|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20212J9991999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Clinton,H Clinton, Chairman Jackson &/Or Wd Travers Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Plant to Ensure That Public Health & Safety Adequately Protected ML20212L1831999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Wd Travers Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Millstone to Ensure Adequate Protection to Public Health ML20212L2081999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance ML20212L2171999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners,Wd Travers & Ferc,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island ML20212L1971999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Chairman Jackson & Commissioners Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance to Ensure Public Health & Safety ML20212K1241999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected ML20112E8911996-05-24024 May 1996 FOIA Request to Inspect & Copy Original OL Issued by Aec/Nrc for Util & EPP Issued as App B to Plant OL SNRC-2192, Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank1995-05-15015 May 1995 Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank ML20082B9131995-03-13013 March 1995 Submits Corrected Page for Insertion Into Final Rept Re Confirmatory Survey of RB & Phase 4 Systems at Plant ML20081A9321995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-81, Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6531995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-80, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6841995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081B5801995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7001995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7111995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2189, Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 19941995-01-20020 January 1995 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 1994 SNRC-2188, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey1995-01-20020 January 1995 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey SNRC-2187, Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring1995-01-11011 January 1995 Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring SNRC-2182, Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning1994-11-0101 November 1994 Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning ML20077L3331994-10-25025 October 1994 Forwards Revised Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20076K3881994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny,For Review & Comment ML20077M8351994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Draft Rept, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool & Phase 2 Systems,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2184, Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld1994-10-12012 October 1994 Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld SNRC-2185, Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-10-0404 October 1994 Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20076F9251994-09-26026 September 1994 Forwards Final Rept Orise 94/I-80, Confirmatory Survey of Turbine Bldg,Site Grounds & Site Exteriors Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2183, Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-871994-09-23023 September 1994 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-87 SNRC-2181, Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 11994-09-14014 September 1994 Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 1 SNRC-2180, Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-021994-09-0101 September 1994 Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-02 SNRC-2179, Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl SNRC-2178, Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4))1994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4)) ML20072P1591994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Revised, Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Bldg & Suppression Pool for Plant SNRC-2176, Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-821994-08-0404 August 1994 Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-82 SNRC-2177, Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld1994-08-0404 August 1994 Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld ML20071L8741994-07-29029 July 1994 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Building & Suppression Pool for Review & Comment SNRC-2175, Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively1994-07-18018 July 1994 Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively SNRC-2173, Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-06-14014 June 1994 Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) SNRC-2172, Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-821994-06-0707 June 1994 Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-82 SNRC-2171, Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel1994-06-0202 June 1994 Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel SNRC-2170, Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan1994-05-20020 May 1994 Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan SNRC-2168, Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc1994-05-13013 May 1994 Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc SNRC-2169, Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project1994-05-11011 May 1994 Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project ML20029E1731994-05-11011 May 1994 Informs That Based on Recent Discussions Between Officials, Licensee Decided to Retain Organizational Position at Least Until Fuel Removed from Site ML20029D1991994-04-29029 April 1994 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993. ML20029D2571994-04-28028 April 1994 Advises That Jc Brons Resigned to Pursue Employment W/ Another Util Co,Effective 940429 ML20029C7111994-04-22022 April 1994 Submits Technical Info on Biological Shield Wall Blocks to Be Surveyed SNRC-2163, Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util1994-04-21021 April 1994 Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util ML20065M3701994-04-20020 April 1994 Responds to NRC Verbal Request for Info Re Estimated Cost for Decommissioning SNRC-2161, Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station SNRC-2160, Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b)1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b) SNRC-2148, Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases1994-03-0808 March 1994 Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases 1999-10-01
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20112E8911996-05-24024 May 1996 FOIA Request to Inspect & Copy Original OL Issued by Aec/Nrc for Util & EPP Issued as App B to Plant OL SNRC-2192, Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank1995-05-15015 May 1995 Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank ML20082B9131995-03-13013 March 1995 Submits Corrected Page for Insertion Into Final Rept Re Confirmatory Survey of RB & Phase 4 Systems at Plant ML20081A9321995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-81, Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6531995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-80, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081B5801995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6841995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7111995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7001995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2188, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey1995-01-20020 January 1995 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey SNRC-2189, Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 19941995-01-20020 January 1995 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 1994 SNRC-2187, Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring1995-01-11011 January 1995 Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring SNRC-2182, Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning1994-11-0101 November 1994 Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning ML20077L3331994-10-25025 October 1994 Forwards Revised Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20077M8351994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Draft Rept, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool & Phase 2 Systems,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20076K3881994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny,For Review & Comment SNRC-2184, Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld1994-10-12012 October 1994 Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld SNRC-2185, Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-10-0404 October 1994 Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20076F9251994-09-26026 September 1994 Forwards Final Rept Orise 94/I-80, Confirmatory Survey of Turbine Bldg,Site Grounds & Site Exteriors Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2183, Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-871994-09-23023 September 1994 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-87 SNRC-2181, Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 11994-09-14014 September 1994 Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 1 SNRC-2180, Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-021994-09-0101 September 1994 Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-02 SNRC-2179, Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20072P1591994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Revised, Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Bldg & Suppression Pool for Plant SNRC-2178, Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4))1994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4)) SNRC-2176, Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-821994-08-0404 August 1994 Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-82 SNRC-2177, Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld1994-08-0404 August 1994 Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld ML20071L8741994-07-29029 July 1994 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Building & Suppression Pool for Review & Comment SNRC-2175, Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively1994-07-18018 July 1994 Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively SNRC-2173, Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-06-14014 June 1994 Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) SNRC-2172, Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-821994-06-0707 June 1994 Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-82 SNRC-2171, Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel1994-06-0202 June 1994 Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel SNRC-2170, Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan1994-05-20020 May 1994 Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan SNRC-2168, Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc1994-05-13013 May 1994 Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc SNRC-2169, Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project1994-05-11011 May 1994 Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project ML20029E1731994-05-11011 May 1994 Informs That Based on Recent Discussions Between Officials, Licensee Decided to Retain Organizational Position at Least Until Fuel Removed from Site ML20029D1991994-04-29029 April 1994 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993. ML20029D2571994-04-28028 April 1994 Advises That Jc Brons Resigned to Pursue Employment W/ Another Util Co,Effective 940429 ML20029C7111994-04-22022 April 1994 Submits Technical Info on Biological Shield Wall Blocks to Be Surveyed SNRC-2163, Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util1994-04-21021 April 1994 Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util ML20065M3701994-04-20020 April 1994 Responds to NRC Verbal Request for Info Re Estimated Cost for Decommissioning SNRC-2160, Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b)1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b) SNRC-2161, Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station SNRC-2148, Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases1994-03-0808 March 1994 Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases SNRC-2145, Provides Comments Prepared by Util on Draft NUREG/CR-5849, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination1994-03-0808 March 1994 Provides Comments Prepared by Util on Draft NUREG/CR-5849, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination SNRC-2157, Forwards 1993 Rept of Personnel & Man-Rem by Work & Job Function. 1993 Personnel Exposures Extremely Low as Majority of Radioactivity Removed from Site1994-02-28028 February 1994 Forwards 1993 Rept of Personnel & Man-Rem by Work & Job Function. 1993 Personnel Exposures Extremely Low as Majority of Radioactivity Removed from Site SNRC-2158, Submits Notification of Pending Change to Decommissioning Plan Submitted 901229.Safety Evaluation for Change Encl1994-02-28028 February 1994 Submits Notification of Pending Change to Decommissioning Plan Submitted 901229.Safety Evaluation for Change Encl SNRC-2156, Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1993. Latest Revised Copies of Offsite Dose Calculation Manual & Process Control Program Also Encl as Apps to Rept1994-02-25025 February 1994 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1993. Latest Revised Copies of Offsite Dose Calculation Manual & Process Control Program Also Encl as Apps to Rept ML20067C9271994-02-22022 February 1994 Forwards Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data for Period of Jul-Dec 1993 SNRC-2144, Forwards Vols 1-4 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept. Twenty Proprietary Pages of Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-02-0404 February 1994 Forwards Vols 1-4 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept. Twenty Proprietary Pages of Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) 1996-05-24
[Table view] Category:LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20043B4951990-05-0707 May 1990 Requests Voluntary Suspension of Effectiveness of Prospective NRC Administrative Actions to Modify Util Security Plan to Discontinue Local Offsite Emergency Response Measures,Pending Us Court of Appeals Action ML20044A1021990-05-0303 May 1990 FOIA Request for SECY-89-247 on Proposed Action Re Shoreham & Documents Referred to in SECY-89-247 ML20011D5421989-12-11011 December 1989 Forwards Signature Page of Util 891208 Request for Exemption from Primary Containment Leak Rate Testing Requirements,Per 10CFR50.54(o) & App J,Paragraphs III.D.1 Through III.D.3 ML19353B1041989-12-0808 December 1989 Forwards Request for Exemption from Primary Containment Leak Rate Testing Requirements of 10CFR50.54(o) & App J,III.D.1 Through III.D.3 ML19325D6171989-10-0404 October 1989 Forwards Handwritten Changes Made to Pages 83-86 of 890928 Upper Mgt Conference Between NRC & Long Island Lighting Co ML20247B8111989-09-0808 September 1989 Forwards Util Renewed Request for Exemption from Onsite Property Damage Insurance Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w). WE Steiger Affidavit Also Encl ML20247H9621989-07-21021 July 1989 Requests Immediate Reconsideration of 890720 Preliminary Review of Shoreham-Wading River Central School District 10CFR2.206 Request to Prevent Further Deterioration of Valuable Electric Resource ML20247L3181989-07-19019 July 1989 Suppls Shoreham-Wading River Central School District 890714 Request Re Margin of Safety Provided by Placement of Fuel in Spent Fuel Pool at Facility ML20245G8851989-04-21021 April 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Decommissioning of Facility, Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants in General & 890413 Testimony of DOE Opposition to Decommissioning of Plant Before Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources ML20245D3421989-03-20020 March 1989 Forwards Listed Endorsements,Including Endorsements 14,163, 144,94,75,39 & 31 to Nelia Policies NF-295,NF-100,MAELU Policy MF-29,NELIA Policy NF-182,MAELU Policy MF-61,NELIA Policy NF-281 & Maelu Policy MF-112,respectively ML20247N5371989-03-0202 March 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Emergency Plan Dtd Sept 1988 or Later ML20246P1331989-02-21021 February 1989 Urges That 100% License Be Issued for Plant.Long Island Has Vital & Current Need for Addl Electrical Need Which Only Plant Can Satisfy.Economy of Long Island in Serious Jeopardy Unless License for Plant Promtly Issued ML20196F6551988-12-0202 December 1988 Forwards Corrected Cover Page to Lilco Answer to Intervenors Brief on School Bus Driver Role Conflict & Emergency Broadcast Sys, ML20195K0001988-11-17017 November 1988 FOIA Request for Records Re 881109 Decision to Certify to Commission Appeal of OL-3 Decision to Dismiss Govts in Licensing Proceeding ML20154P9791988-09-27027 September 1988 Advises That Listed Individuals Representing Suffolk County, State of Ny & Town of Southampton Should Remain on All Svc Lists & Continue to Receive Correspondence Re Plant.Svc List Encl ML20151C5151988-07-18018 July 1988 Advises That Witnesses Will Have to Appear in Order of F Jones,Regan Sheppard & Davidoff at Hearing Tomorrow Due to Presence of Sheppard ML20150A9621988-07-0505 July 1988 Forwards Endorsements 30 & 21 to Nelia Policy NF-269 & Maelu Policy MF-115,respectively ML20153H3361988-06-23023 June 1988 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Requests That NRC Response Be as Detailed as Possible in Order to Better Enable Client to Determine Need for Further Legal Action ML20151C7141988-05-23023 May 1988 FOIA Request for Documents Re FEMA Graded Exercise on Adequacy of Radiological Emergency Response Planning & Preparedness for Plant & Rev 9 to Licensee Emergency Plan for Plant Including FEMA Review of Subj Plan ML20154H7101988-05-17017 May 1988 Forwards Emergency Planning Contentions Re 860213 Exercise, Inadvertently Omitted from Govt Brief in Response to NRC Staff Brief Supporting Lilco Appeal from LBP-88-2 ML20154B5851988-05-10010 May 1988 Clarifies Matter on Hearing Schedule Issue & Forwards Three Ltrs Bearing on Parties Scheduling Efforts.Matters Will Be Addressed During Conference ML20154B4771988-05-0606 May 1988 Corrects Error Noted in Util Suppl to Lilco Response to Govts 880413 Objection & Motion in Alternative to Compel Discovery. Changes Listed ML20151P0711988-04-20020 April 1988 Discusses Board 880413 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Govts Motion for Reconsideration of Board Memorandum & Order on Section 50.47(c)(1)(i)(ii) Compliance).Govts Neither Seek Further Reconsideration Nor Agree W/Views Expressed ML20148K1111988-03-22022 March 1988 Forwards Listed Endorsements to Listed Policies,Including Endorsement 102 to Maelu Policy MF-26,Endorsement 123 to Nelia Policy NF-76,Endorsement 71 to Maelu Policy MF-56 & Endorsement 89 to Nelia Policy NF-189 ML20153H4101988-03-16016 March 1988 Confirms Content of 880303 Telcon Re Numbered Paragraph 2 of FOIA Request 88-63.Paragraph Clarified to Read as Stated. NRC Response to Request Due on 880317.Task Action Plan for Evaluation of Request to Operate Plant at 25% Power Encl ML20149K9101988-02-19019 February 1988 Comments on Util Motion for Discovery Cutoff & for Summary Termination of Witness Designations & Ltr from Util Attys Re New York Court of Appeals Decision in Cuomo Vs Lilco. Suffolk County Disagrees W/Allegations Re Purposeful Delay ML20149F1961988-02-0505 February 1988 Ack Receipt of ASLB 880201 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Applicant Motion of 871208 for Summary Disposition of Hosp Evacuation Issue).Aslb Must Follow Rules to Avoid Waste of Resources Caused by Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151D6591988-01-27027 January 1988 FOIA Request for All Records Including Preparatory Matls & Contemporaneous Notes & Info Submitted by Util Re 880114 Meeting Involving NRC & Util Concerning Facility ML20149F1741988-01-22022 January 1988 Discusses Concerns Re NRC 880114 Secret Meeting W/Util in Which NRC Refuses to Prepare Written Summary Describing Discussion of Meeting.Preparation of Complete Record of Meeting Requested ML20148J1361988-01-20020 January 1988 Advises That Affidavits of Fr Jones,Gj Blass,Fp Petrone & Fg Palomino Filed on 880119 W/Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton Response in Opposition to Lilco Motion. Encl Original Signature Pages Being Filed Today ML20147B9731988-01-12012 January 1988 Forwards Emergency Planning Contention Re Lilcos New Emergency Broadcast Sys Proposal.Three Comments on Contention Listed ML20234B9791987-12-30030 December 1987 Requests That Util 871218 Request for Full Participation Exercise Be Denied.Request Grossly Premature Since Many Inadequacies in Rev 8 to Plan Remain & Upcoming Rev 9 to Plan Requires Thorough Rac Review ML20238D0891987-12-29029 December 1987 Requests Verbatim Transcript Be Kept of All Conference Calls Re Hearing Argument & Reaching Expedited Decision on Govts Motion ML20238D0721987-12-28028 December 1987 Opposes Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Lilco Seven Realism Summary Disposition Motions.Requests Opportunity to Provide Views Prior to ASLB Final Ruling on Govt Extension Motion ML20237E5391987-12-18018 December 1987 Forwards Motions for Summary Disposition of Legal Authority Issues & Contentions EP 1-2 & 4-10.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236F0071987-10-27027 October 1987 Advises That Commission Actions Have Fouled Emergency Planning Rulemaking & Requests That Commission Either Reject & Disregard Ltrs by Members of Congress or Commence Fresh Rulemaking & Afford Public Opportunity to Comment ML20235Y4291987-10-15015 October 1987 Requests That Studies Relied Upon in Proposed Rule Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Participate in Offsite Emergency Planning Be Published & That Comment Period Be Reopened ML20235X5841987-10-0707 October 1987 Notifies of Minor Typo in Govt Opposition to Lilco Motion for Certification to Commission,Served on Board & Parties on 871001.Word Not Should Be Deleted from Line Next to Last Line of Page 5 of Opposition ML20214U7081987-06-0202 June 1987 Forwards Endorsements 25 & 16 to Nelia Policy NF-269 & Maelu Policy MF-115,respectively ML20245B8191987-05-29029 May 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Application for & NRC Denial of License for Low Power Testing,Emergency Backup Power Source & Use of Transamerica Delaval Generators at Any Other Nuclear Facility Including All Production ML20214N2281987-05-22022 May 1987 Advises That Util 870512 Request That NRC Distribute Util Reply to Intervenor Opposition to Expedited Consideration of 25% Power Request Should Be Rejected Due to Being Unauthorized Pleading Not Permitted by NRC Regulations ML20215M0031987-05-0707 May 1987 Forwards Motion to Limit cross-examination of State of Ny & Suffolk County,Inadvertently Omitted on 870505.W/o Motion. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206T1851987-04-13013 April 1987 Forwards Transcripts of Direct Testimonies Re Lilco Reception Ctrs & Motion Requesting Board to Reschedule Commencement of Hearing of Reception Ctr Issues Until Ongoing Litigation Completed.Related Correspondence ML20206H2231987-04-0707 April 1987 Forwards Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton Motion for Conference of Counsel.Motion Constitutes Interim Response to Util 870320 Summary Disposition Motion on Legal Authority Issues Re Contentions 1-10 ML20205R8341987-04-0202 April 1987 Requests Addl Info Re Lilco Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App E.Expresses Dissatisfaction at NRC Ignoring Author Ltrs While Replying to Util Ltrs on Same Subj ML20212J5691987-03-0303 March 1987 Responds to Util Seeking to Rationalize Plea That NRC Grant Section 50.12 Exemption from 1 Yr Exercise Requirement.Nrr Does Not Have Jurisdiction to Make Factual Findings Re Exemption Request ML20212D4361987-02-27027 February 1987 Forwards Direct Testimonies of Rc Roberts,Ej Michel,R Dormer,P Mcguire,D Harris,M Mayer & Gc Minor Re 860213 Emergency Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20211E8711987-02-19019 February 1987 Responds to H Brown Re Util 870122 Request for Waiver of 10CFR50,App E Provision Concerning Emergency Planning Exercises.Issuance of Exemption Recommended. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20235B2741987-02-19019 February 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Indicated on Encl Docket Sheets. Request Does Not Encompass Matl Already Available in PDR or Lpdr Denoted by Three or Four Asterisks on List ML20210F3341987-02-0606 February 1987 Informs That NRR Lacks Jurisdiction to Consider Lilco Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App E,Dtd 870122.Filing Must Be Returned to Lilco W/Instructions for Proper Filing Either W/Commission or Presiding Licensing Board 1990-05-07
[Table view] |
Text
..
s 4 . .. .
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART
$0LTHLoki- 2*H FLOOR avMW,t,au.
IEC M S M.ti, Nr " " A " "W TASHINGTo% DC 200)e se91 H:e pxN Astwt nun <x :.:: we nux .o e oc u DIVFD 7$$" ,
numu = m m
,, g.
n.uso.m w o.u '8h mar y A enmmn un ,m.
(202) 778-9119 March 16, 1988 Ottis, e n e.
Director, Office of Administration Nuclear Regulatory commission Room 4210 Maryland National Bank Building 7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Attention: Ms. Natalie Brown Re:
Freedom of Information Act Recuest. 88-63
Dear Ms. Brown:
This is to confirm the content of our March 3, 1988, telephone conversation concerning numbered paragraph 2 of the above-referenced Freedom of Information Act request. Paragraph 2 is clarified to read as follows:
"All records, not served via the service list in 50-3 2 2-OL-03, 05, or 06 dockets, relating in any way to any other communications during the period March 1987 to the present between LILeo, including any person acting for or on behalf of LILco, and HRC employees, officials, eqents or representatives, which concerned LILco's request to operate Shorehan at 25 percent power, any Federal Emergency Management Agency review of revisions to LILco't. emergency plan, any further exercise of LILco's emergency plan, and any proposed procedures or schedules for any review or exercise of LILco's emergency plan."
ite Nuclear Regulatory commmission's response to this request is due on March 17, 198s. Please call me when the NRC's response is ready, so that I may send a messenger to pick it up.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
Sincerely, gy:,@u. C Mfibw >s torraine c. Gibson Paralegal 8809090169 080017 PDR FOIA DEL AIR 80-A-34 PDR
, , 4 , w; . .
- y -
r ;
- (
Task Iction Plan for Evaluation of 1
Long' Island Lighting Crepany's Request to Operate the Shoreham Nuclear Power T.tation at 251 Power Lead Oroanization: Division of Reactor Proiects I/II, NRR Task Manager: Ronnie Ln -
Project Completion Date: July 8, 1987 4
s 4
l
( i 0 ; g C :' s ' ,
ACTION PLAN I. INTRODUCTION The Long Island Lichting Company (L!LCO) has filed a Motion before the Comission on April 14, 1987, requesting authorization to operate the Shoreham Station at power levels above 5% and up to 25% of full power. In anticipation of a Comission reeuest for a staff review of the Motion and its associated bases, we have prepared this action plan for accomplishing an expeditious review.
The three major elements of this action plan are a description of the relevant background inforration, a description of the review program and a sumary of ,
the recuired staff resources with the corresponding schedules and milestores.
The section on background infonnation will include sumaries on plant status, hearings status and licensing status. The section on our review program will describe the scope of the staff's review of the proposal. It will identify the rature of the various elements of the staff's review effort. The final section of this action plan wil'. prv/ide estimates for the resource requirements in each of the technical review branches that will be participating in this review effort, along with the corresronding schedules and milestones as indicated in a bar-chart. The chart will also identify the interfaces between the various reviewing orpenizations.
A. PLANT STATUS The Shorehan Station is currently in cold shutdown. All the start-up tests that can be accomplished with a St power license, including synchronizatinn of the main generator with the off-site grid, have been completed. LILCO has taken advantage of the protracted period of plant shutdown and has accomplished a number of plant enhancements, including those called for in the ATWS rule. The plant is ready for operations at power levels above 5% of full power.
B. HEARINGS STATUS Public hearings on all issues but those dealing with selected areas of the ecergency plan have been completed with decisions rendered in favor of LILCO.
There are currently two licensing Boards scheduled to hold hearings during much of 1987 on the remaining issues relating to the emergency plan. These hearings are not likely to be completed for at least several months.
1 i C. LICliNSING STATUS I
LILC0 has an application for a full power license which is currently pending I before the Comission. Under authority delegated to it by the Comission.
The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has issued first a license author-izing fuel loading and criticality testing (.001% power) and later a license l authorizing operations up to a power level of 5% of full power. The 5%
- license is currently in effect.
t
{
t l
i
2 The staff's licensing reviews have been completed for all issues that require resolution prior to authorizing coerations above 5% of full power, except for a selected number of issues dealing with the emergency plen, which are currentiv under litigetion before two licensing Boards. In addition, a finding by the Regional Administrator, that the Shoreham Station is ready for operations above 5% of full power is also pending. ,
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM The 1.!LCO request to operate Shoreham at 25% power is based on the provisions of 10 CFR 50.47(c)(1) which states that if the emergency planning standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.47ib) are not met, the applicant would still have an opportunity to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Comission that:
- 1) deficiencies in the (emergencyl plans are not significant for the Shoreham Station;
- 2) adequate interim compensating measures have been or will be taken promptly; of
- 3) there are other compelling reasons to pemit plant operation.
LILCO claims that all three elements of 10 CFR 47(c)(1) are satisfactorily demonstrated by the analysis contained in its request.
In order for the Comission to consider the LILCO. request, an evaluation by the staff is necessary to examine the technical me'rits of LILCO's assertions under 10 CFR 50.47(c)(1). The probabilities, the severities and the durations of accident development for 25% power are significantly different from those associated with accidents that could occur during full power operation. The staff's evaluation should show if the conditions for operating Shoreham at 25% power are such that in the event of an accident involving offsite releases, the demands on the EP are substantially reduced in comparison with operation at 100% power. Tha evaluation should determine if offsite protective measures, when necessary, can be implemented with reasonable assurance. The evaluation should include an assessment of the "other compelling reasons," 1.e., the need for power and the use of foreign oil. The staff evaluation and recomendation for Comission action will be sumarized in a report to the Comission.
!!!. SCOPE OF REVIEW PROGRAM The staff actions to evaluate the LILCO request are divided into five subtasks I as follows:
A, SilBTASK 1 - ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT FOR SHOREHAM OPERATING AT 25% POWER An accident assessment will be performed to evaluate the following:
(1) The probabilities, relative to the Shoreham PRA analyted for full power operation, of accident sequences that would require offsite protective measures is be taken.
l l
i
, . . i. .' ~
I 3
(ii) For each of those accidet seouances evaluated in (i), evaluate the dose (whnle-body, thyroid) profiles as a function of distance.
' Compare the dose profiles soainst NUREG-0396 dose-probability vs.
distance calculations for the corresponding accident sequences, i.e. !
most core-melt secuences and the worse core-melt sequenc'es.
(iii)Evaluatethetimeeierentinaccidentdevelopmentandrelease scenarios. Corresponding to each release category, evaluate the probabilities for the need of quick offsite response (less than 2 hrs.), extended response (5-10 hrs.) and delayed response (greater than 24 hrs.).
The staff has perfomed a review of the Shoreham PRA for 100% power.
This subtask consists of applying the parameters unique to the LILCO request in the accident evaluation. Some of the key input considera-tions are: (1) Those effects arising frori the 255 power limitation in comparison with 100% power: 1.e..; reduced fission product inventory; reduced demands en the safety systems; increased tim available for actions to mitigate the accident; and the availability of main condenser as heat sink with full turbine bypass for ATWS events; and (2) These factors related to physical and procedural changes that were not considered in the 100% power PPA; e.g.,
additional on-site AC power which significantly precludes station black-out accidents; improved Standby Liquid Control s which is eouivalent to about 200% of the 10 CFR 50.62(ystem capability cH4) require-ment for mitigation of ATWS events; Automatic Depressuritation System improvenent for accident control; elternate HPCI water source (from Condensate Storage Tank) to provide redundant water sources; procedural change to lower reactor water level setpoint for MSIY closure to 4
reduce challenges to the SRV and demands on suppression pool.
(iv) Coordinate with the Subtask 3 assessment which is detailed below.
B. SUBTASK 2 - ASSESSMENT OF 0FFSITE EMERGENCY PLANNING NECESSARY FOR 5HOREHAM OPERATING AT 25% POWER.
i The assessment will consist of the following elements:
(1) A preliminary review of the inadecuacies of the LILCO's plan and exercise results as identified by FEMA and those issues pending before the ASLBs for full power operation in consideration of 25%
power and whether they are pertinent.
(ii) Assess the significance of those FEMA identified inadequacies in the event of an accident during 25% that would require offsite protective measures. Key elements for consideration are the results of Subtask I
1 assessment pertaining to: (a) Selection of accident sequences that would result in offsite doses requirino protective measures (i.e. above PAG dose levels); (b) The site of area and population
4 involved; (d) The Cominion in CLf-86-13 has determined that an ad hoc participation of State and local governments can be assumed in the event of an accident at Shnreham. The time elements in accident development and release scenarios evaluated in Subtask (1)(iii) is an important consideration in evaluating the adecuacies of preparation for those ad hoc re1ponses. -
C. SURTASK 3 - SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF PROLONGED OPERATION AT 25% P0k'Fp A review will be perfcmed to exanine the equipment and operational characteristics of protracted off-nnnnal operation of the Shoreham plant at 25% power that may have safety implications. Modifications to the plant and other compensating design features will also be evaluated to assess the potential benefit offered in support of operation at the reauested power level. This review will be as indicated below.
Subtask 3a Review all the transients end accidents as given in the SRP to assure that operation of the plant up to 25% powar will be bounded by the Chapter 15 analysis perfomed for full power. Evaluate whether any special pro-cedures or operator actions are required to mitigate transients or accidents which may occur in low power conditions. Evaluate whether the time available for the operator to take action to prevent core vulnerable states from occurring will be significantly longer than would be the case for full power. Evaluate ATWS mitigation capabilities during the low power conditions. Assess the modifications to the SLC. the ADS and the HPCI system and provide an assessment of impacts on accident mitigation.
Evaluate the corium ring for effectiveness for its intended function in the event of a severe core melt accident. The design and installatier will also be evaluated to assure its placement has net impacted the safety function of other systems. Identify control systems which are to be rut en ' Manual" rather than "Automatic" due to low power conditions. Evaluate safety implications of manual operation actions. Also assess the stability of the recirculation system, feedwater system and control system for pro-longed eperation at these inw power levels.
Subtask 3b The present desion of the onsite AC power systems will be assessed to identify the additional onsite AC power capability heyond that recuired by the Standard Review Plan. The relative effectiveness of the present AC power system will be assessed and ue likely impact this system would have on the likelihood nf station blackout will be addressed.
D. SURTASK 4 - ASSFSSMENT OF NRC REGlfLATIONS APPLICABLE TO LILCO'S REQUEST TO OPERATE SHOREHAM AT 25% POWER This assessrent will provide the legal frame work for the staff's recom-rendation to the Comission on the request. The assessment will provide the staff with guidance on the applicability of the Comission's
regulations to the LILCO request and address varinus procedural issues raised.
E.
SUBTASK 5 - REVIEW OPERATE SHOREHDi AT OF 25%OTHER POWER _ COMPELLING REASONS F This if therereview are otherwill compelling enablereasons the staff to50.47(c)(1) under make a recomendation that the LILCO's tc the request should be granted.
Shoreham at 265 power because of the need for power in the area and the dependence on foreton oil in LILCO's genarating facilities.
The staff will solicit the inputs fron DOE which has recently addressed similar by LILCO issues on anon a request unrelated by the Department of Comerce for a petition subject.
IV. PRINCIPAL NRC STAFF ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED A.
Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II. Has overall lead responsibility in managing the task and coordinating the staff efforts in the evaluation as well as inputs frm other agencies, e.g., DOE, if needed.
will be sumarized in a report to the Results of the staff evaluation Comission.
Manpower Estimate: 0.2 man-year FY 1987 P.
Risk Application Branch, Division of Radiatinn Protection and Emergency Preparedness.
and risk assessment reviews as discussed in Subtask 1.Has the re Manpower Estimate: 0.3 man-year FY 1087 C.
Emergency Preparedness Branch, Division of Radiation Protectinn and Emergency Preparedness.
Has the responsibility of performing an assessment of the scope of offsite protective neasures reouired and the adecuacy of LILCO's plan. The elements of this assessment is d,iscussed in Subtask 2.
Manpower Estinate: 0.2 man-year FY 1987 D.
Reactor Systems Branch, Mechanical Engineering Branch, Division of Engineering and System Technology. Have the responsibility ef examining any safety fr.pitcations of prolonged operation at 75%
power as discussed in Subtask 3.
Hanpower Estimate: 0.3 man-year FY 1987 E.
Electrical Systems Branch, Division of Engineering and System Tech-nology. Has the responsibility for evaluating reliability of on site eriergancy power system taking into account availability of the T01 diesels, the Colt diesels, the EMD diesels and the gas turbires, as
( described in subtask 3b.
Manpower Estimate: 0.1 man-year FY 1987
6-F. Instrumentation and Cnntrol Systens Branch, Division of Engineering and Systen Teclinology. Is responsible for providing support for Subtask 3a in assessing the stability of plant control systems and the adequacy of instrumentation for operation at 255 power.
Manpower Estimate: 0.1 man-year FY 1987 .
G. Plant Systems Branch, Division of Engineering and Systems Technology.
Has the responsibility in assessing the accident mitigatinn features of the corium ring and the relative effectiveness of this feature. ,
Hanpower Estimate: 0.1 man-year FY 1987 H. Division of Reactor Projects, Region 1. Has the responsibility of evaluating the licensee and its facility, operator training for readiness to operate at 25% power and identify any need for Tech Spec changes.
Manpower Estimate: 0.1 man-ye n FY 1987
!. Reactor Licensing Branch, Office of the General Counsel. Has the responsibility to provide guidance to the staff on regulatory and legal issues related to LILCO's request.
Manpower Estimate: 0.15 man-year FY 1987 I
i
I l l 1 l!iI i i 1jl llI l ll lIj 8
/ T 7 N 1
/
7 %
4 _
2
/
6 i
1 f 3 7
1
/ @ @ @ 5 3 1 f
L 6
0 .
1
/
6 3
/
6 8 @ @ _
7 2
/
5 R _ @ @
0 2
/
5 3
1
/
5 6
/
S 9
?
/
G' -
4 R
2 D
2
/
4
)
")
) )
) ) )
A
(
B C D E
(
F
( ( ( (
e l
u d P P I e E E e P P g C r R R e G -
S 2 D D R O k I . T . . .
s 1 B S P 8 -
a D P E R L .
T P E D D R .
~
. : '. ' . .I - . ., ' : - - ; . . * . - * *
[ .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .m.~ . . . . . . . . . . .
'A (1) Issue Task Action Pla7 (2) Reauest 00E for subtask 5 input (3) Receive DOE input (4) Start draft report (5) Complete draft report (6) Receive coments on draf t report 7)Startfinalreport -
- 8) Corplete final report
- 9) NRR approved final report .
B (1) Start sijbtask 1 Input progress to EPR (2) Coordinate with EPB a subtask 2 (31 Coordinate with DEST a subtask 3 (4) Complete draf t subtask I report (5) Review draft report complete C (Il Start subtask 2 Coordinate with RAB
(?) Complete subtask 2 inputs (3) Review draf t report complete 0 (1) Start subtask 3 Coordinate with RAB
. (2) Complete subtask 3 report inputs (3) Review draft report complete E (1) Start Dlant readiness, Tech Specs and training review Review complete, provice inputs to report or..problen areas Review draft report complete F (1) Infom Comission of Action Plan (2) Inputs to draf t report complete (3) Review draft report complete
- This schedule assumes no major iterative reviews that may become necessary as the staff review progress, "SICB, SPLB, SRIB, SELB, EMEB
I Wknd s ( \
, . t
.. \
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION -
In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL
)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
Udt1) )
AFFIDAVIT OF DR. RONNIE LO I, Dr. Ronnie Lo, being duly sworn, affirm as follows:
- 1. I am a nuclear enrineer in Project Directorate I-2. Division of Reactor Projects 1/II. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and am NRC Project Manager for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Unit 1. In that role, I am responsible for coordinating the NRC Staff review of Long ,
Island Lighting Comp any's ("LILCO") Request for Authorization to increase Power to 25% ("Request").
- 2. The Staff has prepared an action plan for the expedited review of LILCO's R equest. Such expedited consideration of the R,equest is warranted by the current state of readiness of the Shoreham plant.
- 3. A determination of plant readiness to exceed 5% power based on a scheduled program of inspections will be made at the appropriate t..ne by the Region ! Aderinistrator. However, the Staff is presently unaware of any physical plant or operating personnel deficiencies that would represent an obstacle to authorizing LILCO to operate Shoreham at power l levels up to 25%. During 1985 and 1986. LILCO completed two periods of '
,, ,. Iow-power operations. All the scheduled testing that can be accomplished i at low-power and all operator training programs have been comp!eted.
S7@f#kf!3..t..m.
The main generator was synchronized with the off-site grid to produce a small amount of commercial power for a short period in August,1986 In addithn, since the issuance of the 5% license in July 3, 1985,* the Staff and LILCO have satisfactorily resolved all the outstanding technical issues that need to be resolved prior to authorizing operations above M '>ower.
- 4. The purpose of the Staff action plan is to evaluate whes. 'r, in the Staff's view, LILCO has made a satisfactory showing under 10 C.F.R.
I 50.47(c)(1) that, notwithstanding alleged failure to meet all of the standards in 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(b),
(1) def'.ciencies in the emergency plans are not signif3 cant for the Shoreham Station, (2) adequate interim compensating measures have been or will be taken promptly, or (3) there are other compel]Ing reasons to permit plant operation.
A principal purpose of review is to determine whether the probabilities, severities, and durations of accident development for 251 power operation of Shorehm tre such that in the event of an accident involving offsite releases, appropriate regulatory findings can be made with respect to emergency planning, no' withstanding the pendency of emergency planning issues with respect to operation at 100% power.
- 5. The Staff review will be divided in four main subtasks:
(1) accident assessment for Shoreham . operating at 25% power. -
(2) assessment of offsite protective measures necessary for Shoreham operating at 251 power, (3) safety implications of prolonged operation at 25% nower, considering recent design modifications not previously relied upon in the Staff's full power review, and (4) review of the showing of
cocipelling reasons for operation of Shoreham at 25% power, notwithstand-ing any deficiencies in meeting the planning standards in 10 C.F.R.
I 50.47(b). *
- 6. Subtask (1), in summary, w!!! evaluate the following:
(a) the probabilities, relative to the Shoreham PRA analyzed for full power operation, of accident sequences that would require offsite protective measures to be taken; *
(b) for each of the sequences evaluated in (a), evaluate the dose profiles as a function of distance, and compare those dose profiles against HUREG-0396 dose probability '.ersus distance calculations for the corresponding accident sequences; (c) based on the evaluations in (a) and (b) above, with respect to full power operation, evaluate the corresponding offsite distances within which protective measures should be necessary in the event of an accident during 25% power operation; and (d) evaluato the time element in accident development and release scenarios -- i.e. , for each release category, evaluate the probabilities for needing quick offsite response, extended response, and delayed response.
- 7. The Subtask (1) evaluation W uld take into consideration differences in plant conditions arising from differences in power levels, as well as additional enhancements to plant systems and procedures not relied upon in the PRA performed for 100% power operation.
- 8. Subtesk (2) wiu evaluate the need for offsite protective measures in light of the results of dose-distance and time findings from
l
(
l 4-Subtask (1). This evaluation will focus on inadequacies found by FEMA in LILCO's offsite emergency plans and issues currently outstanding before the Licensing Board.
- 9. Subtask (3) will examine the equipment and operational characteristics of protracted off-normal operation of the Shoreham plant at 25% power that may have safety implications. Modifications to the plant and other design features not already considered in the PRA performed for 100% power operations will also be evaluated. If items of safety significance are identifled, these would be further considered in the ,
Subtask (1) accident probability evaluation.-
- 10. Subtask (4) will examine the merits of operating Shoreham at 25% power because of need for power in the LILCO service area and dependence on foreign oil in LILCO's generating fac!!!tles.
- 11. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation projects completion and approval of the foregoing evaluations by July 8,1987.
The above information is true to the best of my personal knowledge and belief.
Am Ronnie Lo Subscribed and sworn to before me this c?gd day of MW/(. 1987 b' ) s.
Notary Public My commission expires: July 1, 1990
1 ,
~
huxh -
E UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION
' I
) .
)
In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 (Emergency Planning)
)
LONG ISLAND LIOHTING ) COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
Udt1)
NRC STAFF RESPONSE HAM AT 25% OF FULL POWER TO LILCO MOTION TO AUTHORIZE OPERATION OF SH
!. INTRODUCTION _
Company (LILCO) served by Long Island Lighting On April 14. 1987 se Power to 25%" ("Request")
hand a "Request for Authorization Expedited Commission to increa Consideration" "Motion for with a together I.
("Motion") of that Request. the Motion and Request i
Athough not styled as such, the Staff v ews contemplated by 10 C.F.R.
as seeking a form of Commission license actionauthorizing low-power i
See.
I 50.57(c) -- a motion "for an operat nghort of full power operati Station, Unit testing . . . and further operations s Valley Power (Beaver Duquesne Light Company, et al. The Staff takes no position at (1976).
No.1), LBP-74-23, 3 NRC 711 ther the Commission should grant the this time on the medts as to whe t up to 25% of full power; howe request for operation of Shoreham f a as it seeks expedited considerat the Staff supports the Motion insoThe ar Ctaff has provided with its Staff of by the Commission of the Request.
schedule for expedited review by the response a proposed LILCO's Request.
II. DISCUSSION L'.100 bases its Motion for Expedited Commission Consideration on four arguments:
(1) there la 2tt!c prospect for early resolution of the full power emergency planning proceeding, now pending before two Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and the Commissions
( ', ' %ng Island has an immediate need for Shoreham's powers (3.) vg 05% powcr. the r emaining full power emergency planning issue; become insignificant (4) 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(c) provides a regulatory ba Fis for authorizing 25% power operation notwithstanding LILCO's failure to meet some aspects of 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(b).
Motion , at 1-3.
As noted above, there is both authority and precedent for the Commission to grant, upon tootion , a rt.q ue st for authorization of operation short of full power in the context of an ongoing proceeding on an application for a full power operating Ilcense. 10 C.F.R. I 50.57(c) states:
An applicant may, in a case where a hearing is held in connection with a pending proceeding under this section make a motion in writing, pursuant to this paragraph (c), for an operating license authorizing low-power testing (operation at
- not more than 1 percent of full power for the purpose of testing the facility), and further operations short of full power operation. Action on such a inotion by the presiding officer shall be taken with due regard to the rights of the parties to the proceedings, including the right of any i party to be heard to the extent that his contentions are relevant to the activity to be authorized. Prior to taking any action on such a motion which any carty opposes, the presiding
) officer shall make findings on the matters specified in paragraph (a) of this section as to which there is a controversy, in the form of an initial decision with respect to the contested activity sought to be authorf red. The Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will make findings on all other matters I
specified in paragraph (a) of this section. If no party opposes the motion, the presiding officer will issue an order pursuant to i 2.730(e) of this chapter, authorizing the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to make appropriate findings on the matters specified in paragraph (a) of this .
section and to issue a license for the requested operation.
in Beaver Valley, the Licensing Board based on applic.ints' motion and evidence developed on the record, issued a Supplemental Initial Decision authorizing operation of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit
- No.1, at up to 35 percent of full power without limitation as to time.
Beaver Valley, LBP-76-23, supra, . ./RC at 712-716, 722-723.
Under 10 C.F.R. I 50.57(c), where the motion is opposed, as the Staff anticipates this motion will be, the presiding officer must make findings on the matters spect' led in 5 50.57(a), including subparagraph (1) thereof, thct there is "reasonable asturance (1) that the activities authorized by the operating Ilcense can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the regulations in this chapter . . ." as to those matters which are in controversy. Where the I $0.57(c) motion is contested, the Commission, or such other presiding officer as may be delegated that responsibility, would be obliged , prior to granting the motion, to determine as to any emergency planning issues pending in the on-going proceeding, (1) whether such issues are relevant to operation at 25% power, and (2) if relevant, whether, notwithstanding those issues, the requisite 1 50.57(a) findings can be made with respect to activity
- sought to be authorized. ,
The "reasonable assurance" finding under I $0.57(a)(3) necessarily implies compliance with 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(a)(1). which requires with
3
~
d respect to emergency plans, "that there is reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency."
LILCO's Request and Motion do not address 150.57(a) or (c), and do not address the interrelationship of *.hese provisions with I 50.47.
LILCO has argued that "I 50.47(c) furnishes a clear regulatory basis for authori Ing Shoreham to operate at 251 power." Motion, at 2. However, 5 50.47(c)(1) expressly provides that failure of applicant to meet the standards in 1 50.47(b) need not necessarily result in denial of an operating license where the applicant can satisfactorily demonstrate that (1) deficiencies in emergency plans are not significant for the plant in question, (2) interim compensating actions have been or will be taken promptly, or (3) there are other compelling reasons to perrait plant operation. Section 50.47(c)(1) does not obviate the requirements for a finding of "reasonable assurance" under I 50.47(a)(1). LILCO appears to recognize this. See, Request, at 10. Thus, were applicant here to be able to satisfactorily demonstrate that one or more of the three I 50.47(c) findings is warranted, the Commission would still be required to make findings pursuant to I 50.47(a)(1) and I 50.57(a) and (c), prior to granting LILCO's Request.
In sum, though not expressly filed pursuant to the provisions of I 50.57(c), LILCO's Request is proper under Commission regulations, and must be considered.
LILCO's Motion for expedited consideration of its request to be allowed to operate the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station at 25% of full power should be granted. Construction of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station has
r been completeed and all necessary findings to support low power operation were made prior to issuance of the $1 license on July 3, 1985. See Attached Affidavit of Ronnie k, dated April . 1987. The, plant has not been licensed to operate at higher power levels because of on-going adjudicatory proceedings involving the sufficiency of off-site emergency planning for full power operation. LlLCO alleges that there is an immediate need to operate that plant at a lower power level pending the conclusion of the adjudicatory proceedings, it is, therefore, appropriate determine whether there is a benefit to the public in permitting operation of the plant at a 25% power level and whether such operation can be conducted under the Commis sion's regulations and in accord with the public health and safety.
The attached Affidavit of Ronnie M. NRC Project Manager for the Shoreham plant, also describes the scope and objectives of the Staff's contemplated review of the LlLCO Request, together with an anticipated earliest date of completion. The Staff is prepared to review the Request on an expedited bass. aiming at completion of the review and report to the Commission within 90 days. II therefore, the Staff supports granting of LILCO's Motion for expedited consideration of the LlLCO Request and recommends adoption of procedures consistent with the time period needed by the Staff to perform an expedited review.
~
1/ the Staff is seeking the advice of the Department of Energy on the arguments made by LILCO relating to the need for power and need to reduce dependence on foreign oil.
-c.
f III. CONCLUSION LILCO'c Request for authorization of operation at 25% of full power is properly fUed, and its consideration should be expedited on a schedule !
corisistent with the time needed for Staff review of the LILCO Request. '
LILCO's Motion to expedite should therefore be granted. ;
Respectfully submitted, George E. Johnson Counsel for NRC Staff l Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this day of April,1987 a
e i
i 4
k i
l
_ , _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ . . . __._