Text

Response to Limerick Ecology Action Refiled Deferred Offsite Emergency Planning Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl
	ML20093F085
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	10/09/1984
From:	Ferkin Z; PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:	; Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
	CON-#484-493 OL, NUDOCS 8410120378
	Download: ML20093F085 (16)
	v • d • e

_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

khC~'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD COC ETEr U"# C In the Matter of

)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos.',0 5

g, (Limerick Generating Station,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

{g BRANCH COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA'S RESPONSE TO LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION'S REFILED DEFERRED OFFSITE EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS In its Special Prehearing Conference Order dated April 20, 1984, the Licensing Board deferred ruling on several offsite emergency planning contentions proposed by intervenor Limerick Ecology Action (LEA).

By Order dated August 15, 1984, the Licensing Board established a schedule for LEA to refile its deferred contentions.

LEA timely filed its contentions on September 1, 1984.

The Commonwealth received LEA's filing October 2.

In accordance with the Board's August 15 Order, the Commonwealth hereby responds to LEA's refiled deferred contentions.

Except where specifically stated, the Commonwealth is not taking a position on the admissibility of this group of contentions.

Rather, the purpose of the Commonwealth's response is to provide relevant information on selected I

e410120378 841009 PDR ADOCK 05000352 g

PDR l

ll

- b

contenkons for the bspefit of the Board and the partion.

LEA-1 1

Item #1'under LEA-1 cites a lack of assurance that the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) will be le to meet so-called " unmet needs" for busses and ambulances in Chester and Montgomery Counties.

Chester County has formally submitted a list of its unmet needs to PEMA and PEMA is actively investigating means for meeting these identified needs.

To date PEMA has not been notified officially of Montgomery County's " unmet needs."

PEMA is nonetheless aware that Montgomery County is currently short on particular resources and is taking that information into account in its investigative efforts.

1 f

Item #2 under LEA-1 concerns the adequacy of the scope of the full-scale exercise held July 25, 1984.

A supplemental exercise will be held the evening of November 20, 1984.

The supplemental exercise will be coordinated by the three Limerick risk counties (Chester, Montgomery and Berks).

Participating in the supplemental exercise will be all the municipalities that did not take part in the July 5 exercise,'as well as municipalities who did participate in the July drill but have indicated a need for further testing of their radiological emergency response plans, j

/ - -

Tho supplemental exorcise will be evaulated by the Fadoral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

In addition, during the day on November 20, several school districts in the Limerick plume exposure pathway SPZ will be taking part in activities coordinated by their respective risk counties which will test particular aspects of the school i

radiological emergency response plans.

These activities will take place while school is in session.

Item #4 under LEA-1 is apparently concerned that locally-prepared radiological emergency response plans will not meet the planning requirements outlined by the NRC and FEMA in NUREG-0654.

The Commonwealth's response to this concern is that Pennsylvania law requires that local government emergency plans be prepared in consonance with S S-the state's emergency plan.

SeegPaC.S.A. Section 7503 (codifying so-called "P.L. 1332").

Dear Mr.'Boroff:

, In response to your June.22, 1984 letter regarding the proposed radiological emergency response plan submitted to Skippack Township by

. Energy Consultants, I f.d.rst wish to assure you that the delay in i

acknowledging the letter has not been due to a lack of concern for the i

issues that have been raised.

The concerns you have expressed on behalf of the Board of Supervisors about Draft 5 of the proposed plan are ce-tainly real and indeed should be; resolved before the plan is adopted by Skippack Township.

The real issue, however, is how this can best be accomplished. It obviously will require coordination between the Township and Montgomery l

County, as well as with the Commonwealth. Perhaps the following discussion l

~

of the specific concerns will be helpful.

1 1.

Personnel staffing to provide a 24-hour response is a i

problem that every municipality must face at the local level if it is to meet any emergency that might arise, and not only in the event of an accident at the

~

Limerick Generating Station. Few, if any, municipalities

~

have a paid staff large enough to provide such personnel and they must rely upon volunteers for augmentation.

A determination needs to be made by the Township as to J._

how many individuals are really needed to man an emergency operations center for a municipality the size of.Skippack. Using 12 rather than 8-hour shifts can often ease the problea. The fact that Skippack does not have a police force is indeed a problem but can it perhaps be solved by an agreement with whomever is charged with providing such service under normal conditions? If this is not possible, is it feasible

~

'to utilize some type of auxiliary police? The unwilling-I ness of the volunteer Skippack Fire Company to participate in the event of a radiological emergency is unusual and a position not previously encountered as plans were developed by municipalities around the other four nuclear power plants within the Commonwealth. Aside from their i

i normal functions, the additional task usually assigned to a fire company during a radiological emergency is to

....cw.-,-

.w

..-m.-,..%.--s,,m

.,,cw.,,,,.,,__,

,m,,.,,.,.,r_.,,_.3,,_.,

..,,_,,.,,___,.w_,.m,w,

___,__p,

. 4 Mr. Alan E. Boroff August 16,'1984 Page TVo provide' route alerting in the event the sirens should

.. fail, or in areas where they cannot be heard.- If the fire company :is adamant in its refusal to participate s

perhaps an agreement could be reached with a neighboring company. What has been presented here are but possibilities or suggestions since the concerns expressed regarding the 2

availability of personnel can only be solved at the local level in consultation with the county emergency management agency.

i 2.

Transit-dependent individuals would be alerted and notified through sounding of the sirens and county announce-ments over the Emergency Broadcast System.

Since the i

Township does not have the transportation assets needed for evacuation of these individuals, Montgomery County should be advised in writi. g of the number of buses, and ambulances if necessary, that would be required.

If the i._

County cannot arrange for the needed transportation then the' shortages are reported by the County to the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) and arrangements would j

be made with the Pennsylvania D2partment of Transportation to obtain the buses.

3.

The exact nature of the concern regarding. evacuation routes through Skippack and the relationship of the Township to other municipalities that would be evacuating through i

Skippack ir. not clear. The concern as to the impact the evacuation of the State Correctional Institution Craterford would have on Skippack is certainly valid. We are still working on resolution of the problem and expect to be able to provide definitive information to the Skippack-Board of Supervisors the first part of September. As I am sure you will understand, identification of the evacuation routes for Craterford is a sensitive subject and not one that can, or should be, discussed in open forum.

4.

Some of the dosimetry required by Skippack has already been issued from PEMA's stock to Montgomery County. PEMA l-has recently signed an agreement with Philadelphia Electric f

Company whereby the latter will fund our purchase of additional dosimetry for county and municipal emergency workers that would be involved in the event of an accident at the plant. The dosimetry will be ordered as soon as the required legal and bidding procedures have been completed.

It is difficult to respond to the Township's lack of means to obtain other equipment without knowing specifically what is involved. As mentioned previously, essential equip-ment shortfalls should be reported in writing to Montgomery e

e e

b

y

8-Mr. Alen E. Baroff August 16, 1984 J

Page Three County.

If the County cannot fill the requirements then they are reported as unmet needs to PEMA and we

~

will take whatever action is necessary. Neither Montgomery County nor PEMA can do anything without a specific list of essential equipment; needed to respond effectively to an accident.

5.

Here again it is difficult to determine what matters the Skippack Board of Supervisors believe need more coordination.

The capacity of roads in the area was determined by traffic engineers from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and from this the main evacuation routes were determined in consultation with the counties. Since the counties and municipalities are more keenly aware of their own circum-stances, designation of secondary routes leading to the main evacuation routes was left to them. PDIA stands l

ready to provide specific coordination whenever it is needed and requested. To be effective, however, it should progress from Skippack Township to Montgomery County and then to the Commonwealth, if necessary.

6.

While an ' ongoing training progra,m is indeed essential, the framework for one is aircady in existence and needs only to be utilized. Energy Consultants, under contract with Philadelphia Electric Company, has developed training courses covering the various types of offsite response that would be required should an accident occur at the power plant.

The municipalities need only request this training through l

their county emergency management agency. All training for municipal emergency personnel is to be coordinated through the county. If there is a void somewhere in the training, _

please let the Montgomery County Emergency Management

]

Coordinator know and ha in turn will discuss it with us.

l I hope that with this rather lengthy letter I have been able to j

clarify some of the concerns that have rightfully been troubling the Skippack Board of Supervisors. If not, perhaps you would like to arrange a meeting through Montgomery County to discuss the matter further with the l

i Skippack Board of Supervisors.

i Sincerely,

//

John L. Patten Director JLP/RJH:jmb (Tel: 717-783-8150)

George Hugenin, Skippack Township Emergency Management Coordinator cc:

Edward L. Jorden, Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region III A. Lindley Bigelow, Montgomery County Office of Emergency Preparedness Mrs. Mary Wills, Skippack Township Secretary g

6 e,

LW7 OFFICES

~ BORO!'F. II.\\RRIS & IIELLER DOCKETED PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION gpg i

Z. EDWARD HELLER

65o BLUE BELL WEST-5UITE 32o

'84 00T 12 A!0:26 SKIPPACK PIKE MICHAEL R. HARRIS * -

ALAN E.BOROFF BLUE BELL. PENN5YLVANIA 19422

^NDRE*F " ONE (2151628-98o0 N5]r[m/,fgyl E

"^"""*N" W

'.%^$" $ $

June 22,1984 Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency P. O. Box 3321 Harrisburg PA 17105 Re: Skippack Township, Montgomery County - Proposed Radiological Emergency Response Plan for Incidents at the Limerick Generating Station

Dear Sir:

This letter is being written to the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency at the request of the Board of Supervisors of Skippack Township.

The undersigned is solleitor for the Skippack Township Board of Supervisors.

The Board of Supervisors has made a preliminary st,udy of the proposed radiological emergency response plan submitted to Skippack Township by Energy Consultants, of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, consultants to the Philadelphia Electric Company.

Skippack Township has not adopted the proposed radiological emergency response plan in i

view of the significant concerns of the Board of Supervisors concerning the provisions of the proposed plan, being Draft No. 5 dated April,1984.

1 l

Among the significant concerns of the Board of Supervisors of Skippack Township are the following:

1.

Lack of adequate personnel available to Skippack Township to provide a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> emergency response.

Skippack Township does not have a police force. The Skippack Fire -Co., a volunteer group, has indicated their unwillingness toi participate in a radiological emergency response plan in the event of a site j

emergency or a general emergency.

2.

Inability of the Township to provide adequate means to provide notice and j.

transportation to transit dependent Individuals.

l e

El

. g ? ; '

Pennsylvania Emtrgency Man:gemsnt Agency -

June 22,1984 Page Two l

3.

The proposed plan is incomplete with reference to evacuation routes through Skippack Township and its relationship to other municipalities which would evacuate through Skippack Township as well as evacuation of the State Correctional Institution - Graterford located in Skippack Township. The Skippack Township Board of Supervisors are concerned with the coordination of Skippack and adjoining municipalities and the State Correctional Institution with reference to 4

potentia 1 evacuation.

4.

Skippack Township does not believe it has the means necessary to obtain the equipment and dosimetry called for under the proposed plan,-even taking into account the proposed equipment funding offer made by Philadelphia Electric Co.

5.

The need for coordination among the various municipalities as well as the county and state officials with reference to evacuation and other matters, which would include proposed evacuation routes and tr.,*. capacity.

6.

The need for an ongoing training program. Township participants in the radiological emergency response plan should be able to receive ongoing training through either a county or area organization as each individual township is unable to provide this.

The Board of Supervisors believe it appropriate it to submit these concerns to you, at this time. They will continue with their evaluation of the proposed radiological emergency response plan and will conduct public hearings thereon in the near future.

Very truly yours, s

A an E. Boroff /

AEB/bjk cc: George Hugenin, Skippack Township Emergency Management Coordinator 4

Edward L. Jordan, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Emergency Reponse, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, United Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. 20472 l

Montgomery County Emergency Management Office Mrs. Mary Wills, Skippack Township Secretary l

1 i

< ~

/*v-k h W r wtis d 'c b

['"

, Oa PENNSYLVANIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY N

P.o. sox 3321 HARRISSURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1110$ nEIl!

v5'.RC July 19, 1984

'84 OCT 12 A10 :26

r It

n ry

.Oc;Kiim A 5t:

e SiuhCH A. Lindicy Bigelow Acting Coordinator Montgomery County Office of Emergency Preparedness 100 Wilson Boulevard Eagleville, Pennsylvania 19403

Dear Lin:

Your letter of July 10 was received in our office on the 16th.

Please be reminded that the July 25 exercise, as is the case with all exercises, is fundamentally a training activity.

It is indeed unfortunate that some municipalities iti Montgomery County may fail to take advantage of this opportunity to learn their strengths as well as their weaknesses.

I urge you to continue your efforts to enroll all risk municipalities in Montgomery County to participate in this exercise.

You are also reminded that FEMA has clearly stated that those municipalities that are not observed are considered to be -

non-participants.

I know that you and members of your~ staff have devoted much of your energy, time, and expertise in preparing for this exercise.

I commend you for your dedication to the people of Montgomery County.

We look forward to your participation in the July 25 exercise to the maximum extent possible.

Good luck and best wishes.

With kind regards, I am Sincerely,

/

~

/f ohn L. Paccen Director JLP:tjl (Tel:

717-783-8150) cc: John L. Shannon

+

e t

-.,.4

........ ~

K

~

COUNTY OF BUCKS i

OFFICE OF T il E COMMISSIONERS

. [y 00tKETfD Administration Building. Doylesiown. Ps. Is90s U5NRC 215.L88-2911 215 752-0281

'84 OCT 12 A10:27 County Commissioner WILLIAM H. RIESER County Administrator

. CARL V. F0N ASH, Chairman

, ; 7.p] qg., 9,'g,. g JAMES M. McNAMARA hgg LUCILLE M. TRENCII. Vice.CAsiiman ANDREW L. WARREN BRECW C'""'IS'"'8

Septembe-5, 1984 g

4 O

Mr. John L Q/ Patto,-Di' rector Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency P. O. Box 3321 Harrisburg, PA 17105 Detr Mr. Patton:

My attention has been directed to the passage of Senate Bill 987 on July 10,1984 requiring Counties to participate in emergency evacuation planning.

While having serious reservations relative to the basic premise upon which the Limerick evacuation plan was developed, it is the intent of the Commissioners to comply with the law.

Therefore, I have instructed Mr.

McGill to continue the participation of the County in the evacuation planning process for the Limerick Nuclear Generating Station.

~

While the Commissioners are opposed to the plans to draw water from the Delaware River, we have not opposed the efforts of PECO to develop nuclear power.

Sincerely, Carl F. Fonash, Chairman Bucks County Commissioners CFF/jtb cc:

Charles McGill i

l 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION pgggg7En U5hRC BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of

)

<n 50-3520WE%gfjyf

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY

)

Docket Nos.

)

50-353 e v SRAnc5f (Limerick Generating Station,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

CERTIFICATE pF_ SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "Commonwt alth of Pennsylvania's Response to Limerick Ecology Action's Refiled Deferred Of fsite Emergency Planning Contentions" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or, as indicated by an asterisk through deposit in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's internal mail system, Jr, as indicated by a double asterisk, by U.S.

Postal Service Express

+

Mail, thiE 9th day o_f. October 1984:

f

- Helen F. Hoyt (2)

Docketing and Service Section i

Administrative Judge Office of the Secretary Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Washington, DC 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

- Dr. Richari F. Cole

- Troy B. Conner, Esq.

Administrative Judge Conner and Wetterhahn, P.C.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1747 Pennsylvania Ave.: N.W.'

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20006 Washington, DC 20555

- Dr. Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Administrative Judge Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ce==4asion Washington, DC 20555 Commission Washington, DC 20555

- Benjamin H. Vogler, Esq.

Counsel for NRC Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Executive Legal Appeal Panel Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cort.71ssion U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 1

b

~

a Frank R.

Romano Philadelphia Electric Company 61 Forest Avenue Attn:

Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Ambler, PA 19002 Vice President & General Counsel 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19101 Robert L.

Anthony

David Wersan, Esq.

Friends of the Earth of the Assistant Consumer Advocate Delaware Valley Office of Consumer Advocate P.O. Box 186 1425 Strawberry Square 103 Vernon Lane Harrisburg, PA 17120 Moylan, PA 19065 Marvin I.

Lewis Steven P.

Hershey, Esq.

6504 Bradford Terrace Community Legal Services, Inc.

Philadelphia, PA 19107 Law Center West 5219 Chestnut Street Joseph H. White, III Philadelphia, PA 19139 j

15 Ardmore Avenue 1

Ardmore, PA 19003 Angus Love, Esq.

i 101 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19104 Charles W. Elliott, Esq.

Brose and Postwistilo

- Phyllis Zitzer 1101 Building Limerick Ecology Action lith & Northampton Sts.

P.O.

Box 761 Easton, PA 18042 Pottstown, PA 19464 Sugarman, Denworth & Hellegers

Director, Pennsylvania Emergency 16th Floor, Center Plaza Management Agency 101 North Broad Street B-151, Transportation & Safety Bldg.

Philadelphia, PA 19107 Harrisburg, PA 17120 j

Thomas Gerusky, Director Martha W. Bush, Esq.

Bureau of Radiation Protection Kathryn S.

Lewis, Esq.

Dept. of Environmental Resources City of Philadelphia Sth Fl., Fulton Bank Bldg.

Municipal Services Bldg.

Third and Locust Streets 15th and JFK Blvd.

3 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Philadelphia, PA 19107 e

^

e l

l I

l 2

I 11

Jay M. Gutierrez, Esq.

Spence W.

Perry, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Associate General Counsel Region I Federal Emergency Management Agency 631 Park Avenue 500 C Street, SW, Rm. 840 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Washington, DC 20472 Timothy R.S. Campbell Director Dept. of Emergency Services 14 East Biddle Street West Chester, PA 19380 M_

Zori G. Ferkin Assistant Counsel Governor's Energy Council Date:

October 9, 1984 3

bl

~ - - - - - - - - - - -

ML20093F085

Contents

Text

Dear Mr.'Boroff:

Dear Sir:

Dear Lin:

Navigation menu

ML20093F085

Text

Dear Mr.'Boroff:

Dear Sir:

Dear Lin:

Navigation menu

Search