ML20023B358

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards List of Major Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Items from Licensee Proposal That Were Not Resolved at Atlanta Meeting.Differences Between Unit 1 & Unit 2 Proposals Are Minor.Commitment Date for Next Submittal Not Identified
ML20023B358
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/1983
From: Serrano W
EG&G, INC.
To: Willis C
NRC
Shared Package
ML20023B361 List:
References
TAC-08043, TAC-08095, TAC-8043, TAC-8095, NUDOCS 8304220257
Download: ML20023B358 (3)


Text

..

< i..e,.

e Enclosure 11

)

E Gr G u...

II P.O. BOX 1625, ICAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83415 d

1

.l April 4, 1983 2

"r.

C. A. Willis Mail Stop P-730 Phillips Building U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission s

Washington, D. C.

20555 UNRESOLVED ITEMS FROM HATCH RETS REVIEW - Serr-9-83

Dear Mr. Willis:

Attached is a listing of the major RETS items from the Hatch Unit 1 proposal that were not resolved at the Atlanta meeting. Althou5h the Hatch Unit 2

{

" proposal was not discussed, the differences between the Unit 1 and Unit 2 j

proposals are minor and the attached listing applies to both units.

I The ODCM (prepared in 1978) was not reviewed at the plant visit since the A

Licensee preferre;f to resubmit another ODCM. Also a PCP has not been wbmitted for review.

A commitment date for the next submittal was not identified at the meeting.

l Sincerely yours,

...a W. Serrano Radiation. Measurer.ent Programs Branch I

jd

Attachment:

As stated cc:

W. W. Meir.ke, hRC G. L. Vivian, DOE-ID R. W. Kiehn, EG&G Idaho XA Copy Hos Been Sent to PDR x

m ggg202N }

........ - ~. _ _,.

!.n e

a f' l

.s i

liATCH UNIT NO. I q

Nunber*

flVREG-0473 HATCH Comment 16 T'able 4.14.1-1 A differential pressure gauge Item 4 measures thedP between the

'i Service Water System and the Closed Cooling Water System.

The gauge should provide alarm j

or some other indication when theAP is out of ' limit and

{

these functions should be

j periodically checked. The proposal does not...clude a channel functional test in the q

surveillance requirenents.

48 Table 4.11-2 Table 4.15.2-1 Table 4.15.2-1 does not include Iten B a requirement to sample prior

-ii to a drywell purge. The con-tainment effluents are released j

through the standby gas treat-ment system. At the site visit

~

it was learned the releases can be through either a 2-inch line

-l 2r an 18-inch line.

It was j

suggested that when releases are l

through the 18-inch line that the monitors of Table 3.2-10 be on line and a grab sample be

~

analyzed prior to release.

q' i

. Table 4.15.2-1 The LLD value' for the noble gas

. 50 Table 4.11-2 item 0 monitors was not identified in the table. The Licensee states l

the values are detailed in the n

FSAR.

Table 4.11-1 Table 4.15.1-1 The proposal uses !!inir:um Detectable Concentration (MDC) instead of LLD.

0 Reference is to the review question in letter DHA-ll-82 dated t

[

Movember 23', 1982.

d wom m

,my.==

w ge eerr.sa a-

+-p e e-m'oe + <e e- -g==A-y=wW-

  • C'*

4,.. i.

't

\\

j-flumb.er*

f!UREG-0473 HATCil Corament 71 Table 3.12-1 Table 3.16-1 The proposal does not include 4

Item 3b Iten 3b the requirement for a gamma isotopic analysis on ground water samples.

i.;

81 3.12.2

-3.16.2 The Land Use Census does not 3

state it will identify and report all gardens of greater I

2 than 500 ft,

,a iiq lJ 91 6.5.2.8.0 6.5.2.8.1 It is not clear that the I

model RETS QA requireinents

.I l

for environmental monitoring are being satisfied by Speci-li fication 6.5.2.8.1.

1:

100 6.13 6.15' A Specification addressing the Process Control Program uas not included.

This was i

unresolved at the meeting.

101 6.15 6.17 A Specification on major

(

changes to radioactive waste l

treatment systems was not included in the proposal. The Licensee states the requirements are included in 10 CFR 50.59.

Li llowever, it was stated that I

10 CFR 50.59 did not include the radwaste systems.

This was unresolved at the meeting.

i t

-l R

[j Reference is to the review question in letter DWA-ll-82 dated L.l' flovember 23, 1982.

o

),

o

.(. _ _ _.. _ _

..