ML20023B358

Forwards List of Major Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Items from Licensee Proposal That Were Not Resolved at Atlanta Meeting.Differences Between Unit 1 & Unit 2 Proposals Are Minor.Commitment Date for Next Submittal Not Identified

ML20023B358
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	04/04/1983
From:	Serrano W EG&G, INC.
To:	Willis C NRC
Shared Package
ML20023B361	List: ML20023B358
References
TAC-08043, TAC-08095, TAC-8043, TAC-8095, NUDOCS 8304220257
Download: ML20023B358 (3)

Text

..

< i. .e ,. e

, , Enclosure 11

) E Gr G u...

II P.O. BOX 1625, ICAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83415 d

1

.l April 4, 1983 2

, "r. C. A. Willis Mail Stop P-730 Phillips Building U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission s Washington, D. C. 20555 UNRESOLVED ITEMS FROM HATCH RETS REVIEW - Serr-9-83

Dear Mr. Willis:

Attached is a listing of the major RETS items from the Hatch Unit 1 proposal

. that were not resolved at the Atlanta meeting. Althou5h the Hatch Unit 2

{ " proposal was not discussed, the differences between the Unit 1 and Unit 2 j proposals are minor and the attached listing applies to both units.

I

The ODCM (prepared in 1978) was not reviewed at the plant visit since the A Licensee preferre;f to resubmit another ODCM. Also a PCP has not been wbmitted for review.

, A commitment date for the next submittal was not identified at the meeting.

l a

... Sincerely yours, W. Serrano Radiation. Measurer.ent Programs Branch I jd

Attachment:

As stated cc: W. W. Meir.ke, hRC

. G. L. Vivian, DOE-ID -

R. W. Kiehn, EG&G Idaho XA Copy Hos Been Sent to PDR x m

.__ . . . . . . . . - ~ . _ _ , . , ..

ggg202N } '

! .n ':

e a f' l

.s .

i liATCH UNIT NO. I q .

Nunber* flVREG-0473 HATCH Comment

>: 16 ---

T'able 4.14.1-1 A differential pressure gauge Item 4 measures thedP between the

'i Service Water System and the Closed Cooling Water System.

The gauge should provide alarm j

or some other indication when theAP is out of ' limit and

{ these functions should be

j periodically checked. The proposal does not ...clude a channel functional test in the q surveillance requirenents.

48 Table 4.11-2 Table 4.15.2-1 Table 4.15.2-1 does not include Iten B .

a requirement to sample prior

-ii to a drywell purge. The con-j tainment effluents are released through the standby gas treat-ment system. At the site visit

'; ~

- it was learned the releases can be through either a 2-inch line

-l 2r an 18-inch line. It was j suggested that when releases are l

through the 18-inch line that the monitors of Table 3.2-10 be ~

on line and a grab sample be analyzed prior to release.

q' . -

i

. 50 Table 4.11-2 . Table 4.15.2-1 The LLD value' for the noble gas item 0 monitors was not identified in the table. The Licensee states ln the values are detailed in the FSAR.

Table 4.11-1 Table 4.15.1-1 The proposal uses !!inir:um Detectable Concentration (MDC) instead of LLD.

0 t

Reference is to the review question in letter DHA-ll-82 dated

[ Movember 23', 1982.

d wom m ,my.== w ge eerr .sa a-

+-p e e- m'oe + <e e- -g==A-y=wW- "- '

• C'* "* #

4,. . i . ,

't , ,

\

j- flumb.er* ,

f!UREG-0473 HATCil Corament 4 71 Table 3.12-1 Table 3.16-1 The proposal does not include Item 3b Iten 3b the requirement for a gamma isotopic analysis on ground water samples.

i .;

81 3.12.2 -3.16.2 The Land Use Census does not 3 state it will identify and

.; report all gardens of greater I than 500 ft 2,

,a ii q

lJ 91 6.5.2.8.0 6.5.2.8.1 It is not clear that the I

model RETS QA requireinents

.I l

• for environmental monitoring

are being satisfied by Speci-li fication 6.5.2.8.1.

1:

100 6.13 6.15' A Specification addressing the Process Control Program i uas not included. This was unresolved at the meeting. ,

101 6.15 6.17 A Specification on major

( changes to radioactive waste l treatment systems was not included in the proposal. The Licensee states the requirements are included in 10 CFR 50.59.

Li llowever, it was stated that I

10 CFR 50.59 did not include the radwaste systems. This was unresolved at the meeting.

i t

-l R

[j

• Reference is to the review question in letter DWA-ll-82 dated flovember 23, 1982.

L.l'

),

o o

.(. _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . --- _ . _ _ . _ - _ . . _ . _ , . . - , . _ _ _ , - . _. ..