ML20128L220
| ML20128L220 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 06/27/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128L200 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-08043, TAC-08095, TAC-49076, TAC-49077, TAC-8043, TAC-8095, NUDOCS 8507240369 | |
| Download: ML20128L220 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES
.y g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
0l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
$g*****;/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS N05.109 AND 47 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES NOS. DPR-57 AND NPF-5 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY OGLETEPTTORT'CURPWATION MUNICIPAL ELEGIRIC AUTHORITY OF GEORGIA CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKETS NOS. 50-321 AND 50-366
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The licensee has requested by letters dated July 9, 1982, October 24 and December 20, 1983, and April 24, 1984, changes to the Technical Specifications for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
We have reviewed those changes to Section 6 for Units 1 and 2.
A brief description of the changes and our evaluation follows:
2.0 EVALUATION 1.
Corporate Reorganization - The licensee has established under the_
Executive Vice President-Power Supply, a Senior Vice President-Nuclear Power who will be responsible for all Georgia Power Company (GPC) nuclear generating plants. Reporting to the Senior Vice President-Nuclear Power will be a Vice President and General Manager-Nuclear Operations who has reporting to him a Manager-Nuclear Chemistry and Health Physics, a Manager-Nuclear Training, a Manager-Nuclear Generation, and a Manager-Nuclear Engineering and Chief Nuclear Engineer.
Reporting to the Executive Vice President-Power Supply is a General Manager-Quality Assurance and Radiological Health and Safety who establishes GPC policy and programs in these areas. The Vice.,.
President-Engineering and Construction Services, who also reports to the Executive Vice President-Power Supply, provides engineering support..fo.e plant additions or modifications. The Safety Review Board also reports to the Executive Vice President-Power Supply. Technical support for the Hatch Station is still supplied by the Southern Company Service in engineering disciplines and for the nuclear fuel.
l This organization structure is shown in a revised Figure 6.2.1-1.
f l;.
8507240369 850627 PDR ADOCK 05000321 P
pm
L i,
i
. _ i::
r.....:<w
. a.-
u-
.u.,
-s j
e,-Jb.
2==.
5.
~
. - ; u ;-,
- t. ' w w.: t
=L.
-g-n rn
- - 0 L., a = -3 E
- - t. ;
t= ;.. e UO-in n :::
e. d:-
l
-C b=~. -
4
=e
.cM
-J.. ' '-
s - %.,
-y 4
- i.., 7..
-- - g "5 l' C mr
' GEE 58*
~
i v.
~
a l
l I
w-x
.m u.. s >
,- h:-
r Eght 5"EG
=
o W=5 w
2.mEd 55
-tW5 G
v
- x
-<w s3
.weo ee a=
gM ss3 55 7*5 a8 T
4 Nw d G.g YuYE;
~;5
~De
~5 c
L-a -
A.C.C 4 P
M
-- 6--
TE== _ %
is - m 6 5 -- =
l =
u pg 3
- b j
b$
a i
i w '-
1 i
cc nm E
I I
i i
kE ti i
~
l 6
I I
5 w
l O
I M =C E E
i I
m_g I
I W
Q ~E a-gwe W
g
=2EE i
t-R r: u I
I u
re i
y
~ 10 p -
I g
ag T
w ugg I
gg'
-W l
3
--6.
d 5 h m %w Nhh-I 3
'5 U
C u a)
M I
N-Esa-i E
s l
[
u-E l
$. Z W E
l m
l*
Q l
l J
I w
l i
E m
E 1
I D
G w
l I
5 6
l i-E l
L e
= p E
ig E5e ac -
l, e-6-
w w
CW JA rg R C"s.2 ut EE g>
5 3m su
>a =gs 6
-- r re M i
O k
U U
L_
C i ma
- m. as pg Ar,
>m
.- 5 e.
aC
.2 k
.A. w m%
==
J.
Ke
.J 6
C.
S 2C _
C3 U k' ft J wU J 8.
>=
D>
Z
- 3 h.J 2
5 g
l I
ow
-.c l
8 m>
W > as l
l p= 4 K-2 'd Ex-i k
l
>= E----l 9-s l
8sE I
up 5
a am i
==
m i
GE ug5 I
I*
l i
n ;* 3,.
I l
1 e ". z
- w e
' 5 =2
$ M Y" g~J l
l j-5
- 2. a r l
g
=
l l
h2 I
w i
T I
'I a y~.____________--.1{
I l.,. = !
.s -g e
m -.
\\
. We have reviewed these changes and find that they do not delete technical support for the operation of the Hatch Station and should provide for increased upper level management involvement in support of the Hatch Station. These changes also meet the acceptance criteria of Section 13.1.1 of the SRP (NUREG-0800). Therefore, we find these changes acceptable.
2.
Plant staff reorganization - The positions of Plant Manager and Assistant Plant Manager have been retitled to General Manager and Deputy General Manager respectb ely. Reporting to the Deputy General Manager is a new level of Manage'.s: a Manager-Engineering; Manager-Maintenance; Manager-0perations; Manager-Administrative, Finance, and Human Resources; Manager-Health Physics and Chemistry; and a Manager-Training, with their respective staffs. This is shown in revised Figure 6.2.2-1.
The revised plant staff has deleted the requirement that the General Manager (formerly Plant Manager) or the Deputy General Manager (formerly Assistant Plant Manager) have a Senior Operators License.
We have reviewed these changes and find that they do not delete technical support for the operation of the Hatch Station and meet the acceptance criteria of Section 13.1.2 of the SRP (NUREG-0800).
Therefore, we find these changes acceptable.
3.
Plant Review Board - The licensee has revised the composition of the Plant Review Board to increase its membership from seven to nine members and to reflect new organizational positions of the revised plant organization.
A quorum of the Plant Review Board shall consist of the chairman or designated chairman and four voting members, including alternates.
We find this change acceptable as it meets the acceptance criteria of Section 13.4 of the SRP (NUREG-0800).
4.
Audits - The licensee has changed the audit frequency relative to the Emergency and Security plans and their implementing procedures from once per 24 months to once per 12 months to bring the audit frequency into conformance with 10 CFR 50 and 10 CFR 73 requirements.
We find this change acceptable as the audit frequency conforms to 10 CFR 50 and 10 CFR 73 requirements.
5.
Procedural Approval - The licensee has changed the provision for procedure approval to allow predesignated department managers to have approval authority for specified procedures in their areas of expertise.
We find this change acceptable as it meets the acceptance criteria of Section 13.5 of the SRP (NUREG-0800).
6.
Miscellaneous - There have been numerous changes made to the text throughout Section 6 to reflect the revised organizational structure to the corporate and the plant staff level. These changes are acceptable since they merely conform the text of Section 6 to the revised organizational titles.
r:
v.
c.=.
I' p.
- a. n !
[ :. -~
- .m
_t
- r-c
._a i
- _~ =.s v.
'M u_
em
=0 E
6-a L.
l ::- E
=
i EC
'=
-=s
%t
=yn ig s a-rd 5 c
On O=
c-H-
2 v
r- - e. s. t,
=
.1
- n w=
u s._
=
-m-
.8
,d
-G dEE k_ r 25 gn
=
r E
5: g CiB p-fP 5
@=
b:.5, r
m 8
r*
3-a EEE Ewe L
g 5
y F m iME he sG
'g cic EB l5 e-
R
-M R
-3 = :- 1,E 5-tss sh Ms 5
g I
m, 5-r t-a a
1 O
m-t-
-z w
C. s W
N e
L==
=m
=s
,u u
5
=
m
-e
- s z i of
+a CWw n; v: g xv I" $.f
{ si
=
g C
-e$
f lE
- E.
E " *=
C,_ 5 a
...c
^t 6
.. s -
5
=
=
.=-
s e 55
-E R G i@"E 3g c n%n 82 2
i
-E:
M25 y
r-x r s
-m L= s SE Jr C
=
b: e 5-5
!s u s ran e=
e I e
zg=cg
.h w e
- i t,a -
.m,o Es
,a a
-wwE!
vs -
EESt I
3
$E 4h 4
2c da 2"
g L
i
~
=w g
mE i
=
3
=2r w$
tng-e t
- =
am i
- g.
E-G uu
==
8 i
E! 5k'k c-e r_
z<
w
!@g $
g-i E E -$ M 5 35 l$UE li en' ele ce ir-
' - ri
_a w
gwo 0
ce
- $gt P
- E" L
i3 E E w
WPs kE R_. - <
p: E M
- M
>.h T
g J,... E a
g
.t g
t=
- E = ~; " = - y
-r~ 5 M t
.g.
J 3 =.'
=g r
sz w=-
wa>
ts ;.
im. ewS w -
us w-
~ ;: = --- C *
,a m. e s
w.
l5 g s="
"C" c5 EM5 E P. =a 4
s.
to s
i m
L dM L2 l0 Nw
- l. M.
- gem, 2E
-g g
5,-
a
=
- = =
mL ga
.m.- a 1 --E E=
c-
.=
sa
-1z
,z::..x..z..a.
-s >m.
5 w>
5-2x 54
=v<
-.z, ya
- u. - -
g E
5.
w r-v r
.z uWs km r
ac e-e w
P, m w
ma
=
gu o
wu n
me o
p
[o lEEo h.
E L
W L
ME Ms L
E a
s M
!E 5 L.
~
ca, w on r=
bw=
~-
ta m n
. 2:
f5 z - -am mm rs >=.F > I' < p $_ 2 =
- x u-5m,w d r, e-
.2
- zh w
}g g.._.a. e. u.
s - -
-- =
-2 n-
-u o
=h 4
im
-w-mua
<=
h t <f B
- m a !5 M g E b 5 p l PE P" E i
c p
e
\\
.=
io s t-W HATCH UNIT 1 6-3 m
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
S This amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
S We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
F. Allenspach Dated:
June 27,1985
.