|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20148P2031988-04-0404 April 1988 NRC Staff Response to Supplemental Interrogatories from TMI Alert/Susquehanna Valley Alliance.* Related Correspondence ML20150F8851988-03-30030 March 1988 Answers to Sva/Tmi Alert Second Set of Interrogatories to Util.* Submits Responses to Sva/Tmi Alert 880315 Interrogatories.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20150D0561988-03-21021 March 1988 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to NRC Staff.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20150D0441988-03-21021 March 1988 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Gpu Nuclear.* Related Correspondence ML20149N0461988-02-22022 February 1988 NRC Staff Response to Interrogatories from TMI Alert/Sva.* Responds to Interrogatories Filed by TMI Alert/Sva on 880207.NRC Waived Requirement for Order from Presiding Officer Directing Discovery.Related Correspondence ML20196F1181988-02-22022 February 1988 Responses to NRC Interrogatories.* All Responses Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water by Intervenor F Skolnick. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20149M8671988-02-22022 February 1988 Licensee Response to Sva/Tmi Alert Request for Production of Documents.* Documents Re Disposal of accident-generated Water Will Be Made Available for Insp & Copying as Listed. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20149M8621988-02-19019 February 1988 Licensee Answers to Sva/Tmi Alert Interrogatories to Gpu Nuclear Corp.* Responds to Sva/Tmi Alert Interrogatories Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Related Correspondence ML20149K8801988-02-15015 February 1988 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Responses to Licensee Interrogatories & Request for Documents.* Info Will Be Provided Upon Availability & Listed Documents Being Sent to Licensee.W/Certificate of Svc ML20196D3731988-02-0303 February 1988 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Util.* Original Documents Identified in Answers to Listed Interrogatories Requested.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20196D3921988-01-31031 January 1988 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Nrc.* NRC Must Produce Any Addl Documents Responsive to Request.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20148U5331988-01-29029 January 1988 Licensee Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to TMI Alert & Susquehanna Valley Alliance.* Joint Intervenors Should Produce Original Documents Noted in Interrogatories.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20235B6151987-09-18018 September 1987 NRC Staff Sixth Supplemental Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp First Set of Interrogatories.* Staff Intends to Call C Barus as Rebuttal Witness.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20214S0551987-06-0202 June 1987 Gpu Nuclear Response to NRC Staff Request for Production of Documents.* Request 1 Overly Broad,Burdensome & of Limited Relevance.Request 2 Vague.Related Correspondence ML20207S5861987-03-18018 March 1987 NRC Staff Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp Second Set of Interrogatories to NRC Staff & Fourth Request for Production of Documents.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20212N4831987-03-0505 March 1987 Gpu Nuclear Corp Response to NRC Staff Second Request for Documents.* Notes of Interviews Conducted by Stier or Associates & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212K3891987-03-0303 March 1987 NRC Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp Third Request for Production of Documents.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212F9481987-03-0202 March 1987 Gpu Nuclear Corp Second Set of Interrogatories to NRC Staff & Fourth Request for Production of Documents.* NRC Should Produce All Documents Required to Be Identified by Listed Interrogatories.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20211F5331987-02-19019 February 1987 Gpu Nuclear Corp Response to NRC Second Set of Interrogatories.* Persons Attending 830323 Meeting Re R Parks Public Statement Listed.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20211D6811987-02-19019 February 1987 NRC Fifth Supplemental Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.* Affidavit of MT Masnik Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212R6771987-01-29029 January 1987 NRC Staff Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents to Gpu Nuclear Corporation.* Requests Info on 830323 Meeting W/Bechtel & Transfer or Removal of R Parks. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20212R6501987-01-27027 January 1987 Gpu Nuclear Corp Third Request for Production of Documents.* W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20207P7141987-01-13013 January 1987 Gpu Second Request for Production of Documents.* Gpu Requests That NRC Identify Title,General Subj Matter,Date, Author & Reason Why Documents Requested Being Withheld. Related Correspondence ML20207N6721987-01-0909 January 1987 NRC Staff Fourth Supplemental Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20207N7081987-01-0909 January 1987 Second Supplemental Response of Gpu Nuclear Corp to NRC Staff First Request for Production of Documents.* Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20207N6911987-01-0909 January 1987 Third Supplemental Response of Gpu Nuclear Corp to NRC Staff First Set of Interrogatories.* Related Correspondence ML20207L9041987-01-0505 January 1987 NRC Staff Third Supplemental Response to Gpu First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.* MT Masnik & Me Resner 870105 Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20207C4711986-12-22022 December 1986 Second Supplemental Response to NRC First Set of Interrogatories Re Util Organization & Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212D6651986-12-15015 December 1986 NRC Staff Second Supplemental Response to Gpu Nuclear Corp First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.* Unexecuted Affidavit of RA Meeks & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20211K2771986-11-13013 November 1986 Response to First Request for Production of Documents Re Basis for R Parks Removal from Test Working Group on 830223 & Parks Involvement W/Quiltech Co.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20215M9901986-10-29029 October 1986 First Supplemental Response to NRC First Set of Interrogatories Re Suspension of R Parks Employment at Facility Site.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20211G5101986-10-28028 October 1986 Response to Interrogatories Re Bechtel Oct 1984 Rept, Rept of Bechtel North American Power Corp Re Allegations of Rd Parks & Eh Stier 831116 Rept, TMI-2 Rept-Mgt & Safety Allegations. Related Correspondence ML20215D8681986-10-0909 October 1986 First Request for Production of Seven Categories of Documents Re Basis for R Parks Removal from Testing Working Group on 830223 & Investigation of Parks Involvement W/ Quiltech Co.Related Correspondence ML20215D8781986-10-0909 October 1986 First Set of Interrogatories for Documents Re Identification of Util Employees Providing or Receiving Info Leading to Interrogation of Rd Parks Re Quiltech Co.Related Correspondence ML20215D8821986-10-0909 October 1986 Supplemental Response to Gpu First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Documents Re Enforcement Action EA-84-137. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20214R6291986-09-23023 September 1986 Response to Util First Set of Interrogatories & Partial Response to First Request for Production of Documents. Affidavits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20209G1681986-09-0404 September 1986 First Request for Production of Documents Identified in NRC Responses to Listed Interrogatories,Including Interrogatory 1(e) Re Protected Activity Engaged in by Parks Resulting in Alleged Discrimination Against Parks.W/Certificate of Svc ML20209G3181986-09-0404 September 1986 First Set of Interrogatories Re Removal of Rd Parks from Employment.W/Certificate of Svc ML20211E6311986-06-11011 June 1986 First Supplemental Answer to NRC First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to C Husted.Rl Long Notes Produced Indicating Husted Met W/J Herbein on 811005. Related Correspondence ML20211E6601986-06-11011 June 1986 First Supplemental Answers to TMI Alert First Request for Production of Documents & First Interrogatories to C Husted. Rl Long Notes of 820527 Conversation W/Newton Encl.W/ Certificate of Svc. Related Correspondence ML20197C1931986-05-0808 May 1986 Answers to TMI Alert,Inc 860501 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20203L6011986-04-28028 April 1986 Responses to TMI Alert First Request for Production of Documents & First Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20141J3171986-04-23023 April 1986 Response to Util First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Senior Reactor Operator Licensing Exams.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20141J4071986-04-23023 April 1986 Response to Husted First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Alleged Cheating During Apr 1981 OL Exams.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20155F5471986-04-18018 April 1986 Supplemental Response to NRC Interrogatories 3 & 4 & Request for Production of Documents to Util.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20203B4121986-04-15015 April 1986 Response to First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20203B6311986-04-14014 April 1986 Answers to Staff First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Related Correspondence ML20202G5381986-04-0909 April 1986 First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to TMI Alert Re Apr 1981 Senior Reactor Operator Exam. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20202G7361986-04-0909 April 1986 Response to TMI Alert,Inc First Request for Production of Documents & First Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20202G6651986-04-0808 April 1986 C Husted Answers to NRC First Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1988-04-04
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20149E2021994-04-20020 April 1994 R Gary Statement Re 10 Mile Rule Under Director'S Decision DD-94-03,dtd 940331 for Tmi.Urges Commissioners to Engage in Reconsideration of Author Petition ML20065Q0671994-04-0707 April 1994 Principal Deficiencies in Director'S Decision 94-03 Re Pica Request Under 10CFR2.206 ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20065J3461992-12-30030 December 1992 Responds to Petition of R Gary Alleging Discrepancies in RERP for Dauphin County,Pa ML20065J3731992-12-18018 December 1992 Affidavit of Gj Giangi Responding to of R Gary Requesting Action by NRC Per 10CFR2.206 ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20248J1891989-10-0606 October 1989 Order.* Grants Intervenors 891004 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence.Response Requested No Later That 891020.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 891006 ML20248J1881989-10-0303 October 1989 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence in Response to Board Order of 890913.* Svc List Encl ML20248J0301989-09-29029 September 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal Board Order.* Matters Evaluated in Environ Assessment Involved Subjs Known by Parties During Proceeding & Appear in Hearing Record & Reflect Board Final Initial Decision LBP-89-7.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E9181989-09-13013 September 1989 Order.* Requests NRC to Explain Purpose of 890911 Fr Notice on Proposed Amend to Applicant License,Revising Tech Specs Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water & Effects on ASLB Findings,By 890929.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890913 ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247B7781989-07-18018 July 1989 Certificate of Svc.* Certifies Svc of Encl Gpu 890607 & 0628 Ltrs to NRC & Commonwealth of Pa,Respectively.W/Svc List ML20245D3651989-06-20020 June 1989 Notice of Oral Argument.* Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from ASLB 890202 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Amend,Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890620 ML20245A5621989-06-14014 June 1989 Order.* Advises That Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from Board 890202 Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Authorizing OL Amend Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890614 ML20247F3151989-05-22022 May 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal by Joint Intervenors Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert.* Appeal Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Identify Errors in Fact & Law Subj to Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246J6081989-05-12012 May 1989 Licensee Brief in Reply to Joint Intervenors Appeal from Final Initial Decision.* ASLB 890203 Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Re Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of accident- Generated Water Should Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20244C0361989-04-13013 April 1989 Order.* Commission Finds That ASLB Decision Resolving All Relevant Matters in Favor of Licensee & Granting Application for OL Amend,Should Become Effective Immediately.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890413 ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20248H1811989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890411.Granted for Aslab on 890410 ML20248G0151989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* Requests to File Appeal Brief 1 Day Late Due to Person Typing Document Having Schedule Problems ML20248G0261989-04-0606 April 1989 Susguehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Brief in Support of Notification to File Appeal & Request for Oral Argument Re Appeal.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248D7211989-04-0404 April 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Intervenors Application for Stay Denied Due to Failure to Lack of Demonstrated Irreparable Injury & Any Showing of Certainty That Intervenors Will Prevail on Merits of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890404 ML20247A4671989-03-23023 March 1989 Correction Notice.* Advises That Date of 891203 Appearing in Text of Commission 890322 Order Incorrect.Date Should Be 871203.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890323 ML20246M2611989-03-22022 March 1989 Order.* Advises That Commission Currently Considering Question of Effectiveness,Pending Appellate Review of Final Initial Decision in Case Issued by ASLB in LBP-89-07. Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890322 ML20236D3821989-03-16016 March 1989 Valley Alliance & TMI Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of 2.3 Million Gallons Of....* Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890316.Granted for Aslab on 890316 ML20236D3121989-03-15015 March 1989 Licensee Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal.* Motion Opposed Based on Failure to Demonstrate Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc ML20236D2901989-03-11011 March 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of Disposal of 2.3 Million Gallons of Radioactive Water at Tmi,Unit 2.* Svc List Encl ML20236A3761989-03-0808 March 1989 Licensee Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Stay.* Stay of Licensing Board Decision Pending Appeal Unwarranted Under NRC Stds.Stay Could Delay Safe,Expeditious Cleanup of Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236C2441989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Application for Stay Filed by Joint Intervenors.* Application for Stay of Effectiveness of Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07,dtd 890202 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2641989-03-0202 March 1989 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.* TS Moore,Chairman,Cn Kohl & Ha Wilber,Members.Served on 890303.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2161989-02-25025 February 1989 Changes & Corrections to Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Three Mile Island Alert Documents Submitted on 890221.* Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-21
[Table view] |
Text
- -__
.G ,
s, l 3-EMED CCFF42niccg4cg
'?zlQ September 28, l954 Ci -i FQ:p
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289 SP
) (Restart-Management Remand)
- (Three Mile Island Nuclear )
Station, Unit No. 1) )
4 LICENSEE'S ANSWERS TO UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS' FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND DOCUMENT REQUESTS TO GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES Licensee General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (GPU Nuclear), pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 5 2.740b, hereby submits the following answers to " Union of Concerned Scientists' Fourth set of Interrogatories and Document Requests to General.Public Utilities." The provision of answers to these interrogatories is not to.be deembd a representation that Licensee considers the information sought to be relevant to the issues to be heard
- in this remanded proceeding.
INTERROGATORIES 4-1. How does GPU decide whether an individual is an appropriate candidate to be admitted to the licensed operator training program? Provide all documents that provide any stan-dards, criteria, or ;uidance in making that decision.
ANSWER. The prerequisites for the licensed operator po-sition are listed in the replacement operator training program 8410020265 840928 PDR ADOCK 05000289 o PDR 4- v ,,--t s- - - - . . ,,-,,...,..%,,,m,w-,,-.-.-w - - - - - - , , - . - . . . . , ,--,._wec,.w.-,,z-_m,e,..wm-,---- -,-.-w. .-...sn , , - . - . -
n, 4
and the control room operator job specification. See documents i
provided in response to TMIA (2d) document production request 9 for the replacement operator training program. The job speci-fication will be available in the discovery reading room.
i 4-2. What are the prerequisites for admission to the licensed operator training program?
~
(a) If an individual must complete educational or training programs, describe the substance and duration of each such program and the means by which the company determines that the program has been successfully completed. If examina-tions, interviews, or other assessments are used to determine
.whether the program has been successfully ccmpleted, provide copies of the examinations and describe the content and purpose of the interviews or other assessments in detail. Provide copies of all documents setting out standards, criteria, or any other information by which GPU determines whether the program has been successfully completed.
(b) If an individual must hold other positions, such as that of non-licensed operator, as a prerequi. site to ad-mission to the licensed operator training program, state which positions the individual must hold, how long the individual must hold the position, and how GPU determines that the indi-vidual's performance in the position justifies admission to the license operator training program. If examinations, inter-views, or other assessments are used to determine whether the
! individual has performed adequately in the position, provide copies of the examinations and describe the content and pyrpose t
of the interviews or other assessment in detail. Provide copies of all documents setting out standards, criteria, or any other information by which GPU determines whether the individu-al has performed adequately in the position.
ANSWER AND OBJECTION. See answer to Interrogatory 4-1 i
for prerequisites to the licensed operator training program.
The prerequisites are outlined below:
Power plant experience - experience as an auxiliary ,
J operator, military propulsion plant operating experience, or equivalent operator experience at another facility.
i
w Plant Systems Training ' conducted as part of the TMI-l auxiliary operator training program.= If a candidate is not a'previ6us auxiliary operator the
systems training is con-ducted as part of the CRO program.
PlantFundamentalstraininglistedaspartofthebRO job specification may be fulfilled by any proven college or -
high school course or by a course with a content specifically approved by GPU. Fundamentals training' administered in the Naval Nuclear Power School program. fulfills some training re-quirements. Each individuallConsidehed for placement in the-program must be screened using the Minnesota Multiphasic Per-s t ,b sonality Inventory (MMPI) exam.
a .
Licensee objects to Interrogatory 4-2 insofar as it seeks the examinations administ9 red as part'of the auxiliary operator
' training program. There exbms are outside the scope of the re-manded proceeding. , x a*
4-3. State a'll criterfa, including entrance examina ~~
tions, psychological assessments, and required education, that GPU uses to decide whether'an' individual should be admitted to the licensed operator training program. If training, experi -
-ence, or testing outside the company can substitute for training, experience, or testing at GPU, describe the equiva '
lent training, experience, or testing. Provide,Aall documents related to your answer.
ANSWER. See the answers to Inte'rrogatories5 4 1 and 4-2.
4-4. Describe the procedures through which GPU applies the criteria referred to in Interrogatory 4-3 and de-cides what individuals,should be admitted to the licensed oper-ator trainingiprogram. Provide all documents setting out or '
describing these procedures. , , e ANSWER AND OBJECTION. In accordan{e with the union agree-ment, when a control room operator vacancy exists, a job O
_my+ +yww w -s -,,.t -
- Wb ., q v ..,wm w_ c w., og-sew - w s,-----ry-v- ----verw
O.
fposition is initiated. Personnel interested in obtaining that i position submit a written job bid request. The bidders' back-ground and training are evaluated to verify that candidate meets.the job specification and operator training program re-quirements. Seniority is considered only after the job re-quirements are met.
Licensee objects to providing the union agreement, which is outside the scope of this health and safety proceeding.
4-5. State all criteria, including entrance examina-tions, psychological assessments, and required education, that GPU uses to decide whether an individual should be admitted to or. hired for programs or positions that are prerequisites to the licensed operator training program. If training, experi-ence, or testing outside the company can substitute for training,. experience, or testing at GPU, describe the equiva-lent training, experience, or testing. Provide all documents related to your answer.
ANSWER AND OBJECTION. For candidates who enter the CRO program from the auxiliary operator ranks, the job specifica-tion for auxiliary operator 'C' lists the entry level program requirements for TMI operators. The Plant Operator-Selection System (POSS) aptitude test is used as a selection. tool for candidates to the auxiliary operator program. The POSS test is accredited by the Edison Electric Institute'and is used by utilities nationwide as a selection tool. The job posting pro-cess is described in response to Interrogatory 4-4.
Unsatisfactory performance on the POSS examination is grounds for candidate rejection regardless of seniority.
Candidates for the CRO position who are not auxiliary op-erators must meet the eligibility requirements addressed in response to Interrogatory 4-1.
d Candidates from outside operations are selected when qual-l'fied candidates are not available from within.
Licensee objects to providing the POSS test which is a .
confidential document the value of which would be severely un-dermined if it were publicly disclosed.
4-6. Describe the procedures through which GPU applies the criteria referred to in Interrogatory 4-5 and de-cides what individuals should be admitted to or hired for the programs or positions that are prerequisites to admission to the licensed operator training program. Provide all documents setting out or describing these procedures.
ANSWER. See answer to Interrogatories 4-4 and 4-5.
4-7. For the period encompassing the two most recent I rounds of requalification examinations, but no less than the last 24 months, state the following:
(a) The number of individuals considered for admission to the licensed operator training program.
ANSWER. Between November,1981 and the present sixteen
-(16) control room operator positions were posted. Forty-four
-(44) internal candidates submitted bids for those positions.
The number of external candidates considered is not available.
(b) The number of individuals considered for admission who were not admitted to the program.
ANSWER. Thirty-five (35) internal candidates were not selected. The number of external candidates not selected is not available.
(c) The reasons that individuals were not ad-mitted to the licensed operator training program and the number of individuals to whom each reason applied.
ANSWER. Internal Candidates Nineteen (19) Disqualified due to not meeting education or experience criteria
Four (4) De: lined the position Three (3) Disqualified due to holding simi-lar positions in TMI-2 Nine (9) Not accepted due to seniority being insufficient for existing posting External Candidates _
Information not available 4-8. For the period encompassing the two most recent rounds of requalification examinations, but no less than the last 24 months, state the following:
(a) The number of individuals considered for admission to or placement in programs or positions that are prerequisites to admission to the licensed operator training program.
(b) The number of individuals considered for admission or placement who were not admitted to or placed in the prerequisite programs or positions.
(c) The reasons that individuals were not ad-mitted to or placed in the prerequisite programs or positions, and the number of individuals to whom each reason applied.
OBJECTION AND ANSWER. Licensee objects to the relevance of Interrogatory 4-8; however, Licensee nevertheless is providing the following information:
During the period of May 1981 and present, twenty-nine (29) auxiliary operator 'C' postings were initiated.
Twenty-eight (28) internal candidates submitted bids for those positions. The number of external candidates considered is not available.
Fourteen (14) internal candidates were not selected. The number of external candidates not selected is not available.
)
I 4-9. Answer Interrogatory 4-7 for the time that each currently licensed operator was admitted to the licensed opera-tor training program, except that you need not answer this in-terrogatory for persons admitted to the license operator training program before March 28, 1979.
ANSWER. Currently available information indicates the following:
Operators were admitted to the training program in five groups: (a) two in October of 1979; (b) one on February 16, 1981; (c) three between October and November of 1981; (d) seven in February of 1982; and (e) five in February of 1984. To facilitate staffing, seven different postings for thirty-four (34) control roojn operator positions were initi-ated.
- Seventy (70) internal candidates submitted bi~ds on these positions. The number of external candidates is not available.
- Fifty-seven (57) internal candidates were not selected.
Internal Candidates Twenty-five (25) Disqualified due to not meeting education or experience.
Eight (8) Declined position.
Seven (7) Disqualified due to holding simi-lar positions in Unit 2.
Seventeen (17) Not accepted due to seniority being insufficient for existing position.
l l
l l
i
a l
, I l
l External Candidates i Information not available. l 4-10. Answer Interrogatory 4-8 for the time that each currently licensed operator was admitted to or placed in posi-tions that are prerequisites to admission to the licensed oper-ator training program, except that you need not answer this in-terrogatory for prerequisites to which persons were admitted before March 28, 1979.
ANSWER. Currently available information indicates the following:
Operators were admitted to the auxiliary operator 'C' classes on the following three dates: December of 1979, July of 1981 and July of 1983. To facilitate that staffing, six (6) different postings between November of 1979 and present were initiated for forty-one (41) auxiliary operator 'C' positions.
- Forty-seven (47) internal' candidates submitted bids for these positions. The number of external candidates is not available.
- Thirty-one (31) internal candidates were not selected.
The number of external candidates not selected is not available.
Internal Candidates Thirty-one (31) were rejected due to insufficient selec-tion examination scores.
External Candidates Information not available.
4-11. With respect to each' currently licensed opera-tor, provide all documents reflecting the individual's perfor-mance in and completion of prerequisites to admission to the licensed operator training program, except that you need not answer this Interrogatory for prerequisites completed by the individual before March 28, 1979.
-3_
ANSWER AND OBJECTION. The selection process used for ad-mission to the CRO program for current operators is addressed in response to Interrogatories 4-1, 4-2 and 4-4.
Licensee objects to this interrogatory insofar as it seeks auxiliary operator examinations, the applicable union contract, or the POSS test.
4-12. With respect to each currently licensed opera-tor, provide all documente reflecting GPU's decision to admit the individual to the licensed operator training program, ex-cept that you need not answer this Interrogatory for individu-als admitted to the licensed operator training program before March 28, 1979.
ANSWER. See Licensee's answers to Interrogatories 4-1, 4-2 and 4-4.
Respectfully submitted, M A.(k or Blake, Jr.,
Ernest L. P.C.
Deborah B. Bauser SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & IROWBRIDGE 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 822-1000 j Counsel for Licensee i
Dated: September 28, 1984 l
l I
- _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ ___ . . _ _ _ . ~. . . . . _ . _ . . ._