ML20207A089

Forwards Sser Input Supporting Acceptability of Addl Audit Activity & Resolution of Open Issue from Sser 13 Re Lack of Audit Program for Technical Review Team issue-specific Action Plan

ML20207A089
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	10/21/1986
From:	Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Noonan V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20205S465	List: ML20205S459 ML20206Q044 ML20207A089
References
FOIA-87-89 NUDOCS 8610240021
Download: ML20207A089 (2)

Text

. _ _ . . . _ _ .

g

, l0-El-Ob MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR Licensing-A FROM: Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION CPRT AUDIT FUNCTION .

. We have reviewed the Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCO) response (W. G.

Counsil letter to V. S. Noonan dated July 23,1986) to your letter of June 9, 1986, to W. G. Counsil concerning the audit program of the activities relating to the TRT-issue-specific action plans (ISAPs) and responsibilities of the CPRT Overview Quality Team (0QT). The TUGC0 letter includes a commitment to expand {

the TERA audit program to cover the TRT-ISAP program for the civil, structural, mechanical, and miscellaneous areas and to expand the Energy Research Corporation audit program to cover the electrical and testing areas. It also encloses a procedure which describes the responsibilities of the 0QT and a three month l audit and review schedule of the TRT ISAP activities.

We find that the information provided in the TUGC0 letter responds in an acceptable manner to your letter of June 9,1986. Accordingly the open issue in SSER 13 regarding the lack of an audit program for the TRT ISAP program is resolved. Attached is our SSER input describing the acceptability of this additional audit activity. This input replaces that on page 4.8 of SSER 13.

Any questions you might have on this subject should be directed to J. Gilray (X27242) or J. Spraul (X24530).

Brian K. ~ Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance Vendor, and Technical Training C9nter Programs Office of Inspection and E forcement

Enclosure:

As stated Distribution:

DCS 016 HJMiller, IE CTrammel, NRR CHale, RIV QAB Reading EVImbro, IE AVietti-Cook, NRR DPNorkin, IE DQAVT Reading JWGilray, IE LChandler, ELD BKGrimes, IE JGSpraul, IE GMizuno ELD Q :D VT:IE 1

N KE;-

QAB:DQAVT:IE pr Icf DD:D AVT:IE  :

QAB:DQAVT:IE :I JWGilray gdGSpraul c CHale* EVImbro HJMiller .e 10/ 1 /86 10/1/86 10/ /86 10///86 10/ 7 /86 0/2.1 6 MMb yw

Enclosure Criterion 18. Audits. The staff finds that the CPRT controls for audits of QOC and DAP are acceptable based on the following measures described in the CPRT Program Plan. Audits are required to be performed to verify compliance with the implementation of the CPRT's QOC and DAP. Personnel performing the audits must be qualified and must not have direct responsi-bilities in the areas being audited. Checklists are required to be used in conducting the audits, and audit results must be documented and reported to the management having responsibility for the audited areas.

Followup reviews are required to be made to ensure the proper resolution of identified open items. The overview Quality Team will support the SRT by reviewing the results and corrective actions associated with audits performed under the DAP and QOC QA program and those performed by NRC.

Audits of the implementation of the TRT-ISAP are required by the TERA audit program for the civil, structural, mechanical and miscellaneous areas, and by the ERC audit program for the electrical and testing areas.

We find this audit program of the TRT-ISAP program acceptable. In addition, the TRT ISAP program provides an overview of activities and documents through (1) checks of activities by the RTLs to ensure that action plans within their areas of responsibility are being properly implemented, (2) review, verification, and approval of the results of implementing the ISAPs by the CPRT results report and File Review Committee, 4

and (3) review and approval of results reports by the SRT.

l i

l

- - - . . . - _ _ , . _ _ _ _ . - - . _ _ _ . , . _ . . _ _ _ . . - . ~ _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ , . _ _ - - - - - - -