ML20044G162

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of in Response to Two EP Weaknesses Identified in Insp Rept 50-128/93-01 .Notifies That NRC Acceptance of C/A for Subj Weakness Does Not Constitute Preapproval of Revised Classification Guide
ML20044G162
Person / Time
Site: 05000128
Issue date: 05/24/1993
From: Callan L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Hall K
TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
References
NUDOCS 9306020106
Download: ML20044G162 (4)


See also: IR 05000128/1993001

Text

- - -

'

UNITE D STATES

g ME49

a

fi

k

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

..

REGION IV

,

f

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

8

AR LINGTON. TEXAS 76011-8064

,

MAY 2 41993

Docket:

50-128

License: R-83

Texas A&M University System

ATTN:

Dr. Ken R. Hall

Deputy Director

Texas Engineering Experiment Station

301 WERC

College Station, Texas 77843

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-128/93-01

Thank you for your letter dated May 7,1993, in response to the two emergency

preparedness weaknesses identified in NRC Inspection Report 50-128/93-01 dated

April 9, 1993. We have examined your reply and find it responsive to the

concerns raised in our inspection report.

As part of your response to Weakness 128/9301-01 concerning radiological

emergency classification action 1evels, you have submitted a revised emergency

classification guide (Table I) and committed to retrain your operators to

classify emergencies according to this guide. We understand that this revised

classification guide is part of a revision to your emergency plan and

implementing procedures that you are preparing for submittal to NRC by the end

of the summer 1993. NRC will perform a detailed review of your emergency plan

revision following its submittal, including the revised classification guide.

Therefore, please note that NRC acceptance of your corrective action for

Weakness 128/9301-01 does not constitute preapproval of your revised

classification guide.

Should you have any questions concerning this let+rr, please contact

Mr. L. T. Ricketson at (817) 860-8165.

Sincerely,

f')lf)

(

,

,

-

b

-

L.

. Callan, Director

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

CC'

(See next page)

9306020106 930524

[

PDR

ADDCK 05000128

'

G

PDR

L

_ - - - -

.

.

-

- -

-

--

.

. .-

.

.

,

c..

(

.

.

-!

.

-Texas'A&M University System

-2-

]

CC:

'

- Texas A&M University system

'

ATTN: Dr. Warren D. Reece

!

Director.

Nuclear Science Center-

Texas Engineering Experiment Station

'!'

F. E._ Box 89, M/S 3575

College Station, Texas 77843

Texas A&M University System

ATTN: Martha Brown

Nuclear Science Center

!

Mail Stop 7734

l

College Station, Tex.as 77843

Texas A&M University System

i

ATTN: Dr. John W. Poston

1

Reactor Administrator

'

Nuclear Engineering Department

Mail Stop 3133

-

College Station, Texas 77843-3133

l

!

Texas A&M University System

ATTN:

Dr. M. E. McLain

'

Radiation Safety Officer

College Station, Texas 77843

,

Texas A&M University System

ATTN: Dr. F. D. Jennings

Executive Director

University _Research Services

Mail Stop 3121

College Station, Texas 77843-3121

Texas A&M University System

l

ATTN: Robert O. Berry

Reactor Supervisor

Nuclear Engineering Department

Mail Stop 3133

College Station, Texas 77843-3133

1

Texas State Department of Health

,

1100 West 49th Street

!

Austin, Texas 78756

j

Radiation Control Program Director

i

Bureau of. Radiation Control

.

Dept. of Health

1100 West 49th Street

Austin,-Texas' 78756-3189

-!

)

!

,

4

e

-

s

-,nr

.

t

.

.

.

"

I

i

'

Texas A&M University System

-3-

bec to DMB (IE01)

bcc w/ copy of licensee's letter dated May 7,1993:

J. L. Milhoan,.RA

.

L. J. Callan, DRSS

!

B. Murray, FIPS_

,

L. T. Ricketson, FIPS

D. B. Spitzberg, FIPS

!

DRP

DRS

.

MIS Coordinator

!

RIV File

FIPS File

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF (MS 4503)

T. Michaels, NRR Project Manager (MS 11 B20)

.

J. L. Caldwell, NRR (MS 10 D22)

,

!

,

"

,

?

'

,

,

RIV:FIPT I E >-

FIPhjff[e

C:FIPS

'rh

DD:DRSS[M

D:DRSh8

DBSpitzberg:nh

LTRicketson

BMurray

( OIDChamberlain LJCallanfd

d3 ZQ/93

$~ /Q[)93'

5I /21/93

SI 2f/93

SFEbp/93

/

/

,

,

,

_

_

_

__

a.

,

.(

.

~

.

,

,

.-

.

.

.

-

'

TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION

!

-- .

,

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY

-

COLLEGE STADON. TEXAS 77543-3575

l'

('

l

-

_

E

J

'

_

.i

i

NUCLEAR SCIENCE CENTER

}

7 May 1993

4ogis45 7551

.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

93-0148

ATTH: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK

j

Washington, DC 20555

,

Docket No: 50-128 License R-83

!

SUBJECT:

Licensee Reply to Program Weakness Identifications Dated

-f'

April 9,

1993 (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-128/93-01)

-

Dear Si

The following response is submitted by the Texas A&M University.

l

System / Texas Engineering Experiment Station (Licensee), in regards

to

the

program weaknesses

identified

in

the April

9,

1993

j

inspection report issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-

'

Region IV Office.

Stated Weakness

'

A.

NRC Regulatory Guide 2.6, " Emergency Planning for Research and

Test

Reactors"

specifies

that

licensees

should

develop

emergency action levels that relate directly to facility

parameters.

The licensee's failure to establish radiological

!

emergency classification action levels related to facility

parameters which could be promptly assessed was identified as

!

a plan weakness.

Contrary to the above, the inspectors determined that the

- t

monitors for stack particulate (Channel #1) and Stack gas

(Channel #3) were at least a magnitude less than the action

.,

levels for a NOUE and at least two orders of magnitude less

than the ection levels for an. Alert.

Licensee Response

,

A.

The program weakness discussed above was identified by' the

'

licensee in discussions between Ms.

Martha Brown of ' the

Nuclear Science Center and Mr. Larry Rickertson and Dr. Blair

l

Spitzberger of the Region IV Office.

In this discussion, Ms.

Brown used this weakness as an example of one of the major

l

reasons the emergency plan was being revised at the time of

-

the inspection.

i

!

i

43ss~QOo ZRESEARCH AND(p1, .

-.

--

- -

.-

EVELOPWENT FOR MANKINO

-

.

.

. . . .

_

.

._

.

.-. -

,

,

,

.

.

.

.

.

.

i

)

.

-

j

.

Nuciear Regulatory Commission

93-0148

.l

Page 2

i

If the inspectors nad looked at the proposed revisions to the

Emergency Plan and the Implementing Procedures they would have

been aware that corrective action regrading this' weakness had

,

'

already been proposed in the revision.

The-revised Emergency

Plan and Implementing Procedures should be~ ready to submit to

the Region IV office by the end of the summer.

CORRECTIVE ACTION

l

,

Until

a

submittal. of

the

revised

emergency

plan..,and

implementing procedures can be made, the NSC plans to retrain

,

all of its operational staff in the new classification table

(see enclosed Table I) developed for the revision,

i

l

STATED WEAKNESS

Through

discussions,

the

inspectors

confirmed. that

the

.

licensee

procedures do not direct the licensee- to make

'

notifications to the NRC except as required by 10CFR20 and the

,

Technical Specifications. The licensee's failure to establish

'

'

clear guidance in the emergency plan and.the implementing

procedures for emergency notifications to the NRC was

identified as a program weakness.

,

-;

LICENSEE RESPONSE

The licensee admits to the program weakness.-

CORRECTIVE ACTION

l

The Emergency Plan and Implementing- Procedures were under

revision at the time of the inspection and changes.have been

made to the revision to make - it clear to the Emergency

~

Director when notifications are required and the time period

in which they need to be completed (See enclosed Table.I). In

order to

facilitate these notifications additional. changes

.

were

made

to

the

NSC

Emergency

Plan

to

document

the

notifications

and

ensure

the

information

provided

'is

i

consistent with the actual events at the time of declaration

of the emergency class (see enclosed NSC Form 854).

3

i

-i

1

e

e

!

=

4

V

-

- - -

, - - . - -

-

- - . - - - - -

-

--- - -

.

.

.

.

__

. . - .

_

- . . ,

.

.

. . .

>

..

-;

--. . :

.

.

.

_

j

huclear Regulatory Commission

93-0148

-Page 3

,

l

}

'

Should there be any questions regarding this reply, please' contact

'{

me at (409) 845-7551.

-l'!

l

Respectfully subm*tted,

!

-Q

-

.

.- arren-D. Reece

Director

I

Nuclear Science Center

'f-,

.

WDR/ym

i

xc:

Dr.

K.

R.

Hall, Deputy Director

$

Texas Engineering Experiment Station

Texas A&M University

i

-\\

Dr. K.

L.

Peddicord, Director

Texas Engineering Experiment Station

>

Texas A&M University

[

l

Feenan Jennings, Chairman-

i

Reactor Safety Board

l

Texas A&M University

+

Milton McLain,' Director

'

Office of Radiological Safety

[

Texas A&M University

i

,

U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region IV

l

611 Ryan Plaza, Suite 400

Arlington, Tx 76011

Attn: L. J. Callan, Director

Division of Radiological Safety and. Safeguards

'

!

!

.i

i

'

[

!

!

!

.;

!

J

-.-.

. _ _ _ _ _ . _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _._ ..__-.-

- -

__ _

_ _ . _ _ _ _

- . - .

_

. _ . .__

.

_

,

,

. " "

l

.

,

.

.

USU Form 854

Emergency Notification

1

1

l

'A .

Point of Contact

>

.1)

Name:

2)

Title:

3)

Telephone Number:

.

'B.

Information Given

1)

Location of Incident

[

a)

Your Name:

'

b)

Name of Facility:

c)

Address:

d)

Phone Number:

l

i

2)

Description of Emergency Event-

!

!

,

i

3)

Emergency Class:

7

4)

Date of Incident Initiation:

5)

Time of Initiation:

i

6)

Type of Expected or Expected or Actual Release:

'

>

airborne

i

'

waterborne

surface spill

other

]

i

7)

Duration of Release (estimate or actual):

}

B)

Quantity and type of Huclides Released (expected or actual):

_;

i'

Nuclide

Amount Released

!

t

i

!

,

t

1

9)

Projected or Actual Dose Rates (circle one):

'

Operations Boundary (confinement building):

Site Boundary.

,

i

!

i

'i

!

.

-

.

-.

.

>

T'

. ., ?

- v,

4.

,'

.

TABLE I

I

EMERGENCY' CLASSIFICATION GUIDE

Incident

Action' Level

Classification

Fire

Minor fire

Operational

non-specific to the reactor

Event

or its control systems

(EPIP-IXB.lt

in location where radioactive

material is used or stored.

Prolonged Fire

Notification of

non-specific to the reactor

Unusual Event *'

or its control systems

(EPIP-IXB.1)

in a location where radioactive

!

material is used or stored.

I

1

Fire which could adversely

Alert *

.

l

offect the reactor or its

(EPIP-IXB.1)

control systems

!

Tornado

Report of a tornado which

Notification of

-

,

could. strike-the facility.

Unusual Event *

and adversly effect the

(EPIP-IXB.2)

reactor safety systems

Personnel

With or without radiological

Operational

Injury

complications

Event

(EPIP-IXB.3)'

Bomb Threat

Non-specific to the reactor

Operational

Event-

(EPIP-IXB.4)

With possible radiological

dotification of

release implications

Unusual Event *

(EPIP-IXB.4)

Explosion

Non-specific to the reactor

Operational

Event

(EPIP-IXB.5)

which might adversly affect

the reactor or its safety

systems

Experiment

Minor releases of fission

Notification of

Failure

products

Unusual Event *

(EPIP-IXB.6)'

k

.

..

. . . .

_.-

.

'l

-

.

-

,

.

'

,

..

,

t

-

!

-

Minor releases of radioactive

Notification of

l

,

material

Unusual Event *

i

(EPIP-IXB.6)

!

i

Pool Level

Leakage'which can be corrected

Notification of

Alarm

by isolation of the leak cn:

Unusual Event *

.

by adding makeup water

(EPIP-IXB.7)

]

,

Leakage which indicates ab'tormal

Alert *

!

loss at rate exceeding makeup

(EPIP-IXB.7)

j

capacity

j

i

Facility Air

Alarm on' Channel #1

Operational

i

'

Monitor Alarm

(Stack Particulate)

Event

!

(EPIP-IXB.8)

j

.i

Alarm on Channel #2

Notification.of

l

(Fission Gas Monitor)

Unusual Event *

f

(EPIP-IXB.8)

!

Alarm on Channel #3

Operational

,

(Stack Gas)

Event

!

(EPIP-IXB.8)

i

Alarm on Channel #4

Operational

j

'(Building Particulate)

Event

'

(EFIP-IXB.8).

.

Alarm on Channel #6

Operational

i

(Building Gas)

Event.

i

(EPIP-IXB.8)

1

i

!

Declaration of this class of event requires notification of

l

the NRC operation center in Bethesada, MD within 15 minutes

j

of declaration.

(See NSC Form 854.)

.i

i

t

t

!

f

1

- '

3

i

i

,

9

I

'

l

1

-

-

.

. .

.-

i

'.:

4-

i

!

. Texas A&M University System

-3-

bec to DMB (IE01)

,

bec w/ copy of licensee's letter dated May 7,1993:

!

J. L. Milhoan, RA.-

!

L. J. Callan, DRSS

,

B. Murray, FIPS

L. T Ricketson, FIPS

!

D. B. Spitzberg, FIPS

DRP

DRS

!

MIS Coordinator

'

RIV File

i

FIPS File

'

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF (MS 4503)

T. Michaels, NRR Project Manager (MS II B20)

J. L. Caldwell, NRR (MS 10 D22)

I

,

!

.

!

,

>

.i

!

,

<2'?-107

,

RIV:FIP5 W

FIP W [e

C:FIPS

Ph

DD:DRSSd[

D:DRSh

DBSpitzberg:nh

LTRicketson

BMurray

hDChamberlain LJCallan[

F /23'/93

5/20/93

(/Q093

5 21/93

$/2i/93

/

i

F

l

.

.

1

1.

-

I