V e ) ) ) ) )
l )
l b 1 3 4 5 6 7 aa ( ( (
5
(
9
(
0
(
4 t l 5 1 oi 7 5 8 0 9 1 Ta 1 4 3 v 2 A
D E d RY e )
I C l r 2 UN ai (
0 0 QE t u 0 1 7 6 EG oq 7 4 9 8 6 6 RR T e E R SM EE I
CN NA E
GO AT ED s TN e AO l i TP et t SS nsi E nil RR os s s p a
4 O
- FO rAi 1 T e c S P oi 3 TE T n G
NL l u G 2 1 0 4 E EB adM 1 1 1 1 1 L MA t e B EN nrd A RU eie T I mui US eqf QE l ei EI pR c RT p e I
i i
p LL S S EA NP NI OC SI RN EU PN s
FT l e OS e l I n t WS n e i
ES odd I A s e V r rP RO eiR ET P uE 4 9 G 6 6 4 V qR 5 2 B 7 4 5 O l e aRl t a o m T r o
N si s t d n n l i
ni e e e y at c . m l t a n5 e f f n . / e a e i o ut i c l . rd1 n d o pn i y ul gr a t o r y C e a l t b oA au ni a c D g o e niV f ;iQ n
et u n m r P f A ( ma G e a s o al . o yl t t g h' e S e3 s l l e r r l A gf t t ir es ain ao a nf r a cincr nan i
pp n A t o oienco e s o kc re tu ii i M I S l si vt i i s D n i E l' b r grt t d r a t l
oh u il u ee a e e l i r a e e. N i
i f TABLE 3.1-4
(] (continued) l LJ NOTES ,
(1) The 75 NHEMA personnel consist of 63 personnel from NHEMA, supporting staff, and 12 volunteers available to assist at the Incident Fleid Office (IFO) who are identified in NHRERP, Rev. 2, Volume 4. Appendix I.
(2) 23 of the 27 personnel available directly from the Rockingham County Sheriff's Department are required to manage the two State Transportation Staging Areas and to staff local transportation areas in towns requiring ,
State assistance, and to provide communications at the Rockingham County i Dispatch Center. Approximately 18 additional personnel are required to i staff (i.e., act as runners, status board keepers, etc.) the two State i staging areas.
l I
(3) The 51 personnel available to the Rockingham County Sheriff's Department consist of 17 Sheriff's Deputies and 10 dispatchers made available per discussions with Rockingham County Sheriff's Department and approximately 24 personnel made available from contiguous counties' sheriff's depart- i I
ments.
(4) Available from state-wide total of 227 per discussions with New Hampshire State Police.
O) t (5) The 409 consist of 200 Region 3 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in EPZ communities: 126 ambulance drivers in NHRERP, Rev. 2. Vol. 5 Letters of Agreement, 75 medically qualified National Guard personnel, and 8 indivi-duals available from 4 other EMS regions.
(6) Personnel stationed at 10 New Hampshire Department of Transportation garages either within or in immediate proximity to EPZ communities (all of which are part of Department of Transportation, District 6), and the Bureau of Turnpikes, Hampton and Dover garages.
(7) New Hampshire National Guard Emergency Response Organization Call List.
p
'\_/
3-8
TABLE 3.1-5 D .
Q. DATA SOURCES
- 1. NHRERP
- a. Volume 4. Appendix C and Appendix I
- b. Volume 4A, Appendix A
- c. Volume 4B
- d. Volumes 16-32, Appendices A and C
- e. Volume 5
- 2. Annual Reports for the Year Ending December 31, 1986, EPZ Municipalities
- 3. NHEMA Survey of EPZ Municipalities, 1986
- 4. NHEMA Survey of New Hampshire State Agencies, 1986
- 5. New Hampshire Police Standards and Training Commission
- 6. New Hampshire Fire Standards and Training Commission
- 7. New Hampshire Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, Division of Public.
Health Services.
- 8. New Hampshire Firemen's Association
- 9. New Hampshire Department of Transportation. District Garage Directory
- 10. New Hampshire Towing Association 1
i O
3-9
FIGURE 3.1-1 STATE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FLOWCHART (mv)
! STATE ASSISTANCE TO MUNICIPALITIES NEEDS AVAILABILITY I
to Conduct Meetings &
State Review State Plan / Surveys Of State Agency NO Assistance Procedures Against Personnel To Determme END Like#y For Federal Guidance & Numbers Of Personnet Munice Other AEAPS Availab4 to implement polities State Procedures YES Deveion Summary of Aequired AesDonse Devotoo Summary of Affected Mumcipalities bilities For State Key Functions Organizations l I Conduct Meetings &
Surveys Of State Agency Personnel To 10 By Position /Sunctional
! Responsibility All Tasks Aecwrod & Determme
{ Develop Detailed NumberOf Personnet .
(' Analysis of State l Personnel Requirements l
l For Assisting Municipalities
\ -\v/
Develop X Aef of Need vs.
Available Personnoi & 10 Shortfalls Can S8i ortf a!!s implement Recruiting NO Be Resolved Program Focused At By Reallocation Specific Area Of Concern of Personnel Reallocate Personnel END YES r
kj) END 4/87
O -
APPENDIX DETAILING ASSUMPTIONS FOR DETERMINING STATE AGENCY PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS AND AVAILABILITIES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ASSISTANCE TO MUNICIPALITIES O
4 O
3-11 l f
l
l I
STATE ASSISTANCE TO MUNICIPALITIES R '
N,) ASSUMPTIONS
\
The development of the resource analysis for providing State assistance to muni-cipalities unable to respond to an emergency is based on the following assump-tions.
- 1. The State is providing full assistance in those six towns which may be unable to respond. These six towns are Hampton, Hampton Falls, North Hampton, Kensington, Rye and South Hampton. A summary of the key emergency functions in each of the six towns is provided in Table 1.
- 2. No town resources from a town unable to respond will be available to the State. .
- 3. The Department of Transportation (DOT) will supply and distribute traffic cones and barricades in nonresponding communities.
- 4. State Police will staff those traffic control and access control points in these towns for which they have not already been assigned responsibility as indicated in the Traffic Management Manual.
- 5. Rockingham County Sheriff's Department will provide Sheriff's Deputies to staff local transportation staging areas.
O 3-12
- 6. Standard municipal security / patrols will still be performed by municipal.
police in accordance with their normal duties.
- 7. Notifications.-to_special facilities and other organizations, normally per-
. formed by the. municipalities, will be accomplir.hed by the State.
O O 1 3-13
\
DETAILED ANALYSIS OF
(% ' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS
(]
NEW HAMPSHIRE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Additional local liaisons are required to make phone calls and coordinate emergency response with the following, o Schools o Day care centers o Special facilities o People requiring special assistance o Deputy Sheriffs at staging areas A summary of the number of schools, day care centers, special facilities and special assistance requirements in each town follows.
Schools & Day Special Special O Town Care Centers Facililles Assistance
\) (Special Needs)
Hampton Falls 4 0 2 Hampton 11 2 48 North Hampton 5 0 7 Kensington 1 0 4 Rye 8 1 16 South Hampton 1 1 3 During an emergency in which all towns respond, the NHEMA would normally use 4 liaisons to coordinate the 17 EPZ towns and 4 host communities. Based on a response to a RAC comment on Rev. 1 of the NHRERP, it was estimated that 9 liaisons, strategically assigned with adequate phone facilities, could handle all municipalities. There is, then, a supplemental requirement for 5 additional liaison personnel. This is a total of 10 additional personnel for 2 shifts.
l
!o 3-14 l
In addition, there is . a need for personnel to answer phone requests for assistance from those six communities that may not have a local EOC available. !
There are 3 telephones equipped with a rollover feature installed in the IFO for I
this purpose. Assuming all three phones need to be staffed for a minimum of 2 .j shifts, 6 persons would be required.
A summary of the number of people required for NHEMA supplementary assistance to non-participating municipalities is as follows:
10 (5 per shift) Liaison personnel 6 (3 per shift) Telephone clerks IFO COBOEUNICATOR According to the IFO Communicator's procedures' they are to " discuss with the IFO Controller means (RACES, State Police or Department of Highways radios, etc) to establish communications with special faciliti . and schools within" munici-palities unable to respond. Since there will be State Police in municipality providing " municipal security" and traffic control and the Sheriff's Deputies providing assistance at local staging areas, there would be enough capability to provide back-up communications with special facilities and schools should the need arise. Therefore, no extra personnel will be required.
ROCKINGHAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Supplemental personnel are required to provide a Sheriff's Deputy and support personnel to staff local transportation staging areas (TSAs). It is assumed that the Sheriff's Department will have to provide the same number of people as the town would have to supply. In addition, public safety personnel capable of loading people onto evacuation bed buses would be required to be stationed at l0 3-15 w-_-__---_____._-__
the State TSAs. A summary of the personnel required for each of these functions in'the six specific towns is as follows:
Local
- Number of Public*
Town TSA Safety Personnel Hampton Falls 2 0 Hampton 3 4 North Hampton 2 0 Kensington 2 0 Rye 2 4 South Hampton 1 2 12 10
- Based on organizational matrices developed for the resource analysis TROOP A - NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE POLICE Troop A has three functions in a situation where full assistance to municipali-ties is anticipated. First, it is to supply 1 trooper, provide security, and act as a forward EOC. The primary function of this trooper would be to patrol the town and report back to the IF0 on the road and traffic conditions in the town; in essence, to act as a roving EOC.
The second function would be to provide traffic control at those points which are designated in the New Hampshire Traffic Management Manual (TMM) as being the responsibility of the local police.
The third function is to dispatch towing vehicles from Troop A headquarters dispatch center. This is a function which this dispatch center would perform for all EPZ municipalities and is a service which it performs normally.
NOTE: The incremental need for State Police at Traffic Control Points (TCPs) in the six specified towns is only for those points in the town for which the State Police have not already been assigned responsibility.
q 3-16
l
-For example, Hampton Falls has one TCP and it is to be staffed by State k_/
s Police at all times. Therefore, the supplemental need for State Police for traffic control in Hampton Falls is zero.
A summary of personnel requirements for State Police in a compensatory situation follows.
Municipa)** TCP Town Security Personnel Hampton Falls 1 0 Hampton 1 2 North Hampton 1 0 Kensington 1 3 Rye 1 0 South Hampton 1 0 6 5
,~ be staffed by State personnel in the TMM.
- Assume only one shift. National Guard will be activated for second shift.
(s)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DOT is responsible for providing the traffic control equipment for the TCPs in the towns anticipated to require full state assistance. It is assumed that in instances where a town is able to respond but State personnel staff a TCP, that town will supply the necessary traffic control devices. ,
DOT may also have to assist in impediment removal but this is not considered a primary function since the State has 19 towing services capable of supplying 49 vehicles under Letters of Agreement. These services would be the primary source for impediment removal. In terms of snow removal, this service is normally pro-vided by the State for state roads and would not have to be supplemented. It 'is assumed the towns would continue to plow their own roads in an emergency.
3-17
Summary of DOT requirements for assistance .to the six specified municipalities
- is as follows
Number of Number of Number of Town TCPs Cones Barricades Hampton. Falls 1 9 0 Hampton 12 101 42 North Hampton 3 21 5 Kensington 3 22 0 Rye 3 12 3 South Hampton 2 15 0 It is assumed that one crew per town, 2 persons per crew, will be able to supply traffic control equipment in the six specified towns. The exception is.the town of Hampton which may require two crews. This is a total of 14 supplemental per sonnel to provide state assistance to these municipalities.
NATIONAL GUARD National Guard will provide second shift responsibility'for municipal security /
forward EOC for the State Police in the six specified towns. This will require six personnel, i
l I
l
)
O !
3-18 l l
1
_ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _- I
SECTION 4 CONCLUDING REMARKS The data on which the analysis an'd subsequent conclusions in this summary are based reflect the most current information available. The summary identifies the specific needs for and the availability of personnel.
Mechanisms have been established through an ongoing, personnel resource assess-ment program, to fill any shortfalls uncovered by the program by reallocating surplus personnel and recruiting additional personnel and volunteers.
Personnel requirements and availability ' analyses for all six towns anticipated to require full state assistance show that sufficient personnel are available to effectively implement their respective RERP responsibilities.
The same personnel analyses for the 11 remaining mun!cipalities demonstrate that sufficient personnel are available to adequately respond to an emergency situation.
Furthermore, this summary presents sufficient data to demonstrate that the State of New Hampshire has sufficient personnel resources available to provide for an adequate State response and to provide for State assistance as contemplated in the New Hampshire RERP, Rev. 2, Volume 2, Appendix G. Therefore, reasonable assurance is provided that a radiological emergency response can and will be implemented in response to an emergency situation at Seabrook Station.
O 4-1
Be'cause the assessment program is ongoing and the status of available personnel resources is subject to the scrutiny of FEMA inspections during graded exercises and annual certifications, there is reasonable assurance that an emergency response capability will'be maintained in the future.
O O ..,
b.
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 2 l
l A STUDY TO IDENTIFY l
i POTENTIAL SHELTERS IN THE BEACH AREAS NEAR SEABROOK STATION I
l I
Performed for New Hampshire Yankee Prepared by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Revision 1, August 1987 6040-1718202-B4 I .
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LISTS OF TABLES AND FIGURES ii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 APPROACH 2 2.1 Shielding Factors 3 2.2 Public Shelters 3 2.3 Residential Sheltering 4 3 RESULTS 6 l 3.1 Public Shelters 6 3.2 Residential Sheltering 8 REFERENCES 9 6040-1718202-B4 i
'" LIST OF TABLES p , Number. Title 1 LSample Sh'elter Survey Form 2 -Rye-dharacteristicsofPotentialPublicShelters 3 North Hampton - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 4 Hampton.- Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters
'Seabrook - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 5
! 6 Salisbury - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters-7 Plum Island - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters EL : Residence Sheltering Characteristics LIST OF FIGURES l Map of Seabrook Station Beach Area ,
4
- t. l i
l L
6040-1718202-B4 ii L - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
, , ~ ~ . 1
(
e SECTION 1 ' */
- a. ,
o INTRODUCTION "[
u shelta'ing This- study. was undertaken to . identify potential, pub 1'ic r ,
capabilities of municipal' yv1. commeEcial: bui.ldings considered to be, s,uitable for'short,termemergencyusebythebeachpopulationalongtiegassa'chusetts ',
$ g. \ .
and- New ~ Hampshire- coastlines- within the 10-mile Emerge'n'cy Planning Zone (EPZ) of the Seabrook StationbThe towns included in this region, from j
north to _ south, are: Rye, North Eampton, Hampton, and Seabrook in New
. Hampshire; Salisbury, Massachusetts; and the portion of Plum Island between' the 5- and 10-mile l EPZ radii lying within the Massachusetts towns of '
Newburyport and Newbury (see Figure 1). The region studied is approximately
- one-half mile wide. A survey of. private residences in the same coastline region was also conducted to detprmine their sheltering characteristics.
h, The original report of this- study- (March 1986) identified . potential sheltering in basements and masonry buildings. The Seabrook Station
- 3 sheltering vs. evacuation decision criteria for the Seabrook EPZ are based upon the typical sheltering characteristics of wood-frame buildings. The March 1986 report- has been updated to identify the sheltering space available in wood-frame buildings in order to reflect the total sheltering potential.
1 s
t' i J l
6040-'1718202-B4 1 Revision 1, August. 1987 I __i_._____1_.______ _ ._
n.
4
,o , A ,
7, o, ., .
+
, Mt[. SECTION 2
' APPROACH
$g s s
f, ' 4 ',y.[The first step in the original study was to meet with various local, state,
.m Meetings _were
, ' wlj'J gt j 6.and - federal . organizations - to gather background information.
f ; - 6 1' held with officials of the Region'l Office of.-the Federal Emergency-s Q<
- Management Agency (FEMA), the civil defense agencies' of Massachusetts and m)e.f ' .
.~New Hampshire, 'and the American Red Cross chapters at Newburyport, Massachusetts,andEretjr,NewHampshire.
\
s The next step'. was to visit the Tax Assessors' offices at the town halls of-s,: ,
[ Rye, North Hampton,- Hadpton, and Seabrook in New Hampshire, and Salisbury,
,p Q ,, Newbury,' and Newburyport iu Massachusetts. Available listings of all-
~ 7~ 0".. .
comnprcial propertiesPand tax-exempt properties (municipal and church qq buildings) in the : beach area were examined. Maps were obtained for later field use.
s-ye. Information from the tax assessment card for each property was transferred a 1 y;
to a work sheet (Shelter Survey Form, Table 1). Of particular interest were i
the building address, construction characteristics, available floor space, number of stories and whether or not there is a banement. Each building was
\" confirm then- visually inspected externally to the tax assessment y y information. Any~ discrepancies were noted; also, any features of interest
. A' as not ' available" on the tax assessment cards were recorded. From this information, a list of potential shelters was developed.
6040-1718202-B4 2 Revision 1, August 1987
_= - - - _ - - _ .
y 2.1 SHIELDING FACTORS s
Masonry buildings and buildings with masonry basements have the potential for providing representative (typical)- shielding factors of 0.4 to 0.6 for airborne (cloud) radionuclides (Reference 1). From the same reference, wood-frame buildings have typical cloud shielding factors of 0.9. The shielding factor is a ratio of the radiation dose that would be received by
-a person inside the structure to the dose received by a person outside the structure on an assumed smooth ground surface. For example, if. the shielding factor is 0.4, a person sheltered inside the structure would receive only 40 percent of the dose that an unsheltered person would receive. Wood-frame buildings without basements were not included in the March 1986 report but have been added in this revision in order to reflect the total sheltering potential.
2.2 PUBLIC SHELTERS Each potential public shelter listed was visually inspected externally by a health physicist who estimated structure-specific cloud and ground shielding factors. These factors were estimated using information provided in Reference 1 as a guide, and allowing for such factors as number of windows and doors, percentage of basement walls extending above ground, and other construction features relating to adequate shielding. In some cases, structural features of a particular masonry building, mostly large window areas, would prevent use of the entire available floor area. In these cases, the floor areas available for use as a potential shelter were appropriately reduced as described in Section 3. As explained in l
6040-1718202-B4 3 Revision 1, August 1987
_ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ - _ J
Reference 1, the shielding factors vary depending upon wall materials, construction geometry, location within the structure, etc. All of the shelters listed in Tables 2 through 7 have a cloud shielding factor of 0.9 or better.
2.3 RESIDENTIAL SHELTERING In addition to identifying potential public shelters for the transient beach population, a sample survey of private residences in the beach area of each community studied (except for Salisbury, Massachusetts, where all residences were surveyed) was performed for the original report (March 1986) to deter- ,
mine the fraction of residences with shelter characteristics comparable to the potential public shelters listed. This was done by selecting represen-tative streets at random and counting both the homes without basements and those with basements and/or masonry structure as determined by external observation. The total number of residential buildings in the beach area of each community was also obtained, primarily from street listings and tax records available in the towns.
For this revision, the residence sampling was increased to 100 percent for Hampton and Seabrook. The percentage of homes with basements and/or masonry structure did not change appreciably from the smaller sample surveyed previously. This was also found to be the case when the Salisbury sampling was increased to 100 percent during the original study. The remaining wood-frame residences without basements and/or masonry structure meet the sheltering characteristics considered for protective action decisions.
6040-1718202-B4 4 Revision 1, August 1987
}
Condominiums are . included in the total residence figures for Hampton and Seabrook for this revision, with one condominium unit equaling one residence. The results are shown in Table 8.
g
I o
l; ,
SECTION 3 i
RESULTS 3.1 PUBLIC SHELTERS i
Tables 2 through 7 list potential public shelters .for Rye, North Hampton, Hampton, Seabrook, Salisbury, and Plum Island, respectively. The tables list the name and address of each potential shelter and the approximate potential public shelter area. The shelters are listed in order of decreasing shelter area.
Rye has a total potential shelter area of approximately 160,000 ft 2 in 23 public shelters; North Hampton has 11,400 ft 2 in 4 public shelters; Hampton has 1,380,0002 ft in 205 public shelters; Seabrook has 70,900 2ft in 17 public shelters; Salisbury has 302,000 ft 2 in 50 public shelters; and Plhm Island has 31,500 f t 2 in 18 public shelters. The number of persons that can be provided short-term shelter in a given area can be estimated by dividing the available shelter area by 10 square feet per person, which is-the value used in the Reception and Care Facility Survey Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (formerly the National Shelter Study).
It is recognized, however, that not all of the potential shelter area listed in Tables 2 through 7 can be considered as being available for sheltering because of stored materials, internal structural features, etc. The amount of usable shelter area varies depending upon building usage (i.e.,
restaurant, clothing store, motel, etc). A separate field survey of a 6040-1718202-B4 6 Revision 1, August 1987
- - - - - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _-____ _______-______ - __-____ D
A sample of buildings was conducted by New Hampshire Yankee in July 1987. The survey examined the fraction of total potential shelter area that would be expected to be available for - short-term slieltering. It consisted of visual inspection of the interiors . of 78 potential public shelters located along Ocean Boulevard in Hampton Beach. .The survey identified a prevalence of three general classes of business establishments: Class 1 - hotels, motels, restaurants, and lounges; Class 2'- entertainment centers (arcades);
Class 3 -- clothing, gift, and convenience stores (mercantile establishments). The available fraction of total area (not already occupied by internal features) was estimated to average two-thirds, one-half, and one-third for Classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively.*
On this basis, the available areas for short-term public sheltering in the potential shelters listed in this study are 102,000 square feet for Rye, 7,600 square feet .for North Hampton, 861,000 square feet for Hampton, 35,800 square feet for Seabrook, 175,000 square feet for Salisbury, and 17,900 square feet for Plum Island. Applying the guideline of 10 square feet per person to these available areas yields a total capacity 'of 10,200 shelterees in Rye, 760 shelterees in North Hampton, 86,100 shelterees in Hampton, 3,580 shelterees in Seabrook, 17,500 shelterees in Salisbury, and 1,790 shelterees in Plum Island.
- Mien applied to the FEMA guideline of 10 square feet per person, these available fractions approximate the permissable occupation load values of the National Fire Code, Section 101, Life Safety Code for dining / drinking establishments and mercantile establishments (roughly equivalent to Classes 1 and 3) which are 15 and 30 square feet per person, respectively.
6040-1718202-B4 7 Revision 1, August 1987
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ )
, 3.2 RESIDENTIAL SHELTERING l
The results of the sample survey of private residences are shown in Table 8.
The estimated percentage of beach residences with basement and/or masonry sheltering capability available for their occupants ranges from a low of 34 percent in Hampton to a high of' 78 percent in Rye. The remaining percentage of residences (woad-frame without basements) provide sheltering characteristics at least as effective as those used in calculations made for determining appropriate protective action decisions. The field survey results support the conclusions that there are very few residences that would not meet these sheltering characteristics.
6040-1718202-B4 8 Revision 1, August 1987 j
REFERENCES
- 1. Aldrich, David C. ; Ericson, David M. , Jr. ; and Johnson, Jay D. Public Protection Strategies for Potential Nuclear Reactor Accidents:
Sheltering Concepts with Existing Public and Private Structures, Sandia Laboratories, SAND 77-1725, February 1978.
6040-1718202-B4 9 Revision 1, August 1987 l
L____ _--- _- 2
TABLE 1.
SAMPLE SHELTER SURVEY FORM SHELTER SURVEY FORM REF. NO.
Building Name:
Address.'
l Owner:
Building Use:
Year-round or Seasonal Distance Ring (mi) < 2 _ , 2-3 . 3-4 , 4-5 , >5 Number of non-basement stories Square feet per story
~ Structure
Description:
Structure Category:
Wood-frame Masonry Large Office or Industrial ( >5000 ft /2 story)
Other (describe)
Comments:
Non-basement Basement Habitable area, ft2 Persons @ one per 10 ft 2 ,
Cloud Shielding factor Ground Shielding factor i
! l I
h 1
l 6040A-1585600-B4 1 of 1 l
[ TABLE 2 RYE - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 St. Francis Retreat Center 49,140 860 Central Road Pirate's Cove Total 13,490 1200 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (9,200)
Basement (4,290)
St. Theresa's Church / Parish Center Total 13,000 816 Central. Road Masonry (9,750)
Basement (3,250)
Jeanette's Sea Shoppe / 8,600 Philbrick's Convenience Store 2203 Ocean Boulevard -
Saunders (Restaurant) 7,430 175 Rye Harbor Road Rye Beach Motel 7,100 23 Locke Road Pilot House Total 6,270 2000 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (5,470)
Basement 800)
Crown Colony 6,190 1381 Ocean Boulevard Cable House Total 5,800 20 Old Beach Road Wood-frame (3,870)
Basement (1,930)
Dunes Motel and Dining Room 5,480 2281 Ocean Boulevard Rye Beach Post Office Total 5,180 830 Central Road Masonry (3,450)'
Basement (1,730)
Rye Harbor Motel 5,060 2000 Ocean Boulevard Beach Club Inc. 4,070 2450 Ocean Avenue 12900-15856-B4 1 of 2 Revision 1, August 1987 j
TABLE 2 (Continued)
RYE - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter-Area, ft 2-
.Name/ Address Atlantic Four Winds Motor Court- 3,690 1233 Ocean Boulevard Sandpiper Country Store 3,000 2277 Ocean Boulevard Paul's Carriage House- 2,910 2263 Ocean Boulevard Harbormaster Restaurant 2,690 1323 Ocean Boulevard Wallis Sands State Beach Bathhouse 2,550-Ocean Boulevard at Wallis Road Driftwood Grill 2,480 .
1215 Ocean Boulevard Drake's Harborside Restaurant 2,360 1667 Ocean Boulevard St. Andrews by the Sea 1,760 Church Road Lamplighter Craft Shop 1,000 Ocean Boulevard at Rye Harbor State Park Rye Harbor State Park (4 Bldgs.) 570 Grand Total T59,820 ft2 in 23 Shelters 12900-15856-B4 2 of 2 Revision 1, August 1987
-- __-_--__ _ _ _ . - 3
TABLE 3 NORTH HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Fuller Gardens Total 7,160 Willow Avenue Wood-frame (6,760)
Basement (400)
Andrews by the Ocean Total 1,760 28 Ocean Boulevard Masonry (240)
Wood-frame (1,520)
Seaside Village Motel 1,700 1 Ocean Boulevard Paul's (Ice Cream Parlor) 820 16 Ocean Boulevard Grand Total 11,440 ft 2 in 4 shelters 12901-15856-B4 1 of 1 Revision 1, August 1987
Y TABLE 4.
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Hampton Beach Casino Total 109,860 169 Ocean Boulevard Basement (960)
Wood-frame (108,900)
Ashworth Hotel Total 50,700 295-305 Ocean Boulevard Nonbasement (35,460)
Basement (15,240)
Mainsail Motel 29,400 40 Ashworth Avenue Surf Hotel Total 23,460 275 Ocean Boulevard Basement (4,560) -
Wood-frame (18,900) .
Janmere Motel Total 22,700 52 Ashworth Avenue Masonry (4,700)
Wood-frame (18,000)
Royal Hampton Hotel. 20,300 6 Ashworth Avenue Sand Hotel 19,300 30-32 Ashworth Avenue Moulton Hotel Total 19,270 245 Ocean Boulevard Basement (4,770)
Wood-frame (14,500)
Dimitri's Restaurant 18,460 81 Ocean Boulevard.
Playland Arcade Total 17,760 209-211 Ocean Boulevard Basement (8,880)
First floor (8,880)
Seagate Motel / Stores / Garage 17,720 9 Ashworth Avenue St. Patrick's Church / Total 17,120 Parsonage Basement (1,520) 40 Church Street Wood-frame (15,600)
Seaside Motel 15,600 8-18 B Street I
12906-1718202-B4 1 of 16 Revision 1, Attgust 1987
A . I TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter
.Name/ Address Area, ft2 Flagship Motor Court 15,400 198 Ashworth Avenue Sea Castle Hotel Total. 13,910 377,0cean Boulevard Basement (910)
Wood-frame (13,000)
Hillcrest Inn Total 13,510 113 Ocean Boulevard Basement (4,110)
Wood-frame (9,400)
Hollingworth Motel 13,500 7 A Street Peacock Lounge Total 13,260 225 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,760)
Wood-frame (11,500)
Avon Hotel 13,200 15-17 B Street The Happy Hampton Total 13,190 253 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,790)
Wood-frame (11,400)
Hampton Beach Regal Inn 13,000 162 Ashworth Avenue Drift Hotel Total 12,830 18 Ocean Boulevard Basement (830)
Wood-frame (12,000)
Beachview Motel / Supermarket 12,400 101 Ocean Boulevard Laurentian Hotel Tctal 12,310 24 Ashworth Avenue Basement (1,010)
Wood-frame (11,300)
\
Atlantic Motel Total 12,110 20 Brown Avenue Basement (3,F-Wood-frame (8,iJ.,
Sea Den Hotel Total 11,920
, 449 Ocean Boulevard Masonry / Basement (9,820)
I Wood-frame (2,100) 12906-1718202-B4 2 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 u_--____--_--____ __-__ - 1
. TABLE 4 (Continued)
- j. HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS l
I Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Atlantic Motel Total 11,880 s393 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,280)
Wood-frame (9,600)
Hampton Beach Fire Total 11,750 Station' Garage Masonry (5,150) 58 Ashworth Avenue Wood-frame (6,600)
Ye Colonial Inn Total 11,400 139 Ocean Boulevard Basement (3,000)
Wood-frame (8,400)
Royal Crest North Total 11,250 94 Ashworth Avenue Masonry (950) ,
Wood-frame (10,300)
Kentville Motel Total 11,090 315 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,690)
Wood-frame (8,400) !
Algier's Motel Total 11,020 345 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,520)
Wood-frame (9,500)
Springfield Motor Lodge Total 10,960 89 Ocean Boulevard Basement (3,360)
Wood-frame (7,600)
Pelham Hotel To tal 10,930 121 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,630)
Wood-frame (8,300)
-Colony Motel 10,900 46 Ashworth Avenue Grand View Motel Total 10,660 353 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,660)
Wood-frame (8,000)
Tides Motel 10,300 l 95-99 Ashworth Avenue Monte Carlo Inn 10,200 12 G Street !
l 4
12906-1718202-B4 3 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 l
4 TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 White Gull Total 9,950 21 F Street Wood-frame (7,000)
Basement (2,950)
The Puritan Hotel Total 9,460 109-111 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,360)
Wood-frame (7,100)
Windjammer Hotel Total 9,380 935 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,380) i Wood-frame (8,000)
Hampton Harbor Motel Total 9,080 208-210 Ashworth Avenue Nonbasement (400) .
Basement (880)
Wood-frame (7,800)
Sea Side Chalet 9,030 190 Ashworth Avenue Anchor Inn Total 8,990 73 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,190)
Wood-frame (6,800)
Lobster Trap Restauraunt 8,860 507 Ocean Boulevard Dicken's Tavern 8,820 6 A Street Summer Wind Motel 8,670 128 Ashworth Avenue Mrs. Mitchell's Country Shoppe 7,840 285 Ocean Boulevard Harris Sea Ranch Total 7,820 79 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,120)
Wood-frame (6.700)
Budapest Apt. 7,700 21-23 B Street Rocky Wold Mot.el Total 7,660 349 Ocean Boulevard Basement (660)
Wood-frame (7,000) 12906-1718202-B4 4 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
.m i .
i l
- r. 1 TABLE 4 (Continued) l
{
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS !
\
Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Mari-Ann Motel Total 7,510 2 Ocean Boulevard Basement (2,310)
Wood-frame (5,200)
Ocean Motel 7,510 580 Winnacunnet Street Tastee Tower 7,370 313 Ocean Boulevard Sun & Surf Motel Total 7,220 !
528 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,020)
Wood-frame (6,200)
Dolphyn Motel Total 1,200 -
48 Ashworth Avenue Mason ry (1,900)
Wood-frame (5,300)
Sunny's Lincoln House 7,000 95 Ocean Boulevard Marguerite Motel 6,880 112-116 Ashworth Avenue Brownie's Motel 1"tal 6,700 180-184 Ashworth Avenue Basement (700)
Wood-frame (6,000)
Longview Apartments Total 6,570 '
20 C Street Wood-frame (4,930)
Basement (1,640)
Vista Motel 6,500 511 Ocean Boulevard Algiers Too Hotel Total 6,480 341 Ocean Boulevard Basement (980)
Wood-frame (5,500)
Wilbert Hotel 22-24 C Street B & S Jewelry / Neptune / Total 6,410 Seacrest Basement (1,410) 117 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (5,000) 12906-1718202-B4 5 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
_ i
TABLE 4 (Continued)
.HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Seascape Hotel 6,370 955 Ocean Boulevard Bailey Beach Resort and 6,260 Seafood Barn 933 Ocean Boulevard Hampton Beach Police Station 6.100' 66 Ashworth Avenue-Dudley Clothier / Total 5,970 Sunset Restaurant. Nonbasement (3,790)
Basement (2,180) -
Dory Inn 5,950 1044 Ocean Boulevard Redwood Apartments 5,870 S7 Ocean Boulevard Boulevard Hotel 5,850
-520 Ocean Boulevard Hampton Beach Mall Toal 5,850 23-25 Ocean Boulevard ' Basement- (1,950)
Wood-Frame (3,900)
Roy Family Bed & Breakfast Total 5,850 473 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,550)
Wood-frame (4,300)
Jen's Ocean Manor 5,850 753 Ocean Boulevard '
Harris Hotel Total 5,850 75 Ocean Boulevard Basement (450)
Wood-frame (5,400)
The Old Salt 5,830 83 Ocean Boulevard ,
DW's Oceanside Hotel Total 5,790 365 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,490)
Wood-frame (4,300)
Seafarer Hotel 5,780 4 J Street 12906-1718202-B4 6 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
TABLE 4 (Continued)
. HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter .
1 Name/ Address Area, ft2 Joan's Subs & Pizza Total 5,760 )
1 132 Ashworth Avenue Basement (960)
Wood-frame (4,800) j]
Atlantic Breakers Motel 5,600 409 Ocean Boulevard !
L Street Tavern Total 5,590 17 L Street Nonbasement (1,620)
Basement (870)
Wood-frame (3,100)-
Famous Door Realty Total 5,590 9 Ocean Boulevard Basement (890) -
Wood-frame (4,700)
Riviera Motor Inn 5,540 431 Ocean Boulevard Rexall Drug Store Total 5,540 131 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,570)
Wood-frame (3,970)
{
Westport Motel 5,520 86 Ashworth Avenue Beverly Motel 5,500 196 Ashworth Avenue Elmdale 5,450 6 G Street Nautical Motel 5,320 147'Ashworth Avenue Golden Eagle 5,240 144 Ashworth Avenue Mermaid Apt. .
5,240 19 B Street Connecticut Village Total 5,140 7 H Street Masonry (2,790)
Wood-frame (2,350) 12906-1718202-B4 7 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
a TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Mai.Kai Restaura.nt Total 5,120 52 Ashwortn Avenue Nonbasement .(4,030)
Basement (1,090)
Voyager Motel Total 5,080 20 Ocean Boulevard Basement (780)
Wood-frame (4,300)
Sea Squire Motor. Lodge Total 5,040 1088 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,140)
Wood-frame (3,900)
Port of Call Motel 5,030.
7 F Street ,
Shirley Motel Total 5,030 339 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,030)
Wood-frame -(4,000)
Bell Regis Hotel 4,980 98 Ashworth Avenue Wave Motel 4,880 535 Ocean Boulevard Bolyea Apt. 4,870 22 B Street Webster House 4,840 15 G Street Beacon Hotel Total 4,780 105 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,780)
Wood-frame (3,000)
Harris Real Estate Total 4,770 31 Ocean Boulevard Masonry (1,590)
Wood-Frame (1,590)
Basement (1,590)
Royal Crest Motel 4,720 98 Ashworth Avenue E
Pepin's Iun 4,700 20 G Street t 12906-171'8202-B4 8 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 l
6 TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Blue Jay Motel Total 4,590 186 Ashworth Avenue Basement (290)
Wood-frame (4,300)
Pappy's Pizza & Subs 4,580 9 F Street Community Church . 4,540 49 Ashworth Avenue Brass Lantern Motel 4,450 91 Ashworth Avenue Grayhurst '4,340 .
11 F Street Moulton Jr.' Apartments 3,180 11 A Street Fry Doe Restaurant Total 4.240 115 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,140)
Wood-frame (3,100)
Laurentian Apts. 4,220 15 Island Path Backstage /Suzy's Sportswear- Total 4,210 235 Ocean Boulevard Basement (210)
Masonry (4.000)
Pelham Motel 4,200
$ G Street j J
O'Neill Cottages 4,200 l 2-14 Gookin Court Dave's-Garage 4,200 321 Ocean Boulevard I Rapuano Apartments Total 4,130 13 G Street Basement (730)
Wood-frame (3,400)
N.H. Lobster 4,110 23 Harbor Road 12906-1718202-B4 9 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
a TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Windso'r Motel .- 4,070.
14 G Street
-Atlantic Motel Total 4,060 34 Brown Avenue Basement (1,360)
Wood-frame (2,700)
~Seabury Apt. . 4,030 24'B Street- .
Joanne's Restaurant. Total 4,020 5 J Street Basement (1,620)
Wood-frame (2,400)
Kevin's Total 3,970 119 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (2,830)
Basement (1,590)
Surf View Total 3,940 487 Ocean Boulevard. Wood-frame (1,280)
Basement- (2,660)
Bromfield Motel Total 3,880 7 G Street Basement (580) I Wood-frame (3,300)
Sea Mist Motel' Total 3,840 9 G Street Basement (940)
Wood-frame (2,900)
Preston Real Estate / Total 3,760 Yankee Lady Masonry (1,240) 63 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (2,520)
Blue Haven Hotel Total 3,730 497 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (2,200)
Basement (1,530)
Green Mountain Creamery 3,720 373 Ocean Boulevard Little Jack's 3.d90 l 537 Ocean Boulevard Betty LaBranche Realty /etc. 3,660 (rear portion) 931 Ocean Boulevard .
l 12906-1718202-B4 10 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 l
TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Highland Inn Total 3,660 9 Highland Avenue Wood-frame (2,660)
Basement (1,000)
Gleason Rooming House Total 3,630 1 Nudd Avenue Basement (1,330)
Wood-frame -(2,300)
Window Box Gifts Total 3,620 489 Ocean Boulevard Wood-frame (2,540)
Basement (1,080)
Grand Maison 3,600 ,
897 Ocean Boulevard .
Patriot's Corner 3,560 27-29 Ocean Boulevard Pasteenak's Seahorse Apartments 3,360 18 C Street Miramar Real Estate Total 3,310 9 Nudd Avenue Basement (810)
Wood-frame (2,500)
Kristy's Corner 3,300 199 Ocean Boulevard Houle Cottages 3,300 8-10 Auburn Street Shoals View Motel Total 3,280 857 Occ.a Boulevard ionbasement (720)
Basement (860)
Wood-frame (1,700)
Debonair Hotel Total 3,260 '
18 Ashworth Avenue Masonry (1,360)
Wood-frame (1,900)
Silver Wave Motel 3,200 9 A Street Mcdonald's Total 3,160 187 Ocean Boulevard Masonry (1,580)
Basement (1,580) 12906-1718202-B4 11 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
4 TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Salty Dog 3,100 11 J Street Motel (Hollingworth) 3,100 15 A Street Ocean Air Apartments 3,000 429 Ocean Boulevard Rocky's Real Estate Total 3,000 597 Ocean Boulevard Wood-Frame (2,000)
Basement (1,000)
Rest Rooms (State Beach) 3,000 Ocean Boulevard (across from Casino)
Bon Air Guests 2,980 13 Highland Avenue Ron's Beach House Restaurant Total 2,950 965 Ocean Boulevard Basement (750)
(2,200)
Wood-frame Lighthouse Convenience Store ' 2,950 369 Ocean Boulevard Hyde Park Total 2,910 8 Nudd Avenue Basement (810)
Wood-frame (2,100)
Sunset Chalet Hotel 2,880 93 Ashworth Avenue Broadview Apartments Total 2,820 4 Haverhill Avenue Basement (820)
Wood-frame (2,000)
Hogg's Convenience Store 2,790 7 Ashworth Avenue i
Clew's Hardware 2,720 l 166 Ashworth Avenue l
Sea Ketch Restaurant & Pub Total 2,690 127 Ocean Boulevard Nonbasement (1,610)
Basement (1,080) 12906-1718202-B4 12 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
s i ..
l TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Hollywood Motel 2,650 465 Ocean Boulevard Hampton House '2,600 335-337 Ocean Boulevard Speed Queen Laundromat Total 2,570 143 Ashworth Avenue Basement (670)
Wood-frame (1,900)
Americana Apartments Tota.1 2,570 61 Ocean Boulevard Basement (1,010)
Wood-Frame (1,560)
LaRocca's Market 2,500 12 Ashworth Avenue Junkin's 2,500 193 Ocean Boulevard Seaside Villages 2,470 1098 Ocean Boulvard Bell Buoy Apartments Total 2,450 19 F Street Basement (910)
Wood-Frame (1,540)
The Deerfield 2,420 9 J Street Hollingworth Motor Court 2,350 31 Ashworth Avenue Lorenz's Clam Stand Total 2,290 9B Ocean Boulevard Basement (790)
Wood-frame (1,500)
Seaside Grille 2,250 9A Ocean Boulevard i True's Clothing 2,250 l 191 Ocean Boulevard l
American Spirit /CITGO 2,160 503 Ocean Boulevard 12906-1718202-B4 13 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i
I TABLE 4 (Continued) .
i HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Barlee's Surfside 2,140 72 King's Highway State Park Bath Houses (7/87, new) 2,000 Ocean Boulevard Fried Dough Place 2,000-7 Island Path Buoys and Bells Motel 2,000 11 Tilton Street Kitty-Lou Motel 1,980 '
200 Ashworth Avenue ,
Tom Thumb Dairy Bar 1,980 375 Ocean Boulevard Ocean Edge Motel 1,920 915 Ocean Boulevard Bea's Cottages and Apartments 1,920 104 Ashworth Avenue The Dorna 1,900 7 Nudd Avenue Garland Restaurant / 1,870 Sparky's Sports 10-12 C Street Holiday House Total 1,820 17 Highland Avenue Basement (920)
Wood-frame (900)
^ Rainbow Village Motel Total 1,740 4 P Street Basement (440)
Wood-frame (1,300)
Beachcomber Motel 1,680 419 Ocean Boulevard Clew's Furniture 1,620 164 Ashworth Avenue 12906-1718202-E4 14 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 L__-_--____-
l.
TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Shorwind Hotel Total 1,610 15 F Street Masonry (890)
Wood-frame (720)
Harris Cottages 1,600 33 Ocean Boulevard Midge Real Estate 1,500 327 Ocean Boulevard Olde Mcdonald's Total 1,360 395 Ocean Boulevard Masonry (860)
Wood-frame (500)
Carroll Cottages 1,360 8 Page Lane Titone's Ashworth Market 1,250 20 L Street High'n' Dry Restaurant 1,240 595 Ocean Boulevard Oceanside Mall 1,240 367 Ocean Boulevard Danny's 1,240 154 Ashworth Avenue Market / Laundry / Restaurant 1,200 (2-Story Annex) .
703 Ocean Boulevard Windebimes Food & Spirits Total 1,200 7 Ocean Boulevard Masonry (400)
Wood-frame (800)
Scrub-Dub Laundry / Salon 1,200 536 High Street i
Farr's Famous Chicken 900 43 Ashworth Avenue i
Boston Bob's Eatery 900 41 Ashworth Avenue 12906-1718202-B4 15 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987 L_____ ____ _ ____. i
I l l l l
l J
l 'l TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAtiPTON - C11ARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS 1
i Shelter I Name/ Address t: , Area, ft2 T. J. Rapp's 820 l 71 Ocean Boulevard Studio Grocery 750 l 142 Ashworth Avenue ,
j a, Purple Pickle Deli 750 k'.o , 1 f
26 H Street <
Go-Go Putt 720 59 Ocean Boulevard j l
Blink's Fry Doe 600 , {
134 Ashworth tvenue ,
i Grand Total 1,375,910 ft 2 in 205 shelters i
- l
)
l
)
l l
1 l
l I
12906-1718202-B4 16 of 16 Revision 1, August 1987
____--____________J
afgk C y a.
,('
.{
. :: y
~ .. M,; ' '
TABLE 5-
. : a .. g Wp' f' i SEABROOK'- CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS R
Shelter Name/ Address. Area, ft2 N
Beach Shoppe /Lpundromat Total 13,650
^q g Rt. lA" '
- Laundromat- (1,000)
,) (4,750)
, ' Basement (7,900)
Wood-frame 0'Keefe's. Store & Restaurant 5,970 23 Rt. IA Hogg's Convenience Store. Total 5,600 419 Rt. 286 Basement. (1,600)
Wood-frame (4,000)
Preston's Country Store 4,860.:
Rt. IA " , .
Cristaldi's ' 4,700 443 Rt. 286 St. Elizabeth's Catholic Church 4,690 Chelmsford St.
DiBurro's Market Total 4,540 Rt. 1A at River Street Basement (720)
Wood-frame (3,820)
Mac's Clam Bar Total 4,440 Rt. lA Basement (820)
Wood-frame (3,620)
Dairy Queen Total 4,080 418 Rt. 286 Nonbasement (2,720)
Basement (1,360)
Markey's Lobster. Pool / Restaurant 4,050 410 Rt. 286 Captain Don's Fish Market Total 33430 River Street Masonry (400)
Wood-frame (3,030)
Police Station / Beach Precinct 2,800 Rt. 1A Poore Steve's Ice Cream Total 2,340 40 Rt. IA Basement (1,170)
Wood-frame (1,170) 12902-1718202-B4 1 of 2 Revision 1, August 1987
TABLE 5 (Continued)
SEABROOK - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area, ft2 Brown's Lobster Pound 2,230 407 Rt. 286 Adams Real Estate 2,110 Rt. IA Ceal's Clam Stand / Jewelry 880 Rt. IA (corner River St.)
Seabrook Bank & Trust 500 Rt. 286 (corner 1A)
Grand Total 70,870 fta in 17 Shelters 12902-1718202-B4 2 of 2 Revision 1, August 1987
t- -
}
L.
TABLE 6 SALISBURY - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS 1
Shelter Name/ Address Area,ft 2 Carefree Arcade /Fleamarket/ Kabob Hut /
Carousel Lounge /Primaricare 31,150 23 South Ocean Front Funland Arcade 26,840 South Ocean Front Frolics 23,640 South Ocean Frcnt Normandy Lounge Bldg 15,690 Broadway and Ocean Pavillion and Beach Club 13,000 ,
Ocean Front Midway Arcade 12,580 Broadt4y Sidewalk Cafe and Shops 11,000 South Ocean Front Club Edwards 9,400 Atlantic and Ocean State Reservation / Beach Total 8,840 Pavillion (5,250)
Maintenance Garage (2,630)
Rest Rooms of Campground (960)
Mcdonald's/ Arcade 8,500 24F Central Avenue Joe's Playland 8,010 37-39 Broadway Bowery Playboy Lounge 7,590 11 North End Boulevard Salisbury Building Supply 7,230 591 North End Boulevard Willey's Candy Shap Total 6,900 12 Broadway Wood-frame (830)
Masonry (6,070) 12903-1718202-54 1 of 4 Revision 1, August 1987
I
, TABLE 6 (Continued)
SALISBURY - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Ares,ft 2 Police / Fire Station / Rest Rooms 6,710 Railroad' Avenue Driftwood Motel 6,380 359A Beach Road Beach Front Motel Total 5,900 46F Central Avenue Masonry (3,520)
Basement (2,380)
Tripoli Pizza 5,2u0 47 Broadway i
Dodie's Total 5,190 150 Atlantic Avenue Wood-frame (3,460) l Basement (1,730)
- Ocean Gate Motel 5,110 367 Beach Road El Rancho Motel 5,000 Broadway Supreme Tees 4,590 South Ocean Fron Star of the Sea Catholic Church 4,410 North End Boulevard Sand's Bar 4,170 11 Central Avenue Shaheen Enterprises, Inc. 4,000 5 Railroad St.
Plaza (4D+1) 3,890 North End Boulevard Colonial Arms Motel 3,780 40 Brissette Avenue Sea Galley Restaurant Total 3,740 464F North End Boulevard Wood-frame (1,870)
Basement (1,870)
Tic Toc Lounge 3,690 7 Broadway Mr. K's Lounge 3,500 243 North End Boulevard 12903-1718202-B4 2 of 4 Revision 1, August 1987
I
, TABLE 6'(Continued)
SALISBLTd - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area,ft2 Broadway Arcade 3,000 Broadway and Central Avenue Butch's Total 2,940 North End Boulevard at Masonry (1,470)
Central Avenue Wood-frame (1,470)
Napoli's Pizza 2,880 Broadway Salisbury Discount House 2,800 South Ocean Front Anne's Specialty House 2,670 ,
South Ocean Front ,
Driftway Fun Park Total 2,640 Driftway and Central Masonry (800)
Wood-frame (1,845)
Mark's General Store Total. 2,580 26 North End Boulevard Basement (1,290)
Wood-frame (1,290)
Seacrest Motel 1,900 412, 412F, 414 North End Boulevard Dream Machine Arcade 1,780 Broadway Mr. Mike's 1,720 Ocean Front Shaffee's Lounge 1,550 9 Driftway Star of the Sea Church Parsonage Total 1,470 North End Boulevard Wood-frame (670)
Front Basement (120)
Rear Basement (680)
Shaheen's Bottled Liquors 1,390 1 Broadway Mr. Mike's Potato Stand 1,380 Donut-Depot 1,300 415 North End Boulevard l'
1 12903-1718202-B4 3 of 4 Revision 1, August 1987
=________________._ _ 1
TABLI 6 (Continued)
SALISBURY - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address Area,fta 5 0' Clock Club 1,290 Ocean Front Sandpiper Restaurant 1,230 7-9 North End Boulevard Ripple's 1,100 105 North End Boulevard Lena's Subs 630 18 North End Boulevard Speedway Area 160 Railroad Avenue Grand Total 302,100 fta in 50 Shelt 1
l l 13903-1718202-B4 4 of 4 Revision 1, August 1987 l
2__--
l TABLE 7 i
PLUM ISLAND - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL'PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter ,
Name/ Address Area, ft2 St. James Chapel 4,000 Northern Boulevard between 38th i and 40th Streets Shellfish Purification Plant 3,950 !
North end of island ;
Island Sub Shop Total 2,750 51 Northern Boulevard Wood-frame (1,650)
Basement (1,100)
Surfland Bait and Tackle Total 2,100 28 Plum Island Boulevard Basement (1,050)
Wood-frame (1,050)
Mr. Moe's Package Store Total 1,990 Plum Island Boulnvard Wood-frame (1,190)
& Columbia Way Basement (800) {
US Government Reservation Total 1,910 North end of P.I. Office Area (1,160)
House basement (750) ;
Citgo Service Station 1,560 4 Old Point Road Plum Island Volunteer Fire Station 1,560 Northeast end of island Snack Bar/ Parking Office Total 1,520 South End of Southern Wood-frame (760)
Boulevard Masonry (760)
The Lighthouse 1,440 Northern Boulevard (North End)
Dick's Variety 1,330 27 Plum Island Boulevard 4 C's Dairy Bar 1,320 2 Plum Island Boulevard Ocean Front Deck 1,270 2 Northern Boulevard 12904-15856-B4 1 of 2 Revision 1, AuEust 1987
TABLE 7 (Continued)-
PLLH ISLAND - CliARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL SHELTERS Shelter Name/ Address- Area, ft 2 Captain C's .
1,200
' Northern Boulevard and 73rd Street Plum Island Town Hall' 1,160 Plum Island Boulevard at Northern Boulevard Paul & Patt's Beachcomber Rest./ Lounge 1,140 Plum Island Boulevard PJ's Variety _ 1,100 134-Northern Boulevard-Plum Island Comfort Station 230 North end of P.I.
Grand Total 31,530 ft 2 in 18'Shelte'rs i
l' 12904-15856-B4 2 of 2 Revision 1, August 1987.
l --
E _ ____ _ _ _ _ _
I 1.-
V, TABLE 8 RESIDENCE SHELTER CHARACTERISTICS Estimated Percent-Total Residences
- w/ Basement in Number of Residences or Masonry i Conununity Beach Area Surveyed Structure 1
- Rye, NH 679 249 78 North Hampton, NH 259 223 75 Hampton, NH 3,036 3,036 34' Seabrook, NH** _758 758 51 Salisbury, MA- 1,440 1,440 48 Plum. Island, MA 865 280 48
- Condominiums included as one residence per condo unit.
- Includes small section of Hampton, south of Hampton River inlet (Beckman's Point).
i
-6040B-1585600-B4 1 of I
W \
js \ PORTSMOUTH g
/ % ,/ /
\ /
I~%s
\
\ !
"r 5 GREENLAND y'*~j 8
c - ~ .c ,
NEWFIELOS #
~~
,/ .-
g (
\------ .A .TR ATw AM i -_2, myE . ,s r 5 i (, ,
\ ) : <~-,f
% NORTH HAMPTON g %,
EXETER %
p \ % j/
g # -- --. . __ -
4
/ a s H A M PTON A/ -r-
\
s 's %
i
\
/ \ HAMPTON .
/ \ \ FALLS ATLAN7/C
[ \ KENSINGTON \I ,
\ EAST \ t 2 MI ~
MINGS1 )N g ,,,, , d
"' \ p. SEAsROOK ,**** g5Cg*A N
\
\ #$,}HAMPTON SOUTH #
Y I
f /~ 3 f g SAuseURY 5 an!
\ \
/
I s ,,, . /
- BEACH N WTON \
-g gygggggy g STUDY AREA
.p, ,
i
' ,'g . -
7 f ,
/, I MERRIMAC \
gg d g
'% # 'ss EM
- NEWeURYPORT" - g asLMs0
! \f-v'- p I WEST s/ I
-.~. J wEWeURY 7 NEWeURY j j
/ .
/
%s s E s, r- .
y-
~ ~ ,
% l 4
FIGURE 1
. MAP OF SEABROOK STATION l BEACH AREA L_-- ---_--
0 SEABROOK SHELTER STUDY bi"%h SMELTEntts W3 GEE MIGRI90457 forg MAAdPTON p ,. -
F.940 6.st*
3 GER RAasus 23.93o j
- 3 *
.m 4J g g-
.=
__*% 3.3ge g -
S.790 s
- 1 ,.*
I got pe A..ld es.m
_____4 -
.--. Q %
n .
2 96 STATEN8 g \ -
pggg e i '
D g' /* ..,
x,.. , ,,
gie 999 1 1, @,,. ,,. e.
=. _
MlN/ft RSS /
_ -----