|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20212J9991999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Clinton,H Clinton, Chairman Jackson &/Or Wd Travers Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Plant to Ensure That Public Health & Safety Adequately Protected ML20212L1831999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Wd Travers Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Millstone to Ensure Adequate Protection to Public Health ML20212L2081999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance ML20212L2171999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners,Wd Travers & Ferc,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island ML20212L1971999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Chairman Jackson & Commissioners Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance to Ensure Public Health & Safety ML20212K1241999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected ML20112E8911996-05-24024 May 1996 FOIA Request to Inspect & Copy Original OL Issued by Aec/Nrc for Util & EPP Issued as App B to Plant OL SNRC-2192, Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank1995-05-15015 May 1995 Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank ML20082B9131995-03-13013 March 1995 Submits Corrected Page for Insertion Into Final Rept Re Confirmatory Survey of RB & Phase 4 Systems at Plant ML20081A9321995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-81, Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6531995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-80, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6841995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081B5801995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7001995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7111995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2189, Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 19941995-01-20020 January 1995 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 1994 SNRC-2188, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey1995-01-20020 January 1995 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey SNRC-2187, Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring1995-01-11011 January 1995 Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring SNRC-2182, Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning1994-11-0101 November 1994 Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning ML20077L3331994-10-25025 October 1994 Forwards Revised Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20076K3881994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny,For Review & Comment ML20077M8351994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Draft Rept, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool & Phase 2 Systems,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2184, Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld1994-10-12012 October 1994 Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld SNRC-2185, Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-10-0404 October 1994 Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20076F9251994-09-26026 September 1994 Forwards Final Rept Orise 94/I-80, Confirmatory Survey of Turbine Bldg,Site Grounds & Site Exteriors Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2183, Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-871994-09-23023 September 1994 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-87 SNRC-2181, Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 11994-09-14014 September 1994 Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 1 SNRC-2180, Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-021994-09-0101 September 1994 Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-02 SNRC-2179, Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl SNRC-2178, Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4))1994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4)) ML20072P1591994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Revised, Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Bldg & Suppression Pool for Plant SNRC-2176, Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-821994-08-0404 August 1994 Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-82 SNRC-2177, Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld1994-08-0404 August 1994 Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld ML20071L8741994-07-29029 July 1994 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Building & Suppression Pool for Review & Comment SNRC-2175, Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively1994-07-18018 July 1994 Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively SNRC-2173, Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-06-14014 June 1994 Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) SNRC-2172, Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-821994-06-0707 June 1994 Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-82 SNRC-2171, Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel1994-06-0202 June 1994 Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel SNRC-2170, Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan1994-05-20020 May 1994 Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan SNRC-2168, Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc1994-05-13013 May 1994 Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc SNRC-2169, Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project1994-05-11011 May 1994 Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project ML20029E1731994-05-11011 May 1994 Informs That Based on Recent Discussions Between Officials, Licensee Decided to Retain Organizational Position at Least Until Fuel Removed from Site ML20029D1991994-04-29029 April 1994 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993. ML20029D2571994-04-28028 April 1994 Advises That Jc Brons Resigned to Pursue Employment W/ Another Util Co,Effective 940429 ML20029C7111994-04-22022 April 1994 Submits Technical Info on Biological Shield Wall Blocks to Be Surveyed SNRC-2163, Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util1994-04-21021 April 1994 Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util ML20065M3701994-04-20020 April 1994 Responds to NRC Verbal Request for Info Re Estimated Cost for Decommissioning SNRC-2161, Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station SNRC-2160, Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b)1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b) SNRC-2148, Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases1994-03-0808 March 1994 Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases 1999-10-01
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20112E8911996-05-24024 May 1996 FOIA Request to Inspect & Copy Original OL Issued by Aec/Nrc for Util & EPP Issued as App B to Plant OL SNRC-2192, Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank1995-05-15015 May 1995 Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank ML20082B9131995-03-13013 March 1995 Submits Corrected Page for Insertion Into Final Rept Re Confirmatory Survey of RB & Phase 4 Systems at Plant ML20081A9321995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-81, Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6531995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-80, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081B5801995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6841995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7111995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7001995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2188, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey1995-01-20020 January 1995 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey SNRC-2189, Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 19941995-01-20020 January 1995 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 1994 SNRC-2187, Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring1995-01-11011 January 1995 Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring SNRC-2182, Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning1994-11-0101 November 1994 Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning ML20077L3331994-10-25025 October 1994 Forwards Revised Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20077M8351994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Draft Rept, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool & Phase 2 Systems,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20076K3881994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny,For Review & Comment SNRC-2184, Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld1994-10-12012 October 1994 Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld SNRC-2185, Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-10-0404 October 1994 Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20076F9251994-09-26026 September 1994 Forwards Final Rept Orise 94/I-80, Confirmatory Survey of Turbine Bldg,Site Grounds & Site Exteriors Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2183, Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-871994-09-23023 September 1994 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-87 SNRC-2181, Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 11994-09-14014 September 1994 Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 1 SNRC-2180, Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-021994-09-0101 September 1994 Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-02 SNRC-2179, Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20072P1591994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Revised, Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Bldg & Suppression Pool for Plant SNRC-2178, Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4))1994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4)) SNRC-2176, Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-821994-08-0404 August 1994 Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-82 SNRC-2177, Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld1994-08-0404 August 1994 Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld ML20071L8741994-07-29029 July 1994 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Building & Suppression Pool for Review & Comment SNRC-2175, Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively1994-07-18018 July 1994 Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively SNRC-2173, Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-06-14014 June 1994 Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) SNRC-2172, Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-821994-06-0707 June 1994 Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-82 SNRC-2171, Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel1994-06-0202 June 1994 Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel SNRC-2170, Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan1994-05-20020 May 1994 Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan SNRC-2168, Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc1994-05-13013 May 1994 Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc SNRC-2169, Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project1994-05-11011 May 1994 Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project ML20029E1731994-05-11011 May 1994 Informs That Based on Recent Discussions Between Officials, Licensee Decided to Retain Organizational Position at Least Until Fuel Removed from Site ML20029D1991994-04-29029 April 1994 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993. ML20029D2571994-04-28028 April 1994 Advises That Jc Brons Resigned to Pursue Employment W/ Another Util Co,Effective 940429 ML20029C7111994-04-22022 April 1994 Submits Technical Info on Biological Shield Wall Blocks to Be Surveyed SNRC-2163, Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util1994-04-21021 April 1994 Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util ML20065M3701994-04-20020 April 1994 Responds to NRC Verbal Request for Info Re Estimated Cost for Decommissioning SNRC-2160, Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b)1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b) SNRC-2161, Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station SNRC-2148, Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases1994-03-0808 March 1994 Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases SNRC-2145, Provides Comments Prepared by Util on Draft NUREG/CR-5849, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination1994-03-0808 March 1994 Provides Comments Prepared by Util on Draft NUREG/CR-5849, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination SNRC-2157, Forwards 1993 Rept of Personnel & Man-Rem by Work & Job Function. 1993 Personnel Exposures Extremely Low as Majority of Radioactivity Removed from Site1994-02-28028 February 1994 Forwards 1993 Rept of Personnel & Man-Rem by Work & Job Function. 1993 Personnel Exposures Extremely Low as Majority of Radioactivity Removed from Site SNRC-2158, Submits Notification of Pending Change to Decommissioning Plan Submitted 901229.Safety Evaluation for Change Encl1994-02-28028 February 1994 Submits Notification of Pending Change to Decommissioning Plan Submitted 901229.Safety Evaluation for Change Encl SNRC-2156, Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1993. Latest Revised Copies of Offsite Dose Calculation Manual & Process Control Program Also Encl as Apps to Rept1994-02-25025 February 1994 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1993. Latest Revised Copies of Offsite Dose Calculation Manual & Process Control Program Also Encl as Apps to Rept ML20067C9271994-02-22022 February 1994 Forwards Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data for Period of Jul-Dec 1993 SNRC-2144, Forwards Vols 1-4 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept. Twenty Proprietary Pages of Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-02-0404 February 1994 Forwards Vols 1-4 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept. Twenty Proprietary Pages of Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) 1996-05-24
[Table view] Category:LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20043B4951990-05-0707 May 1990 Requests Voluntary Suspension of Effectiveness of Prospective NRC Administrative Actions to Modify Util Security Plan to Discontinue Local Offsite Emergency Response Measures,Pending Us Court of Appeals Action ML20044A1021990-05-0303 May 1990 FOIA Request for SECY-89-247 on Proposed Action Re Shoreham & Documents Referred to in SECY-89-247 ML20011D5421989-12-11011 December 1989 Forwards Signature Page of Util 891208 Request for Exemption from Primary Containment Leak Rate Testing Requirements,Per 10CFR50.54(o) & App J,Paragraphs III.D.1 Through III.D.3 ML19353B1041989-12-0808 December 1989 Forwards Request for Exemption from Primary Containment Leak Rate Testing Requirements of 10CFR50.54(o) & App J,III.D.1 Through III.D.3 ML19325D6171989-10-0404 October 1989 Forwards Handwritten Changes Made to Pages 83-86 of 890928 Upper Mgt Conference Between NRC & Long Island Lighting Co ML20247B8111989-09-0808 September 1989 Forwards Util Renewed Request for Exemption from Onsite Property Damage Insurance Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w). WE Steiger Affidavit Also Encl ML20247H9621989-07-21021 July 1989 Requests Immediate Reconsideration of 890720 Preliminary Review of Shoreham-Wading River Central School District 10CFR2.206 Request to Prevent Further Deterioration of Valuable Electric Resource ML20247L3181989-07-19019 July 1989 Suppls Shoreham-Wading River Central School District 890714 Request Re Margin of Safety Provided by Placement of Fuel in Spent Fuel Pool at Facility ML20245G8851989-04-21021 April 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Decommissioning of Facility, Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants in General & 890413 Testimony of DOE Opposition to Decommissioning of Plant Before Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources ML20245D3421989-03-20020 March 1989 Forwards Listed Endorsements,Including Endorsements 14,163, 144,94,75,39 & 31 to Nelia Policies NF-295,NF-100,MAELU Policy MF-29,NELIA Policy NF-182,MAELU Policy MF-61,NELIA Policy NF-281 & Maelu Policy MF-112,respectively ML20247N5371989-03-0202 March 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Emergency Plan Dtd Sept 1988 or Later ML20246P1331989-02-21021 February 1989 Urges That 100% License Be Issued for Plant.Long Island Has Vital & Current Need for Addl Electrical Need Which Only Plant Can Satisfy.Economy of Long Island in Serious Jeopardy Unless License for Plant Promtly Issued ML20196F6551988-12-0202 December 1988 Forwards Corrected Cover Page to Lilco Answer to Intervenors Brief on School Bus Driver Role Conflict & Emergency Broadcast Sys, ML20195K0001988-11-17017 November 1988 FOIA Request for Records Re 881109 Decision to Certify to Commission Appeal of OL-3 Decision to Dismiss Govts in Licensing Proceeding ML20154P9791988-09-27027 September 1988 Advises That Listed Individuals Representing Suffolk County, State of Ny & Town of Southampton Should Remain on All Svc Lists & Continue to Receive Correspondence Re Plant.Svc List Encl ML20151C5151988-07-18018 July 1988 Advises That Witnesses Will Have to Appear in Order of F Jones,Regan Sheppard & Davidoff at Hearing Tomorrow Due to Presence of Sheppard ML20150A9621988-07-0505 July 1988 Forwards Endorsements 30 & 21 to Nelia Policy NF-269 & Maelu Policy MF-115,respectively ML20153H3361988-06-23023 June 1988 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Requests That NRC Response Be as Detailed as Possible in Order to Better Enable Client to Determine Need for Further Legal Action ML20151C7141988-05-23023 May 1988 FOIA Request for Documents Re FEMA Graded Exercise on Adequacy of Radiological Emergency Response Planning & Preparedness for Plant & Rev 9 to Licensee Emergency Plan for Plant Including FEMA Review of Subj Plan ML20154H7101988-05-17017 May 1988 Forwards Emergency Planning Contentions Re 860213 Exercise, Inadvertently Omitted from Govt Brief in Response to NRC Staff Brief Supporting Lilco Appeal from LBP-88-2 ML20154B5851988-05-10010 May 1988 Clarifies Matter on Hearing Schedule Issue & Forwards Three Ltrs Bearing on Parties Scheduling Efforts.Matters Will Be Addressed During Conference ML20154B4771988-05-0606 May 1988 Corrects Error Noted in Util Suppl to Lilco Response to Govts 880413 Objection & Motion in Alternative to Compel Discovery. Changes Listed ML20151P0711988-04-20020 April 1988 Discusses Board 880413 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Govts Motion for Reconsideration of Board Memorandum & Order on Section 50.47(c)(1)(i)(ii) Compliance).Govts Neither Seek Further Reconsideration Nor Agree W/Views Expressed ML20148K1111988-03-22022 March 1988 Forwards Listed Endorsements to Listed Policies,Including Endorsement 102 to Maelu Policy MF-26,Endorsement 123 to Nelia Policy NF-76,Endorsement 71 to Maelu Policy MF-56 & Endorsement 89 to Nelia Policy NF-189 ML20153H4101988-03-16016 March 1988 Confirms Content of 880303 Telcon Re Numbered Paragraph 2 of FOIA Request 88-63.Paragraph Clarified to Read as Stated. NRC Response to Request Due on 880317.Task Action Plan for Evaluation of Request to Operate Plant at 25% Power Encl ML20149K9101988-02-19019 February 1988 Comments on Util Motion for Discovery Cutoff & for Summary Termination of Witness Designations & Ltr from Util Attys Re New York Court of Appeals Decision in Cuomo Vs Lilco. Suffolk County Disagrees W/Allegations Re Purposeful Delay ML20149F1961988-02-0505 February 1988 Ack Receipt of ASLB 880201 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Applicant Motion of 871208 for Summary Disposition of Hosp Evacuation Issue).Aslb Must Follow Rules to Avoid Waste of Resources Caused by Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151D6591988-01-27027 January 1988 FOIA Request for All Records Including Preparatory Matls & Contemporaneous Notes & Info Submitted by Util Re 880114 Meeting Involving NRC & Util Concerning Facility ML20149F1741988-01-22022 January 1988 Discusses Concerns Re NRC 880114 Secret Meeting W/Util in Which NRC Refuses to Prepare Written Summary Describing Discussion of Meeting.Preparation of Complete Record of Meeting Requested ML20148J1361988-01-20020 January 1988 Advises That Affidavits of Fr Jones,Gj Blass,Fp Petrone & Fg Palomino Filed on 880119 W/Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton Response in Opposition to Lilco Motion. Encl Original Signature Pages Being Filed Today ML20147B9731988-01-12012 January 1988 Forwards Emergency Planning Contention Re Lilcos New Emergency Broadcast Sys Proposal.Three Comments on Contention Listed ML20234B9791987-12-30030 December 1987 Requests That Util 871218 Request for Full Participation Exercise Be Denied.Request Grossly Premature Since Many Inadequacies in Rev 8 to Plan Remain & Upcoming Rev 9 to Plan Requires Thorough Rac Review ML20238D0891987-12-29029 December 1987 Requests Verbatim Transcript Be Kept of All Conference Calls Re Hearing Argument & Reaching Expedited Decision on Govts Motion ML20238D0721987-12-28028 December 1987 Opposes Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Lilco Seven Realism Summary Disposition Motions.Requests Opportunity to Provide Views Prior to ASLB Final Ruling on Govt Extension Motion ML20237E5391987-12-18018 December 1987 Forwards Motions for Summary Disposition of Legal Authority Issues & Contentions EP 1-2 & 4-10.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236F0071987-10-27027 October 1987 Advises That Commission Actions Have Fouled Emergency Planning Rulemaking & Requests That Commission Either Reject & Disregard Ltrs by Members of Congress or Commence Fresh Rulemaking & Afford Public Opportunity to Comment ML20235Y4291987-10-15015 October 1987 Requests That Studies Relied Upon in Proposed Rule Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Participate in Offsite Emergency Planning Be Published & That Comment Period Be Reopened ML20235X5841987-10-0707 October 1987 Notifies of Minor Typo in Govt Opposition to Lilco Motion for Certification to Commission,Served on Board & Parties on 871001.Word Not Should Be Deleted from Line Next to Last Line of Page 5 of Opposition ML20214U7081987-06-0202 June 1987 Forwards Endorsements 25 & 16 to Nelia Policy NF-269 & Maelu Policy MF-115,respectively ML20245B8191987-05-29029 May 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Application for & NRC Denial of License for Low Power Testing,Emergency Backup Power Source & Use of Transamerica Delaval Generators at Any Other Nuclear Facility Including All Production ML20214N2281987-05-22022 May 1987 Advises That Util 870512 Request That NRC Distribute Util Reply to Intervenor Opposition to Expedited Consideration of 25% Power Request Should Be Rejected Due to Being Unauthorized Pleading Not Permitted by NRC Regulations ML20215M0031987-05-0707 May 1987 Forwards Motion to Limit cross-examination of State of Ny & Suffolk County,Inadvertently Omitted on 870505.W/o Motion. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206T1851987-04-13013 April 1987 Forwards Transcripts of Direct Testimonies Re Lilco Reception Ctrs & Motion Requesting Board to Reschedule Commencement of Hearing of Reception Ctr Issues Until Ongoing Litigation Completed.Related Correspondence ML20206H2231987-04-0707 April 1987 Forwards Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton Motion for Conference of Counsel.Motion Constitutes Interim Response to Util 870320 Summary Disposition Motion on Legal Authority Issues Re Contentions 1-10 ML20205R8341987-04-0202 April 1987 Requests Addl Info Re Lilco Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App E.Expresses Dissatisfaction at NRC Ignoring Author Ltrs While Replying to Util Ltrs on Same Subj ML20212J5691987-03-0303 March 1987 Responds to Util Seeking to Rationalize Plea That NRC Grant Section 50.12 Exemption from 1 Yr Exercise Requirement.Nrr Does Not Have Jurisdiction to Make Factual Findings Re Exemption Request ML20212D4361987-02-27027 February 1987 Forwards Direct Testimonies of Rc Roberts,Ej Michel,R Dormer,P Mcguire,D Harris,M Mayer & Gc Minor Re 860213 Emergency Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20211E8711987-02-19019 February 1987 Responds to H Brown Re Util 870122 Request for Waiver of 10CFR50,App E Provision Concerning Emergency Planning Exercises.Issuance of Exemption Recommended. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20235B2741987-02-19019 February 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Indicated on Encl Docket Sheets. Request Does Not Encompass Matl Already Available in PDR or Lpdr Denoted by Three or Four Asterisks on List ML20210F3341987-02-0606 February 1987 Informs That NRR Lacks Jurisdiction to Consider Lilco Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App E,Dtd 870122.Filing Must Be Returned to Lilco W/Instructions for Proper Filing Either W/Commission or Presiding Licensing Board 1990-05-07
[Table view] |
Text
.__ _ ___ - - _._ _ _ _ _ _. - _ .._- - - . - - - - - .- - - . _ - . - .
_ ppgg,ggg
'I. ' MM '3 '90.17:21 F ROM ' O. L . A. (JASH I NGTON DC
. .) ,
F .
- DOW LOHNES4 AISERTSON tes.m o iNoWo1Ne pgfw ' '
g.. =
fr _d/,ms' & -
PFL - p~,,ge-'y%. ,-
,,0
.. w -
. J ign,h ... is.. twcm.rmo evasst ...n..
. .,.. ..e. .
gg,,
nar .
,,.4
,E5h .
m......,...... --: -C,,-
u .
s g.,g, m ...a.....
. 9? t
,7 ny W
b'.E r*
h' E *Nf4lF
E ,W - W.',.'3ll
=c. gg g.
~
@.g;a J.
!
. .e-g,e.w
'n:u..
- * ' - - g,*ts E[.p" .. 191m g% (202) 857-2929
""" E ~' " E E*
. g4L, $$ =
e- - '
May 3, 1990 f b h= .g.EL,,- E- .~
E. ntfa
- *:=. W m,.
6.,*--
..'*J.,., gg.,, ,0 ,,,, ,,,,
VIA.TRLEcoPY FREEDOM Of INFORMATION Nr. Donnie H. Grinsley ACT REQUEST Director .
L on Divisaon of Freedom of Information d
""1 V 0 and Publications services J office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory commission h [-h -h ;
L Washington, 0.c. ac555 Oog62g0gJa9005 raannom or m oannTrou not asquman MCCRANE90-206 PDR Deer Mr. Grimeleyl I hereby Pursuant to 10 c.F.R. I 9 23(b) (1989 request one. (1) copy of (a) $ECY-89-247 relating),to propo l
actions regarding the shoreham Nuolear Power station 25, 1989, and which~is-(b) the probably related vote dated sheete, between July 1, 1989 end August (c)'documente referr l 247'which have not yet been pieced in the Public Document Room, and (d) 500-5285.
nrrmlT To ny rnEA L
I do not'believe that the search for the requested :
J records of 100 pages shouldand, exceed therefore, two hours I do ornotthat believethe records that there are will in excess' be i any charge for the requested search However, and records, if there are pursuant fees totobe 10 l C.F.R. I 9.39(b)&(c)dicate (1949). my willingness to pay such fees in I hereby in charged,ith accord w 10 c.F.R. 5 9.40(a) (1989) so that the search for the ,
records and their release may proceed as' expeditiously se
]
possible. iss>e m un... ewt u ne cam 1 w..,. w . . m . ev .i.am ent i*vmf. GA.'vema.s o f f se 8N.etre.mA4Ms. l'ae d48'
.. aN Ytet, A gy r9#4199{t 1644 maesital it.a .e p4444 Arn.Am' ..eetia 3464e344 ft.4Pm048 47i4i s494464 j it6t**eefs#Jfs$a03 00 ftsteo+4m it hel f 664'.,
. ithsenget ie6.. seg4ees 186150D ta it'pi st+ B433 46t44eJaiseditoseet. fista tru.S
,,m ,...
- i.. 6, %&,g, ..10m oc 1
. , s u, oonni. n. oriaster '
May 3 1990 Page$
amounaf FOR FEB WATVaR e
It fees would otherwise be charged, I aise request waiver or reduction of the fees, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 5 9.41 (1949), on the basis that the records will be used to further the public understanding of the Commission's actions in connectlen with shoreham and to aid the participation of the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District (which is e state created and Scientiistis and Engineers for Secure Energy Inc.
entity)is (which a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organisation) in partleipation in proceedings related to the Shoreham Plant. It is diffleult to describe precisely the likely impact on the public understanding of the subject without seeing the records themselvest however, The their avellability vill surely improve public understanding.
public effected hora are all of the people of Long Island who would benefit from the supply electricity from shoreham and whose electric supply and reliability may be damaged by the absence of the Shoreham Plant. The intended asens for dissemination to the general public includes the turnishing of the records to NRC Licensing Boards and the Federal Courts considering various l proceedings on the. question of whether Shoreham should be l decommiss:.oned. Public access Theretoisthe no information commercial would or private be ;
provided free of charge.
interest which I, the Boh901 Distriot, or SEg have in those ,
records.
gacouns aoT rwxxpr l
I do not believe that the requested' records are exempt from public disclosure Jursuant to 10 C.F.R. I 917(4) l (1989). Itoalso available suggett that these records should be made the publio in accordance with the memorandum from samuel 3. chilk, secretary, to the commissioners on the Subjects l "Public Release of Staff Requirements, Memoranda, Commissioner's i Votes, and SEcY pay,ers# dated December 13, 1939, because more than ten (10) days have passed since the related SRN was issued (August 25, 1989) and placed in the Public Document Room (September 20, 1989). I NEED Pom BYPRb1T10N civen tne cross of matters before the NRC and lapending .
l litigation in Federal court, it is respectfully requested that j the release of the ruquested records.be expedited by telecopy to )
se et (202) 857-2757.
1 l
,.s a -- , , , . , . . . . . . , - , - - . _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - . - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WASHINGTON DC PAGE.883
=- - MAy: 3 '98_17110 FROM t'.L.R.
l! ' Mr. Donnie M. Grimsley l- May 3 1990' v.v.i cenenIMInTIoWp If any sinrification or additional information is required, please oa)1 me at (302) 857-2929. ,
With many thanks for your attention to this matter, I-i ta, si erely , _,
.- , ew ts mes-V. McGranary, .
JPNtjab 001 Joseph F. Scinto, Esq.
Steven F. Crockett, Esq.
u 9
l 1
~ ~
,y. s , .
' NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE-
[.T .. .
f%
+
)
l August- 14. 1989 l l$ SECY-89-247 For: The Commissio(nersNotation Vote) .
From: James M. Taylor L
Acting D.ecutive Director for Operations
?
Subject:
- SHOREHAM STATUS AND DEVELOPMENTS l_
Purpose:
To inform the Commission of the current status of activities
! at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, in accordance with I an April 21,1969 SRM and to inform the Commission of l certain procedural issues raised in connection with the' ;
i current activities and proposed staff positions concerning these matters.
l Discussion: Haterial Developrients Regarding the Agreement Between LILCO and New York State l ' ' The LILCO shareholders' vote on June 28, 1989 approved the l settlement agreement that would transfer Shoreham to Long l Island Power Authority for decommissioning. The shareholders' l approval was the last action, except for NRC approval _of a
!=
license transfer, needed to complete the sale of Shoreham to New York State.
Plant Status LILCO is proceeding with plans to establish a'" minimum posture" censistent with the terms of the settlement agreement which prohibits further operation of the Shoreham facility.
l
' ~
Defueling activities began on June 30, 1989. The vessel head was detensioned and removed on July 8,1989. Fuel movement began on July 13, 1989. Defueling was completed on August 9, 1989. The reactor vessel will be reassembled and normal water level will be restored as the next activity.
Contact:
Stewart' Brown, NRR af-21444 NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 4%psm -
L, s W 99mn - -
$ s g, M Y
- - ~ . , . . - - - . _ _ . ..- - -
I. *~.'
e ,
o . .
Meetings With LILC0 l
l On June 30 and July 28, 1989, at public meetings. held at' '
the request of the NRC staff, LILCO briefed the staff on its defueling activities and its plans to prepare the. '
4 Shoreham facility for transfer to New York State under its .
agreement.
LILCO emphasized that-it intended to comply with-the-requirements of.its full-power license and the Comission's regulations and that it would submit requests for NRC l approval in accordance with Comission regulations that .I required such approval. LILCO discussed its plans to adopt.
a " minimum posture" consisting mainly of defueling the reactor, reducing staff, and discontinuing customary maintenance for systems considered unnecessary to support operation with all the fuel placed in the spent feel pool. ~
' Defueling of the reactor vessel is an activity permissible H under a reactor operating license, and defueling at '
Shoreham p. resents no safety concern.
LILC0 emphasized that under the agreement LILCO did not plan to decomission the Shoreham facility but to turn the -
("n I facility over to New York State and that the decision on what to do with the plant thereaf ter will be up to New York State.
The staff pointed out that LILCO presently possessed a full-power operating license from the NRC and LILCO-was expected to comply with all conditions of the license and Comission regulations, and that any changes in those .)
requirements would require NRC approval'in accordance with a NRC regulations. LILCO was also to comply with all '
provisions of the FSAR and if it intended to change those ,
provisions, LILCO was obliged to follow the process set forth in 10.CFR 50.59. LILCO asserted'that it recognized ;
its responsibility to follow the 50.59 process and acknowledged ;
its comitment to-NRC to provide a description of the l process it had followed in evaluating the proposed " minimum posture"' condition.- The staff will review whether LILC0 has followed the' required process steps. The staff indicated that the approach outlined does not give the staff near-term concerns--but that it was not clear that in the longer term the posture LILCO outlined would be satisfactory.
At the meeting, the staff took a firm position that even though there was not a specific technical specification governing operability or surveillance of particular systems in the shutdown mode, it was not acceptable to us to permit the plant condition to deteriorate. We indicated that we l'
u i
i.
- ~ , , -
~ '
l would not accept "de facto" decomissioning. 'LILC0 assured I
us that it did not intend to permit the condition of plant systems, including "non-safety" systems, to deterjorate.
Another important point that came up during the discussions was the reduction in staffing at the plant. LILC0 indicated l- it was in the process of reducing operating staff from 356
- to 269 and support staff from some 230 to about 180 (not l including training staff).- LILC0 indicated that it believed it could accomplish much of this reduction under its present license and Technical Specifications as they applied to the-current shutdown condition.-.To the extent that staff reduction entailed modification of license requirements, LILC0 would l request license amendments from the NRC before such reductions were permitted. Although LILCO asserted that it would ensure adequate staffing to conform to the requirements of the license for the shutdown condition, staffing would be below .
that needed to permit the plant to return to an operating '
or standby mode.
LILCO asserted that it would continue to have significant staff at the facility and would be bud eting some $45 to
( $55 million for the Shoreham facility or the coming year.
A copy of the transcript of the July 28, 1989 meeting is enclosed.
Procedural Questionss Although LILCO's plans would appear to be adequate to ensure adequate facility safety in the defueled condition, the plans raise novel procedural questions-involving the start of decommissioning. Under Comission regulations, a decomissioning plan must be authorized by NRC. _ The approval ,
of decomissioning requires an environmental assessment- ,
L and, in this case, may well require an environmental impact statement. If a prior hearing is held, it would require completion of the hearing process before decomissioning canbeauthorized(orauthorizedinconnectionwiththe hearingprocess),
u Comission regulations do not define the Wht at which decomissioning starts. However, basic NE)A law imposes some constraint: The Comission cannot permit NEPA i
evaluation requirements to be circumvented by segmentation of a major action with significant impacts and authorizing the segments the NEPA ndividually review before (or without) of decomis'sioning. Thus, thecompleting question of when "decomissiocing" starts becomes very important.
'{-
m 4
4
~ -
+
. It might be arped that any reduction from a condition of. - -
" fully ready to operate" with the intent of not returning
- to operation, is the comencement of decomissioning. .But this would require that a plant be kept at full ready j
fA,(fully staffed, fullyisoperable.
ntil decomissioning approved. How andwould fully. this surveillanced) apply to
~ a situation in which it was unclear whether the plant would i be returned to operation, a situation that existed for some period at Dresden 1 and currently exists at. Rancho Seco?
The other end of the spectrum might also be argued: that ;
decomissioning does not comence while the licensee carries -
out activities not prohibited by-the operating license, and conforms to the minimum requirements of the operating ,
. license and Comission regulations (including the requirements-of safety 10 CFR for the50.59 plant mode and 50.71),i.e.,
( adequate safety in aand defueledcondition). f The staff intends to follow a middle ground, permitting the plant to be put into a " caretaker" non-degraded status .
while adequate decomissioning plans are developed and are being reviewed by the NRC. Such status would require that:
(1) All systems required for safety in the defueled mode are maintained in fully operable status. ,
(2) All systems required for full-power operation of the facility are'to be preserved from degradation, with such maintenance or custodial services-and appropriate documentation-as may be necessary to ensure such q preservation.
(3) There shall be an-adequate number of properly trained staff to ensure plant safety in the defueled state, ircluding the ability to' cope with malfunctions, accidents, and unforeseen events.
With assurance that the plant is preserved as a physical entity capable of being returned to service without untoward resourceexpenditure-(similartotheeffortneededto the
- returnaplanttoserviceafterenextendedoutage)le staff believes that this provides a reasonable midd groundpermittingsomereductioninexpenditurefromthe fully ready to operate" condition while not permitting the licensee to de facto decomissIon the facility (take irretrievable actions or permit irretrievable degradation; for example, action or degradation which is very difficult to undo) without NRC approval of the decomissioning plan, i
} ..
t 5-Even if the physical facility were preserved it would take l, someextendedperiodoftimetoreturntheplantto operation after the loss of the full complement oY licensed operators. Nonetheless, the staff does not believe that tie loss of.the licensed operator staff should be treated as the equivalent of de facto decomissioning. Provided ',
.there is an adequate number of pro >erly trained staff to ensure safety of the facility in tie defueled condition, the staff does not intend to require that additional staff sufficient to operate the plant at full power be maintained while the decomissioning plan is under development and under NRC review and approval.
The staff will continue-to monitor and evaluate the licensee's activities on an ongoing-basis and if necessary will take appropriate action to ensure plant safety and to ensure that the facility is preserved pendin t
NRC review of decomissioning plans.The g the develogment staff pians to- and meet with LILCO again in about a month.
_10 CFR 2.206 Request em, On July 14, 1989, the Shoreham-Wading River School District filed a request, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, that the staff institute a proceeding to require LILCO to cease the J '
defueling and destaffing of the. facility. On July 20, 1989, the staff denied the request for an imediately effective cease and desist order. This 2.206 request was
- supplemented by letters dated July 19, July 21, July 26, l
and July 31, 1989. In the July 26, 1989 su Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy.ppler.ent.Inc. joined with the school district in the 10 CFR 2.206 request. The staff is reviewing these requests. On August 4, 1989, the Long Island Association filed a petition to suspend LILCO's minimum posture activities.
DOE Letter On July 27, 1989 wrote to Chairman,Carr Admiral Watkins,support expressing Secretary for of theEnergy, issuance of an imediately effective order prohibiting LILCO from taking-defueling and destaffing actions. This, in effect, would halt LILCO's present course of action for Shoreham
" until-NRC permission is sought and granted. In the July 27th letter, Admiral Watkins also urged that a prior hearing be held, in connection with LILCO's proposed transfer-of the shoreham facility. The staff will be drafting an appropriate response.
o d-w-rw w- e
\i l Procedural Status-roceeding l
There relating is to presently decomi!ending sioningno or adjudicatory transfer of !he Shoreliam !
- facility. Thus, the separation of functions restrictions l L are not applicable at this time. However, there is little L doubt that this matter will involve hearing requests and
,. litigation in connection with any application that may be l-filed requesting such authority, l
' In this connection it should be noted that the portions of this paper discussing procedural questions may qualify for withholding under 10 CFR Part 9.- Accordingly the staff-recomends that the paper not be made public at this time. i If a request for disclosure is submitted, a redacted !
version will be prepared.
Sumary: 1. NRC approval is required before the facility is )
transferred or decomissioned and before any modifica-tion of license requirements. Before approvin missioningtheNRCwouldofferanopportunity<q_decom- or .
hearing and would prepare as EIS. Before any other transfer is authorized NRC would offer an opportunity for hearing and review safety and environmental _ issues.
The nature and extent of such review would depend on the purpose of the transfer (e.g., decomissioning, other). Before ap mothballing, of specific license conditions, theproving NRC staffmodifications would
_ offer an opportunity for hearing. Depending on its safety significance, the proposed change in license conditions may involve "no significant hazards con-siderations."
- 2. Pending NRC approval of decomissioning, the staff ,
will require all systems needed for safety in the defueled mode be maintained in fully operable status and that all systems required for full power operation are to be preserved from degradation.
l 3. Pending NRC approval of decomissioning, the licensee L
should maintain an adequate number of properly trained staff to ensure. safety in the defueled state and to cope with malfunctions, accidents and unforeseen events. 1 h
L
-- - '- ^
f, ,
- , ; * *, _ * -l
^ j i 7 I
Recomendations: Unless the Comission otherwise directs within 10 days from the date of this paper:
- 1. The staff positions outlined above will be reflected in public materials prepared by the staff, including meetings with the licensee and others, correspondence and in preparing responses to 2.206 petitions.
- 2. The paper will be withheld from public disclosure at this time.
J l -
mes M. Tay r Acting Executive Director for Operations knclosure:
Transcript )
l
(
Commissioners' comments or consent should be provided directly to the Office of the Secretary by COB ~ Tuesday, August 29, 1989.
~
' Commission Staff Office comments, if any, should be' submitted to the Commissioners NLT Tuesday, August 15, 1989, with an information copy to the Office of.tha Socretary. If the paper
.is of such'a-nature that it requires additional time for analytical review and comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be-apprised of when comments may-be expected.
SECT NOTE: We have issued this paper as a notation vote per i the request of Commissioner Roberts.- '
DISTRIBUTION:
Commissioners OGC I
OIG REGION I & V EDO SECY
- - i i,
- - - ,,-