ML20127D017
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:i A NAR 3 01978
- I Stu. bYEMcr Alna. AblNN
/2/os' Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 4 MEMORANDUM FOR: Olan D. Parr Chief. Light Water Reactors Branch Ilo. 3 Division of Project Management FR(M: Thomas H. Cox, Project Manager, Light Water Reactors Branch No.3.DivisionofProppetManagment
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITH HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ON SOUTH TEXAS UNITS 1 & 2 DATE & TIME: Wednesday April 5, 1978, 8:30 a.m. l Thursday, April 6,1978, 8:30 a.m. LOCATION: South Texas Project site, Wadsworth, Texas PURPOSE: To review the status of construction at the South Texas Project site and to obtain information to facilitate and support an independent staff estinate of a fuel load date for the South Texas Project Unit 1. PARTICIPANTS: NRC T. Cox, H. Bassett,. L velac W. Hubacek HLP r J. White. H. Key, W. Menger, S. Veselka j Brown & Root C. Crane, H. Brown, G. Biennan ..I orfstmalSirmed By: 850 T. m i {pk 840606 Thomas H. Cox, Project Manager i 84'367 Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3',' pop f / Division of Project Manageraent 5 f g*,,,,, LWR #3: LPM LWR #3;BC [,,,,,,, TCox:cecW-OPa E ]{g}, ',,,,, 3 h
- 3/618/78 3/ g (78
\\'A =c== n. o.7 3 w=o, om.o ,ar......................... t )
w h8 UNITED STATES y' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON g .g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- g, *...,/
MAR 3 01978 Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 MEMORANDUM FOR: Olan D. Parr, Chief, Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Project Management FROM: Thomas H. Cox, Project Manager, Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3, Division of Project Management
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITH HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ON SOUTH TEXAS UNITS 1 & 2 DATE & TIME: Wednesday, April 5, 1978, 8:30 a.m. Thursday, April 6, 1978, 8:30 a.m. LOCATION: South Texas Project, site, Wadsworth, Texas PURPOSE: To review the status of construction at the South Texas Project site and to obtain information to facilitate and support an independent staff estimate of a fuel load date for the South Texas Project Unit 1. PARTICIPANTS: NRC T. Cox, H. Bassett, W. Lovelace, W. Hubacek HLP J. White, H. Key, W. Menger, S. Veselka Brown & Root C. Crane, H. Brown, G. Bierman Al g r(49 Thomas H. Cox, Project Manager Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Project Management l l
j- - ~ l i 4 4 tiEETING NOTICES DISTRIBUTI0f! J Docket File: J. Knight NRC.PDR D. Ross. ' Local PDR~ R. Tedesco TIC'_ S. Pawlicki LWR #3 File' -I. Sihweil . NRR Reading P. Check E. G. Case' 'T.. Nova k' D.~ Crutchfield Z'. Rosztoczy i. R. Boyd T. Ippolito j '.R. DeYoung. nV... Bena roya D;'Vassallo1 G. Lainas D~ :Skovholt' F. Rosa - R.:Denise V. Moore F.' Williams-R. Vollmer J. Stolz M.- Ernst 't;. - Kniel. W.,Gammill - 0. Parr' G. Knighton J S. Varga B.-Youngblood R. Clark W. Regan-T.lSpeis D. Bunch P. Collins - J.' Collins C. Heltemes-W Kreger r i ~ =R.-Houston-R.'Ballard L. R. J. Mattson' .M. Spangler y H :Denton ._ J. - Stepp
- s r-LACRS-(16)-
L. Hulman 1,: . B L. Crocker H. Ornstein i .H. Berkow L.: Dreher 2 r. Attorney, ELD. Project Manager T. Cor
- j
-IE- ( 3 ).
- B.~Faulkenberry, IE N'
SD_(7) ' M.'Rushbrook m- -Receptionist NRC Participantsi -j}osnak:ubenstein ' H.iBassett,. ovelace, W. Hubacek z t
- [~i s
L - ~ 4 A + .T ,.3 T E 9 p -n
. AGENDA-FOR ERC MEETING.ONLAPRIL 5, 6& 7, 1978 WELCOME - H. L._ Key, Project Manager - South Texas Project - HL&P I.- -HL&P INTRODUCTION - W. M. Menger, HL&P General Manager of PPE&C II. ' CONSTRUCTION MANAGER - D. G. Barker, HL&P Construction Manager A. . Texas Environment - B '. '.Open Shop Considerations C. B&R Track Record III. CONSTRUCTION STATUS - F. D. Asbeck, HL&P Construction Supervisor l A.- Reasons for Delays on Unit 1-j B. Unit 2 Status C. Civil / Structural' Accelerated Program - C. L. Crane, B&R Construction Manager 1, IV. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT - L. E. Hayden, Jr. - B&R Engineering Project Manager A. Status ~(Emphasize Electrical) B. Construction Report. V. PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT - R. C..Hutto, B&R Assistant ' Engineering Project. Manager VI. START-UP MANAGEMENT - R. I. Moles, HL&P Plant Superintendent A. _ Plans B. Integration'of Start-Up Activities into Construction Effort CLOSING - G..F. Bierman, B&R Project' General Manager PROGRAM CHANGEOVER - H..L. Key 4 .VII.. NRC PRESENTATION VIII.' SITE TOUR ~(F. D. Asbeck and C. L. Crane to act as tour guides) IX. ' EXIT INTERVIEW 4 =g 9 y g a ry-- w-v-w--
e p
- )
AGENDA FOR NRC MEETING.ON APRIL 5, 6 & 7, 1978 . WELCOME -'H. L. Key, Project Manager - Sout.. ;'cxas Project - HL&P - I. HL&P INTRODUCTION - W. M. Menger, HL&P General Manager of PPE&C II. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER D. G. Barker, HL&P Construction ' Manager A. . Texas. Environment . B.- Open Shop Considerations C. B&R Track. Record III. CONSTRUCTION STATUS -- F. D. Asbeck, HL&P Construction Supervisor A. Reasons for Delays on-Unit 1 B. Unit-2 Status C.- Civil / Structural Accelerated Program --C. L. C r a n e,' B&R Construction Manager O'CK b.AL, IV. ' ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT - L. Z. 5_,'an, Jr. - B&R Engineering -Project Manager. A. Status,(Emphasize Electrical) B. Construction Report V. PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT - R. C. Hutto,:B&R Assistant Engineering Project Manager VI. START-UP MANAGEMENT - R. I". Moles, HL&P. Plant _ Superintendent-A.- Plans
- Integration of Start-Up Activities into Construction Effort 1B.
CLOSING'- G.LF. Bierman, B&R Project General Manager., PROGRAM CHANGEOVER - H. L. Key -VII. -NRC PRESENTATION Crane to.act as tour guides) J .VIII. SITE TOUR (F. D..Asbeck and C. L. l' ? IX. EXIT, INTERVIEW 1-k t 1 y-W' C C m n
..J,. w.;su: k +~/ ~ .{m I (MU) g yy y 3 b Odo CJ.fr= 6 eve b y *..'.'r2 [8s d t/Ef, ' ~ c l ~ Call T f,p b d u...keh'( h Ed.'g,.'M g J d [.. I. [ !... t . _.. i. T. [ w i 1 8 c...,' U S < % M 6 u. k/...,'.i. hM. A w vin Y 0 T i
- SJLAlb, i_!
lenf Tb4R's W 2..ld M. d i SEmIy F Tw/M be sh 8 tattu / ). ;I. i.! ! ~ 3/c A p MAik - BM bum #3 dLA&. Am @(rd 7 ' ef_ Mc .. _ ',... l "05' TQ p %y -. b Itr s AJ 3 M At.J.. L....... ; i w p IdTp m -1 Pu. Y @ d J% -&% 4 El 8
- -... y. i - a to 4,~4 -16.
b I a- .C.. '_! _ : .-.. _...- M iht h we.. lD .. % -l h '. 4 4 h iiL R g u e @ sw % SAL, E I 1.. : i...... - - .- Jr e7el y :, % Q h a.,.j he%d. 1 i ,. i . ~ t. i i .L.. fit ~. My M? Eaek A rain - mau. ab.J n aa iakd. LD1ha-A A *R-1... LJ J.
- i_..
- .2..i f.- -_-._._. h ti. b k 2N,8 M s.h L'0
_.d A 4 1.. :. i ;.. J... A L M g,4rk g sr 22. (!vuA M w d 4 ; k - is to $ w k M h' L...;.. L. ' .. d n 7 's /?.oM M m.. _._ J e IM. tweek,./aL' f C i> t ri f L / D & /,,cfrJ & @Fy*..l-l \\ l6 5 & Se4 i= v :.)
- I
' ld$ ,ttUclees 6f/hAee- .ansu<,W)bhl&/e' r B ( /
- 7.... p L. [. L i.l.._. _._.. _... _.... _._..._._-.. _._. _._. - r 4 aug /..,..
e i i. [ p N N/ ! i, L, l agPet M,ea-1,y & 3 bw. i I i t i D: IIl. U Nerel$ N y Ab $ &a f, gfaM , #v4 i'ijj l" 7'4gllG }a-sLff4. fris; 1 A-b ~De ' .ll[{i: i +% A#4, ll. ! lll-W' i l i i i l i r e' 'i: { I i;I { 3 9 l i.<
~ tow % fy "/dW O L G A % % r L'A L Q p.L L,:s u
- u. su n & 4(ww~L.)
I I f i ~ ' % D 13%(L& W ) t. i QLY 1 V& btX J ' ' A/+ %) 8 4. _. f O I I ) e ......-.._m. e t 9 1 g 4 .I 3 J..._._. A. H L'.A P A m ' y,,. 4 p M %m . L. .L y.y'. 7... - e.. - / 'J h e**.* e ...L_.... i ....._..-__.6_ .._2.._.._.._.._ t i t 4 7._....... i i I i ._.._...._..L_. ..._.,1_,.... 8 1 i-j-
- t. -
t j I i I j t \\ _.. 3.. i + _ _.......... i f ,ij, i ....._ _.:. _ y -_ 4 i t ....._...a I j l 1 i I s f f. g g i, f .. p.. f + + l g l f g 9 l f I I .l I t -....i... l 8 a t I i I i 4 I I s l f s e p { g i t n [ j... 1 J. e 3 ( g. + e i l 6 "P O ^ I O 8 9 j q i j 1 l 4, [ 4 7 -.- a I i 1 4 I I t h j J e 6 i i 4 e i I 9 I t i I t + r. i r ! 5 1'. f j i. t f 'I e i .f--
g4 Remarks 1By D. G. Barker, Manager Construction, HL&P AJ Texas Environment lc; Economy - Strong'aggressi-environment for growth. Very ~ ttractive-for-labor. a J 2. LWeather _ LWefare capable of working-throughout th'e year. Shift _ ork is not' inhibited by cold weather at night. w 3. Site Location -'Very close (8 miles) to the intracoastal_ waterway. . Delivery 1of major pieces of equipment and-bulk matelial takes place with minimum problems. Terrain is flat and highways in . Texas are.among the nations best,-further' enhancing.our_ delivery schedule. 4. Labor - Good supply of-labor in all crafts. Texas is an "Open . Shop" state. B. Open Shop Considerations - (B&R) 1. Non-Union -lNot. subject.to work stoppage,. walk-outs, slow-down or strikes 2. Flexibility - Crew size,-shift work,. overtime.and work week can be adjusted and worked to the overall' benefit of.the' project. 3. Training -; Personnel (craft) are developed at the jobsite. Personnel can be reassigned from one-craft'to'another based upon_ project ne'eds. 4.' Site Fab Shops --We are capable of and hav.e built fab shops ~on -the-jobsite.for. fabrication of piping, hangers, supports, restraints, cable trays and' reinforcing steel. EC. Brown'_and' Root Track Record 1; -Enjoy'a-good reputation in the nation and-the world forfgetting -the job done. b 2. Flexible organization with strong executive ~ involvement-with' Lheadquarters(in Houston, Texas. s
- V
~ ( 3 '. - Strong' manpower following both labor and: professional personnel. 4. cComprehensive training program for craft labor and construction supervision"to support. project? schedule. 5. Contract' -Fixed profit arrange' ment with no incentive for delaying the project. 6. Brunswick ~-' Construction' duration.in 1974 was 2nd best out of 14 ~
- inithe: nation-.on startup;of Unit-#2.
Unit #1 in 1976'was the bestlin1the nation out of.7 units.
- 7. EIntegrated startup schedule and slide along arrangement Ehould enhance schedule. D 8.
W. A.JParrish - Joint team approach-between HL&P and B&R-allowed forfsignificant saving in schedule (4 mo'nths out of'8) in late stages of. construction.on this. project to-achieve scheduled Commercial. Operation dates. i 1 l I' f v i i b.' ~ ~ r,
FC D, ps.g,=e,; ~ 9' As'indicatcd earlier by Mr Bill Menger, our present level III schedule shows us to be approxinately 29 weeks behind in certain critical areas. 'Ihe schedule slippage in Unit I has been caused by several contributing factors, scme of which are late engineering design, late procurement of engineered equipnnnt, issuance of stop work orders on both containment liner installation by PDM and on concrete placenent activities. PDM's stop work'has contributed five (5) weeks lost time with an additional five (5) weeks ' lost due to' the three (3) stop work orders placed on concrete activities. Other factors contributing to schedule delay are the congestion caused by ' high robar density and the many interferences between rebar, embeds, pipe sleeves, anchor bolts, etc. ~ Brown & Foot's slow engineering start has been overcone through many hours of overtine and hard work on their part, and the engineering and procurement activities are presently sufficient to support the construction schedule. Positive steps have been taken, by both HL&P and Brown'& Poot, in the area'of Quality Assurance, that should eliminate the need for additional stop work orders. Significant training for construction supervisicn, craftsmen and QC inspectors has been conducted and will continue. 'Ihere has been a reorganization of the B&R QA Departannt, and in general, everyone concerned has obtained a greater' awareness of' -Quality requirements. 1 . I l 4 f 1
e +- 'Ihe problems associated with conplexity of design and interferences will con- ~ tiinue to some degree,'but actions have been taken to reduce the impact of these problems, such as procedure revision, develognent of cmposite drawings, construc-tibility reviews, nore field engineering involvement and nodeling of the nere conplex areas. Exanples of the nodeling effort can be seen at the far end of the i conference room. I have been discussing the problems contributing to the. Unit I schedule silippage.- _ I would like to say at this point that Unit II is presently on schedule. Sone advantages we have realized on Unit II are: problems with design and procure-nont have been greatly reduced, most constructibility problems enconntered on Unit I have been corrected for Unit II,. the schedule for Unit II is nore flexible in that activity ductions are longer, and finally we have noved well along the learning curve. Now I would like to turn this over to Brown & Root's Project Construction i Manager (Mr Carl Crane) to discuss with you the accelerated plan established at STP to first prevent further deterioration of our schedular position and secondly. i to regain the time that has been lost. oma oder r. ~ t t l
(, l.g I (iW' tE 1 _- During the first' half of 1977, a definite trend was established by our continued underexpenditure of scheduled manhours and our inability to meet - our concrete placement schedule. Due to this negative, trend, a concentrated effort was launched to develop a work plan to first prevent further deteri-oration of our sche'dular position and.second to regain the time that was lost in the first half of 1977. Project schedules were reworke'd to respread the remaining manhours and quantities over - the remainder of the project ~ duration, thereby, establishing new manpower and quantity sche'dules for the remainder' of the project. The following list presents key items in the recovery plan and status (* ( (C C 'M 2
- O M\\ U.
of actions to date in e'f4ecting._thish f / b'; 8 1. During the summer of 1977, the schedule for concrete placement activities was affected by the number of trucks available for con' crete placement and by the limited chpability of our ice making facilities. - Our fleet of concrete trucks has now been increased from eight (8) ~ to fifteen (15) which virtually eliminates the problem of truck t availability. Our ice making facilities have been modified to in-i crease production and storage capacities such that concrete produc-tion will not be.affected by the supply of ice. +_ _ _-_ _ :- ~ ~
V With the modifications noted' above,' our bat'ch plant is non capable 'of producing in excese of 25,000 cubic yards per month which will ~ ~ . support our concrete schedule for:the project. ~ During' thelpast. nine '(9) months,- we. have averaged placing over. l'3,000 yards. per month in comp,arison to an average of less than1 8,500 yards per month for the first half of '1977. 2. Due to the size of our project and the.large amount of work to.be done.away from the power. block-area, in addition to?the demand *for ~ increased supervision'in' critical areas, the recovery plan was based on increasing our staff of ' front line supervisors, i.e., superintendents, general foremen and foremen, to provide assurance of maximum production and planning in support; of scheduled activities. - Construction has 'added seven (7) superintendents, ten (10) general . foremen and forty one (41) foremen in order co provide the required- ~ additional supervision. ,3.. Due' to'.the trend in early 1977 of _ther underexpenditure of 'schedulch ~ manhours' by thel uilding department, the ~ decision was.made to place -~ b .i.Nc Q L '2 fy 7.7] ) 4 ~ the building-department on a' scheduled [fif ty hour-work,we k., Steps ' = weref also taken' to increase th'e number,of people in this; department.
3_ to support the requirements of the schedule for remaining work activities. During the first six months of 1977, our average rate of underexpenditure of scheduled manhours was approximately ^ / a 130,000 manhours per month. During the last six months of 1977, f ~ > 6 y [J our average rate of underexpenditure was reduced to approximately gf f O '/ 90,000 manhours per month. During the first quarter of 1978, our I w y
- N -
average rate of underexpenditure has been further reduced to approxi- / ) ~ . mately 5 g 0 manhours per month. b e \\ ..y c( 3 ' r' Total manpower in the building department has been increased from ( \\ 1,150 in August, 1977 to 1,760 in 11 arch,1978 with plans for a p+ ] fl aU further increase to 2,200 by October, 1978. By increasing our total building department manpower and by continuing to work on the basis of a scheduled 50 hour work week, we feel that underexpenditure of scheduled manhours can be eliminated and that a substantial amount of the previously underexpended manhours can be made up. Additional overtime will be worked in the more critical areas to assure maximum support of the project schedule. 4. The requirement for additional construction materials, i.e., form-work, shoring, etc., was dictated by the increased scheduled con-
_g_ ce; crete: quantities in the recovery program. These materials are ~ being purchased as' required to assure full support of the project schedule. t ~
- 5. L The need to increase our indirect labor force, i.e., construction engineers, administrative personnel, etc.,, was dictated by the in-
- crease :ht numbers of craf tsmen in the 'ficid.
This staff must be ~ 'increasedproportionatelywithincreasesinconstrucjioncraftsmen to assure proper' support of con'struction personnel. This staff is presently. being increased in support of' schedule requirements.
- 6.. So that the long lead time for receiving pipe hangers, cable tray
~ supports and power cable supports will not impair the piping and electrical schedules, it has become necessary to field fabricate over 15,000 pipe hangers, all the cable tray supports (2,600 tons) and .all the power cable supports. - Erection of a 52,000 S.F. fabricating facility will start ' this week. and a new coating facility-is;ncar'ing completion..This will' enable I ~ us to? start. hanging cable. trays.:bi the next-30 to 45 days. Also, the ~ l offsite fabricated pipeihanger's 'are being fabricated now and are ready to ship.
he 7. -During:the first nine months of 1977, -delays were experienced due to the inability of backfill vendors to support our scheduled rate of delivery. Backfill deliveries improved significantly through' February, 1978; however, starting in March, we are again being' faced with' the problem of the ven' dor's not being able to our ' schedule. -Negotiations.are. currently under way.with our backfill.vendorstoincreasetheirrateofsupplyto(thepoint that project sched'ules will not be delayed. 8. In order to shorten the overall civil schedules for the: containment building-interior and the Fuel Handling Building, we have developed detailed work plans in areas' involving our stainless steel liner -subcontractor.to provide paralleling of their activities with'our work in-these areas. These plans will play a major role in allowing the civil work in these areas to be completed earlier than previously i ' projected. As outlined above, we' arc investigating every possible avenue of approach . and taking immediate action on those that-are feasible to expedite the civil . portion of:tlSe. construction schedule. e feel strongly that improvement can ~ be made,l'n our current: scheduler position.. Further investigations are also O p, _{_
m . i ~ 6-1 4 being made?on:all mechanical, electrical-and ins'trudentation activities
- ~
to provide a. schedule for these activities'that will support the startup schedule. (~ The startup_scheduleLis being:further detailed to break out subsystem turnover ~ , dates which wi11 allow construction to more accurately. predict when their-t. activities must'be completed. Based'on current status and future projections, the scheduled Fuel Load ~ Date-for Unit 1,.May.1,'1980,:is still an: achievable date. e .s e t' ~ + 9 f 4 . + 0 f ~ d i 4 8 ? 9 v-3 'sw r w ,. e='w
.= D f 1 4 : NOTE: Additional equipment to support the accelerated procram has been .placed on'tlie jobsite in the form of 2 additional concrete pumps, 2 tower cranes, 2 or 3 cherry pickers, couple of forklifts, 3 or ~ 4 flatbed trucks, etc. - 1 9 3 e. S 4 5 J n 5 4 E' a. I, , 8,a 1 -. e, e t i i o j -6 4 i 1 -
, } BfDWfiC7 Root.tric.. ~ NRC PRESENTATION SOUTH TEXAS ~ PROJECT ENGINEERING STATUS I.. STATUS OF STP ENGINEERING' Brown'& Root Engineering for the South Texas Project is currently '67% complete as calculated ~on an earned basis.. The term earned as used here, means progress measured by achievement of major Engineering milestones, such as the issue of drawings for construction,_ procurement of equipment, finalization of speci-fications, system design descriptions, and other major, Engineering 1 ,i documents and drawings. i The major Engineering disciplines have achieved earned percentages ~ complete as of February 25,-1978, as follows: [ Electrical: 53% i Mechanical 67% ~ Concrete 82% Structural 76% Instrumentation & 64%. Control Heating, Ventilating-65% & Air Conditioning i Nuclear Engineering 76%. As can be seen from the above percentages complete, the. Engineering effort on the South Texas Project has passed through the conceptual and preliminary phases, and is currently _in it's final phase'in all Lmajor areas. In major disciplinbs, such as Electrical, we are com-- plete with what may'be termed as " front end" Engineering and are w e ently engaged-in final layout and design. The same is true for all major disciplines. x
NUWnOfRoot.inc. Pcg2 2 4 ' Engineering activities on South Texas Project have been benefited by two major considerations that were established at the very inception of the Project. 1. Slide Along Concept - This concept means that Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the South Texas Project 'are identical units situated approximately 600 feet from one another. All Engineering done for Unit 1 is totally applicable to Unit 2, and indeed, Unit 2 drawings are made from Unit 1 drawings. The only Engineering effort involved.is renumbering of certain componen,ts, minor changes to title blocks, and other items of such nature, and reproduction and issuance thr'ough the drawing control procedure. 2. The second item that has greatly speeded the Engineering process for South Texas is that there are no shared facilities between the two units. There are some common facilities, but these common facilities are being engineered and installed during the Unit 1 Engineering phase, and do not effect Engineering for Unit 2. Additionally, another schedule advantage being attained from this concept-is that all procurement for both Units takes place at the same time. All specifications are applicable to the equipment for both units, and all. purchase. orders that are e issued are issued for two units at the same time. This has greatly reduced the amount of redundant work required by Brown & Root Engineering, and has speeded up the overall I Engineering and design process for the South Texas Project. l
P2gs 3~ BrownOfRoot.inc. II. ENGINEERING SCHEDULE All Brown & Root Engineering activities are scheduled through a CPM network consisting of approximately 23,000 Engineering activities. Through this' CPM, all Engineering efforts are directed in support.of construction and start-up requirements. On a quarterly basis, a detailed evaluation is made relative to Engineering support of the construction 12 month look-ahead schedule. On a monthly basis, Engineering progress is furnished to construction Scheduling and Planning to assist in their detail planning. On a day to day basis, the individual planners are in touch regarding particular schedular problems. All Brown & Root Engineering disciplines participate actively in the creation of the B'rown & Root Engineering plan or schedule. This participation is reflected in the logie diagrams that make up the 23,000 Engineering activities, as included in the CPM network. Engineers also provide timely updates of achievement of milestones to our Planning & Scheduling Department, such that this information may be evaluated and worked into updates of the South Texas Project schedule. III. ENGINEERING TRACK RECORD Let's examine the Brown & Root Engineering track record briefly for the South Texas Project. In this examination, there are several facts that need to be brought to light. One of these facts, you gentlemen from the NRC should be aware of. To date, we have met ~ every Licensing commitment required for the South Texas Project, exactly as scheduled or before the schedule date. This is a record-i
hgg. Pzga 4 that is attained by very few Engineering constructors and/or ' applicants. Additionally, Brown & Root Engineering is currently meeting all construction requirements and is in total support of the field effort. Let's go back several years to the start of Engineering on South Texas. It must be pointed out that the South Texas Project is the first contract for which Brown & Root has had Engineering respon-sibility for a nuclear power station. As s6ch, Brown & Root had to build it's staff. Brown & Root, as a. company, had little experience in the design of nuclear power plants, but Brown & Root was able to attract and hire engineers frou various engineering - i organizations around the country with extensive nuclear plan experience. What this means is that initially, Brown & Root Engineering MW got off'to a slow start)g We did fall behind schedule to some degree. Over the last several years, the Brown & Root Engineering team assigned to South Texas Project has jelled, and is currently able to support all project requirements on schedule in a professional manner. IV. CONSTRUCTION / START-UP SUPPORT Brown & Root Engineering through it's planning and scheduling and discipline interface activities with the South Texas Project ~ construction team, is totally aware of Brown & Root construction activities. This awareness allows our Engineering staff to give rapid response and support to all field activities and problems. -Brown & Root Engineering and Construction' personnel are in con-tinuous contact with.the regular site visits made by Houston-engineers and planners.' Additionally, through our construction r- -,-w
\\ i Pagn 5 ) Brownf5 Root.inc.' s teams' involvement with HL&P start-up group, Brown & Root i EnE neering is constantly made aware of plant start-up requirements as they effect the construction and engineering l schedule for the South Texas Project. Brown & Root uses what is called an FREA procedure. This is a Field Request for Engineering Action. With this procedure, any and all problems associated with the construction of the plant that require Engineering input may be handled. This procedure provides for control. rapid means to resolve any and all field problems which would otherwise cause construction delays. If the need arises, Brown &; Root Engineering is located approximately lb lb-hours drive from the South Texas Project Site, and can be called 4 upon to visit the Site at any time to resolve construction problems on a first hand basis. sJ& C ,. a.,9) ~ V.
SUMMARY
As previously stated, Brown,& Root Engineering is totally informed and cognizant of Brown & Root construction and start-up needs and problems, and is now and will be in the future, in total support of their efforts. Gentlemen, if you have any questions, I will address them at this time. Thank you. 4 h / g l l
-I -GENTLEMEN: I WISH T0 DISCUSS THE PROCUREMENT EFFORT-AS IT RELATES 'ID THE. PROJECT SCHEDULE. I AM SURE YOU ARE AWARE 0F THE PROCUREMENT CHAIN WHICH IS CO}Dit.. TO THE' NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY. BROWN & ROOT AS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTOR 1 . FOR HL&P, INITIATES -PREPARATION OF THE PROCURDIENT SPECIFICATION. AFTER THE. VARIOUS' APPROVALS, INCLUDING QUALITY ASSURANCE AND HL&P, THE SPECIFICATION .IS REVISED AND FORMS'THE BASIS FOR-INQUIRY TO THE VARIOUS CANDIDATE SUPPLIERS. UPON RECEIPT OF QUOTATION, TiK TECHNICAL, COMMERCIAL, AND QUALITY EVALUATION 1 '0F 'T:"? M'. TION IS MADE BY BROWN & ROOT. THIS WAS FOUND 'ID BE THE MOST ~ LENGTHLY PART. OF THE PROCUREMENT _ CHAIN. ACCORDINGLY, A NEW MODE OF OPERATION WAS ADOPTED. SIl0RTLY AFTER RECEIPT OF-QUOTATION,'A SERIES OF JOINT MEETINGS BETWEEN HL&P AND BROWN & ROOT,-QUALITY ASSURANCE, PURCHASING,.AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL;WERE HELD FOR THE PURPOSE' 0F EXPEDITING.THE SELECTION OF THE RECO)D! ENDED SUPPLIER. -IN MOST CASES THIS SHORTENED THE PROCUREMENT CYCLE t,- FROM M.-60 DAYS. THIS PLAN WAS ADOPTED IN FEBRUARY OF 1977. AS-V..; EVIDENCE-TO THIS SUCCESS, THE PERCENTAGE COMPLETE OF'PROCURDfENT ON A WEIGHTED BASISTAT Tile END OF 1976 WAS 22% AS COMPARED TO 12 MONTHS LATER AT THE END OF '1977 of 80T BOTH BROWN & ROOT AND HL&P RECOGNIZED IN LATE 1976 AND EARLY 1977 THAT PROCURDIENT C00LD POSE A MAJOR PROBLD! TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND'CONSERTED JOINT EFFORT WAS MADE BY BOTH PARTIES TO IMPROVE THIS. T i-s'A THE ENTIRE INITIAL.PROCURD1ENT EFFORT FOR THE SOUTH TEXAS' PROJECT IS NOW. CALCULATED TO'BE 8'iT[0N A WEIGHTED BASIS. ALL MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND BULK MATERIAL HAS BEEN ' PURCHASED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIRDIENTS OF THE INTEGRATED ENGINEERING / CONSTRUCTION LEVEL III PROJECT SCHEDULE. WHILE THE' PROCUREMENT. EFFORT HAD LAGGED SOMEWHAT BEHIND OUR TARGET LEVEL II-PROJECT SCl!EDULE,JIT IS FELT THAT THE IMPACT OF'THE INITIAL PROCUREMENT, i s =
EFFORT HAS BEEN FELT BY CONSTRUCTION AND THE RECOVERY ~ PROGRAM AS DISCUSSED WILL' CORRECT.THIS. THTS-t!ANDOUT'SHOULIfGIVE YOU.AN_APPRECIAkk'0'N'_DE_THE STATUS df THE' TNITIAL-PROCUREMENT-*S-IT-tXI5u> lta. -1978. ~ ~ SPECIFICALLY, I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS MAJOR PROCUREMENT ITEMS WHICH COULD POSSIBLY HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PROJECT. SCHEDULE IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS. p 6'{t$Ao PIPING NE\\ - THE COMMITTMENT FOR ALL ASME AND-ASNP SHOP' FABRICATED PIPING WAS RELEASED IN DECEMBER OF 1976. A LOCAL SUPPLIER WAS SELECTED WITH-EXTENSIVE NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE AND A LARGE SHOP CAPACITY. IT IS wa WC s oW%9FD3.' ESTIMATED THAT WITH UIE FABRICATOR'S AVAILABLE CAPACIT[ THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED FABRICATED SPOOLS FOR UNIT 1 COULD BE T %T 4 E. 5 % I '- . COMPLETED IN 13 MONTHS TIME. WE ARE CONFIDENT THATAff HAS THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO PRODUCE PIPE AT THE STIPULATED RATES OF PRODUCTION ACCORDING TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS FOR BROWN & ROOT ENGINEERING TO RELEASE FAPRICATION IS0 METRICS AT A RATE COMMENSURATE WITH THIS CAPACITY. THIS IS
- ENTIRELY WITHIN THE RANGE OF OUR ENGINEERING CAPABILITY.
REGARDING BULK PIPING, '(2" AND UNDER)- WE PROJECT THAT A PURCHASE ORDER WILL BE PLACED, AT. LATEST, BY THE.3RD WEEK IN JUNE. teoc:.W.C\\ON CURRENTLY, ALL BULK PIPING THAT IS REQUIRED BY THE FIELD IS BEING ORDERED ON'AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS. 4
B. PIPE SUPPORTS AS WITH THE FABRICATED PIPING THE PIPE HANGER SUPPLIER WAS SELECTED IN DECEMBER OF 1976. ~THE SUPPLIER HAS ERECTED A NEW . t.. x s.: x FACILITY -VERY-CLOSE^TO THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. A GREAT DEAL OF THE NUMBERED OF ENGINEERED SUPPORTS HAVE BEEN RELEASED TO THIS SUPPLIER FOR DETAILED DESIGN AND SUBSEQUENT _FABRICAT7.ON. BULK. PLUMBING HANGERS AND NON-ENGINEERED HANGERS ARE EITHER IN THE FINAL DESIGN PHASE OR CURRENTLY ON ORDER FOR BOTH UNITS. C. VALVES LIKEWISE, THE INITIAL COFD11TTMENT FOR ALL ASME VALVES WAS PLACED 'AT THE END OF 1976. 'THE REMAINDER OF THE VALVES WERE PURCHASED ~NO LATER THAN MID-1977. WITH VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS, ALL VALVE PURCHASE ORDERS ARE ON SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS. 'IN FACT, MANY VALVE SUPPLIERS WISH TO SHIP THEIR ENTIRE SCOPE OF VALVES AT EARLIER DATES THAN REQUIRED. D. MECHANICAL s. dd ID C ALL MAJOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT HAS.BEEN PURCHASED EITHER IN THE l' LAST QUARTER OF 1976 OR THE FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF 1977. WITH . (. c.- \\,s l ii .t . gag., s ,( VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS,'THEIR SUPPLIERS ARE PREDICTING SHIPMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SITE NEED DA 0F THE REMAINING ITEMS TO z gy. g,g i .g,q. @g'g BE PURCHASED, THESE INVOLVE PRIMARILY PORTIONS OF THE FIRE ~ q ~, ' t UQiW.V'3 - PROTECTION SYSTEM AND MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL NUCLEAR EQUIPMENT [DD WHICH WILL NOT BE REQUIRED ON SITE UNITL 1979.
- wus&[
f'.'hDffthM E. ELECTRICAL '*d' t LPS e + ww.wu:et-) VIRTUALLY ALL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER HAVE BEEN PURCHASED WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF 'A FEW ITEMS SUCH AS y:wanW._. DISTRIBUTION SWITCHBOARDS, LOAD SEQUENCER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. 4.v. m )
. a. . g. s l .ALL MAJOR TRANSFORMERS AND SWITCHGEAR ARE EITHER READY TO SHIP i IN THE NEAR FUTURE OR HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON SITE. ELECTRICAL f BULK MATERIAL INCLUDING 15KV, SKV, AND 600V POWER CABLE, CLASS l IE CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION CABLE, AND A$f CABLE TRAYS HAVE F PARTIALLY' SHIPPED TO THE SITE. THERE IS ENOUGH ELECTRICAL BULK MATERIAL AND ENGINEERED EQUIPMENT TO MORE THAN ADEQUATELY l SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS. l F.- INSTRUMENTATION OF THE MAJOR PROCUREMENT ITEMS FOR INSTRUMENTATION, VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE INSTRUMENTATION PACKAGE SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN PURCHASED AS WELL AS ALL CONTROL AND RELIEF VALVES AND ENGINEERED INSTRJMENTATION Wk MATERIAL. THERE IS'NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THE PROCUREMENT wms ' SEQUENCE FOR INSTRUMENTATION CAN NOT ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THE P 10JE.CT-h SCHEDULE.
- '< - i f
IN
SUMMARY
IT IS FELT THAT THE INITIAL PROCUREMENT EFFORT HAS VIRTUALLY
- ci. ! :
COMPLETED. THIS IS A RESULT OF THE EARLY RECOGNITION BY HL&P AND BROWN AND ROOT THAT THE PROCUREMENT EFFORT COULD HAVE A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. ACCORDINGLY, CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE TAKEN. -0 t4 W.' w A b U- .m m RE, KEY PERSONNEL _HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED 10 BOTH BROWN & ROOT AND. O &T c. HL&P PROJECT STAFFS TO ASSURE THAT PROCUREMENT EFFORTS, SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL PLACEMENT OF THE PURCHASE ORDER, WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. THANK YOU. l I \\ - N E-we t g.. w,, ts wz.n vt...N o g Q /, t% s t.9,grc e n -- is " - .,,,. e. x- ,g p f.y gn._ g ugee ~ . ; p :, ,-a,<:~:.kC.k . % sd :.... y ..y, y.;;._ . NMWg 3, . ( -U -{ '. ; w i j., x 'v 4A WX l ' " t.N Y 4 -i.: c s.- r s,- nuW S mm nr A9, 1
i u., e l ' The Startup Group is cmprised of_ personnel frm Houston Lighting & Power, Brown and Root, Westinghouse and Nuclear Services Corporation. This organization includes experienced startup engineers frm both the NSSS supplier and the constructor and is so designed to reduce interface problems. The NSC consultant is an unprejudiced third party, not subject to supplier or constructor pressure. In this capacity, he is able_to provide unbiased advice to the HL&P Startup Fanager for the good l l of the project. The HL&P Startup Manager heads the organization giving l HL&P unified control. He has direct ccmnunication with the General Manager of the Power Plant Engineering and Construction Department. In order to reduce the overall time to Ccrmercial Operation, the Startup Group has assurred a major porticn of the required plant testing. This includes: system cleaning, hydrostatic testing, initial instrument calibraticn, and cmponent checkout in addition to preoperational testing, l l Each major plant system is being broken down into " testable" subsystems. Thesc subsystm s will be released by constructicn to the Startup Group l for cleaning, hydrostatic testing and preoperaticnal testing. " Released for Test" packages in the form of scoped me line drawings are prepared by
-s the Startup Group and then detailed by Brown and Root Startup Engineering (line numbers, cable ntznbers, 'etc.)- The detailed package will itemize , all~ equignent and engineered items which are to be released. The affected Brown & Root departnents will receive this detailed package and the need date for this equipnent-to assist in their planning. Brown & Root Startup Engineering will track theconstruction of the detailed packages in the field. As construction is ccrupleted, they will perform a preliminary audit to verify ~ the proper installation of the equiment. When all auditing is cmplete, the equipment detailed in the package will be released to the Startup Group for testing and operations. This program is set up to give the Startup Group the earliest possible access to systers and cmpenents to begin cleaning and . testing in parallel with construction 1cmpletion. An incmplete cmponent in a subsystem will only delay the testing of that subsystem, rather than the whole system. The broad scope of work of the Startup Group allows it to schedule the " downstream" activities to support the preoperational test program and to best utilize maintenance, operation, construction craft, and startup personnel.
- s.
C-A logic diagram is being developed for each subsystem. This nes T*v6/startup logic will be input to the cmputer and interfaced with the exisitng 4 r construction Ievel III Schedule. The level.III Schedule is a detailed schedule presented in Critical Path Method logic diagram form. This new logic with its many more interfaces with the constructicn schedule will identify those systems and subsystems which are the most critical at any given time. With this informatial, construction can readily respond to startup needs. A draft of the Startup Manual has been written. Startup instruction 6 is titled " Test Procedure Developnent and Test Conduct". This instruction establishes the test procedure format and processes for the develognent, review, and approval of test procedures, as well as the process for the conduct of these test. Processes are established for modifying test procedures when necessary. The Startup Group will begin. preparation of ^ ' these procedures in July upco conpletion of' the subsystem logic diagrams _. Now I will turn the neeting over to George Bierman, Brown & Poot Project General Manager, for sane closing statements. i I
'c POTENTIAL SCHEDULE CONSTRAINTS WHICH ~ REQUIRE MANAGEMENI ATTENTION STRUCTUR)LL AND CIVIL WORK ~ 1.
== Description:== Substantial voids were found in the floor under the spent fuel pool of the Fuel Handling Building. Status: Major void areas have'been identified. Subcontracts have been issued for a radiation shielding protection study and for repair of voids
- using epoxy grout.
. Management Action: This problem was reported to the NRC under 10CFR50.55(e). Engineering personnel have been assigned to support construction work and to monitor progress. 2. Descrip tion : Supply of reinforcing steel (rebar) is critical to t,he . construction schedule. Status: Rebar f abrication and detailing are being done by a subcontractor. Early delays by this subcontractor caused a slip in construction schedule. Meetings were held with subcontractors management and agreements obtained. Management
- Action: An engineer on the Engineering Project Manager's staff has been assigned the responsibility for coordination between the rebar subcontractor, Structural Engineering, and construction scheduling. The rebar coordinator reports progress to the Engineering Project Manager who, in the event of delays, can take action _ to provide correction.
3.
== Description:== River measurement station problems. Status: Problems have been encountered in placing the river measurement station wier at-its planned-location. Alternate locations and alternate ~ measurement methods are being investigated. Management Action: An Assistant Engineering Project Manager has been assigned the responsibility for coordination of activities, meeting schedule dates, and management reporting. 4.
== Description:== _ Pipe whip restraint purchase order. Status: Purchase order is in bid evaluation. Loads analysis and design effort is being shared by B&R and subcontractor. Management Action: Bid evaluation process being expedited and emphasis being placed on cost over schedule. Consideration being given to partial fabrication on-site if schedule problems develop. L w
MECHANICAL-1.
== Description:== Piping supplier (ASME). Status: Piping fabricator has been-selected. Local supplier was chosen to accelerate process.. Method of streamlining the generation, review, and approval of fabrication isometrics within Engineering and approval of spool sheets has been created. , Management Action: Schedule status is reviewed weekly by Engineering Manager. /b. alternate local source has been identified. 2..
== Description:== Pipe Hangers-Status: Hanger details and fabrication are done by a subcontractor. Engineering has streamlined process of' conducting stress analysis, review and approval of drawings, and approval of subcontractor detailed drawings. ~ Hanger fabrication shop is being constructed on the site to relieve part of the load on the subcontractor. Management Actioni ' Schedule being monitored constantly by A-E Management. Construciton of site fabrication facility.being expedited. 3.
== Description:== ASMI valves Status: Early purchasing plus sof t market has precluded scheduling problems. Management Action: Continuous monitoring. T w d4 t ) \\
- -....... ~. ~. ~ . ~. -. 1 ' 1 , e .v , _ n; t q: ~' INSTRUMENTATION'AND CONTROLS i -1. l
Description:
Control' panel delivery ~ i Status: - Scheduling showed late. delivery of control panels. Paper models . were made which expedited-fabricators design activities. Termination cabinets'were used. Delivery.is now on schedule. i . Management' Action:' Continuous monitoring.' i ,O- " 2.
- Descriptfon: - Control Valves ~
- Status: Early purchase orders plus soft market result in early delivery. Management Action: Continuous monitoring. ~,, p. 3.-.. .v ,? ..5 s 1 ( t a b V r M-A J .*4' i 1 4 tre 6 .[ f h ,u. m.
-f .y O ~ ELECTRICAL c 1.
== Description:== Cable delivery . Status: Cable orders were placed early and cable delivery is-being made. No scheduling problems.are anticipated. Management Action:. Status will be continually monitored., 2. Description : Cable pulling Status: Engineering specifications for cable pulling and continuity checking is completed. Construction and.QC procedures are in draf t form. Management-Action: Engineering support for initial construction activities will be available. ~ 3.
== Description:== Electrical Penetration Assemblies. Status: - Late issuance of specification resulted in negative. float. Ex-pediting of purchasing activities, cooperation by vendor, and rearrange-ment of construction activities has brought. shipment back into schedule. Management Action: -Continuous monitoring. m. 4 r 4 4/. 1 8
.'.O
- f.,,: n Lt
'"U R*T?L CP = Construction - alc me: t c.Dwt up ' 4 -4
- :.'bjor.$lilestones :
X = Preliminary Ibtes L2'/13/77 .1/28/78. ~ Neefs-WUGkW' Need Projected of Need Projected 'of-Milestone Date . Ibte Float Date Date-Float- ~ J: River Service Trans. 25 Apr. 78 20 Sep.'78 -20.6 27 Jul.'78, 12 Oct. 78 -10.8s .CR ' Pesv. !bkeup Pumping ' 8 Jun. 78 27 Sep. 78 -15.4 11 Sep. 78 2 Nov. 78 -7.6-CR 125V DC DOP Chargers .26 Dec. 78 1 Feb. 79' -5. 2 ' .26 Dec. 78 30 Aug. 78 . 16.2- + " 25.6 '
- 31. 125V DC BOP Batt. & Pnls.
5 Jan. 79 10 Jul. 78 +25.0 5 Jan. 79 5 Jul. 78 ' + CR 2 bin Control Boards 19 Jan.' 79 10 tur. 79 -8.2 19 Jan. 79 8 bby 79' -15.4 CR --UcIl Water < 25.Jan. 79 19 Jun..78 +30.6 25 Jan. 79 24 Apr. 78 .+38.4 - 5tka. transformar 25 Jan. 79 8 Feb. 79 -2.0 25 Jan. 79 15;Dec. 78 + 5.'4 CR 13.8.KV Aux. & Stby. Bus 29 Jan. 79 4~Apr. 79 -9.4 29 Jan. 79 29 tby 79.. -17.2.- CR Annunciation 2 Feb. 79 17'by 79 -14.8 2 Feb. 79. . 27 Jun. 79 -20.4 CR-.Pire Protection-8 Feb.'79 1:. un. 78 + 33.6 8 Feb. 79 -12 Jun. 78 +33.6 LCR "480V DOP Su3r. 23 Feb.'79 18 Apr. 79 -7.6. 23 Feb. 79 9 bby 79 -10.6 ,CR 125V lE Chargers 28 Feb. 79 -13 Jul. 79 ' 19.0 28 Feb. 79 21 Sep. 79 -28.8 CR 480V BOP 3CCS 1 Sur. 79 18 Apr. 79 -6.8 1 bur. 79 25 Apr. 79 -7.8-Energize :13.8 KV Swgr.. 6 Mar. 79 18 Jun. 79 -14.8 5 Mar. 79 27 Jul. 79 -20.4 CR.125V lE Batt. ~ & Pnls. 18 Fur. 79 22'Jun.-79 -13.8 16 Mar. 79 26 Jul. 79 -18.4 CR instrument Air 5 Apr. 79 29 Fuy 79 -7.6 -5 Apr. 79 2 Aug. 79 -16.6 CR Fresh Water 9 Apr. 79 9 Apr. 79 0.0 9 Apr.'79 11 Jan. 79. +12.4-CR 4 KV IE Swgr.- 16 Apr. 79 29 Aug. 79 -19.0 16 Apr. 79 12 Oct. 79 -25.2 CR Bukeup Dcmineralizer-7 !by 79 '23 Jan. 79 +14.8 7 May 79 8 Dec. 78 +20.8, CR 480V lE Swgr. 8fby~ 79 17 Aug. 79 -14.2 16 Apr. 79 12 Oct. 79 -25.2 CR Cssential Cooling Pond 14 tby 79 8 Aug. 79 ' 12.0 14 May 79 6 Nov. 79 --24. 6L
Weeks Weeks Need eroiecuvl-of Need Projectxd of flitestone fute irite Ploat Date Date-Float CR 480v lE ELTS 15 thy 79 17 Aug. 79 -13.2 15 oby 79 28 Sep. 79 -19.0 CR IDJ, Screens & Wash 21 buy 79 21 Jun.-79 -4.4 21 dby 79 16 /Wg. 79 -12.2 CR DOP Inverters 23 Aby 79 3 Jul. 7f 445.4 23 Fuy 79 20 Jun. 78 +47.2
- CR Domin.110 Stor. & Trans.
5 Jun. 79 9 thy 79 +3.6 5 Jun. 79 19 Jul. 79 -6.2 CR lE Inverters 13 Jun. 79 28 bby. 79 +2.2 13 Jun. 79 12 Jul. 79 -4.0 CR Fuel Oil Stor. & Trans. 14 Jun. 79 15 Fur. 79 +12.8 14 Jun. 79 2 Jan. 79 +23.2 CR Reactor dukeup Water 19 Jun. 79 15 Oct. 79 -16.4 19 Jun. 79 9 Nov. 79 -20.2 CR Corrponent Cooling Water 19 Jun. 79 29 Oct. 79 -18.4 19 Jun. 79 10 Dec. 79 -24.2 CR 120V lE Vital 22 Jun. 79 27 Jul. 79 -4.8 22 Jun. 79 21 Sep. 79 -12.6 CR Stby. Diesel Gens. 5 Jul. 79 30 Oct. 79 -16.4 5 Jul. 79 20 Nov. 79 -19.4 CR 4 hV BOP Swgr. 6 Jul. 79 11 Apr. 79 +12.0 6 Jul. 79 15 buy 79 +7.2 CR D. G. Bldg. IIVAC 9 Jul. 79 17 Sep. 79 -9.8 9 Jul. 79 26 Oct. 79 -15.6 CP. Nuclear II &N 10 Jul. 79 21 bbr. 79 +15.4 10 Jul. 79 29 Aby 79 +5.6 CR SFP Cooling & Cleanup 11 Jul. 79 17 Aug. 79 -5.4 11 Jul. 79 26 Oct. 79 -15.2 CR Open Aux. Cooling Water 16 Jul. 79 16 Jul. 79 0.0 16 Jul. 79 1 Fby 79 +10.4 CR Aux. Doiler & Aux. Steam 17 Jul. 79 6 Jul. 79 +1.4 17 Jul. 79 17 Apr. 79 +12.6 CR Padiation tbnitoring 17 Jul. 79 29 Nov. 79 -19.0 17 Jul. 79 30 Jan. 80 -27.4 CR Closed Aux. Cooling 110 23 Jul. 79 7 Jun. 79 +6.2 23 Jul. 79 1 Fur. 79 +20.0 CR 120V BOP Vital AC 27 Jul. 79 22 Feb. 79 +21.8 27 Jul. 79 7 Sep. 78 +45.2. CR Clutical and Vbl. Cont. Sys. 27 Jul. 79 23 Oct. 79 -12.2 27 Jul. 79 26 Nov. 79 -16.8 CR Cas. Ibd. Waste 27 Jul. 79 25 Apr. 79 +13.0 27 Jul. 79 27 Jun. 79 +4.2 CR Condensato Stg. & Trans. 7 Aug. 79 29 Nov. 78 +35.0 7 Aug. 79 6 Nov. 78 +38.2 CR Containment ilVAC 7 Aug. 79 12 Dec. 79 -17.8 7 Aug. 79 2 Jan. 80 -20.4 d CR Emergency Boration 10 Aug. 79 15 Oct. 79 -9.0 10 Aug. 79 2 Nov. 79 -11.8 CR Safety Injection 10 Aug. 79 17 Dec. 79 -17.8 10 Aug. 79 6 Feb. 80 -24.8 CR IIeat Tracing 10 Aug. 79 5 Apr. 79 +17.8 10 Aug. 79 27 Feb. 79 +23.2 CL llot Shutdown Panel 22 Aug. 79 1 Aug. 79 +3.0 22 Aug. 79 23 Aug. 79 -0.2.
R ~ ~ hbeks Wo -ks - Need Projected of Necd. Projectal of Milestone Date Date Float Date Date Float' CR Contaiment Spray 24 Aug. 79 14 Dec. 79 -15.6 24 Aug. 79 26 Nov. 79 -12.8 l .CR Posidual lleat Pm oval 24 Aug. 79 2 Jan. 80 -17.8 24 Aug. 79 27 Feb. 80 -25.8 CR Liquid Rad Waste 24 Aug. 79 5 tbv. 79 -10.0 24 Aug. 79 16 Jan. 80 -19.8. CR Reactor Coolant 28 AtrJ. - 79 2 Jan. 80 -17.8 28 Aug. 79 2 Jan. 80 -17.8 CR.Condensato 31 Aug. 79 24 Sep. 79 -3.0 31 Aug. 79. 16 Aug. 79 +2.2 CR S. G. Blowdown 21 Sep. 79 20 Jul. 79 +g,o 21 Sep. 79. 20 Jun. 79 +13.0 Pad. D aip. Floor Drains 24 Sep. 79 10 Sep. 79 .+2.0 24 Sep. 79 19 Oct. 79 -3.8 CR T CR Conmunications 28 Sep. 79 4 Apr. 79 +24.8 28 Sep. 79 ' 29 bby 79 +17.0 X* Fuel Bldg. Ready Receive Fuel 5 Oct. 79 ~ 29 tbv. 79 -7.8 5 Oct. 79 28 Jan. 80 -16.4 CR Condensate Iblishing 17 Oct. 79 26 Apr. 79 +24.2 17 Oct. 79 8 oby 79 +22.6 CR Auxiliary Feochvuter 18 Oct. 79 22 Oct. 79 -0.4 18 Oct. 79 16 Nov. 79 -4.2-CR bbin Steam 22 Oct. 79 22 Oct. 79 0.0 22 Oct. 79-26 Nov. 79 -4.8
- r.'
Solid State RPS 26 Oct. 79 14 thr. 79 +31.8 26 Oct. 79 17 Apr. 79 +27.0 S. G. Second Side Ilydro 6 Nov. 79 6 Feb. 80 -13.4 29 Nov. 79 12 Fur. 80 -14.4 CR ECP fhkeup Station 12 Nov. 79 3 Oct. 78 +56.6 12 Nov. 79 24 Nov. 78 +49.2 Initial RCP Operation 17 Nov. 79-19 fur. 80 -17.4 7 Nov. 79 23 bby 80 -27.8 ~ '
- Cold Hydro 20 Nov. 79 26 Bur. 80
.-18.0 14 Nov. 79 2 Jun. 80 -27.8 CR Nuclear Instrumentation 3 Dec. 79 10 Dec. 79 .-1.0 3 Dec. 79 17 Dec. 79' -2.0 CR Control Rod Drives 28 Dec. 79~ 18 thr. 80 -11.2 28 Dec. 79 9 Apr. 80 -14.4 Begin Hot Functional Testing 17 Jan. 80 2 Jun. 80 -19.4 16 Jan. 80 -7 Aug. 80 -28.8 X Co:plete 240 lir. Run 31 Jan. 80 17 Jun. 80 -19.6 30 Jan. 80 19 Aug. 80 -28.8 X-Pull Vacuum Fhin'Cond. 3 Feb. 80 22 Jun. 80 -19.8 3 Feb. 80 23 Aug. 30 -28.8 X Spin Feedwater Pump Turbine 5 Feb. 80 25 Jun. 80 -20.0 7 Feb. 80 27 Aug. 80 -28.8 X Initial Turbine Roll 6 Feb. 80 27 Jun. 80 -20.2 9 Feb. 80 30 Aug. 80 _3g,g X* Initial Synchronization 9 Feb. 80 2 Jul. 80 -20.4 15 Feb. 80 4 Sep. 80 -28.8 X Carplete Thermal Expansion 16 Feb. 80 10 Jul. 80 -20.6 22 Feb. 80 11 Sep. 80 -28.8 Cxplete Ilot Functional Testing 20 Feb. 80 15 Jul. 80 -20.8 27 Feb. 80 19 Sep. 80 -28.8.
Weeks Reks ?k ul Pro jectal of .. Pleal Proy nd of flilestones Date Ibte Plcut Date Date Float X* Into; rated Safeguan! Tests 1 tur. 80 29 Jul. 80 -21.6 1 tbr. 80 18 Aty. 80 -24.2 X Tine Pasponse Testing 7 Mar. 80 29 Jul. 80 -20.6 7 Fur. 30 21'Sep. 90 --28. 4 Containment IIRT 18 thr. 80 ~ 19 Aty. 80 -22.8 10 ?nr. 80 1 Oct. 80 -28.8 X Ccnplete P. II. Equip. Checkout / Core 5 thy 80 12 Oct. 80 -22.8 21 Apr. 80' 12 13ov. 80 -28.8 Irxlexing Core Ioad 7 tby 80 8 Oct. 80 -22.8' 28 Apr. 80 19 Nov. 80 -28.8 p. p-l 1 I ~ t
NRY 2 3 819 MEETINr SU' NARY DISTRIBUTION i Docket File H. Bassett, MPA NRC PDR S. Kari, MPA Local PDR A. Abell, MPA TIC H. Berkow, DPM 4 NRR Reading G. Mathews, ISE LWR #3 File L. Schaub, C D. Bunch ({~W.Lovelace,MPA E. Case R. Boyd D. Vassallo H. Gammill. J..Stolz R. Baer D. Parr S. Varga C. Heltemes L. Crocker D. Crutchfield F. Williams R. J. Mattson R. DeYoung Project Manager ELicitra Attorney, OELD M.' Rushbrook IE(3) NRC
Participants:
ACRS (16) J. Lane R. Denise H. ee l L. Rubenstein g j BCC: Applicant & Service List i I e k 't
~.__l.__--_--.------.
- ~ r, y mene , NM1NG AND TRANSIGRTAL SMP 10/12/78 inn emmesym6et mem neuens ones - A8eserfe%en f Buck B lU (I3 3, l BILL Lov6 LACE- ) 3. / s. 4 1 4 'TfEW "Do VT 54Y t g 1 MittT N F W '1M IS. j neuen Appmuel
- 8 h p,%
'l For veur hisonnenen see ese For conecuan "' * "s'** n_. 4 asnaanns >) Enclosed is a copy of a "Teleco from Houston Lighting & Power" py Request \\ 1 1 i Herb Berkow 1 l ,( ) { W w ,w Do It0T use tfds fann as a stEcoltD et appsouses, concunensee, deposele j eteeranses, and simmer acuens M OWesnel, esg. syntet Agency /h) ) H. Berkow D M1
== i, l o m o. M - in.. 7-7 3 A2-u.=
- e.e.
e. ..se., i 1
i IKElul LIGIIllU r, mER bilWAtxta POBox.1700 l I M T m, TEXAS 77002 110E:$E)_21.d-1(21L FELECOPY. REQUEST
- y3g, 10, 0F PkES 01PMY:/
10: l: ' ' y i } 1 1 i l FMi: 2 'Il / k i / [X[, I't,' ' / [ QPI3 dWl0ll:' '_5. r' $,/ l 1 I 1
Telecopy to: Bob (apra Bethesda, Maryland (301)492-7617 (Confirination P is ext 7317) NUCLEAR PLANT COMPLETl0N RISCHEDULED Houston 1.lghting f. Power Co. announced tEdny that initial operation of tne South Texas Project Nuclear Generating Station any be delayed up to two years due to increased regulatory requirements and the project's very ce9 plex design. "Or a construction Job that spans such an extended period, the experience of others has shown that many verlables can sI nificantly D impact schedullnc " sold HLEP Executive Vice President George W. Oprea, Jr. "However, even with these projected changes, the plant is still expected i to be completed within a time frame consistent with other nuclear plants I i begun at about the Same per' lod." 0nren said preliminary results of an analy, sis by an Independent consu) ting firm also indicated that the extended schedule could push the 2.5 million kilowatt plant's total cost to about $2 billion, er approximately j $800 per kllowatt. "This comparec favorably with other nuclear plants on a similar schedule," he said, "as well as with some coal plants now being j i built." l- "Deseite this reassessed schedule, we feel the plant will deliver electricity to South Texans reliably and economically," Oprea added, "particularly In light of our recent agreement with Westinghouse flectric Corp. i for nuclear fuel, note... 4 --m
1 The South Texas Project, presently under construction in Matagorde County, is Jointly owned by NL&P, Central Power a d Li h n g t Co. of Corpus Christi, and the cities of Austin end Son Antonio. Announced in 1973, the project began construction in September of 1975. ] i S 9. e e e g 9 e e l e l ^- W r --
ME,E T l flfi,, S_UMM AR Y D I ST R I BU T I ON AUS 9 878 Docket file ~ flRC
Participants:
IIRC PDR o(el'a Local PDR y, TIC H. Bassett flRR Reading W. Hubacek LWR 63 File , ~ E. G. Case. -R. S. Boyd R. D. DeYoung. D. B. Vassallo J. StoirJ i R. Baer O..Parr 'S. Varga-L. Crocker D. Crutchfield F. Williams R. J. Mattson D. '4uller 4 Licitra ^ Pro. ject Manager J = Attorney, ELD 3 I. Rushbrook $] 'M IE ( 3 -) M 'ACRS (16) i L. Dreher S L. Rubenstein 73 i.
- c..
BCC: South Texas Service List- ) ..l j? v w p,- ,+r
t NRR(Cont'd) I
- 2. ' MILLSTONE UNIT 1 Due to abnormal oscillations on the B feedwater system, the licensee was reducing power from 100% to 50%. At 11:25 PM on February 11, 1982 the unit scrammed from about 90% power due to low reactor vessel water level resulting from an unexplained open-close feedwater valve oscillation in the A feedwater system. While reducing power, the B feedwater system was under manual control by one of the plant operations staff temporarily stationed locally at the valve wheel. The pneumatic feedwater valve controllers on both valve. stems have been subsequently removed, disassemblied
. and inspected.- Deposits that could have caused the erratic feedwater valve operation have been found. Both pneumatic feedwater valve controllers.are being replaced. There have been similar occurrences over the 12 years of operation of this plant. The valve regulator is subject to wear. The valve regulator was changed on one of the occasions to upgrade performance reliability. i,
- 3. OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 l
During an inspection made in accordance with an agreement reached in our October 1981 meeting on Oconee Unit 1. Duke Power Company discovered three broken bolts and 24 bolts with crack indications in the lower thermal shield ' attachment.in the Oconee Unit 2 Reactor Vessel. (In Oconee-Unit 1, 94 of the 96 bolts were' degraded.) Duke Power intends to replace the existing steel bolts in Oconee Unit 2 with inconel stud assemblies like those installed in Oconee Unit-I prior to startup. '01&E will determine the need for bolt inspection l j-requirements at other B&W reactors. 1 4. DRESDEN UNIT 1 f . Commonwealth Edison Company-(CECO) has informed 'NRR that it will not proceed i with the proposed chemical decontamination of Dresden Unit 1 in 1982 as previously scheduled. The decision was based on financial considerations, Ceco's uncertainty as to whether it could be ready to decontaminate during the-June - October window between Dresden 3 and Dresden 2 refueling outages,.and uncertainty about .the total cost of returning the' unit to service. 5. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT (STP) l Houston Lighting and Power Company advised NRR that Ebasco has been selected to repla'ce Brown and Root as the constructor for the South Texas Project.
- Information concerning Ebasco qualifications and their QA/QC program for.
construction are scheduled to be filed ~within 4 to 6 weeks. g ~' i##### 1 g ycrn, = 4 ,----__-,-,s ,,--e. e,e., a w-w w-- y-
% > n..",... l, O-.! % s'.-/'g, l ~ week because of concerns about a break. , e7:n & Root's total withdrawal. .'..~..scthe Quadrex report and our down.in quality control during the 3r a suspension of construction changeover in desigs engfdeTrs- "If they want to mothbal!It Chalt 111 '.h.cnstrated that Brown & Root is safety.related work and do whatever is .,f3de of building a nuclear plant." needed to protect the site - then I .'h;td.nt years too late, but HIAPis wouldn't see any reason to hold the '1 heanng. Bechhoefer said. '. meg to that realization. But"Ne cencerns about the man. Shannon Phillips, the NRC's resident ..t capability of HL&P. Where inspector at the site, said safety-related ' ' e teen all this time)" work is now at a fairly low ebb. -4'n argued that HL&P should Phillips estimated that of about_1,50 _ craft people now at the site only about t ..hy hait construction until a new '...akes over. 20 am on shfety-related work. Stany of 'E attorney last week petition. those.~T*.e said, are on reworicorrecting ~50' ear Regulatery Commission earifer deficiencies.
- ru: tion at the S:uth Texas Pieper of Bron & Root estimated she <
,. -aing a thercugh. Independent construction switchover could take several weeks to several months, but he - .:: review, said Brown & Root "has no intention of
- EU petition, not yet acted on.
dragging it cut." Asked to assess the im. ' s J :he report ey Quaorex, an . c:nsultant, raised grave safety pact on Brown & Root's reputation of its 23 scout Brown & Root's engt. troubles at the South Texas Project. Pieper said: r ,.. unc. i e J.es Bechhoefer. chairman of an "It's one of those things where you .u;ensing board considering the feel at the time you have been bruised I 3and the Brown & Root with. pretty badly. But we have several hun.. 9 'JJ J :!J.fafl.,rt: n,. 3j;:c. j to withdraw completely from the p!etion tirne. ,.c :n Texas Nuclear Project because it W.B. Pieper, senior executive vice withdraw. c.M not get a new construction con-president of Brown & Root, said negotta. "What basically happer.ed was that .ract. the global firm's second highest Jians with HIAP since Sept. N on Brown we declined to accept :ne new role they , ecutive said Thursday. & Ruot's reduced role in the project offered us." he said. Pieper said Brown & Root will cooper. te Houston Lichting & Power Co.. _never really got off the ground. ate fully with HL&P in wmding dowm its H14P Telt the exisung contract was e.irn removed Br'own & Root as the all that was necessary - all you had to construction work to a " safe stoppmg out details of the temaining construction, yect's design engineer on Sept. M. do was change its scope a little bit and point. He said HL&P is now working $d it now is considenng several con. carry on." Pieper said. .truction firms to finish the estimated "We took the position that the change - it will ask Brown & Root to perform. i; a bi:1 ton job. in design engineers was so drastic and "We're not mad at each other," Piep < ww- ' 'Une constructor candidate is the. significant that a new contract was see Bronn.W &cntel Power Corp., the new design necessary." / BTOwTL & ROOT 'S$ e':l*SSe .:Ce e e = m.t Frcr/t d 0:hcr .Page Fo;;e Pc 3 [ especially the skilled craftsmen. will ji3 J3 03, T,,,",13 + From page Just star there==d go to work for. *mI D' *7, whoever comes in " he said. unV The earlier switch in design engmeers, 'm i ultimately, after a transition period, will '1CRNING - 2g:,,.;6 affect an additional LOOO engmeers and ; er said, adding that Brown & Root plans gt.g,,_, ~m . c r.o lawsuit against HL&P over the con- ~ ' ' - ~ ~ tract dispute. related employees of Brown & Root in Although Brown & Root indicated Houston. after the Sept. 24 demotion that it might An HL&P spokesmaa, Don Beeth, pull out of the project completely, Piep. said selection of Bechtel as the new con- ) er said 'Itursday the company wanted to structorT" certa'iiily' nota'To'regon{ ' remain an the job and was "very disap.. fco'oclustofE" comted about not finishing the project." "We are considedag a number of con- "We think it's a good project and we structors with nuclear experience." 5 ant to see it go," he said. "We're telec. Beeth said, but he declined to identify
- icity) ratepayers too."
them. Pieper discussed the failed negotia. A project opponent Peggy Buchorn of
- tt ns in an interview after HIAP and Citizens for Equitable Utilities, said Br own & Root issued separate, cryptic CEU was delighted with Bechtel's ap-at nouncements of the newest jolt to hit pointment as design engineer but op-l "r.D troubled project.
poses Bechtel as the new constructor, l'he replacement of a designer. "We would very strongly suggest they l
- "Et neer-constructor on a project in bring in an independent contractor and
.id-construction is believed to be un-an independent quality assurance organ, Mec dented in the nuclear industry. ization," she said. e "If they don't, we'Il have the same . A Brown & Root spokesman, Clark .old self. policing situation that just did 223 ctil, said the company will "make M' effort" to relocate the 2.ll00 con-not work with Browit & Root." ^~JC"lon workers at the site. William S. Jordan _III, a Washington.._ "I' m sure a lot of the employees, htorr7yTor CEU in a licen.s_ing he_a_r_t_n.g. ~*
s1 Q-s 4 y_.- a 80 one's beating down Austin door go bu / [Ukh h ar [ Explosive Sun Helt growth for a Southwest, headquartered in Dallas. while forced lilAP to add general-Both litAP and the CentrolSouth-n. esma si se Ing capacity every year equal to that west companias are also building s FOff SALE 16 percent of mu. of the entire city of Austin. The na-cient plant; original owner; mint lion's fifth largest utility not only is ' cool and lignite plants, wenning ~ themselves from expensive natural condillon; real gas saver, Only managing the South Texas plant's gas. Both are listed among fortune i * *g ('$*[$.. 8 }'#*l. f'
- 0 f
$768 million; will consider trade, construction, lt is aiso pinnning a sec-magazine's top 50 utilities, {c*, m. ,m Confact c//y of Aust/n, 512-d77 ond nuclear plant. With some serlons horsetradingin i,on Edit Olhar 65f f. Central Pcwer's current 25.2 per' Ihe otilng since Austin voters decid-om Page rogo I Size and geography make IIouston cent share of the Nuke will serve ed Tuesday l' try to seis their IG per-o IJghting & Power Co. and Central me.e than just Corpus Christi. A re-cent share of the Nuke, both firms AUS't Ill, TEX AS Power & IJght Co. of Corpus Christi, cent agrecement with the federal go-are taking predlcinhty neutral At!EttIC4ff-STA'!j !Afl ESI or Central Power's four utility, four-vernment and major Texas utilhles stances. On the other band, Browns-unV f $01 slule holding company, the logical will permit Central Power 10 funnel ville,long rumored to be u potenflal "U3 'JU I prospective buyers for their partner electricily generated by the South buyer, seems distinctly uninterested. IJORflI!!G -,/, 5 0 3... ' Auslin's share of Ihe South Texas Nu-Texas project across state lines to sis-tIflDAY - 120,700 (clear Project. fer companies owned by Central Be*,m m't afford it, doesn't need it and feels negntive about "get-cuss," said IIIAP spokesman Don lang involved in a project with those Ifecth. "But that is more o mailer of kind of problems," said Carl Chilton, pollteness rather than an interest to . chairrnanof theBrownsville'sPublic buying. Utilitics Board. "We may need it, we may want it, Cost overruns, delays and con-but if we don't have lhe money, we . struction problems are on the debit can't buy it," Deeth added. "We are ' side, said Chillon, an accountant. circady stretched to lhe limit to "We've never given it'any serious build what we are already commit-consideration, said Chilton, whose led to bulld." city buysabout half ofitspower from The company recently postponed cpl. Its construction program due to trou-lil Al'. which buys some power bles raising capital, a problem com, from Austin and San Antonio, will mon to udlities nationwide. Under " discuss with the other owners (of construciton are a 600-megawatt the Nuke) what they want to dis-sage 9-A (_ o 1
] r L '..,,.,e Lfn G"p. L~.n fyy ::2 ?n!tlbgence, bac. ga.--le <G ,r.: 3,"4. coal plant scheduled for completion in 1983 and D two 750-tnegawatt lignite plants due for 1987 and 1eSS completions. Austin's share of Nuke, sched-PORTLAUD, ORECON uled to begin producing electricity in 1986, is 400 OREGONIAN ,.,eg3 watts. i Two other !!gnite p!cnts are in the planning '%D 3.;ges for HLLP and the company hopes to break SUNDAY -- 405,(M -.ound in 1982 on the Allens Creek nuclear plant, ~' Enich will be just under half the sue of the South Tcus project. Most major components of the Al-g h INI 3_s Creek project have been purchased. ,7 y e 9 } / y '* h [ D ] In cddltics to p0 t;cning its construction pro-g f]"Q ^ @ .. v k \\MV -r.=, ELaP c!:0 lett its top-rnnted AAA bond rat. /M aa - m the mid 1970s and saw one bend rater slice
- .i AA to an A last year. But Wall Street analysts I,
ed. sd;1 call HL&P a good investment. ((
- j j (
Central Southwest, which has a solid AA bond ,a r: ting, has a coal plant and two lignite plants un. ~ BNEAN!E SENIOR {i der construction and, pub!!cly at least, a distinely corre nene.nr.Theor.consen vrarmer attitude towards Austin's "For Sale" sign. CASCADE LOCKS - The Cascade Locks City Buying 16 percent of the South Texas project Conch. ony,,of twg, holdouts against tb u.. p o,, e from Austin to complement the 25.2 pereent its subsidiary Central Power already owns is,an in-ph staged a dd' session WellneNay and fin teresting question. There's no denying that,, said ly, reluctantly, decided to join in the effort. spokesman John Edgar. The council, which also serves as the board of "The diff!culty is the tremendous cost," Edgar directors of Cascade Locks City L!ght, spent two said. "We beDeve it is a vtable facility. It must be hours in closed session with attorneys Lucretia Hol. completed for the sate of the company and the lingsworth, who works for the city, and Donna Kelly sake of the ratepayers." explonng the possibility of release rom the city's contract with WPPSS. But, Edgar said, "there is no way at this time our
- Ite possibility of getting out of the contract at system could speculate on where discussions this point doesn't look all that good." said Mayor might lead. We have to analyze the economics of Eugene MiUer.
it After another 1% hours of discussion in open To compilcate matters, San Antonio is consider-session, council members voted 6-1 to panicipate in ing se!Ilng its 28 percent of the South Texas plant. the mothballing. They generaDy agreed that mothbal-Mayor Henry C!sneros said the sale would be con-Ifng, which will obligate the city for an estimated tingent on whether it can be shown that lignite is a 561.000 to be paid off over the next 20 months,is the cheaper alternative and whether a buyer can be lesser of several WPPSS connected evils facing their found. small Columbia Gorge city Participauon in mothbal!Ing will mean an etimated Cisneros doesn't think the Nuke-sale market is rate increase of 5 percent for City IJght's 750 custom-getting crowded. ers, and 18 monthly payments of $3.400 to WPPSS. "If HLAP is going to buy even 1 megawatt from de locks has a.00067 percent share in wp Austin. It will be because they have changed their electric generation plan and then they can afford ' If t$e city had to " cash out" its share, it would both cities' share," he said. amount to about 353 mD! ion. The mayor denied that Austin's election had "We don't have $5 million to pay our debt off." any effect on San Antonlo's decision to put out sale Miller said. "We have to raise our rates even to pay off 581.000 - we don't have that either." fcelers. "We are on our own course," he said. "It is ne council's decision, said member Marjorie Jack-not pegg)d to the Austin vote." , son. " puts off bankruptcy a while locger.With uncon-According to Richard Balough. Austin assistant. trolled termication,(of WPPSS 4 and 5)it's going to city attorney, the sale of Austin's share of the my, p Nuke will take more than a year. 'ne other part .,co il members referred to WPPSS as ners in the project have the option of meeting an offer the city gets from another utility. e City Administrator Ken Hobson said he was fairly confident that =othbating costs woald be held i to a maximum of 5150 mi!! ion, the mayor said "I wish l Ihad as much faith in that as you do." There were just three city residents present at the ouncil meeting. All voiced objections to the city's , cc. edinvestmentin WPPSS. J i
M PCJJ i$0. 2!tC2, itC. /A2mNotoM. O C. 20o0S Front EGt Other Page Pogo Page iamca, ras POST OCT 121981 u0am:a - 299,5u s.mm -- 359,us ~ f ~~ e Design enginecrmg on nuclear prgie flawed, firr:6]hges p p Sy EAB0LD SCARLEIT licenseabGity". and four a , agency offlefals did not get actual copies e of the findings until about 10 days ago. Post Emytremament Wetese defects that "may have a serg- ? The NRC has been reproducing on plant licensestality." Serious Saws in Brown & hat's de ' But an HL&P spokesman.hn R. copies, and they will be distributed to sign enawering on the South Texas Nu-Beeth, said HL&P is " confident these the staff for review this week. he said. clear Project could disqualify the
- concerns wS1 be resolved and the plaat Some top NRC officials were report-multibilllee<lollar nuclear-plaat from wSI be tiermeed."
edly annoyed that HLAP had not sup-gettlag an opersuas ak. , an inde, "We surely agree that Quadretraised piled the Quadrex findings ent!1er. But pendent commultlag ftra says. some concerna which -If left nacormet-Sells said it was a report made for The Qaedrez Carik said it also tened ed - could aflect lice====WHty," Beeth HEAP and "there is no reason for us to defece la design englasering that.oeule, sakL "But we deal with cooceras every dammad reports made for the company." 1 impair the plaat's faitahlity te preshace day wedet, if left uncorrected, would af-A Brown & Root <pakarnian said the sectneemmenwury. big construction connpany wW have no electric power. Qaedres, a unetmar engineering coed ~The Nuclear Regulatory Commis, counwat on the Quadmx mput und altant,was hiredlast January by Haas. 'sica's manager for the project, DoneJd Monday. ten Lighthig & Power Cow the. project's
- M. Seils, said in Washingtoa he was HIAP on Sept. 24 removed Brown &
staanstag partner to review and evala - "petoomaHy stot too alarnied" about the ate Brown & Root's design M pW Root as the project,s design engineer and turned the job over to the h hre! - Sous. howeva, declined connwet as Power Cwp, h utWty Crown & .,,,g, A three volumee report on its !! stags. whette the fladings may jeopardise as staff was unable to - laced with. highty critical coatments NRC oper9 ting 5cener for the nuclear keep construction work moving at a annet Brown & Root's N < 4 Proper pace. was atenitted to HL&P last May Bet' "H's predature is make any judg. les jest been made puhBe by project
- sment on that until.the NRC staff has Quadrez said it found no evidence
, ' appements... ?- made as is<iepth analysis of the Quad. that Brown & Root had any overall, inte- ' grated system of doign engineering for ,,. Quadres said-It'tbtes six genart err rez report." Sells afd. general, design engineertag problems Although the NRC was told of the the6 " 4-aartaus. threat to plant adrez study last May, Sells said, see Design /pege ^__ _O d h-g g 4 O l
1 V A' h,.,a. [.,..t .fi-0.'. Y they were safety-related. "1 hat HfAP did net detect these de-ventilation, air cond; doming and cooling NlFf0mPS961) , p " ** "M * **'r *"'7* Mport; algn prdhmharing eight yews and 4 mtsW k mectw bulWings, and en- ,I en the project was out of date "in a, something about it," Sinkin added, cient verification procedures in comput-numberof areas." "sueely calls.lato question their techal-er codes.
- ,ths knif. finished,astelest project near Quadsen further said it found "no evt. cat competence as operator of a nuclear - Heeth said HtAP considend Quadres.
Ba< Cl4y.,.r... dence" that Hropa & Hoot, in 4,lesigning plant." tIadIaga la 11 geaeraI areaa as them was. pry little evldsace of a the plant,. considered case of mainte. Ileeth of HlAP, however, pointed out significant. i 1 l wej lthought-east ama consisteset basis for pance, repairs and innpections once the the uti y itself voluntarily set she Quad-lie said these lachsded the discovery deq gn? Quadres pald. "apuch of the plant begins operating, res at y la motion and "I wouki like to that engineerlag is still ant done on pipe pla t desigp basis ls rooted solely ja * ' For example, in some maintenance think that speaks well for the character breaks outside containment tailldings, .. cubicles of the snechanical and fuel han-and competence of IIIAP." nuclear accident analysis, vender amt i peeringjudgment ; hat le some le. 5 undres added t diing buildings 6 re@ajr crews who might Beeth said the ladependent study by subcontractor controls, in-service in-say res, " design details have bsea glA be eyearpg (k, in 1&legree tempera. urging of Jerome II. Coldberg after hethe California firm cam ptl. radiation suits would la from other (samilar) plants and i havg.le wor pusible licensing pmblems. tu f* y'i g ms, quadres said, - joined IllAP in Octoher 1He as vice Beeth also maintained the Quadres without confirpdng thelr a-tage STP plant. <.e. "Our,eitperience has that in-president for nuclear engineering and Ondings were not a "last straw" that led 8
- lay, consniting firnt said Ilr'es F "pervice laspectless eps require a design criteria' "refigct jadspatry.y{'*^@ nan.x g
struction. tling;, scaffokling erection, surfacef amount.cfstructural dis, con,,We chose Quadrer beca "We were share of some of these Ita ys for the IN34 tiept frame" Diet ,I ,have the skills and talents necessary siss "acMrese story *c gri and insulation removal," Quad. amt they had no previous involvement pmblems before k Quadrex nportand N'I % U % J G 8iV T J fes' attpd these tasks can either be lattmy do not - "A this confirmed our conceras," Beeth f M re&(/ En in saany lastances, gaald, dei elleninated er simpillied if proper access. with the project " Beeth said~ sakt. "What we had to do then was de-n engineering was based on "normar engineering is incorporated." Beeth said, however, that many of cide on the best way of rectifying the l t alperation and addell that this by I anny Sinkin, a leader of a San Anto. Qu.ntrex's findings "came as no great situation." teelf als simply not a auffielent basis (or nie group opposing the project, speculat-surprise to us," and lilAP thinks some Deeth described the replacement of idssign." ed that Hechtel may have to withdraw of the atmly findines ara "tecerrcci r.r D. & Root as "obvioinly a snajor ',quadres said there was little evi-as the new construction manager H trrelevant, or based on poorly taken action." <lsace the design engineers had coaskier. Bechtel deckles it cannot adopt azul take ' positions." " Hut it would have lieen far more 'ed such'special conditions as partial responsibility for Brown & Root's design He saki tilAP nevertheless will re-major it we had to go in amt tear out wait. view and investigate the Quadrex find. major sections of the plant," he said. power, startup, shutdown, refueling,-
- lhe NRC lasisted at a Washington Ings "usuler a high-power microscope "
"We feel we have caught this matter in u;alatenance and acektents. The consultants said STP will be the meeting last week that Dechtel adopt "We have concerns, but as of this ample tiene to resolve it without major !first plant to use a Westinghouse reactor the fuH design if it takes over'the point, we have found nothing which surgery on the plant itself." . lth this particular esnergency coollag project, Sinkin said, would cause us to feel there are any Deeth also said IllAP had not at-w system, and design assumptions for "I woubt assume that before Dechtel fundamental flaws or non-fixable errors tempted to conceal the Quadrer find- " worst case" accidents thus must be-takes on this kind of responsitdlity, they in the <tesign," Deeth saki. "Nor have Ings. lie said 50 mples had been chru-especially complete and accurate. rill want to spend many months review-we found anything that would regulm lating uncontrolled since May in IllAP '. llowever,-Quadres saki, assumptions is t the project - and that's going to significant modificatlost of in-place asul Brown & Root engineering depart-regarding pun,itions of doors and equip-n' tan further delay in the project and $ construction." ments. ,mpat hatches la the reactor tudklings er ut millions of dollars " Sinkin Ileeth said out of 283 total findings hy On the lack of any public C aterukxt. Quadres, IllAP consklered only Iwo as announcement of the findings,. Deeth unrealistic Isamed on plant operat-l It was Sinkin's group, Citizens Con. " reportable denciencies" under NitC said: "This was just one of many perience."
- Quadres sakt Brown & Root engiq terned About Nuclear Power, that first regulations, studies. We make a lot of stedles about had wrongly classified some design ac-.
made the Quadren report avpitable to The two items reported to the NRC, which we make no pullle anhounce-i .T* tititles as not safety-related when in fact [ the picss. ~ he said, involved inadequate heating, ment." ... h{fL ' I
1 2 Report. g,tes elev.. een problem. e i a ~ i m- .I Careas in nucjear::p%lanf: des,gn i i 1 Q. v.O , ;. ;;f, ' .s 1[5fAR146 BYARS ' Isfand incident wid'$ ave little.effect: in effect, the I*' ,.p.5 k }.,.', South Texas project alreadymeets the newer, tougher. j Ctposicle Scieaos)fruer. -hy areas of Brown & Rootkabsle'stgn'ohtb$Sbutti.' hbiost probbas pinpomted Tesas Nw: lear Project near Bay Oty are disorganized - byQuadrex: 2. t' .ibe report, made pbblic-Sunday; sayrsome4rthP.M e Electncali A' single.fiihire ebuld disrupt the.ilo aeshocomplete, a consultant's repart'saysi + protilems were discovered during a three. month inves f,Qilant.'sJastruments.m W-tigation ard raised questions about Houstarr Lightmg a'. r genetiatled The design did not adequately con. Co.'s ability to obtahr=an operatinglicense for T raccent~eonditions- &P had the investigation performedsby,V,$p@delbareactorcontafnmentstructure.pungr rNo analysis of th t.
- .., L.?
s satsa .~.'.i Regarding4. series of 10 rt!ated pipmg items, the @The Quadrez reporti as suinfornia-based-Y Quadrer by HL&P', t.wport says. responses tottuesucns mdicated "a genery
- pisted.to problems in Lt general areas of the plant's. 'allacg 'of expertise with pipe rupture considerations."
eesagn. .*". 4 3. d e Mechertab Pumps ansvalves have been tested ITiro findmgs considered most senaus acethat com. G.,by analysts rather than by actual operation under codes used m the desigrNeere.not venfled as to simulated operating conditions.. ~ accuracy or properly revised, and that heatmg.., o, er Niiciear analys2s -This deals with the analysis of metalation and air ++v--M systems were mt de-37, what'would happen in areas of the plant other than the signed to meet accident cot *fiana ' - ~ w:..ituattdr'fn the event of a break in a pipe carrymg very Itoth of these items are potential violations of the ~ '. bot water or steam, causing rising temperatures and NQciear Regul Commissioe's fpressures in the conesinment and other buildmgs.- been mpo{,.2 th HC.asgenteria and e===a . Quadtex says analyses by Brown & Root were either 4 third findmg corsiderEd vite ie'the pWect is that @* fiis gp dt not co t p s Breem & Root had not analyzed the e5eToi anscci. 7 dent on some of the entical pipmg systendsaid Darb - In @,ik group did not comrol tMtum Beeth, HL&P spoke < man on nuclear affatn., '. a. I values used in desigmng equpt and me design
- Although this does not need to be reported to-the:
SEC, he said, it is considered a taajde.uversite by.;;, a used in some cases was not in accord with ustry standards. Further, the report says, many
- h calls ina =nas q=st==
- modeensal W. $ E,n m mund in me analysis e m Beeth said INothing has been*founN risiSiuttle analysis had b6
. Pipios and a sign of the South Texas preject or which would require ; done,it was
- o assess. the report says. It said #
Q Brown & Root had not had a way to assess the effecf9' ,t seeds m k done io b,mg.,n , <= p, 3 eau,. gp=* - -a= ara =ab*=
- *d*.
on in behn was.... Radi e.ar contre -.ms sectmso said u : gmyesug 1*I# Yr instntmenu e dd be affected by a ' g g ,and.R g e6gineerof the project. ' *. n_y + Sed model JA review.of a scale model of the ' me msuna d be mport m Imown ae"/ '
- %as.y, de adwne Hadings did,dtngger me. # plant fodnd numerous valves and other pieces of '
~ 4quipment located se that access for.ption or- ) be sasi. the report did$ame fesI:s wouW be difMult or h__& $ssen & Root's abilityis -M<ri y e,.W.Mhght sooner W=== they were cangnt in time to, complete thePflisetitsaid HL&P wishes that the problems had been i i papacs as a r===an=N.sehedule. Cb'p. ar.& Root' was.ZeC$ltfy RPIMsf Mi gDeWfN. ben.7 '.' ' 'N R6e(" relied heavily.on, 'aiN ~*
- Broern c The report sayse 1
arefutect anirenen=aesi the prolet, 1 ig6conhectory and assumed.they did their woric cor. 4.-em90milessou2weetosHouscuten.. s cfasadere L could affect me He==mg th=pinbiamy,4re*-rettiy. Mah wi! Inst ha,Madattua.,Beethsaid. -fa eactL area of design, Quadres fhand I tlyplant. Iasser penNann or conditmos increah*h8yg7 doiQjambr4fe'a inasstve redesign i I=daharafl.: .o;- ..@. s. enumerated. Inchxting items on whach Beeth said engF ; peoblem." he M' i neers could beexpected to differ. 4 Some Quadrez findings took issue with how Brown & 1 y,p,,,,ffg.enev, g Root engmeers did somethmg, rather than with the, moult, k said. warmmrvow. o.c moons Construction in many cases was overconservative F'we Edt Other and therefore more expensive, the report says. An. ' P'e* example of overbuildmg czted is the piping support speem. Desigmng these supports to be stronger than - HOUSTON, TEXAS neesssary tr.ay have affected the cost and eharkia of CHRONIC tiip am b mport mys. {} 12 jgg 'tiowever, it says. becanse parts of the plant were .JENING - 359,5'T3 Gilt stronger chan necessary at the time, later c 1 changes required by the N.RC after' the Thme M.iht. SUNDAY - 423,4%
D trn b:4 r r. S:, _. 9.., f.ent 0:aer ?oc:s ?a Z '. '...@:.~. ' '.,Y'.*,.. other public 2nd private sector groups. Yet the Council seems to be , ;, ; - - - - - q < --.. = ignoring the knowledge of these ~;.- .;" 1 irroups gained after many years of v.... -., -,., - ~. study and millions of dollars soent. WILLLui RECKLEY. President C. of Sid. Chapter Radioactive \\mer can Nuciest Society Coaese Part Data Faulty Editor. The Journal: _..u,.:..n::.w::,.3.w* .:--.,< ~..,*' In regard to proposed Bill No. 44-
- n,
,Q.~ ~
- 31. " Regulation d "
, tation ?ce. 5, of rsdfo c'" anamus. Upon r .%.;us.egislauon..t shocked us
- o discover most of :ne Council find. j
-...0, TI.U s R ings on whica :he billis based were in %I's error. Furthermore. : hey do tot effecuveiy solve :ne stated ?urpose ........ h. ::. g ~- of the legisianon given in the intro-e. :...... a - "' ' 7 3 due!!an oy :ne regulations and re-strictions that foi!ow. We are forced to believe : hat :he Council has not gained an understanding of this issue N and yet :his bill is on its way to A AA becoming 3!ontgomery County law. g. gg'- the otil retains. almost exactly, the wording is prooosed by its mittal authors, nameiv the "Beitway Al- }iance for Safe Energy" i3ASE). It j -f)ff M ~ is fatr!y obvmus,tirat :ne legisiation's as syM JJ main purpose :s :o. net as anotner roadbtoes for nuclear generated eiectr:c piants. t rame as a surer:se Far:ner celays are excected be. second =1t com=g :n 'ine.n 1988. m. ~
- o us to see leeslaton produced in cause of wort snowdow.s en Se stend of 1986.
this manner wit: little or no resesren troucle-eisp;ed Sot,tn Texas P o;ect i done ey the Council but :nstead de-i nuclear plant. -Sut mere :s a good enance we can pending soiety on one specialinterest horx on de piant has dropped :o :ts ( group. ,owest '.evel since he pro}ect began. ;morove en : hat." Poston sald, espe-
- 221y ;f me des:gs pnase can ce
.Ve suoplied the Council with a !!st ofte:als coni:rmed Tiescay. brougnt bact'a m al.evel. of indivicuals
- attacneo) knowledge-l sole in :be suoject of :rsnsoorung Because engmeer::g des;gn cannot radioactive materials and other re.
keep pace with consruccon. a work .ooston said...s :ot scommen for .e l sources availacie. This effort seems force that once :otaled more than 1000 T s:gn to iag Wnd conscuc mn. but persons 5.as been recoced to L"00. ac. e sa:d Se. M6 Mn com. to nave been to no avstl. carcing 'o Jesse Postat. w=wgen. g"oW ar 'M M. > Wause of 'egal l We feel the Council has done a l great injustice 'o :his issue 2nc 5 font. eral manager fcf"ify ?:5!ic Service Woceedags. 3 gomerv County ntizens av not :nves. and ena:rman f Oa 5~?'s manage- ~ r or me past year. :fffE:2!s of 3rown
- gating :nis 15sae more estefu21y.
ment comn ttee. l Root. L c me contractor, and Hous- " ccat.egisla::on suen as :nis nas ceen aavised aasinst by such organ. L{PS.s a OS percent parmer a me
- o'n L:gntmg and Powet-C.s. :he man-2n pr:Jec:.
a-*.g car *ner. have scent a g eat deal
- za:: ens 2s :he :.'.5. Dept. of Energy.
Deot. af Transact:ation. Nuclear o ;me a near=gs tefere a panel of Regulatory Commiss:on. :he Society The current proclec.s wi!! be e. Se Nuc!aar Regulatcrt Comrmsson, for Nuclear Stedicine 2nd manv . Ne:ed 2 a eoct. ::e nex.* month on wfuch last year :.ssued an order :o . costs and *::netables for 2e project. saow cause wnv worrshould ::ot be . Pcston sa:d. , halted. ~ 3 Wh.le ne cecimed :o s;eculate en 2e Althouct cro!ect aff!dals said Sey upcomeg eoor ear::er recotts said : have snoiun'2e project.s teing ouut may reflect an add:t:enai two. year se. Safely and 'o spec 2 cations de hear. Lay. with Lmt I com:ng :n ;lne :n ae : cgs are not )ver.
- hey'are scheta!ed str.ng of '.9fe 7. stead of 1964. and :ne
.o resume m Sectemoer:n Houston.
rc4J n$c gencop
- vAsHINGTON. D.C. 20005 Front Edit Cther Pese Page Pete liCUSTON, TEXAS
- *Y DEC 2 4 W
'!ORNING - 299,546 SU?IDAY -- 359,423 tm. fim. hed nuclea_r p.lant s s ... b-s- =e-- -~e.. og= building settling unevenly ~ By EABOLD nr' antr.r1T ' ' " said no piping or wiring has yet been Peggy Rw4wn, a leader of a Bay City Post Eastreamses Wrteer innen!W1. citizens' group opposing the plant, said "It we had not done anything about it, she has received reports of uneven set. A half-Onished building at the South it could have developed into a problem' tling in other buildings at the $2.7 billion Texas Nuclear Project has tilted an inch' we wouldn't !!ke," Beeth said. "But we project. at one end from uneven sett!!ng, a Nu. found out about it early. I don't think the But Beeth and NRC sources said they clear Regulatory Commission document. slab is In any danger of cracking or any-were unaware of.any other cliting shows. . thing like that." . problems. But project officials say the slant in-He said temporary weighting of the the Unit 2 MechanicalElectrical Auxil-high end of the buikling with sandbags,. Uneven settling of the mechanical-lary Budding has nothing to do with son pins other corrective steps, has M electrical huilding was discussed at a osed ta a compaction and backflu violations found.,theunevessettling. [ted because m' ' The tilt reached a maximum deviadon rseeting was called to consider results of ' I 8 tion delays left it unevenly weighted at of about 1 inch last June but is now re. a special three-month staff investigation turning W M, Beem M W the M hans Proket and a pendng one end, said Don Beeth, a Houston enforcemen Lighting & Power Co. spokesman. The mechanical-electrical building, etion againt HL&P, the; proMet Uneven settling, if uncorrected, could reactor containment building as: pull apart piping and. electrical wiring-turbine generator building are the three The tilting problem was revealed when connecting the structum.to the reactor * !argest structures in the twin-reactor nu-a transcript of the meeting was released containment building.,Beeth, however,,,, clear power plant near Bay City. ..un er a Freedom of Information,Act d 4 4-
- s. c.
{ At the time of the Apru 15 meeting, nesses of compaction layers, use of im-two interim reports, found compaction: the NRC staff had just recently learned proper testing equipment and falhut to and backful at the project meets orix-s i of the mechanical-electrical bunding's sample and test sous property. eseds standards and provides "a h@ de-j l tilt. Staff members toki the commission-A staff member at the April 15 meet-gree of safety." ers they had not yet determined whether ing said the nnainge raised "really a A final report by the review pa l is'. ne the unlevel settling was caused by inade-serious questlos on the solPunder some still being completed, but Beeth eld he* quate seu compaction. of these structons when the construction was told it wul reconfirm the gte, rim But Karl Seyfrit, regional NRC direc-begins." findings. Wr, says me NRC now agnes me tHW Se>frit, however, said the soil and One other unresolved item. Beebd., ',",Iginadequag7 back dll question is now about 80 percent is the quality of backfill over,ailsiget "I ~ ag, resolved to the NRC's satisfaction, and buried pipe that will carry essential cool ' While air pockets in the concrete con-the issue should be fully laki to rest in ing water to the reactor core. But that tainment walls and other problems had another two or tbree mooths, hacirfill has to be dug up ar/wer, he surfaced earlier, soil compaction and backful questions were raised for the In response m an Apru 3 showe saki, to check questioned w'.gis om.the-pgp,* sPulat order, imposed by the NRC along with a "In the final analysir, Beetfn'iid, e $100.000 penalty for a range of violations, i HL&P engaged an independent panel of "we seem to have spe".c a lot of tt$ney i Investigators reported failures to com-noted sou experts to review compactica and a lot of timev,er backfill th,afgtae i piece compaction accordtag to required, and harlemi at the nuclear, project., exceeds anythi'istnuired."_ 1
I. NRCSays4 Wor.k'ers ! P,wu 3,adige,-e, A. l .,.e - o ... m. Of Brown.& R'oot Incere, = c.s. ..e. ,,e. v2 MM an Inspdon, " m:. STREET Jo$am . $ i D. h ^.,? !.L 3 T ' ? ;. i --East:23 roI::on- -===. -=== a aw n.i-* r MAY 7 1981 ARUNGTON. Texas-3 Nuclear Regu-203NING - 640'064 Talory hena*m safd it turned over to the Jhmice Department ;esults of an investtra-nem each fouutehrthm Brown & Root Ian ampisyes csespond-mobstreet.inspec. . man as quanty asseremme construence pro-seemeest',the 3shth.Tetas Pteiset nuclear (h -sammassamir cityrancociober! _YR,;. t The commissloa sam the Justice agency \\ h \\./ wil[doctde whether to brtar criminal con-() T \\ L-spisacy charges against the Hantburton Co. aatt's employes..The titree. adroitted that > r v , they remove:L records from an office before a a schedaded commismos invescration the f NRCanM. . h. employee. admitted that they'd movat equipment and records from a tool. shack to a supervtsor's office, where tnves&t gators didn't find them the agency said. Brown & Root'is a major contractor of the anclear plant, wtdcts is owned by Hous-ten ushung & Power Co., a atait d Houston. Jadastries Inc.: Central Power &. Light Co.: Cty Pubile Service of San Antaalo, and the ety of Austin.." ;. ' kt itinoestffation, published tlus week, the NRC'8suna titat er Brpwa at Root fore-- mas N'** employes to prevent them. troser reporting qualitycintrol problems to supervisors'o0 rown & Root! and Houstos , ughang & Pow)er.W-JN-iwe. .. Buses & Root and Houston Ughtina said
- est ths.foremes had been. Ared and that i th8Fhedineterated
- te(ensioy amacsuett ibehavior was taesiershoe. naassorught-Hugsaid.The u,tsty sakF ae tree other end also had been fired.Bouston IJghttasi
.. tt: bathr,se the.-term "W desn't husease as criaaised'ettbre by the Brous & Root employes against the-NRC1 ,But a witat judgmset on tha'part of'cortain" indtrtduals. Nettbar the NRC nor the compa ' man kismsfied'the erapicyes.7 .'.". ' -nousen wwar M'fii.aoeb; i en mRc!aso usy !be someompaance m ,_,w,,,asserapes and centrol pro.%u gaatty grams. - " .:2 - +
s ix Foes of Nukelicense had=b F Front 26t Cther Pe':S Pe9* seek se.cret tesh, mony;/ Page . Tms AYiERICA!!-STATE 52AM . A -, SyBRUCEHlfnNT - -h.vaSaa. Antoniobased organiza-a,n.m n. sew asten. ,,, tion, or Citizens for Eqmtable '1CRNING - 7,503 HOUSTON-A federdhard-Utilities of Bay City, have any SUNDAY - 120,700 witnesses volunteering to tes-g,, ,g g as many as 10 witnasm se-,dfy a meir beaH, """" l MAY 19 g forthe groups said. poensed by two groups che-lengtng Houston. Lignting & Attorneys for the two groups Power Co.'s application for a 11 ' 'are resorting to subpoenas, and cense to operate the South, while they wdlurge the witnes-Texas Nuclear Project, board ses they intend to Waaa2 to chairman Charles Bechhoefer ' testifypublicly,Slakinsaid,the-indicatedMonday, prospect of being cross-exa-mined by HL&P attorneys and The witnesses could be com-pelMty is indmi-hthink dating; don't want to go gj g ~~ er d "'~~h h '~s 88"88N,,. a we would issue subpoenas
- "N ac "=s against people who don't want' Jack Newman, attorney for
.'=2 m neer to testify" pubilefy "because-HL&P, said it is "almost a cer-otherwise you would never get ' tainty" that he will argue
- F?.
P'" intormation again." against the secret testimony at Chairman of the henr* Wednesday' shearing. $p;I,7,,, "- 3 ' u.,,, --"I- ~ N 23 NI ber Atomic & Safety O=?'E- + Edwin Reis, a staff attorney Board panel that wu! decide for the corrimfuion, said Mon-o q$.* -,3 ~,26,323 2,., M -- 60~,372 whether to grant the operating; day be did not know what post-license, Bechhoefer said. the f tion the staff wu! take at Wed-
- ~"
two intervenor groups must nesday's Maring. As far as he give good reason in a hearing Wednesdayforallowingthewit ! knew he said, no licensing
- board has ever permitted testi-nesses to testifyin secret -and.
mony to be taken in secret be. Stockholders reject that parts of Wednesday's heat,.cause of witnesses' fears of re-pl8R to f0fm nu ,nel. ing also might bebeidin'secart. tausdon. Lanny Sinkin, a 7 = = - Nenhern States Power ca. stoca.' foroneof those group the Clu ' l Sinkinsaidthetwointervonor noiders Wednesday overwaelminsty planned to subpoena cefensed a propoemi to create a com-tens Concerned About Nuclear 5tnessa, akuthaMof man to annune me economic w Power, said the secret e wh d babt rcquire pect of neclear power on NSP. mony was necessary ".to.. oin He indicated present testimony by people that some of the 1ritnesses still-ne propeant,initte;ed by a sroup of who are concerned that testify
- work at the 22.7 biulon projecti ftve saareciders, mes defeated yee.
ecttheirearningaliv:ng, al-whichis managedbyHLkP and terday at the company's annual g publiefy could adversely !s betag budt by Brown & Root meeting in the Minneapolis Audito-Neither the Citizens ",05 In. Austin owns 16 percent of rtum by a vote of 23.8 mmion against and 549.635 in favor, according to About Nuclear Pover, a theproject. NSP spokesman Tom Busaee. The-votes in support of the resolu-tion amounted to 2.26 percent of the 24.3 milljon saares voted, which means that it did not receive enousa votes to be considered on the agenda at me aart annual meeting. t i i _.-m
~F }.v' F A/4.e.,ooosA w m m nen.o Front Edt Othee Paes Page Pego IIO'ZTON, THAS JUN 21 198) s u,P execun.ve expmms hiring of Brcwn & Rqot By HAltut.D SCARF.I7t'f 82 4 i> choice of Brown & Root. a The memo denenbed a meeting.ai Jaii.111.12. of f,){,- Poet Emotreament Writer HLAP's quality anurance niansiger, Richarit A Brown & Root Inc. was chosen to build the Suutn Frazar, wita Rrown a Rout offic:4:s. Tern O'Mr Pnelect because its three top nya!> foi. Frazar sharply stten.ized tiruen & Rout's m.uiac~ tiiloo were i. emily engaged wph other nucle.ir meat auperviatun. inadequ te.p suty asausach e< f.r. projects. a federal hearing buard was told datuaitay.
- " "' I ' I*-""d Ef"IiI"** 5" ***I'"4 '""*'""I'""
Executtve vice president George W. (lpea Jr...f
- "d
the Huoatun Lirutng & Power Co. maid the utittiy re.e. Fraur told Oroma a nuut a.pianty anao..n. ~ ed the usher Insee construction companies we.v tuu l'8'"' ipos hd a Nuv, re),utauun an.uu,(.dn. : om 14 bay to give the pro}ect "first. ream attenttun.'" "'"'.. tad he warned "iniptuvementa must to: usa.u-rn Opsea was stoestioned aboint the metecitan pror-sa 4"L. by Ernesi E.11111, one of ine three admintanative.. Anoiner memo huwwer, ahuwed ih.u m a t..o... 9 judges on a Nuclear Regulatory Commianton hear:ng meermg..a itay 1, IWW Fraear told tituun a %.. ouard. officiala ne waa pleased and encourand by tra,a The board is taking evidence on whether HLhP ham N!P'd!3 N*P'"'**" '" ** "" uer.xu adaa... shown the " character and competence" to merit an operating !! cense for the $2.7 billion nuclear pun r tHATAR SAID Hti COULD now recummeud uru*n e plant near Bay City. & Root to other utilities. Yet another memo, introduced at the hear:nn! carts. OPREA SAID THE MEARCN for a contractor was er this week. showed th L by August 11179, HlaP h.ul conducted from mht lM2 into early Wi3. Actual con-ag.un revermed its views of Brown is it.,u s 's struction d!J not bedhi until about the start of 1976. twrformance. He said HL&P inntally considered about a onzen A nuctent construction veteran who had jumed builders and narrowed the field to four finallatz - HUP as a consultantiJ.H. Ferguson told f.huwa a Stone & Webster, tne Bechtel Corp., Ebasco and Root in a scathing entique that its i.erfiumance aan Brown & Hoot. De other three had consWerady more Wence unacceptable and apparently gettmit wurae. The memo warned Brown a Ruut might he re-than Brown & Root la building nuclear plants. How-moved from the lob. ~~ ever Oprea maid, all three had heavy commitments to However, Ed Turner, then vice president uver nu. Wher nuclear pba. e clear construction, told hoar (f quemueurrs the mesuo Oprea acitnowledged to Hill that aH three are union was not meant to be a formal notu;u ut cancellation of contractors, while Brown & Root is an open.anop the contract. C"* P*"Y-Turner said HLnP at the time was cunaistering a Opnea said that was not a factor in the selection of numoer of alternatives includsus hiring an uutside . Brown & Root, but HL&P did have some concern constnaction manager, Hl.aP lerunuug cunstruction about the tvection of unicas with whom HL&P had manager, requfrtng Brown a 16,t tu aubcuntract cleaungs. more wotic and - as a le=L resort - remuving Grown "All our plaats up to that time had been butit by g gagg, ualen shop," Opres amad. Aaked about his l'/f8 approval uf 1.lrown & Rout's HOWEVER, OPREA continued, "everything we performance. Frazar aatd it was condition 41 on tirown saw about Brown & Root was encouraging /' arm! & Root carrytag througn the reforma it had started. HL&P decuted Brown A Root could devote more atten. "Their LMd actions did cutTect numa pruhlettis," tion sad recurces to the South Texas Project. Frazar naul. "But they simply stid hut get to Ine tevel Brown & Root ahrned a negouated cunt.plus con-of molvendt root causes of the problems." tract to imUd the project for a itzad fee of $12 million. 'the hearing, which has been held here at the Semn A u.emurandum introduced at the heartag arkswed Texas College ut !.nw auditunum, wsil resume Euday that hy early IWW IlhaP was not so happy with sta in &an Antonio for a week of menatuns thenv. l l c
suilders fire a a.C,2C005& WagwNt2 TON.C ECt Cther for slowness; " Front,l~, l;A, AMERICA!!-STATESMAN j 'Off1Clal says i ucamo - t 7,5e SUf! DAY - 120,700 sysu.oouT uT 'l OCT 9198F -. - mn P 7 as h. e gl. The engineen of the South Texas Nuclear Pro-3,, g ject were fired because of slow procuww ' were 32 against the sale,4 in favor of the sale and 4 fears that the power plant would never be fin-one abstentia ished, a Houston t.!ghting and Power Co. offidal said Thursday. Beeth said a withdrawal by Austin from the pro-P*i "We came to the dedston that Brown & Root t. could not keep up with production and possibly could not finish the job." HIAP spokesman Don "We feel Austin ought to go and vote and do Beeth told a group of engineers.
- , what they want," Beeth said. "A 16 percent share Beeth said the Sept. 24 firing of Brown &, Root l Is not going to have any affect on the project.
was "almost unprecedent. Beeth said he felt the public misunderstanlis nu-ed" but that constddrations clear power because of the television portrayal of of me cost, work schedule radiadon as a menacing evil which gives Spider-and eventual operation.of man his strange powers and the Incredible Huln aa the plant was more hla greenlah tint. l Important. l "It's going to be disrup. "What people need to know about the safety of tive and delay the project nudear power plant is that they pan't blow up itke temporarily but we
- a bomb and that we've had commercial nuclear wouldn't have done it if it power energy in this country for 25 years and not was not going to improve one identifiable injury, much less death, has come the cost schedule," Beeth from radiation from a nuclear power plant..
said. Den Beeth @. "Asking how'many people could get killed by on forthe Houstoekutt me radiation in the South Texas Plant is like.ask. rector f nu eartaf Ilty, made his comments during an addresito a "Qg ,[he sa e swim-dinner meeting of the Central Texas chaptsir of. the Institute of Electric and Electronic Engin- "I'he ultimate nudear seddent,in my view,Is a. seers. HIAP, managing partners of the nuclear nuclear war over Middle East oil." . f-plant, fired Brown & Root as engineers of the pro-ject and is @ Bechtel Power Corp. as ,repia m aaata. W De HIAP offidal said Austin faces a dilaism, ' in its Nov. 3 citywide referendum because tafbr e mation on the ummate cost of the half-finished plant is unkown. Voters will decide whether*.the. s ctty should sell or ntain its 16 percent of.-the
- project, u-
" Austin is going to have to 30 to the pol Md l ' make a dedston in the absence of an awful lot of [ Information wtdch ta required for an informedeoge," Beeth said. "We don't know how medt its 1 l ! I so6ag to cost or when it,will_be ready." i .I
/' 2 c, _ Jgpl = ... :.n 'Il . 2' 3 ^ . (: ' 'U Post Office Box Three, Houston, Texas 7/001 ,,,m + -f%. r.;., ,.h.@Mhhstch ST-ER-E-14474 31, 1978 57N: <A;077) c.31 j qv us un c.)
- m,
.d- . m L I p. R .l cf QBouston Lighting & Power Company - f"'-]'; i . M.1 oP. O. Box 1700 'C"- " Booston, Texas 77001 Attention: Mr. Henry Key ~ =... :3y - ~ -} ~ N ~ -.n n -
Subject:
thit 1 Level II Schedule Analysis South Tazas Project Electric Generating Statiott .f.. . i M-U Gentlemen: -- y;.-L W attached schedule =nisysis is for constructica progress thru hbruarry 25, 1978. c. Construction is in the process of developing a revised pims 'foid the Electrical Nechanical Aurtliary Bn11 Mag. This revised plan will bring the structure back to a late finish date. This means, that all building department crafts will be scheduled and leveled on a late start, late H f=h basis. It also neans that there is abacutely no flgat left vithin that si.mi.de and that munpcwer will be leveled at==vi=um utilization for the life of the project. ,,7 The Contain=mt 3uilding has been replanned utHf d=3 the same principle as previously mentioned for the Electrical Mechanical A=411ary Building. The twelve month schedule has been revised to reflect this plan. A mjor asile-stone associated with this schedule is to begin setting of the RSS esgripent In eArly Dece3ber 1978. If yon bave any questions, please contact us at your h-- f-ec[. f Very truly yours, ~' ,J}_]% ^ ~ 4eorge F. Hierman Project General Manager CFB ac l cc: L. A. Ashley L. E. Rayden, Jr. l H. L. Baker R. C. Butto l C. E. Bonin S. A. Rasnici TN50.E3riwdw R. E. Reder C. L. Crane Pile No.: ADHD l
2ij.y- ~ .n..
- y.;;; -
13IT 1 IEVEL II SCHEDUIE AMALYSIS ~ t l '.A: l OF PROGRESS TW20tXR FEBEiHY 25, 19 78 . f.? J.;;.~. 'n ':: - t A - k.'l<.-l '.% *. REACTOR CONTAIN1EIT BUILDIN_G - % ?x W mA.[.. 1. Shell Concrete - During the month of February, work ccarth on Lif t 8; however, the pour was delayed doe to interferences between rebar, sheating and contaimt liner penetrations.: Completion of concrete placement for Lift 8 was rescheduled to March 20g >19784 i.e., thirty (30) weeks behind schedule. A detailed work plani has been developed in an attempt to prevent further =11m ~ 1n the schedule of shall construction through Lift 17.': Aw== that this P an can be effected, we will complete the shall tim J. Lift:17 en l sepr==h-r 30, 19 78. s g.ppe. ~ + ;.:9.!S ; -- = 2. Interior concrete - During the month, work taas eaae==rr=r-d 'au com-plating the secondary shield walls to elevation +16' in preparatico for starting work on the elevated slab from El. +16' to 11:'+19'.~ . Work progressed well in this area to the' point that shoring'and decking for the east half of slab could be installed.. Ilelays are presently being experienced on this slab. Every effort is~ presently i being ande to pour this slab on April 13. 1978. Wrk also en=H=ned C on structural steel erection, the elevation +5'-9" slab and walls g e -., yW $ outside the secondary shield wall. k cA ~, % kd l
- iC h As menticoed above, a comprehensive work plan has been developed Eoi all U
ccustruction activities in the Reactor Contakesmt Building.- This plan 4 was established to meet the earliest date possible for setting the IRSSS components. Based on this plan, these components will be set during December 1978, which represents a three (3) month improvement over 4 previous forecasts. We presently feel that the schedule can be met with ~ the assumption that full support will be provided by everyone woThing on the pro, ject. 9 l' This plan calls for the expenditure of approximately 15,000 ammhours per week on the betmay to support the schedule. During the sooth of Feb ~ ruary, our expenditures averaged a little over 16,000==ahe=-= per week; therefore, we feel that the work plan can be effected. He bzwe +=ha the following steps to insure that this schedule fa met: 1. Additional supervision has been added to direct all efforts in this building; 2. Required manpower has been diverted to this building to fully staff both day and night shifts; 4 . -.. +,, -, e
~f ' * ..-Qq.. ..~.-.i..-e g. -1 s-m .+,. ~ ""5 3. Additional construction civil engineers have been provided to strengthen support of craf t personnel; 4. Additional overtime is being worked where necessary to swport the schedule; and .:.,, ~..;.~,. . a i 5. The building has been listed as highcat priority to all support cra fts. C - -' 6 m @ 9.vte.. . $5 The schedule that has been developed is deff air =1y within the' xabie of S pjj our capabilities.
- [".
-- d{h ' =."MW ' - i $$;mm. i. = 10-Y r- - c: d a;g cPUEL HANDLING BUILDING 2.'.- % g.:5:.S 7 Ct. C u ~ x n During the month, very little work was done oo the north end of the building ~ due to slippage in delivery of embedded piping from Soutbvest Fabricators. Delivery og rhia pipe had slipped to mid-March and all concrete work and contin =rinn of armin1*ss steel wall liner erection was delayed. ~ MO 7-
- .-:/:;..
)EmANICAL AND FTRCTRICAL AUXILIARY BUILDING '- ~ dQ Wall construction to elevations +29' and +35' is presently mimeteen (19) weeks behind schedule. During the month of February, 1,119,565 pommia of rebar were received which represents a dramatic improvement over the previous average of 160,000 pounds per month. If rhf n rate of Mfvery can be susraf nad, we feel that impros* ment can be In1-ind in cur c=rrent scheduler position. .:3.D Due to the many na. tor mechanical and electrical systems in tMa' Suilding, ~ the civil schedule is extremely critical and scst be expedited 'to the fullest possible extent. Construction has again in this building ta1ra" the following steps to assure==rf== support of the schedule: 1. Additional supervision has been added to ' direct all efforts-i.g+., 2. Required manpcw.r as dictated by material deliveries has been diverted to this building to fully sinFF both day and mi bt E shifts; t; d ~ 3. Additional construction civil engineers have been provided to strengthen support of craft personnel; 4. Additional overtime is being worked as required to s
- d. the schedule, and S.
This building has been given priority (second only to the Con-teir = ant Building) to all support crafts. . '. e
h TURBINE CUZRATOR BUILDI5C i 1. Structural Steel - During the month of February, structural steel erection continued. Progress in this area is king controlled by steel delivery and by recoating of steel that was improperly enated by Hosher. Completion of steel erection will.be delayed by twenty-eight (28) weeks due to late delivery of steel. Ground Floor Slab As structural steel erection progresses, kt is 2. the intent of Construction to proceed with construction of the ground floor slab; however, only a small portion ~of this slab has - Most of the bolds on this ' slab are D m @ been released for construction. 8 cQ M due f:o late purchase of equipment andy subsequently, lat K ~ " t& vendoe information. Every affort should be-made to complete equipment y$ g @ procur*=ent activities in order to allow completion of A* 18 9 construction of this slab. If this is not done, addi+4<==1-ammbours
- n. n vill be expanded on nainranance of backfill and electrical. and==^=nical 4 'y activities will be delayed.
Turbine building mchanical and electrical activities had been sched-uled to start in the last quarter of 1977; however, due to delays outlined above, they will be delayed until the second quarter of 1978 di1xh vill result in a significantly higher inanposer peak in these crafts. RESERVOIR AV. D CIRCUIATEG WATER SYSTEM 1. Make-Up Puno and Screening Structures - Based on an evaluatica made by ifouston Engineering, the ocheduled date for starting to fitt the reservoir is being revised frcu August 1,1978 to h '-cr 'thru Jan.1979 with no impact on the overall project schedule. Correct schedules for these structures will support the revised date. g l 2. Circulating Water Intake Structure - Current' schedule projections f forecase that this otructure vill be completed seven (7) months behind schedule. -Ihe primary basis for the schedule slippage is the diversion of manpcwer to more critical areas. Improvessent in ' the schedule can be realfred if aAAtt anal personnel can be hired i and assigned to this area. Construction will be ready to start work on this slab in Aoril and, therefore, hinaering most tale f===M=te ~ action to remove all holds. 3 Circulating Water PipinR - During the month, work progressed mell en insentiation of subject piping. Completion should be on M= Lie for l l May 1, 1978. '
O e ESSENTIAL 000tDIG MATER SYSTEM .l. Essential Coolin2 Pond - The start of work on this activity has been J rescheduled to March 1,1978 with no impact on the overall project GmO schedule. +. N M 2. Essential Cooling Water Piping - The start of work on this activity 3ON Lj W '$ has been delayed thirty-four (34) weeks due to late receipt of pipe. G This is a critical concern due to the fact that backfill on the east ji.d n. E side of the Aurt Mary Building and installation of a gmd portion of e.4 y~ underground duct banks and nanholes in the yard area vill be delayed by this activity. YARDWORK 1. Perunnent Drainage, Fire Protection and Seunge Treatment Facilities - During the month of January, work progressed on these activities as vork areas became avm11mble and as weather permitted. j 2. Railroad - The starr of this work was delayed about three-(3Facoths due to lack of access to private properties north of the plant property line. To date, only the Runnells and Imwis properties have been ac-quired with negotiations continuing with Union Carbide and EFAC. Due to this late start and the possibility of further delays on the rail-- road, certain equipment and material deliveries may have to be made by truck or barge. 3. Wnistration Building Youndation - Construction of this~ foundation is presently eight (8) months behind schedule due to late receipt of embedded steel and underground materials, design changes and bolds, ) and bed weather conditions during excavation and bacMt11 operations. This is an ites of concern only d:e to the fact that the ocenpancy date vill probably slip. 4. Demineralizer Building-The start of work on this activity is pres-i ently seven (7) months behind schedule due to delays in A-=iliwy BM1Mng ecastruction which delay b=eW11 This is an item of con-cern due to the fact that the demineralizer mystem will be one of the ,~ first systems required for start-up. ~ 5. Yard Concrete - Due to delayed design information.. tittle work 1 as beca done to date on this activity. This is an item of ccecern be-cause if this work is not started soon it will-fall. in an area of peak asapover requirement and cause a reduction in construction j econony. l 1
9 SIDeULW During Febru.2ry 1978, we were scheduled to egend 411,244 direct manhovra and actually expended only 348,667 which equates to an sederespenditure of 62,577 direct n:mhours. Also during the month, we were scheduled to place 17,290 cubic yards of concrete but actually placed only 9,798 cubic yards. g., g it co ci bh th If Concrete and ennenth schedules for all remaining vork on the job are [] m [5 currently being revised in order to respread remaini g concrete quantities ij ri and nanhours. These revised schedules should be ccepleted by early April, H c:: 12 1978 and will be used in the future to evaluate perfor==nce and everall ~- j k [a[. construction schedule position. e e l l i
t PART OF OUR MONTIILY PROGRESS REPORT RECEi. REOS.-A)C _l_~ PE OT SPECITICATION Ol'A's*TI TY TO C'.IENT FRO:t C. !! "T T0 INo'J II:Y M OTi_5 PJ. C ' D TO C'.l LST a - PI'I:C' L'sS I.. 4 ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 233 227 i _' ; S 201 l 183 1 16 '- l 140 1 l I ...n i i 1 i i s A. J6; w,: 4. v,.) e l a~---- l 1 t s. 1 i l i t i f I 1 - v.;. c. p L... ;. ;* .n,.. e 4 w g 9 .f. l Ju i 33 l l .ja s .ra n .% I A e soA. .m.....
- t..
I l g g I f l I e i 4 i i I i 1 a 8 0 e I e 1 l f' f 1 _r. r,, _:- .r og .-~. 1 5' a a N/A N/A i N/A ':! A ATIACIDIENT - l i I l s I I } . s,, t a,_ , o,, ,c_ 4_- e l _o, _er 2 : 100 c) I e a i 6 l l i I 4 I l 6 I i'ERCENT TACTOR l I 12.- 2_.e
- 12. _
i 3:. s.1 4.,._ c. a- ,1- .*F COMi'I.ETION i. s-4 t 8 ,i e a .c.r., .n r p r ..y l l l s a... .cTor: or 85% l l l j I ,~ -,3
1/16/~c' STARIUP R\\ NAGER IIL&Pl B. F. DUNCAN GIEULTANT SUPPORT IIL&P B. SN1PLE-NSC-J. W. WADE I I STAR 1UP SCIEDULER . WESTINGHOUSE. BIO.N & IH7r NSSS STARTUP-B&Rl BOP STARILP ULT S/U ENGR _ LEAD S/U ENGR W l R. B. SIIGD B&R lM. B. SGP% i I kl 7 S/U ENGRS B&R 7 S/U 127316 IIL&P S S/U ENGRS IILsP 5 S/U I2s' GPS 1 SCOPE: 2 SCOPE: 1. Reactor and all supporting 1. Turbine-generator and auxiliary and safety systens supporting steam cycle 2. Safety related electrical systens distribution 2. Non-safety related 3. Fuel handling,' transfer electrical distribution arxl storage ~ 3. Fire protection 4. Liquid radwaste 4. ItVAC 5. Wells and water treatment 5. Reservoir makeup station 6. Solid and gaseous radwaste -7. Diesel generators i
+ ?J -d .= b 4' RB o78..f L. L.. /MJJ&.-nl4 i L 3 3.a. al s.- ) f'. O eI d.' t;, s o .I.\\ M. bw d ~Q d bhqnM- [ %pln oC.3 kW.jn J.L.LA. om.c .o CJ R. ) 6L~d.m,.r3 L J id.~. y% i .)s. a h v <u...., y,, px, x-u .2s,aoy,A G<.,w .... ~tL W Nq $ ' l3, coo y~,w siJJ... L, .2 - 1 o L vXf 7 .., s u aIW~ II~ /! O D y . rj , 't l }. j),, D )c;L 7?-d$OS L 15,60o lL,y ,L s ~U. DA pLuJt 6 AWJ LJA. mg ,t f.). ' 3.. p. ,.. f i.16 Qf.. (., f 4 l., ~ E e. apf SwtS y w.o.- _ Ys. b a.A a ;fi L. a p + % = M . ~. Q kh, -+ 4 e \\, - r i s
,3, - ~.. - ~......,. -...
- f-1 s.. y ~
11 a 4
- p,'-
. u., A g
- el g
h GIP Oh-F b % %b 4-h=.wNMW.,,-*. y- ,n t.- t:. 2 ,. -.. a ,_= _ ^, , s..: u'.. h ...-/. T Oh3 . ~ .%' s+..+s i. $ 7-} 4 f..-j.y' O ., ' '.I p r. .-w ...--a. p... g.. t - pg. - - - W. )h! i. Y. 4 I .,Q 5-4: ?... w . p u.. 3 _ ~ L w. .a am.,. - 1 $ +~+ db e. 6 . u y. a 7,<x,. ~ 6: 4. y .c p' g Q is c, n ci. .hble.. p Wa juA A y 3.j A R I ~ t 1 1 [ ~ 'h' @ p 9 g, g Q. ' ' g e t - r p ,. r L g' _Y-b b_ O ' Y J^ g}am-y _ ~,_ .JJuC-: m m [ ~
- .m._.
v= i a)...,..-_- . y. m, ewaa-+'OmM e4e -e-49e p- "i.m,6 q,h f L y _ s +.,. . ~ i. 4 g ~ < 4 ..p_ -g_ sme.. .c s_..a.'r ' y. 4 .+-,,.s e e+ w ...,4a,;-~,~._aa',; 2 ..w. 5 i t 4-+e y k -_ w .A I o l', s i 4-3--._.- 4 7 S ,7 ,7,- 9- ~ 4 m. kk-.. W& P ,'_ j g- . t o e _.i.,. ^ ' s . ~ > w-J,w _,,. ....,_ - ~..._ .2. 'Y. ~.~.
6 i g iig,( { i s h. a,, !.)"...) ') ?.~ I k v,:c. q,. q ~s .g 6 v e,, n 4s i.i (. ,s N f G-k 4 W e p a, v .g-5 9$ s.' f R Y r' 9 l .) Q}( g.Va e e 3 a 4 f.I y- %4 m 2 '4r.) o e ti k ', h%- !. _ 43 i O.,. i. I.. _..,. . L. . r.... i. a[. Q ), . ;.. 1 1,: a; M g y. 3: i .1 .{ .4 0 . p... 3 g 'I .. ko... .f.- t. h '( 8 [ I' { f
- I e),..f, lA..f E
c. O I .& I = p o-a q q %__N a b3g3 g- .. - 6 e - e e V e r.I. 2. w _. 1.'.j L.s, O v- % 4 A e + ~3 : u g _.9. x._,. w e a- ~- a g g. .s. .g.... p. a. 30 g ....i... .{.. .e. 1 .l. I. .de, 4.. a H -.,s... ~ e > , ~.,. - .- lg.
- 4..
s e e
- i...
.g. I,I ) 6 .4...... ......L. 4. ]. .e.. ,a I g ...g.. 6 3 a 1. .;. i .4.. .,.... ~.. .s _ _s 4 . }. e-.. 4._. . g l [ g. .i.. g i i i. i G.. I i .l... .t. . i a 4. ~ ~ ' ~ ] ** ~~~~.'.7...... ' ' ~ ~ ,. (J...... .i...... j .c hh._q i 6 $... 1 t h.4 ~" 1.- ... *,f. I N-.. f.d
- 1.. '
I.I f. T..... '. 1 i.., =, 2. p,........ 4..., .. q._s3 3 .. g.. s. ,e.p. y ..... 4 9. . i. !4 ' ~ ~ I 1%C. :.!..' M :....,._.. d. 4.4 I t---'~ 'k... g - "d.'..' ;S._. p,., { g.~.;..; ...jT y,b 3 s j ,c p .,?M.-(s k l i p ..s. t, g. p,.;, ..a.u .I. y.,...-...-_.......... n.--.... s .i....s; .......l.. y. ,....y s.. { J...,.. ...1 i.. .sl,. ......L..... 6. ..i.... ._._..,w_.-. i ....s.... g m 6....,.,_.... _ _... 1. ,s.. ...i y
- w,..,
i s.
- s.............
5.~.. . n 4 y l w,. ..J. 3 N, t i h N s\\,, - i . o .M,. w A b ..h 2 c a s
- s..
.l. ~ a v \\ Y I N R" . 'd .b l...... i _. i.nl .h t gf.y y3 2 z D 1.. 6 .. {... i. - bg - S o e u4 l g.+. - r-.-. t,, du D,;.g,_ j.-. y .I~g. aE v.4.......,.. ....a p. o o 3 j ,J
- q.,
t p* - 4 40 A es 2 .l. ..._.l. 4 ug 1 y ) Q S. 4 *, e g .8 o (, m .8 g g. j. 4M [.E *R })# t [.11: ? [t M .g .) 3o, 9 A 94 4 t
- l 4
E
d 's 1 e i. lh I m ?f I y} T e, I L o. \\3 L % ). ?. c 2 '4! 4 N,1 p lI i k tt* - s q c tr1 n 3 u 4 ck k 0 $' z N O N J + 9' M Ir 8 Oki U a c sf a 2 A ,a g g s s. 4 ( ..,......_,._.T-~.i O s r.. a. ~ ) .l. ... p.. 1{,..;,. .[ ]. .r.. g b p. s i..... .i. .s. i. .l l. .t.. .l. .l. d i y .i. 4 .t. i 4 .e. . l.. .... l.... l... .a tQ X-g. 4 q 3 j. {..k..l .. I,., .D d,. [" g...,%., - h. 0.'... 3 g w.. g . I. o'.~;,G ' e'.. r e 0 h N L4 O W O' 4' %'. ra' O'.. C' : C' b ' O 9' O. - I' E e . e. . 9 4en G y m
- c m
o .o - s* %s... d g, to M. -3 e ' ' e. ' r- . ;. i'.. tC_tt d. s_2 'v g V) a, 6 2. 4 .}. ....i a. .J. l i I y. -e... a N.~
- s. _.. ~.44
..i.. .} -.e. .4 7, s: g.. a. g..,.. .[ .t. ,. o - .1,.-.. !.., -.. 9 y-. Q. 1 ., 3 4. u.... .:-}. .a. .....a. 8. .l e .6. .{. . l..,. J ey g. 4 p.g ...i.,..e .g. q....e.. i s. 1 a... e .s .i 3 a !.e ); c- .l-g, ..4... l......_...a.,.. L s 4 .6. +. , - g. L, m 1! ...... 4 J g Fy i ,4.. r P..--- ..m 44l OT W IJt-1 ,J.- .I.
- ^ * * - - ' - * * *
....t..*' t b6.g 3
- g. a s
). _.._...2 .s. ........ l '....,.. jY. \\.s. 7..;.___ ,y. g . r... . 4... 4..., s. 4_ f. i s . f.... p...... i Tj... .. 1.. _.. 3; s, j .i.. 1 4! s .a . /, *', . j .e. 1 .e. 6 '.~
- ..f.
t e, n p. ,. _. N........ ..._....'.T..... . j.. _.... -....; 9, . A y,.,. s, g. .....i j .. !....l. l. ..-.._.\\.... Q.---.. n .i. y .} Y ..'My.. _ s -l.;
- s..
\\,, ..j - q-y3-g ...,....t.. _. w.. 3 s n d. m s 2 .., 9 b ,g . q s,. 3 e. n_j
- ..;S D
l a E .i._. .h., d' je '_ I ,-} S.i..... -e. D <c s.. . g
- a -
t.j i s. . y .e...;. p... o N h. l 2 x+ - 4 s.: w.. . 83. s. o i ~ ,N 5> D ,4 g. .q. D h C 4u p_. g. 9 s -g 33m y i.- a q '$ g g i3 g a3..... g .g ... q 'N __ _ e6 s_ Q. f.. - . e..,
- g 8
c m ~ [ j' i.
- X',
d; b,3 1' .[- a* 2I Zy. lI 'I.. s 'I k as5 I i .l 1. J.. -l l. (; 3 M tz 6. m',. 1 i. s. s. ..u 2o 9 Tr 't Q g 4
) l l j l I i i 9 M
- l. h.y
( r 1 9 x
- kn
.c. 4( e-g at; N ks 1 }%
- .i 4
- e0 4) g A
NM ~ ] M 4 c E O n. b Q to N 8 8 I 3$ D% Q " v sd n< e a A c ,a s s >= 4 k s --y...~~- g ,,,. T..., _3.~. w -i. t,.-,- j;* -- } {,- *= ,.m.9...-. }
- g.....f
~f .t.. .l. .l .t. .. 5 gg i.
- 4. :
..L .e 4 cd .g. .I. .L,.. .6.... s% i. . I,....
- 7..
j y i a. t--7.'.-l';k.'c1-l 4.. 'TP k k.....t$s-.....{....., 5,' 1 L -. l qk - o t-C ~~> 0 d' '*h o e e O . I W-o c'... e :. .o' e o'. I' e c o e c' 0 3ri ty o e e '.._%. h.9 g ' V'.* di '}-T"% O ,. i... N._ N 1g. F. O J.'. to. M J... Cf. ( .i. .) g a .l }. ,..g... :-l... I.
- j...
3 ., l .{. y gg. .g .g. .-.a 2 .-4 gl* y.. .. - __e....... 6* ..$....6 .. l.- m,, ; } **. {< ?- t .,e.e .,, ry ,y. 9, - .. i..;. cb . i. e. s :. .i.. .!._.,... e. -._...-(... i .j . '}. ,.8 - i ,,3 4.... t . \\. i i ,s .t, g ..J a.. 9 .} F F.' 1
- 4 OT e
.p... u h.p.,h. g. l.o .3 .f. . 5ld.6
- b. -
n- .-.s. M,<,.. .l'..:}... g. '.i. ",l ~.. 6, . ~( _. 6-q 6 p m. .g. e , y j e. s. ..e i. i s 2_
- s. _
.... e,. s s .g.... 1
- 4 4
.. i,........ I. . q. 9 ,,p. g 9
- f l
.f. ..s 3 4 y . s, $ .1. I
- e. 9,
. g... 1. Q i ..,,,... s .L i '.,.,,0w..... g. g ... i i e l . L ...___.1 i .. &....{-.. y .s a. v p,. ...i,..... [.,Jy.. s .~... s, t .,c. s ),n Q,4 ., Q. Y '1
- s. ee e
m e _.. L.
- . a...~
r. l. e 1 V, w s, . e.j 9, "....s._.. g 6. <3 ..f'._.. s,.s. _ c c,.... o ,3.. t t. I *r 1 N.
- 4 0.'
0D' '. 3 2 2g W e b...._ ,4a s . *= g i-S 3 w l L $a M.,l ' f,q.g.s
- 4,
.I' t I {.! Nx\\' a [. 7... N-g3o = t t u 4k s: '.. k .c l l 4-y% n(g4 = .O h N.g q *e .i -4 l -}. .l. es ag ins a d j ..t 1, g % g ,A .i., i e. i a q.. r dg i. a Q w 't d 0 \\ + 4 i
s N !J i S 4g. Y ? '*; D ~ & e, s,.ytH m : 3 s 4 "k 8 k' l/. N xh. %i A hI Y J 9 T E Oo n I i wt 3e 4 o 1 dk e c V Q a E Q 9M vd %q -o 1.n%a __T... _...l._ ,..__._..,._ _ l. ..'l O L ".. ' 4.. i-i 3 ..o } If .h. 3 J. -6 g .e. t ,e J. .g 4 .t. .g .4 s. 9 Er I .3 i. .). .. E..l.k. l. k E g 4 .4 '.g i .i 44 2 E3 2 8%, l I A ' 'I x o
- A
. I : - o e. 6: 6 o D> wv N e s'. C. ' 'n'
- a.
- E e
Q Q o I' M I,. %N. e o w =,. = s .e w 9 Q N => IA g q.,,,,,,]%.,,,,, g,,,, .,.,,g Q Q* ,,,((,,,Jf,,,,,g g r. w Q -Q g
- Q^
{ .m....N N ..N* (. r g. -l N
- f f.
t. .. f.. l p i a .j... .. g.. -
- h.. - -
p%, '.. 9 t. j ) .u e t j g l .g .g 4 -...t...-1-_.. 4, .... - ) {. } 1. .t j. g' y d i 1. e I.. 6 p. .4 i g
- e 4
6 .g. Ml .{ g. e 4 ..I
- e
...$..e... h f-1 .} .........6.~........ g h .l. i s. 3 I _.J - -...t 6-e. is, 1 r.
- h l
u! , s p
- t..'
I,,ss g. g I, -9.. i 64 3., _'. s. .}... e. I l.4l h I* p -s- ]j % :iy a )
- y. g.-
t .......,....r-9.% m. 3 s e . g +p. 4 j N,.. N .s a...... 6 .a .t j.. .. l.. ~... -., at l i3 i '=g .._ =....,. J '4 -_4_. f.. .g... g v... I 9 g. j g -Q t. K'. s.... x f. ?,. a g. . g'. t Q.....,~.. .6. 7.......,a6, .. 9,. -..L. .( - ..+, i .......L.. ..... g.... e... _4.. i e
- y i.
- t l
.2.- t. \\ w y t t s t } e l g - a 9 .....-g. .f. s. .i .{.. .i k .( .4 g s .g 4 8 = a },,...... 3 j..,. t 'l' g, 9,, t M-I ,.... 'l l.. w=p .,p a c J.
- t. g.
.j 4 4 C' I e 9 4 gts 3 p.. 'l g h{ b * .' 'i '
- j
- 1 'd * ~ .i, 5. . _. s..., = . ; - +.d. d-8, i .s = i. .-- - N O 4* , f,,a .^ s. 4 %.... -9Q* O
- ~
s.
- d...
. a q .,.~ e .s i l i g 4x r .o 4 = '- . g % f. \\ s3s t. 3.p... g.. _... 7, t ,, g =c, . e :.. 4 4 < ti < I., .i.. a i e. . k e ' D. Ya h (n 4 l$ .. :'/
- l.
.f.. .l. t-t --l- ,3p1 y(* h* 7 N,< A L1.1 I .1. '+ N4 d i I i
6.Z .:5 b ,g 'u. 04' d j z h J .O h M 5 1 jf 48, J e vi N. 4 c s Ig h.b 3 ac u a r D% r:. 5 '.q ds t v u 2 da - '} O ZS w
- g:
e.* b a4 O gas 'd O b 4 ai i .i1 :,l -; t C5 eI2 I o z i. O5.sCa s l w) o5I
- .n 4.a [
O O s F.. gI
- / :-
., e . _u.._.1... 0 -t. .p. .g .4 .l. .4- .l. l- .g.. .g e -t. .I ..t. .._.... i......I. j. .i .l.. .-l r .j. .i. O. .e.. ... O e o O o o. o h. 0 6 w e . o C e t i' 3 - f d. ' ,t[ T 14'. S 9 _.__. N \\.sR j'. I f'~ 0 I o' '4 6 o 4 e o = s e c-u%- h,g g f i*g-fC A V e o n o 1 s s. .l. W N -
- 9.Q,'
- }.
.C. t#. N'. N - A .g... l.., .l.. .l. .l .g. 6 .l s, ..e r. -l. l- 'l. 's y,. j ._u.... q..._.. _ 4 ,.Cep.. e _ 2 o ~. .l g i. ql. p i + p,;. p
- 3. ;
i. ... 3 c,, *L.;... 3 b-) t q. I i. 9,. 0 l g' .1 l .tw.,.....I..._.. ..o. I 4 a 3 .s 2.. h, ?..I~. s.. o L. 1 .x_. I gw i = b.w a 5 6 .i x,a.. e. .,i. =>.a. tg lco,q. l. s W.. 1..._ 3 __.. .L., Oy,3 8-1 o, i l:.._._. ..I... d. '. -..,d{ g+: . _~ ib g. ...i. .g. ey a,..... i. l. 9%. .r 4 3 .. ]..... {... _, 'f; .y n s.,.... ,, i 6 L r, .s ;. .t a l... s.gl......., ...i ., J, ..l.... .l [. t k. r j ._6__.... _ .e. (,. gq. .l. [ 4 t m y...' ; I.. _.l~ \\, C "" - 8 .l r J. g g 4 g. ..s.. .i. \\o
- u. s..
t z .. l). .i.., i I.*:.l;'k..*: ..j. 1. .L .I'
- a
- 'l...
.i g , -.. 7 c, g. .6 - w .i l .g. .t. .g. ..a. s' j .a. a j e. I.. .t. m th.. g% 1 h 31
- l t-t -- -
t- .j ,%. *j. } g,4 y w
- b g
Ni ...i I - ,..g t - g 8g g .d 9 't ,s 9 - i e g.. .,._y.... ...+. 3.J g... .;.7.....,. , y .l'. .e, .e. . l' - . i, . x. y 4.. j, 4 ;., 3 l s. .I a v = A o 5 e w - 1 v.3 5 u J $ \\1 i* S 't b 4 i g.f )C f..J. i .e lj ' o;t N g i h, J_ 5 I I h h., i 1, - i s C.I f d Q gj d* NN s!. s Q .; ; w;: E-j u m o-o J 4*o N i A O o I w 39 I g 3 Z{0 M J 3= N O I' of* $u N q Z $I Wh
- j...
s .p. .). .g. .t.. -(... 2 ,J. .]. I .4 1 .i. i .1. W i 4. .d.I.. x 4.. o . o o ......-l1 0.. 8'..C. 4 v. ? . '.. r. l. . a ::........ < 6 I. o,. .0.. .. C. 4, c..- 9 D. n e 8 - e s S 8 l e.9 g s- ~c s~ 7 s~- g s-2 w I-ee e Q R-'.%. c w: c o , u f 6.__.',t _' A..'. w.. w a
- =
-i ... tt t,t _ __._tc.- F e.e __1 A a in c. W s' ' '*d--_d- .e s . 4 g. J. .l. .l. l.
- l..
..- l, ..i.. q .f. } I.. f 3.j g I ....,. + j. 4,, - ..i. _ 2 l. a g -t, g s.. i r t
- - 3 9
a 1 L ,0 i. t 1 ...a_... is_.._...._i.. L-i. t, i t, . o .d. ,.b, t;i. 4 *.,,.e..G o'sol. g - m a... 4 { o,, s g a-t-t ." g e .'. 1:" lY ~ iM. d .i: 37' l 4 'O. .. ' Q... ...s. q..
- r..&,
h IF. N: _.l. , g :3 I ap& .g i ..i i . _.,1 -..._..'.... f. L _ W '.'. :. y 53,s.
- p. J
_.j. ..g.. 7 s
- p. 3,.,;,
' as...... ,,g. s. Z n-.. .\\( .. I ',f :- I..-. .e. .._.t. 4. x .ses. g o Tb-, o .e a 7.., '. 7.. }. ....'.Q.....'j.' l g { 3, $. b.. w. $ :N.1 :_' : I ". !,..._. 5 _. li e, $9... N f.. Y,.} A i, w..... ..e N ,.,.,<cr. .\\ i .., s s L. ; l a: y .t - t.
- 1.....,
7._ a _. _...a -...,m .-4 g s. ,.4 4. m< .i 1 1 -\\ t J - -. ~.. '. 4-* ,Ia. ' g, ' ' ~ .O e3 g*.. .g. .i.- .l. \\. -6 .t ins
- --*--*+a--
6 g- . - + - - - ', g g y 3 g. 4 a u s s c 2
- J j
3 l .t. a g } . s _. f s gj.A Ne 9 t g3 9 b e .(. + 1 1. ) a Yg .a i ..e {F % i. e g y a.. -.... .i. IWe. .g s; .l. g* g? e. 'd ,L.....o.i. ..o;. L._ y ,,...i 'r,! j g .a .4. % g 6, e t q h.s 3 e p 4 y 4' G. ~j g g,,,, N N 3 g.. i b (
- g...-.
n as*A .%.2.......t_......._.. .._;. ;.._ j ....y..... a }v,9 g: t
- ~
q at 4. 24 .o a 6 is j w,g p _ .g r ..i l g. k,.d .. i t,. -. ta t .) 6 g q -,,, o s I. .i .j ,.i .I N
- 3...
.g. [4 -s. N < e $q$
- e j
r 6 4' -g. _L. _ 'L ___. 1 a E F -.?, 4 if ii A. I it t. e v-
4 I Ps 96 D d -4 It e
- J Qa Q
,4 n. e s *. Y. G 0. 4 {9 v I N. . n.. ( Y.l. ? W4 = e '41 t N Q ai A e., s {l 4 D U 1 9 b d* 4 ZS es f 1 { S. I. I, i
- 43
.r n w I o= 0***- d w*4 g 3' 4* e,, ee Z i. 0 9 0 s g 3 4 o!* u [ EI h .. }... L...{ _.i _. .s. ... ). .s. t.. j .4..... I .._..~..) t..-. . *.*.. g -.- =. - f -
- 3
~, p. ........ -.'.. ~ p' ..r. .4 .t. i = 4 .f.. . w.~.*]'.-- -~.e.. 5, q -.. u.. s r.... -......i .e. O-8...
- 8. -. $s g,.......-
g g. ( < s .. _.. g 'sk. G
- ^
s. o. ~ w 9 v. e .y. .....-g..~. t ,1,. .l. .j.-. e o 4 6.. ._.4... a 2 .s...._.. ...............i.-.....y..._..+.._.-.4..... .{. }. . 9.
- .-4,,;".
t ,.m. ,:s E t?5 ......4 4 5.,4 ' t 6 i .g. u g. l.... . l - gs g.g ' 'J- -t- ....i. g. ......q 6 -t-g s .s .i .e. ., s. &. g. - g .. 9..... 4 .{. .4. .g ,bs. .~. - y, .t .}.. 4 o. i .,. c .g.. rg.... ..-1
- o.
i s. ...a Q.. .z.q.... g(Ji ........,3. r...- 6 .g- },- 4t. f %g.q. .s p.. .1 .}. 4 .}. 6
- g g.
7 .w... ....s -... -+ _.....+. N. .}. g. ... i. I ........- {.... M +.. - -.. ..m 3.N.. ...zY.. _. .,,....p... . N.... s , c
- 7..... -
.I. g ...4.
- j..
- i.. *
.1. g. -. %.. ..... 7. p.. _ N.......,... .-.j... 1. 4.... .. L _3 u-n 4 6 .a.. .{. ,')...g i....J }.. ....?j. 4 >4 N.... 19 .g.. .h ..... ~... _. -. 6.N i ...M........,..., ? ...._'s. 9 4... i A,.........w- .... ~.. .L.
- t. - ( 3
.. ~... x e .} s g .t p.. _ _ _.~. _.~ y _.. q-A, _...g.. r Q .k t i .J ,__4 _. [. l g.. .i........ ,t..... g.. _4__.t..._. g g. i iw. .9 .... _ _., _ _ _... N.. ... e w .. -.-l. ...n. 1. ..}. <t p... A t... W.., -_}.___--{.....-. s. .-4.. ...+. .N. .. - ~.. 14 ..... -. - -.~_{......~.........{....-.4....-_.......A..x 3 e. 6.....g ._.._F...t._ -..I, .s. i... .....p..., ,j i.~.. _..t. .s .t. l ;l .s.. 4. L...- - e... -..t. . o;... .I.. .I. .}.. .l. .l. g m Q l...a. .-\\ \\. a s a.. .i M ..q. . _...t ..L....}. _.4, ....-.....4.. .._..A..~ .1 .l. ......d.......... I G g I .t t.' T. 3.'.'.=,,, ....t .~. ...,t.. ...l,.. n. g 6 .g...... .C...,.... w .i
- 'N;p....~.,_.._....[.._.,....
.-.....-....-t--
- --*'*A-
- - ---- H --- " -~' ,..e_. ....l........ a t*\\ 3.m.. l g n T. .i_.. . 4;:7... r.,.v4.m... t.. r. n r-
- r e * -.nrs..
t- .+ -1 r r tr+ -
- s.
g. g ::. _g. 7a, a. .}. .....i.... .g. 1.... 4 I i ............4....t...... .{. 4 4.. I [ ...p...._.4.-..-.& ....... +. -. -........ - _.. -. -......... .. m... .4 .t. 4 t.... 1 e. .....l.l......l..... .t.. .1,. 6 .s. A. .t. 6 s.
y ;*. (j (; f .,1 h ,I.j e y f,_ I' p D Y / 5 4 .E / 0 % T er T Q / / / E 8 .L o P. P I 0" I M /# f9 w 7 %W. U I 9 R / MO /. 8 f; 9 C p +/ ,3 H / / / / F / O_ 3 J e O f Y,. 7 ? TE IT 5 J g NA UR 3 / , 6 s f / [/ Y O f /- X T M_ S J / 0 E I / I L E T S g K E A W N S A j M /, r E. E W U S a ?y p S C I Q A HT b 8 e/ S 9 NR O d, J AU MOH / 8 9 7 T 4 [ 7 / O E1 / TE f d 4 'v IT R NA b f J D UR I 1
- e SR OP 7
/< 9 J Y 9 S g CA T 3 E E [# S .p I Y T T D A A T A NA d / ~. /, D D / 3 o D U S 3' / O / p E E A Q T / U U S S / I I M '5 J' 0 e S S f /( / /4 / 7 S f f NR M j f, AU [ MO / b H TC 'I ,1 1I, i EJ TE O IT R NA Y P UR p S s A t X u E Y T TI H T T N U A O U S Q D S E NR S AU I MO V : H E Y R B i I' 7 8 3 g TE R 3 0 3 IT 7 4 4 NA 2 e UR 7 B 1 4 5 Y 7 2-2 2 / 7 T 1 I 4 3, 26, 7 7 T n 3 5 2 N 1 1 G 0 A 1 4 0 5 U 4 O . Q 4 N TR s 5 0 5 O P T S 1 8, 3 2, 7 2 7 E NR 7 E C AU 1 0 7 MO R D b U Y H 1 3 1 B B 1 l Y Y Y Y i C C C C T R C O I E n v. g v l N P g l n a f i a f i c k R d c k d x B T R a x R a E G O r E r t O B C t C c l c h e R 6. A l e h e 1 e c l I i t r l 1 t fa e t i a e 1 i s S Y L S k P S 1 S k W r r K A I o 2 o O E E R E R f w 0 0 w 4 0 h 1 2 h 1 2 B W A t t 2 4 A t t 2 4 3 E i. r 1 1 i r 1 6 R r a 6 6 n a 6 U E 1 1 A U E 1 1
fi .l
- ]
1l i'
- f
[. b / D Y N E % T S ~ g T Q / M E I 8 L N P f 9 d M. f [7 O t / C ZuR B 0 U ~ KO 4 2 / [ H / /. F / C l [s. / TE 'e IT 6 ~ NA 8 f 2
- /
/ d UR e A Y 7 K T / 0 E I T 1 E T / E K E Q W N / T E E U D k S . QI A k S A f, E Q HT / S 0 NR 8 ~ AU MOH l 2 d, TE 5 J IT / (nA 8 I R f YT f 3 L E A T M f I A T . W D N. d, A 8., C O U A Q T 4 9 7 S S 3 NR AU I MO H T ,1 C t j1 a t e1 (' EJ TE O IT R NA P UR y SA uX H E Y T T I H T T N U A O U S Q D S E NR S AU I MO V : H E Y R B 1 Ii L TE IT 3 8 2 9 NA 6 2 0 5 UR 0 2 1 2 n 7 o 7 t Y / s T 9 1 0 2 2 u I 1 4 0 5 / o T 1, 5, 3, 8, 5 H NA 6 7 5 1 U 8 Q 'q 0 0 8 0 T S 9 2 3 8 5 4 E NR 3 7, G AU MO 5 1 D U Y E B B Y Y Y Y C C C C T R h C O c v l N P t s a l f I 7 E a n c f l k R C i x k f B WB a E E k T R r B t O O 2 s D c O d e 4 r h m R 3 A 1 e d c n l L 1 w n o a e C S S e a 0 T S N. L s 0 0 0 0 K A m n 1 2 2
- 0 E
E r i 2 1 2 4 E L' R E R o s 1 3 3 3 A t a 6 6 6 6 B S B 1 1 1 1
te = BROWN & ROOT, INC. luP MTE
- < 8 /r /-9? >
J 8 N0* 3hll'I SOUTl! TEXAS PROJECT ' WEEK OF hY /, /97/ ~ WEEKLY LABOR REPORT. gggg J OF /4 v: ANAL ANAL AREA 1511 Unic #1 ~ 5/2/77 BUDGET REVISED. j l TO DATE TilIS WEEK . COMP 1.ETED Make-Up Pumping BY: IIcygon BY: l Structure - Earthwork HAN UNIT. MAN UNIT ' HAN UNIT MAN - UNIT * , MAN IIOURS QUANTITY RATE IIOURS QUANTITY RATE HOURS QUANTITY RATE !!OURS 'QAUNTITY RATE HOUR QTY. l gjg jf.dl 16121d Mach.Excav. CY 17,866 198,50f .090 l j,7, fM_g ff3, fjf , g7ey9 (;f 161440 Fine Crade CY 90 300 .300 ~ 162110 Dredging C) 12,000 12,000 1.000; ,M(l/ Aff K 163120 Comm. Bkfl. CY 1,845 '4,100 .450 ff'/ fp f,'jpg J 163220 Sand Bkfl. CY 25 42' .595 163420 Cat.I Bkfl. CY 47,051 93,540 .503 84, 3 8 f6,3/4 ,//f/ 3Jrj ),):3 0 ,jf p. rf.; y pjag 163620 Filter Mat CY 100 110 * .909 J 165301 Rip Rap CY 2,530 3,160 .801 j 165302 Blanket Mac CY 475 1,580 .301 i f//M 166120 Pump & Ball LF 10.450 [.ft8 9 3/9 f i .n e
i - l O i I t! I5 i 1,I g fi f g g g.= D Y f-E 1 T p g .N T Q. / ( / E f g L . h [ P $/ O N 'R /# 7., / K M / 7 f' j f / C %AC e M0 5 f 7 g / / 1 4 9 f 1 F d. / 0 TE 2 IT NA '8 /, c ! UR_ e [ S / - % M / Y F K T O E I W N T 'A E T E K E T E E U A E H S A D k' S l Q i lT / 7 S ' R / IL U / ) EO / H / w h 7 je 9 TE g 6 IT g NA 8 / UR p A y~ 9, f / 4 5 7 Y E T / j /, I TA TN /e 4g' O g D g D A S O U f T , Q )'S g 8 9 / /g f 7 j e /g f p S S / NR !! i S, 'h AU 7, f /r 8, O l f TCE J TE O IT R NA P UR P S A A I X H E Y T T i I l T T N U A O U S Q
- o D
S E NR S AU I tt O VE Y I R B TE 1 I T 0 0 1 0 NA 6 1 1 0 UR 1 3 4 1 Y T I 2 d 8 0 1 7 T 2 0 1 3 7 N 5, 1, 9, / A 2 U 8 5 3 1 5 4 / Q 5 2 1 q 5 0 0 2 0 T S 6 8 2 7 0 E NR 9, 0, 5, 2, G gAC t l 4 8 7 3 0 D 7 4 1 U Y I B B U Y S Y Y C C C L I y l l t l l i i i T l f f l R i k k i C O c e c l c a N P I 7 E a x a u-a B F E B a B 9 R Hd 1 T 1 R p a I a e p O O m h d r t m u c O 5 B 2 P e a o ap a u R 3 A t C oS C P 1 n t I 5 p i L 1 U L 0 0 0 0 0 o Y N N L 1 2 2 2 2 e e 2 1 2 4 1 s W K A k p 1 3 3 3 6 O B E E i 6 6 6 6 6 R O E R h t P 1 1 1 1 1 '4 4 5 B J
,l ,j j j 'v, 6 i ?' f 7, g p Y 4 r "~ I g g ~ c T Q S 6 J E I L M, P 4 f d-M /, R f o / p / O Zu. O ~ ? C U f S/A M f r / f .. F i l / O ]g /". l' 4 M TE 5 IT 3 4 [ f, NA / UR f 5 Y 3 0 /F K T /" 3 O E I , J T b E T 4 K E A 1 N gE 1 E U j E H S A / W S I .Q A HT "5_ f S 3 1 S 7 S I R A' U MO 4 II f e 6 / 3 TE / 3 IT / NA 3 / h UR Y p 3 f E T f. / r d I T g- /, M A TN D A O U 2, / Q / T /p L
- s b
e /'3 [ S 3 /, 8 S NR AU MOI [ I T i C 1 EJ TE O IT R NA P UR p SA g X p E Y T T I i T l T N U A O U S Q D S E R IRU S I P0 1 V 1 E Y R S i I \\ l\\ TE 0 0 0 IT 6 5 5 NA UR 1 4 4 Y 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 IT 4 0, 2, ~ 7 N 0 8 8 7 A 7 4 / U 2 Q / 5 5 '0 0 T S 6 0 9 E NR 2, 6, 6, G AU MO 1 1 3 D U Y H 1 2 B B Y Y Y Y )M C C C C 1 T s t o 7 R i l C O N P n B f I 7 E U v l S a l f 9 R d c f l k 1 T 1 R n x k f Y-B o E E k O O O 5 D P k B t 4 e r R 3 A c f 5 e n o h m d e I 5 g i w c n l i .O Y 1 a l h a o a e P 1 r e t M C S S 7 K L o p r K A t i a T O 3 E. E S P E 0 0 0 0 A 0 E R 1 2 2 2 B J U A D n 2 1 2 4 W w 1 3 3 3 f) o 6 6 6 6 C d 1 1 1 1
,. i !l* k f f E i t' i t! a f, 't; D Y E % T / 4 T Q Q c f 2 I 8 d f /s, f ? / / / O NR C %AU 2 / ' O j f / f l M / H / F / 0 / g f' IT f j TE f j NA // UR / I / Y / '/ g F K T C E I T 1 E T g W N /, O K E U T E E f. / S A A E H I Q D W S ^ HT g f f /r SR f IU U f. [ j L}OH TE S p j IT / j /, NA UR O g YT s y E L I T [d A A T ~ N D A / U / O Q ^ T 9 (f g f f / ~ @ - g g S R U 4 L U O / j B H T e 'l h 1{
- l.l g l 31
,!il C E TE J IT O NA R UR ~ P P SA M X H E YT T I H T T N U A O UQ S D O E NR S AU ! O I } V H E Y R B I l, l I \\ TE 0 '0 0 0 8 0 5 4 I T 6 0 1 2 4 NA UR 1 1 6 9 2 Y 0 0 3 7 2 T 1 1 1 1, 8, 5, 0 7 I 7 T 8 1 6 N 2 2 3 2 A 2 2 U 5 Q 5 5 9 0 0 0 S 9 4 5 T S 4 1 B 3 3 E NR 5, 2 1, O AU 6 O 3 2 D 8 1 U Y H B 3 Y 5 tr Y Y Y Y C 1 a C C C C w r h T e t ~ P t r C O 2 a a l l l N P 2 W E f f i I 7 E 7 v k l k a WR 1 e a B f B B n c k R T i r. x n B t O O E. l n o c Z M O l 2 o i m J. e p R 1 o p h l m l m i c o m e u I 7 C P a p o i c S S P 1 mY i r S E W K A i. n 0 0 0 0 t t O 3 E E t a 0 0 R 0 E R n l 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 B W A e P 2 6 3 3 3 6 s 1 1 6 6 6 6 s o 6 6 1 1 1 1 E T 1 1 1lll1lI l 1lll111i
.s d d' I' ke 0 2 I s E Z. Y D 7 / N 6 7 / I T Q E. ~ 7 Z l P = N', 7 /# b M'. '/ 7 [r c ?' 9 / O ! R / C It U 8 7 / I / / EOH 8 4 / [ 9 / / OF / M b. TE IT [ 'e
- ! A
[ UR / J' /, Y F K T 0 / O E I E K E A W N 8 T L E T M T E E U U A E H T S A D J S C I Q I A HT I S NR S AU M M0lI e 9 [, 3 TE IT 5 [, f 8 / NA 4 I UR 6 7 f Y 6 / / T f 4 L E I T A A T / / 8, U N T D A S // [ O U CA Q T b 9 / 6 / 8 / / 5 9 NR / / 8 9 S AU 4 MO 3 k d H / TC 1 E 1 0 4 4 J TC O IT 9 2 4 1 0 R NA 0 1 2 6 0 V P UR 1 P SA M X 5 5 0 0 0 H E Y 5 1 0 3 0 T T t 0 4 0 2, 5, I 8 c T l 7 e 1 2 6 3 3 N T / j 2 6 U 4 o A 8 2 O / r UQ S 1 P_ 0 0 0 4 0 D S 9 9 0 8 0 E NR S !AU 1 4, 0 9, 5, 0 0 7 1 1 3 I l V ; I 2 2 E Y R B ii 0 0 TE 3 5 IT 1 1 NA 3 UR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 3 0, 5, 5, T I 5 0 3 3 7 T 5 6 7 n N 1 / n A e. U 2 e / Q 5 .cn 0 0 0 0 l 9 0 0 0 l T S 1, 0, 4 5, i E NR F G AU 0 1 3 D MO 2 2 I U Y H I B B e r Y Y Y Y S S y C C C C L L T 1 e k f T a o R t t k C O i n r a N P n i a y s I 7 E U w l S y 9 R r h n l l i C 1 e t o f f a t 7 1 R t r i k k B n 0 0 O a a t B B p i 6 0 5 M 1 E a a o 0, t R 3 1 v I. R p I 3 g a n p 1 1 u 3 n c c t p m 1 o Y i e x o a i u e s N N L t r E C C R P W e i K A a u d i0 B E E l t 0 0 0 1 0 0 u R O 'C R u c 1 2 2 0 2 1 l B J W A c u 2 1 4 3 1 2 c r r 1 3 3 5 6 6 n i t 6 6 6 6 6 6 I C S 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
t f, y % D D Y g py '$ E % T j T Q E E L s 4 ? % f N p 7 d { R 7] 7 4 / C %W U 3 / O I 9 / H g F / /, O 9 y M, 2 TE IT 7' p [ 3, R / A 'e '% M* t Mr Y o / F K T 2 f O E I 1 T b E T E K E A W N G T E E U 3 z A E H S A D W S I Q ^ HT I S 3 5 V 8 d R U L O 9 } H f 7 / 1 TE t I T / j 2, 0 mA / p /,. 1., R t t Y g g /e A T g p L E T p g N, I T 2 A A ?. N D A /g f S f M U O A T Q c 7 f f f, 8 e e / / /' d S f NR J HO d 9 AU H / / TC ,l i' l i I E J TE O IT R NA P UR P S A L X H E Y T T I H T T N U A O U S Q e D S E NR S AU I MO V : H E Y R B l l TE 5 4 8 IT 1 1 3 2 NA 1 3 UR n Y 5 O 0 7 o T 4 I 3 3, 7, 3, 7 t I / s T 2 u N 8 9 9 / o A 7 7 8 5 H U 1 Q 0 5 0 b T S 9 1 0 E NR 4, 0, 3, C AU MO 0 5 1 D U Y H 2 2 2 IB 3 i t Y Y Y Y i s C C C C n y T U S R k v l C O 2 r r a f N P 2 e o c l k l 3 t w x f B f I 7 E 3 a h E k k WR t B W t B. c R r T e d m O g a h O l n 2 n E c O B 1 i s o e a R 3 A 3 t !i C S S I 3 a l g 0 0 0 0 O Y N L u n 1 2 2 2 c i 2 1 4 2 u K r p 1 3 3 3 B E i i 6 6 6 6 R O E g C P 1 1 1 1 B W a
J,l j 1r 5 q Q-J ?* 7 D I' / f O. 7 d I Y ~ T Q 7 U T E / E I L P I / 4 / 0 M f /# [a / 7, / 2 / '/* / O NR 5 7 M C ZAD 5 M. 9 M0 / F I 9 3 2 3 / l / O d 6 S Y TE I T 5 / 8 ? 's l' NA e UR N,Y ~ /
- r If K
T / S Y / F E I / S ~ O E t E A N f S T 1 T E l T E l W E U ( S A A E i D W S C 11 Q A 1T d' /t S 7 R 8) I J* U / L 0 I lI / / ~S TE S 9 I IT NA 6 UR 1f Y 4 T / 0 / L I / ET T / S / A A N W 8_ / /j 8 8, D A 3 C U O / A Q T / f C C A p 7 7 S / f S ',,4 S '/ j NR AU d /,. [ 7, i0 l lI T l C E TE 3 J IT 5 0 7 4 O 2 1 1 e NA 0 R J. 6 3 P UR O P S 6 A X L Y 5 2 0 1 E t T 8 c T 6 0 0 4 I l T 6 9 0 1 7 c i / i. T 4 o N 2 2 8 2 A 3 6 2 U / r 0 1 p U 1 Q 1 5 6 3 R. t 6 1 D S 0, S_ 3, 8 E NR 7 S AU 7 8 1 t 0 I l l V I E Y R B 3 TE 5 '0 5 NA 0 2 3 IT UR 1 1 Y 2 2 5 i 1 0 0 T 9 9 2 0 0 2 2, 3, 0, 5 n I 7 e T 7 t N 4 1 5 3 / 3 A 2 1 2 2 st U / o Q ' 1 5 p 7 8 4 0 0 0 8 5 6 0 0 00, l 5, 2, 8, 3, 5 l T S 2 8 3 3 i E NR 6 G AU F ) 01 I D I U Y 1 B B e Y Y Y Y S S. p r C C C C L 1 y t1 i T f h T n c f R t' s k s o C C i r y N F D o v l S I 7 E w a i s 9 R r h c f f a t y 1 e t x k k B n C T 1 R t r E B B p i O O a a a o 0 I. R p 2 C 5 B 1 W E R 3 A 2 h m p 1 7 I 3 e c m t p m 1 3 n a o a i u e s o Y t e M C C R P W e G N L t r d K A a u u l t 0 0 0 1 0 0 l 0 3 E ER u c 1 2 2 0 2 1 c E R 0 A e u 2 1 4 3 1 2 n B J r r 1 3 3 5 6 6 I t t 6 6 6 6 6 6 C S 1 1 1 1 1 1
t 5 f; 1i! 5. 4 g 1 D Y 4 8 E % T / c T Q / E / I* L P / C d O'I ~ f %M R O / C / I N U ~ O 2 ! F / 0 0 4 Y TE i / [ UR IT l NA ~ ~ ~ N e / /. h, F K T f Y 4 C E I T L E T ~ ~ ~ k 2 E A W N g E U N S A A E E p W S I Q A T S 4 AU ~ ~ 7 NR / MOH O 0 N 8 TE b e NA 3 ~ 8 IT / UR [ Y / 9 T / 9 L E 7 A A T ~ S I T N N I. f D A O UQ / A T 0 2 4 8 S / k S 7 NR AU MO N H T ij, CEJ TE O IT R NA P UR y SA gg EX Y g T T I l T iT N U A O U S Q e D S E NR S AU I MOH V : E Y R B \\. 1 i 0 7 0 1 TE 5 9 4 6 IT 1 NA 9 2 3 UR 1 YT 5 3 1 3 I 8 9 4 8 7 T 6 8 2 7 N A 2 9 2 U 1 Q 5 5 5 5 0 T S 0 8 6 3 E NR 9 3, 5 C iU D MO 1 2 Y H J'B B s Y Y Y Y C C C C T R. C O s N P e v l l I 7 E l a v i f 9 R o c a L k 1 h x c B B T 1 R d E x 0 O n E t t r 0 5 M o c a 2 3 h d m e 0 I 3 c n m l b Y 4 k M 1a o e 3 a C S 1 N N L s r W X A c o O 3 E E l w 0 0 0 0 R 0 E R o h 1 2 2 2 E J u A h t 2 2 1 4 n r 1 1 3 3 a a 6 6 6 6 M E 1 1 1 1
6 'n g g
- g. g R :p g a u k
c- .v. s + e n t 1: s s
- t..
~ 1 [ c M 4 Y </ h s$ d \\i 1 I u g tg h .I, N b "3 l I I w s =
- s E'*
kl b \\~; %3 4 b D q' 5 U g h e g k. V - N gg s s q e 4 t s s I s. T'N o g s c so S S N i u C g ) E g E %y e e a a @4 N-4 s, M 9 m ~ I i 3 w
- c a
Q w: . y w g , n i 'y, a g a ,w s s E I I h 4 h S 4 g k x2 N h 4 s &, 4 h S as s- % 3 n n n w = 9. x.g. y q,y h $4 s N E **N. U l'f h
- 1 s%
n s s s
- s. Q-s
%s >I s. .i \\ %3 k \\ k k M ~ N m (- 4 4 m' C 4 s %n {y h ~ h V N, 4 b \\j 9 % d g-M's g k,. M-b.% w' s o .<a s% O A N a a s Q 4 e w g e w N v 5 d S g g Y % 4 q N w g %%' 4 y E 8' s N s = s x x s % s. g '3 sw a Eg S S' S S S S = 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 o 9 t = g d d C 8 I s .e c g 3 "2 t n B Q 8u m ~8 ~is.. a e H sm C C 5a b 2 8.. !B a2 1s t a p 4 2 2 a e i 8 m h ~8
- s 2
2 4 ~ 1 a 1 .: = w i 2 a 8 g ,1, 3 y 3 a n = a = 1 e e e e c g g g g 3 a t E 1 1 1 1 0 0 d 1 1 i 9^g .e m aw a 9 2 1 f 3 p e g 4 0 2 E a E a G 3 q l ml q p gi
l h k Y D. g T / r N T Q / kl EL f M P M 4 O gW. O R f / C
- C f,, M H
F ) [ C 9 f, /', .TE 9 .IT 1 NA / /* ^ / UR m /, f Y / s F K T 3 e, / e O E I 7 e T E T 3 R E i N / t 7 E E -U E H S A s g ' E I Q k HT / I / / / / / S / I / S NR f S 8 [ 3 AU MOH J / O / /, l. e / TE 7 IT NA j UR 4 Y 1 TI ETA TN d D A / U O Q / T f 2 I-0 ^. f 7 9 4 f, )/ /. 4 8 / S ~ NR [ d / l, AU MO M 7 H / / / C i l j \\ j T E TE JO IT R e NA P t UR e p S l A n g X r g E o Y 1 T C T 5 I 7, H p 8 T 7 N 1 T J_ A 5 U e 5 U 2, O "S t 2 Q a 1 m 2 i t O s e E 8 8 9 D S 4 3 1 E NR 8, 8 4, S AU I MO 4 9 2 H 7 6 3 V E Y R B l' y TE IT NA UR 5 0 Y 0 TI 0, 7 T 5 7 N 1 / A 3, 2 U / Q 1 t 5 1 9 0 3 6 0 T S 6, 3, 7, E NR AU 8 3 0 C
- O 7
7 5 D 1 U Y H B B )r t n l s o y e l d i T r m i R r R r a e m e C O N P o m c c e i n W a u o I 7 E v l l P T u 9 R r S P u e a o 1 T 1 R s t t H t Y O O e n n p O 3 B. R e e d e K 3 1 m m n r / 1 e e 'e a P S S E C C e 0 Y l l d p A P e L 5 L W K A i i o c o T o o r x l O J O 3 E E R G E R S S P E S T D i A B J t
' ' - * ~' ~ ~ ~ g g it g g C,. ' gs]e 9% v y.( y
- .g '
-y c: 9 e, q t-d 4 mi s N C H. a. t-e,; o t. x Mb_ g " Ti! _3 tsj w q U e d C C g h "h $ s.s rg Q h
- Ql
- N D
N Q k h % hN n e s s. -~ n n s e a w e, s gg s s $h 4 N D k N S g, N 9 v M R $ 'O )- d $ kk 3 3 (k g%s% ww ei n s w ~ s g %j s o e n s i s a & a !i n n e qn s w e x e ye m v s ,q V s w w ni w nm s. w aaa t a n ,m g h h h {N h d D-b' h g ,n q-. i %w s I N 4 h N g g 4 y % 4 q x w w g s x. rr. a h b k'. t{ b f9 d 's d y q <1 e g S N s 4 s s o o n N b" g %n D D t %n E sh 4 4 4 N v% %) 4 k, g i 4 g n't, { .%, u w g N g $N n w %g y s a ,o s-m.w e w .e - v-g. 9 a-. g h S N 3 y e w F ..y N 9 c. N ee g a Q g' h N M g et S $x %'.h k N 4 9 o o h69 W % % %: o s, < t x x - me yw o e k =a T T T,' 4 4 4 4 h h S ( k 4 h N N Q k @d h 5 t t, en w 4 %g k. w ky s
- g % n ss w
s.. N N N N MJ O N s s g M \\ on a 3 adys ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 5
- a. 5 5
- a. a. 5 5
a .5 1 p j 3 o c e E 8 E
- , e o
= e J l e e g 7 Q g l B J 8 j ~ M 8 un E s8* m ;: v. m o ts3 Eb n o e G M 4. n m s 8 38 4 9: a x = k a y i e e g a g 'N 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 n,, b 'E 2 R 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 e 2 R .e m o 3 a" 3 0 3 3 3 it 3 ? 3 4 3 3 a s a a-a v o - - = = a.x g a s =, a ~ ~ m n ~ ~ m n =m a g 3 0 B 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7 i 1 1 1 i i i fd >O d e M E E E 2 e e e t e a e e 2 2 3 3.. 8, O.4 E a 3{& & s i & & I
4 e'* Fu4I*8*edb ', ee e sw +-.py.d 6* a
- .+,
n'#6 d M' D Q (a, s 6 w 'C a e v s y a a x. s Mh $ i 1 se l 4 L ] N s-. o b 4 D b \\'. %., 9 Lt m et c, m, + ? .Q )s Tk n a >o 4 s 3, m \\ o. w b h N i v s, .W M 2 9 ra U &a - u e a h~ ~. 4 4 y [1 4 0-4 Eg 4 4 4 m q ~ = = 5 1 3 3 s e \\ s p 4 % N .w s a N s Q H y, g, s s 4 Y w N A A h q 4 a u o LAs s'46 g ei 4 6 fB g t N h e% g-m ~ i!x! 5.a a E j "I 9 o 9 9 3 j bf f '\\ o n 8 3 n J Q 0 m i 8 } t. W g' u 8n z8* B i: a a BU' 'N f H N m N U N3 Y9 8.. P. y a5 i J g 4 -o S M S a 't R .o o a o U 3E $ 'd E M a e a 2 e: e ~ 3 A E j C 0 n m a y E U n' m m e d > 'm R
- d t
M M a.d e 1 1 1 1 a b a m u-a m a m m m m g l $1 l
E* u M.a E -u t'. u ~ M u 'i w N w a M Q o s v% w a.x; M s/ t-e ece et %x 4 g w 3 e s s .c n s. u a k @ 4 0 u S.Y u s y V R M g g R R g M w \\ U "3.,a p e% '% S u tw es y (s w n m x m o N x '. 4 6 e 'ss d o d E s-s u e. b.d s R W s n s. g -e n e. tr e N %g i s-x 1 y gg s
- s. (
R I i 7 ,q y g u e. 4 5+ Nh M + 4 x s e,s m s w u o H g s k d s A 4 g' g g y 4 %. w ; 8 i q i I e m v.w,s a z m N g a g g < w = a a = e "J q 4 p t-to l I } I ,, = 4 4:- m 4 % w s-g s g3 Q g$ 2 k.N
- k. s(D D % ( I M **
i l 4 N R %x g N, se. h ), g E NI M g 5 ' %..-@g m , w s s e 1.. m s u% 3~ m %[ N, @@g j 2 5 $'R & I I e g - %,g a _e ww w w s 4 w$ %e h h D 41 %w e w w 2 ( 1 a m w w S N Ej % $ 4 R g 4 4; g g $ Q-{ 4 g N. EN =2 ~ b M = b d 8 5 B e S E8= ia ;:
== b N' N m l m2 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 = g 'o h O k
- h. e b
O o o ~ o. 3 R 8 ~. R 8 ~ O 8 .S 0 A t. a o O.S o. = c g g g 0 2 3 2 0 g 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 o e a. 3 ~. S b 58 s 8.- . z! 5 ' 0 a 2 3 3 4 e 0 u 8." gg ~ G G cG G y' c ti G u c G G n b .= 3 a ~ a 0
- 3 4
0 5 t V 0 2 R ",x'N E 2 3 f X 8' t O a a j 2 3.2 4; i e o a - l;: W a 2. e e a a .a ,1 9 3,; a a: e 'k J = - _3 El. m% 8 El 5 4 i A W .k. 4 % 2 u .3 3 u m o =. m m s
- .g -
e e e a a a s a a a s a a a a s a = 2 = x n a 2
- o g
- -, b, na 8 u a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 *% h j
.k o D Y E Z T s s T Q f' t E L D,- 7 ? d Q' NR ? / C ZL" 3 EC /' / / H F 4, M C f ~ I'
- .E 1T M
NA 0 d UR 'C. N e 4 T / F K I / C E I f T L E T E K E A W N T E E U U 3 H T S A A F-S C I Q 2 D A HT p p f g g 2 /, a /[4 / g /g g) g S g f g f 3 f / S NR AU 'd_g //. 8, 8, MOH 3 / 3_ TE 7 IT ) NA f, UR // Y 7 L E T / I T / A A T f N 9 U D A I O U /. C Q W'l/ A T f 9 f 9/.; g f 7l c g 7 v /, 2 f p j e f, C /, G. S g 0 M g J/ f t NR L U g 1, EO 6 7 H S / /. / T j I i!. i CE TE JO IT R NA P UR f P SA M X E E Y T TI H T T N U A O U 'S Q D S E NR S AU I MOH WY R B i 5 TE 7 IT NA 0 UR 6 Y 0 t T 0, I 7 c 7 e T 5 3 N / j 2 o A 6, / r U 2 5 P Q 2 5 1 7 0 4 3 0 3 "8 8, 0 2 1 0 T S 9 9 E vR 5, 9, 3, 8, 0, 1, 9, 2 t U 5 2 G 9 EO 0 6 4 2 0 DU Y H 7 5 0 6 8 5 6 6, B B 7 5 1 1 ) e e r c l e i i s v s*i T r k l p r r R N ? o r m o i t c u e i y b i C O c s r< o S v a E t p o n h c S t o 9 n I 7 E r m 9 R e m a S c a V-M r 1 s u c p o T 1 R x m t o y i e S O O R E o t c a O 5 B t C n p n v p R 3 A n r o g e d m >/ s e F i l i a r n i c R L em o l t i P a h R o Y k v i a p S C S P N L n r f v p d L N l p a e k a i n d A a i K 7 G b s c c r u c n T m t u 3 E m e a x t o x a O o q B J W A E R B E S F E S T r 0 E T E A Y
s -0_ e l ~ I[fj, ~ ~[~ j I~I[ ~~ fl "7 .g j [ ..+-. -_. g. ,.. _..._p
- p. -
3 { } . _1.- _..i._I._ _7, _._. l . l'.,./ a 1 l l i ~y'%__. _., _ ,g __ ,.i,._ l_ l a 2. e 3, M,' _.,. e _I._...{__ l._ (*g..,i i 1 4/ ,l 4' /., AI
- h. f y
q -[b 5 0p '^d 5 ,l! z "-l '//;
- l
.k 0 . hl l, f, jp a s v f '-~~ ~~ h l <t k g, _ g .o 1 Q v o, e so L____ e a 0 ,i q_ ~* \\ h 5 dit k l ~'~ /jy
- \\
- s vg
g.__Mg3 _. _._/. '? - Q j, N l i s.? 3 d 1 tg. /r S.1 s_l _._.N, l'N O 57 Q* b, s f. _* 4._ i lCh 'a 'l k_ U ",[v n; w i g ,4 3 a I .9 y ( g e m 1,L-,y e t, w rl v ;n ~g ? m 4 9
- f.,
m s.-.._ t 56! 0]
- \\
l } ,C. kl ) l ""ts lN kl 2h l _ l.h._. ! 'Y,I ll C. C ," 1 (."/t 1
- N/,,
,"; ? 'tj - _..s 'i g { ,s W t'/. .O ,i y s,1 .~ y N/, N) l [5 Y,l 3 _7 "I 5\\ \\ !i '{Q 'T ue, .g: t .a i s sI' ~,. ) ~; M_._ l %g 2 4 /, w n c* s.
- L y
? N i g /bf, q' - {(- N ! .t l i k b' (~
- t.._.'.$
"a... - 'L I, ~ Q. ')'/., q$ \\.,*, _{. s s i (
- l a
s 6//,i M $l -'9. j l ,t ss s.__ 5 m .'.~ 7//r j MI Y. l'. .\\ l h. 1 s / ._, y ' I./i D l l 't ! i X i' &l \\l e M/- E a 3 v s 4s u, w y 3'. I N y g) y '? 4 I. ,) h (.
- /r, y
.y Y. 6% ~.j__. g lq. g 1 pp s i 4___ _.._dn 1 wg .A s C. %' % 3 I) ... 4 J AQ > i L __h_ q m.n 'c a V" i ? i a ) 3 ) + 6 .~._.d O see-c. 9 = C C f [' l C c 9 u r c o v ~ 4 N (', L., C' ( / ( H. p[I e k I L. ('. \\ I C g \\ \\ k i C ( () = .~ 's s s C I (,, .I ,; W ~ l. l. {". g. l i =; - 4_- ll "I' ii ii 1i ii+ i1.jj.t.j,I .it.l. 1.!rl-l-l l $6
? O-I t p 'T4 9y a u I & l'.?
- A l
/$5e \\' x h '}N ' /8// 04 f.2Y,c?l ,co s. c : X N ~a h < / oo Yh % os . hs A 1 9 4 ? h L 9 q,. L 73 L aAAw \\- s% s - - 4\\,wd -(ti 1, ,., '? *, 7 A A 4
- o. g -
). e-k 5 s \\'m u 4 4 ~7 k b. .,,I 1 3 f ( t N ? g s 3 -.v. \\ n ;-- g.g % ' *& s. s s .,v 2 gwg g ~ . A s w). q x m s% + to*% N4 g D S C , 'g $?\\$ g p* 3^$M d.o.1 ** M .1 4 a 2 N w y* w' e V ( 'n 14 ee a y'[N N q o 5 k b i A
- +
n $ ^ :-
_= + 7 4 f ' O + ,2 p l Es r Fp e f t ? 4 ,...,., g . 3- -,._~#..._,.. .... i. i .,m'. /4 0 N L ?$-~ . MAS 4Y$$ 8?lO& hf ff- - O __. b d $ --,- w )!M". -. A 8ne --4-w.m-=4.wa.- 6-* D e .~4e O O pe%, . p7w -p = _ - w..-s- .w. A---*w-w' s r4 w -_-4-km 9 he w.dm.- 4 9 s -s.s _'s,. .- h . = . ); n? O t Vpr=I. $ 1, ist.. I t F 1 J2r* 1 > 0,kLl le E Vp< w f. $!e 4 Y J. -lA ~ T 7 m/Ae - p.u y /, /1/c Na /* t # -./* %.. W w s. s +. f J6 C D ' f t. t. -an-e.,..-. -' 1 A yl* &.O. j f f My _ ). e6 ' V + 4 / *'
- _t]_ _p]
vg m o M4- /n o._ i _q -4 e-,--.. 2..ve=. 1 ---m mon w w m n -- fQL/ Je' s p~.1g ~ ? I a.+--- - Mewe 4.h= N =eme e wk Amen _ eel.pe .W e-up-* 3-'** - - - - -.. RhLit- "9 sje-N'PU k. --9 -' Ql '/U
- a.
._...= ~..~. k-.O.. } 11 O o. .z.,.. 2. 1 { .-,,a ...J. 4 -w...r_e,, a ~.1 z7 ff-_ _4.'.._8A 7 4 s .m ..w.e e.++.% hg4We es' e 4 '@ 4i=.hi+ A &-m t i. ,'d -- -- 4 e - j ~ w }. ; I J ) .' 4; '..? h-E - / .t' ,e. .J Jw.._ a .u _.a___ _u
1 i y j lEach mnth the LTC.is given the Unit Percent complete for both Units 1 and 2 and the-total project percentage co plete. In the April rcport, these numbers will be 33.82% Unit 1, 7.58% Unit 2 and 23.87? total project.1. Each unit is broken down into areas which-in turn are broken down into primry activities such as earthwork, reinforced concrete, structural steel, etc. %e primry activities are further broken down into detailed activities; as for example, the reinforced concrete primry activity is made up of detailed activities such as fornwork, cadwelds, rebar, anchor bolts, etc. his u formation shows up on the Detail Quantity and Fanhour report. In order to determine the unit percent cor:plete, the ccuputer calculates the weighted percent complete for each detailed activity in each. area and totals the ntubers to give the total unit percent'conplete. h e formula ~to calculate the weighted percent complete for each detailed activity is the actual quantity-installed or placed di'ided by the total quantity for that v detailed activity tims the forecast manhours for that detailed activity divided by the total forecast m nhours-for the area that that activity is in. To determine the total project percent complete, the computer first. totals all of the detailed activities 'in the detailed Quantity and Manhour report and prints a s Sumary Quantity and Fanhour report listing the primry activities showing the cxpended and projected manhours, the physical percent complete and the weighted percent complete for each primary activity. We Cost Departrent then manually calculates the total project percentage complete by strming the individual weighted percent complete of the primry activities for both units. We calcula-tion for weighted percent conplete of a primary activity' is the physical percent complete of that activity tines the forecast vanhours for that activity divided by the total project direct manhours. ' Note: 1. Nineteen primry activities 2 Ntrerous detailed activities 3. Areas are defined by Federal Power Conmission accounts and broken dcun by building or system. 4. Direct manhours are any manhours expended on construction of permanent plant' facilities e e e / e b
- Part "D" of Item III of the Agenda for the NRC Meeting on April 5, 6 & 7, 1978 Attached is a draf t of the construction status for the March's Monthly Construction Progress Report. Due total' is the percent complete that is reported to the,NRC. For March, ~. Unit One will be 33.82% and Unit Two will be 7.58%. . All information for this report.is taken from Summary Quantity and Manhour - Management. Summary '(Attachment "B"). Columns 1 and 4 on the Monthly Construction Progress Report are taken from -the Physical Percent Complete column (pink). Column 1 is Unit 1; Column 4 L ' is Unit 2. l ' Columns 2 and 5'are taken from the Weighted Percent Complete column (blue). ' Column 2 is' Unit 1; Column 5 is Unit 2. Columns 3 and 6'are calculated by adding the Total Direct Projected Manhours Unit.1 12,658,651 (yellow) Unit 2 7,704,915 { Total 20,363,566 i and then dividing each of the individual projected manhours by the total i manhours to obtain their percentage-of the total project, i.e., j 10 Sitework 16727P.4 20,363,566 = .0082 This: figure is then multiplied by the physical percent complete to obtain the i-projected weighted percent complete or columns 3 and 6 .0082 X 30 2.5. Column 7 is the sum of columns 3 and 6. The total percent
- complete (Directs only), Line 8, is.the sum of each column (excluding columns 1 and 4).
The following is. the method used by the computer (See Attachment "C"). The weighted percent complete on Attachment "B" is a summation for each activity. '(Act.huantity Forecast Manhourg I Weighted Percent Complete '= (Forecast Quantity X 100) Forecast Manhours X At Next liighest Level-
O y'g a 9 - 2'- f' 1-0-1312-202310 - ((3523 3352 100)) 5510 X x 95.15 x.1758 16 31348 l j e e
t 1 L... i
- HONTHLY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT FO.
CN. g PERIOD ENDING.,3/)S/7W MA -' l, g
- a.,
p o~. 4 r i t j u / f, \\[(s, , CONSTRUCTION STATUS OF V. DOR SYSTDt3 \\ h$s ,' 2 h.B ' b b (lf -Physi al 2 Complete ? A.' ,soit ttID Project f Tait hTD Project P.:oJ tcT sluilI.lt 9 , _ UNIT 2
- go7At,
- #9HY (Compared to Directs only) 'kI a' IlfrD Z d 2 ITID %. 4su % hComp. Cobr. Co:np. Corp-Cono. Cer n. 10 Sitevork 30 ,yo ,y[ 16 ' Earthwork ,_, y f* ~ G/ /[, f 0 9.64 Q /,28 ,'y 8 M.& } IS Piling 7g , y cf ,pg ,uy { 19 Structural steel 7g ,g3 ,gy ,33 20 ' Reinforced Concrete yy y,q 9 yf9 , g, [ =Jg y,y ,9, y } 3E YA I"E l3 le 48'
- 90 2
,29 ef} !. 6 I 5 P 33 EVAC Piping l 36 PJumbios, Severs & Drains pc , f $( , // f , g/' . // I 44 - Reactor Plant Equip. 52 Turbine Plaa: Equip. l 54 General Pla;.: 2.q ui p. ..._i 58 Instrunent 6 Controls [ .0 7_ __ .04 . U 4' ^ _62 Ilcetrie:1 _? e O (, . /(, ,/0 74 Insulattos 4 76 Paintj eg /4 ,77 ,L/6 3 ,) { ,/ O C2 Architectursi t &&. EVAC 4 l.- 92 TestInd " C o ical Cleaning l 93 Startug y g g g v hotfee n of.f' I?*W1 91 0I loS O <2*??G A * ?'I { ~ 9
O ~ C =. 0 C O 'O =. O O O - O O C:. Q O O O O Cu O O O) l i i. t I l. l .t g i 3 i 4 g 5 .a in l I ^5. k q i 1 l i 4 .3 ~. O i n. g g e l W i I' e. -" a" a* i gOM 0"* H d i "a r-l %"c ~ o.s '.a c "o Soo o~. l 2'8 -0 t-w t n -o o a ono on e -, i O ., S O O. O O O e C* O 3 S o o O O 9 O O o o O 3 o C O,3 D ..,...e.a. COO. o. o. o. o. ~.. o. o. o.,. n. o. c. o. s. o. n. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.. ~ ~ M. o. l.Q, i.es. 0 e. 8,'"l
- o l
p a 4.,-. N ** 1#% i a M.e.e l 2 X4 f 3 i.d. v s =. i 24 .l e J a.'3 .Z ..e A %J. "5 i te, 8 $h a I O' l gl.S 4.4
- N' *1 g
I =. ,'S O M M.,%4 hliDf e ,. J e, R 8". = , $j g !.". N 1"j I & 4 % gti j. ,..n a >E E l l ) t . E.a o i I^** ,~. o, -~~ r 1 l .a.~,,,-~ ~ e. n,,- r. ~ - ~, ..,.,n,n.. ~, -,.. .~ -n- =.. i .~ n ~.n-, . - i.a - 2 J.3 e, i i, .2.. l1%W o , a , s .s- , ~, ~, ~,..,..
- n.,,,,.,.
.o- ...,m -=,l.~.~.,,.,,,.,~o~,ra.n,,.,..,,,~, .o.,.,~. - o c,.,. ~. , - a., ,,,s,o.~.,,,. i u.>...,;,=.n.~..~.:..~,.4..,,,.-=,,r. ~ ~-. - =.- , ~,..,~ o..,,, s, .,~ - e s.. -,u.. ,.5,- ,,~, .~ s.,e, .~,-. .2. s,- s. ~. ~, - i -e- --~, -.- 4- ~ ~~ z l,, I ~ 2 11. i a - z. o ,r i .-,a.,-~..,~~,~~~,.,......,.n.,-.~,,,,,,,,.r-.,-.,..~,,~oo,..n.a,.. .,, - o u,..., n n. .u. ~,,. . u s .., n,,,, -. - a a.,~o., ~,. ~ r =..,~.,.. ~,.,.,,,.~.,, ~~,- .,, = e,r u i o-.=,,,z., ~ ,- a.
- o. ~o
+, ~.
- o. =l M,.
4 ,o o l ,oo~~ ..a m o o,,, p m 4 ,M~ .T ~ 1 4 i. -<o ~ ~ m - z., 44- = s ] ao s a, a soo I
- o. E.
E Qu tan .tE =. 6 = a a.- s o,- a isso 1 1 a z 2 ,, - s u, l 2---o -a -x-e o 2=
- a
-.2 o.s, a, t -4 1 % s. .a,., J J. J,J,. J. E..34 4and a- -2=aJJ * ,sa,..- l <u 4 J e -n J - u o z l l ,5 ' 4 4.: 4 -. s.. x s e. a < - o., v.
- s,a.e,,. a..
2 i r -a ,. ~ I. s <a o 1, -o -2, -a-a -2,.z., o,, :.,e, .,. -.. x. u. s nu o e.r a .z. i oa -<- xI - -,.,u, a o s.:..: a e. 2.,. w e <a
- a..o.
.. a a a,. o ,a.. ,. - a.a. s e. z . c,1 > a a o,.., a 3.s., s..m., ,e I. . ax, t n ,u,..,,-a .,.,a.s. i a 2s,- .n a ..-o,..,. ao
- s..
a o., ..o - o o s.,., s, sa - c . o. 3 a,. z u. - 4.a. o i o.
- u z--u--.
u- .-r-t'. a...a., .s..J x u. r., a. t, u e z,..u.... .,. o.e..e.a..
- 1., u.,..o.
, u.a a ns,n.- >..c.o,,,- a,..2.o a. i
- a i
u --,a. ~, .i e e tau. s. ~ - s a r a - a .,1 - n - o z,.o..,1. s. o: -a,a ..o . a, s. a <.- m. 1 I. ans a ao a I i r + i i o I i t I a + H. l J l i I i I i l 1 i i l l l t l u J i ~,-, i u s 1 .,.,, ~,., 4...o~,..,,.,..,~,,..,, ~.,..,,., <.,, ~,,.,, - . s,, o e -~,.,,, . -~~ I i l ) i i { l l .o a t j j c 1 i I t i l-4 4 h j i ,. i ~ i O O O 'O=0 0 O O~ O O=0 0 O' O. O 09 0 0 0 On o O ..l o 1 I r t i 1,
n -. _. w......,_ ..u..,......,,,,,..~. .a.$, f~ u ...,c 3511*7 padate 4 kwul, If.C. gg l' *. L. Q hwkeAh v 4Lat.Il1 Y 4 Fahe.st,H f.g ## ' 4 {l, Mat.&GLtthi '.4PMawr et4P= Scuin Itars PWOJLCf PENIUu tau!AG 03/2S/78 ,.g =" O m ') t aPEt.r.tc Pt s.Ct hi. envi!CrL ht I0 nit.0 O ""c'"5 6"ustto "'"""d5 "c"'ta'
- t"'ta' 0%I1 (C5I COJL Ct%W4#110A 10 bait HWuth's EAPthCEC CCPPLEIL tuMPLtit ese
.se Q;_ in PL LMr. ! A b. bi et > 3 4 0** a % t#4 4*/07 10 Q ..,bl4 00% Q i Se e.g birthAL PLahl twb!>*th 40 /SShl2 .uu I gutua*=ght41gGN b CONia 142 17 986- .00 'Q 62 LLELinlLAL 1071 943s46 60 f) in ~ ' --' 97 Pal %ilhu 57s6 6-t 79 2,.4 .l./54 OJ f") ItSilhG 6 Ceth! CAL CLE 76-6S/3e .60 !g. - l l Q 40 OthECT Cost M61-4 7794915 7 8 8.00 Q 2* paCnCPeabt luta .00 2 UNI t / 555774 7704915 7 4 1 75 O 7I tuu! Pre Al L0h! 2003 .00 r5 - 66 "&Ihi-st ut>5 6 488LII!E Skeel .00 - 39 Ct F ICE daLahlt :b 339#6 .00 0 "' - " ' '''5 d " O 76 ma lCe>t h 4 Jsh!1GNa ban 3 .00 - - et s MOLIU41 Ps? 2J4 .00 p# 7d INU M CI (whi N48t* .00 6 F CLite.I mLhn %t ina .00 M pou)1C4 LibMilhu & PCs Jfid7e6 J4182831 10 14 14.00 O O O "j ; O C O C-O C O. ^ ,1g ~.... O O O m n -m o m, so O C O O O o O O o 9
I r %b k. U.3 O L.S 0 L) kb LJ J Y N0 NE \\ k ~~~ e i I o h e Pt ? e et -3 o As l ..= lL .z uxen P= e 4 a .n N 4.e 6 .h u 8 1 8 6 8 8 8 f f 9 4 8 a .E. l c N.4 o e sat M e se > a= 4.e 4 ew N M 4 uw N = a 0 11 3 - 4 n l sd 9 a 4 o e o e u r c. ,n et o oo o o. a o o 7 o O O o o o o o o e' a= o O O N. O O O @ in O O O o o o O N O o o o 4 @ o -. l - O -3,.* O P@4-J 3.J a.= $ e u N o O ooCooo4
- t t
.e e. 2 s J .J. o o o a l
- e e e o e e * *
- e e o e e o e *ee
- k g 3.s J 9
,e g e e o e e
- e
- * *
- e e **
0 e. 3 0 0 8 UOIt i 4-E e g I e i J O e= 0 Ca O O O O O 00000000000Oo O00000000000000020000000 a .e. o000000000009 000 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 CJ 0 0 0 0 0 l 3.sa /. G o o o d o em i 3g e e e e e o e e e e o e e e o e e o e o e e o e e e e e e o e e e e e o e e o e o ee g i g sr 8 -2 5 8 s g' Ps [ U.ad K 9 g
- 8 /b lE 9 e
N e g o O *= Or*@OO e O O o o P= @ - @ O O
- = O O 4 O O O o N O O O O O O O.* O O M o o o **
l
- 3 comoOo c o p= O O O o d M o o o OOOpoucocoo0000D0 00000o l
s= 3 s = 0 o e e o e ee e o e o e e o e e s e e o e e e e o eo e e o e * * * *
- E e o e e e e
.e. P3 4 g e0 2 .e-E D s O taA K g 5 - 1 0 @ ".e m'O 44 4 P= 4 o 4 u1=.O I .3 m - ~ naco - O O O O a. szw. N N o O I 4 n@ o.M4e @ N - PB 4 P= 4 N 0* O 4 P* P* M P.* a P=.P
- -. 80 C.n @ M 4 4 'fl @
.ain9 O@O N =.o. e e f'1 @ 4oA4o c0 N
- p. P=
4Neef*P3<4 l 2 I= T 9 4.* M. e .N N p @ P1 @ M o eeM p o W 4O nn a 3.I 4 e N 4 t W PB N v 4 o l (
- 0 iN W3 e
o. N N O Pb N s O40 f I a l e m O2 s 3 Pm Fw N Pm l
- o. J P1 g
E E q 6 naa 2 0 a E4 l g g ] I 1 l g P= e - o N n m l +.. -e O N-e l Q2 9 D A @@@o 4 4 M 4 N n O n M - J e .D
- A 9
P= 40 4 @ A.* n N P= 4 4 N nn e u l [
- e. N N
N N ins i 1J ) 4 P.t Ae N e Pt N a "1 >= I e a l E P. W.E a M.h WI { J o 4 o I us u !ruz .n oN... a-eoo 2 ~ e .o. l 4.: st - 9.h Qu u
- 4 W u l
,N, @ n n n., 4.S @ =. ,e. O ** P.=. -,.4 e - 40 =. @ o P= PD O 4-4 .A 'N o, @ - o. .,,~. .n N. N. l 4 4 N. ~ o =dT-0 4-n,.eMTM p N o 2 -n . oa n n .n - J O j n N J. N Ae - e. a.>* O 9 P3 N 4 1 wa .A >= 4 B O-l
- 2. a a.T.
ad Q D* t -u
- G 2
J.A T l e ) 1 d 1, O l a a s J.J 4 .P l o P, o,. O o .O ~, @. ..~n. .O ni -1 . -, o 04r,- n o N, e 4 e z., n. O. 4 4 .o P,. i 44 a P. O .n o N a 4 p ~ o a a3 l N 4 1 t -..=- =o.. .==. e a a. u casuwaas. u . as a wa a a a a I 1 a. i n o, o u 2 l 2 o. J. a 1 u l 9 WX
- 4
.d 3 taa 4 as and .e uu a e e m a ,e u. u. -<u i o o a x .s a a w ma-na .a ,e 1.a W. i es.a m.,. o o. u a. , o.a. w e x z .=n, , s. ma i a.o .oo -,.o. O a. o a w a 1 o2 s i o e u-a a so 4 o emo o o u . u a e e <uusotm2o a . u .A O, u et l A I 2 2 o .J 1-2 O aA
- eft J
2 h ta, 2 1 a.,= X taa s x o o. .e a. a ae is Pa o 2 1.., w T.T o.J O, 4 Q M. l aOO E T A h na O
- Y o z a.I. a o e
= O is
- t e
a w 22 ' e ,a e - u t. a l 2 k-- u d 4 a.k, -, U W e t., au. u A h 3 s. ~4a<< a a a o o a l g } E i A b u .E24u4WAA b. u b E4 E BudbW W. S u -. ~ - - - .obosooooooo ocooooooooooooooooconoco 4 o c as o l i u c o rs o sa c o o c o n o m e cocooooooooooooooooooooo I Ce. g .- a n . ~~ N.. o. .o,.n o P. - m~ ~~ .o.O.a0 .o. l O on. n. i i 4 o I. l I 2 i -.,.. s N n.,n,O,,,,N P9 0,.,. 6.e.o.,n. c o. i n e,,~,o M,a, c e..o o o o *n o e 0 a_. o 9 ,=. o, e. n o. enP a.,.,,,,,,.,n, 4 4 , n n,,,P,, n 4 ., 4.e .,., e ~Na,N ~ N N N % % N. N N N N,N N %,ew N % N N. N N %eN N N l NP4 N N N N N N N N, N N. h ' N N,0 N N 2on u o co_now. o O na22e eco % e ooeu nooen .= -u
- ~NnN N
~~~NNN~NN N ~N~N~~~N~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~ .f.h 3 0.J i N ew N N N. N.-.N. N,N. N N N.,..%.s N N. H.,. -.M.e.e..s.s ed N N N N ew N N N N ew N y sis N N N es N N N = n .,. ~,,.. -
- p.n.,.~,,.,.,..e.,.
n. .n. n o e. l .a t m !' O O O=O O OO O 0:0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 O b
SUMMARY
STATUS As o" / SIP!M ' CONSTRUCT 10N' ENT KEY OATES VAR. FROM CO MILESTONE CUMULATIVE FUEL COMMERCIAL SCHE 0 ACT LOAD OPERATION 1 WEEKS UNIT I POWER BLOCK 48.6 48.6 12/86 6/87 0 UNIT 2 25.0 25.0 12;'88 6/89 0 POWER BLOCK BALANCE 76.5 76.5 0F PLANT.
- lNCLUDES TURNE0 0VER FACILITIES FROM
_ OlSTRIBU. 44,3 44.' TABLES PREVIOUS CONTRACTOR, COMMON FACILITIES, AND YARO. TOTAL 44.1 44.1 CUMULATIVE SCHED ACTUAL ENGINEERING PERCENT COMPLETE 67.4 66.9 1 I d
i PERCENT COMPLETE 4 100~
- ooo, aa
,,,,,,,,,,,,,o a 'a a aaaaaaaaaaaa 90 a 'a 'a ~ a a aaaaa ..a ... a=........ 7 80 ~ E8'NGN 6 6.9 s. . n"" / 60 UCTION UNIT y ONLY) f SO {#48.g l 40 30 20 1 10 1 O I I I .I 1 I I I l i 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 i i
TOTAL MANPOWER PERIOD FORECASTED OMRTERNEAR PLANNED
- ACTUAL AUTHORIZED PEAK OF PEAX BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 526 477 526 SITE ENGINEERING 55 47 55 PREREQUISITE TESTING 28 18 28 SUST0TAL See 542 See 706 3048 EBASCO - CONSTRUCTION 2
NONMANUAL 1,192 913 1,192 1,383 4 0/84 MANUAL 3,636 3,636 3,700 6,000 10/85 r N SUOTOTAL 4,828 4,549 4At2 BECHTEL ENGINEERING & HD 1,060 1A08 1,228 40/83 HL&P HOUSTON PROJECT MANAGEMENT 193 193 193 236 20/85 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 248 242 24 8 316 4 0/86 ANU STARTUP PLANT OPERATIONS 285 270 285 667 4 0/86 $UBTOTAL 726 705 726 IJIS CONTRACTS 258 225 250
- BASEB DN FORECAST NO.1
' e p .
- v. -
4%f~@$ G M. W. @i l:f f M.] M@ W 6 f: MW:Ri gMMW,W&@W@q.F > W.Wh W.W m/ 7 g k k IIk b@i; \\ kkf f
- h. -m M,.,%..,Q..
k. .e a r. g Wm.d. D. m. Q E.M,.N.. e.@, ;.'M.., rf. %o,.p4.- g, e.r.< % a ,6. 3J . n; - O : ,. + vce . - -. u. !. y. 4% o p W%.ng, L'4EMi, v@s)n. Y 5 -f Vis
- 2. %..
Mr* g WW.'.;g '% *u. W';g'.&...; %%w.1egh= g}4 J,5$.. g* \\ *f - wv - &'...%.'. *e. m '. *... cz Q',":..&. u-h. s. %.:, p r1"Y w 4y* s.r
- e. -
.W,W . cg., ce W .i ? - p %o.. m% c h;; p.. -.u../..f, "
- Q...,.
...w.. - en.c s . m%. ( w ^ v,"<*Y,,rf. e4 c. ;g' *- ^ o ?'nc,8%.p., w,..y. %,g:. m woY Lp a.c q,+W g e~~. r.e y,1 v. p i.:me 5 e Q. J.3r, i C,*A.3q q, p ",L. aan J .+A. - - g...,.- t 4. . n.*e v
- . g p,..
.4.a a f 4 W,, - Q:i "'*;4.e,g? 'sQ c . ~ *. h-., . 4 t c
- ' q. M*.=.- L Q;JA p* > ;.uR,.
U ~... f+%.. e. ~ *% **h** ga -. c.y .c &c. ~-'39A ^. >
- s'~.
q.e (,- A '&,r b ;*d iV.y' w,j+W.:. e v 't eg L
- c. c,% 4 %;4 rse A
p 0;.$ r':U m 6f
- - ~~',,1, W r. C,*e p?...... f:f '~. a.:. v' K y, w*.
a W* p : 4
- w
- r
%9'* Q.Qg p.q y: e*... V %;'W,,m ?.!). s.riO.. ~.e, ' p :;,M a - %_ b:L %m ~.M.Qg,g:},.. 'Q.,m av"t - %_;i Q_....Cd:q l gq. c.- 1Gj *. W..y. +* y:W*Mn m $s 4 s Q + na - p p. hsw c. +
- a. s
,-e - ,c &n.p.% .y: e $;. -s %r.;a:n>A s.ria y&o..:: T '. L U W.*.$.n **.m;- a...;.. p *,. - e..M W.W D.. s WJ hy.d'g*v a '&Q~;, g. v,h}n k%a$ e;,"e s v 1 s. erN , -s en-y.., f;*V.t...+.e' N.e n m. :. g 'd-+?m,4 .. o.,.<r: n. +* -e '. ~. : a : en-c y wyc..xy.% o. q l . $W ~- ... ~ "
- t.h;ff' oi k,.fl?b e EN.
,?:,.[W; g,&s:h,: u. WE m - Mee*n* y,' w:s e-+*ad-l V Q'. ig ';<.ea :'t s,u .pe :m. :L n .h -J m.- .-;r. -e . ~ y. e ,.. -*
- e-o u f>.a-.e g 0 '.,b.,n,,f.ny e V C r, f..,.g'Q..M ;,'m,,,,yt.;
s .~ ,;y*,e :a c e:. c %. .h Q,* y u. fr x oKi?,, 7," o: <*e i:- 7. c;;,W.. t_..a ?, - - e /. AS,wi m.- -W^,- OM, a. m.,r;h M' r;a '. n, n c a.-. y?. cg A ~"D4; u.s l yc-. :1 - p-o u,,.,. e4
- . u..
eq".>,aq ..w: r n, :c - sm.);y ',i c. v c..;)'M'Ji'M :'u.~h'"Ses l e 'e; m..m.; e. e. .~
- / a'i.*
- . m..- O
,,. 7 as *. * - %. m. . *.. c e v,.
- P
.c. u., 4 o h g<' w m 'C r* w age 1+f.,- m. W;-.
- c. e c -#
a '- . "/+ 4.s. sfs. gf -9.
- ?y'(3 e -7,,
e-=%A 4 o I t:I r. ~ >. : .ii!A W.,*. y,;w yss,aM,-- v. e. A.,;,5 e n% s' $ Ww v i sw W e o a.m,. - = 5. - E w ' +.,., et' g m ; *. En' e. 88F.* <. 8E
- - 4*'. :. !
f ,ip' ;;. *cg*a:... sc-/'.- i r + .c, s.J oO.af':t. ;c'e j,:.b',;L,y.. e. :. :-gt w:.;*t;:- ma P w%'d.g?r/ .D.c'%' tan ** m.9
- p..cc,me pl};
A E., c o-?- p
- c. q p mw
- - e.gik.u/p e'O e
n, ? .- u UL s: i *- . a - fse i 'v.J,, s. g w-.mm.1
- c e.r. ans Mv;, r J o -= %j'>
ee ek c
- t s
.m L ,a, e e 'n. au.Ei,.r..a.@/== ~ - s - a.. :s y..a p e-h, c t w^'- cW wO. can:: w *g.,.gw - vn: A z+% =. < e.u % e'N es, av8 , a em e e m . - o 2 es0.. f F#; .e +a u c. J or - c e no. erw e>
- T nas.
- m > m.u.. ; e in'sn* ~u si.%. :.,o.-oy as ;::w,;.{ d.s h
e-.m en.. e m, e s; y'se V m-c
- sea an
.c-Q een :w.M? ccye e.n>*&. I. ' {M. M. k*M. Mf0.G*EM. -.tnp on v.z. d...,." as; s yc.ar. zgn f.-@m y on%,; w?, e c or se se
- c..
t o . e n. :> e - {?we n.. e.. sc. e '. '.c e. ew.,, eig,; un. o. e -M.$ < W= 3 en u ,e wg a: en -.
- U w.
en. m c e 6 e -.;Y m - o ::: - m. ' :: ag. w.*% v. ti e u - w. M. w.N D... M.. k..., F C I D.,. w. $..
- h..g.-
N o e w *. 8, e o a ,, ' w-' :h.u z.,. e)?; s. q $,,+= En#. :) <L.,'i,,, e ' ;== [ '.e.w,.e%og 'p: ' e fr *;, af yee u ~ s L s.. 1- -
- e
- >g.
c =:2 m -+a e: c: c*s:o u.amws....- as & c,r m,.:.a u.
- s. e. :-
e m a +. l v c s -s. x. ssn en;}p?g,,... a;. en c .e ~..N. - f g54an ~se;;,g. >- ^ c w,. ~. ). 9,.;s.. o ; g~% u u o.m o., m e: e q-es:r.;,a c,o. .e*,,:;,kQ gQtj.ry.. o,: ;gg e em. ';..ey u .o \\ M> Qp. V:." C.R ; f f- @,' G y g
- 1 h (
s.:l w. ' ~ %g. 8 %n' M'Yp%.vu.a" % ?. 4. + 4.% A e w % ' pbhg... i n, ~W,. le cp.'.' mq:7 g L,0 .nd.b:g,s. s, p., J. .G:.4 s -+ .. w na n. k,\\ ;.q.:+.:l; c.,'y*.
- 4".p%w,t'%pf,1 C.
- ..,.yi Q,.u.
o ~ ..n. "( O,':. g . %;q, <3.,y r;,,y sp j + .;p p, w y;., a n. u
- M
. y#
- b,
,N,'?h.e #.. h,f N: - 6 ~ ~ p34.,%.7/u g. W.!.iN.h.,:m$,ik.,W.,..m..$'?{ y{.., ; $ 9* I e .w up.v, w - sa ? $ETI M t -e m.,.m.. .e .w,.g-v7 w,,9 w.#- t.g-9.s*,... s_. w.. ce w - l i t,% 0 ' * {.7..,.;., l ..f ..l e.. } *e". \\ ,h
- 4*-.'
- g. g.3...,:,*,.
~.. .-,. py
- g..
.r,.. ~' %
- f J.1.;..
M :7'f,;,;. v.. ..e-ap. s b 4 * ;.,, '. ~$ A-8 g ' W~^ T ,s,. I* = u.,.,. !.t' ] k* " \\' t e e
UNIT 1 MILESTONES UNIT 1 MILESTONES DATES START OF TRANSITION 10/12/81A NOTICE TO PROCEED WITH NEW 02/15/82A CONSTRUCTOR RESTART ENGINEERING 04/30/82A RESTART CONSTRUCTION (NONSAFETY RELATED) 06/15/82A (SAFETY RELATED) 04/06/82A BEGIN ROLLING 4x10s SCHEDULE 01/03/84 TEF.MINATE ROLLING 4x10s 12/01/86 ENERGlZE SWITCHGEAR /106/01/85] COLD HYDRO 06/01/86 ILRT 08/01/86 FUEL LOAD 12/01/86 COMMERCIAL OPERATION 06/01/87 "A"lNDICATES ACTUAL DATE l [ t
i ENGINEERING STATUS e RA0lATION MONITORING SYSTEM e MAIN CONTROL PANELS
- REACTOR VESSEL e RELIEF WELLS 2
i e MAIN COOLING RESERVOIR
- COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE e ANCHOR BOLT /EMBE0 i
- STARTUP FEEOPUMP e AMERICAN BRIDGE SHOP WELDING NONCONFORMANCE l
e OESIGN CONTROL SASELINE t e DESIGN MODEL I l l 1 l
()m b' I L HECilIEL ENGINEEHING PEHCENT COMPLETE 100 i LEGEND: i N s ~ ~....
- ..., -scuroyiEu.
/ ~~< Aciy,, l '#CHEuyIED g/.4 4 N Ig a ^ AClygg La y GG s o y g e gg 30 20 10 1 l I i I 1 I I i l g 1587 1983 1984 1385 1986 1981 1988 1989 e ce
l ENGINEERING STATUS SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL STARTED ISSUED FOR USE DISCIPLINE SPECIFICATIONS SCHEDULED ACTUAL SCHED' LED ACTUAL J A RCHIT E CTU R AL' 52 37 38 17 12 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL 75 75 75 73 71 CONTROL SYSTEMS 83 83 83 75 69 ELECTRICAL 133 132 132 124 107 MECHANICAL 161 151 151 148 146 NUCLEAR 15 15 14 14 14 PIPE SUPPORT STRESS 6 6 6 6 6 PL ANT DESIGN 92 92 92 92 88 TOTAL 617 591 597 549 513 J DR AWINGS TOTAL STARTED ISSUED FOR USE DISCIPLINE DRAWINGS SCHEDULE 0 ACTUAL SCHEDULE 0 ACTUAL ARCHITECTURAL 560 517-471 164 163 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL 1,972 1,714 1,756 1,607 1,654 CONTRO L SYSTEMS 2,010 1,975 1,967 1,689 1,615 ELECTRICAL 2,858 2,632 2,637 2,071 1,7S6 MECHANICAL 382 356 '345 313 306 NUCLEAR 46 35 34 34 22 PIPE SUPPORT STRESS GROUP
- 13,844 7,925 8,391 7,916 8,221 PL ANT DESIGN 9.649 8,640 8,962 6,734 6,750 TOTAL 31,321,
23,794 '24,563 20,521 20,527 'LARGE 80RE SUPPORTS ONLY
.r-- a S 4 W M I m m P'Ib3 a) u I E_ 5 W E E I s-= munuma i ~ 3 \\ E g l l l l l l 3 I I I I I I I I ~ WMbedNVW SNiddV18 I
a 8 h a W m { I numme mamma b3 NW m m C w eg Wu 1 5 I E E. .J 4 N I O 2 ~ \\ i umma I I I I I I I I I I I I i ,1 i l E. I. 5 R I. I I 5 A i W M odWWW SW1ddVis
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE / CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 LARGE BORE PIPE 250 EeGamEEmmG CSesTRNCTION AELEASE B ' INSTALLATION 225 LF LF I k 200 -- staate#LE 122.728 70 S4.481 54 ACTUAL 125.377 71 95.268 54 ~_ p""-"" h 175 ~ TeTAttFC8 176.368 /p l / / ~ 150 $ / / / a / / / / 5 / ENGINEERING / f
- 125t,
/ s' a- / / 's 100 $ / m 3 N 75 CONSTRUCTION / / / / 25 / / 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J JlA S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M AMJJAS0ND JFM 1982 1M3 1M4 1NS
- INCLUDES NON ISO'ED PSPE
O l l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE / CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 SMALL BORE PIPE 250 EmGleEER85G cessTRUCTies RELEASES
- IBSTALLATION 225 LF LF h
200 -- scastsetE 77,283 51 29.378 20 ACTBAL 74.575 58 30.9E7 29 TeTALIFca 150.27s 175 l /" s's,,-- 150 $ 4 a / Y 7 / 125 ENSINEERING =/ p' } / / u. / ac / / 100 4 / / E / / / l / 15 / CONSTRUCTION l f' f / / / ,/ / s/s / / f 25 / / _.9 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M 1982 1M3 IM4 1M5 'llBCLUDES N00llS0'ED PIPE l l
I l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ( ENGINEERING RELEASEMONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 LARGE BORE PIPE HANGERS 250 EGGlefleasG* Cae5Tastiles 2 eftEASES IWSTALLATIem 225 EACM EACM k 200 -- staatsetE 8.281 54 2.912 is ~ Actuat s.44e ss 2.926 is 175 TetAt(FCe 15.19s -q,, s's' g / / l ,/ 125 3 / / E / / u l / / 100 "** i / / l / ENGIIIEERIIIG / 1 / / / / 15 / / / / / s' T / ,/ / s / f 25 j l COIISTRUCT10N /' 0 J F Rf A 18 J J A S 0 N D JlF JlJlA S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D JFM M A to 1982 1M3 1904 1985 l
- leCLWSES NON ISS EB MANGERS l
l t
1 l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE / CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES l UNIT 1 CABLE TRAY l l 250 EsGanEEedeG c 8 85Y'10CT m t mELEASEB IS$TALLATIes 225 LF LF h 200 - - sentsetE S7.E75 30 29,490 24 ~ ACTBAL $7,716 SS 29.934 24 TOTAL (fcm 122.465 175 1 150 $ a. I E 7 125 0 f, a /,# ~ g /s / ~ CC / 7 100 g ENGINEERING f / E ,/ / / T 15 / / /, / / 50 s'/ / s s a 5 25 f CONSTRUCTION 2 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 1982 1M3 1984 1905
i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE /CONSTRUCTM)N INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 CONDUIT 500 1 EeSanEEasBS Cte5TRWCitSN aELEAMS IS$TALLATees 450 LF LF k 400 -- SCmEsutE SSJ64 29 5 FAB 2 is .c1..t i.,.in = .m >S TeiAtitce 3s33e 350 w-- / / T 3# ! / / / / 3 / / 250 * / / / / m / / m / / T 200 $ / / E / / / / 150 / / / / EIBG41BEERMIG / / / 100 s' p _ _ s' y\\ ~ CSIISTRUCTIGII lA S 0lN D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D JFM J F M A M J 1982 1983 1984 1985
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE / CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 WIRE & CABLE (POWER & CONTROL) 50 EmGaeEEAdeG CSGSTANCTION I RELEASES 8eSTALLAT80N EACM EACM Z 5 40 -- sCastesLE 3.725 15 71 S.3 { ACTuAt isse 7: n.3 TOTAt (FC8 24.225 '~ 5 i 7 30 m u ENGINEERING (CIRCulT RELEASED) Z \\ s' p? ,/', ,/ k 20 s 7 o ENGINEERING / / I d* (ENTER TO CIRCulT / / T f & RACEWAY PROGRAM) / f I s'/ p' k 10 / CONSTRUCTION b \\ p' / / /s s/ g J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M IM2 1M3 1984 1985 i
~ SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING RELEASE / CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION CURVES UNIT 1 HVAC 5,000 EmGIEEESEBG CemSTRDCTMN RELEASES NISTALLATeen 4,500 Les Les ~_ -- scesteutE I.964,20E 76 363.000 15 4,000 ~ ACINAL P.WES.001 SS 305,157 15 5 3,500 TeTAt lFce p37s. sos .1 6 3 f C1) 3,000 g E y Z 2,500 '5 Y b 'e ENGIIIEERING% / // o e' // T 2.000 2 ~,/ / / s. / / 5 1,500 p / / / j FABRICATION-- / / / 1,000 / / / / / l /'/ 500 / C08tSTRUCT10N 0 m J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 1982 1983 1984 1985 e
c HANGER STATUS ~ RELEASED FOR TOTAL T TE (EACH) (EACH) (EACH) HANGERS (EXCLUSNBS SERNWC SUPPORTS) LARGEB8RE 13.344 3,221 M 10,300 SARALL BORE 15.710 3.5M 23 EDS RESTRANITS 132 tot jeg yy SN#38ERS 1,333 233 gg ggg s 4 i
l I i i LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
- CURRENT
- FUTURE POTENTIAL 10CFR50.55 DEFICIENCIES INDEPENDENT REVIEW 1
- HL&P ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
- QUADREX i
- INPO i
4 i i - ' " ' ' * ' " ' ' - ' ' * ' ' ' ' - - - ' ' ' " ~ ' ~ ' ' " ~'
i 8 i PROBLEMS / SOLUTIONS
- STEAM GENERATORS
- ELECTRICAL AUXILIARY SYSTEM
- RADWASTE SYSTEM 4
) e i 4 I l 1 i 4 1 4 r- __m_. y--,, ,m _-m,__ m, y ._,-4 ,y,-
1 l l l l 1 4 i PROBLEMS RESOLVED I e TRANSITION PROGRAM
- SECONDARY WATER CHEMISTRY e CABLE TRAY SUPPORTS
- TMl DESIGN CHANGES
- DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL e SYSTEM IS0s e MAIN CONTROL PANELS e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION
- DESIGN CRITERIA I
I i l 3 l \\
i ) DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL
- ENGINEERING HAS IMPLEMENTED A DESIGN FREEZE PROGRAM
- SYSTEM CH ANGES - BUILDING BULK ITEM CHANGES (PIPE, PIPE SUPPORTS, CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORTS, HVAC DUCT AND SUPPORTS)
- ALL PalD'S ARE NOW FROZEN ON THE DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURE
- BULK ITEM DESIGN FREEZES SCHEDULED BASED ON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION 0F INDIVIDUAL 8UILDINGS
- SYSTEM FREEZES SCHEDULED SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TURNOVER TO STARTUP DESIGN CHANGE PACKAGES WILL EFFECT SUBSEQUENT CHANGES l
. -. -.. _ _ - - _ - -, ~ - - -.
f. i PROCUREMENT BULK COMMODITIES
- LARGE BORE PIPE SP0OLS
- LARGE BORE PIPE SUPPORTS
- SMALL BORE PIPE
- SMALL BORE PlPE SUPPORTS
- SMALL BORE VALVES (NUCLEAR)
- SMALL BORE VALVES (NON NUCLEAR)
- CABLE TRAY
- CABLE l
j
i STATUS OF MAJOR EQUIPMENT ORDERS t
- DEAERATOR
\\ h1 ',? '
- BOOSTER PUMPS '#,
i 0;,r;,. M ' #N
- MSR ORIP PUMPS
'"' J C, '
- CONDENSATE POLISHING DEMINERALIZER
.f,)
- CONDENSER TUBE SHEET SAMPLE TROUGHS 2' ",'l.'.
~ id 181
- SAFETY CLASS CHILLERS l' " A '*',.
\\ .b . s-g 4
- ELECTRICAL AUXILIARY SYSTEM a '"-
" t. EQUIPMENT j
- OTHER PURCHASE ORDERS 1
I f l f
== ..u. W p O 9 ,8 k BULK DELIVERY STATUS UNIT OF IN MEASURE INVENTORY ' TOTAL-LBP SUPPORTS EA 10,300 32,000 4W LBP SPOOLS EA 18,000 24,000 WlRE AND CABLE LF-9,235,000 14,300,000
- j VALVES (L.C.))
EA 16,000 30,000 8 + e ..,8' -a f T
SULK MATERIAL RE0VISITION STATUS ITEM P.O. ISSUED 1. Nuts and Bolts 10/12 A 2. Small Sore Piping Material 10/21 A 3. PlumcIng Materials 11/28/S '4 Copper Tubing 09/26 A 5. Brass Tuoe Fittings 09/21 A 6. Electrical J-Boxes (E-69) 10/13 A 7. Conduit, Accessories and Fittings 09/23 A 8.- Receptacles, Toggle Switches, Ligthing Fixuture's 09/30 A 9. Small Non-Nuclear Valves 10/21 A 10. Small Nuclear Valves 11/30 F
- 11. Bulk Structural Steel Shapes 10/20 A 12.
Instrument Tubing and Fittings 09/21 A V; A. f \\ t 1 Figure III-2
\\ ll %'.ro / ' MAJOR CONSTRUCTION MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED
- JUNE 1982 - NONSAFETY RELATED CONSTRUCTION RESUMED e AUGUST 1982 -SAFETY RELATED CONSTRUCTION RESUMED
- JULY 1983
- RESERVOIR FILLING COMMENCED -WELDING OF THE UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF THE ECW PIPING COMPLETED -WELDING OF THE UNIT 1 REACTOR COOLANT LOOP PIPING COMPLETED
- AUGUST 1983
- UNIT 1 RC8 DOME TOPPED OUT - UNIT 2 RC8 CONCRETE COMPLETED TO SPRING LINE I
i i CONSTRUCTION STATUS
- REACTOR CONTAINMENT 8UILDING
- DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING
- FUEL HANDLING BUILDING
- TUR81NE -GENERATOR BUILDING
- MECHANICAL AUXILIARY BUILDING e ELECTRICAL AUXILIARY BUILDING
- ISOLATION VLAVE CU8lCLE l
l l
L i 9 I 89 1 88 l 9 1 a 78 l 9 1 E T S S E 6 l 98 E L P R 1 M G f O O C RPT 1 N d / ET O / I C N TR 5 I CE U p 8 UP l 9 1 RL j f_ f, TA S C NI S O Y C / H / P 4 j l 98 / 1 / L / AU 6 / T 8 4 7\\A C D T E S L AL U6 3 CA D8 8 EU E4 l 9 RT H 1 OC C FA S 0 01 82 E G I 9 E 1 L 8 0 0 e e 0 0 M 0 g 0 8 3 3 7 S 5 4 2 g 1
- w
%a3=E s4$, 1 a 4, i
l CONSTRUCTION AUDIT AND INSPECTION PROGRAMS
- WORK SAMPLING
- INSTALLED QUANTITIES
- WELDER QUALIFICATION
- WELD ROD ISSUE
- TOOLCONTROL
- GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND MATERIAL CONTROL
- NON NUCLEAR INSPECTION 4
1 i 1 4 i i
s v SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT - FORECAST 1 BECHTEL NONMANUAL 800 4. 700 p-705 M 600 I 500 e E 2 I . 5 1 a 4M csx E _f t; 3o0 2eo 100 I 1982 l 1933 l 1984 l 1985 l 1986 l 1937 l 1933 l iggg i l
A a O' e E me h 3 l 2 a I w z 6 w 2 W w Uwa E unnummuu 3 s 5 a a a d W3AA0dNVW SNiddVIS i i 1
,.i 989 1 l 889 1 l 7 8 9 1 1 TS A l C E RL OA 6 8 FU 9 N 1 A E T L C M B EN JO l A L O N A I RPO V 5 A C 8 S 3 S 8 9 Y A A 3 B 1 X B D I E E / E H T D T H l VN I T O ID U M S O 4 R E S 8 H 9 U T 1 OHR NO AF MS l R D U ~ E O N H 3 N N 8 A 9 A L PM 1 = N E l M T I N 2 E 8 L 9 A 1 V l UQ ~ E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4, 2, 0, 8 6 4 2 1 1 1 z a$w ssO i<
- i d
- j 4
- l
s EC1 ENGINEERING (N.Y. AND LOCAL HIRE) soo 4eo PEAK 39e i a 5 ! aos i t a 1 CD Ei 2co 3 ios i e isez 1 issa I ines I ises I ises I issi l isse I ises
es s i I ass i 1 l i n i l iI I l I i R O B se A s L1 i LT AS U A N I C E A R MO oo m s LF s. n i A s x T i 4 O T l 4:s i I l l I l l l l ; I I l I I Il 7 ~ I a s s i l zn i s e e n o n 8 o 0 o o o o o 0 0, c. c. o. c. o. o. 7 s s 4 3 2 1 l 8q=j 4 i
i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT - FORECAST 1 MANUAL LABOR-PIPEF1TTERS 2.200 2,200 _ ~ 2,110 2,000 2,000 i 1.000 1,800 l' 1,600 1.600 , 1,400 -] 1.400 mo 1,200 g 1,200 y C3 E 1,000 1,000 I 5 'a 800 800 I 600 600 400 400 l 200 200 I I 1M2 l IM3 l 1984 l 1M5 l ING l IM7 l 1988 l 1989 i
L .l j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, 0 0 0 0 i i i i i 8 6 4 2 O sn i 1 l l sn i l i n i 1 T S S I AN C A EI RC s OIR n F T i C E T L C E I E - JR OO RB s PA n SL I i A L X A l E U T N I H A I T M U O S m i l m i l zn i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, f 4, 2, 0, 0 6 4 2 i i i i i agoI<=s25 g m l 3 47,447 LF m_ a l EE 5 HC S'; h": s': s.ss e c C3 3 >C 13,844 EA g w 9 :;, x, C-m ',u' - e-A w s 3 s. ve I eq r 4,144 EA I a3 9 m o 5 = p s. m W O g 2,529,032 LBS m M l z e ,s.s 's r-s, een I 906,598 LBS E g g e i m ~ C a m r . g n> = W 5 409.904 LF i . = - e a W D > W ..~ \\ " s' ' sl, ' ' ' - ' s. E f* ', ' Q' - 2 d (( ' s ', m g.. e o 8
0 ./ / I ./ / I / -o / W O. = ;. e a
- e. m a an
./ E o e>a e-jaa O l g mw p= e g,,- s< aw / E _,<.+'.*l**.* l gwe A . =n < .o y l ~ wwa .)',, E aa g ~ sa- ) --- - a w tji >.. gi \\ /- i f g g _~ g wa a w i \\ \\ E s g gi, s. w s g N. m a i a...* 's s, g \\ g .y, I I a a a-R a w UIM04NVN UNIiavis
i l i PROBLEMS /S0 Lim 0NS e MATERIAL CONTROL e HVAC e CABLE TRAY e LARGE BORE PlPE SUPPORTS
- REWORK AND REPAIR 4
i l i l 4 e 1 i l 1 s l
i i l. 4 e t 4 I PROBLEMS RESOLVED t a i
- CONSTRUCTION MILESTONES i
- REACTOR COOLANT LOOP PIPE WELDING 4
l
- UNDERGROUND ECW PIPE WELOING 1
i 1 1 ) 1 l ? i i I I i Y I k I i \\ l 1 <n e --,.-----------e., ,_-..-_w., -.,-e----w_. .._m.g,, _.,,mm., ,w.,_,_,,.m.. -. -
+ U .o, = = e 7 5* i g 'I w s -= -4 0-O s E- ! j'I C= = 15a
- ! j hi Il n
-ic !( - Mi e c 7.= i <= Ee xe R &$a e a en-g i - a 2 H* O j* D~ i i E** - ~= Oa $
- 3
'=I Il CO c 7 !! ~i I '3
- i ts *-
I I t 1 1 i
- 1
'3EI[ II g ~72 ? E*E' 1'I!!g$E I a 3 _ < a=l' 3 r: lf lw 1 e a s. I I I %u .JI .5, = C- ] g* 22 I 8 - I !. 3 h._Ih- --- ghi! =... U:E 3 !- 3 I 'w an L. :< =- -:n kg -ga.
- =s g
i s I l I i E o ! - g g h* { - r a y! - a s g Ex - 3i 1 -.h M
- g3 I
s s'
- s
- 1..
I: a = I s* e 8 t y 1 4 V I ( lfh s
- , e
, I
- h. a, g
L E
- 1 w
s 32 3
- 3h
-g -e -a d < W g T i 3-g* B g 8 A I ' }2 g -3 ,3 g [
- l W
f 8 6 4 4 =e
- t l
l a -<t Eg p - h I . 4 g > s. , =, - s, t3*3r! I e I 64 a O 'ffj :8' -t 3' a-- y
SUMM ARY - QUANT! TIES UNIT 1. BOP. & UNIT 2 TO GO ! SCMHe ACTUAL ,A VIOU 9417 08 70 AH AST Coue00iTY utatuAt 40.1 ,, A5 0f t-182 l 70 0 Af t i 70 0Af t COMP CONCRETE UNIT 1 CY 678 640 165114 13 5;l } 171.422 l 111.435 M C04C Alft uelT 2 ' CY 878 401 1C2.780 75 821 122.249 122.363 sg C09CA!?E807 CY 84.464 58.244 262:0 68 837 j. sg 344 73 C04CAttiTOTAL CY 441 MS 328.138 115 367. 364 548 i 368 652 82 uvACutifI Lt 2.570 800 253000 2.337 $ 0 l 383 80 345.157 15 0 2.353 400 25.147 32.293 1 2.353 800 l av AC UNIT 2 LB g 35 200 0 35.200 ) ei 0 0 av AC 807 LB MwacTOTAL LB ! 4 960 548 l 263.000 4 596 500 ; 384 227 [ 417.450' 8 Catit inAY UNif 1 LF 122All 13 870 108 til 29.499 29 334 24 i CAlti TAat umrt 2 LF 126.330 0 126;30 i 13.435 6 14 035 11 { 94 I 664 15 CAtL! TRAY 307 LP 4.400 0 4 430 e tg CASLtTAAYTOTAL LF 2$3 24l . 13 878 !)g 375 43 323 44 443 WET C040 W4171 LF 308Jt0 40 810 l 264100 57.Cl2 l $4144 19 487 C040 UNif 2 LF 300.910 42 430 1 256440 44 201.. 49547 18 wtT C040 80P LF 119 tl 37 470 ! $4 444 43248 l 43 436 47 utT Como TOTAL LP l 709.734 120 718, He 026 1 144 531 I tit.7sf 21 1.533 1 8391475 l 14.159 14 351 0 f
- t At & CA8LE Whit t LF 6.092975 0
8 0 4.147 550 0 atAE & CA8LE k%If 2 LF 5.147.850 WialgCAstigCP LF 2.214 450 l 121.600 I 2 142.150 I 140 435 . t43 495 6
- IAE & CABLE TOTAL LF to Ml275 j 123.100 I to 302175 '
154 sle 154 las 1 TE49tNAT!0%$y41Tt I tA 194 til 1 0 114 til j 0 353 0 ~0 I. 196155 4 0 0 0 l' ftAviqATIQ45UmlT2 (A 196.115 433 f $3 417 ,I t $$$ i llg, 3 f t AUiM AT10%$ 807 (A 54 347 ' 430 , 4l1 727 tlH 1 996 0 ftAtHgAfl04tTOTAL IA 461 217 SM Att Pitt ugif 1 LF 150 2?t 7.362 142 ps ! 23373 l 30 067 ( 20 SWALL'IPEUNif2 LF 150 264 t.071 141 til i t 5:0 1
- 1. lit 1
I SMALL P'PE OCP LF $4 51$ 7.747 44 888 11.164 i t24 8 3 23 43472 l 44 251 ! 12 SMALL PtPt TOTAL LF i 355 157 18 fit 333 377 LA AGI P'Pt WNIT I { LF 178.368 72 332 tt3 2*4 ) 34 43: l 35 253 54 13 22.t:5 2:523 I' LAAct P'Pf unit! LF 175 t47 17842 157 465 ' 1:59:5 13sf72 GE LA AGt PI'l IOP LF 204.119 107 811 100 500 LAAG4 PtPt TOTAL LF $44 314 19: 545 34 749 253 754 !$4 848 45 108 - {, 19 LAAGE NANGE A$ U4171 (A I 15.1M t las 13 113, 2,912 23:6 172 I LA AGE nANGe ns unlTI (A 15.058 0 15 :58 i 0 2 34 l 44 63 - I 2 LAAGE MANGl#1007 EA 2.134 taastnaestatTOTAL to 32.304 lite 30 702 l 3 gst 1 3 144 la + LIGt40 CY
- CutiC Vascs 49*Pou%CS LP.Lt4EAnftti (A e(ACm
' SCHE 3ULEO T0 0Af t REFLECT 3 FORtCAST 40.1 CONSTRUCTl0N INTERMtol ATE SCMtouLt. NOTE. SummeARits SMotNING A OU ANTtTV INSTALLED BY PatVIOUS CONTRACTOR i i IICLUDE TURNIO OvtR F ActLif tts.
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNIT ONE-FAMILY OF CURVES FORECAST # 1 DATA I C04000ENCE ROLLING ENERGilE TERAAINATE ROLLING 4/its AND C00m0ERCIAL , 4/,0s UNIT i FUEL LOAO UNIT i OPERATSONS U881T i Y Y Y 100 r"., 4 g p-p' / !/p // / '/ h /, f p' l / / e / j _ / _1 / [_ 80 //
- 7
/ r r // Ir# / i i 70 / i /t t- / i i i // 3 l f i l l / H ./ I 5 60
- /
/ / i k es x/ // 0, f!!k).? l} i f/ $g/ l/: l l [/ 7 v./ o e ! J/ "// / / I i E e,,
- i
/L / i 5
- /
/
- 4/
/ i / /o i i i y f l % -f h 30 / i ll / / S i. i /.H s' f ? ~E i i i / / s n , /l d. ? ' -p
- ,-/
20 / s =s / i I 10 _SMAL L_ PIPE p# i~~ ~ /, j .i .!'E !I I I I L -r g g g l l l g g g i. i. i i. i. i. i. i I i
BULK OUANTITY
SUMMARY
CONCPETE (CUBIC YARDS) UNIT 1 l QU ANTITY INSTALLED FO E DESCRIPTION PERl00 CUMULATIVE O SCHEO. ACTUAL SCHEO. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 4.398 2
6 3.291 3.295
- 2. DIESEL 1,247 66 66 125 125
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 1,876 4
4 1.507 1,507
- 4. TURBINE 482 0
9 17 26
- 5. ELEC. AUX.
1,006 0 0 564 546
- 6. MECH. AUX.-
1,526 2 2 822 822
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 2.991 0
0 0 0 TOTAL QU ANTITY 13,528 74 87 8.308 8.321 185,114 185,114 PREV. CONTR ACTO R 185,114 TOTAL PROJECT 178,840 74 87 171,422 171,435 180.000 l LEGEND 178 000 ACTUAL ""*** SCHEDU LED 176.000 174 000 5 2 3 172.000 d 5 E 170.000 E I 5 168.000 E 166.000 ,/ 164.000 162.000 I ' I I ' ' I I I I I I ' 160.000 1882 1883 1884 1885 1888 l 1887 l 1888
i BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
I LARGE PIPE (LINEAR FEET) UNIT 1 1 QUANTITY INSTALLED { F0 DESCRIPTION PERIOD. CUMULATIVE SCHED. ACTUAL SCHED. ACTUAL l
- 1. REACTOR 21.011 650
'502 3.518 3.478
- 2. DIESEL 4,793 0
0 0 0
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 4.663 224 148 2,479 2.403
- 4. TURBINE 32,498 510 1.106 8.668 9.264 i
- 5. CLEC. Aux.
7,507 1 48 1 48
- 6. MECH. AUX.
26,622 636 896 6.823 ' 7.083 I 7 MSIV CUBICLE 6,282 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL QUANTITY 103.378-2,021 2.700 21.489 22,275 72,992 72,992 PREV. CONTR ACTOR 72.992
- ~'
l TOTAL PROJECT 178,388 2.021 2,700 94.481 95.288 4 1 8 180.000 l l j j LEGEND j-169.000 - ACTUAL / l ....... SCHEDU LED /- i l i j 158.000 1 i j w i 147 000 r i [
- l e
m 136.000 1 2 l 2. i j 12$,ggg SUSTAINED RATE = 3,595 LF/MO ' t FOR 23 MO. j { h 114.000 / E / / 103.000 t 92.000 '81.000 1 I I I I I I I ' I~ I I I ' '70.000 l 1902 1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 l 1988 i i .-H ,n, ...,..,--n -,n .. - -. -, -,, -,. ~ ..-m,--,,,-n,--. a---
BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
SMALL PIPE (LINEAR FEET) UNIT 1 l GU ANTITY INSTALLE0 FO E I OESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE O SCHEO. ACTUAL SCHE 0. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 18.501 136 195 805 864
- 2. OlESEL 3.934 0
0 0 0
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 11,682 105 102 2.764 2,761
- 4. TURBINE 33.933 7
<10> 13.294 13.277 - 5. ELEC. AUX. 14.669 16 1 253 238
- 6. MECH. AUX.
55.125 814 879 4.900 4.965
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 4.470 0
0 0 0 TOTAL QUANTITY 142.314 1.078 1.167 22.016 22.105 7 n2 7.982 PREV. CONTRACTOR 7.n2 TOTAL PROJECT 150.278 1.078 1,157 29.978 30.067 155.003 l LEGEND 140.000 - ACTUAL f """' SCHE DULED / / 2 i 125.000 .-l s l 110 000 5 95.000 [ l 80.000 j SUSTAINEO RATE = 4.950 LF/MO E j FOR 23 MO. ll: I g 65.000 / / a j 50.000 l / 35.000 ./ 20.000 I ' I I I ' I I I I ! I I I I I 5.000 in inn in4 i.n in. ini l in. ~ c..n....
.. ~ - t BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
LARGE BORE PlPE HANGERS (EACH) UNIT 1 QU ANTITY INSTALLE O DESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE l SCHEO. ACTUAL SCHEO. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 2.577 55 21 101 67 I
- 2. DIESEL 420 0
0 0 0
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 590 24 0
58 34
- 4. TUR8INE 4.026 97 106 466 475 l
- 5. ELEC. AUX.
854 29 27 68 66
- 6. MECH. AUX.
4.542 48 113 533 598
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 501 0
0 0 0 i 253 ' 287 1.228 1.248 TOTAL QUANTITY 13.518 1.888 1.888 PREV.CONTR ACTOR 1.888 TOTAL PROJECT 15.198 253 ~ 287 2.912 2.928 p". 20.000 i LEGENO 18,000 - ACTUAL + *** SCHEDULED 16.000 j l 14 000 E ./ w l $ 12.000 / $ 10.000 t SUSTAINED RATE = 540 EA/MO = FOR 20 MO. E / C /
- 8.000 t
s a RETURN TO ORIGINAL SCHEDULE / k i = i 6.000 f. 1 ./ 4.000 i / j 2.000 7 1982 '1983 '1984 1985 1988 1987 1988 s f .4. i . - ~.. -.
BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
CABLE TRAY (LINEAR FEET) UNIT 1 1 1 QU ANTITY INSTALLE0 F0RE DESCRIPTION PE R100 l CUMULATIVE qO SCHEO.l ACTUAL SCHEO. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 10.171 15 60 15 60
- 2. DIESEL 1,614 0
0 0 0 3 FUEL HAN0 LING 5,732 126 52 369 295
- 4. TURBINE 8,588 104 401 6,162 6,459
- 5. ELEC. AUX.
54,820' 5,139 5,306 9.063 9.250 4
- 6. MECH. AUX.
26,320 0 0 0 0
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 1,350 0
0 0 0 TOTAL QUANTITY 108,595 5,384 5.81 9 15,619 16,064 13,870 13,870 PR EV. CONTR ACTO R 13.870 TOTAL PRGIECT 122,465 5,38!4 l 5,819 29.499 ' 29.934 't a 150.000 l LEGEND 135.000 ACTUAL
- SCHEDULED 120.000
,,f *
- 105,000
'2 / = 1 e[ a
- 90.000 E 75.000
. SUSTAINED RATE = 5,110 LF/MO E RETURN TO / . FOR 17 MO. g ORIGlhAL SCH200LE b([ 60,000 / . r, a 45.000 ~ l 30.0 6 i ~.* j j l 15,000 [{. l l e A 0 I I I I I I I l ! I I I I I I I ' 1982 ~1983 1984 [1985 1988 l 1987 l '19ss r - ;. A_ t i ? a
-= T BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
METALLIC CONDUlT (LINEAR FEET) UNIT 1 QU ANTITY INSTALLE0 OR DESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE NO SCHEO.l ACTUAL SCHED. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 37,314 58 198 243 383
- 2. DIESEL 6,480 0
184 0 184
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 16.070 25 238 91 304
- 4. TURBINE 56,158 1.038 2,340 15,295 16,697
- 5. ELEC. AUX.
60.208 7 0 7 0
- 6. MECH. AUX.
90,570 313 43 636 366
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 1.300 0
0 0 0 TOTAL QUANTITY 288,100 1,441 3,003 18.272 17,934 40,810 40,810 PREV. CONTR ACTO R 40.810 TOTAL PROJECT 308,910 1.441 3,003 57.082 l 58,744 330,000 l LEGENO: 300,000 '****** SCHEDULED ACTUAL / l l l 270,000 l \\ l 240.000 i w $. 210.000 / 5 ! SUSTAINED RATE = 11,284 LF/MO g 180.000 (,1 FOR 19 MO.
- 1
. j 150,000 8 / 120.000 l. 90.000 / i 60.000 ^* 30,000 I'! I f f ' l 'l I I i 1 I I f f I l 1988 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 e ~
t BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
WIRE & CABLE-(LINEAR FEET) . UNIT 1 QU ANTITY INSTALLED DESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE O SCHED. ACTUAL SCHED. ACTUAL s TOTALiNIT 1 6.091.475 9,112 9.304 12.659 12,851 l TOTAL QUANTITY 6.091,475 9,112 9.304 12,659 12.851 PREV. CONTR ACTOR 1,500 1.500 1,500 TOTAL PROJECT 6.092.975 9.112 9,304 14,159 14.351 10 i l I LEGEND: g ....... SCHEDULED - ACTUAL \\ 8 \\ \\ s 7 x 6 a as - l f U-U2 5 I !U Og E 4 = = 3 4_. SUSTAINED RATE = 273,155 LF/MO / FOR 18 MO. l 2 I: '. *[ t .4 88 h f f f f f f f l f f 4 1982- -l 1983 ll 1984 1 1985 1986 ~1987 l 1933 t t A _.m_
\\ t BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
TERMINATIONS (EACH) UNIT 1
- .7 QU ANTITY lNSTALLED
.y FORECAST OESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE NO.1 SCHEO. ACTUAL SCHEO. ACTUAL .\\ i 7 L* s a. t TOTAL UNIT 1 196,155 0 350 0 350 ,y TOTAL QUANTITY 194.155 0 350 0 350 [., s PR EV. CONTR ACTO R 0 TOTAL PROJECT 194.155 0 350 0 l 350 1 250.000 1-LEGEND 225.300 - ACTUAL T.
- SCHEDU LEO t
y 200.000 175.000 E U [ s 150.000 i i 5 125.000 g' j. 1 i l-3 100.000 f SUSTAINED RATE = 9808 EA/MO g FOR 16 MO. 3 75.000 l-50.000 \\ l 1 l 25.000 ll '***I'**I***I.* I I I I I I I I' I I 0 1982 l 1983 1984 1995 1988 l 1987 l 1988 l r, ,-- -+
I BULK QUANTITY
SUMMARY
HVAC DUCTWORK (POUNDS) UNIT 1 QUANTITY INSTALLE0 OESCRIPTION PERIOD CUMULATIVE O SCHEO. ACTUAL SCHEO. ACTUAL
- 1. REACTOR 569,120 3.096 28,950 46,771 72.625
- 2. OLESEL 21.637 0
0 0 0
- 3. FUEL HANDLING 180.294 2,119 583 4,324 2,788
- 4. TURBINE 184,794 0
0 0 0
- 5. ELEC. AUX.
412.902 11,383 14.563 24.958 27,697
- 6. MECH. AUX.
911,416 5.567 146 24.027 19.047
- 7. MSIV CUBICLE 27,437 0
0 0 0 TOTAL QUANTITY 2,307,800 22,165 44,242 100,080 122,157 PREV. CONTRACTOR 283.000 283,000 283,000 TOTAL PROJECT 2.570,800 22,165 44.242 383.080 385,157 3.000,000 g LEGENO 2.700.000 - ACTUAL i SCHEDULED I i 2.400.000 2,100.000 f _f' j 1.800.000 4 / Oi 1.500.000 2 E / 2 E 1,200.000 RETURN TO f g ORIGINAL SCHEDULE f' = N I 900,000 I 600.000 I Y 300.000 O f f I I ' f f I f I I I f f I f ' ~! 1982 1983 1984 1905 1988 l 1987 l 1988 4 3 v e- -g.- .-r-- ,n r -a ,, - ~ ~
SUSTAINED INSTALLATION RATES - UNIT 1 PIPING QUANTITIES OTHER' PROJECTS STP STP5x8s Sats Ax10s EQUIVALENT LARGE PIPE (LINEAR FEET) 3,700 3,595 2,054 LARGE PIPE HANGERS (EACH PER MONTH) 280 540 309 ' UPDATED FROM FCI TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM ADDITIONAL PLANTS SURVEYED. J 4 + t
SUSTAINED INSTALLATION RATES - UNIT 1 ELECTRICAL QUANTITIES OTHER' PROJECTS STP STP 5x8s 5x8s 4x10s EQUIVALENT CABLE TRAY (LINEAR FEET / MONTH) 4,000 5,110 2,920 CONDUlT (LINEAR FEET / MONTH) 9,700 11,284 6,448 WIRE AND CABLE (LINEAR FEET / MONTH) 200,000 273,155 158,089 ' UPDATED FROM FC1 TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM ADDITIONAL PLANTS SURVEYED. 1 1 l l l
.~ ._.-._m P STARTUP IIANAGER I I F-~~~~~~~1 ' BECHTEL PROJECT DECNTEL PROJECT l ADRIHetSTRATe0N I SCHEDULERS ---I COST / SCHEDULE n i RAANAGER l SERVICES I i t- - teANAGER----J L _ _ _ T _ _ _ _s g i I 4 5 I !I I PREREDutSITE STARTUP GENE AAL TEST aAANAGE R SUPERVISOR I PREOPERATIONAL TEST IIANAGER 1 I I I LEAD STARTUP LE AD STARTUP LE AD STARTUP LE AD STARTUP LEAO STARTUP LEAD STARTUP ENGINEER E NGINE E R ENGlieEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ELECTR4 CAL IAECHANICAL S&C 1 I I I I I STARTUP STARTUP STARTUP STARTUP STARTUP ST ART UP ENGIIBEER$ ENGINEER $ ENGINEERS ENGlelEER$ ENGINEER $ ENGINEER $ b -w
STARTUP PROGRAM 1 PHASEI INITIALLY ENERGlZE ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PERFORM CLEANNESS VERIFICATION FLUSHING RUN lN AND TEST ROTATING EQUIPMENT PHASE ll PERFORM SYSTEM PRE 0PERATIONAL TESTING l l PHASE 111
- FUEL LOAD j
POWER ASCENSION TESTS t i n- ,- ~ -,. - -
STARTUP TOTAL NONMANUAL MANPOWER 120 0 110 100 90 l 80 70 sc I E 60 ll Ea 50 '40 30 20 CURRENT PROJECTED 11 SENIO R SUPERVISORS 9 11 TEST ENGINEERS 13 114 10 STARTUP SUPPORT 4 15 0 l 1984 l 1985 l 1986 l 1987 l 1988 I tus Figure VI-2
m. PROCEDURES REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOAD
- 1) Total number of procedures required for Fuel Load 521
- 2) Number of draft orocedures not started 492
- 3) Number of draft procedures being written 0
- 4) f.umoer of procedures approved 29 5)
Number of procedures in review 6
- 6) Total number of preopera ional test required 123 for Fuel Load @ o A 7 't 7)
Number of preoperational test comoleted 0 E)
- f. umber of creocerational test currently in 0
progress 9) I.umoer of systems released to startup 1 e 4 4 a
YtCJ 1983 1984 1985 1986 MONTH l Al Sl0lNl 0 J l F l Ml A lMl J l Jl Al S l 0 l N l0 J l FlHl Al Ml J l J l Al S l S l 0l N! D' PREREQUISITE PROCEDURES (IEST) M MECHANICAL COMPL a N e 03 JUN 85 l COMPL A E LECTRICAL y l r S e S COMPL lac PROC. l I&C
- e" T.
.s ....+ O Q FLUSH l i_..,$.... g COMPL PRE-OP PROC PRE OPERATIONAL s s a [ TEST BOUNDRIES 8 8 SCOPING 5 ? INITIAL SCOPING COMP 9/83 8 { 1 RESCOPE AS RE0"O l l T l STARTUP E TESTING 1 CONSTRUCTION PERFORM SYS HYOR03. CBL MEGGER. ALIGNMENTS & WAL K00 VINS SCHEDULE S/U
SUMMARY
rnaapt S/U i ER INTERGRATED PROJECT SHCEDULE DS
SUMMARY
V PHASE V SCHE 0 COMP "INTERME 01 AT E SCHED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION START UP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
1 s f 1 i t! I v i i= i A / x i t*! / m i 9) r-, 3 (ty - - - -.g ' e .= .if I (=> - - - - -@ - {=> - @ @ = r:1m N,., s e -Im ~~s s .a v. s I... s ,s T s 's g T b)\\' i m s s E Y s u m s a W m s a T s m I fil (-) O:: l IE1 ,a s 8 g f \\ m s E i j = v. I g 1 s 1, s =l s T T ii I I. b = s l bI a 8 3 hil 3 I I T 00 iIi 8 I I r il.s,3I.8 a ] i !!!ii!! I = i lji 8 3 I i
- i - s s i i s a
!= i
m e 0
== 8 n ( 3w ) E n _ gk E Ug o 58 -s =. -= O E" Hg <l$- c ( $25 e 8 !!== 8 n:
- I=
m t I,E 5 s
- s a
- 5
==r ] W. w s w a( IE EW >g-O C am,- e 33 5,37 a a R $3 5-s = <r 1r
- ).. v C,,; r. r, s. ,( WWIT SWE TR AY & C""D"'I unE & cast E (EAB) PRWARY CRfTICAL PATHS 4
- 3 9
I HVACIEAtl o--. l I I I I lI FWING lacei SECSNSARY CHITICAL PATits me l-) I } l'j re c mAsi l NVAC tegAtl l l
- Hq i
l I STARTUP C.O. [ 2 3M 1888 1985 1ses im isse
- ige, igg, 1
i w -m
amo i -71 , i : -, 4. 3.
- a e e
- F 0
0 .s 9 8 E ae
- g me 4w een 0
. e e se om e .e me 6 9 J $ l ge 9
- 4 9
,e g -4 e em 4 e G JeRL 4 i s a6 et t se J J e e W & 0 ** es e 0. as ao se as are
== 3 6 'e se.e rw =, 6 1 e-D 9 L A e .s e e.e e t i e e *b e-j p 4 e. em 9 6 e e ee 6 A 4 0w e 0 4 8 i 0 e e f 9 > 0 1 9 4 9 "9 9 89 3 A t a en 9 l 0 e ** d B I e3 e-t t t 9 6 $ b Ft t 4 t. 4 e so i e 9 4 0 e f 9 0 a ** *e 0 9 8 l e i 4 em 0 4 4 4 4 e. e,n l'e. e s 9 8t* g e e p . eo e. ~. e. 8 '* g 8 9 9 E 4 0 F em 29 (* e e as e e aJ d I e s 86 4 e se f 9 # 9 4 A 4 e n 6m en v e e e ar 1 0 4 4 e6 J es op 4 g Fe te 3 e b 3 6 6 1 C '4 8 4 f 9
- 9 e
i eswe4 e'4 i e e - a. g e em 8 8 0 t t 9 0 0 ee 0 9 e 4 m e* 4 P e um W P l { J li G 9 e 4 et j e6 & v en tb to i k 2 an e tip me d as e eg 3 0 -ne 4 e t 3 r to 3e e en e e gg =9 g e e l ,.e. e.9 W. e,J,.6 ,9 w 3 - J = a g m e. e 3 8 es e j u w ** en ee e e e, e, a,n e as n e. a s n em e e e
- C 4 W' E to $
D que e e go 1 ea8 3 is 4 4 3 e e ** ** pee t F st e e e e
- *4 0 4e9 9 e
em em e ao se en w. 6
- e em $
as de te em 4 4 40. $ 9 e $a 9 Sed 9 t en ese e e* I e 14 ef 9 L te se p e 9 tb em 0 0
== 0 6 en
- e 4
e as j to I 8 e 9 e o a I 6 e. w . e l a e t e s e o e. t t en at 'd g e og 1 9 8' se f. 0 ed ,d en em 8 en as E et I e 1 4 I 8 o b e F *> 5 e .e se 4 J 0 e se 3 g
- se, t
eB 4 1 g a . J l 'e 6 h se i t e'e 9 , ad se q l 9 en e t ' s e.n e8 of 4 as . 6 9 m e se .3 g se r f as 6 b en en se 8 f8 J e 1. se l J ( 4 o o ** e se .e j i
== I $ , Id e s b l 99 d d e p I
- 9 m
e
- 0 e ** ls 4
4 q e e e t, .e
- 1 e e d
e d a t G e .8 0 iI 9 [ i e5 m,- e, - e. I e
- e 6
e g p, I & I P t a-1 I e i 3 4 4 t
- e a
gw e, l e e = 0 4 4 e
- I es 3
en f :.* $t '9 w 8 6 em e gg n,
- I t
e b 6. u W 0 4 9
- $ en I
44 ao se e i e, so 6 ee , = e t en et-e e, og ,,. g eg i A e pg a p 3 j '.s e4 0 p 4 se i.e 4 eae e e i 4 es up g , an ge gg g. l l ? 4 S% e e e e 0 .a f e e e i e4 e m-ee a m. k E E m M M N M X X X M E E E E E X. K R E E R W " E E E E E E N J K K W E E E E E E E E m m X X X E E E E- ~' =
- S o
+
i + { s j &a 6 A1 4 S e9 e em 0 te tb e g 9 g y es se i WD G 0 3e 4 as e t wa es 0 em 4 I ., O n& 0 89 0 -e9 es as J 9 ee & 9 e th ee er d y y em 3 0 g en e & tw 't5 S6 e 0.d se e i, e-9 0 { A 0 to J 4 Le 6 $ e "3 5 t es em p F# e e l 0 J - 0 i eae i f 9 % 9 4 l ' 0 0 i' 'i d 0 t em 0 l-t d 0 9 9 9 ed .a # [ t e e* J4 1 0 8 m 0 t t 9 9 0 Ig A e 9 89 8 9 A 0 0 $ em <g, 4 e 4 0 e e se e so A 4 e e em #e e m a e e sae e e 4 = 3 m 'S 4 es se 6 es e f* I er% 0 t g E e l 8 4' em 36 W. se den f ' f e odd e e e y sa f 4, 9.d .A 9 t 9 e A - t e e 9 4 'A .e 4 8 0 9 e e P m 'J G e h 2 P 9 t,3 3 a e s 6 e g 3 w se B se se G, se 4 4 es se se og 6 0 6 0 l 0 4 em 9 4 e 0 eB D 4 8% 4 1 9 A $4 4 0 9 8 We & 0 se ob d' I 6 F so W I 6 %1 0 ep 9 se 4 I l w. =* sm at e)I ge en e e so w .e 9 4 ao 6 e e og -e
- *e en F 0en a tes e se ce se as 18W 6
9 t a w en se 4e t 4 4 e 6 A es e I en e ao 9 4 e se e seO4eO=0 3 i I e A me 9 6 f g 3 9 g g g e j se e se se e f6 3 ** 6 ye 9 we am j' e as t9 444 9 e et e at f e, on tu, e e* en e ao l es A 1 e. 4 e e f3 6 e ted 9 e om e e tA e 9 ) O es g d 00 I 9 9 et e so t 6 I w 0 w 4 I I as g I ed li d .s I if 3 .g 4 se l-b d s a 6' 'I e e. p 9 e 4 1 + i n 9 et 4 I l 4 e y 6 e t I t t e .e, e s I 0 d 3 ao e =A 6 e e e 1 l t et i 8* I 86 0 a w e e 1 9 0 e ao r 8s to ed ee y ^ e9 d 9 e i 44 9 .s se o n-l I i e se d b .Y i e .e en se e i . 6 .N l 4 4 - t L t a g em 4 v 2 m J d e 9 - d d 4 e i ee l' d6 i
- . e se I
.s 0 s t i 6 9 e 1 em e8 te to i e e g d a 9 es e g+ se 9 em. 0 9 4 ( e8 ( es 6 8' ' 8 l T- = y e t 9 9 4 y0 P 9 T F 9 g 9 an e. as se t 9-se.e, t e e e ne., .g sg i j i 4 90 e 9 e set se sei e e d i I 9G l e a6 et r 8e t 8' 9 9 ', 9 3 h af 0 6 e at ' et 3 +8 4 se as se se L 8 9
- W 5 a 4 y y w
w - 9 g y y g g 4 g g g g g y g g u K m a E w w w I a a a e a a m y x m x x, 2 m s em m m
1 j -a.
- %"'t PM_
a T e I i 40 >P 4 6-t J 1-9 3 as s i e se t w
== 4 e 4 as. I - jW $A 9 $ ee, se y G 6 em 4 0-se e as 4 *G G GJ W D $S 4 as % ee 4aJt to e & 0 >t et t 4 es i = 1 0 y em e se ,se l & ed 4 3 O 4 I. d t es no 4 Esa,. 9 4' e4 9 4 d 9 6 $6 0 0 =* 1 0 0 a= t= 0 E G G 4 d 6 4 th
- 4 0.9 6
9 8 9 d 0 9 em e i 4 4 4 9-9 9 6
- 9 l
0,e = ae [ e r o' g I % 0 l l 6 4+ 8 4 4, 46 9 4 9 9 e 9 Pe ** *d 9 8 0 so 4 4 9 4 e :- o S 6 es e, O Ad 4 0 e e $4 *e S 4 { y 3 -0 R% 0 0 a 0 F em 30 se 9 4 d &6 0 e 4 0
- t h
4 O , I 4 e-en e e. e e- $ 4 44 4 4 S 9 7 * ** 6 3 f* l 4 8844 h J 4 4 as e e iem O44. a e e. se e4 0 't 6 c. e t 9 ( 9 r L p 9 .m 4 , e we 4 se o **
- es se e
fe% ae Q w es e e ao q g 64 86 9e d et 4 =0 m 89 es W & $weawe ee 5 3 *ee p 8 9 gp so > $ fp 9 e 4 eft & 4 se j $ so e se 4 e 4 S es gg $ ede @ esp I F et + 4 =o a 4.T e 96 1 J (
- ewnentue Q
8 8. 9 4 ed w 0 $ e se Is se te j W" em 9 Pe e '$ % 4 B 9 i eBP F $ 0 i EJJ 6 i
- e. io e eng e
S$ $ $v l G F1 en e Q 9 4 se 6 5 4 as l W f 6 ed as l w e e e e 9 m t e ** ) 4 J 4 [ e 3 e 1 J ? e y es b
- t m
I o. e t 6 4 4 e e s e.== e 68 0 89 1 P i e9 e e t M 't eI e m 9 R 0 e e d et J - se e l d d e P 0 0 . ad. fe
- "I
?0 -4 9 . n> 0 t' no ee - 4 Wt e6 en d 99 d e d ee 6 st >4 i e t e4 se ' -e 6e ad ad g 9 e ft $ 4 9 8 9 g9 0 ma e e 4 44 P A. 8 eo 9 e l e i p J P i -e 4 e e 1 se 4-g e. - se go 9 4 ao 9 .O eq Ge g ( se $ e e 4 se t W - 4 G 4 s 9 e ? D 4 4
- e a $
e < .o s t - l 6 .c. i e t i g a ' g, g 3 i i g g ( e i i sw w - = = -, - = = 1 --- - = = 1 - - - m - - - - - - - 1 = = = = = = - = a 1 = 1 m n - 1 1 1 1 x 1 = 'k-i 4 m. .m.. .m. . m
e b e*==m. - 3 I. 8$ '.p 2-9 9 31 6 S es 9 - e se e e.- tas 4 wi 4m l 4 4 4 i &* G 9 Se t 9 l - ep T de $ em "S 9 I bl L9 0 I fe 0 ..c &. 4 0 as me J G e a e 4 4. m 4 8 em : , en i e at m 0 3 nw 43 E. 9 .A 4 ed to 9 e 4 9 i e 4 ee.a 6 ) 0 $ W G 9 ** 9 9 $ De m P d 0 I 44 4 98 . m t 't e
- 9 9
4 68 9 I $ 8"e k e e e 9 ed tP $ e a e to e0 eFe i e 9 9 e 8 k t'9 8 m e o m 9,4 f 4 e m. 9 Em f* 4 9 0 ed v0 e $e e 8F G h lP*$ % 9 4 4 [ s = P0 v. e.#.* de e I l e. g e t e es m e e 9 9 A d I h-i ePF W $ m j $ 18 0 $ [ l 6 he g e4 e l 4 9m 4 i t t t i l-t 9 l 0 l 9 9 I m 6 i e so so e se l i e d 10 A i ete m $ se u => t om l es d as es% 4 0 w w3e e a e ee e e-I e 4 85 9 **
- 3 6'
e j "9 64 w9 en 6eew6 p"9 8 e t 8 L en se en a es e me t s a em J {m ee s
- O $ *
- C. e em
- 9 0 4 e 9i W
7 9mm4CSA 4 e l e -m eeed S0 0 t. e en w e em 6 i um 4 9 iso e e e9 0 e tJe t 9
== a. a we e e J6J 4 0 S em t w '4 se 4 t 4 5 g. 0 4 e 8 d i i f l 4 m i 0 wa 9 4 5 4 6 4 l l. v' I \\
- T se e se 4 0 ao j
l N e E t 04 4 5 4 d. . r i Il-e e e
== 1 h eI n e 0 = i e 'g m e e s t n 4 0 4 1 1 6 $ d 0 e t 0 e I d te t 0 h i5 m I + l e 4 8 S 6 m i e 9 =6 t ee e a se e p e$ e~ f 4 $8 0 I I iO M f y e s l' m oe m l' e 94 as i f 94 4 me s 6 m e e - l - p g A 4 A l } l y 9 e e a h% 7
- Y E
8 m = = = x x x x x w m u w u u x x x - m x - - - a m u a e e a w w w a a a a m,,,,,,,, - - - m e i m. m
J l i SOUTH TEXh5 PROJECT NRC CASELOAD FORECAST 1 1 l t i r l l l l t i 1 l l l Novemoer 30, 1983 L 1 6313W/0141W
NRC CASE LOAD FORECAST AGENDA DURATION SPEAKER 10 Min. INTRODUCTION J. H. Goldberg 20 Min. I. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT STATUS
- 0. G. Barker A.
HISTORY 8. ORGANIZATION C. PROJECT STATUS 0. MANPOWER E. PRGJECT SCHEDULE y n. 60 Min. !!. ENGINEERING R. W. Cooper A. INTRODUCTION B. STATUS 1. Narrative 2. Percent Complete 3. Specification / Drawing Count 4 Manpower 5. Engineering Release / Construction Installation Curves C. SPECIFIC COMMODITY STATUS 1. Hangers. Restraints, and Snubbers 2. Cable Tray and Supports 00 RATION SPEAKER D. POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS 1. Licensing Requirements (NUREG-0737) 2. Potential Deficiencies (10CFR50.55) 3. Independent Review 4 Problems / Solutions E. PROBLDIS RESOLVED 30 Min. !!!. PROCUREMENT D. O. Wohleber A. INTRODUCTION J. MATIAJAL MD EQUINNT STATUS 5313W/0141W
C. STATUS OF MAJOR EQUIPMENT ORDERS D. QVD REVIEW PROGRAM E. BULK OELIVERY STATUS 60 Min. IV. CONSTRUCTION J. W. Williams A. INTRODUCTION B. STATUS C. HL&P's CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROLE D. STAFFING 1. Manpower 2. Labor Relations 3. Rolling 4 x 10s E. PROBLEMS /SQLUTIONS F. PROBLEMS RESOLVED G. INTERFACE WITH STARTUP DURATION SPEAKER 30 Min. V. BULK COMMODITIES INSTALLATION D. O. Wohleber A. INTRODUCTION B. COMMODITIES
SUMMARY
C. INSTALLATION CURVES 30 Min. VI. STARTUP W. W. Wassberg A. ORGANIZATION B. PROGRAM C. STARTUP DURATION DETERMINATION D.
SUMMARY
30 llin. VII. SCHEDULE D. O. Wohleber A. INTROUUCTION B. DEVELOPMENT C. CRITICAL PATHS 0. FLOAT 50R VARIOUS ACTIVITIES $313W/0141W
,i' )P S p ;g E g E L K gy L H yg U (y W g S Rg R g y E Egy E gy N 8g S gy C Ey T gg 5 g L R gg T Hg / O yg S Og P S Wp P g j_ U C S g_ g,
- 0. g_
.D g_ ~ = gll 1IlJ ~ )C ~ P]M( ~ le LH& ~ t H(G i ~ T U C 6Q l U C hL E ~ N R At ( OO T I u H S L ~ C C C I TTS N L c I I CAA O WM M )P g y C w EZB R P W. R C ) - R &g JI E E T Lg ON g N H G L 1E 1 R AD ( y A (H ) ( E PGN N C I Rg G g SRA A RE E Ay R ED R Sy S AOL B K( U Eg X M E T RX C L g T C E AE O Og A H E T J BL R Kg E C O G. L P HT T TB P O. 8
- g H. p, E
R G
- g J. g_
U C yg y OE P N SJ& 4 OL R gS yg E RH gg E yg P BN gn G ga II y_ g, E ] S g_ P; &gLy H G ( g N Ty BS Ng IR Eg E Mg K Eg L Lg Kg L. y_ E ) C P )C ) A Lg A HLD)1-LE A ( G RT5 SS EEE A GR (M I U Y E H M T G A U E. W. ) 1L@H~ W A u l S H ( P G U R T M RA TS W. W. 22?. 7~
d NRC CASELOAD STUDY SITE TOUR o Board van at Administration Building o View essential cooling water pond o Tour laydown and warehouse area o Tour Fabrication Shop o Tour Intermech Fabrication Shop o Tour Riverwater Make-up Facility o Tour Circulating Water Intake ~ j o Tour Fuel Handling Building i o Tour Reactor Containment Building l 0 Tour Turbine Building l j{ Tour Mechanical-Electrical Auxiliary Building i o Board van at east side of Turbine Building and return to Administration Building I s 1* e 0
f' &C3 r& ( ') ...e., ~ is UNITED STATES I.t ,i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .e D.' l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g %.".*... / December 1,1983 [" s Docket Nos: 50-424 and 50-425 'e v, 4. J. e MEMORANDUM FOR: Roger Mattson, Director CC Division of Systems Integration, NRR \\ '~ Richard Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering, NRR H4rold Bassett, Director / Division of Data Automation and Managenent Information, RM THRU:- Thomas M. Novak, Assistant r for Licensin Division of Lice ElinorG.Adensam,Chif Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing FROM: Melanie A. Miller, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION FOR SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) - GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, ALVIN W. V0GTLE NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Enclosed is a draft of the NRR input for the SALP for Georgia Power Company, Vogtle Nuclear Plant. This draft report is based upon input solicited from selected staff personnel who have had contact and involvement with Georgia Power Company's licensing material. Please review the draft evaluation and provide any comments you feel appropriate. All comments received by December 9,1983, will be considered in the final report. In order to meet this deadline, oral comments directed to the project manager, X24259, would be adeouate. To ' assist you with review and comment, the following persons were contacted for input: A. Ibrahim, GSB; J. Lehr, C. Billups, EHEB; J. Fairobent METB; T. Mo, M. Lamastrs, RAB; D. Gupta, SGEB; and B. Lovelace of Resource Management. (( (. w ~ u Melanie A. Miller, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 4 L' Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
1. Evaluation Matrix' 2. Input for SALP Report Y Jpa / 4 M _. '()hlM )70 -_ h j [
L I I f i FACILITY NAME: Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 LICENSEE: Georgia Power Company NRR PROJECT MANAGER: Melanie A.* Miller s l I. INTRODUCTION l This report presents the results of an evaluation of the applicant, Georgia . Power Company, in the functional area of licensing activities. It is i intended to provide NRR's input to the SALP review process as described in NRC Manual Chapter 0516. The review covers the period November 1,1982, i to October 31, 1983. A distinction of activities between Units 1 and 2 was not considered feasible or appropriate. i l The basic approach used for this evaluation was to first select a number 1 of licensing issues which involved staff manpower. Conenents were then j solicited from the staff. In most cases the staff applied the evaluation i criteria' for the perfomance attributes based on their experience with the applicant or his products. Finally, this'information was assembled in a matrix which allowed an overall evaluation of the applicant's performance. j Due'to the limited number of licensing activities over this period, the .NRR staff has commented on the content of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and the Environmental Report (ER). Evaluation of these documents does not conform to the seven criteria, therefore, they were i not utilized. f i The quality of information provided in the FSAR was rated as Category 2. In some instances the staff found that not enough detail was supplied to { adequately address a topic. ( The content nf the ER also ranks a Category 2..While references to the FSAR'are allowed..it was indicated-that the licensee did this too fregent.ly; sometimes to the point of hindering the review in some areas. In some l sections of the ER, as in the FSAR, not enough detail.was provided on a given topic. l II. Sununary of Results i i NRC Manual Chapter 0516 specifies that each functional area evaluated l j will be assigned a performance category based on a composite of a number of' attributes. The. single final rating should be tempered with judgement with respect to;the' significance of'the individual elements. i Based on this approach, the perfomance of Georgia Power Company in the j functional area Licensing Activities - is rated Category 2. j j III. Criteria j Evaluation criteria, as given in NRC Manual Chapter Appendix 0516, Table-l l 1, were used for this evaluation._- i ) )' f.
W 2-IV. Performance Analysis The applicant's performance evaluation is based on a consideration of seven attributes as given in the NRC Manual Chapter. For most of the ~1icensing actions considered in this evaluation,-only three or four of the attributes ~were of significance. Therefore, the composite rating is heavi13 based on the following attributes: Management involvement Approach to resolution of technical issues Responsiveness to NRC initiatives Staffing There was no NRR evaluation basis for Enforcement History, Reportable Events and Training. The evaluation was based on our evaluation of the following licensing activities: Category 1 Compaction Caseload Forecast Content of the Final Safety Analysis Report Content of the Environmental Report-A. Management Involvement in Assuring Quality Overall rating for this attribute is Category 1, based on a very favorable impression made by GPC management at the Caseload Fore-cast Panel (CFP) site visit and subsecuent meetings with the staff. High levels of management were represented at the CFP visit. More important than mere representation, the individuals in' attendance were very knowledgeable about the Vogtle project and they appeared to place appropriate emphasis on assuring quality at the plant. B. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety Standpoint The overall rating for this criterion is Category 2. This rating is based on resolution of compaction of Category 1 backfill'around . safety-related piping. The applicant, once staff concerns were . identified, addressed them in a timely manner. After' discussions 'on the compaction issue, the licensee proposed a satisfactory solu-tion which accounted for staff safety concerns. 'C. Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives The overall rating for this area is Category 1. The licensee was-prompt and very responsive to NRC inquires, particularily offerina cooperation and information.on the compaction issue when the review required several telecons and supplemental submittals. However, 'this' approach is typical of the licensee's response on most licensing. issues.
. D. Enforcement History ~ There is no.important basis for ah.NRR evaluation of this attribute. E. Reportable Events There is no important basis for a NRR evaluation of this attribute at this time. F. Staffing Category 1 is assigned based on involvement with the licensee's staff at the Caseload Forecast Panel visit and on the compaction issue. The staff appeared technically competent with the appropriate people involved on both issues.. G. Training There is no important basis for a NRR evaluation of this attribute at this time. V. CONCLUSION Based on the evaluation of Georgia Power Company's performance for a limited number of activities in the functional area of licensing, an overall per-formance rating of Category 2 is determined. The evaluation is limited due to the early licensing review stage of Vogtle. Even on the selected activities, the contact and involvement has been very slight and does not provide a basis for a detailed evaluation. For typical licensing activities such as the Caseload and the compaction issue, the licensee's performance has been rated Category 1 in most applic-able areas. However, the content of the FSAR and ER has been rated Category 2 and needs upgrading before the staff can adequately review the plant. Based on the activities rated, the licensee's performance is,iudged to be Category 2. l l l l L
y /- w Vogtle Evaluation Matrix ( p-e. Licensing Management .A;; roach to Responsiveness Entorcement Reportable Staffing Training-Action involvement Resolution-History Events ' Tech t ,f r. 3 / - },' ~ 1 f N/A - N/A) 1 N/A Category 1 N/A 2 . C$ction' /, i, [ 1...
- Caseload 1
N/A 1 N/A N/A ', f
- 1 N/A F:recdst
-J<. <*,s , /s, ' f / v c-
- .j vA
~ p- ,4 g 'fd 1 -Overall Rating 1 2 1 N/A N/A I N/A /- f I -a f 2, A Content of FSAR ,t, Category 2 * ., },., t ' Content of ER E Cdtegory~2 / ~ 3 ' t ) I L )' l { - 'p ) f5-o ,6 J $ ,A: + y -( .v r / 5 5 8 f .e - I; 1.' x 't ..,e a ,.g g i, q_ 4 .a .: ~ 'f .e w ./ g j ) t.. e ,h )\\ i y}}