ML20211Q400
| ML20211Q400 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000128 |
| Issue date: | 09/07/1999 |
| From: | Kim C TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211Q406 | List: |
| References | |
| 99-0209, NUDOCS 9909150058 | |
| Download: ML20211Q400 (2) | |
Text
U
[d @h i
TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIM ENT STATION TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
[~
'f COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843-3575 I
L l
NUCLEAR SCIENCE CENTER 409/845-7551 i
September 07,1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 99-0209 ATTN: Document Control Desk j
Washington,DC 20555
Subject:
Submission of Revised Technical Specification
Reference:
- 1. Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center Reactor License R-83
- 2. Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center Letter #98-0132
- 3. Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center Letter #99-0204 i
Dear Sir,
In accordance with the request from the NRC (Ted Michaels) by phone and subsequent fax on August 11,1999, the NSC is submitting the final version of the Nuclear Science Center's Technical Specification pending an official approval from the NRC.
Please note that the revised Technical Specification simply incorporates the changes that were 4
proposed in the previous letters with the exception of a minor modification. The " bases" of the Technical Specification 3.6.4 have been slightly modified to incorporate the results of the phone conversation between the NRC (Frank Demeglio and Dan Hughes) and the Nuclear Science Center (Latha Vasudevan, Chan-Hyeong Kim, and Alfred Sanchez) on August 11,1999. Please note that the previous " basis" of Technical Specification 3.6.4 (b) is no longer correct as we used the detailed calculation (see Appendix 1, Safety Evaluation Report) instead of using the previous overly conservative calculation to determine the emergency action levels.
t 99o91soose 99o,o7 C. )o PDR ADOCK 05000128 P
PDR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR MANKIND C
e 99-0209 L
Page 2 l
Consequently, the attached Technical Specification does not include any discussion on the i
. emergency action levels, which will be discussed in a future reevaluation of the NSC emergency l
plan and procedures. Even though our calculations show that the release of a few thousand l
Curies of xenon does not require classification of an emergency action level, the NSC is planning
' to update the emergency plan and procedures to incorporate an accidental release of Xenon-125.
Sincerely, CharkY 0
Eyeong Kim Acting Assistant Director
' CHK/ym
Enclosures:
(1) Revised Technical Specification xc:
12110/ Central File l
Dr. W. D. Reece, Director, NSC Latha Vasudevan, Radiation Safety Officer, NSC Theodore Michaels, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
i i
I.
1 I
l