|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20155F6621988-10-0606 October 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR55.45(b)(1), 10CFR55.45(b)(2),10CFR55.45(b)(4),10CFR55.45(b)(5), 10CFR55.45(a)(2),10CFR55.53(e) & 10CFR55.53(f) Re Operators Licenses About Requirements for Plant Simulation Facility ML20153E6771988-08-31031 August 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR55.59(c)(2), Subsections (IV) & (V), & 10CFR55.59(c)(3)(i) Items a Through AA, Eliminating Requirements for Certain Lecture Subjs & Manipulation Exercises ML20155B6631988-05-27027 May 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements.Exemption Contingent Upon NRC Review of Mode 1 Criticality Analysis ML20210T1521987-02-0909 February 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50,App A,Gdc 17 & 19 Requirements Re Electrical Power Sys & Control Room Habitability ML20141G1251985-12-30030 December 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50.61 Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML20138K1631985-10-24024 October 1985 Exemption from 10CFR61.55 Re Waste Classification of Epicor II Resin Liners ML20138D3921985-10-17017 October 1985 Exemption from 10CFR30.51,40.61,70.51(d) & 70.53 Requirements,Per 850418 Request.Exemption from 10CFR70.53 Shall Expire Following Completion of Defueling Effort, Including Assessment of Fuel Fines & Debris within Plant ML20134L9361985-08-28028 August 1985 Exemption from GDC 34 Re Removal of Residual Heat & GDC 37 Re Testing of Eccs,Per Util 850326 Request.Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Encl ML20133P8021985-08-0808 August 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50 App A,Gdc 34 Re RHR Sys & GDC 37 Re Testing of ECCS Sys ML20128H7961985-05-16016 May 1985 Partial Exemption from 10CFR50.54(a) Requirements Re Incorporating QA Program Revs Into FSAR 1999-07-21
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20149E2021994-04-20020 April 1994 R Gary Statement Re 10 Mile Rule Under Director'S Decision DD-94-03,dtd 940331 for Tmi.Urges Commissioners to Engage in Reconsideration of Author Petition ML20065Q0671994-04-0707 April 1994 Principal Deficiencies in Director'S Decision 94-03 Re Pica Request Under 10CFR2.206 ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20065J3461992-12-30030 December 1992 Responds to Petition of R Gary Alleging Discrepancies in RERP for Dauphin County,Pa ML20065J3731992-12-18018 December 1992 Affidavit of Gj Giangi Responding to of R Gary Requesting Action by NRC Per 10CFR2.206 ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20248J1891989-10-0606 October 1989 Order.* Grants Intervenors 891004 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence.Response Requested No Later That 891020.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 891006 ML20248J1881989-10-0303 October 1989 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence in Response to Board Order of 890913.* Svc List Encl ML20248J0301989-09-29029 September 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal Board Order.* Matters Evaluated in Environ Assessment Involved Subjs Known by Parties During Proceeding & Appear in Hearing Record & Reflect Board Final Initial Decision LBP-89-7.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E9181989-09-13013 September 1989 Order.* Requests NRC to Explain Purpose of 890911 Fr Notice on Proposed Amend to Applicant License,Revising Tech Specs Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water & Effects on ASLB Findings,By 890929.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890913 ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247B7781989-07-18018 July 1989 Certificate of Svc.* Certifies Svc of Encl Gpu 890607 & 0628 Ltrs to NRC & Commonwealth of Pa,Respectively.W/Svc List ML20245D3651989-06-20020 June 1989 Notice of Oral Argument.* Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from ASLB 890202 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Amend,Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890620 ML20245A5621989-06-14014 June 1989 Order.* Advises That Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from Board 890202 Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Authorizing OL Amend Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890614 ML20247F3151989-05-22022 May 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal by Joint Intervenors Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert.* Appeal Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Identify Errors in Fact & Law Subj to Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246J6081989-05-12012 May 1989 Licensee Brief in Reply to Joint Intervenors Appeal from Final Initial Decision.* ASLB 890203 Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Re Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of accident- Generated Water Should Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20244C0361989-04-13013 April 1989 Order.* Commission Finds That ASLB Decision Resolving All Relevant Matters in Favor of Licensee & Granting Application for OL Amend,Should Become Effective Immediately.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890413 ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20248H1811989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890411.Granted for Aslab on 890410 ML20248G0151989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* Requests to File Appeal Brief 1 Day Late Due to Person Typing Document Having Schedule Problems ML20248G0261989-04-0606 April 1989 Susguehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Brief in Support of Notification to File Appeal & Request for Oral Argument Re Appeal.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248D7211989-04-0404 April 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Intervenors Application for Stay Denied Due to Failure to Lack of Demonstrated Irreparable Injury & Any Showing of Certainty That Intervenors Will Prevail on Merits of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890404 ML20247A4671989-03-23023 March 1989 Correction Notice.* Advises That Date of 891203 Appearing in Text of Commission 890322 Order Incorrect.Date Should Be 871203.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890323 ML20246M2611989-03-22022 March 1989 Order.* Advises That Commission Currently Considering Question of Effectiveness,Pending Appellate Review of Final Initial Decision in Case Issued by ASLB in LBP-89-07. Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890322 ML20236D3821989-03-16016 March 1989 Valley Alliance & TMI Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of 2.3 Million Gallons Of....* Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890316.Granted for Aslab on 890316 ML20236D3121989-03-15015 March 1989 Licensee Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal.* Motion Opposed Based on Failure to Demonstrate Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc ML20236D2901989-03-11011 March 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of Disposal of 2.3 Million Gallons of Radioactive Water at Tmi,Unit 2.* Svc List Encl ML20236A3761989-03-0808 March 1989 Licensee Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Stay.* Stay of Licensing Board Decision Pending Appeal Unwarranted Under NRC Stds.Stay Could Delay Safe,Expeditious Cleanup of Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236C2441989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Application for Stay Filed by Joint Intervenors.* Application for Stay of Effectiveness of Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07,dtd 890202 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2641989-03-0202 March 1989 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.* TS Moore,Chairman,Cn Kohl & Ha Wilber,Members.Served on 890303.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2161989-02-25025 February 1989 Changes & Corrections to Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Three Mile Island Alert Documents Submitted on 890221.* Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-21
[Table view] |
Text
i 7590-01 P UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the matter of )
GPU NUCLEAR, INC. ) Docket No. 50-289 )
ET AL. )
)
0 (Three Mile Island Nuclear )
Generating Station, Unit 1) )
EXEMPTION 1.
GPU Nuclear, Inc., et al. (GPUN or the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-50, which authorizes operation of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating l Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1 or the facility) at power levels not to exceed 2568 megawatts thermal.
The facility consists of one pressurized-water reactor located at the licensee's site in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, sad was licensed to operate on April 19,1974. The license provides, among other things, that the licensee is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
II.
Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50 contains specific requirements regarding fire protection features of nuclear power plants operating prior to January 1,1979. Subsection Ol.G.2.c of Appendix R specifies, in part, the enclosure of cable and equipment and associated non-safety-related circuits of one redundant train in a fire barrier having a 1-hour rating. The underlying purpose of Subsection Ill.G.2.c of Appendix R is to provide reasonable assurance 9905040102 990420
PDR ADOCK 05000289
r 4
accordance with the ASTM E-119). In each of the areas / zones that have automatic suppression and/or automatic detection features, the systems installed in the plant meet all I
applicable NFPA codes, specifically the criteria for a Class 1 detection system specified in NFPA 72D and NFPA 13 or NFPA 15 for suppression systems.
Fire zones AB-FZ-4 and FH-FZ-1 contain both automatic suppression and detection features. Fires in these zones are postulated to be slowly developing cable fires, with possible ignition sources including cable overload or transient combustibles, if a fire were to occur in these fire zones, indication of the fire would be received in the control room, through the ionization smoke detection system, and either the automatic pre-nction system (AB-FZ-4) or the wet pipe sprinkler system (FH-FZ-1) would initiate suppression if the fire continued to grow.
If necessary, the fire brigade would be dispatched soon thereafter. The licensee estimPtes 1
i that the fire brigade will respond to these fire zones 15 minutes after receiving an alarm.
Manual fire fighting equipment (hand-held fire extinguishers and hose stations) is available in l
l or adjacent to these fire zones.
I Fire area CB-FA-1 contains both automatic suppression and detection capability. A fire in this area is postulated to be a slowly developing cable fire, with possible ignition sources being overload or transient combustibles. Exposure of the protected envelope to fire is possible through ignition of cable insulation. There is also an acetylene gas line running above the suspended ceiling from an external tank. The licensee committed in its October 14,1998, and December 23,1998, letters to install detectors for combustible gas in this area to provide ,
prompt detection and notification of an acetylene leak, so that the leak could be promptly isolated at the source prior to reaching the lower explosive threshold for acetylene gas. If a fire were to occur in this fire area, indication of the fire would be received in the control room, through the ionization smoke detection system which is above the suspended ceiling. An l
l
automatic wet pipe sprinkler system which is below the suspended ceiling would actuate to suppress the fire should it continue to develop. If necessary, the fire brigade would be dispatched soon thereafter, and response has been estimated by the licensee to be 15 minutes. A hand-held dry chemical extinguisher is also available adjacent to this fire area.
Fire zone FH-FZ-6 is provided with automatic detection and will be provided with l automatic suppressior'. The licensee committed to install an automatic wet-pipe sprinkler l suppression system in this fire zone in its letter dated December 23,1998. A fire in this zone is postulated to be a slowly developing cable fire, with possible ignition sources being transient combustibles. If a fire were to occur in this fire zone, indication of the fire would be received in the control room by the ionization smoke detection system or through the actuation of the wet-pipe sprinkler system to be installed. If necessary, the fire brigade would be dispatched soon thereafter, and the licensee estimates a brigade response would occur within 15 minutes.
Manual fire suppression capability (hose stations and dry chemical extinguisher) is available in or adjacent to this fire zone.
Fire zone ISPH-FZ-1 contains both automatic detection and suppression features. A fire in this zone is postulated to be a slowly developing cable fire, with electrical switchgear as a possible ignition source. If a fire were to occur in this zone, indication of the fire would be received in the control room by the ionization smoke detector system. A zone-wide automatic wet-pipe sprinkler system is available to suppress the fire, should it develop, and portable extinguishers (carbon dioxide and dry chemical) are available within the fire zone. The fire brigade would be dispatched, if necessar/, and the licensee estimates a brigade response i time of 25 minutes. A portable extinguisher and yard hydrant are located outside the fire area and are available to fight fires in this fire zone. Protected envelopes consisting of cables and
6-conduits passing through this fire zoae are fire rated at 39 and 50 minutes respectively, and pass within the vicinity of in situ combustibles in only limited instances.
Fire zone ISPH-FZ-2 contains both automatic detection and suppression features. A fire in this zone is postulated to be a slowly developing cable fire, with electrical switchgear as a possible ignition source. If a fire were to occur in this zone, indication of the fire would be received in the control room by the ionization smoke detector system. A zone-wide automatic l wet-pipe sprinkler system is available to suppress the fire, should it develop, and a portable
, extinguisher (carbon dioxide) is available within the file zone. The fire brigade would be I
dispatched, if necessary, and the licensee estimates a brigade response time of 25 minutes. A I
portable extinguisher and yard hydrant are located outside the fire area and are available to i bght fires in this fire zone. Protected envelopes consisting of cables and conduits passing through this fire zone are fire rated at 39 and 50 minutes, respectively, and pass within the vicinity of in-situ combustibles in only limited instances.
The staff is relying on the licensee's commitments made in its October 14,1998, and l
December 23,1998, letters for approval of the exemptions for fire area CB-FA-1 and fire zone FH-FZ-6. Therefore, approval of an exemption for that fire area and zone is contingent upon the licensee completing the modifications described in those submittals. The staff believes that reasonable assurance exists that an adequate level of fire safety has been provided through the availability of automatic suppression and detection in these fire zones / areas to ensure that one division of safe-shutdown components necessary to achieve safe shutdown will remain free of fire damage. Therefore, the underlying purpose of the rule is satisfied and this request for exemption with respect to the foregoing fire areas / zones from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section Ill.G.2.c meets the special circumstances delineated in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) in that the application of the regulation in these particular
l circumstances is not necessary to achieve the under1ying purpose of the rule. While the l
installed Thermo-Lag barriers in the fire zones demonstrate less than a 1-hour fire endurance rating, they do provide measured resistance to fire. The areas in which the Thermo-Lag envelopes are located have a low combustible loading in the area of the protected envelopes, have available manual suppression capability, and are equipped with automatic suppression I and detection features; the combination of these features and circumstances reflect a level of I
safety that meets the underlying purpose of the rule. Therefore, the staff believes that the exemption should be granted for fire zones / areas AB-FZ-4, FH-FZ-1, CB-FA-1, FH-FZ-6, ISPH-FZ-1, and ISPH-FZ-2.
The staff does not believe the same assurance has been provided for fire zones AB-FZ-3, AB-FZ-5, AB-FZ-7, and FH-FZ-2. Fire zones AB-FZ-3, AB-FZ-5, and AB-FZ-7, have automatic detection but not suppression. Fire zone FH-FZ-2 has automatic suppression but not detection.
The licensee has failed to provide reasonable assurance that one division of safe-shutdown components necessary to achieve safe shutdown will remain free of fire damage in j the four zones immediately discussed above. Accordingly, as discussed above and in the staff's Safety Evaluation dated kril 20, 1999 . the staff has concluded that the licensee's request for an exemption from the technical requirements of Section Ill.G.2.c of Appendix R should be denied for fire zones AB-FZ-3, AB-FZ-5, AB-FZ-7, and FH-FZ 2.
IV.
l Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), the Commission will not consider granting an exemption from the requirements of a regulation unless special circumstances are present. j Subsection (ii) of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2) includes as special circumstances situations where
l l application of the subject regulation would not serve the underiying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the unoorfying purpose of the rule.
The underlying purpose of Section Ill.G of Apportdix R is to provide reasonable assurance that one safe shutdown train and associated circuits used to achieve and maintain
- safe shutdown are free of fire damage. As stated above, the staff has determined that the underiying purpose of the rule has been satisfied with respect to fire zones AB-FZ-4, FH-FZ-1,
- l. CB-FA-1, FH-FZ4, ISPH-FZ-1 and ISPH-F2 2. Accordingly, the Commission has determined
, that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) special circumstances are present in connection with these fire zone / areas.
The Commission has also determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the exemption requested by the licensee for fire zones / areas AB-FZ-4, FH-FZ 1, CB-FA-1, FH-FZ-6, ISPH-FZ-1, and ISPH FZ-2 is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants GPU Nuclear, Inc., an exemption from the technical requirements of Section Ill.G.2.c of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50, to the extent that it requires the enclosure of certain redundant safe-shutdown circuits in 1-hour fire-rated barriers, for fire zones / areas AB-FZ-4, FH-FZ-1, CB-FA-1, FH-FZ-6, ISPH-FZ-1, and ISPH-FZ-2 at TMI-1. The exemption for fire area CB-FA-1 and fire zone FH-FZ-6 is contingent upon the licensee completing the commitments identified in its letters of October 14,1998, and December 23,1998, for that fire area and zone. The request for exemption for fire zones AB-FZ-3, AB-FZ-5, AB-FZ-7, and FH-FZ-2 is denied.
1
\
l
r
.g.
Pursuant to 10 OFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the issuance of this exemption will have no significant impoet on the quality of the human environment (64 FR 19205 ).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
l FOR THE NUCLEAR REGU TORY COMMISSION
- t
! \
John A. Zwolinski, Director Division'of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of April 1999 l
l l
l l .
W w -