ML20211K277
| ML20211K277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1986 |
| From: | Jim Hickey GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| References | |
| CON-#486-1487 CIV-PEN, EA-84-137, NUDOCS 8611170116 | |
| Download: ML20211K277 (440) | |
Text
-
i ,
/tfr7 8"^* cO?RM D0LKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 86 NOV 13 P4 :25 ;
cFncc : n. e BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 00 Chi !!rd r. tvm!
Ei M!:'
In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-320 I
) License No. DPR-73 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION ) EA 84-137 (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, ) (Civil Penalty)
Unit No. 2)
RESPONSES OF GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION TO NRC STAFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REQUEST NO. 1:
All documents which constitute or contain a basis for Parks' removal from the Test Working Group (TWG) on j February 23, 1983.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1:
i GPUN is currently unaware of any documents specifically 1
referring to the reasons for Mr. Parks' replacement as alternate l Startup and Test Supervisor, with its impact on the basis of his TWG membership, other than those already in the possession of and/or publicly available to the Staff.
I REQUEST NO. 2:
All documents which contain information related to, or discussions of, the investigation of Parks' involvement with the 8611170116 861113 DR ADOCK 05000 20 )g{}
Y 6
4 I l GSION r ' c :<Y CD'
' , 8: .- '
H I U S. N = i ::
Du. 6 4 ..
a l
- o. *.
$ I h
I
~
c- -
AhIIk__ ___. t
[
+
sl <
[
_ _ - ./. ,/.__..
b p .'i, s.._
_ _ . , /..w,-
m w.
N l
n Quiltech Company, including all notes, records and reports cre-ated by Bechtel employees Messrs. Wheeler and Hoffman.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2:
GPUN objects to this request on the ground that it is not relevant to the subject matter of this proceeding and is not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence insofar as it seeks documents concerning inquiries made after Mr. Parks' I
press conference on March 23, 1983. Without waiving the fore-going objection, GPUN produces the documents attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
i REQUEST NO. 3:
All documents which contain information related to, or discussions of, the removal of Parks in March, 1983 as primary Site Operations Department representative for the Test Working Group for purposes of the polar crane review.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3:
See documents attached hereto as Exhibit "B."
REQUEST NO. 4:
All documents which contain information related 1.o, or discussions of placing Richard Parks on a leave of absence on March 24, 1983.
8 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4:
See documents attached hereto as Exhibit "C."
REQUEST NO. 5:
All documents containing information related to the transfer of Richard Parks to Bechtel offices in Daggett, California in August 1983.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5:
GPUN objects to this request on the ground that it is not relevant to the subject matter of this proceeding and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evi-dence.
REQUEST NO. 6:
All documents containing information related to the termination of the employment of Richard D. Parks by Bechtel Cor-poration on February 3, 1984.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6:
GPUN objects to this request on the ground that it is not relevant to the subject mttter of this proceeding and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evi-dence.
REQUEST NO. 7:
All documents identified in response to NRC Staff's first set of interrogatories to GPU Nuclear Corporation.
o RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7:
See documents attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "D."
INFORMATION PROTECTED BY PRIVILEGE In accordance with section 2.740, 10 C.F.R., the fore-going responses are limited to matters which are not protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product privilege.
Dated: November 13, 1986 SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWPRIDGE By _
j J./ Patrick ickey Attorneys for GPU Nuclear Corporation ,
_4_
l
N
- nf ;, . undrAMM
'X e r it-
' ** C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE GFFir.i . _,-p.
) 00CMETih: 2 4 insict In the Matter of
) Docket No. $bE$10 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION ) License No. DPR-73 ~
(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, ) EA 84-137 Unit No. 2) ) (Civil Penalty)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that copies of the foregoing " Responses of GPU Nuclear Corporation to NRC Staff's First Request for the Production of Documents" were served by messenger, this 13th day of November, 1986, to the following persons:
Ivan Smith, Esquire Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Docketing and Service Branch Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 George E. Johnson, Esquire Office of the General Counsel 9604 MNBB U.S. Nucler Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
\OJ au o J.(PatrickHickey
,, v e- . - . , - - ,- w ~ , - - , - , . . -
---m- - , - - - - - -
EXHIBIT A
DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2 June 8, 1984 Memorandum to Robert C. Arnold from Edwin H. Stier, Subj: TMI-2 Report /
Management and Safety Allegations March 2, 1983 Interoffice Memorandum to H.D. Bruner from J.W. Thiesing, Subj: Quiltech, Inc.
March 4, 1983 Letter to Robert C. Arnold from Larry G. Santee forwarding copies of notes re interview with Rose Rittle (1) Interoffice Memorandum from James Troebliger and (2) Santee's handwritten notes (both dated March 3, 1983 March 21, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to File, Subj:
Termination of Employment of Larry P.
King March 24, 1983 Interoffice Memorandum to H.F. Brush from S.M. Pace, Subj: Three Mile Island:
Possible Employee Involvement with Job Shop Operations February 26, 1983 Memorandum to B.K. Kanga from J.W.
Thiesing, Subj: Quiltech, Inc.
February 22, 1983 Handwritten notes of J.W. Thiesing Handwritten notes from Hofmann's file entitled Sequence of Events March .02, 1983 Post Meeting Notes of Wheeler and Leopard
TO: Robert C. Arnold DATE: June 8, 1984 ROM: Edwin H. Stier 40
SUBJECT:
TMI-2 Repor t/ Management and Sa fety Allegations On June 8, 1984, you and I discussed your recolleccion, that on March 11, 1983, in the course of a meeting with William Aus tin, you and he discussed the preparation and use of his r6 sums by Quiltec, Inc. You asked me whether I was aware of any evidence that might confirm your recollection.
In response to your inquiry, I spoke by telephone with William Aus tin on June 8, 1984. He told me that when he learned that his r6 sums had been typed by Rose Rittle on Quiltec stationery, he was very upset and immediately spoke with James Thiesing about it. His purpose in doing so was to assure Thiesing that he had not authorized Quiltec to circulate his r6 sums and that he wanted TMI-2 management to have no doubt about his desire to remain in its employ. Shortly therea f ter, Thiesing told Aus tin that he had passed Austin's information on to Bahman Kanga.
Austin's recollection of your meeting of March 11, 1983 is vague. He does not specifically recall discussing the r6 sums incident with you at that time but he believes that such a discussion probably occurred. Austin remembers that he told you ev'erything that he knew about Quiltec. The preparation of his r6 sums by Quiltec was very much on his mind at the time because he was worried that GPUN management would reach the wrong conclusion about his loyalty. Therefore, he believes he would have raised the subject with you.
I am aware of no evidence that is contrary to Austin's and your recollections.
EHS:jtb 1
e w -
Bechtel North American Ptwer Corporation Interoffice Memorandum H. D. Bruner Date March 2, 1983 n
Quiltech, Inc. From J. W. niesing Suthect Of Recovery Prcgrams Copies B. K. Kanga At THI-2 Administration Bldg.
My inquiries related to Qu11 tech, Inc. resulted from concerns brought to me as a member of the management chain in the integrated GFDI recovery organization by Bill Austin in early February. The chronology of events related to this issue is presented below.
At the time Ben Sloan left GPU, in May or June 1982, coecents were made te cie by GPU persons, whose identity I cannot recall, to the effect that S3can was being very secretive about his future plans and that it was rt:nored that he was in some business relationship with Larry King. I passed this off as idle conversation.
In September or October of 1982, Mike Herlihy, SRG Manager, left GPUN. I was again told, probably by Dave Buchanan, that Herliby would not divulge his future intentions, but it was rumored that he was to be associated with Ben Sloan. Soon thereafter. Ted Reckert, Plant Engineering, left GPCI. I was told by someone in GPU, probably Buchanan, that he was going out en his cwn to work in Texas.
Late in 1982. Ken Licnarvns, Plant Engineering, rvsigned. At that time, in-forination again surfaced from Buchanan and/or Bill Austin that he was going i
to work for some company in which Larry King had an interest.
On Tebruary 2,1983, while on a business trip with Bill Austin, he raised I
the issue of the recently-departed GPUN personnel and stated that he ( Austin) f felt rwasonably surw that Herlihy, Reckert, Sloan and Lionarens had departed i GPU dirwetly to an engineering job-shop of which Larry King was either
}
prwsident or, in some other way, had a substantial business interest. Bill expressed a concern regarding management in' action on this issue since we had Jost four good performers to the same alleged source and he believed that core were to follow. I told Bill that I would check into the eatter and get back to him. Bill told me at that time that he believed the name of the j coepany in question was Quill Engineering. I believed it likely that any
'.nformation I would obtain later regarding Quill Engineering would be devoid of a King involvement.
On about February 14, when I returned from vacation I called Bechtel Project Frecurument and asked that they run a vendor inferr.ation survey on Quill Engineering (what Quill Engineering was, where it was located, who its RESP.
Ex. 16
8 Bechtel North American Ptwer Corporation CottTIDENTIAL H. D. Bruner .
3/2/83 Page 2 officers wem , personnel resumes, etc. ). I called Project Procurwment on about TeBruary 16 and was infomed that they had had no luck. Quill wasn't in Dunn & Bradstrwet or in any of their usual a ferences.
That same day, I asked Dave Buchanan if he had a more accurate corporate name. He said he believed the name was Quill Tech Inc. , and that he had heard someone suggest in the past that the company was located in Virginia.
I called Project Procurement on February 17 and suggested they check ncent corporate registrations in Virginia.
I called Project Procunment on another matter on Tebruary 22 and inquired about the vender survey. I was infomed that they had located Quiltech, Inc.
in the Virginia corporate registry, which provided the following info: ation:
Quiltech, Inc.
John Hoade - Treasurtr/ Business Agent, Lynchburg, VA Larry P. King, Jr. - President l
Ben Sloan - Vice President A Ms. King (?) - also an officer.
l l
I was told that their telephone inquiries had previded the following:
j Quiltech's telephone number is (516) 929-9300, ext. 357 cr 289 Quiltech has an office at 704 Lynden Rd., Hersho (533-73Q )
[
and also an address at b Rosedale, Hershey.
I then asked the Project Procurement ripresentative if he knew who any of these people were and he said he didn't. I informed him who Larry F. King and Ben Sloan were. From this point on. I believe there were me further Bechtel-initiated contacts with Quiltech. I subsequently learned, on February 23 that Procurwment had no other contacts except a call on February 22 from a woman who was believed to be Ms. King. She accused Prcject Procurement of misrepresenting Bechtel's interests, etc.
l Because of his previous statements of concem I called Cave Buchanan te :/
office on February 22 and asked him to reiterate his previcus coerents regard-ing substantive connections between former GPUN employees and Quiltech.
Dave quoted Ted Reckert as having told him that Ted was werking for Quiltech at Shortbar. He quoted Ken Lionarens as having said he was working for the same ccq:any as Reckert. Dave quoted Ted Reckert as having told him that Mike Herlihy was also working for Quiltech. Rich Galligher was called in at Dave's suggestion and he said that Ben Sloan had told him last surrner that Larry King was prwsident of Quiltech. Rich also said that he had discovered Rose Rittle (Bechtel engineering secrwtary) typing Quiltech resumesMer E rY Iast summer. She had said that Rick Parks (Bechtel operations engineer Mimt gerations) nad asked her to do the typing for him. tA nave not yet pWs'iIFGis issue. )
l l
4 Bechtel North American Ptwer Corporation CONTIDENTIAL H. D. Bruner 3/2/83 Page 3 Late in the day on Tebruary 22, I prwsented the information to John Barton.
Due to Bahman Kanga's illness on February 23 and 286 John and I did not con-tact him until the afternoon of the 284th, at home. With John Barton's knowledge, I called you on February 23 in the evening and summarized the situation.
. W. Thies
( JWT:pft l
i i
3 Bechtel North American Ptmer Corpordtion f Engineers - Constructors 15740 Shady Grove Road '
Gaitherscurg, Maryland 20877-1454 '
301 - 258-3000 CONFIDENTIAL .
March 4, 1983 , , )
s Mr. Robert C. Arnold, President GPU Nuclear Corporation Post Office Box 480 %
Route 441 South ,
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Mr. Arnold:
1 In accordance with Mr. Kanga's instructions, enclosed you will find signed copies of two (2) sets of notes to record an in-terview on March 3, 1983, with Rose Rittle. One set of notes is from James Troebliger and the other set is'mine.'
\
The tone of the interview was set by Mr. Kanga by indicating to Ms. Rittle that she was not being investigated and that we were soliciting details from her with regard to L. P. King's possible conflict of interest.
Ms. Rittle was open and cooperative with us.
I am available to discuss these notes with you at your convenience.
Yours truly, 7 .
Df Larry G. Santee n
Manager, Program Controls LGS:ms Enclosures (2) s cc: B. K. Kanga (w/ encl.)
J. Troebliger (w/ encl.)
2, /2. : "L : -
h . E C ig' 6 6.I (e m'-If #
- g ~s '
L smus Pl C# .-
~
' s a .-6:- a ,c ,- d ' E m h r s.
- 7 la l' i I _
~ ~-
2 . . . . hh hr ums r,. e ' De 7, L.m. ;. R 3_ ._.
e E.% A. Y*** It c .-
b od J ll' Ip1u h rI Ulr1t & AS M TA. LLv ii f,*an... . ,
s %-..a. .,
wn e m_a w=. , i . t. , acu u w,.. x._ .
_ r.. .
7 fcR Esc m.ss L'd e - Sure.a . . tz Es w :~rr. i'
. _ G so s m_ - _t__
9 I 10 / a .- m. t_ __ 7e . y , _ c ,, e T- A O , _ , _ _ , _ _
11
,2 nu~ _i m w_ s -u . . . , . , ,
I3 i
.__ - . . . . r u~ A,w~ r.a , 2 c &. s. s * ~ T_
t5
__ _16 , ._ _ . _ . .._$** t % C l'~ d '- 0 Iv' f s' O S~ el bM& . _ - . . . . .
'7 38 . . . _ _ . b 6 "i *$ *. __ .: _ m _ _ .
.. _ . . . ._.d..__
20 n <% .J et: ._..u
. _ lim /mA e a .mq c, 3 21 _. _. _ ._ . _ _ . _ . _ ._ _ __
g,.g ._
.._d 22 .. ..h. ' Ls.T s <. n r%9sw O.C }Js.q f 'EEs c.4,4 > .!.dA t..:: :>
_. . n . . . _ _ . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . . . _
- . . 2e . ..0 ) ..UC . . Y C La./_-Y'.* .f._I. A
- a:. * ' l ='_ '-f.
t .
Ul.,I' J'* ._ A I *:- % "
.- 2s . . . _ . . . . . _ _ _ ._.___? w> .' d. c r.c .2. .62 7wa V -
,,.. a .-s 1- J u *:. -
2* 6r G-* 6 2.a5.nsa. _ ___. . _ . . . _ . .
27
~
.. . 28 . __ $3 w ' fe. A : r s * > =** *, . t%
s
- o e: m k on s'.
.--A .. L. * * .
'.* . /. g. ...
29 n 6.% ...... .
. . c ,. 7... ... . .. . . . ..
31 32 // c,3 g. 3, _.f_, 4, [, j,,, ,k. 4, g, ,,, H ,,g.,, __, _ , ,,
33 34 $ 5, b.e g, ,M bN a, m, h/** . * '!' Men d[ J, A< es C D /< 1 a.< ( ,
n 4. -,_e_k G=. v.e_ L ic Qas c. ..su --an i.
l
\ 36 S i Zees.s Tcw:_f 3, ,... A g ..r T 1 pun .i _:A.._
. _. 3 7 7m.
,J r.. - m._em.~ e.s m m.
a k ..,s. c 7 .+ r M.: 1.la. p_.,._:.; e ,:__f.
3e W 1),as_ -
3'
(.9 s -* t vs. 2 _I.s._ $! C_i4 7 -- 4Y h.9.C ** y. I / .ad-O '45 LF,'
40 _.}l< !! _f_:, A H * , .5 .t. .s. * <
- a _L"*r~' H " O ~.@ Cuf C I-as Suc w u e. ,. G. .,s,.an. e._.I c_du _
42 43 da -
PS,fd*F Db C 8 t.L$! _..
._ 4 5 . ., 1- . av A:c u 5__._. Ve fi n A r' _ _
ee __ . 3 w.w. . .
ft, _ _ # = R.h LW _.. -J 4s , _, _. . 3(f*ru N T" .. ._ _d 1, _ . _ . . . _ . G <- .__
_- 30 , . _ . -
L L T' k.4 . - -
m
e s
L [Y-3 L. . S
==
V- rr c c- i -
l , , ,
l4 3 . 7 e
- l. ,
I bM _Da 11 ~ '- Q ..>.,u~ 7, J % nu n ea no . # A s .L s s 'w_d' , . _ ___
__.._.__2. . _ __. _ __ ,. _
3 . ___ I.
4 s i 7 . .
. } _.
_ .e . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ . _. ._ .
.. ,i 9 _ _ _ _ . . _.
__.,i 10 ti
. . _ _ _ . . . . . . _ ._ ___ _ .. .___. __ .. _. . ,1 I
12
...)
'3 . . _ . . _.L '
14 15 16
. 17 . . __ . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ .
14 19 20 . _.. ._. . , _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _. __
21 _ . . . _ . . . . _ _ . _ . . _ _. . . _ . _ . _ _._
3
. . 22 . ._.
- b. b l . . _ __ _ J 23 _ _ . . .. _ . . . . . . _ _ . -
l .
,I 24 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _
25 _ . . . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ .
20 2e
. fsf.)L-M -- -
3* . _ _. . . _ . . .- S _S'S*YS _ .
30 ._ . . . _ _ . _ . . _ f . _ _ . _ _ _
3i $ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ ____ _
32 ,
- /
33
/ c 34 35 L b, < 121 L_3JE$_ _ . _ .
3.
37 _. _ . _ _. . _ . . . _ _ _.
3e 39 40
' I. . _ _ _ . _ _ . ._ - - -
42 d3 . _.
_...f4 . . . _ . -- .
.. __4 3 , _
. de. _
47 I
_ _ _ . ._4 e .-
_ ._ a 49_ . . _ . .
50 , _ _ .
'Q ffwa n!w __
L M I w ucse
,b % - A' cac dem x 4,86Y/77A/
$Aoss &Ad koma ov&tvt&d ef ssa L4 & strosned RfurnE nao Stansca c4 H66r 1;irfias 7a fier3 77 pdie rfhas 26soms.s,src bb Asb4 /Mic cactuees4
}?ost is gr uias ra usnaras, !
l
$oss ~ Evemsc. /9fA - Rsswwa 77ko ou Qun.7sce lem%c hek furs Muss ke n 7y/f-7)st p *xa er aos ai;,
TfMD oorsthe cf Doom. seats. H* oat BW TyAO M kt teua.n rpro er f.us ,,a tw.sce ;g taisu r /funfg y hac )%xs /bieuy Gitc 5 :
75 0 fsx.w- Bau $nat KEx.) Licanesa
% s necard M ~ f.6 er?' 25" Rdsvers * - Afost1/ GA) enAc .1 2G90eger 70 ryM ffsmrs Pssi r)
- A. l i
1 7.- :
W DID Aks7"", pr- finsT, %%nc mocM of Benas nsesc
/fdoM6C 3pcf tT /3 SomdM%*M JAf M ddC MMb 7b M MMW Km _ $RG _ edtAO _ w /TN._ __
l
] gudDMMH4140 kasf ASKED A fL L Y a p w f s w.s GetM cs]
viTR b*ief kk
& ,8)a. M Amr Aw AIMM 8/LL nt 6 ti m Q utC7Fc._ Arf snm JMF Ma*m 77Asc We sa Qwax derrasre MW //tt. Arms AGud sw aae oA: 7%se Watt Abso TYAFb. 8tL L M bel 56 WAt*
$4hr1%== ES,d A w) MK/JC OLL M SW
&f for DYD Attr M 'UY M Mm h.%ktt MME $3/83
+=bn ' -
M!BlX 3-31i2 Ar k
- 4. G. dw ru 3 3-83
-c ,-., . . . -, , - mn,-,---.- e-n.--- -
,.-n,_. - , _ _ - - - - - - . . . - - - - , . . - - . - - - - - - - - - - -
- / E E E T. 1 E E E I l a i Intar6ffloo Mcmcrandum i _
l
,P"'8 March 3, 1983 Subject INVESTIGATION REGARDING L. P. KING INTERVIEW WITH ROSE RITTLE 83/053 Location TMI - Human Resources To Memorandum for Record On this date, Larry Santee of Bechtel and ar/self interviewed Rose Rittle, a Bechtel employee who was involved in the typing of resumes under the direction of Rich Parks. During the sununer of 1982, Ms. Rittle was requested by Mr. Parks to type resumes of a number of individuals on the stationary of Quiltec. Ms. Rittle was instructed to type these resumes during non-working hours and to keep everything she was doing very confidential.
Ms. Rittle ramamhers typing at least 25 resumes, most of which were resu=es of GPU employees. She specifically ramambers typing the resumes of Larry King, Ben Slone, Mike Herlihly, Ted Rakart, Bill Austin, William Henry, III and Ken Lionarons. Ms. Rittle was paid $75 for typing the resumes. She believes it took her 15 to 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> and thati she did it using company equipment.
L Ms. Rittle stated that she did not view this as unusual at that particular time because she had been asked in the past to type resumes. She said that she had notified no one of this assignment until yesterday, March 2, 1983 when she asked Bill Austin what was happening with the Larry King situation.
Bill stated that it involved Larry's efforts with an outside consulting ft:=,
Quiltec, that may compromise his effectiveness with GPU. Ms. Rittle stated to Bill that she had re-mnbered typing resumes on Quiltec stationary and that Bill's resume was one of the many that she typed. Rose stated that Bill Austin was quite surprised and stated to her that during 1982 Ben Slone had requested a copy of Bill's resume but Bill was uncertain of the disposition of it.
Both Larry Santee and I recorded a written transcript of Ms. Rittle's answers to our questions and had her sign both written transcripts at the end of cc:
interview. We also requested that if Ms. Rittle had any resumes of the individuals mentioned or had any stationary belonging to Quiltec, if she would please provide that information to Larry Santee.
l pyv . . .
i
._..; ..z >, s _;
. 1
~
Inter-Offloe Memorandum Dan March 21, 1983 Termination of Employment of Larry P. King T3 File Loca h The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the reason for termination of employment of Larry P. King and aggregate with it the principal associ-ated documentation.
On February 24, 1982, Mr. Clark informed me at our offices in Parsippany that he had been told by John Barton that Mr. King was the president of a company called Quiltec and that Quiltec had hired four former GPUN employees. We instructed Mr. Barton to meet with Mr. King along with Jim Troebliger, site Human Resources Area Manager, and determine from Mr. King if this was true. If confirmed, Mr. Barton was to suspend Mr.
King without pay inmediately. That meeting took place as directed and resulted in the suspension of Mr. King.
Mr. Clark was scheduled to have a meeting with Mr. King on February 25, 1983, as a result of an earlier memorandum (handwritten) from Mr. King to Mr. Clark requesting an opportunity to discuss with Mr. Clark Mr. King's concerns about TMI-2 activities, and a subsequent phone call from Mr. Clark to arrange the meeting.
On February 25, prior to meeting with Mr. King, Mr. Clark and I agreed that we should try to separate resolution of our concerns about Mr. King's out-side business activities from the effort to address constructively Mr. King's concerns about safety and management issues at TMI-2. We further decided that to facilitate dealing with Mr. King's safety concerns effectively, his status would be changed from suspension without pay to suspension with pay.
We also decided to have Mr. Clark's February 25 meeting with Mr. King be for the purpose of understanding as clearly as we could the nature of Mr. King's safety concerns. Attachment 1 is Mr. Clark's documentation of the arrange-ment of the February 25 meeting and Attachment 2 are the notes taken by Mr.
Clark and discussed with Mr. King at the February 25 meeting. Attachment 3 is a memorandum from me to Mr. King which sets forth my understanding af Mr. King's safety and management concerns regarding TMI-2 activities.
Attachments 4 and 5 are letters to Mr. Lowe and Dr. Griebe establishing their charter for an independent investigation and evaluation of Mr. King's concerns about potential safety issues. Dr. James Fletcher, Chairman of the TMI-2 Safety Advisory Board was informed by me on March 8 of Mr. King's concerns and the Company's concerns about Mr. King's outside business ac-tivities. Dr. Fletcher was provided with a copy of Attachment 3. As a re-sult of tnat notification, Dr. Fletcher arranged for Dr. Bruce Lundin, also a menter of the TMI-2 Safety Advisory Board, to interview Mr. King on March 10.
A0000648
t l .
i .
].
File March 21, 1983 Termination of Employment
. Page 2 of Larry P. King 4- >
j Parallel with those activities. I undertook to pursue with Mr. King his involvement with Quiltec. On February 28 I met with Mr. King and gave him a letter containing 21 questions, a copy of which is included as :
4 Attachment 6. At that meeting, I extended the time for his response to '
Harch 3. I again met with Mr. King on March 3 and at his request ex- t tended the time for him to respond to 7:00 p.m. on March 9. Attachment 7 4
documents that agreement. I subsequently received Mr. King's response on i March 9, a copy of which is included as Attachment 8. Based upon that re-sponse and the timing of notification of resignation from Mr. Herlihy and
- ~
Mr. Rekart (set forth on pages 2 and 3 of Attachment 9) it was clear that Quiltec had finalized employment agreements with Mr. Herlihy and most likely with Mr. Rekart, both of whom were closely associated in their GPUN activi-
- ties with Mr. King, prior to those two individuals informing GPUN of their '
i intention to resign. Although some additional time, as described below,
. was needed to further understand all the implications of Mr. King's activi-
- ties and whether he was being fully forthcoming in his letter of March 9, I met with Mr. King in the morning on March 11 and gave him a letter setting forth our initial assessment of his letter of March 9. A copy of my March 11
) letter is included as Attachment 10. That letter identified that I would need additional time to pursue our review of the information he had provided but that he was subject to termination oased upon the information he gave us in Attachment 8. There were two aspects of addressing Mr. King's association j with Quiltec that made it necessary to proceed very deliberately. Firstly, l as indicated in Attachments 2 and 3, there was a history of several weeks of
{ frequent disagreement between Mr. King and other members of the organization j about the conduct of activities which had potential safety implications.
i Secondly was the fact that Dr. Thiesing, a Bechtel employee assigned as
! Manager-Recovery Programs, and with whom Mr. King had a substantial history '
of disagreements on technical issues, had been the one to tell Mr. Barton of Mr. King's Quiltec activities. Since there were questions as to the ex-
, tent of knowledge within the TMI-2 organization about Mr. King's outside
- business activities and the propriety with which Dr. Thiesing dealt with in-formation provided to him on the issue, I agreed with Mr. Sanford of Bechtel's Gaithersburg office, for Bechtel to proceed with an investigation of those
! issues using one of their internal auditors.
i
! Attachments 11 and 12 are copies of information provided to me by Mr. Kanga
- in conjunction with Bechtel's inve<tigation of the role of their people in i this matter which was undertaken by Bechtel management personnel prior to the arrival of Bechtel's internal auditor.
I met with Messrs. Joe Chwastyk, Dave Buchanan, and Bill Austin during the afternoon of March 11. All three of them appeared willing to discuss openly with me what they knew of Mr. King's and other GPUN employees' involvement with Quiltec. Mr. Chwastyk could not recall knowing about Mr. King's offi-cial involvement with Quiltec prior to meeting with Messrs. King and Ben l Sloan at Mr. King's home although he was aware that after Mr. Sloan left i GPUN's employment, Mr. King continued to have discussions with Sloan on j technical matters. His recollection was that the meeting with Mr. King had
)
occurred more recently than Novent>er,1982, although he could not recall when the meeting actually took place. He said that since that meeting he '
- - , . - _ _ , ~ _ _ . - _ - - - - . _ . ~ _ _ _ . -- - . - - - -
File March 21,1983 Termination of Employment Page 3 of Larry P. King had not had ongoing involvement with Quiltec in any way although he had pro-vided Mr. Sloan with a copy of his resume and an invitation to Mr. Sloan to let him (Chwastyk) know if Mr. Sloan had something that would be attractive.
Mr. Chwastyk further stated that he had asked Mr. King (whether before or after the meeting at Mr. King's home could not be recalled) if Mr. King had looked at whether his Quiltec activities were a violation of the Company's Conflict of Interest policy. Mr. Chwastyk said that Mr. King asserted that he had reviewed the Conflict of Interest policy carefully and did not be-lieve he was violating the policy. Although I discussed this further with Mr. King on March 11. I was not able to resolve the discrepancies in their two accounts.
Mr. Buchanan stated that he had learned from Austin and Rekart in November, 1982, that Sloan Herlihy, and Rekart were all working at Shoreham iluclear Generating Station for Quiltec and that Mr. King was associated with Quiltec.
In early January Buchanan was informed that Mr. King was president of Quiltec.
He stated that he gave the substance of that information to Dr. Thiesing in January. Mr. Buchanan stated that while he felt that what Mr. King was in-volved with was improper in light of his employment with GPUN, and was dis-turbed by the situation, he saw no reasonable avenue for giving visibility to the situation beyond talking with his immediate supervisor, Dr. Thiesing.
Mr. Austin stated that he discussed his knowledge of the situation, wnich he gained as a result of meeting a Stone and Webster employee at the November ANS meeting in Washington, D.C., with Mr. Buchanan (which was confirmed by Mr. Buchanan and was the reason Mr. Buchanan found out about the specifics from Mr. Rekart) and subsequently. .in the early part of February with Dr.
Thiesing, while the two of them were on a business trip to Idaho.
On the afternoon of March 12 I met with Messrs. Clark, Kanga, and Barton.
I discussed with them my conclusion that we should terminate Mr. King's employnent.
On March 15, it was orally reported to me by Mr. Kanga that the internal auditor was told by Mr. Rich Parks that he had arranged for about a dozen resumes to be typed at the request of Mr. King. He stated further that Mr. King had given him $75 to pay for the typing and had sought his advice on formatting of the resumes. Mr. King denied requesting Mr. Parks have the resumes prepared and denied knowing whose resumes were involved. He acknow-ledged paying for the work effort but denied he knew the typing was done by a Bechtel employee after normal working hours.
I reached the conclusion that it was necessary to terminate Mr. King because, although we probably did not know all of tne details of his activities on behalf of Quiltec while he was a GPUN employee and of his knowledge of Mr.
Sloan's activities on behalf of Quiltec involving GPUN employees, it was clear from his letter of March 9 that he was accountable as president of the company for making known to us the circumstances of his association with
s U, l File March 21,1983 Termination of Employment Page 4 of Larry P. King Quiltec and their hiring of GPUN employees. His failure to understand and/or feel that responsibility was such a fundamental deficiency that he could not be utilized effectively as an employee of GPUN. I would have reached the same conclusion regardless of when, and under what circumstances, I became aware of the conflict between Mr. King's obligations to GPUN and his outside business activities and responsibilities.
I met with Mr. King on March 16 and notified him of my decision as set forth in Attachment 13.
f l '.'b N R. C. A/nold Attachments (See attached list) cc: T. L. Myers (w/ Attach)
J. F. Wilson, Esq.(.w/ Attach)
P. R. Clark (w/ Attach)
- 8. K. Kanga (w/ Attach)
- c. '.
Bechtel Power Corporation O
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Interoffice Memorandum H. F. Brush N Na 83-104 sue,se' Three Mile Island: Possible Employee 0 *'* March 24, 1983 Involvement with Job Shop Operations
- "' S. M. Pace O' Internal Audicing coo.e * ^'
J. M. Komes 50/11/C-17 6'- 7700 C. W. Sandford J. W. Weiser R. M. Loomis The allegation was that a General Public Utility (GPU) employes ("the GPU employee") had a financial interest in a job shop which was hiring GPU people away from work on the Three Mile Island Project. Further, Bechtel employees have assisted the GPU employee with his job shop operation.
Lee Hofmann conducted an investigation. It was established that the GPU O emP l oree was the President of a 3 b shop anown as eutitec inc. Severat highly skilled people had left the client's organization and each of them may have had an association with that job shop.
We determined that a Bechtet senior start-up engineer had received from the GPU employee a number of personnel data sheets and was asked to have resumes typed from them. The engineer found a Bechtet secretary to type the personnel information into resume formats, which she did on her own time. He also paid the secretary $75 for which he was reimbursed by the GPU employee. The secretary later disclosed to her supervisors that she had typed the Quittee, Inc., resumes for the engineer. The engineer made no such disclosure until he was interviewed by Lee.
Directive 2-1 was violated. There are mitigating circumstances. When he was hired in May of 1982, the engineer had very little orientation as to Bechtel policies and procedures. We did not locate a signed Directive 2-1 Acknowledgement. He claims that his reporting relationship within the integrated GPU-Bechtel employee mix on the project was clouded. He reported to the GPU employee on a day-to-day basis. On at least one occasion, he found himself in a position where he felt that his thoughts were being challenged.
The GPU employee seemed to give our employee a feeling of protection during the on-going GPU-Bechtel technically oriented debates on the project. In short, it appeared that even though he was a Bechtel employee, our engineer may ha.ve felt that he was not receiving support from his Bechtet superiors.
When the engineer was asked to get Qulltee resumes typed, possible ethical
(, ramifications did not occur to him.
, SM4 (149
iii, a I
e To: H. F. Brush
, From: S. M. Pace I ' Page 2 March 24, 1983 GPU har terminated its employee. The Division has verbally reprimanded the engineer and reviewed with his certain appropriate policy writings. Also, it has counselled the secretary.
The Division is taking stsps to reestablish a closer relationship with our employees on the project so that they are aware on a day-to-day basis of the support available to them from Division and project personnel.
Internal Auditing has closed this investigation
. M. Pace SMP:HLH:cac
{',
0 0
o O
C
_ ,n.-
P 7?> Bk' KM L Fm J w. % -
U f U
%byf:Q.a!/ eel,Im brie: 2-es-e 3 p:ssassislIng>
M. D. &am-M tk en k SW / eft GPa., L nty ou Ja,mi, w s were w & ~ G GPe p.rus,pL n ide4Q r ca~ 4 reca//, b th e6d Hot s/cw un+ .V secrefive a M kcs % p/~s ad tkt if a ytwared tM k wo s L- m buks rdaksL o. m'tL Lavy. .
I fassul & :
off as tdle svenL.
1 ~ < & a y. C d s b w e E M 8 2 , I N k . /,4.v- k 529 mp, M/ GPad r -s af tu, 3robdhu Dave. Bac w ,ad HerQ w,JLpo/di kk W Mh11
-, na eu u - s a-w a-
% 5 fo n - L~ tk.ob , &L Aadsr/, //o~f
&gaw /eH qpaa. I wu */d g we an& s,J-#mL a &.w a-ga as
p r. - -
l t-u -e3 Ldc L. M8 2, & M, flad E '?
reaf
- th+ h , M A sky b Au h a,/ M M A1 /c
&a a~A a*ud
&%. gah a -
7 evea a.r s m A 6 4 ~ 8 b r- wr+ g A o h a s k +
grdLd f& L 2% y ML di ac y ,% M .
o~ F 2, /T3, S wn G %, =
kWAW f%
da9. Bh ,
a yh & ol p A & p b x=ol % t i
&* ML % **
~
j A%
i
)kn, EW bel objpatal qpet a ,p-apa fWh b ; W % p a sta,d Af &
2e M .
(w r % o wp - Li ,
ef w ~ u &
6 b** e, w *0 4.4 7
- /
lh Y W ~
. LR t W &L H' A-Q .
I ML B4 54 I add., eAuA M tL p vnz. -
a gt u a w 5a ML p
- M w sut A Ww y g-ru y ..
.m
(
h lav+- Q E at da;M,9- W s6 f cp & :
- i. 1,_ a+ww.
L
~
A- A g //e' Me.Sfd_. /)%u : .
aa sea. aawee . .
- 3. bM &
- 2I- $ 8 4A/ A w.s. .J
&n> w chipA. .
- 1. .
- p. w 3 p g 9 s
< lg s &o. *~ . na
/ ~ 93 kap ; .- -
r p p i nma ew &
+ n z u m ta
% lo.gs o S e, say ~ w A p .. .
-x op u z a a hwa a
4
6 1 'u-
. ~*
"e a % %~&
b
..a arpa M ord , L N ds- ')y.
h '
Y< W M]st-K . K & i & A stal ( p M. F4 //
) unatt w m gpt "u cL~i l % a ti M.'
W Ae, f we lek . A see Su ha ti d a .
A ~
N b 6 Y a & cLL m1 aria. te hs& . ,j
- h '
A dctuL o u @ o AJ x p A e a
>> &w 4 .
&.1,sg (LW % b $- & J
$6t 2 bbnk- A>5 yWW> en n,ww i~ o M "om tMs. (n,a g w,w :4> m -
is g k y .) T W L if ?Ast 03 p s- 1 a sa a, 47 wu~% Ae &2- a $$y GGGL E -
, f W fu % ,s c
L d. . .
l ~ .c :.
I. ',, '
y fr'M e ~~. e5 fi % w& +r 7 /&W $ $ , c, .. .
/
d^d h Y1 ~
f '
L dve^) b [' .
6lw, 7 S'f sal d tr by l. <. -
p( at in m y ,e9 .. .
da_
M d- g A CAydC.
I NM f 4- a+ Z w /+it q]u N
. N g -
h'*
-s yn 9a r np epm + =
w 7 pssa wa. . -
n 2n w s-p~4 q L.A '
a pan s
'Qwc~r . c.
iz e9 / +G A I M %& h y 41LC C A.
9 s a are a s s e W Wf
- u. = . -
n n % + 1 n ,pe p w , ale. & call y n aM %z ,
%A' n Tut A % la W Gull w t L Wd SuJ$w: /
f&"P&- -_--
?
es = ., -
$
- E4 "E )
%c7 y i IM @% dw l
5
) &ap'd M W U o
/C W ~ i auwv3e. y m . fe,&
L M & m ~ Qate sL,ck.f B t k LL M w a-A pw LL 1 % e h a b d 6 64' .&
e M y M GvMad &Ja ny % -
c& nux ) d A s A A M ccy& .=r 1 .
V' 5 A Nl%AA W 1 m y u ~ ##7._
wA bg agJ % . S M M' tfy ko.L w C M , .a&
ep ya j uiL W .A .-
y s ~
pt:
l 9
y- M> W- TW/W. Y-
.-n%M m > w~ .~ & - .
M cP. %', s.-
%PW
%C M -
a A. c?) ak- n afccuo.
f O G r. M fr
? up .~
~
'2-%-6, Q f'
& h!:'~,:-m /
k'L t c-+ ,'.
('57 6) T z 7 83oe y' 3 y 7 ,t., 2.97 l
&tNOTa<$ W k chce af '764 M, 553- 7342. ad o.~. -
at # + W , th. .
&- A au p p 4. h 4 p
%f m " k 4 k. % c-yGA P a4 W
% m.
& c4E6 y & V dp W 4 W .h ..
ow- eta. ec&c.14 y 'd. cae o # __
& k. M % b ny.
s A aca. ...
Owulf yl6A-}' ~~
l 4 .u s ,.ae c . & ~b e d L fn- % :. L '
y , n k e in-t % f ,we. .
% %otk~ W 4L~ttel--
&ca&L bout LW # e, ofsa o~-
F 2 2 al M oks:t .
4 W - GfaA] &&: -
a os . Da pas st. AM&=
.3
, v-e. e c
'w
~
- 4
% g W L a -N d W n a d L qhb"O at,#&. /L a -
K.VG-as- 'HAn
~
&n>-tk p-< c- a n Ackd. D-p' WD facktn '
42d & ~%t mk /kh, -
m obac-
&Gw1ML.AAhwfL w c A d . a d M ja- , M ll .<-
tM k % ~ M t&A & Ad y "v L M' ww- PM Q ittel - ,-
deca 1A A~' M s A /n
^
)
92 ~.
(pedta&[A~r 1$$ . pu J M i: -
CeanA,q & E A sad W-) /. -
W L # ac-s yla . (9- /w -
ng" W % -)
40% ,a Cr#n z2, & pwxa N
& f &p && A aAd. A.-
u . e- che_ h /h;rc 7 rO A chlw f ny A GPaC
4 s
4 l' c T e { lc 2 6 3
-s w n x ~ -
U h -
h#
dh rN z3 H 24, p ~~Ls a a usy- w ~ y- p a 24 6 , af W . (A)i/L f Ba~%.> M Jp.
A cae,A h -7 z3 A&
uf y~ m .
pue: % ~n- w wny,~:
$p& eup-% fn'~3L..
W witL G M g .2t %L -: :
Lt av n & qpwJ-fy=
mM. QMM e
- k w& dtR. (i. e . d:
Mw So k ), /k Jctd w ev kane. aw.
W +A i" [P*& '^f')h }
ale-AAt@,7
& un a % M f Q p . sa ,^ n r gam *~J
i s
s
,4,,, c . -
t i]
T V[b',s 02tn &J 4a we danuk2 hdQ +JW okc s a p Li & A e ~
o e
e e
w-+~-,. --m-+mm--wwn-m, ,rv,rr-- ,,n,-m-- en, 4--n,,,,--- -----n., w,w -- - - ,, , r--wn, -v- c- -----~ww-- --p----,n
' ,m '
CALCULATION SHEET
.. CATE OfSIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO _.d
.~ 0 sROJECT aosNo SUCJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NO. b tlO hPNN bh(3 awano- .
T#4 RLa&d40*l w**TWRT M Sauses.M. /ca sk.a c /.)ficeh L&.sese..) Sve,pt , in av x'oug Nep A Anna +f rarrawsr sa a reis saap entiso bvatrs. ruunpow.o soas<w wks Honikf 6ft.L /%rp/.n. As.a*Y A w eacax.
on 7?ts. TMast <st 1s w p A % 3 sci. S a r w .n.,
)$G.attita) & kr4, ^?och< lNLWs #s9 be.n t ea.
una r-up A.pten ca. ,6,wes as nnp or ?-oss A m t - 3
(- See3snMt Y, 4Aans '6 " R++& Aanny Mond uu,rit His 4>ue t rs.e o#%Mrs eor .,
.% 9 7nns: W TNos$ons i.e,es )haso i4y l'11 b / W oM htt R $ 4ktett, feS &4M kGA.
%G Sc M
- d Je w as a bess./ e.1 Leo)>..
pym,n s R$en*>>a-23 e 2 't 'S 22$ 9Me d2.~)o s JihH**dHb 78s'unss.)n.a@1suw)yA)hejse.r, A o 10 i
i
n " '
cal.CULATION SHEET OATE
.A
()ES!GN SY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO[ --
.*OJECT JOBNo
! SusaEcf S G O R N 1/ 422km171
' ~ cAtcut4 tion no. witE so.
0 Mth'I t. 8E h htJuA 4 4.
TVt.Y Y kQ$)9Lil A h t ITC (c. L**069 &Sk/) fdW=1 h $0 l JCt go 0 490 R;> }2 oTTC L l
)h h STGotoJTYftso^ dusaOk. " D ~ M y /O W O N I u k Y 3.'T l 8so/2ptu- (IL,728hA)
, .NVWW i
)*stl )fagsgt..tss/LY No &6, /hkol LL6p $4.0RH H$ ($kBeM4 WULTNktu5km l# E~
UYtL0rlL3h kV}
Reex /Attas Littsat ip hu.s con!
69dr&:yse.) 744.u40 op w as /9 7e6 q .5Mc.om.:toas )n TMk $744t.i ~op
, ,.., f:#446&A4H( DbSd.f#6 M&
(,
}hrG 03 Qa?!LTt.c. Tem::,'kp eCo9s foursongp k)$c TMg 1991 J H S i n ts. Man 6sNo'S Nork To Fn4 R. ZbpT&. g ext oW.ob-Gt QuoLTAC. THC, S. DFAct,RS
), J. A Au s Zit. F)e n s w r l 2,&,# / S:;pp S 0,.T. kvek 222 VP
- 4 -T W. Rogos. 7)tt.as.
c 7 . p p o se o s. )?t,hnr R P!.*% - Sens. R$ fss,a.s 9tInv 21 AM.JW) av snm. {on Rod s*v<)n,P me /M wA$a. asNoot.td bdMh Ylh1
- mz a nue<.
i $s,4.e.1 57 ti- 0# &#d aN& &lI. [W1M4. 'd R T % a es W)3sra *'s 1 2 co ) sj11. l l t
J ._ 1 A._- .A_ - - . - - _a.- _a . ~, - _q - - - - - - - - - ,
CALCULATION SHEET CATE DESI 8Y DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO
\ /ROJECT JOBNO SU8 JECT bb bi
~
SM A 38'"- L' N CALCULATION NO. FILE NO t
~-0
?M*v Gk Stone , n 6PtA. swks.s., 24.s=r Lsa. vow TM ms1 6 fu. . bilos Avpstt., 6.ptu 1ihrme.r 7% ss,no& P1 6.N6*trLLA.,7a % O 734)G.$t r*6 THoti" $Lc4H LU#4 0 4rkoe v4la. 'NE W 68. W s912u &
, ow 'rttr .7ce $<n. rxar :
- A % 6etret, wTo 19u$<r*Lss Awme "hti } J w t T M J R o o W M M 4
- 6. St.assa w 4eena To Po STW14~~op
, 4 *!'k U / /i=Ta.TN W t.u +tatt s.
M *to -1se,ar.ro y/L l
M wa w ~ V, a orork 7 pas e r n s At 1864H& Yae G. llth +<.o Va 7 Quot.The. In e
@ut(.76 4: Z# e. .
w a w m huv u sa9e naw,w Tr.c f3prW.S f2 :
Frnav.c 4 Q 7kstL4T w Grun.7sc Pv6)%pi J.5M.sa.y Mrag, &/u. Aw;;4 Lt-THG. ~w~ i s en. o s s a Ij ] r.t.
At 1. F%e sw To wW RoeK /%rnx::. f.Betalt.f Pkw M I
% %EE)/f*pran;.
R M a s9 f?'. % T o & k T % h.
Assm.s 7yrsp gfan. >l- -
B bw. /knas :. -
I. A e.siunt P.,-re st+ssa, a nr o 2. M S m ef 2..
Luth.w wers. &fer. M quiurse e zue. ihan smrw, ,e w.
1
- ^ CALCULATION SHEET care i DES SY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO l
'ROJECT JOB NO SUBJECT b, MA -
y
- Tb -
CALCULATION NO. 8ILE NO.
kAffr M rw .6ao we'4 6 l Rus/5 %Pr 4 ,y:E5 J77 Km6's ,4WA$,T 4 Wa$7fs0 Serkaueo.a 7A3 l
- 299z Tak ,%= To s%.twa wo+ss Hwks F9- '
- TY,7sW& 7#6 /2&S,Ms.
lRA46 94kkD fatheit.in 9?ALRsH, kws u 'rR1 w *s & T V f 6- Jt am t Pq 86:eMD&
/ w=m. Ross L&4. ,Aerrn.wse kMA+no AHtK$ usSKw A*TTh af $ofA. & .'T-NTintuotW T)H3
} T W G. TMA.JCLk$L = s , Rs1TLk $L2. sl2sTTL4. i/
l R . b M e La a.ru Q T V o % . A s t w e ? .
1 P$ 39 Fpuart. To /Maas l & SMk.Doosaa,r m r w %,
25-Do g
. /$ Suow srars=*ww
- kTTLic. 74,9)%.O THL /2s$vw ousn rut psy.r 2.-s wuxs or
)ksn. W k + TJ W 3ers b T F n if & /L.
l Otavt To ex tc. Yeouc AH%ur > S Ha E as,
! 4677 M. A s w S m 4f./L5 7)( u,E h 45; R. *Nte &L H4Rit,t.%.y G % $Lepp t i
e ArLL. Rus,nm D hwty .)4r t, a g, 4 to.a n w H u a3
- l 'YeD k WATILO
- L ._L. 7e ha.+,w
- H te m ssts u s
- ,7 >2 8 :
i l
.s 1 ' *a CALCULATION SHEET DaTE DESIGN 8Y CATE. CHECMED BY SHEET NO 'I 3ROJECT JOB NO.
SUSJECT MNMOb JM M CALCULATION NO- FILE NO.
O
! !$ $0nWLCS.
Avejssor footx$ (4cs ve.p TMs. Tw%9 Au=si11wsaurwTns:
e m2 .M Arrn Hs 4 ws. Ae.ms:. a rra yy
% S a s:. p a s a r.o o s s : a, -% f)wus ?:
1 - *Ja , 1 *s-. e,u s k ? MS &oto4. TH6 A& W $ SN14 ave M TAG l hr+41wmy Xe**L 9-)CoNL 6 & k. lMaks AHa#s, Ps
- ']S*
i STic .
i 724/$ e$ 1344. M Y D *u4. Z87f=ua & Tnfl.
M~ wen 6 MM /9tXJc? 7/fkT
$tks F'i hw =t; .At TMw -/ fat 12:tri-s. ?9 '
\
YntRW s orL 13+4-)~ awa. m i
lh4kw
+ Qo.urs. > c - TVr*G Mon s QM--s4 ss:pr)ow wa Hsitks.y,4Pa. Mr+rv /2ww sw.o,w rrc
> <t a 2. ?res* , Jspr &Pa . )k excu<-o n.r THissws P2 ZN9 % \ MJH&.A.G. &in. W A1 6as86 t~O M ettfosa.sc M . Tko s2&c.asts
/rontTo~E.&PtA &Qt.s. Ienienno T M a i H k n.s L s. y W W h % v s.
r.*. Ov.trae J.sec.
/
/
. . - - . - , _ . -.-n
C CALCULATION SHEET CATE
, DES Bf DATE CHECKEDBY SMEET NO o , .*AOJECT JOB NO i SU8 JECT -
/NN2de!!'.E 2 CALCULATION NO. FILE NO NsM"'a- M 6W.
! fiS2, l.k:$ $ #44. . @vCMA&M , A d/tA, D 16.$4H 6 84 1
kMLt , 7bl.9 TMJsSta6 TMar M .um A nsAm. We OU36/kmsWik NM % &
F ett. L Q va m e. D e e.)
a y h $
\ 2991. kFT 6PtA , 7eftspiu6hartpt7tre.9 Tihs>er<
l 'm tuinU m, - % )ye u
/.ns) TNc+r w ). van m s ~<rn.w assu.w.
(Q. sit The. I,se .)
l ' b 2. Seu A>sr=w,19 6#<.a. 6jed y r( r ,trw.ui u m a
!. 19 s 3, p. % w s e w s.u.v w aru w wisse& 97 w f%p"arv zu TH:ss,)a t. , R$x.:.
TM)$$ eaL w>ty >s,y'T M he n -
Pom 6 5 Tehou6, /& %
/9o.rv,- /c::e84 's 6 Pw *f '
~
TMiss,,a6, 7a4 9 4 sraw * //t Q A)-<amEd
= M TD JW)HTu . aT &Q )f4. sA& Lbe 5""
I nan [};"l0.65Hhs T$ L*, &LM & ALL $ketHtG Difel.o. 4 79 6 fAO T)Ai f/sei N!b12,49vD Atikf=9 b/) h TN th f,,,r e f.=
P7 l 1995 To Pinp our wFor >fs. <e au o >+s.rur' gas,s.u ?t l l
- ,. . O veu Ts.ca Noted v. & A2sev e 42.r*+ 4,
- l Y
$ h&
- nf 0
'~
Ac.t22nao To wnA.4 n M vd AM- Bu a.2swp P)
_ nak*G TVr4 f aNQu,4.y.
\__
._ ~ ; ,,.. .,
CALCULATION SHEET t i
/ )
QATE OESIGN 8v OATE CHECKE0 8Y SM EET NC'
. JECT
' JOB NO susJEc7 bhG M MatEb y catcuuriou so. ntE no l
- 'N 8472A iii bl2. [ed b dM Me dMNO
~ q uav . rs % y .- s m,, wc.
u s u n o uas w T H i4.% toL 9 4 W tc9 0 W.M n _n a +)tstL >& v s, w S n f W
- u T M b
/P,D. r 'hkenA Pte7hsi.s . 14sfaN .5s.ddaa,% 7#tas, N6 /'* 2 MAdirn 44eA. w9n%(.t%6#r /96.) i
> 4. e + m r 3,w we, m s 7u .
Qasu ~%ea . THss$ m s n is,w B v w G 2.44.0, '
).m N
% m waasniin) #
- c. s u u n a o m .:.c Fe4 Mc:erape/%9915A N #
1993
@ott.7Es JhS JH40tR-4 }N. J.unt PM 6-) %^=A=SWy
$7'
, )9 v10 4 ()?. 9 Q M heatuf h es1 crj 7pn&<u&
B. NG FKfLtoa$ d.,wt
/d '7/ttS M p/ 6.Sa x n s & Me5 V M )
s urewete '
OLIL2.4H+0 )99k?bir,Q hr Q(,,j,,, L.atHs RQvt%Q vainswe.,g M w p.s n vinss>as row 4aarn t.Ja Qa snw.w rae t9ss en9 7ut 9 Sv1:n. %v 7Ne ms Pe k n 6 s R.h k ert m p este susTM st TG1
m *s
. CALCULATION SHEET DATE DEslGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SH EET NO k .JROJECT JOB NO.
SUBJECT 13$"' I d d [Ed1/I$ CALCULATION NO. FILE NO.
, O Pih% /Pr.43cw $
- urv-4.
knE. Maay .Mus w*s S .splwoks J.ike?
l 71ko 6ftr.- 4.AferHeur, THW LueTM PH J+93 owl. 9 )kfc. &@==- TL.:~Y APeTbr<in TJRAwkw 69es To sacrur.assesM A sner aavs>rtsn TW4. d'4Wh4 6*4rt.(s. Adavc "^-9 LM47t4
)3. Ik.*3t. 8stuaHGnt. PM4nr
)5 f '
(. .
C -Toa. n v /$veu e e w re e n. A r. m C P P. A!kt a m o '
& 9 MMsn ?k6w.T P. R. Ecow e $ Ak&RL y _ Tow. FLWIst Ass 9ue.A+!&; tat.
- k'* / /20$6. 83 C MSC'd 3 .:7e w ~r)/ise re il &### *'M'f"A #'"O-
-7.Mce # m 71fL >Hime>o+nm .7%>s. a ar>r ,
l 4 Aweer.reo dee.4.Q TNA n us,$r>64r44-03 - M m heito iasy su nno 1983 e 4 t re a. , N e 5 7s'# h e w r s 1N7la.naL )9uotr>ns 1 NcA4 TEAMlW
& 7Nrs
l
$ fff W/l6'f}
,/ } a D
- G _ ~' }.' -
Q?. fin **. ! Rf/ C7Q p nf.( t"~., &ed,f x.'.c?t, fica a .-] rro ,g at c v 6'2 7 m p t c 3e ,.cr
' up m, , yi ., f u t s y m n .,(5 1
,/
f f) e G& 'e - *- .# h$$
IM& > w9jf J; Y y fff, yfff sy d t Azt7.cxp 6
-- ~3 *. O l
't .]s ?NY ' fS ?Y f l 2p,Jseday 4;nupyr4
?n ; rya a v y S, og er3 . i.m s.,g,y ae,-
.._. m .
W 'T* M 7f ~ 6TJd'h.!1f/ $ff-ff p_)
25 195ryp ' & 3993Wf w tc c ,et .9hl ,A
> - eent perbstL 'cff 'U/S fi $M!d 3-r-?'m, vc'g(. uvt v+/sS 97 c.L (s i zff mojj ^
? 's =nj t' if9t919? !.*W f gyez2 i,qg
>vfi
- 79 6'-f..(,ji? a,4
~ . 3 - l . 'f $~g,1]$1 3-lf G ,
- < -- - o v,0 .:.~nfG '? 4(f l W '*1 3gY<$ 1 )
- u a W-n f .) v % y ' 0:3N t f-v-t'dy n w ,%.! , shy . goy 5atyD nos' 2 O dH y
'd- ^+'7 5 T W7 ^f t<r.i/ -,
pt y w-
,, ~v , a " c, , r.. / , .- . 1 .1cr
'hka'?uNby man,f ..!o04j$p Q 4f
?5f.V[ m 'r g } &37 /.1o U ~2. 9 4' f ? 6 f $/ 4N y e m'tb y wllcn i
i w/OS s wrW[jf ? eq,r.-- >1 7,, c p +/f,/ .- .e
- - ,-' n ? '.
. ?iW{ wp/(n'f p 7 .; W 5.,'g ,
y- Gyl'yg f t n-1. y}{ 22:n,~4 P1M.f.p' top Q ?et 2nt< 4~ t reA ti pen =a y(m 6de n !,qi n?treod (
O N 3118 ON NO11Y1 g y ,,, ;. , ; . ,gg g ,,gs 103rGris ON90r g g gg,.
- g / ON133Hs Ag 03M33HO 31v0 AS NOIS30
~
g"-
.y 9 3170 133HS NOl1V1007yo g
a . ,
CALCULATION SHEET CATE D b-/c -g 3 DESIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO e l
MOJECT JCB NO ]
SUBJECT b# E CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _ _ _
C2 - 2 ' - /$uPh 7o1-.9 /$?Le 2 z.,;.;up gu,,u-T6r-ttias..,
I c t e ( Q w P 'lst & t ri7g (p>
&2 9.I- j wmLp.,
l k Q)p y / h E./-,
2.2.s~ % ) .
i 'E M 12f t t.4s Cpf-7.zertz-pq
,r.- 4 'rm t. p A<
%nn,__x._
e c e ,n . ,. .
6 c/d$c@tt? w h t'e n $ y6 v --curn r -<
A hr;2 f w ;n.;
&n.u Pea - / ~
kFe }/u.-<, A.s o2~L5-93 TY }{rtC. / %et/&cM 7k/ of<eMyt-h =cNe .: 2
/rH L.t p q) 76 L Mo,
. h t--i 2 2 m u) w s. ; / % x t % v p 1 & . c 6cT / 2<24) W--& 9 RDDf2%s No sac 74 / J '/ 5 c.4 + '
Trust v R64-n r ;wg > /
,l-l + a & & 1 co<rg/J sci.4 NH unLsik:' -
/.g c< t w v>
1 'I2 r M 7 D &' % ) a 6 - )-i m / b o.S'?
/- St o ri - )--s w y M S. fi2 i u-o
,f Ssrm-h4:k.9GG *t W / 1'~2 i i f-a n. % u e r W C d u r/ U c / A n F) u g W Y ~1
^
9< f& san. ;? fasc 2fR (M
~T6L- 71&cNR - 4'>lfo 6upHsp.
6 /k v t S t- r n -> 7EL Wo
/ ) W ?f) & / / +/4n+0s m 1 //op ~7f/ML +7f49e"'+n.
T6-l}/o80E.- r pts u g gc_ a u?s w u s
&ws_
e -Hg
~&s W' Zph lj--i BfcanyOyu & znemD dWl '
/$M&Mc - 6e<X,. J Ofe9 /M71Mr n Gr%C c.. '
CALCULATION SHEET OATE Jee o - / ta p 3 DESIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO
/AOJECT JOB NO SUBJECT l>2b#b M CALCULATION NO- FILE NO cM&f a 4.aacu
.%..,$ L^-+Y s s . 72f T M'I d?ey) //9-Jh pc~r 9a s 7Q Ha s Msp M n A% w-.>
Ptww- %'qG)6Mn1brQ1'st.a h 6glioit/une< . mJ, No &T7p-W }--*'A T & 8 c.Le ~7M~~
/??cr 2.s aM S % .a pi9 M c /2sp.-a, w...
$ ttil - S L P GctLt/ $AHH W6Ma.
TosK w kins' iim wa eag .w. enu v r -
gg33 sa /4titz. m o e r o + pew,o LQ)fn99 ND&Oh-5% % iais.9 Ve a i8 < <9
- .- @ M _ @ e.u <TV /4nM ;
W 6Mt 7EL 9 te-&ct& Cv7{G "
W S+'/J kf9IW) $ /]hnef w. *d'Af y w&.
kL b1 ~LRitG JA6&/ ///Ar. HoRe.9 h>we OL-t'- 6Awt. W% Rs DV J/tr49 W (E & x c
$tinin.p HsJwsu.sn2 :) & 70M'r'$9a At.- % 7fe
, 7, Ru s ,7teus,u w s y e
- WW O[ N*)$W Y M'bW
CALCULATION SHEET
#~^ ,,, OATE DESIGN BY DATE CHECKEDBY SMEET NO _ _ . _i
<ROJECT gog No.
SUOJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NO E ' { &Y kW.cf lA)& W f*[fY y e,s, /At&. 1 71 k' / %'n.n* l'?u.~ J.- pour kdE E2> J c' m- 8wu s a saa ove ~ 1 $u rws ,Y.. n m 2 9 2*dt E d w -s O S 2 1&y,a;w Hvidori"76sht+v . T>P R *-ON #7 L *'*"k 'h"- ypus , 9 e 3 , , 7/Ak$w/ Tb /}cslL. D-ek-
%% prevns: ,a s P h K n..
)$ci m intp w t 7c u p n?
~
CALCULATION SHEET
#' CATE M_.M "_b 3 DESIGN SY DATE CHECKE0BY SHEET NO
/ROJECT
/id-~~ ,
JOB NO SUOJECT MNdJ)# s. u3 I b, rJ$/$ _ CALCULATION NO- FILE NO
~
), .fes v.) Ove t L. $9 kkeeste )fp. at T/vi E
? w)).WATL yM. 4 p)7(GL Tb?)s.
y c2c T)HE W2 y$4. A by e > Ta A t 6 92pso 4 Q,, Q plf /6
; Pui Az XM . => ~
wo , u m .m NS _ 83 b 7#/% 76L. Mu4.u M (M . 4'N 0'ef $ ypg , d o H 4 o c. n n & RM u.new-t =f 7b Lg.a V 7Feb 8 > Eiss.-ce E ' i?M;ru. LL/}& <t& /<Gshfr*, N6$.S . ~*i .: ' 2 PG Hc7 T4- $$ ).h ' /f L w>u *-~
- 7D WH6%
O'. a;; No Of26M.YSkDhwpaw -Ns / M f u(-L. ey i 7th LS/jv6 h p s n s cen;i >-
- 2. - 3 en.451. 5 ef/tc. 7e('_
6et:.LL 72> mpurr z t ,9 h r be "s6sa- IMfc en t e;2(c- [eGy' //h N. fen- S ) , J& as u pra w C ./ Ps u u m o 4 ,se 8 4epsf dir>v A / 4 sf 6 7)ht u erx ca w w difi 4 w 6 P P. Y?UZAnn9 57? Pit 7e.Q 70 Y S *w ofztsa oumul 9L J-cu n p Me Ni M e n p v et.t 1E M G ,
CALCULATION SHEET CATE h -) m__ . .[*}
~
DESIGN BY DATE CHECxED BY 4 SMEET NO e ftOJECT JOB NO SUBJECT O .<I$7 4 d' kd* w O JC- I f * ***_ /_ f_- CALCULATION NO. _ FILE NO ~~- M /, / v 7st.-,) 7 x M S,i a i n m m /q so A M < W '& v u A M w n t-n . %r e b & 7tn 7W4 ~
~IXY$k.SJy efca~ t?i.;itinEcJfDic. L , n n - a.-
w 7 p f A u s a . i- e s n u s d L r /i t 1. en A,gLrgwys'ad ,TDmen P*r. .l' " W s ts
"6 ?"
}Reyf
&ic He prxtz 9 /Fo.
l7fjhm2 P m2s?64 J6t1211 m ( 70&o 77+noudit hl/1 W #d@ er2t 7/Mf' gf & H%r Maad Pa+%. Pa n >Gu nu9 >>o v d,sp Mu_. yce> "T?//S usewi n (?1.<M M ud W >s l kWWh boi~ L?s9,e' 6r~ Asetv 7&L 7a - - unastw 12n T;/4s m smo 4 ws7m. f Er m uvus,anf G m b , W fec>G TMA
- g 7/f7 Se-;$tby+6:
Acnut SM;'mWI f a L'nAviaw-+ i -he4.%., ' p,9 st . fez.wws[yp 9 yo // k 6 y' O n W H s 6 llc ,
& c.fu.c,7cm;.,
Q
e CALCULATION SHEET OATE
- 2..fh O ]4
'O O *
[ .[h '
- ' -- e OESIGN SY OATE CHECKED BY SMEET No p *' ,
</ 3 .
AOJECT - 7' r? IS .C %7{ } JOB No SUBJECT - l L-Y ( L CALCULATION NO. FILE No
' Is
~
h k W,f y'))
/ -
)993 y % 9 h % g & s/2+ u # ri n,. =n. m .t.u.
_mL {.
=
CALCULATION SHEET 1
, OATE & ~~}}_~._~ h ,
DESIGN SY OATE CHECKED BY SMEET NO
.ROJECT JOB NO ____
SUBJ ECT- 'I MVe b MI MW N r* 4M CALCULATION NO. FILE NO LA.? Idktb RP k }/f W t<.>a7M $tdi6 sr.1in 16,em 7a . ,..: .,., ' ', .: G Q $ tis s a R- Hew n-r TM d ?? .. . . u , '. .].
)@, A2se.g >.1.n T v G n H* f'Tus W *a'r J 1-sear
'TG L. Wo n (, t~~ 9 h e 14 % L- /AlQ .,'J '
kt 7D Qs.*s t s,.TGCM TM c..
& c.t .ct,.H e 6, S c'SSbCPr-H-G . S:-i g x,nu m e- A - w.nr fu wx .n a Q vss.r T h H C H e . *b ftl & .
&\ )$, i%P T'/A
) 7 Ar*G Wh*'"' =&" N)Gvs 4 U '*N 0DNWW i & &M - N H & w sk k e r W R '.:. > n :> .:.
i [r#6 64,e cT hW Qu 6 7b#. if)smeng Ms A,7in - < ,, , - Lw.,w Sn rt s. - ;nruzar wo.
?ewcQ4as<<.nea
/5P++ 7L 76 84m 4 " # 6 &ey;t / 6pc.c m M S Z. *.
Rsex Aws, PrHsc Hs t 7e T9Y
/5-Zo M' ),rpg7 Su,m t
)?i;TW M /W 9rT&-/8Hb
']f /@y ko&KAh'AS>.
rws9 4a.aa srn.c+-.e . kf-tJ o C. M.)th v 27o j,c k,. ) 6e m W y' l
- $N6 R79pc. sites le?t'Y// 4?vi wu.Te',r.+t 4% Sc*Ic t.- "A/o J 5 /C7 6 : 7c?
A% .
- - - p 40 /er/ NostN N ft'l// )//N V2t .A?e hey /W*/!i--
)C+ -
y7L .J& 9,) t i 70 9 92 5-sc i ,i s -
L Yb 6 /lA l% %$.
M P.xQue < < Tr e +tl t. 4-p e )3k:4 n.j To Hunt tus c n yg a + c- g / $ m is V ,is t i k r M r.
#^
CALCULATION SHEET DATE _ DESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKED 8Y
- SMEET NO A 'ROJECT JOS NO SUOJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NO Ib
& &beW h A u.> H- M 6m e tcirs< 4 se s ?
4x4 SoSp% wo44. A Se' t w 7? " M. /
l
#^
CALCULATION SHEET DATE C3.dA_-b OESIGN SY CATE CHECKED BY SMEETNO / / o _ MOJECr JOB NO l SusEcr L n-/w s ; 49 EFL6.n catcuurio~ ~o. ,,tE ~ o l
- l. E-D kirtsj2 Svog=1r % 'G-0P M E Lu[66e#r Po* 9 't6%S T'* " L
- 2. Jm }6at :
&Wm eb J.
*p 6 Sois
- Km .K nL&.a. P oeur 1 el *rs-
- XMik.eps9e4 t.<.>s r Jean > b ~TD Y) N do L.b Ho c-% R qun.7nex & s d .d./2 fi Ane[-~w :
_ W Ma~< -w 6 s 1%w nt, wm -sws o wM ou sex .
- N h u e .tt. Appw~:Msp M;7s :-a - nee Ac.: e C~.3 .
b 4 7 L +.st. W
.B e> )? eL ~3R>I M95 LU5W ;
86-N SLeRN pg) b7bg
/ne,Ts q p p 2fe.er-
),a w s b & l? ViuTf e.M.
Zurmr a.- <?voure.ag snne
/dpra f . Cr j m M =o, e n%
/
NWT s @
/
75ekpie+4 D s &7s. p,r d sewpm a w -- 7 s c m . w , n.1 m Wa
'Tf gge Q *
/
7froas, Nor un a rg )GH&n yv>< e 9. fagz,S ;=y sr
- h t.:,JZ h /. co74( 9/M+l Ar cSn ry,v.
gpot Xt vib. 4, %;7Lut wbT To SW NoT Vicd V(:stdA. ([,,. Oi 9 6 ;w Pp)Q f N'T Mf)P &u DvYu-+mrvs
@LT.TW4{ $ 94%
wst4 , 10%nV es<.>&ony. yer m%+ta4 Reb ~4ad s '77) $wM._ Tot.99- p&awGwe 4-7Ms % u-WV Wm ;?4 -- er. ac;ueN. Dip .%;~ fw.,rw kJ Fs M 8'ised kW
i
= - - . . . .-
0
~
000 @ 000 @ H. LEE HOFMANN g e-M_s3 Eft: ,#MS JNRdEd>cb ffHidbS n na - 2 U3 s wW u lONGhldd 5
- Innssi.ssi.na w H4x9 /uxs A mm 0 E SflA 2- f f.,
//z & u>ny wn6usst A fM ut rv/m I tTw psup ruerr M&w
)&wxavi t.ht/N krTit9t.rT'6&N/*L$V W ] & ~
uw $wnw t W e-usur aph"su ' & - QQ urb"k Ans l wm
/nnsti Mog r . Sta ssz.=r:
9
~
CALCULATION SHEET
#' , OATE _ _ _ _ __
OESIGN BY DATE CMEOKED BY S-EETP.O _ _ _ _ _
*ROJECT
- sCBNO __
SUSJECT .- . CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _ ____
~
K.. I l 8 hhb O [ s M/ R Wwn &smW 2 b2uHn&J2. mot ea Dw%o% M em ogVG5nyt.;rr8 p.-)W At.o s;& NU/ h%eM(=9 Tort. 8 ^24 se s;WLR wow AML %Hc%Af) 9;eo D %-1F%3 f
. m . _._
i
=
^
#- CALCULATION SHEET CATE D h ~~j. k : $ b j
OESIGN SY OATE CHECKED BY SMEETNO [ J o l
'ROJECT JOB NO ___ l SUBJECT 18 7Mfb_ A * , 1d M_ S CALCULATION NO. ALE NO _ . _ _ _
Rn%upgq ,' & H Lo # rt.ast e @ r g s7 x ;- n M$M F>ctAes,,Argw $ PD ST.%v: )/:oa 2:1i W W.19 7 \ i 1 me isl, n,s w +a htW b M , semv M 4xp sp>+G?. -aw &-y ay)% ?My)Tuxs JW6 W v>< :
- 4. P L m t.uw -
7//+79 eo S m/ -e rp PM1y'L- i & dn-rw- .
/ /
))v$ / / 84 fi . 5 .7-- -
A s. . 1 p-N$ 4
> w .&
ften 7%H Q-s>> M. l %'
*^ .
l CALCULATION SHEET I OATE _[ _/M DESIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SH EET NO _____ # l
.ROJECT JOBNO I SUBJECT -
CALCULATION NO.
, FILE NO W hl - & fn? ); t Wd HunoS '
wve 74+-~~-
/
Xs 19t4:L / f' Guet < 7%eM . $ m ,op /
}& 6%i 6w-m- ) + 5 Lopon ME wy p9 f)df gecal fu l WQ N '" *
- fmg k. 24 Lex /kx i ... /+yb && /8dA 57ee*0 dutww.r 6 tom
- 2. Ntd. % $s/Au TW.
Yf ( V
#'"$ n. / 4? &$4manaax / - -
I m'Ne: m>+g P's fk us m &; w y & w .& &wn IvW}/ ras >9et w nf
&)p.reo)$rw 6s .
~
Y -
CALCULATION SHEET
#~ OATE *!h_7 DESIGN BY CATE CHECKEDPY SMEET NC h . ./
4ROJECT JOB NO _ SUBJECT Cl*LCULATION NO. FILE NO Rf)%;P tSvs-<.wt % 7WE. SiV J V W w 4 A a c 7 AS l'fMI~ 47 eure A
/W $ ,
LA&L t
& a sia A > g a d &
Whe W 0*$M-
) nw w % c,ar7zy ~( qf w u_.>evk fA/h 07L ) Yj h '
W wu y& Pe ea ea,
%t 9xt w u.
~
$Haks u-u r).eay % ds 9/rm - -P b&'H. b 770 h s, TYP/M M//95 N4tVE #M fWrisi es Aa -
p>s wm 1
%V G M>> b sc-7 55 8 hk Meerun n4 7NWi6 Ao.
=>
,A CALCULATION SHEET
.- #E $hfk f)
DESIGN SY DATE CHECKED BY SHEE'NC L /._
.ROJECT ;OsNo SUBJECT h CALCULAtlON NO. FILE NO l
M e
%t -
24# Mw)#GA b c? M*Y
% 6 4 fAAWs P >-v;:'=? % W f4nJs' 4.addK-s.iLP ttie lMb 8?M in M&
c
/*N4 #m a c.,e W k' - m nd nw a- M f#fhe SFbck pse. Esus.&&6 & Q Dw
=,o x 2 -s - ssdu bes a rWsp M rMtw.
ON He? ~7 t-f vscas-J
/i4ths%r4 #
- ir om es psw . ~
. -+?* .
hL we au,4<4 S turf yce~ Wfa i 7- ! " Mgp
)%, /M~r 7P.'
CALCULATION SHEET
#' 3 ATE f ff_h**
DESIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SHEET NO N
.edOJECT JC8 NO SUBJECT )- *? - S CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _ _ _ . . _
l A W 52 4 Kuh , 1 8 bI
& & C E *- h ) C $
D o - ovr TS'" Ma Ah
/ h . f 6 + v E 7
- W A c s.&
SkQA2c ** + S -7 ) fje = 7 sox /k.ro@2 rys eius en d Ahm. > ysprjpg th-(.. ff ?. o / & c n 4 4. m W .Guiu;T% 70 W h +1'it n : Y)irusf /&n M AL C > R r,l
?centk 414 V C%.
Swem a-]#on c.e A?.wis. ! 7/r M.
% w r , %
1 w & & an. 7 w - l-a h )99? & " SL-CVl?k.
&L QS 7D MN& 1
/2}/L J2ess -+ oLD &pa, TbLp{goe.s r7~W ee.n 7S*"Mg'
\
L .- ;%g 7,m Jds CsvM 71f4;vr /?rus how cndl.
~
CALCULATION SHEET OATE _O " [ h__ __ DESIGN 8Y DATE CHEOKE0 8Y SMEET NO . 1.
'AOJECT JOB NO SUBJECT Y CALCULATION NO. FILE NO TjQ L .s h' pr of 5 H6 Anbes,, JV/pr?wk~j p p?sma n g orx<.rL7k e wenk .
uns . w' h &$ *' <5'"kWA,ce+d- Q A
#2.-/d- S 5 9)ao & eMM. ,&d. da./Avdept; wi+1er wo MM:s &ws vn ro / f i % g ? f f e ,~ y w , n e W r.S % l & '
W % ,1:ses w s 26 [/Z/911 f.A. N? N// $-
~ '~
AsHrW%,&u A p s m ri m -- \ Sv.sanrM + , ns l w w & 7 G rr./6 7 Tang.+ luihtT 1 Y' 5 &f A 8a n Z M , N e s e w F_. , fm .* //ww l
/
/
i e se 4-w A"4 -c & w %4$*rs l 914E- Wh(b SRP3sL v /$ k 6 7-4 l fn,,ntL1~ki d t M p t/ E . h rtt y & l.. e. M s. i ,, %,w y ~x -, QvW ~50~h ,
^
#, CALCULATION SHEET OATE ,
!o/ ". 8 8'*
I DESIGN BY DATE CHECKEDBY SMEET NO A , s :
.ROJECT JC8 NO SUBJECT b CALCULATION NO. SILE NO __.
92--2.3.-8 3 TvGy S LLert,.a W b= c,yeau u 'd= % 7Et-- d+A+:%
)) :5 Tuss w adnws n 's -21$=h -
A m y Jd wt, " N*T / wtTs.9 7D 3 && 6iy.
)):Ie YG.C W*AMS 9tYksi Asgh
)t l l $ A s M gE t g f R u u--%
n,,,o .
-npeidue l 8 2 e n u e t. & 0 hw.su - wa M +
ups - Pnt = f % % %-. 9 f+r /q wsp,J W M 7ec""iat k w-x f*#1 A 744,u s. 4'>&.e;f adeap&7~m trcf g n:-z \ gga*+ )k W*4. 1 74un e smuw mz %
~
$$h - 3 -- L
~, blo We-4 4M&&r-.
gan%y 7et-O 7Arn:-c . - , 4 *
$4:7 Of PAcas 7 J-c/5: F 4 venysay. '
l
CALCULATION SHEET OA*E
/ db O ',
~ ~ - _ . _
DESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKED BY he O SH EET NC6__ .; C__(
.JROJECT JOBNO _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
SUBJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NO ______ fArsks w h~s kr2C 4e_> # 4 - 1sA 7# M 74nw - 7WL _ i m wou.7n4k & &
& MPm
&cw>- -
8 c::.W
,,pr,t A s./A 9 ws &w 89uAunu s, A >ccus +:- a m ms. den 7e c ~~ }}}2c W ALaw Amt .
/mes mp ) = . u- m e 4 m Tr~'&
}& c q ao w / - /
l I 1 l l
\
i l l l t
--,,s ~
m
//.'/6 //Af TX(AGE #/NE /SLAND 7035/M
/fooM 2o/
//12477/16 B67wn61tl: LEE //sfr9MAAI R g /// A D A . 4 W 6 s L 4 /2-fft vat 2 b b . P A R k s psax KoBr L. zumscuceD yiivissw ppa soucirsh pad wirt uppeasrnooin w sus 2 opsanons lY. (/ucompoR 7-R5if /g g 74)p op opg, ,p7pgi,9) suun> o a .
V8bY 0$f5lSIVE ()7 S?dfJY FP. Jos runerop gy /wippsesucor R/uc D/D Alor w/SN N cear/ pac OuwASA776M da A and w 7wa SuoA~17ed
- f. STR72D f //t tx/,'sptt) TD //jt/C A 6t u'2
. EmfisySt P45EW WHM Md CHA7 FED wiTM VG L. toin159 99,W re 97D
. b l9P 6X PRESSED AU6E//2. AMD Yach us 7b/RV V12 WRD RsiesD 4 GPu 5M?Le^7WL % GrTJG 7MS MM77A/6' N. EX PLMMSD 324Wr&Ll% u y (MATEKRog/ h56L) Rick 8540 ssrsb Man.x pcea,I ro si , lM TklE RoclV. ff. lN0657'6d Mo7&S hl. SBR) SED N0765 AvD SyflR/AlEd buMy'
- f. AlSRflN66 f02 /pTGf2V/Sh/ buni/ C. SANOM )
AMd in vi MD / Man k ka2Z. % 7&E JiOOM MNLK /(o&I' - - EftMTEL SMPwfGE -Entwnw2es-vnsm'swrsursawroru - W. LE6 /p'7?kDoc6D ///irigsf n MRf?K Q. Ask,$O /f f.'J86 g/A5 RA) gy&Q
-H wa necur sw cowas sacP ePF2nvous
. 3 . lRR LPL JDBSWaP Ct75D By Rick t%M (, 91AT56O C i r c W y B c)< MftIc'S 8?. C ATA T2 & C CrrtD 7by /?id< FMW5 8l', N05,NSc, Eer, tuAns Asc RPz Alb /30Vf SW07S /W HI'J D?W/crd. R)ciK 5'rf??S.'> Tk/AT* NE (. AFT'
~
~WliBA ~b22Alfd oi~ TWS BCVy SFbP&NA)&w RbK cirt)
PaiorEeH', L?otuzE6H'.
't .
KP. Peorecy - ccarnAex5 ou .s./TE EPR E REPiussm nvc. RP, & 0Il L' REEL / - b2L) SloAd I5 ~f2i2F.OJPL FRtEeD. uasucea roeaz ou 6aE PRoht (pui t.carw/ SST OF bv StoAU. pcx unit up VAit h5, Kia&,5 t.oAJ TALKED ABcOT~~ S& YUP of COM?ha . 'bsa Sten >v lS WALP ownsA .yoPatou *by
%R.K5 \S os; Vla D v.)Mo t5 YH 6-V 07NfA HALI o5 Quitxr% H sof l>300t D 907' c.tTE$ Tewo /3pmu LUM,KED Kice cAF W/E /staui),
O RP. Assomes hu- is tTza. ce qui um 0?. A)0 kNAUCtA L /Q2767 No JDv6STMGMY lAJsMV k- NAVd f '72E&f649) AlDW fPZM,
& O I &&7&E6&l' ?
19P. uny wise men us m 2 ieuaa AAlfoNE. LD Hb co a t..D Do sa ME. 9 P 8/
- FeR W M . TPRrs C+5
/U Kooss OPRcE hr THE 7?ME.
DID t)OT UJAA W 'ro Crrt ).)AMS of I sE67tETAy lklY SWh 5 fIDOlb 8MAA5-- h W D SAID " MHoM fod ALAFA DY TRLVh D TO . H. was -
/$W 404 S /El Yk/E G4id'A/ BLDGr (THE/7sr)
$?- (D + 0 LD yea pc seu t- Tyfo rf'6 AMg wRX.wf)
M }M/O FaR I V.
1 G 0?. ZT v)4 9 AJ 07"' PAAl 4 T
$II~ f) PIT.I iN D et; /{/S . hl6 70LO 0 662 y $27~ N6/2 Oc.JAJ f/2/C6~ s
O g
/vas.
L M y' % s5 W D 3,y pat 2xs 7xa7-M Lc0a ab Db > / c 7 y P t g (y LA Vid6 CRAVE BhEM A SMiPik)F E;o}veloPEoP idsud&S LAR)lf M2ED5b 4WSukE6 7 $ 5d AtG /?>&N #6k'&b Havt IA/A/M~
/VEEt)rb 90VE- LARB
~
7M6 ' t.cERE EsSUME6. y 7DLD Mn 7 g, e 57 M2K6 cns,D Xiadr5, D)2Ahir2, #WY
RE:R$4E.P A S 72/#6' *
///)NDy/@fG6 ThE f
/
PN/7XS Sus &E572D BRptE FD7M&7~ AND fdDVfD&D H/S OLDA.) /?DU/45 l
. AG AH SXAMPLE j PAP 52. Stock wns w yuc Env5 LOPE.
I Ren 13ewsr 7>e LEITE11.HEA D LoAS ON 74& PR couin, PSk-Y l PbEEA RG8va tta t. asp.c invocvcD - Ricn smm n/sst insu4vs wuz Panevy (, GIVbd P RO L DVib O b T hl Ld6 ilk Dq , price, UtJDtCAQLD -
O es
$f. 2 -3 ccEEKS wA 3 I)})RMS Tha' .Xrl-R~
TWpo ones w m me Resuuss. OR ilk 5 CoPiSD et2lGriepLG OFFB/25/) h5 &>HiW u.>A:
- . PRi2WS
~
Seswrea ey gue
~
Kia & REJMBOR.5ED i%2h5 THS 76 LARGE b)HiTE BNt/No? &IVGD w ar cw c.tasiav oe rrumsaamra .
~
P&2xs Pwxs xe7r a copy ec russt.159 des
~
.31Y.A USE HE INAS 80R/ocr5. g/g GTATED twt V/5 DD NaY t.aw.
THAT Fnc 1 to Ti.WN w M. Ma-SAID Ll1L bl A D D.l65E /U hh.f EE6R Uu n L vEM-[ 12se. san y. PgoPEA L Fo7L ~PfcAVEL V4lby , Fft.o M Cpu ictacq , Ty;posNE
?,wEtt.
1 v hlN S Yl bY,
~
w e wen nae m n ~sm Pib eAibG f i n c>n r w T3 GD G s% d anvu apq . go scp Nrrr2.msm w (LVNcd
CDJ L D WW QU erf. 125/WWDEl2. } }=~ W GOf As 0.ASY 61L CHfAld P/2d/% W/U6-- 0Ws STRT~&t) iT LA JAS 7kE. o^JW ' TIV1L ME u M 5/Et2 AM2a4"NGO 757 ' kincr / u s.u c q ,9 A g u a c a Ns b $$ hdV/D5 55uRAME To /7tcn /At7kf 7 0 f IW775A./7 70 /35 54/ll
-l S' VD Lt1AJ7*6EsW 7HW-7~ //E t<.MJ J2ESRA > stb LE f~0A StEAkC."BM,P/:- A4 W RP S R. /bi d 7Mesets 87 Bruns L A16Mr coad.Et2//M6 ,4/,iS *C os.'77 W u E D bb(/tof Mi& I, '
~ru> a SEPAt2 AT5
- Q Cc A G j o W$^ , lT 72//2EA / l/l A W ' S Gow?La M LG , ~2- 0 0 nx, g V< A- ctt s a ,
77,29 >> . 1 OJHRT HAD PARKS 7.nEAJ Ptn 70 hss of meer. rnAus2 sit n A po74fA sir 75 .' F63./7,/973 FRM A r a u M 6 5 e p /3?ts-ax.5 E :, vic. s'inTvTE 210
. 7 fJ!i?/Y #iNf. ApD GDL JA' wasn C -
iaa , a, o o e u wwa ruuse l . Mmtn ocD Fium Sstuous 1-a i%5tTer-
~ ~
x f P6%. Ica - Po&L cnaut t.wn yssi p2cescuitc IS RSAT> f W tMf'M
%k5 ISSUfeb FC07L M 'Of- Cow FS5 13 MiKL RADBiL L {0&'HM) inM9!nf /~}
PAIM RrceivEb couas3.r1T f~Eib Yis RRML PcinaEb cmmons f4-sleuA7uRE._ By r/AJG, TN2xs
... ~Tbok THI5 AS AFAlbai &
TEeduleal 30DSEMEA rT* CHARUE WAOSoK (()uEsnoeED PARK' G . ' Yo/sy l%RK5 cat.isa ya kna&A O f f ic 4 h j! // A A25 D u f o /2-I/AM ps&r>dm 1%Rks 95KED Kios iF +/5 wAs Y5 05 TW/S M5577&, II:/o P//54 /us&r AT-O //:6 fD/2 MEEnuf.r-Go ki a'Vb znwn n mc/Jaa&A-h UkSDAJ/ W$lYb~*g& j//rpSo;u, (Ak ' (,
0 PAzKG comiD ns nx> iiu1ruica7?ani AlEST) ^26-, /?At2KT BELisyEE 7NR 7' /3E~24M ,Wii . /NWMD 7~o /An1M2 OM. 7WB.5/d6- QUEZ77QWED CZM% TAMS Peers b/AD MAzz. wm0L {MTH165Io sJ .'
-w a a OPERA 37bNS S/4ED ASA/05r Wunux1 B&tNSGPs/Aty,
?ASl6(126f 7D AVE AFT 28 7NRERT
&Pu AWME#h=M/ CcansuT5 l
ASAiasi P9/2/c5 EXTREMW eeacelaO lpaur RETMuA keu By 13Bw75L
/W4NA4& MESI t f(. Mas A &ica754 Sa?PayK PJEJ l Tants w w w you ?
~
P. r wiec oiscuss rwr nua s vic6 PMsiDsk)
e .
? I5SoRE R& G M & it. n P L - E w i o u That.
su
- ore- e s- Mi m W. .
A55crRAD PAAM eP c,ce2> /e n w r (A - (DH } As?L A.lL 7';L/fsE. cc/MM GW7$ owf St/06. ktT2.S-D patJ ?
/hd. N'oFSA4/]it.) daHDuc.7ED A PR-sFeArea.n+c jAlT1'-12-V Lud .
//L /fi*t%.47tDLY ASSU& $10.
PRRk3 Yw-7~ k'is /arsc-gcryk$wEesCwasa
~
1 FFA 7W/?7~ #1/?. f/9/2KS E/10776Al
/_6l/LL b)4 s V6<2-f I-/t&.L/ AND do &T'E A/ EGAn M , I Catt LD y oT DETET2M m E Wu s. m E12 74/5 EArom ea t.oks A kta a i n s.-s r w r ,0.J 5f- SE.LP Pi2 orecrior; pg.ta. Jas&so-o, ofl FREE 8EAL . Wls FEEtt M6- 1.oEDE So ET1LtnJ4, :E SusW_c.T TuEnE- is AW ELEMM o P- TboTLI nh/ e tv Eb .
L CIra D IT~ ST% MGrf i uAT UN s ! L NOW j ME WAS. Mor St Arte D Ar> y of TW EsE_. FEEU M6rS tait 4 M E. , A// 5 lhe. cute 4 oN - Sf TtE. S U P6.f Lvs.I6TL , ED , MTL6db MAS A)FF j 9Dic.M7F_.d A MR7aF-DMM-l
1 '~ 4
#* CALCULATION SHEET O A ?E d2 .Z ._"__" N ? I DESIGN BY DATE CHECKED BY SHEETNC [ b
#AOJECT JOB NO _ l SUBJECT M 2 b"b M CALCULATION NO. FILE NO Fu4.L. 74. 4
- ~ -
-Ti w CIVx Sa 2ffe -c.,1,4pT /cr G L 1 7e (.Al. TN/ 6 9th 6 W ' ~
to:
! m T-W /! em n:.P j o spu: '?MP ,
a 7R6R. RM 7/ta Rys27.::.~l /,Qyww Qi::.
- mi To ~
8 K pCpn&a r$+w,,-/ q(f.'e.+_. .rf'O ::. :2
-7. r. Maarem 6 >? u-- '
ho'L~L )?su_= m sA A et .'. JWThhkA W b 47 ,.? !/-)/ (7ndMs /60n 2 7,w , awar/ co~r.wer w l w . N6 A /2 p ..)' ~ 1 o n A N& RWG'=~17'*A-e aN K.- ~jx;:
-)
, Jq Q '2 cJ+ / .s
- i G n tt'i' % n h e :- w g
/$Cr44 NE Ch /h
- 4,s .a A.e~v As. F.e.k . ,. ;ine _ ,
& w t. t,JH& /&#M 6 42.t-)
GPet. buP ')~/hw w t' nj 6 o m 4 , o,S i M.-+-- BotS l*><74 A A-stA-Y A d>H 6.
@@L fte s sow' .C ep w C Gin er- 4> : y Ath6 }/ent7/f g g ,,,3 ,ger gg. ggga e ,g w e.n,;.y h/@N ftih w k.: son ,oc m 80" )(7O ceo , cro (19/$oc 1~~ &.r-k. Ae n~o L :;
'To . .
S e - ) a a ><> t.c ye.th r .
~T)h m ti page 2? 24 g y z S p s. L ,i,m sve n ..a ICW T& ~S/S ,,Lkr. C,!-
%<.oAH &feesek }Y M4 lWH6. f))9/ W M k $ 46)eL.fC5 f/2&f.eg:wjf T2h '
fbU[0 $V6 btTic &J en.vH t -
- Av wou Pir.o u r t=< esters. tcreer shu zeran
)It(h+4e.,t W 1;W&M Y f d c } fr 4 7 /,,,,,* r Y 4 ,
T/t +3 o Y/f Me. hwnH '
)))6y a,ltf/W)*/Lt T']
M -) WH en n s e .;-e &iT'e h!,' h> h $')4I" n ~~ ph m 4. /2 Opee.orem -Wrs.m >:$,. % .. l A rpok weiM? 4+e.it 4mred% n2L
1 l = CALCULATION SHEET g,n J .'- y : _,'. . i. . ;- > ?.C ,
** O- l~--
oEsicNey cATE '"' dsECIED BV SHEET NO b_! f .
'ROJECT JOB NO _ _.___ _.
SUBJECT /M/ he d CALCULATION NO. FILE NO
'Z5n,NJ
}t~ T M mt+sd fn w r J2;pe6,. G w&
r%T FJa7 kkpe se n \ [ti: 4+7G O c AL' '-f /NU l brews nsw Arp4 hec,=-q . M 6@:-7 7'M ~ cA , .,
.T& )+S :-t nmo Z M W e. [4%daGur- a .f;-
Lesei2bt G < O R 8 Loe' ras Her finu.n
$1u6 - o$vk r int 4:s%T*
w.m w,>-> <ser,zm m,+.re. qu, wc 4 g) Kme,wmr.;-PxerHun/c>^g*4 ~ 69" u 6 '-
.. wm n.u.a ,
Y dfH) H t % ,
& W b.nt7, de
/ ets N/4//LV %lGL M 49 hlA4sG CA. A E *' ,
t [eMt.A..
.Toan fkuw &/a.
Ws N fo h
> y' l /
4? b //-9aTon
+w /
To cNo >nivic CHwayrs(M ' A:Ci a6. [. }lft9i?.5/D^ }&tede,) NCf }lGt'.~e. ;6)er t %-
& Len p '.a
)90s~ur /24 a) ens ltrrt
#_, m.
t 9
^
s # CALCULATION SHEET DATE _ C_5 --j]_ $ DESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKEDBY SMEE*NO s _ _ _ _
.ROJECT JC8 NO _ _ _
SUBJECT 8b N d CALCULATION NO. FILE NO ___ N 72 )A.7Sm
% / < ic,p.cq,aja,... ..
&. bhpr/D6 )W2-7/' f>& }}kr2s L ' y pjm / u, 2 < w Ndit 6,th e +.s..-/-
9Cr 7~ d[4L Pl.P NOT Te-4.L. Rh/ Y)&cPV i.e.>MA-st. G: );ke. i.e sg do eM L t >/W' f / / W D *J FGs 2.7 x;.e 3 Zw T r,+A%4 Devh /$ ve.xnn u d&2: TicLG Wh. 4sOshp.isWTs"4.- E n 2 w d t 6 /4 t- W- w M Fmyei NGn yl / &rt e $ L n ,.- c. us.
}60 %sw 7G-9 Akod Wd mp M> i w2,wois ha doret 7:.:.n 6MehkW ksgrms w kw( C. TC.wr -9
\
WA&w c ., paaux' l h/2 LS.M ' s t-- V ^ k S ' Y he h va yig g w ,4' w ,w w ns w e u.. W< bY-CA-77r Y)veMn4* :n~ 1~
; If n
- iv~n no sso be" 9 S6op)f n>SM&e ~/o %.
z"Wi" O'/Sm
))kJr.sCk$wo>&'!6!Fr
- s. 4m uswr em ra,'}}G
^
CALCULATION SHEET
#, :ArE g@. .//_-h1 DESIGN BY DATE CHECKE08Y SMEETNo y _ , .
.eROJECT aceNo SUBJECT /, l bL CALCULATION NO. FILE NO __
TO T Pf&ng -honti- Vnysa .* ? 79 e f > d = ?A'~N i
~
ST %gfA Z WT& J % n e n >.-
)tagstk r ;Ti n Y (p P er- & s s.
V LTWWD 4/44. /sA /2 4-4, Orf M92-7Gw?.4+4 QA T 6Sw2-r-up lb-- . e p t u k 6 p 4:, 7VA; fSWIw te 'ib dWr+4TvK , dJft.>rc % T 9k-v AeM% 7c & n 4 E ivs Tc /h u r n t,/ E N 4 A
-Ti ~ T Mdv-4 f%an m wm, cts _ P%grn) Smks M ac fo 44.rrr<J6 She4../& W M9 &cky), '
V>erw 2S7;q<tr-OP A 74ym. N c p pl Q rc M a r m % ' ^ ." A & k d k % 7b M ry M /6 oM_
$*: pe T?,a9E. 26 s. .
No 776.}H et^ @M^ T h40.0 J2b s /?temtO &f Mm9 va+rnuha j ,pra 7ctp 7i>L T TH +T c2-n 6?./y'Qp.cnv5 LaA 6 Lcz'W'* #f W* c.ena. rn~ Semef & f**- wmust.ea ar w.au .
#" CALCULATION SHEET
- ATE k_h_"If_"__ ,
OESIGN SY DATE CHECKE0BY SNEETNC. $__
'AOJECT JC8NO _
SUBJECT b kl N C CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _. Mho,/ HJ7 Th /99 7, 8 A te N /%Alfr-) l Ou'r (fu. fWT &Nle 6 J S e en h - Ad:pp g M &- t- p w )r T o A
/ ' '41 N fa P 1 l
jdt e C < P,<k W } W6 R . 1 l
$15,4^ T JW// Y :,': : ^
/)eW .3'/L #
/.**rLt .Ss M: 7'~
TM 4r J-v w u w s:. m S. m s r unw 6d oM P /f Utc.///s.
. Es7i c wr/cd l 7HM Me n (, w W s.o.w.
L&kr m . v H rw6AL.n.d.aaau.nru ijy ve ,iw1 : y
- - u.m'u p ras m ru
&f4te % M 6T/iL-4e,,q RfL cunP " 'THoT -7)W T b ,> eTi w ) P1D NoT~ TS-LM TD
)?H y $s.pyjee tk S, jeAlawur 77(4:. /2ut ~ - '
er )yL.t f7 @g y f fCt. M c7 4 % cu.::-,i Isms / / Rs ,o Z & & . T
- Z P 42m T M W Oc- vA Tl6 i+ir 6n^^v
\
E./cr tp w 1.y o 79 % A.9 (6 f A M l
'1a6 >W) p-sn d i 6 Nr+e.x )%&)& g Je- MM deut OM-e, S&Ocem cv!nals To Muy' as.9 . ;;
Jcsq o Ti - / h%p //>eizp Suip w c+ d n4 + 7MeM /2t.wwe- D) oar FM> ct:,%n>au
;p ___
=.. _,
DESIGN 8Y CATE CHECKEDBY SMEETNO bs amEcr ace ~o ___I.. Se m c1 g n>a/x6 c <comr,c~~e ,,<E ~ c _ 9 'h nw. ff t 9; -
.s 7W.9 P pf #"4 f ss g .p.o ,
mdmkr Wrep m u y ar l2an~on m a rxar me >>w L,. 4 u,, m er n is 1 sea _ tee rue or;jwd f#f,$'Q&
- 7* ~ T 4- 4 s S e o /24,.pvyn n m~ m.
ef #,P semsa:hm a d w orxat.
+ omw+.nuw./heiwe nmr p( J 't w T. v ros-t m_ T Q A W 91-era
'7. Je w T. -
L > x+_ 4- A nk WT AikE $4u#Lde WMm W W Alt u n w i-> . 0 W/nG$isG-A. W lls AfrAh 9fc-9 Ahr 6 5 -
/JF/e!"
l
% YG:o)dymt-ier 4-1 n T2+s-> L.{
P m T W T trn J4-M t.uip-nr A W m ean-s>grw ruw8 .
};; vs_ J~a w T ?? rys.u-u G u riwet MW -C l&cM t c~ 7 eWee:T~ .
th e w>s J.e,ee h% AW4- f>w.mwrn 7/Me/. the> -% AAnp Ws, \ biw /fof'Ri'
- / Wye, >
-r n w 4 7 o 4e .
l
# CALCULATION SHEET 47EO h_~//_ b OESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKEDBY *"
SH E E7 *.O _ ,,
~
/ROJECT ;ogye _
SUBJECT Y N lI"b} p} k CALCULATION NO- FILE NO . _ _ _ N $Y h l C.YO , ". 9%f*-'^m.) f & { r )y~ h]f W. S ',*.. s o . - m u a o. w ,ru =
+.rt .
/%3 2d )*,G)
; y.g. L Thou A v W \'Ycrt-O J & T .
buts y,wr Heb n Wds, w-M , f, M v'r 4.u-ey')
'/'15$4L.~. i )See)Q.f...-.
WZf$ V .I'" uT a'Mt.D & y )4 &cr,um m ,r b % T TEL )%au e /bu-k r., O 5okl t =- TbtE A%T /4Mt'. 245Xi u'n i fs.s, #d+19. v
-= d'e>m'e9 w /m r -
i e,n Wa-a. rkh4
6 n M /2 ace
- 0. }A> L.<.5/PCf fewn ha /?,a, & W #
e.e 1 % 01 J?i p sr ins. 7s Trd-L A'm nm W D f***tB Q EW ki N5 [ L a I / /\/ V U L /'.b Q b@ . n -/ Tw
/%:::+ 4- A.:s,;n Jtw T Y v '
ogw vNo 9Wb.$Wc-6 L&M {
, 'TOfGI)i utrA. R no oe>r MM Qun.z bl.ch bH E / leer99 %
WlAQ L'H+r+r T//GH 70%y f
- w ; "#-'
< - ( S @r z e k ) W % ,.
6o
/!9 mtHAsd.;r Q v02s atswo pn /&,-72 ,t).,a.
w .L, . 7 z w p. I b e & D N W V t H 6 6:t s 6. h)bvHsts+>bmL. TP il2w' H .T 3 ' TbuyM~ 72h&2.Stte /2nn.L
4
^
CALCULATION SHEET
#, OATE __k_ P "" .' - 3 OESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKED 8Y SMEE7NO 4,-
r AOJECT JCBNO _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ SUBJECT lh2 hl h)lia CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Y &h l mr in Pto 19 s 7 w /2 tag d w [ /M 5144 #>24A,3 4,s~. v._,,an , w v.a;s, W e rac.2 D A .
, ff W f $Y U e 6 E 4. ,,A. Weed.. -4 ek;S ty cap y2;.p;n.,
AM' > /
* /
cIn T nup 69 )$ssex>wn Ha- : tr & Leifs 44.M &)+ My .== M TM QuiL.L.7 bu .
-'~
m A sd 2 Tct-o .Ti n T, 4 giw fea -
% n- 749 )
M s non a an'- nu,ccna V[tw- 7b@ /A,in %o fXM A car a a3 ,- 24w .f Tor ash) l >c,w % e.u-fees, 2 3, El n TULP /$r2.a.>we-GrL. lh
-rgg p.(m;c % n~s.piire vir u ~- . .
w Om s! w v < mmed .
- b. lW)A~ k L!>My w })c?
Si b,e.s ee- Q koi &&& 9J4 H /f/4^n {W/n.)) N6 M d-{__. s M .
G
.. l l
000 @ 000 @ g H. LEE HOFMANN 10: h L G- 0 3 -d"-93
$ biff)M& C SPNfortf W H'%
Aw.5 /&/ . 4225sez e &Q foTLWL ""*'Wh riscq;-d kwh66 "He u m m " wa d re n 5% BTWr. vim AMtWG P2. O lik wicpr 7D fog LD9)l%!,f fy
} NAt M9eur 72(L "restsa'
. .r s cun~nra < sea ,a 6At % 7et.# #aaus " ew )
( WfeidT To ha2c , 7/h; ,$ Sp64M6 TO 6W yess tnt $
$eIk*Offsto$LesM$
l l l
\
f
f
)ei J
0 PW l01 / Y)OM M LJA..L _ v 0% 6-25____
, tsgw <
- c. saap P- wMh u- . - .
" Tlt > .lb..Id w c ~ /&,h?W'S:ao- -1 y tO : ;;4----
c 49 - & ju ' W-ppap-ypn x s v. -- op :. , - >w__
--._ lb A- -
[/Ind
~
_> i gL-n g- ' me m
") ^
, . e
~
yo-.,L,l L,nn= fs 4 1 ,,. n., , - - e Es mlQ36 w- 2. -,$n .
' 00 fr(. c.v.~ !+ v la + Q,- s~
() ' '
..- T..R wa M a a '~ ~ 4 cm _ _ - _ .
..' A;htu p 5a u % A 0
&&f S f40,1- %x w -^
A ^ ^ Mhd% ax _.Jjx d
- S- W y 5 O - NtQ - _ _ _ .
e . quaap 7 f
I e CALCULATION SHEET , 3a'E 4'_)r;[ $d* DESIGN BY CATE ' _ CHECKEO 8Y
, -w SMEETNC
'ROJECT JC8 NO _ _ _ _ _
SUBJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NC bb "bsI ' M M Mh, hh Y bNbbhd
// L /N dex>n, cps.m m 97.>> z m p y a w b is>~a,~.g.
%e. my f5 Y het A h Arg 7b wxY:We [i6 'h~ h 6.9sr.
hha K 86 + W lt>< 6 . S wom .A swikan nah.<w-w -n , Of& bb f Eat 2-1 u.
#* CALCULATION SHEET
- cE . 3 -<6 -9 3 OESIGN SY CATE CMEC AE0 B f SMEE!'eC [_ / _
AOJECT
,C8NO __
SUBJECT CALCULATION NO. FILE NO _ _ v m 6in,n Qam ,
%c,y g S7,pq d p*4 W A N/c A/
d Qu,e.,7se Zneangostano. ( B o g ). 9 3 4 - 5 7 5 5 f;, Jncnyr= Arm.o: 08-os-8I Law =. % 4 e-s 7t & &x 4 win H. s c c.7-
%7& -7edfedw E W Tota 7bieaMV Ho99L Tmac
- v. / < m, nr P4,i.r c.h 9 -s
??a rg, w _
\ l hpsa.e- & 7 oss. em c. n w 4 ::r w c ; m t pL M&w.r, raae.ml &c.a+ ogscanm ,a , v,& uare.gwet s..r+~ra r wwu n -~ d er v.il k p e T nom"2.))26 LDt+4 W ho?R A M b b /v'< W A,- wsa4R hv7%.
& me.v d. fww $Ik,s8ss,s s.u~ a,m R.ptsit 1 bje. 90 - &
J.wwxnws nit.Jin ek 24-5c5 NHWM 1* $ ,
"}5 )N Soo p S.rbp Juf,#
}}c ftH&L &far?? d* RW'9tl.+%L 7LL GMaa6&-. To J p ra a k ) d. s u c- S 94R osos'
_,,,--w-,w_w-e y ,mmwww wm e m,p' -Y' *W"M"WW "*- ' ' " " ~ " " ~ ~
, #* CALCULATION SHEET
=cE . ?, - jf. _? %
DESIGN 8Y DATE CHECKEC BY 5-EE* NC ,/ ' , 10 JECT
.CBNC ___.
SUBJECT AO M '*M 'ITLk - CALCULATION NO- ciLE NO _ __ t::w h '~ / :tf I E kbbfe. ko TTL k. S Tsyt '2.: 4 s' t.
& Ge.T U W/ $ hwF./ 3 yAS
& a< w u ez. wryrzst saa-s w 6 %.
/htt.A. )P-u s n N Gy_pFA M64e.;trA. MrS ds.;d' 9 Wtehp 6 fu ky L
2 ~ fa:u Pu & ac-s, }/c.>tta. i A"YbWi II4 (p/2. ~ 8L.Q6 & / '2 9 E40*
** f )l G. ?) T Q e- A t -- } S c;:,6 s ,
RfTk/L V e v I 9 Ii:n d % e W M
- NTi$$
a u rW' 6tpu.asm$ 0 D Ru sbE L q ge.6w pA IN /'Y' p t fI c)d 7$HLK /htSN ($'N6) 7t>o f QL?t4$j .&> k'% d-.4, ~-s: TC) 7 ) (c S 4 . " E !'- e d l/,. N$Nfc0 W m&bl
'N - L% t.)E D $ 2'Z/p/n!b 5 W.! M %T474~ raue n % g p n> ,
i ??RS "
- WH ' '% ^' i " ^-
i I den {etn/qWMAW
).
Am$yk6"4Yu% wW~, M(. -- rot o T W ? re &c:r )b Pne.:e,t. (c,, 3.- Har t onm. y.
CALCULATION SHEET DESIGN 8Y DATE CNEOKE3 SV 3 cg ,c [ , , . . . Od
,C8NC ._
SUBJECT sM CALCULATION NO FILE NC _- .
% 9 m D na r gde= @s u .: i ; e..
cH&res*cak. )4b;. ~ 4"L.c' lea [/Mk4 nc9 M - C.ms /Lii.
"RT + w- % v.s.nsw.L" M ,t-)
/ l 6 )gj~ {s/9 f f 4 4 .5 V V *FI c.-h b Oy)Wd %&
WI'h 4s? )H $t9t_ >
/ $-6 6. 'TM/1Lt <~an&N
\ Ft-ung As+e w G zrrz s :
. WP G<h $ ~
he,. M 4 M 1> / /96 &S,
?/ L 27,
- H9 ~ Fe,,}2nwr M4m'2-k.
SCLL 'J7M+/ 2 0 ! .h 5 w T V/ ns /, WD'ML1 nr a -t-a - fw& r e 12 , w p , w .x s. . 1 4- }-0& 7//4. MAk , A y 4 6?crpiNo Fs. I u .) M k . hw+sa. 5*ud Pays de'vL ~ 7e.4- 8 v w s T u-a N ~. Cb T/ f W6 W* u. w N LTT M rds e fsew e7/ct G a>n p , ay a sr r u 9 x, =:. u n'* C/2- /
& n b f 5L),6p $&b 5 s.r>was., 4' quiu mW.
~
5V"' x-4 4 ws. t .&.
'"% FfIN' 14w2s, 9reppe w J eaa /de n.g jQ9 a W6OL
<. F* w )?hi
- eeu w
~
%y>r u j' f?g y Ho x.r.) t e > E . G . e ..
( ken s&cyte. s/ 72u.4~$e l ww m w0 /~-_P... - ---_.-_. - --__-.A L >M n rvrp. ~ . .. l -
CALCULATION SHEET
~4*E DESIGN 8Y " ~
CATE CwECKE09Y S - E E * *.O - o dOJECT ,CBNC SUBJECT J N b_ CALCULATION NO C L E N O __ .
& $7)pn.o mendg.Tci?wec.Asu~a 7e.Q km _ g &-#94LL.4 JYM '
& m 6 3,s y k n . N l '7 % T = '.
r R 1 h.,9
< TVA 7t'h h <T- DW t Be 3%A / % *n A w - .
'Too}L N>aur )> W /es //' 7 W Mk hkw TVfTcp> cry r-N/
N N Ad $ l Ve:5VLLY 7 8 r %l C / )<> c" () +-L '-: JM slo /98 The. L. Jh6TW kW2/ LY M# N $ ( L o s L L.o 19 ~ N 'e H W np R& can.,o t ge Q 7 ' T//e. tefJL>t r*~P o r'l'R fillQ& L1'
/ s9-L 'i$h/h24$ \
l [f)mzk$ta. rett W SP W k V!M.\ l 1 p46Jr Fnus n.a 9
)$wke, & t= s: 4 &ecT- fg.1,, . w A: = =
h kse +$)% n<uw v ^ & Wa.n r
/ .. . 1
/ 1pui64 G, af /ptfuu%.T. l
/2c h 6960 Mc /O y 84ee.&a-y SeeW2 %- h Pr A. e L /P R l
pae fMW6",7blh u G-v Gr w 72 w 7bhe: l ",s, / \ (.;,n,s >2 erat ?%cy .
$/][$ w& Bew Ik:
pgy g9 5 ~ % o
- j2=6e /L W c.
#~ '* '* M f.'
W Q j?,% G ( $4 '<">sr , ?, , Y $'! M -
)- s>.
bML <%_ _ - _ _ _4tste x .4 ~2b 9 5 k__-___Q__ L_<ur.A
CALCULATION SHEET DESIGN SY CATE C-ECKED SV S-E E* '*C , d I AOJECT h' 08 W _ SUBJECT *fY/ - CALCULATION NO. 4E N O _ __ ps ..i m a S c. ? !. x a ' p 4 x c 7 e s %9gx Ar1ES Bye @. 4.&o )> w s M M N ,7 \ W W wer er w m - P'TR% w< W", w n g n h. , r u es femv: %y * /?(4,24. 73+4x 2 wt-7LO fezks / f VG+f.
< n a a n m a w % =.
/sseh$ MM4<j des-Av : ~ u, :
Ep M a= ( AG
@* n u w x-M.% w u. pof.Nc p f 'Ikr_
uxen w &,, wum w r+e> Q rh Tielu A+si~ -Tiw 7MS ?:
&59hffLO) lA & LAs1Q D&.Mi> E / a Ileden.m s4Gs.sthf 70 Miru.st -
f HIT 4.,4st TbCO A2>EM 0s2LS u /2try, 92 <Trufe " i 2/h9 \ Pe.L. je,g3 WlN WV $1"b lC/M 6vWM4D AY &> *L l $4?L. /HA6 Osw Avs.TcM %Hpy J/nj+=t. - k><Tk Laany Kn. 6 ? : W" gin & M -- p ts4MS /fd2+ 2s M d,-f - l crusn. &nye +~p .= "&g c 7s D77gvL n O-tw 12 0 a l .
// t.qs-p te m t11 & vi L Tkn a
, TCC-s2 8L$72ns - 77/7F fcM_ T/EP
&M QuiLTheM Simm )%L Roex. Py c.:
[hm
e CALCULATION SHEET
- 2 s 0ESIGN BY DATE OMECKE0SV 5-EETSC -
'ROJECT 209NC _ _ .
SUBJECT I - CALOULAff 0N NO. C'LE NC _ _ l }}tiQ Wc1NL & . e.,>. + p av4.fD+%^ Rm.te ump* } AV- '
& v-tLph /$4a6 ta-WhrL 4-hi: :* =.ur... -
Q Q h% h v-9 % r w y M i w - ,-
~
M<N yyept SLe-RW s%99/bb'M hGW 1k p-9 Wh (. g g P/p Nrr S /f) ,L.!J W /d69uw : W/M % q%o, j$ o hZ:s Sif bst?E 8/.S 4?d-HA'-4 b $4470g, N c 6 l d e-4 > fe. G ts-n%f SAfac/GD
+4s.) u.40s. Sa/1pM AI NE'7I & TbuG & .
Jetotnr( m.m. & cha.we nx prs Qw e n.
/2 6 }. e sti W X < d C '+ )Y/S /24 Lu - -
L Mt 1' W D (2 / W . . we nw J G-k& W 2/W Af4.i - W -L u - v ,.._ i VM.
/ / 65wG Tb QtGH njh wf"-
/F NE5
(. I2e PQ NJr T6 66 %p& - T'! u. r m A* " # d 'l'" l 1
;ng y, wik; & &ik- quMTeni). '
l A?/' W
% YbYo usew SP L.
i - sh nc r/{c:3 p YM I
,-,,,,---w-,..,--,,,--_-%-.. ,,.,,,_,gy--.y----w-
fcsr ,wi :~ ~ . = < = - 5 __& T nm=inPi L=D Tc 55i A &cuJ KS y' FR! Eiv 0 L'y , cia E. Tc '7n's /xss77sr6 - 5~t2 CN1 Ti-/d CUTS E 7~ ,
/ Ent u.512 O AND /N v i YE.D pat 2W5 P/:)i272CiPS / /O]
ItJ i% sow 77e d a!= f//s srnrsD Coa ce <20s.
.Z~ 577li2750 77-/5 j?E677p'6 - By un74Dochtk=
IMRAJ LEoPAi2D 72) Pr1/2K[ AstD 7b' t:D 17lCW Z'HRD /9/J AGE /LiDil 6F /7??s75 T2 DI5Cuc5. f/RST T ADD /26SSED ///J EMito,vpWi</ i ST97~vs naD LED .ig75 Assiv04 mrM NO L BEcMTEL D//2ELTJVE '2 - I . ,=ss=cr, .: u " E BDMESS P,2 D K$ EP/ P' c -1M =,u , s av s PE 2 PaiuGRAPL ouE- o r= m i tt;u sua c. /?an x c To LD iAE HE DI D NOT G t v'E A D M N 1 2isc :~~ W IS M STWrU$ AtJ D TL, A I W E /A A v/ Q9,T. HE wr Dc TM Aa M E D D M i^ (4 P P.7 E ^1 n W 3s OG l a V ESTic,ATED j l W Re A' t= M E D ArJD 1%I RG C A L L E D 9 v Pl D. WE Mbi 1 B ,e ED 'Il h TIJ, E.1$.' tdG- AS A Fei2CD4 CAU5!N 9 A M DISTTESS'. ME STTTLD Tr '?T MI 5 McV'E H h D TbE5ta
%VEM l??~~D hND 'Tc4RT HIS TM 15 0: 3'-
RELCCAT C D Pc72- SAF6_.Ty . HE REIpVE5 E
/AR. MoPF/ MAN'S NDT65 T TD LO N'/M T' LOA 3 p av~ Pi2I v LE 0s G D W TMGM HD
T4 Y M n. 8.:;H. ;a -
-- - ,.,g .
= ::
La s/t.c c.:~ A a u acL.,
.Z Ass o rts.D H e M. Taa.r BEcu rE4 WWL D NE v6 /L Ccc $ t D5 i2 rAr ee s ws , eq weg <_.D I M P? its L W,n o ;2. 4 t S .t:A m i t y o(L s-//S N'e m f .
WIS PE. ply w AS , 'I wcPE uD r " PAf2.KS STgrED TWAT NE I?ESEdWD Ed c--. J uEs71G ArED AMD E x. P 6-Es sF D Tw+r-TNIS toAS Au Perrsn7F % cod 5 R a'P NIS C.s u a ru j < S a O S A A E- N .
~E Itdtsl it D DI A M Gr bd -
TME SAF-6-7ty' S50 E. . H E. Laoa L D M6T CrET SPEcd< C . MS/d-'n cd ED TMNt ME 56EM ED S A-B s F SD LDWad uJ Mll.. SAdfditD3 bFF l C E- TH A- T A ' Slot. Ri sik d PAN 5 C - Lo o x.2 D Wc M E. 'Pb us-P c.7LA-CG._. - -lM pac. T- TW 4- T N /5 (FAi2x3) HA D 3,'2e omf N 6 5 0 T6T E 4 r U P. PA2x3 STwmD Tu47-TM i$ Loe A Lo>4 5 rt_ le A-5 M Tb do L/ &'Z.- UP. Hs. Tue4 Y TuAT SEchose. of W($ W 9 0 L. V E M E d T ' WtS Gill.LFT2..I EA>d
~A GPO MA J Pon-to AS F( RED ib y STe A LL /0 C - Tw o Co t ' A D-.S . H6 S At D THIS GPU MM tOA $ l HE- ( SoM -id - LA w 0 F Acom s/L C4 P O MAN A46 R. We L_vi l M T4 6. blA-TL C12A ^J E- FJ'-f-0 LT, w --------w - - , - . - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 l X Gb I Th*CX TC THE BEcH76L Dt2.6c 77vs \ A N.D TOLD P A zz s m i uis qu , creev A ss o c < A 77 crrJ w As T>.t5 oa c y T264s zrrJ POTL COL. I pTT. IDJ A L g u -Q t T AMd 7ktk ( 7ML Sys7tPt M DILK'M - TWM 7~ DOL TD HIS OPSN A ~)O CAU DI D A cc w iu <
@ 4S Quit.rssM A ss3 e c + < <W WE MAD DET&l2.hu H O-O To CD N T7 ^ > V C--
Ht5 & M P t e -f WA i . Z ExPLA id 2 D EAc-4 PAT 2.AGILA P W MRn w L D ld T%D b9 THE-. ArrAGMnO McslTEL DJ(LELT) 6 ? - I . .T I M Vi t EO PAuS TD SIGN THE DiREc n d AwD Sso D . iT BAcx Ta ME. HC SAi 0 NE toavLD. l N6M. LOAS No T23CoGO > Ti6d OR ACKp ou) L E M e M.Eu < o F WP-o M s-ht .c f CnJ 4LS PA71-T. 1
~C GA V E- H//lA OOiT SEC12- AGt2EEAE,L ~
' ~ A N D SoME. 1/0 EORMAMo AJ cd TV6 E L O PDLtC.y ADD EM7te466 CLo*E.5E StD TW AT' ME LOovLD SIGA) TWF56-I l DCVM.fie PoJ D {lETUTLAJ SAM'c To ML. l
-s
~~E E:,KPt.A1 A;ED RF;PcR 77 to 6- 72 Eta < /tisc/e?>.-
Di2+w><aCr Po i' H'< m T>Inc Ftrucz2 CAM L-5rnivrvP Di2s#M i rA nas.) A Aia 12stpcssrED 1%'47~ Hs' - GI t/2- Vt fLN A-N D E fu O PPoiLTv.0i q 70 N's LP /h?M wwd HL HM-5 D/FFt c.o <-7i es su PMW T TDL D b/IPt THA T MR. Sidfeil.D La au o D VeiP HIG 'Doot oPasJ AWp 7tLD [52ws 7~H&T Los /JESDsD 7D E 57??B U S M M
~TEu 5'T~ 7251A 72 D a) SH' t f Tb N 6' 4./ BAC W
- 074'diL ,
Wf* 5MTB D "lOMy SHs' atD Z TPW S r~ hu^j' M An>AG512 OD THt 5 5i Tr$ ? T pScbD IF ME TwuGHT~Z S4dLD BE TRusraa. sE. wasaf gsApy A us toe it TuAT A FF r AM A-77 ve' c 'y bot A r TuE SRME- mm C ML U>kaMP TD hvD'D blL U U CDH\i% iLYA D LE-Pa3t T1 o u T POT utpt is) La i n t /-) Dl 12-6.P ~T Q U E5710 d ,
~
UE. LO't-AYT~ TSOC b TLI6 TH/l64 T-Tbo5tvEs5 c.m, r0 c,- KAM6AS REJ_.1EviMcs HuW o F- RESPed 9/ SI L t T/ AND 7>I A-T M71 SA ura72 0 ryrtgg7&/E s
- ~75 C.s AsF- Wi3 EMPLcrH MsA.rT
; - - _7 gg g V w [ **
f N V O i c a , e ,= I ~ l L Eo P A rtD L Asst c u e e ,=- C
~/
~~
, /
l i f506' ,)Psuv 3
~
l2amed- iP5ue ' psu a r , o
- l 1 ) i
- w r l l' 1
fm
' f N_
) /
l ' 1 I
$n-E Ct?5A Ml SA r / C A.) $.
T wcpc &sp A3e sr DI6 LEri6/2. To Ka^) 4A 3 /z/ //3, . 2 Are4B WiM /F MR. KAwat HA D EXPLRdEd 1NL SrruR7,or) AND lp HL ACwl"0 7L/R 7' H 6 4>o v c 0 136 M57~~S ui 7&D
/AJ ANoWif /h & E. Uit2T7L- H/S //24556 S7%F7eP SBmfD 12aJ^). N& Skit?
H5 A)H TDLD - dot A 7k@ AND , 7 War /T' tvM Ad A&T of bufur?iDB7!al
/?Gkwsr MM' f=0A.SP&RMiivCr Ov/
ABav7~ 3GP&Pf. E MKdD H'//H TD pgs vtD i $?C bd/ W ' SPEcipic- l Then 5 on SRFE-ry. Ns' lacuwb Pr/ Ci 7~5 A/Vy 96L/f/C6 7buT~ %i .D 4/E b.>ctrD sEs>D A- m ? y' TP Ad?s %tafc it.D.
/~/E. Sr?I D [ HA VE-- A- SwDiw T A m TA K < A>G cFF D /WD S/2.8 uJhfftDAv7' T-s DFJ.A D1E- I i: T w JL D 5( Sri IT' ',' X ) la v5 LG C= A- L Q\ &M MD I T'S A-wA-i N 5 Y TMEWTV N ATW65 M C '. .I'M Ceu % Ds NrdL-- C,o i o cm w 7 w /-
L. AboTL DEPARTME.na'T." "tJo ouE. cA/J HRit A s 3 #15 ."
T Aswe D 72icJ< tp A e/2c u? iussz't& AND EDucA77 0 a' P M i w h pii w ;- N'sf-/' OAJ 7'W d S O 2 W Di= /%32%/r;CAS fo5t Y7 o AJ c.O NA/LA S541GM7' /1'& o.2 A S UAJSU ILE. I A-y E d. D /p /-/E 44)AoWP
/N 7E Ait4 L AuDi 77 an S4ck AMD T)-/R r k)E a.)oatP ETu n6- 7ME R*271ES loblo HL etAtPtS i VR/2455dB N'tM TD 5 PEA + w rus /33us- ME. Ave i DG D 7W/$ SR
^
/st.T(r- Z w / t c.- P i e t O l '
l0H'4 7 00 AJ / tag 52dAr pit /d Wy'sr (-d. GA-L- A c 7- 7 o AJ w 7'M-xE . S /t f-8t2ME/) t/ 2
/42d5 af 7HE 3.'3 o l'M Atlillot O /y/HE-77itf(r 6x.) Tht& uDn&L M s % '2 .
fgil % 7bt.D A76 4'E /d9S /A/72)f275D /A/ Att/ /?5S/GMM&/u7~~ W /s.Mu= CM6K. kk/Y h/2US}
s
, 3/82:23 SoMar: MEErios tecru Ricx PAi2xs DA n!.: MAR.c4 21,1983 TlME.'. '2 '.00 PM ro E'.1 o PM Mcf.: ~B. kAt4GA'S OFAICE TM_L. tot 3 SITE BTTEtJDAtac.E.: R. A .W M EELER, , C4i EF STA9.TV P EMSf usFA.
V. R. LEOPARD, Asst.CH E.P SrArtrVPpscR R. L. PARKS , sg.smn:rv P wiassm__ NorE.S
~I lusTRuCn1ED Vend LEOPARD To TAKE Mo No nE.S DORIMG- Ti tE. tAEET) WGr itd AN ATTt=MPT 7D Rff MR. PARKS per EASE _. L i k'Ete lS E. I Too k No NOTES OTu aiz TuAM A ra o ce.assou A c coca D, PH R ASE- OR rec.pu F_5 i T 1.t A i foiA. PARKS SA, D .
T M AT2.KED THESE_ ou A 4 A CsE9 D A I HA 0 PI2apAT25 D EM-BodfiL To TLlE.7bEstTE . T Atso PLAcED SomE on- Tue issoas a-LOtSL.(E.D TD A DDi2ESS oO ' PAPER. LWIC4.I USED AS A MW ETADNIC . TW E A s.EtJ D A A rJD TW I S M U EMou l e. ACC.oM PA W y /My A)oTES .
% TW E. ORtGl u A L A 65-^3 M A iv D /A tJ EM s N e C.-
to ETLE. P/2EPauD EN - p_o sTE._ w wE TOSS /72E FRw GPD , I g A VE. PE-taRiTreAJ T6oTN Fo72_. CLARtT3. bon oR1cvi to A L AND R6u)Ri TIE - l Pr l1E. ATTA(t 4 E D . w ,ww ma - - - , - - - - , - ea,. - - - -
i J/3 L/ F3 AC,EMDA:1. STRTv5 of EiMPu yN75AJT
- 2. WL Di2ECTl VE 2 -l
- 3. NEW W i RE IN PoilMATiobd 4 REPORTI td& TRELATIOldSW l P6 6- WAT2ASSMENT
- 6. SAFETY 7, LETTEi2,To KAMGA 21 NAW (A55MMWT issoE) 8 ce <" et pui e (ame scnns)
_=_-- _ . -
? / ' " / G .)
t
\ ] MNEMoul0 l
ouR l uTET?>J A L AuBITI N C- Pi?.o cess HAs NoT 7 o DATE TORbdEb uP WRouGrCoi4G- on ycola. PART oP Ar /nAeNiTODe. wyi c4 wArz2.aurs DISM ISSA L_. MR, MMDFoi:tb MAS PBpuEsi ED l%E. To TE LL You TH AT' You WILL NOT BE DiSM)SSED ONLESS NEW EVI DEMC_E.TOIRMS U P W4tcW toou LD REQo I2_E- AMcTL4ER. ASSESSMEAS~. WE Foi1TW Ei2,1OSTRucTED ME To RS/lBAl
- ECHTEL DREc:nvE '2 -I toIwt you so TuaT lAJE CAM Pi2EC. LODE ANy Miscocc EPT)o A) S /M TH E_ FoTO lE . .
fdR. SAA3Foi2D Lo1LL ANsu3sR t/coit LETre-i2OF MAID 4 Ko,1985 AroV I CA M Asso72E you THAT W E_ WI LL /4DDRE55 \rlooR coMcERu S TD .TM E Ml0sH EST DEAREE. ?o SSIT34.E_ bc /T4 p'c cR, NELP. MR. SAMcRD WILL KEEP Wis Doo72., OPEG TB you AS NECESS AT2.y, L LloPE Vou LoocLD USE_ yiy DooT2, F/RST A AlD TBDA y l'LL A Qu A t o'i- Y o t) w i T7-4 l OUR ORGA M1 SAT 7 O AJ AtVi) REPollz /MG-
- RELA-i IoM SW I PS. .
VooR coMTTA3 vED EM PLc y McAJT Lor tt Be AT T ms susrecs To e same_
"??T?' ? ?#?
ASSicsMM EMT s e_. Cos3TTLACX EX P l 12.ES j C LI E M T WIRES con oPETLAi WJ S PeASoMMEL ETn. . I IJ EED Yo071 MELP so TW Ai uJE c.Au C,ET OK) balTM ouit b) oil.K A/S/LE. AT TM.I. LA/E Ai(F_ Mc7 C=OI h3b TD h/\AKf MlMG$ DJ/7WOUT VouR COMM t rlW 5 MT ANT) MI N E. i l
O cumae-ve, c currit< u, tw"'s 3,tzz@ Ou/2, /iv7EgA.sg , AUD/777JG- /3?DCES3 HA.S N'T 7' D rd A 7v12s>&D o P c ailoneDeia oG y e u it. 7%il.'r of* A MA G-AJA w M LJN tc.nt-koAR,uarrs Dismis.sA 4.- , MR. SRdro/2D yes Pepossrs.D me ro rutt you rwir you wint-NDY 66 DI.SMIs.s&D UNcsSS EV/ DEA,c.E Tv/WJ OP wHicht tac u t p squ//2E. Awa vys/L A S~fE S SAr s u 7:- WK /2/27464 /AJS7tts>-tsb A!2- YD R=yi sc<.) ?PWrE(_. LDil2Ec:rWG_ Z -f LDiTH fo a Sc 748y c.aa c<gaj P/2.s et u O 5 AA)y M/3cauc&p77 siv.c /AJ TkG. EUT7./R.E , A14 .sM%tD a>u c. Av.7al&2 fuit- LE.trsR et', MRAC+/ /G, Apo y cof M S u iz G y g u '7 4 5 h(E c.<.)i c c A PDt2555 ya a /2_ cD AJc5/2y s 72 THE. N/&f3r
~D@lLS6. h35)S(_i5 L.dl 'fH ydU(L HEL Y'a NA NEW~CA>
V i LL Kts 'P H is t%cr2. opes > 're yo < > A s n>EsmnAy . Z k/OPd y o ' you t D C) SC 4 y Zkx Q (Ci /2.5 '7^ Auk _
'~fo .Tu f f i. L i4 Qu A i/ LIT yo J Lajw/ouW CEG AV I E. A'T7O /J RGPeit7'1 & N7 7aA>sg / P.S.
Gf bdTL- Cbra T1 uvtLD CM PQ MnW7~ 40/ t t.- BE Ai TMX SuhTLLT TD &l2 39 M f=. Pila s Li w] '77/A T* 6.XIST5 d$/ AA/1 FrA/27t/ P /+55/GA>M5W /,-e. . Comn&'T' 2%ft RfA, CLIEWT +/iW5 dry) h/Cl?
<x .
'I h/ffSt) G/00$F/g/y' SO V.f CAA) CoEt ou w,w oonw ums 4r rue s nt-. w 6 ARE ccT eata&-10 4 Wtt.
$ 6 G i f S S W ITulo W Ll c o 2 , C 5kynt W M G i GT~
VtJO M \ M L .
J/tt/f3 AGEA3DA ITIEMS : sinTv5 of EMPto yMEN7-SFeg7E4 Oti2EcTWE 2-/ -- NELO M s RE /AlScAN)A riad 12E PoiL77NS- ret.A7700JHtr's HAn.A ssMsN7~
~b La G. oL S a a 4 Con- tsia s A s rders' iaA +/,
S A F E T~Lf - T. U t e L Pik va c e_ A u sr op n ,s g s-LS W oG M Scg z % j<gac.; - pga,,9 ,ww,gg__ De&d Ceum , Tr%E- /v <put It T (Arwo vb) 313e ges n N c, l _ sh =,- ! , Z /1 Sc, R._ DE PP277'A 5&~T~ 7 l CL s .t r-ac.e.eaar
~
we.m PR**'M
%hbbl 0 b M Sw o w a FF-t D A v' o I? - V,4c-AnaJ ~ pong,w d o assolt.s n V%be O & y l A 0 08% D f ? Ye
?\CK h5KF.h FOR d0FFMR$3 79)T.
l k yl w A se FS. Pucs nay i=nm r>.us nw ith Fr340 Aty s,aejatteoo ren_ sraeuos #2 l l l ID UKE 7D muC uh72-1 yea ASca'r B KauSAS j?M:.r.~.^ .
AC-SJJA IT4tA f
) . 13E6HT&L DMEcTWE S (2- /.)
- 2. EJ1PLoyMEM /)A7~7F pa r i/M PattiED At T1ME of Ht i?2-.
3 - (Allt</alcr- reb 7770/J3H) P' f W/ TU 60 /G rLEA. VISAA) /L%C/A&.D bdr/>E L L E L OTH6tl./3Edgi /14M47~ (2r %.It /254477adSH/ Ps W. HA/M5fM6AJ7~~ 6A) 3175 MEEinup APPRcAC ( l /WPE SPEC)fic ( I on Ang,iz,5)w,,,Y.z.
%"El S. TAhd$ CDAIW/74/5 wbrrEA) STP 7eNf W OP SAF5 82AC77G.S- 73b/ -B7Eszyy sca.
h* lD3Affr# d6/& REAcSjsypspj; op pa6 I - - _ -
ltsi ptf6 P & 4 "' " b/11-/55ll l Z A77EtriP/15D To SE-t A
- l. o t U l < E f '
7b 1;VS J'8677AT6 - PtRI EAIDLY ' TON 2 Pt20tv1 YHL ouTSE7~ ~/ EAtus72D RND /Ntii'rt.D pai2W5 P)91272CiPAitrAl ItJ 1%soto77od o!= W/s Srn7&D CoM cet2xis. f 57Nt27EO /A/E//?g77/V6 By py774)Mc/if]6 l/6/2AJ LEoPAi D 71) /%7t2kr Asto 7sup 2 RICif T HRD /;7/J AG6AJDA 6F /7E/75 T2 DIGCuc5-f/RST Z ADDI2a552D ///5 E////%f/19cf STRT1/ 5 flyD LED /A/TD //66sv04 /7Ef/ No. 2 BES/TEL D/2ECDVC 2 - I . Essw r, w y T BD?Ess PPDK5 EMPLciMsM , sTorrvs PER FDiucJtAPL ouE- oF mi MM 20tJC. PMnkC Tb LD ME_ NE. DI D NbT Gl t/ E A DA/v1 Al Allo # L IS 70Th STAh>9 ArJD TW AT NE rA y dpy;7, W E c t TE.D TW A i WE DlD mbt /4PPRED ATF l BD OG la VFSTiC,ATEDj TW Re ate ,e E D ArJD TWc6 cA L L ED sTv Pi D. WE MatoT) do ED Tii% Tq e.ist @ As A
%l2CDid CAUSING MIM DISTTLESS'. ME STATE D TWAT MIS AloA1E N A D TbEstJ 3RbkEM ltJTD AND TIAT NIS Dys tcML-RELccATr;D Fo7L SAFET. y . RE. R&pvGsTEd A/I?. McFF/ MAN'S Do755. Z' Tp LD M/M 2'~
LOA 3 p W Pi2I vLE Os GD & TMGM AWD
l ] o w <- p,m "M 7 H A T M (L k W fffvsetv S/ L 't. -/5 5 LQE/142 A.)DT A v A- o c n/2 LL , I ASS U t1.1 D HI /k TuA-T BEcH7'EL w5UL D NE v'6/L CoM S Detl tac _r, es ws , eq weat D I M PE ft L Win e TL A/t S .f:AM L y a /L. M /S h'eW6.
.LllS PE. ply W AS ,"I HOPE _ UDr."
PAars swre.D rwrr se ee.secTsa p2,as_ lnV 8.ST) G ATT D AMD E x. P fLE.ss6 D TwW TMIS LoAS Au Arren?i % cous /L a'P HIS c s u a rai t S 6 O SA$ E-T'/. 1 l O th Te D Dr A L.c 6- c 4 7 w d. s q s q
$$0E. . H E. Laoo L D 057 GrE-T SPEC / A/ C .
MSarnouED TMA-T ME SEEMED SA-Ti s F 6 D Lopraa //J MR. SA>5cTLDS bFFI CL- TH A-T A Sta2 Rs ' sin d 'PAA d LooKE D A-T 74 E. 'Poca-rt e.72 4n.re_ - ./a F-Ac.-r Tw4.r ye.(i arz.x3)o uA a Bacowf l N6- 50757sc< UP. Pgiucs sTWrED TN4F TMl$ LoAS A LOM s TC. le A-5 A l Tb do v'E f2._ UP.
-(E.Tues.) THAT $2cAOS$. OF W(S Ip t/c t t/EMMT We s C,IRLFTLIEaD to AS Fr FAD A GP0 MAa FoTL ibt/
SEA Lt rar - Ttoo T:ot LA TLS . H6 S A t D TWi S C,P U MM tOA S isE ( SoM-in-Lew ?) oF AuoTW6/L C P O IVtAN A46-TL /d VD L_Uid i O TM 6. ' bCA4L CSAM E- SGf-0 LT, l
, ,o, ,
.I Goi 73&X To THE BEcarst M/24cav6 A N.D Te LP Pans rw , uts qu , crrc v :
ASso e< a77W te As Tua oa cy 7264sW PoTL. co2_. I RTERM A L f;u D L T AMD
#1A T~ 7MS Sys7TrP1 L<> bT W 5 D -
Tw T~ DOE. TD HIS OPEN f)u? CAs/D D Accwua
# 4iS Quat 715cM A sst a a e erv LoE RAD De77 rum ms-0 Te co,o mu v r_-
H is te M P t e 4 WA i .
. ExPLA iO E D eAc-a par 2.AcltA PW M An x E D 1r) TsD bp THE MrnexcD
'%Cs.lTEL D1(LELT15 ? - I . l IM s!' WO Panus 70 sieu Twe DuMcWE A-uD H6- SAi 0 N6 SEA) 0 .1T' TMc4c. TD ME.
Lc av t D .
~MGR E. LDAS yD 12ECbkO s TI6d ci2 ACKp e u) L F_DGr 8 ME pg-T OF Wt 7O A.)6-M/ A) G-Du MLS PAB T.
~C GA V E Hl/lA OOil SECi2- /W2fEAIEA/T A 9 D Sox.E_. IM fo714Ano o ex.) TM6 EEo Pouc+/ AoP EMPco4EE CLo3.#c si o TwAr WE Locat a siet) Tusse_ ;
i DCVMil/JTS (bJ D {2STUI? AJ SAMC To MG . l l l
> l t
b /2 L -l93, I E.XPL/W /oED REPcL7w 6- 72ELgf fa45yfr.r D12A'4>^3G FC7L A// M Tw/z fcrAJc7zoA/4 L 57%TLTUP Dis 4M i *A ned A A>D RErpsts7ED 7%'4 / / //- Gl VO- V4,/2.Al #4/ D 2-- ja l>?PonTus.)i q 70 N'sLP mm < OHM HL HMS D/FFt c o t.ri es a> PW
. T TOLD M1/A 7 HAT }/hl. SquFa12D L4)oybD KcLP HtG pool oPar) AWP 7tLD hMeks 7~W#T WE /)ELDsD 7D E5778uSW 4 77tu S'T %LA 71 D R) SW /f Tb N8' ff EACM' ONgi2 ,
h/f 5MTB D "Dioj' SW6atD 3 I 7Lus 7-A y M 4 A/A G 6 ('Z O A 7)4/5 5/ W$ 7 l L T pSc50 IF HE THoo&H7~~Z ' Sih%D BE TR usnED . sE wAsu f gsApy A estoEiL TuAT & FFiiLMA-D ve' L y bot AT TuC SAME-mmL ML IDkd7EP , TD Ave i D DIE upc. omit-on-TA?3 (E_ ! Po3m ov I POT M ikt IAI LatTM A Di RSAT CSu E571 o V , JE LoEof 11ACK b TLt6 TN//.6A T-TbuivEs5 c.m r0 ( - KA06NS 86 L1 E,UlM Gr Hi A4 oF RESPbd9/ht Lt 7'y AND Tw+T M71. *5AWo7LO TMT16/171WEd
. 1s S*SEJI? _ EMPL MM@ArE _ _ _
6/2s/&3 l C /MCpu 4.92= D A3c J7 7>/6 L67/ 6/2. TD KAMSA Sltll/b. Z ATkk D i Witt a /F Mi?. KANM HA D ExPLA!WEd TM L Siru n tlo u A N D /p J/L AC"MCO 74pr H& wovcO 7?E 2cs7~ Sui 7sp l tr> GNsm's1. Rs cE uprit.- His pi /24M Si7vA-MD SErru"D IbN. NC Sert 7 HE IJ+> TDLD - DoY A 7kED AND Twar /T' i< a-1 ml A67 op surt/nitM7/n/
)90A/MS7' Wi#' l / ~o/L SP&pfkwcr 0V/
ABov7~~3GF577f-E A5KdD N't/'4 TD PBo vide $7E k!!WI SPEctFt' / T&c15 os.) SRFEry'. //L Lt)coub P UT Ci 72 A/Vy 96C/ f/Cf ThuT~ 51-1D 4/E tomb 5EWD A- 3 7 y' TP 44Rs 9t@Fo itD
/4E SA-tD "E HA VE- k 3 wow kfftDAtnT' T Am WK,A>6r o F F D /HD/7/2_s44 y-o T)E 64 DE- I i= r SHo AD St6Al I T ',' E W A M Lt:JsA L R\ 6G A-vD ID AGA- < A/ S T-TW E LA*> Tv NA6 MS M C'. I'M Ceu % Ds iLi n)& C,o i o c, w Tw t-LRboTL DE PRRThDa7~' "No ouE cA?J WRfs As3 n1s .
a 3/2:z-(83 T A 51c a-D 72te x i p A e/20 u? kts*7'us-AND sauenv7e2 P/Lahngh ,/?yguy-
//6LP OD 7 W d S U 2 W ci= i% c yr;C PS foSt 77 o U eD i4M/L4 SSH&A/Y. NZ 03A S U+)50 ?-E. E A-5 K d-. O / F /-if Lok ^>hED
/A> TE A 104 L Au pe r,a.it.r S a eir A p p D/R T' LOE LOO v L D b )2i M & ? M E f B 71 6 5 lAJ+/o h(L dz.ptpt 5 fv77/245569 ff/M 7D SPEkk n rus /s. sus - MEAveiD&D 7W/5 Sky /A7(.r f w/t c- D6&/ OE 14)/J e h u b oAJ /144 62 oaf R/t/d WMR7' l-6 GkL Ae 7- 7 o A) N MwE .
5 //l/f-8/2M@ /%fld5 af 7F/E 3.'30 PM RRAlalP ty/ME-77WV 6x) 7kts udn&L 4 67?E/2 .
?$tlKG 79u) ////5, NE Wds /A/7fj/Agy)/A./
l AW A55/GMM5nJr nr toow eMSK, bk S/ 3/22 /83 l
4 i5td & t iv' & 5 (L t G C-
-i
, (A) Fl & tL(Lf c a s e i=
l
\ LEoPArtD L Asst cue e<=
o - esos geomn& P50L l P5us 'p ~
/
/
1 1 2 L k.soIr/ I ' s,rc Oi? SA ^)I BA i ib A).S.
's o
3/21//] ffra- h r/* u.n h7 -b o p la s e/ de .r a s. t < 6 + c.u o < <
& pa e d ej f-he Yn k #dteal hatd k de-y t.n M-b 7n . 044)4ao6* , %.k Aa. k.s e- n d ?x ,
y La w. 3 fada ej E m s toy m a n r:
- w. P a x .- w i ng;, ---s s-s a / 4, s t04 tu a 2 na+ e 'n o u a .x A n s , . /4 e. ofiJ hw e. a Je4 a.s t Y4 na p /-4. av q ue s./ J a .r a.r t , e.< n /*
- r
& Ms. - e r,fa < srk. 4* e + .I a d n .-fs.ee th.t <
haL d ll 'f 4/ pof ad ov1 e-. /s .1., {w . $c 4.5 a.s &a / J '7n V . ,5 eop-d 4aJ se n + bm PWs m s s n p. e. . //-- m .r da /J tha.J Ae to n ey p & yss 4f r /.M R dras d Gs r1 /< r et r
&c -c.
So-A. l*f b o#**/e s e 2-f ast d A) ed / deb e Z n){ns m d o n.
~
~
ba.- se n 2-r w y e n .- es~ w i/4 k . /-Lk, , r,C not t.a e a.t fa - ise-d f-A n in p nr op
&Aa et. J --fi <. wea eaua A . //= w .1-e
~
et.t K
~
4 t-a. Ke pf,; 3 b,.-a. A Le , em a J 7 Y en a 3 e 5 as 7 Y e ss J n /-so < +r ~1 'A >n e - d 4* * & - twa e f da - f -m a w a - e- 9 e 's-r 4 A<'m a /sa.
.Z' 7' w o o yp % n o .c +ke s a.- wn .:n /* a w 8/ N m,.5.,.Jlur os el d d D
- n A ( y M 4 7' V W d e **' k . [ GJ e p '
$IE b d e ao l 5 se. LU d si / l ff 0 e nt. (f' b* l
\
?f f
's O e on p fe 4 .( a) st e or Sta. h is- & s n , f.u / 5e es ho
(.21.'L.) hL Y lA YbG "A fcf 'h f k & CY Me f &t 9 o-.r m p fe.4 ed h 4-/w if.* d he c.o . a f ep' J ryn hio a.y t ernel v c h W e1 fSt.e 41 h N V- &J & tG" s .
~
hep.e-faky 0 (s./< *e#1 s Ai G .; f h .c s /-a. t.-v ,o
. a.s a - y < >,y * /a /< s -> t A > ,, w ., s b'~e M/&
- of W I 1 --f N s,# , fa v$ r . E/ 4JA.3 e y p /a<n<.( 4 h a>n &ha }n J< .seeg d- da < v we o,e o- , /. 4 i:.s ,t. m aA n-a p s v /a . - /s NE de-a ; o a. d a n <L Jtte: E nee fe,-./ w e a ed' Q V~r " - ?
- e 4.-e. $s % or . [6 UJ a 1 wppo .c. A. el
/1c. pa 6/,, ev 9 4 f4 <- n s -ir,a f w a -/< sy sa.nuan e 7,( ,a ,r.-dc n p - ., .c a. /
m .L -1 a. y m .e. < f, W 4J M of &h/ est d b hw. 3-4 e ,4r-d 7,/ v e q u' i - a c f h fe f l s & . *p t k.-p x-r z er 3 rf w na p e e n 4 v' w +s u ,y wa, t,.-< u y ,<. , . . , w ,,y u ., , , a. .,4.ci - n ,..e. - ~ ., - c .- [oo kr s c.u er //c , l ff ~~L l l
t
~
h p' G s 3 eet a r 9' W V* 6 v 5 J' 0W/ bu ku s/ ey b n /d a 3 w- cf k<< 'M v. +4> ->-s ~y in her p . -sa -m a ~ < ._. i% do < *ng hti trs4. /4.- s4. .s. A-4 .c 4e Aas W or 4 a <a > > - < b y 2n. . k,aeps wAn Isa vs.: r fa., n s A t.s Je 4 a,.r ,s. -. w& of *,x. F& G -u n <_ / -s A-< ,y . 'br - Pa Mr 1 . J. f. .c de A .1. l nef -<w d-a e.<> a a n. M Q y f-As v - ha n ss m e .e /s, h hvl% Md b = $$ br.1 fM /p 47'a r 157 de. ayx. - a.rt et 4n. A.a. J />re eoct & as 4 a. E4 /s c.a. / < b n 4-= f v /.-a o* / e . ffn <>r M 2 seq wA y le. [t' ~/ /-4 't.s n .I ke 4./ /,. t Air hd <* L <
/a L L. - , 4. - e 4 a, in ts ur 4ru 4e w e
,Le G< J % 4,y f os I~.L / A. <<.y Thj }ke 5"a f <f H - asa-r ere o -a t W.c in oa way w oeid bdd[ d W J y/-dr / Jr.I' /4Ar. /d 6.rs. e an e At t/ ke tu a e /d i C h*e. N A a . a- a-o, on4 k roude k va/.-a un a tan ic i n h th c.t w. ~ ve an,, ar. a x /
,5d.% h de wes w s
')ns . fa at r was eea w nad a 4 . <> s t he.
Aes rs y en w A , e.4 +4e s a p. 9 a ,., ty.c< r t<> .n r ma L e, is / Myy Wnw-de s se f hae L. f-(.- .s A.-l a ~,L-ba.s % 4 e sa <
/* C> 113 4 fe % St Aa. d.' n e 'f Wn 64 x ! *ef$ns .e /
$ a/.r-o m e da. y e -s e m f s. /w /m e < V.s a 4* o A Y'NG.- 6s C a- .3 4/ jo ea .f eJ ,5* sgye , /k .,s /s /, /
Hsr th h wna +s
/su i-r of 8 ,c.L 4 / m a e t ~ * &
/b 7 '
3 c e n t. fl.- s 4.l. J ti a r/ e f., it .s c -te sa4& t t n ud kata a , wos n .L d- -t4.a- n-ss q wests W ~C.A u-/ cla wn. M'n a.fs, sWe 4-4.a f 4 e. Pt f4 8 fu. M i(2., e a % #a ura r a wh4 M
/4 Md 1-6 a + w& 4e- S-eu94/ W Ga/< 4,. n /a. f. < a 1.e m . 4ea 6 z /< Ze in as tA.<-- c. w 4.e. t+< > &a /d i t-e-. W *-r J s .c. A d- (s.y. <%y f-4 e rs 6.
h1 - Psafc., c.fm. l. t 4 - m .a y sA?/ we /Hu H < = Es < y h1e . Sa k.< sfa L. d L co s /d /o'4 a e asy L-4a 8. 4,t.-f i n i4 * * / z o d. f of re -y .i -/- 5y 'H2 . l-/-- p n s- u . Ik a Ja./ d Ae as a n.4 -l < Y
+= b y et net J /.'. - m < 4e u)h y de e .-a. -
7 o r- yn h thie an - I- A . f-J ,ot w .
~
h& . pa % & dd he. e.J e o y a < ng Ta buc 4 m.a-aa es- 4 - s f&
'?n a - pa</cr w 4 - ., p .1a A y a k </ a.o a
.s-,L'tr s. J . ,, e- at
,0 wYt/ c m c. s <
do- < o a .i /-e < 4 y s. /-( = h 4 c/ 64<< nt-4 ha. W wy 4e wean a e.d /e f* If 4- t Aqa d a., c1-4 Ge -t 4/ . n_
R 3
~
No V t.rzt y Ceaf tnka s,<fo e.J
& &. 08 Ar M**~'-
4 lu v.a.- y n a- . - 5 m , <t o~e y a s 4 a-.
+ h vaza p J) ceu & %. :n4-Wod LJ h.a n %. Ad ~ k-r reg-& Zs e u> hot h 6 aa y te y e.e.) a e a en e t/< l'a E deck he f L+ e e'd-a-. .L n < ^ U M L-
+-f%t + inJ .z_.r b v4 b 4, & at,s/as - el 4 L usiti eD e a. a Aa.ec o- 4a.e' m .2../ a, in J.m rs zo ^S y % t. toaM.5',
/d .2,op,_ .e ,/e 4 *.s 9 e . =- ej /2 rw .r. (g t4 s f= 4 J a.< .i i ~p /9. c h.< A w J-- aanr, r fyet/ dd u +< ca / '/- at& e6 -.c. o./ ha f Aa d=-3 * ~oC C Sa f f4-<. m.s n A.<o o- - L t.s 41, deep arn Ja. - ,
b' d- ane2 x -/-) y6 6 ~* * < <C 5 rI d O4 H T fz h of ghk,- -
\
J[2 2-/g3 s 1 I
.S
J I i
- i. ,
t i e ?. <
% h.
~
_2 -LL- 83 GalGL, n.
%M<x%
Y W ~ [W h: N NU , cq su-rzr- el se. x %] L P. C.< k f4 f, VP fS
- n. die W ) .
5~3 's - 73 4 2 - .~ 70 9 L. A' N 5 KM ~ bM * % A pia [
%e. d- x W
~ bk""k>sh-da> W T h>J%t "pAb " ..
~
n' g 9 0 8 C $ r ; ;; ;. .
.t -. .. . .
y i .. ,I s u ~ A Q /; 4 g 4 p "
- p. w w p.M S -
C g-&w 2.-7J-B5 G7db , 24
^
7 4 m (kkp-)
- 1~ Ox a ~ n a v e ra8. -
ge &a e}c Ap L - t. l L.
*=em 1 - - - - - - = - - , - _ - , . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - , - . _ , _ _ - - . - . , _ _ . _ _ _
4 3-2-B la. E.UW l-L h '
%W Autnsw t/ A n spau n G $ Tp cab =L L
V f Je.- fak. PM ed' k - L A G W
- Q We_R44a E 4n-so w fu :.
Qc y' " .
}
1
*0ff~ j '
o% , vfTe 1 050- n % M S" t 82L'y W 6w A & M : Wf ( 1 : k wo4-- 4 Ih Wo . L A-C - t *W. -h M A 2Y w % f,< w A. 4&v W &
&s. *e W s
W p= y k
. web " 7W d W G ~it > undeL
,~ &
W n& AX.
- A* L A Q s /J L #C h e ? l l
-l\ ,. ... -
l i .d . I
,y .
EXHIBIT B I i
]
l DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3 March 17, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to E. Kitler from J.J. Chwastyk, Subj: TWG Membership
Intorce 100 Momorandum V Date: 3/17/83
Subject:
TWG Membershi
~ ~
To: E. Kitler, Supe ser of Start Up Location: I/U ite Operations Bldg. 222 l l Effective immediately, please consider W. Marshall as the Primary Site Operations Department representative to the TWG. Mr. Marshall vill replace Mr. R. Parks as the primary member only for the Reactor Building Polar Crane project. This action is considered appropriate for the present situation and is not considered a negative reflection of Mr. Park's ability, conduct or performance. The designation of Mr. Marshall should not adversely affect the Polar Crane Refurbishment Schedule.
./
l//MY
- 6. J. Chvastyk /
Site Operations Dirtetor, t (Acting) JJC/bjs cc: W. Marshall R. Parks J. Barton B. Kanga File vjg yd s& I f* ^.
. O c '
y J5 f g _-; d. En 7
& cA-p 6 /t'4 r u ge
1 EXHIBIT C
DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4 April 4, 1983 GPUN News Release, GPU Nuclear Refers Affidavit to the NRC September 17, 1984 Letter to P.R. Clark from C.W. Sandford March 24, 1983 Letter to Richard Parks from Richard A. Wheeler March 25, 1983 Letter to Richard Parks from Richard A. Wheeler 4 1
L. . News Release me m
=:Mia't' P r. 'lNuclear
' Post Office Box 480 y%%[^ 7 57 Public Information Services For Further fr.forrnation contact: Dcuglas Bedell or John Fidler For Release: Inynediately Date: April 4, 1983
#33-83N GPU NUCLEAR REFERS AFFIDAVIT TO THE NRC Middletown, PA -- GPU Nuclear Corporation today turned over to the Nuclear Regulatory Conynission an a.fidavit by a GPU Nuclear engineer who rllages unsafe tranagement practices in the cleanup of Three Mile Island Unit 2.
The 22-page affidavit was prepared by Edwin H. Gischel, plant engineering dirr!ctor at Unit 2 for GPU Nuclear. Gischel's allegations ~are similar to earlier concerns expressed by twc others involved in the TMI Unit 2 cleant;;: In forwarding the affidavit to the NRC, Robeit C. Arnold, president of GPU Nuclear, noted that the company is investigating the " concerns and allegations" made over the last two or three weeks, and also will be analyzing Gischel's affidavit. In submitting his affidavit to Arnold, Gischel said he felt that an investi- ! gation of his allegations by the NRC is necessary and asked that the affidavit be l passed on to "the appropriate representative" of the NRC. Arnold sent the affidavit to Lake Barrett, deputy director of the NRC's TMI-2 program office, who is based at TMI. Arnold said he was confidcnt that all activities at TMI-2 have been conducted with safety as the paramount concern. The allegations involving the cleanup already have been subjected to an ongoing review process that has been in place for the l cleanup. Gischel is part of the Site Operations unit at Unit 2 that also included Larry P. King, for.ner director of site operations for GPU Nuclear, and Richard Parks, a Bechtel Group, Inc., employee. King and Parks have also alleged mis-
-more-l
> 'l April 4,1983
#33-83N i
conduct in the management of the TMI-2 cleanup. In a reorganization of the Unit 2 cleanur, Jechtel and GPU Nuclear employees were combined into a single organization' headed by Bahman Kanga, a Bechtel vi.e president, who became director of Unit 2. Kanga reports directly to Arnold. As have King and Parks, Gischel focuses in his affidavit on procedures for load-testing the polar crane which, when fully tested and qualified, will be used to lift the head Trom the THI-2 reactor vessel. In a new allegation, Gischel said that an incident at TMI 2 on January 8, 1982, in which an employee discharged an air hose into a contaminated floor drain,
" initially...had been classified as a minor release within the plant" and later the i
radiological control department " learned there had been a release to the environment." The record shows that GPU Nuclear declared an " unusual event" -- a low-level emergency classification -- when the incident in question occurred and in two news releases immediately after the event said that "TMI officials reported insignificant radiation releases" that were not detectable offsite above normal background radiation. GPU Nuclear's initial evalut. tion was not changed in subsequent reviews of the cvent. Gischel is also alleging harrassment because he was asked to take a neuro-
- psychological evaluation in connection witi, his recovery from a stroke last June.
GPU Nuclear denied the allegatim t f he. assment. King was dismissed by Gdl Nuht on March 23 because of a personnel matter unrelated to the safety concerns. GPU Nuclear said that King was involved in the ,
- managemcnt and ownership of a separate company which hired away employees from GPU Nt clear. GPU Nuclear held that was a conflict and dismissed King.
After Parks made his allegations on March 23. Bechtel placed him on a leave of absence, with pay, while his charges are being investigated. Although he is not a degreed engineer, Parks's Bechtel title is " senior startt'p engineer." Technical employees sometimes have the word " engineer" in their functional titles without possessing a college engineering degree.
SEP 21 35; Bechtel North American Pbwer Corporation Engineers - Constructors 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-1454 301 - 258-3000 September 17, 1984 Mr. P. R. Clark President GPU Nuclear Corporation 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Re: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG-0680, Supp. No. 5, of July, 1984; Allegations of Harassment of R. D. Parks
Dear Mr. Clark:
In a report entitled "TMI-l Restart," NUREG-0680, Supp. No. 5 (" Staff Report"), and issued in July, 1984, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") Staff stated that R. D. Parks had been " harassed by management officials of Bechtel." There are many significant factual errors in the Staff Report. As a result of these errors the NRC Staff has drawn inferences as to the motives of Bechtel managers'which would not be warranted if all the relevant facts were considered. I am convinced that the inforEation upon which the NRC Staff based its conclusionLis seriously deficient. In large part, these deficiencies result from the fact that most of the information upon which the NRC Staff relied was obtained during a hurried investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor (" DOL") conducted under severe time constraints imposed by federal statute. Accordingly, the NRC Staff has never had an adequate opportunity 40 consider Bechtel's side of this case. A full scale report is presently being prepared which will fully set forth Bechtel's reasons for its l actions regarding Mr. Parks. We hope to submit this report to you in three to four weeks. Although our full report is not yet ready, I wish to bring to your attention as early as possible several preliminary observations regarding the more obvious shortcomings of the Staff Report's conclusions regarding Mr. Parks' allegations of harassment. What follows is based on'the investigation undertaken by our attorneys.
- s. Bechtel North American Power Corporation Mr. P. R. Clark 2 September 17, 1984 Conclusions of the Report {
Regarding Parks j As a preliminary matter, it must be emphasized that the Staff Report relies in large part for its factual findings upon a report prepared by the NRC Office of Investigations dated May 18, 1984 ("OI Report"). The OI Report in turn relies entirely on a report of an investigation by the DOL prepared under severe time constraints. (OI Report, Ex. 102). The OI Report simply states that "[t]he scope of the DOL investigation of Parks' complaint, which found for Parks, was deemed sufficient for NRC purposes and is included as part of this report for regulatory and enforcement consideration." (Id. at 12). It is significant that the OI Report indicates that no independent investigation of Parks' allegations was conducted. Despite the limited factual basis for the OI Report, the NRC Staff determined that various Bechtel managers harassed Parks in the following ways:
- 1. By removing Parks' responsibilities as alternate startup and test supervisor, one of many of his responsibilities, on February 23, 1983;
- 2. By interviewing Parks on March 14, 1983, regarding hie involvement with the job shop Quiltec;
- 3. By temporarily removing Parks from the Test Work Group with regard to the polar crane tests, on March 17, 1983;
- 4. By putting Parks on leave with pay on March 24, 1983; and
- 5. By telling Parks that he should not go public with his concerns, that another employee had been humiliated, and that Parks had put Bechtel in a bad light with its client by raising safe.ty concerns regarding the polar crane.
Actual Reasons for Purported Harassment Although the evidence cannot be recounted in detail at this point, the evidence which Bechtel will present in its report will show that each of the alleged acts of harassment were, in fact, unrelated actions taken for legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons. In particular, the r port will show that the first purported act of harassment was a simple organizational alignment to ensure appropriate representation of the various disciplinary departments at TMI-2 on the Test Work Group (TWG). Contrary to the Staff Report, the decision to replace Parks was not made by
Bechtel North American Power Corporation Mr. P. R. Clark 3 September 17, 1984 Dr. Thiesing, but was made by the chairman of TWG, Mr. Kitler. The decision to replace Parks as the alternate was made so that the TWG chairman's alternate would be a representative of the chairman's department, Site Engineering, rather than a representative of Site Operations, which was Parks' department. When a startup engineer, Mr. Walker, arrived at the site and was assigned to the Site Engineering department, Parks was replaced by Walker so that the TWG chairman's alternate would be from the same department as the chairman. The second purported act of harassment specified in the Staff Report is Parks' interview regarding his involvement with the job shop Quiltec. Parks was implicated in this matter by the fact that he personally arranged for the typing of resumes of TMI-2 personnel on Quiltec stationery. This questionable conduct clearly justified Bechtel's investigative interview of Parks. Moreover, the interview was conducted in a straight-forward, non-intimidating manner. Third, Parks' assertion that he was involuntarily stripped of his functions on TWG regarding polar crane matters will be rebutted. In fact, Parks and his superior in the Site Operations department discussed Parks' removing himself from TWG for Parks' own benefit. Parks agreed to the change, and also indicated to the Director of TMI-2 that Parks did not consider his stepping down from TWG to be an act of intimidation. In short, this change in Parks' status was entirely voluntary on Parks' part. l Fourth, Parks suspension on March 24, 1983 was motivated by Parks' inflammatory and libelous accusations aimed at his fellow professionals at TMI-2 which threatened to destroy the working atmosphere at TMI-2, not by any desire to retaliate for filing a complaint with the DOL. It must be emphasized that Parks publicly laid the blame for the 1979 accident at TMI-2 upon a colleague at TMI-2. This libelous statement, together with the highly charged public allegations which he directed against the professional integrity of other co-workers and supervisors, destroyed his ability to continue working in a productive, cooperative manner with these individuals. We accordingly suspended Mr. Parks but continued his salary pending our investigation and resolution of his claims. Last, contrary to the Staff Report, Parks never was told by Mr. Kanga not to go public with his concerns or that another employee had been humiliated. Furthermore, Parks never was told by Mr. Kanga that Parks had put Bechtel in a bad light with its client by raising safety concerns. In fact, Mr. Kanga never discouraged Parks from expressing safety concerns in any manner.
d Bechtel North American Power Corporation Mr. P. R. Clark 4 September 17, 1984 In addition to the fact that these purported acts of harassment were properly motivated, it must be emphasized that Parks' allegations of harassment do not stand up in view of all of the circumstances. Bechtel had no desire to retaliate against Parks for voicing his concerns because, in fact, Eechtel took steps to resolve substantially all of Parks' technical concerns well before his suspension. Moreover, if Bechtel had desired to retaliate against Parks it could have seized upon his involvement in the Quiltec matter as a basis for terminating him. In fact, Bechtel decided not to take any adverse employment action against Parks because of his apparent lack of familiarity with Bechtel's conflict of interest policy. This decision was made before Parks publicly released his allegations on March 23, 1983. As mentioned above, this letter only generally addresses the main deficiencies in the NRC Staff's July, 1984 Report. Those deficiencies, and Bechtel's evidence rebutting the Staff Report's conclusions concerning Farks, will be set forth in greater detail in the forthcoming Bechtel report. However, I believe this letter demonstrates that the NRC Staff lacked a reasonable basis for its conclusions that Bechtel harassed Parks, and I would hope that you will reserve making an informed judgment upon Parks' allegations of harassment until after you have fully reviewed and considered Bechtel's evidence. Very truly yours, W lu & C. W. 9 Sandfor Deputy General Manager CWS/vwc
Bechtel North American Pter Corporation Engneers - Constructors 15743 Snacy Grove Road *" Ga t'e'scu g, Marytand 20877-1454 301 - 253-3000 March 24, 1983 Mr. Richard Parks 14 Elmwood-V0P Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Mr. Parks:
We have been informed that you have filed a complaint with the Department of I. abor alleging that management has harassed and intimidated you in connection with certain questions you have raised concerning the TMI-2 recovery proj ect. We vigorously deny that any such harassment or intimidation has occurred. In order to insulate you from even the appearance of such conduct, and to assure the continued effectiveness of all personnel at the site, we are placing you on an indefinite leave of absence with pay, effective i==ediately, until we have had an opportunity to review this =atter further. We will be in touch with you within thirty days with regard to the status of our review of your allegations. If you need to come to the jobsite to pick up your personal effects, please call me to arrange a mutually convenient time and please feel free to call me with respect to any problems you may have. We want to confirm to you that Bechtel vill not take any adverse personnel action against you merely because you have filed a complaint with the Department of I. abor or beca6se of any other allegations you may have made with respect to practices at the site to other federal agencies. Very truly yours, Richard A. Wheeler Chief Startup Engineer
Bechtel North American Power Corporation Engineers - Constr ctors 15740 ShadyGrove Acad .* Ga thersburg. Mary ano 20877-1454 301 - 258-3000 March 25, 1983 Mr. Richard D. Parks c/o Ms, Betty Quackenbush 321 Adelia Street Middletown, PA 17057
Dear Mr. Parks:
You should be aware that during your leave of absence with pay all benefits you are enrolled in will remain effective. Insurance premium payments will continue to be apportioned between Bechtel and you on the same basis as during active work time. You will also continue to accrue vacation and sick leave according to standard accrual procedures. Your time card will be submitted by my staff as it has been in the past. Upon my return to Caithersburg yesterday I mailed to you the expense report forms you requested. You may submit your expenses by mail directly to my office. Please call if I may be of further assistance. Very truly yours. fh ichard A. Wheeler Chief Startup Engineer RAW:vwe
9 d EXHIBIT D i 5
- - - . , .y w +. e--,.my. .-w - w.__. - .-e - - - . - - . . ,
DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7 April 4, 1983 Letter to Robert Arnold from Morris K. Udall March 29, 1983 Letter to The Honorable Morris Udall from R.C. Arnold March 22, 1983 Inter-office Memorandum to Auger, Faust, Gummo, Parks, Perry &
; Smith, Subj: Planned Inquiry of House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs l- March 17, 1983 Letter to Robert Arnold from Morris K. Udall March 18, 1983 Letter to The Honorable Morris K.
Udall from R.C. Arnold i May 4, 1983 Letter to Robert Arnold from Morris K. Udall i May 9, 1983 Letter to The Honorable Morris K. Udall from R.C. Arnold May 31, 1983 Letter to The Honorable Morris K. Udall from R.C. Arnold March 4, 1983 Handwritten notes on TWG Meeting March 4, 1983 Three Mile Island Unit 2
' Load Test for Polar Crane Recovery, Revision 3, No. TP 141/1 May 14, 1982 Letter to R.L. Rider from J.C. Devine with attached Comment Resolution Sheets.
Also attached Memorandum to J.C. Devine from S. Lefkowitz dated April 26, 1982 and i Letter to John J. Barton from Lake H. Barrett dated April 1, 1982 March 30, 1982 Polar Crane Recovery Description j March 7, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to Buchanan, t Clements, Fornicola, Gallagher, Marsden, Parks, Radbill, Thiesing, Walker & Warren, Subj: TWG Meeting Minutes of March 4, 1983 i I f
..y- r _ _ . ., , . . , , -.- __ . . - - ~ . - - _
....,r.-_.-. , , _ < _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ . .__._y ._r...,,,, , , , . . . _ , ,., , , , .
February 23, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to B.K. Kanga from B.E. Ballard, Subj: Polar Crane Safety Evaluation March 23, 1983 Typed notes from John J. Barton re Parks' Affidavit June 19, 1979 Bechtel Directive No. 2-1 May 20, 1981 Typed notes from J.M. Komes entitled Professional Excellence April 26, 1982 Employment Application of Richard D. Parks Miscellaneous dates Newspaper articles February 27, 1985 Memorandum to Philip R. Clark from Edwin H. Stier, Comments on NRC Staff Responses to Questions from Udall Committee Concerning TMI-2 Cleanup March 29, 1985 Memorandum to Philip R. Clark from Edwin H. Stier, Subj: NUREG-0680 Supplement 5 December 6, 1982 Inter-Office Memorandum to Chwastyk, Fornicola, King, Kunder, Mummert, Subj: Startup and Test Personnel Coverage February 18, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to R.C. Arnold, Subj: Safety Evaluation Report for Polar Crane Load Test February 10, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to L.P. King, Subj: Review of Polar Crane Load Test Safety Evaluation February 17, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to J.W. Thiesing, Subj: Polar Crane Load Test Safety Evaluation ! February 17, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to E.H. Gischel, Subj: Polar Crane Load Test Safety Evaluation February 23, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to E.J. Kitler, Subj: Procedure AP 1047 Startup & Test Manual TWG Membership February 24, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to E. Kitler, Subj: Site Operations Test Working Group
November 17, 1980 Memorandum to M.W. Herlihy, Subj: TWG Members - Operations l November 18, 1980 Memorandum to M.W. Herlihy, Subj-Procedure AP 1047, Startup & Test Manual, I TWG Membership November 24, 1980 Memorandum to M.W. Herlihy, Subj: Startup and Test Manual - AP 1047 Resolution of Recovery Engineering Comments & Designation of TWG Member and Alternate November 25, 1980 Memorandum to Barton, Elam, Bensel, King, Conaway, Ballard, Wright, Devine, Brownewell, Herlihy & Parks, Subj: Procedure AP 1047, Startup & Test Manual, TWG Membership June 18, 1981 Inter-Office Memorandum to M.W. Herlihy, Subj: Qualification of Recovery Engineering Technical Working Group (TWG) Member June 30, 1981 Inter-Office Memorandum to Hovey, Barton, King, Bensel, Conaway, harren, Rekart, Miller, Wright, Parks, Presgrove, Herlihy, Subj: TWG Meeting Minutes October 12, 1981 Inter-Office Memorandum to M.W. Herlihy, Subj: TMI Unit II TWG Representative from QA Department February 18, 1983 Inter-office Memorandum to Buchanan, Chwastyk, Fornicola, King, Kunder, Mummert & Warren, Subj: Startup and Test Personnel Coverage March 1, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to E. Kitler from J.J. Chwastyk, Subj: Applicability of AP 1047/1043 to Polar Crane Test Program March 8, 1983 QA Quality Deficiency Report March 10, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to J.W. Thiesing from B.E. Ballard, Subj: Polar Crane Refurbishment Review March 11, 1983 Inter-Office Review to M. Radbill from J.F. Marsden, Subj: Polar Crane Work Package Review January 7, 1983 Quality Assurance comments to the draft polar crane load test procedure (Rev. O) February 7, 1983 Quality Assurance comments to the draft polar crane load test procedure (Rev. O)
February 16, 1983 Inter-office Memorandum to R.F. Fenti from D.M. Lake, Subj: Resolution of Comments: Load Test for Polar Crane March 1, 1983 Inter-Office Memorandum to D.M. Lake from J.J. Chwastyk, Subj: IOM #4370-83-1019, Resolution to Comments on P/C Load Test Notes of Task Force telephone interview of B. Ballard on May 12, 1983 f 1 1 l l I i (
-- , . . - - - - , - .- ,,.-,-.,,---n- --. ---. - . - - . - . . . . , - , ,,, .--r,-,-,.- , , , - , _ , , , - , , - - , , - - - ~ - - , - - . - - - - - . . -
jy_ e:p,7 COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS u.s. Houst OF REPRESENTATIVES WASHINGTON. D.C. 20515 April 4, 1983 Mr. Robert Arnold President GPU Nuclear Corporation Post Office Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Mr. Arnold:
Ihis is in response to your letter of March 29. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter. There are no current plans to request Messrs. Augur, Gummo, Perry or Smith to meet with me or my staff in Washington. I would appreciate your providing the Committee certain documents unless they have already been provided to the NRC. These documents are depositions of the following persons taken in conjunction with the GPU-B&W trial: Walter J. Marshall Joseph J. Chwastyk George A. Kunder Frederick J. Scheimann - Gary P. Miller Jack Herbein Leland C. Rogers James Seelinger In the future I may request Messrs. Chwastyk, Kunder and Marshall to meet with my staff. In any such meetings, GPU employess could be accompanied by attorneys who represent them. The presence in any such meeting of persons other than the interviewee, his attorney and persons having an official connection with the Committee would impede our investigation. Recent allegations and other matters relating to cleanup of Unit 2 and restart of Unit 1 will be the subject of a hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment on April 26. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, MORRIS K. UDALL Chairman
- V' -
h *- '
)$
e l GPU Nuclear Corporation [ M M[ Post Office 6a 480 Acute 441 SCL!n Micclet' own. Pennsyivania 1700 717 944 7621 TELEX 84 2386 writer"s Direct Dial Numcer March 29,1983
. f* .
.-V .' s
/ Q j,'*, . . , \
.Q '
- p. ,f The Honorable Morris K. Udall i - ', 1,'-.' , , ,
Chairman t. ~3 - .- A Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S. House of Representatives T-h %" '3q .9 'L- /?, ' NO /. ',f Washington, D.C. 20515 WgM.4 ', - .
Dear Congressman Udall:
In response to your letter of March 17, 1983, I have met with all the individuals listed except fir. King and Miss Wenger (wno are no longer employees of GPU Nuclear) to encourage their cooperation with the inquiry of the Comittee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Attached is a copy of the memorandum which I gave them during that meeting and which I discussed with tnem. I emphasized particularly the second paragraph, which points out the Company's past history of full and open cooperation with official investigations. I made it clear the Company expects the same attitude' and approach to investigations on the part of its employees and contractors. The individuals asked three questions to which I comitted to try to obtain the answers from the Cormlittee.
- 1. When will these individuals be expected to be available for the inquiry and, specifically, can Mr. Gummo proceed with his vaca-tion plans for the period March 27 through April 4 (I did not advise him to cancel his plans and he has since left for the Bahamas, but can be contacted to return)?
- 2. How long will the inquiry involve these six individuals who attended the meeting? ,
- 3. Will there be any . limitation on others sitting in on interviews as requested by the interviewees?
We look forward to a prompt response to these questions and the questions con-tained in my letter to you of March 18, 1983, so that full cooperation in the inquiry may be facilitated. Very trul ours,
)R. C. A nold +
~
President bec: H'. M. Dieckamp slm B. K. Kanga E. Blake, Esq. AttachmendPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation
t Int 3reffico 10cmarandum D:te March 22,1983 l Subject Planned Inquiry of House Comittee on Interior and Insular Affairs D
- John Auger Richard Parks Craig Faust John Perry Robert Gumo Joseph A. Smith The Company has been notified by Attachment 1 of the House Comittee's intent to conduct an inquiry into the TMI-2 accident and clean up. The letter re-quests the Company's encouragement and facilitation of the cooperation of each of you with the inquiry. As indicated in Attachment 2, the Company is trying to obtain more details about the inquiry. If additional information becomes available, we will pass it on to each of you.
The Company in the past always has cooperated fully and openly with official investigations. We expect our employees and contractors to support this policy. We also believe that our employees should 'make known to us any concerns they have as to Company activities; particularly those relating to safety issues. The organization has been structured to provide visibility for the addressing of safety issues and also to facilitate identification and reporting of safety concerns. We hope that all eg loyees will support our policies in these areas. Absent additional information from the Committee and based upon the individuals identified in Attachment 1 I expect you will be questioned concerning your knowledge of issues relating to concerns expressed by Mr. King about TMI-2 activities. It is further possible that the inquiry could include matters relating to the TMI-2 accident. Lacking additional details, the Company is unable to provide s'pecific advice to individual e@loyees regarding the inquiry. However, some points to con-sider: , o While the Comittee staff at this time may not have authority to require individuals to cooperate with the inquiry, it is my under-standing that the Committee could give them such authority should it be necessary or desirable. e I would suggest that it will be in everybody's best interest if a record is made of all interviews and I expect the Comittee will cooperate in making such a record if so requested by an individual being interviewed. A000064 8-
s i Page 2 Planned inquiry of House Committee March 22, 1983 on Interior and Insular Affairs e To facilitate the Company meeting its obligations, the Company will be requesting copies of any records made in the course of the inquiry as was its practice in prior investigations. e The Company is also willing (and believes it may be helpful to each of you) to make available Mr. Ernest Blake to sit in with any of you during your interview if you should so desire. Mr. Blake is an attorney with the firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge and has been heivily involved for several years in TMI licensing activities and with many of the investigations conducted since the TMI-2 accident.
.I have asked to meet with you as a group today so that we can discuss as fully as our information permits the questions and concerns you may have about the inqui ry.
R. C. rnold slm - Attachments cc: H. M, Dieckamp P. R. Clark B. K. Kanga C. Sanford W. Meeks E. Blake, Esq. e s I
. , - . - . , . , , - - - - - - . . _ . - - - , . - -n . - ,- . -.c- - .._.- . . - -- - - . - . . ,-- , - - -. _. - ._.
== *rsisa ., .,
WO*t$ r UO.LL,act2.Cpulwase ... ira +i.
.._...'. ,....,.o .,,,,.
0 .,'.*.7..'m..', COMM1TTEE ON INTERIOR '*'""'"""'"-
.t.!:7;.''." " 5, .. . . . . . r .'., - .
AND INSULAR AFFAIRS "L%i'lL:,< E37$E:'3' E-5 E.ii Q
'"'[*,c.
"U.", , . O',M..
m Eso U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
"#'"'*C"""'"
a' M'C'*CWNi5 o me.. u e - v. : . u. is. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 e.WC .as C E u, .m
.A . .. ,4
. 6en c., .J ~, March 17, 1983 euna an m o '
o "'."7.' "f'
.'.".1
'n... a., .
en . a- en.a.e .
"c"*4.T." "cf Mr. Robert Arnold President GPU Nuclear Corporation Post Office Box 480 i Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Mr. Arnold:
I would appreciate your encouraging and facilitating cooperation of the following persons with the inquiry of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs into the TMI-2 ' acciden't and cleanup: John Augur Craig Faust Robert Gummo Lawrence P. King Richard Parks John Perry Joseph A. Smith Joyce M. Wenger j - Thank you for your assistance. * , , Sincerely, 7t&W MORRIS K. UDALL Chairman l ATTACHMENT 1 l
._-_L.--.
't GPU Nuclear Corporation f- N o te 1So n Micaletown. Pennsylvania 170:, 717 944 7621 TELEX 84 2386 Writer"s Direct Deal Numcer (717) 948-8189 March 18,1983 The Honorable Morris X. Udall Chairman Comittee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman.Udall; In reference to your letter of March 17, 1983, it would be helpful to me if you could provide me with information on the purpose and scope of the Comittee's inquiry and when, where, and under what conditions the individuals named would need to be available for the inquiry. If the inquiry relates to potential safety issues, I would appre-ciate being provided with any information or allegations of which the Comittee is aware that relate to the safety of activities at Three Mile Island so that the Company can pursue expeditiously any such issues. Very truly ours, f[
. C. r' d President ATTACHMENT 2 GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corceration
j u - . ,, a . sw,x.
.w .e.-, . -
- c .
... om m. c,.m == av
$[L
=:m':*
((h. lll==% COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS
" " " ^ " " ' "
== c= = =
'77 U.S. HOU8E OF REPRE8ENTATIVIS 7,,"ydUg
^ 7 ,s'. E d u. E I"m vr WA8HINGTON, D.C. Es15 1% . %'llllll'"A . May 4, 1983 g, g,c."' fT -- Ct.'.tl '.O
- l"L'"'"
'" .7.
= m",.= ..
= =,,,,,. r es0.. , cC . :y r,t 2c:
f.',:l" l 1" #" ." " # 0;f
-W g e 6.;e.Vi.
T. .3 Mr. Robert Arnold k ~ ra 6 N 7 President Q $ f. 'gT. .'// ' General Public Utilities Cf ' Corporation Nuclear <,s P.O. Box 480 '.;;,.' N. _. [,'
..igj,1, A Route 441 South Middletown, PA 17057 Dear Mr. Arnoldt Pursuant to the Committee's inquiry into the cleanup of TMI-2 and the March 28 accident, I would appreciate your pro-viding the following:
- 1. Memoranda and/or other documents with the identifica-tion numbers listed on the attachment to this letter.
- 2. Transcripts of interviews conducted by Mr. Stier as described in Section I of Additional statements of l
GPU_ Nuclear Corporation submitted in conjunction with the Subcommittee's April 26 hearing.
- 3. All memoranda, interview transcripts and depositions, pertaining to Quiltec and/or pertaining to Mr. King's i
! alleged conflict of interest, prepared by GPU or Bechtel empidyees or consultants prior to February 25, 1983. -
- 4. A. listing of times of phone calls and/or other contacts made by Mr. Blizzard in his inquiries concerning Quiltec.
Thank,you for your assistance. Sincerely, . s l i MO IS X. UDALL Chairman Attachment [ (? .' # # s. E Z 4 )
) .
ATTACHMEN_T 4200-81-910 4200-82-398 -
-945 -
409
-946 - 412
-947 -
425
-958 -
428
-964 - 437
-967 -
443 1 468 4200-82-006 - 470
-008 -
474
-018 - 479
-021 -
484
-028 -
517
-051 -
523
-056 -
545
-070
-085 4200-83-003
- -092 .
011
-100 - 017
-112 -
021
-113 -
029 -
~131 -
034
-137 -
035.
-139 = 039
-160 -
046
-170 -
051
-176 -
052
-192 - 058
-194 - 062
-230 -
065
-246 -
068 ! -263 - 069 l -264 - 074 .
-272 ~
-280 .
- - 086 *
-282 - 094 -
-289 - -
096 -
-308 -
097
-317 ,
~327 TMI-2-R-47100
-336
-339
-348 *
-371
-372
-378
-379
-382
-387
--n---- -,,,w_,,---,-,.r,n.,,__ -
,.,,-.,.w., ,,,,,,mnn,_,-,-,.,.n-,.m_,. _ - . - - , . - - - ,._,----_---n-n----,
6
)
GPU Nuclear Corporation m JNuclear e nonyss48o Middletown: Pennsylvania 17057 717 944 7621 TELEX 84 2386 Writer"s Direct Dial NumDer May 9, 1983 The Honorable Morris K. Udall Chairman Corrmittee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Udall:
Under separate cover we are providing to you today copies of the signed transcripts, including transcript corrections, requested in item number 2 of your le'tter dated May 4,1983. These docu-ments are being provided in advance of the other information in response to a subsequent request from your staff. , Very truly yours, L. R. C. rnold
. President ,
slm bcc: H. M. Dieckamp B. K. Kanga E.'L. Blake, Esq. , J. c. Wilson, Esq. GPU NWloar Corporation is a subsidiary of tne General Public Utilities Corporation
t ( AL L44/l d/e GPU Nuclear Corporation 5 3 tuclear o
- e;;,eemeos Middletown. Pennsylvania 17057 o191 717 944 7621 TELEX 84-2386 Writer's Direct Dial Number-flay 31, 1983 The Honorable Morris K. Udall Chairman Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Udall:
By letter dated May 9, 1983, we provided to you the documents in response to item 2 of your letter dated May 4,1983. The following enclosures are provided as respon-sive to the remaining three numbered requests and are so noted: Request 1 - A copy of all memoranda listed on the attachment to your May 4 letter except for the following numbered memoranda which have not yet been located: 4200-81-945, 4200-81-947, and 4200-83-046. Request 3 - A copy of the handwritten notes of Philip Clark taken on February 24, 1983, during a phone conversation with J. Barton are being provided to you by GPU Nuclear Corporation. We are also forwarding for Bechtel North American Power Corporation a copy of B. K. Kanga's memorandum dated March 2,1983, to R. C. Arnold with two attachments (D. M. Blizzard's memo to J. W. Buell dated February 23, 1983, and J. W. Thiesing's memo to H. D. Bruner dated March 2,1983) which was provided to us by Bechtel as being responsive to item 3. Re_ quest 4 - Bechtel' has informed us that all telephone calls and contacts made by D. M. Blizzard with respect to Quiltec are described in the February 23, 1983, memo from D. H. Blizzard to J. W. Buell which is provided in re-sponse to item 3. Very tr yoursg i R. C. nold President bec: E. Blake, Esq. J. Wilson, Esq. K. Richardson, Esq. GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation
.w.M"
- -9-83
~
vw6 //~df & a s a , u i n ., ,.c, /./ Lt,
- - 4-. s A, -x - , ~. R jf- s uc . ,,
3 m ,- 4
- (i) kor e did fk
- g) as sa w a
~ (3) & M A A.n .
So&r C.
~ /. /55 Ya p*U GC,. ' .s % W def p&M
- z. =n r oc w m x w x6
. am - e<
e./ af "'? mA.S. &M M mm A p -< 4 M ,5 'M M
- 3. And a v: % wm a ran< 4 ya (=.s m 06 pd$% cc. d z~. Py m'
wk ' m e m M m-< y &
" ,a: A m
& WJ h
, I ~- n.m p ec,/a -
,a~m f $a4w -Co** *
- d at / sm ,s=- d oe se -u n .-s d 265s ad A c. 4 de s#% x a
,W An afn a; - v, ay m eu <-.4p a <c y y ' " , /&l.O *) d **$, / cc Mac d ~ .p df c.5 '~
69 <WJ i r-e sN/p 4 re s .o d A -n? d e s 4 <c
,4 - sy s <ub w a s .,
i
- .) % a- <-m '> -
) App M
) Zach a/ .:, w, ,,, a- o.
o #- x m3, nu? 6 l l n
- s h. ,
-- m
m b s
!" 4'.* / ., a &! s zu /b - G & + S m -co /s. +
a] as/ & x % war / A #
/9. = . w. $ .
$^- o. n ? g& S h e <% Aa./ % -d ,Q ,_f a) NP .h - e?: c,a
' /
22o/ 22e s 3as .,*
.2z 8 *
)
, 72f'2 % + n- &
M~y .:d A '/ L s Co - s we,e he >', ,e /-./ ~A4 wo /ca,l
,' ! J -M A m .x (ans:' i ny p 27 W 9 w -4 h.e u...,,
6 A) 7- 4 As'.w'z;/
.' a ap<4 w o') &dd f ,
.m x. 2/ A&
5 a ,, e -- =-- e e - & .-wz ~J e, m .% .-/ n "M 't f /4 nW m / Y* p,7
- a. ./4 -- :L<LF Au /m . cdd m m rx . M
'-4./pg rrd m & /!W $ A $
n, - ~ a a, - : ~ _ - ( ,, -
^M W uw ,,s- 4 &-
l d x /c aC y C J-<- l
& A' $ ~/f d -Mf,' ~ ff ~ ,,,-$
p p x f/ ce' Z d- > ,y c &
- a. 4 ,-.<. r ~g M a.
.12 - ~
adf' W y . M ., x~,z. . .w <~d we s ~ 'Q & 4 l s-l% \' /Y o% .m .x <.w n Gd CW w -+,*t, pg 1 1
~en et -ws ed l
l
c e WI-4370-3891-83-PC0001 Revision 3 THREE MILE ISIAND UNIT 2 NUMBER TP 141/1 14AD TEST FOR Mrx TS 182 POLAR CRANE RECOVERY
, CATEGORY A CLASSIFICATION 1 REVISION 3 PREPARED: Cognizant Engineer -
Date 9 M4A 63 APPROVID: SU&T Manager _ Date/ 8 Ns p B t PRELDi1 NARY REVIEW MEETING: D te 3!M!I3 MINUTES OF MEETING NUMBER 46-I3=dt9C f
/i TWC APPROVAL POR PERFORENCE:
SU&T TWC Representative M Date _,.7//a/B A f ' { yu A r,,a t, / C*en t. n t ' ' Plant ops TWG Representative K!(3 of AfollOtaf C ace O !/ 7 !6'3 Plant Engineering TWG Rep. - Date_3filf63 Site Engineering TNG Rep. hMd Date M a est(3 QA TWG Representative Date 3/Z,3]f3
\ PORC Review Complete Date _ J Director-Site Ops Approval Date OTHIR APPROVAL $3 /6 gj Design Engineering Date 3/ $3 '
Nuclear Regulatory Coeunission / Date TEST RESULTS: Acceptable with the following test exceptions and deficiencies: SU&T Manager Date TWG APPROVAL OF TEST RESULTS: SU&T TWG Representative Date Plant ops TWG Representative Date Plant Engineering TWG Rep. Date Site Engineering TUG Rep. Date l PORC Review Complete Date Director-Site Ops Approval Date
6 GPU Nuclear ao so"$o
- 1dMuclear Middietown. Pennsylvania 17057 717 944 7621 Writer's Direct Dial Number.
717-948-8313 May 14, 1982 THI-II-BC-0398 Mr. R. L. Rider Project Enginer Bechtel Northern Corporation 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, MD 20760
SUBJECT:
Polar Crane Recovery Description, 2-M72-MH01, Rev. B
Dear Mr. Rider:
Attached are comment resolution sheets from Plant Engineering, Q.A., Licensing, and Recovery Engineering on the subject document, Alsc attached is S. Lefkowitz I memorandum regarding the subject. Sheldon's memorandum is submitted separately since the comments are very general in nature, and I wanted to make you aware of his concerns. I suggest a meeting be held to cover his concerns, but I will leave this up to you. , If you have any questions, please contact Chet Shorts at extension 8305 Very ru y yours, l a J. C. DeVine, Jr. Recovery Engineering Director i JCD/CAS/amg Attachments . cc: J. J. Barton i: ": ina"g J. E. Larson W@E7F "j R. N. Prabhakar MAY 2 51982 TMI.2 Dechtal Job 13587 e.oe i w.. ..., .= n nace of the General Pubhc Utihties System
l
! [r t>JNuclear comment Resolution Page 1 of 3
~
Ile9uest n/A h .
; %,,, Pola: Crane Recovery Description "'-
l C. A. Shorts May 14. 1982
! Reviewer ~ Date of Comments Oriemasor Dese'el Reseauteen 8:eni Reference Accept Regoct Reneen for
- m. Peger ere.
8'** ** ' **d 8* * *' N . Comment Co ament Rejeceien l 1. 6/ An inspection should be performed on r 3 M8 'r' MM M'" O M 2.1.1.3 the bridge and trolley rails. .docMt4T &&M Mo i 2 7/2.1.2 How do manually rotate eddy current ko/t6 9 $N ' I i brakes? , i 3 7/2.1.3 Should include reference to IEEE 62-78
" Guide for Field Testing Power Apparatus o@0I kh -
l Insulation *, (I d 4, 8/2.1.4 First paragraph, Do you have original - MAY 25122 data to compare this to? Vibration and noise should be monitored in some + TAAI.2
- manner. gedieel Job 13587 Second paragraph should include some %f4,gg g fz p p e w cz p + TX method to insure good contact of con 7N tactors.
J
~
\'
IVof NA/u?A;4- . Of4d6S de/57 5, 8/2.1 Should include a final pre-operational bfAJJEdcE '_ , 73 [ br/s M [ inspection that includes all the items in TMI.2's annual inspection procedure M'7V TVAtW4 8 C # M eg' a v e d that was previously submitted to you. p ~ { 6 11/2.3 Recommend adding an additional category { ! to include components that have long lead times, or have multiple uses on the
~
crane, i.e., inching motors, relays, etc. " O#T @ N- 6# . S/T
- Y W u
= =
i j Nuclear Comment Resolution J Pap 2 of 3 1 Ilestue08 S/A h g Polar Crane Recovery Description - " - 1 4 r_ A_ N rts May 14. 1982 ! Reviewer
- Does of Comeneous Origeneser Does of Rosetussen rma Iseen Refesence Accept Repect Reneen Ier No. Page#Pese.
k MW hh Commessee Co sunent y Askseien i . j 7. 15/ Fourth paragraph, the proposed load test ] 2.5.4 method and seapsence should be out11aod. - ; j - j A paragraph should also be inclieded on g@ test sequence and methods for the '
. auxiliary hoist.- -
- 8. General A discussion should be included about ,
safety evaluation for movement of test ' loads. A statement should also be made about safety evaluations of actual loads i to be included in the TER for that activity.
- 9. 17/8.0 Include a discussion about providing l copies of all documents and correspondenc t -
to Recovery Engineering in a timely I manner and that except for the items
- i noted, approval of the distributed
, documents is not required. If a major . . j safety concern is raised as a result ,
; of a GPU review of the information ,
documents, it must be resolved before the , l activity can be performed. A discussion - 1 should be included about the monthly j meeting which will cover the following: o work accomplished for the month i l o work planned for the next month
, s -
[r qJ] Nuclear comment Resolution Pap 3 of 3
~
flegunst S/A No W.O. No' Docenent Polar Crane Recovery Description %
- C. A. Shorts May 14.1982 '.
j flaviewer' Date of Conunents Origenesor Date of p .a.. , Cesentents lesen h iessace Pagetrese. Show Actual Proposed Howarding, A***P" *" 8*' No. gg Coenneent Co emeent Hogeselon o Items (that were discovered) which impact the cost and/or schedule. - l j . 4 4 e
- W
, e
![c gijNuclear comment Resolution Page 1 of 1
~
flequest g/A No _ , %g Polar Crane Recovery Description _ R. Prabhakar 4/23/82 Reviewer" Date of I'.onuneous Originator Deee of Rese4ueer.n
- as Accept negact n g.,
leens' Refeeence w &, No. Page/ Pere. Conineens Co sentent Regeselon gg
- 1. 16/ Structural members and welds to which 6.0 nuclear quality assurance applies should be identified on drawings (or in some - .
other suitable docueant). Please confirm how t.nis will be accomplished. t I . e i . . l l. l I L. _
[r g11 Nuclear comment Resolution ,,,,,,, lle(guesi S/A Ne Polar Crane Recovery Desc-1ption
~
J. E. Larson April 16. 1982 Reviewer ' Date of Comments Originator Date of Resolution
~~
item Reference Accept Regoct Reesen for No. Page/ Pere.
*^" " *
,, p Comment Co ownent Rejection 1 5/2.1.1 Add a paragraph discussing testing, .
Inspecting, or replacement of all lubricants. . 2 15/ The load test orogram should be developed 2.5.4 and presented .is soon as possible to - the NRC. 3 17/6.0 Define whose quality assurance program. -
- 4. 17/7.0 Reference attached NRC letter, and insure any conflicts are resolved.
l t l i l \ . I l fh' -
[r gllNuclear comment Resolution pay l of 2 flesguesi S/A No
%,,,,,g Polar Crane Recovery Description .
]
E H. Gischel Nav 5. 1982 ' Reviewer- Date of Conwnsens Origenster Dese of Rosaluesen rman itsen Reiseeme Accept Regoct Reneen for No. Pegetrose. Show Actual Proppsesi Rom % i MM Cosanent Co ownent Rekseien
- 1. 6/ Visual inspection should include the 2.1.1.3 entire load bearing and load controlling -
paths, including sheaves, pins, hooks. etc. Also, hook throat dimensions should be recorded and hooks should be magnetic . particle inspected. *
- 2. 12/ The pendant control push button set
- 2.4.a should be described as "an alternate" '
, to the operator's cab versus "a re-dundant" control station. ,
- 3. 13/ Does anything prevent rotation of the 2.4 bridge further than the degree described?
Could this be a problem?
- 4. 14/ The bridge rotation limitation in l 2.5.3 section 2.4 should be addressed here. *
( g 5 14/ prior to and following testing the , . 2.5.4 hook throat dimensions should be re- , corded and the load bearing and con- . trolling paths should be visually
- inspected for defects which could be .
detrimental to the successful completion and acceptance of testing. It is recommended that the instructions for pre and post load test inspections prescribed in the draft TMI-2 Lifting
-. w a
[c g)) Nuclear comment Re~ solution Page 2 of 2 Heque:8 A/A No Polar Crane Recovery Description E. H. Gischel Nav 5. 1982 Reviewer ~ Date of Conunents Oeigenesor Dese of Resoluesen Coensnents
; steen Relevence , y, Accept Re.act messen for No. Page/Pete. g . Comntent Co nment Weien and Handling Progras decisment be adhered to. ,
l 6 16/6.0 NQA should pertain to the entire load bearing and load controlling paths. , l
- l l
. t l . O 9
e I l lw -
gpg TMI-2 MECHANICAL )La \ i COMPONENT INFORMATION
. Memorandum AND EXAMINATION PROGRAM i
( . l.2 1 To: J. C. DeVine, Jr. Date: April 26,1982 Frcm: S. Lefkowitz
Subject:
Comments on Bechtel Polar Crane Recovery Description After reviewing the subject Bechtel engineering recovery plan, we find that it is generally a well v'ritten programmatic document to be used as the basis for more detailed recovery activities planning and implementation. The five part structure (i.e., Section 2), provides for all the steps we believe necessary to sup-
, port the detailed planning, and we concur with the logic contained therein.
Since this document serves a programmatic overview function, we find that the only specific comments appropriate at this time relate to the early exclusion, or implied exclusion of certain activities which may affect the final planning process. These comments are detailed below: SECTION 2.1 1 INSPECTION AND TESTING , It appears that visual examinations will be used as the initial screening process for determination of much of the data to be col-lected for mechanical components. We believe that it will be necessary to augment these with nondestructive examination tech-niques, especially in the areas of drive train and structural members. The present plan does not place enough emphasis in these areas. In addition (See Section 2.1.1.3), destructive exami-nation of portions of the wire rope may become a necessity and should not be eliminated at this time'. SECTION 2.2 - CONDITION ASSESSMENTS AND COMPONENT EVALUATION l Current standards for acceptance or rejection criteria for component l condition are left almost exclusively to " sound engineering judge- , ment". Hence, it will be extremely critical that the personnel establishing the test plans, collecting the data and assessing the data be knowledgeable of both component design, application and functional requirements for use in a nuclear facility. If requested. EPRI would be willing to provide assistance-in support of these activities for mechanical and structural components. Further, we believe that primary emphasis on data assessment ; should be placed upon first hand observation and assessment by 1 Action Required: - Dua Date: ) l
EM-042 .Mr. DeVine, Jr.
. Page Two - April 26, 1952 qualified inspectors. Photographic documentation of crane condition,
( while important for records, memory refreshment and report prepa-ration, should not be used as the basis for condition assessment and evaluation. SECTION 2 3 - PROCUREMENT OF REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS , While EPRI will not be organizationally involved in the procurement I process, we submit the following comments from a quality assurance perspective. As written, there are conflicting policies set forth in this section. Section 5 (Seismic Requirements) and Section 6 (Quality Assurance); i.e., Section 2.3 flatly states that all replace-ment components "will receive standard shop inspection and testing", while Sections 5 and 6 imply that components affecting seismic integrity -(implied to be structural members and welds), will be treated as quality related procurements and refurbishment activities. l We believe (1) this fundamental conflict should be resolved, and (2) it is too early to exclude components other than structural members and welds from quality assurance requirements unless ! a component-by-component evaluation has already been made. SECTION 2.5 - PREOPERATIONAL AND REQUALIFICATION TESTING The preliminary plan prepared by EPRI to describe its partici-
, pation in this program sets forth EPRI's desire to contribute heavily in these activities. We urge Bechtel's serious consider-l (,
ation of utilizing EPRI resources for testing methodology development - ! and implementation. l SECTION 4.0 - INVOLVEMENT OF OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS The process set forth in this section implies that EPRI and DOE involvement will require Bechtel to obtain much data or sample material that is non supportive to the recovery effort. We wish to express our position that it is our intent to maximize data requests, etc., to the extent that. they support recovery and to request additional extraneous data only where necessary to complete our engineering assessment / analysis of mechanical component performance. With this in mind, we would like to see this section redrafted to embrace the involvement of outside organizations as a constructive asset to the recovery as opposed to a dilution of ' GPU/Bechtel resources. SECTION 8 - DOCUMENTATION As written, the only documents requiring GPU approval are the
- subject programmatic recovery description and procurement doc 9 men-tation. We believe it is essential that those documents prepared during the Assessment Evaluation Process (Item c) be meticulously scrutinized by GPU, as the conclusions drawn for these documents will be' used to set forth the actual details of the repair / refurbish- '
I ment activities, and hence, the largest cost component of the recovery program. ,
- r. - , , - . - - - - - - - . - - - , , - - , , - - - , , , - - - - -
i EM-042 - Mr, DeVine, Jr. Pcge Thre'e - April 26, 1982 TABLE 1 - CRANE COMPONENTS TO BE INSPECTED ( We believe that this list of components be expanded to include all components whose failure could result in a loss of load control, unless substantial evidence has been provided to justify its deletion (e.g., we recommend inclusion of drive shafting, structural attachment of components to crane members, and specific areas of critical structural components). 7 S. Le owitz lal ec: Mr. D. R. Buchanan Mr. G. W. Clements Mr. C. B. Leek - Mr. C. A. Shorts Dr. G. Sliter Mr. F. L. Wadsworth ' , ( . e'"
T ,.,p.ar%g#
- 4
# 5 UNITED STATES
[ y .jd'[ .- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g g.j=.., wassmcTog.o.c agsss , iiRC/Tl41-82-017 O L,..'./ . Docket No. 50,320 p[ '
- Mr. John J. Barton
&<ls" -
Acting Director of Ti41-2 - General Public Utilities Nuclear Corp. P.O. Box 480 Middletown, PA 17057
Dear Mr. Barton:
Subject:
Ti41-2_ Reactor Building Polar Crane Refurbishment The NRC staff has reviewed your letter of January 4,1982, (Barton to Barre,tt, LL2-81-0262) and considers the following criteria applicable for refurbishing the reactor building polar crane. The criteria is as follows:
- 1. Resistance measurements should be made to verify that no unacceptably low or high resistances exist between the various circuits and
~
(" circuits to ground.
- 2. The quantity and quality of lubricants should be checked and found acceptable or a' suitable replacement of the lubricant should be made.
- 3. DJe to the past potentially very corrosive environment, a thorough
, inspection should be performed on the wire rope systems of both the 500 ton (name plate rating), main hoist, and the 25 ton auxiliary
. hoisi. Particular attention should be given to the more environ '
mentally exposed wire rope in the reeving system and the attached points. Chapter 5 of the Wire Rope Users Manual which is published by the Antrican Iron and St' eel Institute has been provided as
- Enclosure 1 for your information.
- 4. Enclosure 2 has been provided as a guide for a recommended inspection plan for the crane system. You are not required to follow this plan verbatum; however, an explanation should .be provided to the staff if any recommended steps are not performed. -
G
s
.i .
J:hn J. Ba rton -2 April 1, 1952' 5 We agree with your proposal to use Option 3 of UUREG-0612 as stated in your letter. .The staff interprets your proposal to include the requirements of ANSI B30.2-1976, Chapter 2-2, " Overhead and Gantry Cranes", (Enclosure 3). In conjunction with other inspection.
~
testing and maintenance criteria, ANSI B30.2 requires a dynamic test with the load rating not more than 80 percent of the maximum - load sustained during the test. The test load should also be_less than 125 percent of the rated load. As your plans for refurbishment of the polar crane continue, some of the above criteria may prove to be undesirable due to the uniqueness of the situation at Tl11-2. If such problems arise, we are available to discuss alternate steps to qualify the polar crane for service. , You should note that your letter of January 4,1982, has been interpreted to only address the crane refurbishment issue and will not be used as a response to the generic study of Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants . All items in generic letters as they relate to UUREG-0612 should be responded to specifically as a generic letter response.
/
y I / 3 e,-7 g
- i. * .'- 4. .': :
.L
.
- Lake H. Barrett
( Ceputy Program Director TMI Program Office
Enclosures:
As Stated - cc: See Service Distribution List l . l . l l - f I .
TR ANS. NO. BTE-0166 / 'r /. o s ;; , TRANSMITTAL
- ~
r BECHTEL NORTHERN CORPORATION 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 l TO: G PU SE IVICE CORPORATION DATE March 30, 1982- - i ' P. O. 80X 480 - MIDDLETOWN, PA.17057 . BECHTELJOB 13587 PURCHASE ORDER NO. ATTN: Mr. J. C. Devine Jr. 8ECHTEL FILE NO 0760/8420/2-M72-NH01 Sepias Encl.O Under Sep. Cover O Prints Encl.O UnderSep. Cover C ACTION NUMBER Microfilm 1. Approved Manufacturing may proceed. Encl.C Under Sep. Cover O 2. Approved Submit final dwn. - Mfg. may proceed. Specs Encl.D UnderSep. Cover D 3. Approved except as noted hke changes and submit _ Vellums Encl. O Under Sep. Cover O ' 4. Not Approved Correct and resubmit. final d A Other Encl.S UnderSep. Cover D 5. Review not required Mfg. may priscoed.
- 8. Comment / Approval Due Date Aoril 23. 1982
- 7. Information Only S. Other DE SCRIPTION Action Bechtel Manufacturer's No. Number Number g Title 6 2-M72-MB01 B Polar Crana Recovery Description SIJ:may ce J. J. Barton, w/o J. W. Thiesing, w/o TMI-2 Master Plant File, w/l .
D. R. Buchansa, w/1
, Very truly yours, k
.l. CONFIDENTIAL ,
e. P r U .?. N I T O COU9.T G; DER h m. i Y, mid. , [ ,M03 I a l l ca v w e m w . m % . e- . - a-* . a* .e.~ e= ~~
j' Becitel Nortlern Corporaton Engineers - Constructors 15740 Shady Grove Road GaitherstK;rg. Maryland 20877 301-254 3000 August 18, 1982 In Response to TMI-II-BC-0398 Mr. J. C. DeVine Jr. CPU Nuclear P.O. los 480 Middletown PA 17057 Polar Crane Recevery Description Three Mile Island Unit 2 Containment Recovery Engineering Bechtel Job No. 13567 File 0255.2/8420/2-M72-MB01 SLGE-0537
Dear Mr. DeVine:
I THI-II-3C-0398 forwarded your coments on the Polar Crane Recovery Description. 2-M72-MB01. Since the crane refurbishment responsibilitie.s have now been divided between BNoC Bone Office Engineering and BNoC Construction the Polar Crane Recovery Description is no longer valid. We have therefore suspended work on this document. Your coments will be filed with the description and, should -V***#* it be resurrected, will be resolved / incorporated at that time. -
, RECOVi If you have any questions, plasse contact us.
' ENGR-Very truly yours. REC'D.
AlJG 1915
- - INIT. I R. L. Rider "
, Project Engineer -
h Rut:jff I cc: D. F. Kingr GFUN # ' J. J. Barton. GPUN ' N. K. Pastor. GFUN D. 1. Suchanan. GPUN ' C. E. Corley Bechtal -
- 3. K. Kanga. Bechtel '
-~-
I J. V. Thiesing. BNoC FILE:
~
( m. L. Fr==rman.-spoC TMI-2 Master Plant File CONFIDENTIAL I - , I
- 14. ;L PURSUANT TO .
L- ,. ' CEE-COURT ORDER wm
- n ~ .)
- - - - - - - - - - , - ,,,,,,---,,,y.- - - - , - . , - , - , , , - - - - - , . . . - _ _ . - - - - , , .
1 Attachment 1 to BLGM-0318
. l l
- \
2 ? I I . a . 2 POLAR CRANE RECOVERY n g DESCRIPTION s {
] ~
Il^l as 1 Il, il l'I il h nI , CONFIDENTIA !0 bit [/f[ i 1 PUR!UANT70 8,1411 i;j counwaa l
}
,l, N A 3 '274(f Issued for CPUN Review JF1(fM -
RLAR Ajil - - - - aren h mo. oAta navisions av cm n olM" sma a '[O8A scAta osmowse lonAww j%'d! emf, onlG4N J** 13587 i GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES nav. NUCLEAR CORPORATIm Memnt No. j g' BNoC
# 2-M72-MR01 B THREE MILE 151AND-WIT 2 op l swast 1 24
1 1 S. - I l TABLE OF CONTENTS { 1, . HJ .
- 1.0 Purpose and Introduction i
Ig. 2.0 Description .
)
g .k 2.1 I'nspection and Testing gg 2.2 Condition Assessment and Component Evaluation e, s 2.3 Procurement of Replacement Components
- l
-l 2.4 Refurbishment j 2.5 Preoperational and Requalification Testing i 3.0 Supporting Services 4g - -
5g 4.0 Involvement of outside Organizations 3 . 5.0 Seismic Requirements 6.0 Quality Assurance 7.0 Licensing Considerations . E 8.0 Documentation ( ]ilg 9.0 References TABLES & FIGURES 1 Table 1 - Crane Components to be Inspected Table 2 - List of RCS Components Which May Be Removed During
- f. Pre-Head Lift Inspection And Head Removal
- g Figure 1 - Polar Crans Inspection Assessment / Evaluation Logic Attachments
, 1. Letter BLGE-0360 dated November 3, 1981
- k. Three Mile Island - Unit 2 Spare Parts Data Sheet (17 3'iests)
-{
l ff,$,lpjg~ 97N t CONF!DENTIAL PURSU?.!fTTO i COURTORi)ER ( NUMSER GENERAL PUBLIC UrILITIES 2-M72-MR01 NUCLEAR CORPORATI(It SHEET OF h TPO March 29, 1982
=
.Il 1$
. .1 -
*g \
2 1.0 PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION r-
.a This document presents the engineering plan for recovery of the TMI-2 reactor building polar crane to operational condition from damage sustained Iyg during and after the March, 1979 accident at THI-2. The engineering
. recovery plan includes assessment of crane condition, repair or replacement gg gg ?of damaged components and testing to requalify the crane for use.
3, 3 5g The polar crane is a twin box girder overhead trave'lling bridge crane with C[ a motorized trolley. The crane is equipped with main and auxiliary
]g hoisting systems designed for a 500 ton capacity and a 25 ton capacity respectively. The main hoist serves floor elevations 305'-0" and 347'-6". *
[ 3I The auxiliary hoist serves those floor elevations as well as floor 4F elevation 282'-6." Operation of all crane functions may be controlled from 3j either the main operator's cab supported from the underside of the crane or the pendant pushbutton station operated from floor elevation 347'-6" and
}7 , above. Power is supplied to the crane via the circular runway
} ':: conductor / collector system in whien pickup shoes " collect" power from the j conductor bars mounted around the full containment circumfere,nce.
Y$ During the accident, the reactor building containment spray system in the g.j reactor building done was initiated and resulted in the crane being I& subjected to the corrosive effects of the borated water / sodium hydroxide J spray solution. Immediately following the accident the crane was subjected to higher than normal radiation, temperature, and moisture conditions that I E]I _I have deteriorated the crane f: e its original operating condition. There is also indication that the hydrogen burn has affected the crane. l 3: To support the TMI-2 plant recovery effort, the polar crane will be needed for missile' shield removal, reactor vessel head removal, reactor' 5I 2D disassembly, sad reconstruction activities. The polar crane recovery will g} restore all of the original safety features as described in the TMI-2 FSAR, g "g Section 9.1, and will ensure the structural int _egrity.of.the crana to the original design reluir gents as_ defined.in__ Burns & Roe Specification . I NZII. _Tliiiilsafety features described in the FSAR include redundant hoist a3 Trakes., redundant hoist upper limit switchen, and a separate control and
- drive device (inching hoist drive) in 'asec of failure of the normal hoist 1y mechanism.
I g, Radioactive decontamination of the polar crane is required to reduce the 1evel of radiation exposure for personnel working on the crane during the J recovery program. The decontamination effort is not within the scope of I. the polar crane recovery program and is not addressed in this document
]. except as it might constrain crane recovery efforts.
l .
., COMIDENTIkg, $~fNfg '7@
Pfi.YUM:TT0
#p$ (00fr c.,w -
i
~~
NURABER I - GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES 2-M72-NR01
' NUCLEAR CORPORATION SMEET OF
( li THREE MILE ISLAND-UNIT 2 caTE 3 24 g'l' TPO March 29, 1982 l l ___
2I iu . i m) ' ag
,f2 ..
2.0 DESCRIPTION
'j ,The recovery of the TMI-2 polar crane will return the erane to operational status as required to support the removal of the missile shields, reactor head removal and reactor disassembly activities.
E - I 'The recovery plan for the polar crane consists of the following major activities: eI
.g = a. Inspection hnd testing - To be performed to obtain data required to j._
assess the condition of crane components.
,$ j_ b. Condition assessment and component evaluation - To assess the results jg g found during inspection and testing and to determine the remedial actions (if any) to be performed on the various crane components.
1] c. Procurement of replacement components - Based on component condition assessments (or other applicable. criteria), replacement parts will be
~
1jg procured for replacement of damaged er seriously deteriorated components. ij { 3, g
- d. Refurbishment - Damaged crane components will be removed and repaired / replacement components installed. ,
- e. Preoperational and requalification testing - Checkout and testing of
! g[ the crane will be performed to verify crane operation and capacity. 2.1 INSPECTION AND TESTING w . {j The inspections and tests performed on the crane will be conducted in pg accordance with a detailed written Polar Crane Inspection Plan. The gg plan will identify the components of the crane to be inspected and rg tested and the type of inspection and test to be performed. (Refer to Eu Table 1 for a general listit}g of components to be inspected.) "The II inspection and testing of components will be conducted on a priority aj basis with the highest priority placed on components required to complete other inspections, followed by major long-lead time crane components, followed by secondary crane components._. Components I reeuired to complete other inspections are items such as the sain and-
~ ~
o auxiliary hoist oranes and ii5 tors needed To raise and Iower the wire ropes for inanection.Jjor crane cosponenifire those for which
~
- significant engineering, construction or procurement activities are Il' required if replacement is necessary. Secondary crane components are all other components that are not considered normal maintenance itects. ,
]
The results of the inspection and tests will be documented in inspection reports (see section 8.0). It isi recognized that those reports will contain data which any also be of use to external agencies
- R for research purposes. Specif.ically the types of data that may serve
# CONrttwiat nuassan I GENERAI. PUBLIC UTILITEIFT NT TO 2.xn-m01 OF j NUCLEAR CORPORATIC( Q ,,{j { g {g SMa H 4 24 g
a THREE MILE ISIAND-tatIT 2 cars
- g. TPO - - - - March 29, 1982 CON?DENTIAL Nt!
Rh. f m .i e aj this dual purpose include photographs documenting existing equipment fa y - conditions and data from electrical tests such as insulation resistance readings from motors, no load starting current from actor tests, and 4 ,Js control panel equipment operability. 4 - The inspections and tests to be performed are: E
- a. Visual examination and photographs q
I] b. Manual testing or operation of equipment ,
- e. Passive electrical testing (continuity, insulation resistance, cht:ic gf readings) 5E jg d. Power testing i
I 2.1.1 Visual Examinations
- SE 1j[ The initial inspections of the crane will be visual examinations performed by inspectors faniliar with the specific 3 crane components, to determine the general condition of the crane components. Techniques include direct observation and photography of ij* crane components to document the existing condition and for IE engineering evaluation.
F1 In addition to the general visual examinations detailed visual ( ,C l,3 examinations of equipment will be performed to determine the g!) suitability of equipment to undergo operational testing (either 5 ====*1 or Pavar testins). The detailed vi===1 e===inations vill l 3]- require removal of component covers, and in some cases partial l 3I component disassembly. En
} Components subjected to visual examination are categorized as
,3 sechanical, electrical and structural.
fa3 2.1.1.1 Visual Inspection of Mechanical Components Each of the mechanical gear drive units will be visually 1y J inspected for corrosion of gears, gear shafts, and 1
={ bearings. Cear units are totally enclosed or covered and l
} *. will require removal of inspection ports or covers for q] access to the gears, and gear shafts. '
22 Visual examination of a representative sample of both bridge l and trolley wheel bearings will be performed. Removal of either the inner or outer wheel bearing covers to examine the bearing internals and wheel ax1 ohessary{l$Ij, ,
,, j } f 2 7 70 4 S U.at 0.13 a l
[L GENERAL PUBLIC ITIILITIES NUMSER 2-M72-NH01 i NUCLEAR CORPORATIN SMEET OF
$ 5 24 j _
THREE MILE ISLAND-12 TIT 2 l} ~ DATE g TPO - U March 29, 1982 l au
J5 i!
<J l 'I f3 All d.c. sagnetic clutches which engage the inching drive motors will be examined for corrosion damage. Each of the
{a ' clutches is covered by a metal canopy that must be removed to conduct the inspection. ' l I *
- 2.1.1.2 Visual Inspection of Electrical Components l I The control panels for the bridge, trolley, main hoist and f]
.= g -
suxiliary hoist will be inspected to" assess the condition o'f the internal components (lugs, wiring, contactors, resistors, relays, timers, fuses, etc.).
}j All of the electric motors will be visually examined for corrosion of bearings and shafts, damage to insulation on J *E. power leads and motor windings, and corrosion of motor I
brushes and slip rings (for the main bridge drive, trolley t }}I drive, main and auxiliary hoist actors). . . All cabling, including current collection systems on the runway and bridge, will be examined for insulation damage iI{1 g and/or deformation. 2.1.1.3 Visual Inspection of Structural Components Visual examinations of the structural members and welds of g[ the crane will be performed by experienced inspectors to identify potential probles areas. Additional NDE will be performed on the areas identified by the inspectors as g_ potentially degraded. . Both of the main hoist wire ropes and the auxiliary hoist 1 3 wire rope will be visually examined over the full working , t length of the rope in accordance with the requirements of ' Eu ANSI (American Nations 1 Standards Institute) Standard Il 330.2.0-1976 Overhead and Gantry Cranes. Section 2-2.4 [l Rope Inspection. R'episcenent and Ma'intenance. This
.. inspection may be performed by an addy current method.
This method "looks" at the full depth of the rope (including
, the wire core) and has the capability to identify broken or y corroded wire strands, damaged core, and overall loss of rope.
diameter. There are ne plans for performing any destructive examinations or testing of the hoist wire. ropes. 1}
.:- CONFIDENimt, 00$QyTfh
PUR.W.WT TO
- j l COUni vDa NURAEgR 2-M72-NR01 (T
CENERAL PUBLIC ITTILITIES NUCLEAR CORPORATICHI SMsg7 OF j 6 24 a THREE MILE ISIAND-tRITT 2 OAfg TPO n March 29, 1982 vbU6
p! I ;
}hI
< 3 2.1.2 Manual Testing of Components
'd Manual tasting and operation of equipment will be performed to demonstrate the mechanical operability of the equipment. The manual 1J
)y -
testing and operation will consist of manual cycling of electrical g control panel components (contactors, relays, etc.), and uncoupling g{ of mechanical drive trains to isolate individual compotients for gg rotation by hand. These tests will identify malfunctions with the ua mechanical operation of equipment such as f:osen drive shafts and jl sticking or failure of contactors and relays. , I1 3s Components that will undergo manual rotational testing include all
.a I bridge drive, trolley drive and hoist actors, bridge and trolley E{ drive gear units, and main and auxiliary hoist addy current brr.kes. l IJ 2.1.3 Passive Electrical Testing Jy . l Fassive electrical testing of electrical components and -
11 wiring / cabling will be conducted to detect fault defects such as il I loss of insulation resistance in wiring, cabling, or actor windings; grounded circuits; shorted actor windings; and loss of circuit continuity. The tests to be performed include insulation resistance ' testing ("megger" testing) of the power cabling feeding the various electrically operated components (notors, brakes, and clutches); negger testing of the motor and eddy current brake windings; and (II Oj
]
magger testing and resistance checks of control circuits in the various control panels. 3 Circuit continuity testing of the control panels will be performed
'3 I to verify circuit integrity within the panels. Continuity testing 3 of the power circuits to electrically operated components will be performed to ensure integrity of these lines. Continuity testing of 1
i l actors will be performed to ensure that no open circuits exist in l gg the motor windings. 33 Insulation resistance tests will be conducted in general conformance g with IEEE 43, " Recommended Practice for Testing Insulation m l Resistance of Rotating Machinery " and will require the use of a 500 volt DC magger insulation resistance tester. Readings will be taken one (1) ainute after application of the aegger test potential in I order.to determine adequacy of the insulation resistance for normal Ij energisation and operation of the motor and other equipment and
. cabling.
}} g - Resistance measurements of motor windings v.ill be conducted in general conformance with IEEE 118. " Standard Test Code for Resistance Measurements," to determine if any shorted windings or turns exist in the actors.,
E WN GENERAI, PUBLIC UTILITgH, .HDENTIAl"~ 2-M72-NR01 (- 9 NUCLEAR CORP 03ATI W 5.
.,1 3 T g SMsg7
- t. 0F THREE NILE ISIAND-UN b Dafs TPO -
,, March 29, 1982 01417
.I I 1
]3 1
M2 2.1.4 Fower Testing Following the visual examination, manual rotation (as I apprcpriate) and passive electrical testing of' electrical equipment, power testing will be performed to demonstrate [ I' operability. Motors will be operated under no-load condition (uncoupled from the remainder of the drive train) first by
" bumping." then operating the motor until stable operating f]
.g conditions 'are reached (approximately 10-15'ainutes expected).
Power testing of the d.c. magnetic clutches will determine whether l lg the clutches engage upon energization. During the power testing
- i -
operating parameters such as starting current, no-load current,
,Ij= temperature and voltage will be monitored to compare with original Jg performance data.
The ontrol panels will be power tested by isolating the
}]Ij controlled equipment (actors, brakes, clutches, etc.) and providing input signals to the control panel from a portable control panel g test assembly. The assembly simulates control signals to the control panel and acts as a substitute for the damaged cab controls I iI{ and the removed pendant control. The power testing will determine whether the control panel responds properly to the input control signals.
I Fower testing will complete the inspection and testing required to (,[ detetuine the repair / replacement need for those components. 2.2 CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND COMPONENT EVALUATION 5._ ( {j A condition assessment of the crane components will be made using g.g results of the tests and inspections described in Section 2.1. After gg the condition of a component is assessed, further evaluation will be R8 necessary to determine whether to repair, replace or use the component E u, as is. 11 g{ The assessment and evaluation of components will be documented in the . inspection plans and reports (see Section 8.0). 1 2.2.1 Condition Assessment Assessment of crane componeats will he conducted on the sc.no priority basis as the inspections; i.e. assessment of components I,
- required to complete other inspections, followed by major lot.3-lead crane components, followed by secondary crane
]
components. The assessment process,will follow a step by step r progress 19n identical to that of the inspec. tion and test program l I with a decision point at the end of each step. Each decision point will allow for aeceptance or rejection of the component. s gRg Acceptance at a decision point will allow continuation of the inspection / assessment process while rejection will require NutsSER l ( $ CENERAL PUBLIC ITfILITIES 2-M72-MR01 2 ONFIDF.HTIAL ""^^ C "' "'TI " 5" 5 " I 24 g TPO ZT "I T9anz: wits IstAND-UNIT 2 g1d))
.our March 29, 1982 q CONRDENTIAL
.3l 18 .
.8 .t .
J. f2 fe evaluation of the component for disposition. See Figure 1 for graphic presentation of the assessment process. The criteria to accept or reject a component at each decision 8 point will be based on national or manufacturer's standards, l equipment performance requirements, qualified inspectors' gl judgement and/or engineering judgement. as determined applicable. Inspectors' and' engineering judgement will be used l f] 3
.g only when no definitive criteria can be' identified.
l Acceptance criteria vill vary depending upon the type of l!
.Ij equipment assessed and upon the type of inspection / test technique used. The equipment type can be categorized as either I
sechanical, electrical, or structural. Inspection / test j g. g a techniques are described in Section 2.1. l]x 2.2.1.1 Mechanical Equipment Assessment Criteria 11 Mechanical equipment is defined as those mechanical Jg components associated with the various crane drive trains, ij [{ g Assessment of visual inspection results will be initially based on the mechanical equipment inspectors' judgement. gy The inspectors will be instructed to identify areas showing ga deterioration such as wear, corrosion or deformation. The g{ inspector's initial evaluation will allow the assessment
= process to continue if appropriate. Final assessment will be performed by engineering based on data supplied by the (g inspector (may include photographs).
1I Assessment of the mechanical operation inspection results of g,3 drive trains will be performed by the inspector. The
, gg inspector will determine if the drive train performs its r
Ev[ intended function'i.e.. no sticking or binding. Manual dI operation will be the last point in the assessment process i j{ for mechanical equipment l 2.2.1.2 Electrical Equipment Assessment Criteria g
' Assessment of visusi inspection results will be based on the electrical inspectors' judgement. An inspector will I, judge whether any visual damage has occurred which would
},
prevent component operation. All assessments by the
. . inspectors will be reviewed by engineering.
(0:innENTIAL I' . ,
.l p3m:y.m..a, 70 igt -
CUM GGCL4 num.En GENERAL'PUBLIC UrILITIES 2-M72-NR01 ___ ( T NUCLEAR CORPORATICIt SMEET OF a j THREE MILE IstAND-tElIT 2 DATE 9 24 _ TPO March 29,1982 yyy 01413
3
}-
.1
*1 ke Assessment of the manual operation inspection / test results (I -
vill be determined by the inspector on the ability of the component (relay, switch, etc.) to operate manually; i.e. i no problems such as sticking, binding or' failure to , I4E . operate. I Assessment of passive electrical test results will be I' determined initially by the inspector and reviewed by f{
.g
=
. engineering. The results'of continuity testing shall indicate circuit continuity for acceptance,.while a minimum value of 1.0 mesche is required for electrical insulation I'3
. ("megger") testing.
.Ijl 4=8 Assess **nt of power testing results may be initially made 5
by the inspector, but the final asse'ssment will be made by 3]I engineering. Test data vill be' compared, where applicable.
- to national standards or manufacturer's component data. In the case of components such as D.C. clutches and relays, ability to function correctly will be adequate acceptance il{ criteria.
2.2.1.3 Structural Assessment Criteria Assessment of structural components will be made by ({ 5
, structural specialist using criteria to be determined based upon the extent of structural inspection required. The
**'"**" ***'*"*"** "12 **'"""'******"i"*"
. degradation compromises the structural integrity of the l
'I I ***"**
! 33 2.2.2 Component Evaluation - E
- Il After comp 1'eting assenseent of each component, an evaluation jy will be made to determine whether to repair, replace, or use the component as is. The evaluation will be based on the nature of
( II the inspection / test failure, the extent of the dausse. difficulty of decontamination (if required). ALARA considerations, cost and schedule. Components which have progressed through the assessment process j1. as seceptable will be evaluated as "use-as-is". However, these components will still be subject to normal maintenance practicas
~
]' such as lubrication, etc. Components which have been assessed as unacceptable rspaired or replaced.
will be evaluated to determine if thgylpy 7,,,,,,,,., ,, ill S.:...Si Df/F{Tjg g. ( $ GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES 2-M72-NR01 5 , NUCLEAR CORPORATIGt sugET OF 10 24 THREE MILE ISIAND-UtIT 2 Daft g no ****'"' 9,1420
35 g! -.
<h.
s. II (e Components assessed as unacceptable may be referred to Whiting for further evaluation before detersing that a repair is required, igE 2.3 .FROCURDENT OF REPLACDENT COMPONINTS I Following the identification of damaged crane components requiring I'{ repair or replacement, procurement of replacement components and parts
.g f] for repairing other components will be initiated. The procurement of components will be separated into four categories as follows:
l 1
- a. Components which must be replaced in order to complete the jj inspection and testing program. As an example, the main and J g* auxiliary hoist holding brak3s suet be replaced (as determined by j 5* their poor condition found in previous entires) to conduct the wire rope inspection (the hook and block must be lowered under control to l
l]2 unroel the wire rope from the drum). *
- b. Remaining components required to restore the crane to operational condition. The large majority of components will fall in this iII category.
- c. Components required to maintain the restored crane, i.e. spara parts gg recommended by the crane manufacturer. (Refer to THI-Unit 2 Spare ga Parts Sheets attached.)
({
- d. Components whose inspection results may be inconclusive, which are z not a normal spara part, and whose failure during preoperational 3_3 testing would adversely affect schedule due to procurementi lead jj times.
EE The highest priority will be placed on procurement of those components Eo required to complete the inspection and test program. Of the remaining I] components to be procured, the longest lead tiime items will receive j, higher priority. Competitive bidding will be pursued where possible. l Specific identification of components (by make and model number) will i be ande with the assistance of the Whiting instruction and saintenance manual, and additional software that may be obtained from Whiting. 4 ho ' Reglacement components will be identical to original crane components or a WhitIns's ap3 roved alternate and will receive manufacturers I ' standard shop inspartian and testing. After installation the J. components will undergo preoperational testing as described in Section 2.5. .. . 4 ' CONFIDENTIAL
- cj $EU4NT TO (g
w .a q uuse an 2-M72-NR01 i GENERAL PUBLIC trfILITIES
$ NUCLEAR CORPORATIg SMEET OF g 11 24 ,
e ruRzz witz Iswm-WIT 2 . cars g TPO J c) March 29, 1982 WWNTM
Eh. NI . s.gi - I1 ' 2.4 REFURBISHMENT C- 3i Based on the results of the inspection and testing program the scope of the crane refurbishment will be identified and engineering documents
'gE
' prepared to specify the refurbishment work required. The repair or ll : replacement of crane ectoponents is considered maintenance and gI Engineering Change Memorandums GCMs) will not be used. The II installation of temporary systems or items required to support the fj refurbishment affort will require ECMs. The engineering documents
.=g being prepared will include refurbishment instructions (via specifications, drawings and correspondence) specifying the components l!
,lj to be repaired / replaced and the appropriate vendor or other instructions for disassembling, repairing or replacing.
)
)
l I *F It will be necessary to begin refurbishment activities during the ! gI inspection and testing phase in order to support that phase of the l] polar crane recovery. Specifically, the hoist brakes (previously . identified as requiring repair) are required to be operational in order
]jg to Iower each hoist to completa the wire rope inspection by the earliest possible date.
ij {g g Refurbishment of the crane to support missile shield removal, RPV head removal and reactor disassembly will restore the crane to its original operating condition including safety features with the possible 11 exceptions noted below: Ik s. The operator's cab appears to be extensively damaged as a result of ( ,I the hydrogen burn and may not be restored. The crane is equipped with a pendant control pushbutton set which acts as a redundant (not
., J a safety feature) control station. Refurbishment or replacement of g the pendant control should require a smaller expenditure of manhours gg than that,for the cab controls. Therefore this is the preferred E control station to restore.
Ev] 21 b. The erane power supply to the bridge =ay not be immediately restored g{ via the runway conductor / collector systes.' An alternative to the conductor / collectors is to supply power via a new power cable to the crane that would still allow adequate rotation of the crane to i.I support the ongoing activities until the conductor / collector system can be refurbished. l
- c. The crane trolley's conductor / collector system is under review to l J .}9 determine if the trolley can be powered by another means which may
, allow an earlier availability date for the crane.
I l5 A review of activities requiring the crane to support missile shield removal, reactor head removal and reactor disassembly indicates full
,l rotation of the crane about the circumference of the containment is not
.* g required. Based ovi this review, the required sone of coverage is from -
e CONF!Dmm - ( GENERAL PUBLIC tTrILITIE .SI 2-M72-NR01 ggC N C0"#0**TI" ( I O. M [
- 12 24 DAfg THREE MILE ISIAND-IRtIT 2 March 29, 1982 g'? TPO Uf!0EQg Wfu22
J.l l' asinuth 310 degrees to asinuth 90 degrees, a total of 140 degrees of e' g.'l I
\
rotation. The restored power supply system will allow a minimum dS . rotation of 140 degrees to permit the required crane action during g these recovery activities.
'"'" "^' " "''" ' '" """ j I'gf I ~ Prior to returning the crane to service, preoper requalification testing must be performed to demonstrate its capability g to perform its required functions safely. The original crane design g code. Electric Overhead Crane Institute (E.0.C.I.) Specification #61
?
superceded by the Crane Manufacturer's Association of America (C.M.A.A.). Specification #70-1975 specifies tests be conducted in 1 accordance with the crane manufacturer's commercial test procedure. The crane manufacturer. Whiting Corp., uses Occupational Safety and Ig Health Administration (OSHA) Regulation 1910.179 as ehe, basis for 3g conducting these tests. In addition, the NRC provides guidelines - J (NUREG-0612. Control of Heavy Loads) which require testing in accordance with ANSI B30.2.0-1976 Chapter 2-2. A review of these standards indicates their testing requirements are similar and ANSI 1 B30.2.0 is chosen for guidance in this program. The preoperational and requalification tests to be performed will consist of the following.
- s. Visual Examination and Passive Electrical Tests
'I
- b. Limited Operational Tests
- c. Full Operational Tests 5
1 3I d. Load Tests 2.5.1 Visusi Examination and Passive Electrical Tests 1 A visual examination of crane components vill be performed to J]a ensure that crane components have been properly installed and I5 where appropriate, properly wired. Passive electrical tests . such as continuity checks and magger tests will be performed I o prior to power operation of the crane.~ 2.5.2 Limited operational Tests - JJ Following visual examinations and. passive electrical tests the g loads will be disconnected from the. control panels and the l panels energized for operational testing. Control input signals { will be initiated from the pendant control station and operation I of the controllers (switches relays. contactors) observed. l Instrumentation monitoring of controller operation will be used 1 O{NDAD (. r ~NUMSER GENERAL FUBLIC UIILITIEk.:.'. ~ 2-M72-Nnot r n a..T TO g NUC12AR CORPORATIGI CN,){ G,g 3HgET 13 W 5 - 24 oaTa
" ramEE xIr.E IstArn-unrr aflyg 00NR9[NR
l
.R l T' <l ,
to verify proper operation when not otherwise detectable (by
. visual or audible methods).
Jj Loads will be reconnected and the crane mechanisms (bridge and J ,
, trolley drive, and hoist lifting and lowering) briefly operated
. to verify operability under. power. Crane. performance vill be I)y - closely monitored during this brief operation to detect any problema. The limit'ed operation will serve as a break in period l
gf to exercise the crane through the basic crane actions of hoisting, lowering, and bridge and trolley travel. g u 2.5.3 Full operational Te'ts s Full operation of the unloaded crane will exercise the hoists, a bridge and trolley through their complete limits of travel. This testing vill be performed in accordance vith DISI I( 330.2.0-1976 Para. 2-2.2.1, Operational Tests, which requires E
]gy the testing of the following functions: , ,
- a. Boisting and lowering l b. Trolley travel .
- c. Bridge travel g
}] d. Limit switches, locking and safety devices Roist and trolley travel limit switch operation will be tested
- by extending operation to the limits and verifying that the
!= operation is terminated by the limit device.
1a, 2.5.4 Load Testing 1.f ANSI B30.2.0-1976, pqragraph 2-2.2.2, Rated Load Test, indicates
*a load test should be performed for any extensively repaired .
Jj crane. It has been determined that the crane hoist brakes will
- gI require replacement which according to Whiting Corp.,
constitutes an extensive repair. Therefore, a rated load test ,; will be performed on the polar crane.
- 1, The ANSI standard requires the load test to consist of the l E- following minimum requirements:
4} jJ
- e. "Boist the test load a distance to assure that the load is ,
supported by the crane and held by, tha hoist brake (s)." J
. b. " Transport the test load by means of the trolley for the I full length of the bridge."
l} (ONFIDENTIAL nu r. . . . - l
= h s. "umegn
( GENERAL PUBLIC UTILIM,}J Jr 70 - -M01
)
M- # M h 'A g gC ucci.na CORPOMM 14 24 _ TPO TEREE M M I N N 2 . March 29, 1982
- y11<12; CONR!!ENTIAl.
3 y. ni.
- c. " Transport the test load by means of the bridge for the full
- length of the runway in one direction with the trolley as
.I~' . close to the extreme right hand end of the crane as practical g and in the other direction with the trolley as close to the lI ,
. extreme left hand end of the crane as practical."
I{ d. " Lover the test load, and stop and hold the load with the brakes (s)." t1 i
.= g These requirements given above will be met except for the 4
j-required limits of trolley and bridge travel. The test load will not be transported over areas of the reactor building where i j!j a drop of the test lead would be detrimental to the equipment required to maintain the reactor in its shutdown condition. Jg The polar crane main hoist will be rate'd for 260 tons (estimated l]I value which is still under review) requiring a test load of 250 tons (125% of the rated l'oad). The maximum load to be lifted by 11 the crane is identified,in Table 2. The auxiliary ~ hoist will be rated for 25 tons. In order to support the pre-head lift i ii{ schedule requirement to move the missile shields, the main hoist any first be qualified to approximately 40 tons. The lower capacity qualification will allow earlier removal of the missile shield due to the relative ease in constructing the smaller test gy ga load. [t 5 3.0 SUPPORTING SERVICES The polar crane recovery will require various supporting services to g_ conduct the construction work. Rapid access to the crane from floor hj E1. 305' and from El. 347'-6" will be provided by the Spider staging gg platform until large crane movements are required. This hoisting unit will i y[ lift personnel and equipment from these floors to the polar crane (walkway ,, Ev elevation 427'). The asnufacturer's rated capacity of the unit is 1500' l I] pounds. nu I Temporary power will be required for power tool operation, lighting, and - ' testing of individual components on the crane. The temporary power will be
- y delivered via temporary cable since the erane's conductor / collector system is damaged beyond immediate repair.
Personnel support structures such as scaffolding, will be provided for I access to the conductor and runway rails around the containment, and for ji sce'ess to the underside of the crane bridge and trolley (bridge
., g conductor / collector system and main and auxiliary hoists upper sheaves).
The support services required for normal containment entries will also be required for the polar crane inspection. l AONROENTIAL bgt @C!:7m _ NMR Mh'[ (jk}
- (Ot GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES 2-M72-NR01 of
.T NUCLEAR CORPORATION SMEET 24 l
l? . TEREE MILE ISIAND-talIT 2 Daft 15 March 29, 1982 g TPo ej]e ~ o, onunngd...
.n
.If j}5 E
' *I fe 4.0 INVOLVEMENT OF QUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS o During the course of the recovery program, there will be involvement by
'other entities, for example EG4G, acting for the U.S. Department of Energy II gI (DOE). Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) and Whiting Corporation,
;the'manufacturerofthepolarcrane.
I EG4G's involvement on behalf of D0E and EPRI's involvement, is for the f]
.g purpose of obtaining data and material samples for'research and development analyses. Data:will be obtained from tests conducted during the recovery effort and will be made available to these entities for their use. Any I.I specific tests requested to be performed will be evaluated on a case by
,lj case basis and these requests will be executed by BNoC as directed by GPUN, Jg provided they do not impact the polar crane recovery effort.
, I BNoC has contracted with Whiting Corporation for technical services during l] the recovery period. Whiting's involvement will include providing ,l engineering design services and software upon request. Whiting personnel i 11 may be requested to participate in the polar crane inspections and recovery work under a separate contract. Whiting vill be consulted for their I evaluation of inspection and test plan results and estimation of component I condition. It is also anticipated that Whiting may assist with the { preoperational testing and requalification load testing of the crane. l l g[ 5.0 SEI5MIC REQUIREMENTS The seismic requirements for the polar crane are to maintain integrity of g the main structural components. Equipment installed on the erane is not
.g j seismically qualified for operation, nor is the mounting of the equipment ;
seismically designed. g.g The recovery of the crane is expected to require only standard parts and E= mountings that have no seismic qualification requirements. It is not jj expected that work will be required to the crane's structural components.
;, Novev.r, should settviti.s be required which are within the scope of
. seisnie design, the work / component replacement will asintain the original seismic integrity of the crane. For further information regarding the crane seismic requirements, refer to Burns and Roe Specification 2555-22.
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE , I .I The quality assurance requirements for the polar crane are limited to those components required for the crane's structural integrity during a seismic
]Tg event, Nuclear quality assurance applies to the structural members and
, welds, but not the miscellaneous crane appurtegances. i i CONFIDENTIAL n -
E. e PUYUANT T0 -- (- i T NUCLEAR CORPORATI(El CosEI DRJER = **a 2-M72-NR01 GENERAL FUBLIC trf1LITIE5 SMsgT OF j a THREE MILE ISIAND-tEIT 2 0471 16 24 g Vpo <
., March 29, 1982 26 CONRMNTM
l 2j
- n}i
*1 M3 Inspection and any required NDE testing of the crane for structural s integrity will be performed in accordance with a nuclear quality assurance
,, , program.
E Por,the polar crane recovery, it is expected that only standard replacement ; gl : parts and work on standard components will be required. Recovery work will ' be performed to standard construction procedures and inspections. fj Those portions of the crane not required for crane ' seismic integrity are
.g classified "not important to safety," in accordance with BNoC Design Criteria Document 2-G01-100. -
.11 7.0 LICENSING CONSIDERATIONS
.g g The licensing approach to the crane is described in the attached letter l]I BLGE-0360 dated November 3,1981. .
~
' 11 8.0 DOCUMENTATION
\
The recovery of the polar crane will require that certain documents be , [ issued to conduct the work required for the recovery effort. Documents to be issued during the polar crane recovery include:
- a. Polar Crane Recovery Description (2-M72-MH01), the baseline program
({ 5 description requiring GPUN approval. w_ b. Polar Crane Inspection Plan (2-G06-100) prepared by BNoC to specify the inspections and tests to be performed. These documents will identify {J g ,g the scope of the inspections and tests, provide the detailed procedures 3 required to implement the inspections and tests, and provide acceptance i criteria for tests and inspections performed (as applicable). Some Eo acceptance criteria may be (efined in separate correspondence and j] specifications. These are not baseline documents and will not require gl GPUN approval.
- c. Inspection and test result reports documenting the results of the 1 inspections and tests conducted. The reports will include conclusions
" reached based upon these results, and provide recounnendations for o
repair / replacement of crane components. These will be issued for information and will not require approval. l' lE
$e = ?"'["'* Sir _%
" sEpuusEn GENERAL PUBLIC ITIILITIES((llJg7 ODem 2-M72-NR01 (I '
NUCLEAR CORPORATIGE SMEET OF j? THREE MILE ISIAND-UNIT 2 DATE 17 24 TPO March 29, 1982 g l MNRDENTL %^7
. At iS '
TE s t f3 d. Procurement docuneats for purchasing replacement components will consist of material requisitions (issued by BNoC). The procurement (3g documents will specify the components to be supplied' including documentation requirements (certificates, drawings', instructions. l'8 gl I etc.). Procurement will be by BNoC and will only require GPUN approval in accordance with Level-of-Signature-Authorisation requirements. I e. A Technical Services Agteament (TSA) has been entered into between BNoC f{g and Whiting Corporation for the purpose of obtaining engineering servlces tosassist in the planning and assessment of the polar crane I recovery. l 1I
- t
,lj f. Freoperational test procedures specifying the tests to be conducted to Jya demonstrate crane operability will be issued. These do not require GPUN approval.
5E 3 3 Load test procedures will be issued to specify the procedure and , taplementation requirements for conducting the load tests for the
- crane. These do not requize CPUN approval.
II g
- h. Repair / replacement instructions for components will be issued to specify the required repairs for components and the replacement for those components to be repisced with like components. These do not require GPUN approval.
g{ i. Engineering Change Memoranda (ECMs) for temporarr systems required to 3 support refurbishment. These require CPUN approval. The method of documenting tasks performed for organisations other than GPUN and J BNoC is open and cannot be determined until the nature of the tasks is known.
.g 3f 15
9.0 REFERENCES
{j 9.1 Burns and Roe Specification 2355-22 Reactor Building g, and Turkina muilding cranes - 9.2 Whiting Corp. Instruction and Maintenance Manual for
, Crane Serial No. 10044 h 9.3 American National Standards Institute. Standard No.
4 B.30.2.0-1976 Overhead and Gantry Cranes 9.4 In.stitute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1'
- Std. 43-1974 IEEE Recousanded Practica l
.for Testing Insulation Resistance for Rotating Machinery llE -
$ 2-M72-unol (T
GENERAL NUC12A1 C0gFogATION FUBLIC UTILITM0HilDIMIIA OF g g gGy mg,f o.p er* jgggT 18 24 g ,,. TumzE xItt IS w NIr g gy g d nMarch 29, 1982 CONRDENTR %2s
.If ie '
u .i ' p
.g 3 9.5 NUREG-0612 Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants (s ,]E
~ Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Reg.
9.6 I 1910.179 Overhead and Gantry Cranes
. 9.7 Crane Manufacturers Association of America, spec.
I #70-1975 Specifications for Electric Overhead hj Traveling Cranes I
.g 9.8 Electric Overhead Crane Institute, Spec. #61 Specifications lf in for Electric Overhead Traveling Cranes jg 9.9 THI-2 FSAR, Section 9.1 I 9.10 Polar Crane Inspection Plan, 13587-2-G06-100 Rev. O j
$1 9.11 Three Mile Island-Unit 2 - -
1jg Project Design Criteria, 13587-2-G01-100 Rev. 0 - I 9.12 Letter BLGE-0360 dated November 3, 1981 Draft Licensing 1j Approach for Polar Crane Refurbishment. ' I& 9.13 Letter BW/BTL-82-8 dated January 11, 1982 B&W Licensing 1 Support for Pre-Head Lift Inspection and Head Removal: g[ RCS Component Characterization ' l 1 9.14 Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. I std. 118-1978, Standard Test Code for Resistance Measurements
*E S 151 Eu il '
II 1 . m J. i k- . I '0NFI
^
w DI ~ a . . nrta$ -
' "" utstl yn '
2-M72-unot kT GENERAL PUBLIC ITTILITIE(00gr NUCLEAR CORPORATI(El 0F eg[EWe 19 24 g a THREE MIM ISIAND-UNIT 2 DaTE l TPO March 29, 1982 CONF DEN 3A.*23
j 25 l 3! .
. .1
.EI s3 Table 1 CRANE COMPONINTS TO BE INSPECTED A. ' BRIDGE DRIVE TRAIN g gI . 1. % Ep inching motor . 4 l
- 2. Magnetic clutch 4 )
I 3. 10 VHSM gear drive 4 , f
- 4. 8" Flexible: coupling
- 5. 10 Ep asin bridge drive motor 4
4 l
- 6. ' 8" solenoid braka 2 . ,
1 7. Coupling, bridge motor to zero speed switch jlj 8. 9. Bridge motor zero speed switch Flexible coupling 1 1 8 J Jga
- 10. Pillow block bearing 8 gI 11. 4:1 Gear reduction 4 l 12. Bridge wheels 16
- 13. Bridge wheel bearings 32 Trolley Drive Train ijj1 3.
g
- 1. Main trolley drive actor 1 .
- 2. Trolley drive braka 1 gy 3. Trolley motor sero speed switch 1 g* 4. Flexible coupling 2
([ g
, 5.
6. 7. Gear reducer Trolley drive rack gear unit Trolley drive inching gear actor 1 1 1 g 8. Magnetic clutch 1 gj 9. Trolley drive spur gear unit
- 10. Flexible coupling 2
4 g 3g 11. Flexible coupling 2 Rg 12. Trolley wheels 8 1* 13. Trolley wheel bearings 16 II 14. Coupling, trolley motor shaft to zero speed switch 1 jj 15. Trolley travel limit switch 2 C. Main Hoist Drive Train 'a Roiner Unit i
"5 1. Main hoist 150 hp. motor
- 2. Main hoist motor .:ero speed switch 1
1
- 3. Coupling main hoist motor to zero speed switch 1 4 4. Flesible coupling 2
- 5. ' Cross head gear unit
]T,g 6. Tillow block bearing , ,
1 1
- 7. Flexible coupling .
- 1
- 8. Eddy current brake .
1 l 9. Magnetic efutch 1
- 10. Main hoist inching gear actor' l
gR .C0mmm asArn = - 1 e = --- w .L 1hp I GENERAL PUBLIC tFf!LITg[f Q,. 2-M72-MR01 (' T NUCLEAR CORPORATIM ggt OF 24 g 20 n THREE MILE IS1AND-tINIT 2 . DATs March 29, 1982 g Tpo (/] MNFRENTIAL .
~
l 2 I-
- 11. Main hoist . solenoid brakes (holding) 2
']I *g 12' Main hoist No. 500-C herringbone gear unit 1 42 - 13. Main hoist drum pinion drive gear 2
- 14. Main hoist drum pinion drive gear support bearings 4
)JJ .15. Main hoist drum 2
-16. Main hoist wire rope 2 pieces
- 17. Main hoist drum support bearings 1gy 18. Main hoist weight type limit switch, 4
1 gf 19. Main hoist screw type limit switch
- 20. Coupling, main hoist drum to screw type limit switch 1
I
\ 21. Main hoist load sensing device 1
~[ 22. Main hoist upper sheave nest
- 23. Main hoist bottom block assembly 1
1
- 24. Main hoist hook 1 Ig D. Auxiliary Hoist Drive Train and Heist Unit 5E 1. Auxiliary hoist 40 hp actor (
j
- 2. Flexible coupling 1
- 3. Eddy current brake 1
- 4. Magnetic clutch -
1
- 5. Auxiliary hoist inching actor fl ,
1
- 6. Flexible coupling 1
- 7. Pillow block bearing 2-I 8. Auxiliary hoist braka 2 9.
( I]g Auxiliary hoist herringbone gear unit
- 10. Auxiliary hoist actor zero speed switch
- 11. Coupling, auxiliary hoist driveshaft to zero speed 1
I d5
- switch 1
5 12. Auxiliary hoist drum 1
- 13. Auxiliary hoist drum support bearing 1 mI 1 14. Wire rope. 3/4 inch dia.. IPS 6 x 37. IWC. 1315 ft. 1 l U 15. Auxiliary hoist screw type limit switch 1 !
l
- 16. Auxiliary hoist loc.d sensing device !
- f. 17. Auxiliary hoist upper sheave nest . 1 Jj 18. Auxiliary hoist bottom block assembly 1
- 19. Auxiliary hoist hook 1 g
E. Miscellaneous Crane Components
- 1. Control panels j
- 2. Runway rails <
I l 3. Bridge rails . ( d 4. Bridge girders
- 5. Bridge end trucks :
] 6. Trolley structure
. 7. Pendant control cable and handset
- 8. Crane wiring .
ggi,]Q , g PURSUANT _ _ . . , . . snam TO l (' wuA4 WWUMSER 2-M72-MR01 CENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES g NUCLEAR CORPORATION p SHgET OF g J g 4 , Daft 21 24 THREE MILE ISLAND-tRtIT 2 March 29, 1982 E TPO l e CON 7jDENT.A 1 . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ __ __ ____ _______. __ ___, _ ._
1 3} y
- 9. Runway conductor / collector system gI 10. Bridge conductor / collector system
(}4 3 ** 11. Cab
- 1-11 il
- are only operated from the cab.-
** Only portion required to allow operation from pendant control.
L Ji ar ig - 51 11
- fgl .
51 ( ;11 r 11 E SI s I3 lj c E1
]{
~
. . (h.'. ,7 ?.'.? 72, g
.Djj 4 7p , ' ,' ,'
w- ..;
[Q CURE 0,93y i NUMSER k 2-H72-HR01 GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES OF 3 - g ' NUCLEAR CORPORATIGg y SHEET _. THREE MIU ISIAND-UNIT 2 O h DATE TPO 8 CONFIDENTIAL
'~
I~1 - 5- 1 I TABLE 2
#j LIST OF RCS COMPONENTS WHICH MAY BE REMOVED DURING 3 ,
J PRE-READ LIFT INSPECTION AND HEAD REMOVAL gI . g .f APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE COMPONENT WT. (LBS) DDfENSIONS
*{ A. Entire CRDM (Without Leadscrew) 835 282" I 12" B. Entire APSR Mechanism (Without Leadscrew) 835 282" x 12"
.I I[ C. Motor Tube (Espty) 425 210" x 3" x 12" D. Stator 235 18" x 12" OD E. Position Indicator ' 35 15' I 2" x 2" -
l F. Conduit 40 13' x 3" x OD G. Leadscrew Assembly 140 20' x 1.5"
]
E. R. v. Closure Stud 63" x 6.5" Dia. R. V. Closure Nut 670 8" x 9" OD
.J h R. Y. Washer 3" X 10" OD
?1
( 3j I. 1. V. Closure Without Drives. Studs Nuts, or Service Structure 162.500 96" x 2,00" Dia. 1I J. R. V. Closure Complete with Drives. Nuts. Service Structure 309.000 26' x 200" Dia. 15 K. Head Insulation L-Panel , 200 5'E I 4'W x 5"T il a8 I 3.1 1j. ~ f?IRTEN1.n
- A.fD/5Ny a gl . COURY 0:0 g .
2 - NURASER I GENERAL FUBLIC UTILITIES NUCLEAR CORP 0BATI M 2-M72-Mt01 SMEET OF (g 1 23 24 m E I m ,D--I,2
'.a Om TPO
~
O March 29,1982 CONFDEN"lAL
This h- and she desis. O assers are the peeporty of SECl***L. They ese messly leaned and en the beteener's c.gwees ayeemens W millnot he
- :. 4. i . hm.es. . m . . . e ., e., % i w, EFO 278B2 A .48 Co 23 ,
PASSIVE POWER . i VISUAL DESPECTION MAfontOPEndlIION ELECT TES1940 TESTING ASSESSbENT ASSESShENT ASSE55 BENT ASSESSnENT
'~
69 9 N accepenett esta-as t l -
- M*lllir!2!!'.=rJ.,
g l g COneONENTs g ,13 ,g; .-
=. 4 _ m.4 ca Es 8C ELECTRICAL A accarineas . A accremata * '
Atest-as-g hf A/ Q4 e gq l a-a" 5 AL, 334 - acce,====,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 4 , _ 4 u u,euctemets
- O test-AS4s R y 3 c
mean er
$ CC6@ODENT # ""'**
E !I."'
, 9 ggunTION C ' .*
9 3 =~~ n tr e: Q.: 3 '
- 5 om
=c P *iR. 2
- POLAft CRAff 905PECTIOffi A55E554ENFfEWhtA44FIDI4 LOGIC g k g. s5 1
- FIGURE 1 n
u e S . o'WJ ,~ G _-__ __ _ _m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
T
; Intor-offico Momerandum 4345-83-0005 - m ,c o . ,'83 TWG Meeting Minutes of
[c a d Nuclear ' 8"U3'CI March 4,1983 To D. Buchanan Location Administration Building G. Clements J. Fornicola l R. Gallagher J. Marsden R. Parks M. Radbill J. Thiesing D. Walker R. Warren Attachea are the minutes of the Tn'G meetir.g held on March 4,1983 to discuss Polar Crane issues. 3 4-23 A #s E. J, Kitler 6 Startup & Test Manager - Unit II ff W-c2.- $-Y-93 Pla6t 0 TWG Representative l c + 0 ( D 0.A A D n - 3I 63
- , ,,- Plant Engineering TWG Representative
')h0 3 ~7'-83 Site Engi eering G G Representative l .
16 sU b~ ~ 3 G QA Mod / Ops TWG Representative DRS/DDW/jaa Attachment l
. .a -
i . TWG MEETING MINUTES A TWG meeting was held on March 4,1983. The following persons 'were present: TWG Dwight Walker (SU&T) Rick Parks (Plant Ops) John Fornicola (QA) Ron Warren (Plant Engr.) Rich Gallagher (SE) GUESTS Gordon Clements (PORC) Mike Radbill (PLTG) Dave Buchanan (SE) Joe Marsoen (QA) The meeting was held to discuss the following polar crane issues:
- 1. Load Test Procedure status
- 2. Review of all data given to QA/QC
_ 3. Results of No-Load Test
- 1. Load Test Procedure John Fornicola stated that QA had comments on the load test procedure.
All but one of the comments were administrative. Comments will be pro-vided to group members when issued. All TWG members were given a copy of the load test procedure for final review. Comments are to be given to Mike Radbill on Monday, March 7 Rick Parks considered it was inappropriate to provide separate 50P's to cover prerequisite valve lineups. It was agreed by TWG that lineups could be include.d on UWI 4370-3891-83-PC-0001 cover sheet. l 2. Results of QA/QC Audit of Polar Crane Task Groues Documentation of Work on Crane Joe Marsden stated that all deficiencies would be : overed with one ODE. He noted that many of the modifications were made without ECM's. Back-fits could, however, be accommodated with engineered drawings instead cf ECM's. He noted the following specific modifications made; not in accer:- ance with AP-1043:
- 1. Trolley power and control bypass syste-
- 2. Installation of 200 am: fuses in main disconne:: in ca: cf o:iar crane (Wee 300 amps)
- 3. New pendent station and fes:::e :a: s
T . TWG Meeting Minutes Page 2 !
- 4. Installation of two mounting brackets for jib crane on trolley
- 5. Installation of temporary air supply on crane.
The QDR will be submitted to Jim Thiesing. It was noted that these items had been discussed with Design Engineering. Other deficiencies noted were lack of compliance with AP 1047 and 1043, and missing signoffs on UWI's and Work Packages. It was noted by John Fornicola that the no-load test should have been re-viewed by TWG but was not.
- 3. No-Load Test John Fornicola stated that all QA comments were administrative in nature.
Rick Parks expressed concern that in the no-load test procedure, Steps 85, 92, 220, 228, 320, and 328, it is not clear whether the limit switches functioned. Mike Radbill agreed to provide written clarification. It was agreed that the following open items of UWI 4374-3891-83vC-0002 would be resolved pirer to the load test:
- 1. Upper geared limit switch needs verification of operability.
- 2. Trolley limit switches need verification of operability.
- 3. Lubrication of main hoist gears on trolley.
- 4. l Additional Discussion ,
l Mike Radbill noted that P.C.T.G. performed adjustment and verification of proper operation of the upper rotary type geared limit switch. This was performed via an approved UWI. It was agreed that it should have been re-l viewed and signed cff by TWG members. Mike Radbill will initiate a Startup Problem Report to address this. Rick Parks questioned whether the p:lar crane hook had been used to li': any loads. Mike Radbill stated that, to the best of his knowledge, the i hook had not been used to lift any loads. John Fornicola noted that no testin; has teen listed on the MTX. It was agreed that all further testing would be listed. In response to concerns frc- Rick Pa-ks, i was a:-eed t5at T,?S is nc: -e-quired to approve lifts using the #ive :
- 9 ist atta:ned tc tre : la-crane main hook.
l Mike Radbill noted that Re::very 0:s was : ire::e: :. Desig- Engines d ; l to install dummy fuses vice 200 am: 'ases ir ::ia- crane cair c's::ve::
i - o l TWG Meeting Minutes Page 3 It was agreed an ECM would be required. For the sake of expediency, l Rich Gallagher agreed to prepare documentatier. utilizing AP-9 013 te perform this modification in advance of ECM approval. It was agreed that performance of the load test would be in compliance with AP-1047. It was agreed that disposition of the QDR discussed in Section 2 should not affect acceptance of no lead test results er TWG acceptance of the load test procedure based on technical content. f
. Intor Offico Momerandur.
February 23, 1983 rJe Nuclear Suoi:c: Polar Crane Safety Evaluacion 6110-83-039 B. K. Kanga Locanon TMI Trailer 175 To Director, Unit 2 Quality Assurance has reviewed the Safety Evaluation for the Polar Crane Load Test and the concerns that have been raised per your request.
The calculations to back up the Safety Evaluation were reviewed. Sechtel Quality Assurance was. requested and has reviewed the calculations in Gaithersburg and GPUN QA has reviewed the calculations available o'n site. The only calculations available at the site were 3&W analysis of decay heat but are also remaval, which were originally performed to support quickInlook, the Safety Evaluatice applicable to the loss of components due to load drop. son.e events were evaluated in a probabalistic manner and no calculations were made. One example is the drop of a missile shield directly on the Reactor Fead. The extent of damage is postulated a.nd not backed up by calculations. Otr review also identified two items that were not specifically addressed in the Safety Evaluation:
- 1) The load test should qualify the same length of cable that will be required for head lift.
- 2) Load testing of the f abricated load test frame prior to Polar Crane load test has not been addressed, although all other rigging ccaponents have.
There have been additional concerns raised that are not directly related to.:neate Safety Evaluation but which could be a potential problem. We plan to tnves crc <:r un the f ollowing areas in more detail and will inform you if our turrent La inadequate: L) Training for operators and personnel directing the load test .
- 2) Calibration of the load cell.
sli
- 3) Modifications to the Polar Crane--concerns have been raised that modifications to the Polar Crane were not appropriately documented.
- 4) Test . rc3 ram - verify that the programmatic controls for testinc were followed (i.e., AP-1043 and AP-l047 have been complied with).
- 5) Reverify inspection and re furbishment doc umen ta tion .
. .e
t
- 3. K. Kanga Memerandum 6110-33-039 February 2 3, 1983 Page 2 I would reccmmend Engineering assure themselves that they have adequately covered the two items noted concerning the Safety Evaluation. Though these items may not require any modification to the Safety Evaluation, they may require change or review for applicability to the actual load test implementing procedures.
In sunmary, we in QA have found no significant programmatic problems with the Safety Evaluation or the Polar Crane refurbishment process but we will continue to assess this program and keep you appraised of any problems discovered. It should be noted that there appears to be a number of technical concerns being raised and these should be addressed fully by Engineering. An interesting item to note which we did discuss within QA was the approach Sechtel has taken on this specific Safety Evaluation. Though it is acceptacle from a programmatic and engineering standpoint to perform the evaluatation case on a worst case scenario, in our recovery mode , there may be some operational considerations that may make this approach not always prudent. An analogy J, In our industry for years we considered the large break LOCA the worst case limiting accident before the TMI accident, where as now we have learned that a small break LOCA deserves equal attention. Senior Engineering managemenc should perhaps review this issue. E. S CCw.c . S. E. Ballard, Sr. Manager - TMI QA Modifica tions/Cpe ra tions BEB:JFM: cam
- c: N. :. Ya:anas R. L. Long IARI RS t
i
'itler March 23, 1983 Re: Parks' Affidavit Ed never heard of " mystery man" or George Kunder's role during the accident until this morning when Parks' affidavit was made available.
He has no knowledge or ever discussed this issue (Page 36) with anyone else mentioned by Mr. Parks in his affidavit. R s / $$$I$ yJ. Kitler N1 Jo n J. B
\ ,
tion hvbus
- s Smith March 23, 1983 Re: Parks' Affidavit Bernie does not have any recollection of every discussing any aspect of the accident with L. King or Rick Parks. He can-not relate to any of the statements on pages 36 and 37 that I had highlighted and asked Bernie to read.
Bernie has never heard the term " mystery man" until I showed him the subject affidavit. O f 1&dk UU f Bernard G. Smith J. Bartdn
/
l John I I /
/ '
d I l l l l l
Auger March 23, 1983 Re: Parks' Affidavit March 4 or 7 - Auger was getting info for Kunder on a speech Kunder was to give to the Gannan University Energy Seminar later in March. Auger was asked to find out when we left natural circulation cooldown mode to the reactor and transitioned to " loss to ambient" mode of cooldown. Auger talked to Chwastyk in regards to the above. This was in the presence of some others mentioned on Page 36 of the Affidavit. Chwastyk was pre-occupied at the time in a meeting (with Parks ' Auger thinks') and in an "off-the-cuff" kind (cynical) remark, Chwastyk told Auger, "tell Kunder we went to ambient heat loss when he (Kunder) turned off the pumps. Auger again asked Chwastyk where he (Auger) might find the actual date, and Auger was told by Chwastyk to talk to Adam Miller, who subsequently advised Auger to look at the procedure which controls cooling modes, h i [ 0- - oil % John Auger 6
/Gohn J.
.$ h,-(.<: -
B rtch O . i
/
l l
\/
. Chwastyk March 23, 1952 '. Parks' Affidavit Regarding statement re Chwastyk identifying Kunder as " mystery man". Chwastyk never said that - or had he ever heard of the term " mystery man" until last day or two.
Statement as identifying Kunder as man who shut down Safety Injectirn Pumps - Chwastyk never said those words. Chwastyk did say Kunder was the man who had Reactor Coolant Pumps shut down due to high vibratiom and that this was common knowledge. Chwastyk remembers an instance where Auger asked in the presence of others mentioned on page 36, "when did we go on
-loss to ambient cooling". Chwastyk was not really paying attention to Auger in that he was pre-occupied in some work at the time. He remembers that Auger was gathering some information for a speech that Kunder was to make. Chwastyk's response (casual)
- was, "go ask Kunder - he's the guy that shut off the pumps".
Auger than mentioned that he was looking facthe date of going to "less than ambient" cooling, not the date for when we went on natural circulation. Chwastyk said he then understood what Auger was looking for and suggested he go and look in the Control Room logs and talk to Adam Miller. Chwastyk remembers an instance where Lee Rogers and J. Floyd (he thinks) were in the Site Ops. office area and there was casual discussion about the accident and resultant damage. They discussed Reactor Coolant Pump operation and relationship to the accident and damage. Chwastyk does not remember any discussion regarding HP Injection ' imps in the presence of people mentioned on page 36 specifically (Ryan, Warren, Kitler, Gummo), l Telephone Conversation of March 24, 1983 3 9:10 J. J. Barton to J. J. Chwastyk Regarding statements on Page 37 of the subject affidavit on Chwastyk talking Parks out of going to the newspapers regarde
- ;i :
. J. Chwast;< March 24, 1933 George Kunder. Chwastyk does not remember talking Parks out of going to the newspaper. Does remember calming Parks down re physical threat to Kunder and Parks going to the NRC. Joe believed that the NRC issue was after Parks heard a rumor he might be fired. Chwastyk does not remember why (specific issue)
Parks wanted to go to the NRC. Chwastyk does remember trying to clam Parks down, "why go to the NRC based on a rumor you (Parks) heard."
/ '.
/ f. - l' f j t./ (<
u JY
//. J. Chwastyk &
i
/J yhn J.
Ba ton l I k 1 l t i
v ,
- Gu=o March 23, 1983
'. Parks' Affidavit i Bob never heard of " mystery man" until today. Was not present regarding the subject matter on pages 36 and 37. '
Bob knew Parks was upset over Larry King's dismissal. Bob feels that Parks thought he might be next because of his (Parks' disagreement with the polar crane refurbishment program. Bob never heard Chwastyk, Smith or anyone else talking about Safety Injection Pumps. Parks did say in Gummo's presence that Parks felt he was being railroaded because of his safety con-cerns on the polar crane and that nothing is being done to Kunder. Parks believed that his (Kunder's) actions caused the company a great deal of money. Bob did not know what Parks was referring to by this statement. D : _/ M k& /t' 47 mM \ VW Robert E. Gummo J hn J. Brdon
;a Kunder March 23, 1983 H, Parks' Affidavit Re Page 36 (last paragraph) - Kunder stated that "I did not shut down the Safety Injection Pumps on the day of the accident nor give orders to shut down the pumps."
Re Page 37, first paragraph, Kunder does not recall any expression or reason from Parks to Kunder regarding going to the newspapers. He (Kunder) recalls one instance, which may or may not be related, in King's office with Parks, King and about two other individuals present (may have been Lookabill, Warren, Gischel and/or Marshall). The discussion concerned PORC's concern over problems with a procedure on OTSG drain-down. PORC's comments were being discussed and Parks became upset and threatened Kunder (punch him in the face). Kunder momentarily left the office and did not confront Parks. In order to resolve the procedure problem with King, Kunder came back to the office doorway and an agreement was basically reached to resolve PORC's concerns. Parks did apologize prior to Kunder's finally leaving the office. Kunder was not aware of any rumor that he was "the mystery man" who shut down the Safety Injection Pumps. n 0- hr N fg
~
f George Kunder Jo n J. Bar on
. (Subba) Marshall March 23, 1983 P.: : Parks' Affidavit Discussion regarding Myerstery Man -
At the time of the discussion, doesn't remember term j "myerstery man" being used. Doesn't remember what started the discussion. Does remember there was discussion on Reactor Coolant Pumps being shut down during the accident and the various opinions people had whether this was the appropriate action at the time of the accident and the fact that B&W some-time after the accident issued a procedure to all B&W plants that recommended shutting down the RC pumps was for natural circulation cooldown for certain accident scenarios. Doesn't remember Safety Injection pumps ever coming up during the discussion. C\ l' -- / W. 4 m t d _01 J/. Marshall
- Nd' John J. Arton
Perry March 23, 1933 Re: Parks' Affidavit John remembers conversation in the office one day when someone from Licensing or SRG - identified as J. Auger) came in to find out what date the plant went to ambient heat loss as a cooling mode. He asked several people if they knew the date, and Perry and others said they did not know. It was suggested that Auger ask Chwastyk. Chwastyk was in the area at the time and answered, "Tell George it was when he told us to turn the pumps off". Chwastyk's remark was an "off-the-cuff" half-joking type of answer. Perry has been present in the office at times when Parks mentioned writing to the newspapers (Paxton Herald) re Kunder identified as the " mystery man". (q\
,s
/ ) ,( %
John Perry /
$ hw #
~/ (:- '
John J. Barto6 y '
/
l
'l ll l
'./
m L Ryan (B&W) March 23, 1983 Re: Parks' Affidavit Mystery man - means nothing to him. Never heard of the term until he and I just discussed it. Bob has no knowledge of the discussions mentioned on page 36 and 37 of the subject affidavit. Nothing he read in my presence regarding the " mystery man" has he ever heard before or been party to any discussion with the people mentioned on page 36 on that subject. p in n / ialui ! Robert F. Ryan'y 0- M1 John J. l Nat. - akton t i
J, . Smith (Gilbert Associates) March 23, 1983 , i e: Parks' Affidavit Discussion on "Myerstery Man" J. Auger asked Joe Smith does he have records where we went on ambient heat loss as a mode of Reactor Cooldown af ter the 1979 accident. Auger was looking for this information as he (Auger) was helping Kunder prepare a talk on the TMI accident. Joe told Auger that he would have to look up the file. Auger then went to other people to see if they remembered. Auger asked out loud in the presence of some others mentioned on Page 36 of Affidavit whether they were aware of the date for heat loss to ambient. In response, J. J. Chwastyk said in a casual manner, "Why not ask your boss (reference to Kunder) when he shut down the pumps. Joe was not personally knowledge-able of which pumps were being referenced to by Chwastyk. Regarding Page 37 - letters - Parks said on numerous occasions that he was going to write a letter to the Paxton Herald identifying Kunder as the " mystery man". Joe remembers incident at the Site Operations Christmas luncheon before Kunder and Parks in King's presence when Smith inquired as to what happened - Parks stated that he threatened to smash Kinder's face because of disagreements they had over procedure reviews. Joe is not aware of the references to Chwastyk talking Parks out of doing things, such as writing to the newspaper; but Chwastyk did ask Parks what good did he think it would do for anyone? Parks has made recent comments in Smith's presence that his home was broken into and that he was fearful for his children and has moved them out of state (Kansas maybe).
, ,40
, , }l 4 JtW Jos9pH ATSmit6 J n J. B dton I
\
l
P.oge rs March 23, 1993 Re: Parks' Affadavit Lee never heard of anyone being identified as the
" mystery man" he read in the subject affidavit highlighted on page 36.
Lee does not remember ever having any conversation with B. Smith or J. Chwastyk regarding G. Kunder shutting down the Safety Injection Pumps. p W,)Jw - /
~
s - Lee Roger'h s dohnJ' ShL Barton
!J
( i
m Warren March 23, 1983 Re: Farks' Affidavit Ron remembers one instance where there was a difference of opinion between Marshall, Brill, Warren and Kunder in the presence of Parks. It involved a Unit Work Instruction that was prepared by one of Warren's engineers. Discussion was over Kunder's comments on the UWI and the type of paper, i.e., procedure that should be used to do the job. Warren responded to Kunder's comments via memo. Gischel got involved, over-ruled previous agreements and decided that an ECM would be prepared to reflect actual work performed; essentially agreeing with what Kunder desired in his discussions with Warren. Warren feels that Parks was present during some of these dis-cussions. Warren doesn't remember any reference to " mystery man" tantil today. Warren does not remember being party to or in the presence of any discussion re Kunder and Safety Injection pumps as mentioned on Page 36 of the subject affidavit. Warren remembers another recent involvement w/Kunder. King was aware of this instance. Kunder wrote a memo to King on Plant Engineering not meeting commitments to PORC. Warren and Kunder discussed this issue in presence of King and resolved the issue in that Plant Engineering (Warren) and Kunder agreed to appropriate resolution of the outstanding commitments. The reason Warren brings up this last instance is that he be-lieves Parks walked in and overheard at least part of the discussion. l _ /2
/7 h/0t.uwt__ fl v , A R. P. Warren J5hn J. ahton i
(
MEMORANDUM TO: All Attorneys and Legal Assistants FROM: Sheldon J. Weisel and Victoria J. Perkins RE: Thursday Morning Seminar DATE: November 11, 1986 The next seminar will be held on Thursday morning, November 13th, at 8:30 a.m., in the Conference Center on the 1st floor. Coffee and pastries will be served. Continuing with our series on the Tax Reform Act of 1986, this week Charles Tempkin and Allen Klein will discuss the impact of this legislation on individuals and corporations. Again, we want to emphasize the importance of these seminars to all the lawyers involved in our b'usiness and real estate prac-tices.
-u ,c t ,_j W L -pg) fJW:emj l
I l l t i l t
( ..
. No. 2-1 Page 2 of 4 June 19,1979 Relationships with Clients, Suppliers, Subcontractors and Others It is Bechtel's policy to deal only with clients and others having ethical standards compatible with its own. No impropriety should or can be tolerated since this will inevitably impair the high ethical standards of all ;
those associated. ' In situations in which Bechtel knows or is informed by a reliable source that a client, supplier, subcontractor or other participant (including a Bechtel employee)in a Bechtel project is acting illegally or unethically, a report of any impropriety should be made to the responsible Bechtel supervisor, who
- in tum will promptly bring it to the attention of the responsible Division, Special Operation or Service Manager. The Division, Special Operation or Service Manager willin tum notify the Counsel of the appropriate operating company and, at his/her option, the eManager of Internal Auditing.
The responsible Division, Special Operation or Service Manager or designee along with the responsible counsel should discuss each report of impropriety with the highest feasible authority of the client, supplier, subcontractor or other organization. Should the impropriety or unlawful act not be resolved in a satisfactory manner, the matter should be brought to the attention of the responsible Executive Sponsor who may, at his option, present the facts to the Chairman or the Executive Committee for their final consideration and judgment as to the appropriate action. Outside Activities Employees are expected to devote their full time to Bechtel's interests during regular working hours. An employee's participation in outside activities should not infringe on his/her ability to do his/her assigned Bechtel job. While employees are encouraged to participate in philanthropic, professional and community crganizations, they must ensure that the manner of their participation in a particular organization does not imply Bechtel's endorsement or sponsorship. Requests for Bechtel's endorsement or sponsorship of a particular organization, or for financial contributions thereto, should be handled according to the requirements of applicable Bechtel Directives. Authorization to serve as a Trustee, Regent, Director or Of ficer of a philanthropic, profeuional, rutional, regional, or community organization or educational institution calling for significant time, financial contributions or endorsement by Bechtel may be granted on a selected basis. Approval by the responsible Executive Sponsor and notification to the Chairman are required, l l Heplaces issue Dated December 22,1977 l l ._. _ _ -
i .- . No. 2-1 Page 3 of 4 June 19,1979 Outside Activities (Continued) Approval by the Chairman or at his option the Executive Committee or other authority designated by either of them is required for service as a member of the Board of Directors of outside companies. Such approval will normally be granted in the following cases: e An outside company which is not a current or potential client, contractor, subcontractor, competitor or a supplier of goods or services to Bechtel. e The relationship will clearly not impair or be adverse to the best interests of Bechtel or any of its clients, e Membership by a director of the Bechtel Principal Operating Companies on the Board of Directors of a publicly traded company. Confidential Information The employee must obtain tne approval of the responsible Division, Special Operation or Service Manager prior to disclosing Bechtel or client confidential or privileged ir formation. Bechtel financial statements and related data may be released only with the approval of the Controller or Treasurer or their designee. Responsibilities Division, Special Operation and Service Managers shall furnish each new employee (excluding field manual employees) a copy of this Directive and obtain the employee's signed acknowledgment of having read and understood the policies and terms therein. This acknowledgment shall be i filed in the employee's Master Personnel File. Sample acknowledgment is shown in Attachment B. The Division, Special Operation or Service Manager may adopt this or any substitute signed statement that will satisfy the requirements of the Directive. Each employee has the obligation to inform his/her supervisor of any incidents or potential situations concerning unethical conduct, conflicts of in,terest or lack of information security. Whenever there is any question as to the legal implication or consequence of a given course of action, the advice of the Legal Department should be sough t. Replaces issue Dated December 22, 1977
g . . s - No. 2-1 Page 4 of 4 June 19,1979 Implementation Although this Directive describes representative standards and guidelines, it cannot cover all situations except in general terms. Should unusual or special circumstances call for examination or interpretation of standards or guid(lines or involve uncertainty about them, the matter shall be submitted to the responsible Division, Special Operation or Service Manager. The appreval of the Chairman, or at his option, the Executive Committee is required for any deviation appearing to be justifiable under the circumstances. Examples of conduct at variance with policy are :.sted in Attachment A. Further implementation of this Directive, such as internalinstructions or periodic reviews, shall be at the discretion of each Division, Special Operation or Service Manager. Legal and Insurance will prepare and issue Management Instructions as required to provide further guidelines. Sign . l r Related Directives: No. 1 -9 Bechtel Public Relations No. 2-16 Public Statements No. 3-6 Bechtel Political Contributions No. 3-7 Memberships and Contributions No.4-3 Secrecy Agreements and Restrictive Covenants No. 4-4 Secrecy Obligations to Foreign Governments or Their Agencies No.4-13 Agreements with Representatives Outside the United States and Payments to Foreign Government Officials Related Management Instructions: , Legal Instruction # 113 Recruitment of U.S. Government Employees for Positions with the Bechtel group of companies Legal Instruction # 120 Security Classification of Information and Data OMS Instruction # 100.19 Informaticri and Data Security Replaces issue Dated December 22, 1977
- h. .
I 3 , No. 2-1 i
. Attachment A i Page I of 2 June 19,1979 i
EX AMPLES OF CONDUCT AT VARIANCE WITH POLICY The following practices will be considered as deviations from policy. The examples given are not intended to cover all possible situations.
- 1. Ownership, directly or indirectly, of a substantial interest in a client, subcontractor, supplier or other service firm which is or might be doing business with or in competition with Bechtel, or with a present or prospective client of Bechtel.
- 2. Serving as an officer, director, employee, committee member, agent or representative of or cmsultant to any company, firm or business other than the Bechtel organization when such service conflicts with Bechtel's interests or detracts from or infringes in a significant way on the employee's time or responsibilities with the company. A reember of an employee's immediate family serving in any of the above capacities may also create a situation of conflict.
- 3. Directly or indirectly owning, trading or dealing in real estate, materials, supplies, equipment or other property with the intent of selling or renting to Bechtel or its clients.
- 4. As a result of or through employment by Bechtel, using or causing or advising others to use any information as a basis to buy, sell or deal in stock or other interests in any present or prospective Bechtel client unless or until the information so acquired is public knowledge.
- 3. To seek or accept, directly or indirectly, from a client, contractor, stbcontractor, supplier or service business (or its representative or agent) who is doing or might be doing business with Bechtel or a client of Bechtel:
e Any commission, fee or compensation of any kind. e Any loan, advance, benefit or service which in any manner depends tpon l or is associated with Bechtel relationships, or deviates from the i ordinary course of normal personal relationships on terms generally
. prevailing for such relationships.
e Any gif t or entertainment of value beymd common courtesies that may imply an obligation to the donor or may be considered excessive, in poor taste or improper. l l e Bechtelis opposed to giving Christmas, year-end or other gif ts to l clients. In geographical areas where such gif ts are customary business l exchanges, the Division, Special Operation or Service Manager shall be ! responsible for limiting such practice and to ensure any gif ts shall be limited in value, held at the level of common courtesies and be free of any implication of obligation f rom the recipient. No gif ts considered excessive, in poor taste or improper shall be given. Replaces issue Dated December 22, 1977 l
.-s- - . - .---_ w- .-., .--w -,
- - . . . - _..-----.w-,,,, ., . _ , - _
\ ,
l l r l No. 2-1 ! Attachment A Page 2 of 2 June 19,1979
- 6. Knowingly participating or in any way being involved in:
e Unlawful or unauthorized payment or rebate, or any negotiation involving the same. e Uniawful or improper disbursement of funds.
- 7. Without company approval, using one's position in the Bechtel group of companies to further outside interests or to imply Bechtel's endorsement of political policies, campaigns, or aims, or the products and services of others.
- 8. Using or diverting Bech'tel's know-how, intemal information, equipment, tools, materials, supplies or the time and services of its personnel for any purpose not compatible with Bechtel's best interests.
- 9. Revealing for any purpose outside of appropriate business situations any confidentiat information belonging or entrusted to Bechtel.
l l l Replaces issue Dated December 22,1977 l
T
\ ,. ,
\
, No. 2-1 Attachment B Page1of1 June 19,1979 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Bechtel Directive No. 2-1)
The undersigned acknowledges that:
- 1. I have been furnished a copy of the Directive
- 2. I have read Directive 2-1.
- 3. I understand the policies and terms of the Directive and agree to comply with them.
5 gnature
~
e
y s:== m r j L ,i < =.l, _,l
@ LL :
c..,- .: :. c. 2 .c.. . .s L ._ <r- .. r..:. s* C . Having recen:17 c mpleted our annual review of the Division's Cuality Assuta . . prc;; ram, it s e e~.3 appropriate to emphasize to each of you Bechtel I:cwer Corporation's dedication to safe and reliable power plants obtained throu:;h quality of design, construction, and modification. We have an obligation to cur clients and the public to perform with professional excellence in this regaru and we depend on each individual's best professional effort in performing war to meet this objective. To rely on reviews, inspections, or audits to find mistakes or omissions in your work is not professionalism. Thos e overvie .. functions are to rei*nforce our confidence that our productive efforts are ccrr. . . Saying it in different words, checking is not meant to duplicate your work: Bechtel depends on your personal execution for quality of product. I recognize that situations beycnd your centrol may arise that cause you cor:a -- for safety, reliability, or quality. I urge you: CCMMUNICATE THISZ C: CERNS TO YOUR SUPERV!SCR ! Eechtel expects, as policy, that your su-' visor respond sufficiently for their resolution. Should you still beli3ve tha.
'/ cur questions or concerns require further exploration or response, take a:: .
If you work in this effice, inform 3 our project :mnager or functional mana - At jobsites, consult your site manager or functional rmnager. In any e v n , ccmrnunicate your concerns to the level ci management necessary to eatui-yourself of thorough exploration cf the concern. The principles which I have discussed apply equally to all our work, but w f added emphasis to nuclear work. As never before, publi: attention is f::u: en nucicar issues. However important it is, this focus should not be the .~.::;- vating factor. Motivation should be cur own individual pride in every face .:1 our werk, in every detail. As the whole is equal to the sum of its parts, ::. too, is excellence of quality the sum of details accomplished well. Our review cf the Division's Quality Assurance program indicated very few problems. *hwever, we should not become conplacent. I have every :cnAce - that each of you will rededicate yourselves to the goal of attaining even hie.e levels cf ex:clience as a matter of everyday routine. r, -_ _ A =-
.I. M. Kome s
- eak Volu.m 2, No. 7 May 20, 1H1
s' W
-. c~.'
l- c. w. o > e I in .' u
.n s
.r J . >
s/, , 9 . .m o g,, 4 d
.. . .D '
4 O d ' 61 . rJ ; 7 4 ':' '
- 9. ' " - ! c _ .'.
jc < a di -: / 0 :. 3 D
~
s
- ct , p-ei T .c : t C , G -
3
' . _ _ . . l3 s t is: : , , ,
W ~ H ! >' I eM .:
. i J
i:=s: y : I . , D k N $ '; IIE 8 l I. s '. i f
' H ! I L@
. $ ,oo h ;I!! !!.i! 'N m 'h:s!
.o -~C, f i i a ,, w . c. , .
*
- 8
- s
- 1. c $ .
; g e.
;pc. ." : f, i i
..i?-
3g : - l',c u I
- V i 3
w3 :
,-t .
3,g .!: :-
. .. n. ,t i.
- <c i 1 t l.;
a .
,3 n.
; c a .t ro .e;!
o r- s
' o 1 o
173*: I. ! ^ "4 i;! p- i::0 ' 2
! , q -
;rgg s 1 a ! .,s ! r. -
- 3 a , l r-D i IJ ' Z d 8 a ;
9 l l
.p >
I, .s E i: G. ;.. ! C)--- pt , i , I e l e. 2
, , , ' e; io 0 i.
3 - , . 4 i !c ; . p: , C. t a e i 'E i . i 4 e i l l, l
, i :* 2. to 'd ,
75 !.x, j,. r.l ' 4 v 0 s *! 9 ; .
,.T.,, y
.,,9 ,. g .
V
.- n '
g J 3-g ,- i ;; e r i..y.i ,
' ; j l .
l j. :- J l -o. -
'!gLa
't ' E I :{ )' ~: '.
h ' 8 ll
- l ', ; , 7I.'
\
l
=
- E 1 i :3 r -
e l
- l
,r I l
. 3 or r, j it < h U '
.!h --= !' S ' i fi
; i i* ' g?! 2
,.'g.
9 ' ; ::t ;. ; !! ; I
' ; 9 i g,e ,,
- a. ; ya ; ; , ;j . ! i j !- ,
4
; , , ts ,
a . $r. g 3 ' o
' i' i n i
'I E le i l i i
l 4
; ;z
,9
- l. <r ' c .;
. * "l 3 : ,
t l :
- u ;
I t
' I qt -
;; i 2 ! .; -
<-) __ 3 , ,
i ' i5 0 ; 3 3 u.
.s . O r>
i ,"i' E )i . l
, c/ -
T- 5 a it t- ; oa.
; 2- m f.E
,.s : ;.,
ij].e!, a l. l i l.' 3 ; l j lli l
, u -p:
a h: i. ' 'l - t-
. i,
> '! L 4 4 O 'I t
*8
.{ i 1
l' l ;l si i I t m i @D D : s' a
~,
- . , t' ' <
4 !, w. n .s
.n D s .. .
-! * ;; i l :
' q i i l
; i :2 e
0
'" e 4-
, *n n ; I! l i -j tI l
i s! i 5 ; *2 : : - - 61 Z
- - **:: i I! '
- 1 I f ig E !!'k I! j I' - l I i l l l !l
; jh _
N ) vi d ? a , 4, , t l. a
- .,p L .-
.:q
,s<
s: td o -
- . s; i .I .
- i
- I i
i
, .s <6 .
v O
, .. < .t 4 4-- .
g A ' i j I i# ';';
- I, . l { '{ I 2: !!; f ,; _ , l - c , ;
c 2, f o . i aq e . r j i ,1rN . ,. ; i, >::. !. s~; c_ I ' t l
.ar i
91 3 ,i . l: c3z I I- +, e a ; iw -
'y-l .':
<, :g. ', . s .
v , e i f:i j. t < s ,. , :-
; ed -6 5 .I ' ,' s l l i n.
i f_)
~
-J i i st I, ,
! I '. i 7.ii c 2 Q k O ; - 9 '
, l ll i
; i i , I W ;. 4 -
4 f. 5 j g' ;
; is ,
i h l
.I !
i l,3 jg}Id I'u m E w. r ( :- ! 'db l I I
! 1 ; < - - -
If 9 o t:..- i' ! ;
': 'M M E
in$ V"). i r i
- l 3 2 d c.
.. i aI >- a ,, i
- e 3 : ;-o b o! ! y!. . N I 5',; 3 , i ; .!h! l . ! ,' ,$ ': I N *
- a. ' zi I I ! -
'5
.cl '.13 t .,
t i < g ,. '2 y , :. 1 ;3;c j. . . - n , . il,I w .O .: vi o;.{- l l !;; s - i ! ; ; '2 1 e : m is ' ' i l ,j r ~W b ,. i 8 4 9 i l . ll X ,j -"I'!< ', b>;j% ,.>Iii: b. -
, :i i : ! !!
. i N.. I c".! o.r O !. !!! !.!f;li -
e! , j! laa;i.;!!;!i.;ii!!,!Ilb..'n i : r <! r F
. Qr q
'I s
f 1
!!: . - 4 n:
.c I
.s2 y,c- 3}d -
- Ij o. , d l9 c
-g
- g . s
-; ;: ;;. tR 2 a :.
g ..,-c
.it, ;; it
. 9 ,,
.:. *: !:. i j i :
1:. .. i. . , . .
. 4 l !', s i i s
e U.S. MILIT ARY SEltVICE REcoltD l'rmn _[O . __ __ To _ . 19 M . _ _ _ .. .__ Braintiof Scrnce _ M S .__ @ % _ -- MC! CM. I lmt ruc tions Ific followine. employment recoril is VE HY !MPOlt T AN I m cinunlesme: you for employment. Clarimal<.gically list your snevious enipl. igm. ni. UNE MPLOYf/ENT .emt U S. Military experience los stie p.nt ten years,licymnm. witli your most recent .ectmty. He were to mtluite f..r r. le activity. your specific slutses. responsiinlities anct numiner of persons supervisesl. If necess.ory, use .wistetsunal slicets to fully cover tie.w ai tmties. Attacli sesume ongo supplement information given fielow. I LIST AEL PFhEVIObS EfEP[OYFdE'NT INCLUDING RECENT E MPLOYMENT.
'U.S.' MILITARY EXPERIENCE. Ik CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER. DEGINNING WIT H MOSI
) pg ..... y- . n . . u . . - a o. ..-w s s.a . . . . . .. us. ..
- ~_. . . la ls % O-- - -.--.
~~~ - 1 --~'~
Jfi-C.- M _0.h _C o rt.I3 _ ThyAE.._ Cusob eq c, _5_tia of E,5
'T_o , ,OTi( t i y Cow y5
- c..: _ _y_. e. _c.m._ _ _=__ L___.N.. .- , .. . _ h,vi_n_e_ __
- s. i n.a. r _o_ . _ _s_. .e to_tt e s a s-c. % cam N h_ , , ,_ _ .
.g....__ ... . . . f_ @ .,
(MiQ Q{.*MCt4 _h _ _ { est f L4t041, 4 a OD , M1-E h(
. b.' ' O.M_ _$O_
_ @h .. . . C **t t/l. k7 t&Q
'. t_ b.N . _ _ . - _ _ _ . . . . _ ' -* __.2
..OD_.---._. . _ . . -- . . _ . _ _ _ _ . ._ _ -._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
*1. __.E. M b
- _ k * .-'. ,
- . _ _ _ _ _ .R ASI s 0 0 _ ... . . __ _ .. * ** - b b.-. .
E
* %E
. . . . --.--- C M O N T H LY S A L A R.Y. O NLY DO N O T. INC L t J D E
- OVE R T I. M E. .O. R .D E N E~FI.- TS
~-- -- - - . ~ . -
{Ng __. . . ~1~?: ......
' _ (.,_ . .- ..... . - ._.- ._~_ _._. . -. -..... . .
-- .. - ~ -
~
- -'.. _ [o_ ter,'( .Coosu_ b Aois.
-. . - - ~.Dit. . - .. _Pe%i A e. ..c. oe_.s. cLTioc . sceosc Es'.Tc3 0 j :( ,n,, Cow ,,n t , sf
- ... . sn w. V . . . . ?TiTsiwy _ _ _( S VPS -l_ -_ - _ __ _ __
pn : ~ ....
~
-..= _ n. .-
COWoyb Ao t ;,,^'*,,,
, '.s en .
g1 c,t 1 F N . s.-
- 7</ g ,,,I T$tAwr YA l kij bwt G. :: -
M c be, (( e., e i
- itASIC M(>NlttiY . At. AI. Y ()Ni Y. Ot ) NO T INCE.UDI OVI'R~IIML Of t Ill!NI.f I TS
;c. n _
iyg : , 6 '~"-~~""'"'"~~~~""-"-~~"":___
.c.. .MJ T rabos #2f CS _ _ _
Pcspus.ll6 _ Fee 92ca.)ivt aaul coaaec]ive ,
- - c z.yee tehus .... s, too,s ma,o, cow c s h aea. w cemt ?a e < f ea ,-
Misseot, ~Er .. gpe Er _ ecpo.p,y ed .
- . F%. ra. a. vc.c ,a a ..
?.~.'." '. : _ _ _ ; :- &Lv: .Malai Sof v . :: :. -
_. Ela. WAi, ' Scfv f:"... P3 M [M wo - . 2.' .. % loo 6 NO. . .
" . "[ R dow 't o p u d m a,'
. 'llASIC MON Titt.Y SAL AfiY ONLY. DO NOT INCLUDE OVEftTIME OFT HENEf'lis FufB .
[r _ f_ _
..._ . _ _ hr." :"- _ ~). _
.c - .. cpwoeso.s .. Amevt Co-Dudop . ojad.M poocedo<>ts , Sopwisie. f<ml,reL
- . .: _ .._]. n m. _u_ _... R. o Ab _ . - _ _ _
, .... _. ._hk. . 5. 0.. ^) . . .
m.id h.oy.iio n . o end-6ES - g . _ C_cLD LicM5 G D' A w <N ~ f c "'
..... Mm ,.
E=_.w Mya hp Pp , . .yrow /ssistw_ 'Pl* T es'i~ s.,....s.. 5i7
. " , , _ OT_ilit;. A _
. . -.._.-._ T.~r. .. >. 63:- 30.co
- n. - ..N ID(orvb __Not(cq n . - (2. prTA>l
- . dost _ Ducaesoa ;:';..?_ Aco /~""
h/I$,OA.N%( YYr,l<e%4 <
- N Fi- jo{e sN es sR :. *.., *, _ _ _ t%Q hoM ,
_ .,m. ';' % tCd.Afd D ,_ b t k _ _ 1 :. _,[~ 4 , Q r _7 *gg."') ,
- . . - .
- H ASIC MONT -
m HI.Y
-:.--..SAL. .- AFf Y ONt.Y. DO NOI- INCLUUt- OVE R TIM E. Off 13E NEl~lTS l l
<...o.........ss.~,,..s....,,...
-Y 1 I I __ l . _.. _. _E
- 5 7Y -,,, ,J/ . - (o IL. L_t e i s _.. Pe r. t. -(o_ .- . . .
-h.ad. of .o[.eachd. f twcroluns , _Geraact 70. %
- .. .c.e .
. m ,s n.uc. ave-- .oyca.rt, e k_ . ..(co~ w w w fLw. PM~O
.... l LL.- __ , , . _
5.' *.. _ j
,' d 1 ( gli I.7If ..
conr ,a o c Row Of '. -
- f (mq m.t Pew o,0 Pir>c ov^3- 5(L
?cc<dvR.
I li A' .it Mt srailli Y . Al AltY t sf Ji Y l><s Na31 INC.t (101 OVIflilMI O H li t NI I I I ?.s .)co c (.Jo.9 c t t t
.*
- t e t. ri . w e H e. r . l . . .Me a e i e n e .- a u .e *.st ea
1 ; G ._ 'l I N ? . --. Itl91 ?~ % * ~ " " ~ - "' I ' '-~ '" h:. ::.- . O s M Av utd at fc o n 7 M ioi n - 1 M od m t, ihm P s% pc I
^
- k. :::'- . .
.. 3 w;caoaoc AdL Gwn Lt EGFutj. Schat G uG.w-r: w i
6, , . . . . _ _ ,1 ?!~ 1. tuk.k Sopen viso ,2. penI,r,eJ, s b .wrue
,p, , ,. < e,
-.- .. ~ . . . .. , , . .
......7,. E-I . . . .
h_~; ., . . e- L,
- . VPboUS ::-- ScA btn .
if ._ _ _ . ?"^ sic mOuintY SAtAuv Onty. <>O nor inCi uDe ovcuriuc On i c ncriis i.f
. ~ . . .
.... . . . . , . ...._......s. . . . . . . . . . .
I.. _ . . . .
..~
i .,. .....
.._.s. .... .
'.'**.t__. . . . . . . . _ . . . ._ j ll . . <..
a . -. w "."".'."*7."". l s . . . ..
- s. . .s.
- s. ... , . . .
r . ..,: .. _- -. . . - . . . .
' O ASIC MONT HLY S AL ARY ONI.v. DO NOT INCLUDc OVFRTeMil OR HENEFIIS I n . ; f*nSINt %*y Old PP.is t 5*. ION AL nE F t RE NC t 5 ,
NAMF .A'.',, e st'.c uP A T BON l LOMPL r f r ApoHI $$ i po. ).. g l #D /6744 ~ ea SM,60p ENGR. . .TM1- 7. IbEc.b c C. I aaa . stS c.. . - . .. e z. (13,ar mnv4cest dinc<iod Tu i.- 2. 1),ne<roa Phri ces l Yi W L a 2. STMTuf) _ h1GIL l YT - 7 f
, l-lEtWhI _
H O V E. You e V E H est' t N CONVIC T t o O F A F E e.O N V 3 l] V E % P.O O F A NSW E pf Ib
- V E 5"* G 4W E D E T A 44.5 O N A S t F A f f 4 f t Stet i F A felony convirtson record wdl not necessarily har you from employment. Factors such as your vp at the time of the of feme, as well is the nature of the violatein nel
{
] reh.phehtation p be taken into consideration. --
f I herchy authorste my former employers .ind unhveduah lasted herem to release to you anform.stion as to my ch.iracter .ind al.ility cnd v.arafication of enatters i, stated hereen I understand that. af I am employs d by you, any past etuployment and educalmn will be verifiest amt that .iny m.itersal misrepresentatmn or omn son <m ilm foran m.ny lie epounds for termm.ation. It r vny un t. st..ndmq that the worls to whn h I may he .eus.in.4I tliat es bring dime or to be alone by your t:omp.my .end sts annes.stion ss larg. ly of a contulents.it us
.o . . a . . . n t . . i . . . . i n , . . . .e h. . i i , i., ihe ..wrni ib .i i .on emph,yed by yon. i a.p-c .. . .. . mni.i.on pr.m eden, to sn<h c,npi.r,m<ni in ..yn ar, ay,c,m ni .,n.i n 6,nm.i. .i n .
- m. of ..f I H le+.t on, e orntainting .en i supinyre Inventenir. .eted Ses erry A;peernent . ant to tie tunnul by tly ternes of such Aepeement. ,
.... ff ** '.* 7 y m en c. . 7, . e , 4 (- O4 f . ( ,4 .3
.b.i. ;D a. PA R.:9 L: CCAT10.':
C. S. Lvy, te! ar ."axer Schocl' Prot: type U.S. Navy. 'lachinist Schoclin; Itic.Gnc Cc.nmunit;. CoIIc;c CNPEitiENCE N CS Ccep; ration,1930 - Present Enc.;y Consu!! ants, Inc. - 1930 ACF Indust.-ies - 19 9 Consume:s Power Company, 1973 - 1979 Il!inois Power Compsny, 197~ - 1978 U. S. Navy, 1970 - 1977 NUS - Responsihic f ar providing consulting engineering services to utility plants during c nstruction, startup, and operation of power plants. These services inelade the preparation cnd implementation of test procedures, operating procedures, and test assistance for new and operating power stations. Currently assigned to the Shorchum h*uelcar Power Station (S26 M Nc BWR). Primary resporsibility is as Senier Engineer in chi.rge of radwaste systems, including the organization and coordination of effo.-ts of redwaste systems test engineers in the daily administration of test grcup activitic3 Other responsibilities include supervising the preparation and set up of test activities, systems supervision and maintenance surveilinnce after the checkout and initial c?e.ational tests and instrument calib ations. Also evaluate the validity end necept-aDiIity of test results, write preoperation&I .und acecptance test procedu.e, a .2 supervise setual testing. P.evious';. assigned to Three Mile Island Unit 11 Recovery Team. Primary respcn3ii.- itics included development and implementation of functional test procedures fc.- tre Submerged Dcmineralizer System (used for containment cleanup) and other p: ant recovery systems. Served as Acting Starttp Manager and Test horking G. cup
, Chairman while test manager was in extensive training prog.am. Assisted in establishing, issuing and revising of test manual including work authorization p.occu, inspection, startup testing and turnover to plant staff and implementing Recovery Tc,1 Prog.am and procedures consistcnt with Reg. Guide 1.68, Site Technical Specificati:ns and cuality assurance program. Provided assistance to Plant Recovery Operations Director in the capacity of Operations Engineer.
ECI - As. signed as a test engineer to Beaver Va!!cy Power Station Unit I during an extended refueling and retrofit outage. Duties included preparing and performing test precedares for existing and newly modified systems that have been upg.aded to reecnt requirements. Wrote und performed system design operational performcnee tests ca post-TMI retrofits including the solid siste protection system, quench spray /rce:.c spray five year testing. Wrote recire spray heat exchanger leakage test end perfo.med this DBA test. ACF Industrics - As Electrical Mnintennnee Supervisor directed facility maintennnee personnel in both preventive and corrective maintenance functions on production equ'pment. f r.J ~C:. 2 - .
2 l' \ *
.. \i s
Cc.n-c ~.er- .! .i d c. . : <. p : c . c: . p;,i:.an of Shif: Supe. vis: p :r:!cipu:ed in : .c re -
.* cp . tin.ii. ud nir:str2:ive, ,ca:, m: r.J ,;r.r. . -
ce; ' :rc . Ce r .,>
' O .)
s v . . e . ;.s . S.
. . c c 's 4 Of '.rninir; to .suppo;! Oaid heer.<in e
cn .NZ3 . - n t.m g. uu,i h ud.'- fe.- the operational a::d test g. ou;'. I:!. .si; .5..cr Cun'p -- - Devebped ope.ational, adm:nist.ative, emergency and sur-vei:6nce p-:eedo e is a p;a.n rene.or operator durir.g unit construe: ten. L'.S. N a v- - Trai:1e ' to civ!- ~.d served as machinist in the r.uclear power p.c;.um Pro nc . ' propu!st.n p ants,Lc .cir.; Pe:.y Officer respon.sible fo. main:enance of both :te pri:n: y " f.- divisional record, keeping, and training of power plant per. sonne!. A.ssigned as i:ainin; in tructor at a navy surface nue! car prototype. e O
pmy , r m< l' !
. . , m _ =,
$ b ! ... ~~
F?.OFESS:C NAL EXCE' LENCE Having recen:1f ccmpleted our annual review of the Division's Quality Assues . 2 prcgram, it sea .s appropriate to emphasize to each of you Bechtel Power Corporation's dedication to safe and reliable power plants obtained through quality of design, construction, and modification. We have an obligation to cur clients and the public to perform with professional excellence in this regard and we depend on each individual's best professiona' effort in performing war' to meet this objective. To rely on reviews, inspections, or audits to find mistakes or omissions in your work is not professionalism. Thos e overvie'.. functions are to reinforce our confidence that our productive efforts are ccrr. . . Saying it in different words, checking is not meant to duplicate your work: Bechtel depends en four personal execution for quality of product. I recognize that situations beyond your control may arise that cause you cor:e z-for safety, reliability, or quality. I urge you: CCMMUNICATE TH = (~ ~ CERNS TO YOUR SUPERV!SCR ! Bechtel expects, as policy, that your cu-c visor respond sufficiently for their resolution. Should you still be'.iave that
=/ cur questions or concerns require further exploration or response, ta'.<c a:: .
If you work in this office, inform your project :ranager or functional mana : At jobsites, concult ycur site manager or functional rmnager. In any ev.3r . cc:nmunicate your concerns to the level cf mana'gement necessary to sat .ci-yourself of thorough exploration of the concern. The principles which I have discussed apply equally to all our work, but wit-added emphasis to nuclear work. As never before, public attention is fact:;. on nuclear issues. However important it is, this focus should not be the me::- vating factor. Motivation should be our own individual pride in everf facet cf our werk, in every detail. As the whole is equal to the sum of its parts, cc. too, is excellence of quality the sum of details accomplished well. Our reviaw cf the Division's Quality Assurance program indicated very few p roblems , :Icwever, we should not beccme conplacent. I have every conf.cc that each of you will rededicate yourselves to the goal cf attaining even hi .her levela cf exce!!ence as a matter of everyday routine.
^'
_-_ _L J. M. Komes
- cak Volu.- e 2, :Jo. 7 M ay 2 0, 1931
N i Q f. %
!!Wl i ThisWork:2 -
.f*.Q;
~ ~ < -
~
' 9= -[-
,. .) * ~
. . v.
(. y h,.}
, Ai f & . :
m [,e[:m
,,, .T .'M.
- e. . ., .m [N5 ,. .
. . .: . . .j .
" , . ~ f.
-N I
y
> -m ' "
,e
~'
L%. .
^
.. THE IMPo-)? -
C0M P s. : l , ; , .
. . Deep = . -
; many a c.:
a:tx.s1.cc: m -r.
._?i.
g - GNT:m v t.1 TF. 6
!),5 e r- .. . . .
- _. t.EA X E Y 5
.Diggingb::a =e ,
the world's :-s: ' fassilh= :: RfCKIA 'o 3 i ggows .. ;. HEART 5 b gg7H}NO 'siN*j
- AND Sci'ti P- '
QUeSi:CES r.V .3X
& ABOUTgyl -l. , ,g ,; n I!
- g. ; .
R15K5 0F polNG IHg
; Tai.y i
(- g., .. . gggntiHlYp , !!ct:
.\ao=:g:, x: +.
[ si* l l
I k
's ~ .
r. > . . ... f l . .
- r. *
, %tb.- ...
e
- n. j
., : s e o w~ -
n g. 2 4
. .y.
p s is t *G V I
& .' a' e,% me q~- .
hf. t-; 5
'. -C j ,A..
'Q i
'7dGl ,*i h
y, . w i .. x .
~
- WHISTLEBLOTATING TrdtEnnd Consequence - .. .
sr an a cc,c% m igy; ;,
- taayd - - tr ys
~~. 1-a%e theng.ae-ht thmr,:; _{'j2 -
- l. seer Axt Part. - ' - ' -
ac en 2 sat s -a ] n . m 't *% .'ame *wiestwMrse Harrisburg, Mme , '.wa - gen at NJ
*srs ear, mums and had paad ha dos at muma N W W aast 12m'a M piant m .a , s
~ N i , _a, ,, _n.
- a. a_ t
.. ----- - c- -- =i - m c-a - .
g a,;te a * 'S had.r*r2B St W Of D BK$ rgtetilall Ptrtp to ]DIR the Osaalap 4 MMW 1R5174 W 10 N a 35'.r1 '4 81"U J ai -5 se.u m u .',rmas3 eestoee ' quam sa Tut prying aan seum "et uten proemrurea S~nm = acue+ me , a.as x w - - SeCtA4 *eOLir?ll QEaOTT<'MitTUI *J5EE LSd t a:
- Le ?*.e -
- A8 000 Sf the (T9 top entgiDeW1 @ the fie&BGP CrTTE vert uEng a Crtas that 3 *pg h L.
**4 ; 1 e==* +9r sa P*stcc '.'tinty 4WW W WN 4 adn t Deest testat Had :t *>ocijet it ceuad se f.t.:e 4 ;-
;P' ;; =: 9 : ei %>r.3 a.mrirse P'rwe tw na pmsdura med in m haase ruptured the rector s ontauunant we.t 4, N; s: u
. sp ' 3* 1 Je *'Iritil fGrftDtX 033 sag *I '* Wet. Utac$ beelt theseattrar core Parts < 43.a.tv
*anade*Sett te:en.ast to *.arert 'he me 430 aleted that Serttet wts a3tPW'J14 CTO- 3cgt . .g,: ;.. .,,,; , a
.ade 3cers aoE korg Segat2TT ptt0Gr Spat > 8 '
- 14tnA&BL811 WTage LO Se truttast Gut of 'he 17, a'O eas '1rea'.en.r.g 'Se retitt fttrurg 3f NL add dMPOB8d W MY m- - - e- , ,
*I - n,t, s.d ,, - r t .e.. , . . . .
fr'astrtlang ID00ths trpAg to base ;Dene con us ed v "Ja
@E NM M O'EOUD- cer33 addreeM1 throug3 mLernal c3aAbeta- M
- tr't;! C'A
' 7.3ter hk Parts =So 1
- hs M Nu m awarv W a W
*>ut '.be enart they asset .ae uncre h o ut ,e a u a..
**ade e 'de .NgTT warting as Seces amt, A kt W amninuAac30pc k I
meait they received frosa ugger IJ&&de gg m,ta. a. .c= 8 d A8d 108 N#f*EI D meet De trip was toej to stog et.st.gg 'une p eu
. .- .._ e_ ,".,
's T = ,":1 =, ;,2 - - ~ ~ - , ., m
;;,.t."
i I.C'7 -
= -W~ m n,,, _ D. p,,,. -= =-
- -e - ,e.-- . .. .. _ = - e m - - a d - co. m . au. -
i a
~
m - . . _. I
w _w- - -
~ -.~,.
m asas meas m Mt M . . , . , , ,
\ .. . . _ _ _ . .- -
, .. u
;.,.. . . . . v-**f. C .oeM v
,Y2VafGV Nt M fJUf ...s . .
..=.= ec P:r m.** .m
. , . . , , . , , w , a _. _-
- : . .. a .e , e s.
. i fc~"qA .. t
' b(0thtf'$tttfers 2Vill* :. eu. .1, r- ~s, -f x wn . ~.t t *.u - ~#,~
- e . e.t 24t :a .:*r t m x b
fau4aow d m . em m: 2 xia w a e.o :.ar,
. g. .u u.coor e: u .: ef *:42 t . ns 3 g, 3 ;.
s , , . ., . P aru , . .set
, .a 4, sr m.ss.at?<*
- e. . .
*al, .a
.y,,, a .; = ,31 3, 2 , 3 , , 73 ya ,, p
[ Of ddd$.Oh8[$ ~ - 7 t r':'T D*SM33;Cfl Aad
- I"I A34 Illu
*e L"# W W MTh
.uarmp.d a =m ;f u repoe.s. cat.cs n.,," m ,.u ,yy. ,'d.mF #'M-
. ,uco ,,
8 [0UI /dN O' .
- N tenuon t.xah escauted. A fr end t RC a.seg ;reur: mea
- Lcn .ere not a.,,
W Patu : umped :sta Ni e piant z.anager. 3'#4 fdO **8 ' AL 5"'PC"t'd 13 I2' *
/0 tot" /0 /#20{0 //'~ ok. cent.ded searza that Paru see nad approacned the iant to get some tut
- 2a t'
Se f.w'f*'8 "ti auencosp6a.s d a wr-c.nauca ai Tvt mi .12same he car. ,4 7
*er huseand perhaps to have ha 14s taaen Spartment af Lacor. adegas sarassment
. . 1
~ away from La Parts toot thas as a earn. at
- ort ,
ing'. he wife nad Lad three Surs eeruer To Be cent day Bechten tssued Parts sa
.n, protect has chudren, he sent them to hve afue suspecsma. me m new e
. g., . m3 ha trother. ige 0 adas assy. Bechtal c:aa emptanauca eu that tbey J.dat east
. 3
**' Q *' flew Parts to Marytand os biannen and I a.. . . r ._ g% r,i.c.. herournech.f>=dh. h - m. him espcmed beu,,e, ta furtsar harusment
.,,,v . Parts L
, , , , , , , .e4,,,o,,e
, , , .. , , , w.u
. ,. nad h, pam nn,d. uu.un :. ,,,,._,.
,.'g, comascoon to T'd! was ever ma* u*:anu so brug to pentac rsght im i . .e
'.. . Parts eas scared. Me accepted atarnal l eas ==== mad
- Paras recans of taas
'.' * , ..'.channen for retsart:g comptaats eere a:gbur.arna tune. %ct run a provuts my act * ^ -
9 -* *
*s. . cous; mag around aant and tne eas:neer .r.nacence out ia proving that the N RC.GPU 3*f'*b
- l egg .* ._ eas unsure how GPU or Becatet monad react and Becstas sere guty Ad my tune oas as to r.J C-l ig .- d he seu punoc eta ha aaegauces Paras sour.d up in thal
- Faut mactas later. Parta syg.s geta toucs mta the Governmens Accouet- agreed to be romangned by Bechtai to me .
l , . " " ~'.- ,
. . . : ' aamury Prosses eGAPt a puhue-interest group Caal Wa&er Plaat a the Mossve Desert ,,
'. g M..,.Jn fasamgwn. DC taaajdvne and asp. Withis ha.f a year beeu taad off. .as e- - -
r - er-~ ~ s aca ,s.g ,m,na,ed m .ch _un.'
.~e..g/. . *g**-..?nsy.etow md f4 be runnang up a red Parts egnetos muLGAP as a consunant ce and a Ma. ~'
f I
'CommithinMe Trut:a' #2@xmm .:. ;- .
l :n t:1e3entagon t!n +cne ,caroid A frnest PtM, .** d (' . ' -
'"5ema time bach.* ntzgerald evote.
%.. \'
ans ason taat a waslasusef ** V ' *tytag eas a sey of Rfe la the presras De com snant the trutC that ess> W asamuos to the praesem a uitruungest Toni _ sun :us twenae Department 100laL me trs13. os maner nos painful *
- p, . ' -
.;HB Be wl.as Las anaJyu here the tham .-
j,j
* ' ' * ' " " ' ' " * '"d '
- 4 m W bdm m W #
.u:cd 6ita a four yest.een'bett;e"ta'ad g comeuttae ta isdL ht2geraad ducioned the 4euds of how ce Aar Forts had adowed me -
*M
~*'
% 3 Et Lz 88010 4 attorney I f ees,aad 83 31 umauu estascoeum xa .n m am egu aws. and C
,,,,,,,,,g,gg4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
a r3e end frias ht23 era.4 eas fladh . 33 billiot 'l eas confndest taaa as ecce sa I n:ce *Se Pogugoe reenrod aam 6e 147*3 fag,
- couM Sage haces the dramaut vasta and .,
a .er pa vutg. . css presL:gama ps.and gg e abuae of LaapSygr m8Sassl eas teetat the y r:9ec.atetv etactshed tug:. sed as as " Postagonal paradoes of virtue womad take '., c we enasceceemer recourag:ag the ,# 7 net pai.r:au,,' as T'.tageraad<aus am- . .' cruit ascese Fitzgerad artme has ersten la set amput taAas r'ght*= ha cast y
=urten.
Fu s rpeMans :mm
'.a seep a cater J eye on the Pha&& . . For 06 M he ruro. i
. 'ed out to be pamfuL At f arst there were mJd n L F: le ? Et IaQ15 ons l'.r.ady reta. throtta from bagher4t9810 4438% RaK add i Aated is :J r u.aa jos Augersat and ha..! eben Lhat dMa t saow down the dogged Dts.
a.an :.4.e : s :=egata so nfia fwar nr. *
- 88"' 88"'teney poured mm a swam suo
- m .
, fu as.1 as:ced the *Actac Faastana,*J pasDureaucranc uc a little ', gerned.reorganmag tae Pentages that used a morefewer
&as produced treet tao many of waspoet arautd t3+ .
I
' .3
) .mes pmesant t *M eut th.a .ef ahasahed OtJger1&d 3lo4L eas MM P.ap : Mi
^^ . s ' la addluce.the Detease Department set distressed by the maaner in aars respecs>
I ble butesucrats commatted to sound def ecae 3 I . ,-. ,7m :: uc netas is career t th the w ' up as invest.guory unit to pm Atzgerad os and f acas sanity mere cut dosa e nen they m.y :r.a e a ,'ame ,er e:noru ta ==* As = pmni ha damer are uwepud w s,e a ,
- . ,ce u two ::gersaC b sertad k esud him as com a comet homonaasas and a e
'e'8 Su - ,"
* '#[ '
ce mas s manae esasost artoerase easur . womanmar.as sellas a dopo iner- utordits to Etzgernac, cr'ocs staath N # "~ l nd .J=.ar.asreecs a tse samen.eesmeestJ Ernas Atzgerend made ha erplomve du, f.e4 as murnal das. cents received the ". 4:3 x wucc x sey sespans proposes **"' ekmures enn no Laought to tar coes, %shroom trustment to pnvent mest , l-
* "'**# E8 " " . q asoca As a ecut<ostrol eaDeet, he eis of. f*om oemaang furtser informatactL aluct '
Ptagersee ans *cc.nated ?w twetoectv$ - feedsd by tae practace of offering private meant feedag mes maaure and heepag V) ,
; casuar rs esaga checna u cu mespong taem .a taa dart * > w.c p Ja u- % e
- at*.s and rererved partnr. . g,, ,,,,,,g Lance rau o of wut- * 'm yen ,g,,pg, .,o.,.,.
fesmonal outragt etzgerus had a voon of ntagwaM = as by no unaas a uneet crn. 3 ~e a . -
- Lands. Ben. .a # 3e omte sa seuseale f 4 Shaat ietser te superiors crtuc*Jaag the ' a weapons proceremsat syuum synmen n, ie. He erote a boca scout ha ordent *3e w : tat w .
out W casuit Hisa Pnests of Wasta." and nettered around .ssem.. lg Lautamos masse prograa la sL be cr10.. cwe LLa mautary estamiasi-a for shady He see muutary men boastant their ce thecountrv Hsofforispaadoff Amahtary- :*9rsa.s P . ref orm inovemeit has ==ad bota in- ers 1:e t :d
, seslang wie arte ma Lary concreogry a ' r,ers thane they f antaered their post reurt sade and outade of govertunent cor9dora, :an a w , .
e gN 3 #Y eeg3,. gt q 07 tDedyuts tocoraractors He ab and og g fitageraad has rey pc. w. m * - t . m
Ne k r m feta se v a *f te N>o Cas- NW 7rnms esta 3e wry s'atsames shr- M M M a iaear pe en ratt nr utew team.ca J! awa tie derr Eve swear act vis T -e As s at.e 9 4 9 .ser . JO mu e r.J:.r.a rg, {, - rses ta :n.se s.gM.xatt .ues of ner-p , l gg g y'. *
- s::.s and .@w:s .s J.cstrwhoe.
e ,
' Parts s c.rretuy +ortag u set ap a tg autesoread 4* aft and off.ptaost and
- ettsueono*ers sspport group far tte cme- ' tere are stui mgerms wesLorJ aDout ar ;adustrs asd be acterte to a credo *Better as part:ars contnDuled to as get-
' saared try suppc1 grouts and *1usdeClow- t;24 shot on a raad ers aae uu ay soi se your nraines
< 'I. . .gg gg ggf g3y, g
'.[
Karve d and rraen serpm . . n gers yo er % me sua mmaoc *tsuers of e f[ggf hgf fhgy m r l , ave ,, ,o,, ,a,d ,0 ,, 0,, . me. .ui y - f- fnonemt rep-o-
"nrus u= c= ~a = ** * , _
,,,,n,,,,,,,
~mmd ino-ands or'- . . rs.e. . front representvin Wm,. game .a smca ine payer w w aum u ptag na m o strises for the grand prues of of masat fnud and 40use In geomcm Truta and Juauce onde and prreatteertar JDtm accord;ct to cer*ma _ _ _
p* praytst that the ronaQ&aQoD prues = car #I *
,b -
reer. frweds and sanary - stJ3 retna:n eith. pear to be ce the rise. A; ta re ca wgn Kaufman. as taviroaswataa ne 3.mreme.ra offwe or vanan
'" rrcinuon agency J.PA) emmo>ae. = nose sw.s and s.4ges . oust aacs cocaias cae
' report ce the affoc) s tulf . 'gBoraect of aJegaboca recette4B by !g fedKal ageOCiM g.*"* g 8 tone taste aantes hetped oepose EPA - from the Department of Agricuftare to I casef une Gorsuch Burfort cosaders the Vaerans Admsnutra.aon-- resorts eat
*hauthowtag 4 -five4ttnensaceaJ caes> the total etaber of composats of diegances i sde actast Parka ey Becated were vertfied boart* The ptayer must be deciplined. acts and knettacal procedur1s Naped ,,ff9tB at press time NRC commanaoners were dem Kaufsas' It t 62DDrust la coOtrol anger. (30 ga 3 gga aggtg perted la 1951 te 11J1R La ,-
l tat;gg waat peaastwo to amass GPU. Beth- la maae sure that when you mov,181 a g attdar haf year pared ta M tes s co6 tractor and Parts was commeertag p6aaned mare. na a reertree oat" haN ah appsan M M M , l ' brig a cr.11 suit 44amst Secttag ne gresien dineef n ressime:. vtact ni safw asere mopertree r ^ 4-ta the seasta:ne, the forimer Mame luck Parts' case see sutue haddee threats. Were taas 2d states have pumed satwegeim4
; crie seer a life Bas tasee as trocar twist ne nam of not respoeshthuam pertaps a career I wily procuae Parts has been a ppatal Wactast 14 couad however. be 4.ren - and lawa nausead hot bass tot reportang.verer ,
' f gure .a hetpto3 Cahforma aan.ouclear vio6ent Karen 54.1 wood's titches was adet- .
, .. of '_
I
.- Seep 4te&* ,
4 y.., ,... , \ 4 i - no m
. n we ean dmaa van es vanees ta,
.NU v YY bvh .
=
j i ..AW VYY qQ Q Q person invorved baowesses entstae at 42.* 3ey are res1Bnc n te" t
.1v .. O ,,v nays Ctart -t haes ta asendar stat'a verifb ment os casca n.
404e titaout thas perses- etalcas De
~
nem est norty on the naamyusessy presenk " v8strprotest weeld be'JdupWaryce gem A emmentatamW y= ,sh . y, ce s : . men zusa ao eita t3e .> masavety document ite wons'soing? be ppp Tte it.escon sitow to blow thefbaeht> sLes af a een - and to
- tom - ta
';* t Part se the arguma af *La>
ecs . ::4.te J Me :eentag a tne asas Do y<su tsow ad tne reevant f acts and accroprtste taes' ts st passNe stat 7erson. staty conflicti carm csaccointments Jr g gg
!numatory ced to the geest$on of how to
,,,,,,,,,,,s nary .s ce wst se.
't i eet 4 prJrt. ,. : .
guy,the etsue a tae umsmar af how to tand to rema me .
.r~r4J:.:4 at .netsk as acta rry ready tDec. pais ego graulicauon r:ugtt be affecnet ts eng Mhc. >our padgunt7 malata&a )our ps)esotegend enhauty. sups. 3thert hr aa*.bem. .
eaady Jartng the ineventet seneSmissa Detag as a emat;eticp-M:en *Bist;eS6owefiare tors between TheGovern2 Dent Accountahdtty Pro E 2.1n4 r.vta.rg a J t errey tacit 4 todor1h *# ' " r7 Af ar *Bk24 taase n. s sect)Lauls Ctart earns etuueolowers enlaare aanaec10 a i 's
.c4 *:e Tisceals at maams a pubhc protest agama tne acnansve dente f or vindaca.
.at .f .. .r4 As wroy or damage the M M MWM Yee veel get azs ***
- taon? It tL te says?.be magne tamt tast dew
*teg- tv >f an >rgangacciaca taecareers stroytmostof taetIL'
. , t5ca ta staa a re - .
' ts .tScemarx ;3.r.1.at ;usucity fg gggg enbee M stice.c 4 *- -
S Are te .2 8
.s (M terv agk2 *:c. 7 t:e is see s uts does, perts agree a to essaust ad the proper t f pertas can sec-ssar, 4c.an- . t, s ws are urect. casanes maaing sbre inat >ou asse a d- pygg gg737grEv$ aght at tae end af *:e .
.r.w. -m a . ..an prolenor un acesmeswd papw tne to protect yourzeit. very wrust e wo , %no* eg smeta aos.as witnaa tae geernment eacs nency nas as to .t *A.ra *ar".ar'3 LSavertry add 3 Igy g,g WM ne m ra m.:
s.- aspector geSeral resDoesthee for nTesalgate 8 precared f W *tr*.Mi
. 2cr 3. s v eu m c4tts =of h u snevanca and comptaina and inos. 8 7 %n Ka.! man. .n
- : -auoa. m .se moervants .no t ueve tary save seen r.
.o .
- 1
**.a.a a .aat a.'Jrnata e Du> E $h $ uon neocr .: :.c:
e ' u.- r.e. ,weerfmA latasted aga&gst fat thett thamleceownr.g Can ase ineir eaam ic ine vern system Proue.
/ EOS C1' tat.
,, u .~eca nuensaed.n ae a,. too soard and fa.a complaint -na ine oe- *"$'"' -
a scr*. a ve:r: u t f . 7'5 for seter**.aa. prepfredffdrheS(SF arv and aceret a.'n'se - . r 4
- te':er a i
- a.tLauce 2efits tuow- la the privaLe sector. many corpora-have tone octanasue st
- 4 ' fle * ". - e * .Je le hac0*ert Of prepared to .ame .' %
te0ts have adopted *SpeS door
- pouciet Sowin DacL Dr M4;ed .
[ m"
?) hen wf a a 2 L-3.4 Jr % aman. age Tert a tacB adow eTplan een free afrom to top &&ouadal get.rto.t !
LaSagetDett *0o w1Allisteil 40d follow up dbr'Ag Ty *%JueW*ls 4 ett.Q 11ta343rit pr'.:ll , ,,... J te
- he i0
- e r m -r -, me -mode a r .t '4y earh i.letalof pot #6Cady dam- ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, tm mt .o,s.colms 8. 0et
.png9 eCv9 . w_ _. -
,gg g g ggg g g, , tleOdoteft C9pe With the Strth of the . IYtM art geC59 t.Mo*4 '.ne * "
., :-mu .r m=m.fiimume mome. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,u,,,,,,r,e,, ,iiou.. . .eo u smans ao mawai
,._ :. . e me,catag a souin afnea or team a:.rma a e
- rmot.r.g >1 ear powert tRacg gnay rug ,,,,,,,,,p,,,,,,,,,,,,,sano,. ,o.w nrissia - gro. .naen cas m e -
'brter !J ?Be e Cns11eblower 9 periot.aj poS allastu teof 0ctmpationalSafetyand
. Me fyst lde,*myeSoskaa. t "
*1' beta ka co10tastles that 13e seue *" * * "I taotts add ettetM t.1 **e a .
E cret.DeLity of at efta* sr -
- W4 *b e 'tr;.5sdef 80'. @ pact oO the %Act her opt).g nytdabie to the e haNjem O 3'038 E
. Dan .Olerent '3r t tJ Os oority Jf 13e Sower a got to boot the etague Out Lo # "
= ut'eMoeef t 3ar1B 1potli(RL ~'asa
- the taf 3rmaQce or Llegetacca to a DN "O N #* 'I'L'" UEO 3.rd party suct u a purca.Jul or a pg.but *O O ~
0 9'
^*
. -mze .uueu..ms e mee4 ,,,,,,y tered fmm tas atteme poww mai:aa ne w3e n , ae=assa amuce3fsen too.ed won perwe .u e nucI:m4 ne ry> con uem .x
%e. p
- ar
* *e :s hsse%r 3 *3e f asia ot **aM 3 93 a.Ciast e9ery c1.te I hand.le !aag tc'n I try Io (1o'er #115 thetB ]42 Bow Mt3r1 'l2 11
- L r . ; - :. . c c u a u s u . .= . rru r ;z z c :1 s a w v -- mmHr n
_ - _ = s em - - - -- 2- . , _
._m,,_____,,_ _
g nyFM-T'T ~ f.< .. . . . .- ~~
,=.. 3. .
t m. e: .a sr , m-
. ., - [ e . e :,
- ap.=
a f w .
.. .E L
'l -
J( g> W jj
.< .* u o g-=7
,,nr:.nch-g ( e;..
s - NO %CcTcv5.' ,.,. D HWQ:PT5RS : M MTOf 3RC '
- . e. . . , i ~%IS;cU Ct%O %' . .:s.o-u o /
P M -RAr5 Rc, ~' 4 e Arnold Bron besassa analyst and r ears the agencv started ears .ato a :nore .as 'n ri **
\; WHISTLEBLOWNG ~
nr=r== ~,at w ' m. we .er ar..".' <~~~w e. cared ."~ ~~ ~ .e~au.., ~ ~ c~~
. na -epe. met r, w 2. ..
Ceuaved freue fagy M us a hasoricas persparuto and Bot a betae. . = ase sie .s .; - . l mecr.
~= aet.o, traw and an- n nues n Tie aa um= == mus = ===r== a.,
., a,,,,,, m a ag#Q,"
,,,, o,e ,,, o,,,,Tg cap, gard .,,
m - ma. . no, c ,, ,,,, narr 1*M *. .
- stoe . rom.os as a . ,,,. .,
mems cartmuoes aan an e . .o.s , w o,e .e .0,,m -=== r=.a-w - *t = c m, Peeges we 8 mandardbut elsed bee <tec2:ng federna measugatapes a ted> l pese grwenart and appena puomagerard sa*'r ea. - i come W ethks as adaptacon W the h uos to handbog a current raster of wast $e. p y .-
%a, nm , ,,,,o,.,,,,,,,,,,,g d ar.u re ew.- **=g cue.. r.=== =enor u i
, a a.4,m,,,
,,,,, m=
- me war me==ry com:m. := w -e A fWt thEBe p
= e=uo. Wthe.l.'ed .ar.theEh m. $see has
.,,nged
. _ , _099,W1uasty, , , , , ,and , _N ,N,, v. ra 4=. ens. BA.that GAP "Las m served a useful
?ic e f g J . -= +-
; r.e, r eu.n weg. xa,,
u.e . rene,1,
- e. tr=am,=,a.
= a we a t
m.= u -r .
= - -
ha 1.aletruty profemmer Alaa Wauus a - D &8 ' ' J' "
'A tau +8 lowing
- Bare a "new samme at ani == = p--eu .-= eo-===
" e 'There's a growing dissatisfoction with situational ,ee.o,.~'"?J c .-
; $, 'dC "u'
- sus ='"p'rE' *- ' ethies, C,ie.ii one set of ethics to home life and '%"'C.%'. 5.
; se. .a r ,.d one to the workps c p.opi. or od.ptine o ;"4rv,7 ?. .
- a
, .mem, e.e ,o,r.
,a - ,e ece,,.- .r. g.
s- , ..
- standardized, fixed code of ethics ..- on m,..,,...
e . ., a m . ao. s ico
. a. . -
sout
. . '. OfthG w aaNei mord Code 35:#((-,.-
! .,. - - a.,r e. . ,o r. m.
u Jbons X cong peoras vte had hous _ e e m _- .- ac.ma x ad suppor ed personal actmmma e ess. .a
~ ~ ~ ,e,-,,-.~ . ther,",
,,,, , higher a .0,_
- ees,W 1F8 welcome them sto the procem" Te 'Spuiymena 4 .he ;.r"% e.,, code e,,ha'Oy e,a, ,, 9 %~ =m. .
ea mapur B
; . ~ .s.t.eo
, =e - ist. .
ga
..-a
- d. ==,g :;;l,',,,,,,a, ;;',; ,
,e m . sta n,asess m w success us S K e andmq ' Lata Parts g",.g
^
o.
. a,,,, and ,,,,,, ,,,, ,, .. . uey.m ,, . w o.a.o . . _ .ma .
i som .m s, o =. ,. r,,;*,,, t ag,,*,,-= 0._,; 's t'.
.r ., -
c- 3 4 - r- ,.es.r* .e nea.ear j hemauotL mee mir pm1>w, etapsoves art ,vm.a, Yoe esunhere se hecomma e assumpaary. g aed you ,,, ,,%, e prainer u= = a marrrr =p q , _ ,, , ,XtangauoqL
,, s .e me.a,. 5_.
i 2 Office totalty *. eau e .. m.a n .-
- coces locLay att mucg as r,g be a f00d WMa8*'Wer. FGrtRAstafy betaef , , , , , , , , _
a.ars ir Se ecacas enneusses to test orge, ett be ensmgh,- GAP seemeed a teepug Stw of = 4 9 15 !
- a::t l-* - e
! 8;aat3L u yaatwg,* nem e'-t % retag. p6an.M W wW the pwa .m etDe 3ug3g ,,3, 7.t3, ,",}
I n;se *.ne choice s<ai e .tes he inent forimadable seppert group for scrapped Wam converted tt coas power i Seame ,, , 8 acarreeuas neuanoes aat are amargy laeamre and :- _ . a unecantedty .'nunert or remedsed *La Sade# Diabeo Caor quesuceabea On the uncea e erg. aany the h Actammaaasisy Project, yee W opmung a ww poww 'ast ha.e same er.a:4, 9, e. ! 3c a-. l peoose stut doet enat to taas the rues a, wtat was founded a tm as sa adpaart to SD"ag maspaa Ms adegstaans et incisov
<ced but tary are reearnimme anstance th* lutune for poury studast a uneru Seact p,,c, ..tg . .. .
] savasex w m.i.- At GAP's beUn thea1 *hrassa .:* ..
.i actaoss for west they .. arg -_ and a.tasalmsmaf) r - g thm.a4ank
. .n,inroeGAP tegna as as.aformance ,da . .r .
em. - e mo.ani.,o.m= . ,.a 5tsete44 Ima se e ree i i i 1
]
i
.....)- 1 U d U ...)
1-
~L n, a, W fL$$$ h h6gic -
/
, ! Qs
-8 , @We . (-
C IRUTH & CONSEQUEN]ES N TH E -PRING of !M thirty- w e!! 2- for monitoring the start-up of lbtk Pirk4 g ew one-sear-old eng neer Rick the plant once the sahage was com- fe mnal ina t. - Park $ s ame to Harrisburg. pieted. Park, behned in nuclear power. h rpened. On -- - Pennu h ania. 5iome of the and sas ommitted to doing his per- 'upps in 'n fie.. - ( ' W r pple 1 Three \tde and onal and profewonal bne to get T511 tarare. md 'pn - , n!!, nuclear power plant. The m- bat k mco operation.
' ment. But a- .n re-inn.m .imdent af three ears earher shortly airer jmmng the T.\1l s!can. P ark, had both rh -
ud ;eir T\!! a nudear insahd. ir reac. ap though. Parks became aware of a m ea to tle.irh - - -
.4r
- hmiding id!cd w:th 'sundred< if -erious honndoggle. A lack of comniu- Jangers it TMI.
g ihn* of Kry pton ii ps ind %t" nicanon between Bechtel. GPt'. and workers was t rase. sue *nat ,eeded,<o be liso wed oi. the Nus'! ear Regulatory Commis mn pubht aiert. ! -eem e<: i MI ,wner. L ral P .h!.c Unhev . N RC'. the federal oserseer. was kv- rhar pubhim - t.PU r-i E + i %rni 1. merit in os ketmg s!eanup (n rs hs nulhon of :copie a us - se- A r * .14' m n . *ne >t "n e gorid - dnilar- What % 'is w or%e, " irk- h i- 'ter;c 'i e rF ' r .r "unagan.cnr . mpa- :i . ite manager !. arts K. n g . md i mpen P.r- - diret for of plant engineering F4l Gi s bei b e iture d ae ts 2:rv ne uh age aper.!:on. mte eg .tn e pur ht . pinion w as mreaten- nornetl that Bet hrel w as deb berately . t :Jent .t i M!
; -' e e". tire 'uture of aus: car power. u mg horrtuts in t irt mus ent afett ..scethe e. N..'
A re: pire J ,o espense m rounsiing prot edure . Bechtel was n<< tundutting et und .wact. . l
.p me ant raient m ne iu mns. required quahty<ontrol tests. and the nusicar mdo en M--
- Enter Rick Pir s. .s no %d
- carned cleanup crews were using a t rane that that hn proie am.n c-
% trade ., t,e Nav y s or.ung on ; hadn't been tested. Had it buckled, it fire lie was neme -se -
! n: dear momarines and : ac paid his l could have ruptured the reactor's ton- on operartons that - I n.c* at . meus vac! ear ,ower plants ; tamment sessel w hich held the nuclear prosat: he feit herr.n e : - is t,
- ee .m..*rry accarei eermted core. Parks 41 o al:eged char Betheel i ,unagement e Puu- 'm *,e canue sq.ad at Oll. w a- illowing sontammated cwage to onal w ah.e3. s ansior pmne .m !'o fit As one of tne two be trut ked out of the plant 2nd dapin.ed fe ional mtegruy op engmeer* re,orting a <ne director of illeg ally. In February .N '.:-
si operut:ons. ? irks aas responsible for Parks and his solleagues pent -everal complaint t ith +e 1s
.;i proseui.res . ed in ene 'e2nup.as fru trating months trymg to base the e Wohmgeon. DC !!e sonterns addrewed thr ugh meernal onfidentuiits. . int t- <
't ,0.o ' !. i . .w . .u . -,r, ,, f ar s hannels. but the more they 4 ked, the that lu identirs ua --
%s T ra [ohe Ega7lre e,/ p/ir ser,/ M nitre h if:lv* ment they ret eisetl from Net hrel *'Ernin . se*% '
, / *e+r New
\ ite Journal 4 er+ *t. scra te M opper management. The trio was told w ho opported lo- oc' - -
, n,,-m - , rim w w ,o rop wastmg ome. that these t on. pur umler mse ric a, l ! : = s i os ; u k s 4ourn a s erns were not their re pim ihihtv. l' irk w a- tr in BY WILLIAM McG0WA
_ ,s- -.
*I g
i i 1 4 i IrMnLmn:
'~ ~
New York City m.ws
- Social Worker ! -
= -
.e -
4 om s i. T I. R .New York C.n k
. ial 4..*We I r .u n I .c u n . ' -
*f
, f .-
tu enes o ir e' erin. .on n q.mi - o the p.. aion of ,enn,r uperu or a
'he Urnoith n 6eid oike of ipeual i ' ,
- 5 Services for t !nidren in :'n. he 5egan noncing irreguisnrie* in !n* '
/
i suboromarn handhng ois luid abuse * [^,, i a ses. Dunng a enurine review of *
/*'"
4 i case 6tes. Leun discovered char
/.
X Ot U ! E ' caseworkees had made inadequate in- i
.esngsnons and had faded to follow
, f-+ )
up on Family Court mandates de. signed to protect 'he chddren frnrn {
- .g 2:
i
.w c' .", "
fur her 54rm. By rSe tune leun - - i Secame aw are of the struation. two fallen out of the sribf 1r was I nddren nad already died. the moiner's hour 1 ereated as a slosed c2 e and ignored for murder. ( In one of tho e cases. twentv-two- after that. say s Levin. Whar the 'For me : , . -J mon ho;d Brian M Sad been hospi- caseworker neg!ccreo to find our was .c has to oc -r- r - 2hzed with severe brunes and i : hat the hoyfriend had a complaine
. who was estre~e -
- 2 cerated penis. Before the ho paal on record of 2 busing someone in his deaths of rne en:ior -
) 4ad in mpeimrv o tiscoser the own '2mdy. A acek 'arer Brian was ! e been a
- cam r c. -
{ s 4..scs )i 'ne .c :n pr:es. 2 mJn 6 laim- 2dmitted to the hospir.il agam. "u-n g -) ~e 'ne 320s ' .nde had Brian o m k he cat. tme ese elv he tten and m in- e
! .rir ne: -
e:eica n .u u r 4 ano eturned ,c:ou s lie Jied s ahni two 4 en. n g g .w er- sr o 2 o ne momer This ' ,nt :e. :t was The hos ft:end us arre red for 'ne
! erent e on " e n r- 4- ' arer h mered. 4 as ne mother - murder of the unhl H.nir:end . \ , neworker u aed the aif Nor we ,
In the e nnd s asc. iennenth-o:ii nt onweren. e -a:e morner 2nd repor ed that she was F.hzabeth W. .hed n a resuh of caring and :-nr!c. rant througnour me - He beheved alleged child abuse L with Brian. For a ye ar. Ian :-r - n e morner ron har the chdd had 'he caseworker had negiected to fol- u periors ur n for-2. low up despire a previously reported trurty in all. c: ring -ta:i
.n = 4 v u st*4tu s t o n a incidence of abuse. In thn t ase. roo. i nsu fficie nt and r eg :g-
" .w : r , . . c m "he encon amckly althoug's no sonnecnnn to 'I \fl 4 2, Pirkt 'but I res;b w ai c-d \ eN i Piru bumped ever made.
,ro nmg ehe bur blow ra s i.!! i .,one - a n ger. 4 ho inn-Parks a n s ared. I he au erred meer 4 2 iust eno muca core-6 2eq esr nc Sat Piru s wife had nal channeh for regnrenng inmpiamts appr acca he plant n get some " dirt" to be hurt or 'or the r.
were collapsme irnund !nm. and the radution lcaksf on ter .. and. .scr* ac= to have hn engmeer 4 as unsure hnw G PU or Het h. iin March L Pir - kids r % e - i .. n .;m um P2rks took rel souhl reair if he went pubbs t w ir n onierent e .u r h G \ P - tun n a 4 arm ,
.ife h.nl died ha 21!cgarnin, Pa rk s gne m toni h w it h three scars cariier To prnrect hn s hd- ..ahned his charges. x. I
! the Gos e nmene b e .8J n l'..+ pre,blem .uth he crane . dren he ent them to 'ne with hn (, \ l' n noinne idnunntrarn e . Senehe* i thousand mdn m.o lietbrel 'ne'on.i) C ' hat alu o md oppor'- irreg.da rines-- us n .N4 ( f!ew Pari 'o M a n la nd . .n husme,... 4 hnelebb m er- ' I hn n.hl me lil he ! prew r:prmr.s 4hwl . " - ind 4 4cn he erurned 'ic found hn unnme m i <ed ff w md d..a i onil ;!ow e i-e Sat . - ( l nou e .mt i. iced m.i n . ircr nilcd. e nd ..rt h . .m c , ir ein g -n- ee ..n .r,ar m , i
'8 3
t v 1
1 s
.-- .,s
=
- s. .
'M' t * ,
,e .s-
- ,. . s ,
,.., ..er nvesnonan. Ihs . ,4
- w : eetioned to have a n
.., ,s t r mtee.sn g n i -u . . - o .r-u e ensigned. Instead '
se. s. Gernng ' v- n e - - 'e,emg Sun, the union uded utn vre- w e- o n . - -
< n me off igunst Levini allegation.. . .i + e w.-c.
wewr"e -m r e-ile tati negan excluding him from C >u nt :ia , v a n 4 .t , '.!- . g-jecided to go ouu.. e .4 . He ee r m 45 Sim re:n rate +ent , , . contacted New York C.tv C%ns:1 -a rd preudent Carol Beila m s 's :r' c e. Bs this time taccording to subse- ! work!ese: ma:
'.e nt nurt evidence'. sesen more and penalties A ., .y - -
There enev encouraged him 'o pro-
,Siidren had d:ed as a resuit of taff report released m. e he nore evidence to prose us harget aitnough hev coijn t as- ,eghgeme But as o corou sh is Mund niat n e.em-Lesin ononned 'o compiaan, his tw ents .tw o s a e- t- :
sure nim that e ouid not ce nream.
- ng laws of or indentia.its AtIanen. upertors mid inm enev couldn t talk l neghgence and ge%- .:u . e o inm set 2use he was under inses- non had ounrr-o le v Levin 4ould furtneiv dart .nto ene ne 1-is iooking .nto t.:e area. 4-3o a foider. nean .t me. ': 4 ition Ov of enem offered him 2nd hand .t ner 4 r.ade um unerb .ds ae: Irwin. if .s ou w ould prosce utin g ne segu g-'
' paranoid as heil / thinning roout )niew ,our gutit the sase for tne workers on trmuna . :i c ; ~
rne consequences of being caught. .hddren wouid improve. you know.' etty is also examining 'e f.eun vas upset and angry. He for broadenin g + e 'r s.- ,t He knew he could be fired. and it seemed to the forty-eight9 ear-old 42s found gudty by the agency's caseworxers. Ame :ng m 12 vin that the prospects of !osmg neernai arfairs department of break- sorker should he nn.s.w # both his career and his pen sion .ng sonfidennahrv !aws and was de- ing the existem t .
!oomed carkiv.
muted. f:ned. and suspended for four Leht. \tunr Fa iri s The city councti president i of fice months. The professional social ated 2 notice o er.. 2 sed Leu n's naterial to nold a worners awociation he belonged to expiaining how - - ;4 - es e n retommen u, e 4piashy press e,nierence. \!uch puo- aoandoned him. he:ty aas generated.but sull nothing Levin heg2n haung nigntmares. blowers go to ene ~ . One af enem involved watching a aileganons :f " ev 42s done. [een 4 rote o the gov erno r's good frieno Jrown right n front of propriate response s 2:f:ce and sent an unsigned :etter 'o him a nther:t:es :n the background s h an neis me Chn:ren s A:d soc;etv ven his 'ooked on . m p a ssiv eiv. Fmancial \itnnuen Le m ,
.s ce~ 3rmo .i .i ew oner .nd .- *are er n He hc4Ta n 4tp 'nn. he n!! 'em - .t- )
. n d ~.rpor' as ments u ben f.es m .i s on i: der.* o.' l wer.isor aez.:gense De gou -nor . ..
~
irrned for part.nme worw. Lus uper- ir n e s n ::e l
-2;e o -e:iv 4 hatsoes er Chil-tren s A.c ent l eun 5 inons mous ,nors g.n e tum a neg2rn e es aluanon :m ee 2 7y %rei n - -
eeter and topies af the aniidential ind he w ent .ohiess 'l ehes ed that u erencir ies- -
.:es rac s to Leuni superiors C+ing rignt would un out. ' he avw Id protett du:dren. w.,
gne rhem the records and tnev'd do the bureaut raa u i ianew nnne rah st. *hev uncov- .t seif f ine, ared him ana enarged '.im with omething thout it. But as the thing pr-t ett Sreachm c :o-!:dentiaiity :aws. The went on. I felt that I was ene only kids. not ,n .m n s, Human Resources Adm nistranon guilty pa rt y in all this. I wondered first pnnnty. in. ' e Cea a ;. cnm nanon e ampia nt N RC. G FU, and Bet heet w ere colev. Paru s accursev m -s c-
. urn 'ne Je: ar ment af Lacor. Weging All nn nme wu bound up .n this. mimatranve ind prot esm ra. --
l n arissm en t at 4 ors. Ihe ,e st dav. Four nonths later. Parus agreed en i>e ::em and m \tn . "+- - Bechtel .ssuco Paris an .ndefinite sus- camned bs Betheel to the Cool Water tilegal reprnah ieir
- penuon. utn ,-av. Iheir oific:26 espla- Plant :n the \topse Desert. E thin Bechtel were erti:ee .e unon 4n nat nes hdnt aant him haif e .eit he w a lanl otf N RC s omnu ione - s-espoico to ner ,4- meet Parks w n ener nemg ternunated hs Rech- .s itat penairies to 4 c - (,
5cheses the reas reason is ' hat thes ci. Park igned on with C AP is a con- tontra tor. and Piru .- lidn t sant him unearthing ans :n- inf ant on their . sori aith nutlear fihng a en il n.t : c i a . r >- s tonin anng doc u ment s 'o brmg to . d a nt- None 4.en. t here h.n heen e in the meanon c. ,e' pubin hght n-ru o.n h , rps codnig to lus en gmeer Je ,a- aro I 4 as ob%ewed." Park s res ali, oi t h n s in fieblenung epimic ln Septemher I he -. hiih pronose P r s-mentmarah t e. 'Not ;u t m proung *: the t r me pro;ett w as sompictelv pio, tai itece m .cTu.e t m.unced; t he NK do i ont etted i.a lcar g r. o w ..e . - ns n nin ent e mt m pros ng hat me tPTEMSEE .Me i
d i , =- ._:- - l l i , ' *
- ^ " . . . ' , ' . . ,
~w_._.._,_ .
2
, . . . : y s,
=g;;.seg-.
l Bi le Garde: .. 1 Oklahoma Census , Administrator
! !- ) o f C NT! D good rime in --
i NI. i rr dls g. .d time. all p.o h al to do a is ce ro John lind on - ,,
\!u iogee. Oklahoma. nifice of the - '
g U .s Cen us Bureau. With one es e on i Democ ratic s ongresuonal car and rhe orher es e on esery woman in 2 n ..ffice. Hudson pent nn time l nung tensus emplayees for pohris al 4 A. j j sampaign work. hiring women on the condition char they " party" wich k ' 2 d_ s naring pnliticians, and encouragmg por moking among hn workers. ~,
- f. D'
=.
In fact. soon after Hudson inred - Q , .. < ewents.us.searcid &lhe Garde as r l . in< issarant and personnel recruiter. ,
;t hesame clear en her what her ;nb '
5 wnuld e, tail. Acenrding to charges -
!ater serified hv the mspetror gener. p .-
,e. ,
il's office of the federal Department of Commerce. Garde was suppo ed c 4' rg l ta leep with her boss. lure other 0 ' 4
- I l a omen w ho a nuid foilow smr. and '
- m. er w th n d -en ice exams to
mi ,rm to !!ndson u nnes Garde. Udhe Ga rde was horrified bs ,ron;em , - r e, . - m ese- refused to go rn bed with f ind soni nef iriou, use of his pnhts. etenta in r -i -- ii o on, nun c!ed arner women m 6.d powe . es en nu.re . unce mans ner !cd rue a - he siirie sho were also bemg es- of the har:n cd wnmen m the orfar .h. l i no .,n , i
.e-ii;h pres nred as en how thev snuld were former tudent,of Garde from .J 4e a rong jo.n g .
remt. ind 1 .unced back data that her years as a high school teas her .ms tioned it I Hude .n: :orced her to alter. 9:11. for the firir couple of weeks. U er a month m . Garde kept her *dence. As she later f
, .he utuation M m e l esplamed. he wanted to "gne the it . a , m N oo. wa that Garde 'egan s.- !
i D ania Uns an aus: car power piant for s .i es w ere resob ed i,ce auompans mg *e d n h ireu m .&~ ' ams re i ons. ile has ne-n anic to get profiirs.. P. irk . .i h rm hehes er in t he w -c s m :chlow e - .me
.ne wndred on.ute sorkers en v ers process :rself. "Wln rleblow mg umr 5rother sery*
dn dge o cuiis ant t a es of os ersight, defunrels has an unpist." he .n o li r .i s on k now af i ; r,.o.e" and C :..r* .o const r.it tron G A P', cen it m the w n NRC orhii.ds un e - u .o r n ror ner. .i- i J i ret tor 1.on. Clark. n* of Parkt n ein ng sawes m Cahforma ire nore *emos e :t
'lle ei f . . e he . c sorkers iden. l sonstennons than eser before \fo r I als 4ith hun. \* an engineer. he know s times the law eme ro protest the pun- w' i itisTi i at I 4 har thes ~re talkmg about, and he also h6. onh the gen **nment i n't enfort mg s ite i g one anderstands the stre c= rhev nfier hs r u hi tichiowers help pur the leg d trn es tor e r onung forw int We s an onh emp.sthier erra r st o, mro c.fet t.
nulh.osew uir.- . 4:rh the workers Pirks has been there ' Parks n s urrently worknig to set up 4 -.darnin ; rite , ;- lake .thers who hnc gone on en shnrichhewers o pnort grnup for the ,.ir .r s - r i! - w upport .s horiehhmers airer their ow n nm lear mdusers. 2nd he u.h e res .o ( a Kantm.in. .n : .o - 40 s
s i
I
l
._ =
.gg..<
.m . . ., T A"JQ
, , , . . - - -i , cf wr vrmee o saenu mn se e e.d i! o .a w .e : ,
. , > u g".en oc - and God knew w hat trageus i t > r i.a , ..rs
.e e c-
- we ume out of it. But I anuidn't m 4-.i i m sna,.
f'...m , 2. e c - m y e . * . Sur -otnm g c ame .i mar Gcoe a.so raik to ene papers until I *as abso- .ung to feders: m . em tm approac ed ne Census Bure2u s :urch wre that the prnblem couldn't idating ofhce wor =en a: assistant re zmr ai amnistrator in he taken care of internally.' she office personne! for pone a. .# Denver, but to ,o a.2d. somehow. returned to one of the top census among otner s nares it . -. 4ord of Garde s Jasidence leaked officials in Washington and pleaded sentented to a year in ,2K . ~ back to Hudson. setting off a wave of .uth him to do mmething 2 bout the t ycan probation His poi.' i. . ituation He refused. So Carde con- w as finished. retaliation and harassment that stretened oser four monins. Accord- hrmed the reporter
- queries. The same das the Grar :
ing to witnesses he dnconnected
" Census Sex. P, \llegations turned the indictment. I her phones and emptied her oihce \ lade.' scresmed the \1uskogee returned Bdhe's daugr -
once w hen she was away on buso Daih Phoenu,6c Times-Democrat te m pora rth Lo m o r.t - - ness. Witnesses also attested to see- on a hhstering hot ,f une M.1%0 ugned 2 ,oint.a stnow .e -
.n g H udson in a local bar. poundit g Within hours of that hrst edition. ' One side oi me 2 ante: 4 a taole and saying that he wanted her Hudson apparentiv wielded his in- , Garde recalls. 'ene eener dead. Fmaily he hred her. fluence to help Garde 5 es-husband , the kids back. I was o Garde s reactions to ad this gradu- strip her of her custody nghts; Larry { one point to stand a ally increased m meensity. At hne Garde claimed that Bdlie's move to l say it was ait a ..e :i on. -
the retahations seemed chddish. She Washington left her too unstable to ' return my kids. I esen remembers laughing when her rane the children the was later to Carde. meanw hde. m ~ phones were cut off. Then as things wonder whether he had been "usegl with a staggermg load d , got nastier. she grew more appre- as a pawn to shut Billie up"). "I got from her fight : re y-bensive. She would come home j real desperate n ght abous then." says i she :s currentiv awa:: e shaking and in tears. Stdl. she Bdhe Garde. "1 shought that I was i come of a hearing of ~ - couldn't go pubhc with her charges. . runnmg 1.wse m a Kafka novel.' ' plovment Opportune ihe w as told by pohtical contacts. ' Spurred by the publicsty and her i to determine *netner
'Evervening 4d1 worn itseif out- desire to regsin custody of her daugh- ' todv of her chddre - -
lon t w orrt eers. Garde went to the Departmen: torv actions by Hu At inis point Garde left N1usko- of Commerce and the Equal Employ- encrefore se 2 42r.:n a m gee 2nd mosed to Washington. D C . nent Opport u mt v Commnsion m When as ec , e '- wk:ng for a new ;ot) Then the Washin gton When those nencies 4 histleblow ng ece e-anone ,41!$ from the \tuskogee seemed to be moving too slowiy for now a set o n a . . e c neupapers began. iome of her Garde, she approac hed the Gosern- and director ai G \?
'ormer ,tudents had made calls to ment Accountaoihty Pen;ect iGAP). Chme-.s amon ne~
repor ers to teil them of the gomgs- and hve months later they held a asmedifI'd 30 t ni n r m at ene s ensus oihce. and they all , press conference corroboratmg most answer that 4itn a st w said that Garde could confirm the ' of her charges with their own mde. If it was Bdhe Garie . - charges pendent investigation. Finally, a year tem. yes. But beca use a f'
'! 'e:t 'or them. ' Garde says of to the day after the headlines broke, httle kids. I'd sas no Agenes E P Ai empiosee. *hcae report ever be dirett-and nolent. Karen from bein g reerese 4 an he gentv s willful ;gnorance of ,
Sdkwood's kitchen was allegects sprased \ lore common are e ~ one sasse Jangers heiped depose EPA ' with the serv plutonium she claimed sands of peopie ano - s hief Anne 3urford Gorsuch, considers the Kerr \ltGee nutlear plant was mis. howes authontv o > whisticolowmg a "five-dimen sional handhng. New York City derettne of
- aste. fraud. and in . +
. h ess boa rd . The piaser must be d so. Frank Serpno was ostracued hv fellow ment 2nd pnvate.,cu n phned ms K aufman. 'It 5 important s ops after reportmg widespread graft ro t ertam statistas. h 7 eo sontrol anger. -' sure that and torruption, and there are stdl hn- episodes appear m x i 4nen you mose it s a planned move. genng questions about whether his part. government's Ofhee
- not a reactne one.~ ners contributed to hn getting shut on a and Budget ONIBi. n.
The greatest danger n reprnal, whn h raid tilegations recened bs e m lh k Pirks s iase w.n subtie: hidden Karen silkwi.o md Frank serpno genues from ene Dee threan. Iow of job responubihties, per. mas he 'he mmt d ra m ar u w hnele. sulture to the Vete an .
%ps a s areer hias kint It s ould, how . blow en f 'u r t ones. but thes are br eports that he re n.
M PTE M B E s 1394
.' 8.$.
t
i s : A. Ernest Fitzgerald: u . Pentagon Cast- 0 Analyst ; IFTY F'GitT-sear old A. Ernest Fitzgersid kauws that er was the y , Fut >f ommitting the truth" O
- hat tnst nem his Defense Depan-ment job n 1969. The civihan cost-analnt blew the wh:stleon Air Force i cost oserruns and was rewarded with a four year !egal hattle that cost him 't i fo0M00 in ateorney's fees and 31 miitton in pro bono legal work. In
[ ' w I / g the end. Erme Fitzgerald was vindi-cated. The Pentagon rehired him in
-y ,
-j j F 19~1 for a lower-paymg. !ess pres-rigious job, and he immediately G .noi estabhshed himself as an m-house ,, .
e**e u his tleblo wer. encouraging the & .
- !oser parnors." as Fitzgerald calls his sources, to keep a careful eye on -
the Pentagon's spending policies. In . --
- SD*
l932 the cost analyst was finally i reinstared to his original job. and mismanagement in the design. tors in pnvate . l ! F:ezzerald and his staff hase been research. and production of key back." Fitzgera.; s - - elegated to fifth floor offices and weapons projects. As an award for a xav af ::fe .n me , j bned rbe Artic Fanancs." a paean his conscientiousness. Fitzgerald w as solution o ne - i o their perspic2etty for ferreting out nominated for two top enihan \ir im pie. e.. r e - - he :rutn. Force anrds and received perfor- pamful i Fitzgerald began 5:s career with mance .arings of " outstanding
- two lnsited to est - - i
'he Air Fnec e n 145 and quickly years runnmg. Then, in 1967 he ,ional committe - '
made a name for himseif as a " tire- wrote an unusually blunt letter to distiosed the jeu - j
- ess agntwad.' He started a one- ,
supenors enticizmg the Ntinuteman Force had idou : man c .sade against large scale waste missile program. In it, he enticized Corporanon 3 e- .
, the military establishment for shads e3timate on the i I wmou.ai Asmsonuownsmoro I deshngs with large military contrac- nearly 52 bdhan ma.nts er !!egahr:es and unethical '
trol Data Corpor2non. which employs \ceordmg - .* cm e :..res mmred from i.200 in a six- ' !!.000 peopic worldwide, was cuttmg busm ss anaa us. . on e rino n i H! in 12.500 in a fresh ground when it estahhshed at* meressed ^rrort.
;m.;2r 4.f.s ear penod in 1913. Emplosee AJvisory Resource program for .s hneieblow --s- -
l' ere also aopears to be a trend ; in 1976. Staf fed by ISO counselors and able its ef fect - - nw arJ ife . nore upportne whnele. adminntratne personnel, the program changes hat in-- -
,b.v .nc w e wents -tates have passed offers a twenty four hour counschng tos. There s . rs inti-reprnal :aa .. .41 hotlines for seruce 2nd provides well-estabbshed and person.it mi reporting gosernment fraud and abuse channels for h .Tng snmplames mde- w ntes Columnia I he been -et up, and mformal net. pendentiv nve agated. Contrni Dva TI.m Westm m .1 -
sork of w hnilc5 low mg upport groups h.n been so s u s ewful with its program 4 n grna n aut . t - .- h oc begun to mu broom Nu merous that it *mw cont ras ts the als norv sonsumer i"4 orrorarnm h.nc e tal hshed empioseg erva e en aprroumately twenst ot h er nents He sum
.r:es mi r mii arpe d pros edures C.S s o rpor ir inn
- an rio 2me 42 y y w-yw- -w- ym. w y-,. - , - . , , - - . . , , ----,.g =y, ,,,,,..y,- . , - - . -
1 s
% 4 .~
~g @ . Q _. * '* .. _ l ~ ~ - L ~%*'t: -
- ~-: .e2s . 4
- g-n. :a, :en':: m: ., m &
i.e
.e as . - .ments -.en eo e m or. - -
iz ui
-u r. :e.- 11 4 r-2t- ent a tr* ent ---m "gnt. rge L. .- '-".>L.t m ,.-raining #.irtner n:orma:on. ,
aan neant eeuing 'l tnem T.anure ~ e' -e : - ' -
't4.te -
Jsr Ftzgen.d. , > .g n . m e .t n .j <eepiry enem n tne istC "le
-ned ..t 9 e 22:n: J u E rst F f7ge*2.d 425 M So - e 2.9 5 2 l e' ^
e v 'e e e s e*e + .a , r-2t r- m g ner- > ent s r t c. He w rme 2 wA 2Dout '
-he ' "
.;s ..e' im . :: 2 5 en ' 1! - -leu. Tv ihe ?-vr :* V'aer i eeured around the country iht : g'er ~ -
dn- .. ns mn ne t;ed F t! 4
' s .-
;- 2 d. ne ?-ar igen .,co i ere for . raid .if \ a ;i .' a r- emrn 4 5 5 ne e "e,e-r-.e 'avec 1 .tt;e 1 rei;.c r ats e- ~os e ent 'as 'oio somed botn :nside gera.64 d ?utlice d gmerrmertt e rt:dcrs. .n a rr.r r
.cg ant.::r g 4t ao J r.e J i-ao b ,da:t:on. "e Dee*a e 2erart- .n.i .mA :nat F t raer2.d has egained ' in ie- e-l e L i g st, 95 positio n 4. thin :ne ??ata gon.
-nent et a in .ns 3rigator. .n;t *o 3r,w n. n: y-
?tn Fitzge 2.; an ' morsi .2pse, At . oi'e2r.es -,rn around " e country r . e , o . -
-e i 4 ne Nint 1;s 50s4.e ?re<erte: hi n i proac a u:ei 4irn in,t2: c , of pr >. . g.
e4 s 2 2-. : ,t n i . .aset 90mo ex.ai and 2 carement 2ouse. .. aam:r- or m - romanizer. 25 ed 25 2 ::e ac- \ nc. r.t n:e ,,r;tzgerad. .cu:* ee n . r,ie F :g- i d ade ,.s e s pio- e2rs :ider and riser %r nis e iforts. n as e 4 mi-
- -c . er -
ne 2: .usurn ..cn u nougnt o 4. reusco his :2stics. He ,n ,et - a e . ,r e : 2ers es is 2 . mt-. .,nt roi .mseif ao is ;n-nous amoudsman; 'e e1 ~4"
- s ?ert 'e tas .tft1Ce9 hv "e Or2c. 4'aring t iat his p u b il s- .st Dti.t v
* ;rfers mim wr e erreact:on i or f a- '. .' t '
he ' ng : w ite me ictors ians e. ss t o i. 4 e2Nns 3ut ire retinat:en, he now '2kes up Gre a ne r. . cluses 7r # se h ers who prefer 'o air , v a.r. ",-:
---re as r e :' 3.s ::uert -an "e-,.a u i 24- - :g 2.a ,2c ~-25 ' rf,rm at:on ath er h an pub- m .s m . . r . . . r ~
i . . - s ;ra ce ent - a n no..n c e t. % re ex e:t .t r- ;
.-- t -
e . e- u ne. ne n 2,. s srs ee .re
; 2
. - :g ent. t g ri . - ; se, 'e "e" -
-e .-e- .e -- , e ed :cepend e .t.. .eaan. . . u.a . an: , ,
-- .t-* *
.- *-r -v . - 2a.. *, e nme s s % r.g ipre* .a s s * ** . ..-
.t ie rm g - <-
i r, e a. w - ore Fsige-n.d % . mix "e., . .n :
- e. ra :u > . -r e m inat w x 2 emr2 cartv ..waieNmer to e s -- -
-2 - .- -c , au n v ci ,'.otett .ritas from unuue e; risais.
.r tzgersio notes, . if 4 nistteoiuwers sna e . . . -
e, .c * :- 2.d was e- - - an er in ion t nase to unrua 'hemscises. . tor cc-
.e 1
s ( - .e ..
- i .
- A:n Jom. tDev Can at IeJst be sabed rom t(fit. E H e s.l s - i . - -
[ 'u m * - - , t'- e . 6, cal .ng enemselses an fire.' .
-e:
. e ;--
.e ; r-F-
'r { Ye '- "4 / f e 8F. 99e.re ??
- c tn ees are A t',!te g 1 "I t- l4 *In
.i- -
..t'.
- a ;h e 'D et r 'e se .n.a e n .s er '>m. . -n ! i- .*e- *-
I
'f. - g t il ;' 411b ' er d f % e .s es .i l g ' I I-- e c '. 41.n i Te . e * .a . -
j t ri 4 ** . g -* t) 'bu. !n 'nfire 4.gie .s P hC et hils u lif nen .*
- 1 % * 'l * -r l
ne .ut fie 'lle:r .rg.11 t s &&Ita 'rn.La 4"t .ti is ir. S'-' .- % .
.s .
o . - - .d \, -ae ns !
- es r "g u f e "ie 'i. m es c* - -
- 1. . . - .J ?ren u t. aide '.i : em s ::e i er.t ront ;n g mar- ' . - -
s , r .a . r e. r ce . - e o .i it on. s :ni , .re -+ r. iris inic s e .n- ..;- - - s n. .rm'.-- deg e r ,,e., le .:n o.c , .x. . ; ; .r n un ..cotw e
- i. g ql*
- g e. , f -
(*
*- 4 g gg f g 8 ,g( (- S ag* '\<
a.f I sf U- % * - g,- pk Ng,f * . 81 t ' ug tg- 8 .('
.rc .,u - - -
.-- .tr- e -
, . - - . s t - c- .
- 4
- 1 4
,e e .r..-
'?h
.5 ~
. g 's4 \
. ~
-~
' 3 r
' .-* v , 4 ..
O'..'.h3 J
%n :.m .
l l
; nee .ei . .e n -- n ve nst s k. -
a.m: ..i :n : i . % n!e. \f hama. 4 s..-e. N i roma! .- , n.a.t ws md ne i f min,re;r mn N\4 \ eno-
. e -, 0.1 ! . n , . e--r vie c - o i .i n s e.t enh.o mg sarm ene a. e i ;' icd r e .. . ape .r* M e g a es M i- lig;tra ' 3.1- ' .4 e . re e m ea,.m. .n ce ao .um ni-tn r
-,ml The W ..nrt .s om.in t i n u.se t
cio eanen - n.. ed nee ,i par:ent y i W- 3,
- o. e n her u.xemes and :.in nue s
'N
).-
he* tt ijrs -ed J nd ja mi--cd. .e - N cw right:ng;ce -o e9 I' m mncerac i ' ab.c ne .th. wi. ' Bosn re.d ner
.n m ,orr %rnern f rawl u he ut
^ s.- O k** '
im i r car ons si 'ezal f xuments \f ar nail en Heu r..n. 30 h and ;ns asqn ~ ind cura:cr anpine. '! min s n 'e i g. . es se-e : ef.!Nens .i .res a a sn ;e got :nem w hippen iras calm. nac!e ige.J en t nee s at '.t a rs n ail neer a. t I 3,sn mured her. 'I m with sou a.1 e e -is ig ed a mf amniar on in jenr2;h - t *ne s n soarenes .au 2 1. Alca: ired effort eag ree- -
. 3un s no sr 2 n ger o aroil'4 'eeb n orce e :em neo each retirement. n me pr -
.ngs ai;ersec.:r:on ar.1 paranoia. He Oee ii 3 u sn '* ,,e--s. i ign 'evel ;#ee -x:%
si- i co 3:r r pro.n e e preer at -n c,eer s em a u - aimg !:~ "vo. . o r , r : es .- N u \ s \t a-snai! : ase Paar Cen- o, mq ed m m e. uira enree 6re : e - g m- - - n Huntssn!e nrm.ge nur ne y)5 se nca .e s Omers .s ere gn -, .w. . - , f i ;m a - s \ aa reeg n :remher
-: m dra ~ ~11:r g e- ; e- im e t. .t i- --
.- --- . - ar irn ' - - , - . n .
- -is -
- e. . ,
x -e -eg m e - ,.ec n sell i rne rore s-a \ -a m r, rsr e t i -. n -
- . , w g n - i .e , J.. n i ;J iugn "e i m i e- -nie " - - e < p r e- es
- e- .rm m ir a o, lum !!n n
- n-c:f s.-
l -- n +i esmein --2e akt gh a che in us of 'J'4 n ..xr. ; c a . r ciugne .n ; og r* '
"ur 4 2- n- se aw . e l eNO\ ..,1c ifon ,wirched frnen N.a t!* bem e inne ,. -noncers ;n e, : ecse e . s. ,
Ea rnpc. ' b ;4r a- I < ntd e:1. ned a g e r. -
" - - u Bush res a.'Is. 'm in h hseeraible se t v mm
*- 2 e * ' r 3..J 2nhappy
- ~ - after esni. .nz "cior- 2 ! f. ... c u ne>m. s r a . . -n - -- -
r- . 1 ang simpiv n it t er .n oc n.,.e a w in art:s rei el ea ' - -
- n -9 e cennie 'itne r or-rir s - u n . . .e e n s in e -.gnewal- 42-.
.te "i ir i . ,h : n s . .o r:t i . : n m -r c e m e ".c,.e - s.n n - ,.: me :n
- ' ~ * - "
-s idimed n ar hes s e *e hring . ed \"er Se -*
' Tc' e N ".i infnem2l r0 ajuce/e . 6 e l t.l a i s ' i c tilh s 'sfisrlc-
.i i 'g - 4 te a f a r ~ ' *
*wt- nlawen
-.; . rrw.c
- ion .4 gree. ..t .i " ci r . .h. I be prn ru e
. ..s in g '-
'u" -
%e- D .o veken. 4 a lN ont m..rit m i .m.. irs . e4
.s
. .n s ou .' ne .
s to e. sm e .p. b.n heen I'eu t f itrten in a ei, *n e h ire ici. m e sn..n - -
'un cang .s n. riennw er'. ;% e 'oc 4 areu sean.ci .n. .t h e r i N un n- .,l. .i..tei
.ns e 3" 49d +1.n cen :tu,re han .-nf- whe deel i -e . n i e .- ment . 4 rg- . it r . em a .
% s ;n ::cW..w mg . e a- 1Ie eided i;in. r ne N is - n- r i
.r s : i rr or *-
- ret r urs o u .- s .are ; ras ni e iw n io u .r-o . e e i ..a >e pr s ..r n e I gi . cI iITie r'.e ,9 0 4 l s ( - l e.j l( ) % 'lrh 15g [] % get Tci '- - 't..f- . " , - 7 * ,-- -
(4 l 4
*6
- . - - - - . . . - _ - _ - . . . - - - - - . . - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - . , . . , - . - _ . . -..n - - - - . .
e " \ t
- St. . ,
. e .. .. ,
gf - af. .
. o uai .- t
~"
.e '
.,d a .
J .sn ceaeo to 'ne L . -.ve ye . alled . c - t - - r mn ion to get ms ad yo 74a
- e. . 7 -'*. -
;"eu nc e. b , -e- e- and also nied a cml u.t gunst ne .,'
'. ! v s n: t:en 4 m.t tirettur >i ene 4pne Center s.: aim. ..<e1 2 _*--? -
mush of 2 anscious nmg. .~ s s * ,cnera c. r * -- - 2ss ing that he had conspired to deprne 3 a .. -:t we musnroomeo an .ts m a emas ,- Nm of First Amendment f -doms 4, He pent nery workmg nnment egu nam e -n e I b s ,u pe ri. n and mans J h. co- arrending to ne ene. por:ng #er .ut 4 .r r i te J . * *-
.. . r i, . + c s -
. ~riers se e u .e .': ene.1 i.2 e 24 ,ons, to nsne hn storne.s Lsn cu one oi .nJ . .cc
*n m gto ,m s ,or n.p. J o teg2n udmg other federal w hn.
\ rem.,>ae- e : p o . g . . . .m - m . , -
, ,o ,et r.cnionervsy snaring tre miormanon
. ; u r% v r aesa.hng.oneer o r d, . n r. poacu *a r- e 4 as uncovermg.
* *1 e t r ua * .. ' n .
ne md 2tnermg ll. ausd!e. i m 2 $ tem s e- - - Three and %:f scars after San
.ne* omcans 'nu n 4 is '. ire reassigned. he L.a il '.cr. .ers ttret.t .. -
.m e-I '. r llu< h
.imo t a r-m g h t F :cr$d, o #n g-r .a e Umm usion directed N. AS A to 3.n c *o aae - ..-
toppec hs os u! ns rannns r arered einstate nim to 54.s former ank and un ce 'acs .n get .
.t f. L.,n n s that peorie ntown cimeurse 'iim for beca pav. d.usn
. it frtem o TTit 4 --
*urned the other alv. pretendmg not ook has cnil su.t all (ne way to the j m 4 nat:e-.on.r g -
o ce nm i as ne aliied bs L. creme Court beicre it an fmaily I' e communay ma one,nimned jefeated :n 4 ;4ndmark decisaon enat IlF M < um. Sur !7e press .hdn - md e.e rruts 2 #eceril empioyee's abahty enup inr c e c i etentiess ,pcthgne further angered tosue nisDms. " ado"D'? 2 ' m ure ors Bu h wn .;l ner the 40 no4 Bdl Sush a 54ck at nis \ccountaoihtv - e; redia. sem g nteniewed ..n reicu- Jerkwater joo for NA5A. emending fou nded n T '
.on. mentioneu in eatoriais. quoted -us energies in su pport of fellow Instat.re %r %
n 'rcnt.page re as ,cor:es. N MA whistleblowers. f.e! din g frenzied think 'ank G.\ P mez . s o cres4ureo w ene t .ui 'e w calle at .igne. 2nd colfeenng, bit bs " art and esou ce .. m ..n- . . s.n . u - ecm.1 Sie. n -ry k now n a hist'eb:oa :n g epi- d**** -?e *2r' "" ?-'
.i .i i- zed . ge n -i ..n .. .t - n ode rnm 22"4 a C n tr e present ""' ' ' "" s"
. ; -. e m ,- -: - fle so . .u n -e n r. .r er t e i, s h nric. mi .- " *" '-
s cr no4er- .a n m e it e.n o e rn.ai , -"se '
-e-- c- . a t.e t Jo ar le the at :n fear 2nd tremchng. U n- '^t':J~ * -
, ; -,'..r. c oi der e.ind enst . nu are getrme nro
\nr% , .s -
m s . . , pr.o.seu ronhs ometning that enuid hier mue Ve. ^d"' " 'W ' '" ~
, o e- ! m e. .o , lla*n. Ihnh autions them *\ lake ure :t'4 ' " d" " " C J "N e '
.c etter . n
- n : tem o g me 'or oser something worthw hde. Once 'o *dditmn o n in r ; i
- - ^
-io e n.- e" "ee ree h. you offend the bureausracy it's not 4 % hori >yo.s.n z e,-
Jat atne- .> ~ 4 'I nn. \lar- hie offending Cod. 4ho forgnes hrestcr W Lam J h-
-n 'd F, "t - : e r a n 'oll They 11 never forget.' s ! ear Regulitan C .
sar G A P + n ,,-. -e , ,.
.a ine w. 4r -
r f. .-
. ,c3 . , , g.. e- pt te n 2ke in ene (rh6. s e j C P e . . e ** 1r 5 - -
1., 4 ' .e .: ! ? t -t 'Whnt!ct ioact, are d o qint aken m de , des e- -g.-- V ..-;..- . :. . ....t- we- rhmk.ng out -"e r moral tandards 4 di Piri .e . b ree ' ' :e aio4 ng .se,,,..- '-
.n
- he urheid." .n s Joe i It nes er.uurrevi i:-o u n r w ed e t h so -
. .~t o en t . s .sn- ..r . =o m n- to me en.it I migne he acrdnul 'amn , ten other w :eir .m -
w- urun c '. e -c i.h 6 ed,,een- s hen i New the a tu t!c. I us . imply ng 05m , / m .! e-ei a n nete. - .s . r Herens e -t unhng up for s nas I e a right. I *n i land. C i..for na .) ..m .
..e.ct w e a n e'her . , . "e m erti po he i hs isorrere w rem . nut w ens ( hecago - Ia 4ije i--
t cur a nnihou hos s = ' oo 4"mg ro .u.ng int:i l t onkin r tand :t on miire m n , . .e , ,n.a ie ,. c .s t . -
. me s ou r vn Metrer 'o 'wer . n r o h md b-t s .u rieHow ers are -n cunomed n ..ra m e oi .t :on - i: \.
m.t m..e n er sn J a. ,e a e o J. h. .o o cibo the t roen md ce'eme ren a rr*e'l ' kert,m g *n ree a - - w s, \1 on s n ones.., r - i r- m. . . r t -u- ..esen W hen roes ce + e pr.. etr, se - - e r- - 9ue* eib re " it -t . on g.. or.. ; .i . .e s es +:se r n , ,ce ton.n he'en il ' n .. ' n e- r i -
. s s , tt g .sr 1 re*'t- - **. e ,gg- .c. e ,p ..g. g,- ,q y .,...p.. , - .
i -; e ' s si 4 > 4 .es
4 I
, i:
s i 5 "a
- J .M E,7 .i h[.^..N . [. . 4.,.. .-A O ,
HE E s riaN t 'iow o Mow
.h ntle is slo elv bound ap '
y*. . ., Tene .gt S 3f.ik
.. ira the swues of w nen-and to I a / . . -
a nom --io Mo. .t. Part of the 2n. %, m D
- i gui a ai w m rienlowing tems irnm .,s u ,m -
euding if the wrnngdoing or un-
-emea; atn its -iils mer:ts gmng ,.
j punhe Of ten what:chinwers are forn seeween doing nothing, and thereby i ratith endorung the misdeeds, or masing a pu:!li.: protest which si , g
.s rong. could destroy or damage the a,_
l
.ntegrity of an nrgamzation and the g j{kg
.:areers oi ets olhcers through un;ust j y subiicitv. ' Putting the whistle to . Jc 4
, ane 5 hps Joes not guarantee that one 5 facts are correct." w rites J Csiumbia Unnersity professor Alan 4 ,. g - .,,,,, ,..g l Westin :n 3%t4Bw.wrg'. Sissela ,
Sok. 2n ethics professor at Harvard , ,F ,; . U nn enity. adds in ner book. Jerrris; ' ' ' Or tse Dhra slGerrs/ ment au Rev
- e. inee. n at '*hneieblowing has to '
_ f .
~
ema.n a '4.c aiternative because of i :s cesrr ctne ude ef fects. .ns estin g in soutn Africa or ; rr,me. n. . e ce.
! ~5e asic ntena estabbshed in :ng nudear :>owert. 4nich nas u ,- . ps.--
- e t' 4e n:ce Reform Act of T3 . ounter n 'ne a histleminwer . .v a - .s-i 5r iete~rinin( 4 hether a given sit- ionai poiitics inscia 3cet em:*n.ni.:es u. -
that he me should base ar de-f .ac.an aerits Nowing the whistic 2i l
's . .Je the li,.;os en of instances of able imp 2(t in the 'pubbs e 'e - t l ;
--er s. r. -
'
- nte. raud. 3r mismanagement. for it to be a orthy of be n n. r e ;-i"t s 4!
'A- tin s esadards. pnmanly applied blowcri harsh mothght. .tge- -
o rb e r . ce secor. are: !s the prac. . Once the w nistleblower - .on. er2 . rx- m :ac <rutinv sicarly allegal or , vinced that tne proolem Jemand 2r- am- - -
.,re ".2.:v 3angerous, or is it simply tenuon. Westin recommends 2 ew- c e s,. . - :e . -
e+ 'rable xsiness policy (such as ! ing the f. cts on which your prote r , e 2u. - e:2n ;<raung en ow power !ast spnng i he savs hail annh.geticailv. s nor e2.ls e :;.e n l .e e- .3P- u!egations of shoddy a question .i w h.t in e u :t m g .c c u . 4,.r.e.. ,-- te- c s * .T PN 'ielm s thirty-five. but w hat , . .i ..if a :ent .nvere r o ns as
. . . - ' ir s. 4 oft spoken, prompt re.it eturm it ne sen pe.- ne - e nc . . -
ca rded :.4.s . e r o 62s first trained as 'here. win .io .t" -. s,- s . 2 \leth.sint anni ter. When a potential dark hen :etermna, s et .t - ..r en
. n tierdow er appro.a.hes G AP. Clark 4 h nt :e niow i n g urte ars o ..I !Ir o m-- -
,e g u i- 'n estmg the iiue of the me. es iew s .di ine- re;.n her.m non.; - ( .%
!!c orewd. 2nd knows .* hat swue- .e:iking ,$re en i: 4 on r.m ri.oed n . .o ie s ; . .st ure r ne mterest of L . .n grew. ,rmeion im . c. h wi a .i ..e w e . .- . . -
l e new i. m i .e n.mns 'A h.it c.k .r4- .c. - . <, . i 4 4
S l
;d O k Y ) .% ~A :W YW.C .- : *n,~ -: Y l~ . w &,
- - n e- .
'e -- - ** .;- ~_ s ,
f - w pe -- . c -ses.e-l . e - yr *
' : . M e l t. . ed ' *
- f:r - e-r s 4 ger. 1. ;1 at ou me . ed .4 ~3 N ,w m e a m t:e . "e nar er . g n re - -
pacer 2i. m pr" rect ou r.c.t. W e m n f ww 'o maintain soor p u noWo. , ow ers e e a .c~ he go ernment. e2en ye t , .n an 2; ,ta ciht s. e* peu 2ih 2 irm g t h e "gd. san, ae - nspector general re D=, nun.e fr r n- r evitats;e retaliation pnase. L ord- .'e r n e r a.1 " ass , -
. estig ar:n g gnes s nces 1,a ,m- . g 'o psu hiarnc -ouai wor <er Don ce 'ne ..ge' a c-- -
Mi.nts. 2nd i ne .n ti -crs ants 4 o ic t e n . 'e: n g o derasned and 23 i Yr.on- a re e p r. .r .-
.ci .es e ne. have acen er2aared e24.srh a posalle are the tw o pil. llere , w ...est - .
y2 inst f ir their a nistleniowin g 2n an ai ngnt minded a hat;enhming a ':e yerated :2r ~ 2ne the:r cases to ene Ment 4 stem %csen centen mui.h of his wunse:- 3rie ges. ,a u. 2
.g, .
Prote rion Board 2 d file a com;:ia.nt .n 4 in helping w histieHow e s cope 'r'.n s iro n m e n t ai ? xect. r - 4:rn :he Department ai I acor In s en the tressfulness of the situar:on s h:stic ciow er and ,- - he ens are ector. uny ecrecrations n 4eil as ,ceing 'he ennerent power You h a e 'o k now w na' hase 2Jopted " wen Joor ' conc:es. ,rr .gg!e The first ening i Jo, ' au cues are ano accert 4 nien allow empiosces iree ace- s to iesen. % review the w noie e.ent p. enc es. You ,ar > -
',p management. 4ho mil hsten and Aitn them and get hem 'o reanze out you aiso ha - - +
oilow 2o on chargas and ampiaints hat thev 2re suffenng for a good :ose. If .ou ein - .-: -
.ithout repr sal to :ne a hntf ecion er. ca se. esen if they base made a few sides. ior w nn- -- 1 4hou'd that '2il, the empiosee can trategic erron 2long the 4 av ' fost .
snouldn ? 4et r egister the compiaint sitn gasern. ji a-4 hi t ebiow er1 ncluded- austed dunn g r. *me-ment genc:es enat regulate tne spe- ,2se been <neitered from et e estreme 4 as fu.lv prepar-: - ) . - t ific .arecrare practice suen as tne power : hat can be lomed upon a Whistleblowir g Envirxmentai P- St e ctio n Qency person w no is bucking 'ne sptem. I gest enat ,f .ou are , Jr t'ie Nc:enai In<titute ai Occupa- rv 'o go aer with them ust how w nistie. Jon : t o i 2. - nenas 42ierv and Hnitho nuch power :s stacked ag2 inst them 2 4 hisitea:ow m g .. r W ener et.cn is an sie ") "e o ' hat 'nes are reanstic n encir fynt 6 ocn .can crw te o
. miar emower s w > riow :ne ur einstatement or vind: cat:on. re-se m :.e. ir ~
6 ,.s r .e. 7 t <3 2s e - m r -a- ~'3 en. ,a u 4c k en. "n 'o ' nd e u.egux-< m - r 1 '.e gr y s 3 i -
- i r's ** etl.s ' - *T 1 ^w" s ' t n .de- r;e 4*- * -
s, n . wrn a.nt :r a guano mate esoure-*') 'igne t he opp.m. -st ich,he t z u p - -
-re-3 4' . a ' n i.mur es erv t 2 *
. mn. boia ,ne man or ane w.unan mat.on .n .o 4 .4 ana:e I ss oe ne se .2n acu me 2tions E i. ,eeti hef' t ;et our or em :ne G e- me-t
- en ms utncut *re xnon .nvoised rorv in the he t new p o'er n tow n Pw. G C .rm v.r '
.oairg "e cuscle ir ailf sa n Onc- t i set m pnnt. .ou noe some- on DC :"G. : ': -.
Cari ! nava * - , sid er mar s thing in your hand to ead oser to vexen. C . ! Gme-c:: .V-e nacie w - s ee,c n - . n a t vounclf 2nd to gne o ochen Your beir ' ! D 4 '- " - can x pr -o .v m e anony- autnenticity is siw as s que*tioned as a 413 Can u:e Dme d.. . vusiv r se~e : rec e~ mon: Of i w histle blow er. 20i'iil # s .o i-e ---:.i4. - r e ir 'e No i rero m on 4 h it .r , cans ro ' hem ~v.,,o$ rg
. .%rc e r - c- c e,r i e m- in e ms af y sonal gmath I s int a t Do n . .e n e n , w
, . nit s sr 1
.'e spre to 'eei ml :n t or Jo m.c he *he coin n :2! .r f l' e oral . . - - '
s aes gne '3nng ()e pite the i ns t ' hat thes p..n c. te " g .*3t;te., .
. enten ,n sos mng .ow e rs o sn n ot he s b.in ged ..n s tf u n g t hes th- tanie. . e un ie - '. . .s inow iedge t he .v en e ef fest ne:- a re i.e 'he anic people um anst thes :et k -r it sed ig un .(t on* ha= e 12d on e eir personai -ense .nould he it : c is e 4.th , here the Jct 4 -o re H..a he 6 dl . -- -
a s ed. e "4 bi on e S oc . . e "i -onc. rnem it- t h n < n e i nner u r- I n - - m idens e o now the Musr!-Now er enat gnreou ne . m at gets mem through re n thir- s ong r n u t'ons bas e + 2t:e 2 .'i gge n g lif. he 'rauma ..i me es pe em e and vakes ."gm -.o:mg
- ens e n m .rg4 m. a r n 2. , t : i s ,n"gn ..re er' r>
^
.t n . ,
s t P'F u s F t 244
Mr/4.yewsiteiease razss coNrERENCE: wednesday, March 23, 1983
- h. ituteforPblicyStudies at 2:15 p.m.
1901 Que Street. N.W. 1901 Q Street, N.W. Washington. D C. 20009 Tel: 202 234 9382 , FOR MORE INFORMATION FOR RELEASE: 6:00 PM CONTACT: Billie Garde (202)234-9382 Tom Devine (202)667-7904 March 22, 1983 THREE-MILE ISLAND ENGINEER FILES DEPARTMENT OF IABOR COMPLAINT, GAP ANNOUNCES TMI-II INVESTIGATION
~
Mr. Richard Parks, a senior startup engineer foi the Bechtel Corporation at the Three Mile Island (TMI) Unit II, today charged his management -- a joint Bechtel and General Public Utilities (GPU) team -- with reprisals and harassment af ter he and others revealed massive quality assurance violations and significant safety concerns during the last two adnths about TMI cleanup i recovery operations. Through his counsel, the Government Accountability Project (GAP), Par h filed a Department of Labor complaint charging that management harassment, intim(dition and actions tio strip him of significant duties on-site are illegal under the Atomic Energy Act. As a result of Mr. Parks' allegations, GAP has begun a preliminary investigation into the TMI cleanup. Parks, an engineer with over a dozen years of military and commercial nuclear power experience, detailed his. charges.in a 56 page. affidavit. His primary concerns center around use of the " polar crane" which will lif t and remove the reactor vesseLhead and other heavy equipment to cllow cleanup of the Unit II reactor. His charges include --
- safety-related modifications to equipment and components without full prior engineering and approval;
- quality assurance violations through issuance of test and administrative procedures without prior rgview and approval;
- plans to use the polar crane without conducting all necessary safety tests and conclusions;
- appointment to a key oversight role of the individual reported on-site as the " mystery man" who shut off the safety-injection pumps responsible for much of the damage at the original accident; l
l
*1ack of an integrated schedule between polar crane and other reactor vessel headlift activities;
- severe harassment and retaliation against those who internally challenged these violations, including investigation and dis-missal for utterly pretextual, previously-undefined offenses; and
*NRC collusion with the misconduct.
Parks charged that these practices were intentional and compromise the internal system of checks and balances. The abuses resulted from a manage-ment attempt to conduct additional radiation monitoring without falling behind schedule after it was discovered in January that , radiation levels under the reactor vessel are 30 times higher than previously estimated. In a letter today to NRC Chairman Nunzio Palladino, GAP Legal Director Thomas Devine stated-- we are alarmed that Mr. Parks' experience mirrors that of so many j other nuclear workers who have contacted us. Be reports that your , agency has failed to aggressively pursue his concerns. Instead,.. NRC representatives violated his confidentiality, flat 17' refused to investigate his charges of reprisals, and rejected his allegations on flatly inaccurate grounds contradicted both by MEC motes and cor-porate GA records issued at the same time. Perhaps most disturbing, he reported a practice at TMI for MRC representatives to provide the licensee with advance draf ts of Cosmission dommsents ..and vice versa. After a consensus was reached, the " official" version would be released. j The continuing allegations of NRC-utility collusion are abattering public confidence in the Commission. Mr. Parks, and GAP, want to cooperate with the NRC. As a result we are submitting his affidavit for your review. Unfortunately, to date Commission representatives have not responded to Mr. Parks in good faith. As a result, we have advised Mr. Parks not to ecumunicate further with the ERC until we can negotiate with the Cosmaission to ensure tihat objective, independent technical and investigative staff will be assigned to his case. Mr. Parks' affidavit also has been forwarded to Congressman Udall's House Interior Subccmmittee on Energy and the-Environment. Like many whistleblowers, Parks first attempted'to work within the system -- both the corporate and NRC versions. In a prepared statement, he explained why he is " going public" and legally defending his rights--
...I am disillusioned that GPU and Rechtal management are taking such a sloppy approach toward restoring TMI Unit II. In. light of the damage already done at TMI, there is iso excuse to gamble on public health and safety in ~. der to meet cost and production schedules.
I an equally disillusioned that the NRC has knowingly provided informal guidance and formal approval for this misconduct. At the same time, the NRC has failed to work in good faith with employees like myself who seek to uphold the law. If the NRC and the nuclear industry are this careless at TMI, how satch can we trust the programs at other plants?
year earlier, but it didn t .'T.Me a speCSc es [.. $]} 'f" ' Je CT .'M sa.;. of oc stucy. "mm ee mm P wee =bune mes wy op ,ru m , , , ,,5 h m im p,,,,e , , ""ns an lady m es2 transpana-star!Ual!f over last year," aald Robert E. those is 'a n p m g M M ,,
- i Mircer, vLe chairman and chief Caecutive ered under the regular ,1
< offcer. He said that sales are irnprovtg at i
the company's U.s. tire stores, and that Plant Cleanup ' Sloppy, math warranty-I s*s to auto producers have tLcreased. Unit of truck era ano an hasher than a
. an. Mr. Mercer enJd.
At Three Mile Island' ' U n ur %d i / . m
. I But demed a weak for industnal prod.
ucts made in Northern Ireland, the mmnany Engineer Cliarges said. And demand for farm and construc- ' Dan-vehide tires is poor in most countries because of a world wide depression in those ** * * * '"" # """" 8'#M*'" WASHINGTON-An engineer working at industdes W d & damacd Thrw Mlle Isled nucker re-The devaluanons thu most anected a supernsors of taking a Goodyear's first quarter were in Braal and , sloppy c r accused approach his, to cleaning up the radio-Mexico, the cc.npany sam. ac n plant, and sad his compialats hm {
"However, a less than-spectacular first quarter won't shake our canadence in what eeded by the Nudear Regulatory 0
- S we esa achieve during the remainder of 4
' 1983, Mr. Mercer saJd. Price increases dur- b u UK RM % hM himself as a senior startup engineer em r, r v ,
j ing the year in Bram] and Mexico are ex. played by Bechtel Grp., a California engt- 9 ! # 6 e *er pected to onset, at least 2 part, k M mnng company working at the reactor ste t a gsq of the devaluations, Goodyear said. near Harnsburf. ps. Bechtel and General . Public Utilldes Corp., the plant's owner, are I O $ ,6 9
=mpen = mm= * *macd ==wm j
General Tire s Aero3et fuel fmm the debris left by the reactor's 6 " '* " $ "
- Devises Plan to Clean A series of arguments broke out earuer n this year between 5
Lontarnination at Site p-m, m mmm Mr. fud Putswieand o others m ,b adpre-crane. according to the r.fSeant. ne du. ave w e e - n s w a m sig n ,, . putes led Mr. Parks to take his complaints SACRAMENTO, Caltf.- A Genernj Tire & to NRC staff ofScials on the scene, and then 1 Rubber Co. substdiary, Aerojet<,eneral to the Government Accountability Project, a - g Corp., said it developed a system for remov. Washington-based group that acts as a law- I t Ing contaminating chemicals frorn the yer for "whistledblowers." Mr. Parks then groundwater and soll at its 8,500 acre rocket. filed charges of management harassment
'11510n plant ste, and intimidation with the IAbor Depart
) ie chemicals, mainly trichloroethylene ment. e ano other solvents used to dean rocket en. Douglas Bedell. a GPU spokesman, sam gine parts, were dumped on the ground issues raised by Mr. Parks "have been, or years ago on the assumpuon that they would are being, openly and objectively addressed evaporate harmlessly, but instead were car. as we move forward with decetaminmne ~
[ ried into the soll by rain Aerojet said, While lists published by the U.S. Environ. the plant. At Mrst blush we don't see that any new items have been raised by Mr. ' mental Protecuon Agency and the State of Parks." ,,
; California name the Aerojet site as one re. The engineer discussed his grievances quinng cleaning, EPA funds haven't been with Iake Ba.Tett, the NRC's chief ofScial
- used at the sr.e and rone are expected to be at the plant site, according to NRC spokes-tavolved. Aerojet said. General nre said in man Joseph Fourbard. Mr. Barntt said Mr.
i its annual report that "a substantial por. Parks couMn't identify anything that wasn't ' _ tion" of the spending ts either covered by tr. already being pursued, Mr. Fouchard said. l _ surance or will be reimbursed to Aerojet un. A Bechtel spokesman said the company der terms of government contracts. hasn't yet seen a copy of Mr. Parks's afSda- .
, Aerojet sam 11 spent $U million on vit and couldn't twpond to specific auega- . .m .i a groundwater-treatment work and is pre. cons. However, he said the company is fa- J .8 %q 'g..,;
pared to spend an additional 36 rnillion this m!!ar with Mr. Part's general aDegadoes ? ; / . .'" . . and is reviewtng them. $ .,c year. --
/* '/-
i The deanup system tnvolves pumpeg so far, Bechtel "has found no ersdence to g .' t .x groundwater fmm the earth, removing - suggest that Bechtel work at Three Mue Is- M ,*'. e - , I 9 g+ ."r . D. f. e %(J.j ' chemicals fmm the water and then return. land hasn't been conducted in a manner con- . l i ing the clean water to the water bearing lay, sistent with the standards presenbed by the s ers of the earth. Aerojet said. The dean wa. federal government, the Nudear Regulatory
.N %.-
. M '.FM' M _bg ter is pLaped into areas where it serves as Ommission and out own engineering pro- s 7, e " hydraulic barrier" to contain coctami. fession." j y ** ':
nated water benesth the Aerojet p. ,se,4, i- T .. __ em7ta iH
)
Circle K StakeIs Lifted &:S CW .} J w,ey,2 ,,,, ,,, cc,,,,,c,ed along a part of the Aerojet property line to %. W> > M se.n u a bana w suruce nman, u To 13.4% by Ls.n dner x s 4~ ~W CM ,. % .
-o., sam. '
AndAmericanFinancial wr. n ,
+
wIf Nuclear's Ls, cense ' w For Radioactive Matter %5GG"'7"n* Tim Cup. and sts churma. Cu, H. nner,
& L:l%=T Is Suspended AfterSpill said they boosted their jotnt stake nn arete ,?; .
K Corp. to the equivalent of U.4% of the .bd 1Y ~~
. .m.m .e.- see~. 'T" *"" "'"d*' " " $ "* -
l year earuer. but it Sin t make a spec ; as a j ,' *..y^gq g 3. 'g- 7
.se ;r . w sa ;
of De sW " mom ax m g
' C Ch W*s w'e-Operaung earnings have impM anb-( 7 lI J s'.anualif over last year.' said Robert E.
Mercer, vLe chairman and chief executive y"p"" I..to esM canspona-those mooels w$
- ered under the regular U,00&mi.e or u-
; otScer. He said that sales are troproving at the company's U.S. tire stores, and that Plant Cleanup ' Sloppy, mm.th warruty.
' I s2% to auto producers have increased. Unit atr=k= = = won ==a
. ago. Mr. Mercer said. At Three Mile Island' W n a %V i' M.
But demand is weak for ind um mue m yo,een ueod. ustrial _ prod- Engineer Charges saJd. And demand for farm and construe. tion vetide tires is poor in most countries because of a world wide depression tn those """#"""""II"''*'
** * *"m*GN An agtnen wwking at WASH industnes. Goodyear said.
ne devaluations that most afected damard nm MUe Island nuclear te s
.etor accused his apansors W taking a Goodyear's Snt quarter were in Bran! and El ppy approach ' to deaning up the radio-Mexico, the company said.
unh h ^ g = % q t our conf 1 we can schleve during the remainder of b u amh4 EM M hM 4 1983. Mr. Mercer sajd. Prtee bcreases dur- ^ v (' pected to offset, at least in part, the e#ects ing the year in Bradl and Mexico are ex-hunse as a senior stanup engtum em-played by Bechtel Corp., a California engl-g W g g g pp W
' neering company working at the reactor site W the devaluacons. W sed- near Harnsburg, pa. Bechtel and General .
. , . Public Utilities Corp., the plant's owner, are 8 0 9 q j
GeneralTire s AeroJet etemper fue uom o= deens mm= =ieS ama.na by ur=1um
,eacon Devises Plan to Clean A sertes of arguments broke out earber I - - -
this year between Mr. Parks and others pre-2 COntaminatlOn at Site pann , w m m m fua with o ov o se u ! . crane. according to the amdavit. ne dis-l sv a wuA smer soumma marf a,,.,wr putes led Mr. Parks to take his complaints SACRAMENTO. Calif.- A General Tire & to NRC staff ofScials on the scene and then to the Governtnent Accountability Project. a i Rubber Co. subsidiary. Aerojet<,eneraj g Corp., said it developed a system for remov. Washington-based group that acts u a law-ing contaminating chemicals frorn the yet for "whistledblowers." Mr. Parks then groundwater and soll at its 8.504acn rocket. filed charges of management harassment u!ston plant site, and intimidacon with the labor Depart I ie chemicals mainly trichloroethytene ment. I ano other solvents used to dean rocket en. Dougtas Bedell. a GPU spokesman, said gine parts, were dumped on the ground issues raised by Mr. Parks "have been, or years ago on the assumpoon that they would are being openly and objectively addressed evaporate harmlessly, but instead were car. as we move forward with decantaminating
? rted into the soll bv rain. Aerojet said. the plant. At First blush we don't see that
% tile lists published by the U.S. Environ. any new items have been raised by Mr.
mental Protection Agency and the State of Parks." g, . The engineer discussed his grievances ,#, 4 ,
;l California name the Aerojet site as one re.
with Iake Barntt, the NRC's chief otSciaj
; quiring cleaning. EPA funds haven't been i used at the s!!e and none are expected to be at the plant site, accordmg to NRC spokes- -
tnvolved. Aerojet said. General Dre said in man Joseph Fouchard. Mr. Barrett said Mr. its annual report that "a substantial por. Parks couldn't identify anything that wasn't . tion" of the spending is either covered by tn. already being pursued. Mr. Fouchard said. , ' _., surance or trill be reimbursed to Aerojet un. A Bechtel spokesman said the company der terms of government contracts. han't yet seen a copy of Mr. Parks's affida- . Aerojet said it spent lu million on vit and couldn't respond to spec 15c aDega- -N. ..
, groundwater-treatment work and is pre. tions. However, he said the company is fa- '",
pared to spend an additional N miluco this milar with Mr. Park's general allegations year, and is rettewtng them. /* I'd ne deanup system tnvolves pumping So far Bechtel "has found no evidence to ' t .k groundwater from the earth, removing - suggest that Bechtel work at nine Mlle 1s- ',ef . *% T eW(
~ .
D I*'
, f, cl$emicals from the water and then return. !and hasn't been coeducted in a manner con-d' tog the clean water to the water bearing lay. sistent with the standards presenbed by the h
ers of the earth. Aerojet said. The dean wa. federal government, the Nuclear Regulatory N %].f, ter is pLaped into anas when it serves u Cbmmission and our own engineering pro-e
- bydraulic barrter" to contain contam1 fess 10st"
}g.* M g,% . 93
.k n % p J
*ated c water beneath the Aerojet p ,me.b.
A %"W ,a, ,u coutruc,a Circle K StakeIs Lifted ,scdt(W ~ %y ;-.' - along a part of the Aerojet property line to se.n u a sunn w aruce nmaa. e To 13.4% by Lindner o3q M W... - p.
, y sud. ,. 4W AndAmedcanFinancial m
~
M wdf Nuclear's Lw.ense For Radioactive Matter %GGr"o~ '*T'M *W,% corp. =d its churm=. Cui H. undnu. OE Jhc is Suspended AfterSpill #1d wyb-ta wirsantaaea Cnree . ?: - lb-* - 'E
~
K Corp. to the equivalent of U. pre of the . E common shares outstanding, u an invest.
** '."2 5"= 3.**"" 8'4g a,, aan ment. Tgg,.;;E
b,, 65 MORNI5G HEWS v !! arch 25.1983 DIANE SAWYER
...and national construction giant has the prime contract for repairing the damage at Three Mile Island. Recently one of their engineers, Richard Parks, complained to federal officials about allegedly dangerous short cuts in the cleanup process.
Yesterday the utility that owns Three Mile Island suspended Richard Parks from the project and Mr. Parks is now joining us from WHP television in Harrisburg, Penn- ' sylvania.... Mr. Parks I understand it had something to do with the crane that is supposed to lift the radioactive material. Can you tell us in non-technical terms very quickly what the complaint is -- your complaint? . RICHARD PARKS Well Ma'am the complaint with the crane was the whole engi.neering approach that they took to it and the modifications that were performed on it while. in the process were violating their own quality assurance manual. The crane story was the method that I chose to tell various organizations that really the problem at the Island is irres-ponsible and ineffective management. This is the most recent refurbishment process that has gone on on the Island and I was the most familiar with that and that was the vehicle I chose, to explain and to prove,that management was not keeping the best interest of the general public at heart. DIANE SAWYER Cf course, we should say that management of the utility company has issued a state: cent - they say they are studyir)g your complaints and indeed their process with the crane has been approved by several gror:ps of people including outside consultants. It seems that the management's interest would be, at Three Mile Isiand, especially since they want to reopen those plants would be to be very careful and cautious -- why do you think -- what would their motive be for not taking every precaution RICHARD PARKS Ma'am I don't have a good answer for that. I'm not privy to their motives but it is apparent within the affidavit that I submitted that the only thing that they v.ere really interested 'q was meeting their schedule. Now the whole issue could be resolved as to who was right or who was wrong in this issue if GPU would just relea;e
, for general publication the very documents that I specified in my affidavit.
1
~ ?)
CBS MORNING NEWS , 5 March 25, 1983 1 page 2 DIANE SAWYER What do they tell you about why they suspended you? RICHARD PARKS Well the statement was made that it was to further insulate me from any harassing actions which they vehemently denied even existed in the first place. DIANE SAWYER , Have you talked to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission - isn't that the solution to have them come in and oversee and check out your complaints? RICHARD PARKS Ma'am when I first started expressing my concerns on the crane and the program that was involved with the crance - the NRC's I&E on-site performed a week long investiga-tion into the crane and could find absolutely no problems with the crane and yet our own QA records so differently. We have various documents that I have referenced in my affidavit that show that ther.e were significant problems with their approach on the refurbishment process on the crane itself. DIANE SAWYER Mr. Parks thank you for joining us this morning. It is a story we will be watching closely in the days and weeks ahead. Thank you. 9 1 1
. ....H .. - : ! : ,. _,
PHILE ELP* M lNCJiRER
- 2/12/85 - 4;e 3 :e;e . l THREE yITR ISLAND. Accident without an end Ever since the 1979 accident at TMI. !
the safe cleanup of rsdioactivity has been a major concern. But three M. .. .
. former TMI engineers say their safety concerns were often ignored. '
or were met with retaliation. TMI critics who paid a pric * *
. s.
By Seans PttuGeruid ,
- e. -. P .
senior sog:aser at the Three Idee faland asclear plant. 3ad
- complained stost safety prot > ..
less La the cleanup. Then. os idarca 17.1983. Parks J' .. was rammoned to e asering wita
. g g.
Saaman Kanga. the top execa. Ove in charge of t3e elesaup of , tse damaged remeter Kar.se told - 3 .L Part. to keep totet, warr.:ng him n' - that he estul De "bes111 stet
- If
- arW. tot, federal taverngators .
later coactudet .. f One west al'er ,tast asecag. I f Paras was suponded free has jon i Parks was not the only senior i .. i i engineer who runst4 fandamen.- , w oneou anat onesner 18 .f
. . /. ., . -
cleanny ens totag raa afely * * ' 3 Larry Rag. director of sta op. *
,y ersucas, and Edwin Glaenal,41 .
rector of plant engineerta4 also votesJ anfety concerns to their supertors uns Parta. Nag and Gtschet esca had ma.w rupeest tilines to enstrL"4 Se safety of . l the $1 Btillos cJeanup. Una Parta, neitner mag nor Gtschal woru et T10 asyncre. All three een have comptstand to tavesesstors wig the UA few
'/
clear Ragtsstory Comaasul"r that
- 8** *
%n, ,=
.tBey a r.ait lostof tsaar Joes ineir o La..t.he r.. we.ncup seost safety violemana mat =to warmed for GPU No.
clear Corp. ThC's operator. aud be was spriptly faspesied sad Darred from further entrages to " f tse plant ta March 1981 Just one w i day before he was scheduled to discsse t.;s safety concerts with
- # "Q '
l **
, a TMI esecuri*e vice president.
8 Gnschel amid as was forced to
- l traufer from GPU Nuclest to another General Pubbs Utulues sunma:ary in Jtt? 1963. amid per.
. streat demaats by corporata es.
ficta.s taat he madergo e aetrt> peychological esamaaacosL Officia.s vita GPU Nuciant and ** ~* Becktet Power Corp, the parest company of tae prime centracur Parks,who partioned cleanop enfeer.the NRC sold he was unfatrty inovec * : - is tae clesas;. nave tend me
'rac taat esca cf tae tares enga.
Seert left for 4 valid renset. [Agt hg g ggyMg Jthly, the 14C Saff spmCf.ca;1y chel and W *v"* i seentel moved Paru to aaoner cred the 14 arts UEJ awrag my. traces Wie r r..e s joD fits. they stad. GLattel was tag IIdag3 thrustated Peru wim WRC f:aff :::. . s: :. - trin.ferred to e :sse demandag eent m NRC and ine es os, tiou of N f 4.a; of tamor n, e conc 2 art. realla.noit
.: , eve no no irangst icader eworu encaisi saan.
in me cau and us :.4 : < CPU .co ener no had affered . Frcke and D 83 ens firid c8 the that Ptria tad been batienes and cJamaat, refused to taa to The i.a,rson::e:t :r va. a ' g*ound taat be had a profeaston. RafaWy removed tross has jee Dy alter stost the Ptru cose ost se 4r N AJ cor.0ict of laternet. Osc3'al ofTactai& la a repart la tavastgatoft stad that CLp des N :e* i -t,1[',i l
"~" ~~ "
a e;-ii.m m.uss .... , The former Navy engineer saw a pattern: In job after job, he says, safety rules were disregarded
?
' i
. t
. ,1 l- .
's t <
i
- e. g
.m..
p : *
.s aw ,
~
c . p _ .;< - r ,
;,. .
- Y. ' .y .,,
* i 'N'j',,
;-c ~..
-G $
. k Klag and his wife.Glenas he says he was Sted for ralslag eefety Israer, GPU Nuclear says he had a co l
l i
*e5 I l
...d .- * - : : ..- ..
PHIL Q LPHIA INQUIR G 2/12/85 ri;e3 Bussess of the three anglasare' emapesam Parts sand his concerts tad g-wt, n. TIE Dent 14 mager clemey wert was entsyed for mere fosed eGar tasascm :n staca ce e u veeved is the saan of Persa, Klag and Gism than a year waale the NRC tavesaynes !a a smesse to to presens.ng wicout ; shot == nectedtag WU11am Kahaa, c&staan wrtftma repart la Sepeater 121 the NRC sostrels of Quaurel Petus Vaatass Corp. IGPU). of emm8 timed many of skar suisty allepasmsk No saad he fcend for example. ' Set - ptrappany,NJ the owear of TMI-refesad la Jaty, the came was send sussearally to tree-rees operators - who are rerpear es to natorviewed by The lagester. hft the LDesa lid off the dansgud reuseur for manatasaang the plaat se a sete cone. Tho rser.and onner efDsamis ef GPU Neste. 'vanet la preparense flur rumsving the 1a. - were not esvtsud of some c:sasap . er and Sectie4, seed the enums had tues tamanly redsmustive feel from the reacter omr46 that coald directly affect tae rat es :f . Geroughly tavaungsend by the cesspessen, Set after tse creme was asst plaat taspec- piant systema The cleanup itse.f : s/w waast concluded tast the sagtecers had act tors focad la Aegest sed Septeater one 35% from e separate cosasad cat t-tea maatreets& They seas tasy age se of tream os the creas s bolst we met wert. pwns asse sang he had fouac _ purpose to maressas the asners faresr. tag property. tase where to nad docusses is 4 e assaream of how tas NRC deftmas tae As tasoreal CPU Nesinar report immed te equipmeet and p6 ant syvens nac en a trestness of PartiL lung and GescheL their Octoter sand the probles had oscurred to. teed and teams waea taat 2 == epocac esperleases and crittsames raise surtees csess plaat engasers, set weenas to West Datenter 1T*9 - talorascca Ist gessdoes sheet the afery of the clana87 alte to 10 Weens for the masafecturer to theegat wee &d te helpft! La certa c. ear opereces. A rewtow by The tagearer of thee- est t tem asads of pages of derameats seses a basiery mm.se accamary parts, had fatricated mma=* parts for se tramas 13 393& Set parks Diggest worr es were about - af afety vloiscoes mace the cleasp tegna They thss lastalled the trates la vlotease violations na tae repaar of Os pc.ar c s Ira las dare efter the march 11779, easteemt of correct safety preessares and revtest he satt as Unit 1 ene report sua As earty a Jemanry 19e3. Parts tas - Wit:1am Trevert the top NRC official at federal tavesugatort he boueved Oat ProWees ched by NRC 88* P'*** 1* *'*r'se ine cs nasp, mid dartag == toing heressed for.raiang aseet : as laterview that af test sets of tratas os dartag task force nescags abost prxas: The NRC has etted at least les lastascas of the creae's bota had fuled dartag the seask vielseems and afety shor* cuts At the n proteams at TWI,lacinding lapses ta redle- tive hfttag of the reacter ud. tae assave tap. he seen. to taasted that has depar= + con protecties for worsers, taadequate steel tid could have droppet essad met spygere ese of the crs:e r. plaat se,srtty. firweale'y violationa lands- it was anartly that asad of paesanal accident gaane esvvennestal acastortag and 13 that ParauL Nag and Cischet had warned reemtr pneedure had best pregy i r hand:sg of renacecuve materials. mAght happes Lt plaat relas were act f.al, leved and decascated. Eagency has isseed ta aeoose of vtoia- ioses ta as afn non - fwaai tenws of enneiss - m Tui set by me une tae ud == tired tne eres ine us os,devit be fued artment ofI.4ber in warcs Ptro as:m managws for ines tafreeneas engineers were no waar wwtang at nres
- Throssa ine end of inst year.Tur remords *a'ung staarcamraan Tom woms. of tae n,.me m fre Bu:
a:::m une assand. show. there had toen 393 documented casse Ptw concera,1& Parts said Wr J :w - la whics a cleanup worter e sala had entaalasted Dy radioactive matortais' Newfoamd doebts '"'8* sta'rt te111ag "us waa"t es' can"$3 *""' Among the safety problems docsaented la Richard Parts ased to to aracyed whenev. 3dorr18 saad daries na ;a emew st : records os file with the NRC are 14ess: er he asw people protescas soclear power. Weds had teos manat caly as a ::::e:*a e Radioactive particles lasted tato the air As a career worker la teclear power. De was on Perw aturede. ~Paru a' :s ce - outside TWI la Jassary 1982 tocasas drata certata Get the protesters dad act know anyttlag postuvo to say
- 3e sag plugs in t&e plaat s ar-f11tranca syften what they were talktag steet on rek 17. Ital Parts' Jamt a. y =
were alsstag T141 engtseers had leerted of parks had salisted La the Navy la A em4 sed his the Jet of revew ag a r s. the prottes in Jane 1980 Set lasseed of IFMI, jesanas la seclear power progna. . teettag the polar crane before .! r. : tersg rossa.ed with carbocesel plass, as lag seves years la tAe servtse, he had serweg used to hft me reactor fit ce: sc:ec, required Dy pLaat specificatlosa, the dratas os two sesleer setmatteet the Batos R for that Jane Wita Nag :cc:.tre: were covered with tape. and the George C herstall de had t Pe ks tassed a writtee repert rew;:4 - e Costasiasted water from a storage tant acclearpower theory et a navy trelatag proposed test os the grossd hat mt .a . amar the reactor comptes leased onto taa senset la Saustoa SysL N.Y. promeures had not noen feitow.c ad la January 19a2 and August tsag Anur taavtag the Navy la October tFry, Ports sad to his erftdav t to -:e .
'oscuve setstacces sect a cemen. Parts worked as an eastaaer and reacter aftw be setnined ha repor. ew: 4 -
stroansa. cobalt and trtuna have basa operneer et fear acclear pensa test, he u approached by a Bec: e. r ,e detected repeatedly la the grosedwater meer While worttag on tae constraction of the Maor. Ed Katler, on Us war v4e ":: - Se Cast 2 reactor Wadiand seclear power plass ta Mactusta. partag lot Aarording to Paru n. .er sa e More tAan ese gallons of concentrated Perse sad be had Dnsued as he artve by What the be!! are you doits' :J :s salfunc acid sptiled onto the ground ostade demonstretors pretsettag near the plaat: #Pper saaagement p-ed :ff s; . : Unit 2 on Jaa.13.1981.after a control-reos estrasseL "Thee people are se erupt &* be posat where I've IIsen assed . r :x 7 operator tu; sed the wrong valvt One ren, remembers havtag settered to himself. done to get yee treasterne :r! e r. e sea for the atstaae um tsat plaat togtseer. Parts first was asagned to the TMI clama, Kluer. who ao longer woru et NC .:. Las drawings were out of date-a reestflag op La Jeae 1988, etes he worked for e set to reerted for comment procrea in the chasep. - seteostrerter os the pre) set. He we tress. Five days atw. Peru was -rwe e 7xg ,,,,,e,,p ,ges , sewage heading ferrw w aanmer jet aw in tow iset. Det ne many of he reperviary dsce. .: :e :..a tant for were water la 1982 e W Attata, retarted to Se cleasey la May 122. wtse up. lag a permit from LBe state Department og he we hired as a setaer eagleser W Bach. l r.svironmental samme or from ieses es, iet Me em engmed a tne Unit 2 mis- ,Yota need to abide by the r:Je[ ! taon r er == d.ab**'u*t,one = r ad.departmeAwhaca = headed I cove,taeaed ,a andaoeru.e ee t.a s sew perucles itw. trucked to a traeraent plaat la tAstafier. e , a -t Parts' primary dory la the cleansp was to
= ,c,2r,,:1 F,p av. ~
CPU Nuclest manageseat pa tte the NRC's critactsmL TMI offlgnala maae stre that newly lastalJed agalpment lav tae cleansp is totag ret safely and peces
- a* L ;-.h aad chaage to entfung egetyneet compued clease[s edes o At 43. be had Scre aspenegca La e-4m ~
so tacita proeless to worters or the puHac. with federal and plaat re,visoons gowwg. clear poww Parts King and Cischelcompleaned eDost tag the safe opersrtos of a anclear plaat safety og agaerous occamons tefore they Kgag had a repetanos as 4:rr - Left TML accorttlag to affidatta and swort la the fan of tsal Parks was amtgeed to capette of rallyiss sutertcares - -
- fTFfearnt his department on the Head Lft statements os file wita the federsi govers. Test Force - a grasp of Bergtet and CPU diet A 19M pefecanel e'ef.a*
mast. Ptrts and Kang have appeared before sipervisers a Gaif States u l a US House seteosatttee rtat lavefugated McClear engineers and aggage=1 who were kaastasa had desempeg plac* tag for the avaoval of Jte reactor "f rena, hard nosed operarda~~ 2 -- .t the cteessy. all have complatsed to the MitC. ve Cact has argsad that st artcuts were taasa venet a ud la June leal Mach of the groep s totta it 13e it C attences was focused on the repear of the For Us first year and a saf e- a to hurry one of the tasas most taportsat to the cleasst - the repear of a esktoa envisa. polar creas. wMch weald to used for t3e e,ernow various clasaup ac-
- Joe.
cE ed a posar creae.* that is crucial to tag the removal of can'as :s e: .e
- sagor cleaavp work la s*tesents t3e test force asettags and the UeJ12 complas He said * - . r a carrytag ott tts re'.aied esces. Parts LA. tew The three eastseers med mere was :o que he tegna to nortco a pertern la jet after lot
. antee that the crese ornad wifely carTw a sood La preparanon for tne band Attt, asegret c' leans t he tad tema et that be had *! ** s. , w ~-
escY Desasse precedures had base violated dartag disregarded TMIs written regutaceas and its reimr if tne crise mainacnoast taer reestred safery renews. Paras end.
=arted a navy name could come crushat.4 Parts sad that wten vtotocons of prues. , down ca senasve equ;psett lande taa rens, dare were posared ett daring the esecags
{- ter Dulldin& puMtHy tr'.gef1Sg anot&Gr serb of t4e Head Lft Tasa Fores. Berniel and ois essmat and re,een of racescavny CPU Mscher assagers did act seosa tota. l ered by the esvtacota Parte mad their j spyarest daaregard for proper operenag prw cedares was aestrary to has military trata-sag. etica regaared that wort to deae ty Qe bact* et edi amat a = ( ff *6 _ _ _ - - ---_ _ _.-- _ - __--- - . . _ - - . -- . - - - - - - . . . . . - - - - - - - - , . - - . - , . - , ---- - - - -c- - , , , , -
N!j.CE: pg NCUMER - 3ag2 a MT f
.g' a g
*n l
4' - u .% ..
- q. :~ '
-~ 4 k
e
?'
?;_ :/ h _.
h* .
? ' *. %
's
\
', 'W
-c y j k'('7'n ". . t
~ _ .( .. .,
. = wtMas
..med k i y
. .%.M . .
k'
;,pwvv$gaafk. -
' ~
v ,&per *,s .a 3-]
. s i -
%~gaVV,y4 gg -
x h .#1 %
@ '*W ,34 +,
v y
, m.; J
,i:
c
- % % emy / _ , ,. *
"*******"'****** - E.. .E a=== w ** == * *"
?
Klag's secretary, Joyce Wenger, ehe also wed Sted Richard Parks warned of shortcuts La creawga. s oi I tropled ey la tack of program to ortener im Gru Nee; ear prossess A certised letter a.D.artag
. ci,cae the.4,4. october a:r,Ratvermadcou:=
s.gger. es Klag to be director of atte operecoms - e D 9. ISg necropsycaolog: cal evaluauca. amage tse, 2eme tepmanagement pestitos e ta a iso.ose ante ,t ,at F.ok,ia.,,,1,Edtric,GiscaeL
, see sung,we asigned direcier tended of to imanfy ry and rerporJitthty for overnmetag NO em' nervous fyeten that algas ca.se y a ptotees and a sr a21 hon ananal budget Qe g, p.g)ct.o,f4 t,yrtestag
,,a 6 safery evalsedom ofvita memory and otter men a. :.:P la Septeater km Secatet toon over mest are Me creas was so to ased to help ClacBel told tae NRC that :e :sd m managensat f3Retona la the cleassp fPet the 1&d oG LAs rescser. It was sE&edaled to assJast Badergotag the teJt aJter tJ Pr*
CPV Nacitar After tae staage. King med. . al phyactaa tote sia that it w: : ser' Be claated scre and more with Sechtel (1ft flyt e$tos osacrete alabe that pf0fect the valtd sedical purpote managers over stat be sw as the eDatreca reactor vesagt and oL8er equipment. Cuccel Cuc&ol had ta. Red 'o hat;!s st* tors Distant dLsregard for ThG reg 11anoa& refuand to appf95e the plan becatae be De*
- C20elaat fall and wtater S v b *te Na For esaapie. K2ng said, lleved that the crema saould firTt be fasted remetved the certif!ad lettef CE1e '-
tastatied a sewage 504d43,Thll taalin L9e3 with eagineert et8 ahadLAW Wa8LQve IGed. parOcElarlF anca - PfRC ggvestigator. te had N i**esh out oDtalalag 13e necesary pefeats from" See braAe8 hed D8ea la81all84- . and Jes11a8 out of 1.s aled local author:tes of 24 state Department of la en affldefit later filed with the PIRC.* N lafter was dated Fes 0 :e'.1 -- EartroaSental Repourtet The taa2 Collett- Cischel said "la reviewtag the deciment. I same day that Cdcast had .sr.ec J ed water fro 'Be showere used Dy workers f :-t ans,meyion admec w . .f ae ,io t .reshand.taa.t f-ioe y ang s.anagenest ao cru. to wasim trytag me to pu.ll crtuc.al
-i eueve of ThC's , me ptaas,r.or aue . .e r ce .pt.s la NoveBD 3418 f1 :at ass
.ous. uas .eranoa. tpal K4ag
.,. 4:,s seatioe3 o<
meno to.ble e toa stats wt.3out test:os re.. i io i . meno . im Ci.au test.was mo 1date so.rst atme. Dest, o an effor' et tie wo,'2
. .as re cleasap stacas that the tana's tastauacoa Klas la wtuck he coacloded tast the Pr* nos for my dussat Dy Dreas.:q e as -
had violated stata and local lavt Bertes posed ass of the polar creme ts technacally tally saftt." Ctacael asse :sier : a: al-tot arted the seso to Klag with a notacos anacceptable to plaat eng:aserieg? that was turned over to t:e sa: scrawled on tae toetoa. 'I dont need a GLachel. Jo. who earned se0 0cc a year at CTOA icover your own e- 4 mese from ree- TMI. has told 13e NRC that ta a meeting tae its not conatrucuve and wastes your nae aest day several masters of tae Head Laft
,h *,**c*;',,I[',, 27b'.7 and maat g gpy w ,3 gg,,.g ,3 g. . 2 Lata la 19st Parts told Klag that taa Task Kansa,Forte criccis,ed the cleans lua pannon.
d' rector had pounded He saidabout the cleanup A mee .co. e:** compaar seemed deterstaea to sect to e os the table se be terated Custet s views. forgFet,,,23;e, over tae ase u e ur Kaage refamed to to laterviewed eDout C* fa r-- plaaeven teu to 11ft the tid taoue 'neot! petS,e reactorscarsale pereuos La Janeca.L s,al,l,s,a,remoared and. un.e. .i .c .,t.u .
, ,,4 ma, ,a for tSe los was tagg;ag Paras told Klag that Nt nag &t. wtes Cischel returned home tragung seamos oce sc5 4 : ;*
to rpeed thtags enoeg Becatet was ustad its from wort. De found a certif.e4 let'er free ary at taas e paces ca !==:s '.. c 3a own wort procedates for tBe poiar creas psycholopst Wilham Jast2n1 The let'er ed. Knag sand imag as re" s' N and otter Joot thaa typassag fine <cassa- vtand C.scael to andergo seuretsychologi. ba a tag reviewi requ; red By plant reg 1Llacoat tal evalaatton for t8e besefit of bla head.:L gg,s pasuoned
,g g, ,,m.,g , W an. u , . .
Lt.g naad se had decided to chess est the anfery and career destaaermaAans.* mar'er. Sec.asse taa departsett was rerpos. Jenkina wetted for Corporate $tresscoa.. so,t, ape w K.ag sa. a rJ.e (cr reviewing the repaar and tesuag of trol 3ervices Lac .a prytho og: cal <.aunsettag .Whm W bd J Gme . 2e crane to cerury it for sat service ander contract with CW 'suclear to giored Sar on es say':4 -. Klag saed se l'ad casfirised what Parts screen prorpernve T)G workers and oosaael tas been asyutg espeoyees andargosag nrrene "Sarton ref aaed to be m 4 tee were try ag to types ce rules to Gaanbet had eenit with hatsas before. He meet taest slanasp actada.et* Kaag sm&& bad set wt2 the prytactossi to October Sat it a tapor'Jat to eperste Dy procedtrag 1982 to daarnas his recovery from a strcke at a asc!aar power p.aat Yet need to aDide est be had suffered that June Giachel told by t3e rmes* 'fRC Laver'gators 1848 knalaa had pres-Lar$ lua that t& sir assus4 would rosasa ceafideeGaL
'8)s.
- . - _ . . _ _ _ , _ - _ . _ _ , _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ -- - _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , _ . _ _ _. . _ _ - .----_~.__,_-_.m_
1 e
.. .. M - -
p4C;-3 3CMB D l to e bargued by has se erk Ptrts sm&d ta he 06 aff%evtt sat as . at M had *A nWe* M the end of the worsday es Fet. 24 teed 41a to sostart ethpLA Department of Five days after Mise was rarses tee - Benos catted Klag to has offica Klag med Laher if he wested to fue a compialaL secretary. Weeger ses toad ev aan-James free 641ger. a GPU Necnear perunaast tammr that der, Jesupt Chwesryk. who had "nor acae.' moortag 'e an er%,: egnging, we, agency pegeset, huma eypetated artsag direrter of ste oyers, faled with the Later Deper'sent sortes emned mag whether he was part- uses after Klag we suspeedet caued Pergs Ogring me nest 10 dars is ear:t W owter of quaises las a nucleareassaeenes to has emca C&wearyn med be had wereed is43.she was quesnosed Dy cas;, ace per conseJeag Arm. and whether former CPU Peres that TMI emsnels base semeses had nel officsais is three sepersee meet ) l Neslemt susp6eyees worked for the soepany. gone to the NRC atest statesea'.s see tes mese *o . mag's easwer se both geesness was yesV "! perumaally thought he we gesung ta ever esp 6 crees after mag was ssrpe:see , l t Sartoe thee tend Lag that be was se> has need and didat kase waar as ses gesuag Duttag tacos seasicas. *er.ser as 4 :. l poeded for the coopesy's coefhca- ista? Choeuryt and dettag as latervue. He as latervtee the TMI managers :ad u ; i of4aterest poucy. resa11s that Bartoa ad be had advised Parte a get a newyer. quesucas such as taaer Did s:e ase a: )
- tale Kaags car vita h2m and esmerted on March to and 13. Parts sand, he met King s documenta from s.s omae a.ae-Em to se past esse. There, a secunry wie se, ores nestina ametais, incledtag was suspendedt what did see e:ce a-guard ceanassied Klag's coerear bedse a Charles Saadfort a Bethiei viso preneest any somos concera.ag me po.ar :rs:e that he weaW te dessed arm to tDe plagt Aesordlag te his aff1 devil. Ptrh lelleveg the ever see people ese drugs at N He would later eseplata to colleague thet that be was set getung a sympeeens hear. Wenger ased company :fnc.a.s :ad the ttagag of SNtea 8 estuAshoe seeSW 188 froS his superiert on t&G mfety lmes gGEed IAat She go to $treSCantt06 f:t L Odd Desauds Qe11tes had beca estaD(Lshed a and that he we telag pe3lghed profm sellag te distem fler 73volvesent i:
year and a half earlier and had sever had any for calltag atlesses se Sea. Me foi. Larry mag stescos.* Ste refasad does temaam with ThD. It was d.fficult to loved sp the eescap wie a loner to Sand, weeger ud see teLeves 2at 30 :S understand. he said, why seca a cosaernes abotW remit la kns betag suspeeded ladefl* ford. Ia which as acted that the were worned met she
- Mew 'co :
tatss14stlos agatast has to asppet aeout me afety .ssues 't. sed tv V.14 astery sad withoet pay- hadfore refemme to to interviewes He told tavesugetors wita the PtRC tBat he "The esure Lavest4acos eas s t.4:7 was espatnally engretted when be learned la the menanas. Pets ensaded to anst for me? Wenger, en mid 4L.:q a: etth a "weestdag" peep to Weenagten view. "There was sesonliteiy :: sesJ that tRe cespaars toquartes into has assorna- called tas Government Acumseatsediry Presset noe wit 4 the coassittag firm had toes vesusate st* (GAM Os Marta tilskt parts tend has seery . On Marta n GPU Nuc est ee ac evoepted by James Thiesing - a Sachtel to Thomas Devtse. a GAP lawyer. Troetuger.Se persc:st =a nte? fr-
" manager with whom Mag Bad fregeset disa When Parks returned hoes the day eher agreensou over safe'y issusa a letter to Wenger ' hat 1:e eu M 14 his trip to wea!ag ca. he found eat has massed for maalas tsc;tsJ et e: .
Sota Troetuger and Thanag refused to apartaeat to Middletown. Ph. had tema tre. a;ctory staessents" 'o c:=;e:v . La to laterviewet ken tato The renlaag ce has sensaMlear That name day. K.:( .:e :J ce s? srhan Eng got best be send be telua talcosy bad eses pelled iaans. aad hs front phoned Parts and asked his to go e IEE. Naclear - fired ce :.'.e 6 os:: .: a door we salacted. he seat tavolvement ta Qgaltec ses a :::.". - a,ong wita K.ars smeretary. Jcyce weeger. to Peras asad his stores. tesevises and omer pass op spee pesare from Kas s det mag saterest valueele were tatast Det has poreseal pe= Dettas an interview teve's ::t'as sued be has maad ta parnes;ar for meess pero had teen nfled. Se far a he seend teal. kJag contended taat *VI ec :eet denums wffts se hemd hn sad me creme
- nettag we almang witg only two opcons aas :J We*
Parts and Wesger west to mass ofoss Me pheesd the Maddlesses Potase . ceras wrtoesty or tarow ze :4t .- that alght and gethered up Naga pesers aset As omser came to ha hees and front gate.* and some perspaal teleaglags. As they were cet a reyayt, escoreeg to the paham - They thrire se eut the ft:st fa's easet to leave, they recau, a plaat securitF On Meret ty. Parts act with Maagt As-guard flopped h ~ saat ceretag to as NBC report.14str 2%eer By coiacidence. Parts cases sa* sa-. Paris med dartag en laterview that the eseuas foessed sa part es Mange s cessern - Marca 4 l9h3 - to f.;e a :::: a :- teid mes he had tasa instructed 97 that Parks woeld air his criticisme is yetuc. affidavit wita the US Deper*=e- ! a Get as one em to be ailowed ta magi The NRC later esac3 teed that Mange had saying that he tad toen harsseec a:: .: offlee and t&at methaag wet to te reSeve& tarestened Parks arid told has he could to dated by TM! orftetais s.aer *s.s::4 9 They left the offlee etthout tastag asy21a6 fired for petnag Sechtel la e led light Whea Parts and Weeger aryived at wert conceras eneut the c.aaaap al..e *.
- Pw tag'es. De a:so no.4 a ws - :3 a:.
tBe sert morc'.ag, they est Klag office ge ,ha descrited Kansai emmage man we e cosasstlag se tato botag a stesp. tad tera locked - and settner of taest vu the headquarters af GAP paraattad to ester. and lytag down and temptag quiet He said it wet for Parts a sff'ec x:e tast once before as employee ined to estar. former Navy man one for <*a i :a.; c 1 ras sacatet. and he was austaaetet* ed satt seclear protesters :* *: Cosiplaining of harassatent Duttag as laterv ew. Kangs ayend to talk standaag tefore a group of -est e*1 : Duptte has suspetslos Ge day before, about cleansp asuna tot he dechaud to osa. tag ans 36pege aLa. dant. 3 e u: *v Alag act wita Cart as scheduled to discuss gent OS anything reprillag the Phrks CSE tailed allegGUons of ther*cW.s a*: J hte sateey coscorst to stsc '.ct wita potert Parks saad in his affidevte that after his violacons in the TWI clonass geogtag with Kange. he told Cheesryk taat As he later recounted it. Purts eas a. Arnoid, taes CPU Nacioar prerdest he enti could not fany opprove the compe. that ne was putting gas prefew::,s. . Nag a pay was rutaststed, but te was sell! ny's pleas to use the poter creas. heessse Tuspeedes has &lB 08De> year jet and tse '.:ar.t.a. Os March 9. Nag told Perks that Areeld matoraddr*afety tareas had not boos aesquetely rity of his reo yeeas sens ;t ce .:e had asked whetaer Ports was tavolved with Paras sasd be had smaad 3 :ssJ at gator that day Parts reesived a letter fPeet i dosag tats 7* Qtdtec. Klag worsed Parts that Artold Chwuryk. mformaag Puts SM he ou ao And sesweret #1 have 'A-seesat to be rrytag to tapitcate Perta in fte confuctefisternst ailegartoak eves taeegt longer ausgaed to tae pesarm prgect os s ma #1r81 **r gagg,rg,e ,,sse ptc, day '.:st ag: gyge,g .,:,a Porta had never toes tavolved wita Qualtec. Arnald rfemd W De laterweww for mas moned emer sentor T%C r.a a4e- t 0085" to discas what had aa,pe w =- i On his it. me serag h he M- tepded las BesCag and *3Cs ".. * *
- j caused Lag s verasag Parts rePened a later sae ed to faserna : v se t NRC t&at he belaeved W be wW At first. asserd;ag 'e C.a is .e aald ruggefted taat N Jf" . A s h eparate with Parb&
Argond tegna sByttg Li $3. . *"'* fully aad $30544 to sars . :4 factgen af Parts Lsromes a. .4 them.* CJchel e seios sa4
- a: re aay serresposecase he reg.ars gave his copien*
9ise the mood staf'et s*e
. quoted Bartoa. eorury : rer':r .
senas of Peras Deat gave sia aar :::4: e- s
. Bla bactontBeJ.aat so *se s .
to ala,' Ct.achels f.ove taea two v. w jEE' s
\
.. .. .= -
,.1uw.,1, nwa . uum =,;. :
~
Over and over again, Gischel's bosses asked that he submit topsychological testing to kE i . , u -
'.~
\
...).C *
( -
- ,, y
. 1 ,
3 r f i,,
"" s.
~
y, ;, c(- g , g.,y- .. 4 t
.c
/
-.s
-(( f ,
s..
~
M. [ ,73
. ly .
m . . x . .. . .. . . . ., mi m. .c .. . . .., ..., ,.., o. . ; .7J,. ,, . . , l r 1
- -: A E.:- 3 .w.. :- u .o :: :.-
Environmental problems et TMI Edau (D. Arts) wm prepar*.4 f. E 1981 heerlag as 2e sateay it :e . M Ag A few days tesort tai teaQ M i ..a scuuTitze be resusved a p40ae ca.1 at sc.ge +. meenerowe, inumed ten se ampuurace spal: nem gare suas eu asr et JuusT ogniesesofgame er A8eertAng to note that C: acte! tace eyessygeod anArw and Be April:2 converset;os. wi,ca ge p . t M2 heensa Gees 940B useeg wees We ympg gi enWWat 8towe Deum eussef wuh Jueary 1881. afly a seset ed to Me VRC. ArBold :*d:c.ated " a: tweet esses snaps weg seamst wanted Ctagnet to keep net eeuwse wage tusa ausreuer tt#'WW fee wrong g iguu6 "Mr. Arnold advtand 2e '34t 3e as C'
,* Nacleert have been try:ag :o wera .93 :
to anderflaad and attempt 'o addr*st concerns up to tAls potat. Coac:e s -
= ##v s. sem- ,, 8eH.L *Sgt he made it c;eer car 1i acgrb Caswunmue W #sswo coa cosaLattee. that rec;r,c.,,,,a;n toten 1ao areeamens. einsi se vos1d Duccae taptant3fe
- esmaity, fh effety a em Osachel 10W as MtC tavefrgator Ott -
essvwwerstw*tas #wiesetwetg med ', the ptose. he and Arnold Sad :cra sta. resesmen nosery. D. p 2 diaramme whether he would ag se to e.s: to the europrycnoios:can vesta. cs:
. eMd Armed ladicates Gat partape 6 ::
Proalfe couW be reec3eiL Cnachel tow tavastgators car ce v.o: call from Arnog was foueved sy a m:
, cau from W11uan Gtfrors. ace -resas:
charge of comaanications far CPL 'i.c ea Glarnet again took notes on 2e :ce.e ., notL He wroter m Rccerfte -8111 Gttford ceded me et !.=e 3:: .a CostfAadptATM WATSR: nadamspoo
,,,,, % , todwit, e,,ssergs L_ Mr Aracid had anned am to:aa :e - -
_ wome aananned gesyie,e er we WW 2 *en e euroes nya. fniarvi wort est scae detaGs so i st : . : ..:: - 4J ottaganos to terufy .a :ss: * . swa . em*use m fusiers 1941. W ruanaste sena'L Udatt heartag." Tpree avererie iser. ressem awer we serienne a esas ow a se *'ses'aannse sessiearid emast sese tese W'hea Giacnel went to ears - . ? ensorge es #reme eis resema. F*8'8*8N' " ear 8e ist met mitt C1fford and Jeta 4 .sr: e; Neclear attorney. is an ene=r . %: t-agreementca tascompeari:e:a:c s a
' * ' *" *868' ' 08" be testaqL D.scsanosa accu: :s er . :
Ued Lato (Da eveala4 Arnold. Gifforg and WPn a ta=e *: , s e taverugators taas taey tac :s : er "He has no rtgBt to ser of ost laternal waated to remasare Cischel that the compen cortempo mppias Gisstet from tesem % , pnve nF wee n Sa14 th e=e=,ere was so re:anonst.;-, w .w. -- 2 m ee.ndence. oy. We are a,c ,te
. ,nve,e ,,0,e c-h anry,-= safeer " pet th.e saada mr=e==-=
c: u..,ot trytag tonew to Mr.
,,r,he
- h. wr,e.now,= ,e, from m ,atel as,en.e4 .es.a a .sw . dm= = =f,. .raco. cm =~a. w omci.o.n m =i-urr==e w = == ~
0. w0m me = ar-decided to send tSe laner to Cischel taform. Cafford and Wilson nfused 3 me re-Psychological tdet was lasue aWaco m a,rui.uc - h,dm., 2,8
,n,h,2"g ',",,8 cm nwe., omus g'g*t a c,soon>~e* Ye%'S'a'c'a'fdecided g ,,. ., e ase -sr-m => --
coatects-wt:3 A.rtohL eittar la persos or vta.t.ocasse te wo.fr:ed that Caschel, algnt Dtna
,-e= aen=- sea essa actortag to GScial assortedtaa W af t&G plant.
.,s of afW, arrns o. a d. a. a act
= >s SeApnl26haan g m.:4a====
SE8hed to sadergo betrMeye: 43 er Cove :ag sad taat Wenger had we: the=d;arsmicca, to a - es nothe.s~ ta3.cen,ts,i.red as,G6ssAsi.) ==-cara f- a==== m: e.HA.a concerns p mumuoi ci abost safety at D.so.rr.o.de w im-a ncessend.d .y =u C ma m aso wrea.n be an u = = w as. . ,2 mg
** a == W-- m . * :r ca.mei.mw.02
.m
,cm no.e.,. osu cm, ====e=ran ennu e 2e w" .c eis. act.scseter,,7.to.a.eco..o a o. ,n =.4. .u.
t N n .e < = m e amovn m wm edh.todma.d Arad e ~ a-a=r .NQJ **M Jane 1982 strone. = w re commerina spost safety assses and contended ~D '8 8388 d I"4A!'84 l' C Se one aw.nce.m.
, of f 4 ua ==
ws a e egm,,,,,,,,,, c.no
',*f, = ,, w , m,,, , ,,=,,=e ,<,=,=e,, 'T U L",t."a*E.se,..a , .e.
oo,l after Be was contacted Dy Howard Glaser. a one n .e o e ww . . . . . _ psycholog:.st and president of $trumuCentroL l C
,a,ds,s,try wi,ll D,,rsa,d,m.e es a tratter for what C,ischel i was and U chatraaa cos'the acted Vy Ca-
- top eser;
* .a.
Arnold told Clarnal L3at it was a-ry , , , , ,, GAstaal wTote la the . :e
#' * "" 0 * ""I* affadev1L -Wy fandy ase I have discussag eWtt and tkey talled npee w . 4 la 4 March 21961 asao to aracid, this matter and prered 890s: n ottee. They the test "we scataa Chacael wrote that he would undergo aer.r. support my view for the seessetty of thAs Accor$ag to as NRC A ver.g a . :e I
opsycholo6: cal :sstlag onJr 6170s art to carnosan. knowug fall well that it witt Ciscaelcase.the esssart as :c., o - esv'tas se that it is a candluca of my coatta. mest itkely D.etag as f.sancial ruta as a stort .md on 40 Mapa37 5 H2s*, and esp 6cymeat- Even tasa. Casteel told nas perict De teampsychotog:cany esw Artold be would taas the left 04=ly if he Cischen iond the Mtc cat :,- , couAd seless the persos e to adattastarod it g ggg hg cc8vertecos et Ida7 9 seu a e-Artod has te44 4RC lavefugators t&at he eLed to remove tua ffca :.s e ** la Was41881on. tDe House lat=fier sad amed to secroprrc&o.cgra - decided, sharge ofas taacampsey presseent. G6sttei natier Desasse to taae be laJular Affairs rutcmaattfee et energy sad cause be was ccastdared a a.e . ..e i 3a envtresseet, chaatsa Dy Rep 4Woryts K. FurtJt of his strtaa
# la e letter dated Way 19 .so e Ghettet that he voeld So 'va.s s r e-
'* her ist af he die act taae ce es. -
I l,. 1
....H f .
NLCELNA DC;;RER - 2/;2,85 :sp . Stoc'aol set!! rettsed A few weeks after The NBC' Staff - though not dispettag manag that letw. ne told MaAas be Cascaet s mory - coactoded taat TMI s treet. wwald emept eneser pusuoa meet of Giachet did not coastatute harmen De tory 3. Issa Clactal we transferred meet and that it see ao consecuos betwese free THI to e aceitsclear Joe wits aestro. ha reimag safety concerns and the dime We Edune 4 e OPU se m a mens atest seeropsycaelogical teattag The NRC ma# aise coecluded that CJchel. not Arnold, led tatuated the disusssion of his gggg teenacer before Congreat to the telepaese soeveresuess before the Udall beartaga la spring istL the NRC tages a twofold StremControl as ao longer under contract tavast1genos. In lost into tt. 'ety allega, wita CPU. floas remari Dr Ports. Ang as. ..senet and Pwas mag and Wagw elas toet their to determine whether Tntj officials had ta, esepimats to the US Department of !.ater. remed tne tasse sea after tasy round the geestless
- Segtjements la Septeater18g3 the NRCOfnceoflaver tigattoes- se NRC savestigstave teneca
- On Me 11 1981 the tator Depenmet esenraad aaer of tne afety euegences. wdered Amt m mamam Nts m his te resend by the tarse sea. TWI managers bad. and ad his prevtoes duties et Three Mde reeusely taase stortcutsis tae cleassp. the Island.
NRC Invesugate s amit The aest week.1renger. ta response to her la a review of taa office of favestgenoes. comptatet rescaed an agmam wun W rpothe NRC staff - w Nacient.meines Ais tecs wage she Umco of lavesuganons hica overseas tae, *e remmgaad m o camcal Je away fnas drew a differen> cosclusos la Joanary tsee. A amid that tae. tae mient manos, eral vnonanoas la t4e cleanse had ta 0cmew 1994. mag nuhd his commint relauvely maaor sad that aere vem against M Nuclear De compsay agmd me evidness of deliberate carsuaveauoe* oc m paf bla se sadtscious amunt of money plant ruka os tae co941uos that be drop a stvil suit to in att taere had been so 'agalf! cant in, nad nied agatast tac company Neither party cremm ;a the run to pubus healta sad amfety. woeld discum the terms of the sett:eaent. Demuse of tAe violacoas. the NRC naff coa. For a year and a half after Eng was fired. cineed. Nad saad. be we unette to nad a job in tas But to Movember. the NRC staff. replytag aucfeetindustry 1.ast Maren. Be said he was to e quensos from Udall, said it had chassed being StackhsAled" Dy its sadustry its aind. It said est TM1 managers Pad -l thought I we a real tan saa i thought deliterstaly circumvented administrative I coeW asadle anyming.' he mid at tae procadsres aa< ass tae active for 14e car. use. '9st thee geys na om you wub sa cuaveanoa - ed to be espedaeacy, act ime tant m ts jesnoo >g ne messe is confusion.* clear
- As indtvidual oto goes against them f&e c bange la pasttion, sieted la e letter to Just deems I have e chance.*
UdaAt a subcommittee. case after the MAC tan name, mag we timd Dy tBe MC staff learned of the malfue:tino of the as as tasporter et the Quence aucteer stattoa es os 14e poiar crase dettaq IAe sea.
'"py' g,"as'sd est did act and at A few weeks ago. Se NRC said it had Ma alaet begun anotner lavestigation seeceralag the ^0*# # ** ' 'O# **8#8" amfety of the poiar crees between"Per' tar a'ffe"re'e"r and sechtoi towv"ers Bett tSe Office of lovestinottoes and the ta the spring of tagi Parts was truasferres in NRC staff concluded taar /erks had nona d'8 3'83em ' 'ag' haressed by Becatel ofncialt with tae BecaW W ta8'"I8"m
Dagg hiant I tast taowlesse of CPU Nuclear managemeet. As pen of the senkmatMas and 8ecam The NRC maff concluded taat Paras had tatt md. mey agned a to da to the news base rarestened and haramed Dr Mange. the media scout weet had tappt ted at no. Becatet ofnc* was unut recently needed la eschaage. Parks would renais on the the eartre c!aasup operation estW per a se e64:0W at the Det-ne NPCs find +.s see less conciusive os em pp MW m agme m 3 q aim tae baremment ahesauces Dy mas and Go a stakamt mas act -t wested nonetting challeassag they De Office of hvastiganons found that **'8 "'8 *' "8"I' 'I Las has nose salustly removed free bis Meaave De "'se*r*t.* tPars s' aid o"f the transfe'r lot and had not violated tAe coupesy coa. he agNed m andM 4e mMMMat nittei-namrest rtJee. After a few acaths os tae 300. Paras said. But tae MRC staff - though not afwatta he we eemoted tes a tener portuon non in Ong 3 account of eveats = concluded the January M Nks M m of his ten Nag had base rightfully discharged to, sajustifiatly acessed Bla of stoddy wort cause of his involveneet is as ottade con. efter oil lentes dar1Lg the testing of one of suiting fire. T1e staff concluded that Ung '**8'P"** had act been baramed er retaliated against N ***' " * " -"*8 N D ' " temuse of his conceras about astery smues for to Califo"rnia Parks"we ia d off Parks" hat Concertuat Giacnet, tte NEC Office of I'!ad a M in Cahfonna Suquem Csur lavestigations fosed tBat TMt offleta:s had l' *** ''8 taproperly pressured Gerhet to taae the '88'*"cr'e'mnt
'Be't s ee when'8 it t I 'o'i Parks g"o seuroprrcholog: cal test: that CPU.ps,J psy. Parts is now worttag as se segtneer at do40sists had divujed ccaridential eso. Perry tactear station, nest Cen;and. 'te caJ safermanos to TMI officiad eed that U
- mete um se tests to lad;cate tRat G.sches shouad sederge tSe evaJuance.
Asserdaag se 18e investigator. Ciarbers semae had ieft gia witA sosee visual stid reesing lapelreest Dur nothing that wooid impose 31s Jet performacca
* '. ) '
( i SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE 11/25/84 WHISTLE BLOWING Huth and Consequences _ - u a the spring of ISE,311mW W < *** h ' asse luck Part came to Earrisburg, Pa, haam of the cdypted Three Mme Shortly after joising the T1E dommap6 . Island (TMD anclear power plaat. m though, Parts became aware of a sorteus infamous accident of three years earner had boendeggle. A lack of commentensies he. Ce tk one haal, k was happy a u fk i left TM! a neeleer tanild,its reacter's bued. tween Beettet,GPU and the Neelser Eage, k hd m stam W opportu : tag f1Ded with hundreds of ganoes of Kryp. Imory Commendes 6 the federal e" fx advanceusset. But as an opersooes en too e gas and "not* water that needsd to be seer, was skyrocheting cisseup comes by near, Parts had both tk knowtow and t j disposed of. maGleas of doesrs access to clearty evaluate the pownt .a1 ta TMrs owner. General Pubile Utility What was weren Parks, his bass, sets gets at TMI. i tGT1A hired techtal North Amartena Power manager IJrry Elag and erseter et plant The niety of the workers was at sw i Corp. cae 6 engineertog Ed Giochel nettend that W as was the greater public safety it seem managessent companies, to direct the se was delberately uslag shortenes to circuum ateerd to Parts that puhuc2ty tours (u:de vage operattoa. Stace nesselve nes'aile ople, voet safety procedures. Rechsel was not con, more than 250 people a day throcsh a pia; ice was threataming the entire future of ducting required quality <ostrol teses, and that waslittle mere than an accidest urt: auciear power. Bechtel spared as expense the etsasup crvue were seing a creme that to happes. Parts was also coocerned ate a rounding up the best taneet in the hus6 hadst been tested. Bad it hechied. It could the future of the tadustry. The mma) act men. how rupeared the remeter's caetainment does at TMI had rased puhue alarm over :: - Enur luck Parks, who had learned his mud, whist held the emeiner care. Parts foamhety of acclear power, a second act trade la tk Navy worung as _amelser seb. also alleged that Eschest was atewtag coe- does coeM questi the estre nuclear mdi taalmaand sewage to to treedsed out of the try' . marines and had past his duas at weeus plant and disposed W Gisgaur. nocieer power piness serem the esamry gc,,,er. Parks felt that tus prefesrx Bechtel roerused Parts to jets the ctessop Parts and his codemques spent several al ethms were under fire. He sie bet squad at T18, psytag hba tem frustresing meaths trytag to how these coe. asked to "sigra off" os opersuces that c corns addromed through laternat chameeth met warrant appreral; he fett betrayed As one of the two top aglesers reput, but the more they asked, the more herus, what he aw a management's reycoon a
' g to the direcer W opuntmL M we meet they received from apper manage
- has paresesi, values candor, concern t respectde for as precedures used la g, l cleaney, as well . . senteertag mes.1be ute was asti to seep wattag usM. W aussed W .
the these coecerns ' vers set eser rupeed. startep W tDe plant ones the salvage wee bety. la Petruary 4333 Parts fued a co y,, Ittet Parte grew ansteen. The profes, plalat m me E m in W W and ,r e.ne.a hma to ga r>E he. mes de.d and o-me =ci = = - W wen mro .e w -~ ' w 4,, w w say a- a t tv e ggyggd Appined sun parougues ed *e. 8p A not and wenn McGemen
;h fs w-
( i l ? l d f wits first trassed as a Methodist ::un: ster When a potennal 'snasue04cwer approaches
,[@W587#$fh$7957 G AP. Cark betms by teetmg the value of t:e case. He is shrewd and knows stat = sues i that such actses] brompt akset tmportnes gggggg/g jgg, ggp[g will capeure the mtenst of Congrem the changes a low and pehme poetry that, la medta and the pubuc. "What seus. he mys t="= *****'*'s ** 'a"- yevknew Of apr04/es As malhoes of yemag people who had been "2"****'c'* ^ = "**u= =
of what is exc2 ting or sery, but attat a of activtute or had sopported perssaal activum sufficant interest to prompt real refor~ U ) duttag ther coGege years moved late carpe, fgf GEgOENfI the prospect un t there. = hy do tt" ' rate employ!sest la the ISRik a major soerce or whmueNewing aks owed inside YOffIf0fA0f ye#88F# Cark een determmes =he -tusee. f b60was is necessary at all He revies, all the corporate gates.- As a result, says Sessia Bot. author of $0WO!N$0 tom 0VOit' *** *****substanu preenting
*'*'*** ' * ~
"ated infortnation anon.
1ietna: On the Ethics of Conceahaat and ymously - whach he suggesu is as sig:afi. Revelettos." more empk=yees are wilRag to cant as =tusdeblowing. piece their personal ethnis over company or office loyalty Peop6e today are much seers ) ears the agency stufted gears into a more Frequently Cark teik prospective = tus. aware of the ethical tthm= aman to their orga. active counseung mode. and it recently de- tieblowers that, even though their tsc5o. nazational behavsor." she says. %ey recog clare't its independence from the Institute. sures would be signaficant. '. hey themsenes name the choices avadable to them when dos't have the mettle ne9ded to strw.e confreeting snaattoes that an stucaHy OAP's hard working core of four staff- what W W has n smn W h D," M
- IA' 58"' A' *
- queettonabte. Ce me whole, a gnet many people 1t35 deal want to take the rth ta' ers andfor 12federal taw school students often dou- functsons as a becoine a whadeblower. says Cart.
volved, but they are recognalag emethical sp use has to adjust to that. But many can t. W fM in ham They didat marry as unemployed persoc. actices for what they are. and that's sigadt" noe a wunT a curnet roster W whmue- or an unempicyable person, or L N cast.- bloweg cuna. Executrw enetw Wunnan wbo'd be a the cata au the time x > a Arnon1 Brown. bunness analyst and J. Dircks of the Nuclear Regulatory Coeums- source of embarrassment ta the com:""~ trendepotter for the New York City based sion has saad that GAP "has served a useful or church." firm of Womer. Ednch. Brown, takes Wes. purpose in the nuclear industry." addag. tin's tuseoncal perspective and Bok's behav. ..We welconse them tato the procent- The moral support that GAP prendes soral hypothems one step further. Bro =11 centers on advisms utnstleblowers to ac-betleves there's a "grovas desatsfaction Bessdes its success la andang Rick Parks knowledge the posit 2ve effeet their actcca with situanoeal educs, applytag one set of at Three Mile Island. GAP has also worked have had on their personal secse of acti 9 ethats to home life and one to the workplace enk =basushiewers from to other nuclear mg. "You doe ~t have a lot of evidence a People are adopting a standardtsed. fixed power penset iactedlag Otuo's Zimmer, show the wlusuebiover that ha actaoc.s code of ettues - as adaptatson of the Ju. Mietugne's ludiand. Caufornaa's Diabis can. have made a staggerms dafference tn .:s t dooChristina enoral code.* yos and Chicago's La Saue. in pressmg alle- organziation." says Cart. -So I rero n :s ga M what n mum 2 mem na tem d px l And for those people who flad them- W I want M M M W p at selves face 4o.f ace with a situation in stuch GAP suceseded la keepag three of the doing the nght ttung. der -haghw chacal code a danctly opd plaats off 41ae winie the prejects wen either posed to a wortplace ease - for emat a scrapped tMhnaad). converted to coal power "Depate the fact mat bey cay u
- ben one person's tasede informanos ce cimanset or remesed rLa Sauet Dlablo Can, have changed anythmg. they are u a:e tabor negoussanes 'ame=a== that w pa begna operettng on low power last same people now, and they should te at meet a unfarty and luesnay deshas with sprtag deepne GAP's aDegathons of shoddy peace with wben the decision got them t s l
enson temas - thee. mye Brown.1&at per. destga. the sense of inner rtshua- that ets l see feels regelred to be a =lusuetdewer theen through the trauma of the evperme You de han to be a mamsonary, and you At GAP.s beta e 35.yearold teus and makes them fight oon effeenvety. a probably haw to have a martyr compies to Cart, a sett4potea, boarded lawyw =be be a good =bisuetdower. Portunately. benet s.iB be esemp." .,_ The asset formMahle sau 4.s p osp for leahors and wtheistlevers a aedschiedly the Government h aham y Prg ect, wtuck was femaded la 1975 as as metmart to the tasmeste for Petry Semesa, a liberei thtak4aak. GAP hogue as as taformattee and ressurge cteertagheese, but after three i j W .t . i.
t
. NEW YORK TIMES - MONDAY, MARCH 28, 1983 Page 1 of 3 J ; OREWS1"REATOR .
- l 0ENbE(b$
Engineers at 3 MileIsland Cite Waste pd SafetyThreats ByRIQtARDD.LYONS $P P 1 si .n. v.en . MIDDLETOWN, Pa., Mare FF - Pew anglomers who have partidpated. k salvage afkris et the Three une is. Imed surJear plant here have asserted
&ct mismanagemet af the R hGilan removery program has wasted muuans
._ et douars, posed asw threats to safety asul delayed cleanup sparattens .lur years.
In puhuc statemaats and prbe h. servtews the engineers, who hachade the l ferimer atte operations manager As the i plant's operator, have an=gdahi=d that leadenktp and erecetan have been lacklag, that prosaum about safsey prob. ' Imms and violatjens have hamn ignored and that Federal hemis have base spent est at a5 proporties as the rusmits eeMeved. .i ' The charges esame en the eve of the Guarth ammiversary of the aeddest so i to taland in the Susquehamma River here, the weret h the antian's crvtilaa unclear power program, where cleang sysraumes are seeduled to santume sur at least Sve more years with the cast al. ready ever850 munen. Oftkdals of the sampanies hevolved A W, benever, est to einummy
. eparaties was going absed snesty and.
j - as quickly as passible, ensadertag the
- emmpleseyoftheproMass the sendals amended est here had been delays la kutstestag a new man.
ageunes system that was adspeed last z causammed a Page 318,Calmes1
# W l
_ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .- -~._ _- __
';}
Page 2 cf 3 i i NEW YORK TIMES - MONDAY, MARCH 28, 1983
! *A Dead rs=r a =*
* " r=al==d by the serm==r A sortes of tuoustigadens and tests. appear to show met cenerna for malary Casskamed Free Page 1 many to law seta have desar=ta=d eet how been sprused repentadly for at
' es accedet . Marde 3,1775. was least a year by tinies direct:ag the
[ a clemag of "the dead eisphant," as the
'hn. They enW the changes begugit enamedhcss,amahmetiamofhamnaa arver, g , , , ~ =, p ,, g,. crtppled reasser is N- caums
, about as a rue.1 of the asw program ogs, and lautrv man =tals. 2m part af here.
- wedd amuser past and current som. I me bunders eles plaat and its aguap. As as ==e= Mr. xing se H v. s, meat, and the story seeing and aparas. Im. samt a istter to John J. Barton, his i
plaints about =i-s==== and us. hg it. Im January. General Pubue Uun. . immediate supertor who is deputy site
.esastvecosts.
"Isvesugadans, regulasary delays . ~ 8888 85"*coupsad the """^'a-ar a grFof asuben sortlemnesterector, omsplancs that sewase can.
as crtpping
- and prehiems wie phuc percapaame renciar, es Babenck & Wuena Compa.
taminated wie smau m--t a of radao. )
* ****,, **'d activecomum in was hang trucame out ,
- h*'s
**'*"',*8
, ashort Aranid pruidant of General ar
. so,,euver, asumer es
,"'rer assupted respuendduty unuty nor me of the plant and espond of by moonds est"are insgel.dar mata law."
l public Utuues Nuclear Corporanca, garcamatas esanddent. A wr reply tren Mr. Bartan which operanas es plant,"but we be. g, sia d:,itte.a n.e.d mch a memo from l t e.e = wi. e. .sw - ,4,,, ,*,,,,=m=,,==_g _, ,e "T,d:l::=i- - i M,. .wmu a.d .. E. Emaga, a m
,eds,. ag.cy ,, y,, e. a.ci
,,,,:: g : ,gg ,er i a - Fr
%_c,;r,;,,a,:::tas,,,,,,-e ,,, -=s as-p - r, .in ma-p
- a. b.
,e
-*a.d;;;;fh,,,,,ei.and,la,'
eg ams.= uma oiame.
.g a.d.w, oggi.e d is tra .sig " .a . ,,,,,.la,- , ==-
u,,,,wre .. ., m de arm.s, g
,a .,,,;g,, * .v maan,e, ,
tem.. m .m
. . While as ans was tajured is the med.
ri.d . s. - e - .as enHty and had no realsabstana whenit
.ut i.m.et.d e, a i t. =.
- gasNuclearCarperstaan. came to safery tanssa.
. det, amants of redtonestve saw they QuadAihrCampidum -
gases wasar eensped tres en
- sacei et the sour about the salary Mr. Eing was discharged from his plast, causlag tes of thousands of peo. were damply
'.'W,006.a. year postnam a asseth age?.p to flee this area is ensh.esesral ! creas, at a peace wtikk operatas et espupant called a po lan6de the renc.
I after cosapialaing about lack of safury .. .
" asarBarvtsburg, tur huddaag.
- tur aisonst a year. . " The alastlag off of safety paumps kn.
(.
- aad Richard =i===aag===ts, D. Par the Rechsel Corpornuam, the prime sunk as angleser with .
- amaded to hjets wasar taas the reasser 175. tan maal any o
. The purposeof the crane is to hft off a tractor ser the cleamsp efleets, mise was , In the evens et the as fuel accidmet ind in sure a a lift eut the cuatents. the 40.00
==**h=====*
,,,,gnosting tuulde est make up the uranham heel seemest
. mated trous Ms peuttnas last week and . sessel and a partial matung of the un-
.and the devices that camaron the stoaue piaced gt lasse after making stadiar shsafumielemassa.
rencata.
. char ' The anglesars makt the crarm was
' aparationis esorgaalasd aad at To underseere thstr protest shout the damaned la me meredm=t try an expeo.
tienes I.. - , 1" said Mr. Parts., lack of esoners iur safety, hath Mr. seen altrydrogen gne lushie the reacter. l "There is a sertas lack of coordirinenen Eing and Mr. Parts ===Taata=d that Fureur,thry- sad, the humdsty cawed j
- herwee aream8 m G.P.U.N.,the mahnen. es man who ordered te pumps turned
' tractors, and the Federal en. gy as accuernal eamptog of 8D0 000
~ valved here, the Nuclear eff, whsus they 'd==**a=8 as George -
. runder,is now s ereesar of me sasury gansaser water same finer at the taa4
. twa==am and me Departsname et Revtew Greg, whicit overseas au gag led to the ruedag at electrical can-Easrgy " Issues pertatalag to haanres and dam- ! tres apaspeemt. The crane has b===
Corporate officials e%steesertand Mr.
- reemmuuamed as a ammt of several au l
Elag as someone wtio "was est a teman ger. la as affidavit fund with a Congres. has dollars.
- player." whnis dochaing to ammunat alonal commissas ifause Calamitsee is about Mr. Parts Pedag a sv.nse af Issarter and lamlar Affaire try Mr.
- his Parts. and ta seheequest tasarvtsus, TWe highlevel ensioners weis aise hath Mr. Parks and Mr. Klag ldsettfled were tasarvtsued russareted the com.
plaisas of Mr. Klag and Mr. Parts. add. Mr. Eamder as la the wares of Mr. Parts,"the mystery man wts ardered ang that they were the verge of quH. the safety lejecates pumps turand off." ting bm.ame af the trustramans theyi hIr. Aresid. the presuleet af the Gen.
' were havtag trytag to punit durward l aral Puhler tatstias Ah.:*e Caspose, with cleamapapurusse is. l team, reemrted est the easigettaa that e-emsysitadamerHummemmed l 'I Mrasre. Kader ordered ad WIwas"not trus." +the mais peps l
Tt hustress thats
'- the es. Str. Aresid sad eat Mr. ara-ame glomere have amamed emanada af "certalaly was levolved la me docessani Pages af means. statements, lastare, as step the rencser anotant pumaps."
reports and other writtan anaamrtals wMcsi are different tremi the amata t that they an&d duument thstr esser
- pumps, ha mat tids had been dame ht I
( li-'. accordnace with official procedures.
\./ Their ==9aah agnait cmD heejus.,- Mr. Eunder dealed the allesatimL isan me safeey and compmancs s' **, ~ Asy magswuan that I was at fault is so.
nasclear power tasastry as a time stan muy arrassam," he sad. eew quesume are being posed ahma he hasards and custa. Au few of the anstasere snaking the omspialass saw thry were stameti asp. rs of anclear proar wtus firmly be. laIsa safety and vales.
"The .eles.s leones ~- gangwen _. h.ere,
y . . l g Page 3 cf 3 ) i Tameke CagedImedeqmmee One aglaser who anM he ed as
/ N staal af me rencsar to aMaMeg want to be quotad by name offered, as j Al. tan of cancrusa, so to get la en exampie af wasteful 7 "ws, the the heart of the mectar, the emais aun of bedieng af a gass k a suam armed a the tiemme opermuoms, the polar creme temporary storage tank tur W must he used repensadly. ' romancstvu dolpris, causd sa Inserts "If the creasy 6cks tap either the can. Wassa Staging Module. -
esase Meche er me stami head, thee Anas "yhere was a 16. dest hisla Cyetama them, the p6 ecus h which ameded a gate," km sam. emmehow pret*WF wedd and gas the Gear assuedi j "EadIdame the jah armed Ery humes E the rescser, whsch is strews with pipes might have cast IIDS. het this ans cast ! water ime the rwsar heaf," gB.0EB. Inchadang 81.MO ter materials, Efhe result ensid he em assident E sinuar se me artstaal ene, tae annas , hg and W 4 - eff of water se the renceer," he added. i
)
se enM If munk as accMas did esmem, "Everybodykase about t-ta smetis eare mists he aesther overhaastag of h*"me as amarmous joke," he added,
, es sure af the resenor, whssdi enly in.' " tut ** point 88 there are iam af emese crunees the demand est asses he made Ime that to which absurd amames et af thelasagrttyof thecreas.Eshelstag usesy ese spot." These aMap.
may had est home made. I tasasnovelve of donare spues e One mamastag repair of the creas itself, per diam pay.
} claney Idr. Parks' "as made is mechat amo eynes n emme. > guars. pararey assiped to the operauna, phs I "Thereis meweF tehrtag ta a 175.ame W made af the rensar s W 3deas of metal and have es creme pick -
ahmt a ywapp. , Mr. Arum and Bir, anM they k ty as a test," tMs egenser end. "Se the mest best teams le a shrmistian k une maware af es ahms go ,,, ,".,'*gggg"ag "8'
"'g,"
7 "g' tir E Parte saW la as of
.a rt.d wk ah- saine
,,c,s.o,,m,,,,,
"I don't huswhe if tchance et Aniture . * " ",g ,
j b ene to two er one la See, but priadenes , ,,,,,,g
,g ,,,g, g g, ,,,,,, ,,, , demands adequate testias, haceae as: ,,,,,,y,,,*
accidams, if it did escur, would como .t a g amether way " lir. Inns a em imede the msnar em it j sam,"the estal amount et stage spent in. M take yunas to men the desmagn,"i eMe the rescaur huudlag maar es runs. ageuranas. .l- er mesif anseted as the eqMvaammt af CampanyasyeTsushaAdequese one manwert sg eight hours a day,goe i A meme about the creas and , days a sunk, der 5 weeks." Aheut 75 I Im was seu en Feb. B. ISM, i namBef vttten"T**= frem E. E. Giochel. the plast engisser., '. at the recovery operausa. ' Gro workhg l lag eresser, to tit. Eing. It mated . Mr. Elag heimad that the laset of 4 4
"The polar creme land test assary evahs, i remise precanded any attempt at either asses is emedimecany mahaa Sur heleng esse apuasus er assama teme amenomartag." " *"*d"" d'8 **"88 k'ee an En ad.
' ter, caid' lie had' ruleyed" tho' ' h"*8 88-
- meme as ans supertere aAng wee his " Ca m amadug en the g e ral a ge m.
see doutes ahms the safmy of me tsuus of weses and . Mr. Ar. summe, but that reunedial smensures had amid and Mr. Eamse en that set hamn taham and the omfary of the many asens were daisynd stdle i eranewas a suu m aaswered. availing appeal fium atScials et es Rdr. and Mt. Eange seM, too. M.E.C., whus ethnes hinged en lawann ever, abat the areas weald be ad. and stamr legal staunen teenges W egenealy sustad unear a peupment that 3"'"" g,g,,,
' 73.I"'"ser 'as "8 *h " "
i tems, they eaM wuuld show thes the -e8'.'.".'."m'.*d .s ash.ch.'. he we ." ereme is capaMe et picniing up at least teve est with es aos meangemsma 31 em. am thus me utggt of the ertumare he casamy operstimes are hsad. amen, arderty mamunr." i "We have a amehmaams a dytenry grug tat appeweed tan pies to east the cres Gemaral M anar es aceMass of5cials of i Pubier,Unuuss intimated est! and we ese antanced ens a wul sma." comen, sparsases mista enke sur' ' Mr.Esegn sale. Fears. This was stretched as als years, : 1 Cetustamef cases .. them te sema, yet even that estimate M tur emas, en gud engiamare anM sammed aptimisec as same engismus the ameuma et money spent is est bure-I mamments wfth resmia I "At the rateIMass are gehg a wts he L eved se tar. Cleanup sysruties se . to Imre hafore cdonap operatinus are tar have docuataminated the areas he mr,if swer," Mr. Klag anM.
"" ~
wtucan !J millies gauem of reenacarve water was aptund, as essensus he. enese there ours thaumands of of papes and tacts to be parEud and them, sands of square test or vous and ficers O be scruhhad. Yet this is merely pre.
.Maduary.. to thea.s makt .J.ah of gettnas.tsee
.w. we
m 4 . m I COMMENTS ON NRC STAFF RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS FROM UDALL COMMITTEE CONCERNING TMI-2 CLEANUP PREPARED FOR l PHILIP R. CLARK, PRESIDCTT GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION BY EDWIN H. STIER I t j FEBRUARY 27, 1985 ) } i
)
INTRODUCTION the NRC released a group of In early November of 1984, d documents prepared in response to a series of questions pose a congressional subcommittee to the NRC by Dr. Henry Myers, Philip R. Clark, President of GPU Nuclear staff member.1 him Corp., recuested that I review the NPC material and provide with my comments. Myers' questions all relate to the preparation and the background of which requires some contents of SECY-84-36, SECY-84-36 is a ten-page document submitted to explanation. i for the NRC Ccamissioners by William Dircks, Executive D rector Its purpose is to present the staff's views on an Operations. 1983, dealing with CI's OI report issued on September 1, ht investigation of the King, Parks and Gischel allegations t a cleanup operations at TMI-2 were being performed unsafely. In SECY-84-36, the staff found that a number of procedural violations had occurred during the TMI-2 cleanup effort. They described the cause of those violations as d I "certain management control deficiencies which have been an " will. continue to be addressed by the staff and the licensee. The staff also found "no evidence of deliberate circum l of administrative procedures."2 l
, () Among the questions posed by Myers were whether the NRC office of Investigations (OI) agreed with the staff's statement in SECY-84-36, "that there was "no evidence of deliberate circumvention of administrative procedures to avoid technical requirements" and whether OI believed this statement "should be rephrased to more accurately represent the OI findings with respect to the extent of evidence indicating whether circumvention of procedures was deliberate."3 During the NRC's efforts to prepare a response to Myers' questions, the staff modified its findings. That change is described in a memorandum from Dircks to the Commissioners dated October 29, 1984. In his memorandum, Dircks states that on October 16, 1984, the staff was advised by OI that in CI's view, "TMI-2 senior personnel were aware of the need to comply with GPUN administrative procedures; they did not do so in all cases even though they were evidently aware that such compliance was an NRC requirement; the circumvention of requirements was at least to some degree deliberata; and their motiva' tion appeared to be expediency not confusion." on the basis of this OI conclusion, the staff decided to " supersede the relevant staff views previously provided in SECY-84-35."4 The only explanation for the staff's change of position appears to be a new OI analysis of the same evidence that had 9
l l i
k been previously discussed in CI's September 1, 1993, report. The new OI analysis comprises three documents. The first is a memorandum by Ben B. Hayes, Director, Office of Investigations, dated October 18, 1984, addressed to Dircks (Hayes memorandum). The second is a three-page memorandum entitled
" Summary of OI Analysis" (OI Summary). That document incorporates by general reference the third document entitled,
" Annotated Index of Related Documents / Statements"(OI Index).
It consists of seven pages containing 36 numbered paragraphs, each describing evidence gathered by OI in the form of documents and statements of witnesses. The three OI documents are not cross-referenced. That is, although the OI Summary states that the OI Index includes all of the documents O reviewed, little attempt has been made to explain how any i specific document or testimony has been utilized by OI in ::s
- analysis.
i-Both the Hayes memorandum and the OI Summary make only limited references to specific documents and make no reference to specific testimony. No names are used except for King, Parks and Gischel. Imprecise phrases, such as "TMI-2 personnel," are the only identification of individuals whose conduct is being discussed. As a result, it is difficult to match document descriptions and testimonial references in the Hayes memorandum and OI Summary with the evidence cited in the
- OI Index.
i
ISSUES ({} . oI's conclusions in response to the questions raised by Myers are not clear. Hayes identifies two issues to be resolved. The first is whether anz evidence exists of deliberate circumvention of administrative procedures. The second is whether procedural violations were "more the result of confusion than deliberateness" (emphasis added).5 The first issue imposes the lowest possible analytical burden on OI. That is, if any evidence exists implying that any individual involved in the TMI-2 cleanup knew of procedural requirements which he then violated, the staff's statement that () there was "no evidence" of deliberate circumventio'n would be i incorrect. At the point where such evidence is identified, the analysis can end. No effort need be made to consider it in the context of other evidence. 1 The second issue requires a balancing of the evidence by OI and a finding of whether procedural violations were more probably caused by confusion or by deliberate intent. Rather than focusing on the intent of the individual, this latter ! issue requires finding the predominant attitude ar.ong management at TMI-2. In order to resolve this issue, it is t l . i 9 l l l
s necessary to examine the knowledge and conduct of many i individuals at various levels of management. The Hayes memorandum spends considerable time explaining that it is responding to the first issue, and its conclusions appear to be responsive to that issue. That is, Hayes states,
" circumvention of the required administrative procedures by TMI-2 personnel was at least to some degree deliberate" (emphasis added).6 He does not specify which TMI-2 personnel he is talking about, nor does he indicate to what degree their conduct was deliberate. Toward the end of his memorandum, Hayes summarizes his findings by saying, "TMI-2 senior
{) ' personnel were aware of the need to comply with the GPUN administrative procedures" and "did not do so in all cases." Again, he does not identify the personnel to whom he is referring or how many cases he has found. These conclusions suggest that once Hayes found any evidence that implied that any TMI-2 employee may have intentionally violated procedures, he had to disagree with the staff's finding. l Hayes also makes general statements that suggest he has reached conclusions on the second issue, i.e., he has weighed the evidence to determine the predominant motivation for procedural violations within the TMI-2 organization. However, his discussion of the evidence he considered, and the
r conclusion he reached, is vague. His reasoning starts with an
" assumption" that GPUN and Bechtel personnel-knew of the requirement to follow GPUU procedures. He then states that his
" assumption is strengthened" by documentary evidence that ,
" senior GPUN/Bechtel managers were aware not only of the requirements, but the fact that Bechtel was not complying with them."8 He notes that the " evidence also indicated" that Bechtel felt that administrative procedures were too cumbersome. Finally, he reaches the conclusion that "this CBechtel's attitude toward procedures] coupled with testi=onial
. evidence supports, in'our view, our conclusion that this circumvention was motivated primarily by expediency."9 Mayes does not describe his reasoning process in any more detail.
The OI Summary also contains findings that appear to relate to both issues. At one point it states thus they have found a " considerable amount of evidence indicating that circumvention of procedures was willfu11."10 Although this 1 j suggests that the amount of evidence found is more than a bare i minimum, there is no attempt at this point in the OI Summary to balance evidence of willfullness with any other evidence. Therefore, this conclusion appears responsive to the first issue. However, in the next sentence OI states, "the weicht of I l* the evidence indicates that the cire'umvention was a deliberate l decision apparently based on a sense of expediency and was ! l l l
b d largely unaffected by confusion." (emphasis added).l*' This statement suggests that they have engaged in a balancing process and have concluded that the overall corporate intent at TMI-2 was that procedures should be violated for the sake of expadiency. It is unclear how the analysis of the two issues by 0: has influenced the NRC Staff's revised findings in SECY-84-36. Both OI and the staff now agree that some evidence of deliberate circumvention of procedures exists. However, it is not clear what either of them has concluded regarding the extent and magnitude of the violations or the identities of those involved. If the staff has now determined that the g weight of the evidence establishes that the predominant attitude among TMI-2 management was toleration of procedural violations, it is a significant change in the staff's findings. The NRC documents do not make it clear whether such a major change in the staff's conclusions was intended or l whether the staff has simply recognized that its categories 1 phrase, "no evidence," was somewhat overstated. In order to analyze whether the staff has found an evidentiary basis to make a fundamental change in its conclusions, I will attempt to identify each piece of evidence relied upon by Hayes and the OI Summary, and I will discuss its 1
F significance as an indication of the overall intent of TM:-2 management. My conclusion is that OI has not presented evidence to support a conclusion that the prevailing attitude among TMI-2 management was to tolerate procedural violations. Therefore, I do not believe that the staff could have found a sufficient basis in the OI analysis to have significantly altered its findings in SECY-84-36. In preparing these comments, I have reviewed the documentary and testimonial evidence which is cited in the C: Index. I have also reviewed evidence gathered under my supervision during the preparation of a report issued November g 16, 1983, entitled "TMI-2 Report / Management and Safety Allegations" (Stier Report). That report dealt with many of the same issues addressed in the OI material, and I will refer to it to the extent that it is of assistance in evaluating the OI evidence.12 0 V l ll EVIDEMCE CITED BY OI i Hayes Memorandum While the NRC documents imply that GPUN Management as a whole tolerated the procedural violations described above, the evidence they cite does not support such a conclusion. In his memorandum, Hayes states the proposition, " senior GPUN/Bechtel managers" were aware of procedural requirements and "that Bechtel was not complying with them."13 He then cites a memorandum written by a " senior GPUN manager" addressed to Bechtel " noting that 1) Bechtel was not complying with these procedures and 2) that they must do so." The Hayes memorandum goes on to state that a written response was received from 9 Bechtel promising to follow GPUN procedures, but they did not, in fact, do so.14 The implication is that these documents are evidence that the " senior GPUN manager" was aware that his directive was not being followed. In attempting to identify the specific document to which Hayes refers, I have found two possibilities. Hayes may be referring to a letter, rather than a memorandum, written by M. 1 l Kenneth Pastor, Recovery Programs Operations and Construction Director, TMI-2, on February 23, 1982, to David M. Lake, Field l Construction Manager for Bechtel.15 In the letter, Pastor identifies the GPUN procedures which have to be followed by l [
1 l l h 3echtel during cleanup work at TMI-2. He states that if they "are not alre'ady doing so," they should "begin co.uplying with them." The tone of the letter suggests that it is intended to assist Bechtel in understanding which GPUN procedures apply rather than to criticize them for violating procedures. Although a response was sent by Lake to Pastor on June 29, 10 1982, indicating that GPUN procedures would be followed, this exchange of correspondence does not appear to fit Hayes' description that Bechtel's failure to comply with GPUN procedures was noted in the GPUN " memorandum." The other document to which Hayes may be referring is a memorandum written by John Barton, then Deputy Director of TMI-2, to Lake on August 26, 1982.17 In this memorandum, Barton not'es that there had been a number of procedural violations by Bechtel and that such conduct was unacceptable tc GPUN. Barton specifically refers to procedures that had been
- revised to permit Bechtel to perform maintenance work. This memorandum not only identifies specific violations, but it expresses the clear intent of TMI-2 management in August 1992 that GPUN procedures should be followed. While this document l
l appears to fit the description in the Hayes memorandum, it is l omitted from the OI Index listing all of the evidence OI l considered and therefore may not be the memorandum to which ! Hayes was referring.18 l 1 S lh Although both documents place Bechtel personnel on notice tha,t GPUN procedures apply to cleanup activities, neither relates to the polar crane refurbishment project. Nothing in the documents shows any awareness on the part of Barton or Pastor that the procedural violations that occurred later in that project were likely to take place. Indeed, both documents served to reinforce GPUN's policy and to clarify procedural requirements. The Barton memorandum even refers to the specific procedure which was used to authorize Bechtel to undertake the polar crane refurbishment project during the preceding month. Neither of the documents, absent additional evidence, can support the inference that either its author or TMI-2 management as a whole was less than sincere in attempting 0 to assure compliance with GPUN procedures. The remaining evidentiary references supporting the Hayes memorandum cannot be specifically identified. Hayes cites " assumption", " memoranda and Quality Assurance Reports,"
" evidence," and " testimonial evidence" without further l
l description. Presumably, these phrases refer to evidence more specifically identified in the OI Summary and OI Index. Therefore, the evidentiary basis of the Hayes memorandum cannot l l be analyzed further without turning to the evidence cited in the OI Summary and Index. l l lI T or summary and Index The first references to evidence in the OI Summary establish the requirement that GPUN administrative procedures be followed for cleanup activities at TMI-2. OI cites the 19 GPUN/Bechtel contract and the letters from Pastor to Lake of February 23, 1982,20 and from Lake to Pastor dated June 29, 1982, in response. These latter two documents were briefly discussed earlier in connection with the Hayes memorandum and are unquestionably evidence that GPUN advised representatives of Bechtel that procedures approved by GPUN would be required for all work during the cleanup at TMI-2. I have no disagreement with the way this evidence is used in the OI Summary. gg The first reference in the OI Summary to evidence that TMI-2 management was made aware that procedural violations were occurring is the statement, "notwithstanding this agreement (to follow GPUN approved procedures] senior TMI-2 management was repeatedly advised that administrative procedures (AP) 1043 and 1047 were being circumvented."21 In support of this proposition, CI cites "three quality assurance reports." It does not further identify these documents. I have reviewed all of the documents identified in the OI Index and have found ten emanating from QA. In order to 12 - l
I
. )
determine whether any of these documents fit the description in { the OI Summary, they will be discussed individually. OI INDEX 43 - Letter sent to Bechtel's QA manager advising that Bechtel's QA manual had been approved by GPUN. The letter once again confirms that GPUN Technical Specifications apply to the work Bechtel would perform at TMI-2. Nothing in the letter suggests that GPUN QA was aware of violations of AP 1043 or 1047. OI INDEX 46 - Monthly report dated May 1982, prepared by GPUN QA for TMI-2 management, describing QA activities during the prior month. The OI Index makes two important comments about this report: first, that a Stop Work Notice was initiated by QA on May 21, 1982, because of violations of administrative controls; second,
" management at TMI-II appear to have the attitude toward l administrative control programs, that it takes too long 1
l to get work authorizations approved and into the
- field." The implication of the second comment is that, according to OI, QA is pointing out an improper attitude on the part of TMI-2 management.
i I In fact, this monthly assessment says something significantly different from OI's description of it. I 4 13 -
,,_m. _
W A The report notes that a Stop h'ork Notice had been initiated but goes on to say, "the Stop Work Notice was not issued as Unit Management took immediate action in stopping activities being conducted in the field that had been identified by QA as well as several others discovered during the meeting on the problem." The report then describes the action taken to correct the situation. Finally, the QA Report states the following: As the real source of the problem appears to be an attitude that Administrative Control Programs take too long to get work authorizations approved and into the field, Unit Management has committed to investigate and evaluate the present programs so that recommendations can be 4 made and implemented which will allow QA Program compliance but still meet the
. schedule needs for timely and efficient work completion. QA will track this committment and support it but present programs must be complied with until the changes are made.23 l
l The clear import of this QA Report is that TMI-2 management has been cooperative in trying to bring about procedural compliance. Nothing in this report criticizes TMI-2 management or suggests any inadequacy l in its attitude toward procedural compliance. Furthermore, this QA Report does not suggcst that l violations of Ap 1043 or 1047 had been uncovered. 4 T l OI INDEX 49 - Quality Deficiency Report (QDR) dated August 9, 1982.24 Although it describes violations of administrative procedures which occurred during the I
" Quick Look" project, none of the procedures violated is identified as AP 1043 or 1047. However, the issue of the proper use of Bechtel work packages is raised. It was the improper use of work packages during the polar crane refurbishment project that constituted the majority of procedural violations.
As part of the QDR, CA included a memorandum sent by Pastor to B. E. Ballard, Manager of TMI QA, dated July 13, 1982. It discusses in detail the appropriate use of Bechtel work packages as supplementary instructions on the performance of work authorized under GPUN procedures.2 Pastor explains that work packages are permitted under GPUN procedure ADM 3240.1, " Access to and Work in Containment," as a means of defining detailed instructions to carry out work under a job ticket or an Engineering Change Memorandum (ECM), depending on whether the task is a maintenance task or a l modification to a plant system or component. The Pastor memorandum goes on to say that organizational changes
; and changes in administrative procedures were then taking place and that, as a result, the appropriate use of work packages would be defined more precisely.
. 15 -
l
h OI INDEX *10 - CA =enthly assessment for August, 1982.26 The report discusses the QDR described above and recommends that the administrative and procedural changes mentioned by Pastor in his July 13, 1982, memorandum should be undertaken as soon as possible. No mention is made in this report of violations of AP 1043 or 1047. The implication in this report is that procedural uncertainty concerning the appropriate use of work packages is being resolved. OI INDEX $12 - Monthly QA assessment for October, 1982.27 Two significant problems raised in this report were mentioned in the OI Index. First, CI notes that confusion existed concerning proper safety classifications of plant systems and components. '"h e C A monthly assessment correctly suggests that the solution to that problem is the development of an updated Quality Classification List (QCL). Bahman Kanga, who had l recently been appointed TMI-2 Director, ordered the completion of that list which ultimately contributed significantly to the solution of the misclassification problem. The second problem pointed out by CI is that a "Stcp Work condition" existed because of a failure to 9 obtain engineering documentation and work authorizations prior to the performance of certain work. QA notes that work had been undertaken on the basis of verbal instructions from engineering. QA describes a meeting held at TMI-2 with management and states that
" acceptable corrective action was taken." QA explains that the corrective action was a temporary solution and that efforts were underway to find a permanent solution to the problem. The clear implication in this report is that management had been responsive to concerns raised by QA that procedures were not properly being followed.
gg OI INDEX 417 - Memorandum prepared by Ballard for Kanga at Kanga's instructions to review the activities relating to the refurbishment of the polar crane.2e ~ It is dated February 23, 1983, and mentions for the first time, among the documents cited by OI, that l modifications had been made without proper procedural authorization. i i OI INDEX #18 - QA comment on the Polar Crane Lead Test procedure.2* It points up a number of deficiencies in the draft procedure which was being circulated for review end comment in late February 1993. l l Il 1
V b ll OI INDEX 420 - QA =enthly assessment for February 1983, contr.-ining a description of the review of polar crane O refurbishment that had been ordered by Kanga. The report states: Quality Assurance has reviewed the Polar Crane Lead Test Safety Evaluation and has provided comments to the Director Unit 2. QA will also be reviewing the completed document packages for Polar Crane refurbishment, prior to Lead Test, to verify acceptability of modifications, ) replaced material, inspections and tests j that have been performed. Quality Control has witnessed the operational (no load) test which was performed satisfactory.31 ] This report discusses generally the problem of procedural i jh compliance and notes that the Unit Work Instruction (CWI) system for documenting work should help alleviate the problem of procedural compliance. j OI INDEX #23 - Quality Deficiency Report (QDR) issued by QA on March 8, 1983, for violations of procedures during several modifications of the polar crane.32 OI INDEX 424 - Memorandum from Ballard to Thiesing dated March 10, 1983, describing in further detail the results of QA's review of polar crane refurbishment activities.33 0 P' 9 . It is apparent from the review of all of the OA documents cited by OI in its Index that among the first five documents there is no reference to violations of AP 1043 or 1047 which were brought to the attention of management. References in those documents to violations uncovered by QA suggest that management had been working cooperatively with QA to resolve not only the specific problems brought to its attention, but also the underlying causes of those problems. The last five documents identified by CI all were issued following Kanga's instructions to QA in February 1983 to review the polar crane refurbishment and to determine whether thera had been procedural compliance. All of those documents were prepared in late February and March, 1983, during which time the violations were identified, and corrective action was taken by TMI-2 management. Certainly these documen'ts do not suggest that the prevailing attitude within TMI-2 management was toleration of procedural violations. Therefore, the QA references in the OI Index do not support the proposition for which they were cited in the OI Summary. I l Immediately after the discussion of QA reports to TMI-2 management that procedures AP 1043 and 1047 were being circumvented, the OI summary states, " Note also that Messrs. 1 hh l .. -
F j) Parks, King, and Gischel had repeatedly pointed out the need to comply with these procedures, but their attempts to correct the condition were rebuffed."34 The oI Index contains numerous references to statements made by King. Parks, and Gis:hel in paragraphs 27 through 30. I have reviewed each of those references. They include not only factual allegations by King, Parks, and Gischel, but also a great deal of their speculation and opinion. OI makes no attempt to distinguish between factual allegations and epinion, nor do they indicate which factual allegations have been verified by independent investigation and which have not. After investigating the allegations of King, Parks and Gischel, it has become clear that their statements cannot be accepted at face value. As we observed in our report: 9 It has been essential in this investigation to review carefully each source of information relied upon by King, Parks, Gischel, and Wenger. Many have been found to be misrepressnted in the allegations. The sworn testimony of many witnesses refutes the statements attributed to them in the allegations. In some instances, the contents of documents have been distorted. Therefore, to understand the underlying facts l accurately, it is necessary to turn to the original sources of information and not rely upon l the contents of the allegations for factual information. It is equally important to recognize that inferences drawn by King, Parks, Gischel, and Wenger are based upon a presumption that GPUN and l Bechtel operated in bad faith. The willingness of King, Parks, Gischel, and Wenger to infer wrongdoing at times from the most meager of facts has made it difficult to rely on their perceptions in evaluating the evidence we have gathered.35 9 __-_ -_ - - - - ___ __ -
l O I have attempted to sort out from among CI's references to Parks, King, and Gischel, those which might be construed as factual allegations concerning violations of AP 1043 and 1047 and will describe briefly the evidence uncovered by our investigation of those allegations.36 It is alleged by Parks that key members of TMI-2 management expressed the view that the ECM procedure was too cumbersome and, therefore, they advocated circumventing the procedure in order to expedite the cleanup work. During our investigation, we interviewed all of the individuals cited by Parks as either expressing that view or being present when it gg was discussed. The testimony makes it clear that although there were discussions about the slowness of the ECM approval i process, no one advocated circumvonting required GPUN procedures. Rather, they discussed the development of a new procedure that would expedite approval of modifications.37 l l While employed at TMI-2, Parks did criticize the polar l t crane refurbishment project for violating AP 1043 and 1047. When Parks raised those concerns with management, Kanga immediately initiated a OA review of polar crane refurbishment. That study resulted in a finding that violations had' occurred. Although members of the Recovery Programs Department did not agree with Parks' criticisms of the 1 I
O procedures followed during polar crane refurbishment, ultimately QA and Kanga required Recovery Programs to remedy the procedural deficiencies that had occurred.38 None of the references to King deal with expressions of concern by him that AP 1043 or 1047 were being violated during polar crane refurbishment. Rather, they deal with the adequacy of the polar crane load test safety evaluation report. Specificially, it was King's contention based on Gischel's analysis of that safety evaluation report that ANSI Standards were not complied with in the design of the polar crane load test. None of King's general claims that management was
} unconcerned about procedural compliance are based on specific, factual allegations that can be readily investigated.
Like King, Gischel did not make specific claims that procedures AP 1043 or 1047 were violated, nor did he contend that he ever raised such claims with TMI-2 management. Gischel's concerns were in two categories. First, he argued that the polar crane load test safety evaluation report failed to conform to ANSI Standards. Second, Gischel alleged that modifications were being misclassified as "Not Important To Safety" when they should have been classified as "Important To t Safety." I l
=
lk When the sweeping, unspecific allegations made by King, Parks and Gischel are carefully analyzed, it is clear that cnly Parks pointed out the violations of AP 1043 and 1047 This occurred in February 1983, and Parks' criticisms were quickly confirmed and resolved. Therefore, I do not find support in the material cited by OI in its Index for the assertion that King, Parks and Gischel repeatedly raised concerns about violation of AP 1043 or 1047 that were rebuffed by management. After stating that the complaints were made by King, Parks and Gischel that procedures were being violated, OI states, "Indeed, there is considerable evidence that emplovees who attempted to raise these concerns were subjected to 9 harassment, transferred, or otherwise pressured by management." (emphasis added)39 Our investigation dealt extensively with the allegations that King and Gischel were subjected to harassment, and we concluded that they were not.40 Although we did not investigate the allegations that Parks was subjected to harassment, severcl of his specific claims concerning reprisals for expressing safety concerns were investigated. In those instances, the evidence indicated that the action taken against Parks was not motivated by an intent to discourage him from raising concerns about procedural violations.41 The NRC. Staff in NUREG 0680, Supp. 5, discusses at great l length the claims that King, Parks and Gischel were subjected 1 l
i a = l to harassment.42 Although they found that acts of harassment - were directed against Parks, the NRC Staff concludes that neither Gischel nor King was harassed. The author of NUDEG 0680, Supp. 5, has stated before the NRC Advisory Panel on TMI-2 Cleanup that CI is in agreement with the staff's conclusions on harassment. In view of the NRC Staff findings on harassment, and the fact that no additional evidence has been cited, the sweeping statement in the OI Summary regarding the attitude of TMI-2 management is weakened significantly. The OI Summary next states, "There is also evidence that there was a conscious decision by TMI-2 officials to circumvent gg these procedures."43 OI cites two examples to support this statements first, that a decision was made following the TMI-2 accident that design reviews would be eliminated; and second, that the minutes of a March 4, 1983, Test Working Group (TWG) meeting refer to a modification which was to be made in advance l t of an ECM for the sake of expediency.44 Neither of the l examples cited by OI supports the general proposition that, "a
- conscious decision" was made by "TMI-2 officials" that procedures were to be circumvented.45 The decision to eliminate design review was made immediately after the accident in order to permit werk to be performed without delay in a time of crisis.46 The decision 4
l 1
() was made openly with the knowledge of the NRC. The policy was , discontinued in April, 1981. At that time, CA felt that the policy was no longer necessary and issued two CDR's requiring that all modifications made subsequent to the accident be reviewed and design verification be performed where necessary. Management never concealed or denied the decision to eliminate design review. Nothing in the evidence suggests that a similar decision was made in connection with the polar crane refurbishment project. On the contrary, the evidence indicates that GPUN management expressed the intent that there be strict ' compliance with all procedural requirements including those governing modifications. In describing the second example, the OI Summary states, ; i "The theme of expediency is touched upon also in the minutes of a Test Working Group meeting held on March 4, 1983. These document a consensus regarding the applicability of AP 1047. However, the minutes further indicate that a modification of the polar crane would take place in advance of Engineering Change Memorandum (ECM) approval for the sake of expediency."47 The clear implication of OI's description of I the minutes is that the action discussed in the minutes was improper. Such a characterization of the minutes is inaccurate. The description contained in the OI Index of the March 4, 1983. TWG meeting minutes is somewhat more accurate 4
^
dP than the OI Summary. It states that the work was to be performed under "another administrative procedure."46 In fact, GPUN procedure AP 1013 was used. This was an apprcpriate procedure for making a temporary electrical modification.49 Nothing in the minutes of the TWG meeting of March 4, or frem any other source, suggests that the decision to rely on AP 1013 was an attempt to circumvent procedural requirements. The OI Summary next deals with evidence indicating that there may have been confusion on the part of Bechtel employees concerning the applicability of GPUN procedures for refurbishing the polar crane.50 They cite two pieces of g evidence indicating that such confusion may have existed. The first is a March 1, 1983, memorandum from the acting Site operations' Director to the Startup and Test Supervisor (a Bechtel employee) concerning the applicability of AP 1043 and 1047 to polar crane refurbishment. Parks participated in the preparation of this memorandum which states: Recently, much confusion has existed over the applicability of AP 1047 and AP 1043 to the Polar Crane Refurbishment / Test Program. On February 23, 1983 a meeting was held in B. Kanga's office at which time the attendees were informed of Site operations belief that the Polar Crane Refurbishment Program has to comply with AP 1043 and AP 1047. This belief was reinforced to the attendees by B. E. Ballard, l Sr. - Manager of QA at TMI. Subsequent to this
- meeting, the Test Working Group was convened on 4
1 I l l% l
I (} February 25, 1983 to review and discuss the necessary methods for ensuring that testing performed to date and any future testing complies with AP 1047 requirements.51 It is, therefore, apparent from this memorandum that as of March 4, 1983, Parks and others in Site Operations attributed the violations of AP 1043 and 1047 to " confusion." , The second piece of evidence is Construction Department Project Instruction (CDPI)-20 prepared by Bechtel which provides, in part, that GPUN procedures would not apply to work performed on equipment that had been turned over to Bechtel for repair. There is no doubt that, to the extent CDPI-20 indicated that GPUN procedures were not applicable, it was invalid.52 CDPI-20 was an internal Bechtel document that was never reviewed or approved by GPUN. It was written in the mistaken belief that the procedures under which polar crane refurbishment would be performed, permitted equipment to be turned over to Bechtel under a GPUN job ticket and administratively severed from GPUN control. The procedure under which the polar crane refurbishment job ticket was issued (MP 1407.1) had been revised immediately before the job ticket was issued. Very few GPUN or Bechtel employees were familiar with its provisions. The fact that CDPI-20 was prepared tends to confirm that . ,htel was operating on the mistaken belief
F
/ that'the revision to MP 1407.1 could result in a waiver by GPT.:
L') of its procedural controls over work in containment. The last finding in the OI Summary is that even if Bechtel was confused, GPUN was not.$ This statement standing alone is true. Testimony taken from GPUN employees indicates that they generally understood that GPUN procedures applied to polar crane refurbishment work. As our report states, "Although a misunderstanding existed between Bechtel and GPUN, the documents we have examined and the behavior of key management personnel during the relevant time period, demonstrates that GPUN expected compliance with its procedures."54 However, the OI Summary goes on to say
" memoranda and QA reports" indicate that GPUN personnel were aware that " administrative procedures were not being followed, and so advised senior TMI-2 management."
I have reviewed all of the QA documents cited by OI and discussed them above. They indicate that when icaues were l raised concerning procedural violations, TMI-2 management worked toward assuring compliance. Beyond the QA documents, I have found only two instances in which information was brought to the attention of GPUN personnel that Bechtel was not following GPUN procedures during the polar. crane refurbishment project that were not acted upon immediately. l .
n The first instance has not been referred to in the C: L) material. However, it was discussed at length in our report.56 It began when Design Engineering (a Bechtel group that was part of the Recovery Programs Department) questioned whether modifications to the polar crane could be performed without using ECM's. They were advised by others in the Bechtel organization that the polar crane had been turned over to Bechtel and that GPUN procedures would not be followed. Design Engineering personnel had reservations about that advice. They later noted in a memorandum to the TMI-2 Licensing Department that an ECM would not be used for a particular modification. Licensing asked the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) for an opinion on whether an ECM was required. PORC issued a written response to Licensing that AP 1071 and 1043 applied and that an ECM was required. The Licensing empicyee who raised the issue with PORC then contacted Design Engineering, and was advised of Bechtel's understanding that GPUN procedures were inapplicable to polar crane refurbishment work. The individual handling the matter in the Licensing Department never pursued it further. Although his supervisor had received a copy of the correspondence from PORC, he also did not pursue the matter. Our investigation uncovered no evidence that their failure to act was motivated by a desire to expedite the work on the polar crane, or that it was based on a management decision to permit procedural violations. 9 l
F The second situation in which a procedural violation was brought to the attention of GPUN is mentioned in the OI Index. It involved the review of the polar crane no-load test procedure. As the procedure was being circulated for review, PORC advised the Polar Crane Task Group that the format of the no-load test procedure did not conform to the requirements of AP 1047.3 The Chairman of the Polar Crane Task Group testified that he believed the information he received from PORC was advisory and not binding on him. This situation graphically depicts the uncertainty about ths correct procedures to be followed which existed during the polar crane refurbishment process. The test procedure was g reviewed extensively because it was classified as Important To Safety. The reviewers of the procedure included the chairman of TWG, PORC, QA, Site Operations, and the NRC. In fact, King personally signed the procedure, even though it violated the I requirements of AP 1047. As noted above, only PORC identified the deficiency and notified the Polar Crane Task Group. Finally, when QA reviewed the polar crane refurbishment, they recognized the procedural deficiency in the no-load test and issued the QDR in part on that basis. The OI Summary ends this discussion with the statement, "Yet this circumvention continued even after the initiation of the investigation of the Parks-King-Gischel allegations."$0 ( l
The " circumvention," and the " investigation" are not described further. Therefore, it is impossible to discuss the evidence upon which their statement may be based. The record is clear, however, that the efforts to identify procedural deficiencies and assure compliance with procedures began before any NRC investigation of which I am aware. As soon as Parks presented his concerns at th meeting of February 22, 1983, the review process that ultimately led to the issuance of the.QDR began. 8 9 I i l l CONCLUSION The OI material I reviewed is not written with precision. It is extremely difficult to identify the specific evidence relied upon by OI in support of many of its conclusions. Much of the language in the report is ambiguous. The time periods when events occurred, the individuals involved, and the acts of alleged misconduct are of ten not specified. I do not disagree with the NRC Staff position that s0=e evidence exists indicating that someone in the TMI-2 organization may have known of violations of GPUN procedures and permitted those violations to occur in order to expedite the work. Reasonable minds could find such evidence in the mass of testimony and documents that have been collected in the investigation. However, if the staff has also found that J management at TMI-2 as a whole permitted procedural violations to occur in order to expedite cleanup activities, not only do I disagree with that judgment, but I believe that the evidence cited by OI supports the opposite conclusion. t The evidence shows that the failure to identify and
, correct procedural violations occurred during the TMI-2 management reorganization, and that the situation was remedied i
I l l l l
-____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . - ~ _ - - _ ___ L
i e when the new Director of TMI-2 recognized that a problem i existed and took action. Therefore, while SECY-84-36 has been modified to indicate that some evidence exists of intentional violations, I do not believe there is a basis in the evidence for a change in the conclusions stated in SECY-84-36 concerning the overall intent of TMI-2 management. 4 4 1 i
NOTES 1 Myers is Science Advisor to the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment of the U.S. House of , Representatives Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. 2 SECY-84-36, p. 3. 3 ' Myers memorandum to Haller, June 4, 1984, p. 1. 4 Dircks memorandum to NRC Commissioners, October 29, 1984, p. 1. 5 Hayes memorandum to Dircks, October 18, 1984, p. 1. 9 6 Ibid, p. 2. 7 Ibid. p. 3. 8 Ibid. pp. 2-3. 9 Ibid. p. 3. l 10 OI Summary, p. 1. l I 11 Ibid. V O
- s h
12 The three OI documents make no effort to place the evidence they discuss in an historical context. That is, the reader is never told the background to which the evidence relates. The organizational and procedural changes that were taking place at TMI-2 during the period when the most significant procedural violations occurred must be understood in order to correctly assess the evidence cited by CI. Therefore, I have prepared Table 1 which describes the chronology of management changes, procedural revisions and cleanup activities that occurred at TMI-I. See also: Stier Report, Volume I,' Summary and Conclusions; Volume IV,
Background:
Organization and Management of TMI-2; Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations; Volume IV, Allegations of Safety Review Deficiencies; (footnotes have been omitted when quoting from the Stier Report.) 13 Eayes memorandum, pp. 2-3. 8 14 Ibid. p. 3. 15 OI Index, #4; Stier Report, Tab 60. 16 OI Index, #7; Stier Report, Tab 62. 17 Stier Report, Tab 333. t l 18 OI Summary, p. 1. 19 OI Index, 41. 4
dP 20 It should be noted that the OI report is incorrect in stating that the letter was written in 1983. The correct year of the letter was 1982. 21 OI Summary, p. 2. 22 Attachment 1. 23 Ibid. p. 3. 24 Attachment 2. lh 25 OI Index #8. 26 Attachment 3. 27 Attachment 4. 28 Stier Report, Tab 114. l 29 Attachment 5. I 30 Attachment 6. l 1 l i 9 i l A l
31 Ibid. p. 2. 32 Stier Report, Tab 50. 33 Ibid. Tab 51. 34 OI Summary, p. 2. 35 Stier Report, Volume I, Summary and Conclusions, p. 14. 36 I have limited my discussion here to allegations about 9 AP 1043 and 1047 violations because the OI Summary states that TMI-2 management was warned of these violations by King, Parks and Gischel. Our report, however, deals at length with all of their allegations, with the exception of Parks' harassment claims. 37 Stier Report, Volume IV, Allecatier' " Safety Review Deficiencies, pp. 9-11. 38 Ibid. Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 67-87. (It should be noted that in the description of Parks' allegations in the OI Index, it is stated that concerns about procedural compliance were raised as early as November 1?R2 by correspondence from either Parks ce the Site Operations Department. I have not been able to identify any such correspondence going back to November 1982 in the OI Index).
dp 39 Summary of OI Analysis, p. 2. 40 Stier Report, Volume III, Harassment Allegations. 41 Ibid. Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 79-81). 42 "TMI-l Restart" NUREG 0680, Supp. 5, pp. 10-1 through 10-23. 43 OI Summary, p. 2. 9 44 OI Index #22; Stier Report Tab 90. 45 OI Summary, p. 2. 46 Stier Report, Volume IV, Allegations of Safety Review Deficiencies, pp. 29-32. 47 OI Summary, p.2. 48 OI Index, #22. 49 Stier Report, Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 22-23. 4
I dP 50 oI Summary, p. 2. 51 OI Index, #21; Stier Report, Tab 119. 52 Stier Report, Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 7-16. 53 OI Summary, p. 2. 54 Stier Report, Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, p. 12. 9 55 OI Summary, p. 2. 56 Stier Report, Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 13-16. 57 OI Index, #13: Stier Report, Tab 488. Stier Report, Volume IV, Polar Crane Allegations, pp. 28-31. 58 OI Summary, p. 2. I l ATTACHMENT 1 . 0 t
r ,. wboRPE G ONLY JUN 2 ;cy m sh4, FT-- L _L w 3i nna3
=45 - c:a NB u_
a W i_7-, m. r7.8 i 1 T- REE V.._E IS _AN J N L C _ EAR STAT Ob (ARECOR) ORGINA. COPY w -% ha-.-
, . :., f. .m '- Q . .
- w
*3~
, f.,
' .* e,s= A8tuing,-Q.
' . Spam. 3Eh.
.~,4 ?.:".%
.y . 4'&.d&<*&. e.~#2-
. W- ..vw :.L31 9
m w%%n 1-Tw .e, a.__.-,-,.- C....
- m. . .
--- . r-s-
~ u .w. -- v- ... , 3 ., ..-- ..
..-,m. ..
,2 0F TdI QUALIT! A5502.GCE ??.0C2.01 9
Vice-?residan:/Dirae:::, T.C Uni: II 01:se:ce, Quali:7 Assurance . cc: 71:n-?residan:/01:te:ce, T C Uni: I Exe: :ive Vice Presitan: Vica-? asiden:/ Dire::::, Technical Tunc ices 71:n-? asiden:/Direc:ce, Ad=inis::a: ion Vice-? asiden:/Direc:ct, Nuclear Assuranca Vica-Presiden:/3irac:ct, F.aincanan:e and Construe:icn h Vica-? asidan:/017t::::, ?.adiological and Environnan:21 Con:::'.s QAD See:icn M.anagars
- 3. Kanga
g . s. . =. s '- ' a ..
,,2
". . a . . . . . n. .. ". .' . . .~.~
7; s: Manager - !!C QA Mcdifica:i:ns/Cpara::.:ns I ; Subj: Men:hly 7?/Dirac:st's Raper: f:: May, !?32 I I Cenerai Discussten i i nis raper: is subr:i::ad for infor:a:ica and use in anage an:'s : n:inual assessma- ) 4 of :he i=ple en:a:ica, sca:us, and affee:1veness of :he Q. A. ?::gra.: :n :he ;ni:. Inpu: in:o :his repor: is providad by the Quali:y Assuranca Cesign/?;:curacan:, Modifications / Opera: ices and ?;sgra::/Audi: Recor=::enda: ions or cons: ue:1ve cri:icia:: See:icn of :he Q. A. Capar en:. < are encouraged and recuescad. on :he con:an: or sc:pe of :his ra;c:: bu: Divisions are encouraged :o The ini:dal dia: ibu:fon of :his repor: is li:1:ad, organiza: ions. dis::thu:n copias as : hey saa f t: vi:hin : hair As :his repor: is a Quali:7 Assurance Record, copias ara nain:sinai in :he si:a's Q.A. Record Vaul:. 7nen significan: events or pr:ble=s re uire f:- a; i canageman: ac: ion to be :akan in accorda:.ca vi:h Q. A. Plan requirara .:s. :hase a:::.: cay periodically be idancified and reques:ad in :his report. Thesa : ee ac:i:ns v..- not: ally be li= iced :o : hose problems 0; even:s vii:h ara of such st;.ift:an:t :: na:ura :ha: : hey ei: hor requira =cra :han na cesa .i:a: ton :: divisi:n :: res:.ve are significan: p 03 :a:=:2:i: problees :na: racuire hig. avel canagemen: .0 - i f 1: t : .*::: . AC .*. . ,<....v.... ., / . . .. ~. e. . .3. ,C .e. s--u . o,J.3..r.
. .c . 3. ;2 Ac:ivi:ias Perforted: Month Y- J a Tindings !ss:.:ad: Men:h Y'O' No. CQA Moni:orings: GL 200 ;;R s :
3 : .- So. CC :nspec: ices: L33 n7 :C;CR' s : :: :
- 10. QA Audi:s: I 5 Audi: Tindings: '3
- .*o . QA/ ;C Occu:.a .: 720 J70 Raviavs: ' Yea :o Oa:e 3......3s.
...s. g s. . . ..
. . . . ,i . ;s. . u . . . .. . c _ s v,. , , 3 3 ., s e r ., . r.....,g .3 2. . ..
3 3. . u ,. . . .;. Inicial Response CO- ac:1.e Ac:icn ' ~o . C e. *.:-zer
~ I '. :-
Overdue (00R's/ C:::Lacien Caeci:- M:- g (C:R's/A.:i: Auci: Findings) .=.e - : Da:e Passed Finding s/:C:CR 's. . :i's) (CDR's/ Audi: Findings) 7:41
- !o. (A)' :1' '
...e. + .< v <.s t a n:
Opera:ises O t :. ' ,' .. )
. . m. *~-
In;ineering 1 3 lCain:enance L5 3 ( '. 3 ) ::', 5:: 0 0 13 3(5) i(2) :. .: ' A4:in. 0 0 14 7(5) iCi) 2'3'. Recovery Engineering 0 0 :(2) O(!) :: h Recovery Cps & Cons:. 0 0 2 C(0) *') 0:ho 0 1 3 L(2) 2) :::.
, . , - - , + - - , - - - . . _ _ _ - , _ , - . - . _ . , .- y- - - , , . , , - , -- , , - - - _ , -
-w..._- - , , - - - - + - - - . - _ , . _ - , . - - . . . _ , , .-. -,,.7-
l i Page : 4
- nitial Ras:c-se C:: ee:ive A::icn ?fe . 0:en _:-::: T .1 - E i::
Cvertue (QOR's/ C :: leet:- 0:n 1:- M:n: .s ( R's/A.:.:
# Audi G indings) ta '. : Ca:e Passec (q0R's/Audi:
Find in g s l'0;'R ' s ) Findings) !::al C:her Divisions: No. (A)* (3;* 'C Tach Fun : ices 0 . 0 t o(g) o(t) ,(;s Mainc/ Cons:. O l 1 1(1) O(0) 0(!) Rad /I..vtren. 0 0 2 L(^) .-
, t .- ) 4,-
st.i Ad::in. 0 0 3 3(7) c(g) ;(;) Nuclear 0 Assurance t 4 3C.,) g e, s- ) 3 ., , , All Division To:als: 73- -- so .: (A)* - Divisi:n Acci:n No: C ple:ad
'3)4 - QA C'.:sacu: Raquired (C) = - C::::1::ad Imple:an:a:Lon Cua 32:a No: Reached
() - Las: M:n:h's 0a:2 TOTAL I*t! CNIT NONCCMPL ANCI TREF 05 (ALL DIVISIONS) h Ini:ial Rasponse Corrac:ive Ac:ica :fo. Open L: .;a r Overdua (QD?.'s/ C: ple:i:n Co.::i:- rn an Six !!:::..s Audi: Tindings) can: Jaca Passed (OCR's/Audi: (QDR 's / Au di: Tindi .;s/2:CR 's Findings) ?;5's) a
,A),
, s 3, ,
'. 9 3 *. Annua '.i: ad *
.. Av3/
Avarages IS At3/ ~i .- Monch Men:h - l
't: .- -
1 1982 Men:hly A::uals January 9. 23 32 il 17 :s H Te'.: ary 2 1, 37 .' 3 2 :0 i-Mar:h L 6 25 !2 LO :) : A::tl 2 3 Il !3 7 3'-
- i4y L 7 20 21 2 29 ~1 (A)* - QCR's h (3)' .TiCR's (C) * - ?ON's (0) * - Audi: Tindings
. o. .;...... ..
s Page 3 w.
,w . : , .. . . .sa .'a.*.*.-#.1. . .. ' e s 2 f e . .' - .. *
. . a .- . . . a .. s *.x ~.~~ .~. ~ . '~ s 1 . >.
s~.'-'..'".'..'s'.a..'.-=.r.-..'.
< n - '
..s. e ." c. .. .- " .' .* .* a . a .. . . a . a 3.. . .' a s o .' ,. A. a . a . .. a . . .'. = .
. ..' .' '. a. -. y . - ...
--s.
t A y A. Q.. a.. . . . .e. ., .;. ; ..
.4. _. . w . 3_ i. m... 5 r. s. ?,' s ) ' ::eficiencies c:he: :han :4:arial .0n:0:pliancas o' hardvara 1:ers, usually issuad s docu=en: so': vara e' ac:ivi:71:e s such as ;;::ad.ra*.
n n.. . . .pt.a. . . . . .a, p .ca a.. . ...a .4 a.aaq..a y', .#a.. a .o 44. . .- .. .' . .. a . s , a ..
- 3. l'.A IA .AI. NONCO:GCW.ASCI '47.201 5 (MlC1's) l'.a:arial deficiencias par:aining to hardware s: u::uras, sys:a:s, ::
componen:s -hich renda: :he quali:7 of the 1:a: unac:ap:able s indetar=ina:a. C. L'.C". 'T O. E. I C .~ 7". C'. 'O R. 5 ( 1D 2 s ) - . Used :o docu=an: a .d ::ack purchased i:nes which a:Tive on si:a '
.a *. < g s.u .u.asa
. .. c,.2.e .a
. . ~..o a. s .a .
c...a..z.<s. st.. ai.4..,a..,.,s of- Cacpliance or :es: ra;c::3. CN's are a*.vays issued agai 2: :he v,.~.. .u.a.4 .a s v a <
..a a s -a. . . .. e..t ... s.s
. . . .aso....;..
. . . . . . ..s...
. . .. ...e . ... a. .
. 7.,
., a3 p . 2. .a. .a ,a.
. ., 22.,.
.. . . .,, ..s a . .
1
'.). Ar.O. .r .. ..'.~., t .<. ~
L. s aa . .o . d.~ ,. _ 4 ... 4...2 .z
. s,..
y,A p.sg.s. ..... . ..<. a.a.za.s,..<as o.a e .a . , . G?L~N or vendors /::n::ac:ces. 9 e, g - . . ., a .'. a . a .' ' a .' a , .. - . . . . . ' . e s . a . . 4 .. .# v.'. .. .?. ' s , . . 2.
- s ,
.5.a a ' s . ', .e .' .' . .' a. . .- -
.,.. . < . e s , a. 2 a.....
. a a . r. .a .,.a. .s ..
.ss..a. .a (sa.s a.a .:.. ..:4 . *
. ... a 3s .as
.. , .. . , . s .o. .s . < .
y . .. . . . . .. ..a.. a .. ...... v
. . . :. .. .<a.,
- 1. g a e . . i s . , e ,~ '. s ',. .' . . * .- - '. . . a ' .- . a ". ~. . '. a se s. '... a ..- .- ... .s .' 4 )
..o.
. . . . .g a .es.,,.s4
. s . a . a . . .,
. . . . . . .. . a.-..'-.. . .
. .. , . . . .es . . a . . . .,. ., ...p e aa .e ... , . ,...a..., s.s.,a 1 2, ,....
s ..a...a
. . . .. -.. .a a.a .z..s. .. e..e .. a a.a
. . a..t... 4.,.e. a.s<..- a.e a..a , c.e.
a
.s.e
. .a..:a,,
. . . . . . .. .. ... . 3.a...s
. . .. a.a... . . a.. . . a..s4., s..<..
3 . . . . . . . 3w . v. . .t.... , .r.. .
. .. s e. .e.u r . .. ... ... .. ... .r . . - . . f .; ; 2 .. . . . . - - . . . ..a-L)
A QA 5:sp Work Notica was ini:ia:ad in T.C Cni: II o. May 21, 198!, as a res.'.: c' rape:i:Lva violations of ad=ints::a:iva con::als 'or condu::ing verk activi:iss. arp..ve8. e..-' Cons::ue:ise esek had been implemen:ad in :he 'ia'.d vi:hou: a...e e .. *. . .g de c.._. e . .s a..d. . o . i, . '
. ~ .e a . ..' v'. . .' a s . a .' .# .. a a . .' a . . ' . . . .' .- =.
r.*. e o s .- . a . a . . .* . . .'. s.'.' a av..f s lye e '.- ".. a. .'s.' .'.... ..a4- ....* .' ". .. . .' a s 2. . ."
=a:a:tal subs:itu:es. "'ta 5:33 Vork No:i:a was no: issued as t~ni: "ana; eta.:
=.3 o y 4.
. , . . . a.g 4 a_.e. .
- a. .. . .Cn L s. . 7 3.t .. ..-"'. -' 'a .T.. .t . tr. . .r a*g - 3 a .a .:,.0.. . a.~. . . t .. . .. ... . r in....
. * . *. a ' .t '.a a' .*..i.
. .a
-N .. a d~ . s e .. .. e .... '.'.'7. a' . . . .
' s.e- *s .3.1 s. '.a t. .t.a s. .s.a. .'.'.r--- 3.-~vr 3,..e.* .d.... .. .'.= -
..o3_1b 2.rabla:. .In addi:isn, :ae':ings e.a.a. n theo...e.s subje::. va 4 re he*.4 :he sa:a' da-
......4
/ :y engt..aaring and notif t:a:i:n was pesvidad :s c:ns:::::is: :ha: vork a::ivi:Las were w:ho etza:1on 03 sa condue:ad in 4::c .lanen vi:h p' roparly reviaved and appra:ad vc k appears to Se_s a .d ensinaaring doc.::an:s. As :he taal sour:a c' :he pr:b'a:
l atta::i E fa' ha: the Ad inistrative Con::al ?:: grams :aka ::o . lont to ga: t , has_n::itta :a. d i.:ces: iga:a ane. avaluaca che presan:verk p t: grams so .authoriza:isns :na: ree:..ma .- app da:1ces s '.'.L can ha cade and 1:plemen=ad which vill allow QA ? Sira: ::::* ian:a . h:
.ae.as *a. . . .- -* a*y a.' a*..*<c'.s 44- ..'.a s .a?...'a
. . .. . .. . .. . o '~. .-...r.a..'... ?. a'
. s vill vi:h::ack un:il the :his cha. ec=ni:::an: gas areand =ade. suppor: i: bu: prasan: p:cgrams mus: be ::np*.ied l
l _ _. - . _ . . , - _ _ _ _ . . _ , . _ _ - . _ --_..._. _ . _ . _ _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
?15 .
- 2) he 1931 QA apar :en:
.o... 2,
... ..-u.r. ".,.<.s An n...ust Assess: an presen:t-ise .as given 6::.n; ..a
........<.s
. . . . . .. . s.a.. a
~.4., . a .,
9 . . , s e . . a .a < . . . ,
.' u .- .s s ' .... . s.. a. . . . .' ..'g w- - 2 ' .' - .r . . a . .'sa ,..
p e a s 4.. . a . .d s .. a...' . .
..a
.... s .a . ..
s .,s . .r.;....a. a . ". - . . s .' = .s e. >
... _ s....a.<.a
.... . . ..a.,... .....
- s. ... .
acs '. .' s " s 3 4 '. a n .' . .' . ..e - a . . . s. ~.. ~ . a .' . '.'4 - .' '. . . . a < c , a .e . a . < . . a . , s .: ., . < ~- a . ; ; ;
,. - . r '. .' 4 '. .~
~ ....."...."...'....a-..-..-
a ..a... . . s y. . s., 2 .m.x
. . s., . .. e e ,..a. a .s eu.e .s s .
- epar en- Assassaan reper .
o .. .<. .. .. ,. .. 3 < 2 n . . s . a . . . , 1. ,. .
. . . . .. .... .n. .
R ECe. .u.w.s.m.. A=. . =..* v. iS /. AC
. . . *. , .== R.vn. t r.m. =3 No ns.
c - T.. C
- 3. E. 34Llard, Sr.
Manager - IM: QA
<,a.a.a..a
. .. e .s/ .e
. .. , a....s 9
I 1 l l
t ; . . ~. ; . . . . . .- . . . .. - r : . u, 3.n/ Tear: yA v - , v 2. ,-
- . 7 ... -v- -
j l .v. -. --t-i
, ~ %
9 C O a* n/ o ... ** '. . .* . ~. 2. .'. ~ .L'+7 ".. .' --- N'~. .' ". T "'u. ' ' D. ". - A"-...,
.. vr-* y a m-- - - mrs , - *" r wt-/---
Sched. Perfo =ed Sched. Parfc =ed - s sued.
.v.c a:h .a"..',',, .Mc=:h Y' .v- --
0:erati: s/ Tech See:s: 13 13 ' I3 S ac k s hi " . .V.c . * .. . .' a g/ ... s p . v_. c <. .. . .
.. 4. . .g 0 0 3 OQA - 5 3
- 20 S car:'::/Te s ting 0 ,f
- 1 0 ' l Oi
?.ad. ? ::e::icn : 22 L9 Il- 76 L
- === ,
4 2 10 C e-.is--r : 0
. nummmm=- ===== ===== -
Ad=.is./Secu:1 7 : 15 10 62 1 ll 1 1 . Traini:: : - - 9 .
. k I 1 i Pad as e 5 4 25 0
- 0 0 ] I
- e :
Fire ? ::ee : ten : 4 2 to 0 0 t l 0 2l l_ 5 ' 4:e': st.:/5 ::as : - 7 50 '- ' ' ' '
-3 3'2 - i ! .:- ?:n'.e--i e v a in .
yach. g ; ; ,
- 2 1 0 t m .
L 01 2l : . 1 Ilac/! & C : 6 3 0 l) - l i :I t :
- -~ s:-i :e ?11.
P.ach. : 1 0 . L6
- ===:: -
2 3 ; i : Ite:/I & C : 3 i 0 to 4 t T
'1 I_ 0 l !:
as. .2 ., _.. g t 0 I3 _-l g- 3
- 3 33 l -
- l !-
9:ds ' -s 211t:i:ns
.ach. : [0 ( l0 l [t ll11 l t '. l l3' l [ : I !
Ilec/I & C : 3 . O I_2 tt 3 t? I,- 1J .
.;4.i. .. .. g . t 0 4 31 5L 33 l '
lv -l: Citil/S::ve: : 0 0 0 Il tt la 3 l !3 h h7I : 3 2 2 2 j '3 0 l2 ts Ext:.s _ 5c .e . Peri:- a: n l, I e , {a i S c h e d,. Pert:-:<d !ssued
.ocals: 46 'q' p- , 1
...- .' .3> 3: ,t
. _ _ . , . _ . - . . . _ _ . . - , _ _ _ . _ _ , . - _ _ . - __ m . -
A..........<. ..:.; 2.... .... ... ... ..:. a. n.A. g r. . . . 3 . . a r.;.
. . ;. . v -
4 t 9 .v n . .n v.. . v.. ... .<.., 1 1 Audi s Schedulad . . . . . . 1 3 9l Audi:s Parf: Cad j .I I j-- g Acdi:=d Araas : (Mon:h) Findiers !ssued Pira ? oce :L:n Findt-:s !ss.at L Train'ing l_ *<i I arganc'/ Planning **
-I Macacials Technology ** i i
f .o
. ..r A
Q A/ e C m0 Ct.o. r.=.%.. ...L *.t = T.*..' QA Ira 1 eafint To:al Ra':i at.a d . M:::h *11:h C:- .ar. :s YT ' Mo c.:h Y :- 5;a:ift:a:isns, 300's/ asign Cri: aria Coc. , Sys:a. Oascrip: ices 0,' i [ -l l 0l l !!
., , s/ : A. , s/ : a, , s / ,.?._: . s l- ..
3 L 5. l' .
, I L 32 I'
?ur: .asa ?.aquis i:1:ns *"
- 38 l209[ I L._ 3.J I
l30
?ur:hasa Orda:s 100! l 13 t l [ '
Ir.iinaarin; I a'21:i:.5 in:. 7and:: . 3! [ '3 . 3.: Iva;22:i:ns/',*ar.is: ?:::ed. as , ,---- , i 1. ; L3 e ; i O! l 0 "a..a*s 1.i ? :ca:. ras 0 l 3) ! Of l 2!
!::if t:t:'.:n 717.41 Occu.:an:'a:ica -
?: 213 3
( 0 ! L 0! , l_ 0} l 0 .'
- la:
_0 [0 l 0l [ ] l OC A/CC -
.#. .s.
. . .,a, ...
3
-- . = s. .. a ? ::4d .:a s/ ?.' 4 .s '?::g ra.cs 60
[239 3; (1 l l Mc
'c Ac:'.-cri:4 ::: ns/ 3cha da'.a s l , ,- ,.
*'l ,
i., . . i ' f ' ha . I a 'o f, h 4 $ I.8.". $ s ; i e r. ) ! - C .::1::J Co:uzen:2 [0l-0 0! l2l l l'" 0 l l ::ha: _. 0 l 0 0l 0 l '
*YT3 - Yaa: =a a:a
**!n ?::;:ess .
s
***Co'inad Uni: I and I: Toca's .
__,-,.,,--v-.m'#"" __ _ - __-- - - - - -- - -~
l . . - . . . . . - . . . ....,r..- .. r
,.27 N u.. . . ./Yes::
v3y*
..4..
...... =..e.-
.l 4-- l . 4. .. ..l '. i !
i
.-------l i h ,
.. Qe . . . r
.w . . .
s . . . n. ...s w .z . , , .
.R.2 m ,.....)
.s a i
l l nc Oivision Issuad: CI: sed: To:al C en 5:1 us P.:::h Y' 3 * "On:h YQ Avat:ing Initial ?.as;cnse('ic: Cve:i.a' . Ca.,e
, . .. a - # ca..s : I <
I Jniti11 Resoce.se C rerdua : l0
- ngines ing : L L 0 7
- Ini:ial Rasponsa Unaccep:able : 0
zia:snance
. : I 5 ( L 5 c,;;,e Ly, g;;i,3 cc=;;, i = 7,=gi=; , l :-
Ad=ints : 2:icn : l 2 0 C ..s . I 2 Carree-tee Ac-1:c. Cece'.e:1:e Over: e :
. 0 0 ca..,
_ .. .<y,
. 1.e
... . < g e. ya , ..a .u , _. a.
, ,.aa.
.. ..I 3 -
+.
C:'r e r O ivd sie .s
- Coen Period Tech ?cn:: ices : 1 2 l0 3
ain e.ance i 0-60 days:
I-Cer.s: u :1:n : 0 0 0 2 Radici:g:.:al 5 50-120 days: I
.. .s4..: . . . - s..nt L 3 0 7 120-130 days: l -
g ; 22ni.is::2:1:n : 0 0 9 L 0 t 0 131-353 days: i ,. .
. e2.
Assurar.:e . I 2 v e . . . ;.
.::2. .ssue,.
- 0l -
0 _0 0 3l
, . , .. 2
.. . .s { l l l . l-e
!a : t' . ,ssued -
by 0:..e:s : 0 0 l 0[
, [0
...,.-3...
... ..s.-. ..- .....r.,.,.
3 ,L..C
..w.. ...v.. ... ; .L;3. ,. 3.. a.
. .n.
. - ,R .) 2
>'e . - h Yn
- To:al 0:en S a us t
22 70
- ssued: l., i Avat:ing Ini:121 Kas;c:.s4:
i-_,-
- .:yed:
1} 43 Int:ial Res:cr.se Tn2::t: 2b'.*: I i 3 3.. ,g 3., c.. Correc:ive A::Lon CO:ple:i r. Pendi..;: ( :2
' ' ' ' 3," m' .'- 0 0 -
Disposi:ica 74:ifi:2:i:n Pa.di.g: g Corra :ive Ac: ion Verift:a:1:n ?a..di.g:! Ceam Peried 0 0-40 days : 16 60-120 days: s f 120-130 days: 7 130s35 5 days:l 20
^
' e-
... y.n._,
. : .. w.., ...
. . - .3 r..-a
.r-F.:n:h ,
YO
- 0:en ?eri:d h _:ssued: Il ! 97 f C-60 days : 3L l '.20 .* 3C days : *l 33 63 '
p.esad : ' 60-L20 days : L30-365 days ; '
;. Ar.h.- ., ,, . , ,G -a
. ..i s . ..
, Month T*D
- Total Coen 5:atus '
1 13 1 Issued: Avai:ing Ini:ial ?.aspense (!To: Overdue) ; -I
..eses.
7 36
. Initial ?.as:c:.se Cverdue : l !
Responsa Ivalua: ion In ? ogress: OI Ini-tal ?.asocese **na::se ab'.e { Corre :ive A::ica C :ple:1:n ?endi .g : . Corre::iva Ac: ice C::21eci:n C'.ardue : ! .. Correc:1ve Action Verifica:1cn ?ending : [' .
$ ::en ?,-ted -
30-50 days: I 60-120 days: 120-2'O days: L ' 7 213 days }-l (30 da.s: : ! l Y C *-Year es Ca:e t 6 9 4
-, -. _ ,- ,._,_.._. .. . __ . , _ . . _ . . - . . . - , - . . - . . _ , , . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . . . , _ - . ,.y - . . _ . - , . . - , , _ _ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ . , , , , - . , , . -. . , . _ _ , - . - _-
I e
- i' I
i,! l t ATTACHMENT 2 9 0 4
f
/
1: , M .L * . #"? , "
- 4. d,e *
.g. . .,
# 1
, r -ja :: 0R No.: .#7/77- 8.f'YSZ Ti'e No.: 0 . e a . . a . ..;. a .. 3.
?*.sase M visv x . %. .a s '. a s e va.'.".a . t'. b.v "., .'. a .d- . #.-".'. .... .-..'a_ ; rs ...o_ - s.
Q:R and taie a: i:n v:" c::sl'sr se: essa ; = L 3: = Re ;;'.a :
.'.e
..gsa:1es. ;;: par asage.:e::v and OR0/'30R: 0= .:i::ee O'.. air en.
- .. e. g ..n, ~. . e s.. s .. . a .s . . , . e , .:... ...a . . :.., .. .. .. .: Y:2 ar, r.:;;ss.:ed
. . . a. ._ : s . . ......
, 2 ..
a
. ..:. . t. : . :.
. . s .t s .
.... a.a ..,...
..s
- r. .t. .
a ,y a...a.: . .. . .. . . ..s... . ... . , . ,.. ... 1 .a.=.. 3. .- . .* a . s .m .' . - . . . 1
. e a . .a . s 2 .g.a.
~,~... , .og a. ea . .. .
..s.....: .
. .. a. . ..... . t . .: . . . t g. ..:.. . . . . ..mase a . . ,.. . . .a... . . ,
.s 5 ..a . ,
. . , na
. . . . . . . . .a ,e .
-...:a, , .a ., ...:..
y.:. - , -
. . . . . . .. .s.....e t .
. , ........a.
. g , . . _ . , w- . .,. , ..
- . ..:.-. 5 t .- . .' . . 3 .-. ...*e.ed.,
.. ..~.e . , . .w..,._ _, ,-
- v. :.. n.s . ,...,,.,.a .s.._ :,y .....,. g.. .a
. . a . s .. ..: . .1, .
- s. .-
. . . . . .. .......,.2
. ... ,. .- ... . . .. ., . .,.e.u..
. . :s 1 a. .. ..
~
..e a..n.
. . . .. . ,,2 . . ga.. ,..,.....:..
..... . . .. s a..... . . - . ,..,
. ... g, .a ..y g a. ea . a . .. . .. .. . . . ...,..:.. . . . . . . . . . . .
.,..2.,
.. ... g. a. g. , ..
. .. , . .,.g.r.,a. . . .a ......., .s,
.s.....
a . ,. , ,. .. ..2 s . . .. : s.....
. . . . . . .. s. s. . .. ..e.
a ., .. a . 4 ......a
.. ..e. .e.e.:..
.a ... ....s . ...s.
. . . . ... ..t .
1' _n g...: g.a........a....,....a,
. . .. . .. : . .a .s. .. g . , , .... .:s.: ... . ...,
.:~.,. a..:... .. ... :.., ...s _.,...
.:. ,a s a .,...... ...:.a g e. .... : s e '- .- -. . . .' s . .' -. . . '. s . s 9 . . .
Mast btr 3 0 a::roval. .. a.. ' .' . . =. . .' . s . .= . . s... . . .- . . . - . . . . . .
.... t ..?.. ..>2.:.:....a*. . . . ..
=
=
I
< .,..t....
o r .. s
. , .. ... a .:
r . .. _ r .s.. .....
.: ...: a . p.. ga. :.3.......
. ... .. . -- .. . .o.g. g ..
.. . .. (.1., .ef.. . ..) r s . .
f .g.,..,.......: ,,,.a.t. t ) .. .:. ". a. ."_e , . . "..' . . .a. s s " a.. .. e .v.a.. t . s -
'. )~'.t 5.-
1 . . ...
.. a. . s. t .. , . :. ..v.. a. .r .a.: . . 3 .. e.. . . ..., f a. , . g . t . 3
. . . . . . ( ) ".. . .... . ".1. .. . g.. t...
C s . e .s 1.. '. . "- .* .'a s ' **
- b-s ) . . ' . . ". .z . . . v. . g . . . .; "r
( } - -- ** t=^-'*-
* - === = = s
(. . . ..t s .
... A.3,. .4 +,.. . . ..... .. *. t .2 3 1..t . .. . . s. . 3... t . . . : ta. v. S s ..
.t.1'.. ..
a . ....=.'t'.s s s.. . 's .e1"..'.s., e s.g '~ '
-u . s ." . '. .' .- .*. ' . . s s . a =. =. ~.. e . . .* . . '. . .s.:. $ . :. - . -
a*;
.t . . ...e.4 .
. .1 .t.=..'.. . . "
. ?..--.-
.r3 .t4.. f a ....* ,a.4.. 2
......g t,,
g, ,,,
*l '
e.. t ..s . .. i j
- - - . - - - . e-- - - - - - , - - - - , - -n---,------ - - - - - _ ,-w-n,-, - - - - - - - --r----,- --mn----_----------w , - ,
r
. w. : ::
Cuality Ceficiel cy Ra::ce- CCN ! Gescation af O'eticiencies h1 s/.
- a. Cam:ieved 'JY InittstCt!
, 4 . . . . .4
- .o ,e*
- .- .- gre..w.it (b.g - * * * - - * - ' ~ ' - -
7.. InitiatCt: - - - - - - - *- e,,,,y g ,
*'r,Secton 4ie.
Nanie t Recurrement(s);
- c. 2e. .. .e!"I m..s . 09. 3.,.. S. o, ns . A-- s a.d 7 1-.!. . 3'w'. . C. a e. . 4 . 3 . 1. . *. $ . .,. . a_ s
. gr. . . s g
- p. . s 1 4. . f .q a.g;. 3. .,. . h. . ae. :. . -.s- 2C " *.*. .'
- S ~~.'."~**._:._ - . .
. . e . .
s.-/.. _a-e
._.._...3- 4_._,- ..-e..,
c/__ . .: ._ _ . w, *),.,
.w $ w _
_s_ wy a a- - P-' _3_,._ -- -a _ . _ - - - - _ -
.. * .bses 4- Cs,o -s-d s __a_s _ ._ n. e_ g a s_e_ _4_v4_ ._4_ s_ q k_g s___, _
_4_ e_ b e_ d_ .%_ = . . w--o _ 4_ _
- 4. "
-a -e 3- 04 ficienCV: C y... s_.-f . .a. .'... .-g s-cy. -
.e,-.4.........,.. .. . 3.L.37- t' . . .
.9 m
.:-.y.
. a i . . . , ,;,3 4.. -Ns %. . . g '. 'J.. ..'.. O. s_ ._._ . s . . a_ "8 m ..* h_
_ C a_ a_ .d _ _ __ 1_ * * . -. _s _ _ _ 3_ _3 _
... ..:...... .. . . .s S . s_r .. y ygr . . .
-1*sa h . . . -_. . a
- 1 r".. , . *l at * - } ,,,q ,s
.J ==_ ._ f_. s_ a . 3 -
7_ : o :,. . * ._' _. _ r_. = =_ 7_**',,.?_^ 7 - - _ - -
. .s. s.. % . f% . . ... sis. ..." .a ,-..t,,- , 4 , . .
. 3 .33 . * * - s --_ -- s __
. .. . 3 . .s e --. * -.2 .-
mi .")-... (.f=---.
-.y. -.s % .. 24 -a - " s s'-. :* . .s e --
- 4. s. sJ .-s
.k...C a ' . . . .b s -..
.. 2 4c. s. -b3 e-1 , . .s - s -a- 4==J .22 ss -.-...s.3 s-..- J.'sb.a .-
. .s e =.- 'J4**3- a.
.....s- =s l'*..j *
...n =m-.
J. *
- __
.s.af d - _
-.s- c s-s- ' :-c e - '
-b - '. - * *i
,s. -, 's .,.a-- . ta : -be =me - :3-' .
9 ..... . , e,s. --s? e, . .
.r . .. ,, s Cw ,e.n m-. n a,
. a. a
.. . a . ._ C .. a .
7.,g_..,. . . ,
. . . . _ . . 3.,. .
E"D cJ s va s . w 7..m;, . ,- .
,_ ..s .s. . s .. .3...,. ... C. S*,wS..... . . .
2.,.. ,_ . .._- . . _ . _ , . _ . . . _ . , , i
..,..],....g. a J_
- ..v..c. ,_ .e ...
.e ,: . .f s:- . : ..:
,s. . ,.. . ,.r,.cs. . . C (0,.
. %.. .v s. .
. .,7 .a :.... :.
v... .s . .
.. sv . s... . ,s..
, v. .
('.. i.!'/ i t aNJt:c m TE N ". vSS
,1. .,.
,3 g :;.v .;,
.2.. . .
. . . :I.,.t....l ,. .
, 3 .. .I. . 2 ... .
2 .. . ..
- y. . ; .-
.. l a .. , t. . 4. . ... . . : ....
. g,
- : *. 2 '. . a . . . . . .
.* I " 2;;gr.: a. * * * * *1 *.
- s. a .
' J J t t'*
- s b'^- pM ' . . .
p . . :.=;,, ::= _ . . L:,-.
... . . . . .4 ..
r 1 1., .. , . s ar- e
. - ~
1 .
.... f . ~s . f ,, . . . . _
~,
. . . ... . .. . . . . .. . .. .. .t .. 4 .~s _
. . . , _ w , , , . - _
re., 3. If evaluated to be notantially reportsolo notify Umt * ' r. - r or Outy Sugt. and send =csv et *.O A to L c e n sen e.
~3.,,...,.
... ...:. . . . a. ..t , e.
. :e- w - '.c h C Yes .so 3 c,,
b C""* I ~M ~ ' ~ ~ N~EI~'" 32*t:4$ rtS **sicie 'Or CaretC!ive SCitcM: 22
*V00*/e Us *",* -. C'." 8 * * -*b'*3
= ,...C .,,= ,e .., . . ..... .
. ;. s. . , . ,s . . . - ..
- I 2 2 '. i *
- fi- * ? " * * : S.=::! 3: 23:3,
. . T..I l. 4 ( '. i '
AT* Acne t
- s... s*. ~~s..
.. '- 2**
1 .....
._ y-- , , _ - - -
, m .-=-. . ~ - - - - ! c t ... ... .. - - 1
- j h Assig ee :::
3, A4.'an 'as rec.. aec) t
- Cause:
= =c e's. s-ss s e .; e . s 1. n
, ,, ,,, s. n.-a*y J. ! * - re v.
l 1 1 l Corrective Action: (t.,ctucing act:cn recuired := crevsnt recurrencel 74$. c a.J f.L.9.,j.,, W S W e.04eg A.f.J s $$ t, s o 4 3,,, ,
,p O m ufu l g. A. o to . om dre AM.J 5,, b u_. ragL.
7g ,e _4 o s, .1 , , W C. - -- # .- m cee- % d, e - _ _ < .,,,.L CL. -w.
. f. w e4 ._ *n a C+_'A.a.e ***
, a . Ai s. 4-u e m ~ al u-- s.dG b^f* 4-mL s 4( wm.--- L'...
. f, :. ' O ,a 3, e ( : =e. -} s - e., U e. $ .,a Illr !v ^ 4 *A i.h . 4.0 w ,.a m dp
+
l Cor. t::vs !.::::n wilt ~ : e cc.- :ie::c :v: M - t - G '- f :a:. I
% .-x %.-)s.K a. cr -e ,,
par v Aesconsaare ter carrmv. Accan : ace
; NC 75. A.:TER CCMS'.5"':CN C.c THIS SECTICN RETURN THE CCF TC THE COA SUF5?vtSCM
- l. . Carrte:tvg /-ction Concurfsnce I I e s -*.:
w i T ,,, . fs. ,e s
,b o
%f*e.. , .N g
" A 5 :e ,.sar "et
$. C.A Ver:6:stion and C:osa. Cut
?.? e:.-: cts) of Verifiestion:
% , ! c _9 . . .
_'3..,_...- . ..- , . 2,.. .
,.,,,g ., . , .,,,/ ,
'.- ?... ,. , . . . . ,
, _ _! .// -: . # -' . . , 's,.,_' L,,, .. '.,._ .. _. _ , __
. ,aw
- 1n1 e .r* *L.. e, n... i.,. ,.. *.. s c i* --
.J r. . . 3 ea.A.. ,- ,. , .
j 2 a! .J ,.m. 1,. . . - !.. ,; h., , . . ,. i .2,.
. ..m, " . , '.. ..
- e_ . m . . A 4.? . . . 4 ..- . , . . . . .. ,...s ?
. . q , ,. 3 s.
s .c:6,c sy - . .,a i ---- Ca:s C:.- :v:ar incut Car
- Car :le: c: S ~* ' . ,i, s w i s
. C.... s e w- ,..y. ..-m- m m'- . .l.- ~. 4 t .o .
*" : 3 03tg
' N 4'"" 0
- 3. E*nt. Eactage E8vitw I
e 0 Y. J*Y=*OMI r$ .I f 44?.e N ' #. *s. I * . .* *# 8 I **
. _ _ d.. .*_
I E $j$S.""'$$(j! #9' f n ,9
./* /" * *ea wlas. $*s..ff* ,. _r *.
l am r ,2 A v. . t* 4 **
- P' ,
.~...e n e '. d a M .* 2- Maas *' me a m!3 e s = f3
- n . ? * *s ee n e . r3 t
- .._, , v .c, . s. . r 7 . . ,
( )< Dr.d -! r7p o 3 ,.....,,..:
. :.c ,
- 2 s.. .~ ,., - .. . ..,
, , L. F e U . . -
$ 4
V Inter Offico Momorandum ! 0
. - ". ~2 [ w ]Nuogsg7 york Packages for Quick Look Progras n t:.- .
Locab M-2
- 5. g. Ballard 4350-32-04L7 A ques:ic: has arisen vien respac: to :he purposa and use of Work Packages su=-
and :hei: relatic: to i=;1e=enting the Quick Look cask. This le::e
=arizes how Vork Packages are used is conjue::ioc vich GPU-au:ho:Ged docu-can:s such as procedures and ECM's.
All a::1vi:1es b :he concat=act are described in Work ?ackages as speci-fied i proceh:a m. 32:0. l, Access To and Work in :he Con:ai .=est. The Work Pa:kage is in:anded :o be used as a =e: hod of de!ub; supp*.e:c: 2y iss::ue:Lons dat=ed necessary to parfo= procadural opera:S:, cc:p
- e:e a cie-is or pe= anes: plan chan g e utd a r an IO'. , o r =a ke a : a=po r a. y =c d i.f ica-
- ion i= accordance vi:5 GPU procedure A?-LOL3. k*ork Packages ar e also used h to acco:plish recovery tasks which are deca ='ned to be wholly or par:Lally udapanda:: of the G?U procedural systa=.
Wo:k Packages are not istanded to substitu:e for ge=2:e procedurr.1 requi n-
=en:s. Likevisa verk packages will not subs:icu:e for i=po::an: :s safe:y
- as',a which are perf o=ed unda; approp:Ste procehres, =ais:e .ar.:e j ob
- 1:kets or IC'.'s.
- The wo:k package does no: devia:e, add :o or cha:;a :he re.;s t:ssents and scope of a G?U-autho ri:6; docu=e..:. This is il'.us::a:ed by :he foliove; exa=ples.
A :odified ni:: ogen syste= is :ecassary to provide cover gas :o :he top of The
- he 7.03 high p:in:s a: the het lag:, pressurhar ni :he rea::or vessel.
- tie- b :s :ha pe =aneet sys:e= occurs where a nitrost. regu'.a:o is insta.-
led for use during the Quick Lock. The tie-La codif ua: ion is 6:luded and has bees approved on an ECM. Downs::aa: Li:es to :a=porarily supply the ni: oga: fro: :he 1:-conta*--en: head s: :o che high p is:s vill ha docu-
=e::ed fo: :he Quick Look ust:g the ta=porary :odif ha:Lo: procehre A2- = 2.
and ni:roge: The procehral opera:fons associated vi:h cc:nactug :he ves: hoses and valve operations will be perfor:ed unf ar a de:a' led p:ocedure. ins::u::io:s to Work ?ac* ages are used :o provide su'pp1==an:ary vo:ka L! i-imple=ent :hesa docu=as:s f or such 1:a=s as =2:erial and :co'.isg idas: ca: ion a .d staging, pre-work checklf s: and no:14ha:to: require:4:::. se-quence of verk ac:ivi:les, disposition of da:a and sa:eri. tis, work cleanup taska, a:c. These supple =entary instruccions =ay also 2:1ude ac:ivi:tes h tha: are de:e=6ed to have no effect on nuclear, radvas:e 1.a1 or fire saf t:y ha:dl ug, in the plan: such as plcs-is electrical power sources, =a:4: or hois:1 g provisises, etc. accccus l
\
,_ ,s July 13, 1982
- 3. E. 3411ard so: requi.:e as ICM, 3 =any cassa, recovery work =ay be de:ar=hed h such cases, : vo:k cas pr:cead
- 14-6 au:horization, or procedure.
as outlined i= the Work Fackage. Quick-Look tasks associ.a sd vi:h radia: ion surveys, novi=g the televisto caseras, decon:a=ima: ion of the "3" s:sas ge=eraco; a:sa a d i=scallation of the hots: a:a exa=ples of work au:horized by CPU Management unde: the Qui:k-Look ?:og:am vt 1:h did =ce require IC'.'s or procedures. Likewise, specific Work Packages vers judged to co: require CPU approval as they did em: f 4.1. all withis a:7
- 2. 2) .
of the conditi==s listed 1.2 ?:ocedure A.DM-3240.1 (See:ic 3 is recognized that a procedure does 2o exis: which defices :he in- "(
- en: a d usa of the Work Packaga. The fc::hcoci:3 orgact:a:1o:2.1 c'..a:3 es a:d ace ==pa yi:3 ad= isis::stive procedural c'..anges vill cc :ect this situation.
"" - ta: :isa, a:d speci.fically fo: the Qubk-Lock ?:c g:ss, this le-t er -
is p::vided :: s:a: e the po s t: ice o f C PC .*.ana g e= es t . b
%.. M M. K. Fastor Racovery 7:ogra=s Operations &
g Cons::uctie Direc:or, M-2
. . G : ?.L?.: :21
- J. V. Thies i=3
- 3. M. Laka
?.. L. Rid e:
J. 7. M.arsden J. J. 31:: :
- 1. Y.. 3*.1:i a
'- . 2 . I*.i: j C.V. *.2.5 9
r Bechtel Northern Cogoradon f.g MQA _ ___ s/- r,p- p- ~
^3 C -
Ec;tc.eers - C:t s:tuc* s 157'O Sna:y G. ve ::a 1 Gait. ers:ur;. Marra-: 20577 '~
,- h '
301-256 3CCC v
~
Sep :ac.b er 10, 1952
.k ) N -
OlHCD m
- xes,o=se to Quak uok - Qax- 2-u-u Mr. M. K. Pas:c Recove:7 7;ogra=s Opera:1cus and Cons::ue:ica Direc=c:
C?U Nuclear Cc poracio:
?. O. 3 x 130 Middle::v.. ?A 17057 Quali:y Deficie::y Kap:::
3 :ee Mile s"a:d Cai: 2 C:::ain=en: Rec:very Ingi:ee:1; 3e:h:el Job No. 13537 Tile 0255.3/0191/10209 k 31.M? - 0193
Dear M:
. Pas:or: 7.e opera:ie: su:-<tilla e perf o r:ed duri=g the :::.du-: ofDef.- :he cuick Lock en ies on Augus: i & 5, 1932 resul:ed i: a Outli: ciency ?.epor: I2-65-S2. ne f allsets; resp: .ds :: :h:se 1:e:s 2:ter
- he sups:eiston :f :he Qui:k ack Group.
**eek?acksteE-C2[,Au:us: 1, 19?2 The Q:R s:a as a C?.3M op closure was re=:ved using v :k p t:k-age ins::u::io:s iss:ead of ? ccedure 210:-10.5 or 2LC .0.7. T.- i s closure had been previously ra=oved oc July 19,1932 as par: :f :he firs: inspectics. I: vas ta=pora:Lly rei:s:allef as a dus ::ver follevi=g :he firs: inspectics. The see:cd :::: val was judgsd ::
no: requ:.:e a detsiled procedure, si.ce che p essu:e :e:ainics fun:-
- 1o: of the closu:e head had so: bee: ne:essary.
Resolu:ics - Subseque:: vork si ila; :o the closure re:: val ::ed i: che QDR hss been perfo: sed by p;ccedures.
- 2. ?:::edura 2101-10.3. Auzus: 5, 1982 Int Q3R sca:es cha: the in-cs: ain=en: t e.1: vas n:- dire- ed step-by-s:ep by :he Task Superviso: and -he s:e;s vers ::: si;.ei off as : hey were acco=plished. Tne verk was perfor=ed by -he L:-
e con:ain=e:: crev vho had been chroughly ::ained es the peccedure. Direct observa:Lo:s of the work ve:s :en:in:usly ade by !! :he Tas'.. any :evi-Sup ervisor . I: vas no: necessa;y :s direc: uch s:ap. acions had occur:ed they would have been ne:ed by the Task 3-per-visor and proper dire::L:n =ade.
Bechtel Northem Corporetion l yage 2 Sep:e=he: 10, 133:
- y. . M. K. Pastor Resolutics - No change 1: the =ethod if supe:.*isi:c f:: such :ask.s are dee=ed = aces sary. he Task Supe:-riser was 1:s::ue:ed : sig eff pr:-
endural steps as they are perfo ned.
- 3. F: endure 2101-10.4. Augus: 5, 1982 The QDR states that the blank.s is a procedure s:ep (loca:1:3 the bandsaw support stand on the C?.DM _::c: tubes) vare ::: filled in pri::
to placement of the support stand a:d the installatics steps were per-fo=ed out of sequence. Resolu:Lon - Task Supe: visor vdi' " is bla=k spaces or ur.necessa:7 infor=a: ion require =ents vill be deleted f == p::cedures t.are radia:i : er.posure vould be incurred on future :aska.
*he re=aining 1:er.s.in he QD?. vi:h respec: :o ?::cedure 32'0.! vill :e .
adi:sssed seperately by C::s::a :ise. ?le.tse c .:a:: T:: M:::is if cu ha.e a.y ques:icns. C'ery ::uly y:urs , 2/s- . 9 R. t.. Rida: ELK: :av
- ?::Jac: E.:21:ser A :achset:s: I. Quali:y Defi:Le::y Rep::: ( G ?.}
- J. *'. Theisi=g , Bech:al 5:::he= , v/a C. I. Cs ley, Eachtel, v/a
- 3. 3allard, G?tNC, v/a T. I. F. ::is, 3echsel No::he=, v/a D. F. Lake, 3echtel Northe= , v/a R. . Jackson, 3ech:el Nor: hen, v/a 4
Bechte! Northem Corporation Eng: Peers - 00F5t. *:rs 15740 5: acy Gr:ve ::a0 Gai:Pers:.fg. V ary aP O 2C$77 ,- 301-253 3CCO S ep ta=b ar 22, 1932 Mr. M. K. Pastor Recovery 7 ogra=s Operations and Construction Direc:or C?U Nuciaar Corporation F. O. Box 480 Middle:own, ?A 17057
- 1 Quali:y Defician:y Reper: #CR-8 5 -3 2 Three Mila Isla .d - Uni: 2 3ech:ai .*:b S2:bar 13557 CM-0360 h? F114: 0273/C'65 .
Daa: M . Pas:::: . P ccadura 4300-ADM-3210.1 requires !ac an In and ou: of Cen:ain=en: leg 9 ba =ain:ained to record the mover.ent of tools and cochustibles needed f: :he execu: ton of Entry tasks. QDR-85-30 records a viola:Len of :he
; ocedure by Co:=and Cen:a p er sonnel . A: the ti=a, tha provisions of t.0! 5'o . 5 vara being f olieved . A cha:.ge to a300-A M-3200.1 has bear.
subni::ad in a:cordance vi:h *0: No. 5. Ac:ap:ance of :h s vt 1 sa:isfy tha dis :apan:y. f f A very :::*.y 4:.:, s ,
/ fV v l\e, , , %,
I D. M. ' a:4 Manager, Katovary C;a:a:is .s K?'.*/ ss f c:: ?. R. 3 angel . J. T. De::orre 6
,_..._,--_,...,___._-..___--,.m -
_,.c_,._-m._-.,.-_m - _-.s, _.---,-_._-._,,.__r____ . . - . . ~ , _ - _ - . _ _ . . . _ _ - _ .-
V,. . Intor Offico Memorandun. Oc::har 22, 1982 y
# '. g:,
h7 e ) a
I
. %r A O^-m C .
t m
.4:
D.I-2, .US?ONSI 20 QDR 35/32
. . . v.- . C *.d.".
r '
. ::atc't m...'.'
Qi'.U.ITY AS5t.W.NCE :. 360-5 2-C.9 S This vill confirs our celephe .e ::ncarsa:icns regardins :ha ras; nse to :he subject deficiency repor: daaling ut:h cdifica: ion f :he centain=ene en:ry procedure :c re'risa :he equip 4.: le g 22:...:a..an:e procedure. ha original responsa s:a:ad :ha: :ha raques: for :hansa had bee-subst::ad. A: :ha :ica, :hs: was a ::ue s:stacan:. :4 .eva:. -a r ac. .a s : vas ra:ur.ed b:. :ha ?:::stura C:::::;. ;;:.: ei:h a 4 sa.:-
- ha: :ha cha.ga :aques: be a ;:: ai b-. .s *.2:1;a: . 2.4:: . ar -::;;2 3 z . :...a
.a..a.s. s...
a , ,:. . .. . ,. . . . . . . . . .
. a ..a...as.
- w. . . . . . .
.. ... . . . . . ..... 3. .. .3. .4.. ... .3......
.. a..s.<,1.a.a ..,. . - a
- 2. . . 2 s . .. .as . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . a .1..
. . . 43 . ... . .a . .3 . . . . .2...
.e . . a .2... . w. a4.. w. . . a s.. ...
,.. . . . t. ..
3.., ..
... . .,..a
. 3. .:. . . 1..... . .. ..,
- .:4inment en::v peccadure wil'. be revisad b:. Sc:arba: 30. "95*.
9 r~t , . e
. -. 44 I
.f.O
..r. 2.23... ...
.. ,. .1.. . .......
. ... . . . . . a. . . . . -
.*. 2. . 4.
..*r. d
.. .;. . ;,s... l
... a.3 ,
.. .. .axa i
.l e~A' ..<-se
- ..u . . ,, q"'
y @ w ,, , * - q ./ . y Q[ M k IITo!!?-
- 1 W( /
t i A A l
.y , , m a /&
o 1
/y ,n W - } ] i l - ('
'~
[77
- e. s : -- * ,f N '~' .
>// YS. /
, ,..g /
9 y f
.:C
l intor offico Memorandum k~,.. r UJ Nuclear January 17,1983 r I 5 :lec: QUE U -II-82 - re J. C. Fcenicola L catien Three Mile Island Unit 2 4300-83-00S2 It is my understanding hat all items noted in 00R-85-82 have been closed out with the exception of a violation of Procedure 4300-ACM-3210.1 related to aintenance of the in and out-of containment tool and etui: ent icg in the Cc=.and Center. It should be noted that the peccedural deficien:y was ::rrected some time ag: by ? lacing rt' e re uired ic; in in the ":- .and Center, and I have, on this date, c:.9fi ed with 9a Entry Su:e-vis:- :..2: the log is, in fact, in the C:=and Canter. An u;:: ing global revision to the Con:ainment Entry Drecedure'(.t2:0-ACM-3240.1) will delete the requirements stated therein for tne equipment and tool log. The requireents for, and pro:edures for maintenance ef, this
$ log are curretitly reflected in a Recovery Operations internal precedure which is seen to be issued as a GPU Procedure. This deletion frc: 1300 A:"-
32:0.1 is being made to avoid adding duplicative retuireents in differer.: procedures. - Flease call us if this is nct suffi:ier.: ts resolve tre cutstandin; issue in the 00R. s f? h\ hM'? w
.I W. Thi e s i-nager, . :very
'.. c C )
?regrams
\
\ )
V Ja'T:jrb cc: R. L. Freemerman p. ,,3, ,,;,,3 un ; j n3 r:3 1, , 3 3, D. M. Lake R. L. Rider u.1.gf., f'
. /.,-
. . .h
,e. , S _ ,,
. .. e i._ -
,yi".- 'j. ,- % .~ '
~.
h
- r, s+Q, q .-,d q .
i,....--
..'< / ..;
,1
, ; / t '-
9 ..
..i. /. //.<
- e. * *
. Intor-Offico Memorandum 1 1
1 i
/.~, , n. .2 - ,
.g*. ..s. e...
.. .. g .**
r UC GST V
... .... . - y.
.3.. . ".
(a.ca pcn 4 =
*w
". . .
- d. s. h. a. .= ".*.a.=.a.n.
a.
.. . a.* "t.2
....7.. . .
=, . .w.. . S .. c. . . . a. 4. . a;. Cmw.. a.fa.*..a.
.. s.a.*..**.*. . 8 . a. =.
d
.'m..=..
. 6. %. . a. 2 . b. .,# a. a. . ^ ** O t .
J
- d h. p. a. ****** *
*9* * * *
- 3 .s . a. / . .W. .#...^ *' .** Q . .'9.*. s.
. ..# '9 ".". a. .*. b. ....g 3..*.**'.t
. a. J. ...* *. &. .. ........7,.*'*..*_
,4.. 1 *
. . .s. ..k. ...Oi i. .J a
. =. . .s. .'/. a. =. . a. =. a. .3 .4. a.. s '. .s. =. . J. a. d* ..
- a. .a . 4. *. a. . b.
. a. =.=.a.
a s. .t t. . d' t ,. . e.
.u...g . =. g g i ,. . 3. ..4 , ,, 3..
, . 4. ...
- a. .q =. d
- s. .. A. s.
- a. 4* . . . . . 2.. a. . . . . . . . . -.4 .
...., .. a .e .a l
. .w m..
- a. .v. o.5*.3 *=..'..*.**=.
. .. A..=,*~. . .*. =. = s3 . ~ *
- a.
.. A... . a.
' ' ~-
- 8 4
. b. a. *. 8. s. . a. . .=.,.*+ ,
*a..,.**..==a.
. 3. .= . = =. . = .)= = . . - . t. .. 4. s. 2 - -
n.. a ,
..'..a.
. . s. . a. .. a..234 .;....
. . . .s.. . . a. s. *t's...a..a.
. ... 1. . .n. . .. .. a. .z .
... s. .. .. . a. y.....
s .
.4
.. . s . a.
. . . . =.r a. . -.. . . . . . a. .'t .. b. .,d a. a. . **T. ..
~
!
- a. s. .t a.
'4 3
34 . 4 4.. - . .
, ...s'.**.=...2
.. . =.a..=..= . .
. . . . . *=. z .e '. n.. go...n * = , . %. s. *. .* a. =. a. . s. '.n .w a. .=.-
t
..=
i, 2 ..a.'..
... =. .w. a.a. .. J. 3.J.. ....g
. .a. a a. d. . =. . .4 9 -
'y . . .
*=*"*
.w
"*N.
s1
. s
. .*,. . ? 3 , ~/*
'.* .s. .a. ys. - .y a. . ; a.d. a. .$ a. . ,
T. ..= a - :-y. .t
.. . . . t.=.....
~
.. ..a.a. s....s
- s.... , s.
s - 3o. c o ,'. ,, ..~.: a
.r . - I . . , .g..
..> ,.4..,. re . . . .s ." . *-. -... ...... ._ , u._..
\
e s** . * .4
* . /. .
t y
.- .s'*
E. f ,f F h*'/' '
+
I , == , '
. -s .
6
Inter Office Memorandum r,. s. tc
= m.a."33' g et Q.D.R. 835-32
[ J Nuclear J. C. .:ornicola Location Three Mile Island - L'nf.: 2 C;erations QA Stanager Trailer 105 File: 0303.5/0165 R
REFERENCE:
- 1. Q. D . R. 35-32
- 2. ICM 8: 300-33-0032
- 3. IO>t $4360-S2-0493 4 LTR. *CLG-0360
.,. n:
.s . . m. . . . . . . ,:,
.., . . . .. n.. . e ,. s. . . . .. o * = ,a
- 2. . . . . ..
,,,s .., .,.y;..,, .
., .2.. ...
, .. , . k i . . . . k. . a. u"....2'..--*... 3 1. .' i . . 3
. . . . c . ,. 2 . . ,.
.:.n..m.:v.i
.c .e2ats-,. . u. . ,. . . 2 ,. . . . . . ' =...:..,...
. .-.3 .
r-- 3_ , : :....
- n. . . : a . . , . ,
. . . . . . . ... . . , 2, .3
. . . :. . g ;. .. u. . . u.
......3 . . . .
2 .....
. .- . . , I c g t a- k..... ., . I n
.. . . ,. .- . ., . . a. ,n...,
w... 3.....
,z.; < .; m.. n a s: ..u... p.
.. .. . .n e
,. . . . . . 5
,, ,c.
.. . v,.. . b . .- . .
....,.,...s.,3..
The respc..sibility for this " global revision" has since been pinced with myself and Str. J. Chwastyk. This revision will 9 dele e -he rec,uiree.ent for the log, but un-il the revision is issued we will comply to the recuire .ent as s t at ed in -he Q: 3. .
- 3 22 . . . . 2.2,
.. .. . . . . ; s ,.. ,. ...o .: t , .
, A.se c . . . :.
O.e,
.e.. , s. ...
yl
/ / ,
Q .7.,g .LL;C y /'
, . , y ,. ,
- s. ....,.: ..
.....,3. ,
.,.... 1..-.... . . . .,.. .
.,. ,. c. a.. .. .. ..r. ,. a.
9
.=..
/
.. , g..,.s... ..3..
~
.g.., ,# - 'd ,' -
. v.
s / / . '. s
..: / f e .4 , M X_- ,_,,n*= _ , ,u, . ..
s
#. .* ' *-~
. "* /- ~ - ,.
n s:. ": **?. Uc.' E /5 *
/- ~f3 IL:.t 30. '
/** */ *> _ *-)' Q t S.....is.
. . . . . . ,nos. .iS .. e*.7 t s .= .' . .= =. a ." '.* .* *.^. .t. a.a. .' 8...*..* p .-.*....*.2..'.-
. . - - .. .= ...
~.*.
. ..y
. 3334 . S t.. :. t.. .. .. ., a g.s. 5 ;.. ....e .r..._
.J g . . . . . ..
. .3.:.4f
. . g ,.. 4 I .. .. .. ..
.,..:4y. ....g. .s.ge.g.g... s. . .. . g. .. a. ..... ...R ........-...~..m.a. ... .
.. .~.s..,,....
. . . 3. .s..
. ... . . . . .... . g, . .,
3 . 4 a... 1g.<.... .g .l g 4. 3 9...g .e. =. .a .I **g
. c . .. f.....3 .. ... .
. . . . . ** 4. w*. a. .# y. * * .. ...3 * * * *
. . . . .I .J .? ... s ... ! . . . *. 2. .? a.
,.,..2.J.
.... a ***** ..... Q .J . * * "~y. * ' g *. g d ( *q .' *.* 3 *. .# * *. ... .* *. *. *.* .* .. .
* **. .**1 . ". .3..=. .s , a.. Ja..
. . . e. .a.
.
- a. t =.=. .! *.. *...* I.
.1 e 4... .. . ,. . . .. 9 .
4
?. .= .=. .3
( 2 jg .;. ..a
. . J. ..
.. . ...:. . . . .. .. . ...i...
- s
..t,.3 . .. . . ,
g
,..e4..
.y.... .. 3 t C ~. .* .* *.. J .. . . .
**4
...., 1*. . .* *** *
.,,"...Jg .a. .J .s . a. o.
, w .=. .. ..... . . ....
. a. . : . . a. ...#.
4... .. .. .. . .. t. .. g s. .
; g . . . .. ..g
- s. g... .. .ig .:. . . .
a
. . . . 3.. ~ ... ..g 2 , ., .. ... .s. . -; .. .3.2...$
.... g .I* * ***. I. . . j .'*
.. . a. . 3. *g *.* a. j *. g .E *3. "W.... ** I *
- 4. .* 3. .' * * ..
- 4 .' 4. A. g" S. .". a. *. *. .. . . .
**g " 4. .* .a .I..
...f
. 3.g.
....g. .....
.. . . . . . = = . - .
..4 4.
- 1. . - - ...
a...t .s . 2 -.4... ... 3.--7.-=...9...--.4.....? y . . . . . ~.. .... . ........ a
..g... . J
. a.
......J 1.. . .. I . T . .g. a. f.
. . ... . . ..i . .T .. . . ..
1.$
.g.
gg
. 3.
J. .......*. g . .,....
- . 3. . g . .. ..,.' .3. 4. g. 3. .
- 3. ..
...3 . . .g 3. :. . . .. .."
... .. .. g. .*. 5 . .# . "".. S . .
t"e -
.pg.
3.I
. E
.. . ...I
.m.. p . ..d. 3 . J.I
- 3 *S..T
**J*
.....?
***.3.*=.S**a. 3 ... . I. ... . .?
. . . .... . .. .3.... . a.
4.. , y g . , .. . .. . J. g g . a. . . . . 4 .3,.s .. . 3... . ... ..,.g g.
. . a.. .
j.,...*....J
*4.*7"=..*. .. **
. * . A.
.. ..g*
. *3.. . . I g. I.. ... 1.........
...a. ** .
. . ..........2..=.
.g: * * * * ,. *;* .
*.3..
.. 1 . . ..
. ..4.
,,s.. 3.. . . . -.
- 3. a. 2.
.. : .._....g..
..g..
. . - ..g ....
. ....4 .;.. .s ,.. . . ,... .
..... . . . .. . ,. .;.4 3. . 1,. ,. t "..4.. ., b.i - : =
..2,....:
, = ;,... . . . s. ;
.. . . .s.. . . ..
- .s..t.a.s . .r. . . . . 5,.s..g
= ..
< +.... , . . .g.1 ... .. . . g.:.. . . . .3 '~..T... ... , . .
. . . .i......f... . . s . . ., 2...a.
... ..r . ,:..,
Ba wm cc.u<.w . > . ;- . . .s-1 N c . t. ar . . = i% m <. =a - N : Wn.-a. w w -ren i - 2'
- ...r.. 2,..4 e,,
N_ ,
...... ;........,,..,4.,,.
-..a . . . . . . ..,..i......
4.......
.g.. . . . . .3 . .
s..
- .a,
.. s .: . . . , : . . . . . : . ,.
.. . .. . . . . . . . . 1.....
..g . . .;.. .... . . . .... .
.,.. ...t.i.. .: . .. ...
... r. ..
.. s . 1 ... ...e.......t...,.2....
.3 ... .
.3 .,
t **
. . g .. I e. ..
9 e e 1 1 1 j
]
ATTACHMENT 3 0 9
A-- 5 2 3 , .ii: et l Of y Oli'Ni L ib .1 i T
'pQ Lew J Nuclear i
T-IREE V:LE ISLA;N 3 'N LCi EAR S A c 1 Q.A.RECOR: ORGJ A CO?Y
.3_m
,~
.m ..,% g', =-Q -
'.; a.-
~
i MC ..
==
.-c f.M. s.4@.y - } I4-
~ -
.. . 3,. c.n Q ~'yQ'-C.. 'A
~- '
.;:-G.J 9 .
, , _ - - 3r-W ASSES 5!!E fT 07 THE IMPLI.E:iTA!!ON A:0 EITIC :VIIISS OF THI QUALITY ASSUR.wCI PRCCR.m l
To: Otrac:or. I'.iI Uni: II Director. Quali:y Assurance cc: Vice-President /0tracto r TMI Unt: C { 0*Pt:7 Director, IMI Unic II . l - Executive Vice Presidene . I I Vice-Presidenc/Direc:or, Technical F2nc: Lons l Vice-Presidenc/Otrec:or Administracion g Vice-President /0irec:or, Nuclear Assurance l l Vica-President /Dirac:or, ldintenance and Cons: rue:Lon Vi:e-Presidanc/Direccoe, Radiologi:at and Environ e-cal Con rols QA0 Seccion : tanagers l
.(
E 73 01:ac:o: IMI '*ni: f-I e., s: Manager - !MI QA Modift:2: ions / Opera: ions l I lk Jubj: Men:hly 7?/ Director's Rapo:: for August, L982 . caneral Otscussion This r' aport is submic:ed for inforsa:icn and use in managemen:'s conci:ual assess-sent of the Laplemen:acion, status, and effectiveness of the Q.A. Progras on :he Unic. Input into this report is provided by the Quality Assurance Design /2:ocurama: Depar:sen:. Raco==a Modificacions/Operacions and Pro 5 ram /Audic Section of the Q'.A. dacions or constructive criticism on the concent or scope of this rapor: are accour and requescad. The inicial distribution of this report is limi:ad, but Divisions ar encouraged to distribuce copies as they see fit within their organizacices. As :hio report is a Quality Assurance Record, copies are maintained in the si:a's Q.A. Reco: Vaule. When significant events or problems require formal sanagemanc action :o be takan in accordance with Q.A. Plan requiremen:s, chose accions say periodically be idancifiad and requescad in this repor:. These type ac:Lons vill nor:2117 he li=i:e
- o : hose problems or events which are of such significance ce na:ure :ha: : hey ei:ha requira = ora chan one organizacion or division to resolve or are significas: ; :gra:
sacic problems chac require high Laval sanagament nocifica:Lon. The;e are four dif f erent categories of QA Depar: man: def tetency repor:s discussed in this report. They are described below: g A. QUALLTY DEFICIENCY RE? ORTS (QDR's) Deficiencies other chan sacerial noncompliances of hardware ita=s, usually issued :o document sof twara of ac:ivity i ams such as proca32:21 non:cep'.122:a. procedura tnadaquacy, f ailure to meet consi:=ents, at:. s
- 3. MATERIAL 3 CMC 0870??.AMCE RE? ORT 5 (MNCR's)
Macartal deficiencias pertaining to hardware scrue:ures, sysca=s, c: :cepocan:s which renda: :he quali:y of the L:em unacceptabla or inde:artina:e. C. RECEIPT DEFICIENCY RE? ORTS (RDN's) Used to document and crack purchased items which arrive on si:a lackin; ?s::nas4 Gedar requirad documentacion such as Car:ificacas of Compliance se :es: re;c::s. RON's are always issued against the CPUU Macarials Managsman: C cu; f:: r e s s '.u : : vi:h vendor. A copy is provided to che material user. ,
- 3. AUDIT FIN 0t3C Usad to document and crack QA programmatic deficiencies of either ~?CN or vand:
ConCrac0ers. Each scnch a detailed repor: on the scacus of MNCR's, QOR's, Kaceipt Ceft:ian:7 No: , and Audic Findings is issued (separace from chis one) to all appropria:a 1**/818 a: 6 sanagemen:/supertision for chair envias and accion. These espor:s indi:2:e res: ens par:7 for ac: ton, type deficiency, subj ect area, vendor, ecc so cha: m:ddle sad1 r- fi Laval managt:an:/ superitston are aware of qualtty calated deficiencies. :near s: and chair disposition.
f 7: : ;; rase : f
.3 nen:h's repor: is reorganized in regards :: s:2:istical da:2 p::vided. M::e
,[jr, asis is pl2.ced :: wards showing :ha nu=ber of QA daf t:iancies in a :visi:n's
# [.euse :ha:
need ac:i:n of sc=a :ype. The raper: also indica:es :he nu=be: Of :;en aficiencies : hat have be ta open graa:e: :han 90 days, as well as :hesa :;en grea:e# i 3an L30 days. This 90/L30 day da:a is c:1en a:ed :o :hesa -ha: nand Otvisi:n A::i t.a., response due, cec =t::ad corrac:ive ac:ica in::=ple:e and response due, e::. a assisc Division personnel who are responsible :o crack QA daficiancias in : hair ' own house, :he September rapor: will provida a special Lisc by dafi:1 enc / au=ber Of , all 90/L30 day deficiencias our logs show in thei: Division. This Lis: can be compared with : heir own recoeds and can be used to assure che tracking sys a=s sa::h each other. SIGNITICANT IMPt.EENTATTON/E7?ICTI T ESS ITIMS L. QA Engineering review of Reculpc Deficiency Nocices (RON's) relatin; cs lack o f Car:tficacas of Compliance indicates in the lasc six mon:hs that 23P. Less RON's have been issued for chat reason. This imolies that the C of C guidance pr: vide by QA Engineering to Engineering last yes: has reducec :nis cy:e of def t:iency
- o some ex: ant and potencially has scopoed some of :he inacorcertace reques:s f:r C of C's from vanders when noc needed.
- 2. TM! Uni: I has still not issued the Drawing Utilizacion ?:ocedura in :he A?;00L series. This procedure would require chat uo-co-date drawings are used. I:
I requires the use of a controlled copy or a verifiod copy of a drawin; :s :eri:rm voek. 00A is working with the Operacions and Maincanance Dirac:or to o :ain 1 9 issuanc4. A similar problem exists in TMI Unic tt. i
- 3. Quali:V Con::al has identified a oroblem in ge :ing .~echnt:2L Tune:1:ns onsi:e
- o sign Conci: tonal Releases for Coeracions on Cit Uni: CC. OC is bein: r.re::ec
- o offsi:a :arsonnet for signatura. This is no: cirei~. Of Techni:at Tun::i:ns con:inues to cirec: OC offst:4, :ne MNCR ococedura wt.' L , ave :o :e chaczed ::
give TM* Uni: EI Ra: ovary ?:ograms :he stznature au:nort: or :ne si:e . L; Mave
- o rely :n Plan: Engineering si,anature only.
2:I Unt: I! has convar:ad over to che Maintenance b'oek Senadute Reviev ? :;r: 0 foe OC ac:ivities. This replaces a sianificant portion of OC in-Line reviev ! in-scoce Joe Tickets and has proven to be very effective nn efficien: La i TM! Unit I. Minor orablems vera encoun=ared ac the s:ar:, bu: nave been ::::ec:e: by E'I Unic II Maincanance.
- 3. CQA Review of TML Uni: CI complaced Job Ticke:s is sctil in oe:gress. This review Ls to assess the adequate documentation of naincanance activi:1es vni:n : uld affec: destzn and to determine if adequace uo-f ront Job Ticket :etail was ::: vide:
- o Main:enanca to assure design is not comotomised. AonroximateLy 10% of 300 ::
- Tickets reviewed to data hava been idanci!ted as potential ,esb'.em are:s and are beint forvarded to Plant Enaineering, Maincananca or CC for fur:her evataa:icn.
OQA ts reviaving Job Tickets in Unic I to assura similar ,esolems do no: exts:. D I h.
-.s-.. . . . . _ , _ _ _ _ - . . . . , , , , -
y _ m_ _ . - . _ -
.h : ::
" Page 3 M
- 6. Recen: =eni:orings of U.I Uni: II Quick .cok Pr: gram ac:ivi:ies had iden:ified g problens wit'h Sechtel Work Packages. The 3echtel Work Package is no: p t:c e dura '.i:
and cannot be used to accomplish tr:ortan: to safety work ac:ivi:ies :n :.e uni:. w RECOMMr.QAT:CNS/ AC"' IONS FICU!?l3 f, e
- 1. Sechtel Work Package use should be proceduralized as soon as possible and shculd not be used to perform Important to Safety work activi:ies unless sufficien:
3 administrative controls are applied that assures Planc Operacions, Quali:7 Concr b sce. , are notified appropriately before work commences and are given :he oppercun for review.
- 2. Administrative Procedures for control of drawings in the Uni: and : heir use in 7
14 work activities should be issueo as soon as possible.
- 3. Maincenance should assure that sufficient design details are provided in .~o: .
, Tickats prior to coc:mencing work and Maintenance supac-/iston snould assure suf fi:!
,- detail is provided on the completion o f work activi:1es such that de:e r-.i .a:i: . :
be made that design was not impac:ed by che maintenance ac:ivi:y. Y 9 he_
- 3. E.
c L.u.~.1 L. Ba lla rd , Se, , Manager - IME 0A Modifica tions/ Ope ra c ions 9
- - -=<
, P
._- _'4
$ -l j kl - -
b s i !; g :::j g $.__$.. n .g =ll=ji_-jj=g =g
- 3. . _ _ _ -_
9._=: _,
* =
s S.e -- . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ii = - _
- = =
--._ -l
. ,- = .
- , _= _.
- i , , . .
- . : 4- .
1 ; 2 - _ _ __._ ._
.j -
e
-- : g:
i 2j -_
.j
- >i-- . . l _. j n .--u --
l l :! i n._=, ._= e 0
- : -: r - - - -- -. -
~j
- a _. -_ ~ l =_i l._ l i_.H. .H
- : 3 _= ,
- _~ =_ .
.o
, a e. -
e. a _.. . - - -
.s . . . .
., ,. ,=
aa_--a a e t
.a.
,,n, a,
s 2
. a ,,
- - v .
= ,
. . . 3
.,. "A u a -
=
3, =.
=
=- = -
E . . , .: .:
- u. o.
u u u - s .I
. -= , . . . . . .
. ., 4 j ,
. J u aA 2 . ..2 - - - - =
e 0 .-.
- E 1 9 D U ""
t G T c. fl-l<l~l . . a .
- 2 "'-* ~ l ;
3 E M ,, - 5~ 1 , . - o s . ls
-Q
< . =. .t .
,.y a 1, g ...
s-t
= =
g
- '3 , 5 3g,!%
ll ~'ll
- d _i j -ll *.! -l -!l !! _ d _'; Si- ~ _'2
- - - - - 2 2 _ _
= o
- .I 1. . .
g-s - -e - - i.r ;r,
~
T -
, - = - - . , - ,. - -
gn -
- a. ;. _ _ .,_
3 l y,l 3 = .e - 3 _=m-.-.---e . - - - = . - - - . = =
** .{ '
i
# 3* "" .
l=====l=_ 8, ;I - I ' a l, %l .a'I 1 - ! 'i ei,,,;! ;
.gl 1 -
e l._= l 'l -l 'l e' I
=_ .-
l , ll=.-i._-.,,- [ - -
.h .
t h
- o . l. ,
>l U 3* e.i - pt l l I n- ed t .3. i i
* .- _ , mm. -e - _ - -
I , l aus l /l'
-l -.al'4lls.l'-
l 4 I' ,i -* -* -3i l j f. . e = d.' 3
.1, l_~ {
J _ . l_.; l' -l l= ,;
- '_a -
1> l ;l i1I' ::; . ;; l 1 g i = .
- 1.
;\, 2 .
,, g .
, . ,3 I5 1
%. W - - J g S 2 =
1 3 3 W g a = - 9j 3 g .1 h a 2
- 3. .,.
. =
.e
-s
.s..
1 .
.,1
,g g
g g y g 3 J. 3 E s
=
a. 1 3 3 % 3 , g ,in 3 e g y
.7 m m.
a y , ,, A b 7 ** A " . ""* *
- I *
- SS . . t. y g . . 3. 3. 2 . W .
*. . S "9 a . 3
, g ,, y 3 y 3 a -
y . g 3J e . w . =. = 3 . a. . 1 - 3 ,,,
. .m e to . *f =
. . = 1 g F., g { ,,
g . 3 g ,3, 3 - . y .g
- a. y ,, , ,
s .3
,3 = < % - a g - -
2 . g. -
.t *
.s.
d-
% .2
* .
- w .a A . .e .s. . 3 . .
J. 3 8 3 * = = = A .* as s =t e -j 9 = = T g j
= A. .$4 38 4.
))
J J
=
Q [ g g a m J. . - .- 3 E .
} 1
- 2. . -
. . :. ., - 4 i 2 a y0 l a .-- -_.
,,,3 ;
.s s*
-s s ., , ,,
a ~
~
m = = , - -
~
=i
=glm, 2 , m ~, m
-t .;
u>.___. e ., ___ _ ._. 2.
.i .
.a 3 w e ui , . - _ _ _
I Ei ;
.E 2'" ; - ==# 'l -l!'. ! : , , 2 ', -
_~
- .~~-
., o = a = - - e aii mi = ,
= -
i _ . e =*= l } h
- - -e - --- - ~~__ e i
- .m~ <
3 1.,i, .i I 4. al
.i .
i I .. .,
- 2,i 3 . .
~ ~ ., - - ~ a - e
. ..!.I .- .
s - ~ ggy
. 3 2 - =
.3 g ,,
; y y _a -
~
- - a a
o
- a -
j~ .__ , 3 -
% ** 8 2 =
s
- $ = g =.3_- - _ _ __ i.,
- q ;8' y 3
3 ,
- .i a}
.3 u _
I _t i
$ ,- 4 =
;; ,g
. 3:.g:J 3 ~ - - - , ,.
- o - = . : =,,: ; i i
1 ~- ie]y..: _ _ - - - - -_ - _- s- -, 5 s.uds .. y _5:. .
*.. 2 E.
. :i 5 . ., 2: - -
g -g - - - - - - -- - - : g e c = ~ = < El , .:, , . .
'g= ,y:J 1
~ < ~ < ~ ..
-j .. -
- ---- - = ,:.:. = g y =, ,:._
g ; -
,- w{
t.
=. . .i s
- - _ . -- - t'l 2 = I::: gi ;
= _,3,.,,,.-
._ - . . - .i ~ -
- =ig ,
g i s y,, - ~ l - - -
, -<~o - _ _ _ _ _J },, 3 -J a
3, ,---- - - m ,- - r, g, 3 j*-
.)
..,. ,a o . . . . - g l ,' 8 -
d
~.= r g -
~ ,
' s . .'.'.
. ; y ,
- -, g; - I 3 a i
- - - - - . si.
- a :
s . --- __ - - - 3 :.,:I - = , . ~ ', = ' , ~ - .,
~. 1
., ,,t - - - - - l s '- . ,
-a , . , l .
g .; ; _ - _ _ . _ . - -- ---
- ; a aa '
g, ~g 1 ,---e .- a m.o.= a 2
.y - a ~ - ei j
3,: l
- j. g - - - - .- _ . . - . - ., ,,: - - 3 = 1
- y . - - l
* , pg g. - _ _ a 3 , ,. g
- l. .
, 3 ;j -=:!-
=
. :; - -- - - - - _ . - - - , 3 ,i ';; i,::
ac . _ _ - - -
-a*
g
, '] ,,--- - ----,-
- i : ; = = = = a a a o a 3 - -
t
' ~
1 2 _. - - ._. - - a ._
,, 2g "I
y=.;a: .~,. l -_ - - - - ----- - -
*! 3 ~ ., - -- - .,
e jl e' $1 ~ :: I ji it I ._ . J 6l -l
,1. . 3 ~
3 ..
; 3g .=
.. a.
2 a
. 2 sj g -.-e- -= j e ,i Q , .-- . - .- , - ,
= - ;
L .= I ; o - - - a ~ o a . ol sll =
- I DJi 1,3, 2-.. _ . . _ . _ _ - - _ .
~
=
s
.g. *
- 8'
.. 4 I 3 $ SI %
- I g' g 3 -
3 38 = = - J
** e. . j ee a . 9
= .$. . g g ,, w a -' =
- 3. .
.$ .3 4 .. ** '.3 S **
9 3 g ,g g p 1I * .I
- 89 .a.. 3 . g 4 - - * * * -
D 4 4- = = * "1" 8* 3 e y g .h g 3 .g g W D $ .* 8 * * - -' . - - es ,i e e
- S **.
J 24 .
- e. .
s 3 g 3 33 - ** 8 8 3: C
- I "
- 3 - J .8 "8
- , - 'a
= "{ . -
. . s' -
i
. =.
i .S. . - . . - E' -e z -- r w 2 J .I < J. .* ~ t .a .v . - si -
9 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 4 9 I I t !
. 1 s
. 1 NFrRMAT.ON 0 0 . .
0 [rW %LiClGBT GV ,
't 1
i l i T- REE V'LE IS _AN J N L CLEA9 S~A lON : Q. A RECORD OR G N.A_ COPY
. . M?,,%
. , y ,- - .
N:*, m y .N '.'.yy; . . p.- M i* %: e.i.; g !
O+W -
g , A33I55tI:IT
- 0F UF, C:?'.I iI::TATIC:: .U:3 IFFICT*'.*I 233 0F T*d!
i QUALITY ASSUTvu;CI P?.CCRN! i l i To: O trac:Je, Ut! Unt: tt 3traccar. Quaticy Assur.ince l 44; Vica-Pre = L.!an:/0 Leec:o r, n!t Un te t Depu:v Di.e ac ca r , Utt IJn!. II Execu Lve Ylee Presiden: Vice-?restJen:/3 tractor. Technt:s! Fune-i.7ns Vlee-Presidenc/0trec:or. Ad-itatscracion g Vice-Frasidenc/Otreecer, Nuclear As 4ur mea w V leo-P res tJen t/0 L eec co r. :'a tn = ens.9c 2 t,d c. ins:ene:t'e Ytee-?rastJenc/Otrector. . lad lo t a< tea l .in,J 5.nv i raar e9 :ll '? 'n: r'l a A3 %e:Len ana:ees w - , - , , - - - -a,_, , - , , , - - - - - - , , , , - ,
------,--,.c._- - - , - - , - - - - - - - , . - - - , - - ,---.w.--.--, ..,y- , - rr-g- -,--
Dirac or, OC Uni: I 7; m: y.anager - OC QA F.odifica:icas/Cpera:i:ns
$ subj: F.on:hly 7?/Direc:c 's Raper: for Cc::ier, 1982 c-narsi Discussion This report is submit:ad for infor=aciou and use in. =anage=en:'s con:inuzi assass-n:nc of :he implemen:acion, scacus, and effectiveness of the Q.A. ?:ogram on cha .
Uni:. Inpuc into chts report is provided by the Quality Assurance Design /? : cure =an:
. odificacions/Operacions and Program /Audic Seccion of the Q.A. Depar:sen:. Rac:==en-M dacions or construccive criticism on the concent or scope of this rapo : are an::urag and requested. The inicial distribucion of this report is limi:ad, bu: Divist:ns are encouraged to distribute copies as they see fic wichin their organizacicas. As :his repor is a Quali:y Assurance Record, copies are maintained in :he si:e's Q.A. Rac::d Vcule. When significant events or problems require formal sanagemen: ac:1:n :: be cckan in acccedance with Q.A. Plan requirements, chase accions say periodically be iden:ified and requested in this report. These type actions will normally be Limi:ad.
to chose problems or events which are of such significanca or na:ura cha: : hey at:he: ecquira noce chas one organizacion or division to resolva or are signif t:an: p :: g : 2.n-ss:ic problems cha: :aquire high level sanagement notifica:Lon. There ara four diff erent cacagorias of QA Department deficiency rapor:s discussad L . chis report. They are described below: A. QUALIrf DE7ICIINC*f REPORTS (QDR's) Deficiencias other chan =acertal noncompliances of hardware 1:e=s, usual'.y issued :s document softwara of activicy L: ass such as procedural none: ;'.iance, procedura inadaquacy, f ailure c: see: cocat:sen:s, etc.
- 3. M.CER"AL NCMCONTORP.ASCI RI? ORTS OC(CR's) .
M.a:artal deficiencias par:sining to hardwara sc:uc:uras , sys:tms , : ::m: nsn:s f vnich randa: che quality of the L:an unaccepcaela or inda:ers:na:a. C. RECI;?T DEF*C:IUC't REPORT 5 (MM's) Usad to docusenc and crack purchasad L: ems which arriva on si:a lacking ?ur: nasa Order requirad documentation such as Cae:ift: acts of CompLLance oc :as: ee::::s. EN's are always issued against cha CPUM M.acaetals M.anagemen: Gr:u: f:: rasc h:. v*.:h vendor. A copy is provided :o :he matertal usar. O. AUDt! TIMOEMC
" sad to docu= enc and crack QA prog::=matic daf t:Lancias of at:ha 0 ?'.3 : : ten:::
*on::Ac:Jes.
Each month a detailed report on che scacus of .WCR's, QOR's, Raceip: Oef'. ten:/ 1:: ; anu Audic Findings is issued (separate f rom this one) to all appe:Pria a '.avels :! . 72nagesent/ supervision for chair cavtav and action. These recor:s Ladicate res: ens; h party f or ac:1:n, type deficiency, subj a:: area, vendor, 4:c. so ena: middit 2nc f.:
'avel managemen*/supervtston are aware of qualt:7 related def t:ien:Les. :*.e': s:s:.:
- nd :nate dispost:t:n.
Jni: :: Page 2 SIGNU*CAN" IMPLIMEh""AT:CN/IRICT!7INI53 !!IMS (L) Ac:1vi:y/Ceficiency Su==ary Figures / Trends Ac:1v1:1es Month YTD Mon:h TTO - CQA Moni:ori=gs: 66 (87) 692 QA Audics: 1 (l) 13 QC Inspec:1ons: 133 (57) 823 QA/QC Cocu=en: Revievs: 159 (201) 2503 Deficiencies Issued Closed To tal Re=2ininz Oren
- Month YTD Monch Y""D YD 90 davs M0 dan QDR's / Audit Find 1=gs:. 3 (la) 58 5 (5) 106 71 (77) 4 (1) 23 (10 MMCR's / RDN 's : 14 (9) 154 9 (7) 111 52 (53) 11 (7) 25 (la YTD - Year to Cace () - Last Mon:h's Figures
- Indica:es chose vi:h Otvision Ac-ion Oue (2) Operacions Quali:y Assurance has complaced :he review of Uni: 2 Job Ticke:s
. as par: of the responsa to XRC Inspection Rapor: 50-320/32-10. The reviev was perfor=ed to check the adequacy in addressing cachnical require =en:s in the preparacion of work requests and for che adequacy of decati in the Job Ticket resolucion. Of the 1,137 Job Tickets reviewed, 117 vere iden:1fied 9 as having potencial design concern. Quality Control is perfor=ing fiel:
verificacion on 31 Job Tickats to check as-buil: condi:lons. 36 Job Ti:ke:s were forvarded to Plan: Engineering for evaluacion. Some addi:1onal ad inis:ra: problems discovered were also sent to Plant Maintenance for review. E..g in ee rin; and Main:enance are planning to disposicion the 1:ess and issue a finsi re;c : and ses:us. Correc:1ve ac:1ons, where required, vill be iden:ified in : heir re; l'( 3 ) There con:inues to be confusion and concern about che use o f E3-C l'. :o de:e r: int saf ety classif teacion for componen:s. ES-Oli curren:ty provides sys:a= * .eve' in!cr=acion. In January,1932, an ac:1on plan was developed and agreed uson by quali:y Assurance, Plant Engineering and Main:enance decar :en:s of be:n uni:s, to provide component level infor acion for safecy classif t:acion. This involve: Planc Engineering reviewing the previous quality classifics:1:n lis: (CP-i C3), i, updacing 1: to reflece che ES-Oli categories, and : hen incorpers:tng i: in:o IS-Oli as an incerpre:acion. This has not been dona in ei:her "ni:. Uni: has draf:ed a ec=ponen: level list for recovery systens bu: has no: tssi.ed :: yac. Lack of action in this area continues to cause probless and daisys in job planning, peccurement of =acertal, and vichdrawal o f varehouse na:eria' . . Priorities appear :o be a signif t:anc problem in solving :his tasue. Ini:ial indicacions are chsc TM! Uni: I personnel may scill be using 0?-! 03 versus ' g the new E3-Oli process for interpre:2 cions. . (i) A Scop %*ork condicion occurred in Uni: 2 involving repeated viola: tons of OA '
,> Program requirements for work being perfor=ed prior to che engineering docur.en:.
h work authori:a ton being issued Engineering personnel vere verbally di::1:ing
, ,y changes to cons:ruction personnel and work was being perfor:ed prior :o l issuance of c'.e ne:essary design changes and work au:hori:2: ions. A r.ee:ing ,
1
Page 3 vas held vi:5 Uni: 2 nanagenen: and accaccable cc ee:ive ac:1:n eas :skan.
$hort-car: correc:1ve ac:ica was co=cle:ac :.==edia:ai7 and ::a 5 top o rk Nc:1:e **
# was not issued. A similar problem occurred earlier in :he year vi.1:h was casolved :s some ex:en: by a procedure change :ha: provided be::a: f '.exib i'. 1:7 to perform verk. Tais is being reviewed by Uni: 2 personnel for ;ossib'.a applica:ica in 'Unic 2 as one of :he pernanen: fixes es pravant race:urr anc a to the problem.
% b RICCMENDAT IONS / AC"' IONS RECU!RE")
It is recommended chac Management assess the priori:y of establishing compenen: level informacion for safety classification. l
&_^ ~ 2. Q.LC.u .a
- 5. E. Ballard, Sr.
Manager - IMI QA Modificscions/Operacions 3 i i 9 I
,, - - _ _ . - _ _ - . . , _ _ , . . - , , . , _ - - - - - - _ - - - ~ _ , - , - - - . _ _ . - . - . - _ _ . -
. a
. nC l _,:l o- .? " p --- _
,- :T""~-. , i.-
.i i ,- -l 1
- * =c}.I*!!2:l'it*!!*!l~l:
12 -
- - _i*ti-il=i! -li *!
=> !,,i!=i~1 l
gl
., 2 Sl .
=r
# !,!, ,=
1 _=: 0 5
=
- f:-
y; . j z -_ _ _ .-_ - . - .:. _ _ _ g 33y - ll 3Il ~Il_'d 'llj *il 'll:ldi-li *u
.3 gI * ! c!
. i 'g _!
3 - _. - _ . - u ~ 9
.a ~5' _ .,l -ll_-1 ~ --,,ll-ll.ll.t,.ql a ,_i 8 _,'. ~~_
- g. -
, ,o a
>l
,,.3 l, ,
=
- d. -:- =*r =ar t y
I
- jS
. g * * *
~ *
- 2 .. I 1 1 E 2 *
- 2 2 2 2 2 3 i - - - 5 = *
.I ~
E I 3 :
. . .! 1 _
~ . . =1 .
- 1 ~,* !. . ~ * : 1 3 .". I!
1 1,,
- 33 -
c -
- 4. I J 2 e d } I = :
i2 : j
=
j j i 2
- - ~ a 2 3 S
S S -
]
9 _r d - _. _ g - u y *~ 1
~
- E .
g .- - e 1
.g U
-- - 1 :
- l c<
c 5
.1 w ! 7.
I p:y . ; y 3 g J j-i.r T, a
& -- a i a
. a c.
. =$
, 2. , .a . .
- : 22 . -
N
. I MW =
. - == _ E.]
gg g a -e- - . _ . M "3 e, - em 9 .-
}g [
l ~ !
- j 'II ~ l'------
.. *a 1 fI
{' '
_g 3g a
* * ~'
- 2 E'g_efI~!I*Il#' - -----
=!! .
,. , ~ _ j - _ _ . , , , .
z
,i.
5 _
*
- e ~ ~ .~,.- l-i
- g. - - -
._~ _~. . ,
a
~
l l T ' 9, 9'""3 ; -
~i
-l a
a l lg3 l~
= ..
l
- - - -- - , lll i , s i . ,
1 -li 'l . i ill%>[l-.*~l+ l ,I ,
} -
- 1. i-n e .i-- . 2 _ _ ___._ _.___ _ _ _ _ _
.i al .-
3 2 .IiLI - . n l ., - In ._- t I_,-I l__. - .h_.I -h
; ' -id_: ; - l ,". _-
j I y j -
. ._~- l _,~,h, ._
a e Er 3s I: 9 i i i i
.r Ji y i.l r I.g.: -
i -
. 2 2 2 2
Sh
~
i 1 1 i ii 4 . 1
- !. E. -
1 i i.* i. e. i. 2 4
't. _F , ;
33 I _I - J *
.i. .1 .
I i 2 I .
- .; v v
.i .I.
2 i ;3 : e. 24 -
;3 A F
- 3 3 ' -
0 ; 2 1 =; j
- y. .
iI E
- i. _1 f 3 3 ::,) 1_* 1_
3 d' d a 8 $ g 3; g 33 3 &"' l. , a 3 - a a
~~
i . r -.n-- ,-.----------.-------.----...--.--,,--,-...----n- - . - - - - - - - , , , . , . - , - - - - . - . , . - - - , - - - - - - - - .-
I 1' .ii l
& ,I - ]
a..
=,.,.
. , . ..y . 1 j l ! Il l l l 1 1 l l 1
" ,I J. N J. i i ' i s}}