ML20199B214

Confirms Arrangements Between W Eresian & a Sanchez for Administration of Operator Licensing Exam.Final Applications Certifying Training Must Be Completed & Submitted at Least 14 Days Before First Exam Date

ML20199B214
Person / Time
Site:	05000128
Issue date:	11/03/1997
From:	Doyle P NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:	Bill Russell TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
References
NUDOCS 9711180246
Download: ML20199B214 (11)

Text

'

', (ibi ITU p+* "*% gg-Agg

, g t UNITED STATES

}* NUCLEAR RCGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4 001

%,,, November 3, 1997 Dr. B. Don Russell, Deputy Director Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843 3575

Dear Dr. Russell:

This letter confirms errangements Dr. Warren Eresian made with Mr. Alfred Sanchez for the admin:stration of operator licensing examinations at the Texas A&M University TRIGA reactor. The written and operating examinations are scheduled for the week of January 26, 1998.

I will use the material you provided fcr the August 25,1997 examination, if you have any updates or new procedures please send them at least 60 days prior to the examination date to the following address:

ATTN: Paul Doyle Mail Stop O 11 B 20 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 You are responsible for providing adequate space for proper conduct of the written examination. Enclosure 2 " Administration of Written Examinations," describes our process for conducting these examinations.

Enclosure 3 contains the Rules and Guidelines that will be in effect during the administration of the written examination. Pleare ensure that all applicants are aware of these rules.

Your review of the written examination will be conducted in accordance with the procedures specified in Enclosure 4. " Facility Review of Written Examinations."

Final, signed reactor operator and senior reactor operator license applications certifying that all training has been completed must be submitted at least 14 days before the first examination dates so that we will be able to review the training and experience of the candidates, process the medical certifications, and process the applications, if our review cannot be completed in time to make a determination of applicant eligibility, the candidate may not be permitted to sit for the examination. Therefore, it is recommended that license applications be provided as soon as possible to ensure an appropriate level of review.

9711180246 ?71103 5 PDR ADOCK 05000128 I V PDR I "yh0 ) f ll ll!ll!l,l(l!l,ll,l ll

Dr. Russell November 3, 1997 This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Clearance Number 3150-0101, which expires April 30,2000. The estimated average burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response, including gathering, xeroxing and mailing the required material. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the information and Records Management Branch, T-6 F 33, Division of Information Support Services, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0101), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB 10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503, if you have any questions regarding the examination procedures and requirements, please

, contact me at (301) 4151058, or internet e-mail pvd@nrc. gov.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Paul Doyle, Chief Examiner Non Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50128

Enclosures:

1. Reference Material for Reactor / Senior '

Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations

2. Administration of Written Examinations

3. Procedures for Administration of Written Examinations

4. Facility Review of Written Examinations cc w/ enclosures: Mr. Alfred Sanchez, Texas A&M University DISTRIBUTION w/encis: DISTRIBUTION w/o enc ..

Central Files SWeiss PUBLIC TMichaels, PM Docket Files PDND R/F Facility File (DMcCain)

- DOCUMENT NAME: G:\SECY\DOYLE\TEXASAM.RNW T3,eeehse a topir of this document, andkate in the boa: 'C' = Copy without attachtnantienclosure *E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure *N* = No copy OFFICE POND CE lC HOLB:A lC PDND:D , lf , f l NAME PDoyle twW ) SFigueion SWeiss 1 P l DATE 10 / ?! /97 M/31/97 l l/h/97'"

OFFICIAL NECORD COPY l

Dr. Russell This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Clearance Number 3150-0101, which expires April 30, 2000. The estimated average burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response, includinn gathering, xeroxing and mailing the required material. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Information and Records Management Branch, T-6 F-33, Division of information Support Services, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0101), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB 10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503.

If you have any questions regarding the examination procedures and requirements, please contact me at (301) 4151058, or Internet e-mail pvd@nrc. gov.

Sincerely, Paul Doyle, Chief xa inor Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-128

Enclosures:

1. Reference Material for Reactor / Senior Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations

2. Administration of Written Examinations

3. Procedures for Administration of Written Examinations 4, Facility Review of Written Examinations cc w/ enclosures: Mr. Alfred Sanchez, Texas A&M University

-Texas A&M University Docket No. 50 59/128 f

-cc:

Mayor, City of College Station P. O. Box Drawer 9960 College Station, Texas 77840-3575 Governor's Budget and.-

Planning Office P. O. Box 13561-

~ Austin, Texas 78711 -

Bureau of Radiation Control State of Texas-1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756

Dr. Warren D. Reece Director, Nuclear Science Center Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System F. E. Box 89, M/S 3575 College Station, Texas 77843 l-I

+-

REFERENCE MATERIAL FOR REACTOR / SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS (NON-POWER)

1. Existing loaming objectives, students handouts and lesson plans (including training manuals, plant orientation manual, system descriptions, reactor theory, thermodynamics, etc.)

Training materials should include all substantive written material used for preparing a'plicants for initial RO and SRO licensing. The written material should include learning objectives if available and the details presented during lectures, rather than outlines. Training materials should be identified, bound, and indexed. Training materials which include the following should be provided:

System descriptions including descriptions of all operationally relevant flow paths, components, controls and instrumentation. System training material should draw parallels to the actual procedures used for operating and applicable system.

Complete and operationally useful descriptions of all safety system interactions, secondary interactions under emergency and abnormal conditions, including consequences of anticipated operator error, maintenance error, and equipment failure.

Training material used to clarify and strengthen understanding of emergency operating procedures.

2. Complete Procedure Index (including tempurary procedures).

3. All administrative procedures as applicable to reactor operation or safety.

4. Allintegrated plant procedures, normal or general operating procedures and procedures for experiments.

5. All emergency proceduros, emergency instructions, abnormal or special procedures.

6. Standing orders or procedures changed by reactor supervision and important orders or changes that are safety related and may supersede the regular procedures.

7. Applicable procedures (procedures that are run frequently).

8. Fuel-handling and core-loading procedures and initial core-loading procedure, when appropriate.

9. Any annunciator / alarm procedures, as applicable.

ENCLOSURE 1

A  ;

- i

-. 2 --

.i l10s Radiation protection manual, radiation control n'anual or procedures.~ *

11. ; Emergency plan implementing procedures.-

12. Safety Analysis Report. Technical Specifications and interpretations, if available.

13.1 System operating procedures, including experiments.-

-_141 Piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical single-line diagrams, or flow diagrams,-

as applicable.- ,

15. _ Technical Data Book, and/or plant curve information as used by operators and facility; precautions, limitations, and set points for_the facility.

16. . .Ouestions and answers specific to the facility training program which may be use'd in . 3 the written or_ operating examinations (voluntary by facility licensee).

17. Additional material as requested by the examiners to develop examinations that meet the requirements of the Non-Power Reactor Examiner Standards and Regulations.

The above reference material should be approved finalissues and so marked. if a facility has not finalized some of the material, the Chief Examiner should verify with the facility that the most complete, up to-date materialis available and that agreement has been reached

. with the licensee for limiting changss before the administration of the examination.

c

{

q e -, y a n- ,---- a 4 ran,e..t,- - - -~ - ,--- - - - - - - -

ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS

1. A single room must be provided for administration of the written examination. The location of this room and supporting restroom facilities chould be such as to prevent contact with all other f acility personnel during the writtsa examination.

2. Minimum spacing is necessary to ensure examination integrity as determined by the Chief Examiner (i.e., one applicant per table, with a three-foot space between tables).

3. Acceptable arrangements should be made by the f acility if the applicants are to have lunch, coffee or other refreshments. These arrangements shall comply with item 1 above and must be reviewed by the examiner and/or proctor.

4. The f acility licensee provides pads of 8 % by 11 inch lined paper in unopened packages for each applicant's use in completing the examination. The examiner

, distributes these pads to the applicants as needed.

5. Applicants may bring pens, pencils, calculators or slide rules into the examination room. Only black ink or dark pencils should be used for writing answers to questions.

6. No wall charts, models, and/or other training materials can be present in the examination room. No other equipment or reference material will be allowed unless provided by the examiner.

7. The facility staff is provided with a copy of the written examination and answer key af ter the last candidate has handed in his written examination. The facility staff will then have five (5) working days to provide formal written comments with supporting documentation regarding written examination questions and answers to the Chief Examiner.

ENCLOSURE 2

PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS

1. Verify candidate identity.

2. Pass out examinations and all handouts. Remind applicants not to review examination until instructed to do so.

READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS VERBATIM:

1. Cheating on the examination means an automatic denial of your application and could result in more severe penalties.

2. After the examination has been completed, you must sign the statement on the cover sheet indicating that the work is your own and you have not received or given assistance in completing the examination. This must be done after you complete the examination.

READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Restroom trips are to be limited and only one applicant at a time may leave. You must avoid all contact with anyone oatside the examination room to avoid even the appearance or possibility of cheating.

2. Use black ink or dark pencil only to facilitate legible reproductions.

3. Print your name in the blank provided in the upper right-hand corner of the examination cover sheet and each answer sheet.

4. Mark your answers on the answer sheet provided. USE ONLY THE PAPER PROVIDED AND DO NOT WRITE ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE PAGE.

5. Before you turn in your examination, consecutively number each answer sheet.

6. The point value for each question is indicated in [ brackets) after the question.

7. If the intent of a question is unclear, ask questions of the examiner only.

8. When turning in your examination, assemble the completed examination with examination questions, examination aids and answer sheets. in addition, turn in all scrap paper.

9. Ensure allinformation you wish to have evaluated as part of your answer is on your answer sheet. Scrap paper will be disposed of immediately following the examination.

ENCLOSURE 3

4 2-10; To pass the examination, you must achieve a grade of 70 percent or grwater in each category.

11. There is a time limit of three (3) hours for completion of the examination.

12. When you have completed and turned in your examination, leave the examination area (DEFINE THE AREA). If you are observed in this area while the examination is stillin progress, your license may be denied or revoked.

ENCLOSURE 3

FACILITY REVIEW OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS 1, At the option of the Director, Non Power Reactor and Decomm!ssioning Project Directorate (PDND), the facility rnay review the written examination up to two weeks prior to its administration. This review may take place at the facility or at an NRC office. The Chief Examiner will coordinate the detai'n of the review with the facility.

An NRC examiner will always be present during the review. The examination or written notes will NOT be retained by the f acility.

Whenever this option of examination review is utilized, the f acility reviewers will sign

he following statement prior to being allowed access to the examination.

a. Fre Examination Security Agreement I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge concerning the examination scheduled for at as of the dato of my signature below. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information concerning this examination to any unauthorized persons. I understand that I am not to participate in any instruction involving those appHeants scheduled to be administered the above examination from this date until after the examination has been administered. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agrooment may result in the examinations boitig canceled and/or enforcement action against myself or the facility licensee by whom I am employed or represeni.

Signature /Date in addition, the facility str.ff reviewors will sign the following statement after the written examination has been administered,

b. Post Examination Security Agreement I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge any information concerning the examinations administered during the week 01

! at or any instruction to those

( applicants who were administered the examination from the cate I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration.

l l

Siqnaturc/Dato l

ENCLOSURE 4 l

1

4 2

2. Regarddess of whether the above examination review option is exercised, imniediately '

following the administration of the written examination, the facility staff is provided a marksd-up copy of the examination and the answer key. The copy of the written examination includes pen and ink changes made to questions during the examination aMinistration, if the facility did not review the ext. .ination prior to its administration, they will have l five (5) working days from the day of the written examination to submit formal comments, if the facility reviewed the examination pr'or to its administration, any additional comments must be given to en examiner prior to his/her leaving the facility.

These comments will be addressed to the Chief Examiner by the Reactor Supervisor.

Comments not submitted within the required time frame will be conslifered for inclusion in the grading process on a case by case basis. This may cause delays in grading the examinations.

3. The fellowing format should be used for submittal of specific comments:

a. Listing of NRC question, answer and reference l

b. Facility comment / recommendation  ;

c. Reference (to support facility comment)

NOTES: 1. No change to the oxamination v ill be made without submittal of a reference to support the facility comment. Any supporting documentation that was not previously supplied, should be provided.

i

2. Comments made without a concise f acility recommendation will not be addressed.

4.. A two hour post examination review may be held at the discretion of the Chief Examiner. If this review is held, the facility staff should be informed that only written comments that are properly supported will be considered in the grading of the examination.

l l

l

- -. - . ,. -- ._ -